SUPREME COURT GIVES CITIES IN CALIFORNIA AND BEYOND MORE POWER TO CRACK DOWN ON HOMELESS CAMPS
The ruling by the conservative court majority means cities no longer are prohibited from punishing homeless people for camping if they have nowhere else to go. Homeless people and their advocates say the decision criminalizes poor people who have no other options, for simply existing.
Marisa Kendall CalMatters
OnJune 28, the U.S. Supreme Court granted cities more power to arrest, cite and fine people who sleep outside in public places — overturning six years of legal protections for homeless residents in California and other western states.
In Grants Pass v. Johnson, the court sided with Grants Pass in a 6-3 decision, ruling that an ordinance passed by the Oregon city that essentially made it illegal for homeless residents to camp on all public property was not unconstitutional. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all Democratic appointees — dissented.
The much-anticipated decision overturns a prior influential Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, and means cities no longer are prohibited from punishing unhoused residents for camping if they have nowhere else to go. It will have major ramifications for how California leaders and law enforcement handle homeless encampments.
Now it’s up to western cities to decide whether to use existing ordinances or pass new ones to banish, cite or arrest homeless campers when no alternative shelter exists.
San Francisco is among cities ready to seize the new power. “This decision” Mayor London Breed told a news conference, “has really provided us with clarity that we will use in order to be a lot more aggressive with people who are choosing to stay on the streets of San Francisco — especially when we’re offering them help.”
Last year California cities and counties reported having roughly 71,000 emergency shelter or transitional housing beds. It would take more than twice that number to accommodate every unsheltered resident today.
“Homelessness is complex,” wrote Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, writing for the majority. “Its causes are many. So may be the public policy responses required to address it. At bottom, the
question this case presents is whether the Eighth Amendment grants federal judges primary responsibility for assessing those causes and devising those responses. It does not.”
The Supreme Court ruled regulating camping on public property does not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment — a clause that the court said is restricted to limiting the type and severity of punishment, not the reason for punishment. And the types of punishment Grants Pass imposed on homeless residents — “limited” fines and a maximum jail sentence of 30 days — don’t qualify as cruel and unusual because they aren’t designed to impose “terror, pain or disgrace,” he wrote.
The court also rejected the homeless respondents’ claim that ordinances banning people from camping, if there is no shelter available, essentially criminalize the very act of being homeless. Anti-camping ordinances, such as those adopted in Grants Pass, don’t take status into account; they apply to homeless people, but they also apply, for example, to vacationing backpackers and student protesters camping in front of municipal buildings.
Sotomayor, in her dissent, argued the court’s opinion leaves society’s most vulnerable people with an impossible choice: “Either stay awake or be arrested.”
“Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime,” she wrote, joined by Kagan and Jackson. “For some people, sleeping outside is their only option. The City of Grants Pass jails and fines those people for sleeping anywhere in public at any time, including in their cars, if they use as little as a blanket to keep warm or a rolled-up shirt as a pillow. For people with no access to shelter, that punishes them for being homeless. That is unconscionable and unconstitutional.”
“Arresting or fining people for trying to survive is expensive, counterproductive, and cruel.”
-JESSE RABINOWITZ, NATIONAL HOMELESSNESS
LAW CENTER
Ed Johnson, lead counsel for the homeless respondents, said while the decision is disappointing, it’s important to remember that it’s not up to the courts to solve homelessness.
“That job falls to all of us,” he said in a statement. “The
solution to our homelessness crisis is more affordable housing.”
Activists supporting the civil rights of unhoused people decried the ruling, which they called the most important Supreme Court decision on homelessness in decades. They argued it could result in people getting arrested sim-
Departamentos Sheridan
Lista de Espera Abierta para Unidades de 1 Recámara Subsidiadas por la Sección 8 de HUD para Hogares de Personas Mayores
Las solicitudes estarán disponibles a partir del 24 de junio de 2024 para una unidad de 1 recámara. Para aplicar, descargue la solicitud en www.altahousing.org/Find Housing -Sheridan Apartments o recójala en persona en 360 Sheridan Ave., Palo Alto, CA, 94306, de lunes a viernes, de 9:00 a.m. a 4:00 p.m. Las solicitudes completas deben devolverse por correo de EE. UU. o en persona a Sheridan Apts, 360 Sheridan Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94306, a más tardar a las 4:00 p.m. del 12 de julio de 2024.
No se aceptarán solicitudes enviadas por fax o correo electrónico.
ply for being homeless.
“The Supreme Court’s profoundly disappointing and unjust decision to overturn the Ninth Circuit’s ruling is a severe blow to the rights of unhoused individuals,” Jesse Rabinowitz, spokesperson for the National Homelessness Law Center, said in a statement. “Arresting or fining people for trying to survive is expensive, counterproductive, and cruel. While we are enraged, we are not surprised that this Court has again put the needs of the rich and powerful before the needs of everyday people struggling to get by.”
“This decision removes the legal ambiguities that have tied the hands of local officials for years…”
-CALIFORNIA GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM
But groups including the League of California Cities, California State Association of Counties, and the California Chamber of Commerce cheered the decision, saying it would finally allow for the removal of unsafe, unsanitary encampments.
“This ruling removes the shackles that have held back efforts to humanely get our unhoused residents the shelter and help they need and will enable us to restore order to our streets, sidewalks and public spaces,”
Jim Wunderman, president and CEO of the businessbacked Bay Area Council, said in a statement.
Even California Gov. Gavin Newsom weighed in, filing a “friend of the court” brief in which he wrote: “Hindering cities’ efforts to help their unhoused populations is as inhumane as it is unworkable.”
This morning Newsom hailed the ruling. “This decision removes the legal ambiguities that have tied the hands of local officials for years and limited their ability to deliver on commonsense measures to protect the safety and well-being of our communities,” he said in a statement.
The issue of homeless encampments has had the unusual effect of uniting some Democratic officials with conservatives who also pushed for a crackdown.
“Californians should not have to tolerate the encampments that have taken over our communities,” Senate GOP leader Brian Jones, who has been pushing without success for a statewide camping ban, said in a statement. “With this decision, Democrat politicians can no longer justify allowing this severe public health and safety crisis to persist on our streets. It’s time to clean up California.”
But not all elected officials were pleased with the outcome.
“Today’s decision is not surprising given the make-up of the Court but disappointing nonetheless,” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who has prioritized clearing encampments in her city by moving unhoused people into hotels, said in a statement. “This ruling must not be used as an excuse for cities across the country to attempt to arrest their way out of this problem or hide the homelessness crisis in neighboring cities or in jail. Neither will work, neither will save lives and that route is more expensive for taxpayers than actually solving the problem.”
San Diego recently passed an ordinance banning camping on all streets and sidewalks only if there are shelter beds available, and Mayor Todd Gloria gave no indication that would change. In a statement he said, “regardless of (the) Supreme Court ruling,” San Diego will continue expanding shelters and removing encampments it deems unsafe.
Those who are or have been homeless are worried about what happens now.
Anita De Asis Miralle, who goes by “Needa Bee,” was homeless for about eight years before finding housing in Oakland earlier this year. De Asis Miralle, who advocates for other unhoused people through her grassroots group The Village, worries the ruling will lead to cities disregarding their rights. Already, she said, she’s seen Oakland clear encampments without offering occupants adequate shelter. To her, those sweeps rip apart communities and take away people’s precarious sense of stability.
Tents outside the First Street U.S. Courthouse in Los Angeles, where homeless advocates and supporters rallied as the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C. heard oral arguments in the Grants Pass case, on April 22, 2024.
Photo Credit: Ted Soqui / CalMatters
“The big fear is not only how bold they’re going to be,” De Asis Miralle said, “but how much deeper into instability and trauma and homelessness it will drive people.”
How we got here
The case stems from a 2018 lawsuit against Grants Pass, a small city in southern Oregon that banned camping throughout its jurisdiction. The lower courts sided with homeless residents who argued that because humans need to sleep somewhere, the Grants Pass ordinance made it illegal to be homeless.
That decision was in line with an earlier Ninth Circuit appellate ruling — Martin v. Boise — that determined that punishing an unhoused person for camping in public, if they have nowhere else to go, violates the Constitution’s 8th Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
The 2018 Boise ruling changed how cities respond to homeless encampments. Many interpreted the court decision to mean that they could not clear an encampment unless they had a shelter bed available for every displaced resident. Local courts have hit several California cities — including San Francisco, Sacramento, Chico and San Rafael — with orders halting or delaying encampment clean-ups due to lack of adequate shelter.
Many California cities and law enforcement agencies have complained that the decision tied their hands and prevented them from enforcing common-sense ordinances governing homeless encampments. The Supreme Court majority agreed, saying Boise created an “unworkable” mandate for cities.
The Boise “experiment” forced cities and law enforcement agencies to determine if there is a shelter bed available for each homeless individual they attempt to fine or arrest, Justice Gorsuch wrote. That’s a difficult question, as it can depend on factors such as the quality of shelter beds available, a person’s individual needs, whether they rejected a prior offer of shelter, and more.
“Those unavoidable questions have plunged courts and cities across the Ninth Circuit into waves of litigation,” Gorsuch wrote.
The COVID pandemic made the situation more complex. In 2020, federal health regulations recommended that cities not clear any encampments, in order to limit the spread of the virus and protect vulnerable homeless residents. Encampments in many California cities grew and became more entrenched, with residents building makeshift shacks out of scraps of wood and metal.
When vaccines arrived and concern about the pandemic gradually died down, it left in its wake a growing discontent over the proliferation of homeless encampments in public open spaces. With that came a chorus of complaints from city leaders and law enforcement that the Boise ruling stripped them of the power to enforce rules regarding homeless residents.
It’s an issue that’s particularly crucial in California, which is home to nearly a third of the country’s homeless population. More than 180,000 unhoused people live in the Golden State, including more than 123,000 people who sleep in encampments or other places not meant for habitation.
Multiple California cities already are cracking down on those homeless camps. Some
were getting around the Boise ruling by banning camps in certain areas rather than throughout the entire city. San Diego recently started enforcing a controversial ordinance that prohibits camps near schools, shelters and transit hubs, in parks, and — if shelter beds are available — on all public sidewalks. At the same time, the city opened two sanctioned tent campsites where about 500 unhoused people can sleep.
San Diego’s ordinance has led to a noticeable decrease in the number of homeless residents camping downtown. But camping is just as prevalent — if not more so — along highway on- and off-ramps, and along the San Diego River.
Senate Bill 1011 by Jones would have imposed a statewide camping ban similar to San Diego’s. But the bill died in its first committee hearing, suggesting a lack of appetite for a statewide crackdown.
Activists who provide homeless services, as well as researchers who study the population, say cities should not be able to break up encampments with impunity. Encampment sweeps cause homeless residents to lose important belongings and documents, push them farther away from their sources of food, medicine and other services, and — especially if arrests or citations are involved — make it harder for them to find jobs and housing, according to experts.
“The enforcement of laws criminalizing homelessness has been shown to have wide-ranging and lingering negative impacts on those experiencing homelessness, which create significant barriers to exiting homelessness,” a group of more than 50 social scientists specializing in homelessness wrote in a “friends of the court” brief in the Grants Pass case.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in April. In their comments and questions, the justices appeared divided along ideological lines, with the liberal justices more sympathetic to the arguments of the homeless residents. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Underscoring the importance of the case, more than three dozen elected officials and organizations weighed in by filing “friend of the court” briefs.
What happens now?
This is far from the last time the courts will weigh in on the rights of homeless residents, Johnson, the lawyer for the homeless respondents in the Grants Pass case, said during a media call.
There are several legal claims Johnson’s team raised against the Grants Pass ordinance that the Supreme Court did not address on June 28. For example, the team argued the ordinance imposed excessive fines, and was too vague. His team can reargue those points when the Supreme Court remands the Grants Pass case back down to the lower court.
Johnson also promised to continue pursuing additional lawsuits on behalf of homeless individuals and groups who are fighting for their right to sleep outside in peace.
“The legal fight on this issue will continue today and every day,” he said, “until cities stop punishing their homeless residents for trying to survive.”
LA
CORTE SUPREMA OTORGA A LAS CIUDADES DE CALIFORNIA EL PODER PARA TOMAR MEDIDAS ENÉRGICAS CONTRA LOS CAMPAMENTOS DE PERSONAS SIN HOGAR
El fallo de la mayoría conservadora del tribunal significa que las ciudades ya no tienen prohibido castigar a las personas sin hogar por acampar si no tienen otro lugar adonde ir. Las personas sin hogar y sus defensores dicen que la decisión criminaliza a los pobres que no tienen otras opciones, simplemente por existir.
Marisa Kendall CalMatters
El28 de junio, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos otorgó a las ciudades más poder para arrestar, citar y multar a personas que duermen al aire libre en lugares públicos, anulando seis años de protecciones legales para residentes sin hogar en California y otros estados del oeste.
En Grants Pass v. Johnson , el tribunal se puso del lado de Grants Pass en una decisión de 6 a 3, dictaminando que una ordenanza aprobada por la ciudad de Oregón que esencialmente hacía ilegal que los residentes sin hogar acamparan en todas las propiedades públicas no era inconstitucional. Los jueces Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan y Ketanji Brown Jackson, todos designados por los demócratas, discreparon.
La tan esperada decisión anula un influyente fallo anterior del Tribunal de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito y significa que las ciudades ya no tienen prohibido castigar a los residentes sin vivienda por acampar si no tienen otro lugar adonde ir. Tendrá importantes ramificaciones en la forma en que los líderes y las autoridades de California manejan los campamentos de personas sin hogar.
“La falta de vivienda es compleja”, escribió el juez Neil Gorsuch, designado por Trump, en nombre de la mayoría. “Sus causas son muchas. También pueden serlo las respuestas de política pública necesarias para abordarlo. En el fondo, la pregunta que presenta este caso es si la Octava Enmienda otorga a los jueces federales la responsabilidad primaria de evaluar esas causas y diseñar esas respuestas. No es así”.
Regular acampar en propiedad pública no constituye un “castigo cruel e inusual” según la Octava Enmienda, una cláusula que, según el tribunal, se limita a limitar el tipo y la gravedad del castigo, no el motivo del castigo. Y los tipos de castigo que Grants Pass impuso a los residentes sin hogar (multas “limitadas” y una sentencia máxima de cárcel de 30 días) no califican como crueles e inusuales porque no están diseñados para imponer “terror, dolor o vergüenza”, dijo. escribió.
El tribunal también rechazó la afirmación de los demandados sin hogar de que las ordenanzas que prohíben a las personas acampar, si no hay refugio disponible, esencialmente criminalizan el acto mismo de estar sin hogar. Las ordenanzas contra los campamentos, como las adoptadas en Grants Pass, no tienen en cuenta el estatus; se aplican a las personas sin hogar, pero también se aplican, por ejemplo, a los mochileros de vacaciones y a los manifestantes estudiantiles que acampan frente a los edificios municipales.
Sotomayor, en su desacuerdo, argumentó que la opinión del tribunal deja a las personas más vulnerables de la sociedad con una opción imposible: “O permanecer despiertos o ser arrestados”.
“Dormir es una necesidad biológica, no un delito”, escribió, acompañada por Kagan y Jackson. “Para algunas personas, dormir al aire libre es su única opción. La Ciudad de Grants Pass encarcela y multa a aquellas personas por dormir en cualquier lugar público en cualquier momento, incluso en sus automóviles, si usan tan solo una manta para mantenerse abrigados o una camisa enrollada como almohada. Para las personas que no tienen acceso a un refugio, eso las castiga por no tener hogar. Eso es inconcebible e inconstitucional”.
“Arrestar o multar a personas por intentar sobrevivir es costoso, contraproducente y cruel”.
-JESSE RABINOWITZ, CENTRO NACIONAL DE DERECHO PARA PERSONAS SIN HOGAR
Ed Johnson, abogado principal de los demandados sin hogar, dijo que si bien la decisión del 28 de junio es decepcionante, es importante recordar que no corresponde a los tribunales resolver el problema de las personas sin hogar.
“Ese trabajo nos corresponde a todos”, dijo en un comunicado. “La solución a nuestra crisis de personas sin hogar es viviendas más asequibles”.
Los activistas que apoyan los derechos civiles de las personas sin hogar condenaron el fallo, que calificaron como la decisión más importante de la Corte Suprema sobre
Un campamento cubre una acera cerca de la entrada de una autopista en el centro de San Diego el 22 de marzo de 2024.
Photo Credit: Kristian Carreon / CalMatters
las personas sin hogar en décadas. Argumentaron que podría dar lugar a que se arrestara a personas simplemente por no tener hogar.
“La decisión profundamente decepcionante e injusta de la Corte Suprema de revocar el fallo del Noveno Circuito es un duro golpe a los derechos de las personas sin hogar”, dijo en un comunicado Jesse Rabinowitz, portavoz del Centro Nacional de Leyes para Personas sin Hogar. “Arrestar o multar a personas por intentar sobrevivir es costoso, contraproducente y cruel. Si bien estamos enfurecidos, no nos sorprende que esta Corte haya vuelto a anteponer las necesidades de los ricos y poderosos a las necesidades de la gente común que lucha por salir adelante”.
“Esta decisión elimina las ambigüedades legales que han atado las manos de los funcionarios locales durante años…”
-GOBERNADOR DE CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM
Pero grupos como la Liga de Ciudades de California, la Asociación de Condados del Estado de California y la Cámara de California aplaudieron la decisión, diciendo que finalmente permitiría la remoción de campamentos inseguros e insalubres.
“Este fallo elimina los grilletes que han frenado los esfuerzos para brindar humanamente a nuestros residentes sin vivienda el refugio y la ayuda que necesitan y nos permitirá restablecer el orden en nuestras calles, aceras y espacios públicos”, dijo Jim Wunderman, presidente y director ejecutivo de la empresa. respaldado por el Consejo del Área de la Bahía, dijo en un comunicado.
Incluso el gobernador de California, Gavin Newsom, intervino y presentó un escrito de “amigo de la corte” en el que escribió: “Obstaculizar los esfuerzos de las ciudades para ayudar a sus poblaciones sin vivienda es tan inhumano como inviable”.
Esta mañana Newsom elogió el fallo. “Esta decisión elimina las ambigüedades legales que han atado las manos de los funcionarios locales durante años y limitado su capacidad para aplicar medidas de sentido común para proteger la seguridad y el bienestar de nuestras comunidades”, dijo en un comunicado.
La cuestión de los campamentos de personas sin hogar ha tenido el efecto inusual de unir a algunos funcionarios demócratas con los conservadores que también presionaron por una ofensiva.
“Los californianos no deberían tener que tolerar los campamentos que se han apoderado de nuestras comunidades”, dijo en un comunicado el líder republicano del Senado, Brian Jones, quien ha estado presionando sin éxito para que se prohíba los campamentos en todo el estado. “Con esta decisión, los políticos demócratas ya no pueden justificar que se permita que esta grave crisis de salud y seguridad pública persista en nuestras calles. Es hora de limpiar California”.
Pero no todos los funcionarios electos quedaron satisfechos con el resultado.
“La decisión de hoy no es sorprendente dada la composición de la Corte, pero sí decepcionante”, dijo en un comunicado la alcaldesa de Los Ángeles, Karen Bass, quien ha dado prioridad a la limpieza de los campamentos en su ciudad trasladando a las personas sin vivienda a hoteles. “Esta sentencia no debe utilizarse como excusa para que las ciudades de todo el país intenten salir de este problema mediante arrestos u ocultar la crisis de las personas sin hogar en las ciudades vecinas o en la cárcel.
Ninguno de los dos funcionará, ninguno salvará vidas y esa ruta es más costosa para los contribuyentes que resolver realmente el problema”.
Quienes están o han estado sin hogar están preocupados por lo que sucede ahora.
Anita De Asis Miralle, conocida como “Needa Bee”, estuvo sin hogar durante unos ocho años antes de encontrar una vivienda en Oakland a principios de este año. De Asis Miralle, que aboga por otras personas sin hogar a través de su grupo de base The Village, teme que el fallo lleve a que las ciudades ignoren sus derechos. Dijo que ya ha visto a Oakland despejar campamentos sin ofrecer a sus ocupantes un refugio adecuado. Para ella, esas redadas destrozan comunidades y quitan a la gente la precaria sensación de estabilidad.
“El gran temor no es sólo cuán audaces van a ser”, dijo De Asis Miralle, “sino cuánto más profunda será la inestabilidad, el trauma y la falta de vivienda que llevará a la gente”.
¿Cómo llegamos aquí?
El caso surge de una demanda de 2018 contra Grants Pass, una pequeña ciudad del sur de Oregón que prohibió acampar en toda su jurisdicción. Los tribunales inferiores se pusieron del lado de los residentes sin hogar, quienes argumentaron que debido a que los humanos necesitan dormir en algún lugar, la ordenanza Grants Pass hizo ilegal estar sin hogar.
Esa decisión estaba en consonancia con un fallo anterior de apelación del Noveno Circuito ( Martin v. Boise ) que determinó que castigar a una persona sin vivienda por acampar en público, si no tiene otro lugar adonde ir, viola la prohibición de la Octava Enmienda de la Constitución sobre castigos crueles e inusuales.
El fallo de Boise de 2018 cambió la forma en que las ciudades responden a los campamentos de personas sin hogar. Muchos interpretaron la decisión judicial en el sentido de que no podían desalojar un campamento a menos que tuvieran una cama en un refugio disponible para cada residente desplazado. Los tribunales locales han dictado órdenes para detener o retrasar la limpieza de los campamentos en varias ciudades de California, incluidas San Francisco, Sacramento, Chico y San Rafael, debido
a la falta de alojamiento adecuado.
Muchas ciudades y agencias policiales de California se han quejado de que la decisión les ató las manos y les impidió hacer cumplir ordenanzas de sentido común que rigen los campamentos de personas sin hogar. La mayoría de la Corte Suprema estuvo de acuerdo y dijo que Boise creó un mandato “inviable” para las ciudades.
El “experimento” de Boise obligó a las ciudades y a los organismos encargados de hacer cumplir la ley a determinar si hay una cama de refugio disponible para cada persona sin hogar que intentan multar o arrestar, escribió el juez Gorsuch. Esa es una pregunta difícil, ya que puede depender de factores como la calidad de las camas disponibles en los refugios, las necesidades individuales de una persona, si rechazaron una oferta previa de refugio y más.
“Esas preguntas inevitables han sumido a los tribunales y ciudades de todo el Noveno Circuito en oleadas de litigios”, escribió Gorsuch.
La pandemia de COVID complicó la situación. En 2020, las regulaciones sanitarias federales recomendaron que las ciudades no desalojaran ningún campamento para limitar la propagación del virus y proteger a los residentes vulnerables sin hogar. Los campamentos en muchas ciudades de California crecieron y se arraigaron, y los residentes construyeron chozas improvisadas con trozos de madera y metal.
Cuando llegaron las vacunas y la preocupación por la pandemia disminuyó gradualmente, dejó a su paso un creciente descontento por la proliferación de campamentos para personas sin hogar en espacios públicos abiertos. Con eso vino un coro de quejas de los líderes de la ciudad y las autoridades de que el fallo de Boise los despojó del poder de hacer cumplir las reglas relativas a los residentes sin hogar.
Es una cuestión particularmente crucial en California, donde vive casi un tercio de la población sin hogar del país. Más de 180.000 personas sin vivienda viven en el Estado Dorado, incluidas más de 123.000 personas que duermen en campamentos u otros lugares no destinados a ser habitados.
Varias ciudades de California ya están tomando
CIUDAD DE HAYWARD LLAMADA Y AVISO DE ELECCIÓN MUNICIPAL GENERAL
POR EL PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que se llevará a cabo una elección municipal general en la ciudad de Hayward el martes 5 de noviembre de 2024 para los siguientes funcionarios:
Para Cuatro (4) Miembros del Concejo Municipal: Mandato completo de cuatro años El período de nominación para estos cargos comienza el 15 de julio de 2024 y cierra el 9 de agosto de 2024, a las 5:00 p.m. Si los documentos de nominación para un funcionario titular de la ciudad no se presentan antes del 9 de agosto de 2024, el período de presentación se extenderá hasta el 14 de agosto de 2024 a las 5:00 p. m.
La información sobre la nominación se puede obtener comunicándose con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal, 777 B Street, Hayward, California, (510) 583-4400, en el horario de 8:00 a. m. y 5:00 p. m., de lunes a viernes. La información también está disponible en el sitio web de la Ciudad en https://www.hayward-ca.gov/your-government/elections Si nadie o solo una persona es nominada para un cargo electivo, el nombramiento para el cargo electivo se puede realizar según lo prescrito en la Sección 10229 del Código Electoral del Estado de California.
Las urnas estarán abiertas entre las 7:00 a. m. y las 8:00 p. m. el día de las elecciones.
FECHA: 5 de julio de 2024
Miriam Lens, Secretaria Municipal Ciudad de Hayward
medidas enérgicas contra esos campamentos para personas sin hogar. Algunos están eludiendo el fallo de Boise prohibiendo los campamentos en ciertas áreas en lugar de en toda la ciudad. San Diego recientemente comenzó a aplicar una controvertida ordenanza que prohíbe los campamentos cerca de escuelas, refugios y centros de tránsito, en parques y, si hay camas disponibles en los refugios, en todas las aceras públicas. Al mismo tiempo, la ciudad abrió dos campamentos de tiendas de campaña autorizados, donde pueden dormir unas 500 personas sin hogar.
La ordenanza de San Diego ha provocado una disminución notable en el número de residentes sin hogar que acampan en el centro. Pero acampar es igual de frecuente, si no más, a lo largo de las rampas de entrada y salida de las autopistas y a lo largo del río San Diego.
El proyecto de ley 1011 del Senado de Jones habría impuesto una prohibición de acampar en todo el estado similar a la de San Diego. Pero el proyecto de ley murió en su primera audiencia del comité , lo que sugiere una falta de apetito por una ofensiva a nivel estatal.
Los activistas que brindan servicios a las personas sin hogar, así como los investigadores que estudian la población, dicen que las ciudades no deberían poder desmantelar los campamentos con impunidad. Las redadas en campamentos hacen que los residentes sin hogar pierdan pertenencias y documentos importantes, los alejan aún más de sus fuentes de alimentos, medicinas y otros servicios y, especialmente si hay arrestos o citaciones, les dificultan encontrar trabajo y vivienda, según expertos.
“Se ha demostrado que la aplicación de leyes que penalizan la falta de vivienda tiene impactos negativos amplios y persistentes en quienes se encuentran sin hogar, lo que crea barreras significativas para salir de la falta de vivienda”, escribió un grupo de más de 50 científicos sociales especializados en personas sin hogar en un informe de “amigos de escrito del tribunal” en el caso Grants Pass.
La Corte Suprema escuchó los argumentos orales en abril. En sus comentarios y preguntas, los jueces parecían divididos según líneas ideológicas, y los jueces liberales simpatizaban más con los argumentos de los residentes sin hogar. La Corte Suprema tiene una mayoría conservadora de 6-3.
Subrayando la importancia del caso, más de tres docenas de funcionarios electos y organizaciones intervinieron presentando escritos de “amigos de la corte”.
¿Que pasa ahora?
Esta está lejos de ser la última vez que los tribunales opinarán sobre los derechos de los residentes sin hogar, dijo Johnson, el abogado de los demandados sin hogar en el caso Grants Pass, durante una llamada a los medios. Hay varios reclamos legales que el equipo de Johnson planteó contra la ordenanza Grants Pass que la Corte Suprema no abordó el 28 de junio. Por ejemplo, el equipo argumentó que la ordenanza imponía multas excesivas y era demasiado vaga. Su equipo puede volver a discutir esos puntos cuando la Corte Suprema devuelva el caso Grants Pass al tribunal inferior.
Johnson también prometió continuar presentando demandas adicionales en nombre de personas y grupos sin hogar que luchan por su derecho a dormir afuera en paz.
“La lucha legal sobre este tema continuará hoy y todos los días”, dijo, “hasta que las ciudades dejen de castigar a sus residentes sin hogar por intentar sobrevivir”.
vector.santaclaracounty.gov vector.santaclaracounty.gov
MULTILINGUAL CAMPAIGN DEPLOYED ACROSS LOS ANGELES TO PREPARE FOR FIRST SUMMER HEAT WAVE
LA has launched a citywide campaign in more than a dozen languages to spread the word about the dangers of extreme heat.
Miriam Bar-Zemer Ethnic Media Services
Astemperatures soar into the triple digits during this summer’s first heat wave in Los Angeles, Sandra Villalobos has been going door-to-door sharing information with neighbors on how to stay cool.
Her bilingual team of promotoras — community health workers with the nonprofit Visión y Compromiso — is fanning out around her Boyle Heights neighborhood with materials in Spanish and English.
Villalobos said, “We could tell when we open the door how hot and humid it was inside.”
The promotoras urge residents to get air conditioning or at least fans for what is predicted to be a long hot summer. They distribute towels to moisten and drape around overheated necks and umbrellas for shade when people venture outside.
The promotoras are part of a citywide campaign in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, and 10 other languages, working with 27 community-based organizations to spread the word about the dangers of extreme heat and what residents can do to protect their families and pets.
“It’s critically important that all communities, but in particular vulnerable communities, receive this kind of information in advance of a heatwave,” said Marta Segura, the city’s chief heat officer and director of its climate emergency office. “Heatwaves are lasting longer. They are more frequent. So they are impacting communities, now more than ever.”
Los Angeles is well-known for sunshine nearly yearround. But that sunshine and rising temperatures due to climate change are now a threat to public health. Extreme heat can be extremely dangerous, especially for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and children and in communities with little shade.
The potential for harm is compounded when communities experience other vulnerabilities such as poor mobility, aging housing infrastructure, lack of green space, or linguistic isolation. According to a statewide survey on climate-related social vulnerability, while 27% of the state’s population lives in Los Angeles County, it is home to 40% of the state’s highly vulnerable population, about 5 million people (LA County Vulnerability Assessment, 2021).
The city’s extreme heat preparedness campaign, Heat Relief 4 LA, will run through the summer and into the fall, when some of the hottest temperatures can occur in the city. But the first heat waves are of most concern as people’s bodies have not yet acclimated to major temperature shifts, and Segura worries that this year’s summer is projected to be one of the hottest on record.
The campaign is prioritizing the most vulnerable communities in Los Angeles and deploying multilingual campaigns in areas of the city where many families speak languages other than English at home. And the 27 community-based organizations are each using unique strategies to reach their respective communities.
Black Women for Wellness, an organization that focuses on reproductive health and environmental justice, is conducting workshops and distributing newsletters in South L.A This summer, Black Women for Wellness is distributing a “Stay Cool Guide” for pregnant mothers.
“While heat relief isn’t our main campaign, it’s a crucial issue for our community,” said communications managers Myeisha Essex. “Extreme heat affects Black women and other marginalized groups due to systemic inequities in housing, access to green spaces, and healthcare.”
The city’s climate emergency office is helping Black Women for Wellness address those closely related issues and the organization will also be involved in designing a “heat action plan” for the city that includes a reproductive justice framework.
“Our involvement will ensure that the plan addresses the unique needs of Black women, promoting equity and resilience in the face of climate change,” Essex said.
In the city’s downtown Chinatown neighborhood, the Southeast Asian Community Alliance, is sending outreach teams several times a week to check on residents who live in buildings that are over 100 years old without elevators, comprised of single-room occupancy units without air conditioning. Most are low-income, elderly, and have limited mobility.
The alliance is distributing Chinese language materials from the climate emergency campaign, while also applying its understanding of the special nature of the neighborhood and the vulnerabilities of its residents.
Sissy Trinh, executive director of the alliance, said many residents buy their rice by the cup because they cannot carry or store large amounts. So, water, which weighs much more, also has to be distributed in more frequent, smaller quantities, too.
The neighborhood’s precarious housing conditions and a dense urban environment with little green space and shade all underscore the importance of neighborhood cooling centers, such as air-conditioned libraries and recreation centers, as essential infrastructure during extreme heat events, she said.
“We have tenants that are one rent increase away from becoming homeless,” said Trinh. “Seniors are skipping meals in order to have enough money for rent at the end of the month. AC is a luxury.”
This story was produced by Ethnic Media Services in collaboration with the Laboratory for Environmental Narrative Strategies (LENS) at UCLA as part of the Greening American Cities initiative supported by the Bezos Earth Fund.
JOBS / CLASSIFIEDS / LEGALS
AVISO DE ELECCIÓN
POR LA PRESENTE SE DA AVISO que se celebrará una Elección Municipal General en la Ciudad de Burlingame el martes 5 de noviembre de 2024 para los siguientes cargos:
- Elegir un (1) Concejal, por un término parcial de dos (2) años para el Distrito 1 del Concejo
- Elegir un (1) Concejal, por un término completo de cuatro (4) años para el Distrito 2 del Concejo
- Elegir un (1) Concejal, por un término completo de cuatro (4) años para el Distrito 4 del Concejo
El plazo de presentación de candidatos se abre el lunes 15 de julio de 2024 a las 8:00 a.m. y cierra el viernes 9 de agosto de 2024 a las 5:00 p.m.
No habrá prórroga del plazo de presentación.
Todos los candidatos interesados deben ser residentes y votantes registrados del Distrito del Concejo de Burlingame que están buscando en el momento en que se emiten los documentos de nominación.
La Ciudad de Burlingame cobra una tarifa de presentación de $25. Además, a los candidatos que deseen presentar una declaración de candidato en el Folleto de Información para el Votante se les cobrará una tarifa basada en el costo de imprimir su declaración. La tarifa es determinada por la División de Registro y Elecciones del Condado de San Mateo. Los documentos de nominación para el puesto electo de Concejal del Distrito 1 de Burlingame, Concejal del Distrito 2 de Burlingame y Concejal del Distrito 4 de Burlingame deben obtenerse en la oficina de la Secretaria Municipal, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Para obtener más información, por favor póngase en contacto con la Secretaria Municipal Meaghan Hassel-Shearer al (650)-558-7203 o en mhasselshearer@burlingame.org.
TAMBIÉN SE DA AVISO que las Boletas de Voto por Correo y Condicionales votadas y enviadas para la Elección que se celebrará el martes 5 de noviembre de 2024, se contarán en el lugar que se indica a continuación:
Condado de San Mateo División de Registro y Elecciones 40 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402
ADEMÁS SE DA AVISO que en dicha elección, las urnas estarán abiertas desde las 7:00 A.M. hasta las 8:00 P.M. del día de las elecciones, el 5 de noviembre de 2024. Además, los centros de votación estarán abiertos a partir de 29 días antes de las elecciones en todo el Condado para todos los votantes interesados. Se proporcionará una lista de lugares y horarios en el Folleto de Información para el Votante.
Fecha: 1 de julio de 2024 /s/ Meaghan Hassel-Shearer
Secretaria Municipal de Burlingame / Funcionaria de Elecciones Municipales 7/5/24
CNS-3829007# EL OBSERVADOR
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT NO. 707346
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: T&H CONSTRUCTION CORP , 2349 Pacheco Dr, San Jose, CA 95133, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): T&H CONSTRUCTION CORP, 2349 Pacheco Dr, San Jose, CA 95133. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/15/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Thu Duc Nguyen T&H CONSTRUCTION CORP
President
Article/Reg#: 6256530
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 707346
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707347
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as:
LOVE NAILS SALON INC 715 W Hamilton Ave Ste 1120, Campbell, CA 95008, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): LOVE NAILS SALON INC, 715 W Hamilton Ave, Campbell, CA 95008. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Phuong Lan Truong LOVE NAILS SALON INC President Article/Reg#: 6269711 Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 707347
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707379
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: JOINUS CARE, 1679 Duvall Dr, San Jose, CA 95130, Santa
Recorder of Santa Clara County on 6/28/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 707415
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707293
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Eclectic Elements 1824 Dry Creek Road, San Jose, CA 95124, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): J&L Creative Solutions LLC, 1824 Dry Creek Road, San Jose, CA 95124. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Laurie M. DeGange J&L Creative Solutions LLC
Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): OK HEE KIM, 1679 Duvall Dr, San Jose, CA 95130. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ OK HEE KIM
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/27/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707379
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707476
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: ONE LANE TECHNOLOGIES, ANTHEON 3679 Glen Hardy Ct, San Jose, CA 95148, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Amy Nilson, 774 Brannan Place, Concord, CA 94518. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed
County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Ronald Nguyen, Deputy File No. FBN 696485
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707383
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: CARE ONE NURSING, TRESL 1104 E Childs Avenue, Merced, CA 95341, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): SV RECRUITING AGENCY LLC, 1165 Lincoln Ave 150, San Jose, CA 95125. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/06/2022. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Marilyn Reyes SV RECRUITING AGENCY LLC
above on 07/02/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Amy Nilson
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 7/02/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707476
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707415
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MANESTATE, 2462 Booksin Ave, San Jose, CA 95125, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Mikhael Lerman, 2462 Booksin Ave, San Jose, CA 95125. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 04/01/1988. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Mikhael Lerman This statement was filed with the Co. Clerk-
Secretary/Treasury
Article/Reg#: C2981473
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/21/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707136
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707133
who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Azucena Torres Owner This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/25/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707234
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
Member Article/Reg#: 201533210016
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024.
Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN 707293
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 696485
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: VLBA CONSULTING, 165 Monroe St Apt 3, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Veronica Carrillo, 165 Monroe Street, Apt 3, Santa Clara, CA 95050. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/14/2023. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Veronica Carrillo
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/14/2024. Regina Alcomendras,
Managing Member Article/Reg#: 202201011170
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/27/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 707383
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024 FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707136
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MORA’S PAINTING INC, CUSTOM COLORS PAINTING IN/OUT, 20 Harold Ave Ste A-3, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): MORA’S PAINTING INC, 20 Harold Ave Ste A-3, Santa Clara, CA 95050. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 02/28/2002. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: . “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Alma Cristina Mendoza MORA’S PAINTING INC
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: WESTMONT OF MORGAN HILL, WESTMONT LIVING BUS FLEET 1160 Cochrane Road, Morgan Hill, CA 95037, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Andrew Plant, 3636 Nobel Drive, San Diego, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 11/01/2014. Michael O’Rourke, 3636 Nobel Drive, San Diego, CA 95122. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Andrew Plant MORGAN HILL SENIOR LIVING, LP General Partner Article/Reg#: 431722-95 Above entity was formed in the state of Oregon This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/21/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 707133
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707234
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: ANGEL’S CLEANING, 1822 Darwin Way, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Azucena Torres, 1822 Darwin Way, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707441
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: RAFI PAINTING LLC 1745 Cheney Dr, San Jose, CA 95128, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): RAFI PAINTING LLC, 1745 Cheney Dr, San Jose, CA 95128. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 07/01/2024. This filing is a refile
[Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN706447. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ J. Rafael Villafuentes Altamirano RAFI PAINTING LLC Owner
Article/Reg#: 202462811919
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 7/01/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707441
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707042
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: BLOSSOM TILE AND STONE COM, 1250 Yard Ct Ste E, San Jose, CA 95133, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Gregorio E Vergara, 1250 Yard Ct Ste E, San Jose, CA 95133. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 04/12/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement
is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Gregorio Vergara
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/18/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 707042
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441356
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Elizabeth Gonzalez Rocha INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Elizabeth Gonzalez Rocha has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Jayden Jorge Dominguez Gonzalez to Jayden Jorge Diaz Gonzalez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/03/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 18, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441838
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Liqing Wang & Weijie Li INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.
Petitioner(s) Liqing Wang & Weijie Li have filed a
petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Shengting Li to Andy Li 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jun 26, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441933
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Gabriela Galarza Ramos, Jaime Martinez Lozano INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Gabriela Galarza Ramos, Jaime Martinez Lozano have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Jaime Emilio Martinez Galarza to Emilio Martinez Galarza 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may
grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 27, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV441815
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Heather Ashley Miranda INTERESTED
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Heather Ashley Miranda has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Heather Ashley Miranda to Kit Miranda 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/10/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 26, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV442141
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the mat-
ter of the application of: Mimi Okada & Miyuki Takeuchi INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Mimi Okada & Miyuki Takeuchi has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Mimi Okada to Mimi Kira b. Miyuki Takeuchi to Miyuki Kira 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jul 01, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV442309
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Trinidad Mota Aguilera INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Trinidad Mota Aguilera has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Trinidad Mota Aguilera to (F) J Trinidad (L) Aguilera Mota 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show
cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/24/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jul 03, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV442024
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ehsan Kourkchi INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Ehsan Kourkchi has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ehsan (no middle name) Kourkchi to Edwin Ehsan Kay 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jun 28, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV442203
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Rhea Dishani Perera INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Rhea Dishani Perera has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Rhea Dishani Perera to Rhea Athena Pere 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jul 02, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
July 5, 12, 19, 26, 2024
First Amended Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Christine Michelle Tamer, deceased Case No. 24PR197341
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Christine Michelle Tamer. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed by Reilly Tamer in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate requests that Reilly Tamer be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative
will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: July 31, 2024, at 9:01am, Dept. 1, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7 If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
10. Attorney for Petitioner: Huma J. Ellahie 2542 S. Bascome Ave., STE 235, Campbell, CA 95008 (408)579-1282
July 5, 12, 19, 2024
Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Jeanie Kung
Case No. 24PR197485
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Christine Jeanie Kung. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed by Tina Kung in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. 3.The Petition for Probate
requests that Tina Kung be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: Aug 23, 2024, at 9:01am, Dept. 1, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7 If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
10. Petitioner: Tina Kung 5610 Cello Way, Fremont, CA 94538 (510)376-7910
July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707266
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: BAYAREA CAR SALES
4701 Patrick Henry Dr Bldg 22 Suite 109, Santa Clara, CA 95054, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): DRIVER DEALS LLC, 4701 Patrick Henry Dr Bldg 22 Suite 109, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 05/21/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Tariq Osman DRIVER DEALS LLC
Manager Article/Reg#: 202016310329
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/25/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707266
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706873
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: ADELETIA BEAUTY
SALON 2905 Homestead Rd Unit #B, Santa Clara, CA 95051, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): AERAN KIM, 2905 Homestead Rd Unit #B, Santa Clara, CA 95051. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/12/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Aeran Kim This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/12/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 706873
June 28, July 5, 12, 19,
2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707157
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Angel’s Comida Casera 227 S. 19 St, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Jacaqueline Zamudio, 227 S 19 St, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Jacaqueline Zamudio
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/24/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 707157
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707322
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: D. A DELIVERY AND LOGISTICS, 7052 Santa Teresa Blvd #86, San Jose, CA 95139, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Johnny J De Abreu, 7052 Santa Teresa Blvd #86, San Jose, CA 95139. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Johnny De Abreu This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 707322
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707275
The following person(s) is (are) doing business
as: TWO MEN AND A BRUSH PAINTING, 6529 Marymonte Ct, San Jose, CA 95120, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Scott Evan Cooper, 6529 Marymonte Ct, San Jose, CA 95120. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/19/1989. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Scott Evan Cooper This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707275
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707331
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: La Culichi, 410 N White Rd Apt #3301, San Jose, CA 95127, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Celina Michelle Rocha Moya, 401 N White Rd Apt 3301, San Jose, CA 95127. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Celina M Rocha Moya This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 707331
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707096
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: COMM MANAGEMENT CONSULTING 3160 Via Venezia, San Jose, CA 95125, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is
(are): FIONA EENIURAZAY ENTZMINGER FIGUEROA, 3160 Via Venezia, San Jose, CA 95125. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Fiona Eeniurazay Entzminger Figueroa This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/21/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 707096
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706926
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: VILLAS AUTO GLASS, 677 ROUGH AND READY RD, San Jose, CA 95133, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Felipe Villalavazo Mundo, P.O. BOX 32771, San Jose, CA 95152. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/01/1998. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Felipe Villalvazo Mundo
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/13/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Felipe Villalvazo Mundo, Deputy File No. FBN 706926
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 705908
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MICRO INK BEAUTY, 1716A Tully Road, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Linda Tran, 1716A Tully Road, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business
name(s) listed above on 05/09/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Linda Tran
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/09/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 705908
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707088
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE EQUIPMENT, BAYSIDE SHOP EQUIPMENT, GEO ENTERPRISES, 1488 Petal Way, San Jose, CA 95129, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): GEO (OEM) CORP., 1472 Leaftree Circle, San Jose, CA 95129. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 01/03/1997. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Lew Hsieh GEO (OEM) CORP. CEO
Article/Reg#: 1905575
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/20/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 707088
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 705907
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: POSTAL & PURE WATER ETC, 1716A Tully Rd, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): PHUC VAN KIM, 1716A Tully Rd, San Jose, CA 95122. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed
above on 05/09/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Phuc Van Kim This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/09/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 705907
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707086
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: GNC DISTRIBUTOR CALIFORNIA, 7213 Rainbow Drive Apt 14, San Jose, CA 95129, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Jose David Rivas Dominguez, 7213 Rainbow Drive, San Jose, CA 95129. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/20/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Jose David Rivas Dominguez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/20/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 707086
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
STATEMENT OF ABANDONMENT OF USE OF FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME NO. 706766
The following person(s) has / have abandoned the use of the fictitious business name(s): UPcycled and FUNKtional Designs by J&L 1824 Dry Creek Road, San Jose CA, 95124. Filed in Santa Clara County on 05/08/2023 under file no. FBN695503. J & L CREATIVE SOLUTIONS LLC, 1824 Dry Creek Road, San Jose, CA 95124. This business was conducted by: a limited liability company. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or
she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Lauri M. DeGaug
This statement was filed with the Co. Clerk Recorder of Santa Clara County on 6/10/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN706766
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441718
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ali Abood Mohammed Al Hashemy INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Ali Abood Mohammed Al Hashemy has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Ali Abood Mohammed Al Hashemy 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/10/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 25, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441834
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Victor Rosales INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Victor Rosales has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree
changing names as follows: a. Victor Rosales to Victor Gurcharan Singh 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/17/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 26, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441248 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Uyen Vu Thanh Nguyen INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Uyen Vu Thanh Nguyen has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Uyen Vu Thanh Nguyen to Charlotte Uyen Nguyen 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/03/2024 at 8:45 am,
Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
Jun 17, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV441535
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Jessica Nguyen Tieu INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Jessica Nguyen Tieu has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Jessica Nguyen Tieu to Apphia Tran 2. THE COURT
ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date:
9/10/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 21, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV440220
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Teresa De Jesus Garcia Ayala IN-
TERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Teresa De Jesus Garcia Ayala has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Airam Guadalupe Valencia Garcia to Airam Guadalupe Garcia 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/13/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 31, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV438586
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Emilena Amelia Castro-Solis INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Emilena Amelia Castro-Solis has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Emilena Amelia Castro-Solis to Emilena Amelia SolisCastro 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show
cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 7/23/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 09, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441513
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Illya Garashchenko INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Illya Garashchenko has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Illya Garashchenko to Ilya Ferguson 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/10/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 21, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE
OF NAME NO. 24CV440963
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Ramon Cabrera III and Paula Elizabeth Escobar Rosales INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Ramon Cabrera III and Paula Elizabeth Escobar Rosales have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Sylvia Adriana Rosales to Victoria Andrea Cabrera 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/27/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 12, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV440716
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Monreudy Donsawath INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Monreudy Donsawath has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Monreudy Donsawath to Melanie Donsawath 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes
described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/20/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 07, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV441537
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Lolita Ananasova INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Lolita Ananasova has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Lolita Anasova to Sophie Ananasova 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/10/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. Jun 21, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong
Judge of the Superior Court
June 28, July 5, 12, 19, 2024
Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Asha Sharma Case No. 24PR197332
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of ASHA SHARMA. 2.
A Petition for Probate has been filed by Ankur Sharma in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara.
3.The Petition for Probate requests that Ankur Sharma be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: August 02, 2024, at 9:00am, Dept. 1, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7. If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. 10. Petitioner: 2010 El Camino Real #1126 Santa Clara, CA 95050 (408)350-0495
June 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT NO. 706425
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: TACOS GARCIA LLC 483 Avalani Ave, San Jose, CA 95133, Santa Clara County
This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): TACOS GARCIA LLC, 483 Avalani Ave, San Jose, CA 95133. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/07/2023. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN701103. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Josefina Benitez TACOS GARCIA LLC Owner
Article/Reg#: 202462311881
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/30/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN 706425
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706393
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: WORLD OF DREAMS LEARNING HOME, 750 Baylor Dr, Santa Clara, CA 95051, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): WORLD OF DREAMS LEARNING HOME LLC, 750 Baylor Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95051. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 05/29/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Cristhian Sanchez WORLD OF DREAMS LEARNING HOME LLC Owner
Article/Reg#: 202462317053 Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/29/2024. Regina Alcomendras,
County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Corinne Vasquez, Deputy File No. FBN 706393
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706867
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: 99 HEALTHY WORLD, 6136 Bollinger Road, San Jose, CA 95129, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): 99 HEALTHY WORLD, INC, 6163 Bollinger Road, San Jose, CA 95129. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/07/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Yuhua Jin 99 HEALTHY WORLD, INC
CEO
Article/Reg#: 3356040
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/12/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Fraulein Dominguez, Deputy File No. FBN 706867
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 70703865
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: GENMOR PLUMBING COMPANY, INC, 75 Phelan Ave Ste 4, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): GENMOR PLUMBING, INC, 75 Phelan Ave Ste 4, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN647608. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Genaro Morales GENMOR PLUMBING, INC
President
Article/Reg#: 3069346
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/18/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy
File No. FBN 707038
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706968
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: TOP LEVEL WINDOWS & DOORS, INC, 1725 Rogers Ave, Suite K, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): TOP LEVEL WINDOWS & DOORS, INC, 2512 Sleepy Hollow Lane, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/01/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Isidro OlmosVelazquez TOP LEVEL WINDOWS & DOORS, INC
President Article/Reg#: 6246644
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/17/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 706968
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706805
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: PARENT SOLUTIONS 1132 McKendrie St, San Jose, CA 95126, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Parent Solutions a Licensed Clinical Social Worker Corporation, P.O. Box 111573, Campbell, CA 95011. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 4/20/2017. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN637490. “I declare that all information in this
statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Felicia Eliazar
Parent Solutions a licensed Clinical Social Worker Corporation CEO
Article/Reg#: C4002435
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/11/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 706805
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 707058
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: HAPPY LITTLE HEARTS 182 Rothrock Drive, San Jose, CA 95116, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Ruth Abigail Villatoro Robles, 182 Rothrock Drive, San Jose, CA 95116. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 6/18/2024. This is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Ruth Abigail Villatoro Robles
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/20/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 706805
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
STATEMENT OF ABANDONMENT OF USE OF FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME NO. 706842
The following person(s) has / have abandoned the use of the fictitious business name(s): STAGED BY 3 785 Matthew St, Santa Clara CA, 95050. Filed in Santa Clara County on 01/03/2014 under file no. FBN586546. Mariella Cantando, 785 Matthew St, Santa Clara, CA 95050. Deborah Drljaca, 785 Matthew St, Santa Clara, CA 95050. Ann Ridgeway, 785 Matthew St, Santa Clara, CA 95050. This business was conducted by: a corporation. “I declare
that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Deborah Drljaca, CFO
This statement was filed with the Co. Clerk Recorder of Santa Clara County on 6/12/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN706842
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441235
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Yishan Guo INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Yishan Guo has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Chloe Xiao to Chloe Guo 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/03/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 17, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV438917
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Dimiter Stafanov Panchev INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Dimiter
Stefanov Panchev has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Dimiter Stefanov Panchev to Dimitar Panchev Zelenkov 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/06/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 14, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV440152
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Adiam Tewelde Gebremedhn INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Adiam Tewelde Gebremedhn has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Adiam Tewelde Gebremedhn to Adiam Tewelde 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is
timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/13/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 30, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV439187
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of:
Andre Thomas ScottWaikar INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
Andre Thomas ScottWaikar has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Andre Thomas Scott-Waikar to Andre Waikar 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/06/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 20, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV441259
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Liudmyla Mukhina. INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) : Liudmyla Mukhina has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Liudmyla Mukhina to Liudmyla Orlova. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 9/03/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 17, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 21, 28, July 5, 12, 2024
Notice of Petition to Administer Estate of Sherry C. Tejeda
Case No. 24PR197369
1.To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Sherry C. Tejeda. 2. A Petition for Probate has been filed by Derik J. Hernandez in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara.
3.The Petition for Probate requests that Derik J. Hernandez be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
5. The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administer of Estate Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take any actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative
will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consent to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person Files and objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. 6. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court as follows: July 29, 2024, at 9:00am, Dept. 2, located at 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 7 If you object to the granting of this petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. 8. If you are a creditor or contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either: 1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or 2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. 9. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
10. Attorney for Petitioner: Crista Hermance 4476 Market Street, Suite 602 Ventura, CA 93003 (805)518-9633
June 21, 28 and July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706786
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: PAW PLAYHOUSE 52 N Bascom Ave, San Jose, CA 95128, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): EREBUS MANAGEMENT,
LLC, 52 N Bascom Ave, San Jose, CA 95128. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 06/10/2024. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.) /s/ Diana Armas Fuentes EREBUS MANAGEMENT, LLC CEO
Article/Reg#: BA202410819
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/10/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 706786
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706117
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: MBA ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING, 825 Civic Center Dr. 2, Santa Clara, CA 95050, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Karina Silva, 825 Civic Center Dr. 2, Santa Clara, CA 95050. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 05/05/2012. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN564577. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Karina Silva This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/17/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 706117
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706628
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: SPOTOUT SERVICES, 1941 Tully Road #30B, San Jose, CA 95122, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability
company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): FOOD FACILITY CONSULTING COMPANY LLC, 3334 Floresta Drive, San Jose, CA 95148. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Edwin Leonard FOOD FACILITY CONSULTING COMPANY LLC CEO
Article/Reg#: 202251516616
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/04/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 706628
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706817
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: BUHAYA SOLUTIONS, 1941 Tully Road #30, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a limited liability company. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): AFYA LLC, 3334 Floresta Drive, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN671106. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Edwin Leonard AFYA LLC Managing Member Article/Reg#: 202004310548
Above entity was formed in the state of CA
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/11/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Mike Louie, Deputy File No. FBN 706817
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706755
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: WEST VALLEY GYMNASTICS SCHOOL 1190 Dell Ave, Campbell, CA 95008, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by corporation. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): K & C WILLIAMS INCORPORATED, 18119 Idalyn Drive, Los Gatos, CA 95033. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Kristina Williams K & C WILLIAMS INCORPORATED
President
Article/Reg#: 4267669
Above entity was formed in the state of CA This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/10/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 706755
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS
BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706787
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: HYM LOCKSMITH SOLUTION, 14422 BIG BASIN WAY, Saratoga, CA 95070, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): HERNANDO AUGUSTO MENDEZ BLANDON, 14422 Big Basin Way, Saratoga, CA 95070. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on 12/04/2012. This filing is a refile [Change(s) in facts from previous filing] of previous file #: FBN700889. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Hernando Augusto mendez
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 6/10/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Elaine Fader, Deputy File No. FBN 706787
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 705526
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: PRESTIGE EVENTS & OFFICE SERVICES, 710 Nido Drive, 95, Campbell, CA 95008, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by a general partnership. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Claudia D Duque, 710 Nido Drive, 95, Campbell, CA 95008. Jehison E Valois, 710 Nido Drive, 95, Campbell, CA 95008. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Claudia D Duque
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 4/26/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder By: /s/ Nina Khamphilath, Deputy File No. FBN 705526
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT NO. 706101
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Little Pearls Family Day Care 475 N 12th St, San Jose, CA 95112, Santa Clara County. This business is owned by an individual. The name and residence address of the registrant(s) is (are): Perla Marina De Jesus, 475 N 12th St, San Jose, CA 95112. The registrant began transacting business under the fictitious business name(s) listed above on N/A. This filing is a first filing. “I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct.” (A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime.)
/s/ Perla Marina de Jesus Owner
This statement was filed with the Co. ClerkRecorder of Santa Clara County on 5/17/2024. Regina Alcomendras, County Clerk Recorder
By: /s/ Patty Camarena, Deputy File No. FBN 706101
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE
OF NAME NO. 24CV440821
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: PRABIN GURUNG INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) PRABIN GURUNG has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. PRABIN GURUNG to PRABIN GURRUNG 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/27/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 10, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV428601
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Andrew Joseph Sanchez INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Andrew Joseph Sanchez has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Andrew Joseph Sanchez to Andrew Joseph Ramirez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for
the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 7/16/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 10, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
ORDER
TO SHOW
CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
NO. 24CV440805
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Grace Viola Bradley INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner(s) Grace Viola Bradley has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Grace Viola Bradley AKA Grace Viola Zuniga to Grace Viola Rendon 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/20/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara.
June 10, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior
Court
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV436247
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Corrina Vasquez and Joshua Nakagawa INTERESTED
PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Corrina Vasquez and Joshua Nakagawa have filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Malani Catalina Nakagawa to Meilani Catalina Nakagawa 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 7/09/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. April 24, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV440718
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: Isabella Elisa Fregoso Alvarado INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) Isabella Elisa Fregoso Alvarado has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. Isabella Elisa Fregoso Alvarado to Isabella Elisa Hernandez Fregoso 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter
appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/20/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 07, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 14, 21, 28, July 5, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV438158
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of:
MARC ZARE and EVA SARRAM INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s) MARC ZARE and EVA SARRAM has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. MAXWELL RYAN ZARE to MAX RYAN ZARE 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 7/23/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published
at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. May 07, 2024 Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
May 24, 31, June 7 and 14, 2024
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME NO. 24CV441098
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara-In the matter of the application of: JESSICA MORI. INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner(s)
JESSICA MORI has filed a petition for Change of Name with the clerk of this court for a decree changing names as follows: a. JESSICA MORI to USA MORI. 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING: Date: 8/27/2024 at 8:45 am, Probate Dept., located at 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. 3. A copy of the Order to Show cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in El Observador, a newspaper of general circulation, printed in the county of Santa Clara. June 13, 2024
Le Jacqueline Duong Judge of the Superior Court
June 14, 21, 28 and July 5, 2024.
BIDEN’S TERRIBLE , HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DEBATE NIGHT
The President’s abysmal performance onstage confirmed voters’ concerns about his ability to serve another four years, given his age.
long been over, he added. “Putin, (North Korea’s) Kim Jong Un, and Xi Jinping (China’s President) have no respect for him,” he said.
LA TERRIBLE , HORRIBLE, NADA BUENA, MUY MALA NOCHE DE DEBATE DE BIDEN
La pésima actuación del presidente en el escenario confirmó las preocupaciones de los votantes sobre su capacidad para servir otros cuatro años, dada su edad.
Sohrabji Ethnic Media Services
Democrats had an evening of soul searching June 27 after President Joe Biden’s erratic performance on the debate stage, which contrasted wildly with a confident delivery by former President Donald Trump.
Biden grasped for words, sometimes losing his thought midstream during a sentence. He often trailed off incongruously, failing to fend off baseless attacks and falsehoods by Trump, who took the offensive early on and kept it throughout the 90-minute match-up hosted by CNN in Atlanta, Georgia. No audience was allowed at the event, moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash.
In an extremely rare occurrence, White House pool reporters were banned from the event. And the National Newspaper Publishers Association, a leading voice for Black-owned media, noted that not one of the 600 media credentials issued was given to a Black news outlet, sparking cries of racism.
Anti-Immigrant Rant
Biden failed phenomenally during closing statements, as he struggled to voice the many gains his administration has made, including lowering the federal debt, cutting drug prices, significant action on climate change, and creating 15 million new jobs, including more than 800,000 new manufacturing jobs, with his $454 billion infrastructure bill.
Trump largely kept to a rant on immigrants, noting that people from “prisons, jails, and mental institutions” were coming over and “stealing jobs” from Black and Latino workers and “killing thousands of Americans” by sneaking fentanyl across the border. He claimed he had handed Biden “one of the best economies in the world,” only to see it “fail miserably” in the President’s hands.
Biden failed to drive home his opponent’s status as a convicted felon, mentioning it only once. Trump took aim at the President’s son, Hunter Biden, who was convicted of illegally possessing a handgun, and falsely claimed that Joe Biden himself could be charged with felonies once he leaves office.
‘No Respect’
The former president twice evaded the question of whether he would accept the results of the election, once saying: “I wish he were a great president. I wouldn’t have to be here. But we’re a failing nation. He’s going to drive us into World War Three.”
Russia’s president Vladimir Putin would never have invaded Ukraine under his watch, claimed Trump. And the Israel-Hamas war would have
Trump also evaded a question about his oft-stated plan to enact “the largest deportation ever.”
Unfathomably, the most lucid moment of the evening occurred when the two candidates discussed their golf handicaps, amid a question on the opioid crisis.
‘Awful Debate’
Shekar Narasimhan, who co-founded the AAPI Victory Fund with Dr. Tung Nguyen, tweeted:
“Awful debate. Painful to watch. If folks started as ‘Biden is too old,’ it got reinforced. And if folks started as ‘Trump is unfit to be President,’ it got reinforced.”
The AAPI Victory Fund supports Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander candidates for elected office at all levels of government.
Asked by Ethnic Media Services if the Democratic Party needs to drop Biden as its nominee before the Democratic National Convention, Narasimhan said he would not comment on that question. He did say: “Biden needs a better debate prep team. The party needs to move immediately to remind people how terrible Trump was and is.”
Narasimhan said he did not fear an impact to Democratic candidates in down-ballot races.
Social media exploded with comments from Democrats regarding Biden’s performance.
“Guys, the Dems should nominate someone else – before it’s too late,” wrote former Presidential contender Andrew Yang on X/Twitter, using a newly-created hash tag #swapjoeout. “What’s Joe Biden’s superpower? That he’s a good guy who will do the right thing for the country. In this case, that’s stepping aside and letting the DNC choose another nominee,” he added.
“I wish Biden would reflect on this debate performance and then announce his decision to withdraw from the race, throwing the choice of Democratic nominee to the convention,” New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote on X/Twitter.
“Someone like @gretchenwhitmer or @SherrodBrown or @SecRaimondo could still jump in and beat Trump,” he added, referring to Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, and Biden’s Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
California’s former first lady Maria Shriver wrote: “I love Joe Biden. I know he’s a good man. Tonight was heartbreaking in many ways. This is a big political moment. There’s panic in the Democratic party. It’s going to be a long night.”
Losdemócratas pasaron una noche de examen de conciencia el 27 de junio después de la actuación errática del presidente Joe Biden en el escenario del debate, que contrastó enormemente con una actuación confiada del expresidente Donald Trump.
Biden buscó las palabras y a veces perdió la cabeza a mitad de una frase. A menudo se interrumpía de manera incongruente, sin poder defenderse de los ataques infundados y las falsedades de Trump, quien tomó la ofensiva desde el principio y la mantuvo durante el enfrentamiento de 90 minutos presentado por CNN en Atlanta, Georgia. No se permitió audiencia en el evento, moderado por Jake Tapper y Dana Bash. En un caso extremadamente raro, a los reporteros de la Casa Blanca se les prohibió la entrada al evento. Y la Asociación Nacional de Editores de Periódicos, una voz líder de los medios de propiedad negra, señaló que ninguna de las 600 credenciales de medios emitidas fue otorgada a un medio de noticias negro, lo que desató gritos de racismo.
Queja antiinmigrante
Biden fracasó fenomenalmente durante sus declaraciones finales, mientras luchaba por expresar los muchos logros que ha logrado su administración, incluida la reducción de la deuda federal, la reducción de los precios de los medicamentos y medidas significativas sobre el cambio climático, y la creación de 15 millones de nuevos empleos, incluidos más de 800.000 nuevos empleos en el sector manufacturero, con su proyecto de ley de infraestructura de 454.000 millones de dólares.
Trump se limitó en gran medida a despotricar contra los inmigrantes, señalando que personas de “prisiones, cárceles e instituciones mentales” venían y “robaban empleos” a trabajadores negros y latinos y “mataban a miles de estadounidenses” introduciendo fentanilo a través de la frontera. Afirmó que le había entregado a Biden “una de las mejores economías del mundo”, sólo para verla “fracasar miserablemente” en manos del presidente.
Biden no logró resaltar el estatus de su oponente como un delincuente convicto, y lo mencionó solo una vez. Trump apuntó al hijo del presidente, Hunter Biden, quien fue condenado por posesión ilegal de una pistola, y afirmó falsamente que el propio Joe Biden podría ser acusado de delitos graves una vez que deje el cargo.
'Sin respeto'
El ex presidente eludió dos veces la pregunta de si aceptaría los resultados de las elecciones, diciendo en una de ellas: “Ojalá fuera un gran presidente. No tendría por qué estar aquí. Pero somos una nación fallida. Nos llevará a la Tercera Guerra Mundial”.
El presidente de Rusia, Vladimir Putin, nunca habría invadido Ucrania bajo su mandato, afirmó Trump. Y
la guerra entre Israel y Hamás habría terminado hace mucho tiempo, añadió. “Putin, Kim Jong Un (de Corea del Norte) y Xi Jinping (presidente de China) no le tienen respeto”, dijo.
Trump también evadió una pregunta sobre su plan, tantas veces declarado, de implementar “la deportación más grande jamás realizada”.
Indescriptiblemente, el momento más lúcido de la velada se produjo cuando los dos candidatos discutieron sus desventajas en el golf, en medio de una pregunta sobre la crisis de los opioides.
'Horrible debate'
Shekar Narasimhan, cofundador del AAPI Victory Fund con el Dr. Tung Nguyen, tuiteó: “Horrible debate. Doloroso de ver. Si la gente empezó diciendo “Biden es demasiado mayor”, se reforzó. Y si la gente empezó diciendo: “Trump no es apto para ser presidente”, se reforzó”.
El Fondo de Victoria de la AAPI apoya a candidatos asiático-americanos, nativos hawaianos e isleños del Pacífico para cargos electos en todos los niveles de gobierno.
Cuando Ethnic Media Services le preguntó si el Partido Demócrata necesita descartar a Biden como su candidato antes de la Convención Nacional Demócrata, Narasimhan dijo que no haría comentarios sobre esa cuestión. Sí dijo: “Biden necesita un mejor equipo de preparación de debates. El partido debe actuar de inmediato para recordarle a la gente lo terrible que fue y es Trump”.
Narasimhan dijo que no temía un impacto para los candidatos demócratas en las elecciones negativas. Las redes sociales explotaron con comentarios de los demócratas sobre el desempeño de Biden. “Chicos, los demócratas deberían nominar a otra persona, antes de que sea demasiado tarde”, escribió el ex candidato presidencial Andrew Yang en X/Twitter, utilizando un hashtag recién creado #swapjoeout. “¿Cuál es el superpoder de Joe Biden? Que es un buen tipo que hará lo correcto por el país. En este caso, eso es hacerse a un lado y dejar que el Comité Nacional Demócrata elija otro candidato”, añadió.
“Me gustaría que Biden reflexionara sobre la actuación de este debate y luego anunciara su decisión de retirarse de la carrera, lanzando la elección del candidato demócrata a la convención”, escribió el columnista del New York Times Nicholas Kristof en X/Twitter.
“Alguien como @gretchenwhitmer o @SherrodBrown o @SecRaimondo aún podría intervenir y vencer a Trump”, añadió, refiriéndose a la gobernadora de Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer, al senador de Ohio, Sherrod Brown, y a la secretaria de Comercio de Biden, Gina Raimondo.
La ex primera dama de California, Maria Shriver, escribió: “Amo a Joe Biden. Sé que es un buen hombre. Esta noche fue desgarradora en muchos sentidos. Este es un gran momento político. Hay pánico en el Partido Demócrata. Va a ser una noche larga”.
Sunita
Sunita Sohrabji Ethnic Media Services
ENGLISH ESPAÑOL
Photo Credit: CNN Screen Grab
Photo Credit: Official White House Photo / Adam Schultz
SABÍA QUE…
