10
No. 5 (4.21) as the most important attributes during emergency remote teaching. Contrary to the most important attributes, the participants at University A rated item No. 1 (3.73) and No. 10 (3.58) as the least important attributes. Table 4: Comparison of importance ratings No.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
University A Mean SD 3.73 0.99 4.03 1.01 4.05 0.92 4.37 0.89 4.27 0.96 4.12 0.99 4.13 1.03 3.98 0.95 3.95 0.98 3.58 1.24
University B Mean SD 4.02 1.02 4.17 0.98 4.05 0.98 4.14 0.99 4.18 1.02 4.11 1.01 4.11 1.01 3.91 1.08 4.07 1.02 4.00 1.06
Total Mean 3.93 4.12 4.05 4.22 4.21 4.11 4.12 3.93 4.03 3.87
SD 1.02 0.99 0.96 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.01 1.14
1Ratings obtained from a Likert-type five points scale ranging from lowest rating to highest rating, i.e. Not Important At All (1), Not Very Important (2), Somewhat Important (3), Very Important (4), and Extremely Important (5).
Although these two attributes also rank in the bottom three for participants from University B, the lowest mean rating was given to No. 8 (3.91), which asked the participants about the importance of the statement “students are engaged to actively participate in the discussion”. Evaluating the totality of both samples, it can be concluded that the lowest to highest mean rating ranges from 3.87 (No 10.) to 4.22 (No. 4), which indicates relatively high importance for all ten attributes. Furthermore, the findings from the first sample taken at University A were affirmed with the second sample from University B, with the virtues of the lecturer perceived by the students as the most important characteristics. Table 5: Comparison of performance ratings No.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
University A Mean SD 3.52 0.99 3.62 1.04 3.79 1.00 4.12 0.96 4.05 0.94 3.84 0.98 3.87 1.00 3.81 0.96 3.76 1.01 3.54 1.20
University B Mean SD 3.92 1.05 3.80 1.04 3.81 1.04 3.82 1.08 3.76 1.01 3.63 1.08 3.73 1.01 3.83 1.03 3.90 1.00 3.87 1.03
Total Mean 3.79 3.74 3.81 3.92 3.85 3.70 3.77 3.82 3.86 3.76
SD 1.05 1.04 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.09
1Ratings obtained from a Likert-type five points scale ranging from lowest rating to highest rating, i.e. Not At All Satisfied (1), Not Very Satisfied (2), Somewhat Satisfied (3), Very Satisfied (4), and Extremely Satisfied (5).
http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
