Celebrating
FREE//GRATUITO
45 years
of community journalism
Published by Acción Latina Mayo 7-20, 2015
Vol. 45 No. 9
Autopsy contradicts SFPD version of Amilcar death Autopsia contradice versión de SFPD sobre muerte de Amilcar Alexis Terrazas El Tecolote
T
he hillside shack in Chiquimula, Guatemala that housed the family of Juan Perez and Margarita Lopez didn’t have electricity the day their eldest son, Amilcar, left for the United States. But it did the day he died. During an April 24 press conference, with more than 3,000 miles between Chiquimula and San Francisco, both Juan and Margarita addressed via Skype the media and supporters of Amilcar Perez-Lopez—the 20-yearold Guatemalan immigrant who was fatally shot on Feb. 26 by two plainclothes San Francisco police officers in the Mission District.. “I’ve suffered greatly about my son,” said Margarita, through her Mayan Ch’orti’ accent in the best Spanish she could muster. Margarita couldn’t hold back her tears. “I ask for justice for my son, because I’m feeling this deeply, that they took my son.” Arnoldo Casillas, the attorney representing the Perez-Lopez family, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against San Francisco Police Department on April 24 after private autopsy findings challenged the official police version of the fatal shooting. The lawsuit implicates SFPD Chief Greg Suhr, officers Eric Reboli and Craig Tiffe, and the City and County of San Francisco. “The Mission District has a cancer,” said Casillas. “Over and over, young Hispanic men are being abused of their civil rights— being trampled.” Perez-Lopez was shot on Folsom Street between 24th and 25th streets after plainclothes officers Reboli and Tiffe responded to a call that a man armed with a knife was chasing another man. On the night of the shooting, Suhr stated that Perez-Lopez (who hadn’t yet been identified) lunged at officers with the knife raised overhead, prompting Reboli and Tiffe to open fire. “It’s a lie. There is no other way to characterize that version,” said Casillas. “He was shot in the back four times. If I’m charging you, you can’t shoot me in the back.” The private autopsy, conducted by forensic pathologist Jay Chapman of Santa Rosa, concluded four entry wounds in Perez-Lopez’s back: one near the upper right shoulder, two to the mid-lower right back, and one to the mid left back. There was also one that entered through the back of Perez-Lopez’s right arm, grazing his chest, and one to the back of his head. Casillas argued that the shots to the back and the wound through Perez-Lopez’s arm indicate that not only was Perez-Lopez running away from the officers, but he also had his arm at his side at the time of the shooting. “This isn’t the person that Chief Suhr spoke of,” Casillas said. “It’s physically impossible to get these trajectories through his body unless he’s running away.”
Shot in the back
Echan Luz sobre una muerte
El abogado Arnoldo Casillas, representante legal de la familia Pérez-López señala una imagen que muestra cómo su cliente recibió disparos por la espalda mientras huía. Attorney Arnoldo Casillas, who is representing Amilcar Perez-Lopez’s family, points to an image that illustrates that his client was shot in the back by police while running away. Photo Alexis Terrazas Though Perez-Lopez’s legal team is still waiting on the results of the official autopsy, they have seen the photos of the entry wounds and expect the results to mirror that of the private autopsy. In addition to the private autopsy, three eyewitnesses and a Feb. 26 photo taken by neighbor Chris Carlsson seem to contradict Suhr’s version of events. Mr. Perez, the person whom Amilcar was chasing with a knife following an altercation, claimed Amilcar was grabbed from behind before dropping the knife and being shot by police. The two other witnesses (referred to as Mr. V and Mr. D for their own safety) support Mr. Perez’s claim. Carlsson’s photo also showed Perez-Lopez dead in the street between two parked cars, and not on the sidewalk where Suhr has stated the shooting occurred. Casillas is calling for both officers to be charged, yet admits that isn’t likely. Casillas’ team has given their entire case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Francisco in hopes of landing a federal prosecution. The families afterward On Feb. 27, a day after Amilcar was killed, Officer Eric Reboli’s wife Marilu wrote on her Facebook page: “Thank you to everyone who has reached out to Eric through me. He is doing well and I will pass on the messages. Thank you for the support. Life is fragile and sweet. Be safe out there.” Jonathan Melrod, one of the attorneys participating in the lawsuit and member of the California advisory board to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, said he had seen Suhr interviewed on TV regarding the officers’ families.
4
Manifestantes encienden veladoras a los pies de oficiales del SFPD durante una velada en memoria de Amilcar Pérez-López. Protesters light candles at the feet of SFPD officers outside of the Mission District Police Station, during a vigil in memory of Amilcar Perez-Lopez. Photo Mabel Jiménez “He [Suhr] said, ‘You know, it’s been really hard for the families of the two officers.’ This is the family that it’s hard for,” Melrod said, pointing to a photo of the Perez-Lopez family. “The family that depended on Amilcar for a living. The family that sent their son here to provide [them] a better life. I didn’t hear Chief Suhr talk about that family. And that’s the family we’re here to talk about today.”
Later that evening, hundreds of people marched in the Mission, starting at the location where Perez-Lopez was killed. Two of those people were Refugio and Elvira Nieto, who endured the loss of their son Alex last year at the hands of the police. “I’m here with a lot of sadness,” said Elvira, remembering the expression on Margarita Lopez’s face. “Because I know the pain of having to go through this.”
Alexis Terrazas El Tecolote
L
a choza al pie de una ladera en Chiquimula, Guatemala, donde vive la familia de Juan Pérez y Margarita López, no tenía electricidad cuando su hijo mayor, Amilcar, se fue a los EEUU. Pero sí la tuvo el día que él murió. Durante una conferencia de prensa el 24 de abril, con una distancia de más de 3 mil millas entre Chiquimula y San Francisco, ambos Juan y Margarita hablaron vía Skype a los medios de comunicación y partidarios de Amilcar Pérez-López —el inmigrante guatemalteco de 20 años de edad que fue baleado fatalmente el 26 de febrero por dos policías encubiertos de San Francisco en el Distrito de la Misión. “He sufrido bastante por mi hijo”, dijo Margarita, con su acento maya Ch’orti’ en el mejor español que pudo reunir. Margarita no pudo contener sus lágrimas. “Yo pido justicia para mi hijo, porque lo siento bastante, que me quitaron a mi hijo”. Arnoldo Casillas, el abogado que representa a la familia Pérez-López, presentó una demanda federal de derechos civiles contra el Departamento de Policía de San Francisco (SFPD, por sus siglas en inglés) el 24 de abril, después de conocerse los resultados de la autopsia independiente la cual contradice la versión oficial de la policía. La demanda implica al Jefe del SFPD Greg Suhr, a los policías Eric Reboli y Craig Tiffe, a la Ciudad y al Condado de San Francisco. “El Distrito de la Misión tiene un cáncer”, dijo Casillas. “Una y otra vez, los derechos civiles de jóvenes latinos están siendo violentados —siendo pisoteados”. A Pérez-López le dispararon en la calle Folsom entre las calles 24 y 25 después de que los policías encubiertos Reboli y Tiffe respondieran a una llamada en la que se informaba que un hombre armado con cuchillo en mano perseguía a otro. En la noche del tiroteo, Suhr declaró que Pérez-López (que aún no había sido identificado) atacó a los policías con el cuchillo por lo que Reboli y Tiffe debieron disparar. “Es una mentira. No hay otra manera de caracterizar esa versión”, dijo Casillas. “Le dispararon en la espalda cuatro veces. Si te estoy atacando, no me puedes disparar por la espalda”. La autopsia independiente, realizada por el patólogo forense Jay Chapman, de Santa Rosa, concluyó que existen cuatro heridas de entrada en la espalda de Pérez-López: una cerca de la parte superior del hombro derecho, dos a la mitad de abajo a la derecha, y otra al mitad izquierda de la espalda. También hay una herida que penetró por la parte posterior del brazo derecho de Vea Autopsia, página 6