City Of Canada Bay Council City of Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) - Final 13 July 2021
This report: has been prepared by GHD for City Of Canada Bay Council and may only be used and relied on by City Of Canada Bay Council for the purpose agreed between GHD and the City Of Canada Bay Council as set out in section 1.2 of this report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than City Of Canada Bay Council arising in connection with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this report (Section 1.3). GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | i
Executive Summary Purpose and Scope The purpose of this Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) is to review the current pedestrian needs in the City of Canada Bay (Council) Local Government Area (LGA), to improve the walking environment for all pedestrians. A PAMP provides a list of prioritised pedestrian infrastructure improvements for safer, more attractive transport choices for residents and visitors, to increase pedestrian activity, and to improve the amenity for all in the Council LGA. The specific objectives of a PAMP are to:
Increase use of the pedestrian network for short trips (0 – 2 kilometres).
Reduce the number of missing links within the pedestrian network.
Reduce the number of pedestrian crashes.
Improve pedestrian connectivity with other transport modes, primarily train, bus, bicycle, and car.
Provide pedestrian facilities that cater for the needs of all pedestrians, including people with disabilities, commuters, children, seniors and recreational walkers.
Complement existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
This PAMP has been prepared in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services (now Transport for NSW) guidance document How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (Roads and Maritime, March 2002).
Existing Conditions The Council LGA is located approximately 6-12 kilometres to the north-west of Sydney CBD, and with a population of approximately 96,550 in 2020 (source: profile.id). The City of Canada Bay includes the suburbs of Abbotsford, Breakfast Point, Cabarita, Canada Bay, Chiswick, Concord, Concord West, Drummoyne, Five Dock, Liberty Grove, Mortlake, North Strathfield, Rhodes, Rodd Point, Russell Lea, Strathfield (part) and Wareemba. The most common types of issues identified within the study area are outlined in Table 0-1, which includes poor quality or missing pedestrian infrastructure such as narrow footpaths, kerb ramps,missing bus landing pads at bus stops, overgrown vegetation, obstructions in the footpaths and missing pedestrian links (e.g. formed footpaths). Table 0-1 Key issues for pedestrian Issue Type Narrow footpath Kerb ramps No bus landing pad Missing link Overgrown vegetation Obstruction in path Pedestrian refuge Wide crossing point TGSIs Signage Intersection Poor intersection design
Total Issue Locations 56 55 37 34 32 18 13 12 12 10 9 9
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | ii
Other existing issues generally include wide crossing points, poor intersection design, signage, poor footpath quality and trip hazards.
Ensuring a High-Quality Walking Environment This PAMP has been prepared for the Council to provide a framework for existing pedestrian needs, future management, use and enhancement for pedestrians of all ages and mobility. A PAMP is a strategic document that identifies the pedestrian network hierarchy and associated action plan for management. The strategic, high-level, objectives of this PAMP are based around:
Integrating walking into the transport system as the first and last leg of all transport journeys to encourage people to walk more often and further.
Providing appropriate pedestrian facilities where required, enhancing accessibility and mobility.
Identifying clusters and patterns of pedestrian crashes, to address safety issues.
Developing and integrating pedestrian concentration routes that complement Safer Routes to School projects and Local Area Traffic Management schemes.
A review of previous relevant planning policies was conducted to:
Ensure that this PAMP aligns with National, State Government and Local Council policy directions in relation to the development of not only pedestrian access and mobility plans, but also the wider context of transport and urban planning.
Identify any deficiencies within the current network and develop a strategy that will guide the importance of the proposed measures to improve the access, amenity and safety for pedestrians.
Recommendations The study found many locations within the Council LGA study area, which require improved pedestrian infrastructure as shown in Appendix E. This includes upgrades to existing infrastructure that are either of poor quality/damaged or have non-standard design, additional pedestrian crossing facilities and new footpath connections Major Projects Concord Road / Mary Street intersection: There is an opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge at Concord Road. This will improve pedestrian connection and safety between Rhodes and Brays Bay reserve, which also provides a link between Rhodes Station and Concord Hospital via the Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway. This project has been identified for delivery as part of the Rhodes East priority Precinct plan. Pedestrian Routes A hierarchy of pedestrian routes has been established based on observed pedestrian demand and proximity to pedestrian attractors, such as train stations, Concord Hospital, commercial land uses, schools/TAFE, and key walking routes. This walking route hierarchy was used as part of the scoring method to determine the priority for proposed pedestrian infrastructure upgrades.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | iii
Pedestrian Crossing facilities Upgrade or provide new pedestrian refuges / crossings at the following locations:
Barnstaple Road / Henley Marine Drive, western approach and northern approach
Barnstaple Road / Park Road, southern approach
Barnstaple Road, east of McCulloch Street
Blackwall Point Road / Great North Road intersection, eastern side
Blackwall Point Road, near Great North Road, southern side
Brent Street / Henry Marine Drive, northern side
Brent Street, north of Whittle Street
Brewer Street, west of Shipham Street
Clermont Avenue / Concord Road, eastern approach
Coranto Street / Great North Road intersection, eastern side
Davidson Avenue / Concord Road, eastern approach
Edenholme Road / Great North Road intersection, eastern approach
First Avenue / Ingham Avenue intersection
First Avenue/Arthur Street, eastern approach
Garfield Street / Harris Street intersection, eastern approach
Great North Road / Altona Street, western side
Great North Road south of Irene street, across Great North Road
Great North Road, between Hampden Road and Brickleigh Street
Hampden Road, west of Sibbick Street
Harris Road, North of Garfield Street
Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection, western side
Lyons Road / East Street, southern side
Lyons Road / Scott Street, southern side
Lyons Road /West Street, southern side
Majors Bay Road / Gallipoli Street intersection, southern approach
Mortlake Street / Brays Road, southern approach
Tennyson Road / Orchards Avenue intersection, eastern approach
Thompson Street, north of Polding Street, western side
Thompson Street, northern approach
Trafalgar Parade / Majors Bay Road intersection, western side
Wellbank Street, eastern side of Macnamara AvenueConcord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
The proposed upgrade or provision of new kerb ramp locations within the Council area are detailed in Appendix G.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | iv
Missing Links The following locations were identified to have missing links requiring new footpaths:
Abbotsford Parade between Great North Road & St Albans Street, southern side
Barnstaple Road, southern side
Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park, southern side
Bayard Street between Bertram Street and Bertram Lane
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street, western side
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street, eastern side (south of bus stop)
Bayswater Street, north of Westbourne Street across road
Bibby Street, western side
Blackwall Point Road, southern side, adjacent to Alison Park
Cabarita Park Path, western side
Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street, northern and eastern sides
Cometrowe Street, eastern side
Crane Street - link to Corby Avenue, eastern side
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park, Carpark entrance
Crane Street east of Burwood Road, northern side
Crane Street, westerns Side and link to Evelyn Street Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park, southern side
Dening Street, north of Short Street, western side
Eaton Place, Chiswick, east and west
First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive, southern side
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf, near Teviot Avenue
Killoola Street
Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street, northern side
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection, western side
Mcculloch Street north of Whittall Street, eastern side
Norman Street / Majors Bay Road intersection, northern side
St Georges Crescent, between St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street
St Georges Crescent, through Salton Reserve to Roseby Street
The Esplanade / north of Henricks Avenue, western side
The Parade, between Gears Avenue and Byrne Avenue
Wellbank Street, northern side, west of Ian Parade
Zoeller Street east of Saunders Parade, northern side
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | v
Priorities The How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (Roads and Maritime, 2002) provides guidance on what is important in providing pedestrian infrastructure upgrades. This method was used to determine the priority of the proposed improvements. Table 0-1 provides a summary of the high priority proposed upgrades that were identified, with scores of 60 or higher. Table 0-1 PAMP High Priority Projects – Proposed Upgrades PAMP ID
Location (Street / Intersection)
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority High
TfNSW Rank
Estimated Cost
21
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
Consider opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge across TfNSW
1
TBC
116
Lyons Road / Victoria Road intersection
New kerb ramps
High
2
TBC
77
Clermont Avenue / Concord Road
Install pedestrian refuge
High
3
$25,000
78
Davidson Avenue / Concord Road
Install pedestrian refuge
High
3
$25,000
79
Station Street / Concord Road
New kerb ramps (x2)
High
3
$3,600
219
Gipps Street, adjacent to Concord Oval
Upgrade Stairs (around 60 steps)
High
6
TBC
228
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street
New stop landing pad
High
7
$8,400
20
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
Widen kerb ramps
High
9
$3,600
220
Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection
Widen footpath
High
9
$4,500
221
Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection
Widen footpath
High
9
$6,750
222
Gipps Street
New stop landing pad
High
9
$8,400
80
Concord Road
Install TGSIs
High
13
$500
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | vi
PAMP ID
Location (Street / Intersection)
Description of Proposed Treatment
126
St Georges Crescent
Construct accessible path
TfNSW Priority High
TfNSW Rank
Estimated Cost
14
$13,500
Cost Where possible, unit rates provided by the Council have been used directly. For items where costs were not available, previous studies, estimation and professional judgement have been used. These costs are indicative and are subject to change and make no allowances for contingencies or actual site design and installation (including site establishment, excavation and disposal). The total costs for the proposed upgrades for the PAMP is in the order of $5,136,675 The cost breakdown for high, medium and low priority projects is as follows:
$149,250 for high priority works (note, this does not include costs associated with intersection re-design projects or pedestrian bridges, as further investigations would be required)
$1,356,725 or medium priority works
$3,630,700 for low priority works
Additional studies would be required for intersection re-design projects. The costs for these projects are not included in the above costs.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | vii
Table of contents Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................ ii Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................... ii Ensuring a High-Quality Walking Environment ............................................................................. iii Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ iii 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1
Background .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2
Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................. 2
1.3
Study Limitations .................................................................................................................. 5
1.4
Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 5
1.5
Report Structure ................................................................................................................... 5
Background Review ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1
Planning Review .................................................................................................................. 7
2.2
National ................................................................................................................................ 7
2.3
State and Metropolitan ....................................................................................................... 10
2.4
City of Canada Bay Council Planning ................................................................................ 15
2.5
Existing Travel Characteristics and Demographics ........................................................... 20
2.6
Existing Land Use and Infrastructure................................................................................. 27
2.7
Crash Statistics .................................................................................................................. 30
Existing Pedestrian and Mobility Audit ......................................................................................... 32 3.1
Key Results from Community Survey ................................................................................ 32
3.2
Existing Issues and Constraints Audit ............................................................................... 37
Planning for Pedestrians .............................................................................................................. 40 4.1
Creating a Safe and Attractive Environment for Walking .................................................. 40
4.2
Best Practice Standards .................................................................................................... 41
4.3
Methodology for Identifying Pedestrian Needs .................................................................. 46
Proposed Pedestrian Improvements ............................................................................................ 49 5.1
Types of Pedestrian Improvements ................................................................................... 49
5.2
Speed ................................................................................................................................. 51
5.3
Proposed Pedestrian Improvements ................................................................................. 51
Priorities for Pedestrian Improvements ........................................................................................ 88 6.1
Methodology to Prioritise Pedestrian Requirements ......................................................... 88
6.2
Ranking of the Pedestrian Improvements.......................................................................... 92
Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 117 7.1
Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 117
7.2
Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 119
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | viii
Table index Table 2-1 Functional Classification of Roads ......................................................................................... 28 Table 2-2 Key Road features ................................................................................................................. 28 Table 2-3 Recorded Crashes with Pedestrians in Canada Bay (2015 – 2019) ..................................... 31 Table 3-1 Overview of Community Engagement ................................................................................... 32 Table 3-2 Stakeholders analysis ............................................................................................................ 33 Table 3-3 Summary of Issues types ....................................................................................................... 39 Table 4-1 Minimum Footpath Widths ..................................................................................................... 42 Table 4-2 Maximum Grades ................................................................................................................... 43 Table 4-3 Infrastructure Provision Goals for Urban Areas ..................................................................... 47 Table 5-1 Potential Pedestrian Infrastructure Initiatives ........................................................................ 49 Table 5-2 Indicative Cost Estimate Assumptions ................................................................................... 50 Table 5-3 Identified Issues and Proposed Upgrades ............................................................................. 52 Table 6-1 RMS Weighted Criteria Scoring System ................................................................................ 88 Table 6-2 Weighted Scoring Criteria to Prioritise the PAMP Initiatives.................................................. 89 Table 6-3 Infrastructure Provision Goals for City of Canada Bay LGA ................................................. 92
Figure index Figure 1-1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2-1 Main Mode of Travel to Work .................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2-2 Movement and Place Framework ......................................................................................... 11 Figure 2-3 Eastern District Structure Plan .............................................................................................. 12 Figure 2-4 Comparison of Age Profiles in Council LGA and Greater Sydney ....................................... 20 Figure 2-5 Employment status for workers residing in Council LGA...................................................... 21 Figure 2-6 City of Canada Bay employment by travel zones ................................................................. 22 Figure 2-7 Resident Locations of People Employed in Council LGA ..................................................... 22 Figure 2-8 Employment locations of people residing in Council LGA .................................................... 23 Figure 2-9 Journey to Work for residents of Council LGA ..................................................................... 23 Figure 2-10 Motor Vehicle Ownership .................................................................................................... 24 Figure 2-11 Forecast Population in Council area ................................................................................... 25 Figure 2-12 Workforce forecast in Council LGA..................................................................................... 26 Figure 2-13 Employment forecast in the Council area ........................................................................... 26 Figure 2-14 Key destinations for pedestrians in the Council .................................................................. 27 Figure 2-15 Bus Network ........................................................................................................................ 29
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | ix
Figure 2-16 Crashes Involving Pedestrians Between 2015- 2019 ......................................................... 30 Figure 3-1 Locations of Existing Issues and Constraints for Pedestrians .............................................. 38 Figure 4-1 Path Width Requirements for Various Users ........................................................................ 42 Figure 4-2 Kerb Ramp Design................................................................................................................ 44 Figure 4-3 Pedestrian Refuge Design .................................................................................................... 45 Figure 6-1 Walking Route Hierarchy ...................................................................................................... 91
Appendices Appendix A – Existing Pedestrian Infrastructure Appendix B – Pedestrian Key routes (medium and high priority) Appendix C – Draft Engagement Outcome Report Appendix D – Locations of Existing Issues and Constraints for Pedestrians Appendix E – Locations of treatment opportunities Appendix F – Prioritisation of proposed pedestrian infrastucture Appendix G – Site audit findings and ranking of proposed upgrades
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632 | x
1.
Introduction 1.1
Background
Walking is a fundamental and direct means of access to most places and to the goods, services and information available at these places. Those creating public and private space or facilities must give priority to 'walk in' access, which is attractive, safe, convenient, and accessible for everyone. All responsible agencies should respect the pedestrians' inalienable right-of-way on footpaths and recognise the importance of constructing and maintaining them for transport, health, safety, leisure and social purposes. The Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), has been prepared for the Council to provide a framework for existing pedestrian needs, future management, use and enhancement for pedestrians of all ages and mobility. This PAMP is a strategic document that identifies the pedestrian network hierarchy and associated action plan for management. The strategic, high-level, objectives of this PAMP are to:
Integrate walking into the transport system, as a legitimate form of transport to encourage more walking
Provide appropriate pedestrian facilities where required, to enhance accessibility and mobility
Identify clusters and patterns of pedestrian crashes, to address safety issues
Develop and integrate pedestrian routes that complement Safer Routes to School projects and Local Area Traffic Management schemes.
An important function of the PAMP is to identify pedestrian needs and clearly indicate the Council’s direction for the management and improvement of pedestrian needs within the Council Local Government Area (LGA). Different land uses require pedestrian facilities for a range of users. Pedestrians, including commuters and recreational walkers, need to be catered for as well as the elderly, the mobility and visually impaired, residents, school children, and tourists.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 1
The guidance document How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (Roads and Maritime, March 2002) states that: “A PAMP is a comprehensive strategic and action plan to develop pedestrian policies and build pedestrian facilities. PAMPs aim to co-ordinate investment in safe, convenient and connected pedestrian routes. A PAMP provides a framework for developing pedestrian routes or areas identified by the community as important for enhanced, sustainable safety, convenience and mobility.” 1.1.1
Definition of Pedestrian
A pedestrian includes (for the purposes of this PAMP):
A person walking.
A person driving a motorised wheelchair that cannot travel over 10 km/h on ground level.
A person in a non-motorised wheelchair.
A person pushing a motorised or non-motorised wheelchair.
A person in or on a wheeled recreational device or toy.
1.2
Purpose and Scope
The purpose of this PAMP is to review the current and future pedestrian needs in the Council LGA to provide facilities for pedestrians. This PAMP provides a list of prioritised pedestrian infrastructure improvements for safer, more attractive transport choices for residents and visitors. This comes with the aim of increasing pedestrian activity and improving the amenity for all local residents and visitors to the study area. The Council PAMP has been prepared in accordance with the Roads and Maritime guidance document How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (Roads and Maritime, March 2002). This study has focused upon reviewing the existing and proposed pedestrian network, with the aim of extending and improving the existing network of pedestrian facilities. As part of this report, it is recommended that the Council develop a program for the maintenance of existing facilities. This study, therefore, aims to add the greatest value to Council’s strategies and works program by identifying the gaps in existing networks and extending the networks where appropriate. 1.2.1
PAMP Objectives
The objectives of PAMPs are:
To facilitate improvements in the level of pedestrian access and priority, particularly in areas of pedestrian concentration.
To reduce pedestrian access severance and enhance safe and convenient crossing opportunities on major roads.
To identify and resolve pedestrian crash clusters.
To facilitate improvements in the level of personal mobility and safety for pedestrians with disabilities and older persons through the provision of pedestrian infrastructure and facilities which cater to the needs of all pedestrians.
To provide links with other transport services to achieve an integrated land use and transport network of facilities that comply with best technical standards.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 2
To ensure pedestrian facilities are employed in a consistent and appropriate manner throughout NSW.
To link existing vulnerable road users plans in a co-ordinated manner, such as bike plans, maintenance programs and accessible public transport.
To ensure that pedestrian facilities remain appropriate and relevant to the surrounding land use and pedestrian user groups.
To accommodate special event needs of pedestrians.
To meet obligations under the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992).
1.2.2
Study Area
The Council LGA is located approximately 6 to 12 kilometres north-west of Sydney CBD, and with a population of approximately 92,550 in 2019, based on the ABS population estimate. The Council LGA includes the suburbs of Abbotsford, Breakfast Point, Cabarita, Canada Bay, Chiswick, Concord, Concord West, Drummoyne, Five Dock, Liberty Grove, Mortlake, North Strathfield, Rhodes, Rodd Point, Russell Lea, Strathfield (part) and Wareemba. The study area for this PAMP is shown at Figure 1-1. The study mainly focuses on the key pedestrian routes in the Council LGA. The following areas have generally been excluded from the PAMP study area, as pedestrian needs will be addressed as part of the future planning for the following projects:
Rhodes – the Rhodes Place Strategy is being developed by the Council and the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. The precinct includes land to the east and west of Rhodes Station between the rail line and Concord Road.
Parramatta Road – Parramatta Road Urban Transportation Strategy.
North Strathfield Station – proposed Metro station as part of Sydney Metro West.
Five Dock Station – proposed Metro station as part of Sydney Metro West.
Burwood North – proposed Metro station as part of Sydney Metro West.
In addition to this PAMP, the Council will be undertaking a separate footpath audit, to examine the current condition of all footpaths within the LGA. Therefore, footpath issues such as footpath quality have generally been excluded from this study.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 3
Figure 1-1 Study Area
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 4
1.3
Study Limitations
The study has been limited by the following:
Crash data sourced from the Transport for NSW Centre for Road Safety website http://roadsafety.transport.nsw.gov.au/statistics/interactivecrashstats/lga_stats.html?tablg a=4.
Cost estimates for proposed infrastructure are strategic only, and are based on unit rates provided by the Council (where available).
The site audits for this study focused on the key walking routes in the Council LGA, identified in two consultation workshops and agreed with the Council. The location of the site audits, are shown at Figure 1-1.
1.4
Consultation
Consultation for this PAMP included the following:
Workshop 1: stakeholder workshop with the Council Access and Inclusion Committee (Workshop 1) on 1 December 2021.
Workshop 2: Stakeholder workshop with Surrounding LGAs and TfNSW on 14 December 2021.
e-newsletters publication between 1 February 2021 and 1 March 20Cib.
Posters with a QR code located in 24 Council venues.
The installation of 78 footpath stickers with a QR code throughout the LGA.
Direct email to 1,794 Collaborate Canada Bay users.
Social Media posts - Facebook and Instagram ads between 1 February 2021 and 16 February 2021.
Community Consultation – Online Survey - 31 January 2021 to 22 February 2021.
Community Consultation – Map Tool - 31 January 2021 to 22 February 2021.
Community Consultation – Email December 2020 to March 2021.
1.5
Report Structure
The remaining sections of this report are structured as follows:
Section 2 – Background Review: provides a summary of the previous pedestrian planning and related policies from the Council and various NSW Government agencies.
Section 3 – Existing Pedestrian and Mobility Audit: provides a detailed list of the issues, constraints and opportunities for pedestrian access and movement.
Section 4 – Planning for Pedestrians: provides an overview of best practice standards that apply to the treatment of pedestrian facilities.
Section 5 – Proposed Pedestrian Improvements: a list of potential pedestrian improvements is given with the different types of infrastructure to improve safety, amenity, and access for pedestrians.
Section 6 – Priorities for Pedestrian Improvements: an assessment of the pedestrian requirements was conducted and is provided with short, medium and long term infrastructure projects. An indicative cost and level of difficulty to implement them is included.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 5
Section 7 – Conclusions and Recommendations: provides the key findings in the PAMP, with a list of recommendations and priorities in the PAMP for the pedestrian access and mobility improvements.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 6
2.
Background Review This section includes a review of existing relevant State and Federal Government planning documents, Council's disability and access policies and reports and other relevant Council policies, including the Local Environmental Plans (LEP), and Development Control Plans (DCPs). A summary of the demographic, transport and pedestrian crash statistics and the existing land use and transport infrastructure for the Council area was also used to show the strategic context, relevance and importance for the PAMP.
2.1
Planning Review
The review of previous relevant planning policies was conducted:
To ensure that the PAMP aligns with National, State Government and Local Council policy directions in relation to the development of not only pedestrian access and mobility plans, but also the wider context of transport and urban planning.
To identify any deficiencies within the current network and strategy that will guide the importance of the proposed measures to improve the access, amenity and safety for pedestrians.
These policies provide a strategic framework to improve the pedestrian network so that it encourages and supports walking within, to and from the study area.
2.2
National
2.2.1
Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Guidelines
The Australian Transport Assessment and Planning Guidelines (ATAP) provides a comprehensive framework for planning, assessing and developing transport systems and related initiatives. This document has been considered in the preparation of this PAMP, to ensure that the PAMP aligns with national policy directions. ATAP identifies that walking is probably the most common form of travel as it is involved to some degree in all trips undertaken by all other modes. However, only about four percent of work or study trips in Australia rely solely on walking - making it the third most common mode, as indicated in Figure 2-1, which shows the proportions of those travelling by either public transport, private vehicle walking or bike riding in Australian states. ATAP also identifies a number of factors that are likely to determine the propensity for people to choose walking over other modes, including:
Infrastructure: Good quality, appropriately designed active travel infrastructure with meaningful network connectivity will maximise levels of active travel and improve safety, given the underlying demand for walking.
Land use: some land uses tend to have a higher incidence of walk trips, for example, outdoor recreation facilities, indoor sports facilities, schools, and public transport interchanges.
Complementary uses/facilities: propensity for active travel can be enhanced by the proximity of complementary land uses and facilities, such as a public transport interchange located close to a regional shopping centre or university.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 7
Scale and proximity: the propensity for active travel would be expected to increase with the scale of development, while active travel would be expected to increase with the proximity of related uses.
Safety: such as trip hazards, inadequate path width, location of power/light poles and paths not navigable by wheelchairs, prams and the elderly.
Security: personal security can be a major factor in limiting walking.
Topography and climate: hot or cold temperatures, humidity, steep hills and rain can make walking less attractive compared to other travel modes.
Ancillary infrastructure: including seating, drinking fountains, shade planting, and directional signage.
Awareness: potential active travel users might be unaware of the availability and advantages of active travel networks. 100% 90% 80%
% of Travel
70% 60%
75.8
79.8
86.3
86.9
89.5
84.4
80.1
83.4
81.1
7.3 2.8
8.3
13.6
50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
18.8
14.9
0.8 4.6
1.5 3.8
8.5 1.2 4.0
NSW
Vic
Qld
Walking
Bicycle
8.6 1.2 3.3
3.7 0.9 5.9
11.1 1.2 3.3
9.7
3.0 5.2
1.2 4.1
SA
Tas
WA
NT
ACT
Australia
Public Transport
Private Vehicle
Figure 2-1 Main Mode of Travel to Work Source: ABS Census Data 2016
The ATAP provides a framework for planning and developing transport systems and identifies key factors that are likely to encourage people to walk more for short trips. These factors have been considered in the development of this PAMP.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 8
2.2.2
Safe Systems Approach
The ‘Safe Systems Approach’ as outlined within the National Road Safety Strategy incorporates the holistic view of the road transport system and the interactions among roads and roadsides, travel speeds, vehicles and road users. This includes all modes of road transport including pedestrians. The ‘Safe Systems Approach’ recognises that people will always make mistakes and may have road crashes but the system should be forgiving and those crashes should not result in death or serious injury. Initiatives to ensure safer roads, speeds, people and cars need to be implemented together so the road system not only keeps moving, but safe and protected. In the designing of pedestrian facilities, the Safe System Approach should be used. 2.2.3
Austroads Guidelines
The Austroads guidelines provide a national reference for the development of safe and efficient road systems throughout Australia. Within the Austroads publications, the Guide to Traffic Management and Guide to Road Design includes guidelines to address the interface of the road environment with pedestrians and pedestrian infrastructure. Pedestrian considerations are incorporated into a large number of the Austroads guidelines, with some of the key guidance relevant to the preparation of this PAMP included below. Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings Management This part of the Guide to Traffic Management addresses the intersections of road infrastructure including interchanges, signalised intersections and smaller scale crossings. It includes consideration of pedestrian safety and connectivity, providing context for a number of issues specifically facing pedestrians when considering crossings of road infrastructure. The guide states that crossing points are places where pedestrians are concentrated and: “provided with a safe place to cross the road through the use of treatments and devices that effectively manage conflicts between pedestrians/cyclists and motorised traffic” Key objectives of crossing points include:
To increase motorist visibility of and expectation for crossing pedestrians.
Provision of visual and physical aids for pedestrian users with limited vision or mobility.
To simplify the decision-making process for pedestrians and motorists when crossing the road.
Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A Pedestrian and Cyclist Paths This part of the Guide to Road Design specifically addresses the design considerations for pedestrian and cycling paths, with safety and economic factors at the core of the guidelines. These considerations include accommodation for a broad range of user groups and mobility levels. Key objectives of pedestrian path design include:
Required width of paths, which considers: –
Types of pedestrian users expected (including catering for the presence of wheelchairs and motorised scooters).
–
Amount of pedestrian flow expected.
–
Adjacency to traffic or parking lanes.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 9
–
Accounting for overtaking pedestrians.
Gradient of the path to accommodate differing mobility levels.
Envelope for pedestrians including vertical height for features such as signage.
Sighting distance for pedestrians, particularly at locations of: –
Intersections.
–
Stairways.
–
Around horizontal and vertical curves.
–
Driveways.
2.2.4
Australian Model Code of Residential Development
Australian Model Code of Residential Development (Commonwealth of Australia, 1997) was produced to advance the planning, design, assessment and implementation of residential development. It is for use by designers, builders, developers and government officers responsible for housing development. It states that: “In the planning of residential areas there must be a careful balance between transport needs and protection of the environment. There should be accessibility, choice in mode of transport (private vehicle transport, public transport, walking and cycling).” The guide identifies that a well-defined community should feature design principles, including reduced travel to local employment and activities (e.g. interconnected street networks and local activity centres within walking distance). One of the key performance criteria in relation to travel mode choice is that street networks facilitate walking and cycling within the neighbourhood and to local activity centres. The Australian Model Code of Residential Development identifies that planning for residential development should consider sustainable transport options, including walking, which have social and environmental benefits.
2.3
State and Metropolitan
The following lists the relevant plans, strategies and guidelines to this PAMP at a state and regional level. Future Transport 2056 Future Transport 2056 is the NSW Government’s holistic transport strategy direction, outlining the direction for the integration of land-use planning with the development of the transport network. The strategy covers all modes of transport, including public transport, active transport and freight. It focuses on the six outcomes of customer focus, successful places, strong economy, safety and performance, accessible services and sustainability. This strategy also introduces the “Movement and Place” framework, shown in Figure 2-2, which involves considering balancing the level of vehicle movement including speed and traffic volume with the place aspects of different areas including safety and amenity, and pedestrian activity. In line with the preparation of this PAMP, the strategy encourages:
Active transport such as walking and cycling for local trips.
Safe and accessible footpaths.
Lower vehicle speeds in places with high pedestrian activity.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 10
Figure 2-2 Movement and Place Framework Source: Future Transport 2056 strategy (Transport for NSW)
Sydney’s Walking Future Sydney’s Walking Future, released in 2013 is the strategic transport document for walking in NSW. It aims to promote and improve the safe, convenient and efficient movement of walking in Sydney. Sydney’s Walking Future is a subset document of the NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan (now superseded by Future Transport 2056). This document sets out NSW Government’s objectives for increasing walking to achieve improved environmental outcomes, health benefits and to reduce traffic congestion. These include:
Promoting the health benefits of walking through targeted programs, improved wayfinding and enhanced trip-planning.
Improving community connections by developing and improving walking links.
Working to increase rates of walking including by developing tools and policies to measure walkability and safety.
Some key relevant barriers to the uptake of walking trips able to be addressed through this PAMP include:
Poor quality footpaths.
Safety and security concerns.
The proposed improvements to the walking network identified as part of this PAMP will help support the State Government’s objectives for increasing walking for short trips. Greater Sydney Commission – Eastern District Plan As part of the Greater Sydney Region plan for a metropolis of three cities, in response to the structural and spatial challenges facing Sydney over the coming decades, the Eastern District
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 11
Plan focuses on the eastern part of the Sydney region which includes the Council area, shown in Figure 2-3. Rhodes is identified in the Plan as a Health and Education Precinct, with North Strathfield, Concord, Breakfast Point, Five Dock and Drummoyne identified as Local Centres. Figure 2-3 also identifies the committed transit link (Sydney Metro West) running in an east-west alignment through the LGA. The plan advocates for infrastructure improvements for connectivity, safety and amenity of local areas. Specific priorities which align with the intent of this PAMP include:
Creating vibrant, healthy and safe local neighbourhoods by fostering walkable local areas, including upgrades to pedestrian facilities.
Improving active transport links to and from schools.
Improving active transport connections to and from public transport interchanges to enhance accessibility to the nearest metropolitan cluster.
Figure 2-3 Eastern District Structure Plan Source: Greater Sydney Commission Eastern District Plan (modified by GHD)
Building Momentum – NSW State Infrastructure Strategy 2018-2038 This most recent plan developed by Infrastructure NSW provides advice to the Government regarding infrastructure projects and priorities. The strategy presents a large number of recommendations, with those relevant to active transport and pedestrians within the Council LGA including the following:
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 12
Invest in active transport within the Eastern Harbour City.
Improve to pedestrian facilities to encourage walking, particularly in higher density areas, such as targeted widening of kerbside areas.
Improve health outcomes through the planning and design of neighbourhoods and places to encourage walking, cycling and active recreation.
Local Character and Place Guideline (2019) This guideline provides a broad guideline to identify the aspects of the character of local places across environmental, social and economic dimensions, and ways in which to introduce character into strategic planning. The guideline interacts with a number of other types of strategic documents and reinforces the importance of active transport and pedestrian friendly spaces for a more vibrant streetscape.
Increased active transport broadly benefits multiple outcomes: –
Sustainability.
–
Health.
–
Transport (including travel times).
Local character and place considerations include: –
Safety.
–
Access to public transport.
–
Methods to prioritise walking and cycling.
–
Provision of open space.
–
Accessibility of pedestrian spaces for those less mobile.
Parramatta Road Urban Transformation Strategy (PRUTS) This strategy (PRUTS) considers the Parramatta Road corridor between Granville and Camperdown and is intended to provide a long-term vision and framework to facilitate employment and housing growth while supporting the urban renewal of the area. Key actions relevant to pedestrians in the Council LGA include:
Burwood-Concord Precinct: –
Facilitate mixed-use of land along Parramatta Road to enhance vibrancy and activity, including non-residential ground floor uses.
–
Reduce residential parking rates to decrease car dependency.
–
Develop strong active transport connections and increase open public space in new developments.
Kings Bay: –
Develop a local village around Spencer Street, with high amenity and low traffic.
–
Reinforce active transport links to Croydon Station.
–
Provide open space linkages and green corridors between the hub and Parramatta River foreshore.
–
Create new separated regional cycle path along Queens Road connecting Concord and Iron Cove.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 13
Sydney Metro West Sydney Metro West is a transformational urban rail project connecting the Sydney CBD with Parramatta and Westmead, with stations including Olympic Park, Pyrmont and The Bays precinct. The project is currently under construction and will be due for completion mid to late this decade. Three of the planned stations are located in the Council LGA at North Strathfield, Burwood North and Five Dock, providing these areas with greatly increased connectivity to the east, west and north.
North Strathfield: The metro will interface with the Sydney Trains T1 Northern Line, providing a transport interchange between the north and west, allowing for a revitalisation of the surrounding area and the Homebush precinct.
Burwood North: This strong business, residential and retail centre centred on Parramatta Road will be further connected through this metro station, allowing for a shift from buses and the existing Burwood Station.
Five Dock: This introduction of rail to this area will vastly improve travel times to the CBD and west. The metro will interchange with bus routes along Great North Road and provide residential and commercial areas in the vicinity with increased mobility, adding to the already vibrant sense of place.
The provision of rail connections to these areas provides people with increased options to access business, residences and other facilities on foot and without the use of private vehicles. Concord Hospital Redevelopment Concord Hospital is a major health hospital and precinct in the Eastern District providing health care services and a teaching location for the University of Sydney’s Sydney Medical School. The hospital is currently undergoing a major redevelopment to improve existing facilities, access and construct new clinical buildings. Stage 1 of the redevelopment includes:
A comprehensive Cancer Centre, Centre for Veterans’ Healthcare, and Centre for Rehabilitation and Aged Care.
Improved access and hospital entries, as well as patient drop-off zones, carparks, and loading dock.
Increased inpatient and outpatient capacity, as well as for clinical research.
New retail and a zone for future development.
The improvements to the site and its capacity open the door to opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to the hospital to enhance the development. Particularly, the proximity to Rhodes Station is noted to be a factor for pedestrian demand to and from the site. NSW Road Safety Plan 2021 The Road Safety Plan identifies the NSW State Government’s priorities as part of the Towards Zero campaign and NSW Road Safety Strategy 2012-2021 to reduce road injuries and fatalities. Priorities include addressing crashes in busy local areas, building a safer community culture and planning for safer infrastructure. Key elements relating to pedestrian activity include:
Recognising that increased on-demand services and delivery culture is resulting in busier urban environments with more potential pedestrian-vehicle conflicts.
Improving safety for pedestrians as vulnerable road users by providing crossings, refuges and traffic calming devices.
Expanding 40 km/h speed limited zones for high pedestrian activity.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 14
Removing green-on-green signals during which pedestrians and vehicles cross in the same direction simultaneously and results in potential conflicts.
NSW Aging Strategy 2016-2020 Through consultation with the community and stakeholders, this strategy addresses key areas of policy and infrastructure relating to the needs of an aging population in NSW. In particular, older members of the community have identified numerous barriers to their mobility, including:
Distance from public transport and difficulty in walking over long periods of time.
Poor quality footpaths and missing links in the footpath network.
Older Persons Transport and Mobility Plan 2018-2022 As part of the Future Transport 2056 strategy, this plan seeks to address the transport and mobility issues specific to older members of the community and outline the plan to improve access and mobility for older persons. Key elements of this plan include:
Acknowledging the Local Government role in planning and design of neighbourhoods to provide pedestrian infrastructure such as footpaths and kerb ramps, as well as bus stops, and traffic management facilities.
Considering whole of journey accessibility, including barrier-free access to public transport such as removing steps and providing off-peak services to meet travel demands of different demographic groups.
Actions for Transport for NSW to continue to work with local councils in preparing PAMPs and place-based planning using a systematic approach to optimise funding and provide effective infrastructure improvements.
2.4
City of Canada Bay Council Planning
The following documents provide the local planning context for the pedestrian access in the City of Canada Bay local area. Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan (2013) The Local Environmental Plan (LEP) outlines the planning guidelines and regulations for new developments in the LGA, including rules for zoning of land uses. This plan is to be used in conjunction with the Development Control Plan (see the section below) to provide a framework for the development of Council LGA. One of the key overall aims of the LEP is: “to promote sustainable transport, reduce car use and increase use of public transport, walking and cycling.” In relation to supporting pedestrian activity, the LEP includes:
Allowance for the maximum floor space ratio for new developments in allowed zones is contingent upon these developments encouraging travel by public transport, walking and cycling, as well as having form which provides pedestrian amenity and connections along with open space.
Specific zoning regulations include:
B4 Mixed Use: –
Promote uses that attract pedestrian traffic along the ground floor street frontages.
–
Encourage suitable business, retail, office and residential development so as to increase public transport use, walking and cycling.
B3 Commercial Core:
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 15
–
Maximise public transport patronage and encourage walking and cycling.
The land use requirements provided within the LEP have informed the prioritisation of the proposed pedestrian infrastructure. Canada Bay Development Control Plan The Development Control Plan (DCP) outlines the specific controls relating to new developments within the LGA, and is intended to be read in conjunction with the LEP to inform the overall development within the Council LGA. The DCP lists a number of objectives to promote pedestrian safety and amenity, including that:
Residential developments relate well with the surrounding public domain and contribute to an active pedestrian-oriented environment.
Mixed use neighbourhoods have specific controls to provide for appropriate pedestrian access and amenity, including building setbacks and footpath widths.
Specific engineering and design related controls for pedestrian safety and amenity include:
Lighting is provided to all pedestrian paths and shared areas within residential developments.
Grading and sight lines are controlled around driveways.
New developments maintain pedestrian scale and provide street level weather protection.
Separate pedestrian and vehicle access to buildings is provided.
Engineering specifications for pedestrian and shared paths are followed, including dimensions, steps, signage and road crossings.
Site-specific controls for individual centres within the Council LGA include:
Five Dock Town Centre: new development should reinforce a permeable and attractive street and lane network supporting overall access and mobility.
Drummoyne Town Centre: encourage street-edge developments with the intent to activate the street frontage areas.
In-line with the requirements and intent outlined within the DCP, the PAMP objectives will align to put forward strategies incorporating pedestrian infrastructure that improves accessibility, safety and amenity. Canada Bay Local Strategic Planning Statement The Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) is the overarching strategic planning document for the LGA, bringing together content from other Council plans and strategies. It also implements some of the actions from the Eastern District Plan on a more local level. The most relevant items to pedestrians include:
Priority 6 to provide high quality urban design outcomes for key sites and precincts, specifically identifying the need for: –
Built form and land use outcomes which are human scale and enhance pedestrian amenity and experience in the Bakehouse Quarter. This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects.
–
Provide direct, accessible and safe foreshore access links around Birkenhead Point Shopping Centre.
Priority 11 to identify opportunities for improvements to future Sydney Metro station sites and their immediate surrounds to maximise pedestrian amenity and experience. This area
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 16
has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects.
Priority 12 to improve connectivity throughout the LGA by encouraging a modal shift in the way people travel towards active and public transport, including reviewing the Bike Plan to identify opportunities for shared paths.
Future development along Great North Road in Five Dock which maintains the pedestrian friendly character of the retail strip. This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects.
Canada Bay Local Movement Strategy This movement strategy and action plan reviews the existing transport situation, identifies opportunities and constraints, futures transport as well as land-use trends to identify strategic objectives for various transport and land use aspects and actions to address these. Major roads in the LGA, as well as a lack of dedicated walking and cycling connections, are noted by the strategy to create barriers to active transport. Actions developed by this strategy include the following:
Investigate improvements to pedestrian crossing facilities at certain key locations to reduce barriers to walking connectivity: –
Concord Road (between Corey Avenue, Victoria Avenue and Hospital Road).
–
Gipps Street (between Concord Road and Broughton Street).
–
Lyons Road West (between Great Northern Road and Burwood Road).
–
Parramatta Road (between Harris Road and Cheltenham Road). (This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects).
Plan for and promote improved pedestrian and bicycle access of public transport interchanges.
Supporting measures that localise activities and reduce the distance needed for trips.
Improve walking access to and from schools, including developing information outlining active transport routes and prioritising walking access at key school entrances.
Investigate options to widen footpaths along key links (including Queens Road east of Harris Road). This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects.
Investigate options to improve pedestrian waiting and storage areas at certain constrained intersections.
Canada Bay Local Employment and Productivity Study The Local Employment and Productivity Study aims to outline the nature of employment in the Council LGA and identify strengths, weaknesses and opportunities summarised in a list of actions presented to the Council. These include recommendations to:
Create a town centre in Drummoyne, centred around Formosa Street, including a pedestrian-focused retail strip that is accessible and walkable.
Investigate better pedestrian access of Concord Hospital from Rhodes, including an improved crossing of Concord Road.
Concentrate retail and other ground floor services along Parramatta Road closer to centres such as the Bakehouse Quarter or Burwood Road to maximise pedestrian accessibility.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 17
Canada Bay Community Strategic Plan 2018-2030 This plan articulates goals and strategies for the Council LGA to deliver outcomes for the community across five key themes. The plan is based on significant community consultation and reflects pedestrian outcomes in a number of its areas.
Improving sustainability and reducing car use through increasing numbers of people walking, cycling and using public transport.
Vibrant local centres with a mix of retail and services in these areas to encourage walking and cycling to access them.
A measure of improved connectivity across the LGA would be an increase the number of people walking and cycling to work.
Community consultation identified desires for: –
More services to be located within walking distance to residential areas.
–
A more accessible waterfront using bike and walking paths.
Canada Bay Local Housing Strategy The Local Housing Strategy aims to outline the nature of housing currently present in the Council LGA, to identify the constraints and opportunities involved in delivering new housing and align these with the local planning guidelines and the Eastern District Plan. Actions recommended to Council which are relevant to the preparation of this PAMP include:
Prioritise planning of local centres to provide opportunities for housing that is within walking distance of services and public transport, such as mixed-use areas.
Allow for medium density housing within residentially zoned areas that have walking or cycling links to local centres.
City of Canada Bay Development Contributions Plan This document lists infrastructure and amenities that developers are required to contribute towards. These include:
Pedestrian crossing upgrades.
Pedestrian and bicycle access within precincts and to public transport such as railway stations.
2.4.1
Local Precinct Studies and Plans
A number of local precincts within the Council LGA are highlighted as the subjects of plans and studies to improve the urban character and accessibility. These include specific recommendations and strategies relevant to pedestrian safety, amenity and accessibility. Victoria Road Urban Design Review The review was carried out considering the precinct around Victoria Road, Drummoyne, and focused on public domain constraints and opportunities for the area, including:
Limited pedestrian connectivity across Victoria Road, limited to five signalised crossings, and exacerbated by the movable traffic barrier restricting available crossing points.
Community engagement identified an undesirable pedestrian environment along Victoria Road with the footpath requiring repairs and insufficient pedestrian links.
Lack of visual amenity along Victoria Road, with the opportunity for public art, planter boxes and trees to improve the pedestrian experience.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 18
Five Dock Town Centre Urban Design Study The strategy aims to provide a safe, vibrant, connected and attractive town centre focused along Great North Road in Five Dock, with aims that include:
Improve pedestrian connectivity through upgrades to existing pedestrian connections and the creation of new ones, including new laneways and crossings.
Create a low speed environment that is safe and accessible for all users, including the young and elderly, including encouraging smaller scale intersections and traffic calming measures.
Promote the design of urban parks and spaces with a “human scale” to enhance the amenity and attractiveness of the town centre.
Increase vibrancy and foot traffic to improve perceptions of safety and security.
Concord West Masterplan (2014) The Concord West Masterplan was prepared in 2014 and supported by a number of other studies, including a socio-economic study and traffic, transport, accessibility and parking report. The area of study focused around the western side of Concord West Railway Station.
Railway line creates a barrier for pedestrian access, with the only pedestrian access noted to be via an unofficial foot tunnel and the station overbridge in the same location, with little alternative access.
Recommended improved pedestrian connections to Olympic Park in the west and improved pedestrian amenity along George Street, the main north-south corridor west of the station. –
It is noted that since this study was published, a new raised pedestrian crossing has been constructed to facilitate access between the new Victoria Avenue Public School and Concord West Station.
Rhodes Place Strategy The Draft Rhodes Place Strategy, as of December 2020, is the overarching strategic document for the development of the precinct, which includes the area east of Rhodes Railway Station, as well as the Cavell Avenue and Leeds Street zones. One of the stated guiding principles of the strategy is to “prioritise the pedestrian experience above all other modes of transport.”
Previous community consultation reveals consistent support for improved pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure in the area, notable connections to the waterfront. (This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects).
Intent to incorporate human-scale design principles to facilitate pedestrian amenity and attractiveness.
Recommendation to provide a new pedestrian overbridge crossing Concord Road to access the eastern foreshore and Concord Health Precinct, as well as a pedestrian connection to the new ferry wharf near Leeds Street.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 19
2.5
Existing Travel Characteristics and Demographics
2.5.1
Population
The Council LGA estimated number of residents in 2020 is 96,550 with a population density of 48.52 persons per hectare (source: https://profile.id.com.au/canada-bay). The population of the notable key local areas in the 2016 Census include:
Drummoyne: 12,946
Five Dock: 11,506
Concord: 11,506
Rhodes (East): 817
Rhodes (West): 12,465,
North Strathfield: 5,153
2.5.2
Age Group Demographics
Figure 2-4 shows the comparison of age profiles for five-year age groups between the Council LGA and Greater Sydney according to the 2016 Census. These age profile statistics show that:
Comparatively fewer children and young adults between the ages of five and 19 live in the Council LGA. This indicates that relatively there are lower numberss of primary and secondary school students in the Council LGA;
A notably higher proportion of the Canada Bay population is between the ages of 25 and 34 than in Greater Sydney.
Figure 2-4 Comparison of Age Profiles in Council LGA and Greater Sydney Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 20
2.5.3
Employment in Canada Bay LGA
Figure 2-5 shows the employment status of residents of the Council LGA compared to that for Greater Sydney according to the ABS 2016 Census. A total of 44,698 Canada Bay residents were employed in 2016. These statistics further show that:
Council LGA has a comparatively higher proportion of people in the workforce, 34 percent, than Greater Sydney, 31 percent.
The proportion of unemployed residents looking for work is roughly equivalent to that of Greater Sydney, at three percent.
Figure 2-5 Employment status for workers residing in Council LGA Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016
2.5.4
Journey to Work Data
Data from the ABS 2016 Census, Transport for NSW Transport Performance and Analytics (TPA) as well as from the id.community profiles have been obtained and assessed for the Council area. These sources of information have been used to assess the patterns and demography of employment within the study area, including commuting behaviour. Figure 2-6 shows a breakdown of the Council LGA by travel zones, a metric used by TPA to measure employment and travel patterns.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 21
Figure 2-6 City of Canada Bay employment by travel zones Source: TfNSW Land Use Planner - Employment
Figure 2-7 shows the residential locations of people employed within Council LGA, including the LGA itself and the ten next largest contributing LGA’s of workers. Of the total workers in the City of Canada Bay, the greatest proportion (24 per cent) live within the LGA, while the next greatest LGA of residence is Parramatta City Council.
Figure 2-7 Resident Locations of People Employed in Council LGA Source: https://profile.id.com.au/canada-bay/workers
On the other hand, Figure 2-8 shows the LGA of employment for those residing in the Council LGA. The largest two LGA’s were the City of Sydney and the City of Canada Bay, indicating that there is a significant professional workforce commuting to the Sydney CBD.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 22
Figure 2-8 Employment locations of people residing in Council LGA Source: https://profile.id.com.au/canada-bay/residents
Journey to work mode share data for the resident workers is shown in Figure 2-9. This data excludes residents that are not working, or those that did not travel to work.
61 percent of trips to and from work by the City of Canada Bay residents are made via private vehicle, indicating that there is low effective utilisation of the road capacity.
30 percent of commuting trips were made via public transport modes of bus and train, which reveals that there are significant numbers of workers in the City of Canada Bay area currently accessing public transport stations and stops.
There is a low rate of walking only for the journey to work at three percent, which is representative of the separation of employment in the area from people’s usual place of residence.
Figure 2-9 Journey to Work for residents of Council LGA Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 23
The low walking mode share for journeys to work in the local area reinforces the need to improve the environment for pedestrians and integrate land use and transport planning to provide more jobs closer to home. 2.5.5
Car Ownership
A comparison of the number of vehicles owned at each address in the Council LGA to Greater Sydney is shown in Figure 2-10. This indicates the following:
Nine per cent of households in the City of Canda Bay do not have a motor vehicle, slightly less than the 12 per cent figure for Greater Sydney
38 per cent of households in the City of Canda Bay have one vehicle, compared to 33 per cent in Greater Sydney
Fewer households have three or more motor vehicles in the City of Canda Bay than the average for Greater Sydney
Figure 2-10 Motor Vehicle Ownership Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016
The overall car ownership in the Council LGA is comparable to Greater Sydney, indicating that the area is not heavily car dependent, and providing an opportunity to encourage the usage of modes other than driving for getting to work and other trips. 2.5.6
Future Population and Employment
Population Forecast According to the NSW Government Planning Portal, the 2019 Council LGA population of around 92,550 is forecast to grow to around 131,050 people by 2041, as shown in Figure 2-11. This is an increase of around 46 per cent from the current population, representing a significant amount of growth. Data from TPA population forecasts for the Council LGA travel zones also indicates:
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 24
Relatively higher rates of population growth in the vicinity of Rhodes, Concord West and North Strathfield train stations in the coming decades.
Notable population growth in Mortlake and Five Dock travel zones.
Figure 2-11 Forecast Population in Council area Source: NSW Government Planning Portal – Projections
Forecast Workforce According to TPA estimates, the workforce of the Council LGA was approximately 52,072 as at 2019. This number includes all people who are either employed or unemployed and seeking work. As shown in Figure 2-12, the total workforce in the Council LGA is forecast to continue to grow to around 76,000 in 2056, with the growth rate slowing slightly from 2041.
The workforce in and around Rhodes is forecast to grow significantly, particularly to the north-east and west of the train station.
Other precincts forecast to increase their workforce include Concord West Station west, Five Dock along Great North Road, and North Strathfield Station east.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 25
Figure 2-12 Workforce forecast in Council LGA Source: NSW Transport Performance and Analytics forecasts and projections
Forecast Employment Approximately 35,387 people are currently employed within the Council LGA. This is forecast to grow to 65,583 by 2056, as shown in Figure 2-13.
A significant proportion of this growth in employment results from growth in employment in the eastern side of Rhodes, forecast to add around 9,000 jobs.
The remaining growth in employment is spread across the LGA, noting that the existing centres of Five Dock and Drummoyne are forecast to add relatively fewer jobs in comparison to other areas.
Figure 2-13 Employment forecast in the Council area Source: NSW Transport Performance and Analytics employment forecasts
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 26
2.6
Existing Land Use and Infrastructure
2.6.1
Land Use
A number of key pedestrian attractors / generators have been identified within the Council LGA which are shown in Figure 2-14. The key centres in the LGA include the Rhodes Strategic Centre, Five Dock, Concord, Drummoyne and Strathfield (in the neighbouring Strathfield LGA) as well as a number of other local centres. Retail and commercial areas are often located along the main roads such as Victoria Road, Concord Road and Majors Bay Road. There are a number of primary schools and high schools located throughout the LGA, which are generally concentrated in the southern portion of the LGA. Significant parks and recreational destinations include Bicentennial Park, Majors Bay Reserve, St Lukes Park and Queen Elizabeth Park, as well as foreshore parks and trails along Parramatta River. The path known as the “Bay Run” circumnavigates Iron Cove to the east of the LGA. Key employment areas include the Rhodes Peninsula and Corporate Park, the Parramatta Road Corridor from North Strathfield to Five Dock, Victoria Road corridor at Drummoyne, Concord Hospital, and Great North Road at Five Dock.
Figure 2-14 Key destinations for pedestrians in the Council Source: Google Maps (2020), modified by GHD
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 27
2.6.2
Road Network
Road Hierarchy State Roads perform a state function and are fully funded and managed by Transport for NSW. Council maintains local and regional streets or roads. The classification of roads within the existing road network is an indication of the functional role each road plays and the volume of traffic they should appropriately carry. Transport for NSW have developed a set of road hierarchy classifications detailed in Table 2-1, which indicate typical nominal average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes for various classes of roads. Table 2-1 Functional Classification of Roads Type of Road
Traffic Volume (vpd*)
Peak Hour Volume (vph*)
Motorways/Freeways
>15,000
>5,600
Arterial Road Sub-Arterial Road Collector Road Local Road
>15,000 5,000 – 20,000 2,000 – 10,000 <2,000
1,500 – 5,600 500 – 2,000 200 – 1,000 0 – 200
Source: NSW Roads and Maritime Service (formerly NSW RTA), Road Design Guide and AMCORD *Note vpd = vehicles per day, vph = vehicles per hour
Roads in the study area have been appraised based on the classification provided in Table 2-1. The outcomes of the AADT data assessment were limited to the availability of daily traffic volume datasets, which were previously collected in 2020. Table 2-2 Key Road features Key Roads Parramatta Road
Victoria Road
Concord Road
Functions Parramatta Road functions as a state road that runs in eastwest direction, connecting Parramatta to Sydney CBD. It has a speed limit of 60 km/hr. Pedestrian crossings are provided at signalised intersections. Footpaths are available along both sides of the road. Victoria Road is classified as a state road, running in eastwest direction (but generally north-south through the study area) and connecting to ANZAC Bridge on its east and Parramatta in its west. It has a speed limit of 60 km/hr. Footpaths are provided along both sides of the road. Pedestrian crossings are provided at the signalised intersections. Concord Road is classified as a state road, running in northeast and south-west direction, connecting from Strathfield to Rhodes. The speed limit varies between 60 km/hr and 70 km/hr. Footpaths are provided along both sides of the road. Pedestrian crossings are provided at the signalised intersections.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 28
2.6.1
Public Transport Network
The public transport network within the study area consists of the following: Rail There are a number of train stations located within the Council LGA, or within walking distance from the LGA, including Rhodes, Concord West, Burwood, North Strathfield, Homebush and Strathfield. The Future Sydney Metro station would deliver rail stations to Five Dock, providing for a fast and direct trip to Sydney CBD. Ferry The Council LGA is well served by ferry, with ferry wharfs at Cabarita, Abbotsford, Chiswick and Drummoyne providing ferry access to Parramatta, Darling Harbour and Circular Quay. A new ferry wharf is also planned at Rhodes. Bus The bus services in the Council include M50, 439, 502, 504, 508 and X04, which provides connection to Sydney CBD. Other bus services include M90, 525, 526, and 458, connecting Strathfield and Burwood Stations. On demand bus service are also available in the western half of the LGA, with potential for future serviced area expansion. Key bus corridors within the Council include:
Victoria Road: bus services 501, 502, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 515, 518, 520, 530, X06, X15, X19 and M50.
Lyons Road: bus services 490,492, 502, 503, 504, 504X and 530.
Concord Road: bus service 410.
Parramatta Road: bus services 415, 461, 525, 526 and 530.
Ramsay Street: bus services 438, L38, 439 and L39.
Figure 2-15 Bus Network Source: https://transportnsw.info/travel-info/ways-to-get-around/bus/bus-operator-maps
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 29
2.7
Crash Statistics
2.7.1
Pedestrian crashes
Crash statistics for incidents involving pedestrians at roads within the study area over a fiveyear period between 2015 and 2019 were obtained from TfNSW. This crash data was used to determine the main factors contributing to crashes within the study area. A summary of the recorded crashes along each street in the study area during this five-year period is shown at Figure 2-16.
Figure 2-16 Crashes Involving Pedestrians Between 2015- 2019 Source: TfNSW Centre for Road Safety
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 30
Table 2-3 Recorded Crashes with Pedestrians in Canada Bay (2015 – 2019) Street
Location
Time of day
Crash Type
Injuries
Severity
Total
Lyons Road / Lyons Road West
Between Victoria Road and Crane Street
7 darkness 7 daylight
16
6 serious 5 Moderate 5 Minor/other
16
Lyons Road
Lyons Road / Victoria Street intersection
4 darkness 2 daylight
10 Pedestrian nearside 4 pedestrian far side 1 pedestrian on carriageway 1 pedestrian on driveway 4 pedestrian nearside 2 pedestrian far side 1 pedestrian in carriageway
7
1 serious 2 moderate 3 minor/other
7
Victoria Road
Between Henley Marine Drive and Drummoyne Avenue Between Wattle Street and Homebush Bay Drive
6 daylight 4 darkness
5 pedestrian near side 4 pedestrian far side 1 pedestrian on carriageway
11
4 serious 3 moderate 3 minor/ other
10
4 Daylight 3 darkness 1 dawn 1 dusk
5 Pedestrian near side 2 pedestrian far side 1 driveway
9
9
Great North Road
Between Hampden Road and Queens Road
6 Daylight 1 darkness
8
Concord Road
Between Parramatta Road and Homebush Drive
5 Daylight 2 darkness
4 pedestrian far side 2 pedestrian emerging 1 pedestrian near side 4 pedestrian near side 1 pedestrian emerging 1 pedestrian far side
2 fatal 3 serious 3 moderate 1 minor / other 6 serious 1 moderate
1 fatal 3 serious 2 moderate
6
Parramatta Road between
7
7
The crash data indicates that there were a total of 75 crashes involving pedestrians over the five-year period between 2015 to 2019. Of the total crashes
Sixty-nine percent of crashes occurred at intersections and T-junctions.
Fifty-two percent of crashes were pedestrian near side collision.
The degree of crashes included 3 fatal crashes, 38 serious injury, 22 moderate injury and 12 minor injury.
Fifty-seven percent of crashes occurred at daylight, 32 percent in darkness, 5 percent in dusk and 3 in dawn.
Thirty-two percent of crashes were pedestrian emerging from far side.
It should be noted that the crash data presented is based on NSW Police reports, which generally under represent the incidence of pedestrian and cyclist related crashes due to some of these incidents not being reported. This is due to the fact that many minor pedestrian incidents do not result in tow-away crashes where police are called and the incident, therefore, goes unrecorded.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 31
3.
Existing Pedestrian and Mobility Audit This section builds on the investigations undertaken in previous sections in order to define a set of user and functional requirements to be developed for the PAMP. The outputs of this section constitute the brief for the development of pedestrian infrastructure improvement options. Existing traffic calming and pedestrian facilities in the study area are shown in Appendix D. An audit of existing conditions was undertaken in the study area. The audit focused on identifying existing facilities, land uses, any shortcomings in the pedestrian environment and potential safety issues. The audit has been developed through:
Site inspections, which were conducted in late February 2021.
Community consultation as summarised in section 3.1.
A significant amount of anecdotal or qualitative feedback was received via the Social Pinpoint site, open questions on the community surveys and discussions with stakeholders and members of the community.
3.1
Key Results from Community Survey
To identify current pedestrian accessibility and mobility needs, community engagement was undertaken from December 2020 until March 2021 to determine the community’s views, concerns, and ideas, relating to pedestrian facilities. The community engagement included a survey to allow the community to provide information about existing transport and walking behaviours and issues. GHD prepared key messaging for the PAMP webpage on the Collaborate Canada Bay digital engagement platform. The webpage page included links to an online mapping tool and an online survey set up to collect feedback from the community and interested stakeholders. GHD also conducted two virtual workshops with Council and key stakeholder groups via Microsoft Teams to discuss/explore local experiences, challenges and opportunities to improve pedestrian access and mobility going forward. A summary of each consultation activity and the number of people who were engaged for each activity is provided in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Overview of Community Engagement Activity
Date
Workshop 1 –City of Canada Bay Access and Inclusion Committee Workshop 2 – Surrounding LGAs and TfNSW e-newsletters publication
1 December 2020
Social Media posts - Facebook and Instagram ads Community Consultation – Online Survey Community Consultation – Map Tool Community Consultation – Email
14 December 2020 1 February 2021 and 1 March 2021. 1 February 2021 and 16 February 2021 31 January 2021 to 22 February 2021 31 January 2021 to 22 February 2021 December 2020 to March 2021
Number of People Engaged 7 committee members 8 281 465 12
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 32
Council developed a range of promotional materials and activities to advertise the opportunity to give feedback and outline issues of concern regarding pedestrian access and mobility. To ensure that the project aligned with the COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the project team took an innovative approach to encourage community and stakeholder participation. The promotional materials and activities included:
The PAMP webpage on the Collaborate Canada Bay website.
E-newsletter.
Posters with a QR code located in 24 Council venues.
The installation of 78 footpath stickers with a QR code throughout the LGA.
Social media posts (Facebook and Instagram).
Direct email to 1,794 Collaborate Canada Bay users.
Further details of the consultation and findings undertaken for this PAMP are provided within the consultation report, provided at Appendix C. 3.1.1
Stakeholder Consultation
As part of the preparation for the Community and Stakeholder Engagement Plan (CSEP), GHD conducted a stakeholder analysis to identify key stakeholders and their level of interest and influence in the project. The key stakeholders are summarised in Table 3-2 Table 3-2 Stakeholders analysis Stakeholder category
Stakeholder
Level of interest/influence
City of Canada Bay Council
Strategic Growth Section
High/high
Government agencies
Transport for NSW (Network Sydney South)
High/high
Council advisory groups
Access and Inclusion Committee
High/moderate
Traffic Committee
High/moderate
Local community/special interest groups
The Ella Centre
Moderate/low
Council representatives
Access Sydney Concord Senior Citizens Centre City of Canada Bay Men’s Shed (Harry’s Shed) Concord Senior Citizen’s Club Inc Five Dock Evening VIEW Club Rotary Club of Drummoyne Concord Heritage Society Drummoyne Community Centre Inc.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 33
Stakeholder category
Stakeholder
Level of interest/influence
The Rotary Club of Concord Probus Club Breakfast Point Neighbouring local councils
Strathfield Council
Moderate/low
Burwood Council Parramatta Council Inner West Council
High School (Private)
Rosebank College
Moderate/low
Domremy College High School (Public)
Concord High School
Moderate/low
Rivendell School Strathfield Girls High School Primary School (Public)
Abbotsford Public School
Moderate/low
Concord Public School Mortlake Public School Concord West Public School Victoria Avenue Public School Drummoyne Public School Five Dock Public School Lucas Gardens School Strathfield North Public School Homebush Public School Homebush West Public School Primary School (Private)
St Mary’s Catholic Primary School
Moderate/low
St Mark’s Catholic Primary School St Ambrose Catholic Primary School All Hallows Catholic Primary School St Patrick’s Catholic Primary School Mortlake Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Primary School
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 34
Stakeholder category
Stakeholder
Level of interest/influence
The McDonald College St Ambrose Catholic Primary School Preschool/Kindergarten
Concord West Rhodes Preschool
Moderate/low
Drummoyne Preschool Kindergarten Integricare Drummoyne Preschool Adams Lane Pre School Montessori School (North Strathfield) Integricare North Strathfield Early Learning Centre Papilio Early Learning North Strathfield (Blue Campus) Papilio Early Learning North Strathfield (Orange Campus) St Andrew’s Kindergarten Health care
3.1.2
Concord Hospital
Moderate/low
Community Consultation – Map tool feedback
The mapping tool received 465 comments. A total of 209 were identified as ‘opportunities’ and were from residents in Drummoyne, Concord, Five Dock and Rhodes. A total of 75 comments were identified as ‘barriers’ and were mostly residents from Concord and Drummoyne. The key results of the map tool feedback are summarised below:
The general feedback received about the current usage in the LGA was overall positive.
The existing pedestrian infrastructure was not always well connected or consistent, particularly impeding those with mobility restrictions.
The need to upgrade existing pedestrian footpaths, islands and access points to allow for easier access for pedestrians with prams, wheelchairs and the elderly.
The importance of maintaining safer, hazard-free footpaths by removing trip hazards, improving lighting, applying traffic calming measures and provision of dedicated bike lanes.
Providing more pedestrian crossings throughout the LGA, and in particular near high traffic areas such as shopping villages and schools.
The opportunity for more greenery to improve the overall streetscape in the Council LGA so pedestrians could further enjoy walking.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 35
3.1.3
Community Consultation - Online Survey
The key results of the online survey include:
Most people (68.5%) thought the current pedestrian infrastructure in the Council LGA was ‘OK’ or better.
A total of 38 participants thought the current pedestrian infrastructure was ‘poor’ (23.1%).
Driving was the most common form of transport used by participants (66 participants, 40%) overall when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school.
The second most common form of transport used by the participants when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school was walking (38 participants).
Half of the participants (93 participants) indicated that they walked most weekends for recreational activities, and 103 participants indicated that they mostly walked to and from local shops.
Survey results confirm that there is an opportunity for the Council to promote walking as a form of transport, through improving pedestrian linkage in areas where there are high recreational activities (e.g. fitness, sports), bus stops and shopping centres.
When asked about how safe and accessible the pedestrian routes were to let children walk to school, 71 participants indicated that they did not feel like the pedestrian routes were safe. Reasons included:
–
The lack of pedestrian infrastructure connections.
–
Unsafe footpaths.
–
Lack of signage.
–
Impatient drivers/cyclists speeding on narrow streets.
Participants were encouraged to indicate what changes would encourage them to walk more. The top three changes noted were: –
Additional road crossings for pedestrians, for example, signals, footbridge, pedestrian refuge islands (126 participants).
–
Better quality footpaths (105 participants).
–
Additional footpaths (99 participants).
3.1.4
Workshop feedback
Workshop 1 The session with the Council’s Access and Inclusion Committee focused on the challenges and opportunities for the LGA as a whole and for growth areas within the LGA. The following key issues were raised:
High number of crashes and poor pedestrian facilities along Parramatta Road.
Shared pedestrian and bike paths can cause an issue for pedestrians, particularly pedestrians with disabilities or the elderly.
The opportunities raised included: –
Mapping out social housing areas in Five Dock and other location to assess pedestrian mobility
–
Provide key links to the areas integrating with Metro West to improve pedestrian mobility.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 36
–
Consider the predictable path of travel with consideration to changing environments, especially for mobility/visibility impaired pedestrians.
–
Incorporate factors such as age increase and disability in the PAMP.
Workshop 2 The workshop with key government stakeholders focused on gaining insights into the study area and project objectives from a strategic planning context, identifying key issues and opportunities and discussing future projects. The following key issues were raised:
Burwood Road and Parramatta Road intersection where Metro West Station will be located requires investigating due to high pedestrian movement around this intersection.
As part of the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS), it was noted that an increase in residential dwellings which would impact pedestrian demand.
Council are planning work around Concord Oval which would attract high level of pedestrian movement at Shaftesbury Road and Parramatta Road intersection.
Investigation of link between Henley Marine Drive and Croydon Road.
Need for pedestrian and cyclists crossing between Luke Avenue and Shaftesbury Road.
High Pedestrian activity under a future plan at Burwood Road south of Corner Street.
3.1.5
Community Consultation – Email feedback
A total of twelve written submissions to the Council were received (via email). Key themes identified that were relevant to the PAMP included the need for:
More pedestrian refuge islands.
Marked pedestrian crossings.
Better connected footpaths.
Additional ramps.
3.2
Existing Issues and Constraints Audit
The issues and constraints for pedestrian access and mobility were determined through a field survey conducted in late February 2021 by GHD staff. A summary of the constraint locations are shown in Figure 3-1 and Appendix D. A description of the corresponding issues can be found in Table 3-3. These identified issues have been cross referenced against feedback provided by the community. A detailed list of these issues, together with photos of existing mobility issues, is provided in Appendix G.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 37
Figure 3-1 Locations of Existing Issues and Constraints for Pedestrians
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 38
Table 3-3 Summary of Issues types Issue Type Narrow footpath Kerb ramps No bus landing pad Missing link Overgrown vegetation Obstruction in path Pedestrian refuge Wide crossing point TGSIs Signage Intersection Poor intersection design Trip hazard Other issue Signage / line marking Road Surface No signage TGSIs Seating Pedestrian crossing Stairs Parking / traffic issues No TGSIs Line marking Driveway Hand rail Pedestrian fencing Narrow footpath and overgrown vegetation Bollard Ramp Bus shelter Line marking Narrow footath No poor quality bus shelter Line marking and signage Total
Total Issue Locations 56 55 37 34 32 18 13 12 12 10 9 9 7 7 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 347
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 39
4.
Planning for Pedestrians Walking is the simplest form of transportation. It is available to most people, including those who use mobility aids; is free and has significant environmental and health benefits. Furthermore, all trips involve some walking component, even if they are only from the car park to the shop. Therefore, planning for safe and convenient pedestrian access is very important in transportation planning. This section provides some introductory guidance on planning for walking.
4.1
Creating a Safe and Attractive Environment for Walking
Pedestrians use every part of the public domain, including roads, footpaths, nature strips, shopping centres and other public spaces. Some planners and engineers incorrectly assume that planning for pedestrians will follow the same logic as traffic planning:
Car → ‘trips’ → ‘routes’ → ‘traffic network’
The planning scale for pedestrians is detailed to accommodate the local nature of the trips. Pedestrian movement can be better conceptualised in terms of:
Pedestrian → ‘activity’ → ‘areas of activity’ → ‘pedestrian environment’
Rather than conforming to traditional traffic engineering concepts like turning radii and design speeds, pedestrians are far more attuned to the environment in which they are moving. Therefore, planners need to consider the needs of pedestrians in regards to design, amenity, and personal security. Pedestrians are particularly vulnerable to cars and other motorised traffic. Pedestrian Needs The provision of pedestrian infrastructure should not only aim to fulfil the requirements of existing users or to comply with relevant standards, but should also promote walking for transport, recreation and health, and increase the number of trips taken by foot. Such an outcome would result in fewer car trips, healthier residents and a more active (and safe) public domain. A number of elements are required in order to provide a high quality pedestrian environment. Safety Perceived and actual safety is very important to pedestrians. Road crossings present the greatest danger to pedestrians. Therefore, safe crossing locations should be provided at regular intervals along major streets, or at the location where key desire lines cross major streets. Pedestrians will rarely walk along an indirect route to access safe crossing points, so frequent, direct crossing points should be provided. Lighting in open space is important for security. Pedestrians of all ages and genders need to feel that it is safe to walk whenever they choose to do so. Directness Pedestrians do not like to walk out of their way to reach a destination. This is a natural response to avoid the extra effort involved in walking extra distance. Pedestrian facilities serving desire lines between major centres of activity need to be direct and legible in order to provide for and encourage walking trips. Wherever possible, barriers should be overcome, with additional crossing points such as grade separated or signalised crossings. However, grade separation does not always provide the most direct access.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 40
Engineering solutions to direct pedestrians for safety reasons (such as fencing) should only be used when no other solution is possible. Amenity Pedestrians are particularly sensitive to the quality of the urban environment. Areas with high volumes of traffic, excessive noise, and poor pavements will discourage walking. Additionally, urban areas should be maintained at a human scale that provides an attractive walking environment. While it would be extremely costly to improve the amenity of all pedestrian areas, targeted works can achieve a great improvement in areas of high pedestrian activity (such as shopping streets, areas around commercial, employment and public buildings, and recreation areas). Spot improvement programs can also target localised areas of high need. Suitable for all users Quality pedestrian environments must be available to all who choose to use them. This requires compliance with Austroads Guide to Traffic Management and Guide to Road Design and AS1428.1-2009 - Design for Access and Mobility. Paths must be of a suitable width to accommodate the number of pedestrians (and other users, such as mobility scooters) expected and be of an appropriate gradient, including ramps. The path should be continuous and free of obstructions such as signage and street furniture. The needs of hearing and vision impaired users must be considered and provided for, especially where user safety is an issue. Pedestrian Strategies Council should support and encourage walking in the study area through the following actions:
Provide an environment where the personal, social and environmental benefits of walking are recognised as paramount and that the needs of pedestrians are considered as a primary element in any projects affecting the urban landscape
Ensure that all planning and redevelopment includes walking as a safe, healthy and accessible form of transport
Incorporate the needs of people with a disability into all levels of planning and implementation of the transportation network and public domain improvements
4.2
Best Practice Standards
This sub-section provides a brief overview of best practice standards that apply to the treatment of pedestrian facilities. Minimum Footpath Widths The Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A 2021 – Paths for Walking and Cycling states that: ‘As a guide, the desirable minimum width of a footpath that has a very low demand is 1.2 m with an absolute minimum of 1.0 m. These widths should be increased at locations where: •
high pedestrian volumes are anticipated.
•
a footpath is adjacent to a traffic or parking lane.
•
a footpath is combined with bicycle facilities.
•
the footpath is to cater for people with disabilities.
•
overtaking of path users is expected.’
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 41
Figure 4-1 and Table 4-1 show the minimum widths for various types of footpath users. Table 4-1 Minimum Footpath Widths
Source: Table 5.1 – Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A 2021 – Paths for Walking and Cycling
Figure 4-1 Path Width Requirements for Various Users
Source: Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A 2021 – Paths for Walking and Cycling
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 42
Maximum Grades Grades of footpaths and drop kerbs are important as they affect the usability and safety of pedestrian facilities. Long sections of high grade footpath can be extremely difficult for mobility impaired users to negotiate. High grade kerb ramps can also cause safety issues for mobility impaired users. Users can become vulnerable to general traffic as they attempt leave the carriageway and proceed up steep ramps. It is noted that AS 1428.1 Design for Access and Mobility – 2009, specifies that any footpath should not exceed a gradient of 1:8 as wheelchairs may tip backwards. This is considered as an absolute maximum ramp gradient and should only be used in extenuating circumstances. Table 4-2 shows the maximum desirable grades for footpaths and kerb ramp treatments. Table 4-2 Maximum Grades Footpaths Recommended maximum grade (footpaths) Absolute maximum grade (kerb ramps)
Grade 1:20 (2.5% cross fall) 1:8
Source: AS1428.1 Design for Access and Mobility Part 1 2009 –General Requirements for Access-New Building Work
In hilly areas, these gradients are not always achievable and where possible, consideration to alternative routes should be made. Kerb Ramps The difference in the level between the footpath and the roadway is a common situation that poses difficulties for pedestrians, particularly with mobility and vision impairments. A drop kerb or kerb ramp provides a smooth change in the level between the footpath and the roadway (maximum grade of 1:8). The general dimensions of a drop kerb are illustrated in Figure 4-2. The Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4 – Intersections and Crossings – General states that: ‘A minimum footway width of 1330 mm should be provided beyond the top of the ramp, to ensure that users of the footway along the street are not inconvenienced by the ramp.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 43
Figure 4-2 Kerb Ramp Design Source: Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4 2021 – Intersections and Crossings - General.
Pedestrian Refuges Pedestrian refuges allow a safe point for pedestrians to wait at when crossing wide or busy roads. It is noted that many people do not feel safe when using refuges and should the funds be available kerb extensions should be considered to reduce the width of the road at the crossing points rather than using refuges. The general dimensions of a pedestrian refuge are illustrated in Figure 4-3. Pedestrian refuges should in all cases be adequately illuminated in accordance with AS/NZS 1158 – 2007, and careful positioning of streetlights should be considered in accordance with AS 1158.4: 2007. Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4 – Intersections and Crossings – General also recommends a refuge width of at least two metres to allow storage for a person with a pram or bicycle needs.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 44
Source: Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4 2021 – Intersections and Crossings - General.
Figure 4-3 Pedestrian Refuge Design Raised Pedestrian Crossings (Zebra) Raised pedestrian crossings (Zebra) are generally the same dimensions as flat top road humps (with pedestrian priority provided with the use of ‘zebra’ style line markings). It provides priority to pedestrians as well as acting as a traffic-calming measure. The minimum length of the device, including ramps is six metres, and the desirable minimum height of the platform is 100 mm. Raised pedestrian crossings (Zebra) generally have ramp gradients of 1:15 to 1:20 to be bicycle and/or bus friendly. Raised pedestrian crossings (Zebra) can be used when the warrant for such a traffic control is met as required in AS 1742.10.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 45
Tactile Ground Surface Indicators (TGSI’s) TGSI’s should also be provided to indicate the edge of the roadway to visually impaired pedestrians. Transport for NSW Requirements for Pedestrian (Zebra) Crossings The Transport for NSW (previously RMS) Australian Standard Supplements 2013, section 6.3, provides practice for numerical warrants for a pedestrian (zebra) crossing. It is warranted where in each of three separate one hour periods in a typical day where:
The pedestrian flow per hour (P) crossing the road is greater than or equal to 30 and;
The vehicular flow per hour (V) through the site is greater than or equal to 500 and;
The product PV is greater than or equal to 60,000.
Special Warrants may also be considered where consideration can be given to a potential pedestrian crossing site. In such circumstances, council should justify why this location is in need of special consideration. The special warrant conditions state that:
PV ≥ 45,000 and;
P ≥ 30 and;
V ≥ 500.
Other further reduced warrants apply where a crossing is predominately used by the children and elderly. Transport for NSW has indicated that these warrants have been primarily developed for use on state roads. Where a crossing is proposed on a road where Council is the roads authority, it can be based on these warrants or other criteria based on Austroads and Australian Standards.
4.3
Methodology for Identifying Pedestrian Needs
4.3.1
Identification of Activity Generators and Primary Routes
The following approach was used to develop a hierarchy of pedestrian needs: Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone This is typically the main commercial street. Throughout the day, pedestrians are attracted to this zone from surrounding residential areas: therefore, it is an important trip attractor. Also, there are high levels of pedestrian activity occurring within this zone, making it an important area for internal pedestrian movements (between shops and to car parking). Secondary Pedestrian Activity Generators This includes shops, schools, TAFEs, sporting facilities, clubs, hospitals and community facilities such as churches that are not located within the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone. These land uses will attract people, but possibly only at certain times of the day or week. Tertiary Pedestrian Activity Generators These include the above land uses from the Secondary Activity Generators, but differentiate them based on a lower level of activity. Again, these are not located within the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 46
Primary Pedestrian Routes These are routes from residential areas to the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Activity Zones and Generators. They are trunk or collector level routes, which do not reach every property but instead form a network of routes that are accessible to a significant catchment of population. These routes take account of the existing street network and topographical constraints, aiming to provide a direct and convenient route to the major trip generators. The demographic use of connecting generators is considered when defining the routes (i.e. schools and playing fields, aged care facilities and return service league clubs). 4.3.2
Identification of Infrastructure Provision Goals
The hierarchy above provides a basis for applying standard treatments, ensuring the development of a comprehensive and structured pedestrian network. Specific treatments may be required in some of these areas to accommodate the user needs or where other community suggestions are made. These treatments form the basis of the proposed improvements. While this standard may not be achievable in the short-term due to the capital investment required, it is nevertheless a useful guide to work towards. Desirable scenarios for potential infrastructure responses are outlined in Table 4-3. Table 4-3 Infrastructure Provision Goals for Urban Areas Hierarchy Feature Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone
Secondary Pedestrian Activity Generators
Tertiary Pedestrian Activity Generators
Primary Pedestrian Routes
Desirable Route Infrastructure Footpaths on both sides of the road adjacent to the generators within the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone of full width between the property line and kerb line (typically 3-4 m). Multiple assisted road crossings (pedestrian crossings or refuges). Footpath on the side of the road adjacent to the Activity Generator of 2 m widths. Assisted road crossings at all Activity Generators. Footpath on the side of the road adjacent to the Activity Generator of 1.2 m widths. Assisted road crossings where required by high traffic volumes and/or pedestrian types. Footpath on one side of the road of 2 m widths, footpath on other side of the road of 1.2 m widths. Assisted road crossings at most cross streets. Directional signage to Primary Pedestrian Activity Zones, Secondary and Tertiary Activity Generators for pedestrians.
4.3.1
Minimum Route Infrastructure Footpaths on both sides of the road adjacent to the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone of 2 m widths. Assisted road crossings where required by high traffic volumes. Footpath on the side of the road adjacent to the Activity Generator of 1.2 m widths. Assisted road crossings where required by high traffic volumes and/or pedestrian types. Footpath on the side of the road adjacent to the Activity Generator of 1.0 m widths. Assisted road crossings where required by high traffic volumes and/or pedestrian types. Footpath on one side of the road of 1.2 m widths. Assisted road crossings at major cross streets with high traffic volumes. Directional signage to Primary Pedestrian Activity Zones for pedestrians.
Aims in the Development of Infrastructure Recommendations
Major aims of the proposed improvement works, in decreasing order of priority, are:
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 47
Fill any shortcomings in the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zone area through new footpaths and crossing points, particularly if safety issues have been raised
Establish a network of key pedestrian routes in the town centre and between major trip generators, including schools. Prioritised routes are those that serve a wide range of community users and can remove pedestrians from unsafe environments
Broaden the extent of the network to areas outside of the Primary Pedestrian Activity Zones
Provide additional pedestrian routes for primarily recreational or tourism purposes
Additionally, crossing points are generally catered for via pedestrian refuges, rather than a zebra crossing or signalised crossing. This is because there are onerous requirements to install marked pedestrian crossings in terms of pedestrian and vehicle warrants. Refuges are of benefit to pedestrians as they allow for a staged crossing of a road and provide a visual cue for motorists that pedestrians can be expected in the vicinity of a refuge.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 48
5.
Proposed Pedestrian Improvements This section identifies the pedestrian improvements proposed as part of this PAMP.
5.1
Types of Pedestrian Improvements
Pedestrian infrastructure initiatives are classified under the following categories:
Amenity which is the attractiveness of an area for pedestrians. Improvements could involve upgrading an existing footpath surface or introducing landscaping or art feature along walkways.
Safety along the route to address safety issues for pedestrians from traffic or other physical hazards including trip hazards. This also includes perceived safety issues for pedestrians such as walking along or crossing busy roads.
Information that includes wayfinding signage, maps, brochures and pamphlets.
Disabled/pram access along the routes that do not comply with Disabled Discrimination Act (DDA) standards and other issues including steep gradients and access via steps.
Connectivity with new links between streets and land uses.
Severance for pedestrians to cross busy roads, railway lines or waterways.
Access to adjacent land uses with new pedestrian access to land uses being blocked by fences or walls.
These pedestrian improvements can include the types of projects shown in Table 5-1, which also indicates the benefits of each pedestrian improvement. Table 5-1 Potential Pedestrian Infrastructure Initiatives Initiative
Amenity
Safety along the Route
Footpath Resurfacing Footpath Replacement New Footpath Bridge Crossing Underpass Crossing Lighting
Ramps
Information
Security
Disabled/ Pram Access
Severance
Access to Adjacent Land Use
Lifts Stairs Pedestrian Actuated Signal Crossing Zebra Crossing Raised pedestrian crossing (Zebra)
Connectivity
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 49
Initiative
Amenity
Safety along the Route
Shared Zone
Reduced Traffic Speed Limit Traffic Calming Wayfinding/ Signage Information
5.1.1
Information
Security
Disabled/ Pram Access
Connectivity
Severance
Access to Adjacent Land Use
Cost Estimate Assumptions
The indicative unit costs shown in for the purposes of costing the prioritised pedestrian improvement works. Table 5-2 Indicative Cost Estimate Assumptions PAMP / Footpath Treatment New footpaths – 1.5m wide, no reinforcement (per sqm)
Unit cost $130
Footpath upgrade /resurfacing (per sqm)
$150
Shared path – 2.5m wide, reinforced (per sqm)
$160
Line marking (per 100m)
$500
Footpath grinding (each)
$50
Kerb ramp – to suit a standard 1.5m wide path
$1,800
Driveway treatment (raised continuous footpath)
$20,000
Kerb blister / extension
$10,000
Pedestrian refuge
$25,000
Pedestrian Refuge + 2 blisters
$50,000
Service lid repair
$500
Zebra crossing
$60,000
Raised pedestrian crossing (Zebra)
$80,000
signal controlled crossing
$350,000
signal controlled crossing (exsiting signal intersection)
$250,000
Tactile Ground Surface Indicators
$500
Road signage
$300
Bus stop seats
$1,500
Bus stop pad
$8,400
Bus stop shelter (slimline)
$15,000
Public seating
$3,000
Pedestrian fence (handrail) per m
$150
Pedestrian fence (guard rail) per m
$400
Removal of pedestrian infrastucture and upgrade
$10,000
Replace stair (per m)
$400
Vegitation trimming (per site)
$200
Bollard
$300
Resurface road at intersection
$20,000
Raised traffic calming (raised threshold)
$70,000
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 50
Where possible, unit rates provided by the Council have been used directly. For items where costs were not available previous studies, estimation and professional judgement have been used. These costs are indicative and are subject to change and make no allowances for contingencies or actual site design and installation.
5.2
Speed
Vehicle speeds is a significant factor in pedestrian safety. It is noted that Council has a number of existing 40km/h High Pedestrian Activity Areas (HPAA). In addition, 30km/h restrictions are currently being trialled in a number of other Council areas. Once these trials have been completed and TfNSW guidelines updated accordingly, consideration should be given to further opportunities for reducing speed limits e.g. Five Dock Town Centre. The proposed works identified in this plan include a number of raised pedestrian crossings and raised intersection treatments, these will reduce vehicles speeds and enhance pedestrian safety.
5.3
Proposed Pedestrian Improvements
A full list of the proposed improvements is provided in . The issues and constraints identification (ID) references relate to those provided in Figure 3-1.
.
GHD | Report for Report for City of Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 51
Table 5-3 Identified Issues and Proposed Upgrades PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
1
Abbotsford
Great North Road
Wide crossing location with no pedestrian facilities
1
$25,000
2
Abbotsford
Kerb ramps not aligned and non-standard refuge
2
$50,000
3
Abbotsford
Blackwall Point Road / Great North Road intersection Blackwall Point Road, near Great North Road
4
Abbotsford
5
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road north side near Melrose Crescent Blackwall Point Road
6
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road
7
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street intersection
8
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street
9
Chiswick
Bortfield Drive / Blackwall Point Road intersection
Narrow footpath, uneven naturestrip Vegetation obstructing access to landing area Missing link of footpath to kerb buildouts and Parkview Road Pedestrians directed into roundabout circulation lane. Kerb ramps not aligned. No pedestrian crossing facilities (kerb ramps) between high density residential to the north and recreational parks to the south Kerb ramps not aligned to pedestrian desire line
Provide pedestrian refuge between bus stops and retail development Upgrade kerb ramps and upgrade pedestrian refuge Pedestrian refuge across Parkview Road at Blackwell Point Road and upgrade footpath Upgrade footpath (widen footpath) Trim vegetation
Narrow path (approx. 1.1m) with vegetation overhang
1
Distance (m)
90
$45,250
70
$15,750
1
New footpath
Estimated Cost ($)
$200 150
$33,750
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters.
4
$47,200
2
$23,600
Re-align kerb ramps
2
$3,600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 52
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
10
Chiswick
Bortfield Drive
Trim vegetation
1
11
Chiswick
Bortfield Drive
12
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road
Narrow footpath (approx. 1.1 m) with vegetation narrowing Bollards in centre of narrow footpath. Insufficient width for prams wheelchairs etc. to pass Near bus stop
Trim vegetation
1
$200
13
Drummoyne
Bibby Street/Scannell Avenue intersection
$23,600
Drummoyne
Bibby Street
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. New footpath and kerb ramps
2
14
2
100
$26,100
15
Drummoyne
The Parade
New footpath and kerb ramps
2
70
$19,350
16
Rhodes
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Kerb ramps not aligned and directed into roundabout circulation lane Missing link of footpath between pedestrian refuge and Byrne Ave. Goat track noted on western side indicating high pedestrian use, which is also adjacent to car parking. Note no link to pedestrian refuge and parking on the eastern side. Missing link between existing footpath at Gears Avenue, existing pedestrian crossing and Byrne Avenue. Railing on pedestrian bridge broken
10
$1500
Remove bollards and resurface footpath
Replace wire railing
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($) $200
10
$2,250
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 53
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
17
Rhodes
Mary Street
Upgrade DDA parking space to comply to AS2890.6
2
$3,600
18
Rhodes
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Install TGSIs
2
$1,000
19
Rhodes
Re-align kerb ramps
2
$3,600
20
Rhodes
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
Widen kerb ramps
2
$3,600
21
Rhodes
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
Location of the kerb ramp to DDA parking spaces is restricted by parked vehicle. Parking layout not compliant to AS2890.6 Missing tactile paving - all other crossing locations have TGSIs Kerb ramp not aligned with crossing direction Narrow kerb ramp for available crossing and location where higher pedestrian activity may occur Wide crossing location across Concord Road
1
TBC
22
Rhodes
Blaxland Road
Consider opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge across TfNSW New signs
2
$600
23
Rhodes
Blaxland Road
Remove pole
1
$300
24
Rhodes
25
Rhodes
Concord Road / Blaxland Road intersection Concord Road
26
Rhodes
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Missing hump and recommended speed warning signs Unused pole creating a pinch point Narrow and poor quality footpath to crossing Water ponding in front of kerb ramp to shared path Insufficient footpath width from shared space at DDA parking
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
New footpath
20
$4,500
Re-grade turning area and improve drainage
20
$75,000
Remove bollards and resurface footpath
10
$2,250
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 54
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
27
Concord West
Killoola Street
New footpath
40
28
Concord West
Hospital Road
29
Concord West
Hospital Road
30
Concord West
Hospital Road
31
Concord West
Hospital Road
32
Concord West
Hospital Road / Concord Road intersection
33
Concord West
Currawang Street / Concord Road intersection
Warn grass / goat track evidence of pedestrian use Temporary shelter at COVID-19 test centre, narrow path and waiting area at bus stop Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage Narrow footpath s along hospital road between freemont Street and concord Road both sides. Currently around 800 mm wide No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow footpath. Kerb ramp not aligned to designated path of travel. Poor quality pavement. Kerb ramps across Concord Road are also non-standard and should be upgraded at the same time. Cost for upgrade to be confirmed, with traffic signal post relocations. Tactile paving not correctly aligned to designated path of travel
Widen footpath
New signs and "piano key" line marking
Distance (m)
$72,000 20
2
Widen footpath
Estimated Cost ($)
$4,500
$1,100 100
$22,500
10
$10,350
Install bus stop pad and widen footpath
1
Re-align kerb ramps
2
TBC
Re-align kerb ramps
2
$3,600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 55
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
34
Concord West
Concord Road
Overgrown grass narrowing path near school
Widen footpath
35
Concord West Concord West
Concord Road
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
Concord Road
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
Concord West Concord West Concord West
Concord Road
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection Queen Street
Kerb ramps not aligned to the intended path of travel Narrow path near school (around 800 mm wide)
Re-align kerb ramps
2
$3,600
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
40
Concord West
Killoola Street
Narrow path (around 800 mm wide)
Widen footpath
70
$15,750
41
Concord West
Killoola Street / Concord Road intersection
Realign kerb ramps
42
Concord West Concord West
Killoola Street
44
Concord West
Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection
Kerb ramp not aligned with intended path of travel Narrow path (around 800 mm wide) Narrow path opposite school approx. 800 mm wide with additional narrowing by grass opposite crossing Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide near school
45
Concord West
Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with cracking near school
36 37 38 39
43
Queen Street
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
100
$22,500
1
$1,800
Widen footpath
10
$2,250
Widen footpath
150
$33,750
Widen footpath
25
$5,625
Widen footpath
50
$11,250
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 56
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
46
Concord West
Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection
Widen footpath
47
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with grass father narrowing Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
48
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue / Currawang Street
Realign kerb ramps
4
$7,200
49
Concord West Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street Moala Street / Nullawarra Avenue intersection
Kerb ramps not aligned with the intended path of travel and missing kerb ramp Missing kerb ramp
New kerb ramp
1
$1,800
Missing kerb ramp
New kerb ramp
1
$1,800
51
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue
Exposed services pit
New services lid
1
$500
52
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
53
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
54
Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue / Nirranda Street intersection
Missing kerb ramp, kerb ramps not aligned
2
$3,600
55
Concord West Concord West
Nullawarra Avenue
Narrow footpath approx. 700 mm wide Missing crossing infrastructure, at crossing point on desire line access to Concord Hospital
Remove pram ramp. Undesirable crossing location. Refuge to the south should be used Widen footpath
100
$-
New pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2)
2
$28,600
50
56
Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
15
$3,375
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 57
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
57
Concord West Concord West Concord West
Quandong Place / Nullawarra Avenue Nullawarra Avenue
Missing kerb ramp
New kerb ramp
1
$1,800
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Relocate traffic signal pole
1
TBC
60
Concord West
Victoria Avenue
Upgrade signage / line marking and install TGSIs
2
$1,100
61
Concord West
Victoria Avenue / Queen Street intersection
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area Raised crossing missing repeated pedestrian legs sign, no "piano key" line marking on ramp and no tactile paving opposite church facility Missing crossing location between train station and retail on northern side of Victoria Avenue pedestrian desire line observed at this location.
N/A
62
Concord West Concord West
Queen Street
No upgrade proposed, as other crossing location is available at Queen Street. New crossing at this location would require changes to streetscape. Upgrade TGSIs
2
$1,000
Upgrade TGSIs
4
$2,000
Concord West Concord West
Queen Street
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters.
2
$23,600
58 59
63 64 65
Concord Road / Victoria Avenue
Queen Street
Stuart Street / Queen Street intersection
Missing and damaged tactile paving Tactile paving not aligned to direct pedestrians across driveway Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath Kerb ramps direct pedestrians into roundabout circulation lane
Distance (m)
N/A
Estimated Cost ($)
N/A
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 58
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
66
Concord West
Stuart Street
Widen footpath
67
Concord West
Stuart Street
68
Concord West
Stuart Street
69
Concord West
Stuart Street
70
North Strathfield
Shipley Avenue / Queen Street intersection
71
North Strathfield
Queen Street
72
North Strathfield
Wellbank Street
Footpath narrow (around 900 mm) near school crossing Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage Narrow footpath (around 800 mm wide) near school both sides of road Parents arrive from around 2.40 pm to pick up children and double park for the entire length of Stuart Street and Consett Street for extended periods. This creates a safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles, as through vehicle traffic travel in opposing traffic lane when passing parked vehicles. Vehicle and pedestrian conflicted noted. Kerb ramps not aligned in the designated path of travel Missing kerb ramp at rear of accessible parking space No bus landing pad
New signs and "piano key" line marking
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
50
$11,250
2
Widen footpath
$1,100 300
Work with school to identify opportunities to manage student pick up / drop off activities. This could include a Green Travel Plan encourage students to walk, ride or take public transport to school.
$67,500 TBC
Re-align kerb ramps
2
$3,600
New kerb ramp
1
$1,800
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 59
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
73
North Strathfield
Concord Road / Wellbank Street intersection
Relocate traffic signal pole
1
74
Concord
Cumming Avenue
75
Concord
Cumming Avenue
76
Concord
Cumming Avenue
77
Concord
Install pedestrian refuge
1
$25,000
78
Concord
Wide crossing location
Install pedestrian refuge
1
$25,000
79
Concord
Clermont Avenue / Concord Road Davidson Avenue / Concord Road Station Street / Concord Road
Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school Kerb ramps not provided to access wombat crossing facility from Links Avenue. Existing kerb ramp not aligned for safe passage of pedestrians Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school Wide crossing location
New kerb ramps (x2)
2
$3,600
80
Concord
Concord Road
Kerb ramps not aligned to designated crossing area. Conflict between driveway and pedestrian crossing area No tactile paving at bus stop
Install TGSIs
1
$500
81
Concord
Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
82
Concord
Wellbank Street
No pedestrian crossing facilities across Wellbank Street to access bus stops and Central Park
Install new pedestrian refuge to improve access to bus stops and Central Park.
1
$25,000
Widen footpath New kerb ramps
Distance (m)
TBC 400
2
Widen footpath
Estimated Cost ($)
$90,000 $3,600
100
$22,500
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 60
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
83
Concord
Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
84
Concord
Wellbank Street
No tactile paving adjacent to shopping area
Install TGSIs
1
$500
85
Concord
Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
86
Concord
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
87
Concord
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
88
Concord
Wellbank Street
New footpath
170
$38,250
89
Concord
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
10
$2,250
90
Concord
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
91
Concord
Wellbank Street / Bent Street intersection
92
Concord
Wellbank Street
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) and service pit hazard Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide between war Warbrick Street and briars Missing link between kerb build out crossing facility at Ian Parade, section includes an on demand bus stop Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide connecting to shared path Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) and service pit hazard Kerb ramp not aligned with designated path of travel Narrow footpath (around 800 mm wide)
93
Concord
Wellbank Street
Potential opportunity for continuous footpath
Continuous footpath treatment
Kerb ramps
Distance (m)
1
Widen footpath
$1,800 35
1
Estimated Cost ($)
$7,875 $20,000.00
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 61
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Kerb ramps and line marking upgrade. Relocate traffic signal pole if possible.
3
$20,000
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
Kerb ramp not aligned to the line of travel
Realign kerb ramps
2
$3,600
Kerd ramp not positioned appropriately to provide access to parked vehicle (in middle of space rather than rear of space). Not compliant with AS2890.5 No bus landing pad
Realign kerb ramps
1
$7,500
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
Description of Issue
treatment and improve sight visibility across Majors Lane Kerb ramps poorly aligned to the designated path of travel. Pole located within pedestrian crossing area. Poor quality pavement (on northwest corner). No bus landing pad
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
94
Concord
Wellbank Street / Majors Bay Road
95
Concord
Wellbank Street
96
Concord
97
Concord
Churchill Crescent / Wellbank Street intersection Wellbank Street
98
Concord
Wellbank Street
99
Concord
Kerb ramps not aligned
Realign kerb ramps
2
$3,600
100
Concord
Wellbank Street / Churchill Crescent Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
101
Concord
Wellbank Street
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
102
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street / Victoria Avenue intersection
Missing sign directing to ferry wharf from bus stop and overbridge
Install directional signage
2
$600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 62
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
103
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street / Wrights Road
Kerb ramps not aligned
Realign kerb ramps
1
$1,800
104
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street
Relocate pole
1
TBC
105
Drummoyne
Collingwood Street / Raglan Street
Traffic sign post located in narrow path. Footpath obstruction. Missing kerb ramp
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
106
Drummoyne
Raglan Street
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
107
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
1
$8,400
108
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
109
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
110
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
111
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
Service pole obstructing footpath
reallocate pole
1
TBC
112
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / St Georges Crescent intersection
Missing or non-aligned kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
6
$10,800
113
Drummoyne
Lyons Road
Pole in walkway and poor pavement condition
Relocate pole
1
TBC
114
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / Collingwood Street
No wayfinding signage between ferry wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street.
Install wayfinding signage between ferry wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street.
6
$1,800
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 63
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
115
Drummoyne
Lyons Road
Public seating in poor condition.
1
$3,000
116
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / Victoria Road intersection
1
TBC
117
Drummoyne
Renwick Street / Roseby Street intersection
No kerb ramp due to constraint with significant services, along with poor footpath quality. Poor alignment of kerb ramps
Remove seat and reassess if replacement is required. New kerb ramps
Relocate the stairs and provide kerb ramp.
1
TBC
118
Drummoyne
Renwick Street / Park Avenue
Sign pole in the way of footpath
Relocate signage
1
$500
119
Drummoyne
Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
40
$8,000
120
Drummoyne
Renwick Street / Park Avenue intersection
Poor alignment of kerb ramps. Potential opportunity for pedestrian refuges
2
$3,600
121
Drummoyne
Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street
Overgrown vegetation
Remove kerb ramps on the western side of the intersection. It is noted that a new pedestrian refuge is currently being constructed on the eastern side of the intersection to assist pedestrians crossing Park Avenue. Overgrown vegetation
40
$8,000
122
Drummoyne
Renwick Street south of Park Avenue
Drain with large grate openings
Trip hazard
1
$1,500
123
Drummoyne
Henley Marine Drive
Restricted access for mobility impaired and people with prams between Birkenhead Point
Consider opportunity to construct ramps or lifts to access Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf from
1
Estimated Cost ($)
TBC
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 64
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
124
Drummoyne
Roseby Street / Victoria Road intersection
125
Drummoyne
Victoria Road, north of Roseby Street
126
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
127
Drummoyne
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection
128
Drummoyne
Formosa Street, north of Sisters Crescent
129
Drummoyne
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Ferry Wharf to local residential and adjacent bus services. No lighting evident with dense vegetation, which provides limited passive surveillance. Potential opportunity to improve streetscape amenity linking between bus stop and Birkenhead Point Shopping Centre.
Henley Marine Drive, through Bridge Street Wharf Reserve. Improve street lighting and surveillance.
Shared path conflicts with pinch point at bus stop. Degradation of line marking for shared path. No accessible path linking between St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street. Treatment Construct accessible path. Kerb ramp directs pedestrians into circulation lane of roundabout Trench drain with large grate openings Damaged service pit lid
Consider opportunity to widen footpath and improve pedestrian amenity along Roseby Street to the bus stop at Victoria Road. Review as part of the Bike Plan.
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
100
$22,500
1
Construct accessible path
TBC
60
$13,500
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Upgrade drainage grate
2
$23,600
1
$2,500
Replace service pit lid
1
$500
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 65
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
130
Drummoyne
Day Street / Sisters Crescent intersection
Install kerb blister (x1) and kerb raps (x1)
1
$11,800
131
Drummoyne
Day Street, west of Sister Crescent
Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / central splitter island Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
132
Drummoyne
Day Street / Tranmere Street
Upgrade ramp
1
133
Drummoyne
Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection
Non DDA compliant ramp and poor pavement condition Poor kerb ramp alignment into roundabout
Realign kerb ramps
2
$3,600
134
Drummoyne
Therry Street / Thompson Street intersection
New kerb ramps
1
$1,800
135
Drummoyne
Kerb ramps
2
$75,000
136
Drummoyne
$50,000
Drummoyne
New kerb ramps and upgrade traffic island to refuge Install Give Way line along western side of footpath
2
137
Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Market Street / Thompson Street intersection
1
$500.00
138
Drummoyne
Missing link from new kerb ramp on opposite side of road within driveway Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to the Bay Run. Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to the Bay Run. Unclear priority for pedestrians and vehicles. Potential improvements to continuous footpath treatment across laneway. Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
139
Drummoyne
Overgrown vegetation and poor path quality
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Broughton Street / Thompson Street intersection Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection
Distance (m)
30
Estimated Cost ($)
$8,550
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 66
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
140
Drummoyne
Plunkett Street / Thompson Street
Missing kerb ramps
Install kerb ramps
2
$3,600
141
Drummoyne
Thompson Street
$50,000
Drummoyne
Thompson Street, north of Polding Street
1
$50,000
143
Concord
1
$8,400
144
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Patterson Street (bus stop ID: 213736) Majors Bay Road / Gallipoli Street intersection
Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) blisters and (x2) kerb ramps Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) blisters and (x2) kerb ramps New bus stop landing pad
1
142
Poor kerb ramp alignment into roundabout. No cutout through traffic island. No kerb ramps or other crossing facilities on south side of roundabout. No bus landing pad
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2)
2
$28,600
145
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
Poor alignment of kerb ramps and narrow gap in spitter island approx. 900 mm wide Damaged pavement and bollard
Upgrade bollard
1
$300
146
Concord
Trafalgar Parade / Majors Bay Road intersection
$64,600
Concord
Davidson Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection
Upgrade pedestrian crossing and new kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2) New TGSIs
1
147
2
$1,000
148
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Davidson Avenue
Poor alignment of kerb ramps and tactile paving and missing TGSIs. Zebra crossing is not straight. Missing tactile paving. TGSIs provided at other crossings in the area. Trip hazard with drop off at edges of narrow path
149
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Correys Avenue
No bus landing pad.
150
Concord
Links Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection
Poor road pavement resulting in trip hazard for
Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard New bus stop landing pad Resurface roadway
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
20
$4,500
1
$8,400 $20,000
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 67
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
pedestrians when crossing the road. 151
Concord
Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue
Missing kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
152
Concord
Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue
Widen footpath
50
$11,250
153
Concord
Majors Bay Road
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm and poor condition No kerb ramps at golf club access driveway
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
154
Concord
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection
New footpath to bus stop, new bus landing pad and kerb blisters x2 and kerb ramps (x2) on Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
2
10
$34,250
155
Concord
Brays Road / Majors Bay Road
Missing link to bus stop, no path or kerb ramps provided, evidence of pedestrian use by warn vegetation ("goat track"). No bus stop landing at school bus stop Faded signs
New signage
2
156
Concord
Brays Road, east of Majors Bay Road
Widen footpath
280
$63,000
157
Concord
Brays Road, east of Rickard Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with several trip hazards near school Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Widen footpath
90
$20,250
158
Mortlake
Mortlake Street / Brays Road
1
$26,800
159
Mortlake
Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road
280
$63,000
Potential restriction for mobility scooters due to handrails, poor alignment of kerb ramps, missing kerb ramps Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Widen footpath
$600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 68
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
160
Mortlake
Tennyson Road / Gale Street intersection
Missing kerb ramp
161
Mortlake
Tennyson Road / Emily Street
162
Mortlake
Tennyson Road, at raised pedestrian crossing
163
Mortlake
Tennyson Road
164
Mortlake
Mcdonald Street
165
Mortlake
Edwin Street
166
Mortlake
Whittaker Street / Tennyson Road intersection
167
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
Pole narrows footpath to approx. 700 mm and trip hazard from pit lid and pole surrounds Tactile paving in poor condition, rubber tactiles peeling back creating trip hazard On street ding area exceeds permitted area, which narrows footpath width Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road. Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road, both sides . No kerb ramps provided to cross Tennyson Road and link to Breakfast Point walkway Missing "no parking" (to left) sign and "no stopping" sign (to right) at kiss and ride area
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
New kerb ramp
1
$1,800
Widen footpath (local widening)
20
$4,500
Replace TGSIs
2
$1,000
Enforcement of on street dining area
1
N/A
Widen footpath
30
$6,750
Widen footpath
40
$9,000
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
New signage
2
$600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 69
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
168
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
New signage
2
$600
169
Cabarita
Cabarita Park, access road south of ferry wharf
New signage
2
$600
170
Cabarita
Cabarita Park entry
Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing (legs) signs Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing (legs) signs Missing kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
3
$5,400
171
Cabarita
Cabarita Road, south of Cabarita Park entry
Trip hazard with drop off at edges of narrow path
172
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
173
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
174
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
Missing link from bus stop to nearby path that links to ferry wharf Obstruction (garbage facility) in footpath between footpath and marina Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide
Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard New footpath
175
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
176
Mortlake
Tennyson Road / Northcote Street intersection
177
Mortlake
Tennyson Road / Macdonald Street
Remove obstruction
Distance (m)
20
$4,500
30
$6,750
1
Widen footpath
Estimated Cost ($)
N/A
100
$22,500
Lack of wayfinding signage on link from bus / ferry to public pool, to encourage access by public transport. Overgrown vegetation
New wayfinding signage
6
$1,800
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 70
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
178
Mortlake
Tennyson Road / Orchards Avenue intersection
Mortlake
Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road
Upgrade splitter island to facilitate pedestrian crossing area Widen footpath
1
179
Informal splitter island blocks pedestrian path of travel Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
180
Mortlake
Gale Street, north of Brays Road
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
181
Mortlake
Brays Road, east of Rickard Street
182
Concord
Noble Street
183
Concord
Lancelot Street
184
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road
185
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road
186
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Archers Street
187
Concord
Archer Street / Majors Bay Road intersection
188
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($) $25,000
120
$27,000
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide on approach to school Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide adjacent to school Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards on approach to school Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide
Widen footpath
360
$81,000
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
Widen footpath
70
$15,750
Widen footpath
60
$13,500
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with overgrown vegetation and trip hazards No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow footpath. Damaged sign in pedestrian crossing area, no duplicate ped legs signs. Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Widen footpath
90
$20,250
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
New signage
3
$900
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 71
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
189
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
190
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
191
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
192
Concord
Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
193
Concord
Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
194
Concord
Wellbank Street / Greenlees Park
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
Widen footpath
50
$11,250
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Widen footpath
15
$3,375
Missing section of pedestrian fence in central median No signs or line marking south of Greenlees Avenue to indicate shared path Wide pedestrian and cyclist crossing area across Greenlees Avenue
Replace pedestrian fencing
10
$4,000
200
$1,600
195
Concord
Brewer Street, east of Ellis Street
196
Concord
Brewer Street / Spring Street
197
Concord
Burwood Road / Wallace Street
Missing line marking on shared path adjacent to tennis courts Missing shared path signage Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / central splitter island Water ponding in front of kerb ramp
Number of units
Line marking and signage
2
Potential opportunity reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb buildouts or central median refuge. Also opportunity for slowing vehicle on approach e.g. raised threshold Install line marking
2
Install signage
1
$300
Install kerb blister (x2) and kerb raps (x2)
2
$23,600
Re-grade turning area and improve drainage
$23,600
20
20
$500
TBC
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 72
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
198
Concord
Burwood Road, North of La Mascotte Avenue
No landing pad at bus stop
New bus stop landing pad
1
199
Concord
Burwood Road east of Tremere Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Widen footpath
10
$2,250
200
Concord
Burwood Road east of Suke Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and trip hazards
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
201
Concord
No landing pad at bus stop
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
202
Concord
Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue (Pelican Quays) Bayview Park Car Park
No accessible car space near ferry wharf
Provide accessible car space
1
TBC
203
Concord
Bayview Park
Opportunity for public seating
Provide seating and amenity for pedestrians.
1
$3,000
204
Concord
Bayview Park Path
Overgrown vegetation and trip hazard
Trim vegetation
1
$200
205
Concord
Bayview Park Path
Review as part of the Bike Plan.
4
N/A
206
Concord
Crane Street / St Lukes Park on street carpark
207
Concord
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park
No evidence of shared path in operation along foreshore except low level sign at western end. Narrow shared path No identification of change in alignment of footpath direction which currently leads to directly into car park spaces. Missing footpath link across car park entry
208
Concord
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide near school with
$8,400
Install line marking
20
$500
New footpath
50
$11,250
Widen footpath
90
$20,250
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 73
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
trip hazard and drop off edges 209
Concord
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
No landing pad at bus stop
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
210
Concord
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
Missing children sign
Install signage
1
$300
211
Concord
Crane Street east of Burwood Road
Missing pedestrian link to bus stop
New footpath
5
$3,000
212
Concord
Burwood Road / Edith Avenue
Resurface roadway
20
$20,000
213
Concord
Burwood Road east of Ward Street
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard No landing pad at bus stop
214
Concord
Burwood Road east of Ward Street
Narrow path approx. 1m near bus stop
Widen footpath
50
$11,250
215
Concord
Burwood Road east of Ward Street
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
216
Concord
Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue
Narrow footpath approx. 1m wide with vegetation overhang and trip hazard Narrow path approx. 1m wide
Widen footpath
30
$6,750
217
Concord
Burwood Road east of Marceau Drive
No landing pad at bus stop
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
218
Concord
Burwood Road west of Bayview Park
Trip hazard near Bus stop
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
219
Concord
Gipps Street, adjacent to Concord Oval
Poor quality stairs (condition), trip hazard. Non-standard DDA requirements (e.g.
Upgrade Stairs (around 60 steps)
60
TBC
New bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 74
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
handrail an slope of stairs). Vegetation could also cause slip hazard Narrow path to bus stop
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
Widen footpath
30
$6,750
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
220
Concord
Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection
221
Concord
Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection
222
Concord
Gipps Street
Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide on approach to bus stop No bus stop landing pad
223
Concord
Burwood Road
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
1
$200
224
Concord
Moreton Street / Burwood Road
Kerb ramp appears to be steep and poor quality
Upgrade kerb ramp
2
$3,600
225
Concord
Gipps Street, west of Burwood Road
Poor quality and narrow approx. 900 mm wide
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
226
Concord
Lansdowne Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and poor quality
Widen footpath
20
$4,500
227
Concord
Gipps Street
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and poor quality
Widen footpath
50
$11,250
228
Concord
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
229
Concord
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street
Widen footpath
100
$22,500
230
Concord
Gipps Street, east of David Street
Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards
Widen footpath
90
$20,250
1
$8,400
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 75
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
231
Concord
Norman Street / Majors Bay Road intersection
Opportunity to provide missing link between Norman Street to Nullawarre Avenue via majors bay reserve and playground and nearby paths
232
Concord
Brewer Street
233
Concord
Crane Street - link to Corby Avenue
Potential opportunity to modify existing pedestrian crossing to raised wombat crossing to slow traffic. Note on bus route - lower profile required Missing link to bus stop
New footpath to link between Majors Bay Road / Norman Street intersection to playground and recreational footpath along Ron Routley Oval (Majors Bay Reserve) and link all the way to existing footpath in Nullawarra Avenue. Install wombat crossing
234
Concord
Crane Street
235
Five Dock
Lyons Road, wrest of Great North Road
236
Five Dock
Lyons Road / Scott Street
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
600
$135,000
1
Install new footpath
$80,000
20
$4,500
150
$62,350
Missing link between path and bus stop and park opposite. Will require ped facility to cross Crane Stet (pedestrian refuge). Also missing link to Evelyn Street. Overgrown vegetation
Install footpath, pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2)
2
Trim vegetation
1
$200
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road
Raised threshold treatment
1
$80,000
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 76
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
237
Five Dock
Lyons Road /West Street
Raised threshold treatment
1
$80,000
238
Five Dock
Lyonns Road / East Street
Raised threshold treatment
1
$80,000
239
Five Dock
Lyons Road Ferns Lane
Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway
1
$20,000.00
240
Five Dock
Henry Street, east of East Street
Raised intersection treatment
1
$10,000
241
Five Dock
Henry Street / Scott Street intersection
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road Safety issue at driveway crossing. Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway. Kerb ramps not aligned and not enough space for landing at back of ramp. Potential kerb build out. Missing kerb ramps Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment
New kerb ramps
2
$3,600
242
Five Dock
Henry Street, west of Scott Street
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
243
Five Dock
Henry Street, west of Elizabeth Street
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
244
Five Dock
Henry Street, near Elizabeth Street
Cars parked on footpath causing obstruction
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
245
Five Dock
Harris Road
Pedestrian refuge is too small.
1
$50,000
246
Five Dock
Henry Street, east of Scott Street
Overgrown vegetation
Upgrade pedestian refuge or consider pedestrian crossing Trim vegetation
1
$200
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 77
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
247
Five Dock
Garfield Street, west of Great North Road
TGSIs
3
$1,500
248
Five Dock
Garfield Street, west of West Street
Remove Garden Bed
1
$1,800
249
Five Dock
Garfield Street, west of West Street
Deteriorating TGSIs at Loading dock, lack of visibility Vegetated garden bed restricts egress from rear bus door Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
250
Five Dock
Garfield Street / Harris Street intersection
Raised threshold treatment
251
Five Dock
Garfield Street, west of West Street
Wide Crossing Area. Opportunity to reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb build out or island and /or threshold on minor road to residential area. Note on bus route - lower platform will be required Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
252
Five Dock
Great North Road, north of Harrabrook Avenue
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
253
Five Dock
Great North Road, north of Murralong Avenue
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
254
Five Dock
First Avenue, west of Wingham Avenue
Signage and Line marking
2
$1,100
255
Five Dock
First Avenue / Ingham Avenue intersection
Missing duplicate pedestrian Crossing ("legs") signs and Piano key line marking on ramp Missing kerb ramp western approach to park, poor alignment on southern approach, no kerb ramps on eastern
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
8
$75,000
Remove TGSIs
Distance (m)
3 1
Remove TGSIs
Estimated Cost ($)
$675 $80,000
3
$675
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 78
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
approach, poor alignment on northern approach 256
Five Dock
First Avenue east of Ingham Avenue
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
257
Rodd Point
First Avenue/Arthur Street
Upgrade to refuge island and replace kerb ramps
2
$7,500
258
Rodd Point
First Avenue east of Pricess Avenue
Poor alignment into roundabout circulation lane. Reposition kerb ramps No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
259
Rodd Point
First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive
New footpath to access roundabout
260
Rodd Point
First Avenue west of Pricess Avenue
Path available but not on pedestrian desire line to cross roundabout No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
261
Rodd Point
First Avenue/Arthur Street intersection
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Resurface roadway
1
$20,000
262
Rodd Point
First Avenue west of Heath Street
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
263
Five dock
First Avenue / Park Road intersection
Poor alignment of kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
1
$1,800
264
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road east of Waterview Street
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
265
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road / Park Road
Wide crossing point
Install central refuge
1
$25,000
266
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park
Missing link alongside of park
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4)
10
350
$2,250
$78,750
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 79
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
267
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road, west or Arthur Street
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
268
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road / Arthur Street intersection
Wide crossing point
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
2
$30,000
269
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road
Missing link alongside of park
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4)
270
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road / Nield Avenue
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
2
$3,600
271
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road / Henley Marine Drive
Missing kerb ramp and wide crossing points
2
$100,000
272
Russell Lea
Mcculloch Street south of Whittall Street
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Unstall pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps Trim vegetation
1
$200
273
Russell Lea
Mcculloch Street north of Whittall Street
Missing link alongside of school
274
Russell Lea
Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection
275
Russell Lea
276
100
100
Estimated Cost ($)
$22,500
Missing kerb ramp
Footpath boardwalk, subject to tree root investigations Kerb ramps
$100,000
2
$3,600
Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
1
$1,800
Rodd Point
Mcculloch Street /The Crescent
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
1
$1,800
277
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road / Dalmeny Avenue
Kerb ramp not aligned. Provide Central refuge
Kerb ramps
2
$3,600
278
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road west of Dalmeny Avenue
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 80
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
279
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road / Jersey Lane
$20,000.00
Five Dock
Great North Road, north of Halley Street
Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway New stop landing pad
1
280
Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway. No bus stop landing pad
1
$8,400
281
Five Dock
Great North Road
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
282
Abbotsford
Great North Road, north of Reginal Street
Missing Tactile Paving
New TGSIs
2
$1,000
283
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Irene street
Wide Crossing area
1
$25,000
284
Abbotsford
Great North Road north of Blackwell point road
No bus stop landing pad
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
285
Abbotsford
Great North Road, north of Gow Street
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
286
Abbotsford
Great North Road / Altona Street
Wide Crossing distance
1
$25,000
287
Abbotsford
Great North Road north of Altona Street
Missing Tactile Paving
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) New TGSIs
2
$1,000
288
Abbotsford
Great North Road north of Altona Street
Non standard seating
1
$3,000
289
Abbotsford
Great North Road north of Altona Street
No bus stop landing pad
Upgrade public seating and amenity for pedestrians. New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
290
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of The Terrace
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 81
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
291
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of The Terrace
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
2
292
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Trip off edge of pavement
Relay footpath
293
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Restricted access between ferry and bus for mobility impaired or people with prams
1
TBC
294
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
15
$7,500
295
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Large grate within footpath - risk of trip hazard No tactile paving on stairs
Consider opportunity to construct DDA compliant ramp or lifts to access ferry wharf from Great North Road Upgrade drainage grate Upgrade Stairs
5
$2,000
296
Abbotsford
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
297
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Gipps Street
298
Drummoyne
Lyons Road east of more street
299
Drummoyne
Lyons Road east of more street
300
Drummoyne
Cometrowe Street
$3,600 10
Missing link between footpaths from ferry to footpath at bus stop. Pedestrians required to walking in roundabout to link between bus and ferry Missing part of tactile paving
Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route of travel Tactile Paving
1
$500
Large grate within footpath - risk of trip hazard Access to property is required to drive on walkway. Car park on walkway area Missing link on eastern side from Lyons Road to
Upgrade drainage grate
1
$1,000
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
New footpath
20
$2,250
300
$4,500
$150,000
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 82
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
301
Drummoyne
Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street
302
Drummoyne
The Esplanade
303
Drummoyne
Taplin Park Car Park
304
Drummoyne
Taplin Park Car Park
305
Drummoyne
Taplin Park Car Park
306
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
307
Drummoyne
The Esplanade / Henricks Avenue intersection
308
Drummoyne
The Esplanade / north of Henricks Avenue
Description of Issue
Drummoyne Park. "Goat track" indicating use by pedestrians Missing link for accessible path of travel between Crometrowe Street accessible parking to foreshore walk Moderately Narrow foreshore walking area (approx. 1.4m wide) adjacent to water Poor visibility between end of shared path and road adjacent when vehicle turning into driveway Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard Missing end of shared path signage and directing cyclists off footpath area New narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide does not link to nearby paths. Wide Crossing point Shared path directed into road area. Evidence of people walking on
Description of Proposed Treatment
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
New footpath
200
$45,000
Widen footpath
400
$90,000
Trim vegetation
Number of units
1
Resurface roadway
20
Signage
1
Extend path 90m around into The Esplanade and provide pram ramps (x2)
2
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
2
New footpath around turning head
$200
$20,000 $300
90
$40,250
$23,600 50
$11,250
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 83
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
vegetation grass to avoid walking on road. Vehicle parked on shared path area Missing link between bus stop and foreshore walk
309
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
310
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
311
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
312
Drummoyne
Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street
313
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Victoria Road
Opportunity top kerb build out linking Drummoyne oval to access path on opposite side of road Missing link between bus stop and Drummoyne Oval Warn grass indicating use from pedestrian desire line Narrow Area behind bus shelter with trip hazard
314
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Formosa Street
Missing part of tactile paving
315
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / College Street intersection
316
Drummoyne
317 318
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
New footpath Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
130
$29,250
2
$23,600
New footpath
100
$50,000
New footpath
25
$5,625
Widen footpath and remove trip hazard behind bus stop Tactile Paving
5
$1,125
1
$500
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Resurface roadway
1
$20,000
Lyons Road west of College Street
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / Thompson Street intersection
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Resurface roadway
1
$20,000
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Thompson Street
Narrow footpath width (approx. 1.1m) if permitted outdoor dining is in action
Trim vegetation
1
$200
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 84
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
319
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / Janet Street intersection
Damaged tactile paving
Tactile Paving
1
$500
320
Five Dock
Lyons Road opposite Sibbick Street
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
321
Five Dock
Ingham Avenue south of Lyons Road
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Trim vegetation
1
$200
322
Five Dock
Ingham Avenue / Lyons Road
Signage
10
$3,000
323
Five Dock
Russell Street/Sibbick Street intersection
Potential pedestrian link signage from Lyons Road to five dock town centre via Ingham Ave, Barnstaple Rd. Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
2
$3,600
324
Five Dock
Lithgow Street south of Lyons Road
Boat parked on footpath causing obstruction
Remove obstruction
1
N/A
325
Five Dock
Brent Street opposite Undine Street
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
326
Russell Lea
Brent Street / Seebrook Avenue intersection
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
2
$3,600
327
Russell Lea
Brent Street / Henry Marine Drive
Missing kerb ramps and wide rossing point.
Install pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
2
$28,600
328
Russell Lea
Brent Street opposite Undine Street
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
1
$8,400
329
Drummoyne
Edwin Street / College Street
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
4
$7,200
330
Drummoyne
Edwin Street / Formosa Street
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
1
$1,800
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 85
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
331
Drummoyne
Victoria Road south of Wolseley Street
Widen footpath
332
Abbotsford
Great North Road north of Blackwall Point Road
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing Overgrown vegetation
333
Abbotsford
Blackwall Point Road east of Great North Road
Widen footpath
334
Wareemba
Great North Road, north of Edenholme Road
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing No TGSIs at pedestrian Refuge
New TGSIs
4
$2,000
335
Wareemba
Edenholme Road / Great North Road intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
1
$80,000
336
Wareemba
Coranto Street / Great North Road intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
1
$80,000
337
Five Dock
Charles Street / Great North Road intersection
Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Resurface roadway
1
$20,000
338
Russell Lea
Brent Street
Install pedestrian refuge
1
$50,000
339
Rodd Point
Barnstaple Road
Install pedestrian refuge
1
$50,000
340
Concord
Cabarita Road / Frederick Street
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road to/from school. No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road to/from school Kerb Ramp non compliant
Kerb ramps
2
$3,600
341
Russell Lea
Hampden Road / Great North Road intersection,
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road along Hampden Road eg. near bus stop
Install pedestrian refuge
1
$50,000
Trim vegetation
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
50
$11,250
1
$200 15
$3,375
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 86
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street / Intersection
Description of Issue
Description of Proposed Treatment
Number of units
Distance (m)
Estimated Cost ($)
342
Abbotsford
Abbotsford Parade
Missing Link along side of park
2
150
$32,850
343
Concord
Bertram Street and Bertram Lane
Missing link along residential properties
2
100
$26,100
344
Drummoyne
Dening street
Missing link along residential properties
2
100
$26,100
345
Chiswick
Eaton Place
Missing link along residential properties
2
400
$93,600
346
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
Missing link to parkland
70
$15,750
347
Concord
Zoeller Street, east of Sanders Street
Missing link to parkland
Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route of travel Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
80
$19,200
2
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 87
6.
Priorities for Pedestrian Improvements 6.1
Methodology to Prioritise Pedestrian Requirements
The How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (Roads and Maritime, 2002) provides guidance on what is important in providing footpaths. This method was used to determine the prioritisation of the proposed improvements. Scores were derived for each of the recommended pedestrian improvements for the purpose of prioritising projects. The Weighted Criteria Scoring System from the Roads and Maritime publication How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (2002) was used to prioritise each proposed improvement as shown in Table 6-1. Table 6-1 RMS Weighted Criteria Scoring System Category Land Use
Traffic Impact Safety Facility Benefits Continuity of Routes Priority
Criteria Number of Attractors/Generators Land Use Type Proximity to Attractors/Generators Future Development with Attractors/Generators Road Hierarchy Identified as Hazardous Area (from consultation) Identified Pedestrian Crashes Demonstrated Path Addition to Existing Facility Pedestrian Route Hierarchy
The RMS defines the overall work prioritisation as:
High (100 – 70)
Medium (<70 – 40)
Low (<40)
In order to determine the priorities of the pedestrian access improvement items in a PAMP, the infrastructure initiatives or studies are given a priority rating to be accommodated in the Council budget cycle. A possible weighted scoring system is provided in Table 6-2. However, a system could be customised to suit specific council areas according to local needs. The works identified in this PAMP are primarily located on the key pedestrian routes, outlined in Figure 1-1, which were assessed on-site. Council is likely to receive requests for additional works beyond those identified in this plan. The same methodology can be applied to these requests to determine their level of prioritisation.
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 88
Table 6-2 Weighted Scoring Criteria to Prioritise the PAMP Initiatives Category Land Use
Criteria Number of attractors/generators (locations) Land use type
Proximity to generators/attractors
Future development with attractors/generators Traffic Impact
Road hierarchy
Safety
Identified as hazardous area (from audit or consultation) Identified pedestrian crashes
Facility Benefits
Demonstrated path
Continuity of routes
Addition to existing facility
Priority
Pedestrian route hierarchy
Performance Conditions 1 more than 5 locations 3-5 locations 1-2 locations 0 locations schools commercial/retail residential other less than 250 metres >250-500 metres >500-1000 metres >1000 metres High medium low State Road Regional Road Local Road Special use Other High Medium Low None >3 reported crashes per year 3 reported crashes per year 2 reported crashes per year 1 reported crash per year 0 reported crashes per year High usage Medium usage Low usage No demonstrated use Link existing facilities Extension of facilities Addition to facilities Other High use Medium use Low use
Score 2, 3 10 8 5 0 10 8 5 0 10 8 5 0 5 3 1 15 10 8 5 0 10 8 5 0 15 10 8 5 0 10 8 5 0 10 8 5 0 5 3 1
Notes: 1
Only one performance condition is to be selected for each criteria e.g. Land use type residential = 5.
23
The maximum score achievable overall is 100.
The overall work prioritisation is then determined by adding up each criteria scores to reflect the environment of the specific area. e.g. High (100-60), Medium (<60-40), Low (<40) or Considering (not scored). Source: How to Prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan, Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (RTA), 2002
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 89
Limitations of Transport for NSW Methodology Please note that there are limitations to the Transport for NSW based methodology for prioritising each proposed improvement. For example, the Weighted Criteria Scoring System does not include the presence of existing footpaths on the opposite side of the street. This results in the proposed improvement having a higher priority using the TfNSW method (as it is assumed there is no footpath on the route). In addition, at some key generators, pedestrian facilities may be urgently required (outside an aged care facility, for example). However, the weighting system may not provide a score that is significantly higher for the same type of facility at a less critical location. Therefore, consideration needs to be taken when assessing priorities in conjunction with the Transport for NSW methodology. The methodology also does not apply a weighting for the costs associated with identified works. Noting the limitations on the amount and timing of funding being available, it is likely that works would not necessarily ultimately be delivered in the same order they are scored. 6.1.1
Walking Route Hierarchy
A hierarchy of pedestrian routes has been established, based on observed pedestrian demand and proximity to pedestrian attractors, such as town centre land uses and schools, and key walking routes. This walking route hierarchy was used as part of the scoring method to determine the priority for proposed pedestrian infrastructure upgrades. Appendix B shows the walking route hierarchy used for the PAMP scoring assessment. The figure shows high and medium use walking routes, with all other routes being low use.
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 90
Figure 6-1 Walking Route Hierarchy
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 91
6.2
Ranking of the Pedestrian Improvements
Results from the TfNSW weighted prioritisation are provided in Table 6-3. The issues and constraints identification (ID) references relate to those provided in Appendix D. Recommendations are based on GHD site based prioritisation. TfNSW weighted prioritisations are provided in full in Appendix F. The overall work prioritisation has been determined for high, medium and low priority projects, by using the following prioritisation scoring ranges:
High priority: 100-70
Medium priority: <69-55
Low priority: <55
Table 6-3 Infrastructure Provision Goals for City of Canada Bay LGA PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
21
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection
116
Lyons Road / Victoria Road intersection Clermont Avenue / Concord Road Davidson Avenue / Concord Road
77
78
Description of Proposed Treatment Consider opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge across TfNSW New kerb ramps
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
83
1
High
80
2
High
Install pedestrian refuge
77
3
High
Install pedestrian refuge
77
3
High
79
Station Street / Concord Road
New kerb ramps (x2)
77
3
High
219
Gipps Street, adjacent to Concord Oval Thompson Street, north of Polding Street
Upgrade Stairs (around 60 steps) Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) blisters and (x2) kerb ramps New stop landing pad
75
6
High
74
7
High
74
7
High
Widen kerb ramps
73
9
High
142
228
20
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street Concord Road / Mary Street car
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 92
PAMP ID
220 221
Street / Intersection park intersection Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection
222
Gipps Street
80
Concord Road
126
St Georges Crescent
28
Hospital Road
73
Concord Road / Wellbank Street intersection Wellbank Street / Majors Bay Road
94
224
225
227 229
230 19
22
Moreton Street / Burwood Road Gipps Street, west of Burwood Road Gipps Street Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street Gipps Street, east of David Street Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Blaxland Road
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
Widen footpath
73
9
High
Widen footpath
73
9
High
New stop landing pad Install TGSIs
73
9
High
72
13
High
Construct accessible path Widen footpath Relocate traffic signal pole
71
14
High
69
15
Medium
69
15
Medium
Kerb ramps and line marking upgrade. Relocate traffic signal pole if possible. Upgrade kerb ramp
69
15
Medium
69
15
Medium
Widen footpath
69
15
Medium
Widen footpath Widen footpath
69
15
Medium
69
15
Medium
Widen footpath
69
15
Medium
Re-align kerb ramps
68
23
Medium
New signs
66
24
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 93
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
29
Hospital Road
61
Victoria Avenue / Queen Street intersection
223
Burwood Road Victoria Road, north of Roseby Street Crane Street, east of Burwood Road Crane Street, east of Burwood Road Crane Street, east of Burwood Road Crane Street east of Burwood Road Stuart Street
125 208
209
210
211
69
297
Lyons Road west of Gipps Street
Description of Proposed Treatment New signs and "piano key" line marking No upgrade proposed, as other crossing location is available at Queen Street. New crossing at this location would require changes to streetscape. Trim vegetation Review as part of the Bike Plan. Widen footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
66
24
Medium
66
24
Medium
66
24
Medium
65
28
Medium
65
28
Medium
New bus stop landing pad
65
28
Medium
Install signage
65
28
Medium
New footpath
65
28
Medium
Work with school to identify opportunities to manage student pick up / drop off activities. This could include a Green Travel Plan encourage students to walk, ride or take public transport to school. Tactile Paving
64
33
Medium
63
34
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 94
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
298
Lyons Road east of more street Great North Road, north of Edenholme Road Brent Street
334
338 32
33
34 65
226 23 35 36 75 123
Hospital Road / Concord Road intersection Currawang Street / Concord Road intersection Concord Road Stuart Street / Queen Street intersection
Lansdowne Street Blaxland Road Concord Road Concord Road Cumming Avenue Henley Marine Drive
Description of Proposed Treatment Upgrade drainage grate New TGSIs
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
63
34
Medium
63
34
Medium
Install pedestrian refuge Re-align kerb ramps
63
34
Medium
62
38
Medium
Re-align kerb ramps
62
38
Medium
Widen footpath Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Widen footpath Remove pole
62
38
Medium
62
38
Medium
62
38
Medium
61
43
Medium
Install bus stop pad Install bus stop pad New kerb ramps
61
43
Medium
61
43
Medium
61
43
Medium
Consider opportunity to construct ramps or lifts to access Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf from Henley Marine Drive, through Bridge Street Wharf Reserve. Improve street lighting and surveillance.
60
47
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 95
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
141
Thompson Street
146
Trafalgar Parade / Majors Bay Road intersection
147
Davidson Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street
310
311
56
66
Stuart Street
67
Stuart Street
68
Stuart Street
74
Cumming Avenue
76
Cumming Avenue Edenholme Road / Great North Road intersection Coranto Street / Great North Road intersection Cabarita Road /
335
336
340
Description of Proposed Treatment Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) blisters and (x2) kerb ramps Upgrade pedestrian crossing and new kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2) New TGSIs
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
60
47
Medium
60
47
Medium
60
47
Medium
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
60
47
Medium
New footpath
60
47
Medium
New pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) Widen footpath
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
New signs and "piano key" line marking Widen footpath Widen footpath
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
Widen footpath Raised threshold treatment on minor road Raised threshold treatment on minor road Kerb ramps
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
59
53
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 96
PAMP ID
31
Street / Intersection Frederick Street Hospital Road
93
Wellbank Street
95
Wellbank Street Churchill Crescent / Wellbank Street intersection Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Wellbank Street / Churchill Crescent Brewer Street / Spring Street
96
97 98 99
196
299 300 301
52 53
Lyons Road east of more street Cometrowe Street Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street Nullawarra Avenue Nullawarra Avenue
60
Victoria Avenue
62
Queen Street
145
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street Crane Street / St Lukes Park on street carpark
206
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
Install bus stop pad and widen footpath Continuous footpath treatment Install bus stop pad Realign kerb ramps
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
Realign kerb ramps Install bus stop pad Realign kerb ramps
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
Install kerb blister (x2) and kerb raps (x2) Remove obstruction
58
62
Medium
58
62
Medium
New footpath
58
62
Medium
New footpath
58
62
Medium
Install bus stop pad Install bus stop pad
57
73
Medium
57
73
Medium
Upgrade signage / line marking and install TGSIs Upgrade TGSIs Upgrade bollard
57
73
Medium
57
73
Medium
57
73
Medium
Install line marking
57
73
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 97
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
207
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park Crane Street link to Corby Avenue Crane Street
233 234
117
30 59
63 84 133
134
172 191
282 283
296
Renwick Street / Roseby Street intersection Hospital Road Concord Road / Victoria Avenue Queen Street Wellbank Street Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Therry Street / Thompson Street intersection Cabarita Park Path Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street Great North Road, north of Reginal Street Great North Road south of Irene street Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Description of Proposed Treatment New footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
57
73
Medium
Install new footpath
57
73
Medium
Install footpath, pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) Relocate the stairs and provide kerb ramp. Widen footpath Relocate traffic signal pole
57
73
Medium
56
82
Medium
55
83
Medium
55
83
Medium
Upgrade TGSIs
55
83
Medium
Install TGSIs
55
83
Medium
Realign kerb ramps
55
83
Medium
New kerb ramps
55
83
Medium
New footpath
55
83
Medium
Replace pedestrian fencing
55
83
Medium
New TGSIs
55
83
Medium
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route of travel
55
83
Medium
55
83
Medium
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 98
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
313
Lyons Road west of Victoria Road
314
Lyons Road west of Formosa Street Lyons Road / College Street intersection Edwin Street / College Street Edwin Street / Formosa Street Barnstaple Road
315 329 330 339 24
48
49 50
54
55 57
252
253
Concord Road / Blaxland Road intersection Nullawarra Avenue / Currawang Street Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street Moala Street / Nullawarra Avenue intersection Nullawarra Avenue / Nirranda Street intersection
Nullawarra Avenue Quandong Place / Nullawarra Avenue Great North Road, north of Harrabrook Avenue Great North Road, north of
Description of Proposed Treatment Widen footpath and remove trip hazard behind bus stop Tactile Paving
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
55
83
Medium
55
83
Medium
Resurface roadway
55
83
Medium
Kerb ramps
55
83
Medium
Kerb ramps
55
83
Medium
Install pedestrian refuge New footpath
55
83
Medium
54
100
Low
Realign kerb ramps
54
100
Low
New kerb ramp
54
100
Low
New kerb ramp
54
100
Low
Remove pram ramp. Undesirable crossing location. Refuge to the south should be used Widen footpath New kerb ramp
54
100
Low
54
100
Low
54
100
Low
New stop landing pad
54
100
Low
New stop landing pad
54
100
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 99
PAMP ID
337
1
Street / Intersection Murralong Avenue Charles Street / Great North Road intersection Great North Road
14
Bibby Street
15
The Parade
91
Wellbank Street / Bent Street intersection Roseby Street / Victoria Road intersection
124
232
Brewer Street
235
Lyons Road, wrest of Great North Road Garfield Street, west of Great North Road Barnstaple Road / Jersey Lane
247
279
25
Concord Road
26
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
Resurface roadway
54
100
Low
Provide pedestrian refuge between bus stops and retail development New footpath and kerb ramps New footpath and kerb ramps Kerb ramps
53
110
Low
53
110
Low
53
110
Low
53
110
Low
Consider opportunity to widen footpath and improve pedestrian amenity along Roseby Street to the bus stop at Victoria Road. Install wombat crossing Trim vegetation
53
110
Low
53
110
Low
53
110
Low
TGSIs
53
110
Low
Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway Re-grade turning area and improve drainage Remove bollards and resurface footpath
53
110
Low
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 100
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
41
Killoola Street / Concord Road intersection Queen Street
64 70
71 72 144
158 182 183 263 287 288
292 293
294
Shipley Avenue / Queen Street intersection Queen Street Wellbank Street Majors Bay Road / Gallipoli Street intersection Mortlake Street / Brays Road Noble Street Lancelot Street First Avenue / Park Road intersection Great North Road north of Altona Street Great North Road north of Altona Street Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Description of Proposed Treatment Realign kerb ramps
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
52
119
Low
Trim vegetation Re-align kerb ramps
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
New kerb ramp Install bus stop pad Upgrade pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2) 0
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
Widen footpath Widen footpath Kerb ramps
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
New TGSIs
52
119
Low
Upgrade public seating and amenity for pedestrians. Relay footpath
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
Consider opportunity to construct DDA compliant ramp or lifts to access ferry wharf from Great North Road Upgrade drainage grate
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 101
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
295
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf Brent Street / Seebrook Avenue intersection Brent Street / Henry Marine Drive
326
327
328 7
Brent Street opposite Undine Street Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street intersection
8
Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street
13
Bibby Street/Scanne ll Avenue intersection
103
Wolseley Street / Wrights Road Wolseley Street Renwick Street / Park Avenue intersection
104 120
Description of Proposed Treatment Upgrade Stairs
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
52
119
Low
Kerb ramps
52
119
Low
Install pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps New stop landing pad
52
119
Low
52
119
Low
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Realign kerb ramps
51
140
Low
51
140
Low
51
140
Low
51
140
Low
Relocate pole
51
140
Low
Remove kerb ramps on the western side of the intersection. It is noted that a new pedestrian refuge is currently being constructed on the eastern side of the intersection to
51
140
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 102
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
154
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection
306
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
37 42
Concord Road Killoola Street
43
Queen Street
44
Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection Wellbank Street
45
46
82
137
Market Street / Thompson Street intersection
140
Plunkett Street /
Description of Proposed Treatment assist pedestrians crossing Park Avenue. New footpath to bus stop, new bus landing pad and kerb blisters x2 and kerb ramps (x2) on Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Extend path 90m around into The Esplanade and provide pram ramps (x2) Trim vegetation Widen footpath Widen footpath Widen footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
51
140
Low
51
140
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
Widen footpath
50
148
Low
Widen footpath
50
148
Low
Install new pedestrian refuge to improve access to bus stops and Central Park. Install Give Way line along western side of footpath Install kerb ramps
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 103
PAMP ID
167 168 169
170 171
Street / Intersection Thompson Street Cabarita Park Path Cabarita Park Path Cabarita Park, access road south of ferry wharf Cabarita Park entry Cabarita Road, south of Cabarita Park entry
175
Cabarita Park Path
177
Tennyson Road / Macdonald Street Tennyson Road / Orchards Avenue intersection First Avenue/Arthur Street
178
257
261
262 280 281 286
289 290
First Avenue/Arthur Street intersection First Avenue west of Heath Street Great North Road, north of Halley Street Great North Road Great North Road / Altona Street Great North Road north of Altona Street Great North Road south of The Terrace
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
New signage
50
148
Low
New signage
50
148
Low
New signage
50
148
Low
New kerb ramps Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard New wayfinding signage New kerb ramps
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
Upgrade splitter island to facilitate pedestrian crossing area Upgrade to refuge island and replace kerb ramps Resurface roadway
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
New stop landing pad
50
148
Low
New stop landing pad
50
148
Low
New stop landing pad Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) New stop landing pad
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
50
148
Low
New stop landing pad
50
148
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 104
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
291
10
Great North Road south of The Terrace Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street Nullawarra Avenue Nullawarra Avenue Nullawarra Avenue Majors Bay Road, north of Patterson Street (bus stop ID: 213736) Majors Bay Road, north of Correys Avenue Brays Road, east of Majors Bay Road Lyons Road west of Thompson Street Lyons Road / Janet Street intersection Blackwall Point Road / Great North Road intersection Bortfield Drive / Blackwall Point Road intersection Bortfield Drive
11
Bortfield Drive
12
Blackwall Point Road Wellbank Street Lyons Road / Collingwood Street
312
47 51 58 143
149
156 318
319 2
9
92 114
Description of Proposed Treatment Kerb ramps
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
50
148
Low
New footpath
50
148
Low
Trim vegetation New services lid Trim vegetation New bus stop landing pad
49
175
Low
49
175
Low
49
175
Low
49
175
Low
New bus stop landing pad
49
175
Low
Widen footpath
49
175
Low
Trim vegetation
49
175
Low
Tactile Paving
49
175
Low
Upgrade kerb ramps and upgrade pedestrian refuge Re-align kerb ramps
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
Trim vegetation Remove bollards and resurface footpath Trim vegetation Widen footpath Install wayfinding signage between ferry
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 105
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
127
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection
148
Majors Bay Road, north of Davidson Avenue
180
Gale Street, north of Brays Road Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Barnstaple Road east of Waterview Street Taplin Park Car Park Taplin Park Car Park Taplin Park Car Park The Esplanade / Henricks Avenue intersection The Esplanade / north of Henricks Avenue Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection
181 264
303 304 305 307
308
309
18 38
Description of Proposed Treatment wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street. Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard Widen footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
Widen footpath
48
183
Low
Trim vegetation
48
183
Low
Trim vegetation Resurface roadway Signage
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
48
183
Low
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
48
183
Low
New footpath around turning head
48
183
Low
New footpath
48
183
Low
Install TGSIs
47
201
Low
Re-align kerb ramps
47
201
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 106
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
81
Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Wolseley Street / Victoria Avenue intersection Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Tennyson Road, at raised pedestrian crossing Tennyson Road
83 88 102
135
136
157 162
163 186 197
202
Majors Bay Road, north of Archers Street Burwood Road / Wallace Street Bayview Park Car Park
203
Bayview Park
245
Harris Road
246
Henry Street, east of Scott Street
Description of Proposed Treatment Install bus stop pad Install bus stop pad New footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
Install directional signage
47
201
Low
Kerb ramps
47
201
Low
New kerb ramps and upgrade traffic island to refuge Widen footpath
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
Replace TGSIs
47
201
Low
Enforcement of on street dining area New bus stop landing pad
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
Re-grade turning area and improve drainage Provide accessible car space Provide seating and amenity for pedestrians. Upgrade pedestian refuge or consider pedestrian crossing Trim vegetation
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 107
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
254
First Avenue, west of Wingham Avenue First Avenue / Ingham Avenue intersection First Avenue east of Ingham Avenue Mcculloch Street south of Whittall Street Mcculloch Street north of Whittall Street
255
256
272
273
274
275
276 284
285 316 317
320 151 153 190
Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection Mcculloch Street /The Crescent Great North Road north of Blackwell point road Great North Road, north of Gow Street Lyons Road west of College Street Lyons Road / Thompson Street intersection Lyons Road opposite Sibbick Street Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue Majors Bay Road Majors Bay Road, south
Description of Proposed Treatment Signage and Line marking
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
47
201
Low
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps New stop landing pad
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
Trim vegetation
47
201
Low
Footpath boardwalk, subject to tree root investigations Kerb ramps
47
201
Low
47
201
Low
Kerb ramps
47
201
Low
Kerb ramps
47
201
Low
New stop landing pad
47
201
Low
Trim vegetation
47
201
Low
Remove obstruction
47
201
Low
Resurface roadway
47
201
Low
Trim vegetation
47
201
Low
New kerb ramps
46
231
Low
New kerb ramps Widen footpath
46
231
Low
46
231
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 108
PAMP ID
331
85 100 105 107 112
130
138
139
164 165 173 174 204 231
Street / Intersection of Archer Street Victoria Road south of Wolseley Street Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Collingwood Street / Raglan Street Wolseley Street Lyons Road / St Georges Crescent intersection Day Street / Sisters Crescent intersection Broughton Street / Thompson Street intersection Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Mcdonald Street Edwin Street Cabarita Park Path Cabarita Park Path Bayview Park Path Norman Street / Majors Bay Road intersection
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
Widen footpath
46
231
Low
Install bus stop pad Install bus stop pad New kerb ramps
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
Install bus stop pad New kerb ramps
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
Install kerb blister (x1) and kerb raps (x1) Trim vegetation
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
Trim vegetation
45
235
Low
Widen footpath Widen footpath Remove obstruction Widen footpath Trim vegetation New footpath to link between Majors Bay Road / Norman Street intersection to playground and recreational footpath along Ron Routley
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 109
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
240
Henry Street, east of East Street Garfield Street, west of West Street Garfield Street, west of West Street Garfield Street / Harris Street intersection Garfield Street, west of West Street The Esplanade Tennyson Road / Gale Street intersection Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road Archer Street / Majors Bay Road intersection Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Lyons Road
248 249 250
251 302 160
184 185 187
188
189
115
118
Renwick Street / Park Avenue
Description of Proposed Treatment Oval (Majors Bay Reserve) and link all the way to existing footpath in Nullawarra Avenue. Raised intersection treatment Remove Garden Bed
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
45
235
Low
45
235
Low
Remove TGSIs
45
235
Low
Raised threshold treatment
45
235
Low
Remove TGSIs
45
235
Low
Widen footpath New kerb ramp
45
235
Low
44
255
Low
Widen footpath
44
255
Low
Widen footpath
44
255
Low
New signage
44
255
Low
Widen footpath
44
255
Low
Widen footpath
44
255
Low
Remove seat and reassess if replacement is required. Relocate signage
43
261
Low
43
261
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 110
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
119
Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street Renwick Street south of Park Avenue Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway Whittaker Street / Tennyson Road intersection Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
121
122
16 166
179
192
193
194
195 198
199
Wellbank Street / Greenlees Park Brewer Street, east of Ellis Street Burwood Road, North of La Mascotte Avenue Burwood Road east of
Description of Proposed Treatment Overgrown vegetation
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
43
261
Low
Overgrown vegetation
43
261
Low
Trip hazard
43
261
Low
Replace wire railing
42
266
Low
New kerb ramps
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
Line marking and signage
42
266
Low
Potential opportunity reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb buildouts or central median refuge. Also opportunity for slowing vehicle on approach e.g. raised threshold Install line marking
42
266
Low
42
266
Low
Install signage
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 111
PAMP ID
200 201
205 212 213 214 215 216 217
218 238
Street / Intersection Tremere Street Burwood Road east of Suke Street Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue (Pelican Quays) Bayview Park Path Burwood Road / Edith Avenue Burwood Road east of Ward Street Burwood Road east of Ward Street Burwood Road east of Ward Street Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue Burwood Road east of Marceau Drive Burwood Road west of Bayview Park Lyonns Road / East Street
239
Lyons Road Ferns Lane
258
First Avenue east of Pricess Avenue First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive First Avenue west of Pricess Avenue
259 260
Description of Proposed Treatment
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
42
266
Low
Review as part of the Bike Plan. Resurface roadway
42
266
Low
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
42
266
Low
Raised threshold treatment Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway New stop landing pad
42
266
Low
42
266
Low
42
266
Low
New footpath to access roundabout New stop landing pad
42
266
Low
42
266
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 112
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
152
Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue Brays Road / Majors Bay Road Zoeller Street, east of Sanders Street Blackwall Point Road Mary Street
155 347
6 17
101 106 108 109 110 111 113 265 266
267 268
269 270 271
Wellbank Street Raglan Street Wolseley Street St Georges Crescent St Georges Crescent St Georges Crescent Lyons Road Barnstaple Road / Park Road Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park Barnstaple Road, west or Arthur Street Barnstaple Road / Arthur Street intersection Barnstaple Road Barnstaple Road / Nield Avenue Barnstaple Road / Henley Marine Drive
Description of Proposed Treatment Widen footpath
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
41
290
Low
New signage
41
290
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel New footpath
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
Upgrade DDA parking space to comply to AS2890.6 Trim vegetation Trim vegetation Trim vegetation Trim vegetation Trim vegetation reallocate pole Relocate pole Install central refuge
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
40 40
292 292
Low Low
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4)
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
40
292
Low
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
40
292
Low
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4) Kerb ramps
40
292
Low
40
292
Low
Unstall pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps
40
292
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 113
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
321
Ingham Avenue south of Lyons Road Hampden Road / Great North Road intersection, Zoeller Street, east of Sanders Street Links Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road Tennyson Road / Emily Street Lyons Road / Scott Street
341
347
150
159
161 236 237
Lyons Road /West Street
332
Great North Road north of Blackwall Point Road St Georges Crescent
346
86 87 89 90 128
129
131
Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Wellbank Street Formosa Street, north of Sisters Crescent Formosa Street / Day Street intersection Day Street, west of Sister Crescent
Description of Proposed Treatment Trim vegetation
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
40
292
Low
Install pedestrian refuge
40
292
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Resurface roadway
40
292
Low
39
311
Low
Widen footpath
39
311
Low
Widen footpath (local widening) Raised threshold treatment Raised threshold treatment Trim vegetation
39
311
Low
39
311
Low
39
311
Low
39
311
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Widen footpath Widen footpath Widen footpath Widen footpath Upgrade drainage grate
38
317
Low
37
318
Low
37
318
Low
37
318
Low
37
318
Low
37
318
Low
Replace service pit lid
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
37
318
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 114
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
132
344
Day Street / Tranmere Street Tennyson Road / Northcote Street intersection Henry Street / Scott Street intersection Henry Street, west of Scott Street Henry Street, west of Elizabeth Street Henry Street, near Elizabeth Street Barnstaple Road / Dalmeny Avenue Barnstaple Road west of Dalmeny Avenue Ingham Avenue / Lyons Road Russell Street/Sibbick Street intersection Lithgow Street south of Lyons Road Brent Street opposite Undine Street Blackwall Point Road east of Great North Road Dening street
39
Queen Street
40
Killoola Street
176
241 242 243
244 277
278
322 323
324 325 333
Description of Proposed Treatment Upgrade ramp
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
37
318
Low
New kerb ramps
37
318
Low
Remove obstruction
37
318
Low
Remove obstruction
37
318
Low
Remove obstruction
37
318
Low
Kerb ramps
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
37
318
Low
Signage
37
318
Low
Kerb ramps
37
318
Low
Remove obstruction
37
318
Low
New stop landing pad
37
318
Low
Widen footpath
37
318
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel Widen footpath Widen footpath
37
318
Low
35
339
Low
35
339
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 115
PAMP ID
Street / Intersection
343
Bertram Street and Bertram Lane
27 342
Killoola Street Abbotsford Parade
3
Blackwall Point Road, near Great North Road
4
Blackwall Point Road north side near Melrose Crescent Blackwall Point Road Eaton Place
5 345
Description of Proposed Treatment Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel New footpath Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route of travel Pedestrian refuge across Parkview Road at Blackwell Point Road and upgrade footpath Upgrade footpath (widen footpath)
TfNSW Priority
TfNSW Rank
Priority
35
339
Low
32 32
342 342
Low Low
30
344
Low
30
344
Low
Trim vegetation Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
30
344
Low
25
347
Low
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 116
7.
Conclusions and Recommendations 7.1
Conclusions
GHD was engaged by the Council to prepare a Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) for the Council LGA, to improve the walking environment for all pedestrians. The development of this study included the following:
Review relevant background report, policies and plans.
Undertake community and stakeholder consultation.
Undertake site audits of current pedestrian infrastructure.
Identify, cost and priorities improvements for walking infrastructure.
Background review The background review concluded that:
The majority of State and Local Government planning policy documents reviewed as part of this study aim to encourage sustainable travel modes, including walking. The strategies identified in this PAMP will help to support this objective by providing improved walking connections.
Comparatively fewer children and young adults between the ages of five and 19 live in the Council LGA. This indicates that relatively there are lower numbers of primary and secondary school students in Council LGA;
A review of crash data for the study area indicates that there were seventy-five crashes involving pedestrians over the five-year period between 2015 to 2019 (inclusive).
Community consultation Community consultation was completed across a range of media platforms as discussed in section 3. From this, GHD concluded that:
Driving was the most common form of transport used by participants (66 participants, 40%) overall when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school.
The second most common form of transport used by the participants when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school was walking (38 participants).
Half of the participants (93 participants) indicated that they walked most weekends for recreational activities, and 103 participants indicated that they mostly walked to and from local shops.
Survey results confirm that there is an opportunity for the Council to promote walking as a form of transport, through improving pedestrian linkage in areas where there are high recreational activities (e.g. fitness, sports), bus stops and shopping centres.
When asked about how safe and accessible the pedestrian routes were to let children walk to school, 71 participants indicated that they did not feel like the pedestrian routes were safe. Reasons included –
The lack of pedestrian infrastructure connections.
–
Unsafe footpaths.
–
Lack of signage.
–
Impatient drivers/cyclists speeding on narrow streets.
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 117
Participants were encouraged to indicate what changes would encourage them to walk more. The top three changes noted were: –
Additional road crossings for pedestrians, for example, signals, footbridge, pedestrian refuge islands (126 participants).
–
Better quality footpaths (105 participants).
–
Additional footpaths (99 participants).
Stakeholder Consultation Key stakeholders were contacted via email to gain insight and into concerns about the pedestrian network in the Canada Bay area. The majority of issues identified through consultation with key stakeholders relate to the need for pedestrian crossings. These include:
High number of crashes and poor pedestrian facilities along Parramatta Road.
Shared pedestrian and bike paths can cause an issue for pedestrians, particularly pedestrians with disabilities or the elderly.
Mapping out social housing areas in Five Dock and other location to assess pedestrian mobility.
Provide key links to the areas integrating with Metro West to improve pedestrian mobility.
Consider the predictable path of travel with consideration to changing environments, especially for mobility/visibility impaired pedestrians.
Incorporate factors such as age increase and disability in the PAMP.
Burwood Road and Parramatta Road intersection where Metro West Station will be located requires investigating due to high pedestrian movement around this intersection. This area has been excluded from the PAMP study area as pedestrian needs will be addressed by other projects.
As part of the Parramatta Road Urban Transformation Strategy (PRUTS), it was noted that an increase in residential dwellings would impact pedestrian demand.
Council is planning work around Concord Oval which would attract high level of pedestrian movement at Shaftesbury Road and Parramatta Road intersection.
Investigation of link between Henley Marine Drive and Croydon Road.
Need for pedestrian and cyclists crossing between Luke Avenue and Shaftesbury Road.
High Pedestrian activity under a future plane at Burwood Road south of Corner Street.
More pedestrian refuge islands.
More marked pedestrian crossings.
Better connected footpaths.
Additional ramps.
The need for there to be upgraded footpaths along a certain road.
The need to improve pedestrian pathways and access along specific routes.
Requests for parking bay improvements at a particular parking lot.
Vehicular traffic management and speeding.
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 118
Site Audit An audit of existing issues and constraints for pedestrians was undertaken in the study area. The audit focused on identifying existing facilities, land uses, any shortcomings in the pedestrian environment and potential safety issues. The key issues and constraints include:
Poor quality footpath surfaces.
Pedestrians crossing busy roads at non-permitted crossing locations.
Missing pedestrian links.
Lack of pedestrian crossings.
Poor quality pedestrian crossings.
Street furniture or overgrown vegetation in footpaths, blocking the path of pedestrians.
Lack of disabled or pram access.
The key issues identified within the study area include kerb ramps not aligned, narrow footpaths, no bus landing pad, overgrown vegetation missing kerb ramps and missing links. Other existing issues generally include wide crossing points, poor intersection design, signage, poor footpath quality and trip hazards.
7.2
Recommendations
Pedestrian access and mobility improvement works were identified and prioritised for the study area. The highest ranking projects that are considered worthwhile for progression into the detailed concept planning, design and implementation stage are listed under the categories of:
Further investigations and concept planning
Footpath works to improve the safety for pedestrians along the streets
Upgrades to allow for safer pedestrian movements to cross busy streets
Investigations and Concept Planning Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection: Wide crossing location across Concord Road. There is an opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge at Concord Road. This will improve pedestrian connection and safety. Footpath Works The following locations were identified to have missing links requiring new footpaths:
Abbotsford Parade between Great North Road & St Albans Street, southern side
Barnstaple Road, southern side
Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park, southern side
Bayard Street between Bertram Street and Bertram Lane
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street, western side
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street, eastern side (south of bus stop)
Bayswater Street, north of Westbourne Street across road
Bibby Street, western side
Blackwall Point Road, southern side, adjacent to Alison Park GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 119
Cabarita Park Path, western side
Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street, northern and eastern sides
Cometrowe Street, eastern side
Crane Street - link to Corby Avenue, eastern side
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park, Carpark entrance
Crane Street east of Burwood Road, northern side
Crane Street, westerns Side and link to Evelyn Street Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park, southern side
Dening Street, north of Short Street, western side
Eaton Place, Chiswick, east and west
First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive, southern side
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf, near Teviot Avenue
Killoola Street
Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street, northern side
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection, western side
Mcculloch Street north of Whittall Street, eastern side
Norman Street / Majors Bay Road intersection, northern side
St Georges Crescent, between St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street
St Georges Crescent, through Salton Reserve to Roseby Street
The Esplanade / north of Henricks Avenue, western side
The Parade, between Gears Avenue and Byrne Avenue
Wellbank Street, northern side, west of Ian Parade
Zoeller Street east of Saunders Parade, northern side
Whilst it is understood Council is undertaken a separate footpath condition audit, this does not include specific information on kerb ramps. It is recommended that an additional audit of kerb ramps through out the Council area be undertaken to assist in identifying missing and noncompliant kerb ramps.
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 120
Appendices
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632
Appendix A – Existing Pedestrian Infrastructure
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 122
M TA
CR EE K
LL II N N LL E EY Y P PO O II N N TT
LL
R RH HO OD DE ES S TT E EN NN NY YS SO ON N P PO O II N N TT
BO
LL O ON NG GU UE EV V II LL LL E E
GLA D E S CREEK
GR OV E
LL E WE
Y NSTRE E
T
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
LL A AN NE E C CO OV VE E
UR IN E
ENUE
R R II V VE ER RV V II E EW W
CAV E LL AV
WA LKE R S TR EE T BL AX LA ND RO AD
W WE EN N TT W WO OR R TT H H P PO O II N N TT
C REE K
LL A AN NE E C CO OV VE E W WE ES S TT
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E R RY YD DE E
TA R
H HU UN N TT E ER RS S H H II LL LL
NC BA
EE
K
IR AL
IG WR HTS ROAD
T
N
S TRE E T
R
PA
T
E
SIB B ICK
REE M B A STRE ET
PINE AVE NUE
E NUE
M AV ING HA
E ET TREE T E AS T S
WES T S TR
R OAD HA RR IS
E RE ST
T
R RO O ZZ E E LL LL E E
E E NU
KA RIC
S RD
ET TRE
R RO OD DD D P PO O II N N TT
LL II LL Y Y FF II E E LL D D
E E NU RIN E DR IVE
PRE
ET
ST RE
IA M WI LL
R OAD
RO A D BAY V IE W
RA TH AV E N UE IN NE S ST RE ET
E
MA RC T
TR EE
S
RE GAT TA
NO
D RIVE
V
EN UE
C
ET RE ST
AV
ES CR
ET RE
H UT
N
ES RG
NE LA Y ET RR RE FE S T K IC
ST
AD DI SO
ST
NW RE
E
Tourism, eduction and community
SO
Residential
R ST T ON EE HT TR G S OU RY BR ER TH
B BA A LL M MA A II N N
T EE
Industrial
State and regional roads
R ST
Open space and recreation
Ferry terminal
EG LL
Train station
Railway
CO
Waterways
ET
E ER M AN TR
Pedestrian footpath
Commercial and business space
E
T EE
EN T
T
Unmarked crossing
Bus interchange
E RE ST
Traffic-controlled crossing
Wombat crossing
A AS SH H FF II E E LL D D
Study area
B
N UR
Pedestrian refuge
Marked/zebra crossing
ET RE ST R ST
Footbridge
D
Existing pedestrian infrastructure
RO A
LEGEND
V TA A
S T EN
O
HENL EY M A
H HA AB BE ER R FF II E E LL D D
C CR RO OY YD DO ON N
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
O NE S
EM CL
T NE JA
AY MS
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
MIN
AR ILL
RA
M
OAD
T EE
GE
E
KING S R
T AV
NU AVE
FIRS
STRE ET
RE
R ST
E LL
E DU K
ET
D OA
AN M W PO
AD RO
AD E RO AP L N ST BA R ET TR E LE S NOB
T RE E
S RO AD
O T ST RE
GA RF IELD
D OA SR ON LY
E E NU MC G
R DD RO
NO LE
H ST
QUE E N
LA NC EL
E NU VE AA
E TA IT TR S
EET
T HE A
C CA AN NA AD DA A B BA AY Y
WA
BO
E
N AV
BO UVA R DIA S TR E ET ED EN HO LM E R O AD
ET ET RE RE ST G IN LD
ST
U EN AV
E
STO
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
AD
LE
E TH
E RN BY
DRIV
W RO A D BAY R OA D
ST R
U EA
ADE
M ONS
W WA AR RE EE EM MB BA A
O AD
ET RE ST
DR W OO BU R
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
VI E
UE AVE N
O DE N R HA M P
E ET STR
NS O LY
E SC
Y
E
K PAR
EN U
E CR NS B UR
BB BI
TY LE R C RE
T EN SC
CR AN
ET
ET
EN T
STREE T
L ER
ANS
L ZO E
T
IN CU RT
ET
SWA N AV ENU E
E SC CR
A LB
V IRE A
L IP SS TR EE
E ST R
T
TREE T SS
TRE E
E MP
PH IL
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
N JO H
E COL
ADA S
ST
RE
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
EE T ST R
ST
WOLS E LEY S TRE
N
K RE E
UE
EE T ST R
RS
DE
V EN ISTON A
EL L E
E
E PAT T
GIP PS
ET T RE ON S
ET RE ST
SA LT
DE
VI C TORIA PLAC E
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
AD A RO ARIT
C S A LTW ATE R
M COR
FL AV
E NU
EE T
A AV
R S ST
R AM A
S CRO
N MA C
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H W WE ES S TT
C AB
A IA N PA R
A R PA R A
OY ZR FIT
C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
BR A
OA D YS R
G
ET
AL TO
AD M
REE T K ST
E ST R H ER AR C
H HE EN N LL E EY Y RIVE TY D
E RIC
AL AF TR
ET
AD N RO LS O
ILLAGE D
ST
W
E ET S TR
OA D AY R RS B
D RO A ORD CON C
ET
E E NU S AV R EY E CO R E NU V A N IDS O DAV
T RE GE S
NE
N RMA
E E NU S AV LIN K
ET
S TRE
R GE O
ET S TR E
S TRE
S E TT CO N
N QU EE
IE KE NZ
E C CO ON NC CO OR RD D RIV ED WEST TH ET W E S T E R ST LL T M YA EE TR S A T EE W I LG R ST DA N A T NIRR REE A ST U NG ME P EE T STR ALLA YA R
M MO OR R TT LL A AK KE E
D FRE
WA Y
KI NG
O MA J
RA IL
T
E RIV
E RE ST
E ET S TR KIN W AT E ENU
WUN DA ROAD
A DR
T
AV ON
IA N
E RE ST
W WO OO O LL W W II C CH H
ET
E AN
NUL
E NU
T O
ET
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S P PO O II N N TT
E ST R
RE ST
L CO
RK PA
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H
LA
VE AA RR
OA M
MA C
PIC
P EN IV IN S ULA DR
I
W ENTW ORT H DR IVE
O
E
H
RE ET KING S T
YM OL
D A
WA LA
CHA R L
HOME BUSH BAY DRIVE
SP
RO
K
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S C CO OV VE E Y HIL L
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LL Y YM MP P II C C P PA AR RK K
L TA
N
EE CR
R
S HAS LA M
A AN NN NA AN ND DA A LL E E LL E E II C CH HH HA AR RD D TT
0
187.5 375 Metres
750
Appendix B – Pedestrian Key routes (medium and high priority)
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 123
M ME EA AD DO OW WB BA AN NK K
H HU UN N TT E ER RS S H H II LL LL
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E
AD
HOMEBUSH BAY DRI VE
LL O ON NG GU UE EV V II LL LL E E
RO
RI A RO AD
N NO OR R TT H HW WO OO OD D
LL II N N LL E EY Y P PO O II N N TT
E
AD D RO COR CO N
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D W WE ES S TT
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S P PO O II N N TT
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S C CO OV VE E
W WO OO O LL W W II C CH H
B BR RE EA AK K FF A AS S TT PO O II N N TT M MO OR R TT LL A AK KE EP
AY
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
AI LW
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
R
N NO OR R TT H H S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D W WA AR RE EE EM MB BA A
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D OT OR
AD RO NS LYO
WA Y
PA R
RA
MA TT AR O AD
GIP
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H
PS
ST
RE
C CA AN NA AD DA A B BA AY Y
ET
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K QUEEN
D
LL II LL Y Y FF II E E LL D D
CI TY-W ES
LI
A AS SH H FF II E E LL D D Study area
Bus interchange
High priority
Waterways
Train station
Medium priority
Railway
Ferry terminal
State and regional roads
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation
D
H HA AB BE ER R FF II E E LL D D
C CR RO OY YD DO ON N
A RO
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
K N
LEGEND Assessed routes
R RO OD DD D P PO O II N N TT
T
AR TH ET UR S T R E
S R OA D
R RO O ZZ E E LL LL E E
OA
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H W WE ES S TT
R
NM
AI N
ER
LM
ST
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
A
WE
B BA A LL M MA A II N N
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
B
RK PA
TO
R R II V VE ER RV V II E EW W
Y BA
H HE EN N LL E EY Y
C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
C PI
EEK CR
V IC
EK
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LLY YM MP P II C C P PA AR RK K
YM OL
N BA
RE SC
D RY
R TA
TT E EN NN NY YS SO ON N P PO O II N N TT
M HA S LA
S RN
BU
W WE EN N TT W WO OR R TT H H P PO O II N N TT
RO AD
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
LL A AN NE E C CO OV VE E
LL A AN NE E C CO OV VE E W WE ES S TT
R RY YD DE E
LL E E II C CH HH HA AR RD D TT
A AN NN NA AN ND DA A LL E E
Industrial Residential Tourism, eduction and community
0
185 370 Metres
740
Appendix C – Draft Engagement Outcome Report
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 124
City of Canada Bay Council Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) Community and Engagement Outcomes Report Final Draft May 2021
Table of contents 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1
Purpose of this report........................................................................................................... 2
1.2
PAMP objectives .................................................................................................................. 2
Approach to consultation................................................................................................................ 3 2.1
Engagement objective ......................................................................................................... 3
2.2
Engagement methods .......................................................................................................... 3
2.3
Stakeholder identification ..................................................................................................... 4
Consultation and engagement activities ........................................................................................ 7 3.1
Mapping tool ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.2
Online survey ....................................................................................................................... 8
3.3
Workshops ........................................................................................................................... 9
Consultation outcomes................................................................................................................. 10 4.1
Mapping tool feedback ....................................................................................................... 10
4.2
Survey feedback ................................................................................................................ 11
4.3
Workshop feedback ........................................................................................................... 15
4.4
Email submissions feedback ............................................................................................. 16
4.5
Additional community feedback ......................................................................................... 16
Next steps and recommendations ............................................................................................... 18
Appendices Appendix A – Poster with QR Code Appendix B – Sticker with QR Code Appendix C – Online survey questions and results Appendix D – Meeting minutes from Workshop 1 Appendix E – Meeting minutes from Workshop 2
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | i
1.
Introduction The City of Canada Bay Council (Council) is developing a Pedestrian and Mobility Plan (PAMP) to provide a framework for existing pedestrian needs as well as future management, use and enhancement of pedestrian infrastructure for community members of all ages and mobility. The PAMP is a strategic document that outlines an infrastructure strategy aiming to improve pedestrian accessibility, permeability, and safety within the local area. Walking is a fundamental and direct means of access to key services for many people in the Council. Demographic data shows that the population of the Council area is expected to grow to 115,500 by 2030. As the population grows, the CoCB pedestrian network needs to meet current and future needs for pedestrians of all ages and mobility, including the elderly, pedestrians with mobility and vision impairments, residents, school children, visitors and recreational pedestrians.
1.1
Purpose of this report
GHD undertook consultation with the local community and key stakeholders to understand the community’s experience of pedestrian access and mobility in the Council area and how this can be improved to better meet the needs of the community. This Engagement Outcomes Report summarises the community and stakeholder engagement activities undertaken, the feedback received and recommendations for next steps to be considered as part of the PAMP. The chapters in this report outline:
Our approach to the consultation (see Chapter 2)
Consultation and engagement activities (see Chapter 3)
Consultation outcomes (see Chapter 0)
Next steps and recommendations (see Chapter 0).
1.2
PAMP objectives
The strategic, high-level, objectives of the Council PAMP are to:
Integrate walking into the transport system, as a legitimate form of transport to encourage more walking
Provide appropriate pedestrian facilities where required, to enhance accessibility and mobility
Identify clusters and patterns of pedestrian crashes, to address safety issues
Develop and integrate pedestrian routes that complement Safer Routes to School projects and Local Area Traffic Management schemes.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 2
2.
Approach to consultation GHD developed a Community and Stakeholder Engagement Plan (CSEP) to guide engagement and collect feedback and inform the development of the PAMP. The CSEP outlined our stakeholder engagement approach, which was developed in consultation with the Council, as well as our communication methods.
2.1
Engagement objective
The key objective outlined in the CSEP was to engage with a broad range of community members in a transparent, clear, and open manner to seek feedback about the pedestrian infrastructure network in the Council area. Communication activities were centred on respect, trust, openness, and accountability and guided by the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) Core Values and Code of Ethics. In following this framework, GHD strived to:
Ensure a best practice approach in all community engagement activities
Develop and foster an environment of trust and confidence between the community, stakeholders, and Council
Ensure that a broad range of community members and stakeholders are consulted and given the opportunity to provide feedback
Engage with the community in a transparent and open way that supports good decision making.
2.2
Engagement methods
At the beginning of the project, GHD selected communication and engagement tools to ensure that there were as many opportunities as possible for a wider representation of community members and stakeholders to have their say. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing requirements, online engagement tools were selected for the consultation process. Consultation activities included an online mapping tool, an online survey and two virtual workshops with targeted stakeholders. Further information on these activities can be found in Chapter 3. The following chapter outlines the promotional activities that were used to promote the engagement opportunities. 2.2.1
Promotional activities
Council developed a range of promotional materials and activities to advertise the opportunity to give feedback and outline issues of concern regarding pedestrian access and mobility. To ensure that the project aligned with the COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the project team took an innovative approach to encourage community and stakeholder participation. The promotional materials and activities included:
The PAMP webpage on the Collaborate Canada Bay website
E-newsletter
Posters with a QR code located in 24 Council venues
The installation of 78 footpath stickers with a QR code throughout the LGA
Social media posts (Facebook and Instagram)
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 3
3.
Consultation and engagement activities GHD prepared key messaging for the PAMP webpage on the Collaborate Canada Bay digital engagement platform. The webpage page included links to an online mapping tool and an online survey set up to collect feedback from the community and interested stakeholders. Community members were invited to provide their feedback through these channels from Sunday 31 January, 2021 through to Tuesday 23 February 2021. GHD also conducted two virtual workshops with Council and key stakeholder groups via Microsoft Teams to discuss/explore local experiences, challenges and opportunities to improve pedestrian access and mobility going forward. The following chapter describes all the consultation and engagement activities undertaken.
3.1
Mapping tool
The online mapping tool activity featured an interactive online map of the LGA that encouraged users to place pins on the map at any location and provide a comment. For example, a participant could drop a pin on the intersection of Brays Road and Gale Street and request for a pedestrian crossing. Community members were encouraged to place a pin on a location of interest using one of the three feedback categories:
Current use: What pedestrian routes participants currently use and why?
Opportunities: What improvements or new infrastructure participants would like to see in the region?
Barriers: What barriers limit or stop participants from using any pedestrian routes?
Participants were also invited to leave a general comment by placing a pin anywhere on the map and leaving a comment. The mapping tool was active and accepting pins from Sunday 31 January 2021 through to Tuesday 23 February 2021. Figure 3-1 Mapping tool is a screenshot of the mapping tool.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 7
Figure 3-1 Mapping tool
3.2
Online survey
GHD prepared a 15-question online survey to feature on the PAMP webpage. The purpose of the survey was to capture written qualitative and quantitative feedback from a broad cross-section of community and stakeholder with regards to the current use of pedestrian infrastructure, constraints affecting pedestrian access and mobility, opportunities for improvement and community insights to what they would like to see in the future. Participants were asked to identify the three most hazardous and unsafe locations for pedestrians, and the top three things that Council could do to improve pedestrian mobility and access in the LGA. The survey was active and accepting responses from Sunday 31 January 2021 through to Tuesday 23 February 2021.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 8
Outcomes from the survey are detailed in Chapter 4.2. Please see Appendix C for the online survey questions and results.
3.3
Workshops
GHD facilitated two virtual workshops via Microsoft Teams with the Council’s Access and Inclusion Committee, members of Council’s community advisory groups and neighbouring Council representatives. 3.3.1
Workshop 1
The first workshop was held on Monday 1 December 2020, from 10:00 am to 11:30 am, with seven representatives from the Council’s Access and Inclusion Committee and six Council staff members. The purpose of the workshop was to discuss the project’s objectives, process and context of the Council area to identify existing issues/opportunities and determine the next steps from a community perspective. 3.3.2
Workshop 2
The second workshop was on Monday 14 December 2020, from 11:00 am to 11:30 am, with representatives from Council and from the following stakeholder groups:
Inner West Council
Strathfield Council
Burwood Council
Transport for NSW (TfNSW).
The purpose of this workshop was to gain insights to study area and project objectives from a strategic planning context, identify key issues and opportunities and discuss future projects and any links to adjoining boundaries. Please see Appendix D and Appendix E for the minutes from both workshops.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 9
4.
Consultation outcomes 4.1
Mapping tool feedback
The mapping tool received 465 comments. This demonstrated that the team was successful in their promotional activities as there was a high level of engagement from the community. As discussed in Chapter 3.1, participants were encouraged to use one of the feedback categories or simply leave a general comment. A total of 209 were identified as ‘opportunities’ and were from residents in Drummoyne, Concord, Five Dock and Rhodes. A total of 75 comments were identified as ‘barriers’ and were mostly residents from Concord and Drummoyne. Only 37 comments were identified as ‘current use’ and were mostly residents from Concord. The remaining 146 comments were not categorised on the mapping tool but have been analysed within the context of the other feedback received. The comments were categorised into five themes:
Current use and experiences
Need for improved pedestrian infrastructure connections
Need for clear and hazard-free footpaths
Need for more and improved pedestrian crossings
Landscaping issues
Some of the comments received via this engagement platform identified barriers and opportunities, as well as general feedback, on topics that, while impact pedestrians, are more traffic and road-related matters. For example, the notion of speeding cars, cars parking too close and obscuring the view for pedestrians etc. These themes are collated in Chapter 4.5 for Council’s consideration. 4.1.1
Current use and experiences
The general feedback received about the current usage in the LGA was overall positive. Most of the comments were in relation to how accessible and safe the pathways were next to the waterfront and in the parks. The comments were also positive when it came to the scenic landscape in the LGA. 4.1.2
Need for improved pedestrian infrastructure connections
Several comments highlighted that existing pedestrian infrastructure was not always well connected or consistent, particularly impeding those with mobility restrictions. The need to upgrade existing pedestrian footpaths, islands and access points to allow for easier access for pedestrians with prams, wheelchairs and the elderly was a recurring comment. Some comments highlighted that footpaths ended abruptly or did not have a sloping ramp at crossings, preventing mobility-restricted pedestrians from continuing their desired path. There was also a push for more ramps to be upgraded and constructed. For example, some comments noted that the current ramps were too steep and that it would be ideal to have more kerb and pram-friendly ramps. The notion of providing safer pedestrian access by constructing a walking bridge over busy roads was also discussed. Overall, the comments indicated that improved pedestrian GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 10
connectivity to existing infrastructure would facilitate more usable and safer pedestrian access for all. 4.1.3
Need for clear and hazard-free footpaths
Several comments focused on the importance of maintaining safer, hazard-free footpaths. For example, comments indicated that there were often cars half parked on the road and footpath (due to narrow roads), road signs planted in the middle of footpaths and trip hazards (i.e. as tree roots), which made the ground uneven and unsafe to access, and at times, restricting access altogether. Other comments mentioned the need for more dedicated bike lanes as community members felt it was dangerous for pedestrians due to the many bike couriers speeding down pedestrian footpaths. Several comments emphasised the need for there to be better street lighting. For example, these comments raised the notion that the lack of street lighting resulted in visibility issues for pedestrians to see past bushes, road curves and traffic, making it dangerous to cross the road. Other key issues raised included the need for there to be traffic calming measures, such as speed limits, to improve the safety of pedestrians when accessing the footpaths. Please refer to section 4.5 for further information in relation to speed limits. 4.1.4
Need for more and improved pedestrian crossings
A key concern raised was the importance of providing more pedestrian crossings throughout the LGA, and in particular near high traffic areas such as shopping villages and schools. Several comments noted that there was a lack of safe crossings near schools, which made it dangerous for children to travel along these routes. The comments also suggested the need for the traffic light signal timing to be changed so that pedestrians would not have to wait long to cross the road and be tempted to jay-walk. The importance of installing more signage was also noted by the participants as a key aspect that would improve safety for pedestrians. 4.1.5
Landscaping issues
Outside of comments made in relation to safety concerns, there were many comments made about the opportunity for more greenery to improve the overall streetscape in the Council area so pedestrians could further enjoy walking. Community members suggested having more trees, rest points in the shade and moving overhead cables/powerlines underground to further activate the streetscape and open more space. These comments acknowledged that while it is important for the pedestrian accessibility and linkage routes to be improved, it is equally important for there to be more open space and greenery to allow for a more connected community.
4.2
Survey feedback
The online survey received a total of 165 survey responses. 4.2.1
General community sentiment
Overall, when participants were asked to rank the current pedestrian infrastructure in the Council area, results show that most people (68.5%) thought the infrastructure was ‘OK’ or better:
A total of eight (8) participants thought the current infrastructure was ‘very good’ (4.8%)
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 11
A total of 39 participants thought the current infrastructure was ‘good’ (23.6%)
A total of 66 participants thought the current infrastructure was ‘OK’ (40%)
A total of 38 participants thought the current infrastructure was ‘poor’ (23.1%)
A total of 13 participants thought the current infrastructure was ‘very bad’ (7.8%), and
One participant said they were ‘not sure’ of how they would rank the current pedestrian infrastructure.
Figure 4-1 Participants view of current pedestrian infrastructure 4.2.2
Current use
Driving was the most common form of transport used by participants (66 participants, 40%) overall when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school. However, over half of the participants (93 participants) indicated that they walked most weekends for recreational activities, and 103 participants indicated that they mostly walked to and from local shops. The second most common form of transport used by the participants when commuting to/from bus stops, home, work, and school was walking (38 participants). In comparison to walking, participants indicated that cycling was not a common form of transport when it came to commuting to and from their destinations, or as a form of recreation. The least popular form of transport used by participants was the ferry (4 participants). Other forms of transport used by participants included the train (13 participants) and the bus (23 participants). When asked about whether they knew their way around the LGA as a pedestrian, 101 participants indicated that they strongly agreed with the statement, 51 participants agreed with the statement and 13 participants somewhat agreed with the statement. No participants indicated that they were unfamiliar with the LGA. The survey results confirm that there is an opportunity for the Council to promote walking as a form of transport, through improving pedestrian linkage in areas where there are high recreational activities (e.g. fitness, sports), bus stops and shopping centres.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 12
4.2.3
Barriers
When asked about how safe and accessible the pedestrian routes were to let children walk to school, 71 participants indicated that they did not feel like the pedestrian routes were safe. Reasons included: The lack of pedestrian infrastructure connections
Lack of safe crossings
Parked cars blocking the pedestrian crossings and visibility to cross safely
The need for more pedestrian crossings
The need for more refuge islands
No ramps at pedestrian bridges to cater to the elderly, mobility impaired or parents with prams (e.g., the pedestrian bridge located on the corner of Gipps Street and Loftus Street, Concord).
Unsafe footpaths
Uneven and narrow footpaths (with poles in the middle, or from tree roots that need to be fixed)
Lack of lighting on footpaths.
Other
Lack of signage
Impatient drivers/cyclists speeding on narrow streets.
Although speeding of vehicles is not specifically part of the scope for the PAMP, this issue was raised often in the mapping tool and the survey. Please refer to Chapter 4.54.5 for additional community feedback on such matters.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 13
Figure 4-2 Participants view on whether they thought the LGA was safe and accessible for children 4.2.4
Opportunities
Participants were encouraged to indicate what changes would encourage them to walk more. The top three changes noted were: 1.
Additional road crossings for pedestrians, for example, signals, footbridge, pedestrian refuge islands (126 participants)
2.
Better quality footpaths (105 participants)
3.
Additional footpaths (99 participants).
Other suggestions provided included:
Better street lighting
Better signage
Preventing cars from parking across footpaths.
More direct footpaths to public transport
Amenities along paths (benches, drinking fountains, shade)
Access to an educational program regarding the usage of shared pedestrian and cyclist pathways, and what forms of wheeled transport can legally be used (e.g. electric bikes complying with maximum power limits).
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 14
Participants were also asked whether they would like walking paths to be constructed in locations where there were currently no walking paths. Over half expressed their support (98 participants) in having additional recreational walking paths. Some of the proposed locations for new walking paths were:
Around the waterfront including the Drummoyne foreshore
Around the hospital
Around parks
Around and through golf courses.
Participants also identified their top three suggestions that the Council could do to improve the pedestrian access network in the LGA. Responses included:
Installing safe crossing facilities to access parks (pedestrian crossings, refuges)
Installing better pram and wheelchair accessible ramps
Widening and improving pavement quality of existing footpaths
Improving the connectivity of footpaths
Removing poles from the middle of footpaths for better pram and wheelchair accessibility.
4.3
Workshop feedback
4.3.1
Workshop 1
The session with the Council’s Access and Inclusion Committee focused on the challenges and opportunities for the LGA as a whole and for growth areas within the LGA. Barriers
High number of crashes and poor pedestrian facilities along Parramatta Road
Shared pedestrian and bike paths can cause an issue for pedestrians, particularly pedestrians with disabilities or the elderly.
Opportunities
Mapping out social housing areas in Five Dock and other location to assess pedestrian mobility
Provide key links to the areas integrating with Metro West to improve pedestrian mobility
Consider the predictable path of travel with consideration to changing environments, especially for mobility/visually impaired pedestrians
Incorporate factors such as age increase and disability in the PAMP.
4.3.2
Workshop 2
The workshop with key government stakeholders focused on gaining insights into the study area and project objectives from a strategic planning context, identifying key issues and opportunities and discussing future projects. A key focus was on the cross-LGA pedestrian links that were to be considered for the PAMP. Representatives from the neighbouring councils and TfNSW provided input regarding the current works that were happening within the LGA and surrounds. Representatives from
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 15
Burwood Council noted the works surrounding Metro West and Heavy Rail. This would impact pedestrian movement as it would involve an influx of pedestrians going from one mode to the other. Furthermore, as part of the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS), it was noted that an increase in residential dwellings would further impact the pedestrian mobility network. CoCB and TfNSW indicated that they would share relevant draft strategic plans with the project team and confirm pedestrian plans and the Metro West Station project works. Furthermore, it was recommended to review Green Grid links on a local level, as they were recently identified in the NSW Government’s Eastern City District Plan and Council’s Local Strategic Planning Statement. This was to ensure that all key projects would be captured.
4.4
Email submissions feedback
In addition to the proactive engagement and consultation activities coordinated, twelve written submissions to Council were received (via email). Most of the written feedback was street or location-specific, and while there was some overlap to themes raised as those mentioned above, most of the feedback was very specific and will need to be considered by Council when evaluating these individual locations. Key themes identified that were relevant to the PAMP included the need for:
More pedestrian refuge islands
More marked pedestrian crossings
Better connected footpaths
Additional kerb ramps.
Additional feedback provided in the written submissions that the Council will need to consider in relation to specific locations identified include:
The need for there to be upgraded footpaths along a certain road
The need to improve pedestrian pathways and access along specific routes
Requests for parking bay improvements at a particular parking lot
Vehicular traffic management and speeding.
One interesting comment which was raised highlighted the importance of having low-height landscaping to facilitate a more connected community space.
4.5
Additional community feedback
When analysing the mapping tool and online survey feedback, GHD identified a significant number of comments that raised concerns about matters outside the PAMP scope. However, such comments are still relevant and important for the Council to note as they mainly reflect opportunities that could be considered as part of wider strategic plans for the Council area. The additional community feedback themes we identified, and the respective comments made are outlined below. Vehicular traffic and parking impacting pedestrian safety
Vehicles, motorbikes and bicycles tend to speed through high foot traffic areas. More regulation and/or enforcement of regulation, as well as devices to slow down vehicles and improve the safety of pedestrians, is required
More speed signs along and on roads are needed
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 16
Dedicated bike paths should be built, and shared paths removed
Parked vehicles often block the view of oncoming traffic. On-street parking needs to be reviewed so that pedestrians have a clearer view and can cross the road/intersection safely
Parking lots need to be better connected to other social and pedestrian infrastructure.
Social infrastructure, streetscape and community greening
More community facilities for locals are needed
More public seating is required
More trees and shade along footpaths should be installed
Residents should be instructed to maintain their lawns to prevent overgrowing onto footpaths
Council needs to better maintain cracked/damaged footpaths
Council needs to trim the bushes and trees near crossings and intersections to allow for clearer sight lines.
Community consultation and information
Council should better inform the older members of the community about the project
Council needs to report on what they are doing to make road crossing and street navigation easier and safer for pedestrians.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 17
5.
Next steps and recommendations Now that the consultation for the PAMP has been completed, the next stage in this project is to develop short, medium and long-term initiatives for the PAMP. These initiatives will be informed by the consultation activities and feedback collected. Our recommendations for consideration as part of the PAMP include:
Improving pedestrian safety via more pedestrian crossings, wider footpaths with no hazards limiting access, improved streetscape and separated paths for cyclists and pedestrians. Concerns for safety underpin many of the comments raised during our consultation with the community. The notion that walking is not safe is a key barrier to more community members taking up walking as a form of transport.
Focusing on better connecting and consistent pedestrian infrastructure to schools, public transport hubs and shopping centres to improve accessibility, facilitate more walking and reduce vehicular movement around these locations.
Working with schools to improve footpaths and pedestrian access for children and their parents/caregivers. Some parents indicated they did not feel it was safe for their children to walk to school due to lack of suitable pedestrian infrastructure and speeding vehicles etc. This is resulting in increased vehicular traffic and will only worsen as schools grow to meet increasing population demands.
Conducting a kerb ramp audit across the whole Council area to understand whether current infrastructure is suitable and meets the pedestrian mobility needs of the community.
Exploring opportunities to raise awareness of any changes Council will adopt to make walking safer and more accessible, whilst also promoting walking as a transport mode. This can be done by increased signage, paid advertisements, school programs, the promotion of sports and fitness activities and /or facilitating more leisure activities that involve walking.
GHD also recommends that Council considers further consultation with other Councils to ensure that the PAMP compliments Safer Routes to School projects and the Local Area Traffic Management schemes. The community youth were also under-represented in our consultation with the community. Council may want to consider reaching out to schools or youth representative groups in more targeted consultation. Further engagement with these stakeholders may provide valuable insights to better shape pedestrian infrastructure in the future.
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632 | 18
Appendices
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
Appendix A – Poster with QR Code
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
Appendix B – Sticker with QR Code
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
GHD Level 15, 133 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 T: 02 9239 7100 E: sydmail@ghd.com © GHD 2021 This document is and shall remain the property of GHD. The document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. 12539632-6073076/https://projectsportal.ghd.com/sites/pp15_01/canaabaypedestrianac/ProjectDocs/12539632_City of Canada Bay PAMP_Engagement Outcomes Report_FINAL210507.docx Document Status Revision Draft A Draft B
Author E. Dao & E. Kuanova E. Dao
Reviewer Name
Signature
Approved for Issue Name Signature
Date
C.Huynh
*on file
S. Clarke
On file
26/3/2021
C. Huynh
*on file
S. Clarke
On file
11/05/2021
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
www.ghd.com
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - Canada Bay Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP), 12539632
Appendix D – Locations of Existing Issues and Constraints for Pedestrians
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 125
R RY YD DE E
BL A XLA
UHRS POINT RESERVE
T
R
RE ET ST
AD O
D
ST RE E
CO NC OR
AVE R IL L
CAVE LL AVEN UE
HOMEBUSH BAY CORSO
T
STRE E
T
S TR EE
AT ER VI EW
ET
RO AD
RE GE NT
ND R OA
W
RE ST
BU RR OW AY
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
D
W WE EN N TT W WO OR R TT H H P PO O II N N TT
SETTLERS PARK
WA LKE R
R RH HO OD DE ES S
C ROPL E Y
MA RQ U E
T ST R EE
T
T LLEW ELLY N S TRE E
25 23 20
24
UNION SQUARE
RIVENDELL SCHOOL
18
17
LEWIS BERGER PARK
THOMAS WALKER HOSPITAL 16
RHODES POST OFFICE
RHODES PARK
26 27
LEWIS BERGER PARK
RO
L OA M
A
S
RE ST
50
ET
D
52
EE TR
T
IV E DR
NG DO AN QU
E TH
ET
ET
E TR LS AL MY
T
EK
E RE ST
CRE
KING STRE E
POW EL L S
UE
RE ST
RE ST
R
WUN DA ROAD
AS DR IA N
51
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D W WE ES S TT
E NU VE AA RR WA LLA NU
LA R OA
56
A NG RU BA
VE
BO
A NI
D
RI
SYDNEY HEALTH AGED CHRONIC CARE AND REHABILITATION
CONCORD REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL
T EE TR
NE LA CO
CO NC O R D AV EN
CONCORD REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL BUILDING 19
WALKER RESERVE
ET
T
A LG WI
53
S
EE TR
T
RON ROUTLEY OVAL
55
54
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D MAJORS BAY RESERVE
S
LE VA RD
SET
A D RO
CO ON O N G R OAD
LTO N D
D
E ET TR
AN
DR IV E WENTWO RTH
46
BA NG AL
A RO
47
COR
CH A
HOME BUS H BAY DRIVE
33 CON
TL E RS B O U
L
49
CA STLE STEA D STRE E T
Q UE EN STREE T
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LL Y YM MP P II C C P PA AR RK K
48
32
44 45
30
31
37
34
R ST
T EE
TA PI
NO RM
BA BU SH HOM E
E AVE NUE
LL II B BE ER R TT Y Y G GR RO OV VE E
43
LE
28
T EE
39
THORP
35
R ST
40
42
36
29
T
BRADLEY RESERVE
L VI ER M
N O
41 MUTTON RESERVE
S HO
EM
Y
IV E DR
LO
S
LOVEDALE PLACE
FR
L KI
LA O
T EE TR
58
LEGEND Study area Issue Type Hand rail Kerb ramps Signage/line marking Missing link Narrow footpath TGSIs
No bus landing pad Obstruction in path Overgrown vegetation Wide crossing point Existing infrastructure Pedestrian refuge Traffic-controlled crossing
Marked/zebra crossing Wombat crossing
State and regional roads Train station Bus stop
Unmarked crossing
Other recreation
Pedestrian footpath Waterways Railway
Post office Education Health
Place of worship
0
Commercial and business space
50 100 Metres
Open space and recreation Industrial Residential
1
3
5
Tourism, eduction and community
2
4
6
7
200
66
HO
65
67
57
E AC PL
NOR M
NUE
NG DO AN U Q
A N STREE T
RR AA VE
ET
T EE E TR LAN NDA S NG NIRRA NDO A T U Q REE A ST U NG ME P
68
69
E TR
WA
62 64
AS
NU LLA
E
BAY DRI V
US H M EB
60
W IL G
T
VICTORIA AVENUE PUBLIC SCHOOL
59
E RE ST
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LL Y YM MP P II C C P A R K PA R K
E NUE
CONCORD WEST 61 POST OFFICE
63
ET KING ST RE
V ICTORIA AV
NG DO AN QU
POWELLS TREILLAGE CREEK TOWER RESERVE
CONCORD GOLF COURSE
ST AMBROSE CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL WARBRICK PARK
B IA LANE UM COL
TGSIs
TRE ET
C T
Open space and recreation
Pedestrian refuge Traffic-controlled crossing
Train station
Health
Bus stop
Place of worship
Library
AS
TR E E
T
RT S S
R EE
S TR
W HIT E
WEN TW O
PH IL IP
RTH RO AD
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D EE T
MOS E LY ST
SWA N AV ENU E
UE
ON RO A D
ER AV E N
E ET S TR OS E ME LR
LEICES T
EE T S TR DIT H
STR E ET TE R RO CH E S
MA N S
ST RE ET ME RE
Narrow footpath
Post office Aged care
AD
STRE ET
Missing link
Pedestrian footpath Waterways Railway State and regional roads
Education
T RE E
ER S T RE ET
CO W DE RY L
Commercial and business space
Wide crossing point Existing infrastructure
T
E ST
Signage/line marking
E TRE
ET TR E
RO B E
TE N D RO A GE
CR AN E
S RA
N OU R
D XA N
SS
Kerb ramps
TR EE T
B ME L
BR ID
R
D
Other recreation
Parking / traffic issues
SS
E CO L
CONCORD SQUARE
Wombat crossing
Overgrown vegetation
EE T ST R
A LE
AVENUE RGE
Intersection
No bus landing pad
EL L E
EE T ST R
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
A NE
LEGEND Study area Issue Type
FL AV
RD
GE O
R BE AL
GA AL AF TR
A ED W
CO O P OA TR
ET
E ET STR
D LLOY
AD
EE T
ET
RO RD
A D ST ANNE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH
S
OR
O DR
HUR A RT
SF RE BE
E ET
AD
E ST R
RO
FO
H EA G LE R
T ON
S RE BE
GIP P
AD
GH
LAKER RESERVE
T RE ON S
REDLEAF MANOR EET GIP AGED PS ST CARE RE ET
E N UE DA LY AV
OU
N EY SY D
N LANE
LORD PLACE
RUSSIAN SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
S TR
S TR
FITZGERALD PARK
PAT
E EN U
SON T ER
L BE L
HOMEBUSH LIBRARY
96
ET
E RS PAT T
AL AN E
HOMEBUSH PUBLIC SCHOOL
DE
HENLEY PARK
E ST R PIT T
E
BR
K
HOMEBUSH SOUTH POST OFFICE
NU E AV E
TR
E NU
RO AD
NT
A AV
TS F OR D
S CR E S CE
R AM A
D
LOFTU
UE
RA
T
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H
N ALT O
N AV E
AD D RO
E LAN
NR OA
EE
PAR R AMAT TA ROAD
NE
E DA L
NE S LA C ES PR IN EE T ST R TON ING R R NE CA N LA G TO R IN CA R QU
ING TO
WE L L ST RE E T
RE E POWEL L S C
BU R L
FT US LA
PR
V SS A IN C E
E HO M
COR
N NO OR R TT H H S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
AT TA RO AD
LO
Y AD D
D RO A S ON NE L
ALLEN STREET RESERVE
PO
80
CON
ET
E
ET
R EE S ST
70
U VE N EY A
81
CARLTON PLACE
83
82
S CR O
L SH IP
E LAN
E ST R N OS LE M
OUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION
71
E ET
IO STAT
79
RE N ST
PA
HILL CRE SCE RC NT HU
98
99
N MA C
101
EE T
TR NS ILT O HA M
ISMAY RESERVE
73
IS LE W
POMEROY RESERVE
S TR
72
NU E AVE
T CA S
T RE E H ST ATA WA R
E LAN
TA MA L
77
NU E AV E EY S
CENTRAL PARK
CONCORD EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
T MO N
ET
R CL E
T
ET TRE LD S
Y RO ME PO
RE ST
NG
78
RFIE
O BER
R EE A ST
T
UE EN AV
THE CRESCEN T
AB B O
EE
THE MCDONALD COLLEGE
ORTHODOX WE PARISH OF ST ST MICHAEL BILL BOYCE ER NM RESERVE OT PA RK OR RO WA AD Y
PA RR AM
T
R
HT
E TR E
N ST
G RI
S AW
EE T Q U EE
D OA DR
W RT CA
S TR
T E NTE
OO
S WA R
E E NU A AV LO N BE L
WENTWORTH RESERVE
AIN E
STRATHFIELD NORTH POST OFFICE
N IDS O DAV
A NE ON L
W
R LO R
R CO R IDS DAV
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D W WE ES S TT
ET
MASON PARK
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
75 76
T RE GE S
UN DE R
WA MCINNES RESERVE
NU E AVE
S LIN K
74
R GE O
MASON PARK WETLANDS
EE T R S TR
E
HIL LIE T RE E A ST ME N
V E NU IN G A
T
BRESSINGTON PARK
M CU M
EN BIC
EE T
E ST RE
T TR EE ET T S CO NS
NIA L
A S TR
EN ZIE MA CK
DR IV E
LL YAR A
0
50 100 Metres
Industrial Residential Tourism, eduction and community
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
R RY YD DE E
YARLUKE
ET
S TR EE
RO AD
IE W
YV
B RE TT ST REE T
TENNYSON PARK
BILL MITCHELL PARK
T
TT E EN NN NY YS SO ON N P PO O II N N TT
BA
SS TRE ET
NT CR ES CE
T
ER N
CRE EK
TR EE
E RE ST
JE TT Y
SYDNEY BP CHURCH
PEEL PARK
T
ST AN
N DY SO
STRE ET RY BU
ET RE
ST RE ET
LE Y
TEE M E R S
D
ET
AN ST
MORRISONS BAY PARK
ROA
N
RR OA D
GA TH OR PE
VE RA
E
LL IS I E
RE ET
ST
TR E
PE
ST RE
OS ST
GLADE S
ST RE E
GR OV E
AD RO ES FRA NC
T
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
CH AP M AN
RO AD
TR E
T ST RE E L
AD
HOFFMAN PARK
IC W KS
T
EE T
RR ISO N
LL RE TY
CH AD
RO
RE ET
ST R
HE L
IP
ST
M IT C
O AD R
IL L
E
BENNELONG PARK
KISSING POINT PARK
PH
A
EL LY
KE MP S
RE ET ST
ID
DE LA NG
UG
CH AR LE S
DO
S LA
R ST
MO NN
CR EE K
DO T EE
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E RESERVE
W ES T
DONNELLY PARK CLEVES PARK
SP EN CE R
TOW N
BREMNER PARK
H AC BE RE ST
ET S TRE
ET
SS O R
GLADES BAY PARK
DE LM A P R
A MIE N S S TRE E
A RA D E
T
M ERIT ON S T RE ET
CH AM PI O
TEN NY S
N
ON
RO A
D
RO AD
M
CG O
W
AN
PUTNEY PARK
ET RE ST
BALUN RESERVE
166
UE
V DS A LA N
R OS
DW AY
LE
T
C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
RO AD
ED
CA BA RIT A
T
GE W
OO
NT
RO AD
S
CABARITA PARK
D CRES CE
MI MO
NG RK I DO
ET
T RE NE S ET
Pedestrian refuge
173
KENDALL PARK
STRE
O INS T
Trip hazard Existing infrastructure
ALL
EL PH
O AD YS R BR A
D KEN
A IRW FA
TGSIs
YAR
Narrow footpath
VINE
Pedestrian refuge
IN
174
170
171 LL
SE CLO ET T RE PS HO BIS
T ER
ET
Overgrown vegetation
Kerb ramps Missing link
R IVE ER D
Other
172
RIVE LTY D A DMIR A UIT A CIRC
E ST R
Obstruction in path
Intersection Signage/line marking
169
IAM WILL
158
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
182
IP JU N
T RE E
ET
157 181
167 168
B BR RE EA AK K FF A AS S TT P PO O II N N TT
ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL 180
175
BREAKFAST POINT VILLAGE GREEN
ET RE ST T ILY RE E EM T ST B ER HE R AN E MS L AD A
LEGEND Study area Issue Type
T
ET
EE S TR TO N BA R
T R EE R ST
156 183
179
E ST R
T
159
E ST R
E
160
E GA L
OA D AY R RS B
T CE S
N
LLAG E DRIV E VI
161
K IN WAT
O MA J
U GL O
R EE
ET
178
R E ET
UE
HOWSE PARK
A ST U ST AU G
155
RE ST
RE E T M ST TRA
ET
AV E
ST
EN AV ER RN TU
RE H ST
N DO AD BR
ET RE ST
T HE A
ET
RD
231
A CK RI
E ST R
M AN NO R
N
NG ST ON
UE
I AK DE
ET RE ST
KI
YA RD
162
BER
343
BA
T ET S
T LAN E
YOUNGER RESERVE
177
164
SHAW RESERVE
K MA R
BE NN ET
165
AY
E
MURPHY RESERVE
IT
REGA TTA W
E NU
CU E W TE R CIR A
ND A
ET
M MO OR R TT LL A AK KE E
KE
O
A D R IVE
ME DO RA ST RE E
W
E ST R
O D
N AV E PAL M
Y HIL L
PEN INS UL
176
Wombat crossing
Commercial and business space
Pedestrian footpath Waterways
Open space and recreation
Ferry terminal
Residential
Bus stop
Tourism, eduction and community
Other recreation Education Place of worship
0
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
A KE
MA
T
AV E
RO AD
R
IE FR
M
ST RE E
T
GR OG AN
MONASH RESERVE
ACTON STRE
NUE
MON AS H PAR AD E
WANGAL PARK
BAY S TR EE
ST RE ET
DAL MA R
T
RO AD
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K
HA RRIS
C CR RO OY YD DO ON N
ET
AV EN UE
ROSEBANK COLLEGE
STRE E T T
L AN E
DAWS O N ST R E ET
WYC H BU RY
PROWSE RESERVE
CE AV E
R OA D
T LU CA S
T S TR EE
WYC H BU RY
ET
S TR EE
R ST RE
OAD
BY RO N
SP EN CE
KING S R
HA MM O N D AV E N UE
S RO AD
LUKE AVENUE RESERVE KING EDWARD STREET RESERVE
FIVE DOCK LEISURE CENTRE
LA NG S T RE E T
COO KA
S TR EE T
245
CHARLES HEATH RESERVE
LUCAS GARDENS SCHOOL
RO Y
HYCRAFT RESERVE
KINGS PARK
QUE E N
ET
ILL IA W
R OAD
BARNWELL PARK
RE GAT TA
S TRE ET
WA LKE R
EE T LO FT US ST R
R EE T
R OA D
TR EE T
SS TRE ET
BARNWELL PARK GOLF COURSE
C CA AN NA AD DA A B BA AY Y
RE NO W N
E NU
ND
S
CONCORD OVAL
S BU RY
WEB B S LAN E ES HE R STR EET
MILTO N S
MERYL A ST RE
CINTRA PARK
CH ELTE NH AM R O AD
BURWOOD PARK
GIP P
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
STR EE T
BUWOOD PARK DOG OFF LEASH AREA
T
SH AF TE
D PAR K R OA
CO MER
YV IE W
ST LUKES PARK
N S TR EE
ST JOHN OF GOD PRIVATE HOSPITAL BURWOOD
MLC SCHOOL MUSIC CENTRE
EE
VE NUE
LU KE AV E NU E
BR OU G H
BU RTO
NE W ST
LY ON
234
CONCORD PRIVATE HOSPITAL
220
223
SOUTHERN CROSS CATHOLIC VOCATIONAL COLLEGE
STR
BARNWELL PARK GOLF COURSE
206
CONCORD HIGH SCHOOL
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
MLC MIDDLE SCHOOL
NU E
208
T
224
MLC PRIMARY SCHOOL
205
UR HA M
NU E
207
222 221
T
MLC SCHOOL
210
211 209
233
BE NN ET
EE T
ST RE E
BU RW OO DR OA D
DA V ID
ST R TR EE T TO N S
CONCORD PUBLIC SCHOOL
EV EL YN AV E
225
ST MARY'S PRIMARY SCHOOL
TU
ACE
PL ND A
RH O
AV EN UE ON AD DI S
S TRE E
AV E
E DRIV
OA D
ET
A DA
E
U EA RC
BA
E ST R
UE
ED ITH
213
E ET M STR
197
LE Y
230
198
A
203
204
216
214 215
D
N JO H
PAR K AV EN
226
212
202
BAYVIEW PARK
201
217
200
E
229 228 227
GODDARD PARK
T
NU AVE
ET
SA VE NU
199
218
E DU K
LA CE ST RE E
ST RE ET
ST AN
OT TE AV EN UE
NI CH OL A
DE
WA L
AS C
347
EE T ST R
LA M
ROTHWELL PARK
E ET
RE
SA LT
STR LLE
ST
ND A DRIVE
A PA R
L ER ZO EL
ET S T RE
ET TR E
E ET
QUEEN ELIZABETH PARK
E EN U
S ER E
STEWART RESERVE
CR AN E
E AV
M TR E
EE T
IR EM P
T
E FLAV
GIP PS
PRINCE EDWARD PARK
S
192
193
R EE D ST
N RS O
JACA RA
OW DR EAD EM
S ANDE R
O TRIP
E PAT T
T
ET
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
E ENU L AV
E ET ST R
MASSEY PARK GOLF COURSE
E
S TR
TR ES S JO N
143
L IP SS TR EE
IVE
ET TRE WS IE
E ST R VIEW
194
D A RA IA N P
T
KE
PH IL
AD
K S ALTW ATE R CRE E
88
89
87
CONCORD POST OFFICE VENU E ON A M IS T CO R
R EE E ST GAT LUD
C SH A
RO RITA
EDWARDS PARK
GREENLEES PARK
144
ET
V B AY
90
85
LI L IPO GA L
E ST R
93
A CA B
232
92 91 86
94
84
95
ET
ET
CONCORD KINDERGARTEN
146 145
DE A RA AR P A LG TRAF
C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
T
340
195
196
147
E ST R
UE
K ER IC
N AV E
IO AL B
R EE N ST
RO S
D FR E
T RE
UE VE N
148
SO N
D RO A
SS T HE SM Y
190
N RS O
ID DAV
SA
T REE E ST
150
149 R EY
ET
189
ET T RE ER S L NO B
188
152 151
COR
E ST R
187
153
H AR C
T EL O
186
E AN D
C LA N
185 154
TL MOR
184
LEGEND Study area
Issue Type
Obstruction in path Other
Wide crossing point
Existing infrastructure
Bollard
Overgrown vegetation
Footbridge
Driveway
Parking / traffic issues
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian crossing
Signage/line marking
Pedestrian fencing
Traffic-controlled crossing
Missing link
Pedestrian refuge
Narrow footpath
Seating
TGSIs
Stairs
No bus landing pad
Trip hazard
Marked/zebra crossing Wombat crossing
Unmarked crossing Pedestrian footpath Waterways State and regional roads Bus stop Childcare Other recreation Post office
Education
0
Health
50 100
Place of worship
Metres
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Industrial Residential
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
D RO A
T
K AR
DR IV
E
R
AB
AV E
E
D
B UR N S BAY ROAD
RIVERSIDE GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL LE YS
P OINT
R
T
S HE RW
IN STRE ET
CR
E
SC E
NT
TE SC FO R
Library
Marked/zebra crossing
Bus stop Childcare
Health Commercial and business space
Pedestrian refuge
Missing link
Seating
Wombat crossing
Narrow footpath
Other recreation
Stairs
TGSIs
Trip hazard
Pedestrian footpath
Post office
Waterways State and regional roads
T
Ferry terminal
345
E RE ST
Existing infrastructure
ET ZL
Overgrown vegetation
HE
Other
12
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
WIRE MILL RESERVE
9
T
285
UE
CHAMBERS PARK
E RE ST
MONTROSE ROAD
10
CHISWICK PARK
K IC
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
ET RE ST
W IS CH
286
ROKE BY ROAD
Kerb ramps
Obstruction in path
BETTS PARK
ST R EE
CR OWN
STRE E T
289
342
No bus landing pad
HU NT
H HE EN N LL E EY Y
ICK S TRE E T
THE
N
LEGEND Study area Issue Type
HENLEY LONG DAY CARE CENTRE
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S P PO O II N N TT
T
A
D OA IA R GLADESVILLE RESERVE
11
288
EE T S TR
AD RO RIA TO V IC
E
E RE ST
ON ALT
AL TO
MARM ION ROAD
ET RE ST
RIV IS D
M IA ILL
T
G RIN SP
W MORTIM ER L E
W
E RE ST ER NT HU
S OY ZR FIT
U RO A D
RO CH ER
NU E
D
296
BATTERSEA PARK T EE TR
UDA PLA C E
W
295
290
T
AVE NU E
EE
HENNEY COTTAGE RESERVE
294
CE
MURRAY-PRIOR RESERVE
OA D
AN NI NG
K E LLY
A RR TE
T
R
M
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S C CO OV VE E
HENLEY RESERVE
291
GE
GE OR
Y PAR A JOL
T OR VI C
MEDITATION PARK
DE M ILH A
ST RE E
M A RY
L EL
CE NT
KING ST R EE
EET STR
RIVERGLADE RESERVE
BEDLAM BAY PARRAMATTA RIVER REGIONAL PARK
292
S TREE
T CA
M
PB
E IV DR
EE RO AD
CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE ST ANNE'S AGED CARE
HEYDON PARK
WA
G DI
ST INE
T
E ET N S TR
OA D FR
PE AR S O
BY
T
PUNT ROA D
BANJO PATERSON PARK
SAINT MALO RESERVE
VILLA MARIA RESERVE
GLADESVILLE HOSPITAL COMMUNITY HEALTH NORTON
E RE ST
RIC HM O ND
GIANT STEPS SYDNEY
ET
RE ST
FIGT R
ROA D
ROA D
E
CE IN PR
W ED
D AR
CR ES
ST RE E T
FIG TREE PARK
L A DESV ILLE
S TR
RE ST
M ANNING RO AD
LOOKING GLASS BAY PARK
T
DE
STREET AN
NN
I YS
ET
G
B TAR
SU
E
ET RE ST
AD
ST RE
U EN AV
ER
RO
S TR EE
HARDING MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND
S ROAD AN
L IS
N O IS
WH AR
EM AT
ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE
E NU
T
AS HB U R N P LA CE
AM IE N S
JO HN ST RE E T
R E SE R V E
R
HI
C LL
K
TARBAN CREEK RESERVE
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E
BOYLA RESERVE
ST RE ET
CR EE
MA RTI N
E AV
T EE
R O M
DARRI RESERVE
N
VILLA MARIA CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL
H HU UN N TT E ER RS S H H II LL LL
E
R ST
B
GLADESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL
AN
ET
M A RK S TR EE T
SA LT ER S T
R
E
GLADESVILLE POST OFFICE
AU GU
H RN S
T EE
SO
T
LL II N N LL E EY Y P PO O II N N TT
REE T JOUB ERT ST
TE UL
L EL W
R ST
ST RE E
PAU L ST RE
B
M AK IN
E TR S S V E NU
ET S TR E STAF F FL AG
CO
CO
Y
EA
SE
AU BU RN
ST RE E
ST RE E
AS
AW
CUNNINGHAMS REACH
AD RO F IN
AIL S TRE A BIG ET
MA RS
M
ET RE ST
EE T
E
A AVENUE
RE ET
D
ST R
R TA
T EN
W TT
ER AT
A RO
ING
T
SC RE
TRIM PLACE
N TO RI ME
BO RO NI
AD RO
C
PI
ET RE ST
ST JOHNS PARK
DE RY
N
S
RO AD
LU KE ST RE E T
OA D
GLADESVILLE LIBRARY
LA NE
ER
SS
T
RE ET
EE T
MI LL
P
D GE RA R
T ES W
RO
EE TR
ST
B ONN
TW
ST RE ET
HEP BURN A VE N UE
RY DE
RR
ST R
EV ER AR D
ST RE ET
PA RK
TR EE T
SH S
AS TO N
IT
GE RA RD
E ET
LE O
AT E
EV AN
ST R
EE
CAM B RIDG ES TR
GE RR I
RO AD
T
GATHOR OS PE
ELT H AM S TR E ET
OUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE PRIMARY SCHOOL
0
50 100 Metres
Place of worship
Education
Open space and recreation
1
3
5
Aged care
Residential
2
4
6
7
200
E ET
T ST R EE SIBB ICK
T
A S TRE E MOOC ULTA STR EET
CE
C IT
Y-
ENU E
W
AR
AT AH
ST RE E
ROBSON PARK
T
ER
AN
G
M
CR AN E
UE
BO O
ON AV EN UE
MIN TO AV EN
IN G HAM
259
D R OA INK TL
UE EN AV
DO LO U D
HENLEY MARINE DRIV E
AV EN UE
BE TT S AV
TT AV EN UE B E NNE
A
S WE
Y
O BR
YD
DE RA PA
OR D
PINE AVE NUE
AD PAR K R O
SU TT O N
WATE R V IE
TREVAN ION STR EET
BARNSTAPL E LAN E
GREAT NORTH RO A D JERSEY LANE
W S TR
EE T
E A S T ST RE ET
S T RE E T
RE ET IN NE S ST
UE
N E ET
WES T S TR
LA NE
AVE N UE
TIMBRELL PARK
LE RT O
RE ET
T
327
M
AR LIN GTO N ST
E RE ST
E
THOM P SON
ST R EE T
326
E NU D AV NIEL
UE
SC OTT
338
N O LIS
N AV E ES S
STR EE T
ET RE ST
E
CR OSS
NE
T EE
NU E AV E ES S
NU AVE
S TRE ET
DI UN
258
H DU C E DU K
VE RI LD TIM B RE L
YO RK A VE NU E
R ST
RE
271
260
257
ET
AD
C PR IN
261
262
RO
S
NIELD PARK
ROBERTS RESERVE
EE T
ND ST R EE T
LARKINS RESERVE
268
STR
LAV E ND ER
270
339
HUR A RT
CO UR LA
E NU
OA D
VE
T RE E
N
RUSSELL LEA PUBLIC SCHOOL
R RO OD DD D P PO O II N N TT
E E NU T AV TIC U
REG COADY RESERVE
277
T RE E
HA RR IS R
NE
A NY ME
ET TR E
274
269
H ST
WADIM BILL JEGOROW RESERVE
ST RE ET
L DA
AD
CROKER PARK
UE V EN TA A ES O N MIN
328
272
T RE DS KAR RIC
FIVE DOCK EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
N EC CO N
RO AY
OK AVENUE A B RO HA RR
T HE A
E M URR EN U A L O NG AV
S RA M
253
ST L EY HO W
O LY
E
325
275
273
E ET STR
MS
LA N
T RE E T
324
276
ET
RA
LE S NO B
255
ET TRE HT S
267
D
256
DOMREMY CATHOLIC COLLEGE IG FA IRL
278 ROA P LE S TA A RN
266
263 254
E EN U
320
322
E ST R AN
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K
252
T AV
B
NU E
FIVE DOCK POST OFFICE F IRS
RO NS LYO
321
FIVE DOCK PARK
TA IT
NO LE
AD
LA
TR EE T
ST RE ET
323
ES CR RE CLA
265
AD RO AY
M AR
247
QUEEN S ROA D
C CR RO OY YD DO ON N DA L
248
TA IT
MON S S
ST R EE T
M NO R
KING S RO AD
251
E NU AV E LE A
AV E
LIE GE S
A US T
249
AD RO DD RO E LAN DD RO
SE CO ND AV E
FIVE DOCK LIBRARY
AT KIN S
A UG
T
ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL ET
N INN O
264
T
R OA D
T
FIVE DOCK PUBLIC SCHOOL GARFIEL PRESCHOOL D STR EE
RU SS E LL
ET
S T RE
LE S CH AR
STOREY PARK
240
TR E ET
E RE M YALO R A ST
ET
EE Y ST R
UE AV EN
M CK
15
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
ARK HEALTH CARE MU RR AY ST R EET RUSSELL LEA
W ARE EM B
NUE
FIVE DOCK PUBLIC O T ST RE SCHOOL
E HA LL
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
341
LM E R O AD
RO WLE Y
EE T
W WA AR RE EE EM MB BA A
E AVE NU F E RN GA RT
337
279
R DIA S
B AY R OA D
E NU
LA NE
241 246
NRY S TR EET HE
TO ST R CO RA N
G S T RE KIRR A N
EA GILD
238 239
N R OA D
ED EN HO
CORALIE RESERVE
T
280
W ROA D
E AV
E ST R E
B NE YR
CE CIL
LYSAGHT PARK
14
ET
S TON
T REE S ST
LA NC EL
250
E AV M CGRATH
237
BO UVA
WAREEMBA POST OFFICE
336
R EE T D ST
W YM
E JA M
242
UE AVE N
TRE LIE S
E ET
282
E NU AVE ELL
RUSSELL PARK PA RK VI E
A COR
STR BE LL
AL
335
283
RE ET
235
243
IN CU RT
13
N AN SW
CR E T EN SC
CAM P
DE RA PA
E ST
334
HALLIDAY PARK
244
TR DA S
TYL ER
1
281
TL E S TR E ET
K OK O
ABBOTSFORD PUBLIC SCHOOL
ET S T RE HIL L
236
ALLISON PARK
HA MP D E
RE GIN
UE
T
ET
ON ST WYM
IR EN
NE WC AS
6
CAMPBELL PARK
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
PR E
5
E E LAN MAY N
E NU E N D AV O RM O GL EN E NU E NA AV WER O
N N AV E STO
PA R ADE
S TR E ET
ND W A RD
NT CE
CH EL MS F
W
E RE ST
S TRE
2
4
S RE NS C B UR
Y
A NS
3
I
A LB
333
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
8
7
CHISWICK EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
BB BI
ST
284
OPAL WINDWARD MANOR
LA M ROCK AVE N UE
332
NT
HENRY LAWSON PARK
AV EN UE
DOBROYD POINT PUBLIC SCHOOL H HA AB BE ER R FF II E E LL D D
LEGEND Study area Issue Type
Obstruction in path Overgrown vegetation
Marked/zebra crossing
Intersection
Pedestrian refuge
Wombat crossing
Kerb ramps
Road Surface
Pedestrian footpath Waterways State and regional roads
Signage/line marking Missing link Narrow footpath TGSIs No bus landing pad
Wide crossing point Existing infrastructure Pedestrian refuge Traffic-controlled crossing
Bus stop Other recreation
Post office Education Aged care Library Health
Open space and recreation
0
50 100
Industrial
Metres
Residential Tourism, eduction and community
Place of worship
1
3
5
Commercial and business space
2
4
6
7
200
K E L LY
S TREE
ET
ET
D IC
MORTS RESERVE
HORSE PADDOCK
PLA CE
352
328
330
CU E
H
TH EP AR AD E
T
ST R EE
EE T
MYA LOR A STREET
ES
WA RE E MB A S TR
SIBB ICK
B E CHE R
PINE AVE NUE
MOOC ULTA STR EET
C EN T
348
135
126
127 123
134
BRETT PARK
ELKINGTON PARK
TRE ET
O SS LA G
B BA A LL M MA A II N N
130
129
BALMAIN COVE
VI CT OR
KING GEORGE PARK CONSTELLATION PLAYGROUND
LL II LL Y Y FF II E E LL D D
TGSIs
Overgrown vegetation
Seating
Pedestrian refuge
Wombat crossing
Signage/line marking
No bus landing pad
Pedestrian refuge
Trip hazard
Bus shelter
Missing link
Obstruction in path
Ramp
Wide crossing point
Traffic-controlled crossing
Pedestrian footpath
Intersection
Narrow footpath
Other
Road Surface
Footbridge
Marked/zebra crossing
State and regional roads
B UB CL
Ferry terminal
RE ST
ET
OA
ROZELLE PUBLIC SCHOOL PRESCHOOL
D
1
3
5
2
4
6
T EE
T
BALMAIN EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
R RO O ZZ E E LL LL E E
IA R
R ST
ELLIOT PARK
DICKSON GREEN
T
P
SYDNEY SECONDARY COLLEGE BALMAIN CAMPUS
BRIDGEWATER PARK
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
EL LIO TT S
141
LEGEND Study area
NT CE
142
L EL RN BU IV E HENL EY MA R INE DR
347
ES CR
ET RE
143
137
136
PARINGA RESERVE
SALTON RESERVE
ET RE ST
T
133
ST
T
E RE ST
S
E
140
RY ER MONTAGUE TH
PARK
KE AR M
138
144
ET RE ST
GE OR
T A OS
ET
ET RE ST ET NE RA RE LA D ST RY AN K IC EX ER AD F AL NW RO ET RE A RE RI ST O
RM
RE ST
ST GEORGES RESERVE
H UT
ON HT
GE
C VI FO
UG
145
ST
SO
E RE ST
EG LL
S
CO
146
O BR
ST MARK'S PRIMARY SCHOOL
147
ET RE
TS LE MEN
T
S
E RE ST
148
ST
ET RE ST
C
T EE TR
351
E ER M AN TR
G IN LD
S PP GI
R
ST
ET RE
T
T
LA IL M
NE DI UN
NE
E RE ST
E RE ST
292
346
RUSSELL LEA PUBLIC SCHOOL
T
335
333
T EE TR
WESLEY INSTITUTE FOR MINISTRY AND THE ARTS
T
293
E RE ST
T
ON PS
RE
349
PO
E RE
345
295
T EE
NO LE
S
L
E T
T RE E T
AN M W
ST
341
BO
120
350
T EE TR
117
119
337
339
118
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
DRUMMOYNE LIBRARY
DRUMMOYNE PARK
320
T
343
318
340
ST R EE T
AD RO NS 294 O LY
R ST
MON S S
CR RE CLA
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K
ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL
RU SS E LL
TR EE T
ST RE
ET RE ST
JA
ARK HEALTH MUR R AY ST RE E T CARE RUSSELL LEA 344
G T EE
TA IT
AT KIN S
B
D UD
E
R OA D
321
319
AN
RO WLE Y
LIE GE S
UE EN AV
LM E R O AD
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
R ST
15 S AR GE
TR EE T
RE
D
E NU
N R OA D
R DIA S
ED EN HO
BAY RO A
E AV
BO UVA
RO AD
NE YR
HA MP D E
W WA AR RE EE EM MB BA A
B
P
ARK V IE W
N NI DE
NT
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
RUSSELL PARK
E RE ST
CHISWICK EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH LYSAGHT 5 13 CENTRE PARK ALLISON PARK 14 CAMPBELL PARK
OO M
CR ES CE
TAPLIN PARK OM TH
4
322
ER AT
6
AD RO
RE SC RN BU
W
T
7
332
331
323
T EN SC
YS BA
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
114
T EE TR
G OU OR
FOR TE S
B RL
326
12
AD RO
327
8
116
115
S OD WO ING LL CO
CHAMBERS PARK
T
MA
E RE ST
111
110
S HT
CHISWICK PARK
109
112
107 IG WR
11
113
LING STRE E
108
10
D AR
BOB SMITH RESERVE
329
TERRY STREET
ORIA V ICT
TY LER
W WO OO O LL W W II C CH H
PULPIT POINT RESERVE
UTZ RESERVE
RE ST
IN STRE
M IA IL L
S HERW
UE Y NE AV EN MO UM DR
GLADESVILLE BRIDGE MARINA
W
K ST RE ET
H HE EN N LL E EY Y
KELLYS BUSH RESERVE
H HU UN N TT E ER RS S H H II LL LL
T
7
0
ROZELLE POST OFFICE
65
130 Metres
260
Appendix E – Locations of treatment opportunities
GHD | Report for City Of Canada Bay Council - City of Canada Bay, 12539632
R RY YD DE E
S TRE E
" Ý
T EN
R
C ROP L E Y
!
T
RD
B !
R RH HO OD DE ES S B
LLEWE LLYN S TRE E
T
B !
MA R QU
E T S TR
EET
O RPE
NC O
AVENUE CAV ELL
T ST RE E
IV E
WA LK E R
SH O
GA UTH
B ! B !
RE G
D
!AVERIL BL S T RE E T !
NINA GR AY AV ENUE
DR NE LI RE
B ! DB A! O
B
HOMEBUSH BAY CORSO
ET
B ! B !
AD
VI EW
CO
RO
UHRS POINT RESERVE
S TR EET
AY
AT ER
RE ST
W
W
ND R OA
RO
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
BLAXLA
BU R
W WE EN N TT W WO OR R TT H H P PO O II N N TT
SETTLERS PARK
ET
B
ST RE
B
! F ! !
T ! B ! !! B !!! !
R BOUL EVARD
HOMEBUSH B BB BB MA RY BAY S TRE E T CORSO UNION SQUARE
f !
RIVENDELL SCHOOL
BRAYS BAY RESERVE
G
RHODES PARK
B !
27 LEWIS BERGER PARK
N
M
O
AL
B ! B !
A
N UL
ST
CO
RE
ET
B !
LA
NE
RE ST
B !
ET
RA ND
E RE ST
T
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D W WE ES S TT
WALKER RESERVE
ET
IA
L
RON ROUTLEY OVAL
! \
ROAD
" Ý
ET
Place of worship
RE
Health
AL MY
ST
? Education
NG
Post office
DR
DO
B ! B !
E TH
AN
UE
QU
RD AV EN
IV E
E TR LS
ET
A LG WI
B ! E RE ST
T
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Industrial Residential Tourism, eduction and community
B !
! \
231
231
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
MAJORS BAY RESERVE
T EE TR
NO RM
BA
BU S H
DR IV
E
HOM E
W ENTWORTH
IA
56
E NU
LEVA RD
O
R
RE
I VE
R
ST
B ! B T ! EE
ST
R
BO
AN
T
VE AA RR
S ET
AW
EE
A AW
B ! B !
R
R ST
GA
Other recreation
U
R
G
UN
Bus stop
G
SP
LA ROAD
WUNDA
G " Ý
R LB A! ITB !
CONCORD REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL
R BA
HOMEBUSH BAY DRI VE
T EE
!
! \
R
C
T
B
Train station
O
AD
CONCORD REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL
G BUILDING 19
B !
" Ý
NG RO AD
BA NG AL
® !
B !
ST
KING STR E E
K
T !
H
TE AD ST RE ET
COONO
Waterways Railway State and regional roads
T
!
Y ST REE T
CONCO
SYDNEY HEALTH AGED CHRONIC CARE AND REHABILITATION
T
CAS TL ES
E
D ROA
R
E CRE
f !
Pedestrian bridge Proposed path
WAL LA R O
Q UEEN STREE T
CH A
POW EL L S
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity
E
?
TL E RS BOU
LTO N D
LE IL
TR
B
CONCORD WEST PUBLIC SCHOOL
LL II B BE ER R TT Y Y G GR RO OV VE E
S
D COR CON
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LLY YM MP P II C C P A R K PA R K
THORP
T EE
O
B ! RV B ME !
BRADLEY RESERVE
R
N
MUTTON RESERVE
E AVENUE
! \
LO
ST
O
Y
IV E DR
L KI
O
LA
EM
B ! B !
FR
B ! B !
B ! B !
LOVEDALE PLACE
S
!! B ® !
AN
RHODES POST OFFICE B
! \
?
THOMAS WALKER HOSPITAL
RIDE
LEWIS BERGER PARK
B 21 !
o
0
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
RA AV EN UE
AR NU LLA W
G STR
EET
A
A ND LEX
RA
S TR
E ET
" Ý
AD
AS
TRE E
T
E RT
RO A D
S ST REE
E ET STR
O RTH
ROB
E LY
E ET STR
!!
COW
DERY
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Industrial Residential Tourism, eduction and community
L ANE
T B
PHIL IP
COO B B PER S TRE E
!B ! ! B
o
G
W HIT E
STREE T
B ! BB ! !B ! B B ! ! BB ! ! B B ! ! B! BB B ! ! ! B B T B ! ! ! !
MOS
AV E N
UE
T
OA D
B ! B !
W EN TW
G
IA LANE
UM B COL
LEIC EST ER A VEN UE S ON R
EET STR EST ER CH
RO
ARD
EET
EET
ET
STR
ITH STR
RE
RNE
RED
ST
E ET
ME
G
STR
MA N
T EE TR ES AN
" Ý
B OU ME L
CR
T
EET
AL A NE
SWA N
E IV DR L
TE NN IA AD RO GE
T EN
T
BR ID
R PS
REE
LE S
Place of worship
N ST
CO
Health
REE E ST EL L GIP
E E AV N UE O RG D GE
Library
RSO
REDLEAF MANOR GIP AGED PS ST CARE RE ET
LLOY
Aged care
FL AV
EDW
CONCORD SQUARE
B !
EET
ET
G
GA AL AF TR
S
Other recreation
HUR A RT
!
! \
Bus stop
Post office
? Education
G { n G " Ý
TR EY S
R
!
ET
EET
B
Train station
E ST R
T !
® !
GH REA
Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister
BE
B !
Waterways Railway State and regional roads
B ! B !
B OA D ! RB RD ! FO ES
" Ý
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity
N SY D
!! B
LAKER RESERVE
AD ST ANNE'S RO AD ANGLICAN RD BT RO FO S R CHURCH RE BE AL BE
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
TLE
! ROAD
CAS
! !
BBRO UG HTO BN
!
RUSSIAN SEVENTH B DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH B
EET S TR
AD
n!B!B {
FITZGERALD PARK
" Ý
E
B
LORD PLACE
B B
!! " Ý " Ý
ON ERS PATT
ENUE
B !
HOMEBUSH LIBRARY
B !
N LANE
HOMEBUSH PUBLIC SCHOOL
T RE
E PAT T
B !
K
S PIT T
DALY AV
D
UE
STR
DR OA
! B HOMEBUSH ! !!!!! ! SOUTH POST ! ! OFFICE ® ! ?
N AV E
HENLEY PARK
L BE L
OR
NT
B B B B B BB T B B
L AN
TR
UE
" Ý
AD
B !
UE
C
{B n
N AV E
RO
LO FTU S CR E S CE
EE
VEN LE A
DE
LIBRARY
82
ARA
T ON
BA BP
!! RRAMATTA ROA D B !
E
E DA
ET T RE
RA
!BCONCORD C CO ON NC CO OR RD D !
NAM
SL AN
! \
MA C
TU
REE
TON
S
PA
CARLTON PLACE
CENTRAL PARK
ET
LO F
RING CAR
UE
!
" Ý T
E
URCHILL CR ES CH
G!B
N ALT O
E
ENU
T RE
RIN CAR
N AV E
B
E LA N ESS
N ST G TO
N AV
SS S
T
ENU
UE
E
CRO
L ST RE E
C PRIN
IDS O DAV
NE
W EL
S AV
N AV E
N LA
PO
CES
E LA N
PRIN
D
QU
LIN G
" Ý
T REE
!! OA
B !
D
ST IE R NAP
ALLEN STREET RESERVE
H HO OM ME EB BU US SH H
TSF
ROA
S ON NEL
H OM
Y ADD
EET
O NT
IO N STAT
B !
E
STR
RE E POW EL L S C
AB B O
UE
L AN
S MN O
IDS O
VEN EY A
ENU
!
D ROA
L SHIP
S AV
CONCORD EARLY B CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
B B ! ! B ! B !
N NO OR R TT H H S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
?
REY
DAV
B ! T B ! B B ! ! !
ET
IS LE W
LE
OUR LADY
THE CRES CE NT
BUR
77
D COR CON
EET
!
RM CLE
ANE NT L
TR NS ILTO HAM
B
R MO
T REE
T RE
STRATHFIELD NORTH POST OFFICE
CLE
HS ATA WA R
COR
® !
78
" OF THE Ý ASSUMPTION BB
S LINK
E
MA TT AR
T TA S MA L
ISMAY RESERVE
MO TO RW AY
U AV E N
WE ST ER N
T
POMEROY RESERVE
BB ! !
MING
M
T
EET
PO
E RE ST
EE S TR
TR LD S
ORTHODOX
OY ER
NG A
RFIE
RA
O BE R
EE
?
B? !
B "! Ý
T E NTE
PA R
UE
" PARISH OF Ý ST MICHAEL
D
T
THE MCDONALD COLLEGE
BILL BOYCE RESERVE OA
EE STR
T
KR
W RSA
EE T
R N ST
PA R
GH RI
N VE TA
S TR
Q UEE
D OA
WENTWORTH RESERVE W RT CA
WA
B ! B !
REET
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D W WE ES S TT
EET
DR UE
A INE
! \
STRATHFIELD NORTH PUBLIC SCHOOL
S TR
OO VEN NA A
R LOR
R ST
B ! B !
RGE
! \
W LO BE L
T
WA MCINNES RESERVE
MASON PARK
DE R
REE
T
REET
GE O
B B ! !UN
A ST
A N STRE E T
CUM
T HIL L IE
ME N
NO R M
! \
RE ET IE S T KENZ
E ST RE
! \ MASON PARK WETLANDS
REE
E AC
MA C
S E TT
BRESSINGTON PARK
A ST
PL
CONCORD GOLF COURSE
G
HOM EBU SH B AY DR I
VE
WARBRICK PARK
! \
UNG
G
B ! B !
PRIMARY SCHOOL
T LL A S YA RA
EN
E LA N
AN
N DO
ET
ME P
CON
BIC
T
G ON ND Q UA
ET RE
? ST AMBROSE CATHOLIC
! \
EE
RE
T
S TR B ! A ND A NIRR
QU
ST
TS
NG
AR
ET
DO
ST U
E TR
AN
S SY YD DN NE EY Y O O LLY YM MP P II C C P A R K PA R K
® ! B B! B ! ! T B CONCORD WEST ! ! POST OFFICE
B "! Ý
AS
QU
?
VICTORIA AVENUE PUBLIC SCHOOL
VICTORI
W IL G
LA NE
ET KING ST RE
! \
"AVE Ý A
E NU
W ILG A
POWELLS TREILLAGE CREEK TOWER RESERVE
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
?
?
G 0
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
B B! !
PEEL PARK
IE W
T NS S TR EE
CR ES
T ST RE E
AD RO
YV
T
JE
B !
BILL MITCHELL PARK
B !
A BE CH
!
BRETT ST REET
TENNYSON PARK
! \
B
TT E EN NN NY YS SO ON N P PO O II N N TT
A
EE
B
R
F !
B !
ST
OA D
TT Y
RR
B !
RN
ET
! \
" Ý B !
TE
B !
STRE E T
SYDNEY BP CHURCH
GLA DE S
ST RE
RY BU
ES CE NT
AN ST
TR TE EMER
AD
T
PS
MORRISONS BAY PARK
RO
TOW
ET
GA TH OR PE
CRE EK
! \
EE T
OV ET RE ST
LE Y ST AN
ET RE
RE
T
ST
OS
ST
EE
N
EE
ER
N
DY SO
B !
ST R
NC
E AV
LL IS IE
AN
R
PE
!
AP M
ST
! \
AD
GR
M
P PU U TT N NE EY Y
CH
W
! \
RO ES FRA N C
! \
EE K
T EE ST R
T
L
EE
ROB AD
R
T
R
! \
N
L
TR E
E
! \
RE ET
ST
RR ISO
EL
IC W KS
KISSING BB ! ! PARK POINT
AD
HOFFMAN PARK
AD
MO
EL LY
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E RESERVE
R TY
B B! ! C H
ST
N
EL
RO
DE LA
! !
N
IT CH
RO E NG
BENNELONG B PARK B
LL IP
O
SP E
EC R
ET
!!
AD
L
ID A
AR
UG
D
YARLUKE
BREMNER PARK
B DONNELLY PARK !
BB P HI
CH
DO
E BB ! TR S! AS
ST RE
! \
ET
R RY YD DE E
B B! !
B ! B !
LE S
CLEVES PARK
B ! B !
KE M
B !
ST RE
ET S TRE
ET
RO
S
S
ET
GLADES BAY PARK
DE LMA
AM IE N S STRE ET
R P
A RAD
E
BALUN RESERVE
0
50 100
ME RITO
N S TR E ET
CH
AM
TEN N
PI
ON
YS ON
RO
RO
AD
AD
M
CG
O W
AN
PUTNEY PARK
E R ST
B !
W
O
D LA N
E OS W
W AY
D
INL E
ME
DO EET
B ! B !
KENDALL PARK
B !
G
EET
ONE INS T STR
!
E ET
EET
STR
B
RO
S TR
AD
TR PS
Waterways
? Education
Commercial and business space
Ferry terminal
" Ý
Open space and recreation
Bus stop Other recreation
AY
OA
LL
RIT AR
OO
IN
T MS S
HO BIS
E
A LL
A DA
LO S
H EL P
IA M WIL L
G
GE W
C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
RA
MI MO
A AD
T ER C
ND KE
A IRW FA
FAIR W S RO
ED
CA BA
K
S
T Y BRA
B !
!
ST RE
EE RIV E T ER D
A ND
B
ET
R ST
!
! \
E
D CR ES CEN T
LY
B
T
CABARITA PARK
REGA TTA W
B BR RE EA AK K FF A AS S TT P PO O II N N TT
!!
RK
G I EM
F !
172 BB
DO
EET
E
S TR
D RIV
D YA R
IP E R
KET
G
B
V INE
JUN
MA R
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
" Ý
B !
F ! !
DRIVE LTY ADMIR A IT A CIR C U
RE
?
Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister Proposed path
T
D
PUBLIC SCHOOL
IT
BREAKFAST POINT VILLAGE GREEN
? ET
B 158 B ! !
E ET
" Ý MORTLAKE
EET
B ! " Ý B !
CU
ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL
NE
STR
STR
S LA
EET
ROA
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity
TO N BA R
B !
REE E ST GA L
EET
R ST E
B !
S TR
B AY
U CE
E
LLAGE DRIV E VI
S T RE E T
NU E ET
E
ORS
GLO
STR
R ST
D
NU
HOWSE PARK S TA
AV E
VE RA
ET
ET
BA YA R
NE
RE
MA J
U AUG
T RE
343
R TU
ST
TH S HEA
B ! B !
A BR
N
! !
178
K IN W AT
E ET
D
STR
AR
MA N
CK RI
NOR
O DD
MCDONA ET B LD S TRE BE NNE TT LA N B E
M ADA
AK DE
IN
ST
RE
KI NG ST ON ET
IR RC ATE
E E NU S AV
T REE
YOUNGER RESERVE
E RIV AD
D
MURPHY RESERVE
EDW IN STR E E T
S UL
R
Y ST HIL L
O
B ! B "! Ý
M MO OR R TT LL A AK KE E
SHAW RESERVE
P E NIN
Place of worship
Residential Tourism, eduction and community
o
Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
?
G
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister Proposed path
?
! \
RO S
T
E
AV E N
FR
Waterways State and regional roads Bus stop Childcare
® !
Post office
? Education
G " Ý
Health Place of worship
IA M IL L
B ! B !
G G
245
ROSEBANK COLLEGE
B !
E
BAY S TR E
ST REE T
ET
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Industrial Residential
DA LM AR
STRE E T
T
GROGAN
S TRE E
H PA RAD
MONASH RESERVE
B ! B !
o
0
B ! B B! ! B !
BY RO N
UE
" Ý
B
!Y DD OO NN C CR RO OY
NUE
ANE
T
RY L
RY A VEN
T
HBU
HBU
?
FF II V VE E D DO OC CK K
LA NG S TRE E
MONAS
R ST RE ET
N S TR EE
WY C
PROWSE RESERVE
RO Y
HYCRAFT RESERVE
KINGS RO AD
ND AV E
B !
E NU E
ROA D NHAM
ROAD LUCAS
SP ENCE
FIVE DOCK LEISURE CENTRE
HAM MO
LUCAS GARDENS SCHOOL
WY C
! \
QUEENS ROAD
? B !
B !
W
TA ROAD REG AT
ST REE
CHARLES HEATH RESERVE
B !
B !
B B ! !
BARNWELL PARK
KINGS PARK
KING EDWARD STREET RESERVE
T T ST REE
B ! B !
DAWS O
B ! B ! LUKE AVENUE
! \
IE
ST R E ET
A
! \
BE NNET
ROAD
T
WAL KE R
T
CONCORD OVAL
! \
N ST REE
T
! \
BARNWELL PARK GOLF COURSE
C CA AN NA AD DA A B BA AY Y
REN OW
E NU
D
B B! !
R
OK CO
! \
EE SS TR TU
AD
B ! B !
VE NUE
B !
Other recreation
RO
HARRI S R O AD
G
CINTRA PARK
B !
LO F
IE W
S
WANGAL PARK
B !
TR E
TU
YV
! \
LA NE
WEB BS
BURWOOD PARK
ST REE T
LY ON
ACTON S TREE T
! \ ! \
NEW ST REET
MERYL A
E
CHE LTE
OFF LEASH AREA
207
B !
SB URY
B ST REE T ! B BUWOOD PARK DOG !
E
!
B BU UR RW WO OO OD D
S DU R HA M
B ! B ! B ! B !
ST LUKES PARK
STRE ET
E
! \
B ! B ! 234
CONCORD HIGH SCHOOL
SHAF TE
OAD PA RK R
?
COMER
233
RESERVE
T
?
MLC SCHOOL MUSIC CENTRE
NU
B !
ST REE
SOUTHERN CROSS CATHOLIC VOCATIONAL COLLEGE
ES HER
?
?
AV E
RIV AU D
NU E
CE AV
A CE ET RE
ST
HT ON
UG BR O ET RE ST DA V ID
T S TRE E OW NE LA NS D
NE IC
! B ! B ! B ! B !
SCHOOL
MLC SCHOOL
CH
AV EN U
B
" Ý
M ILTO N
LY N
! \
B
? MLC MIDDLE
AV E
R CE
B !
BARNWELL PARK GOLF COURSE
LUKE AV ENUE
G
RH ON DA
PL
G
E NU AV E N IS O AD D
?
E
! \
HS LA NE
MLC PRIMARY SCHOOL
DIT H
MA
E ET M S TR
OA D
G
B ! CONCORD B B ! PRIVATE !
C CO ON NC CO OR RD D
ST JOHN OF GOD PRIVATE HOSPITAL BURWOOD
A
B !
B AD ! O R OOD
BA
S S TT R RA A TT H H FF II E E LL D D
211 FIN
? ET
G
T
!! E
"B Ý
EV E
B ! B ! GIP PS B ! STR EE B T ! B !
ST RE E
E
PRIMARY SCHOOL
ENU
"? ST MARY'S Ý
T
T
NU
NU BB E
W BUR
B ! ! B
B! !
HOSPITAL
B ! BURTO N
AV E
TT EA VE
B !
E AV
ET S TREE
EE
CO
BAYVIEW PARK
DUK
T RE NS A DA
EET
JOH ENUE
DE
B !
OL AS
!!
RE
A PA R
GODDARD PARK
TR
AS
ET
B !
ET
PA RK AV
ES
T RE
RE
LA C
CONCORD PUBLIC B B SCHOOL ST
STR
AL
! ! !
LE Y
SA LT
NI CH
E SB B TR EE T B
ST AN
B ! B !
S ER E
T RE E E ST ST
B REET ! R ST EL L E
LA M
347
M TRE
E LL
PS
ET
FLAV
QUEEN ELIZABETH PARK
E
ET
AN
ENU
B !
!! W
CR
PRINCE EDWARD PARK
RA N DA DRIVE
S
E ST R
R
" Ý
GIP
E AV
S TRE
N ST
JA CA
OW DR EA D EM
S ANDE R
VIE W
RSO
K
OD TRIP
DE O BZ !
ROTHWELL PARK BB
EET
ST RE ET
! \
IR EM P
A PA R
STEWART RESERVE
EET
BB ! !
193
EE T
J
B B! !
LIP S
MASSEY PARK GOLF COURSE
SA LT W ATE R CRE E
IA N
" Ý
EET
GREENLEES PARK
UE VEN EL A
E PAT T
TR WS IE
PH IL
IVE
ET
G
RE E ST
G
K TL A
R S ST ONE
MOR E ET S TR
T K
ICK
B ! B !
DE R
R LI S T L IPO GA L
B !
B OA D ! A RB A RIT ! CAB
\ ! \ ! ! \
EE T
144
UE
RE E E ST GA T
N AV E TON
LUD
MIS
B ! ! ®
IC
T
T
!
88
R K ST
COR
JE LL
E TRE OE S
REE N ST
B EET
B ! B !
RIC
B NBK S T ! LB A!
B ! B !
IO AL B
! C CA AB BA AR R II TT A A
EDWARDS PARK
RB T WA
B ! T R EE
!
ST REE
E
CONCORD POST OFFICE
C SHA
S TR W ER BRE B
196
SP RING
AD PA R GA R FA L TRA
REE T BE NT ST
! B ? ! " Ý
F RE
!
WE L
V B AY
D
B
CONCORD KINDERGARTEN B
!B ! B !
EET
ROA
NU E
TR ES S
B !
B
B
AD
E ET TH SM Y
B AY
VE YS A
N RO
T REE
UE
B !
RE COR
TR LE S
T ST
N AV E
ORS MA J
S LINK
EET
NOB
EL O
152
TR ER S
O ERS AND
C LA N
B B!154 !
H ARC
B ! B !
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
B
E
M
A
IN G
AR R
B !!
DR B IV E
AB
AV E
NU E
? T STRE ET
ET
CROW
G
Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister Proposed path
ICK S TRE
D
OA KR
HAU RO AD
DE M IL E
D
E YS P O INT R
S BAY ROAD
B !
F
!
SHER W IN STRE ET
! \
D
B
ROAD MARMION ROAD
ARMITAGE RESERVE ROKE BY ROAD
B 286
B! !
G
B URN
T LUK E S TRE E
ROCHER
H HE EN N LL E EY Y
MONTROSE ROAD
W ALTON CRESCE N T
F
! B !
S
E CU
E RE ST
WIRE MILL RESERVE
Waterways State and regional roads Ferry terminal
?
Bus stop Childcare
! \
Other recreation
T
CHAMBERS PARK B !
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
W B CK ! A BL
® !
Post office
? Education
G { n G " Ý
Aged care Library Health Place of worship
BLACKWALL POINT RESERVE
IN PO B
T
RO
AD
!
L AL
345
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Residential
T
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity
TL
F! !
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D
342
N
RIVERSIDE GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL
E RE ST
TR
RESERVE
HU
BETTS PARK
?
T
ET
AS
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S P PO O II N N TT
LE EZ H
RE
S
ON ALT
V
B ! B !
OA D
B ! GLADESVILLE
B !
ST
ING
ET
B !
D OA
HENLEY LONG DAY CARE CENTRE
RT E
ER NT
R SP
E TR
EET
IA R B ICTOR V
E
IA R OR IC T
FO
T
G R EAT NORTH
EE
IVE DR E W IS MORTIME R L
! B !
T TR
WERRELL RESERVE
UDA PLA C
T
YS
S TREE
MURRAY-PRIOR RESERVE
E RE ST
HU
O ZR FIT
GE
AM LI IL
!
BATTERSEA PARK
OR
B !
W
B !
RR TE
PA R
AVENU E
EE
HENNEY COTTAGE RESERVE
K E LLY
HE
STREE T
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S C CO OV VE E
HENLEY RESERVE
E A CB
GE
PAR A JOLY
!
BEDLAM BAY PARRAMATTA RIVER REGIONAL PARK
F
CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE ST JOSEPH AGED CARE KING STREET
RIVERGLADE RESERVE
K NN
! \
MEDITATION PARK
B B ! !
G G
D
P
NT
B !
OA
CA
M
L EL
IV DR
CE
EE RO AD
VILLA MARIA RESERVE
! !
Y
" Ý
HEYDON PARK
CR ES
SAINT MALO RESERVE
R OAD
CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE ST ANNE'S AGED CARE
R
D
ET
M ARY D
M ANNING ROAD
GB DI
PUN T
IN
AR
!
" Ý
FIGT R
! \
E ROA D
WA
PE A RS O
ET
T N STR EE
D OA FR AR WH
PR
CE
W ED
E RB ST
B
T
FIG TREE PARK
L A DES VILL
T
B !
ET
B ! B !
S TR EE
T
DE
RE
G
! \
B !
G
RIC HM O ND
ST
GIANT STEPS SYDNEY B GLADESVILLE ? EE T HOSPITAL B R N O RT T COMMUNITY HEALTH O S N
BANJO PATERSON PARK
?
MA RT IN
ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE
T
T
SI NY
B ! B !
RN P LA CE
T
B !
TREET NS
E AV
E NU
EE
ST RE
N SU
LOOKING GLASS BAY PARK
T
TARBAN CREEK RESERVE
R ST
AD
!
C
!
ER
O
ST REE
LL HI
B
HARDING B MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND
AD
BA TA R
R AM IEN S
!
JOHN S TRE E
L IS
N
AS HB U
S
?
B B ! !
E
O
" Ý
ET
B !
ST REET
B ! H S HU UN N TT E ER R S H H II LL LL
E
IS ET
AN
ROA
R RE
RE
EE K
VILLA MARIA CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL
E NU
R ER
ST
ST
CR
REE T
S TR
O M
ON IT
B
N
A N
ET
RO
G G LL A AD DE ES SV V II LL LL E E
" Ý
MAR K
R E SE R VE
M
M TE BA
T
PA UL ST
AIL STRE A B IG ET
E AV
ST
POST OFFICE
DARRI RESERVE
BOYLA RESERVE
RN SH
S
T T REE
RE
BGLADESVILLE
GLADESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL
EE
B ! B !
! \!
LL II N N LL E EY Y P PO O II N N TT
REET JOUB ERT ST
L
IN SO
T
VEN U
S TA F F
EL
AK
T
S FL A G
® ! \! !
W
TR
F IN
CUNNINGHAMS REACH
AD RO
AD
T
CO
EE
NS
! \
ET
RB TA
EN
B !
?
M
R ST
UR
ST RE
T
C ES T
TRIM PLACE
Y
ST RE E
ST RE E
R
!
SS
SE
AU B
G
A AV ENUE
RO
C
B RO
AS
BO RONI
E
N
GLADESVILLE
E RE ST
M
LL IN
! \
! \
B !
ST JOHNS PARK
! \
RS
R
"! !Ý !
ET
D RY
TE
ER B AT B W TT B I P
AW
ET RE ST
RE
ST RE
IT
GLADESVILLE LIBRARY
G ROAD { n
ET
ST
MA
ES
D LA NE
B !
B ! CHRIST CHURCH " Ý
MI
BP ! B !
EA
GERAR
W
NU E
RD
BO NN E
TW
B !
ET
! \
B !
RY DE RO AD
N S TRE E
E
BGE RA RD ST RE ! ET
ST RE
RE
RA
GU ST INE
!
ON
ST
EV E
R ST REE
S TR B EET
LE O
AU
ST ISH RR
RIDG E
VA N
S
TR EE
CA M B
HE PBURN A VE
B B! ! AS T
RE
B
!
E ET
ET
PRIMARY SCHOOL
MS TR
AT ER RO AD
AD
T
RO
? QUEEN OF PEACE
GE
GATHO R OS PE
ELT H A
OUR LADY
" Ý
SA LT E
B !
o
0
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
DE
PA RA
CE
G A
G
G
B B! ! EET
E
NU
NU
S TR
B ! B NG ! A B B! ! ER
M
BO O
M IN TO AV EN
AV E RD FO EL MS CH
G
N UE
M LA R OCK AVE
G
G
ENUE BE TT S AV E AVE NU HAM
ING
G ROA D PA RK
SUT T O N
R
U E
T A ST RE ET
EET MOOCULTA STR
PINE AVE NUE
BE NNET T AV ENUE
E
TRE VAN ION STR
BARNSTAPL E LAN
T
G
EA S T ST RE ET
THOMP SO
G
EA VE
E U
E
GREAT NO
TO N S T REE T
! \
NU
ARL IN G
S TRE E
JERSEY LAN E
T S TRE E
N LA NE
ST REE T CROSS
ENUE
T
YO RK AV
ND ST RE ET
G
SCO TT
WE S T
ST REE T
¢
R S TREE
G
G
ROAD
NORTH GREAT
INNE S ST RE ET
UE N
¢¢
LAV E N DE
E
COURLA
TH E
G
¢
ROAD
NE
HAR RIS
E
G G
NU
ENU D AV
B ! B !
E AV
G
E AV
NIE L
AD K RO LIN ST E Y-W ROBSON PARK CI T
Y
AN
! B !
UE
T
CR
N AV E
E
B !
E
DOBROYD POINT B HA AB BE ER R FF II E E LL D D PUBLIC SCHOOL H
?
?
Education
Commercial and business space
G { n G " Ý
Aged care
Open space and recreation
Library
Industrial
Place of worship
B
LE RT
NU
259 B
O
ST RE E
ESS
ATA H
NA VE
B !
327
M
AR
DO
N
E RE ST
E
E AD AR DP Y O BR
338
ENU
LO U
W
C PRIN
Post office
T
E
® !
EE
ENU
DO
B B! !
Health
R
S AV
Other recreation
B ! B !
TIMBRELL PARK
HEN LEY MARINE DRIV E
E AV
! \
ST
NIELD PARK
HES
EET
VE RI LD
B !
Waterways State and regional roads Bus stop
R
E
271
DUC
STR
DUK
ARD
TIM B RE L
B !
B D ! A OB R!
B ! T
B ! !
UE
REG COADY RESERVE
WADIM BILL JEGOROW RESERVE
O
SO LI
339
E ET
! \
AD
CROKER PARK
B !
N
EE T S TR A LL HITT
LARKINS RESERVE
STR
E
W
HUR A RT
IC ECT
V EN UT A
O LY
N
E B !
?
REE T H ST
NE
B ! B B! !
! !
L OC UL CC
N
B !
ENU A AV S OT
LA
B LEA RUSSELL B PUBLIC SCHOOL
B ! B 257 ! BB ! !
T
CON
RO
Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister
MIN
B !
B !
DOMREMY
T
LA
S
S TR E ET
R RO OD DD D P PO O II N N TT
K RIC
255
? CATHOLIC G COLLEGE
RE E T ST
E ET
B ! B ! B B ! !
E ET
E E NU M U RR A L O NG AV
O K AVENUE A B RO HA RR
B B! !
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity Raised threshold treatment Proposed path
RA MS
B ! B !
UE
L EY
T
TR LE S
E TRE
FF II V VBE E DO OC CK K B D !
LIGH FA IR
EN T AV
TA IT
B ROBERTS ! B ! RESERVE
AS US T
B !
FIRS
HOW
EE STR
NOB
D
S AY
T
B B ! !
FIVE DOCK EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
RA M
ST RE E
B ! B ! B ! B !
! \
NUE
AD RO AY
C CR RO OY YD DO ON N
ABD
O!
B R ! TH
D AV E
FIVE DOCK PARK
A E RO
268
ET
FIVE DOCK
!
! \ ! \
!
B ! B !
266 265
288
T RE
SE CO N
!
BA PL NS T
STR
B ! B !
AD RO NS
MA N
QUEENS ROAD
E
® POST OFFICE ! B !
!!
BBA R
NOR
KINGS RO AD
n !B { " Ý
B !
B LYO B
AUG
RFIE LD ! ST RE ET B !
AD
LA N DD
279
" Ý
FIVE DOCK PUBLIC SCHOOL ? PRESCHOOL FIVE DOCK LIBRARY GA B
EET
! 250 B ! B !
AR
240
N
B ! B !
TH S HEA
FIVE DOCK PUBLIC SCHOOL
RO
O DR
S
ET
ET
M
T
D RO
RE
S
UE
S TLE S TRE E
B B! !
E AV
UE
RE EC AR CL
EN
BB ! !
ST
TR E
BB ! !
AV NY
T
OT ST R
B
!
UE
ES
N LE
TRE E ES S HARL
VEN NO N A
AT KIN
EET
E LM
E TRE ES S NEW CA
?
M
C
LE A
ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL T
ENUE
B ! B 238 !! !
HEN RY ST RE ET
DA L
E A AV
?
" Ý
LL ST R
DA
JA M
B ! B !
B !
GIL D
EE T Y S TR
M CK IN B ! B STOREY PARK ! B ! B 239 !
AV E MCGR ATH
B B236 ! !!
B !
B ! B !
UE AVE N
" Ý
E HAL L
MON S
RUS SE
TRE E T
ET
HALLIDAY PARK
F ERN
TA IT
G
RE MYALOR A S T
GA RT
LIE G
E
NE
T
B B ! !
ARK HEALTH CARE MURR AY S TR EET RUSSELL LEA
W AR EE MB
NU
GS KIRRA N
Y RO AD
E AV
LA STO N
E ST RE
ET
! B !
RS
W YM
ST RE CEC IL
ROWLE
T
O AD
15
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
341 B
TRE E T
O LM E R
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
BAY RO AD
NE
ET
R EE T D ST
EDENH
ST REE ORANTO
C B ! ® ! " Ý WAREEMBA CORALIE B ! POST OFFICE RESERVE
RDIA S
R OA D
R BY
S TRE
283
B ! B !
LA NCEL
W WA AR RE EE EM MB BA A
ALIE
IN AL
ET
335
PA RK VIEW
B HAM P B ! DEN RO ! AD BO UVA
C OR
EET ST RE
HIL L
PR
ENUE IN AV
RUSSELL PARK
" Ý
B ! B !
E
N
EA
1 B ! B ! B !
TR E LL S
DE RA PA
E IRE N
E V E NU ON A ES T
CR
B ! B !
!
REG
CURT
SCHOOL
ER
AV E LL NE AN
LYSAGHT PARK 14
G
E
K
SW
T
G
ENU NA AV
E ET
B ! ? B ABBOTSFORD "! Ý PUBLIC
B CA M P
N O ST WYM
WE R O
TY L
A STR OKOD
T EN SC
OR MO GLE N
ALLISON PARK
B ! !
CAMPBELL PARK
A AB BB BO O TT S S FF O OR RD D ENUE ND AV
ROAB D
N CE
K ST RE E
E
13
T
ET
E L AN
! !
ES CR
NS B UR
E RE ST
TRE NS S MAY N
B
B ! G! 6
G
WN D W AR D PA R ADE B B BL A CK WA LL P OINT
I
LB A
B B! !
7
C CH H II S SW W II C CK K
8 Y
ST A
B! B !
CHISWICK EARLY CHILDHOOD HEALTH CENTRE
BB BI
OPAL WINDWARD MANOR
SIB B IC
TR
EET
WS
NT
GO
G G
HENRY LAWSON PARK EET
Residential Tourism, eduction and community
o
! B ! 0
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
¢
W
YB
EN AL
H HU UN N TT LL E EY YS S P PO O II N N TT
PRINCE EDWARD RESERVE
FRANCIS STREET RESERVE
T INE
FE RN
V ENUE OA
S VE LE
ROA D
DRIV
!
A ROAD
FERN ROAD PARK
H HE EN N LL E EY Y
B
ST
L MA
E
UE YNE AV EN UMMO DR
UTZ RESERVE
M CA
GLADESVILLE BRIDGE MARINA
PULPIT POINT RESERVE
GE ID BR
! \
H HU UN N TT E ER RS S H H II LL LL
B B ! ! BOB SMITH
B !
RESERVE
MENZIES RESERVE
WR
B B! !
308
IG HT
LA NE
N RE W
IC K
G
RE ST ET
EE T
G
G
SALTON RESERVE
ET
B !
130
R PA
VI
IA OR CT
AD RO
ET
CONSTELLATION PLAYGROUND
! \ ! \ \ R RO O ZZ E E LL LL E E!
G
W
G G
! \
Other recreation
B !
Bus stop
ATE
! \
? Education Library Place of worship
! \
Commercial and business space Open space and recreation Residential Tourism, eduction and community
RF R
D ONT RIV
KING GEORGE PARK
E
LL II LL Y Y FF II E E LL D D
o
0
NORTH CR ES C
E NT
!
Ferry terminal
123
E IV DR
Post office
T
RY
) "
WATERFRONT DRIVE FIELDS
n { " Ý
CA
E RE
Y
DUNLOP RESERVE
RE
Other Proposed path State and regional roads
) "
EB
T
ST
F
Pedestrian refuge/Kerb blister
117
B ! B !
S RO
EE R ST
KING GEORGE PARK
NIELD PARK
) "
E AV
T EE
R RO OD DD D P PO O II N N TT
® !
K
E NU
136
271
LEGEND Study area Future Opportunity
346
ST GEORGES RESERVE
H UT
G
T
ET
RY
T EE
Y DA
RE ST
SO
G
RE R FE
R ST
T
T EN
ST
SA
EE
O RA
PEPPERCORN RESERVE
BRETT PARK
REET ST
G
GE
C
D DR RU UM MM MO OY YN NE E
B !
127
MONTAGUE PARK T
CR ES
ND
O
"? Ý
R
ES
XA
RM ET
A
ST
E AL
FO
T
ST
B !
ST MARK'S PRIMARY SCHOOL
E ER
KE AR
E
NM
R
T
M
E RE ST
RE ST
E TH
E
ET
RY
E RE ST
INE HENLE Y M A R
N
NU
" Ý
A TR
E
" Ý
DRUMMOYNE PUBLIC SCHOOL
ET
327
R ST
T
E AV
?
E RN HO AT
!
LL NE
SO
RE
E RE ST B
R BU
NT
ET
E
B ! T
EM E
E B TR ! S S
RE ST
CL
338
ET
TR
R
S
N
S
A ILL
E
ET
W RA
T
M
IN
E TR
EE
L UL
O HT UG O BR
AN
T
! !
WESLEY INSTITUTE FOR MINISTRY AND THE ARTS
TT
R ST
IN
ET
ST
?
RE
Y LE
Y AR
ST
N HE
ET
S
M
R RU US SS SE E LL LL LL E EA A
B LEA RUSSELL B PUBLIC SCHOOL
SO LI
E
T
NG
W ED
ET
G
RE
R
EE
ET
E RE ST
D UN
N
I LD
T
RE ST
E LL
ST
O
TR
RE ST
KE UN PL
ET
N LE
BB ! !
L TA L W HIT
AN
EE
BOURKE SQUARE
J
!
E S TR
M
S
NE B
?
W
B
P IP
LA
BO
R ST
PO
B ! !
B ! B B! !
B ! B !
B ! B !
CO
S ON
AD RO
G
TA IT
T
E
IT TA
R ST
E RE ST
LY
T
A
NE
D
ET RE
T
ET
E RE ST
B !!
AD
B !
RE
NU
E
OA
SL
RO
RG
B ! B ! B ! " Ý
B B ! !
B
ET
E AV
NU
NR
AT K IN
NS
312
" Ý
RE
RS
E AV
DE
321
ST
EA
NE
MP
DRUMMOYNE PARK
E RE ST
ET
RE
G
R BY
B ! HA
DD
T EE
ST
E
RE ST ST
O
15
BU
TR
H
N
ET
{! n
ER AT
W RO ET
O G IN
O
RUSSELL PARK
RE ST
DRUMMOYNE POST OFFICE
!!! B ® !
B
W
M
PS
AY BR
" Ý
LIBRARY
S AY
M N DE
M
HE
DE PAR A
O LY
B DRUMMOYNE B
B
O TH
BILL FISHER 344 RESERVE
! \
I ER STRE ET
!
UG
DRUMMOYNE OVAL
NA P
B
RO
!
CO
DS
B !
B DRUMMOYNE PARK 310
332
OO
B !
BO RL
309
TAPLIN PARK
GW
E
IN LL
D
B !
MA
W
CO
A RO
RE ST EB N UR
S E LEY STRE E T
D
!
ET
!
BO ST
OA
B
! \
309 311
W OL
SR RIA TO VIC
B !
F !
ST
PLACE
AD RO
ORIA V ICT
50 100 Metres
1
3
5
2
4
6
7
200
Appendix F – Prioritisation of proposed pedestrian infrastucture
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 127
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
Issue Type
21
Rhodes
Northern approach
Wide crossing location across Concord Road
116
Drummoyne
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Lyons Road / Victoria Road intersection
Eastern approach
77
Concord
No kerb ramp due to constraint with significant services, along with poor footpath quality. Wide crossing location
78
Concord
79
Concord
219
Concord
Gipps Street, adjacent to East of Loftus Street Concord Oval
142
Drummoyne
Thompson Street, north Western side of Polding Street
228
Concord
20
Rhodes
220
Concord
221
Concord
222
Concord
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection Gipps Street
80
Concord
Concord Road
126
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
28
Concord West Hospital Road
73
North Strathfield
94
Concord
224
Concord
225
Concord
227
Concord
229
Concord
230
Concord
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Wide crossing point Consider opportunity to construct a new Pedestrian bridge pedestrian bridge across TfNSW
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
TBC
5
8
10
5
15
10
5
10
10
5
83
1
Poor intersection design
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
TBC
10
8
10
1
15
8
8
10
5
5
80
2
Wide crossing point Install pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
10
8
10
10
15
5
0
8
8
3
77
3
Wide crossing location
Wide crossing point Install pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
10
8
10
10
15
5
0
8
8
3
77
3
Kerb ramps not aligned to designated crossing area. Conflict between driveway and pedestrian crossing area
Wide crossing point New kerb ramps (x2)
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
10
8
10
10
15
5
0
8
8
3
77
3
Priority
High
Clermont Avenue / Eastern approach Concord Road Davidson Avenue / Eastern approach Concord Road Station Street / Concord Eastern approach Road
New kerb ramps
High High High
High Stairs Poor quality stairs (condition), trip hazard. Non‐standard DDA requirements (e.g. handrail an slope of stairs). Vegetation could also cause slip hazard No kerb ramps or other crossing Pedestrian Refuge facilities on south side of roundabout.
Upgrade Stairs (around 60 steps)
Stairs
PAMP
60
0
Council
TBC
10
10
10
10
15
5
0
10
0
5
75
6
Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) blisters and (x2) kerb ramps
Pedestrian Refuge, kerb blisters and kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
10
10
10
1
8
10
0
10
10
5
74
7
Northern side
No bus stop landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
8
10
8
10
15
5
0
8
5
5
74
7
Northern approach
Narrow kerb ramp for available crossing Kerb ramps and location where higher pedestrian activity may occur Narrow path to bus stop Narrow footpath
Widen kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
10
5
15
5
5
10
5
5
73
9
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
10
10
10
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
73
9
Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide Narrow footpath on approach to bus stop No bus stop landing pad No bus landing pad
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
30
Council
6,750
10
10
10
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
73
9
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
10
10
10
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
73
9
No tactile paving at bus stop
Install TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
500
10
8
10
8
15
5
0
8
5
3
72
13
Construct accessible path
Footpath
Footpath
0
60
Council
13,500
10
10
10
3
8
5
0
10
10
5
71
14
No poor quality bus Widen footpath shelter
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
8
10
10
5
8
5
0
10
8
5
69
15
Poor intersection design
Relocate traffic signal pole
Relocate traffic signal pole
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
TBC
10
8
10
10
15
5
0
8
0
3
69
15
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps and line marking upgrade. Relocate traffic signal pole if possible.
Kerb ramps
PAMP
3
0
Council
20,000
10
8
10
1
15
5
0
10
5
5
69
15
Kerb ramps
Upgrade kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
8
10
8
10
10
5
0
8
5
5
69
15
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
8
10
8
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
69
15
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
8
10
8
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
69
15
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
8
10
8
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
69
15
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
90
Council
20,250
8
10
8
10
15
5
0
8
0
5
69
15
High
High No bus landing pad
High
Southern side
High High
West of Loftus Street, southern side Opposite Concord Community Centre, southern side Eastern side bus stop, Concord Road at Homedale Avenue Netween St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street
High
High TGSIs
High No accessible path linking between St Missing link Georges Crescent and Roseby Street. Treatment ‐ Construct accessible path.
High
19
Rhodes
22
Rhodes
Northern side, at bus stop Temporary shelter at COVID‐19 test (opposite Concord Hospital) centre, narrow path and waiting area at bus stop Eastern side Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area
Concord Road / Wellbank Street intersection Wellbank Street / Majors All approaches Bay Road
Moreton Street / Burwood Road Gipps Street, west of Burwood Road Gipps Street Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street Gipps Street, east of David Street Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Blaxland Road
Eastern side Western side West of Landsdown Street, southern side Northern side Northern side Eastern approach
Medium
Medium Kerb ramps poorly aligned to the designated path of travel. Pole located within pedestrian crossing area. Poor quality pavement (on northwest corner). Kerb ramp appears to be steep and poor quality Poor quality and narrow approx. 900 mm wide Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and poor quality Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards Kerb ramp not aligned with crossing direction
Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Kerb ramps
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
10
5
15
5
5
8
5
5
68
23
Signage
New signs
Signage
PAMP
2
0
Council
600
10
8
10
5
8
5
0
10
5
5
66
24
Medium At wombat crossing At wombat crossing
Missing hump and recommended speed warning signs Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage Missing crossing location between train station and retail on northern side of Victoria Avenue ‐ pedestrian desire line observed at this location.
Medium
29
Concord West Hospital Road
Signage / line marking Missing link
61
Concord West Victoria Avenue / Queen Eastern approach Street intersection
223
Concord
Burwood Road
125
Drummoyne
Victoria Road, north of Roseby Street
208
Concord
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
Southern side
209
Concord
Southern side
210
Concord
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road Crane Street, east of Burwood Road Crane Street east of Burwood Road
Overgrown vegetation Shared path conflicts with pinch point at Bus shelter bus stop. Degradation of line marking for shared path. Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide near Narrow footpath school with trip hazard and drop off edges No landing pad at bus stop No bus landing pad
Southern side
Missing children sign
New signs and "piano key" line marking
Signage / line marking
PAMP
2
0
Council
1,100
8
10
10
5
8
5
0
10
5
5
66
24
No upgrade proposed, as other crossing N/A location is available at Queen Street. New crossing at this location would require changes to streetscape.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
8
10
5
8
8
0
8
8
3
66
24
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
8
10
10
10
10
5
0
8
0
5
66
24
Review as part of the Bike Plan.
Bus shelter
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
TBC
5
10
8
1
15
8
0
8
5
5
65
28
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
90
Council
20,250
5
10
10
1
8
10
0
8
8
5
65
28
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
10
10
1
8
10
0
8
8
5
65
28
Install signage
Signage
PAMP
1
0
Council
300
5
10
10
1
8
10
0
8
8
5
65
28
Medium
Medium
211
Concord
11/05/2021
South of Burton Street, eastern side Eastern side
Overgrown vegetation
Medium
Medium
Medium Medium
Signage
Medium Northern side
Missing pedestrian link to bus stop
Missing link
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
5
0
3,000
5
10
10
1
8
10
0
8
8
5
65
28 Medium
110
City of Canada Bay PAMP
PAMP ID Suburb
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
Stuart Street
Parents arrive from around 2.40 pm to Parking / traffic pick up children and double park for the issues entire length of Stuart Street and Consett Street for extended periods. This creates a safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles, as through vehicle traffic travel in opposing traffic lane when passing parked vehicles. Vehicle and pedestrian conflicted noted. Missing part of tactile paving
69
Concord West Stuart Street
297
Drummoyne
298
Drummoyne
334
Wareemba
338
Russell Lea
32
Concord West Hospital Road / Concord Eastern approach Road intersection
33
Concord West Currawang Street / Concord Road intersection Concord West Concord Road
Lyons Road west of Gipps northern side Street Lyons Road east of more northern side street Great North Road, north Western side of Edenholme Road
Issue Type
TGSIs
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Other Work with school to identify opportunities to manage student pick up / drop off activities. This could include a Green Travel Plan encourage students to walk, ride or take public transport to school.
Other
0
0
Council / TBC school
5
10
10
5
8
10
0
8
5
3
64
33
Tactile Paving
TGSIs
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
500
5
8
10
1
15
8
0
8
5
3
63
34
Upgrade drainage grate
Services
Footpath
1
0
Council
1,000
5
8
10
1
15
8
0
8
5
3
63
34
New TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
4
0
Council
2,000
8
8
10
1
15
5
0
8
5
3
63
34
Install pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
5
10
10
1
8
8
0
10
8
3
63
34
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
TBC
5
10
8
5
15
5
0
8
5
1
62
38
Priority
Medium Medium
Large grate within footpath ‐ risk of trip Trip hazard hazard No TGSIs at pedestrian Refuge TGSIs
Medium
Medium Brent Street
North of Whittle Street
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing Pedestrian refuge road to/from school. Kerb ramps Kerb ramp not aligned to designated path of travel. Poor quality pavement. Kerb ramps across Concord Road are also non‐standard and should be upgraded at the same time. Cost for upgrade to be confirmed, with traffic signal post relocations.
Medium
Medium
34
Eastern approach
Tactile paving not correctly aligned to designated path of travel
Kerb ramps
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
8
5
15
5
0
8
5
1
62
38
Western side, north of Hospital Road Eastern approach
Overgrown grass narrowing path near school Kerb ramps direct pedestrians into roundabout circulation lane
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
10
8
5
15
5
0
8
5
1
62
38
Medium Medium Kerb ramps and kerb blister upgrade
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
8
8
10
5
8
10
0
5
5
3
62
38
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and Narrow footpath poor quality Unused pole creating a pinch point Signage No bus landing pad No bus landing pad
Re‐locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
8
10
8
10
8
5
0
8
0
5
62
38
Remove pole Install bus stop pad
Signage Bus stop landing pad
PAMP PAMP
1 1
0 0
Council Council
300 8,400
10 5
8 10
10 8
5 1
8 15
5 5
0 0
10 8
0 8
5 1
61 61
43 43
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
10
8
1
15
5
0
8
8
1
61
43
Kerb ramps Kerb ramps not provided to access wombat crossing facility from Links Avenue. Existing kerb ramp not aligned for safe passage of pedestrians
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
10
5
3
61
43
Sothern side
Restricted access for mobility impaired Missing link and people with prams between Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf to local residential and adjacent bus services. No lighting evident with dense vegetation, which provides limited passive surveillance.
Consider opportunity to construct ramps Other or lifts to access Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf from Henley Marine Drive, through Bridge Street Wharf Reserve. Improve street lighting and surveillance.
PAMP
0
1
TfNSW
TBC
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
10
3
60
47
Thompson Street
Northern approach
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
5
10
10
1
8
10
0
8
5
3
60
47
Concord
Trafalgar Parade / Majors Bay Road intersection
Western side
Pedestrian Refuge Install new pedestrian Refuge, (x2) Poor kerb ramp alignment into blisters and (x2) kerb ramps roundabout. No cut‐out through traffic island. Pedestrian crossing Upgrade pedestrian crossing and new Poor alignment of kerb ramps and kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2) tactile paving and missing TGSIs. Zebra crossing is not straight.
1
0
Council
64,600
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
5
60
47
147
Concord
Southern approach
Missing tactile paving. TGSIs provided at TGSIs other crossings in the area.
New TGSIs
2
0
Council
1,000
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
5
60
47
310
Drummoyne
Davidson Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
PAMP Upgrade pedestrian crossing (x1) and new kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2) TGSIs PAMP
across road
Missing link
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
Kerb build out (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
8
10
1
15
5
0
8
5
3
60
47
311
Drummoyne
Opportunity top kerb build out linking Drummoyne oval to access path on opposite side of road Missing link between bus stop and Drummoyne Oval
Missing link
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
50,000
5
8
10
1
15
5
0
8
5
3
60
47
56
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street
South side
New pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
28,600
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
10
1
59
53
66
Concord West Stuart Street
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
59
53
67
Concord West Stuart Street
New signs and "piano key" line marking
Signage / line marking
PAMP
2
0
Council
1,100
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
59
53
68
Concord West Stuart Street
Northern side, near St Ambrose Catholic Primary School Wombat crossing at St Ambrose Catholic Primary School Both sides of street
Narrow footpath (around 800 mm wide) Narrow footpath near school both sides of road
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
300
Council
67,500
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
59
53
74
Concord
Cumming Avenue
Western side
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
400
Council
90,000
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
59
53
76
Concord
Cumming Avenue
Eastern side
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
59
53
335
Wareemba
Edenholme Road / Great Eastern approach North Road intersection
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
8
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
59
53
336
Wareemba
Coranto Street / Great Eastern side North Road intersection
Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
8
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
59
53
340
Concord
Cabarita Road / Frederick Eastern side Street
Kerb Ramp non compliant
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
8
8
10
1
8
8
0
8
5
3
59
53
65
Concord West Stuart Street / Queen Street intersection
226
Concord
23 35
Rhodes Blaxland Road Concord West Concord Road
36
Concord West Concord Road
75
Concord
Cumming Avenue
South of Gipps Street, western side At bus stop Western side, at bus stop opposite Merville Street Eastern side, at bus stop at Merville Street Western side
123
Drummoyne
Henley Marine Drive
141
Drummoyne
146
Lansdowne Street
Poor intersection design
Medium Medium Medium Medium
No bus landing pad
Medium
Medium
Medium
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
Pedestrian Refuge, kerb blisters and kerb ramps
Medium
Medium
Medium
eastern side (south of bus stop
Medium
Medium Wide crossing point New pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps Missing crossing infrastructure, at (x2) crossing point on desire line access to Concord Hospital Footpath narrow (around 900 mm) near Narrow footpath Widen footpath school crossing
Medium
Medium Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage
Signage / line marking
Medium
Medium Medium Medium
Medium
Medium
11/05/2021
Medium
210
City of Canada Bay PAMP
PAMP ID Suburb
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Install bus stop pad and widen footpath
Bus stop pad and widen footpath
PAMP
1
10
Council
10,350
5
10
8
5
8
5
0
8
8
1
58
62
31
Concord West Hospital Road
Northern side at bus stop ID: No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow No bus landing pad 213817, Nullawarra Avenue footpath.
93
Concord
Wellbank Street
Northern side, at Majors Lane
Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment and improve sight visibility across Majors Lane
Driveway
Continuous footpath treatment
Continuous footpath treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
58
62
95
Concord
Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
58
62
96
Concord
Kerb ramp not aligned to the line of travel
Kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
58
62
97
Concord
Churchill Crescent / Wellbank Street intersection Wellbank Street
North side, west of Majors Bay Road Northern side
Northern side, adjacent to library
Kerd ramp not positioned appropriately Kerb ramps to provide access to parked vehicle (in middle of space rather than rear of space). Not compliant with AS2890.5
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
7,500
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
58
62
98
Concord
Wellbank Street
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
58
62
99
Concord
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
58
62
196
Concord
Wellbank Street / Churchill Crescent Brewer Street / Spring Street
Northern side, adjacent to library Northern side
Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian Wide crossing point Install kerb blister (x2) and kerb raps (x2) Kerb blisters and kerb crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / ramps central splitter island
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
58
62
299
Drummoyne
Lyons Road east of more northern side street
Access to property is required to drive Obstruction in path Remove obstruction on walkway. Car park on walkway area
Enforcement
PAMP
1
0
Council
N/A
5
8
10
1
15
8
0
8
0
3
58
62
300
Drummoyne
Cometrowe Street
Eastern side
Missing link on eastern side from Lyons Missing link Road to Drummoyne Park. "Goat track" indicating use by pedestrians
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
300
Council
150,000
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
58
62
301
Drummoyne
Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street
northern and eastern sides
Missing link for accessible path of travel Missing link between Crometrowe Street accessible parking to foreshore walk
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
200
Council
45,000
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
58
62
52
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
8
1
57
73
Priority
Medium
Medium Medium
Medium
Medium Medium Medium Southern side
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium Western side, north of Iadra No bus landing pad Street Western side, north of No bus landing pad Nirranda Street At wombat crossing Raised crossing missing repeated pedestrian legs sign, no "piano key" line marking on ramp and no tactile paving opposite church facility
53
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
60
Concord West Victoria Avenue
62
Concord West Queen Street
South of Victoria Avenue
145
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
206
Concord
207
Concord
No bus landing pad
Medium No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
8
1
57
73
Signage / line marking
Upgrade signage / line marking and install TGSIs
Upgrade signage / line PAMP marking and install TGSIs
2
0
Council
1,100
8
8
10
5
8
5
0
10
0
3
57
73
Missing and damaged tactile paving
TGSIs
Upgrade TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
2
0
Council
1,000
8
8
10
5
8
5
0
10
0
3
57
73
Western side
Damaged pavement and bollard
Bollard
Upgrade bollard
Upgrade bollard
PAMP
1
0
Council
300
10
8
10
1
10
5
0
8
0
5
57
73
Crane Street / St Lukes Park on street carpark
North of main carpark entrance
No identification of change in alignment Line marking of footpath direction which currently leads to directly into car park spaces.
Install line marking
Line marking
PAMP
0
20
Council
500
5
5
10
1
8
10
0
8
5
5
57
73
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park Crane Street ‐ link to Corby Avenue Crane Street
Carpark entrance
Missing footpath link across car park entry Missing link to bus stop
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
10
1
8
10
0
8
5
5
57
73
Medium
Medium Medium
Medium
Medium
233
Concord
Western side
234
Concord
117
Drummoyne
30
Concord West Hospital Road
59 63
Concord West Concord Road / Victoria Eastern side Avenue Concord West Queen Street North of Victoria Avenue
84
Concord
Wellbank Street
133
Drummoyne
134
Drummoyne
172
Cabarita
Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Therry Street / Thompson Street intersection Cabarita Park Path
191
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
282
Abbotsford
283
Abbotsford
Missing link
Medium Missing link
Install new footpath
New footpath
Install footpath, pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2)
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
10
1
10
5
0
8
10
3
57
73
New footpath, pedestrian Footpath / PAMP refuge and kerb ramps (x2)
2
150
Council
62,350
5
5
10
1
10
5
0
8
10
3
57
73
Relocate the stairs and provide kerb ramp.
Relocate the stairs and provide kerb ramp.
PAMP
1
0
0
TBC
5
8
8
1
8
8
0
5
10
3
56
82
Medium Westerns Side and link to Evelyn Street
Renwick Street / Roseby Northern approach Street intersection
Missing link between path and bus stop Missing link and park opposite. Will require ped facility to cross Crane Stet (pedestrian refuge). Also missing link to Evelyn Street. Poor alignment of kerb ramps Kerb ramps
Medium
Medium Narrow footpath s along hospital road between freemont Street and concord Road both sides. Currently around 800 mm wide Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area Tactile paving not aligned to direct pedestrians across driveway No tactile paving adjacent to shopping area Poor kerb ramp alignment into roundabout
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
10
8
5
8
5
0
8
5
1
55
83
Poor intersection design TGSIs
Relocate traffic signal pole
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
TBC
8
8
10
5
8
5
0
8
0
3
55
83
Upgrade TGSIs
Relocate traffic signal pole TGSIs
PAMP
4
0
Council
2,000
8
8
10
5
8
5
0
8
0
3
55
83
TGSIs
Install TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
500
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
Kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
55
83
0
Missing link from new kerb ramp on opposite side of road within driveway
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
55
83
Western side
Missing link from bus stop to nearby path that links to ferry wharf
Missing link
New footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
30
Council
6,750
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
10
3
55
83
Central median
Missing section of pedestrian fence in central median
Pedestrian fencing
Replace pedestrian fencing
Pedestrian fencing
PAMP
0
10
Council
4,000
8
8
10
1
10
5
0
8
0
5
55
83
Great North Road, north at wombat crossing of Reginal Street
Missing Tactile Paving
TGSIs
New TGSIs
TGSIs
Footpath
2
0
Council
1,000
5
8
10
1
10
8
0
5
5
3
55
83
Great North Road south across Great North Road of Irene street
Wide Crossing area
Pedestrian refuge
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2)
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
8
10
1
10
8
0
5
5
3
55
83
Both sides of street
Southern side, west of Majors Bay Road Southwest corner
Medium Medium Medium Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
11/05/2021
Medium
310
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
296
Abbotsford
Great North Road south near Teviot Avenue of Ferry Wharf
313
Drummoyne
314
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Victoria Road Lyons Road west of Formosa Street Lyons Road / College Street intersection Edwin Street / College Street Edwin Street / Formosa Street Barnstaple Road
315
Drummoyne
329
Drummoyne
330
Drummoyne
339
Rodd Point
24
Rhodes
48
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue / Currawang Street
49
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street Concord West Moala Street / Nullawarra Avenue intersection Concord West Nullawarra Avenue / Nirranda Street intersection Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
Location
Southern side Southern side
Description of Issue
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Missing link between footpaths from ferry to footpath at bus stop. Pedestrians required to walking in roundabout to link between bus and ferry Narrow Area behind bus shelter with trip hazard Missing part of tactile paving
Missing link
Narrow footpath
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Provide footpath adjacent to playground New footpath and kerb to provide safer route of travel ramps (x2)
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
8
3
55
83
Widen footpath and remove trip hazard behind bus stop Tactile Paving
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
5
Council
1,125
5
8
8
1
15
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
TGSIs
PAMP
1
0
TfNSW
500
5
8
8
1
15
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
Priority
Medium
TGSIs
Medium Medium
Southern side
Road Surface
Resurface roadway
Road Surface
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
5
8
8
1
15
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
Eastern side
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
4
0
Council
7,200
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
Western side
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
10
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
55
83
East of McCulloch Street
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing Pedestrian refuge road to/from school Narrow and poor quality footpath to Narrow footpath crossing
Install pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
5
10
10
1
8
8
0
5
5
3
55
83
New footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
10
8
8
5
8
5
0
5
0
5
54
100
Medium Low
Medium Medium Medium
Concord Road / Blaxland Southwest corned Road intersection
Kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
4
0
Council
7,200
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
Eastern side
Kerb ramps not aligned with the intended path of travel and missing kerb ramp Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
Western side
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
Western side
Missing kerb ramp, kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
Western side, south of Nirranda Street Western side
Narrow footpath approx. 700 mm wide Narrow footpath
Remove pram ramp. Undesirable crossing location. Refuge to the south should be used Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
100
0
Council
0
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
Concord West Quandong Place / Nullawarra Avenue Five Dock Great North Road, north Eastern Side of Harrabrook Avenue
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
5
1
54
100
Low
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
15
5
5
5
5
3
54
100
Low
253
Five Dock
Great North Road, north Eastern Side of Murralong Avenue
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
15
5
5
5
5
3
54
100
Low
337
Five Dock
Charles Street / Great Eastern side North Road intersection
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Road Surface
Resurface roadway
Road Surface
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
8
8
8
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
54
100
Low
1
Abbotsford
Great North Road
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
53
110
Low
Drummoyne
Bibby Street
Provide pedestrian refuge between bus stops and retail development New footpath and kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
14
Between Hampden Road and Wide crossing location with no Pedestrian refuge Brickleigh Street pedestrian facilities Missing link Western side Missing link of footpath between pedestrian refuge and Byrne Ave. Goat track noted on western side indicating high pedestrian use, which is also adjacent to car parking. Note no link to pedestrian refuge and parking on the eastern side.
New footpath and kerb ramps
Footpath
2
100
Council
26,100
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
10
1
53
110
Low
15
Drummoyne
The Parade
Between Gears Avenue and Missing link between existing footpath Missing link Byrne Avenue at Gears Avenue, existing pedestrian crossing and Byrne Avenue.
New footpath and kerb ramps
New footpath and kerb ramps
Footpath
2
70
Council
19,350
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
10
1
53
110
Low
91
Concord
Wellbank Street / Bent Street intersection
Northern side
Kerb ramp not aligned with designated Kerb ramps path of travel
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
10
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
53
110
Low
124
Drummoyne
Roseby Street / Victoria Road intersection
Eastern side
0
100
Council
22,500
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
53
110
Low
Concord
Brewer Street
West of Shipham Street
Consider opportunity to widen footpath Widen footpath and improve pedestrian amenity along Roseby Street to the bus stop at Victoria Road. Wombat crossing Install wombat crossing
Footpath
232
Other issue Potential opportunity to improve streetscape amenity linking between bus stop and Birkenhead Point Shopping Centre. Potential opportunity to modify existing Pedestrian crossing pedestrian crossing to raised wombat crossing to slow traffic. Note on bus route ‐ lower profile required
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
53
110
Low
235
Five Dock
247
Five Dock
279
Five Dock
Lyons Road, wrest of Northern side Great North Road Garfield Street, west of Northern side Great North Road Barnstaple Road / Jersey Northern side Lane
25
Rhodes
50
54
55 57 252
Western side
Deteriorating TGSIs at Loading dock, lack of visibility Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway.
Overgrown vegetation TGSIs Intersection
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
8
8
10
1
10
5
0
8
0
3
53
110
Low
TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
3
0
Council
1,500
5
8
10
1
8
8
0
5
5
3
53
110
Low
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
5
8
10
1
8
8
0
5
5
3
53
110
Low
Install continuous footpath treatment at Continuous footpath driveway treatment
Within McIlwaine Park, near public toilets Kokoda Track Memorial 0 Walkway Concord West Killoola Street / Concord Western approach Road intersection
Water ponding in front of kerb ramp to Obstruction in path shared path Insufficient footpath width from shared Obstruction in path space at DDA parking Kerb ramp not aligned with intended Kerb ramps path of travel
Re‐grade turning area and improve Other drainage Remove bollards and resurface footpath Footpath upgrade
PAMP
0
20
Council
75,000
8
8
8
5
8
5
0
5
0
5
52
119
Low
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
8
8
8
5
8
5
0
5
0
5
52
119
Low
Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
5
1
15
5
0
5
5
1
52
119
Low
64
Concord West Queen Street
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
8
8
10
5
8
5
0
5
0
3
52
119
Low
70
North Strathfield
Shipley Avenue / Queen Eastern side Street intersection
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath Kerb ramps not aligned in the designated path of travel
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
5
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
52
119
Low
71
North Strathfield North Strathfield Concord
Queen Street
26 41
72 144
Concord Road
Overgrown vegetation
Rhodes
11/05/2021
Wellbank Street Majors Bay Road / Gallipoli Street intersection
South of Victoria Avenue
Western side, south of Wellbank Street Southern side, west of Concord Road Southern approach
Overgrown vegetation Kerb ramps
Missing kerb ramp at rear of accessible Kerb ramps parking space No bus landing pad No bus landing pad Pedestrian refuge Poor alignment of kerb ramps and narrow gap in spitter island approx. 900 mm wide
New kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
8
5
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
52
119
Low
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
8
5
5
8
5
0
8
5
3
52
119
Low
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2)
Pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
28,600
5
8
5
1
10
5
0
5
8
5
52
119
Low
410
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
158
Mortlake
Mortlake Street / Brays Road
Southern approach
182
Concord
Noble Street
183
Concord
Lancelot Street
Southern side, adjacent to Mortlake Public School Southern side, adjacent to Mortlake Public School
Pedestrian refuge Potential restriction for mobility scooters due to handrails, poor alignment of kerb ramps, missing kerb ramps Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide Narrow footpath adjacent to school Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath trip hazards on approach to school
263
Five dock
First Avenue / Park Road intersection Great North Road north of Altona Street Great North Road north of Altona Street Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Northern side
Poor alignment of kerb ramp
287
Abbotsford
288
Abbotsford
292
Abbotsford
293
Abbotsford
294
Abbotsford
295
Abbotsford
326
Russell Lea
327
Russell Lea
328
Russell Lea
7
Chiswick
8
Chiswick
13
Issue Type
Kerb ramps
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
0
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and new kerb ramps (x2)
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and new kerb ramps (x2)
0
1
Council
26,800
5
8
10
1
8
5
5
5
0
5
52
119
Low
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
70
Council
15,750
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Western side
Missing Tactile Paving
TGSIs
New TGSIs
TGSIs
Footpath
2
0
Council
1,000
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Western side
Non standard seating
Seating
Public seating
PAMP
1
0
Council
3,000
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Western side
Trip off edge of pavement
Narrow footpath
Upgrade public seating and amenity for pedestrians. Relay footpath
Footpath upgrade
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
at Ferry Wharf
Restricted access between ferry and bus Other issue for mobility impaired or people with prams Large grate within footpath ‐ risk of trip Trip hazard hazard No tactile paving on stairs Stairs
Consider opportunity to construct DDA compliant ramp or lifts to access ferry wharf from Great North Road Upgrade drainage grate
New DDA compliant ramp PAMP or lift
1
0
TfNSW
TBC
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Services
Footpath
15
0
Council
7,500
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Upgrade Stairs
Stairs
PAMP
5
0
Council
2,000
5
8
10
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Missing kerb ramps and wide rossing point. No bus stop landing pad
Pedestrian refuge
Install pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps Pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
2
0
Council
28,600
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Pedestrians directed into roundabout circulation lane. Kerb ramps not aligned. No pedestrian crossing facilities (kerb ramps) between high density residential to the north and recreational parks to the south Kerb ramps not aligned and directed into roundabout circulation lane
Poor intersection design
Kerb ramps
Great North Road south at Ferry Wharf of Ferry Wharf Great North Road south near Teviot Avenue of Ferry Wharf Brent Street / Seebrook Western Side Avenue intersection Brent Street / Henry Marine Drive Brent Street opposite Undine Street Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street intersection Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street
Northern side
Drummoyne
Bibby Street/Scannell Avenue intersection
Northern approach
103
Drummoyne
Kerb ramps not aligned
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street / Wrights Road Wolseley Street
Northern side
104 120
Drummoyne
Renwick Street / Park Avenue intersection
Southern side, near St Georges Crescent Northern approach
Traffic sign post located in narrow path. Obstruction in path Relocate pole Relocate pole Footpath obstruction. Poor alignment of kerb ramps. Potential Kerb ramps Remove kerb ramps on the western side Remove kerb ramps opportunity for pedestrian refuges of the intersection. It is noted that a new pedestrian refuge is currently being constructed on the eastern side of the intersection to assist pedestrians crossing Park Avenue.
154
Concord
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection
Western side
Missing link to bus stop, no path or kerb Missing link ramps provided, evidence of pedestrian use by warn vegetation ("goat track"). No bus stop landing at school bus stop
306
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
across road
37
Concord West Concord Road
42
Concord West Killoola Street
43
Concord West Queen Street
44
Western Side Eastern and western approaches Southern approach
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Poor intersection design
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
52
119
Low
Re‐locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Re‐locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters.
Kerb ramps (x4) and kerb PAMP blister (x4) upgrade
4
0
Council
47,200
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
1
51
140
Low
Kerb ramps and kerb blister upgrade
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
1
51
140
Low
Re‐locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Realign kerb ramps
Kerb ramps (x2) and kerb PAMP blister upgrade (x2)
2
0
Council
23,600
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
8
1
51
140
Low
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
51
140
Low
Footpath
1
0
Council
TBC
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
51
140
Low
Remove kerb ramps
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
8
1
8
8
0
5
5
3
51
140
Low
New footpath, new bus PAMP New footpath to bus stop, new bus landing pad and kerb blisters x2 and kerb landing pad, kerb blisters ramps (x2) on Majors Bay Road, south of (x2) and kerb ramps (x2) Archer Street
2
10
Council
34,250
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
10
5
51
140
Low
New narrow footpath approx. 900 mm Missing link wide does not link to nearby paths.
Extend path 90m around into The Esplanade and provide pram ramps (x2)
Footpath
Footpath
2
90
Council
40,250
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
51
140
Low
0
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
8
1
15
5
0
5
0
1
50
148
Low
Western side, north of Concord West School Western side, opposite Concord West School
Narrow path (around 800 mm wide)
Overgrown vegetation Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
50
148
Low
Narrow footpath Narrow path opposite school approx. 800 mm wide with additional narrowing by grass opposite crossing
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
150
Council
33,750
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
50
148
Low
Concord West Wallaroy Street / Queen Northern side Street intersection
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide near Narrow footpath school
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
25
Council
5,625
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
50
148
Low
45
Concord West Wallaroy Street / Queen Southern side Street intersection
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with Narrow footpath cracking near school
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
50
148
Low
46
Southern side
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with Narrow footpath grass father narrowing
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
15
Council
3,375
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
50
148
Low
82
Concord West Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection Concord Wellbank Street
Eastern side of Macnamara Avenue
Install new pedestrian refuge to improve Pedestrian refuge access to bus stops and Central Park.
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
50
148
Low
137
Drummoyne
Market Street / Thompson Street intersection
Western side
Install Give Way line along western side of footpath
Line marking
PAMP
1
0
Council
500
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
140
Drummoyne
Western approach
Install kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
167
Cabarita
Plunkett Street / Thompson Street Cabarita Park Path
No pedestrian crossing facilities across Wide crossing point Wellbank Street to access bus stops and Central Park Intersection Unclear priority for pedestrians and vehicles. Potential improvements to continuous footpath treatment across laneway. Missing kerb ramps Kerb ramps
168
Cabarita
169
Cabarita
170
Cabarita
11/05/2021
Kerb ramps
Missing "no parking" (to left) sign and No signage "no stopping" sign (to right) at kiss and ride area Cabarita Park Path Near ferry wharf car park Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing Other issue (legs) signs Cabarita Park, access Pedestrian crossing, south of Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing Other issue road south of ferry wharf car park entrance (legs) signs
New signage
Signage
PAMP
2
0
Council
600
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
New signage
Signage
PAMP
2
0
Council
600
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
New signage
Signage
PAMP
2
0
Council
600
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Cabarita Park entry
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
3
0
Council
5,400
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Near ferry wharf
Cabarita Park entry
Missing kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
510
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
171
Cabarita Cabarita
Cabarita Road, south of Cabarita Park entry Cabarita Park Path
Western side
175
Trip hazard with drop off at edges of Trip hazard narrow path Lack of wayfinding signage on link from No signage bus / ferry to public pool, to encourage access by public transport.
Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove Widen footpath trip hazard Signage New wayfinding signage
177
Mortlake
178
Mortlake
257
Rodd Point
261
Rodd Point
262
Rodd Point
280
Five Dock
281
Five Dock
286
Abbotsford
Tennyson Road / Macdonald Street Tennyson Road / Orchards Avenue intersection First Avenue/Arthur Street First Avenue/Arthur Street intersection First Avenue west of Heath Street Great North Road, north of Halley Street Great North Road
0
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
PAMP
6
0
Council
1,800
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
Northern approach
Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Eastern approach
Informal splitter island blocks pedestrian path of travel
Upgrade splitter island to facilitate pedestrian crossing area
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Eastern approach
Poor alignment into roundabout Kerb ramps circulation lane. Reposition kerb ramps
Upgrade to refuge island and replace kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
7,500
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Northern side
Road Surface
Resurface roadway
Road Surface
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Northern side
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Western side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
8
1
10
8
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Western side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
8
1
10
8
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Western side
Wide Crossing distance
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
8
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Poor intersection design
47
Great North Road / Altona Street Abbotsford Great North Road north of Altona Street Abbotsford Great North Road south of The Terrace Abbotsford Great North Road south of The Terrace Drummoyne Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
51
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
58
Concord West Nullawarra Avenue
143
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Patterson Street (bus stop ID: 213736)
149
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Correys Avenue
Western side
No bus landing pad.
156
Concord
Brays Road, east of Majors Bay Road
Northern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath several trip hazards near school
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
280
Council
63,000
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
49
175
Low
318
Drummoyne
Lyons Road west of Thompson Street
Southern side
Narrow footpath width (approx. 1.1m) if Narrow footpath permitted outdoor dining is in action
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
10
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
49
175
Low
319
Drummoyne
Southern side
Damaged tactile paving
TGSIs
Tactile Paving
TGSIs
PAMP
1
0
Council
500
5
5
10
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
49
175
Low
2
Abbotsford
Eastern side
Kerb ramps not aligned and non‐ standard refuge
Kerb ramps
Upgrade kerb ramps and upgrade pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge and x2 PAMP kerb ramps
2
0
Council
50,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
1
48
183
Low
9
Chiswick
Northern side
Kerb ramps not aligned to pedestrian desire line
Kerb ramps
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
1
48
183
Low
10
Chiswick
Lyons Road / Janet Street intersection Blackwall Point Road / Great North Road intersection Bortfield Drive / Blackwall Point Road intersection Bortfield Drive
11
Chiswick
Bortfield Drive
12
Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road
92
Concord
Wellbank Street
114
Drummoyne
Lyons Road / Collingwood Street
127
Drummoyne
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection
Eastern side
148
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Davidson Avenue
180
Mortlake
181
Mortlake
289 290 291 312
Western side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
8
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Western side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
8
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Western side
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
50
148
Low
Northern side
Warn grass indicating use from pedestrian desire line Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath Exposed services pit
Missing link
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
25
Council
5,625
5
8
8
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
50
148
Low
Western side, north of Carrawang Street Western side
Overgrown Trim vegetation vegetation Obstruction in path New services lid
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
0
1
49
175
Low
Services lid
Footpath
1
0
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
0
1
49
175
Low
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath No bus landing pad
Overgrown vegetation No bus landing pad
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Service provider Council
500
Eastern side, opposite Nirranda Street Western side
200
5
10
10
5
8
5
0
5
0
1
49
175
Low
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
Bus landing pad
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
8
5
49
175
Low
No bus landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
0
1
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
8
5
49
175
Low
Narrow footpath (approx. 1.1 m) with Overgrown Trim vegetation Trim vegetation vegetation narrowing vegetation Bollards in centre of narrow footpath. Obstruction in path Remove bollards and resurface footpath Footpath upgrade Insufficient width for prams wheelchairs etc. to pass At bus stop, southern side Near bus stop Overgrown Trim vegetation Trim vegetation adjacent to Riverview Street vegetation
Southern side
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
1
48
183
Low
Southern side
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
1
48
183
Low
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
8
5
1
48
183
Low
Footpath
0
35
Council
7,875
10
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
48
183
Low
Northern side, west of Bent Narrow footpath (around 800 mm Street wide) 0 No wayfinding signage between ferry wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street.
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Signage
Install wayfinding signage between ferry Signage wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street.
PAMP
6
0
Council
1,800
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
48
183
Low
Kerb ramp directs pedestrians into circulation lane of roundabout
Poor intersection design
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
48
183
Low
Western side
Trip hazard with drop off at edges of narrow path
Trip hazard
Re‐locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle Kerb ramps and kerb blister upgrade circulation area and upgrade kerb blisters. Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove Widen footpath trip hazard
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
8
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
0
5
48
183
Low
Eastern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide on approach to school Vegetation obstructing access along footpath Poor visibility between end of shared path and road adjacent when vehicle turning into driveway Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard Missing end of shared path signage and directing cyclists off footpath area
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
0
22,500
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
48
183
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
360
0
81,000
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
48
183
Low
264
Five Dock
303
Drummoyne
Gale Street, north of Brays Road Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Barnstaple Road east of Waterview Street Taplin Park Car Park
304
Drummoyne
Taplin Park Car Park
entry to car park
305
Drummoyne
Taplin Park Car Park
entry to car park
307
Drummoyne
The Esplanade / Henricks Avenue intersection
northern side
11/05/2021
PAMP
Southern side Southern side entry to car park
Wide Crossing point
Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation
Footpath
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
48
183
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
48
183
Low
Other issue
Resurface roadway
Road quality
Road quality issue
0
20
Council
20,000
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
48
183
Low
Signage
Signage
Signage
PAMP
1
0
Council
300
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
48
183
Low
Kerb build out (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
48
183
Low
Wide Crossing Point Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
610
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
308
Drummoyne
The Esplanade / north of western side Henricks Avenue
309
Drummoyne
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
18
Rhodes
81
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway Concord West Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection Concord Wellbank Street
83
Concord
Wellbank Street
88
Concord
Wellbank Street
102
Drummoyne
135
Drummoyne
136
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street / Victoria Avenue intersection Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Tennyson Road, at raised pedestrian crossing
38
Location
Description of Issue
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
Shared path directed into road area. Evidence of people walking on vegetation grass to avoid walking on road. Vehicle parked on shared path area Missing link between bus stop and foreshore walk
Missing link
New footpath around turning head
New footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
8
8
3
48
183
Low
Missing link
New footpath
New footpath
Footpath
0
130
Council
29,250
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
48
183
Low
Missing tactile paving ‐ all other No TGSIs crossing locations have TGSIs Kerb ramps not aligned to the intended Kerb ramps path of travel
Install TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
2
0
Council
1,000
8
8
5
3
0
5
0
8
5
5
47
201
Low
Re‐align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
15
5
0
5
5
1
47
201
Low
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Missing link between kerb build out crossing facility at Ian Parade, section includes an on demand bus stop
Missing link
New footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
170
Council
38,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
10
3
47
201
Low
Eastern side
Missing sign directing to ferry wharf from bus stop and overbridge
No signage
Install directional signage
Signage
PAMP
2
0
TfNSW
600
5
5
5
1
15
5
0
8
0
3
47
201
Low
Eastern side
Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to Kerb ramps the Bay Run.
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps and re‐ configure Bay Run
PAMP
2
0
Council
75,000
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Western side
Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to Kerb ramps the Bay Run.
New kerb ramps and upgrade traffic island to refuge
Pedestrian refuge and Kerb ramps (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
50,000
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Northern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath Widen footpath trip hazard Replace TGSIs Tactile paving in poor condition, rubber TGSIs tactiles peeling back creating trip hazard On street ding area exceeds permitted Obstruction in path Enforcement of on street dining area area, which narrows footpath width
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
90
Council
20,250
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
47
201
Low
TGSIs
PAMP
0
2
Council
1,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
47
201
Low
Enforcement
PAMP
0
1
Council
N/A
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
47
201
Low
No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow No bus landing pad footpath.
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
8
3
47
201
Low
western side
0 Western approach
Southern side, opposite Central Park Southern side, opposite Concord Library Northern side, west of Ian Parade
157
Concord
162
Mortlake
163
Mortlake
Tennyson Road
Western side
186
Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Archers Street
Eastern side at bus stop
Both sides of street
197
Concord
202
Concord
Burwood Road / Wallace Western side Street Bayview Park Car Park West of ferry wharf
203
Concord
Bayview Park
South of ferry wharf
No accessible car space near ferry wharf Parking / traffic issues Opportunity for public seating Seating
245
Five Dock
Harris Road
North of Garfield Street
Pedestrian refuge is too small.
Pedestrian refuge
246
Five Dock
Southern side
Overgrown vegetation
254
Five Dock
Henry Street, east of Scott Street First Avenue, west of Wingham Avenue
At Wombat Crossing
Overgrown vegetation Signage / line marking
255
Five Dock
First Avenue / Ingham Avenue intersection
At intersection
First Avenue east of Ingham Avenue Mcculloch Street south of Whittall Street
Missing duplicate pedestrian Crossing ("legs") signs and Piano key line marking on ramp Missing kerb ramp western approach to Kerb ramps park, poor alignment on southern approach, no kerb ramps on eastern approach, poor alignment on northern approach No bus stop landing pad No bus landing pad
256
Five Dock
272
Russell Lea
273
Russell Lea
274
Obstruction in path Re‐grade turning area and improve drainage Provide accessible car space
Other
PAMP
0
20
Council
TBC
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Accessible Car Space
PAMP
1
0
Council
TBC
5
5
10
1
5
5
0
8
5
3
47
201
Low
Provide seating and amenity for pedestrians. Upgrade pedestian refuge or consider pedestrian crossing Trim vegetation
Public seating
PAMP
1
0
Council
3,000
5
5
10
1
5
5
0
8
5
3
47
201
Low
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
10
3
47
201
Low
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
Signage and Line marking
Signage / line marking
PAMP
2
0
Council
1,100
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps
PAMP
8
0
Council
75,000
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
Mcculloch Street north of eastern side Whittall Street
Missing link alongside of school
Missing link
Footpath boardwalk, subject to tree root Footpath investigations
Footpath
0
100
Council
100,000
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
Russell Lea
Mcculloch Street / Potter eastern side Street intersection
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
275
Russell Lea
Mcculloch Street / Potter northern approach Street intersection
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
276
Rodd Point
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
1
0
Council
1,800
5
10
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
284
Abbotsford
Mcculloch Street /The Western side Crescent Great North Road north Western side of Blackwell point road
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
285
Abbotsford
Overgrown Trim vegetation vegetation Obstruction in path Remove obstruction
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
8
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
47
201
Low
Drummoyne
Enforcement
PAMP
1
0
Council
N/A
5
5
8
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
317
Drummoyne
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath Car parked on footpath causing obstruction Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Trim vegetation
316
Great North Road, north Western side of Gow Street Lyons Road west of Southern side College Street Lyons Road / Thompson Southern side Street intersection
Road Surface
Resurface roadway
Road Surface
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
5
5
8
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
320
Five Dock
Overgrown vegetation Kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
8
1
15
5
0
5
0
3
47
201
Low
Concord
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath Missing kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
151
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
0
2
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
5
46
231
Low
153
Concord
Lyons Road opposite Southern side Sibbick Street Majors Bay Road / Links Western side Avenue Majors Bay Road Western side
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
0
2
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
5
46
231
Low
Concord
No kerb ramps at golf club access driveway Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Kerb ramps
190
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
15
Council
3,375
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
5
46
231
Low
331
Drummoyne
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
5
1
15
5
0
5
0
5
46
231
Low
11/05/2021
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Victoria Road south of Wolseley Street
Southern side
Water ponding in front of kerb ramp
New bus stop landing pad
eastern side
Eastern side Eastern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing
710
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
Location
85
Concord
Wellbank Street
100
Concord
Wellbank Street
105
Drummoyne
107
Drummoyne
Collingwood Street / Raglan Street Wolseley Street
112
Drummoyne
130
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
Southern side, west of No bus landing pad Warbrick Street Northern side at Central Park No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
45
235
Low
Eastern Side
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Southern side, west of Collingwood Street Lyons Road / St Georges 0 Crescent intersection
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Missing or non‐aligned kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
kerb ramps
PAMP
6
0
Council
10,800
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Drummoyne
Day Street / Sisters Crescent intersection
South‐western corner
Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian Wide crossing point Install kerb blister (x1) and kerb raps (x1) Kerb blisters and kerb ramps crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / central splitter island
PAMP
1
0
Council
11,800
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
45
235
Low
138
Drummoyne
Western side
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
139
Drummoyne
Western side
Overgrown vegetation and poor path quality
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
10
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
164
Mortlake
Broughton Street / Thompson Street intersection Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Mcdonald Street
Northern side
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
30
Council
6,750
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
165
Mortlake
Edwin Street
Both sides of street
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
40
Council
9,000
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
173
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
At Cabarita Point (marina)
Narrow footpath Widen footpath Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road. Narrow footpath Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Widen footpath Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road, both sides . Obstruction (garbage facility) in Obstruction in path Remove obstruction footpath between footpath and marina
Enforcement
PAMP
1
0
Council
N/A
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
174
Cabarita
Cabarita Park Path
0
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
8
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
45
235
Low
South west of ferry wharf
Overgrown vegetation and trip hazard Overgrown vegetation Missing link Opportunity to provide missing link between Norman Street to Nullawarre Avenue via majors bay reserve and playground and nearby paths
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
204
Concord
Bayview Park Path
231
Concord
Norman Street / Majors Northern side Bay Road intersection
240
Five Dock
Henry Street, east of East Northern side Street
248
Five Dock
249
Five Dock
250
Five Dock
Garfield Street, west of West Street Garfield Street, west of West Street Garfield Street / Harris Street intersection
251
Five Dock
302
Drummoyne
160
Mortlake
184
Concord
185
Concord
187
Northern side Northern side
Description of Issue
Kerb ramps not aligned and not enough space for landing at back of ramp. Potential kerb build out. Missing kerb ramps Vegetated garden bed restricts egress from rear bus door Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
8
1
5
5
0
8
5
3
45
235
Low
New footpath to link between Majors Bay New footpath Road / Norman Street intersection to playground and recreational footpath along Ron Routley Oval (Majors Bay Reserve) and link all the way to existing footpath in Nullawarra Avenue.
Footpath
0
600
Council
135,000
8
5
10
1
0
0
0
8
10
3
45
235
Low
Kerb ramps
Raised intersection treatment
Raised intersection treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
10,000
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Overgrown vegetation TGSIs
Remove Garden Bed
Remove Garden Bed
0
1
0
Council
1,800
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Remove TGSIs
New footpath
PAMP
0
3
Council
675
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Eastern approach
Intersection Wide Crossing Area. Opportunity to reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb build out or island and /or threshold on minor road to residential area. Note on bus route ‐ lower platform will be required
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
Garfield Street, west of West Street The Esplanade
Southern side
Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
TGSIs
Remove TGSIs
New footpath
PAMP
0
3
Council
675
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
45
235
Low
northern side
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
400
Council
90,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
8
5
3
45
235
Low
Tennyson Road / Gale Street intersection Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road
Western side
Moderately Narrow foreshore walking area (approx. 1.4m wide) adjacent to water Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Kerb ramps
PAMP
0
1
Council
1,800
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
5
44
255
Low
Eastern side
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
60
Council
13,500
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
44
255
Low
Eastern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath overgrown vegetation and trip hazards
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
90
Council
20,250
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
44
255
Low
Concord
Archer Street / Majors Bay Road intersection
Eastern approach
Damaged sign in pedestrian crossing area, no duplicate ped legs signs.
Signage
New signage
Signage
PAMP
3
0
Council
900
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
44
255
Low
188
Concord
Eastern approach
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
44
255
Low
189
Concord
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street Lyons Road
Eastern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath trip hazards Public seating in poor condition. Seating
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
5
3
44
255
Low
115
Drummoyne
118
Drummoyne
119
Drummoyne
121
Drummoyne
122
Drummoyne
16
Rhodes
166
Mortlake
179
Mortlake
192
Concord
11/05/2021
Renwick Street / Park Avenue Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street Renwick Street south of Park Avenue Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway Whittaker Street / Tennyson Road intersection Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
Southern side, east of Victoria Road Southern approach
Sign pole in the way of footpath
Northern side
Overgrown vegetation
Remove seat and reassess if replacement Public seating is required. Obstruction in path Relocate signage Relocate signage
PAMP
1
0
Council
3,000
5
8
8
1
8
0
0
5
5
3
43
261
Low
Footpath
1
0
0
500
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
43
261
Low
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
40
0
Council
8,000
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
43
261
Low
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
40
0
Council
8,000
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
43
261
Low
Trip hazard
Service lid
Footpath
1
0
Council
1,500
5
8
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
43
261
Low
Southern side
Overgrown vegetation
Eastern side
Drain with large grate openings
Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Trip hazard
0
Railing on pedestrian bridge broken
Hand rail
Replace wire railing
Handrail
PAMP
0
10
Council
1,500
8
8
5
3
0
5
0
8
0
5
42
266
Low
North of Whittaker Street
No kerb ramps provided to cross Tennyson Road and link to Breakfast Point walkway Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards No signs or line marking south of Greenlees Avenue to indicate shared path
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
120
Council
27,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Line marking and signage
Line marking and signage
Line marking and signage PAMP
2
200
Council
1,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Eastern side Southern side
810
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
Location
Description of Issue
Issue Type
193
Concord
Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
Across Greenlees Avenue
Wide pedestrian and cyclist crossing area across Greenlees Avenue
194
Concord
Wellbank Street / Greenlees Park
South of Wellbank Street adjacent to Greenlees Park
Missing line marking on shared path adjacent to tennis courts
Wide crossing point Potential opportunity reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb buildouts or central median refuge. Also opportunity for slowing vehicle on approach e.g. raised threshold Line marking Install line marking
195
Concord
Missing shared path signage
Signage
198
Concord
Brewer Street, east of Southern side Ellis Street Burwood Road, North of Western side. Bus stop ID La Mascotte Avenue 213729
No landing pad at bus stop
No bus landing pad
199
Concord
Northern side
200
Concord
201
Concord
205
Concord
Burwood Road east of Tremere Street Burwood Road east of Suke Street Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue (Pelican Quays) Bayview Park Path
212
Concord Concord
214
Concord
215
Concord
Burwood Road / Edith Avenue Burwood Road east of Ward Street Burwood Road east of Ward Street Burwood Road east of Ward Street
Eastern side
213
216
Concord
Northern side Northern side, Bus Stop ID 2137147 South west of ferry wharf
217
Concord
218
Concord
238
Five Dock
Burwood Road east of Southern side Duke Avenue Burwood Road east of Southern side; Bus Stop ID Marceau Drive 2137148 Burwood Road west of Southern side; Bus stop ID Bayview Park 21373 Lyonns Road / East Street Southern side
239
Five Dock
Lyons Road Ferns Lane
First Avenue east of Pricess Avenue First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive
258
Rodd Point
259
Rodd Point
260
Rodd Point
152
Concord
155
Concord
347
Concord
6
Chiswick
First Avenue west of Pricess Avenue Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue Brays Road / Majors Bay Road Zoeller Street, east of Sanders Street Blackwall Point Road
17
Rhodes
Mary Street
101
Concord
Wellbank Street
106
Drummoyne
Raglan Street
108
Drummoyne
Wolseley Street
109
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
110
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
111
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
Southern side
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
Kerb build out (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
23,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Line marking
PAMP
0
20
Council
500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Install signage
Signage
PAMP
1
0
Council
300
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Narrow footpath trip hazard Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and Narrow footpath trip hazards No landing pad at bus stop No bus landing pad
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
No evidence of shared path in operation Signage along foreshore except low level sign at western end. Narrow shared path
Review as part of the Bike Plan.
Review as part of the Bike PAMP Plan.
4
0
Council
N/A
5
5
5
1
5
5
0
8
5
3
42
266
Low
Other issue
Resurface roadway
Road quality
Road quality issue
0
20
Council
20,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
No bus landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Narrow path approx. 1m wide
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
30
Council
6,750
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
No landing pad at bus stop
No bus landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Trip hazard near Bus stop
No bus landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road Safety issue at driveway crossing. Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway.
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
5
5
8
1
10
5
0
5
0
3
42
266
Low
Intersection
Install continuous footpath treatment at Continuous footpath driveway treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
20,000
5
5
8
1
10
5
0
5
0
3
42
266
Low
Southern Side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Southern Side
Path available but not on pedestrian desire line to cross roundabout
Missing link
New footpath to access roundabout
New footpath
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Northern Side
No bus stop landing pad
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
5
3
42
266
Low
Western side
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm and poor condition Faded signs
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
50
Council
11,250
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
0
5
41
290
Low
Western side
signage
New signage
signage
Footpath
2
0
Council
600
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
0
5
41
290
Low
Northern side
Missing link to parkland
Missing link
PAMP
2
80
Council
19,200
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
1
40
292
Low
Southern side, adjacent to Alison Park 0
Missing link of footpath to kerb Missing link buildouts and Parkview Road Kerb ramps Location of the kerb ramp to DDA parking spaces is restricted by parked vehicle. Parking layout not compliant to AS2890.6 Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Service pole obstructing footpath Obstruction in path
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath plus 2 kerb travel ramps New footpath New footpath
Footpath
0
150
Council
33,750
5
5
5
1
8
0
0
5
10
1
40
292
Low
Upgrade DDA parking space to comply to Kerb ramps AS2890.6
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
8
8
5
3
0
5
0
8
0
3
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
8
0
3
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
reallocate pole
Relocate pole
Footpath
1
0
Council
TBC
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Northern side, east of Concord Road Western side Southern side, east of Wrights Road Western side, north of Napier Street Western side, north of Napier Street Western side, north of Napier Street Southern side, west of St Georges Crescent Southern approach
113
Drummoyne
Lyons Road
265
Five Dock
266
Five Dock
Barnstaple Road / Park Road Barnstaple Road adjacent Southern side to Five Dock Park
267
Five Dock
268
Rodd Point
269 270
Rodd Point Rodd Point
271
Rodd Point
321
Five Dock
11/05/2021
Treatment Type
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard Southern side, Bus Stop ID No landing pad at bus stop 213787 Southern side, Near Bus Stop Narrow path approx. 1m near bus stop ID 213787 Southern side Narrow footpath approx. 1m wide with vegetation overhang and trip hazard
Description of Proposed Treatment
Pole in walkway and poor pavement condition Wide crossing point
Obstruction in path Relocate pole
Relocate pole
Footpath
1
0
Council
TBC
5
8
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Wide crossing point Install central refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
25,000
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Missing link alongside of park
Missing link
Footpath
Footpath
0
350
Council
78,750
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Barnstaple Road, west or Southern side Arthur Street Barnstaple Road / Arthur Southern side Street intersection
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath Wide crossing point
Overgrown Trim vegetation vegetation Wide Crossing Point Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2)
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Kerb build out (x2)
PAMP
2
0
Council
30,000
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Barnstaple Road Barnstaple Road / Nield Avenue Barnstaple Road / Henley Marine Drive Ingham Avenue south of Lyons Road
Southern side Southern side
Missing link alongside of park Missing kerb ramp
Missing link Kerb ramps
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4) Kerb ramps
Footpath Kerb ramps
Footpath PAMP
0 2
100 0
Council Council
22,500 3,600
5 5
5 5
8 8
1 1
8 8
5 5
0 0
5 5
0 0
3 3
40 40
292 292
Low Low
Western approach and northern approach Eastern side
Missing kerb ramp and wide crossing points Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Pedestrian refuge
Unstall pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps Trim vegetation
Pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps Trim vegetation
PAMP
2
0
Council
100,000
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
8
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
40
292
Low
Overgrown vegetation
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4)
910
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Proposed Infrastructure Upgrades and Prioritisation
PAMP ID Suburb
Street / Intersection
341
Russell Lea
347
Concord
150
Concord
159
Mortlake
161
Mortlake
236
Five Dock
237
Five Dock
332
Abbotsford
Hampden Road, west of within proximity of bus stops No facility to assist pedestrians crossing Sibbick Street road along Hampden Road eg. near bus stop Zoeller Street, east of Northern side Missing link to parkland Sanders Street Links Avenue / Majors Western side Poor road pavement resulting in trip Bay Road intersection hazard for pedestrians when crossing the road. Gale Street, south of Western side Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with Tennyson Road trip hazard Tennyson Road / Emily Western side Pole narrows footpath to approx. 700 Street mm and trip hazard from pit lid and pole surrounds Lyons Road / Scott Street Southern side Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road Lyons Road /West Street Southern side Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road Great North Road north Eastern side Overgrown vegetation of Blackwall Point Road
346
Drummoyne
St Georges Crescent
86
Concord
Wellbank Street
87
Concord
Wellbank Street
Northern side., east of spring Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide Narrow footpath street connecting to shared path 0 Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) Narrow footpath and service pit hazard Formosa Street, north of Western side Trench drain with large grate openings Trip hazard Sisters Crescent Formosa Street / Day 0 Trip hazard Damaged service pit lid Street intersection Overgrown vegetation Overgrown Day Street, west of Sister Southern side Crescent vegetation Day Street / Tranmere Southeast corner Non DDA compliant ramp and poor Ramp Street pavement condition Eastern side Tennyson Road / Overgrown Overgrown vegetation Northcote Street vegetation intersection Henry Street / Scott Northern side Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment Kerb ramps Street intersection Henry Street, west of Northern side Car parked on footpath causing Obstruction in path Scott Street obstruction Henry Street, west of Northern side Car parked on footpath causing Obstruction in path Elizabeth Street obstruction Henry Street, near Both sides of street Cars parked on footpath causing Obstruction in path Elizabeth Street obstruction Barnstaple Road / Northern side Kerb ramp not aligned. Provide Central Poor intersection Dalmeny Avenue refuge design Barnstaple Road west of Northern side Vegetation obstructing access along Overgrown Dalmeny Avenue footpath vegetation Ingham Avenue / Lyons Link to Five Dock town Potential pedestrian link signage from Signage Road Centre Lyons Road to five dock town centre via Ingham Ave, Barnstaple Rd.
89
Concord
90
Concord
128
Drummoyne
129
Drummoyne
131
Drummoyne
132
Drummoyne
176
Mortlake
241
Five Dock
242
Five Dock
243
Five Dock
244
Five Dock
277
Rodd Point
278
Rodd Point
322
Five Dock
323
Five Dock
324
Five Dock
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Estimated Responsi Cost Range ble
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
Proximity to Future Road Generators/ Developmen Hierarchy Attractors t
Hazardous Area
Pedestrian Crashes
Demonstrate Addition to d Path existing facility
Ped Route Hierarchy
RMS Priority RMS Rank
Priority
Pedestrian refuge
Install pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
PAMP
1
0
Council
50,000
0
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
8
3
40
292
Low
Missing link
PAMP
2
80
Council
19,200
5
5
10
1
8
5
0
5
0
1
40
292
Low
Other issue
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath plus 2 kerb travel ramps Resurface roadway Road quality
Road quality issue
0
0
Council
20,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
39
311
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
280
Council
63,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
39
311
Low
Obstruction in path Widen footpath (local widening)
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
5
39
311
Low
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
0
3
39
311
Low
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
PAMP
1
0
Council
80,000
5
5
5
1
10
5
0
5
0
3
39
311
Low
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
15
0
0
5
0
3
39
311
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath travel Widen footpath Footpath
PAMP
0
70
Council
15,750
5
5
8
1
5
5
0
8
0
1
38
317
Low
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Widen footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
10
Council
2,250
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Wellbank Street
Widen footpath
Footpath
Footpath
0
20
Council
4,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Upgrade drainage grate
Services
Footpath
1
0
Council
2,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Replace service pit lid
Services
Footpath
1
0
Telstra
500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Upgrade ramp
PAMP
1
30
Council
8,550
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
Footpath upgrade and kerb ramps Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Russell Street/Sibbick Street intersection Lithgow Street south of Lyons Road Brent Street opposite Undine Street Blackwall Point Road east of Great North Road
Location
Description of Issue
Link to Rosebury Street Missing link to parkland Missing link through Salton Reserve Southern side, near Warbrick Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) Narrow footpath Street and service pit hazard Southern side, east of Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide Narrow footpath Warbrick Street between war Warbrick Street and briars
1
0
Council
N/A
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
1
0
Council
N/A
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Remove obstruction
Enforcement
PAMP
1
0
Council
N/A
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Signage
Signage
PAMP
10
0
Council
3,000
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
2
0
Council
3,600
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Enforcement
PAMP
1
0
Council
N/A
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Kerb ramps
Western side
Boat parked on footpath causing obstruction No bus stop landing pad
Obstruction in path Remove obstruction No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad
PAMP
1
0
Council
8,400
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Northern side
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
15
Council
3,375
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
3
37
318
Low
Western side
Missing link along residential properties Missing link
Eastern side, north of Concord Public School Southern side, near Queen Street Eastern side
Narrow path near school (around 800 mm wide) Narrow path (around 800 mm wide)
Missing link along residential properties Missing link
Warn grass / goat track evidence of pedestrian use Missing Link along side of park
Narrow path (approx. 1.1m) with vegetation overhang
Five Dock Abbotsford
344
Drummoyne
39
Concord West Queen Street
40
Concord West Killoola Street
343
Concord
27
Concord West Killoola Street
0
342
Abbotsford
Abbotsford Parade
southern side
3
Abbotsford
Blackwall Point Road, near Great North Road
Southern side
4
Abbotsford
5
Chiswick
Northern side Blackwall Point Road north side near Melrose Crescent Blackwall Point Road At bus stop, northern side adjacent to Alison Park
345
Chiswick
Eaton Place
Missing link along residential properties Missing link
11/05/2021
PAMP PAMP
Kerb ramps not aligned
325
Bayard Street, between Bertram Street and Bertram Lane
Enforcement Enforcement
Southern side
333
Dening street
Remove obstruction Remove obstruction
Western Side
East and west side
PAMP
2
100
Council
26,100
5
5
10
1
5
5
0
5
0
1
37
318
Low
Narrow footpath
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath plus 2 kerb travel ramps Widen footpath Widen footpath
Footpath
0
100
Council
22,500
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
1
35
339
Low
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
0
70
Council
15,750
5
5
5
1
8
5
0
5
0
1
35
339
Low
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath plus 2 kerb travel ramps
PAMP
2
100
Council
26,100
5
5
8
1
5
5
0
5
0
1
35
339
Low
Missing link
New footpath
Footpath
40
0
Council
72,000
5
5
5
1
0
0
0
5
10
1
32
342
Low
Missing link
Provide footpath adjacent to playground Footpath plus 2 kerb to provide safer route of travel ramps
PAMP
2
150
Council
32,850
5
0
10
1
5
5
0
5
0
1
32
342
Low
Pedestrian refuge across Parkview Road at Blackwell Point Road and upgrade footpath Upgrade footpath (widen footpath)
Pedestrian refuge / footpath
PAMP
1
90
Council
45,250
5
5
5
1
8
0
0
5
0
1
30
344
Low
Narrow footpath, uneven naturestrip
Narrow footpath and overgrown vegetation Narrow footath
Footpath
Footpath
0
70
Council
15,750
5
5
5
1
8
0
0
5
0
1
30
344
Low
Vegetation obstructing access to landing area
Overgrown vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Footpath
1
0
Council
200
5
5
5
1
8
0
0
5
0
1
30
344
Low
PAMP
2
400
Council
93,600
0
5
8
1
5
0
0
5
0
1
25
347
Low
Widen footpath
New footpath
Provide footpath to provide safer route of Footpath plus 2 kerb travel ramps
1010
Appendix G – Site audit findings and ranking of proposed upgrades
GHD | Report for City of Canada Bay– Canada Bay PAMP, 21/2539632 | 128
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
Street/Intersection
1 Abbotsford
Great North Road
2 Abbotsford
Blackwall Point Road / Great North Road intersection
3 Abbotsford
4 Abbotsford
5 Chiswick
6 Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road, near Great North Road
Location
Between Hampden Road and Brickleigh Street
Eastern side
Southern side
Blackwall Point Road north side near Melrose Crescent Northern side
Blackwall Point Road
At bus stop, northern side adjacent to Alison Park
Blackwall Point Road
Southern side, adjacent to Alison Park
Photograph
Description of Issue
Wide crossing location with no pedestrian facilities
Kerb ramps not aligned and non-standard refuge
Narrow path (approx. 1.1m) with vegetation overhang
Narrow footpath, uneven naturestrip
Vegetation obstructing access to landing area
Missing link of footpath to kerb buildouts and Parkview Road
Category
Pedestrian Refuge
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Footpath
Bus Stop
Footpath
Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Eastern and Street intersection western approaches
Pedestrians directed into roundabout circulation lane. Kerb ramps not aligned.
8 Chiswick
Blackwall Point Road/Bibby Street Southern approach
No pedestrian crossing facilities (kerb ramps) between high density residential to the north and recreational parks to the south Kerb ramps
9 Chiswick
Bortfield Drive / Blackwall Point Road intersection
7 Chiswick
10 Chiswick
11 Chiswick
11/05/2021
Bortfield Drive
Bortfield Drive
Northern side
Southern side
Southern side
Kerb ramps not aligned to pedestrian desire line
Narrow footpath (approx. 1.1 m) with vegetation narrowing
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Bollards in centre of narrow footpath. Insufficient width for prams wheelchairs etc. to pass Footpath
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Pedestrian refuge
Provide pedestrian refuge between bus stops and retail development
Kerb ramps
Upgrade kerb ramps and upgrade pedestrian refuge
Treatment Type
Pedestrian refuge
Upgrade footpath (widen footpath)
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
PAMP
Pedestrian refuge and x2 kerb ramps PAMP
Pedestrian refuge across Parkview Road at Blackwell Point Road and upgrade Pedestrian refuge / Narrow footpath and footpath overgrown vegetation footpath
Narrow footath
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
Trim vegetation
Footpath
New footpath
Poor intersection design
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle Kerb ramps (x4) and circulation area and kerb blister (x4) upgrade kerb blisters. upgrade
Kerb ramps
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and Kerb ramps and kerb upgrade kerb blisters. blister upgrade PAMP
Re-align kerb ramps
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Obstruction in path
Remove bollards and resurface footpath
Kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
Footpath upgrade
Distance (m)
1
2
1
Footpath
Missing link
Kerb ramps
New footpath
PAMP
Number of units
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Council
Council
90 Council
70 Council
1
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
150 Council
4
2
2
1
Council
Council
Council
Council
10 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
50,000
45,250
15,750
200
33,750
47,200
23,600
3,600
200
2,250
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Traffic Impact
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
10
10
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
8
5
0
0
0
10
8
8
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
53
110
48
183
30
344
30
344
30
344
40
292
51
140
51
140
48
183
48
183
48
183
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
139
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
12 Chiswick
13 Drummoyne
14 Drummoyne
15 Drummoyne
16 Rhodes
17 Rhodes
18 Rhodes
19 Rhodes
20 Rhodes
21 Rhodes
22 Rhodes
23 Rhodes
24 Rhodes
25 Rhodes
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Blackwall Point Road
Bibby Street/Scannell Avenue intersection
Location
At bus stop, southern side adjacent to Riverview Street
Photograph
Description of Issue
Near bus stop
Category
Footpath
Northern approach
Kerb ramps not aligned and directed into roundabout circulation lane
Bibby Street
Western side
Missing link of footpath between pedestrian refuge and Byrne Ave. Goat track noted on western side indicating high pedestrian use, which is also adjacent to car parking. Note no link to pedestrian refuge and parking on the eastern side. Footpath
The Parade
Between Gears Avenue and Byrne Avenue
Missing link between existing footpath at Gears Avenue, existing pedestrian crossing and Byrne Avenue.
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Railing on pedestrian bridge broken
Mary Street
Location of the kerb ramp to DDA parking spaces is restricted by parked vehicle. Parking layout not compliant to AS2890.6 Disabled Parking
Missing tactile paving - all other crossing locations have TGSIs
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Eastern approach
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Northern approach
Concord Road / Mary Street car park intersection Northern approach
Blaxland Road
Blaxland Road
At wombat crossing
At bus stop
Concord Road / Blaxland Road intersection
Southwest corned
Concord Road
Within McIlwaine Park, near public toilets
Kerb ramp not aligned with crossing direction
Narrow kerb ramp for available crossing and location where higher pedestrian activity may occur
Wide crossing location across Concord Road
Missing hump and recommended speed warning signs
Unused pole creating a pinch point
Narrow and poor quality footpath to crossing
Water ponding in front of kerb ramp to shared path
Hand rail
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Wide crossing point
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Signage
Footpath
Shared Path
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Poor intersection design
Missing link
Missing link
Treatment Type
Trim vegetation
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle Kerb ramps (x2) and circulation area and kerb blister upgrade upgrade kerb blisters. (x2)
New footpath and kerb New footpath and ramps kerb ramps
New footpath and kerb New footpath and ramps kerb ramps
Hand rail
Replace wire railing
Kerb ramps
Upgrade DDA parking space to comply to AS2890.6 Kerb ramps
No TGSIs
Kerb ramps
Install TGSIs
Re-align kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Widen kerb ramps
Wide crossing point
Consider opportunity to construct a new pedestrian bridge across TfNSW
Signage
Signage
Narrow footpath
Obstruction in path
New signs
Remove pole
New footpath
Handrail
TGSIs
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian bridge
Signage
Signage
Footpath
Re-grade turning area and improve drainage Other
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
2
2
2
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
100 Council
70 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
10 Council
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
Council
Council
Council
Council
TfNSW
Council
Council
20 Council
20 Council
200
23,600
26,100
19,350
1500
$
$
$
$
3,600
1,000
3,600
3,600
TBC
$
$
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
5
5
5
600
300
4,500
75,000
10
10
10
8
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
8
8
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
0
0
0
15
15
15
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
8
10
10
0
0
5
5
5
10
5
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
48
183
51
140
53
110
53
110
42
266
40
292
47
201
68
23
73
9
83
1
66
24
61
43
54
100
52
119
1
1
1
1
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
239
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
26 Rhodes
27 Concord West
28 Concord West
29 Concord West
30 Concord West
31 Concord West
32 Concord West
33 Concord West
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Killoola Street
Hospital Road
Hospital Road
Hospital Road
Hospital Road / Concord Road intersection
Description of Issue
Insufficient footpath width from shared space at DDA parking
Kokoda Track Memorial Walkway
Hospital Road
Photograph
Warn grass / goat track evidence of pedestrian use
Northern side, at bus stop (opposite Concord Hospital)
At wombat crossing
Both sides of street
Northern side at bus stop ID: 213817, Nullawarra Avenue
Eastern approach
Currawang Street / Concord Road intersection Eastern approach
Temporary shelter at COVID-19 test centre, narrow path and waiting area at bus stop
Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage
Narrow footpath s along hospital road between freemont Street and concord Road both sides. Currently around 800 mm wide
No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow footpath.
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Bus Stop
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Footpath
Bus Stop
Kerb ramp not aligned to designated path of travel. Poor quality pavement. Kerb ramps across Concord Road are also non-standard and should be upgraded at the same time. Cost for upgrade to be confirmed, with traffic signal post relocations. Kerb ramps
Tactile paving not correctly aligned to designated path of travel
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Obstruction in path
Missing link
No poor quality bus shelter
Description of Proposed Treatment
Remove bollards and resurface footpath
New footpath
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Footpath upgrade
New footpath
Widen footpath
New signs and "piano Signage / line marking Signage / line marking key" line marking
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Install bus stop pad and widen footpath
Re-align kerb ramps
Re-align kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Bus stop pad and widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
Footpath
10 Council
40
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Council
20 Council
2
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
100 Council
1
2
2
10 Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,250
72,000
4,500
1,100
22,500
10,350
TBC
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
8
5
8
8
5
5
5
3,600
5
8
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
5
10
10
8
8
8
8
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
0
8
8
8
8
15
15
Hazardous Area
5
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
10
10
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
10
8
5
5
8
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
52
119
32
342
69
15
66
24
55
83
58
62
62
38
62
38
5
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
339
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
34 Concord West
35 Concord West
36 Concord West
37 Concord West
38 Concord West
39 Concord West
40 Concord West
41 Concord West
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Concord Road
Concord Road
Concord Road
Location
Western side, north of Hospital Road
Western side, at bus stop opposite Merville Street
Eastern side, at bus stop at Merville Street
Concord Road
Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection
Queen Street
Killoola Street
Killoola Street / Concord Road intersection
Photograph
Description of Issue
Overgrown grass narrowing path near school
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Overgrown vegetation
Western approach
Eastern side, north of Concord Public School
Southern side, near Queen Street
Western approach
Kerb ramps not aligned to the intended path of travel
Narrow path near school (around 800 mm wide)
Narrow path (around 800 mm wide)
Kerb ramp not aligned with intended path of travel
Category
Footpath
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Overgrown vegetation
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Install bus stop pad
Install bus stop pad
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Re-align kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Realign kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Distance (m)
Footpath
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Trim vegetation
Number of units
Footpath
PAMP
100 Council
1
1
1
2
Footpath
Council
Council
Council
Council
100 Council
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
70 Council
1
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
22,500
8,400
8,400
200
3,600
22,500
15,750
1,800
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
15
15
15
15
15
8
8
15
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
8
8
0
5
0
0
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
62
38
61
43
61
43
50
148
47
201
35
339
35
339
52
119
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
439
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
42 Concord West
43 Concord West
44 Concord West
45 Concord West
46 Concord West
47 Concord West
48 Concord West
49 Concord West
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Killoola Street
Queen Street
Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection
Wallaroy Street / Queen Street intersection
Wallaroy Street / Concord Road intersection
Nullawarra Avenue
Nullawarra Avenue / Currawang Street
Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street
Location
Western side, north of Concord West School
Western side, opposite Concord West School
Northern side
Southern side
Southern side
Western side, north of Carrawang Street
Western side
Eastern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow path (around 800 mm wide)
Narrow path opposite school approx. 800 mm wide with additional narrowing by grass opposite crossing
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide near school
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with cracking near school
Narrow path approx. 800 mm wide with grass father narrowing
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath
Kerb ramps not aligned with the intended path of travel and missing kerb ramp
Missing kerb ramp
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
10 Council
Footpath
150 Council
Footpath
25 Council
Footpath
50 Council
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
15 Council
1
4
1
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,250
33,750
5,625
11,250
3,375
200
7,200
1,800
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
0
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
50
148
50
148
50
148
50
148
50
148
49
175
54
100
54
100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
539
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
50 Concord West
51 Concord West
52 Concord West
53 Concord West
54 Concord West
55 Concord West
56 Concord West
57 Concord West
58 Concord West
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Moala Street / Nullawarra Avenue intersection
Nullawarra Avenue
Nullawarra Avenue
Nullawarra Avenue
Location
Western side
Western side
Western side, north of Iadra Street
Western side, north of Nirranda Street
Nullawarra Avenue / Nirranda Street intersection Western side
Nullawarra Avenue
Nullawarra Avenue / Boronia Street
Quandong Place / Nullawarra Avenue
Nullawarra Avenue
Western side, south of Nirranda Street
South side
Western side
Eastern side, opposite Nirranda Street
Photograph
Description of Issue
Missing kerb ramp
Exposed services pit
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Missing kerb ramp, kerb ramps not aligned
Narrow footpath approx. 700 mm wide
Category
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Missing crossing infrastructure, at crossing point on desire line access to Concord Hospital Wide crossing point
Missing kerb ramp
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Issue Type
Kerb ramps
Obstruction in path
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Description of Proposed Treatment
New kerb ramp
New services lid
Install bus stop pad
Install bus stop pad
Treatment Type
Kerb ramps
Services lid
Widen footpath
Wide crossing point
New pedestrian New pedestrian refuge refuge and kerb ramps and kerb ramps (x2)
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Footpath
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Remove pram ramp. Undesirable crossing location. Refuge to the south should be used Kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
2
100
2
1
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Service provider
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,800
500
8,400
8,400
3,600
-
28,600
1,800
200
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
0
8
8
5
5
10
5
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
54
100
49
175
57
73
57
73
54
100
54
100
59
53
54
100
49
175
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
639
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
59 Concord West
60 Concord West
61 Concord West
62 Concord West
63 Concord West
64 Concord West
65 Concord West
66 Concord West
67 Concord West
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Concord Road / Victoria Avenue
Victoria Avenue
Victoria Avenue / Queen Street intersection
Queen Street
Queen Street
Queen Street
Location
Photograph
Description of Issue
Category
Eastern side
Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area
At wombat crossing
Raised crossing missing repeated pedestrian legs sign, no "piano key" line marking on ramp and no tactile paving Wombat Pedestrian opposite church facility Crossing
Eastern approach
Missing crossing location between train station and retail on northern side of Victoria Avenue - pedestrian desire line observed at this location.
South of Victoria Avenue
North of Victoria Avenue
South of Victoria Avenue
Stuart Street / Queen Street intersection Eastern approach
Stuart Street
Northern side, near St Ambrose Catholic Primary School
Stuart Street
Wombat crossing at St Ambrose Catholic Primary School
Missing and damaged tactile paving
Tactile paving not aligned to direct pedestrians across driveway
Overgrown vegetation blocking footpath
Intersection
Missing link
TGSIs
TGSIs
Footpath
Kerb ramps direct pedestrians into roundabout circulation lane Kerb ramps
Footpath narrow (around 900 mm) near school crossing
Raised platform notified with missing line marking or signage
Footpath
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Issue Type
Poor intersection design
Description of Proposed Treatment
TGSIs
Upgrade TGSIs
Upgrade TGSIs
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Poor intersection design
Narrow footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Relocate traffic signal Relocate traffic signal pole pole PAMP
Upgrade signage / line marking and install Signage / line marking TGSIs No upgrade proposed, as other crossing location is available at Queen Street. New crossing at this location would require changes to streetscape. Missing link
TGSIs
Treatment Type
Upgrade signage / line marking and install TGSIs
N/A
TGSIs
TGSIs
Trim vegetation
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and Kerb ramps and kerb upgrade kerb blisters. blister upgrade PAMP
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
New signs and "piano Signage / line marking Signage / line marking key" line marking
1
PAMP
N/A
Distance (m)
Council
N/A
2
4
1
2
Footpath
PAMP
TfNSW
2
N/A
Agency Responsible
N/A
Council
Council
Council
Council
50 Council
2
Council
Estimated Cost Range
TBC
$
$
$
$
$
$
Land Use Type
8
1,100
N/A
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
8
8
1,000
2,000
200
23,600
11,250
1,100
8
8
8
8
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
8
5
5
5
10
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
10
8
10
8
5
5
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
8
0
0
0
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
55
83
57
73
66
24
57
73
55
83
52
119
62
38
59
53
59
53
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
739
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
68 Concord West
69 Concord West
Street/Intersection
Stuart Street
Stuart Street
Shipley Avenue / Queen 70 North Strathfield Street intersection
71 North Strathfield Queen Street
72 North Strathfield Wellbank Street
Concord Road / Wellbank 73 North Strathfield Street intersection
74 Concord
75 Concord
76 Concord
11/05/2021
Cumming Avenue
Cumming Avenue
Cumming Avenue
Location
Both sides of street
Stuart Street
Eastern side
Western side, south of Wellbank Street
Southern side, west of Concord Road
Eastern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow footpath (around 800 mm wide) near school both sides of road
Category
Footpath
Parents arrive from around 2.40 pm to pick up children and double park for the entire length of Stuart Street and Consett Street for extended periods. This creates a safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles, as through vehicle traffic travel in opposing traffic lane when passing parked vehicles. Vehicle and pedestrian conflicted noted. Other
Kerb ramps not aligned in the designated path of travel
Missing kerb ramp at rear of accessible parking space
No bus landing pad
Traffic signal pole located in kerb ramp pedestrian crossing area
Kerb ramps
Disabled Parking
Bus Stop
Intersection
Western side
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school
Western side
Kerb ramps not provided to access wombat crossing facility from Links Avenue. Existing kerb ramp not aligned for safe passage of pedestrians Kerb ramps
Eastern side
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm) adjacent to school
Footpath
Footpath
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Work with school to identify opportunities to manage student pick up / drop off activities. This could include a Green Travel Plan encourage students to walk, ride or take public transport Other Parking / traffic issues to school.
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
No bus landing pad
Poor intersection design
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Narrow footpath
Re-align kerb ramps
New kerb ramp
Install bus stop pad
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
New kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Footpath
300 Council
Other
PAMP
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Footpath
Distance (m)
Footpath
Relocate traffic signal Relocate traffic signal pole pole PAMP
Widen footpath
Number of units
Footpath
Estimated Cost Range
$
67,500
Council / school TBC
2
1
1
1
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
TfNSW
400 Council
2
Council
100 Council
$
$
$
$
$
Land Use Type
5
5
3,600
1,800
8,400
TBC
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
5
5
5
10
90,000
3,600
22,500
5
5
5
10
10
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
15
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
0
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
59
53
64
33
52
119
52
119
52
119
69
15
59
53
61
43
59
53
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
839
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
77 Concord
78 Concord
79 Concord
80 Concord
81 Concord
82 Concord
83 Concord
84 Concord
85 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Clermont Avenue / Concord Road Eastern approach
Davidson Avenue / Concord Road Eastern approach
Station Street / Concord Road
Concord Road
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Eastern approach
Eastern side bus stop, Concord Road at Homedale Avenue
Southern side, opposite Central Park
Eastern side of Macnamara Avenue
Southern side, opposite Concord Library
Southern side, west of Majors Bay Road
Southern side, west of Warbrick Street
Photograph
Description of Issue
Wide crossing location
Wide crossing location
Kerb ramps not aligned to designated crossing area. Conflict between driveway and pedestrian crossing area
No tactile paving at bus stop
No bus landing pad
No pedestrian crossing facilities across Wellbank Street to access bus stops and Central Park
No bus landing pad
No tactile paving adjacent to shopping area
No bus landing pad
Category
Wide crossing point
Wide crossing point
Wide crossing point
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Wide crossing point
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Issue Type
Wide crossing point
Wide crossing point
Wide crossing point
TGSIs
Description of Proposed Treatment
Install pedestrian refuge
Install pedestrian refuge
New kerb ramps (x2)
Install TGSIs
Treatment Type
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
Kerb ramps
TGSIs
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Wide crossing point
Install new pedestrian refuge to improve access to bus stops and Central Park. Pedestrian refuge
No bus landing pad
TGSIs
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Install TGSIs
Install bus stop pad
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
TGSIs
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
TfNSW
Council
Council
Council
TfNSW
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
25,000
3,600
500
8,400
25,000
8,400
500
8,400
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
5
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
8
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
8
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
15
15
15
15
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
8
8
8
5
5
8
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
77
3
77
3
77
3
72
13
47
201
50
148
47
201
55
83
45
235
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
939
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
86 Concord
87 Concord
88 Concord
89 Concord
90 Concord
91 Concord
92 Concord
93 Concord
94 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Location
Southern side, near Warbrick Street
Southern side, east of Warbrick Street
Northern side, west of Ian Parade
Northern side., east of spring street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street / Majors Bay Road
Description of Issue
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) and service pit hazard
Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide between war Warbrick Street and briars
Northern side
Northern side, west of Bent Street
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Missing link between kerb build out crossing facility at Ian Parade, section includes an on demand bus stop Missing link
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide connecting to shared path
Narrow footpath (around 900 mm wide) and service pit hazard
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street / Bent Street intersection
Photograph
Kerb ramp not aligned with designated path of travel
Narrow footpath (around 800 mm wide)
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Northern side, at Majors Lane
Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment and improve sight visibility across Majors Lane
All approaches
Kerb ramps poorly aligned to the designated path of travel. Pole located within pedestrian crossing area. Poor quality pavement (on northwest corner). Kerb ramps
Driveway
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Missing link
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
New footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Driveway
Continuous footpath treatment
Continuous footpath treatment
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps and line marking upgrade. Relocate traffic signal pole if possible. Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
20 Council
Footpath
100 Council
Footpath
170 Council
Footpath
10 Council
Footpath
PAMP
20 Council
1
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
35 Council
1
3
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,500
22,500
38,250
2,250
4,500
1,800
7,875
20,000.00
20,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
10
0
0
5
0
8
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
37
318
47
201
37
318
37
318
53
110
48
183
58
62
69
15
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
1039
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
95 Concord
96 Concord
97 Concord
98 Concord
99 Concord
100 Concord
101 Concord
102 Drummoyne
103 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Wellbank Street
Location
North side, west of Majors Bay Road
Churchill Crescent / Wellbank Street intersection Northern side
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street / Churchill Crescent
Wellbank Street
Wellbank Street
Wolseley Street / Victoria Avenue intersection
Wolseley Street / Wrights Road
Northern side, adjacent to library
Northern side, adjacent to library
Northern side
Northern side at Central Park
Northern side, east of Concord Road
Eastern side
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramp not aligned to the line of travel
Category
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Kerd ramp not positioned appropriately to provide access to parked vehicle (in middle of space rather than rear of space). Not compliant with AS2890.5 Disabled Parking
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps not aligned
No bus landing pad
Overgrown vegetation
Missing sign directing to ferry wharf from bus stop and overbridge
Kerb ramps not aligned
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Bus Stop
Overgrown vegetation
Signage
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
No bus landing pad
Description of Proposed Treatment
Install bus stop pad
Realign kerb ramps
Realign kerb ramps
Install bus stop pad
Realign kerb ramps
Install bus stop pad
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
No signage
Kerb ramps
Install directional signage
Realign kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Trim vegetation
Signage
Kerb ramps
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
TfNSW
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,400
3,600
7,500
8,400
3,600
8,400
200
600
1,800
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
8
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
58
62
58
62
58
62
58
62
58
62
45
235
40
292
47
201
51
140
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1139
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
104 Drummoyne
105 Drummoyne
106 Drummoyne
107 Drummoyne
108 Drummoyne
109 Drummoyne
110 Drummoyne
111 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Wolseley Street
Location
Southern side, near St Georges Crescent
Collingwood Street / Raglan Street Eastern Side
Raglan Street
Wolseley Street
Wolseley Street
St Georges Crescent
St Georges Crescent
St Georges Crescent
Western side
Southern side, west of Collingwood Street
Southern side, east of Wrights Road
Western side, north of Napier Street
Western side, north of Napier Street
Western side, north of Napier Street
Photograph
Description of Issue
Traffic sign post located in narrow path. Footpath obstruction.
Missing kerb ramp
Overgrown vegetation
No bus landing pad
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Service pole obstructing footpath
Category
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Overgrown vegetation
Bus Stop
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Footpath
Issue Type
Obstruction in path
Kerb ramps
Description of Proposed Treatment
Relocate pole
New kerb ramps
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
No bus landing pad
Install bus stop pad
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Obstruction in path
reallocate pole
Treatment Type
Relocate pole
Kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Relocate pole
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
TBC
$
$
$
$
$
$
TBC
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
3,600
200
8,400
200
200
200
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
51
140
45
235
40
292
45
235
40
292
40
292
40
292
40
292
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1239
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
112 Drummoyne
113 Drummoyne
114 Drummoyne
115 Drummoyne
116 Drummoyne
117 Drummoyne
118 Drummoyne
119 Drummoyne
120 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Lyons Road / St Georges Crescent intersection
Lyons Road
Southern side, west of St Georges Crescent
Renwick Street / Park Avenue
Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street
Renwick Street / Park Avenue intersection
Pole in walkway and poor pavement condition
Category
Kerb ramps
Footpath
No wayfinding signage between ferry wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street. Signage
Southern side, east of Victoria Road
Lyons Road / Victoria Road intersection Eastern approach
Renwick Street / Roseby Street intersection
Description of Issue
Missing or non-aligned kerb ramps
Lyons Road / Collingwood Street
Lyons Road
Photograph
Northern approach
Southern approach
Northern side
Northern approach
Public seating in poor condition.
No kerb ramp due to constraint with significant services, along with poor footpath quality.
Poor alignment of kerb ramps
Sign pole in the way of footpath
Overgrown vegetation
Poor alignment of kerb ramps. Potential opportunity for pedestrian refuges
Seating
Intersection
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Kerb ramps
Description of Proposed Treatment
New kerb ramps
Treatment Type
kerb ramps
Obstruction in path
Relocate pole
Signage
Install wayfinding signage between ferry wharf and Drummoyne Town Centre area along Collingwood Street. Signage
Seating
Remove seat and reassess if replacement is required.
Relocate pole
Public seating
Poor intersection design
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Relocate the stairs Relocate the stairs and and provide kerb ramp. provide kerb ramp.
Obstruction in path
Relocate signage
Kerb ramps
Relocate signage
Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Remove kerb ramps on the western side of the intersection. It is noted that a new pedestrian refuge is currently being constructed on the eastern side of the intersection to assist pedestrians crossing Park Avenue. Remove kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Remove kerb ramps
Number of units
Distance (m)
6
1
6
1
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
1
2
$
10,800
TBC
$
$
1,800
3,000
TBC
$
Council
Council
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
10
TBC
1
40
Estimated Cost Range
5
500
8,000
3,600
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
8
8
10
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
15
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
0
8
8
5
5
8
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
0
5
5
5
10
0
0
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
45
235
40
292
48
183
43
261
80
2
56
82
43
261
43
261
51
140
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
1339
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
121 Drummoyne
122 Drummoyne
123 Drummoyne
124 Drummoyne
125 Drummoyne
126 Drummoyne
127 Drummoyne
128 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Park Avenue, west of Renwick Street
Renwick Street south of Park Avenue
Henley Marine Drive
Roseby Street / Victoria Road intersection
Victoria Road, north of Roseby Street
St Georges Crescent
Location
Southern side
Eastern side
Sothern side
Eastern side
Eastern side
Netween St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection Eastern side
Formosa Street, north of Sisters Crescent
Western side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Overgrown vegetation
Drain with large grate openings
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Restricted access for mobility impaired and people with prams between Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf to local residential and adjacent bus services. No lighting evident with dense vegetation, which provides limited passive surveillance. Other
Potential opportunity to improve streetscape amenity linking between bus stop and Birkenhead Point Shopping Centre. Other
Shared path conflicts with pinch point at bus stop. Degradation of line marking for shared path.
Shared Path
No accessible path linking between St Georges Crescent and Roseby Street. Treatment - Construct accessible path. Footpath
Kerb ramp directs pedestrians into circulation lane of roundabout
Trench drain with large grate openings
Intersection
Footpath
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Overgrown vegetation Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Trip hazard
Trip hazard
Missing link
Consider opportunity to construct ramps or lifts to access Birkenhead Point Ferry Wharf from Henley Marine Drive, through Bridge Street Wharf Reserve. Improve street lighting and surveillance. Other
Other issue
Consider opportunity to widen footpath and improve pedestrian amenity along Roseby Street to the bus stop at Victoria Road. Widen footpath
Bus shelter
Review as part of the Bike Plan.
Service lid
Bus shelter
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
Poor intersection design
Re-locate kerb ramps outside of vehicle circulation area and Kerb ramps and kerb upgrade kerb blisters. blister upgrade PAMP
Upgrade drainage grate
Services
40
1
Council
100 Council
1
Footpath
Footpath
Council
1 TfNSW
Footpath
Construct accessible path
Trip hazard
Distance (m)
PAMP
Missing link
Footpath
Number of units
Agency Responsible
TfNSW
60 Council
2
1
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
8,000
1,500
TBC
$
$
$
Land Use Type
5
5
5
22,500
TBC
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
5
5
13,500
23,600
2,500
10
5
5
8
8
10
10
10
10
5
5
8
8
10
8
8
10
8
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
15
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
8
8
8
10
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
10
5
5
10
8
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
43
261
43
261
60
47
53
110
65
28
71
14
48
183
37
318
3
3
3
3
5
5
3
3
1439
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
129 Drummoyne
130 Drummoyne
131 Drummoyne
132 Drummoyne
133 Drummoyne
134 Drummoyne
135 Drummoyne
136 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Formosa Street / Day Street intersection
Day Street / Sisters Crescent intersection
Day Street, west of Sister Crescent
Day Street / Tranmere Street
South-western corner
Southern side
Southeast corner
Therry Street / Thompson Street intersection
Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection
Description of Issue
Damaged service pit lid
Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Southwest corner
Henley Marine Drive / Thompson Street intersection
Photograph
Category
Footpath
Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / central splitter island Wide crossing point
Overgrown vegetation
Non DDA compliant ramp and poor pavement condition
Poor kerb ramp alignment into roundabout
Footpath
Ramp
Kerb ramps
Missing link from new kerb ramp on opposite side of road within driveway Kerb ramps
Eastern side
Western side
Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to the Bay Run.
Missing kerb ramps. Provides access to the Bay Run.
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Trip hazard
Wide crossing point
Description of Proposed Treatment
Replace service pit lid Services
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
Install kerb blister (x1) Kerb blisters and kerb ramps and kerb raps (x1) PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Ramp
Treatment Type
Upgrade ramp
Realign kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps and upgrade traffic island to refuge
Trim vegetation
Footpath
Footpath upgrade and kerb ramps PAMP
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
PAMP
New kerb ramps and re-configure Bay Run PAMP
Pedestrian refuge and Kerb ramps (x2) PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
Agency Responsible
Telstra
Council
Council
30 Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
500
11,800
200
8,550
3,600
1,800
75,000
50,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
8
8
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
8
0
0
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
45
235
37
318
37
318
55
83
55
83
47
201
47
201
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1539
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
137 Drummoyne
138 Drummoyne
139 Drummoyne
140 Drummoyne
141 Drummoyne
142 Drummoyne
143 Concord
Street/Intersection
Market Street / Thompson Street intersection
Broughton Street / Thompson Street intersection
Location
Western side
Western side
Thompson Street / Rawson Avenue intersection Western side
Plunkett Street / Thompson Street Western approach
Thompson Street
Thompson Street, north of Polding Street
Majors Bay Road, north of Patterson Street (bus stop ID: 213736)
Northern approach
Western side
Western side
144 Concord
Majors Bay Road / Gallipoli Street intersection Southern approach
145 Concord
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
146 Concord
147 Concord
11/05/2021
Trafalgar Parade / Majors Bay Road intersection
Davidson Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection
Western side
Western side
Southern approach
Photograph
Description of Issue
Unclear priority for pedestrians and vehicles. Potential improvements to continuous footpath treatment across laneway.
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation and poor path quality
Missing kerb ramps
Poor kerb ramp alignment into roundabout. No cut-out through traffic island.
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian Refuge
No kerb ramps or other crossing facilities on south side of roundabout. Pedestrian Refuge
No bus landing pad
Bus Stop
Poor alignment of kerb ramps and narrow gap in spitter island approx. 900 mm wide
Pedestrian Refuge
Damaged pavement and bollard
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Poor alignment of kerb ramps and tactile paving and missing TGSIs. Zebra crossing is not straight.
Zebra Pedestrian Crossing
Missing tactile paving. TGSIs provided at other crossings Wombat Pedestrian in the area. Crossing
Issue Type
Intersection
Description of Proposed Treatment
Install Give Way line along western side of footpath
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Treatment Type
Line marking
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Install kerb ramps
PAMP
Pedestrian Refuge
Install new pedestrian Pedestrian Refuge, Refuge, (x2) blisters kerb blisters and kerb and (x2) kerb ramps ramps PAMP
Pedestrian Refuge
Install new pedestrian Pedestrian Refuge, Refuge, (x2) blisters kerb blisters and kerb and (x2) kerb ramps ramps PAMP
No bus landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Bus stop landing pad Bus landing pad
Pedestrian refuge
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2)
Pedestrian refuge and provide new kerb ramps (x2) PAMP
Bollard
Upgrade bollard
Upgrade bollard
Pedestrian crossing
Upgrade pedestrian crossing and new kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2)
Upgrade pedestrian crossing (x1) and new kerb ramps (x2) and TGSIs (x2) PAMP
TGSIs
New TGSIs
TGSIs
PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Council
Council
Council
500.00
200
200
3,600
50,000
50,000
8,400
28,600
300
$
$
64,600
1,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
5
5
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
8
10
5
5
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
0
0
5
5
10
8
8
0
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
50
148
45
235
45
235
50
148
60
47
74
7
49
175
52
119
57
73
60
47
60
47
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
1639
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
148 Concord
149 Concord
150 Concord
151 Concord
152 Concord
153 Concord
154 Concord
155 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Majors Bay Road, north of Davidson Avenue
Majors Bay Road, north of Correys Avenue
Links Avenue / Majors Bay Road intersection
Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue
Majors Bay Road / Links Avenue
Majors Bay Road
Majors Bay Road / Archer Street intersection
Brays Road / Majors Bay Road
Location
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Trip hazard with drop off at edges of narrow path
No bus landing pad.
Poor road pavement resulting in trip hazard for pedestrians when crossing the road.
Missing kerb ramps
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm and poor condition
No kerb ramps at golf club access driveway
Missing link to bus stop, no path or kerb ramps provided, evidence of pedestrian use by warn vegetation ("goat track"). No bus stop landing at school bus stop
Faded signs
Category
Footpath
Bus Stop
Intersection
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Bus Stop
Shared Path
Issue Type
Trip hazard
No bus landing pad
Other issue
Kerb ramps
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard Widen footpath
New bus stop landing pad
Resurface roadway
New kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
New kerb ramps
Missing link
New footpath to bus stop, new bus landing pad and kerb blisters x2 and kerb ramps (x2) on Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
signage
Treatment Type
New signage
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
20 Council
Bus stop Bus stop landing pad landing pad
Road quality
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
signage
1 Council
Road quality issue
Council
PAMP
2 Council
Footpath
50 Council
PAMP
New footpath, new bus landing pad, kerb blisters (x2) and kerb ramps (x2) PAMP
Footpath
Agency Responsible
2 Council
2
2
10 Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,500
8,400
20,000
3,600
11,250
3,600
34,250
600
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
8
0
5
0
5
10
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
48
183
49
175
39
311
46
231
41
290
46
231
51
140
41
290
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1739
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
156 Concord
157 Concord
158 Mortlake
159 Mortlake
160 Mortlake
161 Mortlake
162 Mortlake
163 Mortlake
164 Mortlake
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Brays Road, east of Majors Bay Road Northern side
Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Northern side
Mortlake Street / Brays Road
Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road
Tennyson Road / Gale Street intersection
Tennyson Road / Emily Street
Tennyson Road, at raised pedestrian crossing
Tennyson Road
Mcdonald Street
Southern approach
Western side
Western side
Western side
Both sides of street
Western side
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with several trip hazards near school
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Category
Narrow footpath
Footpath
Potential restriction for mobility scooters due to handrails, poor alignment of kerb ramps, missing kerb ramps Pedestrian Refuge
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Missing kerb ramp
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Pole narrows footpath to approx. 700 mm and trip hazard from pit lid and pole surrounds Footpath
Tactile paving in poor condition, rubber tactiles peeling back creating trip hazard
On street ding area exceeds permitted area, which narrows footpath width
Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road.
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Obstruction in footpath
Footpath
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Pedestrian refuge
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
Obstruction in path
TGSIs
Obstruction in path
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath
New kerb ramp
Widen footpath (local widening)
Replace TGSIs
Enforcement of on street dining area
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and new kerb ramps (x2)
Upgrade pedestrian refuge and new kerb ramps (x2)
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
TGSIs
Enforcement
Widen footpath
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
Agency Responsible
280 Council
90 Council
1 Council
280 Council
1 Council
20 Council
2 Council
1 Council
30 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
63,000
20,250
26,800
63,000
1,800
4,500
1,000
N/A
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6,750
5
10
8
8
5
5
5
8
8
8
10
10
10
5
5
5
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
49
175
47
201
52
119
39
311
44
255
39
311
47
201
47
201
45
235
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
1839
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
165 Mortlake
166 Mortlake
167 Cabarita
168 Cabarita
169 Cabarita
170 Cabarita
171 Cabarita
172 Cabarita
173 Cabarita
174 Cabarita
175 Cabarita
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Edwin Street
Location
Both sides of street
Whittaker Street / Tennyson North of Whittaker Road intersection Street
Cabarita Park Path
Near ferry wharf
Cabarita Park Path
Near ferry wharf car park
Cabarita Park, access road south of ferry wharf
Pedestrian crossing, south of car park entrance
Cabarita Park entry
Cabarita Road, south of Cabarita Park entry
Cabarita Park entry
Western side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow path approx. 1m wide. Opportunity to widen path to create link between Hilly Street and Tennyson road, both sides .
Category
Footpath
No kerb ramps provided to cross Tennyson Road and link to Breakfast Point walkway Kerb ramps
Missing "no parking" (to left) sign and "no stopping" sign (to right) at kiss and ride area
Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing (legs) signs
Missing duplicate pedestrian crossing (legs) signs
Missing kerb ramps
Trip hazard with drop off at edges of narrow path
Signage
Zebra Pedestrian Crossing
Zebra Pedestrian Crossing
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Cabarita Park Path
Western side
Missing link from bus stop to nearby path that links to ferry wharf
Cabarita Park Path
At Cabarita Point (marina)
Obstruction (garbage facility) in footpath between footpath and marina Footpath
Cabarita Park Path
Cabarita Park Path
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide
Lack of wayfinding signage on link from bus / ferry to public pool, to encourage access by public transport.
Missing link
Footpath
Signage
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Kerb ramps
No signage
Other issue
Other issue
Kerb ramps
Trip hazard
Missing link
Obstruction in path
Narrow footpath
No signage
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
New kerb ramps
New signage
New signage
New signage
New kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Kerb ramps
Signage
Signage
Signage
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath or fill in verge to remove trip hazard Widen footpath
New footpath
Remove obstruction
Widen footpath
New wayfinding signage
Footpath
Enforcement
Widen footpath
Signage
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
40 Council
2
2
2
2
3
Footpath
Council
Council
Council
Council
30 Council
1
Footpath
PAMP
Council
20 Council
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
100 Council
6
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
9,000
3,600
600
600
600
5,400
4,500
6,750
N/A
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
22,500
1,800
5
5
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
0
0
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
45
235
42
266
50
148
50
148
50
148
50
148
50
148
55
83
45
235
45
235
50
148
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1939
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
176 Mortlake
177 Mortlake
178 Mortlake
179 Mortlake
180 Mortlake
181 Mortlake
182 Concord
183 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Tennyson Road / Northcote Street intersection Eastern side
Tennyson Road / Macdonald Street
Tennyson Road / Orchards Avenue intersection
Gale Street, south of Tennyson Road
Gale Street, north of Brays Road
Northern approach
Eastern approach
Eastern side
Eastern side
Brays Road, east of Rickard Street Southern side
Noble Street
Lancelot Street
Southern side, adjacent to Mortlake Public School
Southern side, adjacent to Mortlake Public School
Photograph
Description of Issue
Overgrown vegetation
Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment
Informal splitter island blocks pedestrian path of travel
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide on approach to school
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide adjacent to school
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards on approach to school
Category
Overgrown vegetation
Kerb ramps
Intersection
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Poor intersection design
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
New kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Upgrade splitter island to facilitate pedestrian crossing area Pedestrian refuge
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
Agency Responsible
Council
2
Council
1
Council
120 Council
100
360
100 Council
70 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
200
3,600
25,000
27,000
22,500
81,000
22,500
15,750
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
5
8
8
10
10
5
10
10
5
8
8
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
50
148
50
148
42
266
48
183
48
183
52
119
52
119
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2039
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
184 Concord
185 Concord
186 Concord
187 Concord
188 Concord
189 Concord
190 Concord
191 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road
Majors Bay Road, south of Brays Road
Majors Bay Road, north of Archers Street
Archer Street / Majors Bay Road intersection
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
Majors Bay Road, south of Archer Street
Majors Bay Road, north of Wellbank Street
Location
Eastern side
Eastern side
Eastern side at bus stop
Eastern approach
Eastern approach
Eastern side
Eastern side
Central median
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with overgrown vegetation and trip hazards
No landing pad at bus stop, with narrow footpath.
Damaged sign in pedestrian crossing area, no duplicate ped legs signs.
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazards
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide
Missing section of pedestrian fence in central median
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Bus Stop
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Other
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
Signage
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Pedestrian fencing
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
New bus stop landing pad
New signage
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Replace pedestrian fencing
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Pedestrian fencing
Distance (m)
Footpath
60 Council
Footpath
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Signage
Number of units
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
90 Council
1
3
Council
Council
20 Council
50 Council
15 Council
10 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
13,500
20,250
8,400
900
4,500
11,250
3,375
4,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Facility Benefits
Safety
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
8
5
5
5
5
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
44
255
44
255
47
201
44
255
44
255
44
255
46
231
55
83
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
2139
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
192 Concord
193 Concord
194 Concord
195 Concord
196 Concord
197 Concord
198 Concord
199 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
Greenlees Avenue, east of Warbrick Street
Location
Southern side
Across Greenlees Avenue
South of Wellbank Wellbank Street / Greenlees Street adjacent to Greenlees Park Park
Brewer Street, east of Ellis Street
Brewer Street / Spring Street
Burwood Road / Wallace Street
Southern side
Southern side
Western side
Burwood Road, North of La Western side. Bus Mascotte Avenue stop ID 213729
Burwood Road east of Tremere Street
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No signs or line marking south of Greenlees Avenue to indicate shared path
Wide pedestrian and cyclist crossing area across Greenlees Avenue
Missing line marking on shared path adjacent to tennis courts
Missing shared path signage
Category
Shared Path
Shared Path
Shared Path
Shared Path
Potential impunity to narrow pedestrian crossing distance e.g. kerb build out / central splitter island Wide crossing point
Water ponding in front of kerb ramp
No landing pad at bus stop
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide with trip hazard
Footpath
Bus Stop
Footpath
Issue Type
Line marking and signage
Wide crossing point
Line marking
Signage
Wide crossing point
Obstruction in path
No bus landing pad
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Line marking and Line marking and signage signage Potential opportunity reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb buildouts or central median refuge. Also opportunity for slowing vehicle on approach e.g. raised threshold Kerb build out (x2)
Install line marking
Install signage
Line marking
Signage
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
New bus stop landing pad
Widen footpath
PAMP
2
2
Footpath
200 Council
Council
20 Council
1
2
PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Widen footpath
Distance (m)
PAMP
Install kerb blister (x2) Kerb blisters and kerb ramps and kerb raps (x2) PAMP
Re-grade turning area and improve drainage Other
Number of units
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
20 Council
1
Council
10 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
1,600
23,600
500
300
23,600
TBC
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
8,400
2,250
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
42
266
42
266
42
266
42
266
58
62
47
201
42
266
42
266
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2239
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
200 Concord
201 Concord
202 Concord
203 Concord
204 Concord
205 Concord
206 Concord
207 Concord
208 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Burwood Road east of Suke Street Northern side
Burwood Road east of Duke Northern side, Bus Stop ID 2137147 Avenue (Pelican Quays)
Bayview Park Car Park
Bayview Park
Bayview Park Path
Bayview Park Path
Crane Street / St Lukes Park on street carpark
Crane Street / St Lukes Park Car Park
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
West of ferry wharf
South of ferry wharf
South west of ferry wharf
Photograph
Description of Issue
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and trip hazards
No landing pad at bus stop
No accessible car space near ferry wharf
Opportunity for public seating
Overgrown vegetation and trip hazard
Category
Footpath
Bus Stop
Disabled Parking
Seating
Overgrown vegetation
South west of ferry wharf
No evidence of shared path in operation along foreshore except low level sign at western end. Narrow shared path Shared Path
North of main carpark entrance
No identification of change in alignment of footpath direction which currently leads to directly into car park spaces.
Carpark entrance
Southern side
Missing footpath link across car park entry
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide near school with trip hazard and drop off edges
Line marking
Footpath
Footpath
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
New bus stop landing pad
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Provide seating and amenity for pedestrians.
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Signage
Line marking
Missing link
Narrow footpath
Review as part of the Bike Plan.
Install line marking
New footpath
Widen footpath
Public seating
Trim vegetation
PAMP
Footpath
Review as part of the Bike Plan. PAMP
Line marking
New footpath
Widen footpath
Distance (m)
Footpath
Provide accessible car Parking / traffic issues space Accessible Car Space PAMP
Seating
Number of units
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
Agency Responsible
20 Council
1
1
1
1
4
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
20 Council
50 Council
90 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
4,500
8,400
TBC
$
$
$
$
Land Use Type
5
5
5
3,000
200
N/A
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
5
5
5
500
11,250
20,250
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
10
8
5
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
42
266
42
266
47
201
47
201
45
235
42
266
57
73
57
73
65
28
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
2339
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
209 Concord
210 Concord
211 Concord
212 Concord
213 Concord
214 Concord
215 Concord
216 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
Crane Street, east of Burwood Road
Crane Street east of Burwood Road
Burwood Road / Edith Avenue
Location
Southern side
Southern side
Northern side
Eastern side
Burwood Road east of Ward Southern side, Bus Street Stop ID 213787
Burwood Road east of Ward Southern side, Near Street Bus Stop ID 213787
Burwood Road east of Ward Street Southern side
Burwood Road east of Duke Avenue Southern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No landing pad at bus stop
Missing children sign
Missing pedestrian link to bus stop
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard
No landing pad at bus stop
Narrow path approx. 1m near bus stop
Narrow footpath approx. 1m wide with vegetation overhang and trip hazard
Narrow path approx. 1m wide
Category
Bus Stop
Signage
Footpath
Intersection
Bus Stop
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Issue Type
No bus landing pad
Signage
Missing link
Other issue
No bus landing pad
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
New bus stop landing pad
Install signage
New footpath
Resurface roadway
New bus stop landing pad
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Signage
New footpath
Road quality
PAMP
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Distance (m)
1
Footpath
Footpath
Council
5
Road quality issue
Footpath
Council
1
Footpath
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Widen footpath
Number of units
Agency Responsible
$
$
$
20 Council
1
Estimated Cost Range
Council
50 Council
100 Council
30 Council
$
$
$
$
$
8,400
300
3,000
20,000
8,400
11,250
22,500
6,750
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
65
28
65
28
65
28
42
266
42
266
42
266
42
266
42
266
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
2439
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
217 Concord
218 Concord
219 Concord
220 Concord
221 Concord
222 Concord
223 Concord
224 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Burwood Road east of Marceau Drive
Burwood Road west of Bayview Park
Gipps Street, adjacent to Concord Oval
Location
Southern side; Bus Stop ID 2137148
Southern side; Bus stop ID 21373
East of Loftus Street
Gipps Street / Loftust Street intersection Southern side
West of Loftus Gipps Street / Loftust Street Street, southern side intersection
Gipps Street
Burwood Road
Moreton Street / Burwood Road
Opposite Concord Community Centre, southern side
South of Burton Street, eastern side
Eastern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No landing pad at bus stop
Trip hazard near Bus stop
Poor quality stairs (condition), trip hazard. Non-standard DDA requirements (e.g. handrail an slope of stairs). Vegetation could also cause slip hazard
Narrow path to bus stop
Category
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Stairs
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath approx. 800 mm wide on approach to bus stop Narrow footpath
No bus stop landing pad
Overgrown vegetation
Kerb ramp appears to be steep and poor quality
Bus Stop
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Stairs
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
Description of Proposed Treatment
New bus stop landing pad
New bus stop landing pad
Upgrade Stairs (around 60 steps)
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Stairs
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
PAMP
Upgrade kerb ramp
Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
60
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
Council
Council
Council
20 Council
Footpath
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Agency Responsible
30 Council
1
1
2
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
8,400
8,400
TBC
$
$
$
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
10
4,500
6,750
8,400
200
3,600
10
10
10
8
8
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
8
1
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
15
15
15
15
10
10
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
10
8
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
42
266
42
266
75
6
73
9
73
9
73
9
66
24
69
15
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
2539
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
225 Concord
226 Concord
227 Concord
228 Concord
229 Concord
230 Concord
231 Concord
232 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Gipps Street, west of Burwood Road
Lansdowne Street
Gipps Street
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street
Gipps Street, east of Broughton Street
Location
Western side
South of Gipps Street, western side
West of Landsdown Street, southern side
Northern side
Northern side
Gipps Street, east of David Street Northern side
Norman Street / Majors Bay Road intersection Northern side
Brewer Street
West of Shipham Street
Photograph
Description of Issue
Poor quality and narrow approx. 900 mm wide
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and poor quality
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide and poor quality
No bus stop landing pad
Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards
Narrow path on approach to bus stop with trip hazards
Opportunity to provide missing link between Norman Street to Nullawarre Avenue via majors bay reserve and playground and nearby paths
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Bus Stop
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Potential opportunity to modify existing pedestrian crossing to raised wombat crossing to slow traffic. Note on Zebra Pedestrian bus route - lower profile required Crossing
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
Narrow footpath
No bus landing pad
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Widen footpath
Missing link
New footpath to link between Majors Bay Road / Norman Street intersection to playground and recreational footpath along Ron Routley Oval (Majors Bay Reserve) and link all the way to existing footpath in Nullawarra Avenue. New footpath
Install wombat crossing
Widen footpath
Wombat crossing
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
20 Council
Footpath
20 Council
Footpath
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Narrow footpath
Pedestrian crossing
Footpath / PAMP
50 Council
1
Footpath
Council
100 Council
Footpath
90 Council
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
600 Council
1
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,500
4,500
11,250
8,400
22,500
20,250
135,000
80,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
10
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
15
8
15
15
15
15
0
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
0
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
5
0
0
10
8
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
69
15
62
38
69
15
74
7
69
15
69
15
45
235
53
110
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
2639
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
233 Concord
234 Concord
235 Five Dock
236 Five Dock
237 Five Dock
238 Five Dock
239 Five Dock
240 Five Dock
241 Five Dock
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
Crane Street - link to Corby Avenue Western side
Crane Street
Westerns Side and link to Evelyn Street
Lyons Road, wrest of Great North Road Northern side
Lyons Road / Scott Street
Lyons Road /West Street
Lyonns Road / East Street
Lyons Road Ferns Lane
Henry Street, east of East Street
Henry Street / Scott Street intersection
Southern side
Southern side
Southern side
Southern side
Northern side
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Missing link to bus stop
Missing link between path and bus stop and park opposite. Will require ped facility to cross Crane Stet (pedestrian refuge). Also missing link to Evelyn Street.
Overgrown vegetation
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road
Potential opportunity for threshold treatment into residential area from main road
Safety issue at driveway crossing. Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway.
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Intersection
Intersection
Intersection
Intersection
Kerb ramps not aligned and not enough space for landing at back of ramp. Potential kerb build out. Missing kerb ramps Kerb ramps
Missing kerb ramp link, poor alignment
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Missing link
Install new footpath
Missing link
Install footpath, New footpath, pedestrian refuge and pedestrian refuge and Footpath / kerb ramps (x2) kerb ramps (x2) PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Intersection
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment
Intersection
Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Raised intersection treatment
New kerb ramps
New footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Trim vegetation
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
Continuous footpath treatment
Raised intersection treatment
Kerb ramps
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
20 Council
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
150 Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,500
62,350
200
80,000
80,000
80,000
20,000.00
10,000
3,600
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
5
5
8
8
8
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
57
73
57
73
53
110
39
311
39
311
42
266
42
266
45
235
37
318
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2739
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
242 Five Dock
243 Five Dock
244 Five Dock
245 Five Dock
246 Five Dock
247 Five Dock
248 Five Dock
249 Five Dock
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Henry Street, west of Scott Street
Henry Street, west of Elizabeth Street
Location
Northern side
Northern side
Henry Street, near Elizabeth Street Both sides of street
Harris Road
Henry Street, east of Scott Street
Garfield Street, west of Great North Road
Garfield Street, west of West Street
Garfield Street, west of West Street
North of Garfield Street
Southern side
Northern side
Northern side
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Cars parked on footpath causing obstruction
Pedestrian refuge is too small.
Overgrown vegetation
Deteriorating TGSIs at Loading dock, lack of visibility
Category
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Pedestrian refuge
Footpath
Footpath
Vegetated garden bed restricts egress from rear bus door Bus Stop
Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
Footpath
Issue Type
Obstruction in path
Obstruction in path
Obstruction in path
Pedestrian refuge
Description of Proposed Treatment
Remove obstruction
Remove obstruction
Remove obstruction
Upgrade pedestian refuge or consider pedestrian crossing
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
TGSIs
TGSIs
Overgrown vegetation Remove Garden Bed
TGSIs
Remove TGSIs
Treatment Type
Enforcement
Enforcement
Enforcement
Pedestrian refuge
Trim vegetation
TGSIs
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Remove Garden Bed
New footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
3 Council
Estimated Cost Range
N/A
5
N/A
$
$
$
$
Land Use Type
5
N/A
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
5
50,000
200
1,500
1,800
675
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
10
0
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
37
318
37
318
47
201
47
201
53
110
45
235
45
235
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2839
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
250 Five Dock
251 Five Dock
252 Five Dock
253 Five Dock
254 Five Dock
255 Five Dock
256 Five Dock
257 Rodd Point
258 Rodd Point
259 Rodd Point
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Garfield Street / Harris Street intersection
Garfield Street, west of West Street
Great North Road, north of Harrabrook Avenue
Great North Road, north of Murralong Avenue
First Avenue, west of Wingham Avenue
First Avenue / Ingham Avenue intersection
Location
Eastern approach
Southern side
Eastern Side
Eastern Side
Inappropriate use of Tactile indicators
No bus stop landing pad
No bus stop landing pad
At intersection
Missing kerb ramp western approach to park, poor alignment on southern approach, no kerb ramps on eastern approach, poor alignment on northern approach
Eastern approach
Southern Side
Category
Wide Crossing Area. Opportunity to reduce crossing distance e.g. kerb build out or island and /or threshold on minor road to residential area. Note on bus route - lower platform will be required Intersection
Missing duplicate pedestrian Crossing ("legs") signs and Piano key line marking on ramp
First Avenue east of Pricess Avenue Southern Side
First Avenue / Henley Marine Drive
Description of Issue
At Wombat Crossing
First Avenue east of Ingham Avenue Southern side
First Avenue/Arthur Street
Photograph
No bus stop landing pad
Poor alignment into roundabout circulation lane. Reposition kerb ramps
No bus stop landing pad
Path available but not on pedestrian desire line to cross roundabout
Footpath
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Signage and Line marking
Kerb ramps
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Bus Stop
Footpath
Issue Type
Intersection
TGSIs
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Description of Proposed Treatment
Raised threshold treatment
Remove TGSIs
Raised threshold treatment
New footpath
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Signage / line marking
PAMP
Upgrade pedestrian Pedestrian refuge and refuge and kerb ramps kerb ramps PAMP
No bus landing pad
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Upgrade to refuge island and replace kerb ramps
No bus landing pad
Missing link
Pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
New footpath to access roundabout
New footpath
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Signage and Line Signage / line marking marking
Kerb ramps
Treatment Type
Footpath
Agency Responsible
Council
3 Council
1
1
2
8
1
2
1
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
10 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
80,000
675
8,400
8,400
1,100
75,000
8,400
7,500
8,400
2,250
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
8
8
5
5
10
10
10
10
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
15
15
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
45
235
45
235
54
100
54
100
47
201
47
201
47
201
50
148
42
266
42
266
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2939
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
260 Rodd Point
261 Rodd Point
262 Rodd Point
263 Five dock
264 Five Dock
265 Five Dock
266 Five Dock
267 Five Dock
268 Rodd Point
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Location
First Avenue west of Pricess Avenue Northern Side
First Avenue/Arthur Street intersection
Northern side
First Avenue west of Heath Street Northern side
First Avenue / Park Road intersection
Barnstaple Road east of Waterview Street
Barnstaple Road / Park Road
Northern side
Southern side
Southern approach
Barnstaple Road adjacent to Five Dock Park Southern side
Barnstaple Road, west or Arthur Street
Barnstaple Road / Arthur Street intersection
Southern side
Southern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No bus stop landing pad
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
No bus stop landing pad
Poor alignment of kerb ramp
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Wide crossing point
Missing link alongside of park
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Wide crossing point
Category
Bus Stop
Road Surface
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Bus Stop
Wide crossing point
Missing link
Footpath
Wide Crossing Point
Issue Type
No bus landing pad
Road Surface
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Description of Proposed Treatment
Missing link
Resurface roadway
Road Surface
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Install central refuge
Kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
Pedestrian refuge
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4) Footpath
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Wide Crossing Point
Footpath / PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Wide crossing point
Treatment Type
Trim vegetation
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2) Kerb build out (x2)
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
1
1
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
350 Council
1
2
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,400
20,000
8,400
1,800
200
25,000
78,750
200
30,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
10
8
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
8
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
42
266
50
148
50
148
52
119
48
183
40
292
40
292
40
292
40
292
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3039
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
269 Rodd Point
270 Rodd Point
271 Rodd Point
272 Russell Lea
273 Russell Lea
274 Russell Lea
275 Russell Lea
276 Rodd Point
277 Rodd Point
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Barnstaple Road
Location
Southern side
Barnstaple Road / Nield Avenue
Southern side
Barnstaple Road / Henley Marine Drive
Western approach and northern approach
Mcculloch Street south of Whittall Street
Mcculloch Street north of Whittall Street
Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection
Mcculloch Street / Potter Street intersection
Mcculloch Street /The Crescent
eastern side
eastern side
eastern side
northern approach
Western side
Barnstaple Road / Dalmeny Avenue Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Missing link alongside of park
Missing kerb ramp
Missing kerb ramp and wide crossing points
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Missing link alongside of school
Missing kerb ramp
Missing kerb ramp
Kerb ramps not aligned
Kerb ramp not aligned. Provide Central refuge
Category
Missing link
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Bus Stop
Missing link
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Issue Type
Missing link
Description of Proposed Treatment
New footpath and kerb ramps (x4) Footpath
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Unstall pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Missing link
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Poor intersection design
Treatment Type
Footpath boardwalk, subject to tree root investigations
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge (x2) and kerb ramps
Trim vegetation
Footpath
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
100 Council
2
2
1
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
100 Council
2
1
1
2
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
22,500
3,600
100,000
200
100,000
3,600
1,800
1,800
3,600
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
5
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
40
292
40
292
40
292
47
201
47
201
47
201
47
201
47
201
37
318
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3139
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
278 Rodd Point
279 Five Dock
280 Five Dock
281 Five Dock
282 Abbotsford
283 Abbotsford
284 Abbotsford
285 Abbotsford
286 Abbotsford
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Barnstaple Road west of Dalmeny Avenue
Barnstaple Road / Jersey Lane
Great North Road, north of Halley Street
Great North Road
Great North Road, north of Reginal Street
Great North Road south of Irene street
Great North Road north of Blackwell point road
Great North Road, north of Gow Street
Great North Road / Altona Street
Location
Northern side
Northern side
Western side
Western side
at wombat crossing
across Great North Road
Western side
Western side
Western side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Potential opportunity for continuous footpath treatment across laneway.
No bus stop landing pad
No bus stop landing pad
Missing Tactile Paving
Wide Crossing area
No bus stop landing pad
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Wide Crossing distance
Category
Bus Stop
Intersection
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Wide crossing point
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Intersection
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Install continuous footpath treatment at driveway
Treatment Type
Trim vegetation
Continuous footpath treatment
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
New TGSIs
Pedestrian refuge
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) Pedestrian refuge
TGSIs
Footpath
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Pedestrian refuge
Footpath
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
TGSIs
No bus landing pad
Footpath / PAMP
Trim vegetation
Provide pedestrian refuge and kerb ramps (x2) Pedestrian refuge
Footpath
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
200
20,000.00
8,400
8,400
1,000
25,000
8,400
200
25,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
5
5
8
8
5
5
8
5
10
8
8
10
10
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Hazardous Area
5
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
53
110
50
148
50
148
55
83
55
83
47
201
47
201
50
148
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3239
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
287 Abbotsford
288 Abbotsford
289 Abbotsford
290 Abbotsford
291 Abbotsford
292 Abbotsford
293 Abbotsford
294 Abbotsford
295 Abbotsford
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Great North Road north of Altona Street
Great North Road north of Altona Street
Great North Road north of Altona Street
Great North Road south of The Terrace
Great North Road south of The Terrace
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Location
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
Western side
at Ferry Wharf
at Ferry Wharf
near Teviot Avenue
Photograph
Description of Issue
Missing Tactile Paving
Non standard seating
No bus stop landing pad
No bus stop landing pad
Kerb ramps not aligned
Trip off edge of pavement
Restricted access between ferry and bus for mobility impaired or people with prams
Large grate within footpath - risk of trip hazard
No tactile paving on stairs
Category
Wombat Pedestrian Crossing
Seating
Bus Stop
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Other
Footpath
Stairs
Issue Type
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
TGSIs
New TGSIs
Seating
Upgrade public seating and amenity for pedestrians. Public seating
No bus landing pad
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
TGSIs
PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Relay footpath
Other issue
Consider opportunity to construct DDA compliant ramp or lifts to access ferry wharf from Great North New DDA compliant Road ramp or lift
Stairs
Footpath
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Narrow footpath
Trip hazard
Footpath / PAMP
Upgrade drainage grate
Upgrade Stairs
Footpath upgrade
Services
Stairs
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
2
1
1
1
2
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
10 Council
1
15
5
TfNSW
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,000
3,000
8,400
8,400
3,600
2,250
TBC
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7,500
2,000
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
10
10
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Facility Benefits
Safety
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
52
119
52
119
50
148
50
148
50
148
52
119
52
119
52
119
52
119
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3339
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
296 Abbotsford
297 Drummoyne
298 Drummoyne
299 Drummoyne
300 Drummoyne
301 Drummoyne
302 Drummoyne
303 Drummoyne
304 Drummoyne
305 Drummoyne
306 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Great North Road south of Ferry Wharf
Lyons Road west of Gipps Street
Lyons Road east of more street
Lyons Road east of more street
Cometrowe Street
Cometrowe Street / Thompson Street
The Esplanade
Taplin Park Car Park
Taplin Park Car Park
Taplin Park Car Park
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
Location
near Teviot Avenue
northern side
northern side
northern side
Eastern side
northern and eastern sides
northern side
entry to car park
entry to car park
entry to car park
across road
Photograph
Description of Issue
Category
Missing link between footpaths from ferry to footpath at bus stop. Pedestrians required to walking in roundabout to link between bus and ferry Footpath
Missing part of tactile paving
Large grate within footpath - risk of trip hazard
Access to property is required to drive on walkway. Car park on walkway area
Missing link on eastern side from Lyons Road to Drummoyne Park. "Goat track" indicating use by pedestrians
Missing link for accessible path of travel between Crometrowe Street accessible parking to foreshore walk
Bus Stop
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Moderately Narrow foreshore walking area (approx. 1.4m wide) adjacent to water Footpath
Poor visibility between end of shared path and road adjacent when vehicle turning into driveway
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area, results in trip hazard
Shared Path
Intersection
Missing end of shared path signage and directing cyclists off footpath area Shared Path
New narrow footpath approx. 900 mm wide does not link to nearby paths.
Missing link
Issue Type
Missing link
TGSIs
Trip hazard
Obstruction in path
Missing link
Missing link
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route New footpath and of travel kerb ramps (x2)
Tactile Paving
Upgrade drainage grate
Remove obstruction
New footpath
New footpath
Widen footpath
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Other issue
Treatment Type
Resurface roadway
Signage
Signage
Missing link
Extend path 90m around into The Esplanade and provide pram ramps (x2)
TGSIs
Services
Enforcement
New footpath
New footpath
Widen footpath
Trim vegetation
Road quality
Signage
Footpath
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
20 Council
1
1
1
Footpath
Council
400 Council
1
Road quality issue
Footpath
Council
200 Council
Footpath
PAMP
TfNSW
300 Council
Footpath
Footpath
Agency Responsible
Council
20 Council
1
2
Council
90 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
4,500
500
1,000
N/A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
150,000
45,000
90,000
200
20,000
300
40,250
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
10
10
5
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
10
15
15
15
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
8
5
5
0
8
8
5
5
5
5
8
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
55
83
63
34
63
34
58
62
58
62
58
62
45
235
48
183
48
183
48
183
51
140
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3439
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
307 Drummoyne
308 Drummoyne
309 Drummoyne
310 Drummoyne
311 Drummoyne
312 Drummoyne
313 Drummoyne
314 Drummoyne
315 Drummoyne
316 Drummoyne
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
The Esplanade / Henricks Avenue intersection
The Esplanade / north of Henricks Avenue
Bayswater Street north of Westbourne Street
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
Bayswater Street south of Westbourne Street
Lyons Road east of Bayswater Street
Location
Description of Issue
northern side
Wide Crossing point
western side
Shared path directed into road area. Evidence of people walking on vegetation grass to avoid walking on road. Vehicle parked on shared path area
western side
across road
eastern side (south of bus stop
Northern side
Lyons Road west of Victoria Road Southern side
Lyons Road west of Formosa Street
Photograph
Southern side
Lyons Road / College Street intersection Southern side
Lyons Road west of College Street Southern side
Missing link between bus stop and foreshore walk
Category
Wide Crossing Point
Shared Path
Footpath
Opportunity top kerb build out linking Drummoyne oval to access path on opposite side of road Missing link
Missing link between bus stop and Drummoyne Oval
Warn grass indicating use from pedestrian desire line
Narrow Area behind bus shelter with trip hazard
Missing part of tactile paving
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Car parked on footpath causing obstruction
Footpath
Footpath
Footpath
Bus Stop
Road Surface
Footpath
Issue Type
Wide Crossing Point
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Description of Proposed Treatment
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2) Kerb build out (x2)
New footpath around turning head
New footpath
New footpath
New footpath
Narrow footpath
Widen footpath and remove trip hazard behind bus stop
Road Surface
Obstruction in path
New footpath
New footpath
Kerb build out (x2) and Kerb ramps (x2) Kerb build out (x2)
Missing link
TGSIs
Treatment Type
Tactile Paving
Resurface roadway
Remove obstruction
New footpath
New footpath
Widen footpath
TGSIs
Road Surface
Enforcement
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
2
Footpath
130 Council
2
Footpath
25 Council
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
Council
100 Council
Footpath
PAMP
Council
50 Council
Footpath
PAMP
Agency Responsible
5 Council
1
1
1
TfNSW
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
23,600
11,250
29,250
23,600
50,000
5,625
1,125
500
20,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
10
10
8
8
8
8
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
8
8
5
5
5
0
5
5
5
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
48
183
48
183
48
183
60
47
60
47
50
148
55
83
55
83
55
83
47
201
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3539
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
317 Drummoyne
318 Drummoyne
319 Drummoyne
320 Five Dock
321 Five Dock
322 Five Dock
323 Five Dock
324 Five Dock
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Lyons Road / Thompson Street intersection
Lyons Road west of Thompson Street
Lyons Road / Janet Street intersection
Lyons Road opposite Sibbick Street
Ingham Avenue south of Lyons Road
Ingham Avenue / Lyons Road
Russell Street/Sibbick Street intersection
Lithgow Street south of Lyons Road
Location
Southern side
Southern side
Southern side
Southern side
Eastern side
Link to Five Dock town Centre
Southern side
Western side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
Category
Road Surface
Narrow footpath width (approx. 1.1m) if permitted outdoor dining is in action Footpath
Damaged tactile paving
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
Vegetation obstructing access along footpath
TGSIs
Footpath
Footpath
Potential pedestrian link signage from Lyons Road to five dock town centre via Ingham Ave, Barnstaple Rd. Signage
Kerb ramps not aligned
Boat parked on footpath causing obstruction
Kerb ramps
Footpath
Issue Type
Road Surface
Narrow footpath
TGSIs
Description of Proposed Treatment
Resurface roadway
Trim vegetation
Tactile Paving
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Signage
Kerb ramps
Obstruction in path
Signage
Kerb ramps
Remove obstruction
Treatment Type
Road Surface
Trim vegetation
TGSIs
Trim vegetation
Trim vegetation
Signage
Kerb ramps
Enforcement
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
Footpath
PAMP
Footpath
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
1
1
1
1
10
2
1
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
20,000
200
500
200
200
3,000
3,600
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
10
10
8
8
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
15
15
15
15
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
47
201
49
175
49
175
47
201
40
292
37
318
37
318
37
318
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3639
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
325 Five Dock
326 Russell Lea
327 Russell Lea
328 Russell Lea
329 Drummoyne
330 Drummoyne
331 Drummoyne
332 Abbotsford
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Brent Street opposite Undine Street
Brent Street / Seebrook Avenue intersection
Location
Western Side
Western Side
Brent Street / Henry Marine Drive Northern side
Brent Street opposite Undine Street
Edwin Street / College Street
Edwin Street / Formosa Street
Victoria Road south of Wolseley Street
Great North Road north of Blackwall Point Road
Western Side
Eastern side
Western side
Eastern side
Eastern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
No bus stop landing pad
Missing kerb ramps
Missing kerb ramps and wide rossing point.
No bus stop landing pad
Missing kerb ramps
Missing kerb ramps
Category
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Bus Stop
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing Footpath
Overgrown vegetation
Overgrown vegetation
Issue Type
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
No bus landing pad
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Footpath / PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
PAMP
Install pedestrian Pedestrian refuge and refuge and kerb ramps kerb ramps PAMP
New stop landing pad Bus stop landing pad PAMP
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Overgrown vegetation Trim vegetation
Kerb ramps
Kerb ramps
Widen footpath
Trim vegetation
PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
1
2
2
1
4
1
Footpath
Footpath
Agency Responsible
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
50 Council
1
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,400
3,600
28,600
8,400
7,200
1,800
11,250
200
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
10
10
10
8
8
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
0
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
5
5
5
5
5
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
52
119
52
119
52
119
55
83
55
83
46
231
39
311
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3739
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
333 Abbotsford
334 Wareemba
335 Wareemba
336 Wareemba
337 Five Dock
338 Russell Lea
339 Rodd Point
340 Concord
341 Russell Lea
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Blackwall Point Road east of Great North Road
Great North Road, north of Edenholme Road
Edenholme Road / Great North Road intersection
Location
Northern side
Western side
Eastern approach
Coranto Street / Great North Road intersection Eastern side
Charles Street / Great North Road intersection Eastern side
Brent Street
Barnstaple Road
Cabarita Road / Frederick Street
Hampden Road, west of Sibbick Street
North of Whittle Street
East of McCulloch Street
Eastern side
within proximity of bus stops
Photograph
Description of Issue
Category
Narrow path approx. 900 mm wide linking to bus stop and crossing Footpath
No TGSIs at pedestrian Refuge
Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road
Potential opportunity for raised threshold treatment on minor road
Poor road pavement in pedestrian crossing area
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road to/from school.
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road to/from school
Kerb Ramp non compliant
No facility to assist pedestrians crossing road along Hampden Road eg. near bus stop
TGSIs
Intersection
Intersection
Road Surface
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Issue Type
Narrow footpath
Description of Proposed Treatment
Widen footpath
TGSIs
New TGSIs
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
Intersection
Raised threshold treatment on minor road
Road Surface
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Resurface roadway
Install pedestrian refuge
Install pedestrian refuge
Kerb ramps
Install pedestrian refuge
Treatment Type
Widen footpath
TGSIs
Raised threshold treatment
Raised threshold treatment
Road Surface
Pedestrian refuge
Pedestrian refuge
Kerb ramps
Pedestrian refuge
Footpath / PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
Footpath
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
15 Council
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,375
2,000
80,000
80,000
20,000
50,000
50,000
3,600
50,000
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
8
8
8
8
5
5
8
0
5
8
8
8
8
10
10
8
5
5
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
8
15
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
8
8
8
8
10
5
8
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
5
8
8
5
8
5
5
8
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
37
318
63
34
59
53
59
53
54
100
63
34
55
83
59
53
40
292
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3839
City of Canada Bay PAMP
Site Audit - Issues Identification and Upgrade Prioritisation
Traffic Impact
Land Use
PAMP ID
Suburb
342 Abbotsford
343 Concord
344 Drummoyne
345 Chiswick
346 Drummoyne
347 Concord
11/05/2021
Street/Intersection
Abbotsford Parade
Location
southern side
Bayard Street, between Bertram Street and Bertram Lane Eastern side
Dening street
Eaton Place
St Georges Crescent
Zoeller Street, east of Sanders Street
Western side
East and west side
Link to Rosebury Street through Salton Reserve
Northern side
Photograph
Description of Issue
Missing Link along side of park
Missing link along residential properties
Missing link along residential properties
Missing link along residential properties
Missing link to parkland
Missing link to parkland
Category
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Issue Type
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Missing link
Description of Proposed Treatment
Treatment Type
Provide footpath adjacent to playground to provide safer route Footpath plus 2 kerb of travel ramps
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
Provide footpath to provide safer route of travel
Footpath plus 2 kerb ramps
Footpath plus 2 kerb ramps
Footpath plus 2 kerb ramps
Footpath
Footpath plus 2 kerb ramps
Footpath / PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
PAMP
Number of units
Distance (m)
2
2
2
2
PAMP
PAMP
Agency Responsible
150 Council
100 Council
100 Council
400 Council
70 Council
2
80 Council
Estimated Cost Range
$
$
$
$
$
$
32,850
26,100
26,100
93,600
15,750
19,200
No. of Attractors/ Generators
Land Use Type
5
5
5
0
5
5
0
5
5
5
5
5
10
8
10
8
8
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
Facility Benefits
Safety
Proximity Future to Road Developme Generators Hierarchy nt / Attractors
5
5
5
5
5
8
Hazardous Area
5
5
5
0
5
5
Continuity of Routes
Pedestrian Demonstrat Crashes ed Path
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
5
8
5
Priority
Addition to Ped Route existing Hierarchy facility
0
0
0
0
0
0
RMS Priority
RMS Rank
32
342
35
339
37
318
25
347
38
317
40
292
1
1
1
1
1
1
3939
GHD Level 15 133 Castlereagh Street T: 61 2 9239 7100 F: 61 2 9239 7199 E: sydmail@ghd.com © GHD 2021 This document is and shall remain the property of GHD. The document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. 12539632-2496475/https://projectsportal.ghd.com/sites/pp15_01/canaabaypedestrianac/ ProjectDocs/12539632_City of Canada Bay PAMP_Report - Rev 0.docx Document Status Revision
Author
Reviewer Name
Rev 0
E. Mia
O. Peel
Signature
Approved for Issue Name Signature
Date
S. Clarke
13/07/2021
www.ghd.com
