Literal Indeterminacy & Infinity

the expert needs to know, for example the phase could be the margin of this amplitude, etc.). Then use the CNMS, where x( (Ta1, Tp1), (Ia1, Ip1), (Fa1, Fp1) ) will be the first round, i.e. the Ta1 is the amplitude and

Tp1 the phase of this amplitude, of the people voting for candidate x in the first round, and Ia1, Ip2 the amplitude and phase of this amplitude of people who did not vote in the first round, while Fa1 is the amplitude and Fp1 the phase of this amplitude, of the people voting against candidate x in the first round. Then, similarly, for round two we have: x( (Ta2, Tp2), (Ia2,

Ip2), (Fa2, Fp2) ), then for round three: x( (Ta3, Tp3), (Ia3, Ip3), (Fa3, Fp3) , etc. So, we get a CNMS of the form: { x( (Tai, Tpi), (Iai, Ipi), (Fai, Fpi) ), with i = 1, 2, 3, ... .}. In CNMS we may have a repeated element, the candidate x in this case, but whose complex neutrosophic multiset components change from a round to another.

Literal Indeterminacy & Infinity

To Hoda Esmail We may consider I / ∞, where I = literal indeterminacy.

Actually:

lim (I/x) = lim [(1/x) ∙ I] = I ∙ lim (1/x) = I ∙ 0 = 0.

x→∞ x→∞ x→∞

27