Synopsis No 3: Semiology and the Urban Students’ Name:
Boedi Satria Eleanor Ng Feiven Chee Lee Min (Andy) Lim Yee Zhing Oh Keng Yee (Alexis) Tang Hui Ying (Delaney)
0311503 03 0312004 0308860 0311195 0312501 0312089
Text: Semiology and the Urban Author: Roland Barthes Year Written:
Purpose of the theory (Please tick X; you may tick more than one box) x x
Identifying an issue or problem within the contemporary context Analyzing an architecture to identify a problem or solve a problem Solving an issue in a broader context outside of architecture: presenting a theory/manifesto Solving an issue within the context of architecture: presenting a design method Solving an issue within the context of architecture: presenting a theory Others:
Please complete the following: What are the issues addressed?
DISPARITY BETWEEN FUNCTION AND MEANING Function, form and structure should be interlinked with the semiotics and symbolism of the building. When the two fields are put on different sides of an equation, the building loses its meaning. OVER-RIGIDITY OF SYMBOLISM Symbolism is an intangible aspect. Problems arise when the meaning behind the symbols are treated as though they are tangible, resulting in a one-dimensional definition of an infinitely complex subject matter.
PREMATURELY DEFININING SEMIOTICS As if simplifying symbolism to something one dimensional is not enough, when a finite definition is attributed to the symbols, it kills the growth of the meaning behind it, reducing it further to merely a word. What are the design methods/strategy/theories proposed?
INTERLINKING THE FIELDS The fields of architecture and semiotics should be linked. Function, the built form, meaning, importance, these are all aspects that should be heavily interwoven. No one component