GAWU Combat - 17 July - 30 September 2016

Page 1

Issue#4 Volume#37

Combat Voice of the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU)

21st Delegates’ Congress – success amidst threats The 21st Delegates’ Congress of the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU) was indeed a historic and significant event in the Union’s life. The Congress, while very successful, indeed faced its more than fair share of challenges and saw massive obstacles placed in its way. The three-(3)-day event brought together hundreds of delegates from among the enterprises where the Union enjoys bargaining rights. Those worker-delegates, among other things, were charged with the task of reviewing the Union’s work and achievements since the 20th Congress held in 2012, as well as to cast their minds ahead to chart a course for the Union in the ensuing years. The Congress is also necessary for the Union to be a properly constituted body. After the Congress, the names of the Union’s officers and trustees, a breakdown of its membership, among other things, must be forwarded to the Registrar of Trade Unions. The Congress saw many delegates expressing their concern and dismay over the prevaling attitude of the Guyana Sugar Corporation Inc (GuySuCo). They reasoned that the ‘new’ behaviour adopted by GuySuCo was not supportive of the turnaround of the industry, which is very important to all Guyanese. They were also very strong in their objection to the Government and GuySuCo’s decision to close the Wales Estate. Quite correctly, they expressed their strong condemnation of the closure, and took account of the harsh repercussions that will certainly follow thousands of their compatriots. They also strongly expressed the view that the current attitude of GuySuCo and the Government towards the sugar workers and workers generally requires the unity of the working class to combat the highhandedness and unilaterality being displayed in recent months. A major challenge which threatened to derail the Congress was the denial of paid release and assistance with for sugar workers from GuySuCo attending the Congress. The Corporation, just days prior to the commencement of the Congress, informed the Union of its position. The sudden abandonment of the longstanding practice by GuySuCo posed a major problem, but the Union’s careful spending over the years allowed it to fund the sugar workers’ participation from its resources. During the Congress’s business sessions, delegates condemned the GuySuCo decision, deeming it discriminatory. Continued on page eight COMBAT

July 17 - Sept. 30, 2016

July 17 to September 30, 2016

GuySuCo interaction disappoints and concerns sugar unions

Delegations from the sugar unions at the meeting

Unions representing the workers within the sugar industry – the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU), the National Association of Agricultural, Commercial and Industrial Employees (NAACIE) and the Guyana Labour Union (GLU) – on September 29, 2016 at a meeting summoned by the Guyana Sugar Corporation Inc (GuySuCo) had their high expectations fall on learning about the Corporation’s plans for the future and what is in store for the general well-being of the 17,000-person workforce. The meeting left our Unions very disappointed and concerned over the sugar industry’s future direction. The GuySuCo team headed by members of the Interim Management Committee though saying it wants to safeguard the livelihoods of the thousands who depend on the industry’s operations painted an excessively dark and pessimistic picture of the current status and future of the industry. Both the CEO and the Finance Director advised that the GuySuCo, based on projections until year 2025, will remain reliant on Government support for its operations. The industry, in recent times, has benefitted from financial assistance to assist in its revitalization but yet the amounts sought by GuySuCo continue to increase year after year. The disaggregation of this financial support in the past and future, we feel, may be informative. We were, however, pleased to learn that production would reach 320,000 tonnes sugar during the 2017 – 2025 period. This favourable projection represents, possibly, the highest productivity level ever recorded given the fact that industry’s cultivable area will be reduced. We recall the last time the industry recorded similar production levels were during the 2002-2004 period

when the Diamond Estate cultivation was operable. To attain the projected target in times when even the Wales Estate cultivation is expected to be abandoned will indeed be praiseworthy. It indeed tells us that there is great scope for the industry to be turned around and for production to rebound. At this meeting, we were disheartened to learn that GuySuCo, during the 20172025 period, would remain a raw sugar producer. Our Unions have long held the view that the industry needs to broaden its product base and it must be gradually transformed from a sugar to sugar cane industry in which the entire plant is used to produce various products. On this score, our Unions pointed out to the GuySuCo officials that the industry has much scope for diversification and drew to their attention the opportunities in the areas of bagasse co-generation, sugar refining and distilling. These initiatives also were recommended by the very costly Commission of Inquiry (CoI) into the sugar industry. It is widely recognized that these areas offer viable opportunities for the industry to overcome its present challenges and be placed on a sustainable path. The Corporation, however, did not address our suggestions but made mention of the project to plant rice at Wales as well as possible ventures into aquaculture, citrus fruits and dairy cattle. These ventures we gather will be pursued in the near-term but, we understand, if implemented, may not or improve worthily the Corporation’s financial standing and, therefore, can be seen as inconsequential. Also, on this note, we wish to draw to the Corporation’s attention to the Economic and Finance report of the Sugar CoI which explicitly recommended that the other crops be first pursued outside of GuySuCo lands. It is recalled that aspect of the Commission’s report was prepared by current GuySuCo Chairman, Professor Clive Thomas. Our Unions also took the opportunity of the meeting to inquire about a wage rise for workers this year (2016). On this issue the Corporation said the meeting was not to address this important issue to all workers. It seems, at this time, that sugar workers may again be denied a pay rise. This most discriminatory treatment, we warn, is not in the interest of the industry especially at a time when the commitment and dedication of all workers are required. Continued on page seven PAGE ONE


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.