Why I’m Right and Your’e Wrongby Xanax

Why I’m Right And Your’e Wrong

By Xanax Anaximander

There is no typo on the title above. My executive decision to “incorrectly,” although, inconsequentially, that is, incontrovertibly unconventionally render the word, in this time and place commonly spelled as “you’re” as “your’e,” was the product of my attempt to fundamentally attack the hegemonic assomptions of the overwhelming of the western cis-heteropatriarchy, as well as astablish myslef, that is, I use these terms for the same reason as I will explore in my following text on of phenomenology, ontology, deontology, intersectional intertextuality, counterpoint, dialectic hegemonic discourse, linguistic psychology, sexual psychology, empirical imperialism, as a subjective individual against the hegemonic discourses surrounding language, and how it governs the consciouseess of the subjective experiences of subject individuals. My intentions with this work, dead though the author may be, is to use it as a weapon to defeat opponents of my end of the hegemonic discourses surrounding the l’etat, that is, c’est, me, moi.

The above discourse courses as a river discoursing into the vast sea as it is knowledge is my, that is, my own, and thereby the universal, as it is subjective to myself, as a solipsistic individual, being seen through the other, but recognizing my self in the bonds of societal constraint, nevertheless experiencing complex isolation and alienation from my contemporaneous intersections of individuals having been atomized by the individualist western discourse hegemonically subjecting people especially as women, people of color, trans people, and other marginalia-situated peoples, remains my, as the heretofore aforementioned phenomenon appositionaly described above, unifying theory of phenomenology, ontology, deontology, intersectional intertextuality, counterpoint, dialectic hegemonic discourse, linguistic psychology, sexual psychology, empirical imperialism, why donald trump is bad, and, of course, witchcraft.

The root, the radix, if you will, the racine, even, if the latin language resembles the white-phallo-hegemonic imperialism of the Catholic church too much for your, the subjective individual reader, that is the heretofore aforementioned phenomenon as mentioned above with reference to you, not me, problematic though the separation may be, as it is morally imperative for my writing to not cause harm to others’ subjective experience of phenomenological existence, subjective experience of phenomenological existence, is the me, that is the heretofore aforementioned phenomenon as mentioned above with reference to me, not you, the subjective individual reader as mentioned above in the aforementioned heretofore phenomenon with reference to you, not me, problematic though the separation may be. The me, being an arbiter of subjective experience, thereby governs the internal and external, and thereby the hyperstitional discourses and dialectics intersecting with the phenomenological numinon that is my experience of pain, that is, a sense of harm against my subjective experience in my heretofore aforementioned phenomenon above, as well as my subjective experience of pleasure, that is, the phenomenological numinon whereby my subjective experience is aligned with my numinous internal discourses and abstract idealizations. *I let out a loud and proud gamer-brap* Hang on, I need to use the toilet...HHHHHHH HHHHHNNNN-

NNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH-

HHHHHHHHH *plop* ok I’m done.

With the my being the racine of of phenomenology, ontology, deontology, intersectional intertextuality, counterpoint, dialectic hegemonic discourse, linguistic psychology, sexual psychology, empirical imperialism, why donald trump is bad, and, of course, witchcraft, it of course follows that I believe these subjective experiences to be necessary in the formulation of the counterpoint to the problematic aspects of western cis-heteropatriarchy that cause a sense of harm against my subjective experience in my heretofore aforementioned phenomenon above.

Bear in mind that I wrote about the me being the racine of the above-mentioned heretofore phenomenon aforementioned, not the you, that is the heretofore aforementioned phenomenon as mentioned above with reference to you. It follows, then, that I am therefore right, as I am the subject and object of solipsistic material and phenomenological and hyperstitionally ontological experience, not you, as I am not you, problematic though the situation may be. It is therefore necessary, then, that we therefore assume, that I’m right and your’e wrong.