GRI content index

Usage statement: Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. reported based on the GRI Standards for the period from 01/01/2022 to 12/31/2022

Publication date: 06/23/2023

GRI 1 used: GRI: Foundation 2021

Applicable sector standards: GRI 11: Oil and Gas Sector 2021

General Disclosures

SOURCE REFERENCE DISCLOSURE

LOCATION, RESPONSE OR REASON OF OMISSION SDG CORRELATION

UN GLOBAL COMPACT CORRELATION IPIECA CORRELATION ASSURANCE

ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE, STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE

Reporting Practice

Material Topics

Business Integrity

Accident

Water

Waste

LABOR PRACTICES AND EQUALITY OF

TOPICS OF THE APPLICABLE GRI SECTORAL STANDARD DEFINED AS NON-MATERIAL

GRI 11: OIL AND GAS SECTOR 2021

The impacts related to the topic “forced labor and modern slavery” appeared only once in the evaluated internal documents and not once in the external ones. In internal interviews, the topic appeared spontaneously only once and was evaluated as having low significance. When the prompted method was used, only the stakeholder group “customers” evaluated the topic as having a significance of medium to high. All others were evaluated as having a significance between very low and low.

Although impacts related to the topic “freedom of association and collective bargaining” appear in two evaluated documents, they were not mentioned spontaneously in the internal interviews, and when prompted, stakeholders evaluated them as non-existent, with low or very low significance. Only “internal public” evaluated these impacts as having a significance between low and medium.

Although impacts related to the topic “Land and resources rights” are in the internal and external documents evaluated, they were only mentioned spontaneously in a single internal interview. In the prompted method, such impacts were indicated as non-existent, with low or very low significance by stakeholders. Only “internal public” evaluated this with a significance between low and medium.

The impacts related to the topic “anti-competitive behavior” appeared in only two documents, in no spontaneous internal interview, and when prompted, were evaluated as having significance level between very low and medium. Only the stakeholder group “clients” evaluated it as having a significance level between medium and high.

The impacts regarding the topic “public policy” had two spontaneous mentions in the internal interviews, and only one of the cases was evaluated as having a high level of significance. When prompted, stakeholders evaluated it with a significance between medium and low, with the exception of the stakeholder group “public authorities”, who evaluated it as average, and the stakeholder group “investors”, who evaluated it as very low.