21 SEPTEMBER 2023
CMAR INTERVIEW RIVIAN STANTON SPRINGS NORTH MANUFACTURING FACILITY
Agenda
September 21st, 2023 | 10:00AM EST
Introductions/Safety Moment
Project Understanding Preconstruction Approach
Project Approach & Execution
Why Clayco?
Q&A
Who’s in the Room
Coming together to do more than we can on our own.
MARK SMITH Sr. Vice President, Market Leader – Automotive & Advanced Technology, Clayco
SCOTT WATKINS Sr. Vice President, Market Leader – Advanced Manufacturing, Clayco
AUSTIN HARPST Vice President, Clayco
ARTHUR PORTER Strategic Relationship Manager, Clayco
JUSTIN WRIGHT Director of Preconstruction, Clayco
JOSH BOWDEN Project Director, Clayco PACKAGES 1/3/4
TOMISLAV ZIGO CTO and Vice President, Clayco
MIKE FOX Project Director, Clayco PACKAGES 2/5/6/7
VICTOR MANNINA General Superintendent, Clayco OVERALL
GREGG ERNST Vice President, Operations, Clayco
Virtual Attendees
ALANA SPENCER VP, Sustainability, Clayco
TONY MEZINES Executive VP & Shareholder, Clayco
Safety Moment - Psychological Safety
Mental Health Focus
1. Create an environment that supports a psychologically safe workplace.
Clayco Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Free and confidential service available to all Clayco and Subcontractor Employees (and their eligible dependents).
2. Watch, listen and understand our workers, their needs and their challenges.
- stress management
- substance abuse
- anger, trauma, grief support
3. Prioritize the mental health of our workforce at the same level as wearing safety glasses and tagging out live circuits.
- family/relationship support
4. Educate and empower our workers.
Tenets of Our Proposal
The Clayco Team is dedicated to supporting Rivian’s vision for a world-class manufacturing facility and is committed to delivering an innovative, sustainable, diverse and exemplary solution for Rivian’s Stanton Creek North manufacturing campus.
We will accomplish this by:
COLLABORATION
Bringing all stakeholders together in an open and collaborative manner to unlock the potential of the team’s expertise and ingenuity to the benefit of Rivian.
SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION
Support sustainable design and construction, providing solutions that support the local community and protect the planet.
TRANSPARENCY
Meaningful transparency, thoughtful design, efficient facility.
SAFETY IS OUR #1 PRIORITY
Provide an injury free work environment, we assume the responsibility of keeping our teammembers safe and going home everyday.
Strategic Factors
Operational Factors
Market Factors
Complexities of a Mega Project
Project Understanding
Market Dynamics
Resource Challenges
CHALLENGE 1
Design & Engineering
Labor
CHALLENGE 2
Material & Equipment Demand
CHALLENGE 3
Labor Resources
U.S.
MT CO CA OR WA ID NV UT AZ NM WY ND SD NE KS OK TX LA MS AL GA FL WI MN IA MO IL AR MI IN OH WV VA KY TN NC SC MD NJ CT MA NH VT NY ME PA DE RI 20 5 5 4 4 Hyperscale & Colo Data Centers > $1B TIC Starting in 2022/2023/2024 Electric Vehicle Projects > $1B TIC Starting in 2022/2023/2024 Auto Manufacturing, Lithium Ion Battery Renewable Technology, Pharma, Other Manufacturing Projects > $1B TIC Starting in 2022/2023/2024 Semiconductors, Solar Panels
Over $600 billion in projects over the next 5 years
Market Dynamics “Mega” Technology Projects
Long Lead Procurement
MATERIAL LEAD TIME
August 22, 2022
ATTN: Harry Zhang, RE: Hankook Phase 1 Expansion
Mr. Zhang,
We thank you for this opportunity to project for Hankook. You will not find professionals who actively seek to deliver country.
Clayco’s work has just begun with this approach further with your team in detail are happy to answer any questions you commitments and experiences that
• Our team exists to build the most track record of successfully delivering across the country.
• The Clayco team brings together projects across the country. We bring Korean / English technical speaking project to ensure Hankook’s needs
• We work smarter, and harder than better product. Clayco is focused and will leverage this capability for
• Our team provides transparency to keeping cost and schedule front with your team in an open, collaborative company culture is to manage the
Our vision is to be more than your builder. Hankook makes on its market by delivering and financial objectives. We see this business, but also to achieve the goal
With sincere commitment, we’re looking
Scott Watkins Vice President, Manufacturing
Steel Beams/Columns* 5 Months Steel Joist & Decking 4 Months IMP 4 Months Roofing 3 Months Coiling Doors with Glass or Aluminum 6-7 Months Standard Coiling Doors 3 Months Overhead Doors with Glass or Aluminum 6-7 Months Standard Overhead Sectional Doors 3-4 Months High Speed Fabric Doors 4 Months Dock Levelers 7-8 Months Elevators 6 Months Fire Protection - Diesel Fire Pumps 7-8 Months Fire Protection - Electric Fire Pumps 6 Months Fire Tank 4-5 Months Desiccant/Dehumidification Equipment 12 Months AHU Air Houses 8-11 Months Chillers - Solid State 9-10 Months Chillers - VFD 10-11 Months Cooling Towers 4-6 Months Pumps 3-5 Months Air Compressors - Oil Filled 4-6 Months Air Compressors - Oil Free 4-6 Months Dryers 5-6 Months Electrical - 15KV/25KV Switchgear 13-15 Months Electrical - Unit Substation VPI dry type Transformers 12 Months Electrical - Unit Substation Switchgear 12-16 Months Electrical - Life Safety Diesel Generator 5-7 Months Electrical - Large Sized Back up Generators 10-12 Months Electrical - Lighting 3-4 Months Electrical - Fire alarm 3-4 Months 2023 2024 2025 Jan Jan Feb Feb Mar Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
*Fabrication Capacity is the larger constraint
4D Schedule
Project Understanding
GENERAL ASSEMBLY WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT BATTERY DRIVE OFFICE ASRS OFFICE USDA EASEMENT SUBSTATION CUP OUTBOUND LOT RAIL TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 PKG 3 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EMPLOYEE, VISITOR ENTRY/EXIT EMPLOYEE ENTRY/EXIT TRUCK ENTRY/EXIT FAME 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
GENERAL ASSEMBLY WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT OFFICE ASRS SUBSTATION CUP TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 REPAIR YARD 1 3 7 BID PACKAGE 2 Stamping
1. Large electrical loads
2. Substantial structure with multiple bridge cranes
3. 60’ + height with truss or beam roof system
4. Complex press foundations
5. Full or partial basement for scrap handling
6. Removeable floor sections for basement access
7. Heavy duty floor concrete for die storage
8. Waterproofing strategy
Scrap Out
Coils/Sheet In
Cut/Fill Map
Stamping
Body Paint
General Assembly
SubStation
Plastics
1. Large electrical loads/heat loads (welding/gluing) and Mechanical loads
2. Combination roof system of joist and trusses to accommodate suspended loads/AMHS
3. 20 ft. minimum
4. Humidity control 45 – 55 Rh.
5. Heavier concrete slabs to allow robot anchoring
6. Provide additional loading capacity into columns and footing for process equipment loading
7. AGVs
8. Access/Egress
WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT OFFICE ASRS SUBSTATION CUP TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 REPAIR YARD 1 3 7
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
BID PACKAGE 2 Body
Paint
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
WAREHOUSE BODY PAINT OFFICE ASRS SUBSTATION TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3
1. Plan for the future
2. Beam roof system
3. Large HVAC / electrical loads
4. Space coordination is criticaland very congested
5. Consider intumescent paint
6. Specialized production environment
7. Maximize joint occupancy
BID PACKAGE 5
1. Near superflat slabs for AGVs/AMHS
2. Coordiation with walls
3. Heavy slab loading
4. Expansion planning
5. Higher cleanliness levels
6. Rack supported envelope
WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT OFFICE ASRS SUBSTATION TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3 7
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
BID PACKAGE 5 ASRS
1. State of charge
2. Limited hanging loads/bar joist
3. Static dissipative flooring/ coating
4. Heavier floor loads
5. Higher cleanliness levels
6. Provide additional loading capacity into columns and footing for process equipment loading
7. Battery storage fire protection
WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT BATTERY DRIVE OFFICE ASRS OFFICE CUP OUTBOUND LOT PKG 1 PKG 2 PKG 3 REPAIR YARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 FAME 3 4 5 7
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
BID
PACKAGE 4 Battery/Drive
General Assembly
WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT OFFICE ASRS SUBSTATION CUP OUTBOUND LOT LOT TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 7
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
1. Hanging loads and floor loads
2. Concrete trenches and pits
3. Provide additional loading capacity into columns and footings for process equipment loading
+ BID PACKAGE 3
4. Clear heights 24’
Preconstruction Approach
Setting the Project up to Hit SOP
BUDGET SCHEDULE
SOP
RIVIAN PROGRAM
3 4 Long Lead Procurement Maximize Flexibility Preconstruction Deliverables Key Tenets 1 2 Set The Project Up to Hit S.O.P. Design Leadership Cost Certainty Constant Communication Transparency applies to our entire process. We move at the speed of trust. Minimize Schedule Risk
Team Collaboration
All parties must start from a common understanding of Rivian’s production goals and aspirations for the Stanton Springs facility. This is accomplished by:
• Initial multi-day alignment with Rivian, Jacobs, Clayco, integrators to review, study, digest the programmatic performance, schedule and capex requirements.
• Develop cost model for the project and drive the design to the cost model and schedule requirements.
• Define risk and opportunities.
• Work to Define Bid Packages and Delivery Dates
• Workgroup leaders develop means and frequency of communication (weekly design updates, schedule updates), virtual v F2F) They will establish the systems, protocols, and expectations for efficient communications among the workgroups.
• Regular F2F reviews and interaction
• Long Lead and Enginerred Equipment List
• Electrical System Strategy
• Establish Coworking Plan
SUBCONTRACTOR TRADE PARTNERS & OEM EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS
STANTON SPRINGS
Preconstruction/Design Leadership
In the Room
Owner Rivian
One Team
Builder Clayco
Designer
Jacobs
STANTON SPRINGS NORTH MANUFACTURING FACILITY
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP
SCOTT URANICH SR. PROJECT MANAGER
MARK GABRIELLE SR. PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 3/4
PROJECT LEADERSHIP
TONY MEZINES EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & SHAREHOLDER/PROJECT EXECUTIVE PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT
PRECONSTRUCTION LEADERSHIP
GREGG ERNST PRECONSTRUCTION LEADERSHIP
JOE DOYLE
SR. MECHANICAL PRECON MANAGER
RYAN RENKEN SR. MECHANICAL PRECON MANAGER
MEP ESTIMATOR 1
MEP ESTIMATOR 2
SENIOR ESTIMATOR TAYLOR HALLE PROJECT COST ENGINNER
SCOTT WATKINS SENIOR VP, MARKET LEADER –ADVANCED MANUFACTURING
MARK SMITH SENIOR VP, MARKET LEADER – AUTOMOTIVE & ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY/SENIOR PROJECT EXECUTIVE AUSTIN HARPST VICE PRESIDENT
JOE BOBRUK SR. PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 5/6
CHRIS TINNEY SR. PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7
SR. PROJECT SCHEDULER
STEVE HARDY SR. PROJECT SCHEDULER
PERRY ESSLINGER SUPER STRUCTURE SPECIALIST
MADELINE SMITH SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER
ACCOUNTING MANAGER
ACCOUNTING
ALANA SPENCER VP, SUSTAINABILITY CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
SELF-PERFORM RESOURCES
PROCUREMENT
GLAZING & CURTAINWALL
DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
QC
Preconstruction Operations Safety Community & Inclusion Procurement MEP Process Technology Sustainability QA/QC CENTRALIZED SUPPORT KURT JAEGER EXECUTIVE VP, PRECONSTRUCTION
CULTURE & INCLUSION 1 Site/UG/Parking/Test Lead 2 Stamping/Body Electrical 3 GA/Warehouse Mechanical/Plumbing 4 Battery/Drive General Estimating 5 Paint/ASRS/Critical Utilities 6 WWTP 7 General Works PRECONSTRUCTION AND PROCUREMENT TEAM ESTIMATING TEAM PROJECT SUPPORT CHRIS TINNEY SR. PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7
REID PRECONSTRUCTION MANAGER JUSTIN WRIGHT DIRECTOR OF PRECONSTRUCTION SID KOTHARI REGIONAL VDC DIRECTOR KRITIKA AGRAWAL VDC/QUALITY MANAGER MONIQUE BARNES SENIOR VDC ENGINEER PAUL TODD MERRILL SR. ELECTRICAL PRECON MANAGER NICK ZATORSKY
FIELD
MIKE PIERLE EXECUTIVE VP, OPERATIONS GARY MARRIN VP, FIELD OPERATIONS TODD FRIIS VP, RISK MANAGEMENT RICK BAST VP, NATIONAL PROCUREMENT JUAN BAZAN VP, MEP SYSTEMS SCOTT LUMSDEN TECHNICAL ASSURANCE GROUP (TAG) DIRECTOR TIM WEST
DIRECTOR
SANDRA MARKS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT DAN LESTER VP OF FIELD
CHAD
JOSH BOWDEN PROJECT DIRECTOR PACKAGES 1/3/4
MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR PACKAGES 2/5/6/7
TOMISLAV ZIGO CTO, VP
Prefab & Modularization Plan Engineered Equipment & Long Lead Procurement 7 Site Logistics Plan 4 8 Project Estimate 6 Contracting Strategy 2 Procurement Plan 3 Project Master Schedule 5 Preconstruction Deliverables Constructability and Value Analysis 1
Constructability and Value Analysis Schedule of Meetings (Design Phase)
Weekly Internal Design Team Meeting (Thursdays 12-1PM EST)
• Review design progress
• Work Through Enhanced DDL and RFI items collaboratively
• Assign To-Do’s for the week
Clayco Project Management Jacobs
Project Management
All Engineers/Consultants Weekly ~ 60 min
Weekly Design Team Meeting w/Rivian (Fridays 9-10AM EST)
• Review design progress
• Work Through Enhanced DDL and RFI items collaboratively
• Assign To-Do’s for the week
Rivian Project Leadership
Clayco Project Management Jacobs
Project Management
All Engineers/Consultants
Weekly ~ 60 min
Owner, Architect, Contractor (OAC) Meeting (Fridays 10:30-11:30AM EST)
• Review weekly OAC update package
• Discuss Rivian decisions/support needed
• Look-ahead activities
Rivian Project Leadership
Clayco Project Management Jacobs
Project Management
All Engineers/Consultants
Weekly ~ 60 min
Steering Committee Meeting (Every other Friday, TBD)
Georgia Power Coordination Meeting (Wednesdays 1-2PM EST)
• Project Leadership check-in meetings for larger scale/ health of project (ie risks, concerns, etc.)
• Review Status of Application, Engineering and Field Work.
Rivian Project Leadership
Clayco Project Management
Georgia Power Company
Bi-Weekly ~ 60 min
BIM Coordination Meeting (Wednesdays 12-1PM EST)
• Review BIM schedule and updates
• Perform clash detection and review BIM Model
• Discuss BIM action items and To-Do’s
Clayco Project Management & Field Personnel Weekly ~ 60 min
Clayco Project Management Jacobs
Project Management
All Engineers/Consultants Weekly ~ 60 min
Weekly MEP/FP Working Session w/Rivian (Mondays 4:30-5:30PM EST)
• Review weekly MEP/FP Coordination items. Rivian Project Leadership
Clayco Project Management
Jacobs Project Management Weekly ~ 60 min
Key Meeting Name* Meeting Purpose Required Participants Frequency Duration
1
Constructability and Value Analysis
Clayco to actively participate in design coordination meeting and work sessions and provide feedback on “biddability” and “Constructibility” as the design progresses.
• Feedback (Opportunities and Risk) to be managed via the Design Decision Log
• Clayco to coordinate with Rivian and Jacobs to determine if trade partners need to be brought on in a precon role to support design assist or deep dive into specific scopes of work
• Review Documents through the lens of the “site logistics” and schedule constraints and propose alternate solutions as required to reduce overall risk to schedule and budget
• Conduct assessment of the site to identify site related challenges and/or constraints
• Constantly review the documents for VE opportunties (to be tracked via Design Decision Log)
1
with metal deck instead of concrete, in areas without MEP equipment and without fire rating
Constructability and Value Analysis
Value Engineering Ideas
HIGH MEDIUMLOW 3 2 1 ARCHITECTURAL Remove skylights on the roof 3 Poly iso insulation instead of 2 ply bituminous roofing with mineral wool insulation 3 Eliminate Painting of Roof Framing and Paint Columns Only 3 Install 3" Polyiso Insulated Metal Panels vs. 3" Mineral Wool 3 Change to roof trusses, make monoslope and move peak to column line 3 Remvoe Egress Tunnel 3 Eliminate Dock Houses (use standard docks) 2 Remove ESD coating over slab and use standard hardener system 2 Install aluminum windows instead of curtain wall 2 Painting of Sprinkler Pipe 2 Omit Dry Shake Hardener 2 SP6 and 1-coat shop applied paint to serve as the finish coat for steel structure (industry standard). 2 Horizontal metal wall panels more costly than vertical 2 Utilize Energy Modeling to Economize Envelope R-Value 2 Omit Coverboard for future soloar installation on warehouse roof Heater Controls at Dock Door 1 Dock Door Heaters 1 Dock Leveler Specification 1 Truck Restraint Specification 1 Remove Guardhouse restroom 1 Install standard reflected ceiling in office area 1 STRUCTURAL Economize Collateral Load 3 Bar Joists Roof in Lieu of Truss Roof Diaphram (Maximize floor supported loads) 3 Remove one truss per bay align wth walls & columns. Loading Requirements will not be comprimized with this approach 3 Economize Slab Section 3 Slab reinforced with Macrofibers 3 6.5 m headroom clearnace in lieu of 8.5 m 3 Remove Penthouses on the roof. Install MEP equipment in these areas on the mezzanines and on curbs. 3 Pre-engineered building 3 COST IMPACT
Install aluminum windows instead of curtain wall 2 Painting of Sprinkler Pipe 2 Omit Dry Shake Hardener 2 SP6 and 1-coat shop applied paint to serve as the finish coat for steel structure (industry standard). 2 Horizontal metal wall panels more costly than vertical 2 Utilize Energy Modeling to Economize Envelope R-Value 2 Omit Coverboard for future soloar installation on warehouse roof Heater Controls at Dock Door 1 Dock Door Heaters 1 Dock Leveler Specification 1 Truck Restraint Specification 1 Remove Guardhouse restroom 1 Install standard reflected ceiling in office area 1 STRUCTURAL Economize Collateral Load 3 Bar Joists Roof in Lieu of Truss Roof Diaphram (Maximize floor supported loads) 3 Remove one truss per bay align wth walls & columns. Loading Requirements will not be comprimized with this approach 3 Economize Slab Section 3 Slab reinforced with Macrofibers 3 6.5 m headroom clearnace in lieu of 8.5 m 3 Remove Penthouses on the roof. Install MEP equipment in these areas on the mezzanines and on curbs. 3 Pre-engineered building 3 Alternate MFL Firewall Designs 2 Load bearing tilt-up concrete in lieu of IMP 2 Reduce slab reinforcing by using shrinkage compensating concrete for joint free floors 2 Use steel columns in lieu of concrete 2 Utilize vertical x-braced building system in long direction instead of moment frames 2 Eliminate parapet to follow profile of the roof 2 Change to cheaper stair tower structure 1 Mezzanines with metal deck instead of concrete, in areas without MEP equipment and without fire rating 1 Remove catwalks - IDF access from the floor 1 Vapor Barrier 1 MECHANICAL/HVAC Optimize Weld Exhaust Strategy 3 Utilize Energy Modeling to Economize Cooling Tonnage 3 Adjust Air Changes 3 DX cooling instead of Chillers and AHUs 3 Siphonic Overflow Roof Drainage Approach 3 Low Velociy vs. High Velocity Airflow Systems 3 Poly Pipe vs. Carbon and S.S. Piping 3 Remove hot water solar panels 2 STRUCTURAL Economize Collateral Load 3 Bar Joists Roof in Lieu of Truss Roof Diaphram (Maximize floor supported loads) 3 Remove one truss per bay align wth walls & columns. Loading Requirements will not be comprimized with this approach 3 Economize Slab Section 3 Slab reinforced with Macrofibers 3 6.5 m headroom clearnace in lieu of 8.5 m 3 Remove Penthouses on the roof. Install MEP equipment in these areas on the mezzanines and on curbs. 3 Pre-engineered building 3 Alternate MFL Firewall Designs 2 Load bearing tilt-up concrete in lieu of IMP 2 Reduce slab reinforcing by using shrinkage compensating concrete for joint free floors 2 Use steel columns in lieu of concrete 2 Utilize vertical x-braced building system in long direction instead of moment frames 2 Eliminate parapet to follow profile of the roof 2 Change to cheaper stair tower structure 1 Mezzanines with metal deck instead of concrete, in areas without MEP equipment and without fire rating 1 Remove catwalks - IDF access from the floor 1 Vapor Barrier 1 MECHANICAL/HVAC Optimize Weld Exhaust Strategy 3 Utilize Energy Modeling to Economize Cooling Tonnage 3 Adjust Air Changes 3 DX cooling instead of Chillers and AHUs 3 Siphonic Overflow Roof Drainage Approach 3 Low Velociy vs. High Velocity Airflow Systems 3 Poly Pipe vs. Carbon and S.S. Piping 3 Remove hot water solar panels 2 Remove Penthouses but keep custom AHUs on roof 2 Eliminate supply duct insulation. 2 Fire Protection Approach 2 Remove Storm Drainage Insulation 2 Eliminate Pre-Cooling Coils 2 Remove HX wheel from AHU 1 Remove Humidification from AHU 1 Install VAV boxes with electric re-heat 1 Install Air Supply Grilles instead of displacement air diffusers. 1 Remove The Air Curtains 1 Hose Stations 1 ELECTRICAL Optimize Weld Exhaust Strategy 3 Optimize Bus Duct Layout 3 Load Diversification 3 Solar Array Array 3 Eliminate parapet to follow profile of the roof Change to cheaper stair tower structure 1 Mezzanines
1 Remove catwalks - IDF access from the floor 1 Vapor Barrier 1 MECHANICAL/HVAC Optimize Weld Exhaust Strategy 3 Utilize Energy Modeling to Economize Cooling Tonnage 3 Adjust Air Changes 3 DX cooling instead of Chillers and AHUs 3 Siphonic Overflow Roof Drainage Approach 3 Low Velociy vs. High Velocity Airflow Systems 3 Poly Pipe vs. Carbon and S.S. Piping 3 Remove hot water solar panels 2 Remove Penthouses but keep custom AHUs on roof 2 Eliminate supply duct insulation. 2 Fire Protection Approach 2 Remove Storm Drainage Insulation 2 Eliminate Pre-Cooling Coils 2 Remove HX wheel from AHU 1 Remove Humidification from AHU 1 Install VAV boxes with electric re-heat 1 Install Air Supply Grilles instead of displacement air diffusers. 1 Remove The Air Curtains 1 Hose Stations 1 ELECTRICAL Optimize Weld Exhaust Strategy 3 Optimize Bus Duct Layout 3 Load Diversification 3 Solar Array Array 3 Allow Aluminum feeders for 100 Amps and higher 2 Reduce Feeder/ Panel Sizes 2 Eliminate double ended substations 2 Substitute Dry Type transformers with Oil Filled transformers 2 Eliminate busduct. Instead install power distribution panels where possible 2 Open rated Fire alarm cabling vs conduit raceways 2 Efficient Fire Alarm Device layout 2 Option add Lightning Protection System 2 Zone Occupancy Sensors vs. Fixture Sensors 2 Eliminate Power factor correction 1 Change lighting level criteria 1 Fixed circuit breaker type in the Main Low Voltage Switchboards instead of withdrawable circuit breakers type. 1 CIVIL Alternatives to DI Pipe 3 Change Mass Grading Plans to Minimize Double Handling of Material 3 Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) in lieu of Concrete Paving 2 Adjust Grading to Reduce Earthwork Scope 2 Grade Site to Minimize Storm Sewers 2 1
Constructability and Value Analysis
Commitment to Sustainability
ENERGY & CARBON WATER & ECOLOGY
Clayco Sustainability Commitments
CIRCULAR ECONOMY COMMUNITY & WELLBEING GOVERNANCE & INNOVATION
AIA 2030
#5 Top 100 Green Contractors
SBTI
Clayco is the first U.S. construction company to commit to SBTi’s Net-Zero standard.
LJC committed to designing carbon neutral buildings by 2030.
MATERIALS PLEDGE
1
Preconstruction Deliverables
Contracting Strategy
• Analysis of market interest. Rivian, Clayco past experience, outreach, F2F
• Bid packges will be tailored to match market interest and capabilities
• Coordinate package scope with design team
• Define bid package scope and bid list/ Rivian approval
• Bid package need dates
2
Contracting Strategy
Bid Package Breakdown
GENERAL ASSEMBLY WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT BATTERY DRIVE OFFICE ASRS OFFICE USDA EASEMENT SUBSTATION CUP OUTBOUND LOT RAIL TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 PKG 3 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TRUCK ENTRY/EXIT FAME 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PACKAGE 1 Site/UG/Parking/ Test Tracks PACKAGE 2 Stamping and Body PACKAGE 3 General Assembly and Warehouse PACKAGE 4 Battery and Drive PACKAGE 5 Paint/ASRS/ Critical Utilities Infrastructure PACKAGE 6 WWTP (Wastewater Treatment Plant)
7 General
KEY
PACKAGE
Works and Other Categories
2
and Other Categories
GENERAL ASSEMBLY WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT BATTERY DRIVE OFFICE ASRS OFFICE USDA EASEMENT SUBSTATION CUP OUTBOUND LOT RAIL TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 PKG 3 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TRUCK ENTRY/EXIT FAME 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PACKAGE 1 Site/UG/Parking/ Test Tracks PACKAGE 2 Stamping and Body PACKAGE 3 General Assembly and Warehouse PACKAGE 4 Battery and Drive PACKAGE 5 Paint/ASRS/ Critical Utilities Infrastructure PACKAGE 6 WWTP (Wastewater Treatment Plant)
7
Works
KEY
*Contract Subcontract trade partners directly
PACKAGE
General
2
Contracting Strategy Bid Package Breakdown
Procurement Plan – GCs and Subcontractors
Collaborative & Transparent Bid Process will be facilitated via Building Connected Solicitation:
• Work with Rivian to Develop “ Long List”
• Prequalify Contractors / Subcontractors
• Promote Interest. Goal is to have a minimum of 3 qualified bids for each package.
Validation:
• Level bids via Building Connected and Outside Spreadsheets
• Fully transparent process with Rivian participation.
Selection:
• Generate Letter of Recommendation for Review and Discussion with Rivian
• Selection of Contractors to be a Joint decision between Clayco and Rivian
3
Procurement Plan
Commitment to Diversity
50 students on CCDI college scholarship
160 graduates successfully placed into full-time employment
Subcontractor
Relationships
Engage > Immerse > Pre-qualify
(Safety, Quality, Capacity, Expertise)
Clayco Connects
We are currently growing our relationship building cohort of diverse firms and have over 326 Georgia diverse vendors in our Building Connected database. There are 68 in Clayco Connects being mentored on how to get and stay safety and financially prequalified.
Database of Local, Diverse Subcontractors
- Building Connected
- State directories
- Alignment with local government and community programs
PIVOT
- Industry-driven solution to grow MBE participation within construction industry
SOCIAL IMPACT MEASUREMENT
- Project Metrics
- Capacity Growth Metrics
- Job Creation and Retention Metrics
- Data Analysis by Success Metrics
FIELD FOCUS
- Workforce Development
- Psychological Safety
- Train, Retain, Invest
- Toolbox Talks
3
Procurement Plan
Growing our Cohort of Firms in Atlanta
• Clayco has partnerships with more than 35 firms in the Atlanta Area
• SCAD Spring Street project and Bridgeport Development are key projects for fostering these partnerships
• Quarterly sessions are conducted to nurture relationships and provide guidance to diverse firms
• These sessions help firms secure and maintain prequalification for larger bid packages
• Clayco aims to promote diversity in its workforce to mirror the demographics of Atlanta
3
Clayco Rising Meet and Greet in Atlanta, GA
3
Procurement Plan Community Partnerships
Procurement Plan
Our Impact
OUR IMPACT
We are proud to have had the opportunity to work with 150+ interns this summer!
OUR IMPACT
In St. Louis, MO we commemorated Juneteenth by awarding six non-profit organizations with $25,000 each in recognition of their significant contributions
3
Engineered Equipment
Long Lead Procurement Strategy
• Identify all long lead materials and equipment
• Define need dates for purchase specifications, but generally at 30% design
• Develop bidders list/Rivian approval
• Finalize PO T&Cs
The CDC Advantage
• Legacy of Vendor Relationships
• Opportunities for Expediting
• Work with Design Team
• Simplify, Simplify, Simplify
• Third Party O.E.M. Equipment
• Concurrent Procurement and Design Activities
• “Smart” In-House Buyers of Work
• Design Knowledge/Background
• National Perspective on Systems/Solutions
• Performance vs. Prescriptive
• In-House Modeling/Calculations/Estimating
• Subcontractor Outreach
4
Engineered Equipment Concrete Supply Chain/Logistics Landscape
Ready Mix Suppliers
Aggregate/Stone Suppliers
Cement
SiteMix –Concrete Atlanta
USA Ready Mix Mobile Concrete
Thomas Concrete of Georgia
Quikrete
Ernst Concrete
Ready Mix USA Concrete
Thomas Concrete
Vulcan Materials Company
Aggregate Plant Products Company
Ernst Concrete
Hanson Aggregates
Lopke
Fowler Flemister Concrete, Inc
Martin Marietta Morgan Quarry
Vulcan Materials Company
Argos Ready Mix
Martin Marietta Newton Quarry Holcim US Inc Cement
Solo Cup Distribution Center
General Mills Distribution Center
4
Rivian Project Location
Engineered Equipment
Steel Procurement 4
Status of Design?
• Need to prioritize design to ensure that we can make a mill order by to support the overall project schedule.
• Discuss Opportunities to use Tekla Detialing to expedite Mill Order
Market Dynamic
• Limited Truss Fab Capacity
• 8 EV Plants Currently in Design or Construction
• 500,000 Tns+ pf Steel Truss work in Fabrication Que
Creative Procurement Solutions
• Prioritize Design to Support Schedule
• Consolidate Distribution Company (CDC) has ability to direct purchase steel
• Ensures Competitive Pricing and maximizes flexibility with Subcontractor Onboarding
Preconstruction Deliverables
Project Master Schedule
Project Scheduler to Continuously engage with Rivian Project Controls Team to ensure that Clayco has a full understanding of Rivian internal process and procedures.
• Conduct preconstruction conference
• Review and align schedule specs
• Align on process and procedures
• Align on backend architecture
• Develop Level 2 schedule within 10 working days of receipt of design drawings
• Develop Initial Level 3 schedule with 20 working days of receipt of 60% design drawings
• Rivian defines integrator schedule commitments, SOP timing for Master Project Milestones
• Project schedule detail advances as design advances, market inputs on deliveries, labor availability
Maximize
Flexibility
• Schedule risk assessment 5
Project Master Schedule Project Craft Staffing | 50 Hr Workweek (All Areas)
PROJECT CRAFT STAFFING ALL AREAS, 50 Hr Workweek
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Press / Stamping - Acoustical Ceilings Press / Stamping - Building Structures / Steel Press / Stamping - Concrete, Cast-in-Place Press / Stamping - Drywall Press / Stamping - Electrical Press / Stamping - Fire Protection Press / Stamping - Flooring Press / Stamping - Glass & Glazing Press / Stamping - HM Doors, Frames, Hardware Press / Stamping - HVAC, Machine & Piping (Non Process) Press / Stamping - Painting Press / Stamping - Plumbing Press / Stamping - Roll Up Doors Press / Stamping - Roofing & Cladding Body / Mainline - Acoustical Ceilings Body / Mainline - Building Structures / Steel Body / Mainline - Concrete, Cast-in-Place Body / Mainline - Drywall Body / Mainline - Electrical Body / Mainline - Fire Protection Body / Mainline - Flooring Body / Mainline - Glass & Glazing Body / Mainline - HM Doors, Frames, Hardware Body / Mainline - HVAC, Machine & Piping (Non Process) Body / Mainline - Painting Body / Mainline - Plumbing Body / Mainline - Roll Up Doors Body / Mainline - Roofing & Cladding Paint Shop - Acoustical Ceilings Paint Shop - Building Structures / Steel Paint Shop - Concrete, Cast-in-Place Paint Shop - Drywall Paint Shop - Electrical Paint Shop - Fire Protection Paint Shop - Flooring Paint Shop - Glass & Glazing Paint Shop - HM Doors, Frames, Hardware Paint Shop - HVAC, Machine & Piping (Non Process) Paint Shop - Painting Paint Shop - Plumbing Paint Shop - Roll Up Doors Paint Shop - Roofing & Cladding Assembly - Acoustical Ceilings Assembly - Building Structures / Steel Assembly - Concrete, Cast-in-Place Assembly - Drywall Assembly - Electrical Assembly - Fire Protection Assembly - Flooring Assembly - Glass & Glazing Assembly - HM Doors, Frames, Hardware Assembly - HVAC, Machine & Piping (Non Process) Assembly - Painting Assembly - Plumbing Assembly - Roll Up Doors Assembly - Roofing & Cladding Indirects STANDARD STAFF-LABOR RATIO (INDIRECTS TO DIRECTS) 1 Staff Position per 16 Craft Employees (1:16)
(HSE)-to-LABOR RATIO 1 HSE per 25 Craft Employees (1:25)
(QA/QC) to LABOR RATIO 1 QA / QC per 30 Craft Employees
STAFFF
STAFF
+/-
1,500 1,200 900 600 300
1,300 Craft Labor at Peak *Target to divert 20% to OSM 5
Preconstruction Deliverables
Project Estimate
• Cost model/project estimate
• Cost model is a control tool until design progresses to BOD/schematic level
• Model is based on historical cost for similar facilities
• Schematic level estimate is the control estimate and design progress is used to update unit quantities, complexities
• Estimate is sort coded to allow any unique reports Rivian might require from the cost report
• Jointly Align on Contingency and Escalation cost to carry within intital Cost Control Model
• Market Pricing to be obtained at 30%, 60%, and 90% drawings (at Bid Package Level)
• Provide Internal update to Estimate bi-weekly via +/- Log
• Initial Bid Package Buyout and Overall GMP Schedules to be determined after a Design Schedule is shared with Clayco
• Schedule of GMP Packages to be contracted based on needs of the projects.
• Initial Cash Flow Forecast to be provided at 60% Design and Updated with the buyout of each Bid Package
6
Project Estimate
Cost Index 6
RSMeans City Cost Index
Division No Division Name Past 1 Quar ter Change Past 4 Quar ter Change Date Filter Change 015433 Contractor Equipment 1.5% 4.5% 33.5% 0241, 31 - 34 Site & Infrastructure, Demolition 1 3% 8 9% 34 7% 03 Concrete 1.1% 8.1% 37.1% 0310 Concrete Forming & Accessories 0 6% 8 2% 38 7% 0320 Concrete Reinforcing 7.3% -26.4% 10.6% 0330 Cast-In-Place Concrete 0.0% 18.0% 40.2% 04 Masonry -1 9% 19 2% 44 4% 05 Metals 2.7% -11.3% 24.7% 06 Wood, Plastics & Composites 2 0% 15 7% 42 4% 07 Thermal & Moisture Protection -2.5% 4.5% 50.3% 08 Openings -5.0% 0.2% 31.4% 09 Finishes 1 6% 8 6% 42 5% 0920 Plaster & Gypsum Board 2.8% 14.4% 41.8% 0950 Ceilings & Acoustic Treatment 1 8% 2 6% 37 9% 0960 Flooring -0.4% -2.3% 44.4% 0970, 0990 Wall Finishes & Painting / Coating -2.9% 9.3% 32.1% Covers Divisions 10-14, 25, 28, 41, 43, 44, 46 -0 3% -2 0% 39 9% 21, 22, 23 Fire Suppression, Plumbing & HVAC -1.7% 2.9% 37.3% 26, 27, 33 Electrical, Communications & Util -2 1% -5 3% 31 8% MasterFormat Weighted Average -0.3% 1.7% 35.8%
Division Name Division No Change Last 22 Quar ters Change Last 4 Quar ters Change Last Quar ter Data Updated: 2023 Q3 Selected City Illinois - Bloomington Date Filter 1/1/2018 7/1/2023 Division MasterFormat - Weighted Average By Division 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Year RSMeans C CI & HCI Index 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 72.0 97.8 100.0 96.2 73.9 90.9 75.2 74.4 74.5 74.9 79.5
Project Estimate GMP Process 6
SELECTING THE RIGHT PARTNER
Criteria
Qualifications/
Experience
Insurance Fee
Overall GMP Components
Preconstruction Service Fee
Contractor Fee
General Conditions
Schedule
Target GMP Value
TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION COST
Design Fee Early Material/Equipment Purchases (if applicable)
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE
Contractor Fees
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE
TOTAL PROJECT CONTINGENCY
Contractor General Conditions (overhead, job site overhead, etc.)
Contractor Direct Project Cost (labor, materials, equipment for self-performed work packages)
Subcontract Work Packages (labor, materials, equipment for subcontracted work packages)
Contractor Contingency (subcontractor, scope gaps, availability, etc.)
Owner’s Contingency (major design changes, scope creep, unforeseens escalation, force majeure, etc.)
Bar Joist Trusses Structural Steel Cost $$ $$$$ $$$$$ Supply Chain Risk Medium Low Low Future Flexibility Low High High White Steel Required Yes Yes No Prefab Capabilities Yes No No Best Suited For AGV Conveyors Paint Shop Project Estimate Structural Design Considerations 6
Project Estimate
Structural Design Considerations: Steel
Any loads in excess of building capability must be addressed by a white steel substructure.
THE QUESTION: Will the suspended equipment loads be addressed with the building or with the substructure?
13psf 15psf 13psf 10psf 52psf 0psf 20psf 20psf 20psf Dead Load MEP Collateral No Conveyors With Conveyors Retail Process Collateral Live Load Total PSF Loading 87psf 33psf 43psf
Loading
6
Project Estimate
Structural Design Considerations: Factory Clear Heights 8 Meters 10 Meters 12 Meters 6
Preconstruction Deliverables Prefabrication and Modularization Approach 7
Core Wall Install
to COVID restrictions
Modular Chiller Banks
Modular Electric Room
Modular Pumping System
Process
Prefabricated Skid
Preconstruction Deliverables Prefabrication and Modularization Approach 7
How do you define criteria to drive execution methods (e.g., offsite prefab/ onsite prefab/stick built; complexity, size, number of suppliers)?
– Identify OSM targets
– Can design accommodate it
– Schedule improvement
– Cost improvement
– Labor Availability
– Multiple mechanical
How do you manage design engagement with AEOR and/or 3rd party vendors and/or sub-contractors?
– Define schedule requirements for bid packages
– AEOR does P&ID, size equipment and mains, performance criteria. All branch sizing and routing by MEP subs.
Who are your strategic partners supporting MEP execution in the region?
–
ICON Mechanical
– Bachelor & Kimball
– Bernhard
– Southland
– McKenney’s
– Inglett & Stubbs
– Whitehead
– Eckardt
– Luca
– Ace
– Lewis
– Gaylor
–
MC Dean
– M&L
– Faith
–
ElDeco
– Hayes and Lundsford
– Rogers
– Andrews
Prefabrication and Modularization Approach
Key Existing Relationships
7
Preliminary Site Logistics Study
– Developed in conjunction with Rivian and integrators
– Priorities – safety, efficiency, trade labor amenities
– Secure site, fenced, guards & stations
GENERAL ASSEMBLY WAREHOUSE STAMPING BODY PAINT BATTERY DRIVE OFFICE ASRS OFFICE USDA EASEMENT SUBSTATION CUP OUTBOUND LOT RAIL TEST TRACK PKG 1 PKG 2 PKG 3 REPAIR YARD WWTP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EMPLOYEE ENTRY/EXIT TRUCK ENTRY/EXIT FAME 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KEY Construction Traffic Construction Fence
Concrete Washout Laydown/Yard
Equipment
Waste Management
Craft Parking Safety/Assembly Point Staging/Parking Staging/Parking Staging/Parking Security Checkpoint Security Checkpoint Staging/Parking Buggie Parking Lot Construction Offices
Rental
Dropoff/Pickup, Sanitation Area and
Rental Equipment Dropoff/Pickup, Sanitation Area and Waste Management
Preconstruction Approach Q&A
Project Approach/ Execution Construction
Project Objectives
Overall project objectives
• Safety assurance through a shared and collaborative program run jointly by Rivian and Clayco.
• Quality assurance through a shared and collaborative process between Rivian and Clayco.
• Cost assurance and transparency to meet or exceed a target budget.
• Schedule assurance and transparency to align with Client’s business goal for launch and operation.
Blocking and Tackling Overview:
• Staffing Plan
• Safety Approach
• Schedule Management
• Opportunity and Risk Tracking
• Document Control
• Cost Management
• Change Management
• Quality Management
Stanton Springs
North Manufacturing Facility
Construction Leadership
Fulltime Emplyoee Count: 44
In the Room
STANTON SPRINGS NORTH MANUFACTURING FACILITY
SCOTT WATKINS
SENIOR VP, MARKET LEADER –ADVANCED MANUFACTURING
TONY MEZINES
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & SHAREHOLDER/PROJECT EXECUTIVE PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT
JOSH BOWDEN PROJECT DIRECTOR PACKAGES 1/3/4
MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR PACKAGES 2/5/6/7
VICTOR MANNINA GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT OVERALL
MARK SMITH
SENIOR VP, MARKET LEADER – AUTOMOTIVE & ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY/SENIOR
PROJECT EXECUTIVE AUSTIN HARPST VICE PRESIDENT
KURT JAEGER EXECUTIVE VP, PRECONSTRUCTION
SANDRA MARKS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
JAKE LOEWENSTEIN REGIONAL SAFETY MANAGER
PROJECT SUPPORT
VDC/BIM
KRITIKA AGRAWAL
PACKAGES 1/7
SID KOTHARI
PACKAGE 2
MONIQUE BARNES
PACKAGE 3/4
VDC 4
PACKAGE 5/6
Scheduling
NICK ZATORSKY
SR. PROJECT SCHEDULER
STEVE HARDY
SR. PROJECT SCHEDULER
Estimating
SENIOR ESTIMATOR
PACKAGES 2/5/6/7
TAYLOR HALLE
PROJECT COST ENGINNER
PACKAGES 1/3/4
Mission Control
DIRCE BOWKER
SR. CONSTRUCTION ADMIN
PACKAGES 1/3/4
NIKKI KILPATRICK
SR. CONSTRUCTION ADMIN
PACKAGES 2/3/6/7
ADMIN 1
ADMIN 2
JOHN BIGGART SUPERINTENDENT
BILLY MCCOY SUPERINTENDENT
SAMUEL SCHWALLER SR. PROJECT ENGINEER
AUSTIN TERBROCK PROJECT ENGINEER
JEREMY WINKELMAN SUPERINTENDENT
MIKE ROSENBERGER SUPERINTENDENT
ROGER BLACK SUPERINTENDENT MIKE RODRIGUEZ SUPERINTENDENT
TOM STEVENSON
SUPERINTENDENT
SAFETY ENGINEER 1
PACKAGES 1/7
DOUG TWEDELL QUALITY MANAGER 1 PACKAGES 1/7
RICHARD DEASON SAFETY ENGINEER 2
CARL STRANGE QUALITY MANAGER 2
SAFETY ENGINEER 3
ISMAEL VILLASENOR QUALITY MANAGER 2
JOE BOBRUK SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER
JARED SIMMONS* MEP PROJECT MANAGER MIKE SIECKHAUS SR. PROJECT ENGINEER
*Covered w/MEP Project Manager
AARON BRUNNWORTH SAFETY ENGINEER 4
KATERI HEITHAUS QUALITY MANAGER 4
CHRIS TINNEY
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7
TRIPP ROLFES PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7
LUKE GORING
PROJECT ENGINEER PACKAGES 1/7
RON BENDER SUPERINTENDENT
TOMISLAV ZIGO CTO, VP
SAFETY ENGINEER 1
PACKAGES 1/7
DOUG TWEDELL QUALITY MANAGER 1 PACKAGES 1/7
SELF-PERFORM RESOURCES MIKE PIERLE EXECUTIVE VP, OPERATIONS GARY MARRIN VP, FIELD OPERATIONS TODD FRIIS VP, RISK MANAGEMENT RICK BAST VP, NATIONAL PROCUREMENT JUAN BAZAN VP, MEP SYSTEMS ALANA SPENCER VP, SUSTAINABILITY SCOTT LUMSDEN TECHNICAL ASSURANCE GROUP (TAG) DIRECTOR TIM WEST QC DIRECTOR Preconstruction Operations Safety Community & Inclusion Procurement MEP Process Technology Sustainability QA/QC CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION GLAZING & CURTAINWALL PROCUREMENT CENTRALIZED SUPPORT EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP OVERALL PROJECT OVERSIGHT
JOSH BOWDEN PROJECT DIRECTOR 1 PACKAGES 1/3/4 JOSH BOWDEN PROJECT DIRECTOR 1 PACKAGES 1/3/4 JOSH BOWDEN PROJECT DIRECTOR 1 PACKAGES 1/3/4 MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR 2 PACKAGES 2/5/6/7 MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR 2 PACKAGES 2/5/6/7 MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR 2 PACKAGES 2/5/6/7 MIKE FOX PROJECT DIRECTOR 2 PACKAGES 2/5/6/7 PROJECT LEADERSHIP SAFETY OVERSIGHT 1 Site/UG/Parking/Test 2 Stamping/Body 3 GA/Warehouse 4 Battery/Drive 5 Paint/ASRS/Critical Utilities 6 WWTP 7 General Works CONSTRUCTION TEAM CHRIS TINNEY SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7 PROJECT MANAGER PACKAGES 1/7 PROJECT ENGINEER PACKAGES 1/7 SCOTT URANICH SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER MADDI TADDI PROJECT MANAGER JASON ERNST SR. PROJECT ENGINEER MARK GABRIELLE SR. PROJECT MANAGER WILLIAM ERNST PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FIELD OPERATIONS SAFETY QC
Clayco Safe - ZERO Incident Culture
We take a proactive approach to safety by identifying and correcting risky behaviors, reinforcing compliance and recognizing the execution of exemplary safety practices.
OSHA REGION 7
OSHA VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM (VPP) STAR 6-YEAR MEMBER
Mobile Workforce OSHA VPP STAR (IA, NE, KS, MO)
ADOSH REGION 9
VPP Star Phoenix Office and Skye on 6th
NATIONALLY
In Pursuit of OSHA VPP Regions across the US
0.48 CURRENT EMR (WELL BELOW 1.0 INDUSTRY AVERAGE)
62% BELOW NATIONAL AVERAGERECORDABLE RATE
79% OF ALL PROJECTS HAD ZERO RECORDABLES IN 2022
CORE TENETS
Everyone Goes
Home Safe
—
Work Safe. Live Safe. 24/7.
—
You See It, You Own It
Safety Recognition
—
Safety Analytics
—
Accountability and Compliance
OF TRIR: total work hours 109% total recordable injury rate 72% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 7.2M Hours 15.1M Hours 2.46 TRIR 0.69 TRIR
DECREASE
Construction Safety Overview
Clayco has created a program of Health and Safety Excellence to be executed on all Clayco projects designed to ensure everyone goes home safe and healthy every day. Key components of this plan are:
• Development of a project site specific safety plan
• High Risk Activity and emergency planning and preparation
• Subcontractor prequalification & selection process
• Implementation of the Clayco “Rules to Live By”
• Safe Work Permitting
• First Day First Hour” for subcontractor foreman to review safety process and expectations
• Daily Pre-task Safety Analysis planning by all subcontractors
• Daily Stretch and Flex sessions
• Safety orientation and toolbox talks
• Safety auditing process
• Safety recognition program
• Dropped Item Prevention
• Project safety committee
Document Frequency Responsible Notes Daily Reports Daily Superintendent Manhours Daily, Weekly Report Superintendent
Review Daily Superintendent/ Safety Clayco PTSA Audit Weekly Project Team Minimum of 1 completed per week All Hands Toolbox Talks Weekly Project Team, coordinated by Superintendent Attendance by all team members is expected Equipment Inspections Monthly and as required Superintendent Permits (Hot Work, Excavation, etc.) As Required Superintendent 3rd Party Inspection Reports As Required Superintendent Hard copy reports to be provided to MC Extra Work/T&M Tickets As Authorized in advance by TC or DB Superintendent (validation, Project Manager (Tracking and Payment) Signed tickets to be provided to Project Manager
PTSA
Excellence in the Field
Main Technology Driver
DIGITAL LAYOUT AND REALITY CAPTURE
(Navvis, FARO, PowerBI)
• High precision / high velocity laser scanning
• Near-Real time work product analysis
• Cloud based sharing of capture data
• Critical elements placement validation
• Permanent building record in 3D
PROJECT DATA COLLECTION AND VALIDATION
(ACC, FARO, PowerBI, Bexel manager)
• Quality, Safety and Actuals capture
• Project information management in Common Data Environment
• Real time reporting – “Single pane of glass approach”
• Asset tracking for fully digital and highly structured handover
• Tightly controlled job-site accountability
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
(ACC, Structionsite, Skycatch, Newmetrix, powerBI)
• Documentation, Issues, Checklist in Cloud environment
• 360o photos, UAV capture, Job -site cameras
• AI / ML for image analysis and safety metrics
JOBSITE CONTROL
• Technology access to everyone on the site
• Job-site monitoring, centralized communication, resources utilization
• Owner dashboard
VDC - Project Delivery Capabilities
3D (BIM + Coordination)
• Build before you build
• Constructibility resolved
• Prefabrication optimized
• Waste eliminated
• Project insight with confidence
4D (BIM + Schedule)
• Reduction in trade mobilization time
• Increased awareness across trades
• Tighter tracking of progress
• Track actuals vs. planned on all jobs across the enterprise
• Clearly communicate our plan
5D (BIM + Schedule + Cost)
• Quantity validation during pre-con phase
• Estimate / progress vs. pay applications
• Align procurement with the schedule
6D (BIM + Schedule + Cost + Building Performance)
• What-if scenarios to optimize construction budget based on operational cost of a facility
• Inclusion of changes made during construction back into the model to deliver an as-built to the owner
Bringing it All Together – Real Time Insight
Project Insight Project - Progress Project – Earned Value Analysis
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
Executive Summary Schedule
SITE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE 2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
PRECON PHASE 30% 60% 90% PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
PRECON PHASE BASE CONSTRUCTION WINDOW NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
PRECON PHASE BASE CONSTRUCTION WINDOW SPACE TURNOVER WINDOW
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
PRECON PHASE BASE CONSTRUCTION WINDOW SPACE TURNOVER WINDOW PRE-OP/START UP
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
Executive Summary Schedule
2024 2023 04/08/2024 10/13/2023 DESIGN 10/13/2023 PROCUREMENT 10/13/2023 SITE DEVELOPMENT 12/25/2023 LONG LEAD EQUIPMENT 03/29/2024 12/25/2023 CONTRACT GC NOTICE TO PROCEED 10/13/2023 PERMITS AVAILABLE 10/13/2023 MILESTONES 2025 SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 01/02/2025 01/02/2025 12/20/2024 02/16/2024 CONSTRUCTION 02/16/2024 CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT / DISTRIBUTION 02/14/2025 05/13/2024 02/14/2025 WWT PLANT 06/07/2024 01/16/2025 NON-MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/24/2025 02/16/2024 07/16/2025 STAMPING Space Turnover 11/15/2024 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 01/27/2025 PAINT / ASRS 03/15/2024 Space Turnover 05/05/2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY / WAREHOUSE 06/07/2024 Space Turnover 05/28/2025 BODY 08/02/2024 Space Turnover 06/09/2025 BATTERY 08/30/2024 Space Turnover 07/07/2025 DRIVE UNIT 09/30/2025 09/24/2025 09/25/2025 09/30/2025 09/25/2025 09/25/2025
When Speed
challenges to overcome what we bring Major Challenges We See • Craft Labor Constraints & Local Competition • Material Demands • Procurement Logistics Solutions We Bring • Large Project Expertise • Operational Expertise to Deal with Challenging & Complex Projects • Ability to Leverage National Craft Labor Force 8/12Design Review Meeting 100% Package 8/17Incorporate Comments 8/21 8/3 9/18 BLDG 31 Sequence 2 8/3Firm up Structural Loads (MEP Loads Firm) 8/3 Prepare 100% Package 8/31Team Review 100% Package 9/9Design Review Meeting 100% Package 9/14Incorporate Comments 9/18 8/31 10/16 BLDG 31 Sequence 3 8/31Firm up Structural Loads (MEP Loads Firm) 8/31 Prepare 100% Package 9/28Team Review 100% Package 10/7Design Review Meeting 100% Package 10/12Incorporate Comments 10/16 9/28 11/13 BLDG 31 Sequence 4 9/28Firm up Structural Loads (MEP Loads Firm) 9/28 Prepare 100% Package 10/26Team Review 100% Package 11/4Design Review Meeting 100% Package 11/9Incorporate Comments 11/13 10/26 12/11 BLDG 31 Sequence 5 10/26Firm up Structural Loads (MEP Loads Firm) 10/26 Prepare 100% Package 11/23Team Review 100% Package 12/2Design Review Meeting 100% Package 12/7Incorporate Comments 12/11 Building 31 STRUCTURAL DESIGN SEQUENCE SEQ 1 SEQ 2 SEQ 3 SEQ 5 SEQ 4 Issued for Construction Issued for Construction Issued for Construction Issued for Construction Issued for Construction Oven DECISION BY 8/7/15 IDENTIFY AND SOLVE FOR CHALLENGES GAIN BUY-IN FROM SUBCONTRACTORS DYNAMIC SITE LOGISTICS VISUAL OBJECTIVES ESTABLISHED FLOW ACCOUNTABILITY & REPORTING 10% OF WHAT WE HEAR study’s show that people remember: Schedule Leadership: 80% OF WHAT WE SEE 20% OF WHAT WE READ Repeat Clients 4 PROJECTS CONFIDENTIAL TECH CLIENT DATA CENTERS 60+ PROJECTS 2 6 3 7
2
2
Matters
Master Project Schedule
• P6 Based containing all design, procurement, construction, and closeout activities
Executive Milestone Schedule
Executive Milestone Schedule
• Ensures alignment of high-level project goals
MILESTONES PRE-CONSTRUCTION Design Development: 60% Construction Documents 90% Issue for Permits Establish GMP MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT Steel Design Detail (Fabrication and Delivery) Passenger Boarding Bridges (2 New PBB’s) Escalators (2 Each) Flat Plate Baggage Conveyors (2 Each) CONSTRUCTION Mobilization Construction Duration COMMISSIONING, TURNOVER & CLOSEOUT Systems Commissioning AHJ Final Inspections & Approvals
Notice to Proceed 7/1/22 Owner Establishes Approved Budget 7/28/22 7/1/22 8/8/22 8/8/22 8/8/22 8/8/22 8/8/22 1/16/23 1/16/23 12/9/22 12/9/22 8/5/22 12/8/22 3/1/23 1/20/23 12/15/22 12/19/22 Please note: This schedule is preliminary and will be tailored with FWA Staff to ensure we meet FAA funding and/or bidding deadlines. 2022 2023 Months O N D M A M J O N D M A M J 3/12/24 4/23/24 5/10/23 6/22/23 4/26/23 3/8/24 4/29/24 3/25/24 2024
Activity ID Activity Name Original Duration Start Finish Total Float Rivian Horizon Manufacturing Proposal Accel 7.29.22 532 29-Aug-22 26-Sep-24 0 Milestones 438 29-Aug-22 14-May-24 94 Rivian 390 29-Aug-22 08-Mar-24 142 A1200 Clayco Notice To Proceed (Target 8.29.22) 29-Aug-22* -42 A1140 Ready to Start Paint Equipment Installation 05-Dec-23 208 A1990 Ready to Start Stamping Equipment Installation 27-Dec-23 193 A2000 Ready to Start Body Equipment Installation 23-Feb-24 152 A2010 Ready to Start Assembly Equipment Installation 08-Mar-24 142 Clayco 74 31-Jan-24 14-May-24 94 A2090 Utility Services On Utility 31-Jan-24 168 A2030 Substantial Completion Stamping 08-Feb-24 162 A1130 Power On Paint 12-Feb-24 160 A2020 Power On Stamping 12-Feb-24 160 A2100 Substantial Completion Admin 21-Feb-24 153 A1260 Substantial Completion Paint 28-Feb-24 148 A2040 Power On Body Shop 25-Mar-24 130 A2050 Substantial Completion Body Shop 08-Apr-24 120 A2060 Power On Assembly 08-Apr-24 120 A2070 Substantial Completion Assembly 22-Apr-24 110 A2110 Substantial Completion Ancillary 14-May-24 94 Pre-Construction 329 29-Aug-22 11-Dec-23 113 Design 196 29-Aug-22 02-Jun-23 -42 A1150 Programming/General Arrangement 22 29-Aug-22 28-Sep-22 -42 A1160 30% Schematic Design 47 29-Sep-22 05-Dec-22 -42 A1170 60% Design Development 108 31-Oct-22 31-Mar-23 -42 A1180 90% Construction Design 130 01-Dec-22 02-Jun-23 -42 Budget 0 Procurement 307 29-Sep-22 11-Dec-23 113 Subcontractors 0 Long Lead Materials/Equipment 307 29-Sep-22 11-Dec-23 113 A1230 Roofing Lead Time (44 Weeks) 220 29-Sep-22 08-Aug-23 30 A1210 Electrical Gear Lead Time (52 Weeks) 260 06-Dec-22 11-Dec-23 113 A1220 Structural Steel Lead Time (39 Weeks)[Initial Delivery 26 Wks] 195 06-Dec-22 08-Sep-23 0 A1240 Mechanical Equipment Lead Time (35 Weeks) 175 06-Dec-22 10-Aug-23 114 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 2022 2023 2024 Rivian Horizon Manufacturing Proposal Accel 7.29.22 Milestones Rivian Clayco Notice To Proceed (Target 8.29.22) Ready to Start Paint Equipment Installation Ready to Start Stamping Equipment Installation Ready to Start Body Equipment Installation Ready to Start Assembly Equipment Installation Clayco Utility Services On Utility Substantial Completion Stamping Power On Paint Power On Stamping Substantial Completion Admin Substantial Completion Paint Power On Body Shop Substantial Completion Body Shop Power On Assembly Substantial Completion Assembly Substantial Completion Ancillary Pre-Construction Design Programming/General Arrangement 30% Schematic Design 60% Design Development 90% Construction Design Procurement Long Lead Materials/Equipment Roofing Lead Time (44 Weeks) Electrical Gear Lead Time (52 Weeks) Structural Steel Lead Time (39 Weeks)[Initial Delivery 26 Wks] Mechanical Equipment Lead Time (35 Weeks) Rivian Horizon Manufacturing Proposal Accel 7.29.22 Construction Schedule 29-Jul-22 Remaining Level of Effort Actual Level of Effort Actual Work Remaining Work Critical Remaining Work Milestone Schedule Printed 29-Jul-22 @ 09:42 Page 1 of 5 Activity ID Activity Name Original Duration Start Finish Total Float Construction 391 29-Nov-22 07-Jun-24 77 Site Work & Utilities 75 29-Nov-22 14-Mar-23 184 Grading 75 29-Nov-22 14-Mar-23 184 A2130 Building Pad/Stabilize Body 65 29-Nov-22 28-Feb-23 78 A1190 Building Pad/Stabilize Paint (Rivian Schedule Milestone 10.1.22) 43 01-Dec-22* 31-Jan-23 -42 A2140 Building Pad/Stabilize Assembly 65 13-Dec-22 14-Mar-23 90 A2120 Building Pad/Stabilize Stamping 43 15-Dec-22 14-Feb-23 78 A2150 Building Pad/Stabilize Utility 43 15-Dec-22 14-Feb-23 173 A2160 Building Pad/Stabilize Admin 43 29-Dec-22 28-Feb-23 184 A2170 Building Pad/Stabilize Ancillary 43 13-Jan-23 14-Mar-23 184 Site Utilities Site Features Facilities Construction 345 26-Dec-22 30-Apr-24 104 Paint Shop 291 26-Dec-22 14-Feb-24 158 A1000 Foundations and Pits Paint 65 26-Dec-22 27-Mar-23 95 A1010 Undergound E&P Rough-In Paint 65 26-Jan-23 26-Apr-23 95 A1020 Concrete Slab on Grade Paint 65 20-Feb-23 19-May-23 95 A1030 Structural Steel Erection Paint 87 08-Jun-23 10-Oct-23 35 A1060 Concrete Elevated Slab on Deck Paint 65 19-Jul-23 18-Oct-23 35 A1040 Building Envelope Paint 80 11-Aug-23 04-Dec-23 35 A1050 MEP&FP Systems Paint 130 11-Aug-23 14-Feb-24 136 A1080 Interior Upfit Paint 65 19-Oct-23 22-Jan-24 165 A1070 Primary Electrical Install Paint 43 12-Dec-23 12-Feb-24 160 Stamping 274 17-Jan-23 12-Feb-24 160 A1270 Foundations and Pits Stamping 87 17-Jan-23 17-May-23 87 A1280 Undergound E&P Rough-In Stamping 65 16-Feb-23 17-May-23 87 A1290 Concrete Slab on Grade Stamping 43 20-Mar-23 17-May-23 87 A1300 Structural Steel Erection Stamping 65 22-Jun-23 22-Sep-23 42 A1310 Building Envelope Stamping 87 23-Aug-23 26-Dec-23 42 A1320 MEP&FP Systems Stamping 87 23-Aug-23 26-Dec-23 128 A1350 Interior Upfit Stamping 65 24-Oct-23 25-Jan-24 162 A1340 Primary Electrical Install Stamping 43 12-Dec-23 12-Feb-24 160 Body Shop 316 29-Dec-22 25-Mar-24 130 A1360 Foundations and Pits Body 87 29-Dec-22 01-May-23 78 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 2022 2023 2024 Construction Site Work Utilities Grading Building Pad/Stabilize Body Building Pad/Stabilize Paint (Rivian Schedule Milestone 10.1.22) Building Pad/Stabilize Assembly Building Pad/Stabilize Stamping Building Pad/Stabilize Utility Building Pad/Stabilize Admin Building Pad/Stabilize Ancillary Facilities Construction Paint Shop Foundations and Pits Paint Undergound E&P Rough-In Paint Concrete Slab on Grade Paint Structural Steel Erection Paint Concrete Elevated Slab on Deck Paint Building Envelope Paint MEP&FP Systems Paint Interior Upfit Paint Primary Electrical Install Paint Stamping Foundations and Pits Stamping Undergound E&P Rough-In Stamping Concrete Slab on Grade Stamping Structural Steel Erection Stamping Building Envelope Stamping MEP&FP Systems Stamping Interior Upfit Stamping Primary Electrical Install Stamping Body Shop Foundations and Pits Body Rivian Horizon Manufacturing Proposal Accel 7.29.22 Construction Schedule 29-Jul-22 Remaining Level of Effort Actual Level of Effort Actual Work Remaining Work Critical Remaining Work Milestone Schedule Printed 29-Jul-22 @ 09:42 Page of Activity ID Activity Name Original Duration Start Finish Total Float A1370 Undergound E&P Rough-In Body 65 31-Jan-23 01-May-23 99 A1380 Concrete Slab on Grade Body 87 01-Mar-23 30-Jun-23 78 A1390 Structural Steel Erection Body 87 21-Jul-23 21-Nov-23 0 A1400 Building Envelope Body 108 21-Sep-23 22-Feb-24 0 A1410 MEP&FP Systems Body 130 21-Sep-23 25-Mar-24 108 A1440 Interior Upfit Body 87 21-Nov-23 25-Mar-24 120 A1430 Primary Electrical Install Body 43 25-Jan-24 25-Mar-24 130 Assembly 316 13-Jan-23 08-Apr-24 120 A1450 Foundations and Pits Assembly 87 13-Jan-23 15-May-23 90 A1460 Undergound E&P Rough-In Assembly 65 14-Feb-23 15-May-23 111 A1470 Concrete Slab on Grade Assembly 87 15-Mar-23 17-Jul-23 90 A1480 Structural Steel Erection Assembly 87 04-Aug-23 06-Dec-23 12 A1490 Building Envelope Assembly 108 05-Oct-23 07-Mar-24 12 A1500 MEP&FP Systems Assembly 130 05-Oct-23 08-Apr-24 98 A1530 Interior Upfit Assembly 87 06-Dec-23 08-Apr-24 110 A1520 Primary Electrical Install Assembly 43 08-Feb-24 08-Apr-24 120 Central Utility Building 266 17-Jan-23 31-Jan-24 168 A1540 Foundations Utility 30 17-Jan-23 27-Feb-23 173 A1550 Undergound E&P Rough-In Utility 43 31-Jan-23 30-Mar-23 173 A1560 Concrete Slab on Grade Utility 22 02-Mar-23 31-Mar-23 173 A1570 Structural Steel Erection Utility 43 07-Jul-23 06-Sep-23 95 A1620 Pipe Bridge for Distribution Utility 65 07-Jul-23 06-Oct-23 238 A1580 Building Envelope Utility 43 09-Aug-23 09-Oct-23 94 A1590 MEP&FP Systems Utility 95 11-Sep-23 24-Jan-24 94 A1610 Primary Electrical Install Utility 35 12-Dec-23 31-Jan-24 168 Adminstrative Office 248 31-Jan-23 19-Jan-24 176 A1630 Foundations Admin 43 31-Jan-23 30-Mar-23 187 A1640 Undergound E&P Rough-In Admin 22 01-Mar-23 30-Mar-23 188 A1650 Concrete Slab on Grade Admin 43 02-Mar-23 01-May-23 187 A1660 Structural Steel Erection Admin 43 07-Jul-23 06-Sep-23 120 A1670 Building Envelope Admin 65 09-Aug-23 08-Nov-23 119 A1680 MEP&FP Systems Admin 87 07-Sep-23 10-Jan-24 119 A1710 Interior Upfit Admin 90 07-Sep-23 15-Jan-24 160 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 2022 2023 2024 Undergound E&P Rough-In Body Concrete Slab on Grade Body Structural Steel Erection Body Building Envelope Body MEP&FP Systems Body Interior Upfit Body Primary Electrical Install Body Assembly Foundations and Pits Assembly Undergound E&P Rough-In Assembly Concrete Slab on Grade Assembly Structural Steel Erection Assembly Building Envelope Assembly MEP&FP Systems Assembly Interior Upfit Assembly Primary Electrical Install Assembly Central Utility Building Foundations Utility Undergound E&P Rough-In Utility Concrete Slab on Grade Utility Structural Steel Erection Utility Pipe Bridge for Distribution Utility Building Envelope Utility MEP&FP Systems Utility Primary Electrical Install Utility Adminstrative Office Foundations Admin Undergound E&P Rough-In Admin Concrete Slab on Grade Admin Structural Steel Erection Admin Building Envelope Admin MEP&FP Systems Admin Interior Upfit Admin Rivian Horizon Manufacturing Proposal Accel 7.29.22 Construction Schedule 29-Jul-22 Remaining Level of Effort Actual Level of Effort Actual Work Remaining Work Critical Remaining Work Milestone Schedule Printed 29-Jul-22 @ 09:42 Page of 5
Scheduling Philosophy
Pull
Planning
Visual Sequence Scheduling • Drive Field Level Communications • Gain sub buy-in
4D Schedule
Weekly Work Plan
Plan out your Daily Tasks, including punch list issues, and the # of men working on each task for each day that task is planned based on Project Milestones and 3 week look-ahead schedule
Plateau Excavation Work Plan
Plateau Excavation Daily Notes
Try State Stabilization Work Plan
Try State Stabilization Daily Notes
Actual Workers=>> Total Workers planned=>> Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Date of the work plan week starting with Monday 2/27 2/28 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 Yes / No? Possible Constraints South end Building Pad fill building pad with cut fill from North building pad with dump trucks Moistures at 34% 4 4 4 4 4 4 South end Building Pad Compact in 12" lifts with 318 and rollers 8" to 12" Lifts 3 3 3 3 3 3 Dig out cut areas and load trucks with excavators slope banks 3 3 3 3 3 3 Layout and supervise 3 3 3 3 3 3 Labor to fuel light towers and equipment 3 3 3 3 3 3 Gravel entrance road 2 3 Notes Planned Daily Man Count 18 19 16 16 16 16 0 Man Power: Actual Daily Man Count 16 20 Orientations # Of Orientations Needed 0 1 Work Hours: Work Ending at ? 7:30 7:30 T&M: T&M Work Yes/ No no no Testing Testing/inspections/ checklists yes yes Delivery Notes: Deliveries/ Staging areas yes yes Constraints: Upcoming constraints? yes no South end Building Pad Spread lime on building pad 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mix Lime Into soil 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Load spreader trucks 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Notes Planned Daily Man Count 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Man Power: Actual Daily Man Count 6 6 Orientations # Of Orientations Needed o 0 Work Hours: Work Ending at ? 7:30 7:30 T&M: T&M Work Yes/ No no no Testing Testing/inspections/ checklists no yes Delivery Notes: Deliveries/ Staging areas yes yes 10 loads of lime
pad 3 10 loads of stone
fill on warehouse one and gravel road entrance Orientation Area
Done Per Plan?
Schedule of Meetings (Construction Phase)
Superintendent, Subcontractor Meeting (6:30AM EST)
• Review daily work tasks, safety, required inspections, deliveries, etc.
Clayco Field Staff, Subcontractors
Daily 60 min
Contractor, Subcontractor Meeting (Tuesdays 10:00AM EST)
• Review safety, RFI’s, submittals, material procurement, change orders, schedule, quality control, etc.
Clayco Field Staff & Project Management, Subcontractors
Weekly 60 min
Contractor Jobsite Team Meeting (Daily 9:00AM EST)
• Review critical tasks required for the day, share updates and discuss any assistance needed from the team
Clayco Field Staff & Project Management
Daily 60 min
Contractor Management Safety Audit (MSA) (Thursdays 1:30PM EST)
• Site safety walk to observe the overall condition of the project, identify safe acts, identify rising star candidates, share and provide feedback on observations gathered during the walk.
Clayco Field Staff , Subcontractors
(All employees, subcontractor’s representatives present on jobsite) Weekly 60 min
Contractor Management Safety Audit (MSA) (Thursdays 1:30PM EST)
• Site safety walk to observe the overall condition of the project, identify safe acts, identify rising star candidates, share and provide feedback on observations gathered during the walk.
Clayco Field Staff , Subcontractors
(All employees, subcontractor’s representatives present on jobsite) Weekly 60 min
Owner, Architect, Contractor (OAC) Meeting (Fridays 10:30-11:30AM EST)
• Review the construction status of the project with the ownership team
Rivian Project Leadership
Clayco Project Management & Field Personnel
Jacobs Project Management
Weekly 60 min
Key Meeting Name* Meeting Purpose Required Participants Frequency Duration
RAID (Risks, Action Items, Issues, Decisions) Process
• On Rivian, the RAID Process is:
(1) Design Decision Log for Design Items
(2) RAID Log for Construction Items
• The design team will have 5-7 days as standard duration to respond, with the potential of critical items requiring a response within 24 or 48 hours of submission. Client/Owner will have 5-7 days as the standard duration to respond
• In the design phase, RFIs are reviewed once a week via RFI Log in weekly reports with Rivian’s project manager and Jacobs assigned personnel
• The submittal process occurs through ACC Build (review & approval). Rivian can be copied on approved submittal distribution lists if they choose to
RFI and RAID Evaluation Criteria
Request For Information
(RFI)
Process of formally seeking further clarification of drawings, specifications, or other official construction documents, from Client, Architect of Record, Engineer of Record, and/or any other necessary parties.
Please provide a formal specification for the generator equipment required for the project.
Risk
An uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a negative effect on one or more of the project objectives. Risks do not have due dates but should have a migration plan and assigned to an individual to monitor.
Generator equipment may not arrive by the required-on-job (ROJ) date of April 5, 2024 due to supply chain issues.
Action Items
Formal events or work that must be completed within a given timeframe. Must always include a start and due dates, ball-in-court assigned, and be as detailed as possible to ensure proper completion of the action item.
Obtain the Equipment Log from ABC Construction to determine procurement status of the generator equipment.
Issues
An event or condition that must be managed or resolved to avoid negatively impacting the project. Issues are items that have already happened and have a required due date in which they must be resolved before further problems arise.
Generator equipment is late and cannot be delivered by the initial ROJ date.
Decisions
Specific and detailed decisions regarding the project execution that are required from an individual. All decisions must have a due date and be assigned to a specific individual.
A decision from Client is needed on identifying a new generator equipment vendor or compensate existing vendor to expedite.
Item Description Hypothetical Example
RAID Reporting Protocols (Design Phase)
• Clayco Project Management
• Clayco Field Personnel
• No Filters (Full RAID Log Review)
• RAID Log setup and initial review with all project stakeholders
• Review RAID evaluation criteria, process and reporting protocols
• Assign an Information Manager responsible for RAID process activities
• Clayco Project Leadership
• Clayco Project Management
• Clayco Field Personnel
• Filtered by Priority (Critical / High)
• Filtered by Ball-inCourt Company to Rivian
• Clayco/Rivian to review latest RAID Log provided by Information Manager
• Assess high priority RAID items and validate accuracy of ‘priority’, ‘due dates’ and ‘mitigation strategies’
• Communicate any updates to RAID item type, priority, due dates, and ball-in-court company/ individuals to Information Manager for updating
• Clayco
•
• Filtered by Priority (Critical / High)
• Filter by “Days Remaining to Complete” (< 7 days)
• Clayco field personnel to review latest RAID Log (field items) provided by Information
• Manager
• Identify any new RAID items that should be documented in the RAID Log and communicate to the Information Manager
• Define mitigation strategies for RAID items and confirm which RAID items need to be discussed at the OAC meeting
•
• No Filters (Full RAID Log Review)
• Review full RAID Log periodically and at the end of the project for lessons learned
• These lessons learned will be documented and communicated to Rivian
Key Meetings Occurrence Participants RAID Log Filters* Reporting Activities PEP Kick-off Meeting Once
• Clayco Project Leadership
Weekly
Owner, Architect, Contractor (OAC) Meeting
• Rivian Project Leadership
Field Subcontractor Meeting Weekly
Field Personnel
Clayco Subcontractors
Lessons Learned Meetings Periodic
Clayco Project Leadership
•
Project Management
• Clayco
Field Personnel
Clayco
2.8 DD LOG & RAID Reporting Log Example 2.8 – RAID LOG DD Log & RAID Reporting Log Example
RAID Closeout Procedure
RAID Type Closeout Criteria*
Risk • Risks should remain OPEN until the full mitigation strategy is in-place
Reporting Activities
• Assigned Ball-in-Court individual will complete the mitigation plan
• Project Leadership will approve mitigation plan
• Mitigation plan is distributed to the full team
• All Closeout Criteria are met
• Information Manger is notified, and item is listed as CLOSED Action
• All Actions must have a Due Date
• Actions are only listed as CLOSED once the full action is completed and all parties are notified
• Assigned Ball-in-Court individual will ensure the required action is completed by necessary parties
• Team members are notified of the action and any necessary information is distributed, as required
• All Closeout Criteria are met
• All though not required, all effort should be made to establish a Due Date for the issue to be resolved
• Issues are considered CLOSED once a follow-on plan is recommended, approved by necessary parties, and in-place to address the Issue
• If an Issue becomes a RFI or Decision, the Issue shall remain OPEN until the RFI/Decision is completed.
• Assigned Ball-in-Court individual will develop any necessary resolution plans
• Information Manger is notified, and item is listed as CLOSED Issue
• As the issue in monitored, if the resolution plan requires an official RFI or any follow-on Decisions, the Ball-in-Court individual will ensure the RFI Manager, and the Information Manager are made aware
• Final resolution for the Issue distributed to the full team
• All Closeout Criteria are met
• Information Manger is notified, and item is listed as CLOSED Decision
• All Decisions must have a Due Date
• A Decision is CLOSED once the Decision is made and formally disturbed (via email or writing is preferred for record).
• Assigned Ball-in-Court individual will complete consult the necessary workstream to gather all required information needed for a decision
• All Closeout Criteria are met
• Information Manger is notified, and item is listed as CLOSED
*In all RAID item closeout scenarios, the final act of listing an item as CLOSED should only be completed by the Information Manager or Project Leadership’s assigned delegate(s)
Document Control
Clayco Mission Control
• Manages the electronic drawings, specs, approved submittals, etc., in multiple areas to ensure accuracy, easy access and consistency throughout the life of the project for Clayco, its Designers, Owners and Subcontractors.
• Assemble subcontracts and change orders, verify accuracy and completeness, send for signatures electronically, file and distribute.
• Manage electronic drawings in various programs, as required.
• Set up companies and contacts in various programs and apply security settings.
• Manage record workflow processes for any customizations
• Assist with submittals to finalize, save and distribute
• Manage the closeout documents for turnover to the owner
• Train colleagues and subcontractors when needed as well as technical issues with Clayco’s data management softwares
• Support preconstruction in bidding process – sending bid packages, adding subcontractors to preconstruction software
PROGRAMS USED
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PlanGrid
Pype.io
PMWeb
AdobeSign
Office 365
Building Connected
FirstVerify
Workato
Request for Information (RFI) Process Construction
• RFI will be processed via ACC Build Software.
• 5-7 days is a standard duration to respond, with the potential of critical items requiring a response within 24 or 48 hours of submission.
• In the Construction phase, open RFIs are reviewed during the weekly OAC Meeting with Rivian and Jacobs.
• The submittal process ideally occurs through ACC Build / BIM360, per Rivian preference, Rivian can be copied on approved submittal distribution lists if they choose to.
Discovery RFI Review Timelines
Days
Days
Business
1
Day 1-2 Business
2-7 Business
Critical High Normal Standard
RFI Reporting Protocols
Kickoff Meeting
Once
• Clayco Project Leadership
• Clayco Project Management
• Clayco Field Personnel
• No Filters (Full RFI Log Review)
• RFI Log setup in PMWeb (incl. workflows) and initial review with all project stakeholders
• Review RFI evaluation criteria, process and reporting protocols
Weekly
• Rivian Project Leadership
• Clayco Project Leadership
• Clayco Project Management
• Clayco Field Personnel
• Filtered by Priority (Critical / High)
• Clayco/Rivian/AOR to review latest RFI Log provided by Information Manager
• Assess high priority RFI items and AOR to provide update on response/information needed
• Assign an Information Manager responsible for RFI process activities Owner, Architect, Contractor (OAC) Meeting
• Communicate any updates to RFI priority, due dates, and decisions needed to Information Manager for updating
• Clayco Project Management
• No Filters (Full RFI Log Review)
• Clayco project management personnel to review latest RFI Log provided by Information Manager
• Identify any new RFIs that should be added to the RFI Log and communicate to the Information Manager
• Define potential responses for AOR for RFIs and confirm which RFIs need to be discussed at the OAC meeting
• Clayco Field Personnel
• Clayco Subcontractors
• Filtered by Priority (Critical / High)
• Clayco field personnel to review latest RFI Log (field items) provided by Information Manager
• Identify any new RFIs that should be documented in the RFI Log and communicate to the Information Manager
• Define potential responses for AOR for RFIs and confirm which RFIs need to be discussed at the OAC meeting
* Clayco RFI Log is the single source of truth to be produced as standard report from Clayco PMWeb, managed by the RFI Manager and filtered accordingly for concise reporting prior to meetings
Meetings Occurrence Participants
Reporting Activities Project
RFI Log Filters*
Project
Coordination Meeting Weekly
Field Coordination Meeting Weekly
RFI Process
Subcontractor fills out Subcontractor
PE/PM receives email notification that RFI has been created
• Clayco is responsible for collecting the RFI’s from the necessary parties and submitting them to the Architect/ Engineer for further interpretation or clarification.
USER GROUPS:
• Project Manager
• Project Engineer
• Superintendent
• Mission Control
• Subcontractor
REQUIRED INFORMATION
• Project Name
• RFI’s may be submitted in the buyout process while subcontractors are interpreting the drawings in order to provide pricing, but the majority of RFI’s are submitted throughout the construction process.
• Architect
• Clayco facilitates recording RFI’s and distributing the answers to the necessary parties.
• Phase if applicable
• Description
• Drawing/Specifications Reference
• RFI Date
• Select who the RFI is from
• Select who it will be sent to for an answer
• Select the trade
• Select the Priority Level for the RFI
FINAL REVIEW 1ST REVIEW Submitter and First Review (Multiple) Review and Approve Final Review, Approval, and Distribution (Multiple) Project Engineer Project Manager Project Engineer Project Manager Architect and/ or Concurrent Reviewers 2ND REVIEW
RFI Form
Cost Management
• Collaborative Design Mindset
• Lessons Learned/Preconstruction
• Transparent Process
• Continuous and Responsive Feedback
• Risk Identification
• BIM Enabled Estimating
• Quantity Verification
• Value Enhancement
• Lean Construction
• Constructability Review
• Life Cycle Cost/Payback Analysis
• Vendor Collaboration
DECISION MATRIX CONSTRAINT LOG
MODEL BASED ESTIMATING
Turner Construction Constraint Log Prior Work Not Complete 10 11 Unclear Task Description Staff Not Available Materials Not Available 1543 Date Identified Area Description Action Document Needed (ASI, RFI, Submittal) Requestor T/C Team Member Ball Court Company Responsible for Final Decision Responsible Individual Requestor Date Needed Duration from 'Date Identified' Promise Date Completed Date YES NO 1517 7/31/19 Loading Dock RFI 2391: Waterproofing new Dock Drains in Bulletin 39 RFI Response T/C submit NOC Direction from Ownership CCD Kedmont Brian RLE RLE Scott M. 8/7/19 1521 8/22/19 NW Corner RFI 2434: Northwest Corner ComEd Vault Lid RFI Response T/C submit NOC Direction from Ownership (CCD issued) CCD Abbey Paving Jake RLE RLE Mark L. 8/29/19 1567 7/27/20 L3 RFI #2966 and RFI 2999 (Define Hardware): Confirmation scope Security work Level Freight Lobby Vs. Convene Security work RFI Response T/C NOC Direction from Ownership CCD Gurtz/JCI Juan R. RLE RLE Mark L. 7/30/20 1580 8/18/20 Wacker Stair RFI #2983: Screen Wall Under Wacker Stair RFI Response T/C NOC Direction from Ownership CCD FEM Sally K. RLE Gensler Scott M. 8/25/20 9/8/20 Lower Level RFI #2991: Follow up to RFI 2426 Duct Height VAV LL1.8 RFI Response T/C NOC Direction from Ownership CCD FEM Sally K. Turner/Clayco Gensler Marissa L. 9/15/20 RFI 2996: LL121 Fire Damper Through Beam Penetration RFI Response Direction from Ownership Sally K. Turner/Clayco 1589 9/23/20 Jackson RFI #3001: Traffic Signal Existing Conduit Blockage at Franklin St Jackson Blvd RFI Response T/C NOC Direction from Ownership CCD Gurtz Juan R. RLE RLE Mark L. 9/30/20 1594 10/20/20 NE Corner RFI #3015: Bollard Elevations NE Corner RFI Response RFI Cerami Brian V3 Gensler Scott M. 10/20/20 1592 10/14/20 Adams Submittal 055000-122R1 Adams Curb Plate Approved Submittal Submittal Waukegan Brian Gensler Gensler Scott M. 10/21/20 RFI Response Direction from Ownership Ewing-Doherty Sally K. 1593 10/16/20 Adams Submittal 055000-121R4 Adams Street Bollards (CCD 1082 NW ComEd Vault) Approved Submittal Submittal Zalk Brian Gensler Thorton Tomasetti Taylor 10/23/20 1594 10/19/20 Submittal NA-39R3 Sign Type ST09 Shop Drawings Approved Submittal Submittal Legacy Signs Brian Gensler Gensler Jin C. 10/26/20 Total Tasks Project PPC 99% Off Project Demands Unforeseen Conditions Other CATEGORIES OF VARIANCE Tasks Completed Willis Tower Constraint Log
PULL PLAN
Maximize Flexibility Change is Constant
Change Management Approach
Empowered Solutions
Focused Change Management Team
Leverage robust processes & systems that are both Transparent and Efficient
Continuously Communicate with stakeholders on all potential changes
Prompt Impact & Cost Analysis
Validate Subcontractor
Change Orders
Accurate Implementation of changes
Change Management must move with the speed of the project.
Rough order of magnitude (ROM) submitted
Rivian Approval to proceed and get firm pricing
Clayco submit Change Order Proposal (COP)
Rivian Final Approval or Decision
Change Event Occurs Change Announcement Issued from Owner
Change Order Management
Initiate CE in PM Web Request Sub Pricing by LS or T&M Approved Change Included in Monthly Billing Review Sub Pricing and Backup Clayco Assembles Time and Costs Impacted by Change Sub Prepares Quarterly Per Contract Time with Backup Sub Performing Work, Submits Daily Tickets Owner Signs COR Revise or End of Process Revise OCO Compile Detailed Backup by Units and Rates Track Costs per COR Terms CCD Issued by Owner Change Event Occurs Owner Approval Accept (Owner Change) Owner Initiated Change Sub Initiated Change Lump Sum Reject Accept (Sub Change) T&M Owner Approve? Notification to Owner Ref. PCO# Submit COR to Owner for Approval Sub Provides COR Weekly Issue Sub Change Order Submit OCO To Owner YES NO KEY: PM Web - Clayco Project Management Software CE - Change Event COR - Change Order Request OCO - Owner Change Order PCO - Potential Change Order CCD - Construction Change Directive LS - Lump Sum T&M - Time and Materials
Change Management Documentation
CHANGE ORDER REQUEST
104721 - NP Hawks Prairie Bldg 2 Spec CE# COR# CO ID# DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE APPROVE DATE BUDGET Approved $376,400.00 5 001 Pad Stabilization 11/21/2019 $376,400.00 12 Wood Roof to Metal Roof Change 1/31/2020 $0.00 PROJECT TOTAL $376,400.00 Pricing Change Events 104721 - NP Hawks Prairie Bldg 2 Spec CE# COR# CO ID# DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE APPROVE DATE BUDGET Approved ($31,196.00) 10 003 Builders Risk Deduct 1/6/2020 2/4/2020 ($31,196.00) Draft $294,129.45 Yellow = Pricing CE's Change
The Contract is hereby revised by the following items: COR CE# Amount Note: The Change Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive until the cost and time have been agreed upon by both the Owner and Contractor, in which case, a Change Order is executed to supersede the Construction Change Order. The original Contract Value was . $4,201,833.00 Sum of changes by prior Contract Change Orders $0.00 The Contract Value prior to this Contract Change Order was . $4,201,833.00 The Contract value will be changed by this Contract Change Order in the amount of The new Contract Value including this Contract Change Order will be $4,201,833.00 The Contract duration will be changed by . 0 Days The revised Substantial completion date as of this Contract change order is . 10/27/2017 Clayco, Inc. CRG-Richmond LLC Michelle Schwarm Jenny King 2199 Innerbelt Business Center Drive 35 E. Wacker Drive St. Louis, MO 63114 Chicago, IL 60601 Print Name: Print Name: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: 1of1 Printed on 5/21/2020 v.3 Clayco Contract_CO Contract Change Order 100050 Clayco PMWeb Test Project CRG-Richmond LLC 2/17/2017 Contract Date: 35 E. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 5/26/2017 Change Order Date: 001 Contract #: PMWeb System CO#: 004 Line # Description Approved Amount 1 Test Line Item 1 - Steel Change $0.00 2 Test Line 2 - Concrete $0.00 3 General Liability Insurance $0.00 4 Fee $0.00 Total Amount: $0.00 Respectfully, APPROVED BY Matt Nigh Date Date: Thursday, May 21, 2020 To: Jenny King Clayco, Inc. 35 E. Wacker Drive Chicago IL, 60601 RE: COR # 004 - CE Test Project: 100050 - Clayco PMWeb Test Project Dear Jenny King, We have reviewed the scopes of work and have verified that all extra work items are in compliance with our contract agreement. The following is a detailed itemization of this COR. This scope of work requires a schedule extension of 0 calendar days. Please return one 1 fully executed copy of this Change Order Request to my attention so this work can be released to proceed. If you have any questions regarding this Change Order Request please call me at your earliest convenience. 1of1 Printed on 5/21/2020 v.5 PMWeb
Order Request
Clayco PMWeb Test Project 100050 TO: Clayco, Inc. ATTN: Jenny King FROM: Matt Nigh NOPC No: Initiative Date: 3/3/2016 Change Event No: 28 This notice is advising you of a change in the work or delay or potential delay, not attributable to Clayco, Inc. (“Clayco”), which may impact the Contract Sum and/or Schedule on the Project. Once Clayco has had reasonable opportunity to fully assess the situation, additional information will be provided. In the meantime, Clayco will exercise reasonable good faith efforts to mitigate any potential impacts that may arise from the events, briefly described as follows: A.S.I No:_______ Bulletin No:-_________ RFI No:__________ CCD No:___________ Other:_____________ DESCRIPTION: Other Cause(s): NON-CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS FORCE MAJEURE/WEATHER OTHER OWNER SUSPENSION CHANGE ORDER APPROVAL SEQUENCE REVISION GENERAL SCHEDULE OWNER'S DESIGN CONSULTANT UNSAFE WORKING CONDITION AREA NOT ACCESSIBLE AREA NOT READY DUE TO WORK OF OTHERS UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OTHER RAIN SNOW/ICE HIGH WINDS TEMPERATURE OTHER Date(s) of Delay Or Potential Delay: 3/7/2016 Number of Claimed Days (if Known at this time): 4 Trades Affected (if Known at this time): Critical path activities delayed: Retaining wall pour and site utility installation. Other activities delayed: South Parking Lot Paving Describe: Torrential rains all day, accumulating to 1.5" of rain. REMARKS: Signed:_____Matt Nigh Project Manager PM NAME AND TITLE Date: ______________________________________ Acknowlegment: COMMENTS:This acknowledment is subject to confirmation by the contract documents. Signed:_______________________________________________ OWNER REP Date: ______________________________________ NOTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL CHANGE Clayco's initial review indicates that this change or delay or potential delay may INCREASE INCREASE DECREASE DECREASE DOES NOT CHANGE DOES NOT CHANGE THE CONTRACT SUM THE SCHEDULE Actual Schedule and cost impact will be confirmed to via our Change Event No: 28 CHANGE STATUS: On Hold: Awaiting witten directive From Owner/Architect Estimate the change to the Contract Sum and/or Schedule, not proceeding with the change. Estimate the change to the Contract Sum and/or Schedule Proceeding immediately with this Work described Notification of Potential Change Change Order Request Change Order Log Contract Change Order
Change Management Process
Notice Of Potential Change Issued 1. Impact Description 2. Potential Cost & Impact 3. Mitigation Measures Change Order Request Issued 1. Includes Subcontractor Pricing 2. Invoices or Quotes 3. Schedule Analysis With Required Approval Date To Avoid Delays Change Event Identified 1. RFI 2. Drawing Revision 3. Scope Gap 4. Unforeseen Condition 5. Existing Condition 6. Schedule Delay 7. Schedule Acceleration Change Order Review 1. Weekly Owner /GC Commercial Mtg To Review Cor Log and Owner Allowance Draw Log Change Order Executed 1. Lump Sum or 2. NTE Provisional (T&M) Work Commences
QC Process for Submittals
PREPARATORY
Accessibility
INITIAL
FOLLOW-UP
• Use of cloud-based schedule & issue tracking software to provide 24/7 access and real time information.
Benchmarking
Pre-construction meeting by Definable Feature of Work
Initial inspection with established checklists at the start of definable features of work
Clayco uses established pre-construction meeting agendas for consistency
Clayco uses established checklists in BIM360 for lessons learned and consistency
Continuous inspections with established checklists by areas
• Train early, establish what good looks like and make repetition easy through visuals and finetuning processes. Celebrate the wins, create a culture of caring!
Collaboration
• Beyond just coordination, we collaborate with our partners ensuring the process is most effective for that team.
Clayco uses BIM360 to closeout areas throughout the project with issues management visible to the owner
Quality Management Program
01 Interview through Design
Design Input Resource
- Model Based Take-off
- Reality Capture
- Virtual Mockup Walkthroughs
- Clash Detection
- Drawing Peer Review
- Constructibility and Knowledge
- Equipment Access Review
- Stoplight Drawings
- Sustainability Evaluation
- Equipment Access Review
- Pull Planning
02 Construction Phase
Field Resource
- Model Use and Distribution
- Pre-fabrication
- 4D, Schedule Simulation
- Reality Capture
- Real Time Progress Tracking
- Last Planner
- Layout Verification
03 Close-out Phase
- Field Review and Testing
- Pre-testing of Equipment/ Systems Before 3rd Party
- Environment Quality Monitoring
- QA/QC Tour Review
Operational Resource
- LEED Submission
- Building Infrastructure Scan
- Updated Virtual Building Model
- Building Pre-commissioning and Validation
- Digital Building Handover
- Engaged Training and Turnover with Facilities
Three Phase Quality Control
01 Preparatory
Pre-construction meeting by definable feature of work
• Use established preconstruction meeting agendas for consistency
02 Initial Initial inspection with established checklists at the start of definable features of work
• Use established checklists in BIM360 for lessons learned and consistency
03 Follow Up
Continuous inspections with established checklists by areas
• Use BIM360 to closeout areas throughout the project with issues management visible to the owner
Zero Punchlist
Perform punchlist in small areas by trade
Approach to Commissioning
Heavily integrate those who will be completing the actual process into the design & procurement phases of the project.
Develop a robust project specific commissioning plan up front
Actively participate in the MEP buyout
Complete periodic on-site inspections, verifying conformance to design intent
Develop MEP scopes to ensure the design and performance intent are maintained Develop commissioning checklists for every component of each building system
Stanton Springs North Manufacturing Facility
Pink Tag
White Tag Yellow Tag Green Tag
Why Clayco
How We Partner
We are Committed to a Collaborative Process.
Project Understanding
We Will Deliver Cost Savings and Schedule Certainty.
Depth of Experience
Lessons Learned from Past Experience Benefit Rivian.
Diversity & Inclusion
We Have a Proven Record.
Project Execution Tools
We Will Deliver Real-Time Updates Keeping Rivian Informed. Safety World Class Safety Program. We All Go Home Safe.
Q&A
Complete Preliminary Design Design Pkg #1 Design Pkg #2 Design Pkg #3
Issue RFP RFP 60-90% Design Cost Estimates Cost Estimates Cost Estimates Constructability Review Constructability Review Constructability Review Establish Target Price Select GC Value Engineering Bid Construction Packages OK OK OK Construction NTP Compare Target Price to Budget Compare Target Price to Budget Compare Target Price to Budget Approve GMP Submit GMP Construction Owner General Contractor Collaborate with Owner Early Release Long Lead SOP Final Design
Traditional GMP Process