CHRONICLES OF
Quaker Education FA L L 2 0 1 6
Building a climate of civility and respect
Talking about presidential elections in a divided age By Graham Holland
Civic and civil discourse in Friends schools As our nation navigates the 2016 presidential election season, we are witnessing divisive language and behavior on the part of presidential candidates and their supporters in both parties. In light of these challenging times, this issue of Chronicles focuses on how Friends schools approach civic and civil discourse in their communities. Friends schools often have insight into how to encourage community members to share respectfully and with appreciation for difference. What processes, Quaker and otherwise, are being used that educators and schools might draw on as we move through the fall election and its aftermath? We reached out to Friends Council member schools with a series of queries. In addition to stories about civic discourse, you’ll find examples of how schools are navigating conversations about many kinds of difference, including race, religion, economics, family structure and more. We found these stories to be powerful, inspirational, and a source of hope for the time ahead. We hope you do too.
Moses Brown students ask clarifying questions as they share their views of an ideal presidential candidate.
Ever since Barack Obama was voted into a second term in 2012, I have been thinking about how to teach during presidential elections. Given the toxicity that seemed to enter my seventh grade history classroom at Moses Brown School (Providence, RI) in the month before that election, I began searching for a way to establish a more positive tone. I found myself asking: is there a creative, pedagogically sound, developmentally appropriate way to address presidential elections with students? Americans of all political stripes lament the absence of civil dialogue or genuine debate among the voting public. The term homophily is increasingly invoked to describe our tendency to seek out like-minded peers who will confirm what we already think. This trend has accelerated in the age of social media, where we block out the things we don’t want to see and are increasingly fed the content that is most appealing to us. If we take it as a given that these are unhealthy trends in a vibrant democracy, then what role can we as educators play in interrupting them? Grant Wiggins offers a “Backward Design” model to identify the set of knowledge, skills, and outcomes we want students to achieve and then work backward to plan the lessons and experiences that will yield that result. To imagine an end result in this case, we have to visualize the tone and character of an ideal student discussion of presidential politics. It would be characterized by vigorous debate in which even the sharpest disagreements could be expressed with civility continued on page 3
A Publication of the
Students in Graham Holland’s class during a discussion of presidential politics.