06. THESIS BOOKLET

kampung luar batang revitalisation framework

Master of Architecture | Design Thesis S1Y22 Charensia Pricilla Rompis 860209

2

kampung luar batang revitalisation framework Supervisor: Rob Polglase, Stephanie Wan, Tina Huynh

Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning Melbourne School of Design The University of Melbourne

Fig 1. N/A, Last Studio KBBQ Celebration Night, 2022.

acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to acknowledge and give my warmest thanks to my supervisors, Rob Polglase, Stephanie Wan, and Tina Huynh, for their time and dedication throughout this final semester. It has been a long journey and I have made it until the end because of their tremendous support. I would also like to thank my studio mates, Mandy, Carol, Ian, Robyn, Amber, Calvin, Yiqi, Ling, Kirsty, and Tan for their support, banter, and motivation for this final stretch.

And of course, a special thanks to ClarkeHopkinsClarke for providing us such a great studio with the best view and also getting me binge eating on snacks every Monday and Thursday.

Furthermore, I would like to give a deep appreciation to Budi Pradono from Budi Pradono Architects, Indonesia, who has inspired and shown me a great insight into Indonesian Architecture. And last but not least, a heartfelt gratitude to my family and friends who have always been there for me since day one (you know who you are).

author I am Charensia Pricilla Rompis, born and raised in Indonesia. I moved to Melbourne when I was 17 to begin my journey in Architecture. At the end of 2019, I graduated from Bachelor of Design, majoring in Architecture and Landscape Architecture at the University of Melbourne.

With the current pandemic situation, I have not been able to go back to visit my hometown and therefore, I decided to finish up my final postgraduate thesis on a topic that reminds me of home.

10

contents INTRODUCTION thesis question thesis statement 01 PRELIMINARY significance site analysis historical context socio-demographic architecture typology literature/ precedent studies

12 14 18 42

66

02 DESIGN PROPOSAL design strategy scenario 1.0 scenario 2.0 scenario 3.0

72 93 114 136

REFLECTION

164

APPENDIX sketch/ concept design bibliography list of figures

172

11

how can conventional kampung/ village be better developed and revitalised to amalgamate the existing neighbourhood community with the idea of contemporary living post-pandemic?

?

1. Shirleyana, Scott Hawken, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia. 2018. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 36 No. 5, p. 544. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0025

thesis statement Kampung or village is the main urban settlement type in Indonesia that forms the basis of a social structure and urban typology of the city¹. As people are moving towards the modern world, kampung begins to lose its cultural identity and question the existence of itself. Along with the current pandemic situation and restrictions, the kampung that was originally known as a close-knit community is becoming foreign and distant. Therefore, through recollecting the past and designing for the future, this thesis proposes an architectural framework that aims to re-introduce the idea of community, locality, and contemporary living postpandemic within an existing Kampung Luar Batang in Jakarta, Indonesia.

01 preliminary

the global pandemic COVID-19 or Coronavirus disease is an infectious illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that was first detected in Wuhan, China.

The symptoms of the virus usually differ from mild to moderate respiratory illness depending on the body’s level of immunity. Older people and those with underlying medical conditions tend to develop more serious illnesses compared to others.

The virus can spread through an infected person’s mouth or nose in small liquid particles when they cough, sneeze, speak or even breathe.

Several ways have been implemented to reduce the current global transmission, such as getting vaccinated, wearing a proper fitted mask, washing hands, sanitising, and maintaining social distance with others¹.

In Indonesia, the government introduced a public activity restriction (abbreviated as PPKM) to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. Before PPKM, the government imposed a large-scale social restriction or PSBB or what is generally called a lockdown². These restrictions regulate students and non-essential workers to work and study remotely. Although the effectiveness of the restrictions remain an open question, most citizens have opted to work from home to spend more time with the family and prevent the spread of the virus.

18 preliminary

Fig 1. 1. Charensia Rompis, Social bubble during the pandemic, 2022.

1. World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). (WHO, 2022). https://www.who.int/healthtopics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1.

2. Marjan Miharja, Emil Salim, Gunawan Nachrawi, Rachmat Dwi Putranto, and Anggoro Hendrawan. Implementation of emergency public activity restrictions (PPKM) in accordance with human rights and Pancasila principles.

Budapest International Research and Critics Institute, 2021.

(BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 3: 6855. significance 19

healthcare

mobility

working habit

telehealth/ telemedicine

online transportation & logistic

flexible working arrangement (wfh)

social

consumerism

technology

personal space & safe public space

e-commerce & online delivery

smart device (touchless), robot

environment

essential

energy

urban farming & recycling

electricity & wi-fi

less carbon emission from transportation

Fig 1. 2. Charensia Rompis, Current lifestyle during the pandemic based on observation of friends and family in Jakarta, Indonesia, 2022.

20 preliminary

PPKM restriction in Indonesia applies to all sectors of society. Some industries are implementing 50% WFH (Work from Home) and 50% WFO (Work from Office). Furthermore, 100% WFH policy is applied for non-essential sectors, including teaching and learning activities.

In addition to the working restriction, traveling long-distance is also prohibited unless exempt. Domestic traveling in Indonesia requires proof of vaccination and a negative result of the COVID-19 test prior to the flight¹.

Since most people are now working and studying remotely, it was believed that these changes in our daily life have further influenced the way we live, work, and socialise. Internet and technology have become the primary necessity of our daily life.

Telehealth and telemedicine are slowly replacing in-person consultation, a rapid increase of users in e-commerce, transformation into smaller social bubbles, and change in the working habit that involves working/ studying from home². These activities have now developed into a new normal on a day-to-day basis which have also become a part of the flexible working arrangement implemented in several companies in Indonesia such as L’Oréal, Telkom, and Indosat.

1. COVID19.GO.ID, Communities Must Carry Out Activities Wisely During Emergency PPKM. (COVID19.GO.ID, 2021). https://covid19.go.id/p/ berita/communities-must-carry-out-activities-wiselyduring-emergency-ppkm.

2. D. Sundawa, D. S. Logayah, R. A. Hardiyanti, New Normal in The Era of Pandemic Covid-19 in Forming Responsibility Social Life and Culture of Indonesian Society. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021. vol. 747, no. 1, 2-7. https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012068.

significance 21

remote working Remote working and studying are now considered as a new normal given the current pandemic situation. A number of interviews have been conducted over the past years proving several benefits from working from home, such as being close with family, flexible working arrangement, comfortable environment, and cost and time effective.

The benefits from working from home often outweigh the disadvantages.

It was also believed that remote working/ studying has impacted the psychological wellbeing of workers and students, such as the feeling of burnout and loneliness from being separated from the collaborative environment.

1. A. E. Hami and R. E. Sulistiobudi (2020). Happiness at Work dan Happiness Research During WFH. https://psikologi.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/ uploads/2020/06/Happiness-at-Work-DuringWFH-05072020.pdf.

2. Dov Seidman and Angela Ahrendts.

(2021). Commentary: How the best leaders help companies build deeper connection in a work-from-home world.

Fortune. https://fortune.com/2021/04/02/moralleadership-human-connection-remote-work-fromhome/.

22 preliminary

Despite these disadvantages, a study from 1,140 participants found that older generations workers tend to feel happier during the remote working period compared to the younger generation¹.

This could be due to the social factor from working and studying that is deemed essential for the younger generations. The online platform could connect people across the globe easily, however, online interaction would never be the same as physical interaction.

1. family time

4. traffic free

2. flexibility

5. leisure & hobby

3. safety & comfort

6. productivity

Fig 1. 4. Charensia Rompis, Benefits during remote working/ studying, 2022¹.

+ and - analysis of remote working advantages (+) - flexible working arrangement - more time spent with family - collaborative environment - time & cost efficient with mode of transportation

(-) disadvantages - lack of suitable working space - lack of a collaborative working environment - a distraction from the family members - disappearing boundary between working and personal life - lack of technical support and work supervision

Fig 1. 5. Charensia Rompis, Advantages and disadvantages from remote working, 2022¹.

Mood, motivation, and boredom

30% workers

Time management and focus

feel less connected to the companies²

Work demand Technical equipment

44% workers

Communication and work coordination

feel less connected to their coworkers²

Fig 1. 6. Charensia Rompis, Challenges faced during remote working, 2022¹.

Sumatra

Banten

Jabar

Jakarta

Jateng

First week

Jatim

Kalimantan

Timur

Bali

Following weeks

Fig 1. 7. Hami, A. E. and Sulistiobudi, R. E. , Remote working level of happiness, edited by Charensia Rompis, 2022¹. significance 23

Recreational activity

3.5%

Visiting family/ relatives

7.0%

Access to fake news

27.4%

Hobby

44.1%

Exercising/ work out

47.8%

Worship

62.2%

Online communication with family/ friends

65.1% 0%

20%

40%

60%

Fig 1. 8. Charensia Rompis, Activities undertaken during the PPKM/ restriction period, 2022¹.

N/A

11.7%

Internet

31.7%

Bank/ ATM

35.9%

Medicine & General Practicioner

39.5%

Groceries

50.0% 0%

20%

40%

60%

Fig 1. 9. Charensia Rompis, Reasons to go out during the pandemic, 2022¹.

Neutral 34.7% Happy 3.3% Very Happy 1.6%

Bored 33.8%

Very Bored 26.6%

Fig 1. 10. Charensia Rompis, Psychological emotions during the PPKM/ restriction period, 2022¹.

24 preliminary

80%

survey by Central Bureau of Statistics Most of the respondents spent most of their time during PPKM/ pandemic restriction in doing activities that reduced mobility¹. The data shows that during the restriction period, people socialised through the online platform to strengthen the social connections between friends and family from around the world.

The fact that people spent most of their time indoor is more than enough to affect the psychological well-being of most people. Therefore, the importance of having a private outdoor space such as a balcony or backyard is crucial to improve human’s physical and psychological wellbeing.

1. BPS RI (2021). Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Masa PPKM Darurat: Hasil Survei Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Periode 13-20 Juli 2021.

ISBN:978-602-438-427-2. https://www.bps.go.id/ publication/2021/08/02/29234b08faa4910dee5279 af/perilaku-masyarakat-pada-masa-ppkm-darurat-hasil-sur vei-perilaku-masyarakat--pada-masapandemi-covid-19--periode-13-20-juli-2021.html.

212,762

respondents

71.3% from Java 28.7% Outside Java and Bali

significance 25

apartment kitchen bedroom bathroom living room potential working space

Fig 1. 11. Charensia Rompis, 3 Bed Fraser Place Apartment in Jakarta, 2022. base floor plan source: https://www. silverdoorapartments.com/ fraser-place-setiabudijakarta-jakarta-17907/

In an apartment setting for 4 inhabitants, the potential working space is limited to living and dining spaces that are within an open space. This could be both a bad thing and good thing. Bad thing is about the distraction from the house members and the good thing is about being in a collaborative environment where you are “working alone but together”.

medium-sized housing kitchen bedroom bathroom living room potential working space

Fig 1. 12. Charensia Rompis, Rumah Miring in Jakarta by BPA, 2015. base floor plan source: https://www.dezeen. com/2015/12/22/ budi-pradono-architectsrumah-miring-leaninghouse-jakarta-symbol-ofanti-establishment/

In a medium-sized house, the floor plans offer more remote working flexibility due to the fact that there are 3 separated floors that could be transformed into separate private working spaces. The outdoor pool provides a calming ambience that might improve the productivity whilst at home.

26 preliminary

precedent: analysing typical residential floorplan in Jakarta dormitory balcony dorm unit potential working space Fig 1. 13. Charensia Rompis, Proyek Rumah Kost Benhil oleh Bral Architect di Bendungan Hilir Jakarta, 2015. base floor plan source: https://www.arsitag.com/project/rumah-kost-benhil-1/photo/25838

In a dormitory setting, the psychological well-being of the inhabitant is questioned.

The live-work-rest spaces were arranged within small units, however, with an additional balcony which is deemed non-ideal during the pandemic restrictions.

vernacular architecture: Joglo House

living room potential working space

Fig 1. 14. Charensia Rompis, Joglo House, 2018. base floor plan source: (https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2095263518300384

The planning of vernacular dwelling remarks the importance of communal space in a house and the connection to outdoors through the use of verandah. In relation to the current remote working policy, it would be difficult for the house members to work separately without disturbing each other in the “central space”. significance 27

luxury house

kitchen bedroom bathroom living room potential working space Fig 1. 15. Charensia Rompis, Denpassar Residence in Jakarta, 2022. base floor plan source: https://www.decoist.com/ modern-javanese-design-jakarta/floor-plan-of-firstlevel-of-denpassar-residence-in-jakarta/

For a luxury house, each floors are usually dedicated for private and communal areas. Within the communal areas, the spaces can be transformed into a private working space with outdoor views. The relationship between indoor and outdoor could possibly combat a feeling of boredom during the pandemic restriction.

28 preliminary

holiday villa kitchen unit study living room collaboration Fig 1. 16. Charensia Rompis, Dancing House in Salatiga by BPA, 2015. base floor plan source: https://www. dezeen.com/2015/08/03/budi-pradonoarchitects-bamboo-dancing-mountainhouse-multiple-roof-funnels-salatigaindonesia/

A holiday villa setting is ideal for remote working as each individual have the option to work alone in their own unit or in a shared common area. Furthermore, holiday villa tend to have a shared outdoor space that have landscaping element that could potentially boost productivity for remote workers.

significance 29

case study: Digital Nomads

EU

USA

AU existing data on typical occupancy for Nomads²

Software Engineer

Public Relations

Graphic Designer

E-commerce & Marketing

Consultants & Analyst

Property Manager

Fig 1. 17. Charensia Rompis, Illustration of a digital nomad, 2022².

30 preliminary

“ ... not only are these personal lifestyle choices, but institutionalized patterns of behavior that have consequences.”

-Alex, 2019, recorded by Thompson, B. Y.¹

Another term that is used to refer to remote workers is Digital Nomad.

A Digital Nomad is considered as a lifestyle based on the voluntary and continuous mobility to achieve leisure that further results in feeling socially isolated, distanced from family, and feeling of loneliness¹. To become a nomad, the individual needs to be selfsustainable, meaning that they need to be fully independent.

1. Beverly Yuen Thompson, The digital nomad lifestyle:(remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure 2, 2019. no. 1, 27-42.

2. Eurostart Enterprises, How to become a digital nomad?. 2021. http://www.eurostartentreprises. com/business-advice/item/64-how-to-become-adigital-nomad.

Nomadic lifestyle has been increasingly popular due to the current WFH trend across the globe. It will not be surprising if in the future there is a more diverse range of age groups and professions of Nomads. What used to be unfamiliar is now familiar.

Similarly, other existing lifestyles to Nomads are contract workers, FIFO (Fly In Fly Out), people on sabbatical, volunteers and aid workers, and exchange students.

These groups of people can be categorised as short, medium, and long-term residency and are not restricted to an individual, but, can be couples, family, or friendship groups. significance 31

factors influencing Digital Nomads

ease of doing business

living cost

temperature

language spoken

internet speed

San Fransisco, USA

Hub: Treehouse Priority on the wellness, sustainability, and collaborative local community.

currency

Fig 1. 18. Charensia Rompis, Factors influencing digital nomads, 2022¹.

Due to the similar life pattern between WFH workers and Digital Nomad, it is safe to assume that the information and statistics found from the Digital Nomads can be used as a starting point to investigate the needs and requirements for remote working/ studying.

In Indonesia, the living cost is considered to be the lowest compared to the rest of the countries. From the data, it appeared that Bali is the best place for Digital Nomads compared to the other cities in Indonesia. This result might occur due to the scenic view and large demographic of people speaking English in Bali.

1. Eurostart Enterprises, How to become a digital nomad?. 2021.

32 preliminary

Miami, USA

Hub: Miami Entrepreneurship Center Partnerships with organisations and companies that enable entrepreneurs to network for free.

Buenos Aires, Argentina Hub: Urban Station Offers pricing based on the working time required.

best co:working areas for Digital Nomads according to Eurostart Enterprise London, UK

Hub: Huckletree Light and spacious, suitable for startups and tech entrepreneurs.

Berlin, Germany

Hub: Betahaus 5 levels with over 5000sqm.

Budapest, Hungary

Hub: Kaptar Weekly communal lunch to create a productive community.

Koh Lanta, Thailand

Hub: KoHub Haven for remote workers, travelling entrepreneurs and digital nomads, startup retreats, workstations and camps.

Bali, Indonesia

Hub: Hubud Open plan concept with workshops and events between members.

Wellington, New Zealand Barcelona, Spain

Hub: Makers of Barcelona Offers a wide range of pricing, space, and times required.

Paris, France

Hub: Numa Space is fully dedicated to digital startups.

Hub: CBD-Biz Hub Suitable for small business and startup community.

Fig 1. 19. Charensia Rompis, Best places for Digital Nomads, 2022¹.

significance 33

precedent studies: co-working in Bali (rural) Access to daylight

Use of local material: bamboo

Multiple co-working arrangement

Use of local material: wood Fig 1. 20. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working space in Hubud, 2022.

Base image source: HUBUD, Co-working space, 2022. https://ubudhood.com/directory/directory-listing/hubudco-working-space#prettyPhoto.

Hubud : Ubud, Bali Location Type : co:working space Characteristic - open plan for flexible arrangement Large window openings are designed to allow natural ventilation within the co-working space.

- Cubicles available for privacy.

Construction Open-air bamboo structure with a view overlooking the forest.

Community: Weekly events between Digital Nomads.

34 preliminary

Double height space: openness Flexible working arrangment

Connection to outdoor

Connection to outdoor

co:working space | private vs public

Locally sourced material: bricks Fig 1. 21. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working & co-living space in Outpost, 2022.

Base images source: OUTPOST, Co-work & co-live, 2022. https://destinationoutpost.co/location/canggu/

Outpost : Canggu, Bali Location Type : co:working &

co:living Characteristic - Two long tables dedicated for public/ co-working.

- Double-space to promote the idea of openness that further connects to the outdoor space with transparency.

- Two levels of private meeting rooms - The living area is designed with the idea of nature with swimming pool as the heart of the co-living space.

Construction local material, warm tone.

analysis: Similar to Hubud, Outpost locally sourced some of their building materials, such as wood and bricks.

Both co:working spaces also host workshops and events to engage with the local community and promote collaboration with each individual.

Compared to Hubud, it is obvious that Outpost does not incorporate a traditional accent on its interior design.

The furnitures were designed with the idea of ergonomics. significance 35

Jakarta

Bali

Fig 1. 22. Charensia Rompis, Map of Indonesia, 2022.

Bali, number one tourist spot in Indonesia vs Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia 36 preliminary

precedent studies: co-working in Jakarta (urban) table divider for privacy

Shared kitchen area Long linear co-working tables

Transparent window to create connection with the central area

public vs private

Fig 1. 23. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working space in Wellspaces, Jakarta, 2022.

Base images source: Deskby, Co-working at Wellspaces Jakarta, 2022. https://deskby.com/space/dedicated-deskdwp4M.

Wellspaces Location: SCBD, South Jakarta Type : co:working Characteristic - One of the earliest co-working spaces based in Indonesia with other branches spread across the city - The internal layout gives an impression of what a formal office space would look like.

- Industrial, yet warm.

- The divider in-between the shared communal tables give an impression of regular office space with dedicated cubicles for each individual. significance 37

Due to the difference in a rural and urban setting, it is quite obvious that places such as co: working spaces in Jakarta are located within a shared building with other companies.

Co: working space in Jakarta gives an impression of actual office space in contrast to Bali.

The workers in Bali is more flexible and more influenced by the Western worker’s lifestyle. The design of the co: working space in Bali, such as Hubud is highly influenced by the vernacular architecture in Bali. Even the furniture is carefully designed with local material and craftsmanship.

Jakarta on the other hand is more into minimalism where the priority is on the ergonomics of working space.

The layout is usually designed only for essential needs, not superfluous.

38 preliminary

The co: working space in Bali seems to highly value the workers. Weekly events are hosted to encourage wellbeing and community engagement to ensure that every worker is comfortable being in the space with strangers.

Taking Bali’s co:working precedent studies into consideration, there is an opportunity to readdress the working condition in Jakarta such that it could incorporate local community, values, and tradition.

Fig 1. 24. Charensia Rompis, Illustration of a co:working space, 2022.

co:working in Indonesia rural

vs

urban high-rise building

forest, mountain view Scenery open, vernacular, large scale, ownership

dense, minimalism, small scale, shared-building Typology

outskirts of city small population

CBD, large population Location

mostly locals

locals & internationals Demographic

casual

formal Attire

flexible with diverse working spaces

flexible but limited to standard working tables Working spaces

Fig 1. 25. Charensia Rompis, Scenario of Rural vs Urban, 2022.

significance 39

defining kampung Traditional kampung/ village is the main urban settlement type that the majority of Indonesia’s inhabitants live in. It forms the basis of a social structure and urban typology of the city¹. There is an ongoing bias towards the idea of kampung being a slum-like habitat due to the poor hygiene and sanitation². Kampung has a strong local and community presence that are almost impossible to recreate elsewhere. The housing typology and the urban setting of a kampung reflects the history and existing condition of the neighbouring environment.

1. Shirleyana, Scott Hawken, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia. 2018. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 36 No. 5, p. 544. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJBPA-02-2018-0025 2. Kim Dovey and Ross King, Informal Urbanism and the Taste for Slums. 2012.

Tourism Geographies. p. 543-545. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2011.613944.

40 preliminary

area that needs improvement: hygiene, sanitation dwellings that adapt to the: past - present - future residential status before: local people now: low/mid-income people

laneways: as a gathering space

kampung

>50% of total population in Jakarta social characteristic: close-knit community

architecture: local material & local labour, craftsmanship Fig 1. 26. Charensia Rompis, Characteristics of Kampung, 2022.

significance 41

kampung luar batang Muara Baru Port

storage area of PT. Pluit Sakti Kharisma Sunda Kelapa Port kampung luar batang Muara Baru

Estuary of Ciliwung River

kampung akuarium

apartment

old town 20 200 m 100 0 Fig 1. 27. Charensia Rompis, Surrounding Context of Kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

N

1739 demolition protest sign Habib Husein Mosque 42 preliminary

laneways

worship

Origin of Kampung Luar Batang: Luar/ Outside

Kampung/ Village from shelter to settlement Batang/ Wood as a barrier (checkpoints)

Sunda Kelapa Harbour During the Dutch colonisation period in North Jakarta, the harbour near Kampung Luar Batang was highly utilised for trading and therefore, prior to entering the harbour, fishermen would dock their ships behind a wooden checkpoint/ batang and use the kampung area as an overnight shelter. Over the years, the shelter slowly becomes a settlement for the fishermen and they started naming it Kampung Luar Batang.

Dalam/ Inside

fish market

Sunda Kelapa Port

Fig 1. 30. Charensia Rompis, Activity Collage of Kampung Luar Batang, 2022. site context 43

about the site: kampung luar batang SDN01 Penjaringan School

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

Luar Batang V Street

50

Legend: Mosque 44 preliminary

Street

10

r ee t

Bahari

ng IX Bata

Mitra

Kelapa

ar Lu

Luar

Sunda

treet

g II S

Batan

eet

III Street

Luar

III Str atang V

t VI S tang

Daarul Falaah Mosque

0

Luar B

Muara Baru Road

Lua r Ba

Luar Batang

N

treet

ang IV S

Luar Bat

treet

ng I S

Bata

Port

Road

100 m

market

education

parks

water bodies

a Kela

Sund

historical context:

Fig 1. 28. Heuken SJA, Tempat-tempat Bersejarah di Jakarta, 1997.

Fig 1. 29. Indira Laksmi Subroto, The bridge to cross from the fish market, n.a.

14th Century

17th Century

- Development of settlements in Sunda Kelapa Harbour during VOC’s (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie) authorisation.

- Export goods: tamarind, pepper, rice, vegetables, fruits, etc.

- Ships: China, India, Persia, Arabia, and other South Asian Countries.

- Settlement for the workers in the harbour and the fishermen.

- Spontaneous urban growth pattern.

- Habib Husein Mosque (1739) was built - Ethnic group of Betawi Pesisiran in the area.

ort apa P

Habib Husein Mosque

Kampung Luar Batang is located in the Northern part of Jakarta which was formerly known as Sunda Kelapa during the first decades of the 18th century. The area was originally formed during the Dutch colonisation and the surrounding site had been declared as one of the cultural heritages by the Government in 1993.

One of the reasons that the village is known for its deep heritage roots is due to one of the old Mosque in kampung luar batang that was built by Syeh Sayid Husein Abubakar Al-Aydus, a religious leader from Hadramaut in Southern Yemen¹. The majority of people living in kampung is from an Islamic background and therefore, the Mosque becomes the main communal space for the community as well as one of the most visited tourist spot in the kampung.

1. Shuji Funo, Bambang F. Ferianto, and Kyouta Yamada.

Considerations on space formation and transformation of Kampung Luar Batang (Jakarta). 2004. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 3, no.

1 (2004): 173-180. historical context 45

site analysis

12pm

5pm g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

RW-3 (14RTs) Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

Luar

RW-1 (11RTs) Luar

Sunda

Mitra

Bahari

treet

g II S

Batan

eet

III Street

Luar Batang

Kelapa

Street

t VI S tang

ng IX Bata

Luar B

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

treet

ang IV S

Luar Bat

III Str atang V

Muara Baru Road

RW-2 (12RTs)

treet

ng I S

Bata

Port

Road

topography /1m 10

N 0

50

100 m

Legend: windrose 10 0

46 preliminary 100 m 50

sunpath

transportation

access to kampung

a Kela

Sund

ort apa P

external transportation transjakarta 12

7am

12A

to City

12B

to Senen

12E

to BNI 46

1A

to Monas

transjakarta microbus JAK3

to Tanah Abang

Train - Station CENTRAL LINE BEKASI LINE LOOP LINE

internal transportation

community organisation religious function in every RW each RW has a chief of RW with an office and siskamling (environmental safety system)

site analysis 47

site mapping: programs

ng Empang

Luar Bata

Road

Luar Batang V Street

Legend: 10

N 0

50

48 preliminary

r ee t

Port

data from: Funo, Ferianto, and Yamada, 177.

business (3.5%)

The100majority of the programs within m Kampung Luar Batang is 80% residential area. Most of the business sectors within kampung are grocery, food kiosk, trading office, hair salon, and printing. Having business and residential areas in one plot is not unusual due to the limitation in the density of the urban fabric around the kampung.

50

treet

ng I S

Bata

Road

100 m

residential (80%)

Street

10

Bahari

ng IX Bata

Mitra

Kelapa

ar Lu

Sunda

treet

g II S

Batan

ort apa P

a Kel

Sund

I Street

III Street

Luar

ang VII

t VI S tang

Luar

0

at Luar B

Muara Baru Road

Lua r Ba

Luar Batang

N

Street

tang IV

Luar Ba

living & business (16.5%)

site mapping: warung/ kiosk

ng Empang

Luar Bata

Road

Luar Batang V Street

Legend: 10

N 0

50

100 m

50

Street

10

r ee t

Bahari

ng IX Bata

Mitra

Kelapa

ar Lu

Sunda

treet

g II S

Batan

ort apa P

a Kel

Sund

I Street

III Street

Luar

ang VII

t VI S tang

Luar

0

at Luar B

Muara Baru Road

Lua r Ba

Luar Batang

N

Street

tang IV

Luar Ba

treet

ng I S

Bata

Port

Road

100 m

attached warung (75%)

data from: Funo, Ferianto, and Yamada, 178.

detached warung (25%) In addition to a living and resting area, there is often warung/ kiosk found in front of the house. Some warungs are a side business for the wives while the husband goes to work on a day-to-day basis. Furthermore, warung can also be extended to the street where it creates a connection with the pedestrian and improve the socio-economic within the kampung site. site analysis 49

site mapping: building height

ng Empang

Luar Bata

Road

Luar Batang V Street

Legend: 10

N 0

50

50 preliminary

treet

r ee t

ng I S

Bata

Port

Road

100 m

single storey (38.6%)

The100majority of the building height m in the kampung is double-storey height where it typically consists of owner space on the ground level and renter space on the upper floor. Although the mapping categorises the building from one to three storeys high, there are often spaces with less than 180mm due to the road pavements due to the rising sea level and seasonal flooding.

50

Street

10

Bahari

ng IX Bata

Mitra

Kelapa

ar Lu

Sunda

treet

g II S

Batan

ort apa P

a Kel

Sund

I Street

III Street

Luar

ang VII

t VI S tang

Luar

0

at Luar B

Muara Baru Road

Lua r Ba

Luar Batang

N

Street

tang IV

Luar Ba

data from: Funo, Ferianto, and Yamada, 177.

double storey (59%)

triple storey (2.4%)

site mapping: building typology

ng Empang

Luar Bata

Road

RW-3 Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

treet

g II S

Batan

Street

Luar

ort apa P

a Kel

Sund

I Street

III Street

Luar Batang

ng IX Bata

t VI S tang

ang VII

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

Street

tang IV

Luar Ba

at Luar B

Muara Baru Road

RW-2

treet RW-1 ng I S Bata

Luar

Sunda

Mitra

N

10 0

Legend: 10

N 0

50

100 m

50

Bahari

Kelapa

Port

Road

data from: Google Street Images

100 m

traditional building

modern building

demolished building

The majority of buildings in RW-3 are modern buildings. From the site survey, it can be seen that there is demolition across the site where they started replacing traditional buildings with modern buildings. In RW-1 however, a number of traditional buildings are being retained, although there seems to be existing Betawi Vernacular Architecture across the kampung. site analysis 51

research data

51 buildings out of 507 buildings (10%) are made of semi-permanent structure

construction material concrete, wooden structure, plywood, corrugated metal sheet.

regulation in the area mixed use - 4 levels business - 8 levels social related - 2levels

2-10 person each household (5 average)

to address the flooding occurence single storey house: 29%

2-storeys house: 59%

gf: brick wall ff: wooden board, plywood, metal sheet r: 55% corrugated sheet | 43% roof-tile | 2% concrete to reflect harsh sun exposure

3-storeys house: 12%

flood measures

occupancy

why locals are staying in the kampung?

52 preliminary

repeated road pavement

trading

quality of the current dwelling in the kampung that might not be the same elsewhere

lower housing/ increased ground floor

~200 service industry (carpenter, tailor, etc.)

lost of income if they move somewhere else

flood barrier

~675 private sector

locals not being able to adapt to new customs and traditions if they move elsewhere

tradition/ communal activities

Malam Jumat Market & Pekan Market every friday night 4pm-5am house transforms/ extends into shops, stalls, laundry, phone kiosk, beauty salon, public lavatories, garages, tailors, entrertainment, rental house, etc. also occurs during Islamic’s calendar celebrations.

Habib Husein Mosque founder: Syeh Sayid Husein Abubakar Al-Aydus (1756 - buried within the mosque) pilgrimage ritual & activity

characteristics of Kampung Luar Batang

detereorating living quality

highly populated

kampung

origin of “Betawi” people

settlement for Javanese labourers and fishermen

flood-prone area

half storey lower ground due to flood measures

dominated by modern buildings

current programs in kampung luar batang

63 houses with 11 rental houses & rooms warung/ local shop

12 grocery shops

5 telephone rental

Fig 1. 32. Charensia Rompis, Research findings in Kampung Luar Batang, 2022. data source: Funo, Ferianto, and Yamada. Considerations on space formation and transformation of Kampung Luar Batang (Jakarta). 173-180. socio-demographic 53

Vendor’s Space

Service Area

sewer sewer Neighbourhood to the Mosque

The typical layout of dwellings within the kampung consists of occupied space for the owner and rentable space for the renters. The majority of the owners work live and socialise in their own space where the front area is usually extended out to the street and be utilised as a market space for the socio-economic purpose.

1. Popi Puspitasari, Sudaryono Achmad Djunaedi, and Heddy Shri Ahimsa Putra. 2011. Ritual and space structure: Pilgrimage and space use in historical urban kampung context of Luar Batang (Jakarta, Indonesia).

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 36: 355.

54 preliminary

alley

socio-economic context surrounding the Mosque

temporary market space (extended business area)

Renter

Rentable Space

Owner

Occupied Space alley

sewer

Neighbourhood around the Mosque

sewer

alley

Fig 1. 33. Charensia Rompis, Typical housing arrangement in Kampung Luar Batang, 2022¹.

typical accommodation unit for rent

3x4m

3x6m

bedroom + toilet Rp 125,000 - 150,000/ month ~ $12.5 - $15/ month

unit unit

bedroom + toilet & kitchen Rp 170,000 - 250,000/ month ~ $17 - $25/ month

b

a

corridor: shared common space socio-economic 55

updated roofing element for balcony

level changes

modern building

sanitation area Fig 1. 34. Google Maps, Virtual Site Visit, 2022.

Image source: Google Maps. 2021. Kampung Luar Batang (Jakarta).

56 preliminary

modern building

existing building conditions

new vs old

steep staircase

Luar Batang II Street

level changes

balconies

construction of modern building using traditional scaffolding: bamboo

analysis: The ground floor of each dwelling varies from one storey to a half storey from the street level due to the road pavement after a series of flooding. Some of the construction of the housing element such as the staircase does not meet the regulation since it was built by the locals in the past.

level changes

Luar Batang IX Street analysis: Literature studies mentioned that there used to be Betawi Vernacular Architecture within the area, however, according to the virtual site visit, it appears that most of the housings within the site are generic old buildings that are slowly transitioning into a modern building.

architectural typology 57

existing building conditions near the Mosque

shop frontage and existing dwelling

SDN1 Penjaringan (Primary School)

new vs old

Fig 1. 35. Google Maps, Virtual Site Visit, 2022.

Image source: Google Maps. 2021. Kampung Luar Batang (Jakarta).

58 preliminary

construction material

demolition of old housing

half-storey housing

kindergarten

Habib Husein Mosque

intersection in front of the Mosque and food kiosks

Luar Batang V Street analysis: Although some traditional ornaments are still visible in some of the dwellings, it appears that the locals built their own dwellings according to their own necessity and disregard the idea of ornamentation in the architecture. A number of old housings are slowly being demolished and replaced with new modern building. architectural typology 59

Vernacular Architecture in Kampung Luar Batang

Fig 1. 36. Indira Laksmi Subroto, Sketches of the Existing Traditional Houses in kampung Luar Batang, 2022. private

public

Fig 1. 37. Indira Laksmi Subroto, Various Plans of the Traditional Houses of the Betawi people, 2022. edited by Charensia Rompis, 2022.

60 preliminary

Research has shown that only 12% of Vernacular Architecture remains in Kampung Luar Batang¹ which becomes a concern in the loss of cultural identity within the kampung.

Through the virtual site visit, it seems that the majority of the buildings were designed by locals with a functional purpose that was cost-effective, rather than incorporating ornaments.

Nowadays, old buildings are slowly being replaced with a new modern building that incorporates ornament in the facade (European influence).

Characteristic: Porch, Staircase of the porch, ventilation, wooden plank under the roofing edge The organisation of the place usually begins with a porch, bedrooms/ living areas, kitchen, and bathroom at the end of the house.

‘Vernacular’ in this neighbouring kampung can be translated as construction that adapts to the needs of the residents over time and reflects the socio-environmental aspect of the kampung.

1. Indira Laksmi Subroto. n.a. Preservation of Kampung Luar Batang, Sunda Kelapa, North Jakarta.

University of Trisakti, Indonesia, 11.

architectural typology 61

development projects of Kampung Luar Batang in the past

1988

IUCD

Integrated Urban Community Development.

Ended in 1996.

Organisations Involved: PT. Spektra Matrika Indah (consulting firm in Jakarta), funded by BORDA Foundation from Germany, supported by Government of DKI Jakarta.

Key Areas: - During 1989, it was found that the kampung was in a bad social and physical condition due to the increasing level of population, lack of sanitation, and undisposed garbage.

- Aims to promote self-confidence of the locals and to solve the poverty and social-welfare problems.

Successful: - A number of family incomes had increased.

- Locals had a better understanding of their land, Government officials and bank.

- The slum-look of the kampung had decreased, but not completely.

1993

DKI Jakarta’s Governor Decree

Key Areas: - Kampung Luar Batang was listed on the heritage as a preserved urban area.

- Extension of Sunda Kelapa Harbour as a touristic area (i.e. hotels, apartments, etc.)

Key Areas: - Preserving Architectural heritage of a maritime settlements and developing tourism aspect with the city planning program.

- Training for the locals, providing facilities, improving house condition and environment.

1995

PT. Spektra Matrika Indah

in coordination with the Building Planning and Conservation Agency of DKI Jakarta.

Key Areas: - Physical plan to preserve the cultural and historical value of the site.

1996

University of Trisakti

Key Areas: - Re-designing Vernacular Architecture of Betawi Pesisiran that containts ornamental with new interior planning together with the Government’s decree no. 120/1993.

2020

DKI Jakarta’s Governor

Organisations Involved: Government of DKI Jakarta.

DKI Jakarta’s Governor Decree

No. 475/ 1993.

Key Areas: - List of historical buildings to be preserved, such as Mosque of Habib Husein.

62 preliminary

Seniwono Maulana Architects

upon request of the Government of DKI Jakarta.

No. 120/ 1993.

1993

1988

Key Areas: - Revitalisation of Habib Husein Mosque as a tourist spot through ornamentation and exterior design.

data source from: Indira Laksmi Subroto. n.a.

Preservation of Kampung Luar Batang, Sunda Kelapa, North Jakarta. University of Trisakti, Indonesia, 4-6.

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

case study: kampung akuarium Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

Luar

Sunda

DKI Jakarta’s Governor Mitra

Bahari

Kelapa

Street

B

ng IX Bata

II S atang

Sunda

t a Por

Kelap

kampung akuarium

et

Luar

treet

III Stre

Luar Batang

Key Areas: - 3 Shelter Blocks were built in Kampung Akuarium.

- Concept of the new development for Kampung Akuarium in the Fish Market that was demolished during 2016 by the former Government.

2021

kampung luar batang

t VI S tang

ar Lu

Lua r Ba

tang V

2018

Luar Ba

III Street

Key Areas: - Eviction and demolition by the former Government ‘Ahok’ in Fish Market

Street

tang IV

DKI Jakarta’s Governor

Luar Ba

Muara Baru Road

2016

treet

gIS

Batan

demolition area

Port

Road 10

N 0

50

100 m

Buildings from the Dutch Colonial Era

Fig 1. 38. Charensia Rompis, Demolition area in Fish Market (now kampung akuarium), 2022.

DKI Jakarta’s Governor

Key Areas: - Completion of Kampung Akuarium.

Fig 1. 39. Daniel Caesar Pratama, the new vertical kampung Akuarium, 2021.

analysis: Due to the demolition during 2016 in the fish market, the government built a vertical kampung for the locals living near the market. From the Architectural language, it appears that the design is incorporating elements from the Maritime Museum, previously owned by the VOC, such as the roof shape and the window openings.

With the current pandemic situation, it is critical to have a private open space/ balcony which this village does not have.

The building gives an impression of a typical apartment dwelling in an urban setting with minimal consideration to its occupants. Furthermore, some locals have argued that the land is supposed to be preserved, not built on. historical context 63

SWOT

64 preliminary

Strength - Deep historical roots with the community and the Mosque.

- Strategic site: close to the harbour and the city.

- Option for pandemic measures.

Weakness - Lost of cultural identity with the newly built architecture form.

- Flood-prone area.

- Non-ideal living condition.

- Poor sanitation and hygiene.

Opportunities - Potential tourism area.

- Architecture: learn from the past and develop for the present and future.

- An interaction between the locals and visitors.

- Re-activating its traditional and cultural identity.

- Give the locals an ease of mind that the site will not be demolished (case study: kampung akuarium).

- Introduce and guide the locals into living a better life and health condition.

Threats - Local’s ressistance to adapting to the new norm.

- Gentrification.

- Rising sea levels that cause seasonal flooding.

65

literature studies: made in tokyo author: Momoyo Kaijima and Yoshiharu Tsukamoto year: 2001 about - Observation and re: translating Tokyo’s chaotic urban fabric.

- In Tokyo, cultural interest is low whereas the interest in practical issues and affordance is high.

- Unexpected cross-pollination of unrelated programs that co-existed in a single form of building.

- Cross-bred programs between infrastructure, commercial structure, constructed ground, retaining wall with architecture. analysis The idea of cross-pollination programs in Tokyo further applies to the kampung condition in Kampung Luar Batang. The urban typology in the kampung generally consists of a dwelling with a shopfront extension into the street. The activity of people living in kampung revolves within the kampung itself. Furthermore, the socio-economic condition of people living in the urban scale of Tokyo is similar to what exists in the kampung in Jakarta. The guidebook to this literature study can be used to analyse and implement a new framework for the kampung.

66

Fig 1. 40. Charensia Rompis, Made in Tokyo Cover Page, 2022.

literature studies: delirious New York A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan author: Rem Koolhaas year: 1978

Fig 1. 41. Charensia Rompis, Delirious New York Cover Page, 2022.

about - Investigation in Manhattan that records the symbiotic relationship between its culture and architecture.

- Consistency of the unrelated urbanism in Manhattan that was a part of an unformulated movement.

- “A culture of congestion” where greed is the main drive to the architecture which occasionally and accidentally produces some of the best architectural forms that were ever designed. analysis A reference of Coney Island as a testing ground to bring the idea of rural into the urban setting - similarly to the kampung in Jakarta with the idea of rural within the urban setting.

With the planning of a kampung, it appears that the dwellings are built after one another that does not even follow a building regulation. This desperation of functional matter disregarded the rules and created a strong engagement of the community through the street and laneways. literature studies 67

architecture precedent: green school, Bali Location Architects Year Type

: Bali, Indonesia : IBUKU : 2007 : School & Community

analysis The building is inspired from the craftsmanship of the local material through the use of bamboo as a permanent structure and thatched roof to represent a roofing material that was used in the past. The internal arrangement is designed to promote the idea of collaborative community.

Fig 1. 42. Charensia Rompis, analysis on Green School, Bali, 2022.

68

architecture precedent: Kampung Admiralty, Singapore Location : Singapore Architects : WOHA Year : 2017 Type : Mixed-use for

elderly Key : Elderly, greenery, physical and psychological well-being.

analysis The programs within the building were designed for elderly with biophilic design that mimics the idea of a kampung/ village. Through creating public and private space, the building successfully created residential and a mixed-use buildings that complement each other.

views

Fig 1. 43. Charensia Rompis, analysis on Kampung Admiralty, Singapore, 2022. precedent studies 69

70 concept

02 design proposal

71

The framework will be designed as a revitalisation plan to provide the locals with an option to develop their existing buildings. The main objectives are to promote the tourism sector within the community and create better living conditions post-pandemic. The framework will consist of a fixed spatial organisation with a kit of parts that allow the locals the freedom to choose. Furthermore, a partnership between the locals, architects, investors, and the government is necessary to make it work.

72 concept

key design principles Architecture: adapts to surrounding context and materiality

affordability & flexibility

community engagement

Spatial Organisation adapts to local culture and traditions

cross-pollination: people & programs

3 frameworks 5 key design principles across the RWs in Kampung Luar Batang

design strategy 73

Characteristic: Visitors - Digital Nomad - Interstate Workers/ Students/ Researchers Age: 21-50 (self-sustainable) Occupancy:

Software Engineer

Public Relations

Graphic Designer

E-commerce & Marketing

Consultants & Analyst

Property Manager

Length of Stay: Short-Medium Term Objective: Starting point in transforming the kampung as a tourism spot, including promoting local values and improving facilities & services Necessity programs accommodation

working space

praying area

shared laundry

warung/ kiosk

affordability

community engagement

access to nature

escape/ healing

increasing productivity

traits

74 concept

target audience Characteristic: Local - Local Citizen - Nearby Workers Age: varies (existing age group) Occupancy:

Service Sector

Fisherman

Farmer

Trading Sector

Kiosk Owner

Cook/ chef

Length of Stay: Long Term Objective: Creating a better living condition and begin to introduce the locals into contemporary living Necessity programs praying area

toko/ shop

shared laundry

warung/ food kiosk

communal space traits

sanitation better living & hygiene condition

flexibility & adaptability

affordability

community engagement design strategy 75

local’s and visitor’s activity throughout the day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

fajr

persona visitor

sunrise

dhuhr

asr

maghrib

urban farming

community gathering

isha

local

legend

rest

76 concept

laundry

eating/ shared kitchen

remote working/ working space

street vendors/ food stalls

praying

transformation of communal activity throughout the day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

activity place

communal space

transformation of commercial activity throughout the day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

fish market

day market

night market

food stall/ street vendors

warung/ kiosk

place

1 space = multiple functions 77

The diagram shows how people and programs will be designed to blend together within the framework, for example, different occupancies between locals and visitors, and multiple shared programs happening in throughout the day. Through this cross-pollination of people and programs, we can achieve a number of benefits such as community engagement, improvement in the social and economic sector within the kampung.

78 concept

praying area

affordability warung/ kiosk

Consultants & Analyst

Public Relations

shared laundry

better living condition

escape/ healing

Service Sector

Trading Sector

Fisherman

accommodation

community engagement

Cook/ chef

Software Engineer

Market Owner

sanitation & hygiene

living x working

shared kitchen

Graphic Designer

E-commerce & Marketing

urban farming

access to nature working space

Farmer

adaptability & flexibility

people & programs

programs 79

about the framework architecture language referencing traditional Betawi house gable roof

porch/ balconies external staircase

program as a kit of parts

economy

warung/ kiosk

shared laundry

workshop

communal workspace

social

public gathering

shared kitchen

urban farming

communal workspace

wellbeing 80 concept

residential accommodation

quiet nook

praying area

related sectors

Government

Government

mutual agreement Funding Source

Architect

Locals Locals 1. DKI Jakarta’s Governor sector in charge for future plans in Jakarta 2. The Building Planning & Conservation Agency - Jakarta in charge of the preservation of Kampung Luar Batang 3. The Tourism Agency - Jakarta to increase awareness & promote local value 4. Additional funding source: NGO & Commercial sector contribution 5. The locals Architects & Residents

design strategy 81

form response

surrounding context and climatic condition

height regulation

setback for daylight access throughout the building

82 concept

gabled roof to reflect directional sun

spatial programming

residential + shared mixed-use R 2 semi-public 1 G private

public

massing & spatial organisation

residential

G

warung / kiosk back-of-house warung/kiosk street interface

shared programs: 1 space = multiple functions

warung/ kiosk as a blending tool with the public realm

design strategy 83

material palette

referencing existing social and economic context lightweight materiality

3. corrugated sheet 2. wood

heavy referencing flood context

84 concept

1. recycled red bricks

corrugated metal sheet function: reflect directional sun from going into the building, prevent undesired heat.

brickwork function: roof, wall, doors option: brick variation to allow light penetration and air circulation

bamboo

wood

function: construction scaffolding, space divider, and furnitures.

function: furniture, structure

design strategy 85

exposed structure

setback to allow daylight into the house

materiality: wood & polycarbonate 86 concept

daylight access and materiality

external courtyard

interior ambience and design

balcony and daylight staircase as public function

moodboard 87

chosen framework site

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

RW-3 (14RTs) Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

RW-1 (11RTs) Luar

Sunda

Mitra

10

N 0

50

100 m

Legend: Mosque in RW-1 10 0

88 concept 50

100 m

Bahari

treet

g II S

Batan

Kelapa

treet

ng I S

Bata

Port

Road

kampung framework Prayer Room in RW-2

Mosque in RW-3

Street

Luar

eet

III Street

Luar Batang

ng IX Bata

t VI S tang

III Str atang V

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

treet

ang IV S

Luar Bat

Luar B

Muara Baru Road

RW-2 (12RTs)

a Kela

Sund

ort apa P

near Habib Husein Mosque scenario 3.0 focuses on the framework acting as a vertical kampung including warung, shared communal facilities, and dwelling for the owners. intersection of kampung scenario 2.0 focuses on the framework being an active space for gathering with additional dwelling, accommodation, cafe, and shared communal space. near Sunda Kelapa Port scenario 1.0 focuses on the framework as a typical framework with warung, dwellings, accommodation and shared communal space.

There are three religious centres within Kampung Luar Batang that are distributed in each RW (community organisation). Each RW is under a chief or secretary that are in charge of the residents and the surrounding environment. Using similar socio-religious strategy, the framework will each be positioned within each RW considering the street frontage, ease of access, and existing building conditions.

framework site 89

The three scenarios explore different brief and architecture that reflects the existing condition and needs of the site. Each of the frameworks consists of the same spatial organisation, with the lower ground consisting of a dwelling/ accommodation, and shared space in the upper areas. Each framework contains a similar program, however, slightly differs to accommodate the needs of the surrounding programs.

These frameworks aim to re-introduce the idea of community and contemporary living post-pandemic. For the village, these frameworks mean boosting the economy, cultural and tourism aspect of the village.

90 concept

exploded isometric of the proposed framework

91

scenario 1.0

scenario 1.0

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

RW-3 Luar Batang V Street

r ee t Sunda

Mitra

Bahari

10 0

50

reet

g I St

Batan

Port

Road

20

N 0

N

Kelapa

t

Luar

Street

Batan

rt

pa Po

a Kela

Sund

III Stree

III Street

Luar

reet

g II St

RW-1

ng IX Bata

t VI S tang

Luar Batang

key location

Street

tang V

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

tang IV

Luar Ba

Luar Ba

Muara Baru Road

RW-2

100

200 m

100 m

93

target audience

Aman 7 y.o Student

Adi 48 y.o Trader

Tika Ma’ Ani 43 y.o 65 y.o Housewife Retired

locals Since Aman started going to one of the Primary Schools in the kampung, Tika and Ma’ Ani have been feeling bored at home. Therefore, Adi decided to renovate the house so Tika can stay with Ma’ Ani at home and manage an accommodation upstairs with shared facilities for visitors and neighbours.

As for Ma’ Ani, she likes cooking and farming, therefore, Adi created a rooftop space for her where she can grow and cook her own produce. scenario 1.0

Doddy 34 y.o Graphic Designer

Lala Beatrice 28 y.o 32 y.o Fashion Content Designer Writer

James 23 y.o Interstate Student

visitors AM Tika & Ma’ Ani take charge of cooking in the morning, along with Beatrice. During the working hours, Adi took Aman to school before he goes to work, meanwhile, the visitors PM spend their day working in the communal space.

At dinner time, the visitors would cook with Tika & Ma’ Ani and eat together with Aman and Adi in the communal space upstairs.

95

site analysis framework site RW-1: Luar Batang IX Street No. 1

Luar Batang VIII

21m

10m

210m²

Street

ng IX Str

Luar Bata

1

N 0

site plan

scenario 1.0

5

10 m

eet

vehicle & pedestrian access framework 1.0 site (210m²) 1

N 0

isometric view

5

10 m

The first framework within the site will utilise the strategic site near the Port to critique the current building proposal on the site. The proposed site consists of a four-storeys building under construction which is starting to show resemblance to the typical modern buildings around the kampung, especially the curved balconies and prominent external columns outdoor.

97

Betawi roof form modern building under construction

bamboo as scaffolding material residential

residential residential

existing condition external staircase for the units above exposed timber structure on brick plinths existing building material bricks (plastered and painterd) > wood structure (painted) > corrugated metal sheet

scenario 1.0

Strength Located within residential areas.

Weakness - Site being near the port - potential flooding risk.

- Lack of street engagement since the area lacks of warung and communal public space.

Opportunities - The current proposal can be a critique to the existing building under construction.

- New income and job opportunities.

- Reintroduce the idea of warung/ market space to boost the socioeconomic aspect within the area and improve street engagement.

Threat A number of abandoned buildings nearby, therefore, high maintenance.

SWOT

99

proposed design concept diagram

skylight

form response to the surrounding context

sun & daylight access

programs

economy

warung/ kiosk

shared laundry

workshop

communal workspace

social

public gathering

shared kitchen

urban farming

communal workspace

wellbeing scenario 1.0

residential accommodation

quiet nook

skylight

semi-public semi-private

public

semi-public private

horizontal and vertical circulation

spatial organisation

building fenestrations: visibility, daylight, and air ventilation 101

materiality

scenario 1.0

pavement: recycled red bricks staircase: red brick and wood panel highlighting the transition between the podium and the main building.

glass awnings with black chrome contrast between the traditional and the contemporary. window that acts as an overhead canopy, creating intimate space. podium in recycled brickwork as a bold language that performs as a base that highlights the verticality through openings and setbacks.

alternating bricks on the balcony to highlight the transition from the podium (bricks) to the main building (wood), as well as giving the idea of openness to the circulation space.

wood panels exaggerating the idea of louvres for natural ventilation. allow continuous natural ventilation and daylight while maintaining privacy for/ from the neighbours.

glass skylight allows daylight into the buiilding while maintaining privacy. exposed timber structure exaggerating the idea of local material and labour. corrugated sheet emphasising the neighbourhood socio-economic condition.

103

warung gorengan/ fried food stall

Legend:

1. Fried food stall (warung) 2. Kitchen 3. Living room 4. Kitchen/ dining room 5. Ma’ Ani’s bedroom 6. Aman’s bedroom 7. Adi & Tika’s bedroom 8. Balcony 9. Coffee shop 10. Co-working space scenario 1.0

11. Meeting room 12. Communal kitchen area 13. Reading nook 14. Shared laundry 15. Double bed accommodation unit 16. Single bed accommodation unit 17. Quiet zone 18. Chill zone 19. Multi-purpose room 20. Indoor rooftop garden

Section Isometric A-A Scale 1:200

1 0

2

5

m

105

G

N Scale 1:200 scenario 1.0

1 0

2

5

m

1

N N scale 1:100

1 0

2

5

m 107

2 scenario 1.0

R N scale 1:100

1 0

2

5

m

109

Luar Batang IX Street No. 1

Scale 1:100 scenario 1.0

1 0

Section Isometric B-B 2

5

m

External Render 111

scenario 1.0

Physical Model

113

scenario 2.0

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

RW-3 Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

Bahari

10 0

50

100 m

reet

g I St

Batan

Port

Road

20

N 0

N

t

Mitra

Kelapa

Street

Batan

Luar

Sunda

III Stree

III Street

Luar

reet

g II St

RW-1

ng IX Bata

t VI S tang

Luar Batang

key location

Street

tang V

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

tang IV

Luar Ba

Luar Ba

Muara Baru Road

RW-2

100

200 m

rt

pa Po

a Kela

Sund

target audience

Linda 35 y.o Housewife

Anton 37 y.o Business Manager

locals Linda and Anton got married during the early pandemic and decided to move back to their kampung because now Anton can work remotely.

Hence, Anton demolished the existing building in his plot and initiate to make a change for the kampung community.

After communicating with Linda and Anton’s business partner, Anton decided to build their house with an additional co-living and co-working space for interstate workers just like Anton.

scenario 2.0

Janet 24 y.o Social Media & Marketing

Gerard 26 y.o Start-Up CEO

Tiana 25 y.o Start-Up Co-Founder

visitors AM In the morning, Linda and Janet did some laundry in the communal space over a cup of coffee. Linda and Anton usually prepared and eat breakfast with the visitors. During the working PM hours, Anton always works in the shared co-working areas with the visitors and attends some weekly workshops by invited panels.

After dinner, Anton likes to gather and talk to the locals and visitors until bedtime.

117

site analysis framework site RW-2: Luar Batang VIII Street No. 6

12.5m

8.5m

106.25m²

Luar Batang VIII Street

Luar Batang IV Street

1

N 0

site plan

scenario 2.0

5

10 m

vehicle & pedestrian access

1

N 0

isometric view

5

framework 2.0 site (106.25m²)

10 m

The second framework is proposed to be in an intersection where it can become a strategic meeting location for the people across Kampung Luar Batang. In contrast to the other two frameworks, the site is surrounded by shops, kiosks, and mixed-use (residential and business) that could be a great potential to create residential programs.

119

modern buildings external staircase for above units warung/ kiosk storage

mixed-use

existing condition unused space - drying laundry existing building material bricks (plastered and painterd) > wood structure (painted) > corrugated metal sheet

scenario 2.0

Strength Located in an intersection in the heart of the kampung.

Weakness - Lack of space for laundry.

Opportunities - The exisiting site is currently unused.

- Having the site in an intersection, it can become a strategic meeting point for the commmunity and a space for gathering and speech.

Threat - Gentrification - because the site will be an important gathering place for the local community.

SWOT

121

proposed design concept diagram skylight

form response to the surrounding context

sun & daylight access

programs

economy

warung/ kiosk

shared laundry

social

public seating

urban farming

wellbeing scenario 2.0

meeting room

residential accommodation

quiet nook

skylight

semi-public semi-private

public street interface & public realm

semi-public private spatial organisation

building fenestrations: visibility, daylight, and air ventilation 123

materiality

scenario 2.0

pavement: recycled red bricks create a transition between the street interface and the building. staircase: red brick and wood panel a staircase and a seating space that creates an engagement within the bustling intersection of the neighbourhood.

alternating bricks on the balcony and residence’s entry give a sense of openness and light into the circulation space, as well as acting as a transition and threshold.

timber balcony additional feature to the timber grid facade that further highlights the relationship between the indoor and outdoor space. setback from the main podium to give a sense of hierarchy.

glass window for daylight, visibility, and public engagement with the street interface.

glass skylight, creates a sense of rooftop space while remain indoor. exposed timber structure appreciating local material and its beauty. corrugated metal sheet highlighting the existing tropical weather condition.

125

Legend:

1. Public seating area 2. Living room 3. Guest room 4. Linda & Anton’s bedroom 5. Balcony 6. Lobby 7. Meeting room

scenario 2.0

8. Bathroom 9. Quite room 10. Single bed accommodation unit 11. Double bed accommodation unit 12. Shared laundry 13. Rooftop garden 14. Rooftop cafe 15. Cafe bacl-of-house

Section Isometric B-B | Scale 1:100 1

0

2

5

m 127

G

scenario 2.0

1

N

Scale 1:100

1 0

2

5

m 129

2

scenario 2.0

R

N

Scale 1:100

1 0

2

5

m 131

Luar Batang VIII Street No. 6

Scale 1:100 scenario 2.0

1 0

Section Isometric B-B 2

5

m

External Render 133

scenario 2.0

Physical Model

135

scenario 3.0

g Empang

Luar Batan

Road

RW-3 Luar Batang V Street

r ee t

Bahari

t

Mitra

Kelapa

10 0

50

100 m

reet

g I St

Batan

Port

Road

N

20 100

N

Street

Batan

Luar

Sunda

III Stree

III Street

Luar

reet

g II St

RW-1

ng IX Bata

t VI S tang

Luar Batang

key location

Street

tang V

Lua r Ba

ar Lu

tang IV

Luar Ba

Luar Ba

Muara Baru Road

RW-2

200 m

rt

pa Po

a Kela

Sund

target audience

Tetty 42 y.o Housewife

Ma’ Ina 62 y.o Retired

Ahmad Jordan 43 y.o 27 y.o Accountant Warung Owner

locals Ahmad and family have been living in their house for over decades. Through the period, they went through a series of flooding event that resulted in the house being under the street level. Since Jordan has started earning income, him and his dad, Ahmad, decided to renovate the house so that Ma’ Ina and Tetty can live comfortably in the house while they go to work. Furthermore, in order to gain some funding back, Ahmad decided to invest in several shared community facilities for the locals that will be managed by Tetty. scenario 3.0

Rudin 38 y.o Software Engineer

Hamli Lola 34 y.o 33 y.o Local Craftsperson Trader

visitors AM Early in the morning, Tetty and Ma’ Ina have been busy doing house chores and preparing some breakfast. When Ahmad and Jordan go to work, Tetty starts her job, from making sure all areas are clean to make sure people come and go comfortably. Throughout PM the day, the space could turn into a working space, warung, and laundromat. Locals can rent the space within a certain timeframe and therefore, the programs can always change.

139

site analysis framework site RW-3: Luar Batang V Street No. 51

13.5m

10m

135m²

Luar B

atang V

Street Habi b Hu sein M osque

Luar Batang V Street

1

N 0

site plan

scenario 3.0

5

10 m

se

b Hu

vehicle & pedestrian access 1

N 0

isometric view

5

Habi

sque in Mo

Area framework 3.0 site (135m²)

10 m

The proposed third framework is just a minute walk from the famous Habib Husein Mosque and adjacent to an accommodation, residential, and a grocery shop. With the development plans involving the Mosque, the proposed framework can further revitalise the kampung area as a tourism spot and promote the socio-economic aspect of the kampung.

141

accommodation with open rooftop space

currently under demolition residential

existing condition half storey due to the continuous street repavement from flooding existing building material bricks (plastered and painterd) > wood structure (painted) > corrugated metal sheet

scenario 3.0

Strength Near tourism spot - Habib Husein Mosque.

Weakness There is an existing accommodation nearby and therefore, it is not ideal to create more accommodation space adjacent to an existing one.

Opportunities - Using existing structure as a part of the history.

- Connection with the accommodation nearby - Ideal site for business.

Threat - Gentrification.

SWOT

143

proposed design concept diagram skylight

form response to the surrounding context

sun & daylight access

programs

economy

warung/ kiosk

shared laundry

workshop

social

public gathering

shared kitchen

communal workspace

wellbeing scenario 3.0

residential accommodation

quiet nook

communal workspace

skylight

semi-public semi-private

public

semi-public private spatial organisation

connection between rooftops

building fenestrations: visibility, daylight, and air ventilation 145

materiality

scenario 3.0

pavement: recycled red bricks staircase: red brick and wood panel a communication with the neighbourhood facade, while also playing with the idea of half-storey height from the existing floor height condition.

brick tiles awning when opened, it acts as a dining table and awning. when closed, it creates a camouflage effect along with the brickwall.

frosted glass allow light penetration into the warung underneath while maintaining privacy inside the warung’s back of house.

grid structure highlighting the verticality and the increasing density as a reflection towards the surrounding neighbourhood.

roof extension connection with the neighbouring accommodation to collaborate and function as a community. exposed wood rafters gives a sense of a continuation and transition.

147

Legend:

1. Indomie kiosk (warmindo) 2. Kitchen 3. Living room 4. Bathroom/ laundry 5. Tetty & Ahmad’s bedroom 6. Receptionist/ cafe 7. Meeting room 8. Balcony 9. Single bedroom unit 10. Multi-purpose rooftop area 11. Existing accommodation scenario 3.0

Section Isometric B-B | Scale 1:100 1

0

2

5

m 149

scenario 3.0

N Scale 1:100 1 0

2

5

m 151

scenario 3.0

N Scale 1:100 1 0

2

5

m 153

Luar Batang V Street No. 51 Scale 1:100 scenario 3.0

1 0

Section Isometric B-B 2

5

m

External Render 155

scenario 3.0

Physical Model

157

158

Model Making - scale 1:200 (from left to right) Framework 01 -02 -03 Site Model: - 3D Print PLA (Cool Grey) - White Corrugated Sheet Main Model - 3D Print PLA (White Matte) - Acrylic Hand-Painted Corrugated Sheet (Grey)

159

160

161

building fenestrations: visibility, daylight, and air ventilation

162

163

reflection

week 4 informal feedback reflection In week 4, I presented my preliminary research on topics related to remote working and kampung/village, then I came up with a site within Kampung Luar Batang in Jakarta.

During the informal feedback session, I received a suggestion to find a reasoning behind why I have chosen the specific site for the framework.

My response to this was “due to the fine grain of the urban fabric within the kampung, most of the programs are residential with mixed-use commercial activity such as warung/ kiosk, and kos/ accommodation.” Each street is similar in a way that it holds a certain historical and environmental value of the kampung and that was what makes Kampung Luar Batang differs to any other kampung in Jakarta. Therefore, I believe that the framework can be applied just anywhere within the site itself.

week 6 informal feedback reflection Moving on to week 6, I came up with the concept for my thesis proposal that was influenced a lot by the site context.

Previously, I believed that the framework can be applied just anywhere within the site itself, however, after the weekly sessions with the supervisors, I am starting to believe that the framework should not be just like how it was. It should be different and groundbreaking.

Through research, I managed to work out 3 different sites of the framework and as I presented my ideas, I received very constructive feedback in terms of how I could potentially create something distinct about each of the framework sites, more than just looking at the context and create different scenarios for each of them.

I agreed that the project could be richer if I create a kit of parts that allow the locals to choose whether they want to develop their building with or without the help of the government, however, I do not think this framework is about the connection between buildings, but rather a connection with the surrounding context and people.

week 9 informal feedback reflection The feedback that I received for sketch design presentation was mainly on the pragmatics of the building and how it could be refined further. Since we had guest crits attending our presentation, I guess I realised the difficulty in introducing a culture to people that has never heard of my project. I guess this is something that I should think about for the final presentation and how to deliver that within the seven minutes.

One of the aspect that differs from how we see a contemporary mixeduse building is the spatial organisation going from public to private, not private to public - in this case where external circulation is needed to connect the public into the upper shared areas. I guess in contemporary living, it is not so ideal considering the pragmatics side of it.

By applying existing spatial organisation into the framework, it further results in the lack of lighting in the ground floor for the owners. In the coming week, I would like to investigate on how to mitigate this issue that derives from the dense urban setting.

In terms of the design aspect, I received a critical feedback on how I could utilise the facade and make it more beneficial for the inhabitants.

final reflection It’s finally over ...

From week 9 onwards, I feel like the time just flies so quickly and I realised that my design proposal has changed a lot since the last time I presented it in class. Throughout this period, I spent a lot of time figuring out how the design would work in all three sites. In week 9, I came up with a design that I was happy about, however, I realised that there were a lot of problems with it and it was impossible to implement the design on the other sites.

Week by week, I would bring up a new proposal to class and all of them were just not working. I decided to slow down and take a step back. And in week 12, I finally came up with an “actual design” (it was close, I know). I only had a week to figure out everything, including feedback from my supervisors - and I finally solved the problem.

Although there is always room for improvement, I know that I do not have the luxury to explore it further down and at this point, I believe that I just had to believe in myself, be strategic and spend my time wisely for the final presentation. It has been a long ride for me, however, if I have time in the future, I would like to go back and do the rest of the things I have not been able to do.

170

appendix

171

sketch/ concept design This chapter is dedicated to the design explorations that have been unable to make it to the final presentation.

Though the current proposal and the design explorations were completely different, all these attempts have driven the current proposal to where it is now.

These proposals were unsuccessful mainly due to the lack of adaptability across three sites upon the design development phase.

framework 01 submitted as part of Mid-Semester Conept Design Submission unrestricted view daylight from the South East

West residential

x

residential

surrounding context

market as a blending tool

scenario 1.0

South

North

form response

responding to surrounding context

massing studies

1. site boundary

2. extrude (max. 4 storeys)

3. push

4. Southern fenestrations

175

urb

an

pot

stre e

t in

N

5. massing analysis scenario 1.0

terfa

ce

ing l na

u mm

co

enti a

e ’s

n elli dw

farm

oom r r d-use e y pra mixe & n tio oda m om acc

l wa

run

g

c spa

ner

ow

g

R

Prayer Room/ Mushola Urban Farming

2

Shared Communal Space Accommodations

1

G

Shared Communal Space

Dwelling Extended Warung

exploded isometric

1 0

10 5

177

street interface

warung/ dwelling marketplace street

scenario 1.0

shared communal area for coworking/ warung activities

shared programs: 1 area = multiple functions

179

laundry area

flexible working/ warung space

scenario 1.0

rooftop space (urban farming)

181

scenario 1.0

183

scenario 1.0

185

isometric view

view from the street interface scenario 1.0

view through the facade 187

Del

---

---

PgUp

PgDn

*

3

6

.

-----

89

5

2 0

Home

1

4

Num Lock

Ins

7

Page Up

Pause Break

Powe r

Page Down End

Wa ke Up

Scroll Lock

Home Insert

Print Scr een Sys Rq

Delete

Sleep F12

Fn

Ctrl

Enter | \ '"

+ =

? /

[ __ _

F9

: ; > .

P ) 0

L < ,

T F

F4 F3 F2

W F1

Esc

~

` Tab

F1

F2

@ 2

!

1 Q

F3

# 3 W

F4

F5

% 56

$ 4 E

R

F6

& 7

^

T

Y

F7

F8

( 9

* 8 U

I

F9

F10

__ _

) 0 O

P

F11

+ = [

F12

Backspace Enter

]

Wa ke Up

Powe r

Print Screen Sys Rq

Scroll Lock

Pau se Break

Insert

Home

Page Up

Delete

End

Page Down

Sleep

Num Lock

7

-----

Esc

CtrlShift

Caps Loc k

Tab

`

~

!

1

Q

@ 2

AS

Alt

ZX

# 3

E

$ 4

D

R

CV

% 56

^

G

Y

F5

& 7

BNHJ

U

F6

* 8

I

M

F7

( 9

K

O

F8

Alt

F10

]

Shift

Backspace

End

---

F11

Enter

weekly design exercise

*

---

89 PgUp

Home

---

---

Caps Lock

AS

D ZX

CtrlShift

Alt

F CV

G

K BNHJ

M

: ;

L < ,

> .

Alt

'" ? /

| \ Shift

Fn

4

5

1

2

End

Ctrl

0 Ins

G

1

the layout is following a standard apartment building with corridors which are not ideal.

2

sketch plan (not to scale) scenario 1.0

R

6 3 PgDn

.

Del

Enter

slanted wall opening to allow daylight and ventilation

short section

difficulty in adapting similar roof form across three sites

long section

sections (not to scale) 189

framework 02 submitted as part of Sketch Design Submission

scenario 2.0

front & rear connection

public vs private function

unrestricted view

North

storage

x

mixed-use

surrounding context

South form response

191

massing studies

1. site boundary setback

2. extrude (max. 4 storeys)

3. push

4. form response

scenario 2.0

ing

rm n fa

a

urb

e

ac l sp una

m

com o

pot

acc

enti a

stre e

t in

l wa

ion

dat

o mm

dw er’s

g

n elli

run

own

g

terfa

ce

N

5. massing analysis scenario 2.0 193

weekly design exercise

isometric view

sketch plan (not to scale) scenario 2.0

quick section perspective render

quick section isometric render 195

weekly design exercise

Esc

Ctrl

Shift

Caps Loc k

Tab

`

!

1 Q

F1

A

@ 2

F2

# 3

S

WE

Alt

Z

X

F3

$ 4

D

R

C

F4

V

T

% 5

F

^ 6

G

F5

& 7

H

YU

B

F6

N

* 8

J

I

F7

M

( 9

K

F8

< ,

O

) 0

L

Alt

> .

P : ;

__ _

F9

[]

? /

" '

+ =

F10F

Paus e Break

Powe r

End

Page Down

Page Up

Scroll Loc k

Wake Up

Home

Insert

Delete

Sleep

F12

Print Scr een Sys Rq

Ctrl

Fn

Enter

Backspace

11

| \ Shift

----

9

*

2

5 3

6

0 Ins

Del

.

PgDn

4

PgUp

8

1

Home

7

Num Lock

End

---

---

Enter

Shift

!

1 Q

A

@ 2

Alt

Z

# 3

S

WE

1F

X

2F

$ 4

D C

RT

3F

4F

V

% 5

F

^ 6

G

5F

Y

B

& 7

H

6F

UI

N

* 8

J

7F

M

( 9

K

8F

< ,

O

) 0

L

Alt

> .

P

9F

: ;

__ _ []

? /

10

" '

+ =

| \

Ctrl

F12

Fn

Enter

Backspace

F11

Shift

Home

Scroll Loc k

Wa ke Up

Paus e Break

Powe r

Page Down

Page Up

Sleep

End

Insert

Print

Screen Sys Rq

Delete

----

9

*

2

5

3

6

0 Ins

Del

.

PgDn

4

PgUp

8

1

Home

7

Num Lock

End

---

---

Enter

sketch plan (not to scale)

R

2

~

EscF

Ctrl

Caps Loc k

Tab

`

---

~

scenario 2.0

1 G

---

the internal layout appears to be rigid and too tight

slanted wall opening to allow daylight and ventilation

short section

long section

section (not to scale) 197

framework 03 submitted as part of Sketch Design Submission

scenario 3.0

street engagement South

North site context

potential engagement with nearby accommodation through roof garden

unrestricted view

West accommodation x

residential

surrounding context

East

potential of retaining existing structure existing condition

continuous daylight throughout the floor

South

North form response

program arrangement

199

massing studies

1. site boundary setback

2. extrude (max. 4 storeys)

3. sculpting

4. form response

scenario 3.0

m

l una

com

stre et i n

e

c spa

er’s own lling e dw

terf

ace

N

5. massing analysis scenario 3.0 201

weekly design exercise

isometric view

sketch plan (not to scale) scenario 3.0

quick section perspective render

quick section isometric render

quick birds’ eye view render 203

~

` Esc

Ctrl

Shift

Caps Loc k

Tab

`

!

1 Q

F1

A

@ 2 W

Alt

Z

F2

# 3

S

E

X

F3

$ 4

D

R

C

F4

V

T

% 56

F

^

G

F5

Y

B

& 7

H

F6

U

N

* 8

J

I

F7

M

( 9

K

F8

< ,

O

) 0

Alt

L > .

P : ;

__ _

F9

[

? /

'"

+ =

F10

] | \

Scroll Lock

Wa ke Up

Paus e Break

Powe r

Page Down

Page Up

Home

End

Sleep

Delete

Inse rt

F12

Print Scr een Sys Rq

Ctrl

Fn

Enter

Backspace

F11

Shift

89

-----

3

6

0 Ins

Del

.

PgDn

2

5

PgUp

*

1

4

Home

7

Num Loc k

End

---

---

Enter

scenario 3.0

~

sketch plan (not to scale)

---

G

1

2

R

the internal layout appears to be rigid and too tight

1

Tab

!

F1

Caps

Q

Lock

@2 F2

# F3

4

Ctrl

A F4

$

WE

Shift

3 F5

% 5

S R

Z ^

F6

6

D

Alt

T

X F F7

&7

Y

C *

F8

8

G U

V 9

H (

I F9

B J )

0

K __ F10

O

N F11

P

M _ +

L [

, : F12

< =

;

>

]

. "

Alt

'

?

Sleep

/ |

\ Wake Up

Shift Insert Scroll Lock Power

Print Rq Screen Sys

Backspace Enter

Fn

Ctrl Home

Delete Pause Break

End

7

Page Down Num Lock

Page Up Home

8

4

*

1 ---

End

9 PgUp

5

0 6

2

Ins -

---

Esc

--

3 PgDn

.

Enter

Del

weekly design exercise

----

short section the space lacks of daylighting across floor levels

long section

section (not to scale) 205

Exhibition Poster (1782mmx841mm) 206

207

bibliography Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. 2021. “Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Masa PPKM Darurat: Hasil Survei Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Periode 13-20 Juli 2021”. ISBN:978-602-438427-2. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2021/08/02/29234b08faa4910dee5279af/perilakumasyarakat-pada-masa-ppkm-darurat--hasil-survei-perilaku-masyarakat--pada-masa-pandemi-covid19--periode-13-20-juli-2021.html.

Dovey, K. 2012. “Informal Urbanism and the Taste for Slums.” Tourism Geographies. p. 543-545. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2011.613944.

Drews, K. 2013. “A Brief History of Quarantine.” The Virginia Tech Undergraduate Historical Review 2. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21061/vtuhr.v2i0.16.

Eurostart Enterprises. 2021. “How to become a digital nomad?”. http://www.eurostartentreprises.com/ business-advice/item/64-how-to-become-a-digital-nomad.

Miharja, M., Salim, E., Nachrawi, G., Putranto, R. D., and Hendrawan, A. 2021. “Implementation of emergency public activity restrictions (PPKM) in accordance with human rights and Pancasila principles.”

Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 3: 6855-6866.

Puspitasari, P., Djunaedi, S., A., and Putra, H., S., A. 2011. “Ritual and space structure: Pilgrimage and space use in historical urban kampung context of Luar Batang (Jakarta, Indonesia)”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 36: 350-360.

Seidman, D., and Ahrendts, A. 2021. “Commentary: How the best leaders help companies build deeper connection in a work-from-home world”. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2021/04/02/moralleadership-human-connection-remote-work-from-home/.

Shirleyana, S., Hawken, S. and Sunindijo, R.Y. 2018. “City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia”, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 543-568. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0025.

Shuji, F., Ferianto, B. F., and Yamada, K. 2004. “Considerations on space formation and transformation of Kampung Luar Batang (Jakarta).” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 3, no. : 173-180.

Subroto, I., L. N/A. “Preservation of Kampung Luar Batang, Sunda Kelapa”, North Jakarta. University of Trisakti, Indonesia, 1-14. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.488.3937&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Sundawa, D., D. S. Logayah, and R. A. Hardiyanti. 2021. “New Normal in The Era of Pandemic Covid-19 in Forming Responsibility Social Life and Culture of Indonesian Society.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 747, no. 1, p. 012068. IOP Publishing. https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012068 Suryawati, Nany, and Adi, Christian Wahyu. 2021. “Quality Improvement Of Neighborhood And Public Facilities In Four Kampongs In Surabaya During The Covid-19 Outbreak.” India: Novateur Publication. 249-253. http://repositori.ukdc.ac.id/id/eprint/830.

208

Thompson, Beverly Yuen. 2019. “The digital nomad lifestyle:(remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community.” International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure 2, no. 1: 27-42.

Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., and Bends, T. 2020. “An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19.” European Journal of Information Systems, 29:4, 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417.

World Health Organization, “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19),” (WHO, 2022). https://www.who.int/healthtopics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1.

209

210

list of figures Fig 1. N/A, Last Studio KBBQ Celebration Night, 2022.

Fig 1. 1. Charensia Rompis, Pandemic Restriction Diagram, 2022.

Fig 1. 2. Charensia Rompis, Lifestyle during the pandemic, 2022.

Fig 1. 3. Charensia Rompis, Quarantine Strategy during Black Death, 2022.

Fig 1. 4. Charensia Rompis, Rank of qualities during remote working/ studying, 2022.

Fig 1. 5. Charensia Rompis, Advantages and disadvantages from remote working, 2022.

Fig 1. 6. Charensia Rompis, Challenges faced during remote working, 2022.

Fig 1. 7. Hami, A. E. and Sulistiobudi, R. E. , Remote working level of happiness, edited by Charensia Rompis, 2022.

Fig 1. 8. Charensia Rompis, Activities undertaken during the PPKM/ restriction period, 2022.

Fig 1. 9. Charensia Rompis, Reasons to go out during the pandemic, 2022.

Fig 1. 10. Charensia Rompis, Psychological emotions during the PPKM/ restriction period, 2022.

Fig 1. 11. Charensia Rompis, 3 Bed Fraser Place Apartment in Jakarta, 2022.

Fig 1. 12. Charensia Rompis, Rumah Miring in Jakarta by BPA, 2015.

Fig 1. 13. Charensia Rompis, Proyek Rumah Kost Benhil oleh Bral Architect di Bendungan Hilir Jakarta, 2015.

Fig 1. 14. Charensia Rompis, Joglo House, 2018.

Fig 1. 15. Charensia Rompis, Denpassar Residence in Jakarta, 2022.

Fig 1. 16. Charensia Rompis, Dancing House in Salatiga by BPA, 2015.

Fig 1. 17. Charensia Rompis, Illustration of a digital nomad, 2022.

Fig 1. 18. Charensia Rompis, Factors influencing digital nomads, 2022.

Fig 1. 19. Charensia Rompis, Best places for Digital Nomads, 2022.

Fig 1. 20. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working space in Hubud, 2022.

Fig 1. 21. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working & co-living space in Outpost, 2022.

Fig 1. 22. Charensia Rompis, Map of Indonesia, 2022.

Fig 1. 23. Charensia Rompis, Analysis of co-working space in Wellspaces, Jakarta, 2022.

Fig 1. 24. Charensia Rompis, Illustration of a co:working space, 2022.

Fig 1. 25. Charensia Rompis, Scenario of Rural vs Urban, 2022.

Fig 1. 26. Charensia Rompis, Characteristics of Kampung, 2022.

Fig 1. 27. Charensia Rompis, Surrounding Context of Kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

Fig 1. 28. Heuken SJA, Tempat-tempat Bersejarah di Jakarta, 1997.

Fig 1. 29. Indira Laksmi Subroto, The bridge to cross from the fish market, n.a.

Fig 1. 30. Charensia Rompis, Activity Collage of Kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

Fig 1. 31. Charensia Rompis, Aerial Plan, 2022.

Fig 1. 32. Charensia Rompis, Research findings in Kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

Fig 1. 33. Charensia Rompis, Typical housing arrangement in Kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

Fig 1. 34. Google Maps, Virtual Site Visit, 2022.

Fig 1. 35. Google Maps, Virtual Site Visit, 2022.

Fig 1. 36. Indira Laksmi Subroto, Sketches of the Existing Traditional Houses in kampung Luar Batang, 2022.

Fig 1. 37. Indira Laksmi Subroto, Various Plans of the Traditional Houses of the Betawi people, 2022. edited by Charensia Rompis, 2022.

Fig 1. 38. Charensia Rompis, Demolition area in Fish Market (now kampung akuarium), 2022.

Fig 1. 39. Daniel Caesar Pratama, the new vertical kampung Akuarium, 2021.

Fig 1. 40. Charensia Rompis, Made in Tokyo Cover Page, 2022.

Fig 1. 41. Charensia Rompis, Delirious New York Cover Page, 2022.

Fig 1. 42. Charensia Rompis, analysis on Green School, Bali, 2022.

Fig 1. 43. Charensia Rompis, analysis on Kampung Admiralty, Singapore, 2022.

211

Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning Melbourne School of Design The University of Melbourne 212