LA PROPUESTA DE FINANCIACIÓN ESCOLAR TIENE COMO OBJETIVO LOGRAR LA EQUIDAD, ¿PERO SERÁ SUFICIENTE?
Joe Hong CalMatters
Lospuntajes de las pruebas estandarizadas y las tasas de graduación de los estudiantes afroamericanos han estado muy por detrás de los de sus compañeros blancos y asiáticos. Durante décadas, los educadores y los legisladores han tratado de cerrar esa brecha de rendimiento, y una propuesta de financiamiento escolar en el nuevo presupuesto del gobernador Gavin Newsom ilustra lo difícil que es hacerlo.
La idea de la financiación propuesta comenzó como un proyecto de ley escrito el año pasado por la asambleísta Akilah Weber, demócrata de La Mesa, que habría proporcionado más dinero para los estudiantes afroamericanos de K-12. El proyecto de ley pasó por la Asamblea y el Senado con el apoyo unánime. Si bien Newsom nunca vetó el proyecto de ley, finalmente se negó a firmarlo. Weber acordó abandonar el proyecto de ley cuando el gobernador prometió incluir los fondos en su proyecto de presupuesto para el próximo año fiscal.
Pero después de que Newsom publicó su presupuesto a principios de este mes, algunos defensores que apoyaron el proyecto de ley de Weber dicen que la propuesta del gobernador se queda corta. Impulsada por las preocupaciones de que el proyecto de ley violaría las leyes estatales y federales que prohíben el trato preferencial de grupos raciales o étnicos específicos, la oficina del gobernador dirigió los fondos a las escuelas con alta pobreza en lugar de a los estudiantes de raza negra específicamente.
Algunos defensores dicen que la financiación escolar propuesta en el presupuesto diluye la intención del proyecto de ley y perpetuará la brecha de rendimiento para los estudiantes afroamericanos.
Según un análisis de CalMatters, menos del 26% de los estudiantes afroamericanos en California asisten a una escuela que calificaría para los $300 millones propuestos en el presupuesto de Newsom.
Margaret Fortune es presidenta y directora ejecutiva de la organización de escuelas chárter Fortune School of Education y fue una de las patrocinadoras principales del proyecto de ley. Dijo que la propuesta no refleja las intenciones del proyecto de ley de Weber.
“Suena bien, pero en realidad no llega a los estudiantes que necesitan ayuda”, dijo. “Esto es una manzana, y lo que queríamos era una naranja”.
Pero el proyecto de ley no se trataba solo de la raza. La AB 2774 de Weber habría otorgado fondos adicionales a los distritos escolares y las escuelas chárter para el grupo de estudiantes con los puntajes más bajos en las pruebas estandarizadas en todo el estado. En 2022, ese grupo eran estudiantes de raza negra. En todo el estado, el 30% de los estudiantes afroamericanos cumplieron o superaron los estándares en lengua y literatura en inglés y el 16% cumplieron o superaron los estándares en matemáticas en el año escolar 2021-22. Para los estudiantes
blancos, esos porcentajes fueron del 61% para lengua y literatura en inglés y del 48% para matemáticas.
Los puntajes de las pruebas cayeron levemente para todos los estudiantes durante la pandemia y la brecha de rendimiento persistió. En la primavera de 2019, el último año de pruebas estandarizadas antes del cierre por la pandemia, el 33% de los estudiantes afroamericanos cumplió o superó los estándares de lengua y literatura en inglés y el 21% cumplió o superó los estándares de matemáticas. Entre los estudiantes blancos, el 66 % y el 54 %, respectivamente, cumplieron o excedieron los estándares.
“No creo que puedas tomar 245 años de esclavitud y Jim Crow y un legado de educación separada y desigual y esperar que esta brecha no exista”.
-TYRONE HOWARD, PROFESOR DE EDUCACIÓN EN UCLA
Los partidarios del proyecto de ley de Weber dijeron que habría ayudado a los estudiantes de raza negra, como el grupo de menor rendimiento en los puntajes de las pruebas estandarizadas estatales, a mejorar académicamente. Al mismo tiempo, la legislación habría utilizado los puntajes de las pruebas para garantizar que la financiación estuviera produciendo resultados. Una vez que los puntajes de los estudiantes de raza negra ya no fueran los más bajos, el siguiente grupo con los puntajes más bajos en las pruebas calificaría para los fondos adicionales.
“Si después de uno o dos años esos estudiantes estaban progresando, podría ser cualquier otro grupo de estudiantes que podría ser considerado”, dijo Christina Laster, asesora educativa de la Red de Acción Nacional de Al Sharpton y copatrocinadora del proyecto de ley.
Algunos expertos dicen que si bien los funcionarios electos y los formuladores de políticas identifican rápidamente las brechas raciales en los logros, carecen de la
voluntad política para enfocarse en los estudiantes negros con recursos adicionales.
“Creo que tenemos mucho miedo de tener conversaciones difíciles y la posterior legislación sobre la raza y cómo logramos la justicia racial en la educación”, dijo Tyrone Howard, profesor de educación en UCLA. “No creo que puedas tomar 245 años de esclavitud y Jim Crow y un legado de educación separada y desigual y esperar que esta brecha no exista”.
El proyecto de ley de Weber no es una idea nueva. Su madre, la ex asambleísta y actual secretaria de Estado Shirley Weber, fue autora de proyectos de ley casi idénticos en 2018 , 2019 y 2020. Ninguno de ellos logró salir de la Asamblea estatal. En 2018, Newsom hizo un trato similar con Shirley Weber al incluir $300 millones en fondos únicos para los estudiantes con el rendimiento más bajo del estado. Ese financiamiento se aplicó a todos los estudiantes independientemente de su raza para evitar un posible conflicto legal.
Pero algunos expertos y defensores dicen que las soluciones que ignoran la raza no cerrarán la brecha de rendimiento de los estudiantes afroamericanos.
“Cuando a los grupos con el rendimiento más bajo les va mejor, eso beneficia a los estudiantes de todo el estado”, dijo Howard. “Creo que el gobernador se equivocó aquí”.
Ajustando la Fórmula de Financiamiento de Control Local
California financia sus escuelas públicas K-12 a través de la Fórmula de Financiamiento de Control Local, un sistema promulgado en 2013. La fórmula otorga más dinero a los distritos que atienden a porcentajes más altos de estudiantes con grandes necesidades: estudiantes de inglés, niños de crianza y estudiantes que califican para educación gratuita o a precio reducido. precio comidas.
La intención es la equidad sobre la igualdad:
más recursos para los estudiantes que más los necesitan. Y aunque la investigación muestra que la Fórmula de Control Local de Financiamiento ha ayudado a cerrar las brechas en las tasas de graduación, la preparación para la universidad y los puntajes de las pruebas, algunos defensores y legisladores han dicho que el estado necesita aumentar la responsabilidad sobre cómo los distritos gastan el dinero.
En 2015, la ACLU demandó al Distrito Escolar Unificado de Los Ángeles por no gastar el dinero generado por los estudiantes de inglés, los niños de crianza y los estudiantes de bajos ingresos en servicios para esos grupos. En 2021, el Departamento de Educación de California descubrió que tres distritos escolares del condado de San Bernardino malversaron fondos para estudiantes con grandes necesidades.
El proyecto de ley de Weber habría agregado el subgrupo con los puntajes más bajos en las pruebas estandarizadas a los tres grupos de estudiantes especificados en la fórmula de financiamiento. Los subgrupos de estudiantes, como los estudiantes con discapacidades, que ya califican distritos para fondos estatales y federales adicionales no calificarían. Eso dejó a los grupos raciales y étnicos como las categorías restantes.
Este año, el proyecto de ley habría asignado $400 millones a distritos y escuelas chárter para sus estudiantes afroamericanos.
El “multiplicador de equidad”
En el presupuesto propuesto por Newsom, el proyecto de ley de Weber se convirtió en el “multiplicador de equidad”. La propuesta asigna $300 millones para las escuelas primarias y secundarias donde al menos el 90% de los estudiantes califican para recibir comidas gratuitas o a precio reducido. Para las escuelas secundarias, ese porcentaje es del 85%.
A diferencia del dinero de la fórmula de financiamiento que va a los distritos, los dólares del multiplicador de equidad irán directamente a las escuelas y las reglas serán más estrictas sobre dónde se puede gastar el dinero.
Brooks Allen, asesor de políticas educativas de Newsom y director ejecutivo de la Junta Estatal de Educación, dijo que el proyecto de ley de Weber era una “plataforma de lanzamiento”. Señaló que el proyecto de ley de Weber no incluía ningún requisito para que los distritos gastaran el dinero. Dijo que la propuesta de Newsom tendrá más medidas de responsabilidad para garantizar que las escuelas gasten el dinero en los estudiantes con las mayores necesidades. Newsom y sus asesores todavía están trabajando en esos detalles.
Las oficinas de Weber proporcionaron pocos comentarios sobre la propuesta de Newsom. Cuando se le preguntó si Weber estaba decepcionado por eso, su jefa de gabinete, Tiffany Ryan, escribió en un correo electrónico que el “multiplicador de capital” es un “paso en la dirección correcta”.
3 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 EDUCATION
ESPAÑOL
Estudiantes en un salón de clases en la escuela primaria St. HOPE's Public School 7 en Sacramento el 11 de mayo de 2022. Photo Credit: Miguel Gutiérrez Jr. / CalMatters
No está claro cómo el estado asignará los $300 millones a las escuelas que califiquen. Esos detalles se darán a conocer en el proyecto de ley de educación que se publicará más adelante este año, dijeron funcionarios estatales. El proyecto de ley preliminar describirá los programas educativos específicos que recibirán dinero a través del presupuesto estatal.
Posibles problemas legales
La oficina de Weber y los patrocinadores del proyecto de ley dijeron que Newsom expresó su preocupación por violar la Proposición 209 del estado y la Enmienda 14 de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. El primero prohíbe el trato preferencial de un grupo racial o étnico y el segundo garantiza la igualdad de protección para todos los ciudadanos.
No hay mención de estos conflictos potenciales en ninguno de los análisis del proyecto de ley. Sin embargo, un análisis del proyecto de ley de 2018 de Shirely Weber identifica un conflicto potencial con la Prop. 209, al afirmar que el proyecto de ley “en última instancia, apuntaría a un grupo étnico para obtener financiamiento suplementario”.
Los partidarios del proyecto de ley de Akilah Weber dicen que no menciona la raza sino el grupo de estudiantes con los puntajes más bajos en las pruebas.
“Nunca fue una cosa racial”, dijo Laster. “Se trata de la categoría más que de quién está en la categoría”.
Thomas A. Sáenz, presidente y consejero general del Fondo Educativo y de Defensa Legal México-Estadounidense, dijo que el tema sigue sin estar claro porque no se ha adjudicado ninguna ley.
“El problema potencial aquí es que entre los subgrupos disponibles para los puntajes de las pruebas, muchos de ellos están definidos por raza”, dijo.
Los funcionarios estatales se negaron a comentar sobre los posibles conflictos legales. Las oficinas de Weber y Newsom no proporcionaron todos los detalles sobre el acuerdo clandestino que condujo a la propuesta de presupuesto racialmente neutral.
La asambleísta Lori Wilson, demócrata de Fairfield y presidenta del California Legislative Black Caucus, dijo que el proyecto de ley de Weber fue una prioridad principal para el caucus el año pasado y que está satisfecha con el resultado.
“Para llegar a donde quieres estar, tiene que ser un enfoque incremental”, dijo WIlson. “No lo vemos como una pérdida de ninguna manera o forma”.
Una pérdida para algunos
Algunos distritos de California han tenido éxito con programas dirigidos a estudiantes de raza negra. En Fresno Unified, Lisa Mitchell supervisa el programa de Aceleración Académica Afroamericana. En 2017, la junta escolar local comenzó a asignar $4 millones al programa cada año. Este año, el programa cuenta con $2 millones adicionales gracias a los fondos de emergencia por el COVID del gobierno federal.
El distrito usó el dinero para contratar mae-
stros, tutores y consejeros dedicados a aumentar los puntajes y calificaciones de las pruebas y disminuir las tasas de suspensión y expulsión de los estudiantes afroamericanos del distrito. Entre 2017 y 2019, los estudiantes afroamericanos del distrito observaron ligeras mejoras en los puntajes de las pruebas, pero esas mejoras desaparecieron durante la pandemia. En 2022, menos de 1 de cada 5 estudiantes de raza negra cumplió o superó los estándares de lengua y literatura en inglés y 1 de cada 10 cumplió o superó los estándares de matemáticas. Mitchell dijo que el programa podría estar haciendo más para capacitar a los maestros, así como más capacitación para que los padres enseñen a leer en casa.
“Tenemos muchos programas excelentes, pero no cuentan con el personal adecuado”, dijo Mitchell. No está claro exactamente cuánto dinero habría destinado el proyecto de ley al distrito, pero ella dijo que habría ayudado.
El programa de aceleración ofrece un programa de alfabetización extracurricular de 10 semanas en la primavera y un programa de cuatro semanas en el verano. El plan de estudios se basa en autores afroamericanos. El distrito también ofrece un campo de entrenamiento de codificación de tres semanas para estudiantes de quinto y sexto grado que también enseña a los estudiantes sobre las contribuciones de los científicos afroamericanos. Si bien la mayoría de los estudiantes en estos programas son afroamericanos, Mitchell dijo que el distrito no rechaza a nadie. El programa también brinda supervisión e instrucción en el campus para estudiantes suspendidos, así como sesiones de capacitación para padres que desean enseñar lectura en casa.
“¿Por qué le damos a los estudiantes afroamericanos? Porque los estudiantes afroamericanos necesitan más ayuda”.
-LISA MITCHELL, DIRECTORA EJECUTIVA DEL PROGRAMA AFROAMERICANO DE ACELERACIÓN EN EL DISTRITO UNIFICADO DE FRESNO
Mitchell dijo que el distrito no ha enfrentado amenazas de demandas o críticas basadas en la Prop. 209 o la Enmienda 14. Ella dijo que los administradores del distrito y los miembros de la comunidad generalmente apoyan su trabajo.
“Trato de explicarle a la gente que equidad e igualdad no significan lo mismo”, dijo Mitchell. “¿Por qué le damos a los estudiantes afroamericanos? Porque los estudiantes afroamericanos necesitan más ayuda”.
Sin embargo, los representantes de la oficina del gobernador y la Junta de Educación del Estado dijeron que los $300 millones para las escuelas de alta pobreza conducirán en última instancia a una mayor equidad.
“Entiendo que a veces la gente se casa con su idea inicial”, dijo Allen. “Cuando la gente tenga la oportunidad de sentarse con esto y estudiarlo, nuestra esperanza es que vean que hay mucho que les gustará aquí”.
La reportera de CalMatters Erica Yee contribuyó a esta historia.
SCHOOL FUNDING PROPOSAL AIMS TO ACHIEVE EQUITY, BUT DOES IT GO FAR ENOUGH?
Last year, a bill would have directed more funding to the student group with the lowest standardized test scores, which would have been Black students. Instead, the governor is proposing extra money for high-poverty schools, not Black students specifically
Joe Hong CalMatters
Black students’ standardized test scores and graduation rates have long trailed those of their white and Asian peers. For decades, educators and legislators have tried to close that achievement gap, and a school funding proposal in Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new budget illustrates just how difficult it is to do .
The idea for the proposed funding began as a bill authored last year by Assemblymember Akilah Weber, a Democrat from La Mesa, that would have provided more money for Black K-12 students. The bill made it through both the Assembly and Senate with unanimous support. While Newsom never vetoed the bill, he ultimately refused to sign it. Weber agreed to drop the bill when the governor promised to include the funding in his proposed budget for the next fiscal year.
But after Newsom released his budget earlier this month, some advocates who supported Weber’s bill say the governor’s proposal falls short. Driven by concerns the bill would violate state and federal laws banning preferential treatment of specific racial or ethnic groups, the governor’s office directed the funding to high-poverty schools rather than Black students specifically.
Some advocates say the proposed school funding in the budget waters down the intent of the bill and will perpetuate the achievement gap for Black students.
According to a CalMatters analysis, less
than 26% of Black students in California attend a school that would qualify for the $300 million proposed in Newsom’s budget.
Margaret Fortune is president and CEO of the charter school organization Fortune School of Education and was one of the lead sponsors of the bill. She said the proposal does not reflect the intentions of Weber’s bill.
“It sounds good, but it doesn’t actually get to the students who need the help,” she said. “This is an apple, and what we wanted was an orange.”
But the bill wasn’t just about race. Weber’s AB 2774 would have given additional funding to school districts and charter schools for the student group with the lowest standardized test scores statewide. In 2022, that group was Black students. Statewide, 30% of Black students met or exceeded standards in English language arts and 16% met or exceeded standards in math in the 2021-22 school year. For white students, those percentages were 61% for English language arts and 48% for math.
Test scores dropped slightly for all students during the pandemic, and the achievement gap persisted. In the spring of 2019, the last year of standardized testing before the pandemic shutdown, 33% of Black students met or exceeded English language arts standards and 21% met or exceeded math standards. Among white students, 66% and 54%, respectively, met or exceeded standards.
“I don’t think you can take 245
4 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023
EDUCATION
ESPAÑOL
ENGLISH
Photo Credit: CDC / Pexels
years of slavery and Jim Crow and a legacy of separate and unequal education and expect this gap to not exist.”
-TYRONE HOWARD, EDUCATION PROFESSOR AT UCLA
Supporters of Weber’s bill said it would have helped Black students — as the lowest-performing group on state standardized test scores — improve academically. At the same time, the legislation would have used test scores to ensure the funding was producing results. Once Black students’ scores were no longer the lowest, the next group with the lowest test scores would qualify for the additional funding.
“If after one or two years those students were progressing, it could be any other student group that could be considered,” said Christina Laster, an educational advisor for Al Sharpton’s National Action Network and a co-sponsor of the bill.
Some experts say that while elected officials and policymakers are quick to identify the racial achievement gaps, they lack the political will to target Black students with extra resources.
“I think we’re really afraid to have hard conversations and subsequent legislation around race and how we achieve racial justice in education,” said Tyrone Howard, an education professor at UCLA. “I don’t think you can take 245 years of slavery and Jim Crow and a legacy of separate and unequal education and expect this gap to not exist.”
Weber’s bill isn’t a new idea. Her mother, former Assemblymember and current Secretary of State Shirley Weber, authored nearly identical bills in 2018, 2019 and 2020. None of them made it out of the state Assembly. In 2018, Newsom made a similar deal with Shirley Weber by including $300 million in one-time funding for the state’s lowest-performing students. That funding applied to all students regardless of race to avoid a potential legal conflict.
But some experts and advocates say race-blind solutions won’t close the achievement gap for Black students.
“When the lowest-performing groups do better, that benefits students across the state,” Howard said. “I think the governor got it wrong here.”
Tweaking the Local Control Funding Formula
California funds its K-12 public schools through the Local Control Funding Formula, a system enacted in 2013. The formula gives more money to districts serving higher percentages of high-needs students — English learners, foster children and students qualifying for free or
reduced-price meals.
The intent is equity over equality: more resources for students who need them most. And while research shows that the Local Control Funding Formula has helped close gaps in graduation rates, college readiness and test scores, some advocates and legislators have said the state needs to increase accountability over how districts spend the money.
In 2015, the ACLU sued the Los Angeles Unified School District for failing to spend the money generated by English learners, foster children and low-income students on services for those groups. In 2021, the California Department of Education found that three school districts in San Bernardino County misused funds for high-needs students.
Weber’s bill would have added the subgroup with the lowest standardized test scores to the three student groups specified in the funding formula. Subgroups of students, like students with disabilities, that already qualify districts for additional state and federal funding would not qualify. That left racial and ethnic groups as the remaining categories.
This year, the bill would have allocated $400 million to districts and charter schools for their Black students.
The “equity multiplier”
In Newsom’s proposed budget, Weber’s bill became the “equity multiplier.” The proposal allocates $300 million for elementary and middle schools where at least 90% of students qualify for free or reduced-price meals. For high schools, that percentage is 85%.
Unlike funding formula money that goes to districts, the dollars from the equity multiplier will go directly to schools and the rules will be stricter about where the money can be spent.
Brooks Allen, an education policy advisor for Newsom and the executive director of the State Board of Education, said Weber’s bill was a “launching pad.” He pointed out Weber’s bill didn’t include any requirements for districts on spending the money. He said Newsom’s proposal will have more accountability measures to make sure schools spend the money on the students with the highest needs. Newsom and his advisors are still working on those details.
Weber’s offices provided little comment about Newsom’s proposal. When asked if Weber was disappointed by it, her chief-of-staff, Tiffany Ryan, wrote in an email only that the “equity multiplier” is a “step in the right direction.”
It’s unclear how the state will allocate the $300 million to the qualifying schools. Those details will be released in the edu-
cation trailer bill that comes out later this year, state officials said. The trailer bill will describe the specific education programs that will receive money through the state budget.
Potential legal problems
Weber’s office and the bill’s sponsors said Newsom raised concerns about violating the state’s Proposition 209 and the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The former prohibits preferential treatment of any racial or ethnic group and the latter guarantees equal protection for all citizens.
There’s no mention of these potential conflicts in any of the analyses of the bill. However, one analysis for Shirely Weber’s 2018 bill identifies a potential conflict with Prop. 209, stating the bill would “ultimately target an ethnic group for supplemental funding.”
Supporters of Akilah Weber’s bill say it doesn’t mention race but rather the group of students with the lowest test scores.
“It was never once a racial thing,” Laster said. “It’s about the category rather than who’s in the category.”
Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said the issue remains unclear because no law has been adjudicated.
“The potential problem here is that among the available subgroups for test scores, many of them are race defined,” he said.
State officials declined to comment on the potential legal conflicts. Weber’s and Newsom’s offices didn’t provide full details about the back-room deal that led to the race-neutral budget proposal.
Assemblymember Lori Wilson, a Fairfield Democrat and chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus, said Weber’s bill was a top priority for the caucus last year, and she’s pleased with the outcome.
“To get to where you want to be, it has to be an incremental approach,” Wilson said. “We do not look at it as a loss in any way, shape or form.”
A loss for some
Some California districts have seen success with programs that target Black students. At Fresno Unified, Lisa Mitchell oversees the African-American Academic Acceleration program. In 2017, the local school board started allocating $4 million to the program each year. This year, the program has an additional $2 million thanks to emergency COVID funds from the federal government.
The district used the money to hire teachers, tutors and counselors dedicated to
increasing test scores and grades and decreasing suspension and expulsion rates for the district’s Black students. Between 2017 and 2019, the district’s Black students saw slight improvements in test scores, but those gains were wiped out during the pandemic. In 2022, less than 1 in 5 Black students met or exceeded English language arts standards and 1 in 10 met or exceeded math standards. Mitchell said the program could be doing more to train teachers as well as more training for parents to teach reading at home.
“We have a lot of great programs, but they’re not adequately staffed,” Mitchell said. It’s unclear exactly how much money the bill would have directed to the district, but she said it would have helped.
The acceleration program offers a 10week after-school literacy program in the spring and a four-week program in the summer. The curriculum is based on African American authors. The district also offers a three-week coding bootcamp for fifth and sixth graders that also teaches students about the contributions of African American scientists. While most of the students in these programs are Black, Mitchell said the district doesn’t turn anyone away. The program also provides oncampus supervision and instruction for suspended students as well as coaching sessions for parents who want to teach reading at home.
“Why do we give to Black students? Because Black students need the most help.”
-LISA MITCHELL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN ACCELERATION PROGRAM AT FRESNO UNIFIED
Mitchell said the district hasn’t encountered threats of lawsuits or criticism based on Prop. 209 or the 14th Amendment. She said district administrators and community members generally support her work.
“I try to explain to people that equity and equality don’t mean the same thing,” Mitchell said. “Why do we give to Black students? Because Black students need the most help.”
Representatives from the governor’s office and the State Board of Education, however, said the $300 million for highpoverty schools will ultimately lead to greater equity.
“I understand sometimes folks are wed to their initial idea,” Allen said. “When folks have a chance to sit with this and study it, our hope is that they’ll see there’s a lot to like here.”
CalMatters reporter Erica Yee contributed to this story.
5 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 EDUCATION ENGLISH
POR QUÉ PRIORIZO LA VACUNA CONTRA LA GRIPE PARA MI FAMILIA: LA TRÁGICA HISTORIA DE UNA MADRE
WHY I PRIORITIZE FLU VACCINATION FOR MY FAMILY: A MOTHER'S TRAGIC STORY
ESPAÑOL
BPT
Latemporada de gripe (flu) ya está aquí, y aunque muchos creen que la gripe no es grave, especialmente si se consideran "sanos," a veces puede ser mortal.
Esto es algo que Angie Wehrkamp y su familia saben muy bien; en 2015, Angie perdió a su hija Gianna, que por lo demás estaba sana, a causa de la gripe. Ese año, todos los otros miembros de su familia recibieron la vacuna contra la gripe en el trabajo o la escuela. "Tenía la intención de vacunar también a Gianna, como lo hicimos con su hermano, pero simplemente se nos pasó por alto como padres ocupados," recuerda Wehrkamp.
"Mi hijo y mi hija tenían un vínculo afectivo extraordinario. Gianna era una niña de 2 años enérgica e intrépida que dominaba cada habitación a la que entraba. También era la mayor admiradora de su hermano en todos sus eventos deportivos."
Cuando Gianna comenzó a enfermarse, era algo leve y solo tenía un poco de fiebre pero a la mañana siguiente, cuando la respiración de Gianna no sonaba bien, Angie la llevó a su médico familiar para que la examinara. A su hija le diagnosticaron gripe, le recetaron un medicamento antiviral y la enviaron a casa con instrucciones de que Gianna descansara.
Cuando regresaron a casa, a pesar de que tenía un poco de fiebre y sus pulmones hacían ruido, en general Gianna parecía estar bien, descansando y viendo dibujos animados todo el día. "Esa noche la llevé a mi cama para poder vigilarla de cerca," explica Angie. "Cuando desperté alrededor de las 2 a.m., descubrí que no estaba respirando."
En menos de 48 horas de haber empezado con una fiebre leve, Gianna falleció a la edad de 2 años.
Después de perder a su hija, Wehrkamp quiso hacer algo para ayudar a crear conciencia y evitar que otras familias pasaran por lo mismo que ella, por lo que se unió al grupo sin fines de lucro Families Fighting Flu (Familias
Luchando contra la Gripe).
"Me encanta trabajar con Families Fighting Flu porque me permite honrar la memoria de Gianna," dijo Angie. "Al compartir la historia de nuestra familia, ayudamos a evitar que otros tengan que pasar por el dolor con el cual luchamos cada día."
"No haber vacunado a mi hija será por siempre el mayor arrepentimiento de mi vida," dijo Angie. "Ahora cada año le damos prioridad que nuestra familia se vacune contra la gripe." Infórmese y prepárese para proteger a su familia
La historia de Wehrkamp demuestra lo devastadora que puede ser la gripe para una familia. La influenza (gripe) es una enfermedad respiratoria contagiosa causada por los virus de la influenza que infectan la nariz, la garganta y los pulmones. Algunas personas, como los adultos de 65 años y mayores, los niños pequeños y las personas con ciertos problemas de salud, corren un mayor riesgo de sufrir complicaciones graves por la gripe. De acuerdo con los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC), la mejor forma de protegerse contra la gripe es que todas las personas de seis meses y mayores se vacunen anualmente.
Además, los CDC recomiendan que las mujeres embarazadas reciban la vacuna contra la gripe durante la temporada de gripe, que puede ser administrada en cualquier momento del embarazo. Las madres en su tercer trimestre también pueden ser vacunadas para la temporada tan pronto como la vacuna contra la gripe esté disponible, con el fin de ayudar a proteger a sus recién nacidos en sus primeros meses de vida durante la temporada de gripe.
No espere otro recordatorio; planifique hablar con el médico o farmacéutico de su familia sobre la vacunación. ¡Nunca es demasiado tarde! Para obtener más información sobre cómo puede proteger a su familia de la gripe, visite FluisaFamilyAffair.com.
BPT
Fluseason is here, and while many believe the flu isn't serious, especially if they consider themselves "healthy," it can sometimes be fatal.
That's a fact that Angie Wehrkamp and her family know all too well - in 2015, she lost her otherwise healthy daughter, Gianna, to the flu. That year, everyone else in her family received their flu vaccination through work or school. "I had every intention to also get Gianna vaccinated, like we did for her brother, but it just fell off the radar for us as busy parents," Wehrkamp recalls.
"My son and daughter had an unparalleled bond. Gianna was a feisty and fearless 2-year-old who commanded every room she walked into. She was also her brother's biggest fan at all his sporting events."
When Gianna first became sick, it was mild, and she just felt a little warm. But the next morning when Gianna's breathing didn't sound right, Wehrkamp took her to their family doctor to get her checked out. Her daughter was diagnosed with the flu, prescribed an antiviral medication, and sent home with instructions for Gianna to rest.
When they first brought her home, despite running a low-grade fever and her lungs sounding rattly, Gianna overall seemed fine, relaxing and watching cartoons all day. "I took her to bed with me that night, so I could keep a close eye on her," said Wehrkamp. "When I woke up around 2 a.m., I discovered that she was not breathing."
In less than 48 hours of presenting with a mild fever, Gianna passed away at the age of 2.
After losing her daughter, Wehrkamp wanted to do something to help spread awareness and help prevent other families from going through what she did, joining the nonprofit group, Families Fighting Flu.
"I love working with Families Fighting Flu because it allows me to honor Gianna's memory," said Wehrkamp. "By sharing our family's story, we are helping to prevent others from having to go through the grief that we struggle with every day."
"Not getting my daughter vaccinated will forever be my biggest regret in life," said Wehrkamp. "Every year we now prioritize our family getting our flu vaccinations."
Arming yourself with the information to help protect your family
Wehrkamp's story shows how devastating the flu can be to a family. Influenza (flu) is a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat and lungs. Some people, such as people 65 years and older, young children and people with certain health conditions, are at higher risk of serious flu complications. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the best way to protect against the flu is for everyone six months of age and older to get vaccinated annually.
Additionally, the CDC recommends that pregnant people receive a flu vaccination during flu season, which can be given any time during pregnancy. Mothers in their third trimester can also be vaccinated for the season as soon as flu vaccination is available, in order to help protect their newborn infants during their first months of life during flu season.
Don't wait for another reminder; plan to talk to your family's doctor or pharmacist about vaccination. It's not too late! To learn more about how you can help protect your family from the flu, visit FluisaFamilyAffair.com.
6 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 HEALTH
ENGLISH
Photo Credit: Gustavo Fring / Pexels
Photo Credit: BPT
WEEK: KEEPING UP THE FIGHT AGAINST MISINFORMATION
APRENDE NUEVAS HABILIDADES
AYUDA A LOS DEMÁS
GANA DINERO AYUDANDO
Mike Moen Public News Service
Thisweek is National News Literacy Week, and according to an expert, trust in the media remains low. But there are still plenty of reliable sources, and consumers need to know what to follow and what to avoid.
A recent Gallup poll reported than only 30% of Americans have "a great deal" of trust and confidence in the media.
Kay Beckermann, a journalism professor at Minnesota State University Moorhead, said there is concern that many people get most of their news from social media because of trust issues. She said that does not help the problem.
"And so, they might be looking at something that is not a trustworthy news source,"
Beckermann said. "And I think we need to be focusing on, really, helping people understand what is a legitimate news source."
She added a key way to determine if a news organization is trustworthy is by checking if the reporting often includes multiple perspectives and is not one-sided. Being able to back up a claim posted on social media with evidence is another tool. The website NewsLit.org offers tips on how to spot misinformation and other red flags.
Consumers often cite national outlets when voicing their distrust of the news media. Regionally, Beckermann said outlets around Minnesota often do a good job in holding themselves accountable. She strongly encourages readers, viewers and listeners to follow the work of local reporters.
"The Wall Street Journal is not going to tell me what is happening to me in downtown Moorhead, Minnesota, for example," she said.
"But I can look at a local newspaper; I can find out what local businesses are doing. We can talk about local politics, we can talk about local events, things we need to be aware of."
As for news coverage of politics, Beckermann said the classified-documents issue surrounding the White House is a good accountability test. She said with both a Democrat and a Republican being swept up in the events, news organizations that treat the matter with the same level of objectivity, while also being able to lay out any differences, should be viewed as reliable. Beckermann added consumers need to recognize when a candidate they support is worthy of unflattering coverage.
10 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 COMMUNITY Para aplicar, escanea el código QR o visita: WWW.CACOLLEGECORPS.COM
Red Line does not print. It represents the 3” safety area. Please verify critical elements are within the safety area.
NEWS LITERACY
According to a 2022 Gallup poll, 38% of Americans have no trust at all in newspapers, TV and radio.
Photo Credit: Adobe Stock
POST-PANDEMIC TELEHEALTH VISITS REMAIN HIGH FOR MENTAL HEALTH
Eric Galatas Public News Service
Theuse of telehealth has dropped since its peak during the height of the COVID-19 public health emergency, but more Coloradans continue to opt for remote visits, especially for mental health, according to a new report.
Telehealth services spiked by more than 900% in 2020 compared to pre-pandemic months.
Dianne Primavera, Colorado Lieutenant Governor, leads the state's Office of eHealth Innovation and said telehealth is key to achieving state goals for expanding access to health care.
"One of the silver linings of the pandemic was that it catapulted the use of telehealth, both locally and nationally, and showcased the opportunity that we have to increase access to quality health care in communities across our state," Primavera said. Use of telehealth services dropped 11% from 2020 to 2021. The report showed, however, that Coloradans continue to access eHealth services at a significantly higher rate than before the pandemic.
The Center for Improving Value in Health Care's latest analysis includes data from January 2019 to January 2022, which captures telehealth use prior to and nearly 2 years after the onset of COVID.
Telehealth is a major part of a roadmap established by eHealth Innovation, and officials can tap data from the All Payer Claims Database to inform work on expanding access statewide by 2024. Primavera said making visits accessible to
communities that face the biggest barriers to inperson services comes with layers of challenges.
"That's going to require a holistic approach that includes increased access to affordable highspeed internet, to web-enabled devices and access to training on how to use these tools," she said. "And this will hopefully get people connected to all the essential services."
Primavera added stigma continues to be one of the biggest barriers for addressing behavioral health. In smaller towns, where people may worry that their vehicle parked outside a mental healthcare facility might be recognized, telehealth provides a confidential option.
"Weather can be a barrier." Primavera added. Not having access to a bus route or a bus ticket can be a barrier. Maybe you can't get child care and you have an appointment, so that can be a barrier. So it's really taken away many of the barriers to accessing mental-health services."
CONSULTAS DE TELESALUD POSTPANDEMIA SIGUEN SIENDO ALTAS EN SALUD MENTAL
Eric Galatas Public News Service
Eluso de la telesalud ha disminuido desde su punto más álgido durante la emergencia de salud pública por COVID-19, pero un nuevo informe señala que cada vez hay más habitantes de Colorado que siguen optando por las visitas a distancia, especialmente para la salud mental.
Los servicios de telesalud aumentaron más de un 900% en 2020 en comparación con los meses anteriores a la pandemia.
La vicegobernadora Dianne Primavera dirige la Oficina de Innovación en eSalud del estado. Ella afirma que la telesalud es clave para alcanzar los objetivos estatales de ampliar el acceso a la atención sanitaria.
"Uno de los aspectos positivos de la pandemia fue que impulso el uso de la telesalud," dice Primavera, "tanto a escala local como nacional, y puso de manifiesto la oportunidad que tenemos de aumentar el acceso a una asistencia sanitaria de calidad en las comunidades de todo nuestro estado."
El uso de los servicios de telesalud disminuyo ligeramente, un 11%, de 2020 a 2021. Pero el informe muestra que los habitantes de Colorado siguen accediendo a los servicios a un ritmo significativamente mayor que antes de la pandemia.
antes y casi dos años después del inicio de COVID.
La telesalud es una parte importante de la estrategia establecida por eHealth Innovation, y los funcionarios pueden aprovechar los datos de la All Payer Claims Database para informar sobre el trabajo de ampliación del acceso a todos los rincones del estado para 2024.
Primavera dice que hacer accesibles las visitas a las comunidades que se enfrentan a las mayores barreras para los servicios en persona conlleva varios retos.
"Eso va a requerir un planteamiento holístico que incluya un mayor acceso a Internet de alta velocidad asequible, a dispositivos habilitados para la web y acceso a formación sobre cómo utilizar estas herramientas," opina Primavera. "Y así se espera que la gente se conecte a todos los servicios esenciales."
Primavera afirma que el estigma sigue siendo uno de los mayores obstáculos para abordar la salud mental. En las ciudades más pequeñas, donde a la gente le preocupa que su vehículo estacionado afuera de un centro de salud mental pueda ser reconocido, la telesalud ofrece una opción confidencial.
"El tiempo puede ser un obstáculo, asegura Primavera. "No tener acceso a una ruta o a un boleto de autobús puede ser un obstáculo. Tal vez no puedas conseguir una guardería y tienes una
Covered California te ofrece ayuda económica para que tú y tu familia puedan obtener un plan médico de calidad. Cada plan que ofrecemos incluye cobertura amplia con atención preventiva, visitas al doctor, cuidado de emergencia y más. Y no lo olvides, nuestros expertos están listos para ayudarte de forma gratuita y en español.
11 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 COMMUNITY
ENGLISH ESPAÑOL 10.75” 10.5”
Stigma continues to be one of the biggest barriers for addressing mental health, and telehealth provides a confidential option. Photo Credit: Adobe Stock
CONSEGUIR SEGURO MÉDICO ES MÁS FÁCIL CON OBTÉN PLANES DE SALUD DE CALIDAD A UN MENOR PRECIO. ayuda. El último día para inscribirte es el 31 de enero. Tu seguro médico empieza aquí. 800.995.5087
CoveredCA.com/espanol
|
Certified Caregiver for a 94 year old non ambulatory female with dementia.
6 to 7 days per week 10am to 10pm. Location: Los gatos. Salary commensurate with experience. Please call at (831) 655-3655.
Se busca Cuidador Certificado para una mujer de 94 años no ambulante con demencia.
6 a 7 días por semana 10am a 10pm. Lugar: Los gatos. Salario acorde a la experiencia. Llame al (831) 655-3655.
Multimedia Animator: M.S. in Interactive Entertainment plus 1year work experience required. Send resumes to: Striking Distance Studios, Inc., 6111 Bollinger Canyon Rd., Ste. 150, San Ramon, CA 94583, Attn: J. Yosenick
Notification of Grant Proposal, East Side Union High School District
El distrito de escuelas preparatorias del East Side Union está introduciendo una propuesta de subvención para uso de los fondos de aprendizaje del siglo XXI a nombre de las siguientes escuelas preparatorias: Andrew Hill, Yerba Buena, James Lick y WC Overfelt. Este es un proceso competitivo. Los beneficiarios de la subvención recibirán $250,000 por escuela durante 5 años para ser usados en programas extracurriculares y oportunidades de enriquecimiento.
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691620
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as:
FRESH BINS, 2723 Flory
Dr, San Jose, CA 95121, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Sergio Mora, 2723 Flory Dr, San Jose, CA 95121. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Sergio Mora
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/13/2023.
Regina Alcomendras,
who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Jose De Jesus Mercado
Ixtlan Enterprise Inc. President
Article/Reg#: 5414912
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/17/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691674
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691804
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Santa Clara Auto Glass Services 50 Washington St #27, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Vicente Chavez, 50 Washington St #27, Santa Clara, CA 95050.
County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy
File No. FBN 691620
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691674
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: DAILY BAGEL CAFE, 614 Tennant Station, Morgan Hill, CA 95037, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): IXTLAN ENTERPRISE INC., 7075 Princevalle St, Gilroy, CA 95037. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: TOQUE Y SAZON 2, 2260 Fairhaven Dr, Hollister, CA 95023, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a general partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Leticia Pena, 2260 Fairhaven Dr, Hollister, CA 95023. Liceth Paola Lozano Poveda, 1235 Wilwood Ave Apt 51, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/20/2023. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Leticia Pena
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/20/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Corinne
Vasquez,
Deputy File No. FBN 691835
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Soraya Vásquez López
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/11/2023. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691532
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691729
Pablo Lopez Becerra, 2199 Tiara Dr, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/03/2023. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Pablo Lopez Becerra
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/23/2023.
Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 10, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jan 18, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo
Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV410077
The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a refile [No change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN617236. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Vincente Chavez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/19/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By:
/s/ Patty Camarena,
Deputy File No. FBN 691804
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691835
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691532
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Soraya’s Coffee and Bakery Soraya’s Café y Panadería, 1473 Karl St, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Soraya Vásquez López, 1473 Karl St, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/04/2022. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN690016. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: NATALY’S HOUSECLEANING, 463 Wooster Av Unit A8, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Maria Guadalupe Villa Ceja, 463 Wooster Av A8, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 1/15/2023. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Maria Guadalupe Villa Ceja
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/18/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 691729
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691886
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: LOPEZ HANDYMAN, 2199 Tiara Dr, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are):
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691886
January 27, February 3, 10, 17, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV409728
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: TRANG
THUY NGO INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) THUY
THUY TRANG NGO has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a.
THUY THUY TRANG NGO to TRANG THUY NGO 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV410022
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Tiffany Laurell Gordon PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Tiffany Laurell Gordon has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Tiffany Laurell Gordon to Tiffany Laurell GordonLluyomade 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/23/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Nelly Bautista Castillo INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Nelly Bautista Castillo has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Omar Orozco Robles to Omar Orozco b. Nelly Bautista Castillo to Nelly Orozco c. Itzae Yareth Orozco to Itzae Omar Orozco 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/23/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jan 19, 2023
12 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023
JOBS / CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV410007
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Simone Leube Garrison INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Simone Leube Garrison has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Simone Leube Garrison to Simone Leube 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/02/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jan 18, 2023
Jacqueline M.
CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 22CV405993
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Gabriela Gil INTERESTED PER-
SONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Gabriela Gil has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Gabriela Gil to Gabriela Ruiz Gil 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 03/07/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Nov 03, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV410131
has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Victor Hugo VillalobosGonzalez to Victor Hugo Gonzalez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.
Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/23/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 20, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV410281
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Nguyet Que Huong
Tran, Nguyen Tuong
Huy Dang INTERESTED
Dang to Khoa Dang
Dang b. Phue Lai Dang to Lai Phue Dang 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/30/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 25, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691434
true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Mauricio Valencia
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/09/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
Arroyo
Judge of the Superior Court
January 27; February 3, 10, 17, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Victor Hugo Villalobos Gonzalez INTER-
ESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Victor Hugo VillalobosGonzalez
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Nguyet Que Huong
Tran, Nguyen Tuong
Huy Dang has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Dang Khoa
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MR MAU CLEANING SERVICES, 672 Chemeketa Dr, San Jose, CA 95123, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Valencia Mauricio, 672 Chemaketa, Santa Jose, CA 95123. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/09/2023.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is
By: /s/
Patty
Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691434
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691419
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: TORO TAXES, REYES LEGAL SERVICES
115 N. 4th St, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): REYES TAX CONSULTATIONS LLC, 987 Prevost St, Santa Jose, CA 95123. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/17/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Claudia I Reyes REYES TAX CONSULTANTS LLC President Article/reg#: 20225341126
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/09/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691419
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691600
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: ESTEFANIA BEAUTY GLOW, 778 N. 1st St, Ste #203, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Stephanie Hung, 2181 Summerton Dr, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/13/2023. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Stephanie Hung
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/13/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN 691600
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691667
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: BRISCEN STONE & LANDSCAPING, 652 Kodiak Ct Apt 3, Sunnyvale, CA 94087, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Martin Contreras Gonzalez, 652 Kodiak Ct Apt 3, Sunnyvale, CA 94087. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/15/2023.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Martin Contreras Gonzalez
This statement was filed with the Co. Clerk-
Recorder of Santa Clara County on 01/17/2023. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 691667
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691627
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Total Care Carpet Cleaning, 2020 Southwest Expwy Apt G1, San Jose, CA 95126, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Eduardo Santos, 2020 Southwest expwy Apt G1, Santa Jose, CA 95126. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/13/2023.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Eduardo Santos
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/13/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691627
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691490
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as:
Florez By Maleja, 1882
Trade Zone Way, San Jose, CA 95131, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a general partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Mayra Alejandra Guzman Chavez, 1882 Trade Zone Way, San Jose, CA 95131. Biviana Florez Murillo, 1882 Trade Zone Way, San
Jose, CA 95131. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 02/14/2022. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN690780. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Biviana Florez Murillo
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/10/2023. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 691490
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO.
23CV409835
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Liang Liu and Qinqin Zhu INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Liang Liu and Qinqin Zhu have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Jingzhi Liu to Dennis Jingzhi Liu 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/16/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept.,
13 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 JOBS / CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Nov 12, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV409679
in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 09, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV4099834
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Xiaofeng Lan INTERESTED PER-
SONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
ary 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV409238
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Sara Giris Halasa INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Sara Giris Halasa has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Sara Giris Hanna AKA Sara Hanna AKA
Sara Giris Halasa AKA
fornia, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Haidee
Flores INTERESTED
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Kitty Moonbeam Wilson INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Kitty Moonbeam Wilson has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Kitty Moonbeam Wilson to Eithne Rowan Wilson 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition
Xiaofeng Lan has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Xiaofeng Lan to Orchid Xiaofeng Lan 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/16/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 12, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; Febru-
Sara Halasa to Sara Giris Nashash 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/02/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Dec 29, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV409784
Superior Court of Cali-
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Haidee Flores has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Haidee Flores to Guadalupe Martinez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 01/11/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jan 11, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV409895 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Mandip Kaur INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Mandip Kaur has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as fol-
lows: a. Gurshaan Singh to Gurshaan Singh Daula 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/16/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 13, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV409791
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Jessica Nicole Peterson INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Jessica Nicole Peterson has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Peterson to Anaya, Alondra, Torrez, Muniz 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition
for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 11, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV409949
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Joakim Quach
Frate-Gregersen and Ondina Elisabeta
Frate-Gregersen INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Joakim Quach Frate-Gregersen and Ondina Elisabeta
Frate Gregersen has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Emma Joseline Gregersen Quach to Emma Josephine
Frate-Gregersen b.
Hazel Lorelei Gregersen to Hazel Lorelei FrateGregersen 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the pe-
tition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEAR-
ING: Date: 05/16/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 17, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27; February 3, 10, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 23CV409847
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Annand Balasubramaniyam & Naveena Colanakuduru INTERESTED
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Annand Balasubramaniyam & Naveena Colanakuduru has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Aryan Annand to Siddarth Annand 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons
for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/16/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 12, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 20, 27;
February 3, 10, 2023
Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Sharon Jane Longnecker Case No. 22PR193899
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Sharon Jane Longnecker. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed by Misty Longnecker in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that Misty Longnecker be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 4. The petition requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval.
14 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023
Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: March 01, 2023, at 9:01am, Dept. 13, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7. If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing.
Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either:
1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court
clerk. 10. Attorney for Petitioner:
Ryan Steburg
2001 Gateway Pl., Suite 100W
San Jose, CA 95110 (408)573.1122
Run Dates: January 27, February 3 and February 10, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691336
The following person(s) is (are) doing business
as: Donde Carito Celis 387 S 1st St Suite 10, San Jose, CA 95113, Santa Clara County This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Ingrid Carolina Celis Mejia, 651 Branham Ln, San Jose, CA 95136. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 1/04/2023.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Ingrid Carolina Celis Mejia
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/04/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN 691336
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691098
The following person(s) is (are) doing business
as: Taqueria Ortiz 1164 McLaughlin Ave Suite B, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by a married couple. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Ana Laura Ortiz Gutierrez, 4024 McHenry Ave #20, Modesto, CA 95356. Barinderpal Singh, 4024 McHenry Ave #20, Modesto, CA
95356. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/27/2022.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Ana Laura Ortiz Gutierrez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/27/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 691098
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691317
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: CARILLO’S SRVICE, 3819 Seventress Blvd #302, San Jose, CA 95111, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Jacqueline Carrillo, 3819 Seventrees Blvd #302, San Jose, CA 95111. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 02/08/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Jacqueline Carrillo
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/04/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691317
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691428
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: DECOHOMES
2059 Camden Ave Suite 106, San Jose, CA 95124, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Leah Cowley, 2059 Camden Ave Suite 106, San Jose, CA 95124. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Leah Cowley
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/09/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/
Patty Camarena,
Deputy File No. FBN 691428
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691015
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MJ’s Boutique 1178 Curtiss Ave Apt 7, San Jose, CA 95125, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Maria Munoz, 1178 Curtiss Ave Apt 7, San Jose, CA 95125. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/21/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Maria Munoz
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/21/2022.
Regina Alcomendras,
County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691015
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691468
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: GENTLE HANDS CAREGIVERS, 370 Vista Roma Way Apt 217, San Jose, CA 95136, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a general partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Kristine Arnzamov, 370 Vista Roma Way, San Jose, CA 95136. Julian Tyrell Ayanyco, 370 Vista Roma Way, San Jose, CA 95136. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Julian Tyrell Glen Ayanyco
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/09/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691468
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691010
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: BLOUSY LAPEL LLC, 201 S 4th St Apt 401, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): BLOUSY LAPEL LLC, 201 S 4th St Apt 401, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began trans-
acting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/21/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Adriana Espana Recio BLOUSY LAPEL LLC
Owner/CEO Aritle/Reg#: 202129910503
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/21/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 691010
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691139
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Yesenia Cleaning Company, 371 America Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Yesenia Huerta, 371 America Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94085. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Yesenia Huerta
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/28/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691139
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO.
691138
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Roxana Cleaning Company, 209 Coy Dr #2, San Jose, CA 95123, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Roxana Diaz De Cortez, 209 Coy Dr #2, San Jose, CA 95123. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Roxana Diaz De Cortez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/28/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691138
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO.
691367
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: M MELENDEZ CLEANING, 750 N 23 Rd St Apt 14, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Maria De Jesus Melendez De Lopez, 750 N 23 Rd St Apt 14, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or
she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Maria De Jesus Melendez De Lopez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/05/2023. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By:
/s/ Nina Khamphilath,
Deputy File No. FBN 691367
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO.
691530
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Tacos la Choca Mexican Food 2644 Brahms Ave, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Esmeralda Hernandez Cordova, 2644 Brahms Ave, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 1/06/2021. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN691521. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Esmeralda Hernandez Cordova
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/11/2023. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 691530
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 691454
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Christemma Horticulture, 3357 Aramis Dr, San Jose, CA 95127, Santa Clara County.
15 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Mario Gaspar Garcia, 3357 Aramis Dr, San Jose, CA 95127. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 7/20/2020. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Mario Gaspar Garcia
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/09/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691454
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS
BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691363
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Go For It Pest Solutions, 4571 Renaissance Dr #726, San Jose, CA 95134, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Josue Campos, 4571 Renaissance Dr #726, San Jose, CA 95134. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Josue Campos
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/05/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 691363
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691326
The following person(s) is (are) doing business
as: Princess Fruit and Food, 1744 West San Carlos, San Jose, CA 95126, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are):
Mario Alonso Gonzalez, 381 Meridian Ave, San Jose, CA 95126. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 1/04/2023. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: 689885. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Mario Alonso Gonzalez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 1/04/2023.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 691326
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691239
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: El Remanente Mexican Grill, 2118
Main Street Unit B, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Ana M Miranda, 2118 Main Street Unit B, Santa Clara, CA 95050. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/15/2022. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous
filing] of previous file #: FBN690329. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Ana M Miranda
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/30/2022. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By:
/s/
Elaine
Fader,
Deputy File No. FBN 691239
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 23CV409621
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Virginia Marie Barron INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.
Petitioner(s) Virginia Marie Barron has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Virginia Marie Barron AKA Virginia Marie Hussey to Gina Marie Anderson 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for
four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 06, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV406752
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Bertha Ochoa INTERESTED
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Bertha Ochoa has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Bertha Ochoa to Bertha Perez Martinez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 03/14/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Nov 13, 2022
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior
23CV409679
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO.
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Kitty Moonbeam Wilson INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Kitty Moonbeam Wilson has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Kitty Moonbeam Wilson to Eithne Rowan Wilson 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jan 09, 2023
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV406195
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Fariza Ashurova INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Fariza Ashurova has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Fariza Shurova to Fariza Muminova 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 03/07/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Nov 06, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 13, 20, 27;
February 3, 2023
Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of JOHN D. ROGERS, JR. Case No. 22PR193640
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JOHN D. ROGERS, JR. JOHN D. ROGERS. 2. A Petition for Probate has
been filed by JOSEPH
D. DERMER, DERMER LAW FIRM APC in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that JOSEPH D. DERMER, DERMER LAW FIRM
APC be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 4. The petition requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: January 30, 2023, at 9:01am, Dept. 5, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7 If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either:
1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate
Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
10. Attorney for Petitioner:
Joseph D. Dermer DERMER LAW FIRM
15720 Winchester Blvd., Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95110 (408)395.5111
Run Date: January 13, 20, 27, 2023
NOTICE
OF DEATH
OF Linda Sue Shehan
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of Linda Sue Shehan, who was a resident of Santa Clara County, State of California, and died on December 01, 2022, in the City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara, State of California.
IF
YOU ARE A CREDI-
TOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim within four months from the date of first publication with the DERMER LAW FIRM, 15720 Winchester Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Gatos, California 95030 (408) 395-5111
Joseph D. Dermer, Esq. DERMER LAW FIRM
15720 Winchester Blvd., Ste 200 Los Gatos, CA 95030 Tel (408) 395-5111 Fax (408) 354-2797
16 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023
Court
January 13, 20, 27; February 3, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO.
691097
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: 777 Automotive Locksmith, 808 W. San Carlos St. Unit 729, San Jose, CA 95126, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Esteban Garcia Ureno, 808 W. San Carlos St. Unit 729, San Jose, CA 95126. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Esteban Garcia Ureno
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/27/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 691097
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO.
690891
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: KZ Janitorial, 3870 Glengrove Way, San Jose, CA 95121, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Karen Natalia Zepeda, 38780 Glengrove Way, San Jose, CA 95121. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/14/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant
who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Karen Natalia Zepeda
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/14/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 690891
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
NO. 690629
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Spring Cleaning Maid Services 1639 Waverly Ave, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Norma Mary Coa, 4100 The Woods Dr. San Jose, CA 95136. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/15//2018. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Norma M Coa
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/02/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 690629
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691034
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: KC Cleaning Services, 3036 Shadow Springs Pl, San Jose, CA 95171, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The
name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Evangelina Perez, 3036 Shadow Springs Pl, San Jose, CA 95171.
The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/22/2022.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Evangelina Perez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 12/23/2022.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 691034
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 691307
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Oaxaca Tamales Express, 2000 Bray Ave, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a married couple. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Belarmino Cipriano, 2127 Main St Apt 3, Santa Clara, CA 95050. Rufina Morales, 2127 Main St Apt 3, Santa Clara, CA 95050. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/02/2023.
This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Belarmino Cipriano
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 01/04/2023.
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 22CV402113
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Amanda Halley INTERESTED
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Amanda Halley has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Luis Aaron Gonzalez to Aaron Nathaniel Mejia 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 02/21/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Dec 30, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ana Cecilia Torres Montoya INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Ana Cecilia Torres Montoya has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ana-Cecilia
Torres-Montoya to (F) Ana (M)Cecilia (L)TorresMontoya 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE
OF HEARING: Date: 02/07/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Oct 04, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ashlyn Grace Contag to Ashlyn Reilly Snyder 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 04/11/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Dec 15, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV409459
indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date:
05/09/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jan 04, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV404983
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Virginia Carol Cervantes INTERESTED PERSONS:
includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 02/21/2023 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Oct 20, 2022
Jacqueline M. Arroyo Judge of the Superior Court
January 06, 13, 20, 27, 2023
Regina
Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 691307
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 22CV403919
Superior Court of California, County of Santa
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 22CV408433 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ashlyn Grace Contag INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Ashlyn Grace Contag has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Juan Gomez Gonora INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Juan Gomez Gonora has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Juan Gomez Gonora to Jonathan Michael Gomez
2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing
1. Petitioner(s) Virginia Carol Cervantes has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Elijah Alxaiver Carabajal to Elijah Alxaiver Sagastume 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that
17 EL OBSERVADOR | www.el-observador.com JAN 27, 2023 - FEB 02, 2023 CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
Suzanne Potter & Claire Elise California News Service/Grist
Mario Jiménez Castillo El Observador
