The future of finance

Page 1

p27-30 Tech_Stath_FM JulAug05v3

9/6/05

3:11 pm

Page 27

TECHNICAL MATTERS The future of finance

This month The future of finance Professional development Intellectual capital

p27 p32 p35

Stathis Gould and Martin Fahy propose a business partnering model that, they believe, will allow the function to deliver high-quality decision-support services.

In almost every piece of research – and rhetoric – on the future of finance “effective business partnering” is rated as the function’s most important aspiration. Despite that, only a few high-performing firms are successfully redefining finance’s role to meet the decision-support needs of senior executives. Many CFOs are struggling to achieve this while reducing the total cost of the function (without exposing their organisations to compliance risk) at the same time. As the pie chart shows, transaction processing, stewardship and control still take up the bulk of finance’s time. The first finance transformations in many firms were intended to deliver efficiency through a combination of new structures such as shared-services centres, technologies such as ERP, and re-engineering and standardisation. If finance is to advance, it must go beyond systems and processes and focus on the customers – executives, managers, front-line staff and external stakeholders – who expect meaningful information for decision-making. By understanding its customers’ needs the function can further deliver decision support. The diagram on page 28 shows a customer-driven service delivery framework for finance. It demonstrates how finance must consider all its markets, from providers of capital, banks and suppliers, to internal functions such as marketing, operations and HR, to the board and management. Finance’s performance should be measured by the value it delivers to its customers. Their needs will define not only what finance offers but also how it delivers – for example, through sharedservices centres or outsourced providers for processing transactions; finance professionals in business units, or external consultants for strategic decision support;

or specialist teams in corporate centres for treasury and tax management. Web-enabled self-service is increasingly popular since it enables customers to complete transactions and, after training, use analytical applications. The last element in the framework is infrastructure in terms of systems (eg, ERP), processes (eg, global purchase to pay) and structures (eg, regional).The key questions finance should consider are: ■ Who are our customers? ■ Do we need to help clarify their key decision requirements? ■ What are their decision support/ transaction processing/control and assurance requirements? ■ What services do they need from us? ■ What delivery channels should we use? ■ What infrastructure is needed in terms of processes, systems and people? ■ What is our finance operating strategy and how do we price/ prioritise the services we offer? ■ What risks are associated with different delivery models? Meeting customers’ needs is a twostage process. Stage one is deploying the financial systems, structures and processes that provide the platform for stage two, which is a business partnering model for delivering high-quality decision support. We call this commercial finance. Discussions and benchmarking at the CIMA SEM network forum, which involves major organisations in different

ALLOCATION OF FINANCE STAFF TIME

■ Transaction processing ■ Risk management ■ Decision support ■ Function management Source: Hackett Group (https://portal. thehackettgroup.com)

sectors, have shown that cutting finance’s operating costs requires discipline and a focus on decluttering the function’s agenda. Key trends include: ■ Shared-services centres are an established part of the finance architecture and companies are increasing their scope and flexibility. ■ Firms are focusing on improving productivity and cutting costs via consolidation in pan-regional centres. ■ Single-instance ERP remains elusive, or uneconomic in some cases, but operating units across borders requires common processes and systems to ensure standardisation and simplicity. ■ Workflow and e-enabled processes are emerging as standard, but “lightsout” processing is some way off. ■ Global strategies for shared services have led to cost savings of up to 50 per cent, but these have typically taken over five years to materialise. Previous debates on the future of the function didn’t define a service delivery model for commercial finance. Neither did they help organisations to answer the key question of what high-quality business partnering actually looks like. Few firms have clarified their vision of finance for the future and sold it to the board and the organisation. One that has done is a leading pharmaceutical firm, which has produced the following vision for improving the way its finance function supports decisions and participates in management: “To create competitive advantage by supplying management with forward-looking, timely, high-quality and value-adding financial and controlling support, we will strive and prove to be an invaluable partner in shaping the strategy and persistently challenging operational excellence.” FIN A NCIA L July/August 2005 M A N A GEM EN T

27


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.