INFOSYS ‐ PHASE 2, POCHARAM MASTER PLAN APPROACH
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Considerations Master Plan Systems Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Considerations Master Plan Systems Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
MORPHOLOGY Current Practice Built form derived independent of specific aspects of topography and site potential Positioning of buildings in a pre‐determined pattern irrespective of context, site and climate Tall buildings necessitating larger buffers result in total occupation of site, isolates each from the other and completely fragment the open spaces. Plan – low density High Rise
Section showing monotonus sectional impression
Large spread results in extensive and expensive site infrastructure and building services networks. Recommended Practice Compact built form derived from land dynamics and climatic influences. Low rise, high density morphology conserves majority of site and consolidates open space. Larger roof areas allows possibility for net‐zero development.
Plan – high density low rise
Section showing variation in sectional intensity
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
More efficient connectedness between buildings and their relation to the natural ground.
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
FIGURE GROUND RELATIONS Current Practice
Relation with Ground
Tall and isolated structures are completely devoid of any expressed relationship to the ground and to each other. Isolation exacerbated by the need for fire‐tender and other services access, disconnecting the inner space from the external. Building functions unrelated to figure ground but segregated vertically.
Section showing limited relation of built with ground plane
Recommended Practice Relation with Ground
Building distribution and segregation based on functions and their relevance to the immediate figure ground. A lighter footprint is impressed on the ground, leaving it free to express much of the natural character of the site.
Section showing continuous relations with natural ground terrain
Low‐rise and interconnected structures with a clear functional hierarchy leaves most of the built form with a close and constant relationship with the natural ground. INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
STREET VISION Recommended Practice To articulate the ‘inner’ and ‘outer’ facades of the buildings to respond differently to the street and ground plane below. Differential treatment of facades along ‘inner’ streets helps achieve a controlled articulation of the sky above. Section showing cone of vision in continuous façade expression
Section showing increase of cone of vision in staggered façade expression
Section showing various volumes of spaces created due to built mass staggering
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
The quality of daylight penetrating to the lower planes will render the street below rich in variation and experience.
Variation of Density Volume along the Street
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Densely built spaces providing mutually shaded zones
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY (THE STREET) OFFICES
Recommended Practice Pedestrian connectivity both informs and is derived from the interplay between natural landscape, built form and building functions.
PUBLIC INTERFACE
Intraction space created along the street edge
Close knit buildings and free flow ground plane affords continuous and protected pedestrian connectivity. A deep‐penetration network renders the development pedestrian friendly, not merely by grade access but also in terms of efficiency, aesthetic and thermal comfort.
Plan showing the intersection of street with buillt mass INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
DECENTRALIZED ACTIVITY CORES Current Practice Distinct segregation of activities in separate buildings increases circulation needs as also the disconnect between physical spaces. The sense of unity otherwise desirable to create a single campus entity is seriously disrupted. The quality of spaces, while efficient, can be quite cold, clinical and industrial Centralized activity cores with restricted proximity influnece
Recommended Practice Efficient segregation of activities in a unified built form affords a more social and interactive space. Well integrated social, recreational and other non‐ work spaces creates multiple ways and opportunities for a more nuanced campus experience. Desegregated distribution of non‐work activities will ensure an active and vibrant atmosphere without compromising efficiency. Decentralized Activity cores with maximum proximity influence INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
HORIZONTAL CONNECTIVITY Current Practice High‐rise, high density built form is heavily dependent upon vertical circulation; by its very nature, this negates well integrated functional, work and recreational spaces. Each floor is increasingly isolated from the ground plane, causing serious alienation amongst users. The ground plane is rendered quite sterile since this typology does not allow any integration of inside and outside. Section showing typical dependancy of vertical connectivity for interaction
Recommended Practice Low‐rise, high‐density typology creates immense opportunities for dynamic and multiple ways of connectivity of spaces, functions and activities. The campus and its constituents are seen as one integrated whole rather than a series of isolated towers approached through separate cores. Depending on the level of privacy and security needed, each space can be either seamlessly connected or segregated, creating flexible and future‐ready work spaces.
Section showing expression of horizontal connectivity reducing depenedancy on vertical cores
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Considerations Master Plan Systems Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Site Slope Analysis INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Watershed Pattern INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Drainage Pattern INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Existing natural Features INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Site parameters – Considerations for planning INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
BUILDABLE ZONE
BUILDABLE ZONE
Site parameteres – Buildable zones INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Consideration Master Plan Systems Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
AREA FOR EXPANSION
• Low rise, high‐density linear building blocks are arranged within the buildable zones along the east‐ west direction with circulation corridors in between. • All existing natural features including the quarry, sheet rock outcrops, valley and well are integrated within the design.
Site planning – Massing of building blocks INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
• Alignment of building blocks is modified to respond to existing roads and solar azimuth angles. • Pedestrian axes through buildings are defined. • Corridors between buildings to accommodate emergency vehicular access are defined.
Site planning – Pedestrian and Vehicular Axes INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
• Building blocks are carved out and shifted to create pedestrian corridors that penetrate the built mass on the ground level. • Vehicular corridors are accommodated between alternate buildings.
Site planning – Pedestrian and Vehicular corridors INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
• The ground floor is stilted to ensure that there is no modulation of the natural ground terrain. • Recreational facilities and food courts are accommodated on the ground floor level. • Pedestrian corridors that reflect the character of an Indian street are created throughout the ground plane.
Site planning – Ground floor blocks with pedestrian axes INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
PEDESTRIAN AXES PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
• The ground plane is maintained as an active and an interactive space that is predominantly pedestrian, except for emergency access. • The experiential character of the pedestrian corridors changes constantly between narrow and wide streets that often open up into larger public plazas and interaction spaces.
Site planning – Pedestrian penetration INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
VEHICULAR AXIS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
• Through changes in alignment and interconnection of building blocks, floors and intersecting terraces, distinct building blocks are created. • 24 m wide corridors for vehicular access (including emergency access) are accommodated between all building blocks to ensure vehicular connectivity.
Site planning – Vehicular penetration INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
FOOD COURTS PROXIMITY CIRCLE TO FOOD COURTS MARKING 10 MIN. WALKING RADIUS
+ +
• The ground floor hosts recreational, research, education and non‐core activities and food courts, leaving the upper floors free for SDBs.
+
• Multiple food courts are provided at the ground level such that there is at least one food court within a 10‐ minute walking distance from any workspace.
Site planning – Proximity of food courts to office blocks INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Proposed Master Plan for Phase 2 development INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Consideration Master Plan Systems Landscape Strategy Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
CONTENTS Development Parameters Campus Development Criteria Planning Consideration Master Plan Systems Landscape Strategy Built Responses (Spatial and Climatic) Visuals
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Plan – Building orientation along the east‐west direction with a maximum tilt of 15 degrees.
Building orientation • All buildings oriented for minimum heat exposure along the N‐S axis. • A maximum of 15o tilt allowed for better articulation of built form and regulate monotony.
Plan – Building orientation with blocks tilted by a maximum of 15 degrees anticlockwise to minimise surface exposed to summer sun.
W
Plan – Building orientation with blocks tilted by a maximum of 15 degrees clockwise showing extended surface exposed to summer sun.
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
E
Section – Terracing on the eastern side and shading on the western side to avoid exposure to summer sun.
120611
• 15o tilt allowed only towards SE for maximum benefit; any tilt towards the SW would dramatically increase the surface exposed for direct heat gain. • Building façade articulated with deep and vegetated terraces to increase thermal protection as well create a finer grain of architectural expression. INTEGRATED DESIGN
Plan – Building orientation along the east‐west direction with a maximum tilt of 15 degrees.
Modular planning • Interior spaces worked out in modules of 240 SqM addressing the team sizes indicated. Plan – SDB modules arranged linearly along the east‐west direction to form the building office blocks.
• Modules are articulated in a manner that render them flexible for multiple stacking and combining for changing work modes and team sizes. • Modules developed to respond to tilts, breaks and extensions of the work floor without impacting efficiency of structure or internal space.
Plan – Modular plan allows for tilting and exclusion of building modules without affecting the SDB workspace. INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Horizontal connectivity • Several of the roofs can potentially be ramped to create connectivity at various nodes and levels. • Increases the richness of movement and experience for the user through a process of both formal and informal control of access and intersection. • Constant interplay of vegetated roofs – both horizontal and sloping heightens the visual and physical relationship with the larger landscape outside. 3D view – Connection of roofs horizontally at various levels. INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Office space Extended terraces and interaction spaces at upper levels Experiential volume at ground level
Section 1 – Design considerations
Section 1 – Spatial and experiential building volumes Office space Extended terraces and interaction spaces at upper levels Experiential volume at ground level
Section 2 – Design considerations INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
Section 2 – Spatial and experiential building volumes 120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Office space Extended terraces and interaction spaces at upper levels Experiential volume at ground level
Section 3 – Design considerations
Section 3 – Spatial and experiential building volumes Office space Extended terraces and interaction spaces at upper levels Experiential volume at ground level
Section 4 – Design considerations INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
Section 4 – Spatial and experiential building volumes 120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Pergolas as an architectural feature to provide necessary shade and cut glare in the interior space
Light shelves integrated with the elevation profile as response to climate and day lighting attributes Pedestrian linkages (streets) through the building
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Pergolas as an architectural feature to provide necessary shade and cut glare in the interior space
Planter boxes integrated with the architectural façade as a climatic response and also as an aesthetical element
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Use of local materials to define the character of the building
Interconnecting bridges within two office blocks to express horizontal movement
Terrace Gardens extending the office space INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
Free ground place providing continuity of landscape within the campus 120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Cliamtically response elements such as planter boxes, pergolas, light shelves integrated within the façade to create a strong urban facade
Mutually shaded pedestrian Path created between office blocks INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
.
Ramps integrated within the interiors space to create a secondary form of vertical movement , inetgrated with terrace gardens to create stronger social spaces within the building.
Terrace Gardens extending the office premises to create a varied spatial experience
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Roof integrated with Solar Panels with seaters to act as a third level of interaction space. INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
Proposed Master Plan for Phase 2 development INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN
INFOSYS – PHASE 2 – Conceptual Design Development
120611
INTEGRATED DESIGN