Completed Projects by Erica Li

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI U ND E R S U P E R V I S I ON OF Her wi g B au mg ar tn er T E A M M AT E S A n d y M ag n er a J u an Card en as M en g y u Yu Ruoya Li E r i ca L i Yu - Hen g Hu an g Ge Wan g

CAPRA ARTICULA

M o u n tai n g o ats are co n s i d ered to b e amo n g t he b e st cl i mb i n g mammal s . T h ei r s l i m p ro fi l e co mb i ne d wit h th ei r s u p p l e s p l i t h o o f al l o ws th e an i mal to ce nt e r it s wei g h t an d fi n d fo o th o l d s o n mi n i mal s u r face a re a . Ho wev er. th e g o at faces g reat d an g er fro m loss of s i g h t/b al an ce, an d mu s t tak e ex tremel y l o n g wind ing h o r i z o n tal p ath s u p an d d o wn mo u n tai n s i d e s. Wha t i f th e mo u n tai n g o at was ab l e to i n creas e i ts g rip on th e ro ck wal l , as wel l as tak e a mo re effi ci ent ve rt ic a l p ath ? T h e l eg o f th e mo u n tai n g o at was red es i g n ed b a se d o n co n cep tu al i n s p i r ati o n fro m th e l eg s o f ma ny i n s ects . I n s ectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s l eg s featu re man y s h ar p s pike s th at al l o w g r i p p i n g o n s u r faces th at y i el d l i tt le t o no

626.679.3924 f oot ho ld . W it h t his in mind , t he ne w p ro st he t ic f o r t he goa t wo uld no lo ng e r f oc us o n a rd uous horizo nt a l c limb ing t ha t re lie s o n f le xib le joint s, b ut inst e a d , would re ly on inc re a se d surf a c e a re a b uilt f rom highly a rt ic ula t e d sp ike d c omp one nt s. T he f ina l Ca p ra Art ic ula p rost he t ic e limina t e s t he st a nd a rd kne e a nd ho of in f a vo r o f t he inse c t - like sp ike d surf a c e . T he e xc e ss o f sha rp sp ine s e nsure s mult ip le c o nt a c t p o int s, e a c h o f whic h c a n no w b e g re a t ly re d uc e d in size . U sing t he hig h should e r b la d e like a rt ic ula t ion, t he goa t is a b le sc a le ve rt ic a l c liff sid e s, e limina t ing t he ne e d f o r e xha ust ive . Pro je c t vid e o : ht t p s:/ / yout u.b e / e ud f jxOb zjI

1 Ba c k c o mp one nt : c onne c t s + sup p o rt s g oa t a nd t ra nsf e rs loa d int o ground Path of Mountain Goat

2 Te c t o nic solid s: c re a t e s a sho uld e r b la1d e back st ruccomponent: t ure t o inc connects re a se surf ce + asupports a re f o r sp ike c ove ra ge

goat and transfers load into ground

3 Inla y e xt rusions: t ra c e s t e c t onic 2 ge tectonic solids: shoulder solid ome t ry a ndcreates loc ks aint o solid blade structure a s c onne c t io n to increase surface are for

spike coverage

4 Fro nt c o mp one nt : c re a t e s t e xt ura l sub a c eextrusions: f o r sp iketraces s t o tectonic grip wa solid ll 3 surf inlay Path of Mountain Goat

geometry and locks into solid as connec-

5 Sp ike s: tionmult it ud e o f a rt ic ula t e d p oint 4 s e nsure mult ip le c onne c t io n p oint s t o wa ll

Path of Super Mountain Goat

front component: creates textural subsurface for spikes to grip wall spikes: multitude of articulated points ensure multiple connection points to wall

106

E RIC A L I

A PPI ED ST UDIES

107

E RIC A L I

108

02 01

03 01 MODELS 02 MODELS 03 MODELS

A PPI ED ST UDIES

SPR ING 2 0 1 7

S UP E R AN I MAL P R OS T H E T I C

109

110

111

112

113

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

P_3924

P LA N E T 3 9 2 4 M anu f a c t u re d L a n d s c apes co n s i s t i n const r u c t i n g a t o p o g raph i c g ro u n d th ro u g h th e p se u d o f l a t t e n i n g o f a vo l u m etri c m ach i n e o b j e c t . I n t h e s pi ri t o f D a V i n ci and t h e S u r re a l i st s w e l o o ked at m an -m ade obje c t s t h ro u g h t h e l e n s o f to po g raph y. This m e a n s t h a t r a t h e r th an s ee a s peci f i c obje c t f o r i t s c u l t u r a l m ean i n g , f i g u ral i ty, o r utilit y, w e l o o k a t i t a s th e po s s i bl e g ro u n d for o t h e r o b j e c t s t o o c cu py. T h e tech n i qu e w e e m p l o y i s b a s e d o n pel ti n g , th e f l atten i n g of an i m a l h i d e s . I n a c tu al pel ti n g , h i des are s tr at e g i c a l l y sk i n n e d a n d s tretch ed s o as to

co m pl ete ly fla tte n the m, thus re d uc ing its vo l u ptuous q ua litie s to sha p e a nd te xture th ro u gh d istortion. The ma te ria lity of an i m al skins a llows this d istortion to oc c ur th ro u gh he a t a nd ste a m. We only look for a s em i- fla tte ning, a llowing the e xc e ssive pro tu b e ra nc e s a nd d istinc t fe a ture s of the o bj ect yie ld ne w mounta in ra nge s, va lle ys, bas i n s, p la te a us, rid ge s, fa ults, e tc . The g o al wa s to c re a te a te rtium q uid b e twe e n th e f o rma l la ngua ge of top ogra p hie s a nd m ach i ne s.

FA L L 1 6

ART I CUL AT E D T OP OG R AP H Y

INSTR U C TO R : R ami ro Di az -Granado s

L ANDSCAPE S CO NSIST S O FAR T ICUL AT ING T HE PE LT E DSURFACE ST HRO UG HHIG HE R L E V E L G E O ME T RIE S.

manufactured landscapes

01 SILICONE MOLD 02 PLASTER MOLD

ORANGE TAPE ON FLOOR FOR 3D SCANNING

PLASTER MOLD DETAILS

PLANET 3924

DETAILS OF PLANET 3924

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

GRAVITY

SPR ING 1 7

3 D P R I N T R OBOT I C F UR N I T UR E

INSTR U C TO R : M . C as ey R ehm

USING RO BO T L AB T O MANUFACT URE WAX MO DE L F O R FACADE CL ADDING

manufacturing facade

01 WAX MODEL

DETAILS

02 WAX MODEL

DETAILS

CHARCOAL WAX MODEL

ERICA LI

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

626.679.3924

Hi re b y : V i n cen t Ch u i Co nsult ing Inc

ALHAMBRA, Ca lif or nia , A re t ro f it re mod e ling of a re sid e nt ia l house o wn b y t he ma yo r o f c it y o f Alha mb ra . Colla b ora t e wit h t he st ruc t ura l e ng ine e r. Eric a Li d ra f t t he d ra wings re a d y f or p e rmit . Pro je c t inc lud e s 2 nd f lo or a d d it io n, ne w ro of p la n, ne w la yo ut o f living sp a c e s, a nd b e d ro om.

SITE PLAN

100 CHAMPION PLACE ALHAMBRA, CA 91801

MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION

100 CHAMPION PLACE

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN

100 CHAMPION PLACE ALHAMBRA, CA 91801

MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION

NORTH ELEVATION

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN

SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING/DEMO & FLOOR PLANS

A2.1

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI

HI R E B Y OWNER: W innie Liu P ro j ect p er i o d : 6 mont hs L o cati o n : S ant a Mo nic a Co n tr acto r : P eter Ch o & Mic he a l B uild : 1900

2nd & Ocean

626.679.3924 Eric a Li d e sig ne d , re mo d e le d a nd p roje c t ma na ge d t he se a p a rt me nt unit s. T he a p a rt me nt unit s we re b uilt in t he e a rly 1900s a nd a s not we ll ma int a ine d t hro ug h o ut t he d e c a d e s. Lo sing it s o rigina l d e sign, it ha s b e c o me a n e ye sore wit hin it s ne ighb o rhood a nd lo st it s g la mo ur a nd c ha ra c t e rist ic . D uring t he b e g inning of t he d e sig n st a g e , we d isc ove re d a va rie t y o f st ruc t ura l p rob le ms, so me t ha t ne e d e d t o b e imp le me nt a t io n a nd ot he rs re inf o rc e me nt wit h ne w st ruc t ura l e ng ine e ring a nd d e signs. Eric a wo rke d a long sid e a n e ng ine e r who d e ve lop e d a d e sig n t ha t e nha nc e d t he o rigina l st ruc t ure a nd b ro ug ht it up t o d a t e wit h t o mod e r n st yle va c a t io n home s.

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI

HI R E B Y OWNER: W innie Liu

LANDMARK

The Landmark Sign Program

Architectural Plans - Site Plan & Monument Location

The Landmark Sign Program 1. PHYSICAL SIZE Height 6ft (72”) Width 6ft (72”) Thickness 1ft 8in (20”) 2. LOCATION & ORIENTATION Monument to be situated at the intersection of Apple Valley Road and Kamana Road, in the South-West corner of Landmark Site Plan (see page 9). Monument will be oriented for best visibility of display to road traffic (see page 12) and at least 6 feet from property lines or inner perimeter of sidewalk. Actual location may depend on existing underground electrical or other network. 3. DESIGN Sign will be one-sided and contain one digital screen plus LED illuminated panels for tenant name/logo display.

4. CONSTRUCTION Monument body fabricated in Aluminum and painted to match building colors. Digital display will occupy no more than 50% of the monument sign area. Remaining tenant panels will be white acrylic with vinyl lettering.

The Landmark – Sign Criteria – 2014

Site Monument Criteria

626.679.3924 APPLE VALLEY, Ca lif o r nia , A b ra nd ne w me d ic a l o ff ic e b uild ing f o r So ut he r n Ca lif or nia Bo ne a nd Joint Clinic . It inc lud e x- ra y, f luorosc op e ro om. Alo ng wit h 3 up p e r le ve l o ff ic e sp a c e f or p hysic a l t he ra p y, t wo ot he r d oc t or’s o ff ic e s. ATMO c onsult o n t he st ruc t ura l, e xt e rio r, a nd signs d e sign. T he e nt ire int e rio r o f t he Sout he r n Ca lif or nia Bone a nd Joint Clinic is d e sign b y Eric a Li.

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI U ND E R S U P E R V I S I ON OF

L o cati o n : P aris, Fra nc e

D o mi n i q u e J ak o b B ren d an M acF ar l an e

626.679.3924 Pa ris 2 024 + 50 ye a rs T ILES is d e signe d wit h t he t he p ro b le m o f rising wa t e r le ve ls in Pa ris. T ile s is t he solut io n t ha t e mb ra c e s t he wa t e r e le me nt , b y c re a t ing a sa f e a nd liva b le e nvironme nt d uring a f lood c risis. D uring ra iny se a son, t he sit e is e xc a va t e d a nd use d a s a f lo od re lie f zone a nd a ny ove rf low will g o int o t he Se ine . T he st re e t le ve l is e q uip p e d wit h c ommunit y f a c ilit ie s suc h a s a b a ske t b a ll c o urt a nd c o mmon a re a . T he 1 st f loor a c t s a s a ne t wo rk t ha t c onne c t s a ll ho using t o ge t he r t hro ug h b rid g e s. Whe n t he c it y e nt e rs a ma jor f lo od t ha t e nc omp a sse s t he st re e t le ve l, p e op le c a n c ommut e sa f e ly f ro m a b ove g round .

TILE

elevation -1/16”

Seine water level: 12 meters

8 meters

5 meters

scale: 3/32”=1’

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI U ND E R S U P E R V I S I ON OF

PROGRAM:

E r i c Owen M o s s

1 4 0 u n i ts - 5 0 % aff o rd a b le / 5 0 % p er man en t s u p p o r ti ve housing

T E A M M AT E S

3 5 s tu d io s - 350 sf 3 5 o n e b ed ro o m - 500 sf 3 5 two b ed ro o m - 7 50 sf 3 5 ar ti s t l o ft s - 3 50 sf 1 0 , 0 0 0 s f co mmu n i ty - s erving re t a il 1 0 , 0 0 0 s f co mmu n i ty art s c e nt e r P ar k i n g for 4 20 c a rs A r t Gal l er y - 36,000 sf A r t P l az a - 25,000 sf Co mmu n i ty area - 4 5,000 sf R o o f Gard en an d p l ay g ro u n d - 1 2,000 sf

E r i ca L i J u n x i P en g

METROPOLIS

Omni pres ent A meri can aff l uence obs c u re s a number of s ubs t ant i al s oci al pat holo g ie s . Wal k t he s t reet s of Los A ngel es f rom t h e beaches t o B oy l e H ei ght s , and a pri m a r y ex ampl e i s readi l y apparent : hous i ng fo r t h e homel es s /aff ordabl e hous i ng/s oci al h o u s in g i s a probl em i gnored f or decades . Th e C i t y of Los A ngel es has now propos e d t o addres s t hi s probl em by prov i di ng f un d in g , and di s t ri but i ng new aff ordabl e housin g proj ect s t o al l 15 of t he ci t y ’s council di s t ri ct s . P rev i ous more pi ecemeal s t r a t e g ie s t ended t o l ocat e aff ordabl e hous i ng l a r g e ly i n t he s k i d row area of downt own. The current urban propos i t i on s ugge s t s t h e hous i ng probl em i s ci t y wi de, and t he re fo re l ocat i on of new hous i ng s ol ut i ons s ho u ld l i k ewi s e be di s t ri but ed equi t abl y t hro u g h o u t t he ci t y. The s t udi o proj ect s i t e i s i n Ve n ic e , t he l arges t unbui l t s i t e i n t hat Wes t s id e v enue, and wi l l occas i on bot h s ubs t a n t ia l publ i c s upport , and s ubs t ant i al publ i c oppos i t i on. The propert y i s bounded by P aci f i c Av e n u e on t he wes t ; N ort h Veni ce B oul ev ard o n t h e nort h; S out h Veni ce B oul ev ard on t he s o u t h ; and D el l Av enue on t he eas t .

626.679.3924 Loc a t io n: Ve nic e , Ca lif o r nia Bound e d b y p a c if ic a ve nue o n t he we st ; nort h Ve nic e b o ule va rd o n t he no rt h; Sout h Ve nic e b o ule va rd o n t he sout h; a nd d e ll a ve nue on t he e a st . T he sit e is sub d ivid e d b y t he nort he r n- mo st e xt e nsion o f g ra nd c a na l of Ve nic e , And is a p p roxima t e ly 6 f e e t a b o ve se a le ve l. Z o ning Enve lop e : Ma ximum He ig ht - 3 5 f e e t Se t b a c ks - 5 f e e t a long p rop e rt y line , 1 5 f e e t a long c a na l

F ro m t im e t o t im e in t h e a rc h it e c t u re d is c o u r s e t h e q u a lit y o f d e s ig n re s u lt s a re q u a lifie d b y a s s o c ia t in g d e s ig n re s u lt s w it h t h e ‘ lim it s ’ o f a p a r t ic u la r b u ild in g t y p o lo g y. Ra t h e r t h a n a p p ly in g a n a b s o lu t e q u a lit a t iv e s t a n d a rd – t h e p ro je c t is g o o d o r it ’s n o t – p ro je c t s , p a r t ic u la r ly a ffo rd a b le h o u s in g , a re o ft e n c o n s id e re d ip s o fa c t o a p o s it iv e s im p ly b e c a u s e t h e y re m e d y a lo n g s t a n d in g s o c ie t a l p ro b le m . T h is c o n fu s io n o f d e s ig n c o n t e n t w it h b u ild in g t y p o lo g y c a n n o t b e o u r s t a n d a rd . Ra t h e r a ffo rd a b le h o u s in g s h o u ld re p re s e n t t h e h ig h e s t q u a lit y o f c o n c e p t u a l c o n t e n t , Un m it ig a t e d b y it s p re s u m e d s o c ia l v ir t u e s . T h e p ro je c t is a c r it ic a l d e s ig n a n d s o c ia l c o n t e n t fir s t s t e p fo r t h e Cit y o f L o s An g e le s t o d a y. T h e p ro je c t p e r fo r m a n e s s e n t ia l s o c ia l s e r v ic e , a n d it re p re s e n t t o t h e lo c a l c o m m u n it y t h e c a p a c it y o f it s d e s ig n t o t r a n s c e n d t h e lo n g h e ld c o n v e n t io n a l p e rc e p t io n t h a t , in t h is t y p o lo g ic a l c o n t e x t , s o c ia l s e r v ic e is p r io r it iz e d o v e r d e s ig n c o n t e n t . As a h a r b in g e r o f a n e w c o m m it m e n t t o s o lv in g t h e a ffo rd a b le h o u s in g p ro b le m in L o s An g e le s , it ’s e s s e n t ia l t h is p ro je c t d e liv e r s b o t h t h e h ig h e s t d e s ig n a n d s o c ia l c o n t e n t t o Ve n ic e a n d t o t h e Cit y o f L o s An g e le s .

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

ty p o l o g y. R a t h e r t h a n appl yi n g an a b s o l u t e q u a l i t a t i v e s tan dard – th e proje c t i s g o o d o r i t ’s n o t – pro j ects , par ti c u l a r l y a ff o rd a b l e h o u s i n g , are o f ten consi d e re d i p s o f a c t o a po s i ti ve s i m pl y beca u se t h e y re m e d y a l o n g s tan di n g s oci e t a l p ro b l e m . T h i s co n f u s i o n o f des i g n cont e n t w i t h b u i l d i n g typo l o g y can n o t be o u r s tan d a rd . R a t h e r a ff o rdabl e h o u s i n g s h o u l d rep re se n t t h e h i g h e st qu al i ty o f co n ceptu al cont e n t , U n m i t i g a t e d by i ts pres u m ed s o ci al v ir tu e s . The Ve n i c e p ro j e c t i s a cri ti cal des i g n and s o c i a l c o n t e n t f i r s t s tep f o r th e Ci ty of L o s A n g e l e s t o d a y. T h e pro j ect m u s t per fo r m a n e s s e n t i a l s o ci al s ervi ce, an d it m u st re p re se n t t o t h e l o cal co m m u n i ty th e c a p a c i t y o f i t s d e s i g n to tran s cen d th e lon g h e l d c o n v e n t i o n al percepti o n th at, in th i s t y p o l o g i c a l c o n tex t, s o ci al s ervi ce is pr i o r i t i z e d o v e r d e s i g n co n ten t. A s a har b i n g e r o f a n e w c om m i tm en t to s o l vi n g th e a ff o rd a b l e h o u si n g pro bl em i n L o s A nge l e s , i t ’s e ss e n t i a l th i s pro j ect del i vers both t h e h i g h e s t d e si g n an d s o ci al co n ten t to Ve n i c e a n d t o t h e Ci ty o f L o s An g el es . For t h e p ro g r a m t o a d van ce s u cces s f u l l y, th e proje c t m u s t m a k e g oo d o n bo th o bl i g ati o n s . It w i l l .

FA L L 1 7

01 PLAN

l evel 6 typ ic a l floor p la n 02 PLAN

typi cal floor p la n orga niza tion 03 ELEVATION

typi cal units 03 PLAN

typi cal units

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

FA L L 1 7

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

PACIFIC AVE

DELL AVE

N VENICE BLVD

S VENICE BLVD

P rog r a m : 140 u n i t s - 5 0 % a ff o rd abl e/ 5 0 % perm an en t supportive housing 35 s t u d i o s - 3 5 0 s f 35 o n e b e d ro o m - 5 0 0 s f 35 tw o b e d ro o m - 7 5 0 s f 35 a r t i st l o f t s - 3 5 0 sf 10, 0 0 0 s f c o m m u n i t y - s ervi n g retai l 10, 0 0 0 s f c o m m u n i t y arts cen ter P ar ki n g f o r 4 2 0 c a r s

A r t G a l l e r y - 3 6 , 0 0 0 sf Art Plaza - 25,000 sf C om m u n i t y a re a - 4 5 ,0 0 0 s f R oof G a rd e n a n d p l a yg ro u n d - 1 2 ,0 0 0 s f Zon i n g E n v e l o p e : M ax i m u m H e i g h t - 3 5 f eet S etb a c k s - 5 f e e t a l o n g pro perty l i n e, 15 fe e t a l o n g c a n a l

01 PLAN

g ro u n d p la n

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

FA L L 1 7

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

COMMUNITY RM

ARTIST LOFT

UNITS

PRIVATE PARKING & ROOF GARDEN

PUBLIC PARKING

ART GALLERY

PUBLIC PARKING

PLAZA

COMMERCIAL SPACE

ART GALLERY MAIN ENTRANCE

E XP LODE D VIE W OF M E TR OP OLIS

RENDERING OF GROUND LEVEL IN THE PLAZA OVERLOOKING THE CANAL

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

We a n a l y z e si t e c o n d i ti o n s , i n cl u di n g ex is t i n g b u i l d i n g s a n d devel o pm en tal patte r n i n g , a n d a sk e d to i n ves ti g ate co de req u i re m e n t t h a t a re es peci al l y rel evan t to lar ge b u i l d i n g s.

FA L L 1 7

C ont e m p o r a r y c i t i e s a re co m pl ex o rg an i s m s th at d e f y a n y e a sy a n a l ys i s o r s i n g u l ar char a c t e r i z a t i o n . I n t h e pas t h u n dred years cities h a v e g ro w n t o dwarf th e s cal e o f his to r i c h u m a n se t t l e m en ts , s tretch i n g to th e l i m i t s o f c o m p re h e n s i o n . No n eth el es s th ere re m a i n s t h e p h ys i cal f act o f ci ti es . They a re c o m p o s e d n o t o n l y o f f l o ws o f capi t a l , i n f o r m a t i o n , p eo pl es , an d res o u rces , bu t a l so o f t h e i n e r t m as s o f s treets , bu ild i n g s , a n d i n f r a s t ru ctu re. 01 SECTION

ren deri ng of the me trop olis

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

We a n a l y z e si t e c o n d i ti o n s , i n cl u di n g ex is t i n g b u i l d i n g s a ro u n d th e area an d dev e l o p m e n t a l p a t t e r n i n g , an d as ked to in v es t i g a t e c o d e re q u i rem en t th at are es p e c i a l l y re l e v a n t t o l arg e bu i l di n g s .

FA L L 1 7

01 ELEVATION

s o u th ve nic e fa c a d e 02 ELEVATION

f acade d e ta ils

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

FA L L 1 7

The t w o se c t i o n f ro m th e wes t an d eas t s i de s h ow v e r y u n i q u e q u al i ty. The e a s t c ro ss se c t i o n m ai n l y i s to s h o w th e relat i o n s h i p b e t w e e n t h e typi cal u n i ts , th e ar t g a l l e r y, a n d t h e p arki n g s pace.

The w e s t c ro ss se c t i on s h o w th e or ga n i z a t i o n o f t h e 1 0-2 0 f eet tal l arti s t l o f t, alon g w i t h t h e p a r k i n g an d th e co m m i n i ty plaze a t t h e g ro u n d l e vel .

01 CROSS SECTION

eas t

02 CROSS SECTION

wes t

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

FA L L 1 7

OVE R ALL, PACIFIC AVE (WEST ) 1/1 6 ” S CALE M ODE L

VE RT I CAL S T UD I O

FA C A D E D E TA I LS, SO U T H V E NI C E ST 1/16” SC A LE M O D E L

SO U T H V E NI C E ST 1/16” SC A LE M O D E L

N ORTH VE N ICE ST, PA C IF IC AVE 1/1 6 ” S CALE M ODE L

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

THE CITY

SPR ING 1 7

2 G B S t u d i o : Arc h i t e c t u re s I n t e r v e n t i o n

INSTR U C TO R : Peter Trummer

BIG D U MB BU ILD INGS. T HE S T UDIO P RO J ECT WO RK S AT T HE INT ERFA CE O F A HEAVILY ENGINEERED RIVER, WHO S E ENVIRO NM ENTA L P ERF O RM A NCE IS BEING A LT ERED, WIT H A HIS T O RIC NEIGHBO RHO O D A ND LA RGE P IECES O F T RA NS P O R TAT IO N INF RA ST RUCT URE. S T UDENT S A RE A SK ED T O CO NS IDER T HE SIT E, BO T H BUILT A ND NAT URA L, A NDDIST ILL FRO M IT A SET O F P RIO RIT IES A ND O P ERAT IO NS T HAT NEGO T IAT ES T HE CO M P LEX INT ERFA CE BET WEEN T HE S TAT IC URBA N A R T IFA CT O F T HE BUILDING, A VA RIA BLE, DY NA M IC RIVER A ND A CHA NGING URBA N CO NT EX T. T HIS WILL BE EVIDENCED T HRO UGH DRAWINGS A ND M O DELS.

a multiplicity generic model MASSING

PA R E NPARENT TS 1 1 - VENICE HOSPITAL V E N I C E H OS P I TA L

UNIFICATION

PARENT PA R E N TS 2 2 - TATE MODERN TATE M OD E R N

HY BRID - MASS

PARENT PA R E N TS 2 2 - TATE MODERN TATE M OD E R N

HY BRID - CIRCUL AT IO N

PA R E N TS 2 RPARENT2OLE X LE A RLEARNING N I N G C CENTER E N TE R ROLEX

HY BRID - SIT E

CIRCULATION

PA R E NPARENT1TS 1 VENICE HOSPITAL V E N I C E H OS P I TA L

SITE BOUNDARY

The L o s A n g e l e s r i v e r, f o r decades an ei th er for go t t e n o r r i d i c u l e d pi ece o f A rm y Co rps of E n g i n e e r ’s c a n - d o in f ras tru ctu re o f th e 1930 ’s, h a s re c e n t l y b eco m e th e cen ter o f in ten s e sc r u t i n y a n d pu bl i c m o n i es . It w o u l d b e d i ff i c u l t t o o ver ex ag g erate th e tr an sf o r m a t i v e i m p a c t i ts revi tal i zati o n wo u l d hav e u p o n t h e c i t y. I n m an y pl aces , s u ch as in L i n c o l n H e i g h t s , F ro g to wn (El ys i an Val l ey), and S C I - A rc ’s o w n A r ts D i s tri ct, th e m ap o f des ir a b l e re a l e st a t e c o u l d l i teral l y i n vert m ak i n g w h a t h a d b e e n th e ci ty’s al l ey i n to its fro n t d o o r. T h i s st udi o i n ten ds to in tro d u c e t h e s t u d e n ts to th i s i m po rtan t ur b a n d e v e l o p m e n t . W h i l e th e s tu di o o n l y

tan g en tia lly work on the Los Ange le s Rive r pro per, it c onsid e r the p rop ose d c ha nge s to i t an d the ir e c ologic a l imp lic a tions. Ove r the co u rs e of the se me ste r we stud y the c urre nt pl an s and the ir a tte nd a nt c ontrove rsie s, tour th e ri ver, a nd me e t with ind ivid ua ls involve d in th e vari ous p roje c ts for a nd ne a r the rive r. T h e proje c t d e ve lop from a c onsid e re d an al ys i s of the p re c e d e nts e xa mine d a s it is i m pl em ente d within a p a rtic ula r urb a n a nd en vi ro n me nta l c onte xt.

01 PLAN

north we st of the c ity p la nni ng 02 DIAGRAM

PR ECEDENTS: Ma ss, Circul at i on, S i t e

PA R E N TS 1 A LTE SPARENT1-ALTES M U S E U M MUSEUM

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 7

2 G B S t u d i o : Arc h i t e c t u re s I n t e r v e n t i o n

PL AN

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 7

2 GGBB SStTuUD d i oI:OArc F UN h i tD e cMT tuL reAR s I nCt e2r v e n t i o n

PL AN

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 7

2 G B S t u d i o : Arc h i t e c t u re s I n t e r v e n t i o n

SECTION A

SECTION A SCALE 1:500

ROOF PLAN

SECTION B

SECTION B SCALE 1:500

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

ren deri ng of the c ity 02 ELEVATION

pro g ram of the c ity p la nning

SPR ING 1 7

2 G B S t u d i o : Arc h i t e c t u re s I n t e r v e n t i o n

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ERICA LI

U ND E R S U P E R VISION OF R u s s ell Tho mse n S D T EAMMAT ES A l es s io Gra nc ini Eric a Li D D T EAMMAT ES A l es s io Gra nc ini Eric a Li S ep i d eh E mamza d e he i Owe n Wa ng

HIVE

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

626.679.3924 Sa n Fra nc isc o, Ca lif o r nia ,

In re c o n s id e r in g t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y m id r is e , t h e p ro je c t fo c u s o n t h e a rc h it e c t u r a l is s u e s o f s e q u e n c e a n d e n t r y, d e v e lo p m e n t o f s p a t ia lly d e s c r ip t iv e s p a c e s , in t e r lo c k in g v o lu m e s , e x p lo it e d g e o m e t r y, a n d c re a t io n o f a t m o s p h e re a n d e ffe c t . In c lu d in g in n o v a t iv e c irc u la t io n , s t r u c t u r a l m e t h o d s , a n d c o n t e m p o r a r y fo r m s o f r u s t ic a t io n , c o lo r a n d m a t e r ia l u s e . E m b r a c e t h e lo w p ro file a n d e x p lo it t h e in t e r io r v o lu m e a s a m e a n t o e x a g g e r a t e s p a c e . We w ill d e s ig n t h e m a t c h u p b e t w e e n v o lu m e s v s . e n c lo s u re s .

SPRING SEMESTER INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

1 A2

CONCRETE CORE

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT 1

CEILING MOUNT WITH FLANGE

1-6 A4

CONCRETE SLAB ALUMINIUM CATWALL

GFRC SKIN

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

DROP CEILING

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

FIBERGLASS SUNSCREEN

HSSHOLLOW COLUMNS I BEAM 300

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN MULLION VERTICAL SYSTEM

PACE/LINE BUILDING

STAINLESS STEEL DRYWALL SUPPORTING GRID

MULLION HORIZONTAL SYSTEM

CONSULTANTS:

1 A14

HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM MULLION

DRY WALL

TITLE:

MEGA TRUSS

3D MEGA CHUNK WOOD ACOUSTIC PANEL

SCALE:

NO SCALE

CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATION 1 S2

GLAZING SYSTEM

ENVELOPE SYSTEM:

3D SECTION SERIES

GFRC SKIN STEEL PIPE JOINT (4” DIAMETER) ALUMINIUM HANDRAIL ALUMINIUM CATWALK CATWALK SUPPORT(I BEAM PROTRUTED) MULLION VERTICAL SYSTEM MULLION HORIZONTAL SYSTEM

GROUP 8

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

SHEET NO. APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

DOUBLE PANE GLASS

NUT AND BOLT UNITIZED THE SUNSCREEN TOGETHER

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

FIBERGLASS UNIT

DOUBLE PANE GLASS ALUMINUM CASING

9” PART A-2

PART A-1 PART B

83” MOLD

MOLD

I-BEAM

CATWALK

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT (1 OF 6)

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36” X L 83” X 9” H

CONCTETE

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: MOLD

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

MOLD

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

1 A4

PART A-1 ART A, OF THE SUNSCREEN UNIT IS A TWO PART MOLD. GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-1, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

PART A-2 GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-2, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

PART B-1 PART B-1 USE TWO PART MOLDING TO MOLD THE FIBERGLASS TO SHAPE.

PACE/LINE BUILDING

54”

PACE/LINE BUILDING

PART A-1

UNITISED GLAZING FRAME

9” FOAM

TITLE:

PART A

3D Detail

PART A-2

PART B-1

TITLE:

FOAM

90” THERMAL INSULATION

NO SCALE SCALE:

PART A-2

NO SCALE

83”

PART B-2

SUNSCREEN SUN FABRICATIONS FABR

PART A

CATWALL STEEL BEAM SUPPORT

PART A-1

4 A4

3D Detail

SCALE:

PART B

GROUP 8 G ASSEMBLY JOIN ALL FIBERGLASS WITH EVEN LAYER OF RESIN. LET THE COWL CURE OVERNIGHT BEFORE YOU REMOVE IT FROM THE MOLD.

5 A4

ASSEMBLY OF PART A+B EACH FULL ASSEMBLE UNIT USE TWO PART A, TWO PART B, AND TWO FOAM TO JOIN ALL THE PARTS TOGETHER

6 A4

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36” X L 83” X 9” H

2 A5

SHEET NO NO.

ONE UNITIZED PANEL SYSTEM EVERY ONE UNITIZED PANEL HAVE TOTAL OF 6 UNIT OF FIBERGLASS SUNSCREEN. THEY ARE JOIN BY A 53” LONG ROT ON EACH ENDS OF THE PANEL SYSTEM.

3 A5

SUNSCREEN FABRICATIONS

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT ATTACH TO BUILDING EACH UNITZED PANEL SYSTEM IS ATTACH TO THE BUILDING WITH A SPECIAL DESIGN CATWALK STEEL BEAM. AT THE END OF THE SUPORT IT HAVE A STEEL PLATE FORFOR ATTACHING THE SUNSCREEN UNITZED PANEL SYSTEM TO THE BUILDING. THIS REPEAT EVERY FLOOR AND EVERY 60”

DOUBLE GLAZE UNIT

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

ERICA LI

WALL SECTION ROOF (ISO VIEW)

ERICALIDESIGN@GMAIL.COM

ALUMINIUM MULLION

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT

EPOKAL PORCELAIN TILE EXTERIOR

INSULATION LAYER PEDESTAL SYSTEM

FIBERGLASS UNIT

ROOF CONNECTION DETAIL

1 A6.2

HANDRAIL

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT SYSTEM

1-6

SUNSCREEN FABRICATION

A4 CONCRETE SLAB

CATWALK

ELEVATED STEEL SUPPORTS SKIN SUPPORT

WALL SECTION MIDDLE (ISO VIEW)

UNITIZED GLAZING FRAME SYSTEM

SUNSCREEN FABRICATION

FIBERGLASS UNIT

EPOKAL PORCELAIN TILE INTERIOR

ELEVATED STEEL SUPPORTS SKIN SUPPORT

I BEAM 300 HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM MULLION

CATWALK

CONCRETE DECKING

CATWALK STEEL SUPPORT BEAM

SECONDARY STRUCTURE

1 S3

CEILING MOUNT WITH FLANGE

WALL SECTION GROUND (ISO VIEW)

HSSHOLLOW STEEL COLUMN

CATWALK

STEEL MEGA-TRUSS PLATFORM

EXTERNAL STEEL GRID

SKYLIGHT ROTATING SYSTEM

CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB

SLOPED FOAM

GROUNDFLOOR UNIT GLAZED SYSTEM

CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATION

CONCRETE COLUMN

PRIMARY STRUCTURE

1 S2

626.679.3924

3/32” SECTION MODEL NORTH EAST

3/32” SECTION MODEL SOUTH WEST

3/32” SECTION MODEL NORTH EAST

3/32” SECTION MODEL SOUTH EAST

3/32” SECTION MODEL

3/32” SECTION MODEL SOUTH EAST

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

SPR ING 1 7

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

INSTR U C TO R : M argaret Gri ff i n

L O CAT I O N : V E N I CE , CAL I F O R N I A

S I Z E : 2, 800S Q . F E E T T Y P E : 2 S I N G L E FAM I LY HO U S E

HIVE_DD APPLIED STUDIES

APPLIED S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN D

SPRING SEMESTER

SPRING SE

INSTRUCTORS:

INSTRUCT

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

HERWIG BA SCOTT URIU

DOUBLE INSULATED 5/16 “ CLEAR GLASS PANEL

FIELD GYPSU BOARD WALL

WIDE FLANGE STEEL BEAM FIRE PROOFING THERMAL COATING EXTERNAL ALUMINIUM FRAME

1 A2

CONCRETE EXTERIOR TILE 6’X4’

CONCRETE CORE

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT 1

CEILING MOUNT WITH FLANGE

BAUDER PROTECTION LAYER

1-6

ROTATED ALUMINIUM GLAZE UNITIZED SYSTEM

CONCRETE SLAB DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

DROP CEILING

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

FIBERGLASS SUNSCREEN

HSSHOLLOW COLUMNS I BEAM 300

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

1 A14

PACE/LINE BUILDING

STAINLESS STEEL DRYWALL SUPPORTING GRID

WATERPROOFING SYSTEM TOP LAYER

DESIGN AN

SINGLE TOP PLATE FRAMING MEMBERS PERIMETER OF GYPSUM BOARD INSULATION LAYER

WATERPROOFING SYSTEM BOTTOM LAYER PEDESTAL UNIT 12” INSULATION LAYER

CONCRETE SLAB LAYER

300 I BEAM

STEEL PLATE LARGE CAP SCREW

TITLE:

MATTHEW JAMEY LYZ

CONCRETE DECK

DECKING SUPPORTS CONCRETE CONCRETE SLAB

MEGA TRUSS

CONSULT

PA BU

HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM MULLION

DRY WALL

SEPIDEH E ALESSIO G ERICA LI HAOTAO W

300 I BEAM DIRECTION B

3D MEGA CHUNK WOOD ACOUSTIC PANEL

TITLE:

SCALE:

NO SCALE

CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATION 1

GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR FINISHINGS

3D SECTION SERIES

3D S SCALE:

DROP CEILING SYSTEM, HANGING POLE

DROP CEILING PANEL

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

This c o u r s e i n v e st i g a tes i s s u es rel ated to th e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f des i g n : tech n o l o g y, th e u s e o f m a t e r i a l s , s ys tem s i n teg rati o n , and t h e a rc h e t y p a l a nal yti cal s trateg i es of fo rc e , o rd e r a n d c h aracter. T h e co u rs e in clu d e s a re v i e w o f b as i c an d advan ced const r u c t i o n m e t h o d s, an al ys i s o f bu i l di n g code s , t h e d e si g n o f s tru ctu ral an d m ech a n i c a l sy s t e m s, En vi ro n m en tal s ys tem s , B uild i n g s se r v i c e sy s tem s , th e devel o pm en t of b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d th e i n teg rati o n of b u i l d i n g c o m p o n e nts an d s ys tem s . The i n t e n t o f t h i s c o u rs e i s to devel o p a cohe si v e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f h o w arch i tects com m u n i c a t e c o m p l e x bu i l di n g s ys tem s f o r

th e bu ilt e nvironme nt a nd to d e monstra te th e ability to d oc ume nt a c omp re he nsive arch i tec tura l p roje c t a nd Ste wa rd ship of the En vi ro nme nt.

SHEET NO 2 A6.2

01 3D MEGA CHUNK- ENTIRE BUILDING 02 3D DETAIL

ROOF CONNECTION DETAIL ROOF CONNECTION OF THE ROTATED GLASS UNIT

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

SPR ING 1 7

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

WALL SECTION GROUND (ISO VIEW) WALL SECTION ROOF (ISO VIEW)

ALUMINIUM MULLION

HSSHOLLOW STEEL COLUMN

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT

EPOKAL PORCELAIN TILE EXTERIOR

INSULATION LAYER PEDESTAL SYSTEM

FIBERGLASS UNIT

ROOF CONNECTION DETAIL

1 A6.2

CATWALK HANDRAIL

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT SYSTEM

1-6

SUNSCREEN FABRICATION

A4 CONCRETE SLAB

CATWALK

ELEVATED STEEL SUPPORTS SKIN SUPPORT

STEEL MEGA-TRUSS PLATFORM

WALL SECTION MIDDLE (ISO VIEW)

UNITIZED GLAZING FRAME SYSTEM

SUNSCREEN FABRICATION

FIBERGLASS UNIT

EPOKAL PORCELAIN TILE INTERIOR

ELEVATED STEEL SUPPORTS SKIN SUPPORT

EXTERNAL STEEL GRID

I BEAM 300

CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB

SKYLIGHT ROTATING SYSTEM

SLOPED FOAM

HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM MULLION

GROUNDFLOOR UNIT GLAZED SYSTEM

CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATION

CATWALK

CONCRETE DECKING

CONCRETE COLUMN CATWALK STEEL SUPPORT BEAM

SECONDARY STRUCTURE

1 S3

CEILING MOUNT WITH FLANGE

PRIMARY STRUCTURE

1 S2

3D WALL SECTION WALL SECTION GROUND (ISO VIEW)

HSSHOLLOW STEEL COLUMN

MOLD

E RIC A L I

MOLD

ALESSIO GRANCINI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG HAOTAO WANG

MOLD

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

SPR ING 1 7

59 CONSULTANTS: CONSULTANTS: MATTHEWMATTHEW MELNYK MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN JAMEY LYZUN

1 A4

1 PARTPART A-1 A-1 A4

2 PARTPART A-2 A-2

ART A,SUNSCREEN OF THE SUNSCREEN ART A, OF THE UNIT IS AUNIT IS A TWO PARTGEL MOLD. GEL COAT LAYER TWO PART MOLD. COAT LAYER SET PART UP FOR PART A-1, MOLD USE SET UP FOR A-1, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

3 PARTPART B-1 B-1

APPLIED STUDIES

GEL COATSET LAYER SET UP FOR GEL COAT LAYER UP FOR PART A-2, MOLD PART A-2, MOLD USE CNCUSE 3 CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

PACE/LINE PACE/LINE BUILDING BUILDING

TWO PART PART B-1PART USEB-1 TWOUSE PART MOLDING MOLD THE FIBERMOLDING TO MOLDTO THE FIBERGLASS TO SHAPE. GLASS TO SHAPE.

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PART A-2

PART A-1

PART A-1PART A-1

PART B

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 9”

9” FOAM

FOAM

TITLE: TITLE:

INSTRUCTORS:

3D Detail 3D Detail

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PART A-2PART A-2

PART B-1PART B-1

FOAM

FOAM MOLD

PART A-2

SCALE:SCALE:

PART B PART B

NO SCALE NO SCALE

MOLD

PART A-2PART A-2

PART A-1

SPRING SEMESTER

PART A PART A

PART B

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

PART B-2PART B-2 MOLD

83”

SUNSCREEN SUN SUNSCREEN SUN FABRICATIONS FABR FABRICATIONS FABR

83”

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

MOLD

PART A PART A

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PART A-1PART A-1

PART A-1 ART A, OF THE SUNSCREEN UNIT IS A TWO PART MOLD. GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-1, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

4 ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY

PART A-2 GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-2, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

ALL FIBERGLASS JOIN ALLJOIN FIBERGLASS WITH WITH EVENOF LAYER OFLET RESIN. EVEN LAYER RESIN. THE LET THE COWL CURE OVERNIGHT COWL CURE OVERNIGHT YOU REMOVE BEFORE BEFORE YOU REMOVE IT FROM IT FROM THE MOLD. THE MOLD.

PART B-1 PART B-1 USE TWO PART MOLDING TO MOLD THE FIBERGLASS TO SHAPE.

GROUP G 8 GROUP G 8

5 ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY OF PART OF PART A+B A+B MOLD

PACE/LINE BUILDING

EACH FULL ASSEMBLE UNIT EACH FULL ASSEMBLE UNIT TWO PARTPART A, TWO PART USE TWOUSE PART A, TWO B, AND TWO B, AND TWO FOAM TOFOAM JOIN TO JOIN THETOGETHER PARTS TOGETHER ALL THE ALL PARTS

6 ONE ONE ASSEMBLE ASSEMBLE UNITUNIT A4

EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT 36” XX 9” L 83” EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36”IS XW L 83” H X 9” H

SHEET NO NO. SHEET NO NO.

A4A4

MOLD

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: MOLD

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

MOLD

DOUBLE PANE GLASS

NUT AND BOLT UNITIZED THE SUNSCREEN TOGETHER

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER FOAM

1 A4

PART A-1 ART A, OF THE SUNSCREEN UNIT IS A TWO PART MOLD. GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-1, MOLD USE CNC 3 AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

PART B-1

GEL COAT LAYER SET UP FOR PART A-2, MOLD USE CNC 3 9” AXES MILLING, SINGLE MOLD

DOUBLE PANE GLASS ALUMINUM CASING

PART B-1 PART B-1 USE TWO PART MOLDING TO MOLD THE FIBERGLASS TO SHAPE.

PACE/LINE BUILDING

TITLE:

PART A

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

FIBERGLASS UNIT

PART A-2 9”

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PART A-1

3D Detail

PART A-2 FOAM

SCALE:

PART B

NO SCALE

83”

PART A-2 PART A-1

PART B PART B-2

MOLD

ASSEMBLY JOIN ALL FIBERGLASS WITH EVEN LAYER OF RESIN. LET THE COWL CURE OVERNIGHT BEFORE YOU REMOVE IT FROM THE MOLD.

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

A4 PART A-2

9”

PART A-2

PART B-1

CONCTETE

TITLE:

PART A

PART A-1

83”

ASSEMBLY OF PART A+B EACH FULL ASSEMBLE UNIT USE TWO PART A, TWO PART B, AND TWO FOAM TO JOIN ALL THE PARTS TOGETHER

I-BEAM

CATWALK

SUN SUNSCREEN FABRICATIONS FABR

EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36” X L 83” X 9” H

PART A

FOAM

MOLD

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT (1 OF 6)

1 A5

54”

3D Detail

GROUP 8 G

FOAM

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36” X L 83” X 9” H PART B

SCALE:

SHEET NO NO.

NO SCALE

A4 83”

PART B-2

SUNSCREEN SUN FABRICATIONS FABR

PART A

UNITISED GLAZING FRAME

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PART A-1

GROUP 8 G

90”

3 A4

PART B-1 PART B-1 USE TWO PART MOLDING TO MOLD THE FIBERGLASS TO SHAPE.

PACE/LINE BUILDING

4 A4

ASSEMBLY JOIN ALL FIBERGLASS WITH EVEN LAYER OF RESIN. LET THE COWL CURE OVERNIGHT BEFORE YOU REMOVE IT FROM THE MOLD.

ASSEMBLY OF PART A+B EACH FULL ASSEMBLE UNIT USE TWO PART A, TWO PART B, AND TWO FOAM TO JOIN ALL THE PARTS TOGETHER

ONE ASSEMBLE UNIT EACH FIBERGLASS UNIT IS W 36” X L 83” X 9” H

THERMAL INSULATION

SHEET NO NO.

A4 CATWALL STEEL BEAM SUPPORT

HOUSE A, ENTRY LEVEL

2 A5

ONE UNITIZED PANEL SYSTEM EVERY ONE UNITIZED PANEL HAVE TOTAL OF 6 UNIT OF FIBERGLASS SUNSCREEN. THEY ARE JOIN BY A 53” LONG ROT ON EACH ENDS OF THE PANEL SYSTEM.

3 A5

DOUBLE GLAZE UNIT

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

SPR ING 1 7

TEXTURA FIBRE CEMENT PANEL 5/16”

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SYSTEM

ASSEMBLY DETAIL

Stone veneer panels are attached to a building by using a clipping system on the stone element and the building’s element which will hold the panels. The panels are uniquely marked and each panel

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

veneer panels are assembled in various ways depending on the

GLASS BLOCKS

GLASS BLOCKS Glass blocks can be installed using various binders. Mortar, silicone, vinyl and metal strips are some of the commonly used binders. Mortar binder though easy and cost effective, may vary batch to batch giving an unpolished end result. Silicone, give a complete glass finish, but degrades in sunlight and perfoms poorly if used

GLAZED ALUMINIUM VERTICAL SUPPORT

externally. Vinly stack system is the best of the three, providing greater resistance to external forces, and giving a good finish overall, but it is not a cost effective binder. All these binders maybe used with metal strip in the joints. Glass block allow for a diffused indoor lighting condition.

CONCRETE EXTERIOR PANELING 6’X4’

GLASS STICK SYSTEMS

GLASS STICK SYSTEMS A glass curtain wall consisting of mullions and transomes, assembled in situ is a glass stick system. This system is very common and its performance can be improved based on the choice of

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

DRYWALL

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

materials. Spanning of the elements depens on both aesthetics and structural consideration.

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CEILING PANEL SUBDIVISION

PACE/LINE BUILDING

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

CONS

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

CONS

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

DROP CEILING HANGING POLE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

CONS

CONSULTANTS:

GLAZED ALLUMINIUM GLASS UNIT

APPLIED STUDIES

has to be placed at the correct location of the building. Stone manufacturer. Usually, several layers are attached to each other to form the finished form of a stone panel that will be clipped to a structure. They afford a natural look while being very cost effective and structurally light.

FIRE PROOFING THERMAL COATING WIDE FLANGE STEEL H-BEAMS ALUMINIUM CLADDING

SPRING SEMESTER

STONE CLADDING

INSTRUCTORS: EXTERNAL ALUMINUM FRAME

PROJECT IMPLEMENTION

STONE CLADDING

SPRING SEMESTER

EXTERNAL ALUMINUM FRAME

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

GLASS UNITSED SYSTEMS

GLASS UNITISED SYSTEMS Unitized curtain walls entail factory fabrication and assembly of panels and may include factory glazing. These completed units are hung on the building structure to form the building enclosure. Utilized curtain wall has the advantages of: speed; lower feild installation costs; and quality control within an interior climate controlled environment. The ecomonic benefits are typical realized on latge projects or in areas of high field labor rates.

PEDESTAL ROOF SYSTEM PLATE 6”

Higher precision and greater control can be achieved in this system since the main assembly of the facade is done in controlled

GYPSUM BOARD INSTALLATION

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

PACE/LINE BUILDING

CONS

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

environment. Quick installation is the obvious advantage of this system.

1 A6.3

STEEL FRAMED GLAZING

ANGULAR GLAZE UNIT

STEEL FRAMED GLAZING Steel framing works in similar ways to stick glazing. The members

IRREGULAR SKYLIGHT JOINTS BETWEEN GLAZE PANELS

form a framework in which glass is later installed. However steel

DOUBLE INSULATED 5/16 “ CLEAR GLASS PANEL ALUMINIUM WINDOWS SYSTEM 3700 SERIES WATERPROOFING SYSTEM INSULATION CONCRETE ROOF SLAB CONCRETE SLAB FOR EXTERIOR EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM STEEL FRAME

framing involves use of special assmebly materials like pressure system can be made water-tight by inserting gasket that lines the entire system. These pre-fab joints eliminate the necessity of welding and give a smooth clean finish. Such type of framing works well in case of heavy loads of glass.

TITLE:

3D DETAIL SKYLIGHT 2 A6.2

ROOF CONNECTION DETAIL

NO SCALE

DROP CEILING HANGING POLE 24 “

OVERALL VIEW ROOF SKYLIGHT OPENING DROP CEILING SYSTEM

GROUP 8

STEEL GRID SHELL

PROS

A grid shell is a structure which derives its strength from its double curvature (in a similar way that a fabric structure derives strength from double curvature), but is constructed of a grid or lattice.

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

SCALE:

1’=1/16”

CONS

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

SELECTED MATERIALS

1. Durable 2. Low cost 3. Stable 1. Heavy 2. double curvature

PV PANELS

SPRING SEMESTER INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANELS

DOUBLE GLAZED INSULATED UNIT

TITLE:

GROUP 8

CONS

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

PROS

A6.1

APPLIED STUDIES

CONS

The purpose of a rainscreen system is to keep water out of a building.This system is designed by keeping the cladding separated from the building through the uses of furring strips or a specialized rainscreen products. The rainscreenmight be supported onto the main structure or could be supported by a dedicated structural system. The efficacy of the system depend on the spacing between the cladding and the exterior wall as it can change the way the water penetrate through the structural wall assembly. The popularity of ventilated rainscreen systems have found there favor for Metal Panels.Custom sized metal panels are additionally the natural ventilation adds to the longevity and thermal performance of the façade. Metal panels are favoured due their versitality in finishes, thermal perfomance, cost efficiency and weight.

SHEET NO.

ALUMINIUM GUTTER PLATE

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

SELECTION OF BUILDING ENVELOPE SYSTEM METAL RAINSCREENS

METAL RAINSCREENS

SCALE:

ROOF CONNECTION OF THE ROTATED GLASS UNIT

PROS

plates, shear blocks and caps for joints. Furthermore, a steel framing

PV PANELS

A typical photovoltaic system employs solar panels, each comprising a number of solar cells, which generate electrical power. The fisrt step is the pho toelectric effect followed by an electrochemical process where crystallized atoms, ionized in a series, generate an electric current. PV Installations may be ground-mounted, rooftop mounted or wall mounted.

FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANELS is a composite material made of a polymer matrix reinforced with fibres. The fibres are usually glass, carbon, aramid, or basalt. Rarely, other fibres such as paper or wood or asbestos have been used. The polymer is usually an epoxy, vinylester or polyester thermosetting plastic; phenol formaldehyde resins are still in use.

L -SHAPE COMPOSED ALUMINIUM PLATE

PROJECT IMPLEMENTION

PROJECT SECTION REASONS

PROS

1. Energy Efficient 2. Lasts for the entire lifetime of the building 3. Generated electricity thereby reducing some electric loads

CONS

SHEET NO.

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

PV PANELS ARE ARE CHOSEN THE BUILDING. IT CAN HELP LOWER THE MAINTENANCE COST OF THE BUILDING.

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

1. Is a relatively costly material 2. Not aesthetically appealing

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

CONS

THE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANELS ARE CHOSEN FOR THEIR LIGHT WEIGHT MATERIAL IS SEEMS TO BE FITTED FOR THE WEATHER CONDITION AND FIT OUR DIFFICULT GEOMETRY FOR OUR SUNSCREEN DESIGN.

1. Not durable 2. The finish is prone to fading, scratching and cracking 3. Unstable

UNITIZED STEEL FRAME FOR GLASS

GFRC PANELS

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: ALUMINIUM EXTERNAL PROFILE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE

GFRC PANELS Glass fiber reinforced concrete, also known as GFRC or GRC, is a type of fiber-reinforced concrete. Glass fiber concretes are mainly used in exterior building façade panels and as architectural precast concrete. Somewhat similar materials are fiber cement siding and cement boards. They have a high degree of regulation, hence more control can be

LARGE CAP STEEL SCREW

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

excercised in the finishing.

PROS

1. High fire performance 2. Lasts longer than natural stone 3. Can be customised to a prototypical shape DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

CONS

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

1. It is a labor intesive process and requires skill 2. Cannot be managed on site, requires special facility 3. Requires higher maintenance

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

FIREPROOFING THERMAL COATING FIBER

PACE/LINE BUILDING

WOOD VENEER WITH PLY

WOOD VENEER WITH PLY Wood veneer can be finished with stain, polish or resin to achieve desired aesthetic. Plywood on the other hand can be bent, folded and formed. Although it is malleable, plywood does not have a good finish. Plywood is used in combination with wood veneer to achieve desired finish of the material. They are used in combination to achieve a warm yet modern interior.

PROS

PACE/LINE BUILDING

1. Highly malleable, can be formed to any shape 2. Structurally light 3. Easy to assembel and finish

CONS

1. Poor fire resistance 2. Gets structural attrition over time 3. Infestation is a common problem, and requires rigourous maintenance

WIDE FLANGE STELL I-BEAMS DOUBLE GLAZED INSULATED 5/16 “

GLASS PANELS

PROS

Exterior glass panels are usually made from toughened glass treated for reduction in heat gain, shading, reflectivity. The glass can be customised for panellisation. It comes in a variety of tints, affording various combinations within a single facade.

1. Versatile color pallete, finishes and sizes 2. Easy to Assemble 3. Can be shape formed

TITLE:

CONS

GREAT COLOR SECTION FOR OUR NORTH FACING ENVERLOPE SYSTEM. VERY EASY TO ASSEMBLE COMPARE TO OTHER GLASS PANELS. THESE BRING IN THE LIGHT AND PROVIDE VISUAL RELIEF.

1. Low energy performance 2. Requires insulation and tinting

TITLE:

3D DETAIL SKYLIGHT FAIR-FACED CONCRETE

SCALE:

Fair faced concrete requires no finish upon taking down the down the formwork required to cast the concrete. Fair faced concrete requires high level of workmanship from casting of concrete to dismantling of formwork, to ensure good quality finish. The con crete takes on the finish of the surface used for from work, hence there is virtually no limit to the type of finishes the concrete can take on.

NO SCALE ANGULAR GLAZE UNIT

GROUP 8

1 A6.3

ANGULAR GLAZE UNIT IRREGULAR SKYLIGHT JOINTS BETWEEN GLAZE PANELS

SHEET NO.

A6.3

FAIR-FACED CONCRETE

STEEL

STEEL SUB FRAMES Sub frame is a structural component and usually support the finish frame. A framework supporting wall siding or panels.

SELECTION OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND FINISHES

PROS

1. High fire performance 2. Lasts for the entire lifetime of the building 3. Can be cast into any shape

CONS

1. Takes long time to cure, prolonging the construction process 2. Casting is labour intensive 3. Finish of fair faced concrete cannot be changed post curing

FAIR FACED CONCRETE IS USED IN THE INTERIORS AS WELL AS THE EXTERIORS. THE MAIN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS LIKE THE CORES AND COLUMNS AND OTHER EXTRIOR ELEMENTS ARE FINISHED IN FAIR FACED CONCRETE. HIGH FIRE PERFORMANCE AND LOW MAINTENANCE COST. THIS WILL BE CAST FOR THE INTERAL VOLUME WALL.

SCALE:

1’=1/16”

SELECTED MATERIALS

PROS

1. Light weight 2. Low cost 3. Can form difficult geometry

CONS

1. Not durable 2. Requires on site welding 3. time consuming

STEEL FEATURES EXLCUSIVELY AS A STRUCTURAL MATERIAL. SUB FRAME IS NEEDED AT ALL LEVEL OF THE BUILDING AS A STRUCTURAL COMPONENT. ONSITE WELDING IS REQUIRED BUT IT IS THE PERFECT FIT FOR THE BUILDING.

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

SPR ING 1 7

TRANSBAY B

PARKING ENTRANCE

STAIR 1: WIDTH: 3’6’’ CAPACITY: 210 PEOPLE

PARKING EXIT

STAIR 2: WIDTH: 3’6’’ CAPACITY: 210 PEOPLE

TRANSBAY ENTRANCE 1

ELEVATORS ENTRANCE

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

FREIGHT ELEVATOR

ATRIUM

PUBLIC AREA

LEVEL 10: FLOOR AREA: 13630 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: A2 OCCUPANCY LOAD: 1200

Natoma St.

Minna St.

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

ATRIUM

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

ELEVATORS ENTRANCE

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

3 A11

LEVEL 9 FLOOR AREA: 14820 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 140

STREET ENTRANCE

LEVEL 8 FLOOR AREA: 13200 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 130

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

2nd St.

LEVEL 5 FLOOR AREA: 11300 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 110 LEVEL 4 FLOOR AREA: 10400 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 100

8'-0"

LEVEL 7 FLOOR AREA: 12570 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B & A2 OCCUPANCY LOAD: 120 LEVEL 6 FLOOR AREA: 12230 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 120

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

18'-0"

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

LEVEL 3 FLOOR AREA: 13630 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: B OCCUPANCY LOAD: 130

PARKING PLAN LEVEL 1

A11

60"

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

11'-0"

ADA PARKING SPACE

3 A11

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 FLOOR AREA: 13700 SF

5'-0" DIA.

TITLE:

EGRESS

ADA

BABY CHANGING STATION 30"x48"

36" MIN.

LEVEL 1 FLOOR AREA: 14000 SF OCCUPANCY TYPE: A2 OCCUPANCY LOAD: 1200

36" MIN. 34" MIN.

SINK CLEARANCE 30"x48"

SCALE:

36" MIN.

30" MIN.

5'-0" MIN

EGRESS STAIR & PATHWAYS

6" MAX. 36" MIN.

42" MIN.

12" MAX.

1’=1/8”

ADA PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC WAY

ADA ACCESS FROM PARKING

1 A9

AREA OF REFUGE 30"x48"

SHEET NO. 4 A9

5'-0" DIA.

GROUP 8

EGRESS DIAGRAM

NINTH FLOOR PLAN

CORE/ ATRIUM

36" MIN.

60" MIN.

5'-0" DIA.

ADA REQUIREMENTS

ADA PATH OF TRAVEL

GROUP 8

A11

36" MIN.

SHEET NO.

ADA ELEVATOR AND BATHROOM

A11

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

OFFICE

1’=1/16”

16-18"

SCALE:

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

GALLERY

3 HR SEPARATION

LOBBY

3 HR SEPARATION

1 HR SEPARATION

AUDITORIUM / PARKING

OFFICE

ROOF

FAMILY A

196’-6”

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: LEVEL - 10

1 A10

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

178’-6”

FIRE SEPARATION DIAGRAM AXON

FAMILY C LEVEL - 9

NO. ITEM

160’-6”

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

LEVEL - 8 142’-6”

SOLID CONCRETE VARIES FROM 2.5” TO 7” IN FACE TO FACE FINISH THICKNESS, DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF AGGREGATE USE AND ON THE REQUIRED FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING 1 TO 4 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING

SOLID GYPSUM PLASTER NONBEARING PARTITION: 3/4” COLD-ROLLED CHANNELS @ 16” ON CENTER WITH METAL LATH ON ONE FACE AND PERLITE OR VERMICULATE GYPSUM PLASTER EACH SIDE

FAMILY A LEVEL - 7

3 HR SEPARATION

124’-6”

VARIES FROM 2” TO 2.5” IN FACE-TO-FACE FINISH THICKNESS

1 A12

LEVEL - 6

PACE/LINE BUILDING

UNROLLED GLASS

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: 88,514 SF

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

SLABS

TRUSS AND STRUCTURAL CORES RATE

QUANTITY

UNIT TOTAL

1 BASEMENT

$240.00

4,380.00 CY

$1,051,200.00

3 CORE - ABOVE GROUND

$120.00

51,000.00 SF

$6,120,000.00

4 CORE - BELOW GROUND

$190.00

8,000.00 SF

$1,520,000.00

5 MEGA TRUSS

$120.00

5,000.00 FT

$600,000.00

TOTAL PROJECT COST

$9,291,200.00

NO. ITEM

RATE R A TE

1 STEEL FRA FRAME AME DECKIN DECKING NG 2 CAST CONCRETE

QUANTITY

$75.00

403.00 SF

$100.00

3 FINISHING 4 VOLUME SHELL

UNIT T TOTAL O TA L $30,225.00 0

320.00 SF

CONSULTANTS:

$32,000.00

$50.00

110.00 SF

$5,500.00

$1.50

200,000.00 SF

$300,000.00

TOTAL PROJECT COST

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

$367,725.00

PACE/LINE BUILDING

FAMILY A

106’-6”

1 TO 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING GALLERY

LEVEL - 5 88’-6”

FAMILY B

2 A10

1 HR SEPARATION

WALL AND PARTITION ASSEMBLIES FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION

LEVEL - 4 60’-6”

CLASS A OR B ROOF COVERING 2 1/4” PERLITE CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCED WITH WIRE MESH

LOBBY

1 1/4” DEEP STEEL ROOF DECK SIPPORTED ON INDIVIDUALLY PROTECTED STEEL DRAMING

FAMILY A

LEVEL - 3 30’-10”

TITLE: LEVEL - 2 15’-0”

2-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING

GROUND

TITLE:

FIRE AND SAFETY

FAMILY A

NO CEILING

COST SPEC

2ND ST.

0’-0”

SCALE:

NO SCALE

2 A12

FIRE SEPARATION

CLASS A OR B ROOF COVERING INSULATION BOARD OF WOOD FIBERS WITH CEMENT BINDER BONDED TO DECK

NO. ITEM

3 A10

WALL AND PARTITION ASSEMBLIES FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION

2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING

DETAIL

RATE

QUANTITY

UNIT TOTAL

1 TRUSS AND STRUCTURAL CORES

$9,291,200.00

2 SLABS

$118,575,000.00

4 FAÇADE SYSTEM 5 MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

AUDITORIUM / PARKING

4 A10

SMOKE - CONTROL SYSTEM ELEVATION

SHEET NO.

A10

NO. ITEM

RATE

QUANTITY

UNIT TOTAL

1 I-BEAMS

$4,500.00

1,030.00 TN

$4,635,000.00

2 PRIMARY COLUMNS

$5,000.00

345.50 TN

$1,727,500.00

3 VOLUME STEEL STRUCTURE

$4,500.00

393.00 TN

$1,768,500.00

TOTAL PROJECT COST

$8,131,000.00

NO. ITEM 1 FIBERGLASS FAÇADE

RATE

QUANTITY

6 FINISHES

UNIT TOTAL

$4.00

329,227.00 SF

$1,316,908.00

2 FAÇADE STRUCTURAL STEEL

$57.88

10,000.00 SF

$578,800.00

3 TYPICAL GLAZING SYSTEM

$50.00

88,514.00 SF

$4,425,700.00

TOTAL PROJECT COST

$6,321,408.00 HVAC FIRE SUPRESSION

FAÇADE SYSTEM

STEEL STRUCTURE

$6,321,408.00

INTERIOR FINISH AND DRYWALL

$40.00

165,000.00 SF

$5.00

22,358.75 SF

$50.00

146,524.00 SF

SHELL COST

$6,600,000.00 $111,793.75 $7,326,200.00

GROUP 8

$148,293,326.75

LAND COST SOFT COST

PROJECT COST

$67,725.00

3 STRUCTURAL STEEL

GROUP 8

NO SCALE

TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: 88 88,514 514 SF

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST

1 1/2” DEEP STEEL ROOF DECK ON STEEL FRAMING 3/4” THICK CEILING OF GYPSUM PLASTER OVER METAL LATH ATTACHED TO 2” CHANNELS @36” ON CENTER AND SUSPENDED WITH WIRE HANGERS AT 26” ON CENTER

FACADE

$880.00

18,910.00 SF

@18%

$16,640,800.00 $29,688,142.82

TOTAL PROJECT COST

$194,622,269.57 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT

129,480.00 SF $1,503.11

SHEET NO.

A12

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

SPR ING 1 7

TRANSBAY

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PARKING ENTRANCE

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PARKING EXIT TRANSBAY ENTRANCE ROOF

FAMILY A

196’-6”

LEVEL - 10 178’-6”

ELEVATORS ENTRANCE

FAMILY C LEVEL - 9

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

160’-6” FREIGHT ELEVATOR

ATRIUM

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

LEVEL - 8

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

142’-6”

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

PUBLIC AREA

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

FAMILY A LEVEL - 7 124’-6”

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

FAMILY A

106’-6”

PACE/LINE BUILDING

LEVEL - 5 88’-6”

FAMILY B

LEVEL - 4 60’-6”

Natoma St.

Minna St.

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

ATRIUM

PASSENGER ELEVATOR

ELEVATORS ENTRANCE

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

LEVEL - 6

PACE/LINE BUILDING

FAMILY A

LEVEL - 3 30’-10”

TITLE:

LEVEL - 2

SECTION

15’-0”

GROUND

SCALE:

TITLE:

FAMILY A

SITE PLAN

2ND ST.

0’-0”

1’=1/8”

SCALE:

GROUN FLOOR PLAN

STREET ENTRANCE

WEST SECTION

GROUP 8

PEDESTRAIN SIDEWALK

1’=1/16”

GROUP 8

SHEET NO.

A13

2nd St.

SHEET NO.

A15

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

ROOF

196’-6”

LEVEL - 9 178’-6”

3 LEVEL - 8 160’-6”

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

LEVEL - 6

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

LEVEL - 7 142’-6”

124’-6”

PACE/LINE BUILDING

LEVEL - 5

FIBERGLASS SUNSCREENSYSTEM

106’-6”

STEEL CATWALK

LEVEL - 4 88’-6”

UNITIZED, DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM LEVEL - 3 60’-6”

SPANDREL GLASS

LEVEL - 2

TITLE: 7

TITLE:

30’-10”

ELEVATION

TYPICAL PLAN LEVEL - 1 15’-9”

SCALE:

1’=1/8”

GROUND 0’-0”

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

ELEVATION

A16

SCALE: 1’=1/16

1’=1/16”

2ND ST.

WEST ELEVATION

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

A14

A16

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

SPR ING 1 7

APPLIED STUDIES

PARAPET 42”

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER DOUBLE GLASS UNIT 16 MM

INSTRUCTORS: METAL FLASHING

PEDESTAL SYSTEM

CONCRETE ROOF SLAB EXTERNAL SPANDREL

SPRING SEMESTER INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

CONCRETE SLAB CONNECTION

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE

H-BEAM CONTAINER

DETAIL SKYLIGHT

ROOF CONNECTIONS

A19

INTERNAL INSULATION LAYER ALUMIUM COMPOSED UNIT

PEDESTAL SYSTEM 4” BASE

STEEL SLAB CONNECTOR DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

ELECTRIC CHANNEL ELECTRIC CHANNEL

ROOF CONCRETE SLAB

INSULATION 12”

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

VERTICAL MULION SYSTEM CONCRETE SLAB PAVEMENT

GLASS DOUBLE GLAZE UNIT FIBERGLASS SKIN PANELS

300 I BEAM

1 A7

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

CONCRETE SLAB

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

GENERAL PERIMETER CONFIGURATION

PACE/LINE BUILDING

DETAIL FACADE SKIN FABRICATION + APPLICATION

INSULATION PANEL

CONSULTANTS:

SKIN + GLASS SYSTEM

3 A20

ALUMINIUM DROP CEILING HANGING POLE

METAL DECKING

PACE/LINE BUILDING

H-BEAM 300 SUPPORT GYPSUM BOARD CLADDING

CATWALK STEEL SUPPORT CONCRETE PANEL 6’X4’ SIDEWALK STEEL WALKWAYS

SCREW CONNECTORS BETWEEN BEAMS

TITLE:

2D DETAIL SKYLIGHT

2D WALL SECTION

INSULATION LAYER

EXTERNAL SLOPE PEDISTAL

SCALE:

1:50

ELECTRIC CABLE CHANNEL

ROOF TYPICAL FLOOR GROUNDFLOOR BASEMENT

TROUP DE LOUP

BASEMENT CONCRETE OPERABLE UNDERGROUND GLAZE UNIT SYSTEM

ROOF CONNECTION DROP CEILING SYSTEM

GROUP 8 WATER COLLECTOR

SKYLIGHT BOTTOM CONNECTION

A6.2

THE SKYLIGHT IS COMPOSED BY A STRONG STEEL STRUCTURE BEING A 15 FEET TALL GLASS CAGE LOCATED ON THE TOP OF THE BUILDING BETWEEN THE LAST FLOOR AND THE LIVING ROOF.

A17

DOUBLE GLAZED UNIT 16MMX3

A19

CEILING PANELS

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

MULLION SUPPORT VERTICAL SYSTEM

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

UNITIZED GLAZING FRAME SYSTEM

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

SHEET NO.

SKIN INTERNAL STEEL FRAME 2”

1:20

ELECTRIC CABLE CHANNEL

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

ALUMINIUM PROFILE GLAZING UNIT

CATWALK HANDRAIL

WATERPROOF MEMBRANE

INSULATION LAYER

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT ALUMINIUM CHANNEL WATER PROTECTOR INSULATION MEMBRANE ALUMINIUM PROFILE CAP

ALUMINIUM PROFILE GLAZED UNIT INSULATOR GASKET

FLOORING CONCRETE SLAB

EXTERNAL STEEL CATWALK

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

ALUMINIUM ENVELOPE

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

HORIZONTAL ALUMIUNM UNIT

I BEAM-CATWALK SUPPORT JOINT SKIN CIRCULAR SUPPORT SCREW CONNECTOR

CATWALK STEEL SUPPORT BEAM

FIRE PROOF THERMAL COATING FOR METAL BEAUTY CAP

TITLE:

2D DETAILS SPANDREL GLASS

3D MEGA CHUNK

DOUBLE GLASS UNIT 16MM

SCALE:

NO SCALE

1:10

INSULATION

FACADE SYSTEM WITH SKIN

UNITIZED GLAZING FRAME SYSTEM

GROUP 8 I BEAM 300

FIBERGLASS PANEL UNIT HEATING SYSTEM PIPE

DROP CEILING SUPPORT ELECTRIC CABLE PIPE

ALUMINIUM ENVELOPE

2 A6.3

ANGULAR SKYLIGHT CONNECTION STEEL STRUCTURAL CONNECTION WITH I BEAMS AND GLAZED UNITS.

SHEET NO.

A18

ANGULAR ALUMINIUM JOINT

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

STRUCTURAL H-BEAM

A20

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

SPR ING 1 7

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

APPLIED STUDIES

SAN FRANCISCO HAS MOIST MILD WINTERS AND DRY SUMMERS. THE NORTHERN END OF THE PENISULA IS SRROUNDED BY THREE SIDES OF COLD WATERS. SUMMERS ARE CHARACTERIZED BY COOL MARINE AIR AND PERSISTENT COASTAL STRATUS AND FOG WITH AVERAGE TEMPERATURES BETWEEN 60F-70F. WARMER WEATHER CAN BE FOUND FARTHUR FROM THE COAST. WINTERS ARE QUITE TEMPERATE WITH HIGHS BETWEEN 55F-60F. AND LOWS BETWEEN 45F-50F. THERE IS GENERALLY A WINTERTIME FOG THAT COVERS SAN FRANCISCO’S GREAT VALLEY. THERE IS RARE CHANCES OF RAINFALL FROM MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER. MOST OF SAN FRANCISCO’S RAIN FALLS BETWEEN NOVEMBER AND MARCH. SPRING AND FALL USUALLY PRODUCED THE MOST CLOUD FREE DAYS.

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE

INSTRUCTORS:

KWH/M2

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

PSYCHROMETRIC CHART SAN FRANCISCO INTL AP_CA_USA 1 JAN 1:00 - 31 DEC 24:00

110 kJ/kg 90% 80%

LEVELM4- 2

60%

50%

15’-0”

GROUND

591.96

40%

INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

FAMILY A

LEVEL - 10 178’-6”

0.03 70%

100 kJ/kg

SPRING SEMESTER

FAMILY A

ROOF 196’-6”

657.71

FAMILY C LEVEL - 9 160’-6”

0’-0”

2ND ST.

LEVEL - 8 142’-6” FAMILY A

LEVEL - 7 124’-6”

526.19 0.025

90 kJ/kg

HUMIDITY RATIO

LEVEL - 6 106’-6”

HOURS

460.42

285.00<=

394.64

256.50

328.87

LEVEL - 3 30’-10”

228.00

263.09

GROUND 0’-0”

199.50

197.32

171.00

131.55

FAMILY A

LEVEL - 5 88’-6”

FAMILY B

30% 80 kJ/kg 0.02 70 kJ/kg

60 kJ/kg 0.015

20% 50 kJ/kg

142.50

40 kJ/kg 0.01

10%

0.005 10 kJ/kg

57.00

0 kJ/kg -10 kJ/kg

-20

-15

28.50 -10

-5

DRY BULB TEMPERATURE

4 M1

<=0.00

NORTHWEST

NORTH VIEW

NORTHEAST SOLAR RADIATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO INTL AP_CA_USA 1 JUN 1:00 - 31 AUG 24:00

THE PSYCHROMETRIC CHART SHOWS SAN FRANCISCO IS WARM TO COOL. THIS KIND OF WEATHER IS SUITABLE FOR NATURAL VENTILATION. HOWEVER, IT IS WISE TO USE NATURAL VENTILATION ONLY PARTIALLY, TO AVOID HEATING IN SUMMER.

KEY SECTION

WALL DETAILS

STC 50 WALL SECTION DETAIL

70.00 68.40

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS: MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

AIRCRAFT NOISE

MAR

FEB

APR

2 M1

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

65.20

DRY BULB TEMPERATURE

63.60

THE DRY BULB TEMPERATURE SHOWS THE WARMEST MONTHS ARE JUNE THROUGH SEPTEMBER. THE WIND ROSE SHOWS AN ANALYSIS OF THE WIND DURING THE WARMEST MONTHS.

62.00

FAMILY A

60.40

58.80

N F

NNW

69.08

NNE

WNW

62.76

ENE

54.00

27.74 24.27

60.66

58.55

56.44

ESE

WSW

52.23

WEATHER AND RAIN NOISE

TITLE:

SCALE:

MAX WIND LOAD

48.02

SW SSW

S WIND-ROSE SAN FRANCISCO INTL AP_CA_USA 1 JUN 1:00 - 30 SEP 24:00 HOURLY DATA: WIND SPEED (MPH) CALM FOR 3.31% OF THE TIME = 97 HOURS. EACH CLOSED POLYLINE SHOWS FREQUENCY OF 2.9%. = 83 HOURS.

SUN-PATH DIAGRAM THE SUN PATH DEMONSTRATES THE AZIMUTH AND THE ALTITUDE OF THE SUN THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. WE CAN SEE THAT THE SUMMER SUN HAS A HIGH ALTITUDE, HENCE A LARGER AZIMUTH.

SCALE:

NO SCALE

FAMILY C

1’=1/8”

17.34

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

10.40

ACOUSTICS & CONSTRUCTION TYPE

DOUBLE PANE INSULATED GLASS PARTITION

3.47

SSE

ACOUSTICS

6.93

50.13

TITLE:

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

20.80

13.87

54.34

55.60

34.67

31.21

64.87

57.20

MPH

66.97

SUN-PATH DIAGRAM- LATITUDE: 37.62 HOURLY DATE: DRY BULB TEMPERATURE (F) SAN FRANCISCO INTL AP_CA_USA

PACE/LINE BUILDING

66.80 JAN

DRY BULB TEMPERATURE (F) - HOURLY 1 JAN 1:00 - 31 DEC 24:00

STC 50 WALL SECTION DETAIL

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

6 PM

6 AM

INSULATED SUSPENDED CEILING DETAIL

CONSULTANTS:

12 PM

ELEVATION

KEY SECTION

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

PHOTOVOLTAIC PERFORMANCE

MATERIAL: CRYSTALLINE SILICON ANGLE: 37.6° PV ZONE AREA: 1550 SF = 144 M2 SOLAR PANEL EFFICIENCY: 15.5% ANNUAL AVERAGE SOLAR RADIATION: 1910 KWH/M2 PERFORMANCE RATIO: 0.75 ANNUAL ENERGY OUTPUT: 31973.4 KWH PEAK CAPACITY: 23 KW

THE SOUTH-WEST FACADE RECEIVE LARGE AMOUNT OF SUNLGITH DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS. THE ROOF SHOWS TO BE AN IDEAL LOCATION FOR PV.

ELEVATIONS

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

12 AM

1 M4

SOUTHEAST

SOLAR RADIATION ANALYSIS

PSYCHROMETRIC CHART

SOUTH VIEW

SOUTHWEST

FAMILY A LEVEL - 2 13’-9”

0.00

MAX SOLAR GAIN

85.50

20 kJ/kg

FAMILY A

65.77

114.00

30 kJ/kg

LEVEL - 4 60’-6”

EXHAUST FAN NOISE

GROUP 8

0.00

GROUP 8 STC 30 WALL

3 M1

WIND-ROSE

SHEET NO.

THE WIND-ROSE SHOWS THAT A MAJORITY OF THE WIND BETWEEN JUNE AND SEPTEMBER WILL BE COMING IN FROM THE WEST DIRECTION.

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VENTILATION

ACOUSTIC

SECTION

APPLIED STUDIES

SHEET NO.

AUDITORIUM PLAN

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS:

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

STC 50 WALL

APPLIED STUDIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DAYLIGHTING FOR BUILDINGS IN WARMER CLIMATES RECIEVE MORE ANNUAL SUNLIGHT.FROM THE SOLAR ANALYSIS WE CAN CONCLUDED THE DAYLIGHT IS DRAWN TO THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. A SECONDARY SKIN IS CREATED ON THOSE SIDES OF THE BUILDING TO HELP PREVENT GLARES AND INTERNAL TEMPRATURES FROM INCREASING. PROGRAMMINGS THAT REQUIRE OR CAN BENFIT FROM DAYLIGHT WILL BE PLACED AROUND THE RIM.

ACOUSTIC

FAMILY A

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

M2 1 NATURAL VENTILATION

SUN EXPOSURE

MORE OPEN SHADING PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL MATERIAL: CRYSTALLINE SILICON ANGLE: 37.6°

BRANCH DUCTS

PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLATION AND DETAIL

DIFFUSERS

VERTICAL RETURN AIR DUCT F

VERTICAL SUPPLY AIR DUCT

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: NE EXPOSURE

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

SW EXPOSURE

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

SECOND DENSEST SHADING

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

HIGH PERFORMANCE LOW-E GLASS U-VALUE: 0.28 SHGC: 0.25

PACE/LINE BUILDING

PLAN VIEW WITH ZONING

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

60% FRIT GLASS U-VALUE: 0.47 SHGC: 0.18

CATWALL SHADING

CHAMFERED CEILING FOR INCREASED DAYLIGHTING

HVAC

VISION GLASS U-VALUE: 0.48 SHGC: 0.30

DENSEST SHADING THIRD DENSEST SHADING

2 M5

PHOTOSENSOR HVAC

A.H.U: 30,000 CFM

WIND EXPOSURE

GLAZING INFORMATION

MECHANICAL FLOOR: 2ND LEVEL

A.H.U 1; 600 SQ.F D

A.H.U 2; 600 SQ.F

RETRACTABLE BLINDS

TITLE:

OPERABLE WINDOWS

MOTION SENSOR LIGHTING

PREVAILING WIND

VISION ZONE

SCALE:

GLARE ZONE

5 M2

SECTION DETAIL

1’=1/8”

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VENTILATION

3 M2

TITLE:

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS

A.H.U 3; 600 SQ.F

HVAC

A.H.U 4; 600 SQ.F

SCALE:

ELECTICAL ROOM; 36 SQ.F G

IT ROOM; 36 SQ.F

1’=1/8” 1’=1/16”

HVAC SYSTEM & DISTRIBUTION

WIND PROTECTION

TITLE 24 CODE ANALYSIS

T24 CLIMATE ZONE: 3 ROOF MAXIMUM U-VALUE: 0.041 (2016 STANDARDS) WALL MAXIMUM U-VALUE: 0.061 (2016 STANDARDS) VERTICAL GLASS MAXIMUM U-VALUE: 0.41, 0.46 FOR OPERABLE (2016 STANDARDS) SKYLIGHT GLASS MAXIMUM U-VALUE: 0.46 (DECK MOUNTED, 2016 STANDARDS)

1 M2

SECTION WITH VENTILATION AND DAYLIGHTING

GROUP 8

GROUP 8 2

SHEET NO.

HVAC SECOND FLOOR PLAN

HVAC

MECHANICAL ROOM @ LEVEL 2: 4 AHU’S @ 30,000 CFM EACH 2 RISERS @ 36 SQ.F EACH (6’X6’) ELECTRICAL ROOM @ 36 SQ.F EACH IT ROOM @ 36 SQ.F EACH

SHEET NO.

E RIC A L I

STEEL FRAMING

SYSTEM DETAIL

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

SYSTEM SYSTEM DEFINITIONS POST & BEAM Post and beam construction is the most usual and widely employed type of steel system. It is widely employed in construction of simple buildings that have a pre-dominant grid system. The column centre-centre distance can vary between 30ft-60ft. This type of construction supports a steel deck slab.

TRUSS SYSTEMS

1. Fast construction and light weight 2. Can span longer spans with ease 3. Excellent for large roofs and spans where showing / formwork would be unfeasible 4. Allows for a great degree of flexibility in structural joints in terms design 5. Structural members can be pre-fabricated to precision and assembled on site with ease

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPACE FRAME

SPAN

GRID SHELL:

Grid shells don’t have specific span and are based on formal stability.

POST & BEAM

PROS

FLAT PLATE

Flat plate construction can take larger spans. This type of construction involves beamless spaces, and pre-tension slabs. This system is used in the parking lot and the office floors in the courthouse

LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM MOMENT FRAME Moment-resisting frame is a rectilinear assemblage of beams and columns, with the beams rigidly connected to the columns. Resistance to lateral forces is provided primarily by rigid frame, that is, by the development of bending moment and shear force in the frame members and joints.

BRACED FRAME

A braced frame is a structural system which is designed primarily to resist wind and earthquake forces. Members in a braced frame are designed to work in tension and compression, similar to a truss. Braced frames are almost always composed of steel members

CONCRETE SHEAR WALL

Shear walls are a type of structural system that provides lateral resistance to a building or structure. They resist in-plane loads that are applied along its height.

SPRING SEMESTER

HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

STEEL BEAMS

ALLOW STABLE SUPPORT BY EVEN OUT THE STRESS FROM OTHER FLOORS.

HSSHOLLOW STEEL

DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY: DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS: CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

CONCRETE FRAMING Post and beam construction is widely used in many buildings. The column spans used are between 30-45 ft.

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

INSTRUCTORS:

Beam and Post System: 30 ft - 60 ft Trusses: 60 ft - 120 ft Trusses can be 2D or 3D. Bridge: 120ft and above

GRID SHELL

APPLIED STUDIES

SPRING SEMESTER

ALLOW LARGE ROOF AND SPANS

CONS

1.Requires fire-proofing & is susceptible to corrosion and other weathering 2. Generally requires deeper floor construction & dynamics can be tricky 5. Requires precision to a large extent 6. Can be costly in terms of custom made members 7. Requires maintenance at regular intervals to avoid corrosion

D E S I G N D E VE L OP ME N T

APPLIED STUDIES

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

PROS

THere are 2 types of trusses, a 2D flat truss and a 3D truss that resembles space frame modules. A 3D truss usually takes longer spans than a 2D truss. Truss systems usually are employed with other truss or steel posts. 2D trusses span the outer side of courthouse. 3D truss are used to support the skin structure.

Space frames is a three-dimensional structural framework that is designed to behave as an integral unit and to withstand loads applied at any point. It can be crafted with any type of a prototypical unit.

SPR ING 1 7

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

1. Readily available material 2. It is extremely strong and durable and works well in compressive loads 3.Can take on any surface finish 4. It can be formed to any shape 5. Is a fire resistant material

PACE/LINE BUILDING

CONS

1. It is a comparatively heavy material. 2. Slower construction, as concrete needs to be cast and cured 3. More columns than steel, generally 4. It is a labor intensive material, thus contributing to higher costs Spans Beams 30ft- 60ft Slabs = 20ft- 30ft Box girders = +120 Ft

TITLE:

PROS

1. Provides flexibility for architectural design and layout

TITLE:

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SELECTION

Cons

1. Has greater deflection and drift 2. Produces localized stress concentrations at rigid joints 3. Requires care in erection of connections in order to resist lateral loads properly

STRUCTURAL PRIMARY

SCALE:

1’=1/16”

1’=1/8”

PROS

1. Can be located internally or externally for flexibility 2. Accommodates service penetrations 3. Can be located within partition walls

SELECTED SYSTEMS

Cons

1. Bracings obstruct fenestration layout 2. Need for large gusset plates for connections between members

PROS

1. Cost efficient since only a few shear walls are required 2. Can provide torsional resistance to structure if symmetrical 3. Will not obstruct architectural layout

Cons

1. Produce concentrated stress in the walls since the walls support the whole building’s lateral stability 2. Produce large effects of overturning on shear walls

STRUCTURE FRAMING

GRID STEEL BEAM:

STRUCTURE FRAMING

18X76 STEEL I BEAM

THIS SYSTEM PROVIDES STABLE CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM AND COST EFFECTIVE, SO RESOURCES CAN BE RELOACATED TO THE FACADE SYSTEM

STEEL FRAMING IS HIVE’S PRIMARY STRUCTURE. WITH THE STUSS SYSTEM ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND POST AND BEAMS ACCROSS ALL FLOORS. THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF TRUSSES USE IN THIS SYSTEM. 2D TRUSS SYSTEM USE TO SPAN THE OUTER EDGE OF THE BUILDING TOWARD THE CORE. THE LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM WE USE CONCRETE SHEAR WALL AS OUR PRIMARY SYSTEM.

COLUMN: HSSHOLLOW STEEL

GROUP 8

PROJECT SYSTEM SUMMARY

SHEET NO.

GROUP 8

18X18 (5/8) STEEL COLUMN

SHEET NO.

APPLIED STUDIES DESIGN DEVELOPM DEVELOPMENT

APPLIED STUDIES

SPRING SEMESTER

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SPRING SEMESTER

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTN BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

INSTRUCTORS: HERWIG BAUMGARTNER SCOTT URIU

STABILITY CORES GFRC SKIN

ALUMINIUM CATWALL

DESIGN AND DRAF DRAFTED BY: DESIGN AND DRAFTED BY:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADE EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

MULLION HORIZONTAL SYSTEM

CONSULTANTS:

SEPIDEH EMAMZADEHEI ALESSIO GRANCINI ERICA LI HAOTAO WANG

CONSULTANTS:

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

MULLION VERTICAL SYSTEM

PACE/ PACE/LINE BUILDING BUILD

MATTHEW MELNYK JAMEY LYZUN

PACE/LINE BUILDING

STEEL MEGA-TRUSS PLATFORM

TITLE: CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB

HSSHOLLOW STEEL

1 S2

PRIMARY STRUCTURE SYSTEM BASEMENT : FLAT PLATE SLAB

SLOPED FOAM

A FLAT PLATE SLAB IS A REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM UTILIZING A SLAB OF UNIFORM THICKNESS

CONCRETE SLAB

CONCRETE SHAER WALL IS A RIGID, VERTICAL DIAPHRAGM DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND AND TRANSFER LATERAL FORCES

CONCRETE COLUMN

CORES: CONCRETE SHEAR WALL

FLOOR GRID: STEEL BEAM

TITLE:

STRUCTU STRUCTURAL PRIMA PRIMARY SCALE:

DESIGNED TO BEHAVE AS AN INTEGRAL UNIT AND TO WITHSTAND LOADS

CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATION

GROUP 8 GROU

18”X18” CONCRETE COLUMN

SUPPORTING COLUMNS: HSSHOLLOW STEEL 18”X18” HOLLOW SQUARE STEEL COLUMNS

1’=1/8”

GRAVITAT GRAVITATIONAL FORC FORCES

18X76 STEEL IBEAMS

SUPER TRUSS PLATFORM

SCALE:

1’=1/8” 1’=1/

FOUNDATION: CONCRETE ”RAFT” FOUNDATION SUPPORTING TRUSS: TWO-WAY SPANNING

BASEMENT COLUMNS: CONCRETE COLUMNS

STRUCTURAL AXO SECONDARY

SHEET NO.

GLAZING SYSTEM 1

GLAZING SYSTEM

ENVELOPE SYSTEM: GFRC SKIN STEEL PIPE JOINT (4” DIAMETER) ALUMINIUM HANDRAIL ALUMINIUM CATWALK CATWALK SUPPORT(I BEAM PROTRUTED) MULLION VERTICAL SYSTEM MULLION HORIZONTAL SYSTEM

GROUP 8 SHEET NO.

E RIC A L I

A PPLI ED ST UDIES

BEIJING

FA L L 1 6

E N VI R ON ME N TAL S YS T E M I I

INSTR U C TO R :

DE SIG N AN E NV IRO NME NTAL F RIE NDLY BUIL DING IN BE IJ ING

R us s el l Fortmey er R andy Jeff ers on

CUBE

environment base design building

GROUP # 4 Erica Li, Jon Gregurick, Kate Ham, Saeed Kayyani, Alessio Grancini Fall 2016 Instructors: Russell Fortmeyer & Randy Jefferson

Double height, green indoor roof space.

Roof apertures angled toward direct southern sun.

Southern facade.

Green “shelfs” on every floor, protruding into atrium.

Main entry point, sout east corner.

Axonometric Section The building utilizes a central atrium to bring light into the middle of the space on every floor. The central atrium also doubles a green space, on which plants are placed on the protruding “shelfs”. In addition to the green space, an indoor roof garden is created to mitigate the Beijing’s normally polluted outside air. The green spaces serve to enhance the natural air quality, filter water collected from the exterior, and improve the overall experience of the building. The roof facade has large apertures angled toward the south west sun, taking advantage of the most direct sunlight.

B eiji n g e xp e r i e n c e s 2 2 6 s u n n y days a year ( 62%) , w i t h t h e s u n n i es t m o n th s bei n g O cto b e r t h ro u g h J a n uary an d th e cl o u di es t m on t h s M a y t h ro u g h S eptem ber. T h i s i s m ost l y d u e t o t h e c i t y’s h u m i d co n ti n en tal clim a t e z o n e i n w h i c h th ere are two pred o m i n a n t w e a t h e r patter n s : s evere, dry w in t e r s a n d h o t , h u m id an d wet s u m m ers . The S o u t h a n d E a s t f acades o f o u r pro po s ed bu ild i n g e xp e r i e n c e s t h e g reates t s o l ar load s , p a r t i c u l a r l y d u ri n g th e wi n ter (Ju l y – A ugu s t ) w h e n t h e S u n i s at i ts h i g h es t, m o s t direc t a l t i t u d e ; a l l o w i ng m o re s u n l i g h t to s h ine d i re c t l y o n t o t h e en ti rety o f th e s u rf ace

are o f b oth the South a nd Ea st fa c a d e s (sun path dia gra ms). Ad d itiona lly a c omb ina tions o f f actors, c hie fly tha t the Summe r months ten d to b e c loud ie r a nd ra inie r (Ra infa ll/ P reci p ita tion Cha rt B e ijing, China ) a nd tha t Bei j i n g is a n e xtre me ly p ollute d , the re fore s m o g choke d c ity (http ://www.isc ie nc e time s. co m / artic le s/6696/20140117/b e ijing- smogtel evi se d - sunrise - tia na nme n- sq ua re - c hina . h tm , Air Qua lity Fore c a sting Syste ms Ch arts), re d uc e the a mount of Sola r Loa d th ro u ghout the e ntire ye a r.

Vegetation Strategy We propose a green “shelf” on the northern side of the central atrium, which extends at an oblique angle to capture more light deeper into the space. To maximize the amount of light hitting this “shelf” the floors on the southern side are lowered 5 feet. Lowering these floors reduces the angle that light can enter the space, increasing the hours per day light can effectively reach the “shelf”. The vegetation on the top floor green space is placed towards the northern side as to not block southern sun from the atrium. Apertures above the atrium are less dense to let more light in as well.

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 6

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

3 4

Systems Strategy Section HVAC Plumbing Electrical Given the circumstances of Beijing’s climate, it is to be expected that pollution would be taken into consideration when assessing the comfort needs of the building’s tenants. Coincidentally, this expectation fits with the data that states Beijing’s population in general has a 17% need for natural ventilation, 29% need for cooling, and 54% need for heating with regards to comfort. Given this data, it is accurate to say that Beijing’s comfort needs are heating dominated. Taking this into account, the building’s HVAC strategy for heating is based on the fact that hot air rises. Coming from below the building, the heating system is filtered and then flowed throughout the structure by means of passageways encompassing the perimeter.

1. Roof Collection System 2. Distribution Channel 3. Purification System 4. Cistern

Precipitaion Strategy Rainwater is collected from a trough system installed within the roof facade components. The collected water is channeled, using downward gravitaional force, to a series of purification and treatment systems next to the building, below grade. The filtered water is stored in an underground cistern for re-introduction and distribution back into and throughout the building.

Cold air moves hot air toward an atrium located in the middle of the building’s section. The vertical atrium let raise to the top of the building the hot air. Thanks to this air flux the building keeps a steady good environmental condition. This hot air may then exit the structure through the atrium. Reversing this strategy, the cooling system originates from the top of the building because of the fact that cold air falls. Similar to the heating system, cold air is then circulated throughout the building by means of the perimeter. In addition, an extra cooling system of a similar strategy is placed in between the real horizontal partition and the ceiling in order to have a steady air flow.

Occupancy Typical Floor HVAC Plumbing Electrical Occupancy Type - Office Use (Business area) Tenant type is office worker occupying 80% of floorplate. Open office floorplan 80% desk space use 3 conference rooms (2 small & 1 large sized rooms)

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

SPR ING 1 6

2 1 15

13 14 10

12 11

Detail Section 1. I -Beam primary structure 300

2. I-Beam secondary 160

2 9 1

3. Air duct

4. Supply air diffuser 5. Ceiling Supports

7. Ceiling Panels

8. High performance coated IG Unit 4

9. Aluminium panel typical

HVAC Section Typical Floor

10. Insulation Layer

1. Diffuser

11. Steel external catwalk 7

2. Supply Air Ductork

12. Fiberglass Molded Facade Panels

3. Retrun Air

13. Gasket

4. Core Wall

14. Thermal Break

5. HVAC Riser

15. Electrical Box (Power source)

This detail section shows our HVAC strategy, from the window to the wall, for a typical office floor. Placing the HVAC ducting into the ceiling, rather than the floor, allows the slab thickness to remain as thin as possible because minimal structure is required beneath the subfloor to accommodate additional ductwork. As seen in the drawing, this leaves only the supply ductwork in the ceiling. The return air ductwork is put into the core wall as a result to allow for a much more efficient HVAC system, eliminating return air ductwork in the ceiling thus reducing the path of travel. Additionally, the second diffuser is placed closer to the core wall to keep everything as centralized as possible.

Our building is detailed to facilitate the outer, variable parametric facade. As such there is a 3 foot gap between the facade and the building itself, which allows maintenance and cleaning access. The facade also acts as a rain screen, keeping water off the inner curtain wall. The curtain wall consists of a double pane, low-e glass unitized system with aluminum spandrel panels. The facade itself is made of fiberglass panels which are custom molded over CNC shaped foam.

0 to 50

101 to 150

201 to 300

301 to 500

0 to 50 AQI

Air quality is considered satisfactory, and air pollution poses little or no risk

51-100 AQI

Air quality is acceptable; however, for some pollutants there may be a moderate health concern for a very small number of people who are unusually sensitive to air pollution.

101 to 150 AQI

Members of sensitive groups may experience health effects. The general public is not likely to be affected.

151 to 200 AQI

Everyone may begin to experience health effects; members of sensitive groups may experience more serious health effects

201 to 300 AQI

Health alert: everyone may experience more serious health effects.

Left: minimum and maximum values of air polluted. Right: a connection map of the city of Beijing.

Air Pollution Data Beijing is not the only one guilty of all of the environmental issues regarding air pollution. One of the major factors is the geographic location of Beijing in relation to the rest of China. Much of the city’s air pollutants are emitted by neighboring regions. For instance, power plants in the coal-mining regions of Shanxi and Inner Mongolia have tripled since 2000. Additional regions have contributed to this phenomenon as well. Wind flows contribute to bring “polluted air” to this part of China. The illustrations on the right show how Beijing is affected by pollution from neighboring regions. via wind currents. Research has shown Beijing is one of the most problematic environmental situations in recent history.

Air Quality The AQI is an index for reporting daily air quality. A larger AQI value indicates more polluted air, and what associated health effects might be a concern for you. The AQI focuses on health effects you may experience within a few hours or days after breathing polluted air.

301 to 500 AQI

Health warnings of emergency conditions. The entire population is more likely to be affected.

EPA calculates the AQI for five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act: ground-level ozone, particle pollution (also known as particulate matter), carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. For each of these pollutants, EPA has established air quality standards to protect public health .Ground-level ozone and airborne particles are the two pollutants that pose the greatest threat to human health in China.

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

SPR ING 1 6

1 January - 31 December

Hours 20% Hours 10%

West

East 20

T max T avg T min RH 100% RH 50% RH 0% Wind speed min 10-0 (mph) Wind speed avg 20-10 (mph) Wind speed max 30-20 (mph)

15 10 00

Wind Analysis The illustration to the left shows wind data about Beijing. First, with regards to the innermost wheel, we see that the city is highly windy on an annual basis with wind speeds reaching more than 25mph. Second, the strongest winds appear to be approaching from the South-East. Last, the humidity remains approximately 50% during the year.

10%

Sun-Path Diagram/Radiation Analysis – Latitude: 39.93

21 December 9:00, ALT = 12.32, AZM = 135.53

21 December 3:00, ALT = 15.65, AZM = 219.36

Sun-Path Diagram/Radiation Analysis – Latitude: 39.93 21 December 12:00, ALT = 26.56, AZM = 176.66

Solar Insolation Winter Solstice As would be expected for the winter solstice, the amount of solar radiation on the building is rather low. Because of the position of the sun in Beijing, the north face of the building experiences the least solar radiation while the top receives the most. However, this is not the case at 9AM. At this time, the east face receives the most radiation while casting a rather significant amount of shade to the north-west of the building. Interestingly enough, the winter solstice in general creates the most significant shading conditions in comparison to the other times of the year. HOUSE B, ENTRY LEVEL

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 6

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

INSTR U C TO R : M argaret Gri ff i n

L O CAT I O N : V E N I CE , CAL I F O R N I A S I Z E : 2, 800S Q . F E E T

DUO

Id ea o f t h e d i p t y c h t h at o ri g i n ated as celeb r a t o r y a r t i f a c t s i n Ro m an an d Byzan ti n e tim e s , a s w a x a n d i v ory g ro u n ds f o r in s c r i p t i o n . G r a d u a l l y th e i dea m o ved f ro m a box e d h o r i z o n t a l s u r f ace to a f ram ed verti cal s u r fa c e . T h i s su r f a c e was s u ff u s ed wi th bo th as p e c t s o f a d i p t y c h g en re i n i ts n arrati ve and a st r u c t u re i n i t s f o rm al m an i f es tati o n s .

T Y P E : 2 S I N G L E FAM I LY HO U S E

a duet - when two is better than one

Design S tatm en t

01 ISOMETRIC

s o u th we st re nd e ring of the d ip tyc hs 02 ISOMETRIC

n o rth we st re nd e ring of the d ip tyc hs

W i t h an i nt ent t o f ocus on a v i s ual s ens e of dept h and t ex t ure, our group compi l ed a range of precedent s t o i ncl ude l i ght i ns t al l at i ons wi t h et hereal and engagi ng qual i t i es .

t hei r i nt eract i v e, l umi nous , and webl ik e pres ence whi ch s eem t o was h ov er a n d engul f t he audi ence, appeal i ng t o bo t h t h e percept i on of s pace and col or. From t h e s e precedent s , we deci ded t o hone i n o n t h e concept s of proj ect i on, bri ght nes s an d t o n e t o creat e a di s t i nct s pat i al s ens at i on .

The “I n ni t y M i rror R oom” us es l i ght proj ect i on wi t hi n a bas i c cubes haped room; t he room’s s urf aces are cov ered wi t h a re ect i v e mat eri al t hat f aci l i t at es t he f eel i ng of boundl es s nes s and bei ng compl et el y cons umed. The l i ght i ns t al l at i ons f rom J anet E chel man and i M app off er i ns pi rat i on f rom DIFFERENT EXPLORATION OF SCALE MODELS

1/8” SCALE MODELS

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

The p l a y b e t w e e n re n d i n g parts as two halv e s o f a w h o l e o r as co m pl ete i n th em se l v e s a n d t h e n d o u bl ed o r m i rro red; th e p re se n c e o f l i t e r a l o r i m pl i ed f ram es , w ithi n w h i c h f i g u re s a re po s i ti o n ed an d acro s s w h i c h t h e y re l ate to each o th er; th e calib r a t e d sy m m e t r i e s an d as ym m etri es , o r rep e t i t i o n s a n d d i ff e ren ces , between th e tw o p a r t s o f t h e d i p t y ch .

SPR ING 1 6

01 ELEVATION

house a

02 ELEVATION

house b

03 ELEVATION

h o u s e a & b on site

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

01 SECTION

hou se a

02 SECTION

hou se b

03 SECTION

hou se a & b o n si t e

SPR ING 1 6

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

01 CROSS SECTION

hou se a

02 CROSS SECTION

hou se b

03 CROSS SECTION

hou se a & b o n si t e

SPR ING 1 6

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 6

UP UP

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

UP UP

HOUSE A, ENTRY LEVEL

HOUSE B, ENTRY LEVEL

DOWN

HOUSE A, SECOND LEVEL

HOUSE B, SECOND LEVEL

E RIC A L I

02 01

03 01 FINAL PRESENTATIOIN 02 PHOTO OF 1/8” MODELS 03 PHOTO OF 1/8” MODELS

DES I GN ST UDIO

SPR ING 1 6

1 G B S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 2

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

2 SHAPES

FA L L 1 5

1 G A S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 1

INSTR U C TO R : A nna Nei mark

T W O G E O M E T R I C P R O BL E M S T HAT R E L AT E T W O - D I M E N S I O N AL D R AW I N G S T O T HR E E - D I M E N S I O N AL F I G U R E S . T HE D R AW I N G S O F F E R N E W R E AD I N G S O F T HE F O R M AL PAR T S T HAT CO M P O S E T HE M AT R I X O F S M O K E

cube + cube on point

2 sh a p e s W ith t w o g e o m e t r i c p ro bl em s th at rel ate tw o- d i m e n s i o n a l d r a wi n g s to th reedim e n s i o n a l f i g u re s. T h e drawi n g s o ff er n ew read i n g s o f t h e f o r m a l parts th at co m po s e th e m a t r i x o f S m o k e : th e o bl i qu el y o ri en ted cell w i l l b e t h e f o c u s of co n u n dru m 1 an d one o f t h e p o l y h e d r a l co m po n en ts – th e focu s o f c o n u n d r u m 2 . Bo th f o rm s wi l l be read a g a i n s t t h e o r t h o g o n al backdro p o f a cub e a n d t h e o r t h o g r aph i c s pace o f drawi n g .

POCHE’ MODEL

WIRE MODEL ON POINT AND EDGE ONLY

WIRE MODEL ON WALL WITH SHADOWS

ERIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

LIBRARY

FA L L 1 5

1 G A S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 1

INSTR U C TO R : A nna Nei mark

cube + cube on point + library

W FLORENCE AVE W FLORENCE AVE

SECTION

The f u n d a m e n t a l s o f a rch i tectu re g eo m etry, for m , a n d sp a c e - a n d to th e tech n o l o g i es of th e i r d e s c r i p t i o n - di ag ram m i n g , drawi n g , and m o d e l i n g . T h e st udi o em ph as i zes th e role o f d r a w i n g a n d a nal ys i s as n o t s o l el y des c r i p t i v e b u t a l so i n adverten tl y g en erati ve. A s a re su l t , c l o s e a t t e n ti o n i s pai d to th e dev e l o p m e n t o f c r a f t t o en g ag e s tu den ts in th e p ro d u c t i v e p ro c es s o f tran s l ati o n betwe e n p h y si c a l a n d di g i tal th reedim e n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c e s. On e o f th e pri m ary goal s o f 1 G A i s t o i n s ti l l i n th e s tu den ts th e r i g o r o f c re a t i v e wo rk i n arch i tectu re and t o se e t h i s r i g o r as bo th a co r n ers to n e

SITE PLAN

o f th ei r p rofe ssiona l life , a nd a s a p a rt o f an unb roke n, though c onte ntious a nd co n trad ic tory, a rc hite c tura l tra d ition. W h i l e stud e nts will b e e xp e c te d to p rod uc e f as ci n ating a nd b e a utiful work, the y should , at th e sa me time , und e rsta nd tha t this f o u n dationa l stud io is a tra ining ground for tech n i q ue s a nd a n introd uc tion to id e a s tha t can be fully e xe rc ise d in a d va nc e d stud ios. S tu dents will, the re fore , b e a ske d to d e ve lop an i n te lle c tua l fra me work for the ir forma ts an d comp ositions from the p rod uc tive tech n i q ue s for the d e sign of sp a tia l

orga niza tions a nd a rc hit ect ural f orm. W i t h two ge ome tric p rob le ms t hat rel at e two- d ime nsiona l d ra wings t o t hreed ime nsiona l figure s. The d ra wings offe r ne w readi ngs of t he forma l p a rts tha t c omp os e t he mat ri x of Smoke : the ob liq ue ly orient ed cel l wi l l b e the foc us of c onund rum 1 and one of the p olyhe d ra l c omp one nt s â&#x20AC;&#x201C; t he f ocus of c onund rum 2. B oth forms wi l l be read a ga inst the orthogona l back drop of a cube a nd the orthogra p hic sp ace of drawi ng.

WIRE FRAME MODEL

WIRE MODEL ON POINT AND EDGE ONLY

WIRE MODEL ON WALL WITH SHADOWS

E RIC A L I

DES I GN ST UDIO

P roje c t 3 i n t ro d u c e stu den ts to f u n dam en tal w ay s o f t h i n k i n g a b o ut a bu i l di n g : i ts s cal e, s ite, a n d p ro g r a m w i l l bri n g m o re n u an ced prob l e m s a t t h e sc a l e o f th e g raph i c an d m ate r i a l d e t a i l , re l a t i on s h i p to th e g ro u n d, entr y a n d a p e r t u re .

FA L L 1 5

1 G A S T UD I O F UN D MT L AR C 1

The b u i l d i n g â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s f o r m f ol l o w f ro m th e abs tract ex erc i s e s a t t h e b e g i nn i n g o f th e s em es ter. The f i n a l d r a w i n g s a n d f o rm ats ref l ect par ti c u l a r p o s i t i o n s t h at h as devel o p in re l a t i o n s h i p t o t h e b u i l di n g s an d th e rep re se n t a t i o n s.

01 PLAN VIEW

LEVEL 1

02 PLAN VIEW

LEVEL 2

MODEL DETAILS

SECTION MODEL