e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:09/September-2020
Impact Factor- 5.354
www.irjmets.com
MODELLING AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SLOPE Phani Kumar .V*1, E. Jayanth*2, G. Hari Chandana*3, D. Naga Surya Prasanna*4, A. Siva Krishna*5, A. Fayaz*6 *1Sr.
Gr. Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, Gudlavalleru Engineering College, Gudlavalleru, India,
*2,3,4,5,6Student,
Civil Engineering, Gudlavalleru Engineering College, Gudlavalleru, India.
ABSTRACT Stability investigation of slope is one of the most searched after issue in structural building. The stability of common slopes like bumpy landscape, stream beds .and so on and artificial slopes like dams, banks of interstates and railroads is investigated to stay away from catastrophes. Slope disappointments are significant common perils happening both internationally and locally. They are alluded to as the down slope development of rock trash and soil because of gravitational anxieties. Sadly, slope disappointment is a geo risk that impacts a wide scope of scenes and furthermore numerous kinds of foundations. The normal slope stability investigation is unequipped for precisely determining shallow slides where attractions pressures assume a basic job. This acknowledgment is utilized for expand stability examinations including the boundaries, for example, soil attractions to more readily foresee. In this investigation, slope stability examination is performed to decide the factor of security for various states of disappointment. For this reason, limited component technique is considered for the mathematical examination. The probabilistic examination of slopes is finished by SLIDE and mathematical investigation is finished by PLAXIS 2D. The distinction in FOS found from the LE and FE examinations may have a little intrigue, if there is an enormous vulnerability in the info boundaries. Consequently, need ought to be invigorated to examine the shear boundaries and exact planning of the slope calculation before choosing a proper examination strategy. Most ideally, a slope ought to be broke down by FE techniques, else in any case by LE based GPS strategy with explored input boundaries. Keywords: Plaxis 2D, Slide 6.0
I.
INTRODUCTION
Soil Slopes either happen normally or are built by people. Slope stability issues have been looked since the beginning at whatever point the sensitive equalization of nature has been upset by any sort of inward or outside powers. The powers with in nature like substantial precipitation prompting disintegration and avalanches comprise a significant case of inside troublesome powers while the outer powers chiefly human exercises, for example, exhuming and filling of slopes have likewise caused the slide. The extent of this investigation is to examine the slope stability issues for differing cut slope points. Surprising avalanches in thickly populates territories can make colossal misfortunes life and property. For previously existing slopes, the factor of safety will be determined and in this way the stability check for the slope is finished. Likewise, the potential disappointment surface under accepted states of stacking can be discovered. On the off chance that the slope is discovered to be temperamental under shifting measures of precipitation or stacking conditions, reasonable medicinal estimates like normal vegetation spread, utilization of geogrids, securing and so forth can be proposed. On account of bombed slopes, the specific explanation behind disappointment could be recognized by examining different properties of the dirt. Proposal of medicinal measures to forestall further disintegration should be possible utilizing the product plaxis. www.irjmets.com
@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[553]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:09/September-2020
Impact Factor- 5.354
www.irjmets.com
Slide 6.0 is the most far reaching slope stability investigation programming accessible, complete with limited component groundwater drainage examination, quick drawdown, affectability and probabilistic investigation and backing structure.
II.
SOFTWARES USED
1. Slide 6.0 Slide 6.0 is the most far reaching slope stability investigation programming accessible, complete with limited component groundwater drainage examination, quick draw down, affectability and probabilistic investigation and backing structure. A wide range of soil and rock slopes, dikes, earth dams and holding dividers can be investigated. Cutting edge CAD capacities permit you to make and alter complex models very easily.Slide 6.0 is the main slope stability programming with worked in limited component groundwater leakage investigation for consistent state or transient conditions. Streams, weights and slopes are determined dependent on client characterized water driven limit conditions. Leakage investigation is completely incorporated with the slope stability examination or can be utilized as an independent module. Slide 6.0 has broad probabilistic examination capacities - you may appoint factual dispersion to practically any info boundaries, including material properties, uphold properties, loads, and water table area. The likelihood of disappointment/dependability list is determined, and gives a target proportion of the danger of disappointment related with a slope structure.
2. Plaxis 2D Plaxis 2D perform two-dimensional examination of distortion and stability in geotechnical building and rock mechanics. Designing organizations and establishments in the common and geotechnical building industry rely on PLAXIS for an assortment of tasks. From unearthing, dikes, and establishments to burrowing, mining, and store geo mechanics, engineers depend on PLAXIS as their go-to limited component investigation application. Use predefined basic components and stacking types in a CAD-like condition for quick and proficient model creation, permitting you more opportunity to decipher the outcomes. SLOPE ANALYSED
www.irjmets.com
Sr. No.
Description
Units
L-1
L-2
L-3
1
Density, γ
gm/cm3
2.04
1.77
1.62
2
Friction angel, Φ
deg
35
2.5
34
3
Cohesion, c
kg /cm2
1
130
5.88
5
Young’s modulus, E
kPa
120000
80000
80000
6
Poisson’s ratio, ν
-
0.3
0.3
0.3
@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[554]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:09/September-2020
III.
Impact Factor- 5.354
www.irjmets.com
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A) Results The given slope is analyzed by using softwares SLIDE and PLAXIS 2D, the results obtained are plotted below
PLAXIS 2D
SLIDE 6.0 B) DISCUSSION The two methodologies of stability investigations, one dependent on limit equilibrium (LE) plans and the other dependent on finite element (FE) standards are broadly utilized by and by. The fundamental material science of stress�strain relationship, which is deficient in LE methods, has been all around secured by the FE methods. Thus, confused geotechnical calculations can undoubtedly be performed. Moreover, FE investigation can reproduce pressure concentrated issues and misshapening similarity, which have been experienced tricky in LE examination. This has been one of the upsides of FE figurings. www.irjmets.com
@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[555]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:09/September-2020
Impact Factor- 5.354
www.irjmets.com
Then again, LE methods have been applied for a long time. Subsequently, they are well‐established and normal by and by. User‐friendliness, effortlessness and moderately great FOS for a specific case are the benefits of the LE methods. The extent of this examination was to analyze different stability assessment methods. Appropriately, most regular LE approaches were contrasted and the serious LE (M‐P) technique. Correspondingly, the distinctions in FOS registered from LE and FE investigations were looked at dependent on a basic slope considering different burden cases. Likewise, two genuine slopes for a situation study were investigated for the recorded minimum‐maximum GWT, pseudo‐static and dynamic conditions. In addition, the stability assessments of these slopes depended on both LE (M‐P) and FE (PLAXIS) estimation draws near, which both used shear quality boundaries from cutting edge triaxial tests. Likewise, Mohr‐Coulomb model was applied in the two methodologies.
IV.
CONCLUSIONS
The limit equilibrium methods commonly used to assess the safety of soil slopes were briefly discussed. The requirements of an effective computer program for soil slope stability analysis are that it should offer a number of limit equilibrium methods for analyzing circular and non-circular slip surfaces, be flexible and easy to use, allow input data validation, have the facilities to model soil, water, loading and boundary conditions, and have good supportive literature. The computer programs reviewed in this paper were SLIDE 6.0 and PLAXIS 2D. These were shown to have all the requirements of an effective computer program for soil slope stability but at varying degrees of effectiveness. The main finding of these model tests have shown that the majority of results produced by the program were consistent with published data, and where inconsistencies or differences were found these have been highlighted. The degree of inaccuracy produced by using fewer slices is relatively insignificant when viewed in terms of uncertainties associated with slope model and design parameters.
V. [1]
[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
[7] [8]
REFERENCES
Abramson, L. W., Lee, T. S., Sharma, S., and Boyce, G. M. (2002). Slope Stability Concepts. Slope Stabilisation and Stabilisation Methods, Second edition, published by John Willey & Sons, Inc., pp.329‐461. Aryal, K. Sandven, R. and Nordal, S. (2005). Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Methods. Proc. of the 16thInt. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geotech. Engineering, 16 ICSMGE, Osaka, Japan, pp.2471‐76. Duncan, J.M.(1996):State of the Art: Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Analysis in Slopes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 122 (7), pp. 577‐96. Fredlund, D. G. and Krahn, J. (1977). Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 14, pp.429‐39. Grande, L. and Waterman, D. (2005). Phreatic level correction in PLAXIS.Personalcommunicati ons and discussions for adjustment of phreatic surface of inclined groundwater table for stability a nalysis (lars.grande@ntnu.no, support@plaxis.nl). Krahn, J. (2003). The limits of limit equilibrium analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 40, pp.643‐60. Lei Wei, Therese E Koutnik, Mark Woodward. (2010). A Slope Stability Case Study by Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Methods.
www.irjmets.com
@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[556]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:09/September-2020 [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
Impact Factor- 5.354
www.irjmets.com
MD. Mahmud Sazzad. (2015). Stability analysis of slopes with surcharge by LEM and FEM. Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology. Marek Cała and Jerzy Flisiak. (2013). Slope stability analysis with numerical and limit equilibrium methods. SLIDE (2003). Stability analysis for soil and rock slopes. Slide, User’s Guide, Geomechanics Softwar e Solutions, Rocscience Inc., Canada. www.rocscience.com. Spencer, E. (1967). A method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments, Assuming Parallel Inters lice Forces. Geotechnique, Vol. 17, pp. 11‐26. Tümay Kadakci Koca, Mehmet Yalçın Koca (2020). Comparative analyses of finite element and limit-equilibrium methods for heavily fractured rock slopes. Spencer, E. (1967). A method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments, Assuming Parallel Inters lice Forces. Geotechnique, Vol. 17, pp. 11‐26.
www.irjmets.com
@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[557]