Proposed Capital Improvement Plan by City of Greenville, South Carolina

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PROPOSED

FISCAL

YEARS

2013 2017

City of Greenville, South Carolina Proposed Capital Improvement Program FY 2013-2017

Knox H. White Mayor Amy Ryberg Doyle Council Member (District 1) Lillian Brock Flemming Council Member (District 2) Jil M. Littlejohn Council Member (District 3) J. David Sudduth Council Member (District 4) Susan Reynolds Council Member (At Large) Gaye G. Sprague Council Member (At Large) John F. Castile City Manager

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Table of Contents

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 2013-2017 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Transmittal ........................................................................................................................ A-1 Transmittal Letter ................................................................................................................ A-3 Summary Schedules ............................................................................................................. B-1 Schedule I – Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary ............................................................... B-3 Schedule I-A – Project Summary with Project Balances as of January 31, 2012 ...................................... B-4 Schedule II – Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources ...................................................... B-7 Schedule III – Project Summaries by Funding Source ...................................................................... B-14 Schedule IV – Summary of Additional Operating Impact – Operating Costs ........................................... B-18 Schedule IV - Summary of Additional Operating Impact – Personnel ................................................... B-18 Schedule V – Unfunded Projects .............................................................................................. B-19 Schedule VI – Strategic Goal Implementation .............................................................................. B-20 Schedule VII – Comprehensive Plan Implementation ...................................................................... B-21 Project Descriptions Roads and Bridges ................................................................................................................ New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program (NSTEP) ................................................................. Street Resurfacing ........................................................................................................... Fairforest Way Rehabilitation ............................................................................................. Bike Lane Program .......................................................................................................... Salters Road Improvements ................................................................................................ Main Street Resurfacing .................................................................................................... Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection ...........................................................................

C-1 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9

Streetscapes ....................................................................................................................... D-1 Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements ....................................................................................... D-3 East McBee Avenue Improvements ....................................................................................... D-4 Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements .............................................................................. D-5 Brown Street Improvements ............................................................................................... D-6 Cultural Corridor ............................................................................................................ D-7 Village of West Greenville Improvements ............................................................................... D-8 Augusta Street Improvements ............................................................................................. D-9 North Main Street Improvements ........................................................................................ D-10 Washington Street Improvements ....................................................................................... D-11 Wastewater .................................................................................................................... E-1 Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation ..................................................................... E-3 Wastewater System Rehabilitation ........................................................................................ E-4 Wastewater System Survey and Model .................................................................................... E-5 Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................... E-6 Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation.............................................................................................. E-7 Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase III ............................................................................. E-8 Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase IV............................................................................. E-9 Stormwater ......................................................................................................................... F-1 Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings ......................................................................... F-3 Henderson Basin .............................................................................................................. F-4 Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings........................................................................................... F-5 Westview Avenue ............................................................................................................. F-6 Pettigru Street Improvements.............................................................................................. F-7 Fairforest Way Basin ......................................................................................................... F-8 White Oak Basin Phase II .................................................................................................... F-9 Table of Contents

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations ....................................................................... F-10 Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation ............................................................................. F-11 Swanson Court .............................................................................................................. F-12 Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan ............................................................................ F-13 Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements ................................................................ F-14 Hilly Street Drainage Improvements .................................................................................... F-15 Parks and Recreation ............................................................................................................ G-1 Community Center Building Improvements ............................................................................. G-3 Riverwalk to Greenville Tech ............................................................................................. G-4 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation .......................................................................................... G-5 Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access ..................................................................... G-6 Reedy River Regional Park ................................................................................................. G-7 Reedy River Trail Expansion ............................................................................................... G-8 Park Restrooms .............................................................................................................. G-9 River Street Underpass .................................................................................................... G-10 Heritage Green Master Plan .............................................................................................. G-11 Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization ....................................................................................... G-12 McPherson Park Bridges ................................................................................................... G-13 Cancer Survivors Park ...................................................................................................... G-14 NEXT Trail Connector ...................................................................................................... G-15 Falls Park Improvements .................................................................................................. G-16 Economic Development ......................................................................................................... H-1 Piazza Bergamo .............................................................................................................. H-3 TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit ................................................................................. H-4 Commercial Corridors....................................................................................................... H-5 West End Property Acquisition ............................................................................................ H-6 Peace Center ................................................................................................................. H-7 Hyatt Public Improvements ................................................................................................ H-8 RiverPlace Upgrades ........................................................................................................ H-9 Bookends Phase II .......................................................................................................... H-10 TD Convention Center Chiller Plant ..................................................................................... H-11 Neighborhood Revitalization .................................................................................................... I-1 Haynie-Sirrine ................................................................................................................. I-3 Green Avenue Improvements Phase II .................................................................................... I-4 Mt. Eustis Street Improvements ........................................................................................... I-5 Public Safety ....................................................................................................................... J-1 East Area Fire Station ....................................................................................................... J-3 Police Training Facility and Pistol Range................................................................................. J-4 Fire Facilities Assessment ................................................................................................... J-5 Parking ............................................................................................................................. Church Street Garage ....................................................................................................... Liberty Square Garage ...................................................................................................... Richardson Street Garage ..................................................................................................

K-1 K-3 K-4 K-5

General Government .............................................................................................................. L-1 City Hall Exterior ............................................................................................................. L-3 Phone System Replacement ................................................................................................ L-4 Public Works Operations Center ........................................................................................... L-5 Public Works Radio System ................................................................................................. L-6 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... M-1 Projection of Legal Debt Margin .......................................................................................... M-3 Table of Contents

TRANSMITTAL

Capital investment continues to renew and improve the City of Greenville. The FY 20132017 Capital Improvement Program continues the commitment to a healthy and vibrant City by investing in infrastructure, development opportunities, and community facilities.

Transmittal

A-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

March 1, 2012 The Honorable Knox H. White, Mayor Members of City Council Dear Mayor White and City Council Members: The Proposed FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is presented for your review and includes the proposed capital budget of $22,817,000 for FY 2012-13. The Capital Improvement Program is a five-year fiscal planning instrument that is used to identify needed capital projects and to identify the financing and timing required for those projects. Generally, these projects exceed $100,000 in cost and require long-term financing. The capital budget is proposed annually, encompassing appropriations for the projects scheduled for the first year of the plan, and authorizing any bond issues necessary to fund these improvements. The next four years are considered planning years and are subject to annual appropriation. We used the projections developed from the Five-Year Forecast presented to City Council during its annual retreat, and the funding structure of the CIP has been shaped by the availability of funds projected within the Five-Year Forecast. City Council Priorities The proposed CIP significantly advances several of the City Council’s priorities as established in its 2011 and 2012 retreats. The investments in public infrastructure proposed are directly aligned to many objectives including: Gateway Commercial Districts: Over the five-year duration of the CIP, the Commercial Corridors project will receive $300,000. In addition, funding is provided for the Haywood/Woods Crossing Intersection ($194,000) and streetscaping on Augusta Street between Lupo and Capers ($175,000). These two projects are being done in conjunction with the utility undergrounding and relocation projects. While utility underground and relocation projects are not budgeted in the CIP, approximately $1,200,000 will be invested on Haywood Road and Augusta Street relocating power lines. Create Housing Opportunities: Over FY 2012-13 and 2013-14, the CIP fully funds the final two phases of the Mt. Eustis Street Improvements project to provide infrastructure in support of a 20-unit development in the Greenline-Spartanburg Street neighborhood. Infrastructure: The CIP makes a committed effort to preserve, upgrade, and augment its existing infrastructure network. This includes in FY 2012-13: •

Restoring funding for the NSTEP program in FY 2012-13 ($350,000) and increasing it to $500,000 in future years.

•

Providing $150,000 for the C Funds Committee matching program for FY 2012-13 and then increasing the resurfacing budget to $500,000 in future years. In addition, $370,000 is included to resurface Main Street in FY 2012-13.

•

Expanding the City’s rehabilitation of its wastewater system, a result of the Council’s Wastewater Study Committee. Over the next five years, $10,760,000 in wastewater improvements are proposed.

Transmittal

A-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP •

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Reducing flooding and improving water quality through stormwater projects throughout the City totaling $5,195,000 over the next five years.

Reedy River: The CIP advances the Council’s commitment to improve public access to the Reedy River. This includes: •

Acquiring and preparing a new site in anticipation of eventually relocating Public Works away from its present location at a budget of $3,100,000.

•

Completing the Swamp Rabbit Trail from Pleasantburg Drive to I-85 ($2,375,000) and adding access to the trail from Church Street through the NEXT Trail Connector project ($681,000).

•

Providing a contribution to Cancer Survivors Park ($724,000) to improve the segment of the river between Falls Park and Cleveland Park.

•

Providing a contribution for improvements on the south end of Falls Park ($608,000).

Fire Station: Funding is included to construct the East Area Fire Station in FY 2012-13 and begin operations in FY 2013-14. As has been previously discussed with City Council, this may necessitate a millage increase in FY 2013-14 to accommodate the increased debt service and operating costs. Leadership Team Review and Ranking A Leadership Team committee reviewed all projects requesting new funding. They were asked to evaluate projects based on how they met the criteria below. Does the project: • Mitigate Risk to Public Safety or Health? • Improve Deteriorated Infrastructure? • Replace Existing Infrastructure Systematically? • Improve Operational Efficiency? • Coordinate with Other Projects and Requirements? • Provide Equitable Services and Facilities? • Protect and Conserve Resources? • Provide New or Substantially Expanded Facilities? • Promote Economic Development? After reviewing and discussing the project, they grouped each project into one of the following four categories: •

Group A: Special priority projects and efforts should be made to find sufficient funding for all projects in this group.

•

Group B: Projects that should be done as funding becomes available.

•

Group C: Projects to be considered if funding is available; may be deferred to a subsequent year.

•

Group D: Desirable, but not essential projects.

These rankings were presented to you during your retreat in February. Using the rankings and your feedback, the Office of Management and Budget sought to fund projects based on the rankings. However, there may be instances where a lower ranked project received funding above a higher ranked project. This is largely due to either pre-existing commitments or the availability of funding. For example, a Group C project with a contractual development agreement commitment may be funded over a Group B project. Similarly, should a project be eligible for restricted funding (i.e. Hospitality Tax), it may have been funded over a project ineligible for restricted funds.

Transmittal

A-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Major Points of Interest - Revenues • The capital budget for the FY 2012-13 is $22,817,000. •

The CIP calls for nine debt issuances over the five-year period. o

FY 2012-13: The CIP includes a $3,881,000 General Obligation Bond issuance to construct the East Area Fire Station, a $3,100,000 Stormwater Revenue Bond to acquire and prepare a site for the eventual relocation of Public Works, a $2,695,000 Sanitary Sewer Revenue bond for wastewater improvements, a $2,375,000 Hospitality Tax Bond to construct additional improvements on the Swamp Rabbit Trail, a $1,989,000 West End Tax Increment Bond to rehabilitate Rhett Street and Camperdown Way, and a $475,000 lease purchase to acquire a new telephone system.

FY 2013-14: The CIP includes a $4,000,000 loan from the State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund to finance Basins 7 and 15 wastewater improvements.

FY 2015-16: The CIP includes a $2,000,000 loan from the State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund to finance Phase III Wastewater Improvements.

FY 2016-17: The CIP includes a $2,000,000 loan from the State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund to finance Phase IV Wastewater Improvements.

•

A General Fund Transfer of $1,125,000 is included for FY 2012-13; and $1,195,000 is allocated in FY 2013-14, and $1,045,000 is allocated in FY 2014-15 through FY 2016-17.

•

Funding from the Capital Projects Fund is provided in FY 2012-13 through FY 2016-17. This is subject to actual interest earnings in the fund, based on current yields and unspent project balances. We anticipate $441,000 available in unreserved balance in FY 2012-13 and project approximately $250,000 to be available thereafter.

•

The Stormwater Fund contributes $2,620,000 to the FY 2012-13 capital budget for various water quality and control projects.

•

The Wastewater Fund provides $1,329,000 in FY 2012-13. In order to provide funding for future capital improvements and debt service, the CIP assumes 5% rate increases in FY 2013-14 to FY 2015-16, and inflationary rate increases thereafter.

•

The City’s Tax Increment Finance Districts in the Central Business District (known as the Downtown Infrastructure Fund) and Viola Street contribute $3,255,000 and $203,000 respectively in FY 2012-13 capital budget.

•

The Hospitality Tax Fund contributes $1,305,000 in FY 2012-13 for various tourism and park and recreation projects. Unspent proceeds from the 2011 Hospitality Tax bond are also repurposed in FY 2012-13 for improvements at the TD Convention Center.

•

The sale of portions of the Piazza Bergamo site contributes $152,000 in FY 2012-13.

•

The Solid Waste Enterprise Fund contributes $106,000 for the Public Works Radio System project.

•

FY 2013-14 through FY 2016-17 of the CIP are planned based on revenues projected in the Five-Year Financial Forecast. Assumptions regarding economic conditions could change in upcoming years and may mean the City could realize more or less revenue than forecasted. As a result, projects scheduled could be adjusted based on forecasted revenues. Please note that the Five-Year Financial Forecast and the CIP are living documents that are subject to change based on economic conditions and changing priorities.

Transmittal

A-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Major Points of Interest – Projects In FY 2012-13, the City of Greenville will appropriate $22,817,000 for projects encompassing areas such as roads and bridges, streetscapes, wastewater, stormwater, parks and recreation, economic development, neighborhood revitalization, public safety, parking, and general government. The following section details projects funded in the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program. Roads and Bridges • FY 2012-13 funding totaling $520,000 is dedicated to street resurfacing and road rehabilitation projects. This includes $150,000 for Street Resurfacing to match a dollar-for-dollar resurfacing match from the Greenville County Legislative Delegation Transportation Committee, and $370,000 to resurface Main Street. •

Due to budgetary constraints, new funding for the Bike Lane Program and NSTEP are set at reduced levels of $25,000 and $350,000, respectively.

•

Other road improvements include $194,000 in FY 2012-13 for the Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection. In addition, funding is included in FY 2012-13 and FY 2013-14 for the City’s match for the first phase of Salters Road Improvements.

Streetscapes • In FY 2012-13, funding of $1,989,000 is included for the next phases of the Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements. In future years, funding has been provided to implement a phased rehabilitation of Rhett Street from River Street to Markley Street. •

Funding to begin implementing the Streetscape Master Plan is proposed including $203,000 to streetscape Main Street between Academy Street and Stone Avenue, $200,000 to design a portion of the Cultural Corridor, $500,000 to design and implement improvements to Washington Street.

•

Funding is also included in FY 2012-13 to support economic development efforts in the Village of West Greenville ($100,000) and Augusta Street ($175,000).

Wastewater • Funding is included to implement the recommendations of the Wastewater Study Committee including $1,300,000 for the Wastewater System Rehabilitation project, $200,000 for the Wastewater System Survey and Model, $250,000 to design Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation, and $250,000 to design Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation. Stormwater • Projects scheduled for funding in FY 2012-13 include curb and gutter improvements in Gower Estates ($1,845,000) and Swanson Court ($284,000). •

The White Oak Basin Phase II project includes $150,000 in FY 2012-13 for property acquisition to reduce flooding in the residential areas adjoining Bob Jones University.

•

In order to comply with environmental regulations, $116,000 is included in FY 2012-13 to install water quality improvement equipment at the Public Works Complex.

•

As improvements to address flooding concerns along Richland Creek are completed, funding of $150,000 is included to begin the Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan to identify and eventually implement water quality measures for that basin.

Parks and Recreation • Funding is included to continue the development of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Funding in FY 12-13 includes $2,375,000 in the Reedy River Trail Expansion project to extend it from Pleasantburg Drive to I-85, $94,000 to support Cancer Survivors Park, and $75,000 to design a connection from the NEXT building to the trail.

Transmittal

A-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

•

Funding from the Downtown Infrastructure Fund will be appropriated for the replacement of Main Street’s trees. Funding in FY 2012-13 to FY 2016-17 is $150,000 annually.

•

Funding of $608,000 is included for improvements on the south end of Falls Park.

•

Funding of $400,000 is included in FY 2012-13 for the Community Centers Building Improvements project for work at the David Hellams Community Center.

•

Funding of $218,000 is included in FY 2012-13 to replace the restrooms at Cleveland Park. Funding is including in future years to replace restrooms at Timmons Park, Mayberry Park, and Gower Park.

•

Funding of $400,000 is included in FY 2012-13 to provide bank stabilization on the Reedy River within Cleveland Park.

•

Funding of $15,000 is included in FY 2012-13 to design rehabilitation of the three bridges in McPherson Park.

Economic Development • Additional funding of $152,000 is included in FY 2012-13 for Piazza Bergamo’s redevelopment in conjunction with the Project ONE development. This is associated with elevators upgrades at the Richardson Street Garage. •

Funding of $500,000 is included for public plaza improvements associated with the renovation of the Hyatt.

•

Funding of $225,000 is included in FY 2012-13 for improvements to the kitchen at the TD Convention Center.

•

An allocation of $100,000 is made in FY 2012-13 for continued efforts to revitalize the City’s commercial corridors.

Neighborhood Revitalization • Funding is included in FY 2012-13 and FY 2013-14 to complete the final two phases of the Mount Eustis Street Improvements project. Please note the budget reflects a reduction of $580,000 for a federal grant that was anticipated, but will not be received. •

The Green Avenue Improvements Phase II budget has been reduced and redirected to other priorities. This reflects the actual cost of improvements being made to the neighborhood as proposed in the master plan.

Public Safety • The East Area Fire Station is proposed to be constructed in FY 2012-13 at a cost of $3,881,000. •

In addition, $70,000 is included in FY 2012-13 to provide a facilities evaluation of the City’s four oldest fire stations. It is anticipated that future capital projects will be proposed as a result of the assessment.

Parking • In FY 2012-13, $1,520,000 is recommended to rehabilitate and modernize the Liberty Square and the Richardson Street garages. General Government • Funding of $3,100,000 is included to acquire and prepare a site for the eventual relocation of Public Works. In future years, it is likely that additional CIP requests will be made to construct facilities to facilitate the relocation away from Hudson Street. Transmittal

A-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

•

City of Greenville, South Carolina

In FY 2012-13, $475,000 is include to replace the City’s phone system and $321,000 to replace the City’s radio system for Public Works and Parks and Recreation.

Document Format The following information is contained in this document: •

CIP Schedule I is a summary schedule by major revenue source and project category.

•

CIP Schedule I-A is a summary schedule of projects. The first column (Committed Funding) represents the amount of committed funding that has been appropriated to each project in prior years. The second column (Remaining Funding) represents the available balance in each project as of January 31, 2012. The third column (FY 12/13 Capital Budget) is the FY 2012-2013 capital budget. The next four columns are “planning years” only, and are subject to formal appropriation. The final column (Total) represents the total project costs. This total is calculated by adding committed funding and FY 201213 through FY 2016-2017 funding. The available balance column is included for informational purposes only.

•

CIP Schedule II lists projects by applicable funding sources. Columns are the same as in CIP Schedule I, with the exclusion of the available balance column.

•

CIP Schedule III lists projects by funding sources and then by project. Schedules I and II.

•

CIP Schedule IV summarizes the projected additional operating and personnel impact for projects included in this CIP. This is subject to the availability of funds in the Annual Operating Budget process.

•

Just as important as what this CIP includes is what it does not include. Schedule V lists all the projects that were not included in this CIP along with their requested funding levels. Projects that are not funded could be funded in future years should unanticipated revenues be realized or if grants are received from federal or state agencies.

•

Schedules VI and VII show how the CIP implements the City’s Strategic Goals and Comprehensive Plan.

•

Project description sheets follow the seven schedules. These sheets show the projects and their funding sources in greater detail, with a brief description of each project.

•

Included in the Appendix is a projection of legal debt margin.

Schedule III reconciles to

Conclusion In closing, the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program addresses a number of the City Council’s priorities, while balancing those needs with available revenues. The City will continue to search for grants and other non-local revenue sources to finance projects while planning for future capital needs. We believe the CIP provides significant improvements throughout the City in a variety of areas. These improvements support ongoing economic development and continue to offer the high quality of life expected from the City of Greenville. Sincerely,

John F. Castile City Manager

Transmittal

A-8

SUMMARY SCHEDULES

The FY 2013-2017 CIP continues investments made on the Reedy River that enhance and protect it for public use.

Summary Schedules

B-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Schedules

B-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE I Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary

Projects Funded

$25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000

911233

$22,817,000

$10,000,000

$4,586,000

$5,000,000 $0

541205 $3,645,000 500000

$3,425,000

2520000

$10,139,000 FY 12/13

FY 13/14 FY 12/13 CAPITAL BUDGET

FY 14/15

200000 FY 16/17 0

FY 15/16

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

TOTAL FY 16/17 FY 2013-2017

REVENUES Admissions Tax Fund

Capital Projects Fund Downtown Infrastructure Fund

200,000

367,000

299,000

225,000

165,000

385,000

1,441,000

3,255,000

270,000

150,000

3,975,000

(580,000)

Federal Grants

1,125,000

General Fund Transfer

0 1,195,000

0 1,045,000

(580,000) 5,455,000

General Obligation Bonds

3,881,000

Hospitality Tax Bonds

2,490,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

2,663,000

1,305,000

1,036,000

322,000

Installment Lease Purchase Agreement

475,000

Property Sales

152,000

152,000 2,695,000

2,695,000

106,000

(1,695,000)

4,000,000

2,000,000

6,305,000

Stormwater Fund

2,620,000

1,433,000

1,250,000

5,303,000

Stormwater Revenue Bonds

3,100,000

200,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds Solid Waste Enterprise Fund State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund

203,000

Wastewater Fund

1,329,000

358,000

315,000

65,000

2,132,000

West End Tax Increment Bonds

1,989,000

1,348,000

1,079,000

2,427,000

22,817,000

10,139,000

4,586,000

3,425,000

3,645,000

44,612,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL REVENUES

PROJECTS 1,289,000

1,195,000

1,045,000

5,619,000

Streetscapes

3,167,000

1,348,000

1,279,000

5,794,000

Wastewater

2,000,000

4,315,000

315,000

2,065,000

10,760,000

Stormwater

2,545,000

1,400,000

1,250,000

5,195,000

Parks and Recreation

4,241,000

1,506,000

275,000

315,000

535,000

6,872,000

977,000

100,000

422,000

1,499,000

(494,000)

3,951,000

Roads and Bridges

Economic Development Neighborhood Revitalization

(769,000)

Public Safety

3,951,000

275,000 0

Parking

1,520,000

General Government

3,896,000

22,817,000

10,139,000

4,586,000

3,425,000

3,645,000

44,612,000

912,118

1,585,052

1,634,466

1,676,385

6,816,260

TOTAL PROJECTS ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT

Summary Sheets

1,008,239

B-3

Summary Sheets 4,130,000

Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase IV

SUBTOTAL, WASTEWATER

0 0

Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation

0 0

Wastewater System Survey and Model

Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase III

4,130,000

2,069,067

Wastewater System Rehabilitation

Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation

SUBTOTAL, STREETSCAPES

0 0 65,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 250,000 0 4,315,000

0 1,300,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 2,000,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 3,737,198

1,348,000

3,167,000

1,628,103 3,737,198

0 0

203,000 500,000

0 0

North Main Street Improvements

Washington Street Improvements

0 0

100,000 175,000

0 0

Village of West Greenville

Augusta Street Improvements 0

0 0

0 200,000

Cultural Corridor

1,348,000

1,989,000

1,190,480 148,015

300,000

Brown Street Improvements

0 0

150,000 139,608

1,195,000

1,289,000

6,888,271

1,294,400

150,000 324,667

Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements

East McBee Avenue Improvements

Rhett Street Improvements

15,435,021

SUBTOTAL, ROADS AND BRIDGES

0 0

370,000 194,000

0 0

Main Street Resurfacing

Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection

150,000

200,000

10,760

71,875

Salters Road Improvements 0

0 45,000

115,000

25,000

Bike Lane Program

31,909

6,938,125

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation

500,000 500,000

350,000 150,000

2,790

FY 13/14

BUDGET

CAPITAL

FY 12/13

505,089

BALANCE

AVAILABLE

6,337,723

5,951,021 2,359,000

NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program)

FUNDING

Street Resurfacing

PROJECT

COM M ITTED

315,000

250,000

65,000

1,279,000

1,045,000

45,000

500,000

FY 14/15

2,065,000

2,000,000

65,000

1,045,000

45,000

500,000

FY 15/16

45,000

500,000

FY 16/17

2,065,000

2,000,000

65,000

1,045,000

**********Planning Years Only**********

Project Summary with Project Balances as of January 31, 2012

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA SCHEDULE I-A

14,890,000

2,250,000

460,000

1,300,000

4,130,000

7,863,067

500,000

203,000

175,000

100,000

200,000

300,000

5,910,400

324,667

150,000

21,054,021

194,000

370,000

421,875

320,000

6,938,125

4,509,000

8,301,021

TOTAL

FY 2013-2017 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

B-4

Summary Sheets

Community Center Building Improvements

0 0 150,000 0 0

0 150,000 0 0

17,227 101,022 168,958

SUBTOTAL, PARKS AND RECREATION

8,591,886

606,000 0 1,506,000

75,000 608,000 4,241,000

0 1,844,949

0 0

NEXT Trail Connector

Falls Park Improvements

120,000 630,000

15,000 94,000

0 0

400,000

250,000

McPherson Park Bridges

250,000

0 0

(40,000) (54,000)

40,000 54,000

Cancer Survivors Park

Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization

40,000 54,000

Swamp Rabbit Trail Bridge at Cleveland Street

Swamp Rabbit Trailheads

0 0

265,000 150,000

River Street Underpass

Heritage Green Master Plan

5,276

218,000

235,039

0 0

2,375,000

188,789

1,240,000

Reedy River Trail Expansion

Park Restrooms

140,858

675,000

Reedy River Regional Park 380,000

788,168 802,818

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation

990,000

400,000

2,545,000

3,330,317

(2,044)

1,400,000

645,824

0 300,000

116,000

0 0

2,956,900

Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access

Riverwalk to Greenville Tech

7,529,876

0 0

Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements

Hilly Street Drainage Improvements

SUBTOTAL, STORMWATER

0 0

Swanson Court

1,845,000

45,000

Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan

Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements 300,000

989,902 150,000

150,000

1,045,000

White Oak Basin Phase II

Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations 284,000

0 0

150,000

10,150

150,000

0 0

395,963

395,963 200,000

Pettigru Street Improvements

Fairforest Way Basin

800,000

0 0

FY 13/14

13,440

BUDGET

CAPITAL

FY 12/13

1,125,527

BALANCE

AVAILABLE

600,335

0 623,825

Westview Avenue

Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings

1,420,591 3,649,497

Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs

FUNDING

Henderson Basin

PROJECT

COM M ITTED

275,000

125,000

150,000

1,250,000

400,000

850,000

FY 14/15

315,000

165,000

150,000

FY 15/16

**********Planning Years Only**********

535,000

385,000

150,000

FY 16/17

15,463,886

608,000

681,000

724,000

135,000

650,000

150,000

265,000

1,273,000

3,615,000

675,000

802,818

1,538,168

2,956,900

1,390,000

12,724,876

700,000

116,000

1,300,000

284,000

1,890,000

150,000

1,195,000

200,000

395,963

623,825

800,000

3,649,497

1,420,591

TOTAL

FY 2013-2017 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

B-5

Summary Sheets 0

Richardson Street Garage

54,907,546

242,000

3,896,000 119,298

22,817,000 10,139,000

321,000

0 0

30,515,791

0 0

3,100,000

NOTE: Available balance calculated by taking the budget authority less expenditures, less current encumbrances.

TOTAL, ALL PROJECTS

SUBTOTAL, GENERAL GOVERNMENT

0 0

Public Works Operations Center

Public Works Radio System

0 0

0 475,000

119,298

242,000 0

0 0

655,000 1,520,000

0 510,510

557,000

Phone System Replacement

City Hall Exterior

SUBTOTAL, PARKING

557,000

Church Street Garage

Liberty Square Garage

3,951,000

176,732

368,000

SUBTOTAL, PUBLIC SAFETY

865,000

70,000

Fire Facilities Assessment

510,510

0 0

3,881,000

75,000 101,732

75,000

East Area Fire Station

Police Training Facility and Pistol Range

293,000

275,000 275,000

(448,000) (769,000)

930,955 1,376,324

1,279,372

SUBTOTAL, NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

3,793,683

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements

0 0

0 (321,000)

82,945

764,308 1,750,003

362,424

100,000

977,000

10,904,089

12,191,013

Green Avenue Improvements Phase II

Haynie-Sirrine

SUBTOTAL, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

0 0

150,000

TD Convention Center Chiller Replacement

Bookends Phase II

0 0

500,000

296,847 470,000

Hyatt Public Improvements

0 0

2,500,000

100,000

375,333 2,500,000

0 0

152,000 225,000

FY 13/14

4,761,909

BUDGET

CAPITAL

FY 12/13 BALANCE

AVAILABLE

RiverPlace Upgrades

2,500,000 2,500,000

West End Property Acquisition

515,516

5,758,650

FUNDING

Peace Center

Commercial Corridors

TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit

Piazza Bergamo

PROJECT

COM M ITTED

4,586,000

422,000

322,000

100,000

FY 14/15

3,425,000

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

3,645,000

**********Planning Years Only**********

99,519,546

4,138,000

321,000

3,100,000

475,000

242,000

2,077,000

655,000

865,000

557,000

4,319,000

70,000

293,000

3,956,000

3,299,683

1,106,372

1,429,003

764,308

13,690,013

322,000

150,000

470,000

796,847

2,500,000

815,516

225,000

5,910,650

TOTAL

FY 2013-2017 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

B-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE II Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources FY 12/13 Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

ROADS AND BRIDGES NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) State "C" Funds Greenville County General Fund Transfer

525,000

48,671

525,000 48,671

4,350,000

350,000

500,000

6,700,000

General Obligation Bond - 2001

500,000

Stormwater Fund

177,350

General Obligation Bond - 2006 Totals

350,000

5,951,021

350,000

500,000

8,301,021

Street Resurfacing 354,000

354,000

General Fund Transfer

2,005,000

150,000

500,000

4,155,000

Totals

2,359,000

150,000

500,000

4,509,000 5,600,000

Capital Projects Fund

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU State Revenue Greenville Water Commission

5,600,000

15,787

500,000

General Obligation Bond - 2006

706,000

Property Sales

116,338

6,938,125

Totals Bike Lane Program Property Sales

45,000

General Fund Transfer

70,000

25,000

45,000

275,000

115,000

25,000

45,000

320,000

Totals Salters Road Improvements Property Sales

61,875

General Fund Transfer

10,000

200,000

150,000

360,000

Totals

71,875

200,000

150,000

421,875

Main Street Resurfacing Downtown Infrastructure Fund

370,000

Totals

370,000

Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection Hospitality Tax Fund

194,000

Totals

194,000

TOTAL ROADS AND BRIDGES

15,435,021

1,289,000

1,195,000

1,045,000

21,054,021

STREETSCAPES Pete Hollis Corridor Impovements Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

150,000

Totals

150,000

East McBee Avenue Improvements 14,704

14,704

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

309,963

Totals

324,667

Property Sales

324,667

Rhett/Camperdown Improvements West End Tax Increment Fund West End TIF Bond - Series 2013 Admissions Tax Fund Property Sales Totals

Summary Sheets

1,264,396

1,348,000

1,079,000

3,691,396

1,989,000

1,989,000 200,000

200,000

30,004

1,294,400

1,989,000

1,348,000

1,279,000

5,910,400

B-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

Brown Street Improvements 50,000

50,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

250,000

Totals

300,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

200,000

Totals

200,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

100,000

Totals

100,000

Capital Projects Fund

175,000

Totals

175,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

203,000

Totals

203,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

500,000

Totals

500,000

Capital Projects Fund

Cultural Corridor

Village of West Greenville Improvements

Augusta Street Improvements

North Main Street Improvements

Washington Street Improvements

TOTAL STREETSCAPES

2,069,067

3,167,000

1,348,000

1,279,000

500,000 7,863,067

WASTEWATER Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation 334,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

96,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013

1,695,000

(1,695,000)

2,005,000

4,130,000

Wastewater Fund

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

3,700,000

Totals

4,130,000

334,000

Wastewater System Rehabilitation Wastewater Fund

300,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013

1,000,000

Totals

1,300,000

Wastewater Fund

200,000

65,000

460,000

Totals

200,000

65,000

460,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,000,000

Totals

250,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,000,000

Totals

250,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,000,000

Totals

250,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,000,000

Wastewater System Survey and Model

Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation

Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase III

Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase IV

Totals TOTAL WASTEWATER

0 4,130,000

0 2,000,000

0 4,315,000

250,000 315,000

0 2,065,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

2,065,000

14,890,000

STORMWATER Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings 73,026

73,026

Stormwater Fund

1,347,565

Totals

1,420,591

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001

Summary Sheets

B-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

Henderson Basin Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Totals

3,588,497

61,000

3,588,497 61,000

3,649,497

Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings Stormwater Fund

800,000

Totals

800,000

620,680

Westview Avenue Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Totals

620,680

3,145

623,825

Pettigru Street Improvements Stormwater Fund

395,963

Totals

395,963

Fairforest Way Basin Stormwater Fund

200,000

Totals

200,000

White Oak Basin Phase II Stormwater Fund

1,045,000

150,000

1,195,000

Totals

1,045,000

150,000

1,195,000

Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations Stormwater Fund

150,000

Totals

150,000

Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements Wastewater Fund

231,000

Stormwater Fund

45,000

1,614,000

1,659,000

Totals

45,000

1,845,000

1,890,000

Swanson Court Wastewater Fund

21,000

Stormwater Fund

263,000

Totals

284,000

Stormwater Fund

150,000

300,000

850,000

1,300,000

Totals

150,000

300,000

850,000

1,300,000

Stormwater Fund

116,000

Totals

116,000

Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan

Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements

Hilly Street Drainage Improvements Stormwater Fund

300,000

400,000

700,000

Totals

300,000

400,000

700,000

7,529,876

2,545,000

1,400,000

1,250,000

12,724,876

TOTAL STORMWATER PARKS AND RECREATION Community Center Building Improvements Property Sales

467,500

Capital Projects Fund

100,000

General Fund Transfer

350,000

400,000

750,000

72,500

990,000

400,000

1,390,000

General Obligation Bond - 2003 Totals

Summary Sheets

B-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Federal Appropriation - USDOT

482,510

State Grants

198,273

Hospitality Tax Fund

748,433

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund

527,684

1,000,000 2,956,900

0 0

1,000,000 2,956,900

General Obligation Bond - 2006 Totals Main Street Tree Rehabilitation CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002

11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003

14,313

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

761,985

150,000

1,511,985

Totals

788,168

150,000

1,538,168

607,766

Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 607,766

State Grants

65,464

Property Sales

10,396

Hospitality Tax Fund

Capital Projects Fund

119,192

Totals

802,818

Reedy River Regional Park Hospitality Tax Fund

125,000

Stormwater Fund

550,000

Totals

675,000

Reedy River Trail Expansion Hospitality Tax Fund

325,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

675,000

State Grants

240,000

2,375,000

1,240,000

2,375,000

3,615,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2013 Totals Park Restrooms Capital Projects Fund

180,000

125,000

165,000

385,000

855,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

200,000

Hospitality Tax Fund Totals

218,000

380,000

218,000

125,000

165,000

385,000

1,273,000

River Street Underpass Downtown Infrastructure Fund

265,000

Totals

265,000

Heritage Green Master Plan Greenville County

150,000

Totals

150,000

Swamp Rabbit Trail Bridge at Cleveland Street Hospitality Tax Fund

40,000

(40,000)

Totals

40,000

(40,000)

Swamp Rabbit Trailheads Hospitality Tax Fund

54,000

(54,000)

Totals

54,000

(54,000)

Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization Stormwater Fund

250,000

400,000

650,000

Totals

250,000

400,000

650,000

McPherson Park Bridges Downtown Infrastructure Fund

15,000

120,000

135,000

Totals

15,000

120,000

135,000

Cancer Survivors Park Hospitality Tax Fund

94,000

630,000

724,000

Totals

94,000

630,000

724,000

Summary Sheets

B-10

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

NEXT Trail Connector Hospitality Tax Fund

75,000

406,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund

200,000

481,000 200,000

Totals

75,000

606,000

681,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

608,000

Totals

608,000

Falls Park Improvements

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION

8,591,886

4,241,000

1,506,000

275,000

315,000

535,000

15,463,886

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Piazza Bergamo 4,710,000

500,000

5,210,000

Greenville Water Commission

228,650

Piedmont Natural Gas Grant

30,000

(348,000)

442,000

5,758,650

152,000

5,910,650

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

Property Sales Totals

790,000

TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

115,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

110,000

Totals

225,000

225,000 728,556

Commercial Corridors 428,556

100,000

State Revenue

16,960

Property Sales

70,000

515,516

100,000

815,516

Capital Projects Fund

Totals West End Property Acquisition West End Tax Increment Fund

2,500,000

Totals

2,500,000

Peace Center Downtown Infrastructure Fund

2,500,000

Totals

2,500,000

Hyatt Public Improvements Property Sales

296,847

500,000

796,847

Totals

296,847

500,000

796,847

RiverPlace Upgrades Downtown Infrastructure Fund

470,000

Totals

470,000

Bookends Phase II 48,000

48,000

Property Sales

102,000

Totals

150,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

TD Convention Center Chiller Plant Hospitality Tax Fund

322,000

Totals

322,000

TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

12,191,013

977,000

100,000

422,000

13,690,013

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION Haynie-Sirrine Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2003 Miscellaneous Grants Fund

125,545

3,273

125,545 3,273

78,750

Revolving House Fund

75,000

Stormwater Fund

44,560

Capital Projects Fund

437,180

Totals

764,308

Summary Sheets

B-11

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

108,000

(108,000)

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Capital Projects Fund State "C" Funds

82,877

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

224,000

Stormwater Fund

524,814

General Obligation Bond - 2003

186,132

General Obligation Bond - 2006

624,180

Totals

1,750,003

0 0 (128,000)

82,877

224,000

396,814

186,132

(85,000)

539,180

(321,000)

1,429,003

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Capital Projects Fund

390,000

11,000

199,000

600,000

General Fund Transfer

226,372

226,372 85,000

General Obligation Bond - 2006 Federal Appropriation - EPA Wastewater Fund Stormwater Fund Totals TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

85,000

580,000

(580,000)

36,000

20,000

43,000

99,000

47,000 1,279,372 3,793,683

16,000

33,000

96,000

(448,000)

275,000

1,106,372

(769,000)

275,000

3,299,683

PUBLIC SAFETY East Area Fire Station Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2012 Totals

75,000

3,881,000

75,000

3,881,000

3,956,000 156,000

Police Training Facility and Pistol Range General Fund Transfer

156,000

Capital Projects Fund

50,000

Property Sales

87,000

293,000

70,000

Totals Fire Facilities Assessment Capital Projects Fund

70,000

Totals

70,000

3,951,000

TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY

368,000

70,000 4,319,000

PARKING Church Street Garage Hospitality Tax Fund

557,000

Totals

557,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

865,000

Totals

865,000

Liberty Square Garage

Richardson Street Garage Downtown Infrastructure Fund

655,000

Totals

655,000

TOTAL PARKING

557,000

1,520,000

2,077,000

GENERAL GOVERNMENT City Hall Exterior Downtown Infrastructure Fund

242,000

Totals

242,000

Installment Lease Purchase - 2013

475,000

Totals

475,000

Phone System Replacement

Public Works Operations Center Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012

3,100,000

Totals

3,100,000

Summary Sheets

B-12

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COST

Public Works Radio System Capital Projects Fund

119,000

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund

106,000

Stormwater Fund

39,000

Wastewater Fund

57,000

Totals

321,000

TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL, ALL PROJECTS

Summary Sheets

242,000 54,907,546

3,896,000 22,817,000

0 10,139,000

0 4,586,000

0 3,425,000

0 3,645,000

4,138,000 99,519,546

B-13

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE III Project Summaries by Funding Source FY 12/13 Funding Source/Project Admissions Tax Fund Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2002 Capital Projects Fund Haynie-Sirrine Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Commercial Corridors Street Resurfacing Park Restrooms Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Community Center Building Improvements Brown Street Improvements Augusta Street Improvements Fire Facilities Assessment Public Works Radio System Subtotal, Capital Projects Fund

COMMITTED FUNDING 0 0 437,180 108,000 390,000 428,556 354,000 180,000 119,192 50,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 2,216,928

CAPITAL BUDGET 0 0 0 (108,000) 11,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 70,000 119,000 367,000

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

TOTAL FUNDING

0 0

200,000 200,000

0 0

200,000 200,000

0 0 199,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299,000

0 0 0 100,000 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225,000

0 0 0 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000

0 0 0 0 0 385,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 385,000

437,180 0 600,000 728,556 354,000 855,000 119,192 50,000 100,000 50,000 175,000 70,000 119,000 3,657,928

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2002

11,870 11,870

0 0

11,870 11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2003

14,313 14,313

0 0

14,313 14,313

761,985 309,963 200,000 250,000 0 265,000 2,500,000 0 242,000 4,710,000 0 0 0 470,000 48,000 0 9,756,948

150,000 0 0 0 370,000 0 0 865,000 0 500,000 15,000 200,000 500,000 0 0 655,000 3,255,000

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 270,000

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000

1,511,985 309,963 200,000 250,000 370,000 265,000 2,500,000 865,000 242,000 5,210,000 135,000 200,000 500,000 470,000 48,000 655,000 13,731,948

0 0

Downtown Infrastructure Fund Main Street Tree Rehabilitation East McBee Avenue Improvements Park Restrooms Brown Street Improvements Main Street Resurfacing River Street Underpass Peace Center Liberty Square Garage Rehabilitation City Hall Exterior Piazza Bergamo McPherson Park Bridges Cultural Corridor Washington Street Improvements RiverPlace Upgrades Bookends Phase II Richardson Street Garage Subtotal, Downtown Infrastructure Fund Federal Appropriation - EPA Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Subtotal, Federal Appropriation - EPA

580,000 580,000

Federal Appropriation - USDOT Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Subtotal, Federal Appropriation - USDOT

482,510 482,510

0 0

482,510 482,510

5,600,000 5,600,000

0 0

5,600,000 5,600,000

Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, Fed. Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU

Summary Sheets

(580,000) (580,000)

B-14

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Funding Source/Project

COMMITTED FUNDING

CAPITAL BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

TOTAL FUNDING

General Fund Transfer NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Street Resurfacing Community Center Building Improvements Bike Lane Program Salters Road Improvements Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Subtotal, General Fund Transfer

4,350,000 2,005,000 350,000 70,000 10,000 156,000 226,372 7,167,372

350,000 150,000 400,000 25,000 200,000 0 0 1,125,000

500,000 500,000 0 45,000 150,000 0 0 1,195,000

500,000 500,000 0 45,000 0 0 0 1,045,000

6,700,000 4,155,000 750,000 275,000 360,000 156,000 226,372 12,622,372

General Obligation Bond - 2001 NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2001

500,000 500,000

0 0

500,000 500,000

72,500 3,273

0 0

72,500 3,273

186,132 261,905

0 0

186,132 261,905

0 0 0 0 0 0

350,000 1,000,000 539,180 85,000 706,000 2,680,180

General Obligation Bond - 2003 Community Center Building Improvements Haynie-Sirrine Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2003 General Obligation Bond - 2006 NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2006 General Obligation Bond - 2012 East Area Fire Station Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2012

350,000 1,000,000 624,180 0 706,000 2,680,180

0 0 (85,000) 85,000 0 0

0 0

3,881,000 3,881,000

0 0

3,881,000 3,881,000

Greenville County NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Heritage Green Master Plan Subtotal, Greenville County

48,671 150,000 198,671

0 0 0

48,671 150,000 198,671

Greenville Water Commission Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Piazza Bergamo Subtotal, Greenville Water Commission

500,000 228,650 728,650

0 0 0

500,000 228,650 728,650

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 Reedy River Trail Expansion TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

675,000 0 675,000

0 115,000 115,000

0 0 0

675,000 115,000 790,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2013 Reedy River Trail Expansion Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2013

0 0

2,375,000 2,375,000

0 0

2,375,000 2,375,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630,000 406,000 0 0 0 1,036,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 322,000 0 322,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

607,766 748,433 125,000 325,000 0 0 110,000 557,000 194,000 218,000 724,000 481,000 608,000 322,000 100,000 5,120,199

Hospitality Tax Fund Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Reedy River Regional Park Reedy River Trail Expansion Swamp Rabbit Trailheads Swamp Rabbit Trail Bridge at Cleveland Street TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Church Street Garage Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection Park Restrooms Cancer Survivors Park NEXT Trail Connector Falls Park Improvements TD Convention Center Chiller Plant Village of West Greenville Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Fund Installment Lease Purchase Agreement - 2013 Phone System Replacement Subtotal, Installment Lease Purchase Agree. - 2013 Miscellaneous Grants Fund Haynie-Sirrine Subtotal, Miscellaneous Grants Fund

Summary Sheets

607,766 748,433 125,000 325,000 54,000 40,000 0 557,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,457,199

0 0 0 0 (54,000) (40,000) 110,000 0 194,000 218,000 94,000 75,000 608,000 0 100,000 1,305,000

0 0

475,000 475,000

0 0

475,000 475,000

78,750 78,750

0 0

78,750 78,750

B-15

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Funding Source/Project Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Piazza Bergamo Subtotal, Miscellaneous Grants Fund Property Sales Community Center Building Improvements Piazza Bergamo Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements Haynie-Sirrine East Area Fire Station Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access East McBee Avenue Improvements Salters Road Improvements Commercial Corridors Bike Lane Program Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Hyatt Public Improvements Bookends Phase II Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, Property Sales Revolving Housing Fund Haynie-Sirrine Subtotal, Revolving Housing Fund

COMMITTED FUNDING 30,000 30,000 467,500 790,000 30,004 125,545 75,000 10,396 14,704 61,875 70,000 45,000 87,000 296,847 102,000 116,338 2,292,209

CAPITAL BUDGET 0 0 0 (348,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 0 0 152,000

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

TOTAL FUNDING

0 0

30,000 30,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

467,500 442,000 30,004 125,545 75,000 10,396 14,704 61,875 70,000 45,000 87,000 796,847 102,000 116,338 2,444,209

75,000 75,000

0 0

75,000 75,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

224,000 96,000 320,000

0 0 0

224,000 96,000 320,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Wastewater Rehabilitation Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

0 0 0

1,695,000 1,000,000 2,695,000

0 0 0

1,695,000 1,000,000 2,695,000

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund Public Works Radio System Replacement Subtotal, State "C" Funds

0 0

106,000 106,000

0 0

106,000 106,000

State "C" Funds NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Subtotal, State "C" Funds

525,000 82,877 607,877

0 0 0

525,000 82,877 607,877

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Basin 7 Rehabilitation Basin 15 Rehabilitation Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase III Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase IV Subtotal, State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

3,700,000 0 0 0 0 3,700,000

0 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 4,000,000

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000

0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000

2,005,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,005,000

State Grants Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Reedy River Trail Expansion Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Subtotal, State Grants State Revenue Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Commercial Corridors Subtotal, State Revenue

Summary Sheets

(1,695,000) 0 0 0 0 (1,695,000)

65,464 240,000 198,273 503,737

0 0 0 0

65,464 240,000 198,273 503,737

15,787 16,960 32,747

0 0 0

15,787 16,960 32,747

B-16

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 12/13

Funding Source/Project Stormwater Fund Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Haynie-Sirrine Pettigru Street Improvements Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings Henderson Basin Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings Fairforest Way Basin White Oak Basin Phase II Westview Avenue Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation Swanson Court Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements Hilly Street Drainage Improvements Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Public Works Radio System Reedy River Regional Park Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization Subtotal, Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings Henderson Basin Westview Avenue Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001

COMMITTED FUNDING 524,814 44,560 395,963 1,347,565 3,588,497 0 200,000 1,045,000 620,680 150,000 45,000 0 0 177,350 0 0 47,000 0 550,000 250,000 8,986,429

CAPITAL BUDGET (128,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 1,614,000 263,000 150,000 0 116,000 0 16,000 39,000 0 400,000 2,620,000

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

TOTAL FUNDING

0 0 0 0 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 300,000 33,000 0 0 0 1,433,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 850,000 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 1,250,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

396,814 44,560 395,963 1,347,565 3,588,497 800,000 200,000 1,195,000 620,680 150,000 1,659,000 263,000 1,300,000 177,350 116,000 700,000 96,000 39,000 550,000 650,000 14,289,429

73,026 61,000 3,145 137,171

0 0 0 0

73,026 61,000 3,145 137,171

0 0

3,100,000 3,100,000

0 0

3,100,000 3,100,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Riverwalk to Greenville Tech NEXT Trail Connector Subtotal, Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund

527,684 0 527,684

0 0 0

0 200,000 200,000

0 0 0

527,684 200,000 727,684

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements North Main Streetscape Subtotal, Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

150,000 0 150,000

0 203,000 203,000

0 0 0

150,000 203,000 353,000

Wastewater Fund Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Wastewater Rehabilitation Wastewater Survey and Model Basin 7 Rehabilitation Basin 15 Rehabilitation Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase III Wastewater System Rehabilitation Phase IV Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation Swanson Court Public Works Radio System Subtotal, Wastewater Fund

334,000 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 370,000

0 20,000 300,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 231,000 21,000 57,000 1,329,000

0 43,000 0 65,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 358,000

0 0 0 65,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 315,000

0 0 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000

334,000 99,000 300,000 460,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 231,000 21,000 57,000 2,502,000

West End Tax Increment Fund West End Property Acquisition Rhett/Camperdown Improvements Subtotal, West End Tax Increment Fund

2,500,000 1,264,396 3,764,396

0 0 0

0 1,348,000 1,348,000

0 1,079,000 1,079,000

0 0 0

2,500,000 3,691,396 6,191,396

West End TIF Bond - 2013 Rhett/Camperdown Improvements Subtotal, West End Tax Increment Fund

0 0

1,989,000 1,989,000

0 0

1,989,000 1,989,000

54,907,546

22,817,000

10,139,000

4,586,000

3,425,000

3,645,000

99,519,546

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 Public Works Operations Center Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012

TOTAL, ALL FUNDING SOURCES

Summary Sheets

B-17

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE IV

Summary of Additional Operating Impact – Operating Costs FY 12/13

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL

OPERATING Project

ADD. OPER.

COSTS

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

COSTS

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

15,000

66,760

68,763

70,826

72,950

75,139

354,438

20,232

20,839

21,464

22,108

84,643

1,538

1,615

1,695

1,780

1,868

8,496

15,000

15,750

16,500

47,250

Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements

31,000

155,000

Brown Street Improvements

NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program)

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Salters Road Improvements Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection East McBee Avenue Improvements

15,000

15,750

16,500

17,250

18,000

82,500

Augusta Street Improvements

1,500

1,545

1,591

1,639

6,275

North Main Street Improvements

26,000

26,780

27,583

28,411

108,774

Washington Street Improvements

25,000

25,750

26,523

77,273

52,500

55,125

57,881

60,775

63,814

290,095

Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements

2,700

3,075

3,152

3,231

3,311

15,469

Riverwalk to Greenville Tech

3,000

3,150

3,308

3,473

3,647

16,578

Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations

Reedy River Regional Park Reedy River Trail Expansion River Street Underpass Cancer Survivors Park Piazza Bergamo Commercial Corridors Hyatt Public Improvements Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Mt. Eustis Street Improvements East Area Fire Station Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Phone System Replacement Public Works Radio System TOTAL, Additional Operating Costs

1,191

7,888

8,240

8,595

8,953

34,867

169,683

79,190

83,149

87,307

91,672

511,001

300

315

300

315

331

1,561

3,000

3,150

3,308

3,473

12,931

15,000

15,750

16,500

47,250

5,000

10,000

15,000

15,450

15,914

61,364

15,000

15,750

16,500

17,250

64,500

21,250

21,888

22,544

23,220

23,917

112,819

1,000

1,030

1,061

1,093

1,126

5,310

510,000

561,447

1,063,984

1,095,903

1,119,779

4,351,113

2,500

2,575

2,652

2,732

2,814

13,273

50,000

200,000

27,696

138,480

1,585,052

1,634,466

1,676,385

6,816,260

912,118

1,008,239

Summary of Additional Operating Impact – Personnel FY 12/13

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL

ADDITIONAL Project

FTEs

ADDITIONAL FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FTEs

Reedy River Trail Expansion

2.0

0.0

2.0

East Area Fire Station

0.0

12.0

0.0

12.0

TOTAL, Additional FTEs

2.0

12.0

0.0

14.0

Summary Sheets

B-18

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE V Unfunded Projects

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 12/13

PROJECT

REQUEST

TOTAL FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

REQUEST

PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR IN CIP - NO FUNDING (REQUESTED AMOUNT SHOWN) Cleveland Street Curves Handicap Ramp Improvements Market Point Drive Extension Spring/Falls Improvements

567,000 213,125 88,000 125,279

0 223,375 1,200,000 0

0 234,138 0 0

0 245,438 0 0

0 257,304 0 0

567,000 1,173,379 1,288,000 125,279

100,000

14,000

123,000

71,000

10,000

289,000

McPherson Park Improvements

110,000

159,000

269,000

Park Playgrounds

130,500

57,000

71,000

15,200

273,700

Park Parking Lot Improvements

36,000

40,000

26,000

102,000

Richland Cemetery

78,000

53,000

131,000

200,000

15,000

215,000

50,000

300,000

350,000

200,000

West Greenville Community Center

157,000

1,640,000

1,797,000

Wenwood Fire Station

824,000

2,278,360

3,102,360

Cleveland Park Roadway and Parking Improvements Community Center Park Improvements

Ridge Road Dog Park Skate Park Springwood Cemetery

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 12/13

PROJECT

REQUEST

TOTAL FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

REQUEST

PROJECT IN CIP - NOT FULLY FUNDED BASED ON REQUEST (UNFUNDED PORTION SHOWN) Street Resurfacing NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Bike Lane Program Cultural Corridor Washington Street Improvements Village of West Greenville Improvements Community Center Building Improvements Reedy River Regional Park

400,000 208,500 45,000 200,000 2,548,000 217,500 40,000 500,000

300,000 338,000 10,000 2,257,000 0 136,200 0 500,000

300,000 342,775 10,000 2,257,000 0 162,400 0 500,000

TOTAL UNFUNDED PROJECTS

5,920,904

6,542,575

8,192,673

Summary Sheets

300,000 347,770 10,000 0 0 172,600 0 500,000 1,662,008

300,000 352,990 10,000 0 0 199,300 0 500,000 1,629,594

1,600,000 1,590,035 85,000 4,714,000 2,548,000 888,000 40,000 2,500,000 23,947,753

B-19

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE VI Strategic Goal Implementation

East Area Fire Station Fire Facilities Assessment Phone System Replacement Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization Fairforest Way Basin Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation Henderson Basin Hilly Street Drainage Improvements Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Park Restrooms Pettigru Street Improvements Augusta Street Improvements Bookends Phase II Brown Street Improvements City Hall Exterior Commercial Corridors East McBee Avenue Improvements Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection Hyatt Public Improvements North Main Street Improvements Community Center Building Improvements Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Haynie-Sirrine Bike Lane Program Cancer Survivors Park Church Street Garage Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Liberty Square Garage Main Street Resurfacing

Safe City Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Public Works Radio System Sustainable City Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements Public Works Operations Center Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan Swanson Court Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase III Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase IV Wastewater System Rehabilitation Wastewater System Survey and Model Westview Avenue White Oak Basin Phase II Prosperous City Piazza Bergamo Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements RiverPlace Upgrades TD Convention Center Chiller Plant TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Village of West Greenville Improvements Washington Street Improvements West End Property Acquisition City of Neighborhoods Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Mobile City NSTEP Reedy River Trail Expansion Richardson Street Garage Salters Road Improvements Street Resufacing

City of Culture and Recreation Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access NEXT Trail Connector Cultural Corridor Peace Center Falls Park Improvements Reedy River Regional Park Heritage Green Master Plan River Street Underpass McPherson Park Bridges Inclusive City No projects.

Summary Sheets

B-20

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE VII Comprehensive Plan Implementation

Encourage Water Conservation and Water Quality Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation Reedy River Water Quality Monitoring Stations Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization Wastewater System Rehabilitation Fairforest Way Basin Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase III Pettigru Street Improvements Wastewater Rehabilitation Phase IV Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements White Oak Basin Phase II Public Works Operations Center Encourage Sustainable Growth West End Property Acquisition

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Bookends Phase II Brown Street Improvements Cancer Survivors Park Cultural Corridor East McBee Avenue Improvements Hyatt Public Improvements

Create Safe, Walkable Spaces and Accessible Destinations NSTEP Reedy River Trail Expansion Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements River Street Underpass Riverwalk to Greenville Tech Washington Street Improvements

Create a Healthy Environment for all Greenville Citizens Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access McPherson Park Bridges Community Center Building Improvements Park Restrooms Falls Park Improvements Reedy River Regional Park Encourage Redevelopment and Infill for Commercial Corridors Augusta Street Improvements TD Convention Center Chiller Plant Commercial Corridors Village of West Greenville Improvements North Main Street Improvements Bike Lane Program NEXT Trail Connector

Provide Linkages Between All Transportation Options Salters Road Improvements

Enhance and Protect Bennett, Mohawk, and Chick Springs Crossings Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements Henderson Basin Hilly Street Drainage Improvements

Residential Areas Pinehurst and Windsor Crossings Street Resurfacing Swanson Court Westview Avenue

Encourage a Wide Variety of Transportation Modes Fairforest Way Rehabilitation East Area Fire Station Fire Facilities Assessment Phone System Replacement Church Street Garage City Hall Exterior Green Avenue Improvements Phase II Liberty Square Garage Main Street Resurfacing

Summary Sheets

Create a Safe Environment Police Training Facility and Pistol Range Public Works Radio System Maintain Quality of Redeveloped Areas Piazza Bergamo Richardson Street Garage RiverPlace Upgrades TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit

B-21

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina Encourage Revitalization of Commercial Corridors

Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection Heritage Green Master Plan

Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements

Emphasize Unique Community Characteristics Peace Center

Coordinate Housing Development with Infrastructure Haynie-Sirrine Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation Wastewater System Survey and Model

Summary Sheets

B-22

ROADS AND BRIDGES

Batesview Drive recently was upgraded with sidewalks and bicycle lanes through the NSTEP program. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program enhances streets throughout the City to accommodate motorists and non-motorists alike.

Roads & Bridges

C-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Roads & Bridges

City of Greenville, South Carolina

C-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NEW SIDEWALK TARGETED EXPANSION PROGRAM (NSTEP) Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

1999

ON-GOING

2025+

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: NSTEP was developed in response to concerns expressed by City residents. It is an on-going project designed to construct sidewalk on at least one side of every street within the City of Greenville. As part of NSTEP, not only is sidewalk with a curb lawn constructed, but curb, gutter, and storm drainage improvements are made to the street as well. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In early 1997, the City of Greenville began an initiative to determine the wants, needs, and level of satisfaction of City residents. While many of the responses from a random telephone survey were extremely positive and more favorable than similar survey responses nationwide, sidewalks were an area of concern. Due to the apparent interest in the network of sidewalks within the City, the Department of Public Works initiated a summary analysis of the status and an identification of the issues related to the sidewalks in early 1998. It was determined that development of a new sidewalk program would benefit the City and its residents in a variety of ways. These include safety to pedestrians by providing a designated area to travel and traffic calming from the addition of curb and gutter, accessibility standards and requirements (ADA), landscaping and vegetation, and interest and pleasantness provided by the improvements. As a result, the NSTEP program was announced via a press conference in December 1998 and 7.3 miles of sidewalk have been constructed in Rounds 1 through 6. Method for Estimating Cost: Based on a per linear foot cost developed from NSTEP Rounds 1 through 6. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Round 7, Phase 1 (Long Hill Street) ia underway. Round 7, Phase 2 (East Faris Road between Pine Forest Drive Extension and Cleveland Street) has been designed.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The City used in-house design and surveying for Round 7 of NSTEP.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $5,951,021 $0 $0 $5,951,021

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) State "C" Funds Greenville County General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2001 Stormwater Fund General Obligation Bond - 2006 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $525,000 $48,671 $4,350,000 $500,000 $177,350 $350,000 $5,951,021

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000

$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $8,301,021 $0 $0 $8,301,021 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $525,000 $48,671 $6,700,000 $500,000 $177,350 $350,000 $8,301,021

$1,000 $1,000 0.00 0.00

$2,000 $3,000 0.00 0.00

$3,000 $6,000 0.00 0.00

$4,000 $10,000 0.00 0.00

$5,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

STREET RESURFACING Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2000

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: This project will resurface and rehabilitate approximately nine lane miles of City streets annually. The City of Greenville has approximately 600 lane miles of streets that require regular maintenance. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): All City streets have been rated via a Pavement Quality Index (PQI) and the PQI ratings were updated in 2009. Rehabilitating streets is based on a priority of "worst to first". For the most recent projects, approximately 25% of the pavement structural sections on these streets had to be removed and replaced prior to the asphalt concrete surface course being placed. This indicates that the City of Greenville is in a "catch-up" mode. To maximize the expenditure of the maintenance dollar, it is imperative that all streets receive maintenance on a regular basis. Streets are designed with the assumption that maintenance is to be done approximately every seven years with an asphalt concrete overlay being placed in 20-year intervals. Currently, City streets are resurfaced on an average of every 50 to 60 years. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimate is prepared based on current pricing for full depth patching, milling, and asphalt concrete in-place after the streets selected for rehabilitation are prioritized.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Funding was recently appropriated to support the Greenville County Transportation Committee's 2012 match program.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $2,359,000 $0 $0 $2,359,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $354,000 $2,005,000 $2,359,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $150,000 $150,000

$0 $500,000 $500,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $4,509,000 $0 $0 $4,509,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $354,000 $4,155,000 $4,509,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FAIRFOREST WAY REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

APR

MOBILE CITY ENCOURAGE A WIDE VARIETY OF TRANSPORATION MODES

2007

DEC

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project includes a total rehabilitation of roadway infrastructure along a 2.1 mile section of Fairforest Way. The new road will be a four-lane divided arterial street with curb and gutter, sidewalks with curb lawns, landscape plantings, raised planted median islands, and bicycle lanes in each direction. Additionally, a new signal is planned for the Mauldin Road intersection and at the Wenwood Drive intersection. A signal upgrade is planned for the existing span wire signal at Ridge Road.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Fairforest Way provides an alternate transportation link to I-85 from Mauldin Road to Woodruff Road via Millennium Boulevard and Carolina Point Parkway. However, the existing pavement along Fairforest Way has deteriorated to a substandard condition. Increased development in the area, along with new residential housing, also warrants the need for full pedestrian and bicycle accommodation. The road will complement Millennium Boulevard and Carolina Point Parkway.

Method for Estimating Cost: Engineer's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Phase 1 (Mauldin Road to Ridge Road) is funded through a SAFETEA-LU appropriation with 20% local match and $3.1 million in ARRA funds. The first phase was let by the SCDOT in April 2010 with a Notice to Proceed in July 2010. Phase 2 (Ridge Road to Laurens Road) is funded by SAFETEA-LU appropriation with 20% local match. Construction is underway for Phase I. Upon completion, Phase 2 work will begin.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $310,000 $0 $6,588,125 $0 $40,000 $6,938,125

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Federal Grant - SAFETEA-LU State Revenue Greenville Water System General Obligation Bond - 2006 Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $5,600,000 $15,787 $500,000 $706,000 $116,338 $6,938,125

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $310,000 $0 $6,588,125 $0 $40,000 $6,938,125 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,600,000 $15,787 $500,000 $706,000 $116,338 $6,938,125

$66,760 $66,760 0.00 0.00

$68,763 $135,523 0.00 0.00

$70,826 $206,349 0.00 0.00

$72,950 $279,299 0.00 0.00

$75,139 $354,438 0.00 0.00

$354,438 $354,438 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BIKE LANE PROGRAM Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

MOBILE CITY PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS

2012

JAN

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides funding for the installation of on-street bicycle facilities in concert with SCDOT resurfacing projects, the Greenville Spinners Downtown Bike Lane Plan, the Trails and Greenways Master Plan, GPATS Long Range Transportation Plan, the Greenlink Transit Vision and Master Plan, and the Bicycle Master Plan. The project funds the planning, design, and construction of on-street bicycle facilities. Examples of facilities include bicycle lanes, bicycle sharrows, signage, and other innovative bicycle markings and techniques to promote complete streets and alternative transportation. Project work will be targeted for streets that are not scheduled for resurfacing by the City but do require on-street markings. Funds may be used to supplement SCDOT resurfacing projects when new bicycle facilities are added to a roadway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The implementation of on-street bicycle lanes and facilities creates an integrated network of transportation opportunities for residents and visitors. On-street bicycle facilities are the quickest and most cost-effective way to expand the non-motorized transportation network. The on-street bicycle system will integrate neighborhoods with transit, parks, shopping, schools, civic centers, and downtown by providing safe and convenient transportation alternatives. The expansion of on-street bicycle facilities are a recurring theme throughout the Trails and Greenways Master Plan, the Downtown Master Plan, Plan-it Greenville Comprehensive Plan, and GPATS Long Range Transportation Plan. These on-street facilities serve as the critical link for bicyclists between home, work, and play.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate based on previous contracts and cost estimates within the City's Bicycle Master Plan. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Active, with construction contracts for FY 2011-12 projects under permitting.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $45,000 $70,000 $115,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $25,000 $25,000

$0 $45,000 $45,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $320,000 $0 $0 $320,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $45,000 $275,000 $320,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SALTERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

MOBILE CITY PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS

2009

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Reconstructing Salters Road will provide an alternate transportation link to Woodruff Road by providing access to surrounding largescale developments. The project will occur in two sections: Section 1 is from Verdae to Old Sulphur Springs Road (just west of I-85 Bridge), and Section 2 is from Old Sulphur Springs Road to Millennium/Carolina Point Parkway (includes bridge over I-85). Both sections are currently on the Greenville-Pickens Area Transportation Improvement Program. The City, County, and the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) have a design and financial participation agreement. Section 1 requires a 20% local match (split between City and County), since this is a City road. Section 2 is a state road and no local match is required. The proposed cross-section for improvements is four travel lanes, bike lanes, and planted medians.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Woodruff Road Corridor Study recognized that secondary access to many of the developments on the east side of the City are essential in order to provide safe and efficient access to large-scale development sites including ICAR, the Millennium Campus, Verdae, the Point, and the TD Bank campus. This will provide an alternate access to Woodruff Road and to these developments.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate provided by the SCDOT. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The SCDOT has awarded the design contract and is proceeding with the environmental study. Construction to start 2012 and finish 2014.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $61,875 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $71,875

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $61,875 $10,000 $71,875

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $200,000 $200,000

$0 $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $61,875 $10,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $421,875 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $61,875 $360,000 $421,875

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$20,232 $20,232 0.00 0.00

$20,839 $41,071 0.00 0.00

$21,464 $62,535 0.00 0.00

$22,108 $84,643 0.00 0.00

$84,643 $84,643 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MAIN STREET RESURFACING Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

JUN

2013

Project Description: Main Street between Elford Street to West Camperdown Way currently exhibits random pavement cracking. To improve the appearance of the street, the existing pavement surface needs to be milled and resurfaced with asphalt concrete. Additionally, sections of the curb and gutter need to be removed and replaced. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Main Street is a focal point for the City of Greenville and it is imperative that the aesthetics of the City's infrastructure be maintained. Resurfacing Main Street will improve its appearance, provide a better riding surface for motorists, and provide a safer walking surface for pedestrians. Method for Estimating Cost: Current construction costs for milling, placing asphalt concrete, and restriping. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction will be scheduled after Project ONE is completed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$370,000 $370,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $360,000 $0 $10,000 $370,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $370,000 $370,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $360,000 $0 $10,000 $370,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYWOOD ROAD/WOODS CROSSING INTERSECTION Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The Haywood Road Master Plan was adopted by City Council in December 2009. A key recommendation in the plan is to redevelop the intersection located at Haywood and Woods Crossing Roads as a model that will serve as a catalyst for private investment and as an example of the design vision for the future of the corridor. Phase 1 of this project includes the installation of mast arm traffic signals and some landscaping at the four corners of the intersection. Phase 2 would include a new asphalt treatment, crosswalks, and other aesthetic improvements as recommended in the Master Plan and will be submitted in a future budget request.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Although the Haywood Road corridor has historically been a significant source of revenue for the City, the corridor is experiencing the early stages of decline due to a number of business closings and relocations to the Woodruff Road area. The completion of the Haywood Road Area Master Plan was the first step to counteract this declining trend to preserve existing businesses in the corridor and help position the corridor for the future. The creation of the model intersection recommended in the Master Plan will help to revitalize the corridor which is consistent with the City's Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage revitalization of commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Detailed construction cost estimate provided by the Engineering Division based on unit costs for traffic signal upgrade and some landscaping.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$194,000 $194,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $5,000 $194,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $194,000 $194,000

$1,538 $1,538 0.00 0.00

$1,615 $3,153 0.00 0.00

$1,695 $4,848 0.00 0.00

$1,780 $6,628 0.00 0.00

$1,868 $8,496 0.00 0.00

$8,496 $8,496 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $5,000 $194,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

C-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Roads & Bridges

City of Greenville, South Carolina

C-10

STREETSCAPES

Brown Street was recently rebuilt to reflect its emergence as the â&#x20AC;&#x153;Brown Street Districtâ&#x20AC;?. The streetscape improvements proposed in the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program continue investments throughout the City.

Streetscapes

D-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Streetscapes

City of Greenville, South Carolina

D-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PETE HOLLIS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2007

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The purpose of this project is to design and construct streetscape improvements in the Pete Hollis Boulevard/Buncombe Street area. The improvements will be made in support of private development. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Pete Hollis Gateway Plan was adopted by City Council in 2006. Staff is continuing to work with several developers who have acquired property in anticipation of beginning development projects. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal estimates . Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Improvements are being planned in support of the Quick Trip under construction, improvements adjacent to the McDonald's restaurant, and near 801 Buncombe Street and Lloyd Street.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

EAST MCBEE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

SEP

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project includes streetscape improvements for a better pedestrian link between Main Street and the McBee Station project in conjunction with future plans for the Peacock site. Streetscaping will include, but is not limited to, street furniture, pedestrian lighting, new sidewalks, and new curb and gutter. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project ties in with the Downtown Master Plan by improving a major side street and helping to expand downtown economic development opportunities beyond Main Street. Method for Estimating Cost: Preliminary estimate based on similar streetscape projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Project is on hold.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $0 $249,667 $0 $0 $324,667

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $14,704 $309,963 $324,667

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $0 $249,667 $0 $0 $324,667 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $14,704 $309,963 $324,667

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$47,250 $47,250 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RHETT/CAMPERDOWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

FEB

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2009

JUN

2016

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project was formally known as Rhett Street Improvements. It has been revised to include 1,350 feet of improvements on Camperdown Way from Main Street to Academy Street to support existing developments and align with the utility undergrounding program. The project will include wastewater, stormwater, and streetscape improvements for Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to Markley Street, approximately 2,100 feet. The project will be implemented in four phases. Phase 1 will focus on improvements on Camperdown Way between River Street and Main Street. Phase 2 will focus on Rhett Street between Camperdown Way and River Street and Camperdown Way from River Street to Academy Street. Phase 3 will focus on improvements to Rhett Street between River Street and Wardlaw Street. Phase 4 will focus on improvements to Rhett Street between Wardlaw Street and Markley Street.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As part of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, the purpose of this project is to implement the principle of expanding downtown beyond Main Street. Several projects are planned or have already begun along Camperdown Way and Rhett Street, creating the need for a safe, walkable, and accessible streetscape. The streetscape construction will complement the undergrounding of the power lines on Rhett and Camperdown.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate for improvements on Camperdown Way and Rhett Street Phases 1 and 2 are based on Engineering's estimate. Phase 3 and 4 are based on plans previously prepared by an outside consultant.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Both Phases 1 and 2 are in the design phase.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $128,400 $0 $1,166,000 $0 $0 $1,294,400

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) West End Tax Increment Fund West End TIF Bond - 2013 Admissions Tax Fund Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,264,396 $0 $0 $30,004 $1,294,400

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $1,989,000 $0 $0 $1,989,000

$1,348,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,348,000

$1,079,000 $0 $200,000 $0 $1,279,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $143,900 $23,890 $5,483,630 $43,161 $215,819 $5,910,400 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,691,396 $1,989,000 $200,000 $30,004 $5,910,400

$31,000 $31,000 0.00 0.00

$31,000 $62,000 0.00 0.00

$31,000 $93,000 0.00 0.00

$31,000 $124,000 0.00 0.00

$31,000 $155,000 0.00 0.00

$155,000 $155,000 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $5,000 $6,463 $1,865,601 $18,654 $93,282 $1,989,000

FY 13/14 COST $5,000 $6,463 $1,260,913 $12,604 $63,020 $1,348,000

FY 14/15 COST $5,500 $10,964 $1,191,116 $11,903 $59,517 $1,279,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BROWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2010

JULY

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: For many years, the business and property owners in the Brown Street area have requested a new look and feel for their street. The area is in need of infrastructure improvements, as over the years the street has been paved so often that the pavement is now flush with the curb. As a result, delivery vehicles often park on top of the curb, damaging the sidewalks. The project will include a new street surface, new landscaping, new curb and gutter, artistic elements, new parking, and new spaces for outdoor dining.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project aligns with the Downtown Master Plan principle of expanding beyond Main Street. By strategically enhancing revitalization efforts on Brown Street through this new plan, more redevelopment focus is placed on downtown's side streets. In the past few years, there has been significant investment in this area with new businesses and expansion of existing businesses. This project will support creating a "Brown Street District" for this important downtown area, as well as better pedestrian connections, which promote a walkable community. Method for Estimating Cost: Detailed cost estimate provided by the City's staff. This estimate is based on the work being done in-house with City crews similar to South Laurens Street. Operating cost estimate reflects additional street lighting and landscape maintenance. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction is nearly complete and awaiting a few more decorative elements.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $245,662 $0 $54,338 $300,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $50,000 $300,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $245,662 $0 $54,338 $300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $50,000 $300,000

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$17,250 $64,500 0.00 0.00

$18,000 $82,500 0.00 0.00

$82,500 $82,500 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CULTURAL CORRIDOR Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: The Downtown Streetscape Master Plan identified the Cultural Corridor Urban Trail as its highest priority project. The Cultural Corridor project will connect North Main Street to Heritage Green and the Bi-Lo Center via an urban trail along the Beattie Place/College Street corridor. The street would be reduced from five lanes to three lanes and include a multi-purpose urban trail and pedestrian walkway on the north side of the street. Staff proposes breaking the project into three phases. Phase 1 will consist of design and planning. Phase 2 will construct the trail from Main Street to Heritage Green. Phase 3 will construct the trail from Main Street to the Bi-Lo Center. The CIP includes funding only for Phase I and will propose revised cost estimates as design is refined.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Cultural Corridor Trail project has the potential to transform the north end of Main Street, similar to the improvements seen in the West End that are a result of Falls Park and Liberty Bridge. Not only does this project apply several City Council Strategic Goals, but it also addresses many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles of walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Greenville County and the Heritage Green stakeholders were thoroughly involved in the planning process. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and the cost estimates developed by the Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan consultant. Once the construction documents are completed during the design phase of the project, additional cost estimates will be developed that represent the costs of specific project features. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a planned project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$200,000 $200,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $200,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

VILLAGE OF WEST GREENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide for streetscape improvements associated with private development opportunities for the adjoining arts district. Improvements are needed to spur private investment to propel and support this area for future revitalization. Funding would support streetscaping that would also have a positive impact as a traffic-calming mechanism for Pendleton Street and Lois Street. Also, improved pedestrian access and better parking for the district would be coordinated with streetscaping, leveled sidewalks, and lighting. Benches, signage, trees, trash receptacles, and landscaping are also needed to support this area's revitalization.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): An available source of funding for streetscape and facade improvements is needed in order to facilitate and promote private development in the corridor. Redevelopment of the mill area will spur new economic growth, as well as mixed-use development that translates to residential growth and an arts district destination for the City. Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$100,000 $100,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $100,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

AUGUSTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide streetscape improvements on Augusta Street, from Lupo Street to Capers Street (approximately 1,200 linear feet). These improvements will be completed following the planned relocation of overhead utility lines and removal of utility poles along this section of the corridor. The project will include the replacement and/or installation of curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, decorative streetlights, furnishings, and amenities. These improvements will result in a safer environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Planned coordination of the utility relocation and streetscape improvements will result in less disturbance to the businesses and residents in the area. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors as well as meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city. In addition, this project meets the Comprehensive Plan Principles to create safe, walkable spaces and accessible destinations, and encourages redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Preliminary estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design work has been budgeted in the Commercial Corridors project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$175,000 $175,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $175,000 $175,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$1,500 $1,500 0.00 0.00

$1,545 $3,045 0.00 0.00

$1,591 $4,636 0.00 0.00

$1,639 $6,275 0.00 0.00

$6,275 $6,275 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NORTH MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JAN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will improve North Main Street from Academy Street to Stone Avenue. This project would fund the engineering design and construction of the new curbing, landscaping, and lighting to complete the design recommendations of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan and Stone Avenue Master Plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) resurfaced this segment of North Main Street in 2011. The City has successfully requested from SCDOT that the restriping of North Main follow the recommendations of these two master plans, which includes a new center left turn lane, bike lanes, on-street parking, and areas for landscaping. Streetscaping will improve the connectivity between downtown Greenville, Stone Avenue, Earle Street, and the North Main neighborhood. It also has the potential to initiate private redevelopment along North Main, especially the block between Park Avenue to Stone Avenue. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and a modified cost estimate developed by the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan consultant. At this time, staff recommends that the City only implement parts of the recommendations from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan such as landscape islands, furniture, lighting, and specific areas of decorative pavers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$203,000 $203,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $25,000 $0 $178,000 $0 $0 $203,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $203,000 $203,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$26,000 $26,000 0.00 0.00

$26,780 $52,780 0.00 0.00

$27,583 $80,363 0.00 0.00

$28,411 $108,774 0.00 0.00

$108,774 $108,774 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $25,000 $0 $178,000 $0 $0 $203,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-10

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Washington Street was identified for improvements in the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Out of the projects studied within the plan, Washington Street was ranked as a top priority project due to its relationship to Main Street, potential redevelopment opportunities, proximity to the multi-modal Greenlink Transit Center, and connectivity to several historic downtown neighborhoods. This capital project would expand the streetscaping associated with Project ONE to the other side of Washington to align with Laurens Street and the GTA Transfer Center.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Washington Street serves as an important gateway to downtown and is geographically centered along Main Street between Beattie Place and Augusta Street. A recommendation of the 2007 Downtown Master Plan, as well as the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, was to move beyond Main Street. The Washington Street Improvements project would support the goal of encouraging redevelopment beyond Main Street by creating safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations. Method for Estimating Cost: Public Works estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$500,000 $500,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $500,000 $500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$25,000 $25,000 0.00 0.00

$25,750 $50,750 0.00 0.00

$26,523 $77,273 0.00 0.00

$77,273 $77,273 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $150,000 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

D-11

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Streetscapes

City of Greenville, South Carolina

D-12

WASTEWATER

The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program increases the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rehabilitation of its wastewater system with projects throughout the City.

Wastewater

E-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Wastewater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

E-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYNIE-SIRRINE WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2006

DEC

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will support wastewater system rehabilitation in the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood to address inadequate capacity and inflow and infiltration issues. This includes flow monitoring, video inspection, surveying, hydraulic modeling, system evaluation, slip lining, pipe bursting, and open trench line replacement. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This improvement will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at ReWa's Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this wastewater basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of coordinating housing development with infrastructure. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate based on the completed sanitary sewer evaluation showing the pipes needing to be repaired and historic unit prices. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Project broken into two phases: phase 1A construction about to get underway and phase 1B in final design/permitting stages.

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $450,000 $0 $3,680,000 $0 $0 $4,130,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FY 12/13 FUNDING TOEST. FUNDS DATE $334,000 $0 $96,000 $0 $3,700,000 ($1,695,000) $0 $1,695,000 $4,130,000 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $450,000 $0 $3,680,000 $0 $0 $4,130,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $334,000 $96,000 $2,005,000 $1,695,000 $4,130,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of the wastewater system in areas identified as having limited capacity and excessive wet weather flows due to excessive inflow and infiltration as identified by ReWa and City flow monitoring. Several basins have been identified as requiring extensive rehabilitation including the Central Business District, Basin 9, and Basin 15. The methods include rehabilitation of approximately 650 manholes, 2,000 linear feet of pipe bursting, and 10,000 linear feet of pipe lining. This project also includes right-of-way clearing for future rehabilitation and maintenance. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basins and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the rehabilitated basins. This is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on unit pricing of rehabilitation methods. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$300,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $300,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER SYSTEM SURVEY AND MODEL Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2012

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will obtain a survey of the entire wastewater system over a period of five years. The survey will first be obtained for Basins 7, 9, 15, and those areas experiencing significant growth such as the Central Business District. This information would be put into sewer modeling software program that will allow staff to accurately ascertain present capacity limitations within the City and quickly determine what upgrades may be required, if any, when new projects are constructed. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The City has an extensive wastewater system with many areas at capacity based purely on wastewater flows. The City's staff currently requires months of manual calculation to analyze the wastewater system for new developments due to the combined lack of ownership of modeling software and detailed survey data on the system. This program would allow staff to analyze the current condition of the system, assign flows by parcel, and identify current capacity limitations. Also, as new developments arise in areas that have been surveyed and modeled, City staff could provide accurate flow availability for that parcel in just a few days. In addition to the above, having survey data will reduce the time in which sewer system rehabilitations are completed. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate provided by consultant based on total number of manholes in the wastewater system and actual cost of modeling software. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$200,000 $200,000

$65,000 $65,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $436,880 $0 $0 $16,120 $7,000 $460,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $460,000 $460,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $176,880 $0 $0 $16,120 $7,000 $200,000

FY 13/14 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 14/15 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 15/16 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 16/17 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 7 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of Basin 7 to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring, the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed, the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 15 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 15 to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring, the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed, the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at ReWa's Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER REHABILITATION PHASE III Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2013

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of a wastewater basin that will be identified through flow monitoring to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. The project would include surveying the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. After rehabilitation, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed, the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $0 $0

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER REHABILITATION PHASE IV Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2014

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of a wastewater basin that will be identified through flow monitoring to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. The project would include surveying the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. After rehabilitation, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed, the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $0 $0

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

E-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Wastewater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

E-10

STORMWATER

The Henderson Basin project reconstructed a series of culverts in the Parkins Mill area to reduce residential flooding. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program funds a number of projects that seek to reduce flood losses or improve water quality.

Stormwater

F-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Stormwater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

F-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BENNETT, MOHAWK, AND CHICK SPRINGS CROSSINGS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2001

DEC

2012

Project Description: This project replaced inadequate crossings at the following locations: 1. Bennett Street: Remove existing 10' X 7' culvert and replace with two 8' X 8' culverts. 2. Mohawk Drive: Remove existing 11' X 7' arch pipe and replace with a 24' X 8' concrete span. 3. Chick Springs Road: Construct one 10' X 10' box culvert adjacent to the existing two 10' X 10' box culverts. The remaining funds will be used to perform a watershed study to revise FEMA's maps to realize the reduction in the floodplain due to the above improvements. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): There are residential homes that flood due to undersized crossings at Mohawk Drive, Bennett Street, and Chick Springs Road. Flooding and overtopping on Chick Springs Road during storm events creates a safety hazard and inconveniences the public. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of creating a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of enhancing and protecting residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction is complete and the watershed study is under review by FEMA.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $1,339,741 $0 $80,850 $1,420,591

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $73,026 $1,347,565 $1,420,591

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,339,741 $0 $80,850 $1,420,591 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $73,026 $1,347,565 $1,420,591

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HENDERSON BASIN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2007

DEC

2012

Project Description: This project will replace inadequate culvert crossings at Halidon Road, Parkins Mill Road, Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road, and two crossings at Henderson Road. Construction is anticipated to be complete in June 2012. The timeline has been adjusted to allow preparation and review time for the FEMA flood map revisions once construction is complete. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Presently, Gower Creek overtops numerous roadways within Henderson Basin. The roadways that overtop include Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road, and two locations on Henderson Road. There are also multiple residential structures that flood along the creek resulting in repetitive flood insurance claims through the National Flood Insurance Program. With this project, all but one roadway crossing has been designed to not overtop during the 100-year storm event. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

Method for Estimating Cost: Actual design costs and engineering estimate based on design drawings. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The culverts at Halidon Road, Parkins Mill Road, Cleveland Street Extension, and one crossing on Henderson Road is complete. The fifth crossing is currently under construction and construction of the sixth and final crossing will be complete in June 2012.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $170,000 $0 $3,479,497 $0 $0 $3,649,497

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $3,588,497 $61,000 $3,649,497

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $170,000 $0 $3,479,497 $0 $0 $3,649,497 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,588,497 $61,000 $3,649,497

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PINEHURST AND WINDSOR CROSSINGS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

MAY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2012

JUN

2014

Project Description: This project will replace undersized culvert crossings at Pinehurst Drive and Windsor Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install a new 10' x 5.5' x 80' arch culvert at Pinehurst Drive and a new 12' x 5.5' x 80' arch culvert at Windsor Drive. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the creek bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Pinehurst Drive and Windsor Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culverts have minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and are prone to blockage. The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and would benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of creating a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate based on projects of similar size and scope. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Work has yet to commence.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

$800,000 $800,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $800,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $800,000 $800,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $800,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WESTVIEW AVENUE Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2002

AUG

2012

Project Description: The project will replace an inadequate crossing at Westview Avenue by installing a new 15' x 5.5' x 80' arch culvert. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The existing culvert under Westview Avenue is unable to handle the stormwater runoff during heavy storms. Residential properties along Westview experience flooding because water backs up at the crossing. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The request for bids for construction is being advertised.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $3,200 $0 $591,071 $0 $29,554 $623,825

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $620,680 $3,145 $623,825

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,200 $0 $591,071 $0 $29,554 $623,825 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $620,680 $3,145 $623,825

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PETTIGRU STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JAN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project upgrades stormwater infrastructure along Pettigru Street. This project involves the addition of approximately 850 linear feet of new stormwater pipe and associated structures. Also included in the project are the replacement of approximately 300 linear feet of sanitary sewer line and one manhole. To improve traffic and parking at the end of Pettigru, the curb, gutter, and pavement are to be upgraded in the affected area to coordinate with SCDOT activities. Additionally, the eroded bank along Richland Creek needs to be stabilized. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is located in a historic district that abuts Cleveland Park and Richland Creek. The Pettigru District has been developed into a light business district, and associated business parking has caused a concentration of stormwater runoff that channels into the project area, overrunning the existing infrastructure. Additionally, stormwater flow from this area into Cleveland Park and Richland Creek is causing significant erosion problems. In order to affect a permanent solution to the above issues and to minimize runoff through the Upstate Garden and Cleveland Park, the stormwater runoff needs to be captured and diverted to existing stormwater infrastructure at the end of Pettigru Street. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal engineering estimate adjusted for inflation in future years. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Project is in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $16,713 $0 $379,250 $0 $0 $395,963

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $395,963 $395,963

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $16,713 $0 $379,250 $0 $0 $395,963 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $395,963 $395,963

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FAIRFOREST WAY BASIN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JAN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping of the Fairforest Way Basin. This involves, but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, regional detention, and erosion problem areas. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping of all of the stormwater basins within the City. The Stormwater Management Plan is a requirement of the City's NPDES General Permit through SCDHEC. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

Method for Estimating Cost: Enginering estimate based on similar projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Watershed study is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $200,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WHITE OAK BASIN PHASE II Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping of the White Oak Basin. This includes but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis and identifying erosion problem areas. Regional detention and storm piping will be utilized to decrease flooding on Campbell Street, Karen Drive, and the surrounding areas. The site acquisition costs have been increased due to an additional parcel now for sale which would provide additional reduction in stormwater flooding. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping of all of the stormwater basins within the City. There were three culvert crossings replaced in White Oak Basin within the last few years which reduced a significant amount of area flooding. This project paved the way for moving upstream and fixing the flooding that is occurring at Twinbrook Drive, Campbell Street, and Karen Drive. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on a similar project. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The watershed study is complete and is being reviewed by FEMA for a physical map revision.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $125,000 $300,000 $620,000 $0 $0 $1,045,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,045,000 $1,045,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$150,000 $150,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $125,000 $450,000 $620,000 $0 $0 $1,195,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,195,000 $1,195,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

REEDY RIVER WATER QUALITY MONITORING STATIONS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

DEC

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the installation of two permanent water monitoring stations along the Reedy River within the City limits. The first station would be installed near Willard Street and the second near Mauldin Road. These stations would monitor items such as nutrient levels, stream velocity, and stream elevation. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As a SCDHEC regulated stormwater system, the City is required to keep various nutrients in the river below certain levels. By having permanent water quality monitoring stations at both the northern and southern limits of the City, the City will be able to determine the overall contribution to the nutrient levels. This will allow the City to know where to focus its resources as it pertains to nutrient reduction. Beyond that, the City will be able to keep a real-time level of the river which could be used to help other departments know when flooding is imminent. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate based on similar stations that Greenville County has installed. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Consultant selection for station design is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $60,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $60,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $150,000

$52,500 $52,500 0.00 0.00

$55,125 $107,625 0.00 0.00

$57,881 $165,506 0.00 0.00

$60,775 $226,281 0.00 0.00

$63,814 $290,095 0.00 0.00

$290,095 $290,095 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-10

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

GOWER ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2011

DEC

2013

Project Description: This project provides for the installation of a storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive, and Charlbury Street. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes will be rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The residents along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive, and Charlbury Street experience localized flooding during storm events. The current roads do not have curb and gutter, or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on road linear footage and sanitary sewer linear footage. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $45,000 $0 $45,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$1,614,000 $231,000 $1,845,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $45,000 $0 $1,845,000 $0 $0 $1,890,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,659,000 $231,000 $1,890,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $1,845,000 $0 $0 $1,845,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-11

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SWANSON COURT Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2012

DEC

2013

Project Description: This project installs a storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Swanson Court. The roadway will be resurfaced and the sewer will be rehabilitated as well with this project. The plans were prepared in 2007 and will need to be reviewed and possibly modified to ensure that they match current site conditions. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The residents along Swanson Court experience localized flooding during storm events. The current road does not have curb and gutter and has an undersized storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff does not enter the existing undersized storm drainage due to lack of curb and gutter, which causes water to travel down the properties. This causes erosion and flooding. This project was originally part of the East Montclair rehabilitation that was performed internally, but was not completed due to lack of funding. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Awaiting funding for project commencement.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$263,000 $21,000 $284,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 $0 $274,000 $0 $0 $284,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $263,000 $21,000 $284,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $10,000 $0 $274,000 $0 $0 $284,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-12

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RICHLAND CREEK WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2013

DEC

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Identify areas along Richland Creek that could be used to provide regional water quality. Design and construction of the regional water quality retrofits such as turning traditional detention basins into bioretention, providing rain barrels/cisterns to key neighborhoods, adding vegetative filter strips or like to existing parking lots, and adding storage between discharge points and the creek.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will increase the quality of the water in Richland Creek and the Reedy River. Richland Creek is fully urbanized and based on the current stormwater ordinance most redeveloped sites are not required to provide water quality or quantity improvements. The goal will be to reduce fecal coliform, phosphorus, and nitrogen. This project is in line with the goal of reducing nutrients to try and meet the total maximum daily loads that are stipulated by SCDHEC for various nutrients. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Awaiting funding for project commencement.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$150,000 $150,000

$300,000 $300,000

$850,000 $850,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,300,000 $1,300,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $850,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-13

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

SEP

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will include the design, purchase, and installation of a water quality unit at Public Works for the primary outfalls in order to ensure environmental permitting compliance by preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the Reedy River. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): At present, the Fleet Services facility at the Public Works Complex (PWC) is under a federal spill mitigation/prevention permit and a state industrial stormwater discharge permit. The water quality requirements of these mandates require a high degree of effort to ensure pollutants like vehicle and equipment fluids, as well as debris from City operations does not enter the Reedy River. The water quality unit will ensure environmental compliance preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the river. With the Reedy River serving the City's tourism and quality of life initiatives immediately downstream, it is incumbent on the City to immediately initiate this water quality preservation effort.

Method for Estimating Cost: Detailed preliminary engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$116,000 $116,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,000 $0 $86,000 $15,000 $7,000 $116,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $116,000 $116,000

$2,700 $2,700 0.00 0.00

$3,075 $5,775 0.00 0.00

$3,152 $8,927 0.00 0.00

$3,231 $12,158 0.00 0.00

$3,311 $15,469 0.00 0.00

$15,469 $15,469 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $8,000 $0 $86,000 $15,000 $7,000 $116,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-14

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HILLY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2012

JULY

2015

Project Description: This project will replace an inadequate culvert crossing on Hilly Street at Richland Creek and purchase up to two adjacent properties.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Presently, Richland Creek overtops Hilly Street and water backs up at this location causing regular structural flooding and causing the road to become impassable. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on Greenville County Real Property Services and previous culvert projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

$300,000 $300,000

$400,000 $400,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $700,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $700,000 $700,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

F-15

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Stormwater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

F-16

PARKS & RECREATION

The City – in cooperation with Greenville County and the Greenville County Recreation District – has committed to building the Swamp Rabbit Trail from Lake Conestee to Travelers Rest. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program funds extending the trail from Pleasantburg Drive to I-85.

Parks & Recreation

G-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Parks & Recreation

City of Greenville, South Carolina

G-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2006

Comp. Plan Principle:

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: This project will complete numerous improvements at the David Hellams Community Center. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The David Hellams Community Center is 30+ years old and in need of mechanical, electrical, ADA, and external and internal improvements that have been deferred for several years.

Method for Estimating Cost: Design and estimate work completed by consulting architects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): City Council has directed staff to use existing project funds to improve the David Hellams Community Center. On September 17, 2011 staff informed City Council that additional funds would be needed, beyond the existing fund balance, in order to complete the facility improvements.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $990,000 $0 $0 $990,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales Capital Projects Fund General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2003 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $467,500 $100,000 $350,000 $72,500 $990,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $400,000 $0 $400,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,390,000 $0 $0 $1,390,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $467,500 $100,000 $750,000 $72,500 $1,390,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RIVERWALK TO GREENVILLE TECH Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2003

DEC

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will build a trail from Cleveland Park to the Greenville Technical College campus. Construction phases remaining include the Sliding Rock Creek Trail and a pedestrian bridge over the Reedy River adjacent to Cleveland Street at Greenville Tech.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This is a critical section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail under construction in both the City and the County. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineer's estimate of projected construction costs and independent estimates from the Engineering Division. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $133,510 $0 $2,823,390 $0 $0 $2,956,900

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Federal Grant - USDOT State Grants Hospitality Tax Fund Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund General Obligation Bond - 2006 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $482,510 $198,273 $748,433 $527,684 $1,000,000 $2,956,900

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $133,510 $0 $2,823,390 $0 $0 $2,956,900 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $482,510 $198,273 $748,433 $527,684 $1,000,000 $2,956,900

$3,000 $3,000 0.00 0.00

$3,150 $6,150 0.00 0.00

$3,308 $9,458 0.00 0.00

$3,473 $12,931 0.00 0.00

$3,647 $16,578 0.00 0.00

$16,578 $16,578 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MAIN STREET TREE REHABILITATION Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

DEC

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

2006

MAR

2017

Project Description: This project will rehabilitate the 30-year-old tree plantings along Main Street to extend their life and improve sidewalk conditions. It is necessary for the department to expand the scope of the project to include South Main Street to the intersection of Pendleton Street. The decision to include South Main Street was based on site meetings with the City's contracted arborist. Annual project decisions are based on the formal graded condition of the trees and are done in coordination with other City construction projects. This project is entering the fifth year of a ten-year program to replace the declining maples and provide additional root zone space to the oaks. Sidewalks are also replaced where tree roots have caused heaving in the pavement. Replacement of some oaks will also be planned over the next five years. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Main Street trees are a character-defining feature of Greenville. This project also supports a positive business environment for downtown Greenville. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Phase I, II, III, IV and V have been completed. Phase VI will begin in January 2012.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $788,168 $0 $0 $788,168

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $11,870 $14,313 $761,985 $788,168

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $150,000 $150,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,538,168 $0 $0 $1,538,168 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $11,870 $14,313 $1,511,985 $1,538,168

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CLEVELAND PARK REPAIRS AND NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2007

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The project will improve pedestrian access to and from Cleveland Park with surrounding neighborhoods and will make numerous improvements throughout the park. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Improvements at Cleveland Park were the top priority from the 2006-2011 Parks Master Plan. Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate based on previous contracted work. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The following are complete: the playground project, the retaining wall at the basketball court, picnic shelter renovations, and five of the neighborhood access points into Cleveland Park. The department is currently working on improvements to the Rudolph Anderson Memorial and a design for sewer line concealment.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $802,818 $0 $0 $802,818

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund State Grants Property Sales Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $607,766 $65,464 $10,396 $119,192 $802,818

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $802,818 $0 $0 $802,818 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $607,766 $65,464 $10,396 $119,192 $802,818

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

REEDY RIVER REGIONAL PARK Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2008

JUN

2025+

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The project supports property acquisition for the proposed park along the Reedy River. Activities would include legal services to obtain rights of first refusal for the City, acquisition of property, associated relocation costs, and the provision of matching funds required by any potential grants. Funding may also help leverage private contributions.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Reedy River Regional Park was included in the Reedy River Master Plan, the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Comprehensive Plan, and the West Washington Street Plan. Land must be acquired in order to construct the park and funding would allow the City to acquire parcels as they become available. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal based on estimated property values. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Closing has occurred on 320 S. Hudson Street.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $675,000 $0 $0 $0 $675,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $125,000 $550,000 $675,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $675,000 $0 $0 $0 $675,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $125,000 $550,000 $675,000

$1,191 $1,191 0.00 0.00

$7,888 $9,079 0.00 0.00

$8,240 $17,319 0.00 0.00

$8,595 $25,914 0.00 0.00

$8,953 $34,867 0.00 0.00

$34,867 $34,867 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

REEDY RIVER TRAIL EXPANSION Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2007

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will build an extension of the Swamp Rabbit Trail from the intersection of South Pleasantburg Drive and Cleveland Street to Mauldin Road where it will connect with the Lake Conestee section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. The exact route is to be determined through a public design process funded in the current budget. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is part of the Trails and Greenways Master Plan adopted by City Council in January 2008. It is the next expansion segment of the Swamp Rabbit Trail to the south and is critical to the overall regional trails plan. The Greenville County Recreation District and the Conestee Foundation are currently working to construct the trail north from the lake to Mauldin Road. The City began construction of the trail south along Cleveland Street to South Pleasantburg Drive, in 2011. Additionally, this project will significantly increase the number of residential units within a quarter mile of a trail or greenway. The trail also promotes the protection of air quality, advances public health, and provides for a well-maintained infrastructure.

Method for Estimating Cost: Costs based on prior design and construction costs.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): City Council and staff have assembled a project design team consisting of residents in the project area, City staff, and design professionals to determine options for the route other than Parkins Mill Road.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The projected operating expenses include two positions necessary to maintain the existing and expanded trail system.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $225,000 $0 $1,015,000 $0 $0 $1,240,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 State Grants Hospitality Tax Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $325,000 $675,000 $240,000 $0 $1,240,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $2,375,000 $2,375,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $225,000 $75,000 $3,315,000 $0 $0 $3,615,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $325,000 $675,000 $240,000 $2,375,000 $3,615,000

$169,683 $169,683 2.00 2.00

$79,190 $248,873 0.00 2.00

$83,149 $332,022 0.00 2.00

$87,307 $419,329 0.00 2.00

$91,672 $511,001 0.00 2.00

$511,001 $511,001 2.00 2.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $75,000 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $2,375,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PARK RESTROOMS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2010

JUN

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The project will improve the restroom facilities at six parks: Cleveland, Gower, Timmons, Mayberry, Holmes, and McPherson. The restrooms will be rebuilt to meet ADA standards, become environmentally friendly, and look architecturally appealing. Funding in FY 2012-13 is for rebuilding the restrooms in Cleveland Park. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The current restroom facilities in the City's parks are in desperate need of an upgrade. While the parks are well above national standards, the restroom facilities are not. By rebuilding the restrooms and upgrading the facilities, the City can provide quality restroom facilities to its citizens. Upgrading the existing facilities will allow the City to conserve water and electricity and meet ADA standards; while offering an attractive architectural look.

Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design work is complete. McPherson Park and Holmes Park restrooms are being rebuilt presently.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $365,000 $0 $0 $380,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund Downtown Infrastructure Fund Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $180,000 $200,000 $0 $380,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $218,000 $218,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

$125,000 $0 $0 $125,000

$165,000 $0 $0 $165,000

$385,000 $0 $0 $385,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $1,258,000 $0 $0 $1,273,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $855,000 $200,000 $218,000 $1,273,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $218,000 $0 $0 $218,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $125,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $165,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $385,000 $0 $0 $385,000

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RIVER STREET UNDERPASS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2010

JUN

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will build an underpass beneath the River Street Bridge to provide safe pedestrian access between the RiverPlace and CSX portions of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is part of the Trails and Greenways Master Plan adopted by City Council in January 2008. Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Project is in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $265,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $265,000 $265,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $265,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $265,000 $265,000

$300 $300 0.00 0.00

$315 $615 0.00 0.00

$300 $915 0.00 0.00

$315 $1,230 0.00 0.00

$331 $1,561 0.00 0.00

$1,561 $1,561 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-10

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HERITAGE GREEN MASTER PLAN Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

Start/Finish Dates:

MAR

Comp. Plan Principle:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

2011

JULY

2012

Project Description: Greenville County is providing $150,000 to develop a unified campus plan for Heritage Green. The City will serve as the project manager, working with the institutions and consultant to complete the plan. Several cultural institutions are on-site including the Hughes Library, the Greenville County Museum of Art, Bob Jones University Museum and Gallery at Heritage Green, the Greenville Little Theatre, the Upcountry History Museum, and the Children's Museum of the Upstate. The completed plan will include long and short term recommendations that will improve the following: internal connectivity between the institutions; internal vehicular circulation; site furnishings and lighting; and pedestrian connections to Main Street and parking facilities.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Heritage Green Master Plan project meets many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles of walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant proposal. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Greenville County TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-11

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CLEVELAND PARK BANK STABILIZATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will stabilize the banks of the Reedy River and unnamed tributaries to the Reedy River within Cleveland Park. The improvements are near Woodland Way, Cleveland Park Drive, Lakehurst Street, Richland Way, and Ridgeland Drive. This project is similar to the Reedy River Bank Stabilization in Cleveland Park near McDaniel Avenue. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): There has been a significant amount of erosion to the banks of the Reedy River due to flooding. The areas that have been eroded need to be stabilized to prevent further erosion. The sediment that enters the water during the erosion process reduces the quality of the City's waterways adding undesirable nutrients to the water and increasing the level of turbidity. Beyond that, it presents a safety issue due to the proximity of the trails to the banks of the Reedy River. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on the linear footage of improvements and cost of similar projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Phase I getting underway. Funding request in FY 2012-13 is for Phase II.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $250,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $250,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$400,000 $400,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $650,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $650,000 $650,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $100,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $400,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-12

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MCPHERSON PARK BRIDGES Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2012

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: There are three pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park that are beginning to deteriorate. A plan for rehabilitation will be developed to include: a structural inspection, design for repair, design for restoring architectural features, and design for safety improvements. Once the plan is complete, it will be implemented to restore the bridges. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The restoration of the bridges is critical to the use of the trail in McPherson Park. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a planned project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$15,000 $15,000

$120,000 $120,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $135,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $135,000 $135,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $120,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-13

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CANCER SURVIVORS PARK Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2011

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

2014

Project Description: This project consolidates the former Swamp Rabbit Trail Bridge and Swamp Rabbit Trailheads project. It provides for (1) the establishment of a trailhead on Cleveland Street adjacent to the Chamber of Commerce building, and (2) the replacement of the narrow, metal grate bridge between Falls Park and Cleveland Park located between Church Street and Cleveland Street. This bridge is currently less than six feet wide, making it a bottleneck on the trail system. The bridge is also slippery and unsafe. Both project elements will be coordinated with private fund raising efforts and construction of the new Cancer Survivors Park. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is located on the Swamp Rabbit Trail, the spine of the City and County greenway trail network. Currently the Swamp Rabbit Trail has an average of 1,200 users a day in the County, or over 400,000 users a year. That number will likely double within the City as the trail expands. This project will help improve the safety and access for trail users. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by the City's consulting engineers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design being coordinated with the Cancer Survivor Park project.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): City funds will be a small percentage of the funds used to design and build the Cancer Survivors Garden between Church Street and Cleveland Street on the Swamp Rabbit Trail.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$94,000 $94,000

$630,000 $630,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $94,000 $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $724,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $724,000 $724,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$3,000 $3,000 0.00 0.00

$3,150 $6,150 0.00 0.00

$3,308 $9,458 0.00 0.00

$3,473 $12,931 0.00 0.00

$12,931 $12,931 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $630,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-14

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NEXT TRAIL CONNECTOR Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS

2012

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project would construct a trail from Church Street to the Swamp Rabbit Trail, adjacent to the NEXT Innovation Center. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): With the Church Street rehabilitation nearing completion, there is an opportunity to connect the trail to the NEXT building, the adjacent neighborhood, Church Street, and higher density projects like the Brio. This project will support the goals and objectives of the HaynieSirrine Master Plan to provide better bike and pedestrian access for the area. The Swamp Rabbit Trail is one of the most popular recreational attractions in Greenville and this link will provide access to additional users. This section of the trail will also complement the future Cancer Survivors Park. Method for Estimating Cost: Very preliminary estimate. There are substantial grades to overcome for this project. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$75,000 $0 $75,000

$406,000 $200,000 $606,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $681,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $481,000 $200,000 $681,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $606,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-15

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FALLS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2012

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will fund improvements in the ravine and Furman Drive areas of Falls Park which is located between the TD Bank Stage, the Furman Drive bridge, the park entrance near theGovernor's School, and the City-owned parking lot behind the West End Market. Improvements have been designed by a committee established to recommend improvements in the described area of the park. Funding of the design has been provided by private sources through the Community Foundation of Greenville. Private funds will be raised for some project elements, however, other elements pertaining to safety and function require contributions from the City.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Improvements to the south portion of Falls Park will complete the improvements to meet the Comprehensive Plan strategy by improving the quality of life for Greenville residents through the creation of safe, walkable, and accessible destinations and creating healthy environments for all Greenville residents. The project also provides a unique opportunity to partner with non-profit organizations and private residents to complete a meaningful project. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by the consulting architect. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Design development continuing with use of private funds. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): City funding will be a portion of the funds needed for this project. Other funds will be privately raised.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$608,000 $608,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $48,900 $0 $559,100 $0 $0 $608,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $608,000 $608,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $48,900 $0 $559,100 $0 $0 $608,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

G-16

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Continued investments in economic development broaden the tax base and make the City appealing for new businesses. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program supports economic development efforts in both downtown and the commercial corridors.

Economic Development

H-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Economic Development

City of Greenville, South Carolina

H-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PIAZZA BERGAMO Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

SEP

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

SEP

2013

Project Description: This project revitalizes the Piazza Bergamo area which will facilitate the plaza's use by the general public and tenants of abutting buildings, customers, and clients. The project will be an important enhancement to North Main Street and will reposition this area in conjunction with new development. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The improvements are intended to ensure that Piazza Bergamo reaches its full potential for public use through good urban design. A new plan will help the space to flow more effectively for visitors and patrons to area businesses. It has been many years since it was constructed and is functionally obsolete in its current state. Improvements will make the space more comfortable with amenities such as shade trees and new seating options. It will become a new destination for downtown and will function better for events as well.

Method for Estimating Cost: Informal cost estimate. Final costs will be known once planning stage is completed. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction on Project ONE is underway with the Piazza's reconstruction to follow shortly thereafter.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The budget appropriates an additional $152,000 for parking garage elevator access improvements from the Piazza.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $5,758,650 $0 $0 $5,758,650

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund Greenville Water System Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $4,710,000 $228,650 $30,000 $790,000 $5,758,650

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$500,000 $0 $0 ($348,000) $152,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $5,910,650 $0 $0 $5,910,650 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,210,000 $228,650 $30,000 $442,000 $5,910,650

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$47,250 $47,250 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $152,000 $0 $0 $152,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER KITCHEN RETROFIT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

JUN

2013

Project Description: The food and beverage operation remains the primary revenue generator for the TD Convention Center. Most major equipment dates to the opening of the conference center in 1993. Some equipment replacement has been achieved through annual operting budgets, but there has been no major infusion of capital dollars into the kitchen since the City took ownership over ten years ago. The proposal submitted for consideration would replace and expand deteriorating cold storage areas, replace existing flooring, and replace aged cooking equipment. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The project would provide needed infrastructure support to a prime revenue source.

Method for Estimating Cost: Current vendor pricing. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$115,000 $110,000 $225,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $30,000 $195,000 $0 $225,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $115,000 $110,000 $225,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $30,000 $195,000 $0 $225,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2009

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities along the commercial corridors (i.e. Augusta Road, Haywood Road, Laurens Road, Pleasantburg Drive, and Wade Hampton Boulevard). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: installation of new landscaping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; removal and replacement of existing deteriorated sidewalks, curbs and gutters; and the purchase and installation of street furniture, signage, decorative lighting and pedestrian signals. Expenditures will be evaluated and approved on the basis of need and anticipated return on investment. Projects will be planned and implemented using existing City staff and resources whenever possible. Anticipated projects for FY 2012-13 include phased implementation of the Wade Hampton Boulevard Streetscape Plan, Augusta Road streetscape design work, and various other improvement projects along key corridors.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): An available source of funding for streetscape improvements is needed in order to facilitate and promote private development along the commercial corridors. This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors while meeting the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal estimate based on future development plans and opportunities, as well as funding needs from previous years. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Projects funded to date: Wade Hampton Streetscape Plan; Wade Hampton landscaped medians at Bob Jones University; Augusta Road Fire Station streetscape; Augusta and McDaniel mast arm; Augusta Road Master Plan (Blythe to I-85); Haywood Road at I-385 interchange improvements; Wade Hampton decorative streetlights, and the Facade Improvement Program.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $515,516 $0 $0 $515,516

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund State Revenue Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $428,556 $16,960 $70,000 $515,516

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $815,516 $0 $0 $815,516 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $728,556 $16,960 $70,000 $815,516

$5,000 $5,000 0.00 0.00

$10,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $30,000 0.00 0.00

$15,450 $45,450 0.00 0.00

$15,914 $61,364 0.00 0.00

$61,364 $61,364 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WEST END PROPERTY ACQUISITION Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

2011

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: This project will support the purchase of three parcels in the West End for the purpose of stimulating private development. The City will then prepare the property for later resale and eventual private redevelopment. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The parcels in question represent a strategic opportunity to support redevelopment on both Main Street and Augusta Street and would provide an opportunity for further revitalization in the West End. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate of fair market value of the property. A property appraiser would be retained for a more accurate cost. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The project remains in the planning stage.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $2,500,000 $2,500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,500,000 $2,500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-6

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PEACE CENTER Department:

PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EVENTS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

2010

JUN

2013

Project Description: The Peace Center has requested the City's assistance for additional public improvements at the facility. The improvements will improve accessibility to the performing arts center from Main Street and the Reedy River. The City's commitment is contingent upon the Peace Center raising $7,500,000 in private assistance to match the City's contribution. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The project was endorsed by City Council via resolution during its January 25, 2010 meeting. The resolution stated the Council's intent to appropriate $1,250,000 in FY 2010-11 and $1,250,000 in FY 2011-12. The project will support the ongoing redevelopment of the Reedy River corridor and will promote improved cultural opportunities for the community. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $2,500,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $2,500,000 $2,500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $2,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,500,000 $2,500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-7

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HYATT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2011

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide enhanced streetscape and public spaces surrounding the Hyatt Hotel at Main Street and Beattie Place. This area was one of the first to be redeveloped in downtown and needs refreshing, including new landscaping, hardscape, and enhanced pedestrian access. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports one of the first redevelopment efforts in downtown. The private sector has projected spending $10 million in improvements to the Hyatt lobby, office, and exterior faรงade. These public improvements will enhance the public-side experience of the building's various users. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate based on similar streetscape plans. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): The hotel owner will be moving forward on implementing their redevelopment plan; the City will need to coordinate public improvements with these plans.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $296,847 $0 $0 $296,847

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $296,847 $296,847

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$500,000 $500,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $796,847 $0 $0 $796,847 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $796,847 $796,847

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$17,250 $64,500 0.00 0.00

$64,500 $64,500 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-8

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RIVERPLACE UPGRADES Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

JULY

2013

Project Description: This project will make improvements to the RiverPlace area in accordance with an amendment to the development agreement ratified by City Council in 2011. The improvements include completion of the terrace area and installing a carillon.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The development agreement completes the City's participation in the major redevelopment project. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement terms. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction to begin shortly.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $470,000 $0 $0 $470,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $470,000 $470,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $470,000 $0 $0 $470,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $470,000 $470,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-9

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BOOKENDS PHASE II Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

APR

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

JULY

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project supports public improvements associated with the second phase of the Bookends project, also known as 100 East. This will support public improvements associated with new apartments being built on property adjacent to the Spring Street garage.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In order to best leverage revenues, the City's approach of tying public improvements with private development also applies to this site. The City has awaited the second phase of the Bookends for many years, and with it now moving forward, improvements will need to be completed. The project will mean 48 new residential units and new commercial tenants. The project also completes the Spring Street Garage, of which the City invested in several years ago. For these reasons, this project will meet multiple City goals and priorities.

Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Streetscape work is in planning stages; mixed-use project is well underway with tenants scheduled to move in August 2012.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $48,000 $102,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $48,000 $102,000 $150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-10

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER CHILLER PLANT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JUN

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Five chiller units provide cooling capabilities for the TD Convention Center. Three units serving the exhibit halls were installed in 1987 and the other two units were installed in 1993. One of the three exhibit hall chillers failed during the summer of 2011 and minimal repairs provided an immediate, but likely short-term remedy. Funds are being requested to rebuild each unit. Each rebuild will cost approximately $40,000 in 2011 dollars. In addition, three of the units will need to have control panels replaced costing approximately $20,000. Rebuilding is significantly less expensive than replacement.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In the event of a chiller failure, the event space could not be cooled and would be rendered unusable. Method for Estimating Cost: Vendor quote. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

$322,000 $322,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $322,000 $0 $0 $322,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $322,000 $322,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $322,000 $0 $0 $322,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

H-11

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Economic Development

City of Greenville, South Carolina

H-12

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

The City has had significant success in revitalizing many of its special emphasis neighborhoods including the recently completed work in West Greenville. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program continues revitalization projects in the Green Avenue and Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhoods.

Neighborhood Revitalization

I-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Neighborhood Revitalization

City of Greenville, South Carolina

I-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYNIE-SIRRINE Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

MAY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2007

AUG

2012

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves infrastructure improvements associated with the redevelopment of the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood as identified in the community. Improvements include: basic street upgrades and repairs, circulation connections, streetscaping, sidewalks, sewer, stormwater, and green space. The existing budget is being used to support infrastructure improvements for the Homes of Hope and Tower Development currently underway. As part of that development, the Ellie Mae Logan Park will be restored. In addition, funds are also used for project management related to the reconstruction of Church Street.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Much of the existing infrastructure within the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood is substandard including deteriorated roads; broken curbs and sidewalks; and outdated and undersized stormwater and wastewater systems. Public infrastructure developments are necessary not only to keep these systems up to current standards, but also to leverage private investment. Calculations of build-out value indicate a potential investment of $50 to $90 million. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement and contracted costs. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Project is nearly complete and awaiting final reconstruction of Church Street.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $280,000 $0 $484,308 $0 $0 $764,308

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2003 Miscellaneous Grants Fund Revolving Housing Fund Capital Projects Fund Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $125,545 $3,273 $78,750 $75,000 $437,180 $44,560 $764,308

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Neighborhood Revitalization

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $280,000 $0 $484,308 $0 $0 $764,308 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $125,545 $3,273 $78,750 $75,000 $437,180 $44,560 $764,308

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

I-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

GREEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS

Start/Finish Dates:

NOV

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

AUG

2012

Project Description: The final components of this project will be to install trees, park area landscaping, and median landscaping for the Green Avenue Phase II redevelopment. This project will also create public park space for the former Bell Furniture and BP Gas station sites on Green Avenue as well as the detention pond areas located on these properties and at the end of Lafayette Street. The street medians were installed on Anderson Road during the construction phase. Tree plantings will be located on Green Avenue, and Anderson, Casey, Lincoln, Lafayette, McLeod, and Nelson Streets. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Landscaping these areas will finalize the public improvements for the Green Avenue Phase II redevelopment project. Park space will be provided and tree replacement will offset those trees lost during the infrastructure improvements. Park space includes a walking trail which connects neighborhood homes to the park areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Project was designed and cost estimated in-house using City staff. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Infrastructure improvements are complete. Landscaping and plantings for the park area and detention ponds are now ready to be bid and constructed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $10,875 $0 $1,677,282 $0 $61,846 $1,750,003

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund State "C" Funds Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 Stormwater Fund General Obligation Bond - 2003 General Obligation Bond - 2006 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $108,000 $82,877 $224,000 $524,814 $186,132 $624,180 $1,750,003

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Neighborhood Revitalization

($108,000) $0 $0 ($128,000) $0 ($85,000) ($321,000)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,875 $0 $1,356,282 $0 $61,846 $1,429,003 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $82,877 $224,000 $396,814 $186,132 $539,180 $1,429,003

$21,250 $21,250 0.00 0.00

$21,888 $43,138 0.00 0.00

$22,544 $65,682 0.00 0.00

$23,220 $88,902 0.00 0.00

$23,917 $112,819 0.00 0.00

$112,819 $112,819 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 ($321,000) $0 $0 ($321,000)

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

I-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MT. EUSTIS STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2012

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

2014

Project Description: This project will complete improvements to Phase II of Mt. Eustis Corners and Phase III (Mt.Zion Street) in the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood. Phase II includes construction of a new public street, wastewater, stormwater, drinking water, and sidewalks adjacent to Mt. Eustis and Mt. Zion Streets. Phase III improvements include replacing wastewater lines along the portion of Mt. Zion Street that lies between the horseshoe of Mt. Eustis Street. Genesis Homes is developing 20 affordable and workforce residential units for sale and rent. The Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood has reviewed and approved the redevelopment plan. This request supports the completion of Phase II and Phase III. The City's investment will be leveraged by Genesis Homes through the development of workforce and affordable residential units. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The proposed development supports affordable workforce residential units in the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood. These plans are consistent with the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood master plan and aligns with several of City Council's strategic goals including City of Neighborhoods, Inclusive City, Safe City, and Properous City. The request also contributes to the Comprehensive Plan by coordinating housing development with infrastructure, maintaining quality of redeveloped areas, creating a safe environment, and creating a mixture of housing types and designs.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate was provided by the City's consulting engineers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Phase I and a portion of Phase II improvements will be complete. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The City's investment will leverage approximately $1,137,000 in other public and private funding.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $0 $1,152,372 $0 $27,000 $1,279,372

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2006 Federal Grant - EPA Wastewater Fund Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $390,000 $226,372 $0 $580,000 $36,000 $47,000 $1,279,372

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Neighborhood Revitalization

$11,000 $0 $85,000 ($580,000) $20,000 $16,000 ($448,000)

$199,000 $0 $0 $0 $43,000 $33,000 $275,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $979,372 $0 $27,000 $1,106,372 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $600,000 $226,372 $85,000 $0 $99,000 $96,000 $1,106,372

$1,000 $1,000 0.00 0.00

$1,030 $2,030 0.00 0.00

$1,061 $3,091 0.00 0.00

$1,093 $4,184 0.00 0.00

$1,126 $5,310 0.00 0.00

$5,310 $5,310 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 ($448,000) $0 $0 ($448,000)

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $275,000 $0 $0 $275,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

I-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Neighborhood Revitalization

City of Greenville, South Carolina

I-6

PUBLIC SAFETY

The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program continues investments in the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s first responders by including a new fire station to serve Verdae, ICAR, and Woodruff Road.

Public Safety

J-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Public Safety

City of Greenville, South Carolina

J-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

EAST AREA FIRE STATION Department:

FIRE

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

JUN

2014

Project Description: This new fire station, constructed on approximately two acres, will serve the furthermost eastern parts of the City including the ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road areas. One engine company based at this fire station will provide 24/7 initial emergency response within the primary response area. Twelve firefighters will be assigned to provide fire suppression, medical first responder, operations-level hazardous materials, and operations-level technical rescue services.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This supports both the City Council's 2011 objectives and the Fire Department's Strategic Plan. The ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road corridors have emergency response times that are well outside of the national standard of 4:00 minutes or less 90% of the time. Response times to these areas currently average 6:13 minutes with only 21% being 4:00 minutes or less. Excluding the station that responds to these corridors, the average response time Citywide is currently 2:50 minutes with 90.6% of responses in 4:00 minutes or less. This new station is expected to improve response times in the target area by 35% to 50%.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by consultants based on most recent projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): No funds have been expended and the City is currently attempting to acquire land for construction. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The fire station will be designed and built to accommodate future needs for additional personnel and the necessary equipment to adequately serve commercial and residential development in the target area.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2012 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $0 $75,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$0 $3,881,000 $3,881,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $171,500 $799,920 $2,796,860 $187,720 $0 $3,956,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $75,000 $3,881,000 $3,956,000

$510,000 $510,000 0.00 0.00

$561,447 $1,071,447 12.00 12.00

$1,063,984 $2,135,431 0.00 12.00

$1,095,903 $3,231,334 0.00 12.00

$1,119,779 $4,351,113 0.00 12.00

$4,351,113 $4,351,113 12.00 12.00

FY 12/13 COST $96,500 $799,920 $2,796,860 $187,720 $0 $3,881,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

J-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

POLICE TRAINING FACILITY AND PISTOL RANGE Department:

POLICE

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2010

SEP

2012

Project Description: This project funds the construction of a 1,940 square foot addition to the training facility, renovation of the current training building, and installation of a roof over the pistol range located at the Police Training Facility on 690 Mauldin Road. This addition will expand the old and outdated training building of the same size. The addition of the new roof over the firearms range will apply to 12 of the 25 firing lanes. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The training facility and pistol range have been open since 1968 on this property and have served as the primary law enforcement training facility in the Upstate, especially for firearms training. With the exception of a few grant-funded improvements to the pistol range, no new construction or renovations have occurred at the training facility in over twenty years. In order to maintain a safe city and create a safe environment, police officers must be properly trained. The Police Department currently trains in a facility that is old and outdated; for this reason, and in order to provide the latest law enforcement training methods and practices, the department requests additional training room.

Method for Estimating Cost: Construction estimate provided by general contractor. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Construction underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $10,000 $0 $283,000 $0 $0 $293,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund General Fund Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $50,000 $156,000 $87,000 $293,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 $0 $283,000 $0 $0 $293,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $50,000 $156,000 $87,000 $293,000

$2,575 $5,075 0.00 0.00

$2,652 $7,727 0.00 0.00

$2,732 $10,459 0.00 0.00

$2,814 $13,273 0.00 0.00

$13,273 $13,273 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

$0 $0 $0 $0

$2,500 $2,500 0.00 0.00

J-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FIRE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Department:

FIRE

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: This project will evaluate four fire stations and provide a needs assessment regarding the condition and operation of the facilities in the long term. The stations involved will be Station 2 (West End), Station 3 (Augusta Street), Station 4 (Stone Avenue), and Station 5 (Pleasantburg). Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project achieves the Fire Department's Strategic Plan goal to upgrade antiquated and non-NFPA compliant fire stations. Two stations were built in the early-1950's and two were built in the late-1960's. These facilities have been staffed 24 hours a day since their opening dates and their condition has deteriorated greatly over time. The City's Building Maintenance and Engineering Divisions have investigated the needs of these facilities and recommended this evaluation by an outside entity to determine the best and most costeffective course of action. This needs assessment will assist the Fire Department and Building Maintenance in defining a strategic vision for these facilities and propose facility improvements to help extend their useable life.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by consultants. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): It is anticipated that this project will provide recommendations for future capital projects, but future cost impact is undetermined. Future growth and needs of the Fire Department will also be considered while planning renovation and/or replacement of these facilities.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$70,000 $70,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $70,000 $70,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

J-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Public Safety

City of Greenville, South Carolina

J-6

PARKING

The City operates a parking system of approximately 6,000 spaces throughout downtown Greenville. The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program provides funding to renovate the Richardson Street and Liberty Square garages in FY 2012-13.

Parking

K-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Parking

City of Greenville, South Carolina

K-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CHURCH STREET GARAGE Department:

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

JULY

2012

Project Description: This project will make necessary repairs to the Church Street Garage that will extend the life of the garage. This garage was built in 1998 and is primarily used for Bi-Lo Center events with some transient activity and an increasing number of monthly parkers. In 2000, an extensive amount of spalling was noted during a routine inspection on an inverted tee beam on the fifth level of the garage. A repair was made under warranty by the contractor. In 2002, the same beam was repaired once again with additional shoring installed. All steel connections are now showing signs of corrosion and will need to be cleaned and repainted. Several spandrels have cracks and will need to be repaired, as well as spalling and chipping in approximately 20 locations throughout the garage. A large portion of these concerns are water-related, and this project will waterproof the top level of the garage to prevent any further deterioration in the lower levels of the facility. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will make the necessary repairs that are needed to restore the facility and extend the life of the garage. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates were provided by vendor and based on a walk-through inspection with the City's contracted engineer. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Bids have been opened.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $507,000 $0 $50,000 $557,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $557,000 $557,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parking

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $507,000 $0 $50,000 $557,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $557,000 $557,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

K-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

LIBERTY SQUARE GARAGE Department:

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

PLANNED/PROGRAMMED

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

JUN

2013

Project Description: This project will address a number of previous and recent issues that have developed. The majority of the work will address water infiltration on the structural components in the steel structure of the garage. It will also address waterproofing and caulking of the top level of the garage to prevent future infiltration. There are a number of cracks that are appearing throughout the facility. The elevators within this facility require an upgrade to improve both operational and aesthetic appearances due to the fact that they have not been updated since the creation of the garage. Furthermore, the gate control equipment and card reader system for this facility require an upgrade because the current equipment is out of date. This project has been expanded from the FY 2012-2016 CIP by adding lighting to the stairwells and ceilings to enhance the overall illumination.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will make necessary structural and waterproofing initiatives in this facility to prolong the life of the facility and enhance the customers overall experience when visiting the downtown area. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates have been provided by various vendors for waterproofing and structural concerns, as well as replacement costs for elevators and gate control equipment. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parking

$865,000 $865,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $800,000 $50,000 $0 $865,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $865,000 $865,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $15,000 $0 $800,000 $50,000 $0 $865,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

K-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RICHARDSON STREET GARAGE Department:

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

JUN

2013

Project Description: The Richardson Street Garage has not had any substantial repairs or upgrades since it was built approximately 16 years ago. This project will seal and waterproof the top level of the garage to prevent water infiltration into the garage. There is at least one expansion joint that will require replacement in conjunction with the waterproofing. This project will also address lighting levels and aesthetic appearances within the garage by painting the ceilings and stairwells within the garage. The current gate equipment is over 16 years old and requires replacement. This should improve the overall customer experience in the garage.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This will repair water control issues within the garage, thereby extend the life expectancy of the garage. The painting and equipment replacement is crucial with the continued growth of business activity within the immediate area of the garage. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates obtained from other facilities, as well as estimates from various vendors. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): With Project ONE getting underway and future high demand for this garage, staff believes it is necessary to complete this work prior to the completion of Project ONE. By completing this work in the FY 2012-13, it will enable the City to avoid disruption of service when activity in the garage increases. By accomplishing this within this timetable, it will enhance the overall customer service experience by preventing disruption of parking for large amounts of customers, as well as improving the appearance and operation of the garage.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parking

$655,000 $655,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $510,000 $130,000 $0 $655,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $655,000 $655,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $15,000 $0 $510,000 $130,000 $0 $655,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

K-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Parking

City of Greenville, South Carolina

K-6

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

The FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program provides for improvements to existing facilities including City Hall and plans for the relocation of Public Works.

General Government

L-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

General Government

City of Greenville, South Carolina

L-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CITY HALL EXTERIOR Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

AUG

2012

Project Description: This project will provide for the restoration of City Hall's aluminum exterior. The project will chemically clean, treat, and apply a sealer to restore the exterior aluminum curtain wall of City Hall to its original appearance. The building's aluminum exterior is corroding and must be restored. In addition, the project will replace the solar film on City Hall's windows to improve energy efficiency. The current film has exceeded its lifespan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As work is complete on the Main at Broad development adjacent to City Hall, City Hall is in need of restoration to its aluminum curtain walls to make the building look presentable. In addition, the existing solar film is no longer providing any benefit to the facility and has exceeded its lifespan. Method for Estimating Cost: Vendor quote. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): Work on both the aluminum exterior and the solar film shall be underway in the second quarter of 2012. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): All work will be performed in accordance with American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) specifications for the care and maintenance of architectural aluminum surfaces.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $242,000 $0 $0 $242,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $242,000 $242,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $242,000 $0 $0 $242,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $242,000 $242,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

L-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PHONE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

SEP

2012

Project Description: The City's current phone system is antiquated and dates back to the 1970s. The core infrastructure located in the basement of City Hall has met its maximum capacity and scalability. The City currently has little to no support on this equipment. Given the age of the equipment, a failure of the phone switch would cripple the City's ability to communicate with employees and the public.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The current phone situation will eventually fail, leaving the City without a viable way to communicate or conduct business. The City has no way to manage core hardware or handsets. The City is possibly paying more for the current system (centrex lines, lack of support, etc.) than they would be by replacing the system with a voice over internet protocal (VoIP) infrastructure. A VoIP phone system would allow much easier support and maintenance, would use existing data infrastructure, and potentially save the City money in the future.

Method for Estimating Cost: Costs are estimated via industry experience, the size of the organization, and comparison to other municipalities. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$475,000 $475,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $475,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $475,000 $475,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $50,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $100,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $150,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $200,000 0.00 0.00

$200,000 $200,000 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $475,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

L-4

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS CENTER Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the eventual relocation of Public Works away from its present site on Hudson Street and Mayberry Street to a new location elsewhere in the City. This current request provides funding to identify a new site, provide for its acquisition, and begin site preparation. Once a site is acquired and prepared, future improvements will be proposed in later budgets to fund the construction of a new facility. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The relocation of Public Works advances several long-standing goals of moving a critical facility out of the flood plain to better respond to natural disasters and to protect the City's assets from future losses. It is also the first step in advancing the Comprehensive Plan's goal of establishing a park along the Reedy River at the present location of Public Works. Method for Estimating Cost: Costs are based on current land acquisition prices. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$3,100,000 $3,100,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $1,800,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,100,000 $3,100,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $1,800,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

L-5

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS RADIO SYSTEM Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

NOV

2012

Project Description: This project replaces the existing Public Works radio system with a system that is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's requirement of narrowbanding certain radio frequencies. This project will include replacing all mobile, portable, fixed-base radios, and support equipment to include relicensing the system to an 800Mhz digital frequency that takes advantage of current technology. These technologies include GPS tracking of vehicles such as snow plows and sand spreaders in emergency operations. The 800Mhz digital system would also provide some interoperability with public safety radio systems in the event of a widespread emergency. This project also includes radios for Parks and Grounds and Special Events staff. The project also looks at reducing redundancy in radio and other communications equipment with the expectation of reducing total number of units. As the City grows, this proposed system would provide a greater area of radio coverage than the current conventional system.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): On January 1, 2013, all industrial land mobile radio systems must cease operating on 25Khz bandwidth and must begin operating on 12.5Khz bandwidth. Many radios in the Public Works radio system are over 10 years old and most cannot be modified or reprogrammed to the new 12.5Khz bandwith requirement and must be replaced. This includes the system infrastructure. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in operating an illegal radio system and result in significant fines and/or loss of radio license.

Method for Estimating Cost: State contract price. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund Solid Waste Enterprise Fund Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$119,000 $106,000 $39,000 $57,000 $321,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $321,000 $0 $321,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $119,000 $106,000 $39,000 $57,000 $321,000

$27,696 $27,696 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $55,392 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $83,088 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $110,784 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $138,480 0.00 0.00

$138,480 $138,480 0.00 0.00

FY 12/13 COST $0 $0 $0 $321,000 $0 $321,000

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 12/13

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

EST. FUNDS

L-6

APPENDIX

The CIP continues to invest in projects in the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s award-winning downtown and promotes a vibrant core to the community.

Appendix

M-1

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Appendix

City of Greenville, South Carolina

M-2

FY 2013-2017 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2013-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projection of Legal Debt Margin 6/30/2011 Actual

6/30/2012 Estimate

6/30/2013 Estimate

6/30/2014 Estimate

6/30/2015 Estimate

6/30/2016 Estimate

6/30/2017 Estimate

Assessed value Merchants' inventory for debt purposes Total assessed value

357,297,765 9,169,930 366,467,695

362,571,469 9,169,930 371,741,399

363,442,750 9,169,930 372,612,680

374,723,881 9,169,930 383,893,811

384,197,666 9,169,930 393,367,596

393,940,382 9,169,930 403,110,312

404,084,920 9,169,930 413,254,850

Statutory debt limit based on 8%

29,317,416

29,739,312

29,809,014

30,711,505

31,469,408

32,248,825

33,060,388

2,522,000 5,895,000 2,805,000 11,222,000

1,938,000 5,815,000 2,455,000 10,208,000

1,771,000 5,590,000 2,105,000 9,466,000

1,591,000 5,355,000 1,745,000 8,691,000

1,404,000 5,110,000 1,375,000 7,889,000

1,204,000 4,855,000 995,000 7,054,000

988,000 4,590,000 600,000 6,178,000

Legal debt margin, current

18,095,416

19,531,312

20,343,014

22,020,505

23,580,408

25,194,825

26,882,388

Less new issues in CIP: G.O. Series 2012

0 0

3,881,000 3,881,000

3,686,000 3,686,000

3,491,000 3,491,000

3,296,000 3,296,000

3,101,000 3,101,000

18,095,416

19,531,312

16,462,014

18,334,505

20,089,408

21,898,825

23,781,388

Less current debt G.O. Series 2011 G.O. Series 2006 G.O. Series 2003

Legal debt margin, revised

Appendix

M-3

FY 2013-2017 CIP

Appendix

City of Greenville, South Carolina

M-4