GUNS safe or dangerous
Jacob
Other first world countries think of America a very violent place since we have so many guns. They think we result in violence with these guns. Many other countries think of this because they do not understand our history and culture that is shaped around America. We have history such as the second amendment that
states to protect
themselves from the government. Vaishnav S. Rojan says “personal freedom is highly valued since in a instance with a robber best case scenario is robber has no gun you do, worst case robber has gun you do not. Also she says that banning guns will not stop guns senseless killings because it will just force people to making their own guns but then they say take away ammunition.” Many people make and sell their own ammunition as to a local gun store such as recycling shotgun shells to make new. The world still believes that America still should not have guns, but taking away guns will force people to take a different such as which with a different weapon. In many countries you are five times more likely to be killed by a knife than a gun. This news was brought to be presented by the FBI. Such as when many dictators first thing they do is deprive the people from their firearms. An example is when Hitler took the arms from Germany he killed 12 million Jews. America has its rights of having guns for personal use and protection from a government not necessary it’s own government.
What does other first world countries think about America’s safety on guns?
Are guns safe? Are guns safe? As safewise.com states, “guns give a sense of security.� They also say that robbers 74% of the time will not intrude if a gun is present inside of household which causes robbers to invade while the owners are not home. Safety also means the gun safe as cleaning often such as not cleaning one after very many shots might cause lodging of ammunition or even misfire. Safety means keeping the firearm in a safe area where a child may not find easily accessible. Many gun accidents occur among children when guns are kept outside of an safety area. Many multiple gun owners keep a safe which is a child would not be able to open without an adult being present at the time. Many parents believe their firearm is safe among children but they concluded were not. Also many children are killed because the firearm is loaded with ammunition when the parents are presumed to have unloaded the gun.
Why are guns dangerous? Why are guns dangerous? This an argument that wages at a fifty percentage between yes and no. Yes, the people who say yes believe in many statements. An example would be as since we use guns in war they have been presumed dangerous or another would be guns do not kill but they do help a lot. But as for the others who say no state, guns do not kill but people do or someone has to pull the trigger it can do it by itself. Both are valid arguments towards the question but a gun without ammunition is not dangerous, with it it is. The definition of a gun is a device that discharges projectiles, is a foam dart gun dangerous. Also many guns are given a safety mechanism which stops the trigger to be pulled and the gun to be discharged. Many safety classes such as a hunter safety class, gun safety class, or even just firing at a range produces safety. But people who are not trained with a gun in possession are dangerous since they may not know how to operate the machine. As the same for a car, someone who does not have a license is not qualified to drive. So are cars as dangerous as guns? For the other side of the story, guns were meant for causing injury. Such as guns were created for war, to kill.
Why are guns stressed more than other weapons? Why are guns stressed more than other weapons? In https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/get-psyched/201301/the -weapons-effect it shows the weapon effect experiment it explains a person who is angry will have more aggression to people with guns that sporting items. Another experiment would be a gun strapped to the front vs to the back and more people honk at people with the one in the front than the back. As when the human beings see something that can cause harm they have aggression towards it. Another fact would be that one is more likely to die from a knife than gun but the knife it does not cause panic when the victim is killed since it is silent. While a gun causes more issue with faster killing of multiple targets at once but a knife is silent and many murders try to use a knife rather than a gun so they do not alert many people. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/ wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-about-guns-and-mass-shootings-inthe-united-states/ says that more than often the us will about other tragedies by preventing them but with guns they just mourn instead fixing the problem. As in Israel and Switzerland they have guns like us but have to have a license to have them and have lower shooting rates than we do. Bushman, Brad J., Ph.D. "The "weapons Effect"" Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers,LLC, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 04 Nov. 2015. "Are Guns Dangerous?" Are Guns Dangerous? Debate.org, n.d. Web. 04 Nov. 2015. "Pros and Cons of Gun Ownership for Home Security." Pros And Cons Of Owning A Gun In The Home: Gun Safety and Security. Safewise., n.d. Web. 04 Nov. 2015.