Camp Fire Universal Pre-K Impact Study

Page 40

The Impact of Universal Pre-K on Child Care Providers in FWISD 2014 sections. Additionally, while some focus group and site visit participants had not been impacted by FWISD pre-k (one center manager said they were running at capacity with 111 children), most had already felt some impact from losing 4-year-olds to public pre-k.

Economic Impacts Impact on Costs – Leveraging Ratios Though program costs and financial stability are closely linked, the survey asked providers to consider their impact separately using the Impact Scale to provide a deeper understanding of the economics of reduced pre-k enrollment. As shown in Figure 10, among child care centers, 85% predict that losing some or all full-day pre-k students would have a moderate to strong impact on their overall costs, with 50% of all responding centers predicting strong impact. As focus groups and survey comments illuminate, successful child care providers must carefully balance fixed and variable costs to maintain financial stability. Without the revenues of 4-yearold enrollment, many providers report being unable to cover fixed operating costs including facility expenses and classroom spaces. By far, however, the largest cost impact for providers is on staffing related to required caregiver ratios. Figure 10. Impact on Costs: Child Care Centers

The state of Texas issues guidelines directing caregiver ratios for all licensed and registered providers. The higher student-caregiver ratio requirement for younger children results in a reduced profit-margin for young children as compared to 4-year-olds. Table 9 (adapted from the Texas Department of Family & Protective Services) illustrates the student-caregiver requirements for child care programs in the State of Texas. For example, a toddler (18-23 months) classroom requires twice as many teachers as pre-k classrooms for the same number of children.

35 | P a g e


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

APPENDIX XII: SURVEY QUESTIONS

9min
pages 94-110

APPENDIX XI: FWISD BOND DETAILS

0
pages 92-93

APPENDIX IX: SURVEY COMMENTS – ASSISTING PROVIDERS

0
page 89

BIBLIOGRAPHY

3min
pages 63-64

APPENDIX VIII: SURVEY COMMENTS – CHILD CARE HOMES

4min
pages 87-88

APPENDIX VII: SURVEY COMMENTS – CHILD CARE CENTERS

11min
pages 83-86

MINIMIZING THE IMPACT OF CROWD-OUT

12min
pages 56-61

WHAT’S NEXT?

1min
page 62

ASSISTING CHILD CARE PROVIDERS

1min
page 54

A CLOSER LOOK: PROVIDERS AT RISK

2min
page 53

TRANSITIONING PRE-K STUDENTS TO AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAMS

3min
pages 51-52

ECONOMIC IMPACTS

11min
pages 40-46

PERCEPTIONS OF PUBLIC PRE-K AMONG CHILD CARE PROVIDERS

5min
pages 37-38

REAL AND ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERGARTEN EXPANSION

2min
page 39

CCMS AND PRE-K IMPACT

3min
pages 49-50

CHILD CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CCMS) PARTICIPATION

6min
pages 33-35

TUITION RATES

2min
page 32

FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERGARTEN

7min
pages 24-27

BENCHMARKING: FOUR STATES WITH UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERGARTEN

1min
page 16

BENCHMARKING: PRE-K IN THE DALLAS/FORT WORTH METROPLEX

1min
page 23

DEFINITIONS USED THROUGHOUT REPORT

3min
pages 13-14

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

6min
pages 9-11

BENCHMARKING: IMPACT OF UNIVERSAL PRE-K

6min
pages 17-19

BENCHMARKING: THE IMPACT OF PRE-KINDERGARTEN

2min
page 15

BENCHMARKING: PRE-K IN TEXAS

1min
page 22

INTRODUCTION

2min
page 12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.