THE CHARACTER OF INDIAN CASTE IDENTITY AND NORMS ON STATUS REPRESENTATION

e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:11/November -2020

Impact Factor- 5.354

www.irjmets.com

THE CHARACTER OF INDIAN CASTE IDENTITY AND NORMS ON STATUS REPRESENTATION Mukilan.M*1, Akash Vetrivel M.S.*2 *1,2

Research Scholar, 4TH Year, Department of Sociology, VIT Chennai, India.

ABSTRACT The Indian caste framework is a perplexing social structure wherein social jobs like one's calling became 'inherited,' bringing about limited social versatility and fixed status pecking orders. Moreover, we contend that the characteristic property of rank increases bunch recognizable proof with one's position.

Profoundly recognized gathering individuals would secure the character of the gathering in circumstances when bunch standards are disregarded. In this paper, we are inspecting the result of rank standard infringement and how a person's status is intellectually spoken to. High position standards are related with virtues while the lower station standards are related with indecency. These outcomes help us understand the impact with regards to moral standards and status portrayal and are talked about in the system of the Indian society.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Individuals when all is said in done have a place with numerous social classifications that could either be accomplished, for example, one's calling, or acquired, for example, one's sexual orientation. The outcomes of social orders are frequently not just found in the elements of social associations, yet in addition in the manner in which economic wellbeing is spoken to. For the current examination, the Indian/Hindu station framework is of intrigue, which is a fundamental component of the Indian cultural structure. The station framework gives a progressive system of social jobs that hold innate qualities and, all the more critically, stay stable all through life. A verifiable status is connected to one's standing which generally transformed from the social functions to inherited jobs. This, made status progressive systems on inherited premise with restricted social versatility. For example, people naturally introduced to the most noteworthy position, that is, the Brahmin station have normally been ministers and researchers. People naturally introduced to the Kshatriya station have been warriors and lords. People naturally introduced to the Vaishya position have been shippers. At long last, people naturally introduced to the Shudra standing have been workers. Furthermore, there was an extra 'out-projected' bunch called the Dalits or the 'untouchables' who involved the most reduced advance of the social stepping stool. In current India, the Indian government presented an arrangement conspire in which the unapproachable standings were ordered as Scheduled caste (SC), the regressive clans were sorted as Scheduled tribes (ST) and the impeded positions as Other Backward caste (OBC). The Forward caste (FC) people group by and large establish the high rank gathering. The SC, ST, and OBC including the verifiably impeded gatherings, were given openings for work by the legislature through governmental policy regarding minorities in society.

The FC has truly been and, keeps on being, in a solid financial situation with the most noteworthy status in society. In this way, one of the fundamental destinations of the current examination was to analyze how status is psychologically spoken to in the Indian culture as an outcome of the manner in which position is perceived. Indeed, even now, individuals in India keep on characterizing their self-personality by methods for the standing they have a place with and the social gathering that they wind up in. Standing participation is along these lines imbued in the general public and there is extensive motivation to guarantee that rank as a sort of social character would likely be one of the most remarkable personalities in the Indian setting. This viewpoint is tended to by Social Identity Theory, to which we currently turn.

II.

SOCIAL IDENTITY AS BASIS FOR CASTE IDENTITY

Social identity claims that people derive an at most part of their identity from an affirmative of membership with the group that they belong to. Tajfel and Turner (1986) recommended that any gathering (e.g., social class, family, football crew and so on.) can go about as a wellspring of pride and confidence, hence, we will in general improve our confidence by advancing and underwriting the status of the gathering we have a place with, the alleged "in-gathering" . The Indian cultural structure gives a fruitful ground to analyze the intuitive functions of numerous characters like strict, public, provincial , www.irjmets.com

@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[98]

e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:11/November -2020

Impact Factor- 5.354

www.irjmets.com

class and position wherein one could dispose of or meld these characters to assist cultural working . Yet, numerous specialists have focused on the significance and the impact of position as a vital social character among numerous South Asians contrasted with other social personalities like sex and nationality. It has in certainty been contended that rank personality may abrogate other social characters, due to its essential significance for some, South Asians. We contend that with regards to status portrayal, standing way of life would be the most unmistakable personality in clarifying the distinctions in status recognition, because of the inalienable relationship of rank and status. Along these lines, as per social personality hypothesis, people would endeavor to keep up a positive picture of their rank character. We further contend underneath that position personality will particularly be more remarkable for high rank people.

A solid rank character could give sentiments of belongingness or confidence, in this manner depending on some station standards. Especially, it is realized that high standing people consider station to be as a more steady develop wherein this personality is acquired during childbirth. They tend to essentialise their personality and this is overwhelmingly credited to the sentiments of connectedness with past ages of one's standing gathering. High standing people likewise create sentiments of fleeting progression, positive uniqueness, and increased confidence from essentialisation of their rank personality. Actually, in an investigation directed by Cotterill, it was contended that the standing framework will in general be legitimized through the philosophy of Karmic particularly by those high on social strength direction (SDO), that is, the individuals who show an overall inclination for various leveled social relations. Besides, when individuals from higher standings essentialise their rank character, they license themselves to vilify individuals from the lower stations. The low rank individuals or the Dalits then again, don't accept that their position character is acquired and hence don't essentialise it. They may hence improve their selfviability, through the chance of social portability, in light of the possibility that rank personality can be viewed as less perpetual. We consequently contend that station personality is more notable among high rank people because of the conviction they have about being favored to have acquired this positive picture of high standing during childbirth. Low position people would not have a striking standing personality since they accept that this character isn't essentialised and having a place with this gathering has contrary results.

III.

SOCIAL IDENTITY THREAT AND CASTE NORMS

Social personality impacts depend on the security of self-ideas and hence any danger to this self-idea would be related with solid character impacts. Examination has demonstrated that exceptionally recognized gathering individuals would discover approaches to ensure their in-bunch personality.

Nonetheless, Branscombe guarantee that danger to one's social character in actuality relies upon the level of gathering distinguishing proof. For example, they recommend that the individuals who are profoundly related to their in-bunch are bound to show cautious reactions than the individuals who are not all that exceptionally recognized. We can accept that high position people who legitimize their inborn high rank would likewise show solid high station personality.

It is most usually observed that an individual taking part in such a standard infringement is alienated and degraded . One of the most profoundly attached rank standards identifies with marriage. For example, when individuals disregard the standard of wedding inside one's own rank by participating in between position marriage, the higher station individual is accepted to carry disgrace to the family and this standard offense is viewed as shameless. Branscombe contended that when a personality identified with the ethical quality worth is compromised, high identifiers will show more guarded responses. We along these lines contend that the danger to one's own standing, whenever identified with virtues or standards would spur solid position identifiers to reduce this danger and secure their character.

For a long time, the high position individuals when all is said in done had more noteworthy status in the general public, and saw themselves as living to higher good principles and qualities, when contrasted with low standing people . It is by and large accepted that high standing people hold characteristics identified with astuteness, knowledge, genuineness, somberness, and ethical quality while low station people have characteristics of bluntness, ineptitude, shamelessness, debasement, and other antagonistic characteristics.

www.irjmets.com

@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[99]

e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:11/November -2020

IV.

Impact Factor- 5.354

www.irjmets.com

NORM VIOLATION EFFECTS AND IDENTITY

At the point when an norm is violated, individuals regularly see this freak conduct as possibly threatening to the gathering character, and accordingly manage the aberrance so as to diminish the danger.

Notwithstanding, research has demonstrated that the inclination for a gathering to safeguard the danger relies upon the degree to which an individual is related to the gathering . The individuals who are not as much related to the gathering, are commonly less inspired to ensure one's social character . It would thus be able to be perceived that high identifiers would show more noteworthy inspiration to take part inbunch assurance to safeguard the danger . We contend that high rank people would be high identifiers with their station, and low position people would be low identifiers with their standing. Besides, this example of in-bunch criticism will in general be more unmistakable among people who are profoundly related to their group than the individuals who are definitely not. High-station people would to be sure be high identifiers, attributable to the idea of 'being naturally introduced to' one's high standing and consequently would be particularly spurred to secure one's in-bunch by barring the unfortunate part .

Moreover, Castano et al. (2002) clarify that entrenched gathering individuals (high position individuals) are particularly mindful of the relating rules and standards and in this manner, any sort of aberrance from such standards would represent a danger to one's gathering character, which will be reacted to by devaluating the executing in-bunch part and seeing him/her as low in normality. Examination by Stamkou et al. (2016) further additionally include that particularly the individuals who profoundly relate to one's in-bunch see the in-bunch degenerate as less commonplace of the in-gathering. In this manner, all in all, standard going amiss in-bunch individuals are viewed as more negative than non-straying individuals.

V.

CASTE AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES

One of the most widely recognized social issues of the station framework was the segregation of low position individuals as clarified before. In 1950, free India's constitution prohibited position based segregation and so as to make up for verifiable shameful acts the specialists presented standards in government occupations and instructive establishments to improve the personal satisfaction of low standings. A Reserved framework was presented wherein a specific number of seats were held for individuals from the lower positions at spots of advanced education and government occupations.

Nonetheless, this enactment was before long met with a great deal of opposition from the high standing network who felt that the framework was not meritocratic, and gave a treacherous favorable position to the low rank individuals . We accept that the reserved framework is one of the most significant social outcomes of the position framework in present day times, and mentalities toward the framework would need to be an impression of one's rank personality.

VI.

FINDINGS

It was contended that social character would assume a vital part in the manner individuals speak to status. Danger to one's social (position character) as standard infringement would in this manner bring about taking part in-bunch assurance. Note that we allude to standard infringement as conduct of individual in-bunch individuals and not to one's own standard infringement. Hence, the point of this investigation was to inspect the part of standing standard conflicting (disregarding) versus rank standard steady (non-disregarding) circumstances in making mental portrayals of status. Moreover, we additionally needed to inspect how high standing and low position people make moral decisions in circumstances of standard infringement versus non-infringement. We anticipate that rank personality danger would be generally remarkable for high position people in light of the fact that these people all in all have more elevated levels of standing character. The present study in any case, has a few restrictions particularly as for test size and the inspecting method (accommodation examining). While just singlething measures were utilized for estimating character, as a subsequent report position based personality ought to likewise be estimated on its own utilizing a poll and relate this to the current discoveries. The current discoveries ought to likewise be reached out to other standard abusing occasions separated from the casualty culprit context.

VII.

CONCLUSION

The present study attempted to use fundamental social character speculations in clarifying one result of an exceptionally unpredictable social framework, for example, the Indian station framework. It in like www.irjmets.com

@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[100]

e-ISSN: 2582-5208 International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science Volume:02/Issue:11/November -2020

Impact Factor- 5.354

www.irjmets.com

manner tended to the most overwhelming character that is important in envisioning status contrasts in the Indian culture. Contemplating the complexity of the Indian position system, it was critical to explore a little result of the position system instead of the whole structure isolated. This examination likewise makes ready into the comprehension of the odd one out impact as found in status portrayal as expected to general in-bunch criticism perspectives. It is principal to grow this investigation by inspecting different parts of social personality danger in the Indian setting, for example, religion, to increase some additionally comprehension of how various characters interface with one another in the working of the Indian culture.

VIII.

REFERENCES

[1]

Abrams D., Marques J. M., Bown N., Henson M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78 906–912. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906 .

[2]

Ambedkar B. R. (1925/1989). “Essays on untouchables and untouchability I,” In Writings and Speeches Vol. 5 ed. Moon V. (Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra; ).

[3]

Biernat M., Vescio T. K., Billings L. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: integrating two models of social judgment. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29 523–542. 10.1002/(SICI)10990992(199906)29:4<523::AID-EJSP944>3.0.CO;2-J .

[4]

Branscombe N. A., Castle K., Dorsey A. G., Surbeck E., Taylor J. B. (2000). Early Childhood Education – A Constructivist Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[5]

Branscombe N. R., Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. (1999). “The context and content of social identity threat,” in Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content eds Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. (Oxford, UK: Blackwell; ) 35–58.

[6]

Branscombe N. R., Wann D. L., Noel J. G., Coleman J. (1993). In-Group or out-group extremity: importance of the threatened social identity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 19 381–388.

10.1177/0146167293194003.

[7]

Brewer M. B., Gaertner S. L. (2008). “Toward reduction of prejudice: intergroup contact and social categorization,” in Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes eds Brown R., Gaertner S. L. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd; ) 10.1002/9780470693421.ch22 .

[8]

Castano E., Paladino M.-P., Coull A., Yzerbyt V. Y. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 41 365–385. 10.1348/014466602760344269.

[9]

Cotterill S., Sidanius J., Bhardwaj A., Kumar V. (2014). Ideological support for the indian caste system: social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism and karma. J. Soc. Polit.

Psychol. 2 98–116. 10.5964/jspp. v2i1.171.

[10]

Deshpande M. S. (2010). History of the Indian Caste System and Its Impact on India Today. New York, NY: California University Press.

[11]

Dirks N. B. (1989). The original caste: power, history and hierarchy in south asia. Contrib. Indian Sociol. 23 59–77. 10.1177/006996689023001005.

[12]

Doosje B., Ellemers N., Spears R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31 410–436.

[13]

Dreze J., Khera R. (2009). The Battle for Employment Guarantee. Available at: http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl2601/stories/20090116260100400.htm.

www.irjmets.com

@International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science

[101]