Flat Iron Theatre by Devis Tako

Devis Tako Year 3, Unit 3 Brief: Out of Office Tutors: Alex Bilton & George King ARCT 1041 2021

Contents

Technical Studies

Introduction Unit Brief Wide Site Analysis - Bridges Site Location, Access and Site Use Site Constrains and Opportunities Project 1 and 2 in Context

3 4 5 6 7

Project 1 - Low Line Link - Union Street , Bridge 401

8-22

Building Context Site Drawings Plan & Section Sun Path and Traffic Diagram Early Concept Physical Models First Iteration Form Finding Diagram Developed Models Installation Diagram Plans Section Renders

9 10 11 12 13 14 15-16 17 18 19-20 21-22

Project 2 - Flat Iron Theatre - Flat Iron Square

23- 73

Site Analysis Wider Building Context Site Building Context - Flat Iron Square Sun Path Analysis Site Access & Strategic Principles Site Model

25 26 27 28 29

Design Development Site Massing Model Building Concept Model First Iteration Second Iteration Third Iteration First Facade Iteration Second Facade Iteration Final Facade Iteration Building Programme Fragment and Material Model

30 31-32 33 34 35-36 37 38 39 40 41

Precedents Sourcing The Materials Column Composition Studies Physical Prototypes Structural Connection Staircase Fragment Technical Drawings Technical Long Section Materials Exploded Axonometric Fragment and Material Model

43 44 45 46 47 48 49-50 51 52 53 54

Final Drawings Aerial View Site Plan Ground Floor Plan Mezzanine 1 Floor Plan Mezzanine 2 Floor Plan Long Section West Side Elevation Front Facade Rear Facade

55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63

Visualization Southwark St Entrance Low Line Pedestrian Crossing Lambert House Pedestrians Crossing Viaduct - Low Line Entrance Market Stalls O’Meara St - Pedestrians Crossing Interior View Of The Theatre Open Air Theatre Interior View Of Lounge Theatre,Lobby, Lounge Rooftop Bar Southwark St Perspective

64 65 66 67 67 67 68 69 70 71 72 73

Unit 3: Out Of Office George King & Alex Bilton

rely on the city for their audience and inspiration. To survive our cities must adapt, we must see these challenges as an opportunity to re‐imagine the status quo, challenge conventions, and reimagine the way we work. This year our unit will investigate the impact that hybrid modes of working will have on society and design new, more flexible ways of working, living, and interacting that allow for hybrid co‐working solutions for creating, collaborating and engaging with our city. We will focus on designing spaces for creative professions which most rely on human engagement and the exchange of ideas and have been hard hit by the pandemic. Our projects will allow flexibility for creative professionals to decide how and when they want to work. It will be a space to mix, share ideas, cross pollinate and feed off the energy of the city and its vibrant communities. We will explore the issues and opportunities raised by hybrid working and ask how creative professionals can connect, exchange ideas and interact with each other but also with the public and the wider city in order to prevent a ‘hollowed out city’ and instead create a positive impact within the shifting urban landscape. We will ask how important the physical space that you work in is to your creativity and productivity? The home offers comfort, convenience, and an efficient commute whilst the city offers energy, focus, community, and collaboration. We will explore how creativity is best cultivated in our workspaces. Is it better to create dedicated centres of excellence for a specific craft or to cross pollinate a variety of disciplines to enrich our creative outputs?

Second Home Hollywood by SelgasCano

After a trip to the countryside last year, this year Unit 3 returns to London to find a new world where our relationship to the city has been transformed. In a still uncertain future, we are rebuilding our routines and exploring new ways to live, work, collaborate and create. In March 2020 we were all asked to work from home if we can. Despite the huge upheaval required many people found the transition to working purely online surprisingly viable with many learning that they actually prefer it for at least part of the week. In September 2021 we are now being asked to return to work with the London Mayor telling us to “to make the most of what our city has to offer”. However, in a recent survey while only 15% of Londoners want to work from home permanently, nearly half wanted a hybrid solution to split their hours between the office and home. The increased flexibility of hybrid working patterns provides a challenge to traditional workspaces, to maintaining relationships and collaborations and allowing casual interactions and happy accidents which are crucial especially within the creative industries. The change in habits towards a hybrid work pattern will have a huge impact on the city itself causing the London Mayor to warn of a “hollowed out” city. Traditional offices are still working well below normal occupancy levels and the lack of commuters combined with a shift to online shopping has decimated many high streets. This has a knock‐on effect on the communities and business that rely on this footfall of passing trade and risks harming our creative industries, galleries and theatres that

We will investigate the sustainability of our work practices. Is it better for the environment for us to work remotely, each with our own individual office or to travel large distances to a densely packed urban centre? Is there such a thing as a sustainable commute? Is a middle ground of regional work clusters a balanced alternative? How can we sustainably and creatively adapt the existing infrastructure we have to meet our current and future needs? Research We will begin with research into existing creative co‐working hubs and a trip to ‘Makerversity’, a co‐ working hub located deep in the basement of Somerset House, an iconic 300 year old cultural centre with a large and vibrant creative community on the banks of the river Thames. Makerversity’s mission is to provide affordable workspaces for professional ‘makers’ with an emphasis on innovation and sustainability. Students will have the opportunity to meet and interview some of the makers which include cutting edge designers, engineers, entrepreneurs, technologists, inventors, craftsmen, technicians and artists. Students will use their research to begin formulating their own individual brief and area of focus. Site Easy access to transport links will be essential for the creation of our new sustainable hybrid co‐ working hubs so our site this year will be located along the Low Line, a walking route that spans along the length of the Victorian rail viaducts between Bankside, London Bridge and Bermondsey. It connects diverse neighbourhoods and communities in south London, linking existing hubs of creativity, entertainment, and industry along its course. We will take a tour of the High Line, researching the history of the area, identifying the current uses of the viaduct arches and proposing

possibilities for enhancing existing creative industries or proposing new ones that could be introduced to complement the community. Project 1 We will begin with a six‐week mini project to create an installation or intervention within one of the existing viaduct arches. Your installation will function as a device to engage the public with the particular craft or creative industry selected by the student. Students will explore ways to engage the public with the act of creating and making whilst establishing a positive relationship to the street and local community to encourages footfall and use of to the Low Line. Project 2 Project 2 will take your learning from your Low Line site research and from your installation and use it to create your new hybrid co‐working hub for the creative industries. The projects will be located adjacent to the Low Line so that your projects will act as a catalyst for enhancing the existing community of creative workers within the arches. Second year students will be asked to design a live/ work / exhibition space for a single client. Third years will be asked to design a larger work hub for many practitioners either from the same industry or from several.

Site Analysis - Bridges Highlighting different modes that connect the riverbank and type of users. Being a tourist attraction and a central hub, old bridges are adjusted to respond to the demand and new links are created.

Blackfrais Railway Bridge / Bridge (right side)

Building year: 1st bridge 1864, 2nd bridge 1886 Users: Design: 1st Joseph Cubitt, 2nd John Wolfe-Barry and Hery Marc Brunel

Southwark Bridge

Building year: 6 June 1921. Users: Design: Enerst George, Basil Mott

Building Year: 6 November 1869 Users: Design: Joseph Cubitt

Millennium Bridge

London Bridge

Building year: 2000

Building year: 17 March 1973

Users: Design: Foster + Partners, Arup Group, Sir Anthony Caro

Users: Design: Lord Holford and engineers Mott, Hay and Anderson

Sites Locations, Access and Site Use Mapping the location of the arches and the current use. Observation of the vehicle traffic at the roads that interact with the arches.

Traffic observation Site visit walking path

Railway

Vehicle Fast

Slow

Bus

Usage of the railway arches

Underground Bicycle

Garage

Unoccupied

Warehouse

Under development

Fitness

Food & Drinks

Flat Iron Square

Union Street

Scale 1:1250

@A2

100

Disconnected Pedestrian’s Routes Between The Low Line Identifying the problem from the site experience. Stretching to over two miles, the route consists of various types of barriers to pedestrians including facing, walls, roads and other structures.

1. Union Street

2. Union Street

2. Ever Street

3. Southwark street

100

500

Scale 1:5000

1000

@A2

Project 1 & 2 in contexts

Project 2 - Flat Iron Theatre

ine L Low Low Line

Project 1 - Low Line Link

Project 1 - Union Street Folly, Bridge 401 LOW LINE LINK

Low Lane Link is a project strategy that aims to link common spaces that run along the base of viaduct connecting Waterloo to London Bridge. A direct respond the problem of disconnected pedestrian’s routes through the site that has a real-world value. The installation will be something unique, and it will establish a positive relationship to the site while not being a disturbance to the current transport links. The folly, which is a Pop-Up theatre, with 2 auditoriums is easily convertible into cinema two rooms will also be a contribution in the cultural context.

---

Project 1 - Building Context - Union Street, Bridge 401 Project 1 is located in Union Street under the Bridge 401 and is a direct response the problem of disconnected pedestrian’s routes. The installation will create a unique, coherent and attractive walking route that will encourage footfall and it will establish a positive relationship to the site while not being a disturbance to the current transport links.

Site location

Site model

2 1

Scale 1:500

100

@A2

Project 1 - Site Drawings

Site plan

a’

@A2

Scale 1:100

Section a-a’

Level 3 980

Level 5 500

Level 0 0

1:100 0

Scale 1:100 @A2

Project 1 - Site Constrains and Opportunities The site is between 4 tall building that creating shadows during the day making the space inside the arch even shadier. A quality of the space that drive the design proposal. The road is accessible from hight vehicle as buses and lorries to make deliveries during the day a vital access for economical part of the site. While such a access is essential the pedestrians path accessing the other site of the arches is disjointed.

Sun path summer equinox / Prevailing wind map

Traffic diagram AM

Pedestrian crossing Vehicle crossing Rail crossing

Scale 1:100

@A2

Project 1 - Concept model 1-Exploring the quantities that the arch has itself, the dark space. Exploration of a movable timber structure inside the arch, that could be used to grown mushrooms.2- Exploration through a model of split view precedence.

Project 1 - Iteration

Elevation

Section a-a’ 0

1:100

a’

Scale 1:100

@A2

Form Finding Diagram In this diagram where I’m highlighting the roads barriers, I’m exploring how to Implement the restrictions in the shape of the folly. Certain lines are selected and the plan of the folly responds to their angle. 81°,90°,99° and 166°.

166°

90°

81°

99°

Iteration Model Introducing spaces, functions and routes and how they will be organize inside the arch.

Auditorium 1 Screen

Auditorium 2 Auditorium 2

Entrance

Box Office

Auditorium 1

Screen

Entrance

min. hight of a double decker bus, 4.35 m

Auditorium 1

Entrance Screen

Entrance

Auditorium 1

0 1 2 3 4 5

Scale 1:50

Final Model

Auditorium 1

min. hight of a double decker bus, 4.35 m Entrance

Entrance

min. hight 2m

0 1 2 3 4 5

Scale 1:50

min. hight of a double decker bus, 4.35 m

Diagram

Long Section

Short Section ---

Scale 1:100 @A2

Project 1 - Diagrams showing transformation of space

Box Office

Entrance

Backstage

Cinema

Scale 1:100

@A2

Entrance

Stage

Auditorium

Exterior Render

Long Section in Context

Lev el 1 0

Scale 1:100 @A2

Long Section

0 1 2 3 4 5

Scale 1:50 @A2

Exterior Render

Project 2 Flat Iron Theatre will mark a place of interest along the Victorian rail viaduct and unlock the potential of the Flat Iron Square. The market stall on the ground floor will be a stimulation for the local communities in Southwark Council and activate the footfall of the site. Community will be the heart of the building, with the Open Air Theatre distracted by the traffic of the trains which can be used by everyone as a meeting or performance space and the formal theatre a facility to support young artist development, training, and the creation of the new works. The roof top bar will be an addition on the site which will offer a view of the city.

Building Fragment Scale 1:50

Wider Building Context - Flat Iron Square The site that I have selected for the second project is Flat Iron Square, nestled into the space bordered by Southwark Street, O’Meara Street, and the Low Line railway line to Waterloo. It completes the holy triumvirate of London Bridge food destinations that also includes Borough Market and Vinegar Yard. It is a thriving destination with open-air bars, restaurants, a music venue, outdoor seating tucked away in a series of previously disused railway arches and a listed building.

Site Plan

05 04 - Southwark Bridge Rd

01- Southwark St 01

Southwark

t aS ear

05 - Union St

O’M

02 - Southwark St

Southwark Bridge Rd

Low Line

06 - Great Guildford St

03 - O’Meara St 06

Uni

0 10

Scale 1:500

100

@A2

Site Building Context - Flat Iron Square

05 06

02 07

04 08

Healthcare

Residential

Grade II listed building

Mixed industrial and commercial

Catholic Church

London Councils

Shops, with residential above

Educational

Existing terrace

Food and Drinks

Area of study

Art gallery

0 10

Scale 1:500

100

Sun Path Diagrams - Flat Iron Square

Winter equinox 16:00 13:00

21/12

08:10

21/09

E N

Summer equinox 16:00 13:00

21/12

08:10

21/09

E N

0 10

Winter

Summer

Scale 1:500

100

Site Constrains and Opportunities

Site Access & Strategic Principles

Photo Survey 1.

1 3.

6 2

Site

Cycle

Railway

Vehicle

0 10

Pedestrian

Scale 1:500

100

Pedestrian route

Opening into existing building

Site Model

Main Street - North View

Aerial View

South-West View

South-East View

Scale 1:100

Mass Model

Main Street - North View

Aerial View

South-West View

South-East View

Scale 1:100

Concept Building Model

Mass Model

Main Street - North View

Aerial View

South-West View

South-East View

Scale 1:100

Iteration 1

Studio Andrew Todd, The Elizabethan theatre

Inner Stage

Actors Services

Control Room

Public Services

Library / Metting rooms/ Writing rooms

Auditorium

Outer Stage

Inner Stage

Actors Services

Auditorium

Iteration 2

---

Iteration 3

Stage

Rooftop

Back stage

Green room

Open theatre

Warderobe

Formal theatre

Rehearsal room

Store

Box office

Office

Box park

Meeting room Bar

Iteration 3

Facade Development

Facade Elevation Facade Concept Sketch

HOUSE

5 10

Scale 1:200

Facade Concept Collage

Street View Perspective

Aerial View

Facade Development

35,5

3 -

---

3 5

roof 2045

Mezzanine 3 1725

Mezzanine 2 1255

Outside Stage 815

Mezzanine 1 665

Level 2 315

Level 1 0

Final Facade Iteration

Facade diagram plan fixing point

ord

b ent

pav

plan rotation

elevation view

The front facade is a continuation of the balcony typology used in the theatre lobby but fully transparent to allow a clear view of the street view. The glass facade made out of triangular modular is split into 3 parts as per the function that happens on each floor. The facade of the top 2 floors has a rotation that corresponds to the pavement’s angle. The top facade completes the building mark of the site

Building Program

View point

Bar

Outside Stage

Theatre

Bar

Ticket office

Market Stalls

Lounge

Building Fragment Scale 1:50

Technical Studies Concept model made out of reclaimed timber from deconstracted houses. Experimenting the idea of a hybrid column where I am intertwined the traditional joint method with a précised modern.

Precedents

Authors: Astrit Nixha; Anarch Client: Klan TV Photos: Teuta Kanxheri

Year of completion: 2017 Location: Prishtina, Kosovo Total area: 1450 m2 Site area: 1800 m2

Wall Pattern Interior stairway

Traditional motif pattern

Klan KOSOVO - Resistance to the new order - while seeking the future. ‘‘I believe that life is perfect, because of its imperfections… construction must reflect life in its imperfections to present the perfect architecture…’’ The ‘Klan Kosova’ building is one of the first examples of the transformation of industrial buildings in Kosovo made out of 100% recycled materials. The transformation of the shock absorber factory built in the 80’s into a modern television studio tries to raise awareness about the recycling and reuse of materials, but also to give an example of how the building can ‘act’ as a subconscious messenger. It is a building that screams, whispers, moralizes and absorbs. It represents a resistance to the new order as it seeks the future. Existing factory elements such as chandeliers, radiators and pipes used as infrastructure in the production lines, were reused not only in their original condition, but also giving it another function, thus contributing as interior elements. The use of solid waste from different parts of the country contributed in terms of environmental impact, but also in providing an example of how an architectural expression can be created. The building tries to present a resistance to the trends of its architecture and industrialization, the new political order, raises big questions about the way of life looking to the future.

Wood wall pattern

Brick wall pattern

Wood sticks wall

Facade pattern

Facade Facade is made from old railway sleepers of those who are damaged or the life span of 20 years old has expired. Those materials in Kosova after been removed are most are used as firewood. The architect seen the opportunity to use the qualities of this material translate into the façade composed of recycled railway sleepers of different sizes that create a play of light and shadow. The size boards 3 cm thick and coming different sizes form 13 cm wide all the way down to 7 cm. They been coated couple of times on both sides before and after the installation. Walls The wooden partition walls are made from unwanted, cheap, and found planks which they are with different sizes, nots and with defects but when they are assemble, they represent a structure which goes with the motive of the building. The old red bricks are part of the history taken from the burnt houses during the Kosovo War of 1999. The wall is 240 m long, 120 m on the ground floor and 120 m on the first floor. The wall is 4 m hight on each floor or 8 m high in total. The bricks that stick out represent screams that these bricks have experienced in the previous life.

Survey - Sourcing the Materials

Anatomy of a roof truss

5 4 1

1. Ambleside Ave

2. Beulah Hill

3. Malpas Road

4. Honour Oak Road

3 2

5. Forest Hill Road

Column Composition studies

Standard Timber Sizes

60 x 60 mm column composition

Most common cross-sectional dimensions for sawn timber

Family 1

Width (mm)

Thickness (mm)

191)

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

222)

JH X

251)

0 0

X X

442)

JH X

JH 0

0 0

0 X

0 0

0 X

48 x

12 x

50 63 75 100

Family 3

Family 2

22 x 4x

125

150

Family 4

10 x

Family 5

Family 6

1) usually pine 2) usually spruce JH - usually done by splitting afterwards,whereby the width is 2mm less that the nominal size X - standard size 0 - rarely produced size

1. 100 x 50 mm

2. 125 x 50 mm

3. 175 x 75 mm

4. 200 x 75 mm

10 x

4x core

core

In this study I have explored how a timber structure column could be archived with the given dimension 60 x 60 mm which is required for a building that would reach the hight of 14 meters. I selected 4 different size timber which are most used in houses that are build in London.

Physical Prototypes

Family 3 Mass Timber Column, Physical Prototype 1:5

Intention: This 1:5 scale tests a method of how 4 different size timber can be arranged to build up a 60 x 60 mm timber column. The intent was to create this structure element without using any adhesives. Result: The custom wrap around steel bracket performs very well and holds together all 31 timbers. It is. secured by bolts in the end, which are easy to assemble, and it reduces the complexity of the manufacturing process. The outside timbers need to be slit to secure a better grip and the distance between one and another can’t be larger than 1.5 meter. This is in consideration that the timber found will be in different shapes and sizes through their use over the years. This family type doesn’t require very skilled carpentry and can be done on the site.

Family 6 Mass Timber Column, Physical Prototype 1:5

Intend: This refined 1:5 model explores a more precise timber joinery inspired from Japanese wood joints technique. The intend was to create a bespoke core which will be wrapped by slotting 1 layer of old timbers to give the rough look as part of design aim. Result: This type of column reduces the complexity as there are just 17 components to be assemble while increase the complexity of manufacturing and usage of adhesives to create the core. It is required skilled woodworkers to manufacture acknowledging that the tolerance in timber is in mm. The outside layer can slot into connecting note and it does not require specific tools. However, the work volume and the energy used in the process of manufacturing increases carbon footprint.

Structural Connection

Concept physical model 1:20

Exploded drawing 1:20

1:5 - 3D printed

1:10 - Axonometric drawing 6 family 1 steel bracket

15. family 2 steel bracket 5

8 3 steel post base 5

4 3 2 1

1 concrete footing 2 bolt 3 steel post base

4 timber core 5 timber 200 x 75 mm 6 steel bracket

7 timber 125 x 50 mm 8 timber 175 x 75 mm 9 timber 100 x 50 mm

Staircase

Concept physical model 1:20

Diagram assembly parts ceiling wedge

wooden slats

sleepers

friction forces

sleepers

wooden slats floor

Drawing understanding how the structure of the ladder works which is of a sum of levers whose meeting points are bound only by friction and pressure that the wedges print to the system. The weight of the slab unloads through the stairs, to the floor, squeezing the steps.

Rafael Iglesia, Escalera Casa Del Grande wooden slats

Technical Drawings

1255

Mezzanine 2

Level 1 plan 13

Section A-A’

11 665

Mezzanine 1

8 7

315

1. concrete foundations 2. 3 steel post base 3. timber flooring 4. insulation layer 5. wooden slats 6. timer slots (staircase supporting structure ) 0

Scale 1:100 @A2

A’

7. steel rebar 12 mm 8. building services 9. steel bracket 10. mass timber (Family 6) 11. balcony 1

35,5

Ground floor

Level 1

1. steel column 3. timber flooring 5. wood floor joists 6. thermal insulation layer 7. wood floor panels 8. wooden slats 9. timer slots (staircase supporting structure ) 10. mass timber (Family 6 column)

11. family 2 steel bracket 12. building water services 13. building electrical services 14. steel rebar 12 mm 17. wood frame window 18. double glazing 19. beam 21. internal SIP’s wall wood panel

22. wall thermal insulation layer 23. wall waterproof membrane 24. external SIP’s wall wood panel 25. family 6 column 26. spline joint 27. timber 175 x 75 mm 28. timber 200 x 75 mm

A2 / 1:25

0.5m

1.5m

2.5m

Technical Drawings

Fragment axonometric

7 9 8

6 9

4 10 5

2 3

Section column to wall connection 6

8 7

2 4 3

4 11

6 0 1 2 3 4

6 4 5 13 14 6

200mm

400mm

Scale 1:10 @A2

600mm

800mm

1000mm

Scale 1:50 @A2

1. exterior timber cladding panels 2. waterproof membrane 3. thermal insulation layer 4. timer slots (staircase supporting structure ) 5. wooden slats 6. sleepers

7. steel rebar 12 mm 8. steel bracket 9. building services 10. balcony 11. mass timber (Family 6) 12. 16. spline joint

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

family 6 column family 2 steel bracket bolt acoustic slat wood panel thermal insulation layer beam wood floor joists floor insulation layer

9. building water services 10. building electrical services 11. internal SIP’s wall wood panel 12. external SIP’s wall wood panel 13. waterproof membrane 14. external slat wood panel 15. family 2 steel bracket

Technical Section

Roof 2045

Mezzanine 3 1725

14 8 5

12 8

Mezzanine 2 1255

7 15 7

7 6 8

Outside Stage 815

Mezzanine 1 665

7 15 11

Level 1 315

1 Ground floor 0

Scale 1:100 @A2

1. Southwark St entrance 2. Low Line entrance 3. Market 4. Stair 6. Control room 7. Auditorium 8. Loge 9. Proscenium

10. Stage 11. Back stage 12. Closed balcony 13. Roof top 14. Front facade 15. Family 6 timber column 16. Beam 17. Concrete foundation

Materials

Materials key

wood steel rod steel beam glass insulation concrete

Scale 1:100 @A2

Exploded Axonometric

28 24

27 23 26

1. Concrete footing 2. Steel post base 3. Water services 4. Electrical services 5. Family 2 steel bracket 6. Wooden slats 7. Steel rebar 12 mm 8. Family 6 Mass Timber Column 9. Beam 10. Gutter 11. Wood window 12. Internal SIP’s wall wood panel 13. Thermal insulation layer 14. External SIP’s wall wood panel 15. Waterproof membrane 16. Steel beam 17. Timber wall - Stairs suporting structure 18. Steel column 19. Glass facade 20. Celling wood panels 21. Wood floor joists 22. Thermal insulation layer 23. Floor wood panels 24. Flat roof waterprove membrane 25. Glass roof 26. Double glazing unit 27. Roof wood unit 28. Lean to roof glass 29. Steel beam 30. Glass canopy 31. Auditorium seat from reclaim timber 32. Loge 33. Wood door 34. Acoustic slat wood wall panels 35. Wood blinds

21 30

9 8 9

10 34

6 5 17

12 13 14 16

8 9 6 16

9 16

12 9

13 15 1

4 3 2

1 13

Scale 1:100 @A2

Building Fragment Scale 1:50

Aerial View

Site Plan Site Plan

2 7

ar uthw

k St

8 8 1

5 11

Key 2

0 0

1 1

Scale Scale 1:100 1:100

2 2

3 3

@A1 @A1

4 4

5 5

1. Low Line 2. Low Line pedestrian crossing 3. Outside theatre 4. Auditorium 5. Staircase leading to back of house and outside theatre 6. Staff staircase leading to open theatre 7. Crossing bridge 8. Roof top bar 9. Staircase leading to theatre and bars 10. Lambert House pedestrian crossing 11. Menier Chocolate Factory pedestrian crossing 12. Front facade

Ground Floor Plan

17 !"

5 4

12 14

war outh

k St

6 10

Key

Scale 1:100

@A1

1. Low Line pedestrian crossing 2. Staircase leading to back of house and outside theatre 3. Low Line entrance 4. Food and drinks market stalls 5. Artisans market stall 6. Meet walking fridge 7. Vegetable walking fridge 8. Dry store 9. Disable toilet 10. Toilets 11. Lounge 12. Southwark entrance 13. Staircase leading to theatre and bars 14. Sitting area 15. Office 16. Reception 17. Library

Mezzanine 1 Floor Plan

14 12

7 6

war outh

k St

26 24

Scale 1:100

@A1

Key 1. Low Line pedestrian crossing 2. Staircase leading to back of house and outside theatre 3. Staff Entrance 4. Reception 5. Rehearsal Room 6. Actress crossing bridge 7. Open Balcony 8. Staircase leading to open theatre 9. Reception 10. Green room 11. Dressing room 12. Wardrobe 13. Changing room 14. Shower 15. Toilet 16. Back stage 17. Scenes storage 14. Front facade 15. Family 6 timber column 16. Beam 17. Concrete foundation 18. Proscenium stage 19. Auditorium 20. Control room 21. Theatre box 22. Balcony lobby 23. Staircase leading to theatre and bars 24. Theatre entrance 25. Bar 26. Window seats

Mezzanine 22Floor Mezzanine FloorPlan Plan

1 7

k St

war outh

16 10 10 17

2 1

Key

Scale 1:100

@A1

1. Low Line pedestrian crossing 2. Public staircase leading to outside theatre 3. Outside Stage 4. Auditorium 5. View point 6. Sitting area 7. Staff staircase leading to outside theatre 8. Crossing bridge 9. Proscenium stage 10. Theatre box 11. Balcony lobby 12. Toilet 13. Staircase leading to theatre and bars 14. Bar 15. Window seats 16. Theatre entrance 17. Low Line

Perspectives Section

9 9

14 5

12 22 12

21 20

13 7

13 13

6 17

15 5 3

1 23 2

Key 1. Low Line pedestrian crossing 2. Low Line entrance 3. Market stalls 4. Southwark St’ entrance 5. Staircase leading to theatre and bars 6. Ticket office 7. Bar 8. Lounge 9. Roof top bar 10. Corridor 11. Control room 12. Auditorium

13. Theatre box 14. Stage lighting 15. Proscenium stage 16. Back stage 17. Rehearsal room 18. Staff entrance 19. Staircase leading to back of house and outside theatre 20. Outside stage 21. View point 22. Low Line 23. Viaduct

Scale 1:100 @A1

Left Side Elevation

Scale 1:100 @A1

Front Fasade

Scale 1:100 @A2

Rear Fasade

Scale 1:100 @A2

Southwark St Entrance

Low Line Pedestrian Crossing

Lambert House Pedestrians Crossing

Viaduct - Low Line Entrance

Market Stalls

O’Meara St - Pedestrians Crossing

Interior View Of The Theatre

Open Air Theatre

Interior View Of Lounge

View from Control Room

Balcony lobby

Ground Floor Lounge

Mezzanine 2 Lounge

Rooftop Bar

Southwark St Perspective