This activity is sponsored by
pmiCME
OCTOBER 14, 2015 OCTOBER 30, 2015 NOVEMBER 11, 2015 DECEMBER 9, 2015
Rosemont, Illinois Princeton, New Jersey Los Angeles, California Tampa, Florida
Educational partner This activity is supported by an educational grant from AstraZeneca
CME/MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS INQUIRIES info@integritasgrp.com integritasgrp.com
FACULTY* FACULTY
ANTHONY J. Lembo, MD Interactive Professor Associate Professor of Medicine Director, GI Motility Laboratory Harvard Medical School Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts
JAMES W. Atchison, DO Medical Director, Center for Pain Management Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Chicago, IL
CHARLES E. Argoff, MD Professor of Neurology Albany Medical College Director, Comprehensive Pain Center Albany Medical Center Albany, New York
DARREN M. Brenner, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine and Surgery Northwestern Univeristy Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois
For additional CME activities log on to
3
JEFFREY A. Gudin, MD FACULTY
Clinical Instructor, Anesthesiology Mount Sinai University School of Medicine New York, New York Director, Pain Management and Palliative Care Englewood Hospital and Medical Center Englewood, New Jersey
BILL H. McCarberg, MD Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor University of California, San Diego San Diego, California Elizabeth Hospice Neighborhood Healthcare Escondido, California
*Not all faculty members will present in all cities. Faculty is subject to change, with additional faculty to be announced.
4
TARGET AUDIENCE This activity is intended for primary care providers involved in the treatment and management of patients with opioid-induced constipation.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES Upon completion of the activity, participants should be better able to: •• Describe the effects of opioid receptor activation in the gastrointestinal tract
PREAMBLE
•• Evaluate patients on chronic opioid therapy for bowel function and risk factors for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) development •• Implement a prophylactic treatment plan to address OIC concurrent with the initiation of opioid therapy •• Compare the mechanisms of action and clinical profiles of current prescription medication for OIC •• Construct evidence-based treatment regimens for patients with OIC that reflect bowel symptoms, prior treatment response, and patient preferences •• Communicate with opioid-treated patients about treatment-emergent adverse events through open, patient-centered dialogue throughout the course of therapy
PMICME CLINICAL STAFF AND TUFTS HEALTH CARE INSTITUTE EXPERT REVIEWER FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE As a continuing medical education provider accredited by the ACCME, it is the policy of pmiCME to require any individual in a position to influence educational content to disclose the existence of any financial interest or other personal relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s). pmiCME clinical staff and Tufts Health Care Institute expert content reviewers have provided financial disclosure and have no conflicts of interest to resolve for each of the sessions related to this activity.
For additional CME activities log on to
5
CONFLICT OF INTEREST RESOLUTION STATEMENT
PREAMBLE
pmiCME requires all individuals in a position to influence educational content for pmiCME-certified CME activities to disclose relevant personal financial relationship(s) with commercial interests prior to contributing to the activity. pmiCME assesses disclosed relationships and follows a defined process to resolve real or implied conflicts to ensure, to the best of our ability, that all educational content is free of commercial bias. Financial disclosures are listed in this program and will also be announced prior to the start of each presentation and posted on www.pri-med.com.
OFF-LABEL/INVESTIGATIONAL DISCLOSURES During the course of their presentations, the faculty may mention uses of products that have not been approved in the United States for the indication(s) being discussed. All presenters are instructed to notify participants when they are discussing unapproved uses or investigational agents. In addition, specific slides will include notation of the off-label use or investigational agent being discussed. Views presented during this program related to unapproved uses of products are solely those of the presenter(s) and are not endorsed by pmiCME, DBC Pri-Med, LLC, or ACP.
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT pmiCME is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
DESIGNATION STATEMENT pmiCME designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMMERCIAL SUPPORT This activity is supported by an educational grant from AstraZeneca.
6
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
7
SLIDES
8
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
9
SLIDES
10
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
11
SLIDES
12
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
13
SLIDES
14
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
15
SLIDES
16
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
17
SLIDES
18
For additional CME activities log on to
SLIDES
19
SLIDES
20
Bristol Stool Form Scale Bristol Stool Description
Form Scale
Image
Bristol Stool Description
Form Scale
Image
Bristol Stool Form Scale
Bristol Stool Form Scale CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS Description
Description Separate hard lumps, like nuts
Bristol Stool Form Scale
Description Separate hard lumps, like nuts
Bristol StoolStool Form Scale Bristol Form Scale Description
Separate hard hard lumps, lumps, like like nuts nuts Separate
Description Separate hard lumps, like nuts Sausage-shaped but lumpy
Type
Description
Image
Image
Image Image Image
Image
Separate hard lumps, like nuts Sausage-shaped but lumpy Sausage-shaped Separate hard lumps, like nuts Separate 1but lumpy
Sausage-shaped but lumpy
hard lumps, like nuts
Sausage-shaped lumpy Like a sausage or but snake but with cracks on its surface Sausage-shaped lumpy Like a sausage 2 orbut snake but with cracks on Sausage-shaped but its lumpy Like a sausage or snake but with cracks on its surface surface Sausage-shaped lumpy Like a sausage orbut snake but with cracks on its surface sausage oron snake Like a sausage or snake Like but awith cracks its but 3 surface Like a sausage or snake, smooth andon soft with cracks its surface Like a sausage or snake but with cracks on its Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft surface Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Like a sausage or snake but with cracks on its Like a sausage or snake, surface Like a sausage 4 or snake, smooth and soft
smooth and soft
Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft
Soft blobs blobs with with clear-cut clear-cut edges edges Soft
Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Soft blobs with 5 clear-cut edges Soft blobs with clear-cut edges
Fluffy pieces with ragged edges edges, a mushy stool Soft blobs with clear-cut
Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool
Fluffy pieces with 6 ragged edges, a mushy stool
Soft blobs with clear-cut edges Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Soft blobs with clear-cut edges Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool
Watery, no solid7 pieces
Watery, no solid pieces
Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Watery, no solid pieces Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool
withWatery, permission Lewis SJ, Heaton KW, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1997; 32(9):920–924. nofrom solid pieces http://bowelcontrol.nih.gov/Bristol_Stool_Form_Scale_508.pdf Healthcare.
Heaton KW. ScandaJ Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920–924. Fluffy piecesLewis withSJ,ragged edges, mushy stool
nofrom solid pieces withWatery, permission Lewis SJ, Heaton KW, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1997; 32(9):920–924. Healthcare.
nofrom solid pieces d withWatery, permission Lewis SJ, Heaton KW, Journal of Gastroenterology, 1997; 32(9):920–924. 21 For additional CME activities log Scandinavian on to Healthcare.
RESOURCE CENTER
Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Soft blobs with clear-cut edges
NOTES
22
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS Bowel Function Index Please answer the following three questions by making a mark on the line between 0 and 100. Please transfer the results to the open squares at the bottom of the page. Add the three results and divide by three.
Question 1 (Q1) How would you rate the ease of defecation during the last 7 days according to patient assessment? 0=Easy/no difficulty
50
100=Severe difficulty
Question 2 (Q2) Does your patient feel that his/her bowel evacuation has been incomplete during the last 7 days? 0=Not at all
50
100=Very strongly
Question 3 (Q3) How would you judge your patient’s constipation throughout the last 7 days? 50
100=Very heavily constipated
RESOURCE CENTER
0=No constipation at all
Results Q1
Q2
+
Q3
+
Sum
=
Total
/3=
Adapted from Rentz AM, et al. J Med Econ. 2009;12(0):371-383.
For additional CME activities log on to
23
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS »» Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC-SYM) This 12-item questionnaire of patient-reported symptoms assesses 3 subscales of symptoms (bowel movements, rectal symptoms, and abdominal symptoms) over the prior 2 weeks. www.proqolid.org/content/download/11747/176511/version/2/ file/PAC-SYM12_2.1_eng-US_review+copy.pdf
PATIENT RESOURCES »» Patient Conversation Guide This patient tool can be completed prior to the visit with the health care provider to guide a meaningful conversation about bowel habits and constipation symptoms. www.theacpa.org/uploads/ACPA-Opioid_Constipation_Chart-V4.pdf
»» Patient Education Handout This leaflet provides patients with approaches to mitigate opioidinduced constipation and includes a list of questions about constipation for patients to ask their doctors or clinics. www.acponline.org/patients_families/products/health_tips/oic_en.pdf
PRACTICE GUIDELINES »» The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and the Rome III Process, 2006. Drossman DA. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1377-1390.
RESOURCE CENTER
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16678553
»» Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain, 2009. Chou R, et al. J Pain. 2009;10(2):113-130. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043401/
»» VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain, 2010. Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense. www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Pain/cot/COT_312_Full-er.pdf
24
OTHER RESOURCES »» A Clinical Guide to Opioid Analgesia. 2nd edition. Fine PG, Portenoy RK. New York, NY: Vendome Group, LLC; 2007. www.amazon.com/A-Clinical-Guide-Opioid-Analgesia/dp/1933692626#
»» Emerging treatments in neurogastroenterology: a multidisciplinary working group consensus statement on opioid-induced constipation. Camilleri M, et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:1386-1395. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358801/pdf/nihms664356.pdf
»» Responsible Opioid Prescribing: A Clinician’s Guide. 2nd edition, revised and expanded. Fishman SM. Washington, DC: Waterford Life Sciences; 2012. library.fsmb.org/cme/index.html
SUGGESTED READING »» Chronic opioid induced constipation in patients with nonmalignant pain: challenges and opportunities. Nelson AD, Camilleri, M. Therapy Adv Gastroenterol. 2015;8(4):206-220.
»» The impact of opioid-induced constipation among chronic pain patients with sufficient laxative use. LoCasale RJ, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;Epub ahead of print.
»» Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and initial therapeutic approach. »» Opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK: descriptive analysis of baseline patient-reported outcomes and retrospective chart review. Coyne KS, et al. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:269-281.
»» Constipation in people prescribed opioids. Ahmedzai SH, Boland J. BMJ Clin Evid (Online). 2010;pii:2407.
For additional CME activities log on to
25
RESOURCE CENTER
Dorn S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;2(1):31-37.
»» The narcotic bowel syndrome: a recent update. Drossman D, Szigethy E. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;2(1):22-30.
»» Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety. Kalso E, et al. Pain. 2004;112(3):372-380.
»» A multi-institutional study analyzing effect of prophylactic medication for prevention of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. Ishihara M, et al. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(5):373-381.
»» A volunteer model for the comparison of laxatives in opioid-related constipation. Sykes NP. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996;11(6):363-369.
»» Establishing “best practices” for opioid rotation: conclusions of an expert panel. Fine PG, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(3):418-425.
»» Naloxegol for opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain. Chey WD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(25):2387-2396.
»» A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in chronic noncancer pain. Jamal MM, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(5):725-732.
»» Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of methylnaltrexone in resolving constipation induced by different opioid subtypes combined with laboratory analysis of immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects of methylnaltrexone.
RESOURCE CENTER
Neefjes ECW, et al. BMC Palliative Care. 2014;13:42.
26
Please visit the CLINICAL RESOURCE CENTER for additional information and resources
www.EXCHANGECME.com/OICUpdates
Š 2015 Global Education Group and Integritas Communications. All rights reserved. No part of this syllabus may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embedded in articles or reviews.