Chicago News Weekly 2150 S. Canalport Ave. Suite 4-C14 Chicago, IL 60608 312. 877. 5151 Vol. 2 No 45 Wednesday, January 29, 20250 Chicago News Weekly is published weekly on Wednesday. www.cnwmedia.com advertising@cnwmedia.com editorial@cnwmedia.com
Subscription $104 year
E notes
The Normalization of Profanity
Over the past 25 years, I have observed the normalization of profanity and vulgarity in our society. What I find most star-
tling is the widespread acceptance of this trend, with very little, if any, pushback. To me, this shift is deeply disturbing. The increasing use of profane and vulgar language in casual conversations, television, politics, schools, and workplaces reflects broader cultural, societal, and psychological trends. I grew up in a family of three girls and my parents. As the oldest, I was held accountable for my actions because it was made clear that my younger sisters, who were six and seven years behind me, would emulate my behavior. I was taught that I was setting an example for them and that my parents were both the judge and jury of what I did and didn’t do. This instilled in me a sense of responsibility—not just to my family, but to everyone I interacted with. For the most part, I was highly conscious of my actions.
To give you a sense of my upbringing: in our household, words like “liar,” “shoot,” “darn,” and “dang” were considered bad words. I’ll never forget an incident involving my maternal grandmother. One day, she burned her hand on a baking dish as she removed it from the oven and exclaimed, “Got to be more careful.” Her rhythmic cadence was appealing to me. Later, when I had an opportunity to use the expression, I did so in the presence of my father. He immediately asked, “What did you say?” I repeated it, mimicking my grandmother. My father looked at me and said emphatically, “That’s too close.” That moment stuck with me.
To this day, I have never called another woman a “B.” My brain doesn’t even work that way.
Words are a cornerstone of communication, carrying immense weight in both verbal and written forms. I was taught that the more extensive your vocabulary, the fewer words you need to explain something. A strong vocabulary not only shortens explanations but also enhances clarity. Words have specific meanings, and each discipline—whether engineering, medicine, mechanics, journalism, art, music, architecture, or science—has its own unique language.
To deny yourself the opportunity to personalize your self-expression through words is a tremendous loss. Your voice is unique, but it risks being lost if you choose to squander it in the realm of profanity. So, how did we get here?
Kai EL’ Zabar Editor-in-Chief
ill-equipped to articulate themselves effectively in more formal or professional settings.
Media and entertainment have played a pivotal role in normalizing profanity. Shows like The Jerry Springer Show introduced a new genre of sensationalized reality television, where outbursts and vulgarity became a selling point. What some viewed as entertainment, others saw as the erosion of decorum. With time, such displays were no longer shocking but expected, creating a cultural shift in how audiences engaged with media.
Generational attitudes have also evolved. Younger generations often view profanity as a marker of authenticity or self-expression, challenging the conservative norms of their predecessors. Add to this the global reach of social media, where slang and profane language from various cultures are shared and adopted, and it becomes clear how the phenomenon has transcended borders.
The political sphere has not been immune to this shift. Once characterized by formality and statesmanship, public discourse now often includes harsh language meant to appear relatable or genuine. While some see this as a welcome departure from stiff rhetoric, others argue it undermines the dignity of public office.
Social media exacerbates this trend, with platforms like Twitter (now X) amplifying blunt and, at times, profane statements. The result is a political environment where respect and decorum are often casualties of polarization and the relentless pursuit of authenticity.
Among younger generations, the influence of profanity is perhaps most evident in schools. Peer dynamics, coupled with the rise of rap music and pop culture, have ingrained coarse language into youth vocabulary. Where past generations might have faced strict penalties for swearing, today’s educators often approach the issue with leniency, reflecting broader cultural shifts. For some adolescents, profanity serves as a tool to navigate complex emotions or assert independence. Yet, its overuse risks stifling vocabulary development, leaving students
Even professional environments are not immune to the rise of informal language. The casualization of workplace culture has, in some cases, led to the acceptance of profanity as a form of stress relief or camaraderie. However, this can come at a cost: strained relationships, accusations of unprofessionalism, or even legal repercussions.
Workplace policies often address such risks, emphasizing professionalism in communication. Still, the line between acceptable and inappropriate language can be subjective, highlighting the need for clear guidelines.
Language is one of humanity’s most powerful tools. It shapes how we communicate, express emotions, and connect with others. Yet, the widespread use of profanity risks diluting its impact and undermining meaningful discourse.
A rich vocabulary not only enhances self-expression but also fosters clarity and respect in communication. By leaning too heavily on vulgarity, individuals forfeit opportunities to convey their thoughts with precision and elegance.
Addressing the normalization of profanity requires effort at multiple levels. Media outlets can set stricter guidelines for content aimed at younger audiences. Schools and parents can encourage alternative ways of expressing emotions, fostering respect and emotional intelligence. And workplaces can uphold standards of professionalism while promoting positive communication. While the rise of profanity reflects broader cultural shifts, it also serves as a reminder of the importance of balance. Free expression need not come at the expense of civility and respect—a lesson worth revisiting in today’s increasingly informal world.
At CNW, our staff are articulate and highly capable of expressing themselves intelligently, conveying their thoughts effectively across the emotional spectrum while adhering to the decorum outlined in our workplace guidelines.
photo credit: Dot Ward
Don’t
Stop
the Glow
TheGlow Up at Rocbar in Chicago’s River North was an electrifying afternoon of neon-lit vibes, high-energy music, and unforgettable moments. Partygoers lit up the dance floor in their brightest fits while the blacklights set the scene for an immersive experience. The highlight of the event was a surprise performance by rapper Shawna, who brought the house down with an explosive set. With incredible energy, unexpected surprises, and an unbeatable atmosphere, The Glow Up proved to be the ultimate day party.
King Family Seeks Review of Files on MLK Assassination, Bernice King Addresses Public Disrespect
NNPA NEWSWIRE — King’s family’s statement came after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to declassify records surrounding the assassinations of the civil rights icon, President John F. Kennedy, and Senator Robert F. Kennedy.
The family of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. has expressed hope of reviewing records related to his assassination before they are made public. King’s family’s statement came after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to declassify records surrounding the assassinations of the civil rights icon, President John F. Kennedy, and Senator Robert F. Kennedy. “For us, the assassination of our father is a deeply personal family loss that we have endured over the last 56 years,” the family stated in a message shared by King’s daughter, Bernice King. “We hope to be provided the opportunity to review the files as a family before its public release.” The family also noted not granting interviews as they await further information. The release of the documents weren’t the only moment in the news this week for the King’s family. The nation observed Martin Luther King Jr. Day, which fell on the same Monday as Trump’s inauguration this year. Bernice King, the youngest of King’s four children,
told MSNBC that the overlap provided an opportunity to recall her father’s legacy while the country transitions to a new administration. “It’s wonderful that this occurs on the King holiday, the inauguration because it reminds us of King,” said King, who was five years old when her father was assassinated in 1968. “It points us back to King. It says, ‘When we move forward, we’ve got to do it in the spirit of King.” She called on Americans to remain steadfast in the values her father championed, particularly nonviolence. “We have to strategize. We’ve been missing the strategy. We’ve been missing the spirit of Dr. King,” she said. “The spirit of Dr. King is nonviolence. And nonviolence is not just a posture; it’s a mindset. It’s a love-centered way of thinking, speaking, acting, and engaging that leads to personal, cultural, and societal transformation.”
This year marked just the third time that Martin Luther King Jr. Day coincided with a presidential inauguration, the first during President Bill Clinton’s second term in 1997 and the second during
President Barack Obama’s second term in 2013. Obama took his oath of office using a Bible that once belonged to King. In yet another incident this week that stirred controversy surrounding the King family, rapper Sexyy Red posted an AI-generated image of herself and Dr. King at a nightclub on social media on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The image showed the rapper holding hands with King in a crowded setting. The post, which lacked captions was widely criticized and later deleted following a request from Bernice King. “This is intentionally distasteful, dishonoring, deplorable, and disrespectful to my family and my father, who is not here to respond himself because he was assassinated for working for your civil and human rights,” Bernice King wrote in response.
Despite calling out the post, King also addressed negative comments directed at the rapper, writing, “I don’t believe Sexyy Red to be a ‘degenerate,’ ‘ghetto,’ or ‘trash,'” King stated. “I have spoken out in the past about the use of and comparison to either
of my parents to denigrate other people.” Sexyy Red immediately apologized, saying, “You ain’t wrong, never meant to disrespect your family, my apologies. Just reposted something I saw that I thought was innocent.” King accepted the apology. “I value you as a human being,” King responded. “I know that my father has become a bit of a caricature to the world and that his image is often used with no regard to his family, his sacrificial work, or the tragic, unjust way in which he died (a state-sanctioned assassination). Unfortunately, I regularly challenge the disregard.”
Will Mayor Johnson Testify Before Congress on Sanctuary Cities?
Congressional Republicans have invited Mayor Brandon Johnson to testify at a hearing on sanctuary cities next month, intensifying federal scrutiny of Chicago’s immigration policies.
U.S. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, sent a letter Monday to Johnson requesting his testimony on Feb. 11. The hearing is part of the committee’s investigation into the impact of sanctuary city policies on public safety and federal immigration enforcement, Comer said.
The committee also requested documents and communications from Chicago officials related to the city’s sanctuary status, including correspondence with employees, state and federal officials, and others.
Imposter Syndrome—a silent saboteur—creeps into our thoughts, whispering that we’re not enough. It’s the feeling of inadequacy that often strikes high-achieving individuals, making them believe their successes are the result of luck or that they don’t belong in the spaces they’ve worked hard to reach. If you’ve ever felt like a fraud, despite your accomplishments, you’re not alone. The good news is that Imposter Syndrome can be disrupted and dismantled with intentional effort.
Having wrestled with Imposter Syndrome myself, I understand how deeply it can undermine confidence, success, and joy. It’s the shadow that lurks during major milestones or moments of recognition, convincing you that you’re undeserving. But here’s the truth: you are deserving, and your place at the table is no accident. Disrupting Imposter Syndrome starts with recognizing its grip and taking deliberate steps to rewrite the narrative.
Below are three key steps to begin disrupting Imposter Syndrome and stepping into your power with confidence.
1. Acknowledge and Name It
The first step in disrupting Imposter Syndrome is acknowledgment. You can’t confront what you don’t identify. Many
“In addition to the efforts of the [Trump] Administration to ensure federal immigration enforcement can proceed unimpeded, Congress must determine whether further legislation is necessary to enhance border security and public safety,” Comer wrote.
The letter follows the launch of “Operation Safeguard,” a federal initiative involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the FBI, ATF, DEA, CBP, and U.S. Marshals. The operation led to 1,000 arrests nationwide, though ICE did not disclose how many were made in Chicago or how many involved individuals with criminal records.
Comer identified Chicago, along with New York, Boston, and Denver, as cities negatively impacted by sanctuary policies. Letters were also sent to the mayors of those cities.
“Sanctuary jurisdictions and their misguided and obstructionist policies hinder the ability of federal law enforcement officers to effectuate safe arrests and remove dangerous criminals from American communities, making Americans less safe,” Comer wrote.
ICE described the operation as targeting “potentially dangerous criminal aliens” but declined to address questions about specific arrests.
Dr. Sanja Rickette Stinson CNW Columnist
Despite claims from former President Donald Trump and others that immigrants contribute to increased crime, research consistently shows otherwise. A study titled “The Politics of Refuge: Sanctuary Cities, Crime, and Undocumented Immigration” found no link between sanctuary policies and higher crime rates. Other studies indicate immigration is associated with reductions in violent crime. Chicago’s “Welcoming City” ordinance prohibits local police from aiding federal immigration enforcement and ensures that city services are not denied based on immigration status.
It is unclear if Johnson is legally obligated to attend the hearing or comply with the document request. A Congressional Research Service report notes that a subpoena may be issued if an invitee declines to appear, though Comer’s letter did not mention this possibility.
The Mayor’s Office did not respond to questions about whether Johnson would testify on Capitol Hill.
Chicago’s immigrant communities have faced uncertainty and fear amid ongoing federal actions. Trump-era policies, including stricter border protections, efforts to end birthright citizenship, and a suspension of refugee admissions, have intensified challenges for those seeking safety and stability in the U.S.
Empowerment
Disrupting Imposter Syndrome Breaking Free and Embracing Your Worth
people go years battling self-doubt without realizing they’re experiencing Imposter Syndrome. Begin by reflecting on moments when you’ve minimized your achievements or questioned your qualifications.
Ask yourself:
• Do I attribute my successes to luck or external factors rather than my skills or effort?
• Do I fear being “exposed” as unqualified, even though I have evidence to the contrary?
• Do I compare myself to others and feel like I fall short, despite achieving similar or greater milestones?
Naming the issue takes away some of its power. Recognize that this inner critic isn’t unique to you—it’s a shared experience for many, including some of the most accomplished individuals in history. By acknowledging these thoughts, you’ve already taken the first step toward dismantling them.
2. Challenge Negative Self-Talk with Evidence
Imposter Syndrome thrives on negative self-talk and distorted thinking. To disrupt its cycle, you must challenge these thoughts with evidence. When you catch yourself doubting your abilities or accomplishments, pause and ask, “What’s the proof?”
Create a “brag file” or achievement journal—a space where you record your successes, big and small. This could include
awards, praise from colleagues, or milestones you’ve reached in your career or personal life. When self-doubt arises, revisit this collection as tangible proof of your competence and value.
For instance, if you’re doubting your ability to deliver a presentation, recall a time you successfully presented before an audience. Did you receive positive feedback? Did you prepare thoroughly? Use these memories to counteract feelings of inadequacy.
It’s also helpful to reframe mistakes. Instead of viewing them as failures, see them as opportunities for growth. Everyone stumbles, but mistakes don’t define you— they refine you. By shifting your mindset, you can weaken Imposter Syndrome’s hold over your thoughts.
3. Seek Support and Speak Up Imposter Syndrome often isolates us, making us believe we’re alone in our struggles. Breaking the silence is a powerful step in disrupting its grip. Share your feelings with trusted mentors, colleagues, or friends. You may be surprised to find they’ve experienced similar doubts. Support systems matter. Surround yourself with people who affirm your value and challenge your negative perceptions. Join professional networks or support groups where you can exchange experiences and advice with like-minded individuals. These spaces create a sense of belonging and remind you that you’re not alone.
Mentorship is another key strategy. A mentor can provide guidance, perspective, and validation when you need it most. They’ve likely faced their own battles with self-doubt and can offer practical tools to help you navigate yours.
Finally, don’t be afraid to seek professional help if Imposter Syndrome significantly impacts your well-being. Therapy or coaching can provide valuable insights and strategies for overcoming self-doubt and building confidence.
Moving Forward with Confidence
Disrupting Imposter Syndrome is not a one-time effort; it’s an ongoing process of self-awareness, growth, and resilience. While the journey may feel challenging, it’s also deeply rewarding. Imagine what you could achieve if you stopped doubting yourself and embraced your worth.
You have the power to rewrite the narrative. By acknowledging Imposter Syndrome, challenging negative self-talk, and seeking support, you can disrupt its cycle and step into your purpose with confidence. Your achievements are not accidents—they are the result of your hard work, talent, and determination.
The next time self-doubt whispers in your ear, remember this: You are enough. You belong. And you’re not just surviving— you’re thriving. Let 2025 be the year you disrupt Imposter Syndrome and embrace the fullness of your potential.
New Book Release – February 2025
Healthy Living
Stacy M. Brown NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
New American Heart Association Report Reveals Alarming Inequities in Heart Health by Race and Gender
NNPA NEWSWIRE — Researchers asserted that such inequities reflect the disproportionate burden underrepresented communities bear in accessing equitable healthcare and prevention.
TheAmerican Heart Association’s 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update uncovers glaring racial and gender disparities in cardiovascular health, illustrating the profound toll heart disease takes on marginalized populations. According to the report, non-Hispanic Black adults experience an age-adjusted mortality rate of 379.7 per 100,000 due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), compared to just 104.9 per 100,000 among non-Hispanic Asian females. Researchers asserted that such inequities reflect the disproportionate burden underrepresented communities bear in accessing equitable healthcare and prevention.
Women also face significant challenges in cardiovascular health, particularly during and after pregnancy. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy doubled
from 2007 to 2019, with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension contributing to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Black women are disproportionately affected, experiencing higher rates of these conditions, which often lead to long-term cardiovascular complications. Additionally, gestational diabetes increased by 38% between 2016 and 2021, with older mothers facing nearly six times the risk compared to younger mothers. The study’s authors also found that poor sleep quality further compounds the risks, particularly for women, who are up to 2.3 times more likely to report insomnia symptoms than men. According to the report, poor sleep is strongly linked to an increased risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events.
According to the study, social determinants of health, such as poverty, education, and geographic location, also exacerbate these disparities. Individuals in rural areas or neighborhoods with fewer healthcare resources face limited access to screenings, healthy food options, and
consistent medical care. For instance, peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients living in zip codes with a median household income of less than $40,000 are at a significantly higher risk of undergoing amputations. The report also noted that racial inequities extend to emergency care. Black individuals experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are 27% less likely to receive bystander CPR at home and 37% less likely in public locations than White individuals. These disparities persist even when income levels are accounted for.
“We have the tools to address these inequities, but they require a commitment to prioritizing the health of all communities,” stated Dr. Seth Martin, who chaired the report. Officials said the AHA’s “Life’s Essential 8” framework is a guideline for improving cardiovascular health. This model includes recommendations for healthier diets, consistent physical activity, and better cholesterol and glucose management. However, the report indicates that over 80% of U.S. adults fail to meet these criteria. Average diet quality scores are just 59 out of 100, and disparities are evident across race, income, and education levels. Researchers insisted that improving these metrics could reduce major cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes.
Community health initiatives play a critical role in addressing these disparities. Expanding access to nutritious food, exercise facilities, and education can help reduce risk factors. For example, studies have shown that reallocating just seven minutes of sedentary behavior daily to moderate or vigorous physical activity can significantly improve cardiomet-
abolic health, including reductions in body mass index (BMI) and blood sugar levels.
Another critical area of focus is maternal health. Programs that emphasize early intervention and monitoring for pregnant women—especially those at high risk—can reduce complications such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes. Lifestyle interventions, including weight management and exercise, have been shown to cut the risk of hypertensive pregnancy disorders nearly in half. Dr. Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, a contributor to the report, added that systemic solutions are essential to addressing these disparities. “When we examine cardiovascular health, it’s clear that social determinants and structural inequities remain significant barriers. Improving health equity means removing these barriers,” she said.
Additionally, the report spelled out the economic burden of cardiovascular disease, which totaled $417.9 billion in 2021 alone. Prescription medications and office visits represent the largest cost drivers, but inequities in care access often lead to more severe and costly outcomes for marginalized groups. The report concluded that addressing the various issues would require a collective effort from policymakers, healthcare providers, and community leaders. Expanding Medicaid, funding local health initiatives, and ensuring equitable resource distribution are steps that can help bridge these gaps. “Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death globally,” said Dr. Mitchell Elkind, another key contributor to the report. “Progress is possible, but it demands both innovation in healthcare and a commitment to equity.”
Winter Fire Warnings Spark Alarm in Chicago
The Monday morning fire weather watch on January 27th in Chicago and surrounding areas of Illinois has raised concerns and sparked discussions about unusual weather patterns. As climate change continues to disrupt global weather, regions accustomed to specific seasonal conditions are increasingly facing unprecedented risks.
The issuance of a fire weather watch in winter—a season typically associated with snow in Chicago—underscores the need to reassess how communities prepare for and respond to such warnings.
“I’m over 50 years old and have never seen anything like this in my life,” commented one Illinois resident on Facebook. Another user asked, “So what does it mean?” while a third jokingly added, “I’m starting to think it’s the cartels.”
The National Weather Service’s alert highlights the importance of understanding the science behind these warnings. Many residents are unaware that winter months, despite their cold temperatures, can still bring dry conditions conducive to wildfires. This knowledge
gap can lead to confusion or complacency when faced with alerts that seem out of place for the season.
Government agencies have taken positive steps by addressing these concerns on social media, helping to educate the public. Clear communication about the risks, safety precautions, and the rationale behind fire weather watches is essential for fostering community preparedness. Residents must understand that even winter poses fire risks, especially when strong winds and dry conditions align.
Beyond individual awareness, communities need to adopt proactive disaster preparedness measures. This includes assessing the readiness of first responders, ensuring they have the resources to handle emergencies stemming from unusual weather patterns, and developing clear evacuation and public safety protocols. Local governments should consider conducting drills and simulations to evaluate the effectiveness of their emergency response systems.
Public education campaigns are equally vital. These can inform residents about safe disposal practices, particularly for
smoking materials, and encourage responsible behavior during fire weather warnings. Raising awareness about such risks can significantly reduce the likelihood of preventable fires.
Ultimately, the question remains: How many warnings will it take before substantial changes are made? The evolving climate demands a cultural shift toward proactive disaster preparedness. Communities must acknowledge that the risk landscape is changing and adapt their efforts accord-
ingly. By fostering a culture of readiness, Chicago and other regions can better prepare for the challenges posed by an increasingly unpredictable climate.
Is King’s Dream Deferred?
No figure is more closely identified with the mid-20th-century struggle for civil rights in the United States than Martin Luther King Jr. His commitment to nonviolent resistance in pursuit of equal rights for Black Americans earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. King is remembered for his masterful oratory, most memorably in his I Have a Dream speech, but the depth of this complex man was far more layered than is often examined.
As we close MLK Day and enter Black History Month, it’s not enough to simply ask whether King’s dream has been deferred—that question has been posed repeatedly. Instead, we must consider the historical context of his vision and the progress (or lack thereof) made toward achieving it. King’s I Have a Dream speech, delivered in 1963, was hopeful and aspirational, yet by 1967, his Beyond Vietnam address took on a more urgent and critical tone, condemning U.S. militarism and economic inequality. His final speech, I’ve Been to the Mountaintop, delivered the night before his assassination in 1968, reflected both hope and foreboding as he confronted the realities of his movement’s resistance.
King’s story also carried an appendage: the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began monitoring him in December 1955 during the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, convinced that King had communist ties, escalated surveillance under the agency’s COINTELPRO program. The scrutiny intensified in 1964 after King publicly criticized the FBI for failing to address racial violence in the South. Despite years of wiretaps and covert operations, a 1976 Senate investigation confirmed that no evidence linked King to communism. Though critical of capitalism’s role in perpetuating poverty and injustice, King rejected communism, opposing its materialistic worldview, political
totalitarianism, and ethical relativism. He sympathized with socialism’s call for social justice but remained committed to democracy and faith-based activism. His philosophy was shaped by five core principles: nonviolence, personal commitment, education, sacrifice, and faith.
While best known for his civil rights advocacy, King’s later work increasingly focused on economic justice. In his final book, Where Do We Go From Here, he argued that racial equality was inseparable from economic reform—a stance that made him a national threat. He championed labor rights, recognizing the shared struggle between Black Americans and unions, famously stating, “Our needs are identical with labor’s needs—decent wages, fair working conditions, livable
housing, old-age security, health and welfare measures.” His assassination signaled fierce resistance to his vision, and today, his dream remains unfinished.
To examine the progress made toward King’s vision, CNW spoke with three Black Chicagoans about where things stand today in key areas he championed: unions, education, and housing. Their perspectives offer a sobering reflection on how far we’ve come—and how far we still have to go.
Unions: A Pathway to the Middle Class
Joseph Wells, a 35-year member and diversity, equity, and inclusion business representative of IBEW Local 134, is dedicated to recruiting underserved communities into the building trades.
His work aligns with Martin Luther King Jr.'s belief in unions as a pathway to economic freedom. As King once said, “Our needs are identical with labor’s needs—decent wages, fair working conditions, livable housing, old-age security, health and welfare measures.”
Wells' primary challenge is addressing the declining Black membership in trade unions. "When I started, Black members made up 18% to 20% of Local 134," he said. "Now, it's dropped to about 11%, while Hispanic membership has risen to 15%." He attributes this decline to misinformation and a lack of awareness about union benefits. “Most people don’t realize we make six-figure salaries,” he explained. “There’s a shift in thinking—people are chasing jobs that seem
look stable, well-paying union jobs.
As a union representative, Wells advocates for workers facing grievances, safety issues, or legal disputes. He emphasized that unions play a crucial role in ensuring fair wages and benefits, something King deeply understood. “Dr. King saw that unions and the Black struggle were aligned,” Wells said. “He spoke to the AFL-CIO in 1961 to make it clear that what Black workers wanted—good jobs, fair wages, and respect—was the same thing labor unions fought for.”
King’s advocacy helped push unions to become more inclusive, though barriers still exist. Wells noted that while unions continue to fight for workers, misinformation and declining trade education have led to stagnation in Black membership. “The biggest threat to our growth is misinformation,” he said. “People don’t know the opportunities available, and social media shapes their perceptions more than we do.”
Wells sees King’s message as more relevant than ever. “Dr. King was about elevating humanity,” he said. “He wanted all workers to have dignity, fair wages, and decent housing. That hasn’t changed.” But he worries that today’s cultural landscape is causing Black communities to dismiss the very opportunities King championed. “We label jobs as ‘beneath us’ without realizing they offer exactly what we need—economic security and respect.”
For Wells, the solution lies in education. “If we can change the narrative, we can change lives,” he said. “King knew that economic justice was the key to true freedom. It’s up to us to carry that forward.”
Housing Justice: Building on King’s Legacy
on rebuilding her ward’s housing landscape, which had suffered from decades of neglect. The roots of the crisis ran deep: Even before World War II, Chicago’s housing market was tight, and African Americans were largely confined to the “Black Belt,” stretching from 12th to 79th Streets. The post-war influx of Black Southerners exacerbated overcrowding, as restrictive covenants barred them from moving into white neighborhoods. “There hadn’t been much residential construction after the 1920s crash,” Preckwinkle noted. “The Depression, the war, and post-war migration all led to massive overcrowding, but there wasn’t balanced housing construction.”
This lack of investment transformed once-thriving communities. Mansions became overcrowded multi-family units, and apartment buildings fell into disrepair. Large-scale housing projects like Lake Meadows and Prairie Shores were built to address the crisis, but underinvestment and poor policy decisions left many residents struggling. “Without proper police protection, crime took over,” Preckwinkle added.
Determined to reverse this cycle, she focused on balancing homeownership and rental options. In the 1990s, she successfully launched the Parade of Homes, a market-rate housing initiative that helped stabilize her ward. However, her vision of a mixed-income community faced resistance as demographics shifted. Contentious meetings arose with new arrivals who opposed affordable housing developments. “You know, people don’t think about the way we used to live,” she reflected. “When the doctor, the minister, the postal worker, the nurse, the sanitation worker—all lived on the same block and respected each other. I remember that connection.”
prestigious but don’t always offer financial stability.”
One significant barrier, according to Wells, is cultural perception. Parents often discourage their children from pursuing the trades due to outdated beliefs about labor jobs. “They fail to see how multifaceted our industry is,” he said. “There are white-collar and blue-collar positions within unions, offering real opportunities to build a middle-class life.”
Wells recalled a telling anecdote: “Some of our younger union members were at a social gathering, trying to talk to some women. One of them asked, ‘So you work?’—as if that was a turn-off. They didn’t care that these guys made $100,000 a year; they were more focused on image.” This shift in values, Wells believes, is part of a larger cultural change that has led some young people to over-
King understood that fair housing was essential to racial and economic justice. His Chicago Freedom Movement challenged housing discrimination, and his activism helped lay the groundwork for the Fair Housing Act of 1968. “We are tired of paying more for less. We are tired of living in rat-infested slums,” King declared at Soldier Field, emphasizing the urgent need for change.
Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle has spent decades working toward this vision, advocating for mixed-income communities as a means of revitalization. “When people of all income levels live side by side—professionals, working-class families, and those just getting by—the whole community is richer for it,” she explained. However, she acknowledged that as segregation eased, Black communities became increasingly stratified by class, leaving many behind.
As an alderman, Preckwinkle focused
Racial Equity and the Role of Government
In 2018, Preckwinkle released the Policy Roadmap, a comprehensive plan focused on advancing racial equity. She didn’t mince words about the government’s role in housing inequality. “Government has been either complicit in or the agent of destructive policies toward our communities,” she stated.
One glaring example, she noted, was the mass demolition of homes in Black neighborhoods. Instead of rehabilitating vacant properties, the city opted to tear them down—an approach that gutted entire communities. “You can walk down the block in many of these areas and see only one or two buildings still standing. That’s no accident—it’s a result of government policy.”
The city’s decision to demolish rather than reinvest had long-term consequences. “These weren’t shacks,” Preckwinkle
Cover Story
emphasized. “They were solid brick and limestone buildings. But tearing them down cost as little as $10,000, while restoring them required much more effort.” Programs like New Homes for Chicago attempted to address the loss, but Preckwinkle argued the numbers never added up. “For years, the city tore down more units than it built. It’s disgraceful if that’s still happening today.”
As alderman, she fought to save buildings in her ward, working with small developers and pushing for receiverships to restore properties. But she acknowledged the limits of her efforts. “In hindsight, I should have organized people across the city to demand answers: Why do we tear down more homes than we build every year?”
Carrying King’s Vision Forward
Preckwinkle’s work underscores a difficult balance: revitalizing neighborhoods without displacing longtime residents. Like King, she believes housing justice is essential to economic equity. But she also recognizes the internal divisions that have emerged within Black communities. “In pursuit of greater wealth, we moved into places where we weren’t wanted—where we had to fight to prove our humanness,” she reflected.
Her broader critique of government policies is blunt: “Our neighborhoods were destroyed by the very institutions meant to serve us. Public schools were underfunded because political and business leaders didn’t care—they sent their kids to private schools. Our housing stock was wiped out. And the police department? It beat us, tortured us, and shot us down in the streets without consequence.”
Ultimately, Preckwinkle’s fight for housing equity aligns with King’s dream—but it’s a battle still in progress. “Dr. King saw housing as a civil rights issue because without a stable home, everything else—education, employment, health—suffers. That truth hasn’t changed.”
The Fight for Better Schooling
King’s vision of education is best encapsulated in his own words. “The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically,” he said. “Intelligence plus character—that is the goal of true education.”
I spoke with Lamelodee Assata Moore, founder of Moore Math Geniuses, about the decline of African American education since King’s time. She highlights the impact of integration, technology, and the shift from community-based education to individualistic pursuits.
Asked what King might say about to-
day’s public education system, Assata responded, “He would probably be at a loss for words. Our diminished value for education would boggle his mind. The people of his time wouldn’t comprehend what has happened because they saw their efforts as a foundation for growth.”
Reflecting on King’s perspective, she noted, “Critical thinking was a key element of education, whether in a classroom, on a farm, or at work. My generation grew up being told to get an education because knowledge is something no one can take from you. I remember Cincinnati’s annual College Jamboree, where Black HBCUs recruited students. It reinforced our responsibility to contribute as educated adults.”
But something changed. “Integration happened,” Assata explained. “We integrated with a people whose values were not ours. Was it integration or assimilation? Both. We allowed strange values into our homes.”
She differentiates the two: “Assimilation requires losing one's original culture, while integration allows its preservation alongside elements of the dominant culture. Many Black students, isolated on predominantly white campuses, faced cultural shock. Some chose to assimilate entirely for professional advancement. Others learned to code-switch.”
Yet, assimilation wasn’t the only factor. “It was a series of things—Reaganomics, the drug epidemic, rising violence, the emergence of a new Black middle class, and the evolution of rap culture. Suddenly, we were imitating whiteness, whether in lifestyle, worship, or aspirations. Then social media amplified everything.”
Assata sees social media as a dominant influence on today’s youth. “Even if parents take phones away, they can’t supervise their children all day. Social media has more influence on youth than any parent or teacher. It shortens their attention span, making it difficult to retain information. Yet, they can remember a song or a rap because it interests them.”
She believes young people idolize influencers and reality stars because they seem to have easier lives. “But were we really chasing whiteness? Or just the benefits we saw our white counterparts enjoying? Initially, we wanted equality and equal education. But somewhere along the way, we started chasing a lifestyle and lost sight of the value of education.”
Assata recalls, “Education was presented as a chore, and eventually, it became one. Schools tried to make being smart rewarding, but was it? Today, too many kids aspire to be influencers rather than scholars.”
So, does education compete with celeb-
rity culture? “Yes. School lost its appeal. We failed to make learning exciting. History, for example, is just stories told sequentially, yet students don’t find it engaging. We need to present education in a way that captures their interest.”
She argues that exposure is crucial. “Education isn’t just classroom learning. It’s travel, experiences, and seeing the world beyond your neighborhood. Malcolm X wasn’t formally educated, but he knew how to seek and understand information.”
King understood this, she says. “Look at his knowledge, his ability to speak on an international level. That’s education. True education isn’t just arithmetic and reading; it’s understanding who we are in this world and learning from history to make better choices.”
She warns that the loss of respect for education is dire. “Baby boomers pursued education to walk through doors and make a difference. Now, nobody wants an education. We must repackage learning to make it appealing again.”
To reclaim education’s value, Assata insists, “We need to deprogram and reprogram our youth. What was the education when our own people taught in one-room schoolhouses versus what it became in integrated systems? We have to market education like we market everything else to youth.”
Her greatest concern? “We’ve been in crisis since before the pandemic—it just made things worse. The rise of reality TV, social media, and influencer culture has shifted priorities. Schools rely heavily on technology, which disadvantages children without access. But more than that, we’re raising a generation that doesn’t know how to think critically.”
Assata’s final thought: “If we don’t manage this now, computers will be managing students. We have to ask—who is truly responsible for educating our youth? We once embraced education’s importance. Have we forgotten?”
Progress Toward King's Dream Remains Unfinished
Sixty years after King's "I Have a Dream" speech, America has made significant strides toward racial equality while falling short of his complete vision. Legislative milestones of the 1960s laid crucial groundwork, with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawing discrimination in public spaces and employment, followed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 dismantling discriminatory voting practices.
The nation has witnessed historic breakthroughs in representation, most notably Barack Obama's election as the first African American president in 2008 and
Ketanji Brown Jackson's appointment as the first Black woman Supreme Court Justice. Schools, once strictly segregated, have become more integrated, though significant disparities persist between predominantly white and Black districts. Educational attainment among African Americans has risen substantially, with increasing numbers completing college degrees. Black entrepreneurship has grown, contributing to greater economic participation, though a stark racial wealth gap endures. The median wealth of white families remains multiple times higher than that of Black families, highlighting persistent economic inequality. Recent years have brought renewed focus to systemic racism through movements like Black Lives Matter, which has elevated discussions about police brutality and criminal justice reform. The killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and other unarmed Black individuals have underscored ongoing concerns about law enforcement practices. African Americans continue to face disproportionate incarceration rates, often stemming from systemic biases in policing and sentencing.
Despite the Fair Housing Act of 1968, housing discrimination persists through more subtle means, with many cities maintaining de facto segregation through discriminatory lending practices and development policies. Some historically Black neighborhoods face displacement from gentrification, while others struggle with underinvestment.
Voting rights have faced new challenges, with recent state laws implementing stricter ID requirements and voter roll purges that disproportionately affect African American voters. Meanwhile, hate crimes and the visibility of white nationalist groups demonstrate that racial animosity remains a serious concern.
Corporate America has increasingly acknowledged its role in addressing racial disparities, with many companies pledging to improve diversity in hiring and leadership. However, African Americans continue to face wage gaps and higher unemployment rates compared to their white counterparts.
While King's dream of racial equality has seen meaningful progress through legislative action and growing representation, systemic barriers and persistent inequalities show that America's journey toward his vision remains unfinished.
Clover Lee Contributing Writer
The Substance A Review
“Internalized misogyny”
is not a phrase I choose to use when discussing misogyny because it’s just not necessarily a thing like some want it to be. But after viewing Coralie Fargeat’s critically acclaimed film, "The Substance," which has become a film that many are raving about—from 90 and down in age—I must reconsider. The response has made it a huge, mega-hit since its 2024 release. Leading actress Demi Moore won a Golden Globe for her performance as the perfectly beautiful Elizabeth Sparkle, a superstar celebrity who is the envy of all women and the object of desire for men when we meet her on her 50th birthday. After noting her birthday, the story begins.
Mind you, I only watched the film after my very artistic friend from Carmel said, “You have to see 'The Substance,'” after she had delivered a long commentary about the aging process differences for men and women. "The Substance" is a statement on celebrity beauty standards, especially as they apply to aging female stars. It is handed down to the commoners who want to be beautiful like the celebrities, not having a clue what it requires of them or what it takes from them.
The movie is an exhausting 142 minutes long, taking us through the battle between the star’s intellect and her desires to be the pretty “It” girl. Those of us who choose intellect over the insane standards that the world of beauty, masks, and costumes routinely and systematically force upon women may find it quite interesting. The film provides glances inside the psyche of what
leads women to the titular "substance,” which is a metaphor for any cosmetic enhancement. It pits the young beauty against the elder beauty. This strained competition leads to the grand gesture of punishing the film’s female protagonists in numerous horrific ways.
The audience sees, clearly, a terribly grotesque aging man insulting a perfectly beautiful woman by informing her that her career is over at 50. This messaging has not changed. Why else would Madonna ruin her face? Or Meg Ryan and Goldie Hawn ruin their lips with filler?
"The Substance" captures the utterly absurd beauty standards forced, imposed, and unloaded upon women in our modern culture. It’s challenging to open a magazine and see a fresh, clean, youthful face portraying natural beauty. The dramatic appeal to sell the poison of “celebrity brand” beauty standards is hard to ignore. In today’s world, trying to keep up with the Beyoncés and the Cardi B’s is a bit steep. By comparison, dressing like and being like The Supremes or Aretha Franklin didn’t dig as deep into your pocket.
At the same time, this film portrays men as happy to have the money and power, swayed by youth and beauty but actually shallow gluttons of lust. Their chief infractions are wandering eyes. The men in
Fdelicate balance between humor and life’s most uncomfortable conversations quite like Shawn Morgan. Surrounded by friends, family, and fans, Morgan—dressed in a signature silver shirt—recently celebrated an incredible 25 years in the comedy industry. Known as a master of taboo takes and what he calls “awkward truths,” Morgan has solidified his reputation as one of the most fearless comedians in the game.
"The Substance" objectify women to a surreal degree, not far from reality. But, as is usually portrayed, it’s the women who lose themselves, turn violently on one another, and pay the cost with their lives. Unfortunately, the movie shouts the truth: women do this for our entertainment as they seek to be thought of as pretty, sexy, desired, and loved. The ecstasy they feel from the attention they receive is a drug and their ultimate destruction. In pursuit of such, they lose, because in the end, none of that is what feeds one’s soul.
"The Substance" tells this horror story just like it is. The objectification of the captivating, charming, and enticing bodies of beautiful naked women is front and center. Actresses Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley are flaunted and exposed artistically, yet exploited as part of the satire. The point is that we’re all caught up in the web, so their “exposed parts” further exploit their beauty—meant to be exotic and intoxicating—before the horrific manifests itself. Moore’s and Qualley’s beauty is on full display across the screen, as is their in-
Mila K. Marshall, PhD. Contributing Writer
25 Years of Laughs with Stand-Up Legend Shawn Morgan
Morgan’s sharp, Chicago-esque attitude often feels like a roast aimed at the audience, but his charm and razor-sharp wit make you laugh even at yourself.
He kicked off his set with gratitude, acknowledging his parents with a mix of heartfelt appreciation and playful jabs. His opening—a blend of personal anecdotes and self-deprecating humor—set the tone for the night: nothing and no one was off-limits. Before he even delivered a proper punchline, the crowd was already in stitches, agreeing with his perspective and eagerly awaiting more. Shawn Morgan is, quite simply, effortlessly funny.
Diving into his set, Morgan tackled dating
dilemmas with boyish charm, from navigating life after divorce to the salacious conversations about sex that many think about but rarely say out loud. His social commentary isn’t for the faint of heart, but his unapologetic authenticity is what makes him so entertaining. With his signature “I’m just saying” attitude, he embraces the uncomfortable, calls out absurdities, and turns them into universally hilarious moments.
For nearly an hour, Morgan brought the crowd down memory lane, reminiscing about his first time on Comic View and his iconic performances in The Big Black Comedy Show Vol. 3 and P. Diddy Presents the Bad Boys of Comedy (Seasons 1 and 2).
Even when revisiting his most iconic jokes, Morgan has a way of making them feel new again, sneaking the audience into familiar punchlines with fresh setups. For longtime
nocence and simple desire to be beautiful and adored. Then greed’s ugly head rears as “the impossible” becomes more challenging. Their connection as a team forces them to battle for the crown, which destroys the outcome. Both women lose. The mishapen distorted, malformed waste trap of beauty gone wrong.
I felt tricked because the opportunity for these women to work in tandem was lost to the norm: “Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who’s the fairest of them all?” These women—characters Sparkle and Sue— fail to recognize that their strength lies in bonding rather than competing against one another. Consequently, Fargeat’s film erases any heartfelt empathy for the female protagonists or compassion for the male characters, who are merely caricatures. I got it! But must we always see women in search of beauty not find the truth, destroy one another, and allow the men to remain unscathed, free of any direct connection or responsibility for their contribution to women’s self-destruction?
Where do we go from here, or do we?
fans, his comedy is a perfect mix of nostalgia and novelty.
Morgan’s ability to appeal to everyone in the room is what makes him a true legend. He’ll joke about women’s unrealistic expectations, making the ladies giggle and nod while the men throw up their fists in solidarity. Then he’ll double back and roast himself on behalf of the guys, leaving both men and women in gut-busting disbelief. He’s an equal-opportunity microphone menace who delivers laughs for all sides.
One standout bit about stepdads “not really caring about the kids” had couples side-eyeing each other with smirks. It’s these dynamics of dating and love—uncanny, uncomfortable, and awkwardly truthful—that Morgan masterfully explores. His jokes are funny because they shouldn’t be, yet in his presence, you throw caution to the wind and let the man work his magic.
Morgan is a living legend, a fearless comedian who has spent 25 years making us laugh at life’s awkward truths. And judging by the thunderous applause that closed out his anniversary set, he’s just getting started.
The A.I. The answer.is... CNW
The following words each relate to the idea of one thing or person being in place of or resembling another, but they have distinct meanings and connotations. Diving deeper into the depth of these words, we recognize that they all relate to the idea of one thing or person being in place of or resembling another, but they have distinct meanings and connotations:
1. Substitute: Something or someone used in place of another, often temporarily or in a specific situation.
• Example: A substitute teacher fills in when the main teacher is unavailable.
2. Replacement: A more permanent or complete exchange for something or someone.
• Example: He replaced the previous manager.
3. Stand-in: A temporary substitute, often used in specific contexts like performance theater or ballet etc., or work.
• Example: The actor’s stand-in rehearsed the scene.
4. A double: Someone who looks nearly identical to another person, often used in movies or for stunts.
• Example: The actor used a double for dangerous stunts.
5. Doppelgänger: A near-identical but biological unrelated look-alike, often carrying a mysterious or eerie connotation.
• Example: She was startled to see her doppelgänger at the café.
6. Twin: One of two people born at the same time from the same mother, often looking alike. It can also metaphorically describe things that are very similar.
• Example: Identical twins are often mistaken for each other.
Let’s explore the words or context further. For example:
• The cultural or literary use of “doppelgänger.”
• Differences between “substitute” and “replacement” in specific scenarios.
• How “a double” is used in filmmaking or theater?
Here’s a connected explanation of the words substitute, replacement, stand-in, double, doppelgänger, and twin, showing how they differ while being interrelated through the idea of similarity or exchange:
1. Substitute vs. Replacement
• Substitute refers to something or someone temporarily taking the role or function of another.
• Example: A substitute teacher fills in while the regular teacher is absent.
• Key idea: Temporary and functional.
• Replacement refers to a permanent or definitive switch of one thing or person for another.
• Example: After the employee retired, they hired a replacement.
• Key idea: Permanent and often conclusive.
While both involve exchange, a substitute is usually short-term, while a replacement is long-term or final.
2. Stand-in vs. Double
• Stand-in is a temporary substitute, often in specific contexts like performance or acting, where the actual person cannot perform a task for a brief moment.
• Example: A stand-in rehearses the scene before the main actor arrives.
• Key idea: Task-specific and temporary.
• Double refers to someone who looks very similar to another person and is often used in situations where a look-alike is required, like for stunts or body doubles in movies.
• Example: The actor’s double performed the dangerous car chase.
• Key idea: Focuses on physical resemblance for a specific role.
Both involve substitution but differ in purpose: stand-ins are about functionality, while doubles emphasize physical resemblance.
3. Doppelgänger vs. Twin
• Doppelgänger is an unrelated individual who looks nearly identical to someone else. It often has an eerie or mysterious connotation, rooted in folklore where meeting one’s doppelgänger is seen as an omen.
• Example: Seeing your doppelgänger in an unexpected place can feel unsettling.
• Key idea: Unrelated but identical in appearance, often with mysterious undertones.
• Twin refers to one of two individuals born to the same mother at the same time. Twins may or may not look identical but share a biological connection.
• Example: Identical twins share the same genetic makeup and look alike.
• Key idea: Biological relationship, with or without resemblance.
The key difference is that a twin has a biological link, while a doppelgänger does not and is more symbolic or coincidental.
Linking All the Terms
• Substitute, stand-in, and replacement focus on functional roles of exchange, differing in permanence and specificity.
• Double, doppelgänger, and twin emphasize physical resemblance, with double being deliberate, doppelgänger coincidental or mysterious, and twin biological.
Tying the words together to provide a deeper connection and understanding of the words inter relationships giving the interested parties a more in-depth understanding of the words and mastery of their meanings.
2. Stand-in vs. Double
• Stand-in is a temporary substitute, often in specific contexts like performance or acting, where the actual person cannot perform a task for a brief moment.
• Example: A stand-in rehearses the scene before the main actor arrives.
• Key idea: Task-specific and temporary.
• Double refers to someone who looks very similar to another person and is often used in situations where a look-alike is required, like for stunts or body doubles in movies.
• Example: The actor’s double performed the dangerous car chase.
• Key idea: Focuses on physical resemblance for a specific role.
Both involve substitution but differ in purpose: stand-ins are about functionality, while doubles emphasize physical Here’s a connected explanation of the words substitute, replacement, stand-in, double, doppelgänger, and twin, showing how they differ while being interrelated through the idea of similarity or exchange:
1. Substitute vs. Replacement
• Substitute refers to something or someone temporarily taking the role or function of another.
• Example: A substitute teacher fills in while the regular teacher is absent.
• Key idea: Temporary and functional.
• Replacement refers to a permanent or definitive switch of one thing or person for another.
• Example: After the employee retired, they hired a replacement.
• Key idea: Permanent and often conclusive.
While both involve exchange, a substitute is usually short-term, while a replacement is long-term or final.
2. Stand-in vs. Double
• Stand-in is a temporary substitute, often in specific contexts like performance or acting, where the actual person cannot perform a task for a brief moment.
• Example: A stand-in rehearses the scene before the main actor arrives.
• Key idea: Task-specific and temporary.
• Double refers to someone who looks very similar to another person and is of-
ten used in situations where a look-alike is required, like for stunts or body doubles in movies.
• Example: The actor’s double performed the dangerous car chase.
• Key idea: Focuses on physical resemblance for a specific role.
Both involve substitution but differ in purpose: stand-ins are about functionality, while doubles emphasize physical resemblance.
3. Doppelgänger vs. Twin
• Doppelgänger is an unrelated individual who looks nearly identical to someone else. It often has an eerie or mysterious connotation, rooted in folklore where meeting one’s doppelgänger is seen as an omen.
• Example: Seeing your doppelgänger in an unexpected place can feel unsettling.
• Key idea: Unrelated but identical in appearance, often with mysterious undertones.
• Twin refers to one of two individuals born to the same mother at the same time. Twins may or may not look identical but share a biological connection.
• Example: Identical twins share the same genetic makeup and look alike.
• Key idea: Biological relationship, with or without resemblance.
The key difference is that a twin has a biological link, while a doppelgänger does not and is more symbolic or coincidental.
Linking All the Terms
• Substitute, stand-in, and replacement focus on functional roles of exchange, differing in permanence and specificity.
• Double, doppelgänger, and twin emphasize physical resemblance, with double being deliberate, doppelgänger coincidental or mysterious, and twin biological.
Check out the following examples tying these together in a specific story or context?
• Substitute, stand-in, and replacement focus on functional roles of exchange, differing in permanence and specificity.
• Double, doppelgänger, and twin emphasize physical resemblance, with double being deliberate, doppelgänger coincidental or mysterious, and twin biological.
Mastering vocabulary heightens your intellect and the ability to understand and articulate your thoughts.
Joy vs. Coupledom: Have We Prioritized the Wrong Thing?
Recently, I found myself reflecting on the idea of joy—not the fleeting kind that comes and goes but the deeper, more sustained kind that people often say "comes in the morning." It’s a comforting notion, but it made me wonder: does joy really come in the morning when you’re single?
This thought sparked a bigger question about relationships and how they shape us. How much of ourselves do we lose—or willingly leave behind—when we choose to be with someone? Whether a relationship is healthy or not, it seems that a lasting bond often requires us to let certain parts of ourselves go.
At the same time, I’ve noticed something else: joy seems to take a quieter seat in our lives when we’re single. Why is that? Why don’t we celebrate or recognize the joy of singleness as loudly as we do the joy of being in relationships?
This led me to today’s topic: Do we, as a society, prioritize coupledom over joy? And are they really mutually exclusive?
The Joy Gap
Think about it. I have a friend who’s been in and out of relationships since we were teenagers. And while I don’t want to oversimplify his life, I can honestly say I’ve never seen him as joyful as he was during those carefree teen years. Back then, joy was untamed, unfiltered, and unburdened by the weight of adulthood.
So, why is it that as adults, we seem resigned to a life without joy simply because of responsibilities? Sure, we have bills, deadlines, and obligations, but does that mean we have to give up on whimsy altogether?
Take a moment to reflect: When was the last time you sang at the top of your lungs during car karaoke? Treated yourself to your favorite ice cream for no reason other than it was a tough week? Or let yourself laugh so hard you cried?
The Science of Joy
Research supports the idea that joy is essential for a fulfilled life. Studies have
shown that joy and happiness boost resilience, improve mental health, and even lead to longer lifespans. Yet, despite these benefits, we often let joy take a backseat to our obligations—or worse, tether it entirely to our romantic status.
A study by the Pew Research Center revealed that while 88% of Americans believe love is essential for happiness, only 50% of adults describe themselves as "very happy" in their relationships. What’s more, single people often report higher levels of personal growth and autonomy—two major contributors to joy—than their coupled counterparts.
Rediscovering Joy
The truth is, joy doesn’t have to be at odds with adulthood—or relationships, for that matter. Joy is found in the small, intentional moments we carve out for ourselves. It’s in reclaiming the silly, carefree habits we’ve let slip away and rediscovering the things that make us feel alive.
And no, joy doesn’t require us to be
single. But maybe it requires us to approach life with the curiosity and wonder we once had as kids. Responsibilities don’t erase the possibility of whimsy; we do that when we choose seriousness over lightheartedness.
So, the next time life feels heavy, remember: bills don’t stop you from belting out your favorite song in the car. Deadlines don’t prevent you from dancing in the kitchen. And adulting doesn’t have to mean sacrificing the little joys that make life worth living.
Let’s ask ourselves: Have we chosen "seriousness" over joy? Have we placed coupledom on a pedestal, believing it to be the ultimate source of happiness, when in reality, joy is something we cultivate within ourselves?
If we dare to prioritize joy—whether single, in a relationship, or somewhere in between—we might find that life feels a little lighter, a little more magical. And isn’t that worth it?
The Voice Of Black Chicago
THE BOOK OF DAVID Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Kicks Off
The Trump administration has begun its nationwide immigration crackdown. The states where they have concentrated the most enforcement agencies include Illinois, Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Nebraska, and Texas. The enforcement agencies involved include the FBI, DEA, ATF, and ICE. As is usual with national issues, the political positions fall along ideological lines.
On the right, you have people who are motivated to enforce the immigration laws of the United States. That is extremely straightforward. Furthermore, the Trump administration is targeting illegal immigrants who are guilty of crimes like drug distribution, child trafficking, and similar offenses. The Left is stating that these individuals are going to be protected by the jurisdictions in which they reside, e.g., their state or city.
Once again, the left is completely tone-deaf. The American people have spoken resoundingly that they do not want illegal immigrants in the United States. Moreover, Americans do not want to subsidize the livelihoods of these individuals. Chicago spent more than $600 million in 2024 on migrants alone. Taxpayers should have a say in how their money is being spent at the local level, especially when that money is being spent in opposition to federal law.
It begs the question: Why are American politicians so motivated and concerned with the well-being of people who are here illegally at the expense of American taxpayers who vote? This is a more fundamental question than most people realize. What is a leader? Is a leader one who listens to and implements the demands of the people, or should leaders do what they believe is right regardless of what their constituents desire?
I submit that, in this set of circumstances, politicians need to listen to the people who voted for them. Full stop. Politicians need to remember that their positions are finite. They will be remembered by what they accomplish while in office. A politician’s job is to leave their governed area better than when they found it. The current state of affairs pertaining to illegal immigrants has spiraled out of control.
I saw a video today on social media in which Dr. Phil is out with law enforcement to arrest criminal illegal immigrants. He interviewed a Thai man who admitted that he is here illegally and has been found guilty of crimes against children. Brandon Johnson and other politicians would let this individual continue to roam the streets of our country in search of his next victim.
I already hear some of you saying that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natural-born American citizens. My answer is: I do not care. The United States is a sovereign nation that has the right to determine who and how many immigrants can come into our country, just like you can determine who comes in and out of your house. If I come home tonight and there are strangers in my home eating in my kitchen, they would be immediately defenestrated from my home. It is time to do the same for the country.
Mila K. Marshall, PhD
Sen. Warren Urges Musk to Back Marijuana Reform
United States Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has appealed to newly appointed billionaire Elon Musk, urging him to consider marijuana reform as a cost-saving measure for taxpayers. Her argument, detailed in a 21-page letter, highlights the potential for significant reductions in federal spending related to arrests and detention programs for marijuana offenses.
Warren’s home state of Oklahoma legalized medicinal cannabis in 2018. Musk, now the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is tasked with “modernizing federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity,” according to the White House website. In her letter, Warren argues that federal enforcement of marijuana laws wastes hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars annually, yielding few meaningful results.
She points out that while many states have legalized recreational
marijuana, federal agencies continue to conduct arrests and raids on marijuana-related activities in those states, a practice she and cannabis advocates see as a misuse of resources. A significant portion of federal drug possession arrests involves marijuana, despite prosecutions for possession being relatively rare.
Warren emphasizes that such enforcement is not only costly but largely ineffective, diverting federal resources—such as manpower, funding, and time—away from more pressing law enforcement priorities. She suggests that if DOGE were to support her position, both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could achieve considerable savings by reducing unnecessary enforcement actions.
However, implementing such reforms may face challenges. The new acting Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Derek Maltz, a 28-year DEA veteran, remains opposed to legalization, citing concerns about marijuana being a gateway drug. Moreover, marijuana’s current classification as a Schedule I narcotic complicates efforts to eliminate federal spending on arrests and detentions.
Read Senator Warren’s full letter here: warren.senate.gov/imo/ media/doc/letter_to_doge_rerecommendationstosave2trillionoverthenext10years.pdf.
Food & Wine Mare Evans Contributing
Writer
Chipotle Black Bean Quinoa Bowls with Tahini Sauce
The black bean quinoa bowl with chipotle tahini sauce is an easy-to-make recipe that’s not only delicious but also healthy! If you’re someone who likes to plan ahead, you can prepare the ingredients in advance. The best part? The ingredients are flexible and can be customized with your favorite toppings. The real star of this dish is the chipotle tahini sauce—it’s next-level and adds a smoky, bold flavor to this Mexican-inspired recipe.
2 tablespoons chipotle peppers in adobo sauce (I prefer to use the adobo sauce rather than blending the peppers. If using whole chipotle peppers, you can dice them or blend the sauce for a smoother consistency.)
Room temperature water (about 1/4 cup, to thin the sauce as needed)
Instructions
1. Cook the quinoa:
Cook the quinoa according to package directions. Let it sit with the lid on for a few minutes, then fluff it with a fork. If desired, season your quinoa with lime juice and cilantro for added flavor.
2. Prepare the black beans:
Heat a large pan over medium heat and add 2 teaspoons of olive oil. Sauté the diced onion for 2–3 minutes until softened. Add the drained black beans along with cumin, paprika, garlic powder, salt, and pepper. Stir well and cook for 4–5 minutes, until heated through.
3. Make the chipotle tahini sauce: In a medium bowl, combine tahini, lime juice, chipotle peppers (or adobo sauce), granulated garlic, and salt. Mix until the tahini absorbs the liquid. Gradually add water, about 1/4 cup, to thin the sauce to your desired consistency. Stir until smooth and well combined.
4. Assemble the bowls:
Divide the ingredients into individual bowls. Add about 3/4 cup of quinoa and 1/2 cup of black beans to each bowl. Layer on your desired toppings, then drizzle generously with the chipotle tahini sauce. Serve with tortilla chips for extra crunch, and enjoy!
The Poplin Asymmetrical Shirtdress A Bold Twist on a Classic Style
Presented here in navy stripe for $140, this shirtdress is a must-have staple for your 2025 spring wardrobe. The price is right, and it offers a fresh twist on a timeless classic. If you're drawn to the Calvin Klein, Donna Karan, Ralph Lauren, J.Crew, or other preppy designer collections, this piece will make a perfect addition to your wardrobe, offering a modern update to your style.
Worn as styled here, it makes a bold statement. However, you can easily add your own creative touch, infusing personal flair and scoring major style points. While I have similar shirtdresses in solid colors and classic cuts that resemble oversized shirts, this design stands out with its asymmetrical button placement. The shifted buttons create an avant-garde hemline that brings an edgy, fashion-forward vibe.
For added versatility, you can belt it to cinch the waist and adjust the hemline or explore countless other styling options.
Incorporating this best-selling piece into your wardrobe might seem like a bold choice, but the asymmetrical design transforms the classic shirtdress into a true statement-maker. The dress is essentially a poplin shirt with two sets of buttons: one for wearing it as an oversized, button-front shirtdress and another for styling it as an asymmetrical wrap shirt. That’s versatility and value in one stunning design.
Design Highlights
• Oversized fit: Extra room in the chest, shoulders, and waist.
• Dropped shoulder seams for a relaxed look.
• Point collar with a button front.
• Dual buttons on the left side for an asymmetrical wrapped style.
