6035 NW Burgundy Drive, Corvallis, OR 97330 by Dava Behrens, Broker, Coldwell Banker Valley Brokers

About This Home...

6035 NW Burgundy Drive, Corvallis, OR Detailed information regarding this property is contained herein. Interested parties should feel free to take this booklet.

6035 NW Burgundy Drive, Corvallis         

 

6293± sq. ft. 4 bedrooms/4.5 baths 1.24 acres Main level full suite plus a luxurious second level master suite Gourmet dine-in kitchen Formal and informal spaces Attached 3-car garage Year Built: 1994 Schools: Mountain View Elementary, Cheldelin Middle, Crescent Valley High Taxes 13-14: $8964 MLS # 674552

Entertains in style and lives like a dream. This home lives big. A great floor plan for entertaining large groups formally, or nestling into the comfortable, relaxed atmosphere; it truly has it all. From the dramatic entry to the fenced back yard with rolling lawn, the delightful patio areas to the dine-in gourmet kitchen with breakfast bar and quality appliances. A lovely combination of formal and informal spaces. You’ll love the exquisite finishes, hardwood flooring, built-in cabinetry, and floor-to-ceiling windows that bring in the views.

Living room has a gas fireplace, large windows and is open to the foyer and formal dining room

Dava Behrens Broker, REALTOR®, GRI Office: 541-757-0222 Cell: 541-740-3844 Direct: 541-257-3422 dava@davarealestate.com

Formal dining room has an arched, columned doorway to the living room and access to the kitchen and family room

For more real estate and community information, additional photos and Virtual Tours of many of my listings, visit my web site at:

www.DavaRealEstate.Com

VALLEY BROKERS 1109 NW 9th Street Corvallis, OR 97330

Kitchen      

Open and light with wonderful views Quality appliances White cabinetry with gorgeous Granite counter-tops Breakfast bar and casual eat-in dining area Gas fireplace open to family room Access to back patio

Family Room    

Spacious and open Dramatic windows with views and lots of natural light Soaring ceilings Gas fireplace open to kitchen

Office    

Adjacent to foyer with large windows Beautiful patterned wood floor Stained glass pendant light fixture Beautiful cherry built-in bookcases and desk

Main Level Bonus Room  

Large windows Ideal for a home office, den, craft room, playroom, or to suit your needs

Main Level Bedroom   

Large room Ceiling fan Close to main level full bath and back multipurpose room

Powder room, laundry room, and a full bath are all located on the main level.

Second Level Master Suite     

Spacious and bright Large windows with valley views Ceiling fan Gas fireplace with marble surround Attached master bath

Attached Master Bath     

French doors Dual sink vanity with marble counter-tops Jetted tub has a large window with views and a gas fireplace Large walk-in shower Attached large walk-in closet with built-in storage

2 Bedrooms 

Spacious with large windows and ceiling fans

Second Level Full Bath  

Neutral and light Shower/tub combo

Second Level Hallway 

Overlooks both the foyer and the main level family room

Second Level Bonus Room   

23’ x 26’ Large windows Ideal for a home gym, second family room, playroom, artist studio, or to suit your needs

Lower Level Theater Room     

9-seat theater Quality projector, sound system, and control system Built-in bookcases and cabinets Gas fireplace Open to lower level kitchenette

Lower Level Kitchenette  

Oak bar and cabinetry with upper glass fronted display cabinets and a wine rack Appliances include dishwasher, mini refrigerator, and popcorn machine

Lower Level Game Room  

Just off the theater room Built-in oak bar seating

Lower Level Full Bath 

Neutral with a spacious shower and linen cabinet

Outdoors   

Easy care underground sprinkler system in the front and back yards Professionally landscaped using natural land features and native plants Fully fenced, private backyard with spacious patio and gorgeous valley and mountain views

Mechanicals   

Central vacuum system Security alarm system High-speed communication wiring

Rev ©2014 Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC. Coldwell Banker® is a registered trademark licensed to Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC. An Equal Opportunity Company. Equal Housing Opportunity . Each Office Is Independently Owned and Operated. Information from sources deemed reliable, NOT guaranteed.

Amenities

Specialty features of this home.

6035 NW Burgundy Drive Amenities Comfortable and luxurious home      

Situated on 1.24 acres Natural wooded setting and rolling lawn Grand arched exterior front entry with two stately columns Expansive windows allow for lots of natural light and amazing territorial views Wonderful combination of formal and informal spaces Attached 3-car garage

Main Floor Foyer      

Double art glass front doors Open and inviting with vaulted ceilings and chandelier Beautiful blue granite tile flooring Curved staircase to the upper level Arched art niche with display lights with granite sill Open to formal living room, family room, front office, and upper level

Formal Living Room      

Large windows with wooded views Beautiful hardwood flooring Gas fireplace with granite mantle 10’ high ceilings Large arched doorway with columns lead into the formal dining room Open to the foyer and formal dining room

Formal Dining Room    

Open to formal living room and kitchen 10’ high ceilings with chandelier Beautiful hardwood flooring Large window with wooded views

Kitchen       

Open to the formal dining room and family room Large windows with views Quality appliances White cabinetry with gorgeous granite counter-tops Gas fireplace open to family room Breakfast bar and casual eat-in dining area Access to back patio, making it easy for outdoor entertaining

Family Room     

Located off the foyer with vaulted ceilings and two ceiling fans Dramatic windows with territorial views and natural light Gas fireplace open to kitchen Blue carpet inset into beautiful hardwood flooring (another color option for the carpet is beige) Open to foyer, kitchen, and main level bonus room

Office     

Adjacent to foyer Large windows with wooded views Beautiful patterned wood flooring Beautiful cherry built-in bookcases and desk Stained glass pendant light fixture

Main Level Bonus Room    

Located directly off the family room Large windows with views Spacious with neutral carpet and paint Multiple use possibilities to suit your needs

Powder Bath   

Specialty designer wall paper Quality white cabinetry with beautiful granite counter-tops Located close to the family room

Main Level Bedroom   

Ideal for guests or those who prefer main level living Spacious and neutral with ceiling fan Close to main level full bath and main level bonus room

Main Level Full Bath  

Neutral and bright Located close to the main level bedroom

*Laundry room with storage is also located on the main floor Upper Level Upper Level Master Suite    

Spacious and bright with ceiling fan Large windows with views, lots of natural light, and plantation shutter style window treatments Gas fireplace with marble surround and built-in shelves French doors lead to the attached master bath

Attached Master Bath    

Jetted tub with marble surround, large window with views, and gas fireplace Dual sink vanity with beautiful marble counter-tops Large walk-in shower with marble floor and surround Large attached walk-in closet with built-in storage

Upper Level Bedrooms 

Spacious and neutral with ceiling fans and large windows

Upper Level Full Bath  

Close to both upper level bedrooms Shower/tub combo and toilet are separate from the sink area

Upper Level Bonus Room  

23’ X 26’, ideal for a home gym, second family room, and more Large windows with views and natural light

Lower Level Theater Room    

9-seat theater with projector, sound system, and control system Built-in bookcases and cabinets are great for storage and house the theater controls Curtains encircle most of the room, giving a true movie theater experience when closed Open to kitchenette and game room and access to backyard

Kitchenette   

Overlooks theater room Oak bar and cabinetry with upper glass door display cabinets and wine rack Appliances include dishwasher, mini refrigerator, and popcorn machine

Game Room  

Just off theater room with built-in oak bar seating Spacious storage closet

Lower Level Full Bath 

Neutral with a spacious shower and linen cabinet

Outdoors   

Wooded front yard with garden lights and irrigation Professionally landscaped with natural land features and native plants Fully fenced, private backyard with irrigation, spacious patio, rolling lawn, and gorgeous views

Other       

High efficiency gas forced air and AC Two water heaters Central vacuum system Security alarm system New roof (2012) Low landslide risk (as determined by Benton County geological survey) Surveyed and marked corner pins (2012)

Title Insurance What is title insurance? A title insurance policy takes the risk out of acquiring property whose legal history is unknown to you. Through the years, your new property may have changed hands many times through sale, inheritance, foreclosure, or bankruptcy. Each transfer was an opportunity for an error in title to arise. If an error occurred, and never came to light, it could put your title in jeopardy. You could lose the property and the money you used to pay for it. And even if you successfully defend your rights of ownership, the cost in time and legal fess could be prohibitive. Title insurance protects you against these risks, including:           

Confusion from similarity of name Forged documents Signatures of minors or mentally incompetent persons Mistakes in recording legal documents Undisclosed or missing heirs Fraud Invalid divorces Misrepresentation of marital status Un paid taxes Clerical error in public records Wills not probated

Title Insurance

How does title insurance protect me? Before a policy is issued, the title company or one of its agents conducts a search for public records, maps, and documents. These records trace back to colonial estates, pioneer homesteads, or Spanish land grants and trace forward to the current owner. Only after collecting, examining, and interpreting appropriate records is a policy issued insuring the condition of the title. In addition to describing your property and spelling out a recorded limitations your ownership, a title insurance policy sets forth in clear terms what the title company will do in the event that a flaw in the title is discovered or your rights of ownership are challenged.

Technical Details...

...concerning this property

MNNMMNM

NMMNMNM

MNMNM

nmnmnmnmn

mnmnmnmn

Community Information

Information about the highlights of this homeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s neighborhood.

Community Parks

Chip Ross Park Location: In north Corvallis, at the end of Lester Ave. Additional access is by trail from Timberhill Open Space. Size: 125.6 Acres Chip Ross Park features an easy-to-moderate 1.5 mile trail through lush forest and hilltop habitats of upland prairie and Oak savanah. The park offers beautiful views of Corvallis, the Willamette Valley, the Coast Range and the Cascade Mountains. Hikers and runners can also access the many miles of trails in adjacent McDonald Forest from here. Horseback riding and bicycling are permitted on seasonally designated trails. The park is a designated off-leash area for dogs and their humans to socialize and enjoy. There are picnic tables at the Lester Ave trailhead.

Map courtesy of CorvallisMaps.com Information provided by Corvallis Parks & Recreation Department.

McDonald-Dunn Forest Location: In far north Corvallis, accessible from Chip Ross Park and Peavy Arboretum. Size: 11,250 Acres McDonald-Dunn Research Forest is a short 15 minute drive north of the OSU campus. Because of its proximity to campus, this forest is extensively used for university instruction and research. Four distinct forest management themes, even-aged, two-storied and uneven-aged, plus reserved old-growth stands, allow side-by-side comparisons of the effects of implementing these themes. The forest's non-motorized recreation opportunities in close proximity to the Corvallis community result in over 175,000 non-motorized recreation visits each year. Peavy Arboretum is being developed to provide examples of all of the major ecozones found in Oregon. The McDonald-Dunn Research Forest consists of approximately 11,250 acres of predominantly forested land on the western edge of the Willamette Valley in Oregon, and on the eastern foothills of the Coast Range. The forest occupies a ridge system that projects eastward into the Willamette Valley. In general, the streams and ridges extend northwest and southeast from the main ridge. The forest is somewhat isolated topographically from the rest of the Oregon Coast Range, residing in the rain shadow created by it. McDonald-Dunn Forest is in the "Valley Margin Zone" as defined by Juday.

Information provided by Oregon State Universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s College of Forestry.

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School The purpose of this Rating Details report is to provide and explain the data that was used to determine the school rating that is shown on each school’s Report Card. Included in the following pages is all of the data used to determine the rating, together with a description of ratings methodology. The school rating shown here was piloted in 2011-2012 to determine Priority, Focus, and Model schools as part of the ESEA Waiver. For more details on the school report cards, please visit: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=1786.

Overall Level: Level 5 % of Points Weight Earned

Weighted Points

Performance Indicator

Level

Academic Achievement

Level 4

80.0%

20.0

Level 5

90.0%

45.0

Level 5

90.0%

22.5

(page 3)

Academic Growth (page 4)

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Number of Missed Participation Targets* (page 6)

* Schools do not receive points for participation. However, a school's overall Level is lowered by one category if it does not meet participation targets for all subgroups and subjects.

Totals**

** Schools may not be eligible for all possible points. Schools are not rated in categories where they do not meet minimum student count requirements.

Weighted Percent

Federal Reporting Designations Received Title I Funds in 2012-13 (Y/N) ESEA Designation (if any)

Y Model

Inst ID = 37 Page: 1 of 6

87.5 87.5%

Level Assignment

Weighted Percent

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

87.0 or above 70.0 to 86.9 47.0 to 69.9 26.5 to 46.9 Less than 26.5

Levels are calculated using the percentage of points earned out of the total points eligible. For schools with data on all indicators, the total points possible are: •25 for Academic Achievement •50 for Academic Growth •25 for Subgroup Growth The total score is matched to the scoring guide above to determine the school’s rating.

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School Overall school ratings are determined using the percent of points earned for each of the indicators below. Detailed data to support the indicator ratings are provided in the following pages. Academic Achievement (page 3)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Total Level 4 8 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 80.0%

Academic Growth (page 4)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 5 5 5 Total Level 5 9 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 90.0%

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading Economically Disadvantaged Level 4 4 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Not Rated 0 0 Math Economically Disadvantaged Level 5 5 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Not Rated 0 0 Total Level 5 9 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 90.0% 1.

Includes American Indian/Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic students.

Inst ID = 37 Page: 2 of 6

Category Level Cutoffs Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

% of Points Earned 90.0% 70.0% 50.0% 30.0% <30.0%

2012-2013 Academic Achievement Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School Achievement Level Cutoffs One way that we measure how well students are doing is through the use of state tests, which include achievement standards that define levels of student performance in a content area at a particular grade. The Academic Achievement indicator reflects the percent of students that meet or exceed standards on the state reading and math tests at all grade levels offered by the school. Subgroup data are displayed for informational purposes but are not included in the Rating system.

Reading Economically

Disadvantaged1

English Learners1 Students with

Disabilities1

Underserved Races/Ethnicities1 American Indian/Alaska

Native2

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander2 Black/African

American2

Hispanic/Latino2

Reading 87.2 & above 69.0 to 87.1 58.8 to 68.9 49.6 to 58.7 Less than 49.6

2011-12

Math 82.3 & above 66.0 to 82.2 49.2 to 65.9 39.3 to 49.1 Less than 39.3

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

Level 4

160

80.0

138

84.1

81.9

Level

All Students

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Level 4

68.5

76.9

72.5

Not Rated

50.0

42.9

46.4

Not Rated

62.5

84.6

72.4

Not Rated

50.0

60.0

Not Rated

66.7

83.3

73.3

Asian1

Not Rated

White1

Level 4

131

83.2

112

83.9

83.5

Not Rated

69.2

80.0

73.9

Multi-Racial1

Math

Level

2011-12

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

All Students

Level 4

160

65.6

138

70.3

67.8

Economically Disadvantaged1

Level 3

47.9

58.5

52.9

Learners1

Not Rated

Students with Disabilities1

Not Rated

50.0

42.9

46.4

Underserved Races/Ethnicities1

Not Rated

25.0

38.5

31.0

Not Rated

20.0

English

American Indian/Alaska Native2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander2

Not Rated

Black/African American2

Not Rated

Hispanic/Latino2

Not Rated

33.3

16.7

26.7

Not Rated

Level 4

131

71.8

112

72.3

72.0

Not Rated

53.8

80.0

65.2

Asian1 White1 Multi-Racial1 1. 2.

These data are not part of the achievement rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance. Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined >95.0 Greater than 95 percent of students met or exceeded. Test counts are also suppressed. <5.0 Less than 5 percent of students met or exceeded. Test counts are also suppressed.

Inst ID = 37 Page: 3 of 6

2012-2013 Academic Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School

Growth Level Cutoffs Level

The Academic Growth Indicator uses the Colorado Growth Model to measure student progress over time in reading and mathematics. Oregon adopted this growth model as part of the process of obtaining a waiver from some of the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This growth model provides us a more complete picture of student progress and will help provide a better evaluation of school effectiveness.

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

On Track Growth Yes No 60 & above 70 & above 45 to 59.5 55 to 69.5 35 to 44.5 45 to 54.5 40 to 44.5 30 to 34.5 Less than 30 Less than 40

The growth model looks at a student’s growth, which is the change in his/her test scores from the previous year (or 8th grade to 11th grade for high school students). The student’s growth is compared to that of his/her academic peers, who are the other students in the state who have a similar history of reading or math test scores. The Growth Model then expresses this growth as a percentile. For example, a growth percentile of 50 would indicate that a student had average growth compared to all other students in the state with similar test scores in the past. A growth percentile of 80 would indicate that the student’s growth was as high, or higher, than 80 percent of his/her academic peers. For school accountability Oregon uses the median growth percentile for students at the school. The median represents “typical” growth at the school: half of the students had growth that was at least as high as the median, half the student had growth that was less than or equal to the median. This median growth percentile is the basis for the growth ratings for reading and mathematics, as shown below. The growth model also provides growth targets for students in grades 3 to 8. These growth targets are the growth percentile the student would need to sustain to either move up to standard within three years (for those students currently below standard) or to maintain standard for the next three years (for those students above standard). For school accountability Oregon uses the median growth target for students at the school to determine if the school has On Track Growth: If the Combined Median Growth Percentile >= Combined Median Growth Target then On Track Growth = ‘Yes’ If the Combined Median Growth Percentile < Combined Median Growth Target then On Track Growth = ‘No’ This determination of whether the school has On Track growth helps to determine the growth levels, as shown in the table at the upper right corner of this page. 2011-12

Academic Growth

Level

2012-13

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth?

Reading (All Students)

Level 4

111

53.0

57.0

55.0

18.0

Yes

Mathematics (All Students)

Level 5

111

56.0

80.5

66.0

30.0

Yes

Data notes: * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 37 Page: 4 of 6

2012-2013 Subgroup Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School Growth Level Cutoffs

This indicator measures the growth of historically underserved student subgroups. It disaggregates the Growth indicator and reflects the growth for economically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities, and historically underserved races/ethnicities.

Level

To be rated on Subgroup Growth, a subgroup must meet the minimum size required to receive an Achievement rating (40 tests in the last two years combined) and also have at least 30 students with growth percentiles. 2011-12

Reading

Level

Economically Disadvantaged

Level 4

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

On Track Growth Yes No 60 & above 70 & above 45 to 59.5 55 to 69.5 35 to 44.5 45 to 54.5 30 to 34.5 40 to 44.5 Less than 30 Less than 40

2012-13

Median Growth Median Growth Students Students Percentile Percentile

55.5

54.0

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth?

55.0

36.5

Yes

English Learners

Not Rated

Students with Disabilities

Not Rated

76.0

35.0

60.0

59.5

Underserved Races/Ethnicities

Not Rated

69.0

70.0

54.0

Not Rated

American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander1

Not Rated

Black/African American1

Not Rated

Hispanic/Latino1

Not Rated

73.0

22.0

Not Rated

Level 4

47.5

55.0

53.0

15.0

Yes

Not Rated

62.0

76.0

62.0

20.0

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth?

Asian2 White2 Multi-Racial2

2011-12

Math

Level

Economically Disadvantaged

2012-13

Median Growth Median Growth Students Students Percentile Percentile

Level 5

46.5

73.5

61.5

45.0

Yes

English Learners

Not Rated

Students with Disabilities

Not Rated

52.0

62.0

56.0

59.5

Underserved Races/Ethnicities

Not Rated

42.5

62.0

55.0

52.0

Not Rated

57.0

50.0

American Indian/Alaska

Native1

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African

American1

Hispanic/Latino1 Asian2

Not Rated

White2

Level 5

56.0

80.0

66.0

27.0

Yes

Not Rated

65.0

85.0

69.0

40.5

Multi-Racial2 1. 2.

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup. These data are not part of the academic growth rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 37 Page: 5 of 6

2012-2013 Participation Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Mt View Elementary School Student participation rates tell us the extent to which all students were tested in a school. All students enrolled on the first school day in May are required to test, and the data below show the percentages of students that tested, by subject and subgroup. The table below also shows whether or not each subgroup met the federal participation rate target of 94.5%. School ratings are dependent upon student test scores, and these ratings are valid only when schools uniformly test all of their students. As a result, schools with one or more subgroups that missed the participation target will have their overall school rating lowered by one Level.

Participation Target: 94.5% Reading

Status

All Students Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1 Asian White Multi-Racial

Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Not Rated

Math

Status

Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Not Rated

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

171 81 2 17 16 6 0 1 9 0 139 16

145 71 4 15 16 4 1 2 9 3 115 11

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

99.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -100.0 100.0 -100.0 94.1

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

99.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 96.4

Current Current NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Current NA

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

172 81 2 17 16 6 0 1 9 0 139 17

145 71 4 15 16 4 1 2 9 3 115 11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -100.0 100.0 -100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Current Current NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Current NA

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined

Inst ID = 37 Page: 6 of 6

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Mt View Elementary School 340 NE Granger Ave Corvallis, OR 973309654, (541) 7664760 http://schools.csd509j.net/mtn_view/

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Rosemary O'Neil GRADES SERVED K5

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

FROM THE PRINCIPAL

Dear Parents and Community Members, For 201213, Mountain View Elementary received the highest state report card overall rating, placing us in the top 10% of all schools in the state. Our highest ratings occurred in the area of academic growth. We continue to strive for all students to meet standards by focusing our resources on implementing the new Common Core State Standards, assessing and monitoring student progress, and offering differentiated interventions. We will pilot 1:WORLD iPad for every student this year to enhance and accelerate our students’ academic achievement.

parent teacher conferences, as well as reading class newsletters and teacher’s websites. Also become familiar with the two programs we have for children to work on their own in math and reading anywhere anytime online. (IXL and RAZ Kids) Please volunteer to read to a child, help in our artist and naturist enrichment classes, or work in our new garden. We look forward to partnering with you over the coming year to make sure all our students succeed and thrive. Thank you, Principal | Rosemary O'Neil

Please be involved by attending our fall Open House and fall/spring

SCHOOL PROFILE

STUDENTS

Enrollment 201213 K3 45 Change from previous year Students attending 90% or more of enrolled days

279 176 103 12.3% 82%

Average elementary class size Change from previous year

23.6 0.3

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when the data must be suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

OVERALL STATE RATING

Select Demographics 201213 English Learners

Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander <1%

<5%

Black/ African American 2%

Students who have ever been eligible for or participated in a program to acquire academic English.

Economically disadvantaged Students with disabilities

American Indian/ Alaska Native 2% Asian 3%

53% 11%

Number of different languages spoken:

MultiRacial 6% Hispanic/Latino 7% White 80%

HOW ARE STUDENTS AT THIS SCHOOL PERFORMING COMPARED TO THOSE AT OTHER SCHOOLS?

The overall state rating is intended to summarize this school's particular successes and challenges. It is based on a combination of up to five factors. Three of these factors come from standardized test scores in reading and math: student achievement, student growth, and the growth of underserved subgroups. Please be aware that this rating is based mainly on highstakes testing and accordingly, represents a limited view of student performance. Other aspects of this report card are designed to put this rating in the proper context. Compared to all schools statewide in 201213, this school is rated as Level 5.

Compared to elementary schools with similar student demographics in 201213, this school’s rating is above average.

State Average

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 1 = Falls into the bottom 5% of schools Level 2 = Falls between 5% and 15% of schools Level 3 = Falls between 15% and 44% of schools Level 4 = Falls between 44% and 90% of schools Level 5 = Falls into the top 10% of schools

Level 5

Below Average

About Average

Above Average

Below average = Falls into the bottom third of comparison schools About average = Falls into the middle third of comparison schools Above average = Falls into the top third of comparison schools

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Mt View Elementary School

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Rosemary O'Neil GRADES SERVED K5

340 NE Granger Ave Corvallis, OR 973309654, (541) 7664760 http://schools.csd509j.net/mtn_view/

PROGRESS

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

ARE STUDENTS MAKING ADEQUATE GAINS OVER TIME?

Students meeting or exceeding state standards on exams SCHOOL PERFORMANCE Did at least 95% of the students at this school take required state exams? Yes No Participation rate criteria are in place to ensure schools test as many eligible students as possible School Performance (%)

200910

Reading

201011

201112

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

86.4

Note new cut scores in 201112.

Mathematics

41.2 45.2 13.6

92.5

56.5 36.0 7.5

80.0

84.2

Note new cut scores in 201011.

Science

28.8 55.4 15.8

69.9

37.6 32.3 30.1

65.6

86.3

Note new cut scores in 201112.

84.1

28.1 37.5 34.4

33.3 52.9 13.7

90.0

40.0 50.0 10.0

82.8

Visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/data for additional state exam results.

21.9 60.9 17.2

71.0

Met

70.3

28.5 42.4 29.0

80.2

33.4 46.8 19.8

Exceeded

37.0 33.3 29.7

62.1

Met

83.7

LikeSchool Average (%) 201213

Exceeded

47.8 36.2 15.9

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 5, 8,11)

All students tested

41.9 38.1 20.0

Met

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201213 201213

27.8 34.3 37.9

72.0

33.2 38.8 28.0

Exceeded

34.7 49.0 16.3

68.1

16.0 52.1 31.9

80.5

21.3 59.2 19.5

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when data are unavailable or to protect student confidentiality.

OUTCOMES FOR KEY STUDENT GROUPS AT THIS SCHOOL COMPARED TO THE SAME GROUPS STATEWIDE STUDENT GROUP OUTCOMES

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

All Students

Reading

Mathematics

Science

American Indian/Alaska Native 84.1 70.3 83.7

71.0 62.1 68.1

+13.1 +8.2 +15.6

Economically Disadvantaged

Reading

Mathematics

Science

76.9 58.5 72.7

60.2 50.3 55.5

Mathematics

Science

Mathematics

Science

* * *

46.5 43.3 39.6

* * *

42.9 42.9 *

43.0 33.7 42.9

0.1 +9.2 *

Mathematics

Science

* * *

57.4 47.3 53.2

* * *

79.5 79.7 74.9

* * *

Mathematics

Science

94.1 86.7 >95

Reading

55.2 42.5 47.9

* * *

83.3 16.7 *

52.1 45.2 45.3

+31.2 28.5 *

80.0 80.0 *

76.0 65.8 73.5

+4.0 +14.2 *

Science

Mathematics

Science

4.4 11.4 *

Reading

Mathematics

Science

* * *

59.1 46.5 49.4

* * *

Reading

83.9 72.3 86.0

77.7 68.0 76.5

+6.2 +4.3 +9.5

Mathematics

Science

Reading

Mathematics

87.5 71.9 78.9

73.2 61.5 65.9

+14.3 +10.4 +13.0

Science

81.1 68.9 86.7

68.8 62.7 70.3

+12.3 +6.2 +16.4

Male

MultiRacial 98.5 98.1 98.0

Mathematics

Female

* * *

Mathematics

Reading

White

Reading

Hispanic/Latino

Talented and Gifted

Reading

Mathematics

Black/African American

Students with Disabilities

Reading

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

Asian +16.7 +8.2 +17.2

English Learners

Reading

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

Reading

Mathematics

Science

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when data are unavailable or to protect student confidentiality.

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Mt View Elementary School 340 NE Granger Ave Corvallis, OR 973309654, (541) 7664760 http://schools.csd509j.net/mtn_view/

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Rosemary O'Neil GRADES SERVED K5

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

CURRICULUM & LEARNING ENVIRONMENT WHAT IS THIS SCHOOL DOING TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING AND TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE FUTURE?

SCHOOL READINESS

Universal/daily breakfast program

School recess track program

Bullying and harassment prevention program

SMART reading program K3

Positive behavior/social skills training

ACADEMIC SUPPORT

ELL program based on language proficiency Special education program supports students disabilities Math and reading interventions supports students

ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT

Academic enhancement interventions (TAG) iPad: WORLD for all students Parent Teacher Association (PTA) funds art and naturalist

Frequent progress monitoring and assessment

EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES PTA enhancement nights: Science, Reading, Math Childcare

Chess Club Garden Club

Data and information in the Curriculum and Learning Environment section was provided by local schools and districts and was not verified by the Oregon Department of Education.

FEDERAL TITLE I DESIGNATION Priority

Focus

Model

Model Schools are high poverty schools that were ranked in the top 5% of Title IA schools in the state based on Oregon’s rating formula. These schools serve as models of successful student outcomes. Priority and Focus school designations were based on 201112 data. Model school designations were based on 201213 data.

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School The purpose of this Rating Details report is to provide and explain the data that was used to determine the school rating that is shown on each school’s Report Card. Included in the following pages is all of the data used to determine the rating, together with a description of ratings methodology. The school rating shown here was piloted in 2011-2012 to determine Priority, Focus, and Model schools as part of the ESEA Waiver. For more details on the school report cards, please visit: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=1786.

Overall Level: Level 4 % of Points Weight Earned

Weighted Points

Performance Indicator

Level

Academic Achievement

Level 5

100%

25.0

Level 4

80.0%

40.0

Level 4

83.3%

20.8

(page 3)

Academic Growth (page 4)

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Number of Missed Participation Targets* (page 6)

* Schools do not receive points for participation. However, a school's overall Level is lowered by one category if it does not meet participation targets for all subgroups and subjects.

Totals** Weighted Percent

** Schools may not be eligible for all possible points. Schools are not rated in categories where they do not meet minimum student count requirements.

Federal Reporting Designations Received Title I Funds in 2012-13 (Y/N) ESEA Designation (if any)

Inst ID = 28 Page: 1 of 6

85.8 85.8%

Level Assignment

Weighted Percent

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

87.0 or above 70.0 to 86.9 47.0 to 69.9 26.5 to 46.9 Less than 26.5

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School Overall school ratings are determined using the percent of points earned for each of the indicators below. Detailed data to support the indicator ratings are provided in the following pages. Academic Achievement (page 3)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 5 5 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 5 5 5 Total Level 5 10 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 100%

Academic Growth (page 4)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Total Level 4 8 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 80.0%

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading Economically Disadvantaged Level 4 4 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Level 4 4 5 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 5 5 5 Math Economically Disadvantaged Level 4 4 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Level 4 4 5 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 4 4 5 Total Level 4 25 30 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 83.3% 1.

Includes American Indian/Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic students.

Inst ID = 28 Page: 2 of 6

Category Level Cutoffs Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

% of Points Earned 90.0% 70.0% 50.0% 30.0% <30.0%

2012-2013 Academic Achievement Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School Achievement Level Cutoffs One way that we measure how well students are doing is through the use of state tests, which include achievement standards that define levels of student performance in a content area at a particular grade. The Academic Achievement indicator reflects the percent of students that meet or exceed standards on the state reading and math tests at all grade levels offered by the school. Subgroup data are displayed for informational purposes but are not included in the Rating system.

Reading Economically

Disadvantaged1

English Learners1 Students with

Disabilities1

Underserved Races/Ethnicities1 American Indian/Alaska

Native2

Reading 87.2 & above 69.0 to 87.1 58.8 to 68.9 49.6 to 58.7 Less than 49.6

2011-12

Math 82.3 & above 66.0 to 82.2 49.2 to 65.9 39.3 to 49.1 Less than 39.3

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

Level 5

531

87.2

537

87.2

Level

All Students

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Level 4

165

78.8

156

72.4

75.7

Not Rated

73.3

64.7

68.8

Level 3

66.7

62.5

64.9

Level 4

85.1

77.1

81.1

Not Rated

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander2

Not Rated

85.7

Black/African American2

Not Rated

88.9

Level 4

83.8

73.7

78.7

Hispanic/Latino2 Asian1

Level 5

91.8

87.2

89.6

White1

Level 5

400

86.5

407

88.2

87.4

Multi-Racial1

Level 5

91.4

88.6

90.0

Math

Level

2011-12

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

All Students

Level 5

532

85.0

537

83.4

84.2

Economically Disadvantaged1

Level 4

165

71.5

156

70.5

71.0

Learners1

Not Rated

75.0

88.2

81.8

Students with Disabilities1

Level 3

57.6

58.3

57.9

English

Underserved

Races/Ethnicities1

American Indian/Alaska Native2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander2

Black/African American2 Hispanic/Latino2

Level 4

80.9

68.8

74.7

Not Rated

71.4

Not Rated

66.7

Level 4

83.8

68.4

76.0

Asian1

Level 5

>95

93.6

>95

White1

Level 5

400

83.3

407

83.5

83.4

Multi-Racial1

Level 5

91.4

88.6

90.0

1. 2.

These data are not part of the achievement rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance. Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Inst ID = 28 Page: 3 of 6

2012-2013 Academic Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School

Growth Level Cutoffs Level

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

On Track Growth Yes No 60 & above 70 & above 45 to 59.5 55 to 69.5 35 to 44.5 45 to 54.5 40 to 44.5 30 to 34.5 Less than 30 Less than 40

Academic Growth

Level

2012-13

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth?

Reading (All Students)

Level 4

493

58.0

516

59.5

59.0

6.0

Yes

Mathematics (All Students)

Level 4

494

53.0

515

61.0

57.0

15.0

Yes

Data notes: * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 28 Page: 4 of 6

2012-2013 Subgroup Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School Growth Level Cutoffs

Level

Reading

Level

Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander1

Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

On Track Growth Yes No 60 & above 70 & above 45 to 59.5 55 to 69.5 35 to 44.5 45 to 54.5 30 to 34.5 40 to 44.5 Less than 30 Less than 40

2012-13

Median Growth Median Growth Students Students Percentile Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth? Yes

Level 4

152

57.5

153

55.0

56.0

17.0

Not Rated

70.5

50.0

67.5

35.0

Level 4

66.0

55.5

58.0

31.0

Yes

Level 5

68.0

57.0

63.0

15.5

Yes

Not Rated

69.0

8.0

Not Rated

50.5

6.5

Level 5

66.5

59.0

63.0

18.0

Yes

Asian2

Level 4

60.0

59.0

59.5

3.0

Yes

White2

Level 4

378

57.0

397

60.0

58.0

7.0

Yes

Multi-Racial2

Level 5

56.0

64.0

60.5

4.5

Yes

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Target

On Track Growth?

2011-12

Math

Level

Economically Disadvantaged

2012-13

Median Growth Median Growth Students Students Percentile Percentile

Level 4

153

52.0

152

59.0

55.0

24.0

Yes

Not Rated

56.5

54.0

56.0

25.0

Students with Disabilities

Level 4

64.0

43.0

50.0

27.5

Yes

Underserved Races/Ethnicities

Level 4

66.0

46.5

55.5

21.0

Yes

Not Rated

47.0

25.0

English Learners

American Indian/Alaska

Native1

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African

American1

Hispanic/Latino1

Not Rated

40.5

24.5

Level 4

71.0

46.0

57.0

20.0

Yes

Asian2

Level 5

62.5

63.0

3.0

Yes

White2

Level 4

379

51.0

395

63.0

56.5

16.0

Yes

Level 4

50.0

56.0

55.0

8.0

Yes

Multi-Racial2 1. 2.

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup. These data are not part of the academic growth rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 28 Page: 5 of 6

2012-2013 Participation Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Cheldelin Middle School Student participation rates tell us the extent to which all students were tested in a school. All students enrolled on the first school day in May are required to test, and the data below show the percentages of students that tested, by subject and subgroup. The table below also shows whether or not each subgroup met the federal participation rate target of 94.5%. School ratings are dependent upon student test scores, and these ratings are valid only when schools uniformly test all of their students. As a result, schools with one or more subgroups that missed the participation target will have their overall school rating lowered by one Level.

Participation Target: 94.5% Reading

Status

Met All Students Met Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Met Met Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities Met American Indian/Alaska Native1 Not Rated Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Not Rated Black/African American1 Not Rated Hispanic/Latino1 Met Met Asian Met White Multi-Racial Met

Math

Status

All Students Met Met Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Met Students with Disabilities Met Underserved Races/Ethnicities Met American Indian/Alaska Native1 Not Rated Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Not Rated Black/African American1 Not Rated Hispanic/Latino1 Met Met Asian White Met Multi-Racial Met 1.

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

559 176 27 68 50 2 4 5 39 59 413 37

550 164 24 48 49 3 3 4 39 54 412 35

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

99.8 100.0 96.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

99.9 100.0 98.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 100.0 100.0

Current Current Current Current Current NA NA NA Current Current Current Current

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

560 176 28 68 50 2 4 5 39 60 413 37

550 164 24 48 49 3 3 4 39 54 412 35

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Current Current Current Current Current NA NA NA Current Current Current Current

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined

Inst ID = 28 Page: 6 of 6

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Cheldelin Middle School 987 Conifer Blvd NE Corvallis, OR 973304099, (541) 7575971 http://www.csd509j.net/cheldelin/

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Jeff Brew GRADES SERVED 68

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

FROM THE PRINCIPAL

Dear Parents and Community Members, In the 20122013 school year, Cheldelin Middle School received an overall state rating of 4 out of 5 possible. That means that our students are performing about as well or better on standardized tests as most middle schools in the state. It also means that our students are showing the amount of growth from year to year that they would need to meet the next performance standard. Some highlights from this year's report card include: 87.2% of students met state standards for reading 83.4% of students met state standards for math

significant growth over the last year, we will be focusing on raising achievement even more for all students. Proficiencybased grading practices, implementation of the Common Core State Standards, the Response to Intervention model and the 1:1 iPad initiative are all initiatives designed to help promote academic growth for all students, and to close the achievement gap. Thank you and I look forward to working with you. Thank you,

While students from all subgroups and demographics made

Principal | Jeff Brew

SCHOOL PROFILE

STUDENTS

Enrollment 201213 Change from previous year Students attending 90% or more of enrolled days

551 2.1% 86%

Select Demographics 201213 English Learners

OVERALL STATE RATING

American Indian/ Alaska Native 1%

Students who have ever been eligible for or participated in a program to acquire academic English.

Economically disadvantaged Students with disabilities Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when the data must be suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander 1%

Black/ African American 1% MultiRacial 6%

30% 9%

Hispanic/Latino 7% Asian 10% White 75%

Number of different languages spoken: 16

HOW ARE STUDENTS AT THIS SCHOOL PERFORMING COMPARED TO THOSE AT OTHER SCHOOLS?

Compared to middle schools with similar student demographics in 201213, this school‘s rating is above average.

State Average

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Below Average

About Average

Above Average

Below average = Falls into the bottom third of comparison schools About average = Falls into the middle third of comparison schools Above average = Falls into the top third of comparison schools

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Cheldelin Middle School

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Jeff Brew GRADES SERVED 68

987 Conifer Blvd NE Corvallis, OR 973304099, (541) 7575971 http://www.csd509j.net/cheldelin/

PROGRESS

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

ARE STUDENTS MAKING ADEQUATE GAINS OVER TIME?

200910

Reading

201011

201112

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

88.1

Note new cut scores in 201112.

Mathematics

39.2 49.0 11.9

88.5

42.1 46.4 11.5

87.2

83.9

Note new cut scores in 201011.

Science

42.7 41.2 16.1

80.2

37.3 42.8 19.8

85.0

87.1

Note new cut scores in 201112.

87.2

37.8 47.2 15.0

32.7 54.5 12.9

84.7

36.0 48.8 15.3

76.7

Visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/data for additional state exam results.

22.2 54.5 23.3

69.1

Met

83.4

20.8 48.3 30.9

83.6

34.1 49.5 16.4

Exceeded

43.6 39.9 16.6

62.1

Met

82.7

LikeSchool Average (%) 201213

Exceeded

37.8 49.3 12.8

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 5, 8,11)

All students tested

39.5 47.6 12.8

Met

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201213 201213

20.3 41.7 37.9

77.4

38.0 39.4 22.6

Exceeded

24.6 58.1 17.3

67.1

13.5 53.6 32.9

81.0

23.8 57.2 19.0

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when data are unavailable or to protect student confidentiality.

OUTCOMES FOR KEY STUDENT GROUPS AT THIS SCHOOL COMPARED TO THE SAME GROUPS STATEWIDE STUDENT GROUP OUTCOMES

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

All Students

Reading

Mathematics

Science

American Indian/Alaska Native 87.2 83.4 82.7

69.1 62.1 67.1

+18.1 +21.3 +15.6

Economically Disadvantaged

Reading

Mathematics

Science

72.4 70.5 74.5

57.5 50.0 55.0

Mathematics

Science

82.9 85.4 54.5

Mathematics

Science

62.5 58.3 61.1

45.3 45.2 38.6

+37.6 +40.2 +15.9

31.5 23.4 37.0

+31.0 +34.9 +24.1

Mathematics

Science

>95 >95 >95

55.7 46.2 54.9

* * *

87.2 93.6 75.0

78.4 80.7 74.1

+8.8 +12.9 +0.9

Science

Reading

Mathematics

Science

Reading

50.2 40.1 38.8

* * *

73.7 68.4 58.3

50.9 46.7 45.7

+22.8 +21.7 +12.6

88.6 88.6 >95

73.2 65.1 72.7

+15.4 +23.5 *

Science

Mathematics

Science

* * *

Reading

Mathematics

Science

* * *

52.5 51.6 43.6

* * *

Reading

88.2 83.5 85.0

75.4 67.1 74.4

+12.8 +16.4 +10.6

Mathematics

Science

Reading

Mathematics

87.1 82.7 78.5

72.9 63.3 64.4

+14.2 +19.4 +14.1

Science

87.3 84.2 87.2

65.5 60.9 69.6

+21.8 +23.3 +17.6

Male

MultiRacial 98.6 98.3 98.2

Mathematics

Female

* * *

Mathematics

Reading

White

Hispanic/Latino

Talented and Gifted

Reading

* * *

Mathematics

Black/African American

Students with Disabilities

Reading

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

Asian +14.9 +20.5 +19.5

English Learners

Reading

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

Reading

Mathematics

Science

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when data are unavailable or to protect student confidentiality.

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Cheldelin Middle School

DISTRICT Corvallis SD 509J SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince PRINCIPAL Jeff Brew GRADES SERVED 68

987 Conifer Blvd NE Corvallis, OR 973304099, (541) 7575971 http://www.csd509j.net/cheldelin/

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

CURRICULUM & LEARNING ENVIRONMENT WHAT IS THIS SCHOOL DOING TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING AND TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE FUTURE?

SCHOOL READINESS

W.E.B. Orientation, transition and mentorship program

Weekly Advisory period

Visitation program for new students

Second Step antibullying curriculum

Checkin/Checkout researchbased behavior support program

ACADEMIC SUPPORT

Strategic and Intensive interventions in literacy

ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT WORLD LANGUAGE COURSES

French and Chinese offered on site outside school hours

Peer tutoring After school homework club

SPECIAL PROGRAMS *Information was not submitted for this section.

Lunchtime learning support

CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION

CIS program Engineering professionals volunteer during Engineering month.

EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

Before/after school classes: jazz, art, drama, French, Chinese

Data and information in the Curriculum and Learning Environment section was provided by local schools and districts and was not verified by the Oregon Department of Education.

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School The purpose of this Rating Details report is to provide and explain the data that was used to determine the school rating that is shown on each school’s Report Card. Included in the following pages is all of the data used to determine the rating, together with a description of ratings methodology. The school rating shown here was piloted in 2011-2012 to determine Priority, Focus, and Model schools as part of the ESEA Waiver. For more details on the school report cards, please visit: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=1786.

Overall Level: Level 4 % of Points Weight Earned

Weighted Points

Performance Indicator

Level

Academic Achievement

Level 5

90.0%

18.0

Level 4

80.0%

16.0

Level 4

70.0%

7.0

Level 4

80.0%

28.0

Level 3

53.3%

8.0

(page 3)

Academic Growth (page 4)

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Graduation^ (page 6)

Subgroup Graduation (page 7)

Number of Missed Participation Targets* (page 8)

^ Schools that have Level 1 for Graduation can have an Overall Level no higher than Level 2. * Schools do not receive points for participation. However, a school's overall Level is lowered by one category if one or more subgroups missed a participation target. ** Schools may not be eligible for all possible points. Schools are not rated in categories where they do not meet minimum student count requirements.

Totals** Weighted Percent

Federal Reporting Designations Received Title I Funds in 2012-13 (Y/N) ESEA Designation (if any)

Inst ID = 41 Page: 1 of 8

77 77.0%

Level Assignment

Weighted Percent

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

87.0 or above 70.0 to 86.9 47.0 to 69.9 26.5 to 46.9 Less than 26.5

Levels are calculated using the percentage of points earned out of the total points eligible. For schools with data on all indicators, the total points possible are: •20 for Academic Achievement •20 for Academic Growth •10 for Subgroup Growth •35 for Graduation •15 for Subgroup Graduation The total score is matched to the scoring guide above to determine the school rating.

2012-2013 Report Card Rating Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School Overall school ratings are determined using the percent of points earned for each of the indicators below. Detailed data to support the indicator ratings are provided in the following pages. Academic Achievement (page 3)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 5 5 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Total Level 5 9 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 90.0%

Academic Growth (page 4)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 4 4 5 Total Level 4 8 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 80.0%

Subgroup Growth (page 5)

Level

Category Level Cutoffs Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

% of Points Earned 90.0% 70.0% 50.0% 30.0% <30.0%

Points Earned Points Eligible

Reading Economically Disadvantaged Level 4 4 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 4 4 5 Mathematics Economically Disadvantaged Level 3 3 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 3 3 5 Total Level 4 14 20 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 70.0%

Cohort Graduation (page 6) All Students

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Level 4 4 5 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 80.0%

Subgroup Graduation (page 7)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

Economically Disadvantaged Level 3 3 5 English Learners Not Rated 0 0 Students with Disabilities Level 4 4 5 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 1 1 5 Total Level 3 8 15 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 53.3% 1.

Includes American Indian/Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic students.

Inst ID = 41 Page: 2 of 8

Graduation Levels are calculated using the best of Four-Year and Five-Year Levels (see page 6 for Four-Year and Five-Year Cohort Graduation Rates).

2012-2013 Academic Achievement Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School Achievement Level Cutoffs One way that we measure how well students are doing is through the use of state tests, which include achievement standards that define levels of student performance in a content area at a particular grade. The Academic Achievement indicator reflects the percent of students that meet or exceed standards on the state reading and math tests at all grade levels offered by the school. Subgroup data are displayed for informational purposes but are not included in the Rating system.

Reading Economically

Disadvantaged1

English Learners1 Students with

Disabilities1

Underserved Races/Ethnicities1 American Indian/Alaska

Native2

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander2 Black/African

American2

Hispanic/Latino2

Reading 93.2 & above 82.0 to 93.1 66.6 to 81.9 56.2 to 66.5 Less than 56.2

2011-12

Math 81.5 & above 67.0 to 81.4 42.1 to 66.9 25.3 to 42.0 Less than 25.3

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

Level 5

269

93.3

>95

94.4

Level

All Students

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Level 4

82.2

94.0

87.0

Not Rated

33.3

36.4

Not Rated

69.6

64.3

67.6

Level 4

83.3

92.9

87.9

Not Rated

83.3

Not Rated

Level 4

87.0

>95

91.3

Asian1

Level 5

>95

95.0

>95

White1

Level 5

206

94.2

>95

Not Rated

92.3

91.7

92.0

Multi-Racial1

Mathematics

Level

2011-12

2012-13

Tests

% Met

Tests

% Met

Combined % Met

All Students

Level 4

269

74.0

231

85.3

79.2

Economically Disadvantaged1

Level 3

43.2

63.3

51.2

Learners1

Not Rated

28.6

33.3

Students with Disabilities1

Not Rated

30.4

30.8

30.6

English

Underserved

Races/Ethnicities1

American Indian/Alaska Native2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander2

Black/African American2 Hispanic/Latino2 Asian1 White1 Multi-Racial1 1. 2.

Level 3

51.6

66.7

58.6

Not Rated

Level 3

54.2

65.2

59.6

Level 5

>95

Level 4

205

74.1

171

87.1

80.1

Not Rated

84.6

83.3

84.0

These data are not part of the achievement rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance. Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Inst ID = 41 Page: 3 of 8

2012-2013 Academic Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School

Growth Level Cutoffs Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Median Growth Percentile 65 & above 50 to 64.5 40 to 49.5 35 to 39.5 Less than 35

2011-12

Academic Growth

Level

Students

Median Growth Percentile

2012-13 Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Reading (All Students)

Level 4

224

57.0

195

62.0

59.0

Mathematics (All Students)

Level 4

223

57.0

195

59.0

58.0

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating * Fewer than 6 students with growth percentiles. Data is suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

Inst ID = 41 Page: 4 of 8

2012-2013 Subgroup Growth Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School Growth Level Cutoffs

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Reading

Level

Economically Disadvantaged

Level 4

2012-13 Combined Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

55.0

59.0

55.5

English Learners

Not Rated

17.5

Students with Disabilities

Not Rated

48.0

38.5

44.5

Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander1

Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1 Asian2 White2 Multi-Racial2

Level 4

56.0

77.0

59.0

Not Rated

Level 5

56.0

80.0

77.0

Level 4

57.0

63.0

58.0

Level 4

172

58.5

147

61.0

59.0

Not Rated

57.0

78.0

69.0

2011-12

Mathematics

Level

Economically Disadvantaged

2012-13

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Level 3

41.0

51.0

41.0

English Learners

Not Rated

27.0

19.0

Students with Disabilities

Not Rated

35.0

30.0

34.0

Level 3

56.0

35.0

42.0

Not Rated

Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska

Native1

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African

American1

Hispanic/Latino1

Not Rated

Level 3

59.0

35.0

43.0

Asian2

Level 5

89.0

68.0

71.0

White2

Level 4

170

54.0

145

60.0

57.0

Not Rated

93.0

63.0

70.5

Multi-Racial2 1. 2.

Median Growth Percentile 65 & above 50 to 64.5 40 to 49.5 35 to 39.5 Less than 35

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup. These data are not part of the academic growth rating but are included to provide additional information on subgroup performance.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined

Inst ID = 41 Page: 5 of 8

2012-2013 Graduation Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School

Graduation Level Cutoffs

This indicator uses four- and five-year cohort graduation rates. These rates follow incoming 9th grade classes for four or five years to determine the percent of students who graduate with a regular diploma. Each school’s cohort begins with the first-time 9th grade students in a particular school year. Students are added to a school’s cohort when they transfer into the school, and are removed from a schools cohort if they transfer to another high school. Students that dropout or otherwise leave a school without transferring to another school remain in a high school’s cohort

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Four-Year Rate 87.5 & above 74.0 to 87.4 67.0 to 73.9 60.0 to 66.9 Less than 60.0

Five-Year Rate 90.1 & above 78.1 to 90.0 72.0 to 78.0 60.0 to 71.9 Less than 60.0

To be rated on graduation, a school must have at least 40 students in the combined cohort. The ratings levels can be described as follows: •Level 5: the school had a graduation rate that was in the top ten percent of all high schools in the state. •Level 4: the school had a graduation rate that was above average, but not in the top ten percent. •Level 3: the school met the state minimum target, but still had a graduation rate that was below average. •Level 2: the school met the federal minimum target, but not the state minimum target. •Level 1: the school did not meet the federal minimum target. Schools that are Level 1 for both their four-year and five-year rates can have an overall rating no higher than Level 2. The graduation rating for the school (as shown on page 2) is based on the higher of the ratings earned for the four-year and five-year rates. 2007-08 Cohort

2008-09 Cohort

Four-Year Cohort

Level

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Combined Rate

Applied Rate1

Four-Year Cohort (All Students)

Level 3

277

77.6

271

70.1

73.9

Combined

2006-07 Cohort

2007-08 Cohort

Five-Year Cohort

Level

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Combined Rate

Applied Rate1

Five-Year Cohort (All Students)

Level 4

241

82.6

254

89.0

85.9

Current

The Applied Rate is the graduation rate used to determine the Level. It is the higher of the combined rate and the most recent rate.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. ** No data available NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 41 Page: 6 of 8

2012-2013 Subgroup Graduation Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School

Graduation Level Cutoffs

This indicator uses the graduation rates of historically underserved student subgroups. It disaggregates the four- and five-year graduation rates for economically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities and historically underserved races/ethnicities. The graduation rating for a subgroup is the higher of the ratings for the four-year rate and the five-year rate.

Four-Year Cohort Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities

2007-08 Cohort

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Four-Year Rate 87.5 & above 74.0 to 87.4 67.0 to 73.9 60.0 to 66.9 Less than 60.0

2008-09 Cohort

Five-Year Rate 90.1 & above 78.1 to 90.0 72.0 to 78.0 60.0 to 71.9 Less than 60.0

% Grad

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Combined Rate

Applied Rate

Adjusted Cohort

Level 1

61.8

36.9

49.6

Combined

Not Rated

46.2

11.8

26.7

Level 1

66.7

22.7

45.7

Combined

Level

Level 1

65.2

51.6

57.4

Combined

American Indian/Alaska

Native1

Not Rated

0.0

Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander1

Not Rated

100.0

Not Rated

33.3

25.0

28.6

Level 2

73.7

54.2

62.8

Combined

Asian

Level 2

63.6

65.0

64.2

Current

White

Level 4

210

80.5

208

73.6

77.0

Combined

Not Rated

90.9

66.7

78.3

Underserved Races/Ethnicities

Black/African

American1

Hispanic/Latino1

Multi-Racial

2006-07 Cohort

2007-08 Cohort

% Grad

Adjusted Cohort

% Grad

Combined Rate

Applied Rate

Adjusted Cohort

Level 3

67.3

75.4

71.6

Current

Not Rated

100.0

87.5

90.0

Level 4

52.6

81.0

67.5

Current

Not Rated

81.3

84.2

82.9

American Indian/Alaska Native1

Not Rated

100.0

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1

Not Rated

Black/African American1

Not Rated

57.1

50.0

55.6

Hispanic/Latino1

Not Rated

100.0

88.2

92.0

Asian

Level 5

88.9

95.7

92.7

Current

White

Level 4

201

81.6

200

88.5

85.0

Current

Not Rated

100.0

91.7

94.4

Five-Year Cohort Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities

Multi-Racial 1. 2.

Level

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup. The Applied Rate is the graduation rate used to determine the Level. It is the higher of the combined rate and the most recent rate.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined NA Not applicable

Inst ID = 41 Page: 7 of 8

2012-2013 Participation Details Public Version - Final - October 10, 2013

District: Corvallis SD 509J School: Crescent Valley High School Student participation rates tell us the extent to which all students were tested in a school. All students enrolled on the first school day in May are required to test, and the data below show the percentages of students that tested, by subject and subgroup. The table below also shows whether or not each subgroup met the federal participation rate target of 94.5%. School ratings are dependent upon student test scores, and these ratings are valid only when schools uniformly test all of their students. As a result, schools with one or more subgroups that missed the participation target will have their overall school rating lowered by one Level.

Participation Target: 94.5% Reading

Status

Met Met Not Rated Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Met Met Not Rated

Mathematics

Status

Met Met Not Rated Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Met Met Not Rated

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

275 77 7 25 32 4 0 4 24 20 210 13

249 59 6 18 31 5 1 1 24 20 186 12

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Current Current NA Current Current NA NA NA Current Current Current NA

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

2011-12

2012-13

Combined

Applied Rate

275 78 8 25 33 4 0 4 25 20 209 13

245 58 6 17 30 4 1 1 24 21 182 12

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Current Current NA Current Current NA NA NA Current Current Current NA

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities subgroup.

Data notes: Not Rated Subgroup did not meet minimum size requirement in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students tested in the last two years combined

Inst ID = 41 Page: 8 of 8

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Corvallis SD 509J Crescent Valley High School DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince

PRINCIPAL Cheri Stroud GRADES SERVED 912

4444 NW Highland Dr Corvallis, OR 973309735, (541) 7575801 http://cvhs.csd509j.net/

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

FROM THE PRINCIPAL

Dear Parents and Community Members, This redesigned School Report Card offers a comprehensive picture of Crescent Valley High School, based on a five point scale for Overall Level and individual Performance Indicators. For the 2012 2013 school year, Crescent Valley earned a Level 4, above average, when compared to other Oregon high schools. Strengths of our school, based on individual Performance Indicators: • Academic Achievement: improved scores in state reading and math tests • Overall and Subgroup Academic Growth were above average Areas for improvement: • Graduation rates could be improved for all students

This year, we will continue to support improved student learning, leading to improved graduation rates, through systematic schoolwide interventions, relevant/engaging instruction and use of common formative assessments to guide instruction. We look forward to working with you for continued school improvement, while we celebrate our many successes together! Thank you, Principal | Cherie Stroud, Principal

SCHOOL PROFILE

STUDENTS

Enrollment 201213 Change from previous year Students attending 90% or more of enrolled days

965 0.6% 74%

Select Demographics 201213 English Learners

OVERALL STATE RATING

American Indian/ Alaska Native 1%

Students who have ever been eligible for or participated in a program to acquire academic English.

Economically disadvantaged Students with disabilities Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when the data must be suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander <1%

Black/ African American 2% MultiRacial 5%

23% 8%

Hispanic/Latino 8% Asian 9% White 74%

Number of different languages spoken: 26

HOW ARE STUDENTS AT THIS SCHOOL PERFORMING COMPARED TO THOSE AT OTHER SCHOOLS?

The overall state rating is intended to summarize this school's particular successes and challenges. It is based on a combination of up to five factors. Three of these factors come from standardized test scores in reading and math: student achievement, student growth, and the growth of underserved subgroups. High schools are also rated on the overall graduation rate for the school and the graduation rates of underserved subgroups. Please be aware that this rating is based mainly on highstakes testing and accordingly, represents a limited view of student performance. Other aspects of this report card are designed to put this rating in the proper context. Compared to all schools statewide in 201213, this school is rated as Level 4.

Compared to high schools with similar student demographics in 201213, this school‘s rating is about average.

State Average

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Below Average

About Average

Above Average

Below average = Falls into the bottom third of comparison schools About average = Falls into the middle third of comparison schools Above average = Falls into the top third of comparison schools

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Corvallis SD 509J Crescent Valley High School DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince

PRINCIPAL Cheri Stroud GRADES SERVED 912

4444 NW Highland Dr Corvallis, OR 973309735, (541) 7575801 http://cvhs.csd509j.net/

PROGRESS

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

ARE STUDENTS MAKING ADEQUATE GAINS OVER TIME?

Reading

200910

Note new cut scores in 201112.

Note new cut scores in 201011.

72.3

27.3 45.1 27.7

60.6

93.3

36.1 57.2 6.7

>95

Did not meet 29.1 31.5 39.4

78.6

31.6 47.0 21.4

74.0

12.5 64.9 22.6

85.5

15.4 70.1 14.5

78.9

25.7 48.3 26.0

85.3

71.9

14.7 64.2 21.1

78.1

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 5, 8,11)

Note new cut scores in 201112.

32.7 39.2 28.1

Visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/data for additional state exam results.

COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

31.3 60.7 7.9

Did not meet 77.4

All students tested

OUTCOMES

92.1

(Tested Grade: 11)

All students tested

Science

Did not meet

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

Writing

201112

(Tested Grades: 38, 11)

All students tested

Mathematics

201011

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201213 201213

81.2

36.6 44.6 18.8

75.7

30.0 45.6 24.3

77.8

Met

LikeSchool Average (%) 201213

Exceeded

* * <5

85.7

Met

21.2 64.5 14.3

92.3

34.4 57.9 7.7

Exceeded

22.1 63.2 14.7

70.1

Met

7.5 62.6 29.9

80.5

16.8 63.7 19.5

Exceeded

22.7 55.4 21.9

61.0

Met

6.4 54.6 39.0

71.0

8.9 62.1 29.0

Exceeded

28.6 49.1 22.2

64.2

13.4 50.8 35.8

76.2

23.2 53.0 23.8

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when data are unavailable or to protect student confidentiality.

WHAT ARE STUDENTS ACHIEVING IN HIGH SCHOOL?

Students preparing for college and careers.

School Performance (%) 200910 201011 201112

* 69.6

Freshmen on track to graduate within 4 years Students taking SAT

87.0 80.4

76.9 78.7

School Performance (%) 200809 200910 201011

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201213 201213

94.2 77.5

* 34.2

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201112 201112

GRADUATION Students graduating with a regular diploma within four years of entering high school. RATE Overall graduation rate 82.7 81.3 77.6 70.1

68.4

LikeSchool Average (%) 201213

* 54.5 LikeSchool Average (%) 201112

83.8

COMPLETION Students receiving a regular, modified, extended, or adult high school diploma or completing a GED within five RATE years of entering high school. Overall completion rate

DROPOUT RATE

CONTINUING EDUCATION

91.3

88.8

94.5

80.5

88.8

0.8

3.4

1.0

Students who dropped out during the school year and did not reenroll. Overall dropout rate

2.1

0.2

0.5

School Performance (%) 200708 200809 200910

Students continuing their education after high school. Students who enrolled in a community college or fouryear school within 16 months of graduation

74.8

79.3

School Oregon Performance (%) Performance (%) 201011 201011

82.7

61.1

LikeSchool Average (%) 201011

71.6

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when the data must be suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Corvallis SD 509J Crescent Valley High School DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince

PRINCIPAL Cheri Stroud GRADES SERVED 912

4444 NW Highland Dr Corvallis, OR 973309735, (541) 7575801 http://cvhs.csd509j.net/

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

OUTCOMES FOR KEY STUDENT GROUPS AT THIS SCHOOL COMPARED TO THE SAME GROUPS STATEWIDE STUDENT GROUP OUTCOMES

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

All Students On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

School Oregon School Performance Performance Compared to (%) (%) OR Average

68.4 80.5 3.4

+1.7 +14.0 2.6

American Indian/Alaska Native * On Track 0.0 50.8 Graduation 65.6 Completion 0.0 7.7 Dropout

50.8 7.7

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander * On Track 100.0 66.2 Graduation 82.4 Completion 0.0 3.8 Dropout

+33.8 3.8

Economically Disadvantaged 80.0 On Track 36.9 61.1 Graduation Completion 86.9 76.7 Dropout 2.0 3.0

24.2 +10.2 1.0

Asian On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

80.7 85.9 0.9

15.7 +9.8 0.9

White On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

93.5 73.6 94.5 0.8

71.2 83.2 3.0

+2.4 +11.3 2.2

English Learners On Track * Graduation 11.8 Completion 87.5 Dropout 0.0

49.2 64.1 5.1

37.4 +23.4 5.1

Black/African American On Track * Graduation 25.0 53.3 Completion 50.0 70.5 Dropout 0.0 5.9

28.3 20.5 5.9

Female On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

>95 75.2 97.6 0.4

72.9 83.3 2.8

+2.3 +14.3 2.4

Students with Disabilities On Track 69.2 Graduation 22.7 38.2 Completion 90.5 65.8 Dropout 4.1 4.8

15.5 +24.7 0.7

Hispanic/Latino On Track >95 Graduation 54.2 Completion 94.1 Dropout 1.2

59.5 71.1 4.5

5.3 +23.0 3.3

Male On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

92.4 63.6 91.6 1.2

64.3 78.0 3.9

0.7 +13.6 2.7

MultiRacial On Track Graduation Completion Dropout

69.1 84.9 3.3

2.4 +15.1 1.3

94.2 70.1 94.5 0.8

Talented and Gifted On Track >95 Graduation 88.3 Completion 97.9 Dropout 0.0

90.9 95.9 0.4

2.6 +2.0 0.4

>95 65.0 95.7 0.0

>95 66.7 100.0 2.0

Note: a ‘*’ is displayed when the data must be suppressed to protect student confidentiality.

OnTrack data is based on the 201213 school year; all other data is based on the 201112 school year. On Track Data in the Student Group Outcomes section was provided by local schools and districts and was not verified by the Oregon Department of Education. See previous page for outcome definitions.

CURRICULUM & LEARNING ENVIRONMENT WHAT IS THIS SCHOOL DOING TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING AND TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THE FUTURE?

SCHOOL READINESS

Transition, freshman orientation, bullying prevention, breakfast/lunch

Data and information in the Curriculum and Learning Environment section was provided by local schools and districts and was not verified by the Oregon Department of Education.

OREGON

REPORT CARD

201213

Corvallis SD 509J Crescent Valley High School DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT Erin Prince

4444 NW Highland Dr Corvallis, OR 973309735, (541) 7575801 http://cvhs.csd509j.net/

PRINCIPAL Cheri Stroud GRADES SERVED 912

For more report card measures including detailed demographic information visit www.ode.state.or.us/go/SchoolRC

CURRICULUM & LEARNING ENVIRONMENT CONTINUED . . . ACADEMIC SUPPORT Academic Options, AVID, systems of intervention Peer tutoring, Alt Ed Student Support Team, counseling Tutoring center

ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT WORLD LANGUAGE COURSES French, German, Spanish Online ASL HONORS & DUALENROLLMENT COURSES 20 Honors/AP courses 32 College Now courses SPECIAL PROGRAMS TAG Model United Nations Robust elective offerings

CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION

EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

Preengineering

16 OSAA sports

Culinary Arts

Student clubs/sports, performing arts

Visual Arts, Digital Fine Arts

Robotics

Oracle

Data and information in the Curriculum and Learning Environment section was provided by local schools and districts and was not verified by the Oregon Department of Education.