Selected works, May 2012
Itai Cohen
Portfolio 2005-2012
Itai Cohen - Registered Architect.
web: itai.co e.mail: i@itai.co tel:+972544911686
Projects:
Appendix
ReVolt House: Solar Decathlon entry
M.Sc S.01-S.04
Smoke Ring: New Kuip stadium design
M.Sc S.02
Metronome: Music and sound museum
B.Arch S.09-S.10
Tentative: Innovative facade prototype
M.Sc S.01
Mt. Carmel Visitor center
B.Arch S.05
Lotus: Mobile sustainable market stall
B.Arch S.07
Community V2.0: Temporary installation at Beth Hatefutsoth Museum
Independet
Israel’s prime-minister residence
B.Arch S.08
ResumĂŠ
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Table Of Contents
Quick Navigation
1.ReVolt House: Solar Decathlon entry
3.Metronome: Music and sound museum
2.Smoke Ring: New Kuip stadium design
4.Tentative: Innovative facade prototype
7.Community V2.0: Temporary installation Beth Hatefutsoth Museum
6.Lotus: Mobile sustainable market stall
8.Israel’s prime-minister residence
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
5.Mt. Carmel Visitor center
Project Description Date of presentation Tutors Design Team
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ReVolt House
Solar Decathlon entry by team TU Delft 3/2012 Semester 1,2,3 and 4 of Masters PhD Cand. Florian Heinzelmann, Prof. Patrick Teuffel 8 Students in core team, 25 in total.
Background - Solar Decathlon Europe
Home+ House 2010
Rosenheim House 2010
Solar Decathlon Europe is an international competition among universities which promotes research in the development of efficient houses. The objective of the participating teams is to design and build houses that consume as few natural resources as possible and produce minimum waste products during their life cycle. Particular emphasis is put on reducing energy consumption and on obtaining all the necessary energy from the sun. During the final phase of the competition, teams shall assemble their houses in Madrid, in a place open to the public called Villa Solar, where all of them can be visited. They will be competing in ten contests (that is why it is called ‘decathlon’) that will decide which one is the winner of that edition. In the competition taking place in September 2012, there will be twenty proposals from 15 different countries, eleven of which will come from Europe (Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, The United Kingdom and Romania) and four more from China, Japan, Brazil and Egypt.
All of these teams are supported by one or more universities and have the economic and technical support from institutions and companies. The main figures during the whole process, from the design to the last phase of the competition in Madrid are the students, known as ‘Decathletes’, who are guided by a professor, the ‘Faculty Advisor’. (Source: sdeurope.com)
TU Delft had competed in the 2012 Solar Decathlon Europe but had to forfeit and cancel the project just before production, on March 2012. I had been involved in the design since the early concept phase (The design proposed by 3 students and myself was selected in an internal competition within the university). For more than a year and a half a group of students from the fields of architecture, building technology and sustainable energy were working to make this design a reality.
FabLab House 2010
Once the initial design phase was completed, I took the role of climate team leader, in which I was in charge of the bioclimatic design – Developing the house’s energetic balance, using passive, semi-passive and advance active systems. I was involved in energetic simulations, calculations and analysis as well as developing a methodology for analyzing the special circumstances of the house. Other aspects included modeling the house using thermal analysis software, daylight calculations, wind and ventilation simulations (CFD), Daylight analysis and artificial light design. Consultation and meetings with industry specialists from the fields of building physics, heat pump optimization, adiabatic cooling and physical simulation specialists. I was involved in the systems design including tailor made system modification with manufacturers according to the design needs. One of the most important aspects of my role was design coordination and integration with architectural design, envelope, energy and logistics teams.
is a shaded closed facade. The ReVolt house is designed to rotate such that in the winter months, the open facade is constantly facing the sun to provide light and natural heating for the home, and in the summer months, the closed facade The ReVolt House’s sustainable design is following the sun, in order to shade takes well advantage of the properties of the sun’s heat and keep the house cool. The name ReVolt has a tri-fold reference water – temperate conditions, reflection Naturally, the dwellers can override and to the essence of the house: REVolving, of the sun’s rays, and facility for rotation orient the house as they please. VOLTage (referring to its self-powered movement. In addition to sustainability and low capacity), and REVOLTing against the paradigm of what a house is expected to The layout of the house is precisely energy consumption, the TU Delft team be. designed with three living zones: a living also hoped to provide a unique and area, a dining area, and the bedroom area. comfortable lifestyle with the ReVolt Not only is the ReVolt House entirely One side of the house has a window- House, based on the calm of the water self-powered by solar collectors located clad open facade, where the other side and the special landscape features. The ReVolt House is a rotating and floating solar home, which was designed by a team from the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft). The Revolt House was a part of the 2012 Solar Decathlon, the “world cup” for sustainable solar houses.
on the roof, but the house benefits from sustainable design in all respects, from passive ventilation, to natural heating and cooling, to sustainable manufacturing – the house literally floats on 18,000 bottles.
Summer rotation mode
Winter rotation mode
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Design
Design Concepts
Three aspects of the ReVolt House are the quintessence for the further design – namely floating, rotating and effects Floating: The reasons to develop a floating house, is related to the sheer amount of water available in the Netherlands. There are plans to build entire neighborhoods floating on water. We would like to contribute to that and additionally show how to solve that in a sustainable way where the water/landscape aspect gets tightly interwoven with the architecture and energy concept of our house. Rotating: The house will rotate for one reason amongst others because of climatic and energy aspects. One side of the house will have a closed facade which in summer will continuously face the sun in order to shade the interior and mini¬mize the solar heat gain inside (lesser cooling). We call this closed part of the house the “heat shield”. In winter when the suns’ altitude is lower, the “open” glass facades of the house will continuously face the sun. This will generate a solar heat gain for the interior (passive heating) which requires less energy for an actual heating system. Since the house is floating with little friction on water the rotation won’t require much of an effort. Effects: Since water reflects the sun rays we further expect having a great impact on the interior of the house in terms of daylight availability but also atmosphere. We aim to combine sustainability, low energy consumption, and a dynamic relation with the landscape into a unique lifestyle and design.
It’s Dutch! Springs from Dutch traditions of seafaring and boat houses along the canals. A typical Dutch boathouse is a good start for a sustainable house. It’s Future Proof! With the continuous rise in sea level the boat house offers the ultimate flexible solution, always floating on the water.
It’s Mobile! The boathouse rotates following the sun to for protection and to maximize power conversion. It can also move from place to place not being confined to a location. It’s More Temperate! Bodies of water maintain relatively stable temperature during summer and winter. A boat house avoids extreme heat and cold found inland and requires less energy to maintain comfort levels. It’s Futuristic! Building on water increases density and preserves precious arable land and can be a part of large scale development of cities on water.
Bending facade
moment inThe time. During the design rotationaddresses cycle thea three full-height glazed windows Revolt house de one continuous element where many or will isasmade as one continuous element where many of lifestyles landscape, and contextswith related displayvariety an ever-shifting the interesting result of framing difto water. This first issue brought forward the wall and just a few element are exhibited. The and just a few element are exhibited. The ferent views the and day,original or the concept same view to LL an along innovative for aslowly moving from a window absence of straight corners let the eye drawn around ofanother. straight Because corners let the eye drawn aroundorienting itself most optimal towards sustainable building. the house isbuild-in constantly more spacious than it really is. The furniture acious thanthere it really is. The build-in furniture the sun, won’t be any external sun shading elements required, thus leave, leaving moreThe room to breathe. Moreover, it allows ReVolt House follows the movement S D g more room to breathe. Moreover, it allows D ing the view outside completely unobstructed at all times. S of to thethe sun throughout the day thanks nt scenarios that are needed for the dynamic lifestyle ios that are needed for the dynamicwhich lifestyle to a rotation mechanism, itself is activated by solar energy. The house will
Furthermore, thespin rhythm of its rotation determined by sun position in slowly around centre is forgenerally better only works as light well to get more daylight into to sun irradiation, which will a software-based interfaceThree the sky, butresponding the TU Delft team is implementing which three nuclei functions be maximized during winter and screened orks asallow light well to get more daylight into ualwill barrier, thus separating i.e. the kitchen from the the inhabitants to “personalize” the rotation rate according to their three nuclei in summer toliving enhance climatic elations the three areaspassive and glass faer,specific thusbetween separating i.e. the kitchen from the needs andWedesires. For example, by interacting with ReVolt House’s rotaeffects. further enable the inhabitants d; therefore enabling the inhabitants aprogramming view towards between the three living areas and glass fato override the climatic of tionthe system, one could configure it in order to wake up every morning bathed and home entertainment area from any point the rotation in order to have direct light ore enabling the a view while towards sun light, or inhabitants to face the sunset having the house their liking. theinfacade intoenter the volume ataccording the glasstofacades, the a romantic dinner at the loggia. e home entertainment area from any point awareness ofthe water presence redThe appearance while curves enhancehas thebeen notionanother driving force while designThe ReVolt House enables the inhabitant de ing intoReVolt the volume at the glass facades, the House. thenatural three “cycle” glazedofwalls truly live Since with the the can be completely opened, they earance while the curves enhance the notion sun. The as relation with or the source of can all work either entrances small terraces. Even if the relative position of energy has been a crucial aspect in the tialthe organization is tied constantly to sun movement, so is to thethe outside, the house can be surinside conception changes in relation of the architecture design from ding. The landscaping with the wooden deck for acrounded bythea very fixedbeginning, deck forbecoming the half part of itsof perimeter. When parts of the house the snization well as the part will beevery programmed such a is water tied to sun movement, so isin the facade experience and day live. is facing a pool, a lake, or a canal on which it floats, the dweller will beBending in direct to the use with most the likelywooden happening at that elated landscaping deck forspecific acBending facade contact with water, avoiding the visual and physical obstruction of the deck. ethe rotation cycle the three full-height glazed windows water part will be programmed in such a Bending facade g landscape, with the interesting result of framing difthe use most likely happening at that specific , or the same view slowly moving from a window to n cycle the three full-height glazed windows e is constantly orienting itself most optimal towards pe, with the resultrequired, of framing dify external suninteresting shading elements thus leavsame view slowly moving from a window to completely unobstructed at all times.
Interior relations
Interior relations
Exterior relations
Exterior relations
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
the Netherlands. The openfor spatial configurawoning’ (starter’s apartment) a young couple was building receives a sculptured appearance while the curves enhance the notion aorganized lack in the around Netherlands. The open spatial configurathree nuclei; dining, living of rotation. aratlayout organized around nuclei; dining, living the perimeter by anthree alternation of open nnected attechnical the perimeter by an alternation of open the more and appliances spaces. In is tied to sun movement, so is the As the inner logic and spatial organization contains the more technical and appliances spaces. In nt relation to the dining room area, the home enterthe surrounding. The landscaping with the wooden deck for acs adjacent towith the dining room area, the home entere wardrobe, toilet and washing appliance are cessing the ReVolt House as well as the water a shape m and the wardrobe, toilet and washing appliance are part will be programmed in such Circular Circular shape . way that its features are related to the use most likely happening at that specific
The circular footprint of ReVolt House is the most consistent shape for circular movement and allows a reduction of the amount of energy needed for the rotation in water thus not just being a metaphor but coming from the aspect of its performance. According to the square meter allowance of the building footprint, a Dutch ‘starterswoning’ (starter’s apartment) for a young couple was designed, of which there’s a lack in the Netherlands. The open spatial configuration is based on a triangular layout organized around three nuclei; dining, living and sleeping which are connected at the perimeter by an alternation of open and closed facades which contains the more technical and appliances spaces. In that manner the kitchen is adjacent to the dining room area, the home entertainment to the living room and the wardrobe, toilet and washing appliance are close to the sleeping room. Although the whole interior is made as one continuous element where many things are integrated into the wall and just a few element are exhibited. The use of the white color and absence of straight corners let the eye drawn around the room and makes it feel more spacious than
home entertainment area from any point in the house. By bending the facade into the volume at the glass facades, the building receives a sculptured appearance while the curves enhance the notion of rotation. As the inner logic and spatial organization is tied to sun movement, so is the relation with the surrounding. The landscaping with the wooden deck for accessing the ReVolt House as well as the water part will be programmed in such a way that its features are related to the use most likely happening at that
specific moment in time. During the rotation cycle the three full-height glazed windows will display an ever-shifting landscape, with the interesting result of framing different views along the day, or the same view slowly moving from a window to another. Because the house is constantly orienting itself most optimal towards the sun, there won’t be any external sun shading elements required, thus leaving the view to the outside completely unobstructed at all times.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
it really is. The build-in furniture helps to open up the space, leaving more room to breathe. Moreover, it allows the house to adapt different scenarios that are needed for the dynamic lifestyle of young families. The central bathroom not only works as light well to get more daylight into the interior but also as visual barrier, thus separating i.e. the kitchen from the sleeping area. The view relations between the three living areas and glass facades remain unobstructed; therefore enabling the inhabitants a view towards at least two glass facades and the
Furthermore, the rhythm of rotation is generally determined by sun position in the sky, but the TU Delft team is implementing a software-based interface which will allow the inhabitants to “personalize� the rotation rate according to their specific needs and desires. For example, by interacting with ReVolt House’s rotation system, one could configure it in order to wake up every
morning bathed in sun light, or to face the sunset while having a romantic dinner at the loggia. The awareness of water presence has been another driving force while designing ReVolt House. Since the three glazed walls can be completely opened, they can all work either as entrances or small terraces. Even if
the relative position of the inside changes constantly in relation to the outside, the house can be surrounded by a fixed deck for the half of its perimeter. When parts of the house is facing a pool, a lake, or a canal on which it floats, the dweller will be in direct contact with water, avoiding the visual and physical obstruction of the deck.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Revolt House construction description can be divided in two distinct parts, the Landscape and the Shell. These two aspects define the built environment comprising of platform and pool forming the landscape area and different building components forming the shell. The detailed descriptions of each part with the materials, components and construction systems used are explained below.
Shell
Since the house was designed to be constructed and dismantled three times (buildup in Delft, dismantling and transporting to Madrid, construction for the competition, dismantling and shipping back to delft, and final buildup) all connections were designed to be dry and and capable of multiple usage, and all parts were designed to fit in as little trucks as possible. The competition dictates that the house should be built in 10 days at the competition site, a fact that forced design for rapid fabrication.
Landscape
Photovoltaics/ Solar Collectos
Roof Slabs
Roof
Roof Ring
Windows Machine Room/Wardrobe
Machine Room/Wardrobe Kitchen Unit
Walls
Bathroom
Deck and Ramps Floating Floor
Floor Slabs
Floor Floating Platform
Platform
Pool
40
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
°C
MON T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A MS T E R D A M, N LD
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - Madrid, E S P
W /m²
°C
40
1.0k
40
1.0k
30
0.8k
30
0.8k
20
0.6k
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
10
0.4k
0
0.2k
0
Psychrom
W /m²
Location: AMSTE
© W e a th e r T ool
Bioclimatic Design
The task at hand was to design a house that would perform well in the Netherlands, as well as in the competition site in Madrid. Comparative analysis was made to determine the best passive method for controlling the house’s climate; Direct solar gain was selected for heating and evaporation for cooling.
much more complicated, since all software packages are orientation dependant and include the sun’s path, which is irrelevant in this case. Ad-hoc solutions were developed to create reliable energetic calculations. A method was developed in which the radiation was calculated separately from conduction and convection. To establish the amount of radiation infiltrating the house the Perez model was used to derive directional data from the weather data, and then using conditional scripting, the rotation was simulated per window per hour, on the IWEC J an
°C
W /m²
Mar
A pr
-10
0.0k
May
Jun
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
J an
D ec
T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud Cover
A pr
May
J un
J ul
A ug
0.0k S ep
O ct
N ov
40
1.0k
0.8k
30
0.8k
0.6k
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
10
0.4k
0
0.2k
20
LE G E ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality 0
To prove that the rotation is indeed effective the same method was used to compare three models- a stationary model, facing south, a rotating model in summer mode, and a rotating model in winter mode. The calculation had reveled a difference of 9kWh/ day in summer and up to 15kWh/day in winter.
-1 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud C over
-10
0.0k
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.2k
14
16
18
40
1.0k
0.8k
30
0.8k
24
0.0k
W /m²
1.0k
0.8k
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
DBT(°C)
AH
Location: AMSTERDAM, NLD 1.0k
22
Psychrometric Chart
W /m²
40
20
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A Madrid, S PA M, N LD MS T E RE D
30
30
D ec
1.0k
40
40
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - Madrid, E S P
Mar
W /m²
W /m²
30
Feb
°C D A ILY CO N D IT IO N S - 6th J uly (187)
°C D A IL Y CON D IT ION S - 1 4th F ebruary (45)
LE GE ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality
The challenge of climatic design of the ReVolt house was even greater because the house was rotating- unlike any other house. That had made the dynamic energetic calculations MON T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A MS T E R D A M, N LD
F eb
S E LE CT E D D E 1. passive solar he 2. thermal mass ef 3. exposed mass + 4. natural ventilati 5. directevaporat 6. indirectevapora
0.2k
year data. The estimated loads were then set into an Energy+ model of the house (with no windows) as internal loads.
-1 0
°C
°C
Frequency: 1stJa Weekday Times: Weekend Times: Barometric Pressu
Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember 0 Weekday Times: 00:00-24 :00Hrs Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa
0.2k
Psychrom Location: Madrid,
© W e a th e r T ool 0.6k
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
10
0.4k
0
0.2k
0
0.2k
20
S E LE CT E D D E S -1 IG0N T E CHNIQU E S: 1. passive solar heating J an 2. thermal mass effects 3. exposed mass + night-purge ventilation 4. natural ventilation 5. directevaporative cooling 6. indirectevaporative cooling
-10
0.0k F eb
J an
Mar
A pr
May
Jun
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
Feb
J an
Mar
A pr
May
J un
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
W /m²
1.0k
40
1.0k
0.8k
30
0.8k
40
30
A pr
May
J un
J ul
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -AMSTERDAM, NLD
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
D ec 30
© W e a th e r T ool
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -Madrid, ESP
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
100%
100%
80%
80%
100%
60%
60%
60%
60%
40%
40%
40%
40%
20%
20%
20%
0%
0%
D ec
°C D A ILY CO N D IT IO N S - 6th J uly (187)
W /m²
Mar
0.0k
D ec
°C D A IL Y CON D IT ION S - 1 4th F ebruary (45)
F eb
80%
100% -1 0
Frequency: 1stJa Weekday Times: Weekend Times: Barometric Pressu
0.0k
80%
S E LE CT E D D E 1. passive solar he 2. thermal mass ef 3. exposed mass + 4. natural ventilati 5. directevaporat 6. indirectevapora
25
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
LE G E ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality
LE GE ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality 0
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud Cover
-1 0
0.2k
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
0
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud C over
0.0k
-10
20%
20
0.2k
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
0%
0.0k
14th
28th Feb
Jan
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
14th
0% 14th
28th
Jan
28th Feb
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
14th
28th
15
100%
°C
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A Madrid, MS T E RE D S PA M, N LD
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -Madrid, ESP
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
100%
W /m²
10
80% 40
1.0k
30
0.8k
80%
60%
60% 5 Comfort
20
0.6k
10
0.4k
40%
DBT(°C)
40%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
20%
0
20%
DBT(°C)
0.2k
Psychrometric Chart 0% 14th Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember Jan Weekday Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa
-1 0
0.0k J an
F eb
Mar
A pr
May
J un
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
D ec
28th Feb
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
© W e a th e r T ool
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -AMSTERDAM, NLD
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -Madrid, ESP
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
100%
100%
80%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%
60%
100%
100%
S E LE CT E D D E S IG N T E CHNIQU E S: 1. passive solar heating 2. thermal mass effects 3. exposed mass + night-purge ventilation 4. natural ventilation 5. directevaporative cooling 6. indirectevaporative cooling
0%
AH
Location: Madrid, ESP
30
14th
28th
MON T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A MS T E R D A M, N LD
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - Madrid, E S P
W /m²
°C
1.0k
40
0.8k
30
0.6k
20
Psychrometric Chart
W /m²
AH
Location: AMSTERDAM, NLD
S tereographic Diagram
30
N
Location: AMSTERDAM, NLD
0.8k
345°
Sun Position: 159.5°, 59.7° HSA: -12.5°, VSA: 60.3°
20
Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember Weekday Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs S tereographic D iagram Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa
1.0k
30°
0.4k
10
0
0.2k
0
0.4k
10° 0.2k
315°
45°
-1 0
0.0k J an
F eb
Mar
A pr
May
Jun
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
20°
-10
D ec
J an
Feb
Mar
A pr
345°
Sun Position: 130.3°, 66.1° HSA: S E LE CT E D -41.7°, D E S VSA: IG N 71.7° T E CHNIQU E S: © W ea ther T ool 1. passive solar heating 2. thermal mass effects 3. exposed mass + night-purge ventilation 4. natural ventilation 5. directevaporative cooling 6. indirectevaporative cooling
0.6k
330° 10
N
© W e a thLocat e r T ion: ool Madrid, ESP
15°
© W e athe r T oo l
May
J un
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
15°
330°
30°
30 10°
315°
45°
0.0k
20°
W /m²
30°
D ec
1stJul 1st Jun
°C D A IL Y CON D IT ION S - 1 4th F ebruary (45)
30°
W /m²
°C D A ILY CO N D IT IO N S - 6th J uly (187)
300° 40
1.0k
60° 1stAug
40
300° 1stJun
0.8k
30
25
60° 1stJul
1.0k
40° 30
40°
0.8k
1stMay
1stAug
20
50°
0.6k
20
50°
0.6k
1stMay 10
0.4k
285°
10
60°
LE GE ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
0
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud Cover
0.2k
-1 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14 1st Apr1 6
18
20
22
24
T emperature R el.H umidity W ind S peed
0.4k
75° 1stSep
LE G E ND Comfort: T hermal N eutrality 0
D irect S olar D iffuse S olar Cloud C over
285°
75°
70°
1stSep
0.2k
70°
0.0k
60°
-10
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
80°
80°
1stApr
270°
20
0.0k
90°
270°
90° 1stOct
1st Oct
15 1stMar 1stMar 255°
105°
255°
105° 1stNov
MO N T H L Y D IU R N A L A VE R A G E S - A Madrid, S PA M, N LD MS T E RE D
°C
1stNov
1stFeb
W /m²
1st Dec
1stFeb 240°
1stJan 240°
120°
1.0k
16
1st Jan
10
120°
9 17
1st Dec
40
10 15
14
11
12
13
9 16 10
15
225°
14
135°
11
12
13
30
225°
135°
0.8k
5 Comfort
210°
150°
210°
20
0.6k Time: 12:00 Date: 1stJuly Dotted lines: July-December.
195°
Time: 12:00 Date: 1stJuly Dotted lines: July-December.
165° 180°
10
0.4k
0
DBT(°C)
165° 180°
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Psychrometric Chart 0.0k
Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember Weekday :00Hrs J an Times: 00:00-24 F eb Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa
0.8k
Mar
A pr
May
J un
J ul
A ug
S ep
O ct
N ov
D ec
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -Madrid, ESP
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
100%
100%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%
60%
40%
40%
40%
40%
20%
20%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0.4k
80%
Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember Weekday Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa © W e a th e r T ool
© W e a th e r T ool
S E LE CT E D D E S IG N T E CHNIQU E S: 1. passive solar heating 2. thermal mass effects 3. exposed mass + night-purge ventilation 4. natural ventilation 5. directevaporative cooling 6. indirectevaporative cooling
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -AMSTERDAM, NLD
0.2k
AH
Location: Madrid, ESP AH
Location: AMSTERDAM, NLD
-1 0 1.0k
100%
5
195°
0.2k
Psychrometric Chart
W /m²
0.6k
150°
100%
30
S E LE CT E D D E S IG N T E CHNIQU E S: 1. passive solar heating 2. thermal mass effects 3. exposed mass + night-purge ventilation 4. natural ventilation 5. directevaporative cooling 6. indirectevaporative cooling
30
0.0k N ov
D ec
25
W /m²
25 1.0k
0.8k
0% 0.6k
14th Jan
28th Feb
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
14th
0% 14th
28th
Jan
28th Feb
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
14th
28th
0.4k
20 20
0.2k
20
22
24
0.0k
100%
RELATIVE HUMIDITY -Madrid, ESP
1stJanuary to 31stDecember
100% 15 15
80%
80%
60%
60%
W /m²
10 10
1.0k
0.8k
40%
5
40% Comfort
5 Comfort
0.6k
20%
20%
DBT(°C) 0.4k
DBT(°C)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0%
0% 14th
Jan
28th Feb
14th
28th Mar
14th
28th Apr
14th
28th May
14th
28th Jun
14th
28th Jul
14th
28th Aug
14th
28th Sep
14th
28th Oct
14th
28th Nov
14th
28th Dec
14th
28th
0.2k
Psychrometric Chart Location: Madrid, ESP 0.0k
Frequency: 1stJanuary to 31stDecember Weekday Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Weekend Times: 00:00-24:00Hrs Barometric Pressure: 101.36kPa © W e a th e r T ool
AH
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
°C
40
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Deliverable #4
Dec
Deliverable #4 Jun
Jan
0
Hours
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 February 8, 2012 TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 Rotation, Summer mode
20
Stationary
Rotation, Winter Mode
5.3.61 Amsterdam, yearly comparison between models a, b, c
6
15
1
4
10 kWh/day
3.5
Solar radition load kW/h, ΣWindows
Solar radition load kW/h, ΣWindows
0
4.5
February 8, 2012
5
4
5
3
5
2
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
Dec
Jun
Jan
0.5
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0
Rotation, Winter Mode
5.3.63 Amsterdam, yearly delta of solar gain between combined rotation to stationary models
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 February 8, 2012 TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08
20000
6
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Deliverable #4
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 February 8, 2012 TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08
20
Stationary
Rotation, Winter Mode
February 8, 2012
5
February 8, 2012
15 kWh/day Solar radition load kW/h, ΣWindows
15000
3000
5.3.61 Amsterdam, yearly comparison between models a, b, c
5.3.62 Madrid, yearly comparison between models a, b, c
142
2000
Rotation, Summer mode
Deliverable #4 Stationary
1000
Hours
Hours IWEC Day of year
Rotation, Summer mode
Deliverable #4
Dec
3000
Jan
2000
Dec
-5
1000
Jun
Jan
0
Jun
Deliverable #4
0
0
4
3 10
Wh/day
10000
2
5
5000
1
0 0
0
4000
5000
6000
7000
Hours
8000
Dec
3000
Dec
2000
Deliverable #4 Rotation, Summer mode
-5
IWEC Day of year
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 February 8, 2012
1000
Jun Jun
Jan Jan
Dec
Jun
Jan
Deliverable #4 -5000
0
Stationary
Rotation, Winter Mode
IWEC Day of year
5.3.62 Madrid, yearly comparison between models a, b, c
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08 Deliverable #4 February 8, 2012
5.3.63 Amsterdam, yearly delta of solar gain between combined rotation to stationary models
5.3.64 Madrid, yearly delta of solar gain between combined rotation to stationary models 142
Madrid rotation analysis
Amsterdam rotation analysis
20000
143
TUD_PM#4_2012-02-08
31 september
kW/h
14 september
Summer Madrid loads
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
5.3.3.1.2.2 Competition simulations (capacity, monthly load)
5.3.18 Simulation results 14-31 september (Madrid, competition) 14 september
31 september
kW/h
107
Designed temperature graph 5.3.19 Simulation results comfort temperatures 14-31 september
A segment of the Madrid dynamic simulation is portrayed in further detail in this report to hourly resolution (fig. 5.3.19). The
Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ĂĚŝĂďĂƟĐ ĐŽŽůŝŶŐ ŽŶ
Ͳ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ĐĞŝůŝŶŐ ;,W ŽīͿ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ĂĚŝĂďĂƟĐ ĐŽŽůŝŶŐ ŽŶ
Ͳ EŽ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ĐĞŝůŝŶŐ ;,W ŽīͿ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ EŽ ĂĚŝĂďĂƟĐ ĐŽŽůŝŶŐ Ͳ KƉĞŶĂďůĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ
>Žǁ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
,ŝŐŚ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
>Žǁ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
,W
,W
DĞĚŝƵŵ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
Ͳ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽŶͿ Ͳ ďŽŝůĞƌ ŽŶ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŚĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ ǀŝĂ ďŽŝůĞƌ Ͳ ƉĂƐƐŝǀĞ ŚĞĂƟŶŐǭ Ͳ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽŶͿ Ͳ ďŽŝůĞƌ ŽŶ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŚĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ ǀŝĂ ďŽŝůĞƌ Ͳ ƉĂƐƐŝǀĞ ŚĞĂƟŶŐǭ
DĞĚŝƵŵ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
,W
,W
Ͳ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽŶͿ Ͳ ďŽŝůĞƌ ŽŶ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŚĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ ǀŝĂ ďŽŝůĞƌ Ͳ ƉĂƐƐŝǀĞ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ Ͳ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽŶͿ Ͳ ďŽŝůĞƌ ŽŶ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŚĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ ǀŝĂ ďŽŝůĞƌ Ͳ ƉĂƐƐŝǀĞ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ
Ͳ EŽ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽīͿ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŶŽ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ Ͳ ,ĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ Ͳ KƉĞŶĂďůĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ Ͳ EŽ ƉŽŽů ƚŽ ŇŽŽƌ ;,W ŽīͿ Ͳ sĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶ͗ ŶŽ ƉƌĞŚĞĂƟŶŐ Ͳ ,ĞĂƚ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ Ͳ KƉĞŶĂďůĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
,ŝŐŚ ŚĞĂƟŶŐ ůŽĂĚ
Bioclimatic system superposition
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Embedded water system: heating, cooling and domestic hot water
Machine room design
ventilation to remove hot air, cool it with grey water droplets and then in turn cool the intake air to 18c. This is done while the rotation mechanism keeps the house in full shade, preventing penetration of direct solar radiation. In case the pool overheats, a small heat pump cools the water to 20c. Maximum cooling load expected: 3.4kW peak. In winter the house is using a PID controller to determine the house’s angle towards the sun and keep temperature optimal. When
direct solar radiation is not present, the heat pump is reversed and heats the floor to 28c, using the pool’s water as a source. The air-air exchanger is preheating the intake air with the exhaust air in an efficiency of 95%. The maximal expected heating load is 1.35kW peak. The loads are relatively low albeit the large floor to window ratio, due to the highly insulating envelope, rated at a U value of 0.13m2K.
Air circulation scheme and forced stacked ventilation
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The ReVolt house is utilizing the sun, a set of heat-exchanges, the pool’s water and an adiabatic cooler to control comfort within the house. The main cooling system is the radiative ceiling, which is circulated with a submerged heat-exchanger in the pool. As long as the pool is colder then the internal temperature by more then 4c, is would drain the heat to the pool at a cost of only 6w. When the heat load is higher, an adiabatic air-air heat-exchanger kicks in, using stack
Materialization
ϭ ŵŽůĚ ĨŽƌ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐ ĚŝīĞƌĞŶƟĂƚĞĚ ƉĂƌƚƐ
Much thought was given to the materials the house should be made of. They had to be very ŝ͘͘ DŽůĚ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ durable, precise, insulating, sustainable, and very importantly, light - to keep the house’s weight as low as possible for bouncy. After a long period of research, the material selected for the envelope was glass-fiber reinforced PE/PET foam composite, fabricated in vacuum infusion. The house’s parts would be cast using only 5 moulds, which with different setups are able to produce all the necessary segments. The floating platform is made of overpressurised PET bottles, which are able to carry substantial loads after being filled with 6 grams of dry-ice (solid CO2).
WƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͗ /ŶũĞĐƟŽŶ ŵŽůĚŝŶŐ
ŝŝ͘ WƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ
DŽůĚ ϭ ;ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ǁĂůůƐͿ ĂŶĚ ĂĚũƵƐƚĂďŝůŝƚLJ
DŽůĚ Ϯ ;ƌŽŽĨ͕ ŇŽŽƌ͕ ŇŽĂƟŶŐ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐͿ
Mold 3 (ring)
/ŶŝƟĂůůLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĨƌĂŐŵĞŶƚĞĚ ŝŶƚŽ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂďůĞ ƉŝĞĐĞƐ͘ dŚĞƐĞ ƉŝĞĐĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ďƌŽŬĞŶ ĚŽǁŶ
ŶĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ǁŝůů ďĞ ŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞĚ ďLJ ͚sĂĐƵƵŵ ƐƐŝƐƚĞĚ ZĞƐŝŶ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌ DŽůĚŝŶŐ ͚͘ dŚŝƐ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ ŶĞŶƚƐ ƚŽ ŚĞůƉ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ǁŝƚŚ ŵŝŶŝŵĂů ŵŽůĚƐ͘ dŚĞ ŐĞŽŵĞƚƌLJ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ ǁĂƐ ĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĞĚ ŝŶƚŽ ƚ ƌĞƐŝŶƐ ĂŶĚ ĮďĞƌƐ ƵƐĞĚ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ĨĂǀŽƌƐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ůĂƌŐĞ ǁĂůů ĂŶĚ ƌŽŽĨ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ Ă ĂŶĚ ĐƵƌǀĞĚ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚĞ ŵŽůĚ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ ĨŽƌ ŇĂƚ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ ĂƌĞ ǀĞƌLJ ƐŝŵƉůĞ ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌǀĞĚ ŵŽůĚ ĨŽƌ ĞƚŚŽĚƐ͘ /ƚ ƉƌŽǀĞĚ ƚŽ ďĞ ǀĞƌLJ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂů ǁŝƚŚ ǀĞƌLJ ůĞƐƐ ƚŽŽůŝŶŐ ĐŽƐƚ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŝƐ ŽŶĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŵŽƐƚ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĞĚ ĚƵƌŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ͘DŽƌĞŽǀĞƌ ƚŚĞ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ŝƐ ǀĞƌLJ ŵŝŶŝŵĂů ǁŚĞŶ ǁĂůůƐ ĂŶĚ ƌŝŶŐ ƉĂƌƚƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ŵŽƌĞ ŵĂŶ ŚŽƵƌƐ ŝŶ ĐƌĂŌŝŶŐ ŵƵůƟƉůĞ ŵŽůĚ ƐŚĂƉĞ͘ ŽƚŚĞƌ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ ĐĂƐĞ͘
ƐŝŶƐ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĨŽĂŵ ĐŽƌĞ ĂƌĞ ĂƌƌĂŶŐĞĚ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ ƚŚĞ ŵŽůĚ ĂŶĚ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ǀĂĐƵƵŵ ďĂŐ ͘ sĂĐƵƵŵ ŝƐ ĐƌĞĂƚĞĚ ŽŶ ƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ŐĞŽŵĞƚƌLJ ŝŶ ĐƵƌǀĞĚ ǁĂůůƐ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ƌĞƉĞĂƚĞĚ Ăƚ ĚŝīĞƌĞŶƚ ƉĂƌƚƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ ĐƌĞĂƟŶŐ Ă ŐŽŽĚ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Project Description
Date of presentation Tutors
Design Team
XXL Digital Workshop for designing the new Kuip stadium- Rotterdam 4/2011 Semester 2 of Masters Coordination: Michela Turrin. Instructors: Prof.ir. K. Oosterhuis; Dr.ir. H.H. Bier, ir. Jelle Feringa. Dr.ir. J. Paul, ir. A. Borgart, ir. T. Klein, Arch. M. Turrin, ir. S. Mulders, ir. P. Nourian, Dr.ir. A. van Timmeren, Dr.ir. M. Tenpierik, Ing. A.K. Lassen, ir.G.Mangone, Prof.dr.ing. P. Teuffel; Dipl.Ing. F. Heinzelmann L. Birznieks, M. Van Meijeren, P. Papanastasis, I. Cohen
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Smoke Ring
Background - XXL Digital Workshop This design was conceived during a unique workshop given at the TU Delft, titled “XXL�. The XXL Workshop is an elective course held at the Faculty of Architecture of Delft University of Technology. It is concerned with the design, computation, engineering, and production of a horizontal large span building structure. This design process is done as a collaborative digital design in a multidisciplinary group of students in which each student has his/her own different responsibility. The collaborative digital design requires an integrated 3D approach based on BIM (Building Information Modeling) principles, performance analysis, and file to factory processes. It is given once a year covers the entire weekly timetable. It is a team project, and each team comprises of specialists: An architect, a construction engineer, a facade designer and a digital informatics manager. Together they need to come up with a stadium design which is detailed, calculated and optimized. The students are gathered in a studio throughout the day, while the tutors constantly come and go. Each specialist is consulting his tutor in his field of expertise and then needs to come back to the team and find a way to integrate the content of the consult with the rest of the team. The group has to face great challenges caused by various opinions and the overall complexity of designing a mega-structure.
peaking out of it. Above the top of the first seat ring, a 10 meter gap would allow a continuous view of the city through the stadium, from the city into the stadium and from the stadium towards the city. The top seating ring would be concealed in a light-as-possible construction, that would appear to be floating over the hill, making it iconic, memorable and unique. The smoke ring would be fixed on a set of columns that would include the horizontal moment axis, the stairs Our proposal suggests the creation of a and the lifts. The top structure would also split stadium. Partly covered in ground include the VIP rooms and some of the and partly “floating” over the pitch. A functions the sustainable approach taken volcano and a smoke ring if you may. The in this concept is of a more social nature. first ring, as well as the pitch, the parking lot and several other functions are slightly We look at the connection with the submerged and covered until a height of city and the transparency as values of about 15 meters in artificial soil, acting great importance in the relation to the as a green roof, with only the entrances context,and enables the community to One of our favorite things about the programme given for the stadium was the requirement to integrate the stadium and the city. Initially, it sounds like a contradiction - a stadium is introverted by it’s nature. For the spectators the focal point is inside the stadium and since the building should house as many seats as possible, a tall solid mass is created that does not communicate with the surrounding city.
feel greater connection to the place, that is open to all, not only for the paying crowd, the new sloped created would encourage new uses instead of the conventional carpet of parking lots surrounding most stadiums. This green strip continues the master plan’s intention of creating an urban part, making the mountain a focal point in it.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Desgin
Concepts and Programme
Splitting the stadium to two parts, allowing a view of the city through the building.
(24/7)2
Yearly usage analysis clearly show that times in which the stadium is used in it’s full 67,000 seat capacity are surprisingly marginal - barely 0.8% of the time. Therefore it becomes nothing more than
a ‘white elephant’ if approached in the traditional nature. Our conclusion was that the full size stadium was a temporary state, and should be designed as such. Allowing other functions to become the main use
of the mega-structure would prevent it from becoming yet another urban void. By splitting the stadium in two halves that are able to operate independently, we create opportunity for two times*24/7 space use.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Year’s time
The hovering shell is hanged over a 10 meter gap above the mountain, allowing city dwellers to look through the stadium to the far Rotterdam skyline on the northern bank of the Maas. Suspended on slender trusses, the smoke ring is designed to appear as light as possible. Reflectively coated uPVC membranes clad the stadium, and the structural materials are stretched to the edge of their ability, in order to reduce the amount of materials and their weight.
The bottom part of our design is an artificial mountain. It keeps the large scale functions out of sight, and thus giving the majority of space back to the city. It enables the coexistence of two unrelated functions at most times: A market on top and an expo on the bottom. The mountain is covered mostly by a green roof, acting as thermal mass and reduces heat in an urban scale. The lighting slits are optimized according to the needs of the spaces beneath them.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The top part of the stadium is a huge blimp. It acts as a roof, a sustainable energy production method, a VIP lounge and an unforgettable icon. Our artificial cloud is filed with water vapor in a volume that produces approximately 150 tons of net lift. The cloud supplies the heat needed to keep it floating via thermal collectors and uses the excess lift to produce electricity during the day. In most times the cloud would cover the stadium, but it could also fly around the city, follow the team in distant games and give temporary shade and rain protection to outdoor venues.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Part 1 - The Volcano The bottom part of the stadium is submerged and acts mostly as an expo venue, Rotterdam is currently missing, and could benefit from the accessibility infrastructure constructed for the stadium - E.g. mass parking, heavy vehicle access, public transport etc. The pitch that was selected for the stadium was artificial, and was installed on hydraulic pistons, allowing it to rise and descend according to the function needed. In full capacity games (67,000 spectators) the pitch would be lowered at the expanse or the expo area which would be disabled several days before and after the game. Temporary, demountable seating would be installed for a third of the desired capacity of the stadium. Since the expo and other facilities covers a substantial area, and that area is concealed under the artificial slope, a method for utilizing and optimizing daylight was conceived and integrated into the design, as a method of energy saving. The goal of the optimization was to create openings which would allow the needed amount of light into the building, according to the functions under the slope. It was imperative to allow a controlled amount of light in, to preserve the smooth appearance of the slope as well as to avoid over-heating and glare.
I
Level 3 II
Level 2
III
IV
Perforation esthetic approaches, No. III selected
Level 1
300 Lux 250 Lux 200Lux 150 Lux 100 Lux
Level 0 Basic slope design, before optimization
50 Lux
Desired lighting level by function
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
I
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
II
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
III
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
5
6
5
6
6
7
6
7
6
7
6
7
8
8
7
Level 3
Level 2
Level 2
Level 1
Level 1
Level 0
Level 0
8
8
7
Level 3
8
8
7
8
7
IV 8 Perforation logic: The slope was cut horizontally to curves and equally divided to small segments. The optimization software was given the freedom to move the resulted curve’s control points away (inwards) from the original curve up to a predefined limit. The amplitude of the vector was determined by the optimization for meeting the desired Lux criteria determined by the related function underneath the control point.
Maximum possible lighting (all apertures open fully)
Light levels after optimization process.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
0
Slope control points distribution
Desired illuminance vectors translated as Z vectors
Polar translation vectors translated as Z vectors, derived from the calculation
Resulting slope after optimization
Optimized section
Translation amplitute of regions of effect, based on funciton needs
Radiance analysis of daylight in a verification blowup
Rendered view from expo under optimized slope.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Vector map representing the difference between the desired and existing light levels used for optimization
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Part 2 - The Smoke Ring 10 meters above the sloped volcano floats the top tier. Our design intention was to keep the structure as light as possible, making it appear as light as possible. The top tier is able to fit 2/3 of the full capacity of the stadium, and would be used regularly for smaller matches (up to 40,000 spectators). The stadiums operation with the top tier only would be possible with the pitch fixed on it’s upper position, allowing the expo to operate below without interruption. 3D trusses cladded with a fabric tensile structure were selected to reduce the amount of material and weight to the minimum. The tier itself had to be made of heavy weight concrete to damp out the resonance that could have been created by the viewers cheering simultaneously, increasing the loads on the structure significantly. The trusses were twisted to give the stadium a more dynamic appearance, and were solved statically by mutual supports between the trusses in the form of tension rods. The top part of the truss uses a compressed circumference truss to harness hoop forces to dramatically decrease the truss’ deformation, The same solution was applied on the out-most segment of the truss, only this time in tension.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Eccentricity and bending moment, right: front view, inclination
Leading construction concept
3D impression of truss and tier structure
The design was tested and calculated using ARUP’s (Oasys) GSA finite element software package by connecting the parametric model gone in grasshopper to it. The structure was tested for 8 different load cases in various combinations, taking into consideration the strong wind in the Rotterdam port area, rain and snow loads, spectators, and the load inflicted on the trusses by the tensile cladding. The tensile cladding is based on a steel cable mesh that takes most of the load inflicted by wind and rain pushing and pulling against the foil. The Foil used is uPVC, coated with a protective and reflective metallic layer. The tensile membranes are installed between the twisted 3D trusses in a sawtooth pattern so to create transparent slits in the huge mass of the stadium. To design the tensile structure form finding was used (energy relaxation algorithm) and curvature was constantly analyzed and calculated to unsure the loads would not exceed the fabric’s tensile strength.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The gap created between the membranes (one side of the truss) was clad with a transparent ETFE foil, suspended by an additional steel pipe which is bent to allow the foil to have more curvature. Each ETFE pattern is triangular and supported on two sides by the truss and the third is supported by the pipe. The corners are removed to avoid difficult connections of two linear foil mounts at 45o. The Entire skin is not completely weather proof and is regarded as semi outdoor space - no part of the stadium’s top tier would be defined as interior space, but the spectators would be protected from rain (by the blimp roof) and wind (by the skin). Water dragged by wind would be blocked by this transparent foil. A serious problem that needed to be solved is the drainage of rain water. The will to make the roof fly resulted in no possibility to directly drain the roof area using the normal methods. I have chosen to create a wide overlap between the roof and the skin, under which the skin is inclined upwards. The blobish roof would drain water to it’s edge, from which they would pour down on the skin, form which it would be drained directly through a unique fabric drain mounted in it’s edges.
1
2 3 3
1 2
4
3
5 6 7 1
3
8
7
3 4
1. uPVC membrane 2. Steel wire 3. Thermal weld between membranes 4. Steel bar 5. Winder 6. uPVC gutter 7. PET spring 8. Spring ‘sleeve’
1. ETFE transparent foil 2. Arched steel CHS100 3. Fixed linear foil mount 4. Open corners
3D view of membrane’s long edge
3D view of the truss and the transparent ETFE foil
fig.5.12: The sawtooth pattern of membrane connections resulting from different connection nodes, creating gaps and more curvature.
1 3
Cable mesh and support reactions. In white is an arbitrary membrane suspended from the mesh and it’s reaction forces.
1 2
1. Fixed Edge (Details A,B) 2. Cable Edge (Details D) 3. Arched 3D Truss (Chapter 2) Final design, Rmax = 33m
Skin components
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
2
D A C 1 3 2 1 2 3
B
D 4 5
Ooo....
Elevation (partial)
1. 3D truss 3XCHS350 2. uPVC membrane on cable mesh (see detail A,C) 3. Fabric gutter (see detail B) 4. Open metal gutter channel (see detail D) 5. Metal pipe gutter connected to underground drainage
Plan section (partial) of skin and truss system
Detail ‘A’ - Truss connections
7
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 6 4 9 3
2 9 5 8 1. CHS350 main truss member 2. CHS220 secondary truss members 3. CHS180 diagonal truss bracing 4. CHS100 bent foil support 5. Ø38 intertwined steel cable 6. Cable winder 7. uPVC membrane (see detail B) 8. Fabric gutter (see detail B) 9. ETFE Foil Plan section (partial) of skin and truss system
Detail ‘B’ - Fabric gutter detail 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13
14 15
1. uPVC membrane 2. Cable mesh sleeve (see detail C) 3. Alternating binding cable sleeves (see 5.16) 4. Ø10 Steel binding cable 5. 40mm thermal weld 6. Ø38 intertwined steel cable 7. PET spring bar (see 5.17) 8. Fabric gutter 9. Compressed steel clamp 10. 80*8mm round edge bar 11. Ø12 Steel cable 12. Cable mount with screw winder 13. CHS350 main truss member 14. Foil clamp 15. ETFE foil
Plan section (partial) of skin membrane connection to truss
1 2 3 4 5 6 2
7 8 9
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
Membrane - cable - membrane connection
Ø18 bent steel bar, threaded at ends. Ø38 intertwined steel cable 120*50*8mm bar Ø10 Steel binding cable Anti-friction plate 40mm thermal weld uPVC membrane Cable mesh sleeve (see detail C) Alternating binding cable sleeves (see 5.16)
Section (partial) of mesh joint
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Detail ‘C’ - Cable mesh joint
Detail ‘D’ - Bottom membrane edge
1 2 3
4 5
6
7
8
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
uPVC membrane 80mm thermal weld 2mm bent galvanized steel plate Ø38 intertwined steel cable 2mm bent galvanized steel cable clamp Ø10 bolt, welded. 2mm bent galvanized steel mount 2mm neoprene layer
fig.5.49: Section through bottom edge of membrane and gutter 1/2.5@A4
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Part 3 - The Cloud In traditional stadium design, a full span roof is a huge construction effort, an even bigger effort is made if it needs to be able to open and close. The load resulting from the roof’s own weight as well as wind and snow loads over the big, column less span construction are usually carried to the skin and tier’s construction, adding significant forces that should be resisted by it. Our design found a loophole: If the roof is a self sufficient aircraft, that can hover in mid air without supports, no load is transferred and thus the construction can be far lighter. Our blimp roof at it’s final iteration is a three layered non-rigid aircraft. The blimp roof has many functions. Other then the standard functions of a roof it’s ability to fly enables to use it as a temporary roof for out door venues at any location close to the stadium. It could also be flown higher then it’s standard position to be used as a tourist attraction (vista), either as a stationary view or through a tour around the city in the balloon. The flying roof of the structure could be used also to follow the players in distant games, for moral support. Same as the skin, the shape is a result of a form finding process, only this time, the inflation has replaced the role of the prestress. The over pressure required us to use synclastic shapes
for all parts that are inflated. The inflation is resisted by the fabric to an equilibrium. We have chosen to use a blimp rather then a zeppelin. The blimp’s buoyancy is based on a system under development in the TU Berlin by a group called HeiDAS. In it’s base is the use of hot water vapor instead of Helium or Hydrogen of hot air to lift the blimp. Water vapor has about 70% of the buoyancy of Helium, and it is a much more sustainable choice. The energy used to heat the water to reach the needed 150oc comes directly from the sun, through thermal collectors located on the middle layer of the blimp, our calculations even show an extra lift power of about 517 tons, that is utilized to create electricity - the dependency on the sun creates a tidal movement we can utilize for conversion of the access lift power to electricity (fig 5.22). Even that in quantity the sum of electricity generated is not impressive by itself, (potntial of 21MWh), but it only an insignificant margin if you take into consideration that the entire aircraft is energy neutral in flight and navigation, not to mention the energy saved on the production of the construction.
Blimp schematics
1
transparant black opaque
2 H2O (l) -> H2O (g)
3
Reduction of stress due to freeing the roof 4
d
F
F Mechanical Work = F*d Energy production: 55000 Wh
5
Daytime, RAISE of: -T - H2O (g) - lift capacity
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
3D section through the inflated the tensioned fabric fines resist the inflation
Transparent ETFE layer Perforated tensioned fin system Thermal collectors with embedded water pipes Opaque uPVC layer Rigid ‘basket’, containing machines as well as VIP rooms and lounges.
Exploded view of blimp
Nighttime, DROP of: -T - H2O (g) - lift capacity
Bouncy cycle and energy production.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
F
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Model
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Project Description Date of presentation Tutors Status
Music and sound museum on Berwald's Axis 07/2010 Semester 9,10 of Bachelor (graduarion) Arch. Horacio Schwartz, Arch. Galia Weiser Arch. Dan Shumni, Dr. Eng. Rosa Frances. Shortlisted, Azrieli awards.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Metro(nome)
Site and Context The context in which the building is situated is unique; A large urban terrace in front of the city hall with a wonderful view to Haifa’s port.
Public Building across the axis: 1. Science Museum (Technion) 2. Fund’s Hall (Beth HaKranot) 3. The State Comptroller 4. City Hall 5. Municipality Planning Comity 6. Old City Operator (abandoned) 7. Music Museum (proposed) 8. Ministry of internal affairs (abandoned) 9. Museum of Tolerance (Classmate’s proposal) 10. New Haifa Court 11. El Pasha Theater
That same terrace is also a barrier, disconnecting Hadar neighborhood from Wadi Salib and downtown Haifa by a massive 20 meter high support wall.
* Pavilions along the axis
Due to careless planning and negligence, the monumental axis was eroded over the years and lost all its splendor. The design strategy was simple and quite strait forward. Instead of erecting a building, I suggested to submerge one - To dig instead of build.
Urban Scheme
In this way the plot becomes a functional roof area which remains in the public realm, creating the missing connection to down town Haifa. A street was created following the gradual decent from the city hall into the Wadi. The new facades allows people to peek into the underground museum as well as enter it and it’s adjacent functions. The roof is the new street level, which doubles as an urban park and hosts a verity of meeting places and outdoor theater. The injured Axis, much like an injured person, needs temporary crutch to regain functionality and vitality. Therefore an array of pavilions was designed across the renewed axis to recreate the lost continuity between the public buildings along it in the city dweller’s mind. The Pavilions would host temporary exhibitions and connect the street to the museum.
Erosion of Berwald’s axis
arme
l
Hassan Shukri street
City hall square Public Garden +12.00
+12.00
t El Quia street
Conservatorium
Parking lot entrance
Conservatorium Square +6.00
Large Theater
Stage Museum Square +53.00 = 0.00
Play and interaction roof +10.00
Lishquat Gius Square +5.00
ridge
ical B
Mus
Museum Roof +9.00
Public Garden +6.00
Public Garden +1.00
Small Theater -6.00 Shiva
t Tzio
Wadi Square -7.00
n Stre
et
Terrace +9.00 Phone operator
Wadi
Salib
Roof Plan
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Existing garden facing north towards the Haifa seaport Slicing the plot Exposing new street facades Piercing thought the museum to create pavilions Pulling city hall square and urban terrace
Intervention Scheme
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
r HaC
Axis ald’s
Hada
State's Comptroller
Berw
City Hall
Music and Architecture Music and architecture are two fields in which chaos is put in order. Music is an ordered form of sound, while architecture is an ordered form of space. Cosmos, or order, is a defined part of chaos, and is contained within it. While on the other hand, chaos is composed of a large number of superimposed orders. The clash of chaos and cosmos is evident in the urban environment selected for the museum. Hadar HaCarmel is a modernist neighborhood built in the early 20th century under British mandate. This prime example of rational and ordered architecture is in immediate proximity to Wadi Salib – an older, vernacular neighborhood, built without modern constraints and thus appear chaotic.
Concept Diagram
Site Diagram
Section AA
Flow Diagram
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Street Level View
The Museum
The museum follows the logic of the relationship between sound and music, and is divided to two parts that form a loop: The chaotic part - a large, expressive space in which the visitors would experience sound and its physical properties, and suspended orthogonal boxes in which the visitors would learn and experience music. The museum was designed is a way that would integrate the two different entities, Hadar and the Wadi, into a single composition - an ordered top part and a chaotic bottom, with a constant visual and auditory connection between them.
Display Pavilion
Shading Pavilion Urban Playground Café Pavilion Back glass facade Musical bridge Terrace City Hall’s square
Conservatorium
Re-use of Ministry of internal affairs
Public garden
Interpretations of music and sound were also integrated in the dynamic façade, the bridge, the construction and lighting fixtures. The project explores the relationships between the repetitive to the random, rhythm and city, as well as music to light.
Entrance to museum Outdoor theater
Workshop space Auditory Library Museum shop Music exhibition space Bottom entrance Small outdoor theater
Museum square
Schematic Section Of Pavilion
Exonometric view
Music Gallery Exhibition Space
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Temporary Display at a Pavilion
5 2
7
8
3
9 1
4
10
6 11 15
16
17
12
13 14
Floor Plan +6.00
Floor Plan 0.00
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Sound Gallery Exhibition Space
Views
Drainage detail
Section DD
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Models
Interior Scheme Model 1:250
Model 1:250
Model 1:250
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Model 1:50
Model 1:50
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Project description Date of presentation Tutors Costruction Design team
1:1 Desgin and fabrication of a facade element 1/2011 Semester 1 of Master's Ir. Arch. Peter van Swieten Ir. Andrew Borgart Nick Veerman, Itai Cohen
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Tentative: Innovative Facade Prototype
Background During the first semester of the Building Technology and Architectural Engineering Master’s tracks students are required to follow a 1:1 scale facade design and fabrication curriculum, nicknamed ‘Bucky Lab’ - after buckminster Fuller who experimented in full scale with innovative prototypes. The task is to design an innovative facade element and fabricate it. The design studio is supported by advanced structural mechanics, material science, CAD and workshop classes. Each pair of students chooses a topic, research into it and develop a set of tools with which they would be able to eventually fabricate a full scale prototype of the design. Unlike most student projects, this project was constraint by a budget clause, and each team had to stay within the 250 euro limit set by the faculty.
The programme given was to design an innovative facade for a cube-shaped office building. Since many office buildings built in the 70’s are vacant in the Netherlands, instead of designing a new building, we have decided to develop a retrofit facade that would improve the envelope performance in the cold climate. The facade had to be easy to apply and install, weighting as little as possible and allow a comfortable work environment to the inhabitants, with out-side view.
Pressurized layer
Window
In order to achieve these goals, the construction method with the best ratio between span and material was chosen- fabric tensile structures. Using the double facade principal with fabric would ensure high insolation while maintaining high relative transparency and low weight. The ‘Tentative’ facade consists of two layers. The external skin is a translucent PVC foil constructive skin, resisting the wind load as well as holding the cylindrical window element in place, and an inner layer which is made of transparent latex which is pressurized via an air duct which is embedded in the top and bottom rubber mounting strips.
Rubber gasket
For the prototype production the main focus was on the tensile foil as well as the window module.
Section
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Design
The window module, which also function as the facade’s package before installation, is made of a perforated steel sheet, bent into a cylinder, symmetrically trimmed on both sides. Other then for ventilation, the tube acts as a compressed member, transferring loads from one membrane to the other, allowing for the pretension stresses to cancel each other. Between modules a 300mm wide light aluminum truss would be placed and two perpendicular trusses in the building’s concerns. For aesthetic diversity, modules could be rotated and flipped to create a non repetitive facede, if desired.
In order to calculate the shape of the membranes, their patterns and the forces that act upon them, special software from the tensile structures world had to be utilized. The first phase was to create the constraints and let a relaxation algorithm workout the soap-skin shape the membranes would take. Then, material properties are applied, curvature is analyzed and load cases are defined.
Load cases combined: displacements
Load cases combined: displaced shape
Load cases combined: Support reactions
Load cases combined: Sx
Load cases combined: Sy
Load cases combined: principle stresses
Load cases combined: second principle stresses
Load cases combined: direction principle stresses
The process takes several iterations for the shape and prestress levels to get to acceptable stresses and deformations in the membrane.
Relaxed mesh and window
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Static calculations
Assembly process I. Facade arrives packed inside the assembled window module from the factory. II. Unpacking components at construction floor. III. Connecting rubber gaskets and screwing it to the floor, Installing foil on the edges of the window module on both sides. IV. Using a dedicated hoist/winder, temporary holding window in place while mounting the foil on the rubber gasket. Exterior side first. V. Tensioning window module manually by winching the winder to apply the needed prestress.
III
I
IV
II
V
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Prototype - Shop drawings After an abstraction of the design and some material studies, a set of construction drawings was prepared and submitted for review. Do to budget constraints, the constructed model was 2/3 or the designed product.
Prototype Constru
PROJECT
TentativeTensile Facade prototype
Course:
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
DRAWN BY
Nick Veerman Itai Cohen
ISSUE
01.01.2011
DESCRIPTION
Sheet Description
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
1800.0 mm 1027.1 mm
369.0 mm
65.4 mm
410.5 mm
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381 Membrane
730.2 mm
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Feame
Instructor:
Peter Van Swieten Course:
1800 mm
Cylinder
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen
1073.7 mm
ISSUE
01.01.11
RE-ISSUE
-
DESCRIPTION
Front and side views 1:10
Feet
235.5 mm
772.9 mm
844.5 mm
A
0.1
Fr 01
Cy 01
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381 Frame Connection Detail Scale: 1:1
Fr 01
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Instructor:
Peter Van Swieten Course:
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede Cylinder Connection Detail Scale: 1:1
Cy 01
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen ISSUE
01.01.11
RE-ISSUE
-
DESCRIPTION
Section 1:10 Connection Details 1:1
A
0.2
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
M5 Nut
Frame External Clamp See Fr02
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
6MM Stainless Steel Round bar
M5 Bolt, Welded See Fr01
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381
L50*50*6 *4
Internal Cylinder See Cy01
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Instructor:
External Cylinder See Cy01
Peter Van Swieten Course:
Membrane See Me01
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
Cylinder Clamp See Cy01
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen M8 Bolt, Welded See Fr01
ISSUE
01.01.11
RE-ISSUE
M8 Nut
DESCRIPTION
Exploded axonometry
Feet See Fr01
A
0.3
Fr 03
1.5
1.5 mm Steel Plate
15
15
18
30 50 mm Section A
150
scale: 1:1
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381 75 mm
150
Type B
600 mm
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
~11
75
135 째
50.0 mm
Peter Van Swieten
120.0
150 mm
150
600
Type A
Instructor:
Course:
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
Type B
15.0 mm
12mm Drill Type A
18
PROJECT
1.5 mm Steel Plate
75
75
150 mm
18
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
N. Veerman I. Cohen 01.01.11
Top View 18
scale: 1:5 RE-ISSUE
-
150
12.5 mm
~11
DESCRIPTION
Top View scale: 1:10
Frame clamp. Perstective, top, and side views. 1:10, 1:5, 1:1
Diagonal cut
45째
75
Type B
ISSUE
600 mm
1800.0
150
75
50.0 mm
150 mm
75
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Side View Type B scale: 1:1
Perspective
A
0.4
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Frame Clamp Detail
Frame Clamp Detail Fr 03
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
1250.0 A
A
A
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
8.0
A
100.0
80
150.0
200.0
100.0
12mm Drill
45째
Instructor:
200
Peter Van Swieten Course:
40
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen
Weld 200.0 mm 70.0
60.0
ISSUE
01.01.11 70.0 RE-ISSUE
8
Weld 200*50*8
80.0 U 80*40*3.5
248.0
200*50*8
40.0
200.0
DESCRIPTION
Feet Detail. Perstective, top, side and front views. 1:5
A
0.5
Cylinder and covers parts
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Instructor:
Peter Van Swieten Course:
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen ISSUE
01.01.11
RE-ISSUE
-
DESCRIPTION
Unfolded cylinders and covers
A
0.6
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Fr 03
Cyliner Connection Detail Cy 02
Fixing Rod Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
Small Rubber Cover
M5 Bplt
Cover: 1.5 Preforated metal sheet
Rubber Cover
Protective Cover
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
custom made clapm (Cl03)
Instructor:
Peter Van Swieten Cilynder Clamp Detail
Cylinder: 1.5 Preforated metal sheet
Membrane
Course:
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
Cy 03 PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
10.0 mm
Fillet Edge R=~3 50.0 mm
ISSUE
01.01.11
R=6mm
80.0 mm
N. Veerman I. Cohen
RE-ISSUE
-
DESCRIPTION
Cylinder rim detail Perspective, perspective section, top and side views. 1:1 ~ 3.0 mm
A
0.7
Nick Veerman Student number: 1353381
Itay Cohen Student number: 4118952
Instructor:
Peter Van Swieten Course:
Bucky Lab - Design AR1AE015
PROJECT
Tentative - Tensile Facede
DRAWN BY
N. Veerman I. Cohen ISSUE
01.01.11
RE-ISSUE
-
DESCRIPTION
Patterns layout and order
A
0.8
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Faculy of Architecture, Urbanisem and Building Technology. Delft, Netherlands
Prototype - Fabrication
Final prototype
1:1 segment studies: frame segment
Foil pattern arrangement
Foil pattern cutting
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1:1 segment studies: window rim segment
Foil Pattern welding
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Frame and stand fabrication
Cylinder preparation
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mounting the foil on the frame
Project Description Date of presentation Tutors Costruction
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Mt. Carmel National Park Visitors Center
Design of a visitor center for the Mt. Carmel National Park 2/2008 5th semester Arch. Yoram Popper, Arch. Michael Budowski, Arch. Dan Shumni Dr. Rosa Frances
Site and Context The site is located on the Israeli coastal plane, about 10 Kilometers from the city of Haifa. Located near a junction between interstate no. 4 to Tel-Aviv and a beautiful road climbing up the mountain, the site contains the bank of Nahal Oren, a small water stream which is dry most of the year, but can cause floods during heavy rains. The site also features at present an improvised parking lot, a small information post and a picnic area. The site is popular, and used especially during weekends and holidays by families wishing to spend some time in the open, enjoy a picnic and/or follow one of the many nearby trails.
Programme
The project’s aim was to design a visitor center that would function as a gateway and information post for the users of the site and the entire mt. Carmel natural reserve and natural park. The exact site of the building was not given, and each student had to place the building in the place they thought was most suitable. The building programme was as follows; • A 150 m² entrance hall (including: information desk, environmental display area, staff room and toilets) • A 150 m² cafeteria/restaurant area • A 150 m² auditorium • 3 x 50 m² classes • 200 m² display area • 150 m² library • 100 m² store (for maps, books and accessories) • Several Gathering places for groups
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Site Plan
Existing hiking path leading form the improvised parking lot (A) to the picnic area (C). B is a small plateau that the path crosses. This is the site I picked for the building.
1. The Building as a Passage The building acts as a Passage. It’s built around the existing path, not interfering with it. The rock and gravel path acts as the ground floor. The first door the visitor goes through is at the entrance to each of the functions 2. Emphasizing Contrast The building is planned as a ’foreign object’, different to nature. The design tries (using materials and morphology) to contrast with nature rather than blend into it. The design should have a mechanical appearance, to emphasize that it is a man made object that was placed in nature. 3. Disintegratable Building I believe buildings shouldn’t last forever, especially when building next to nature. Most of my design consists of easily assembled and disassembled parts. All my connections are bolted (not welded) thus providing the ability to easily take the building apart. After taking the building apart, the only remains on the site would be several foundation concrete tops, 15cm in height. 4. Modular Building As a disintegratable building it should also be flexible enough for programmatic changes; addition or subtraction of functions as well as changes in function locations. The building is built on a fixed regular grid, on which modules can be mounted. The building is designed to use as few kinds of parts as possible. Most parts have several functions. 5. Minimal Footprint In order to cause as little damage as possible to the surroundings, the building is floating over the column grid. The building doesn’t change the neutral water flow pattern or the terrain. 6. Indoor / Outdoor The building is designed not to give a clear definition of interior space or exterior space.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Design Concepts
Plans
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Strea
m ba
Functions: Auditorium Library / information post Classroom Cafeteria Staff room Toilet Hall / Lobby Patio and sculpture garden Untamed nature
nk
09
01 F G
Ex
ist
Details: A Louvered Roof B Transparent PC roof with vanes C Transparent PC faรงade with internal cladding D Opening faรงade modules E Bracing F Terce G Ramp H Leveling with gravel I Timber poles J Sculptures
ing
pa
07
F
th
04
J
H I
09
I J
F
08
03
G
02
05 G
09
06
09
0
5m
10m
+1.00 Plan
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
01 A
E
08 F
02
03
03
F
+4.40 Plan / Roof Plan
Faรงades
09
B
03
A E
05
D
02 C
04
06
01
08
D
02
03 09
D
North faรงade
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Functions: Auditorium Library / information post Classroom Cafeteria Staff room Toilet Hall / Lobby Patio and sculpture garden Untamed nature
Details: A Louvered Roof B Transparent PC roof with vanes C Transparent PC faรงade with internal cladding D Opening faรงade modules E Bracing 0
2.5m
5m
B A
02
E
01
03
D
D
C
02
09
07
Stream bank
West faรงade
03
09
05
04
01
East faรงade
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
View from north-west
Construction documents
Assembly axonometric
Section A-A - construction
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Section A-A
Details - Columns In order to cause as little damage to the rock surface upon which the building is built, most of the building “rests� on small concrete podiums (A type columns). On several locations, where the weight on a particular column is especially heavy a narrow and deep foundation is cast underneath the concrete podium (B type columns). The rest of the columns are connected to the bracing system, and transfer vertical forces to the ground (C type columns)
Type A Type B Type C
Constructive members Bracing system
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Details - Floor and wall systems Many thought was given to the wall, roof and floor systems on this project, since they are the mediators between indoor space and the nature outside. I believe that in the given context, the building should give a variety of situations that define space and its closure on the scale from outdoor to indoor. The louvered roof defines space by providing shade, then sections of floor are added and only then come the walls, that differ in their level of transparency. Since the site is located in a west faced valley by the sea, it has great breeze all year long, which is a rare advantage in the hot and humid Mediterranean climate. The openings in the walls are important for both blurring the boundary between in and out, but also allow the breeze to enter and save energy spent on cooling. I wanted to allow the Façades to literally open up. The basic facade module is made of an external transparent PC thermal extrusion, followed by recycled OSB cladding. They are supported by ‘T’ shaped profiles, that are mounted to the floor and ceiling RHS beams. The opening system is composed of two engines and gear shafts per module, separately pulling both curtain systems upward. The PC envelope folds outwards and shades the opening, while the interior cladding folds inwards, leaving its lower part fixed as a safety rail. The floor is mounted on corrugated steel sheets, supported by the dual RHS200 steel beams. The tiles are made of a shredded tires rubber cast, offering a good acoustic absorbing anti-drum surface. As the building is disintegratable, all connections are temporarily bolted and can be easily dismantled.
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Thermal PC roof Heat extracting vanes Electric rolling blinds Air conditioning RHS200 beam North faced fixed louvers 2 RHS200 beams T profile Recycled rubber tile Corrugated steel sheets Neon lighting fixtures OSB cladding Opening module Column Foot
09 08
Partial plan 02 01
03 04 06
05
07
13
10
11
12
14 Fixed
Opening
Curtain wall detailed plan
15
Typical Section
C
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
01 02 03 04
05 06 07
Floor and wall details
Floor system: Stainless steel screws Recycled rubber tile Steel plate L50x50 frame 12mm steel rod 5mm steel plate Corrugated steel sheets
Wall system: A Full module B Half transparent module C Opening module
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
B
A
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
East façade Fixed louvered roof ‘+’ Shaped column Staff room Cafeteria Cafeteria Ramp ‘X’ Bracing Shell Opening
01 02
03
07 04
06
05
C
A
Wall Section
A External hollow PC 40mm extrusion. Weather sealed. B Internal OSB cladding C Motor D T140 profile E 2xRHS200 beams Openings System: The external PC envelope lifts and folds at three points, enabling the wall to open and provide shade. The internal cladding lifts in the same manner inwards, starting at a height of 120cm, thus leaving a fixed safety rail.
A
B
E
E
B
D
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
E
Sketches
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Project Description Date of presentation Tutors Design Team: Status:
Competition entry for the Jerusalem Seminar of architecture 2/2009 7th semester Arch. Eyal Malka, Industrial Designer Yair Engel Orith Fish, Itai Cohen 2nd Prize winner
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
LOTUS - Sustainable Mobile Market Stall
Concepts
3 2 7 1 4 5 6 7 Side
10
8 2 7 1 6 4 3 7 5 Top
9 10
1.0 Pole 1.1 Tube connector 2.0 Pole extender 3.0 Canopy 4.0 Central Hub 4.1 Fixed replaceable ring 4.2 Axis 4.3 Bolt 4.4 Hub connector 4.5 Rubber top 5.0 Central Tube 6.0 Petals 6.1 Reinforcement belt 6.2 Nylon net cell bottom 6.3 Fabric sleeve 7.0 Belt 7.1 Buckle 7.2 Lower belt connections 7.3 End of belt 8.0 Pin connector 8.1 Fabric – tube double connection 9.0 Leg 10 Feet
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Product
Assembly
A. Folded for transport: the stand contains all components for its assembly. B. Unfolded: the extension, the tubes, and petals are separated C. Using belts: legs are tensioned into a stable form. D. Assembling the extension: the canopy remains unopened. E. Slipping on the petals: the fabric is attached to the tubes. F. Opening the Petals: the fabric tightens and locks the cells to place G. Extending the canopy: by separating the poles the fabric is tensioned. H. Stabilizing the structure: by fastening the belts, the stand is ready for use.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Details
6.1 Reinforcement belt 6.2 Nylon net cell bottom 6.3 Fabric sleeve 7.0 Belt 7.1 Buckle 7.2 er belt connections 7.3 End of belt 8.0 Pin connector 8.1 Fabric – tube double connection 9.0 Leg 10 Feet
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1.0 Pole 1.1 Tube connector 2.0 Pole extender 3.0 Canopy 4.0 Central Hub 4.1 Fixed replaceable ring 4.2 Axis 4.3 Bolt 4.4 Hub connector 4.5 Rubber top 5.0 Central Tube 6.0 Petals
Our approach to sustainable design is about keeping things simple. No tricky mechanisms, no elaborate energy conversion methods, no ground breaking technologies and no extreme changes in the users habits. We wish to create a simple design, using well known technologies: Existing connectors by Creative mobile market stand sustainable mobile market sustainable stand mobile market Construction©, sustainable Aluminum extrusions and hiking equipment fabric technologies. Thesestand would allow easy production, operating and maintenance for fabricators and users everywhere. Our approach to sustainable design isOur about approach keeping to things sustainable simple. Ourdesign approach No tricky is about to mechanisms, sustainable keeping things no designsimple. is about Nokeeping tricky mechanisms, things simple. noNo tricky mechanisms, no
LOTUS
LOTUS
In Context
LOTUS
elaborate energy conversion methods,elaborate no groundbreaking energy conversion technologies elaborate methods, and energy no noextreme groundbreaking conversion changes methods, technologies no groundbreaking and no extreme technologies changes and no extreme changes
The project wasWe constructed according to the ‘3R’ principals for sustainable design: Reduce, Reuse and in the users habits. wish to create in a simple the users design, habits. using We well wish in known the to create users technologies ahabits. simple We design, -wish Existing to using create wella known simple design, technologies using -well Existing known technologies - Existing connectors by Creative Construction©, connectors Aluminum by extrusions Creative Construction©, connectors and hikingbyequipment Aluminum Creative Construction©, fabric extrusions andAluminum hiking equipment extrusions fabric and hiking equipment fabric Recycle. technologies. These would allow easy production, technologies. operating These would andtechnologies. maintenance allow easy production, These for fabricators would operating allow and easy andproduction, maintenance operating for fabricators and maintenance and for fabricators and users everywhere. users everywhere. users everywhere.
Reduce
The project constructed according The toto the project 3R principals was constructed forthat sustainable The according project design: was toabsolute the constructed Reduce, 3R principals Reuse according for sustainable to the 3Rdesign: principals Reduce, for sustainable Reuse Ourwas first design goal was make a stand uses the minimal amount of material, thus design: Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. and Recycle. and Recycle.
making it light, easy to transport, economical and using the least amount of resources as possible. In order to do so, we’ve tried to create a form using Reduce Reduce Reduceas little compressed members and using tensed instead, which are more efficient. Byadesign using Tensegrity, wea stand were able tothe create a large Our members first design goal was to make a stand Ourmuch that first uses design thegoal absolute was to Our minimal make first amount stand that goal of material, uses was the to make absolute minimal that uses amount absolute of material, minimal amount of material, thusspan making it light, easy to transport, thus economical making and it light, using easy asto thus less transport, resources making economical it as light, possible. easyand to Intransport, using as less economical resourcesand as possible. using as less In resources as possible. In using minimum resources.
order to do so, we ve tried to create aorder formto using do so, as we little vecompressed triedorder to create tomembers doaso, form weand using ve tried using as to little create compressed a form using members as little andcompressed using members and using tensed members instead, which are much tensed more members efficient.instead, By using which tensed Tensegrity, are members much wemore were instead, efficient. ablewhich to Byare using much Tensegrity, more efficient. we were By using able toTensegrity, we were able to Reuse create a large span using minimum resources. create a large span using minimum create a large resources. span using minimum resources.
By making our stand easily foldable and extremely lightweight on one hand and rigid on the other,
we encourage its reuse. The stand’s life span isReuse particularly long due to the fact that all parts are Reuse Reuse By making our standupon easily foldable making our lightweight stand on By foldable one making hand and our and extremely stand rigideasily on lightweight the foldable and onand one extremely hand lightweight rigid on on the one hand and rigid on the replaceable failure,and itByisextremely washable, haseasily very simple failsafe mechanisms, highand tolerance for other, we encourage its reuse. The stand other, s we life encourage span gets particularly its reuse. other, The we long encourage stand as all s life parts its span are reuse. gets The particularly stand s life long span as all gets parts particularly are long as all parts are corrosion. Its durability prevents it from being replaced with a new unit. replaceable upon failure, it is washable, replaceable has very upon simple failure, failsafe replaceable it ismechanisms, washable, uponhas and failure, very high simple it is washable, failsafe mechanisms, has very simple and failsafe high mechanisms, and high tolerance for corrosion. Its durability prevents tolerance it from for corrosion. being replaced Its tolerance durability with another. for prevents corrosion. it from Its durability being replaced prevents withit another. from being replaced with another. Recycle
The stand it mainly made of Aluminum, which Recycle is 100% recyclable, and its recycling process is Recycle Recycle The relatively stand it mainly made of Aluminum, The being stand 100% it mainly madewidely The of and Aluminum, stand its recycling it mainly being process made 100%of isrecyclable, Aluminum, and being itscan recycling 100% process isand its recycling process is environmentally safe. Since itrecyclable, is very spread, recycled Aluminum be recyclable, found relatively environmentally safe. Since relatively it is veryenvironmentally widely recycled safe.transporting Since environmentally Aluminum it is veryraw can widely be safe.spread, Sincerecycled it is veryAluminum widely spread, can be recycled Aluminum can be almost everywhere, thus eliminating the spread, need relatively for material. found almost everywhere, thus eliminating foundthe almost needeverywhere, for transporting found thus raw eliminating almost material. everywhere, the need thus for transporting eliminating raw the material. need for transporting raw material. Material selection: Material selection: Material selection: Material selection: Every material has its advantages and Every disadvantages. material has In order its advantages toEvery selectmaterial the andbest disadvantages. has material its advantages to In use, order and todisadvantages. select the bestIn material order to toselect use, the best material to use, Every material has its advantages anda large disadvantages. Incompiled order tofor select the best material to use, we’ve we ve compiled a table of pros and cons we veforcompiled number a table ofwe pros materials ve and cons (the final a table aselection large of pros number is and of cons materials for a large (the number final selection of materials is (the final selection is compiled a table of pros and for large number of on materials (the final is described on for theits was Aluminum, for its described on the circular graph on cons poster described no. a1) on the thematerial circular described selected graph was on poster the Aluminum, no. circular 1) the for graph material itsselection on poster selected no. was 1) the Aluminum, material selected circular graph on no. 1)relative the material selected was Aluminum, for relative durability, low volume to relative durability, lowposter volume to weight ratio and durability, low maintenance low volume relative abilities. to weight durability, ratiolow andvolume lowits maintenance to weight ratio abilities. and low maintenance abilities. weight Figure A: ratio and low maintenance Figure A: Figure A: abilities.
= LOTUS
= 3 laptops and a soda
LOTUS
=
= = 3 laptops and a soda half aLOTUS Beetle
= 3 laptops and a soda half a Beetle
half a Beetle
The LOTUS LOTUS stand should weight approximately Theapproximately LOTUS11.6 stand Kgshould (2611.6 pounds), weight TheKg LOTUS about approximately stand the same should 11.6 asweight three Kg (26 approximately pounds), about 11.6 theKglaptop same (26 pounds), as three about the same as three The stand should weight (26 pounds), about the same as three laptop computers and a soda can. Its folded laptoplength computers is 158and cma(5soda 2laptop feet), can.about computers Its folded half the length andlength a soda is 158 ofcan. acmIts (5 folded 2 feet),length about half is 158 the cm length (5 2 feet), of a about half the length of a computers and a soda can. Its VW folded length is 158 VW cmBeetle. (5’2 feet), about half the length of a VW Beetle. VW Beetle. Beetle.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Project Description Date of presentation Programming: Status:
Competition entry for Beth Hatefutsoth Museum of Jewish Diaspora 1/2008 Ariel Gutman 1st Prize winner Due to lack of funding, it has not been built, bar the prototypes of lighting system and computer program
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Community V2.0 - Temporary Exhibition at Beth Hatefutsoth Museum
Background: The Museum
“Beth Hatefutsoth, the Museum of the Jewish People, tells the unique and ongoing story of the Jewish People, a People among nations, and describes the special bond between the Jewish People and Israel. The museum presents thousands of years of a flourishing, multifaceted culture, bringing to life the unity that underlies the diversity of the Jewish civilization. The story of the Jewish people is told through the permanent exhibition – now going through a process of renewal – as well as through temporary exhibitions, educational activities, and rich digital database resources of Jewish genealogy, family names, communities, photographs, films, and Jewish music.”
- Quoted from the museums web site.
Beth Hatefutsoth, or “The House of Diaspora” is a museum which tells the story of the Jewish people since it’s forming and until the present days. Located at the Tel Aviv University’s campus, the museum is one of the most famous museums in Israel, and receives a large amount of visitors annually. When opened, in the late 1970’s, it was considered to be at the cutting edge of audio-visual installations and exhibitions. Beth Hatefutsoth is a museum without any originals, it represents its story with models and audio-visual presentations and installations. The museum also provides a very detailed Genealogy database, allowing visitors to find their relatives and family tree. For farther information: http://www.bh.org.il/
During the last several years, the museum has been undergoing many renovations and modifications of both the exhibitions and museum’s structures. A new 3 story wing was built, but only its first floor is opened to the public due to a lack of funding. A glazed elevator on steel construction would connect the 3 stories. Since the top 2 stories are bound to be closed for the next 5 years or so, the museum decided to initiate a competition for the design of the existing elevator shaft (the shaft and steel construction were built without the elevator itself). The winning installation would be temporarily set in that space, until the museum would open the top floors. The following installation won the competition on January 2008, but unfortunately the museum was unable to fund it, thus it was never built.
01
The New wing
05
02
Ground Floor Plan 01 02 03 04 05 A
04
0
Entrance 24 hour Cafe Exhibitions Auditorium Elevator Shaft 5m
10m
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
A
03
Analysis
Today, Beth Hatefutsoth speaks mainly of the past. Its main display is the “remembrances shaft” a three stories high dramatic space, dedicated to those who died during the holocaust in Europe. The museums main theme and concern is the perpetuation of Jewish communities, existing and extinct, around the world. The place is both physically and emotionally disconnected form the present. It has failed to preserve its spirit of innovation through the years. What was once considered cutting edge is now obsolete. If the museum desires to attract and make the current generation feel connected to its exhibitions, it would have to evolve in content and concept. I felt the museum is so invested in the past, that there’s very little focus on present communities and absolutely none to future communities that may evolve. In order to help them, I had to find out what makes a community, and how does a contemporary community look like.
Concepts
What does a community looks like today? In recent years the world is undergoing a major communications revolution. The word “community” has extended its meaning, and now applies to many new ways to bring people together. Communities are no longer bounded to a single physical location, and can occur and be maintained from afar. The internet in general and the social network applications in particular allow people to better communicate and create or maintain communities. These communities revolve around many aspects of life, one of them is religion. Many virtual communities are defined by their participants religion. These communities allow people to share pictures, thoughts and ideas. There are many platforms that allow these kinds of communication such as Facebook, Myspace, Orkut and more. Before the internet, the synagog was the only communal meeting place, but now, there’s a new alternative
The new communities are based upon computer communication in social networks. The most common of them is facebook. The ‘Israel’ network on facebook, is growing by several thousands per month. In traditional communities as well as in virtual ones, people unite through commons: interests, location and of course – religion. If you type the word ‘Jew’ in the facebook database search field, you would find hundreds of groups, united by their religion. For instance; The Jews of Lebanon, 6,000,000 Jews – Memorial Group, I bet I can find 1,000,000 Jews, Kiss me I’m Jewish, And hundreds more.
01
03 This graph is a generative computer visualization of my social networks, as recorded by Facebook’s Servers. Each dot represent a friend of mine, and the lines are stretched between persons who are friends with each other as well as with me. This graph can provide us with plenty of information. For example, the circular cluster (01) represents friends form my compulsory military service, where everybody knows each other - most friends are common since we lived together very closely and intensively. While in contrast, the more eccentric clusters represent friends form my academic studies (02) and high school (03). You can easily see that there are far less common friends and these communities are not as dense.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
02
The Proposal
01 02 04
Partial plan
I proposed to connect Beth Hatefutsoth to a social network, allowing people to express their link to Judaism. By connecting Beth Hatefutsoth to the “Facebook” database, the exhibition could show schematically how many people that signed up are currently on-line, thus engaging in communal activity at every single moment. The installation consists of a special mesh of high power lamps, showing the percentage of people on-line, an internet application that is integrated with the facebook database, a large monitor – sunken under glass floor, showing pictures of facebook users with their friends and an internet camera transmitting live video of Beth Hatefutsoth to the internet. Visitors to Beth Hatefutsoth would see the ever changing light mesh from a far, upon approach; they would notice the glass floor and the monitor. When they would step on the glass floor they would reach the exhibit’s climax: they would see the pictures on the monitor and the light mesh reflecting on the glass floor.
03
04 01
First floor
Enterance level
02 01 Spacial stainless steel mesh, Fixed with 3 watt RGB LED lights 02 Computer monitor mounted under glass floor 03 Web camera mounted on top of the shaft 04 RHS construction (existing)
Section through shaft
Users install the Community V2.0 application on their facebook profile page. II The server, located in the museum, consistently monitors the amount of users logged-in and their location on earth. III The server calculates the percentage of users that are online out of the total amount of people that installed the application. IV Electronic signals are sent to the color LED mesh by the server, enabling it to display using it’s 4000 emitters the relative number of people that are currently online. As the amount of emitters represents the number of users, the hue represents the user’s location by continent. V The Server locates pictures with two tagged people or more, and shows them on the sunken monitor VI A web camera captures the space around the installation, and broadcasts it back to the users profile page I
Night view
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
How does it work?
The monitor, seen through the glass floor, while reflecting the installation’s full hight
Status: Unfortunately, after winning the competition, it became clear that the museum could not afford to build the installation. For several months the museum’s staff and I tried to find sponsors and donors in vain. At the same time, I was in touch with several companies that could build that project. We’ve built a lighting fixture prototype, and tested it on site. In addition, a working prototype for the facebook application was programed and tested.
Day view
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Initial sketch
View from the reception hall to the protest square
Project Description
Date of presentation Tutors Design team
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Israel Prime-Minister’s Residence
Protest project to contrast official design for the Prime Minister's residence and headquarters. Initiated by me. 7/2009 8th semester Arch. Baruch Baruch, Arch. Irit Tzaraf Netanyahu, Arch. Liran Chechik Boaz Dimand, Itai Cohen
Background and Motivation
Carmi’s Proposal
On January 2009 the plans for the construction of the new prime-minister’s official residence and headquarters were presented to the public. The design was done by Ram Carmi, after winning a closed competition. Carmi is one of Israel’s most influential architects; he has designed many public and government buildings, including the Israeli supreme court. The building suffered unprecedented criticism among colleagues as well as by the general public. Most of it revolved around the lack of relation to its context, its shape and its design. But most of all it drew public attention for it’s budget estimate: around 650 million NIS - the equivalent of 125 million Euro. Carmi’s proposal, being monumental and oddly shaped, was severely critiqued and even ridiculed by many newspapers, architects and the general public. Israeli architects resented the fact that the design competition was open only to a few well established architectural firms, and not an anonymous open and public competition. However, none of the critics offered any alternative other than canceling the project.
Project Presentation
When the design was published, I was about to begin my 8th semester, tutored by arch. Baruch Baruch, head of the department of Architecture. As the subject was brought to the limelight and thoroughly discussed by architects, I came up with an idea to make a studio in relation to that debate: to take the original competition’s programme and site, and design alternatives to Carmi’s design. Fortunately, the head of the department and my classmates were thrilled with the idea, and thus this studio project was born. The project’s final presentation fascinated many architects that came as guests, and was held in a very wide and honored forum. I am currently working on organizing a public exhibition in a gallery in Tel Aviv, as well as an online presentation. The project was very challenging, as in addition to being an extremely complicated building to design in terms of movement axis, security separations and the extremely large scale of the building (30,000m2), it had to have symbolic meaning and represent the way we as architects believe that a building with such importance should represent.
The site is located in Jerusalem’s government district, in which many of the nation’s most important facilities and building are set, such as the congress hall (“Knesset”) the supreme court, the office of foreign affairs, the treasury etc. To it’s south lays the museum boulevard, which is where several important museum are set, such as Israel Museum, the Science museum, the hall of the book etc. To the site’s east is the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s campus. On the site’s east is an neighborhood built in the 1950’s and to it’s west is an older neighborhood. On it’s north is an international convention center, and a new neighborhood under construction. Most of the area is an open park
16
07
07
13
13
03
01 02 03 04 05 06
06
14
03 02
15
D
14 15
09
08 04
14
C
16
01
A B C
02 10 B
11
A
05
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
D
Knesset Supreme court Intervention site University campus Museum boulevard ‘Crown Plaza’ hotel tower ‘ICC’ convention center Office of foreign affairs Underground parking lot The ‘Rose Garden’ park Sacker park Planned neighborhood ‘Yemin Moshe’ neighborhood ‘Nachlaot’ neighborhood ‘Beit Hakerem’ neighborhood ‘Rommema’ neighborhood Ceremonial axis Cultural axis Connection to ‘Rommema’ neighborhood Connection between the axis, as part of our proposal Proposed design Axis Existing buildings Planned buildings
01
0
0.5km
1km
Nolli’s map of Jerusalem’s government district - existing
The context, or rather lack of it, was a major design problem. The site is completely isolated, surrounded by highways. The only pedestrian traffic comes from the ceremonial axis, connecting the Knesset, the supreme court and the PM’s residence. The planned connection to the museum boulevard via the site to the convention center could also be a source of traffic.
04
05
0
0.25km
0.5km
Existing, planned and suggested plan of the government district
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Context
Design Concepts
A Hebrew typographic conceptual section of the project
Offices
Residence
It came to our knowledge, that the National Library has grown beyond it’s capacity Park Park Park Park Park and is looking for a new location, in the government district in Jerusalem. We thought of joining the two functions together; the Prime Minister’s official residence would also be the National Library. The National Library is both an ordinary reference library, but it’s also the largest archive in the state of Israel. It holds two copies of every book or magazine ever published in Israel, and some rare collections including Albert Einstein’s writings. The entire cultural history of Israel is stored there, represented in the books that were published along the years. It has a sum of about 8 million books and the number is constantly growing. We believe that history and culture are the roots upon which every society grows from, therefore it would be an appropriate site to set the foundations for the official residence of the prime minister
During our design process, we had five key principles:
Transparency: The residence should be a symbol of democracy, and as such, it should be transparent and allow as much access as possible to the public, either by enabling the public to enter or to watch. 1. A place for civic protest: Another aspect of democracy we wanted to emphasize is the right to protest and criticize. The most important public place in our project is the ‘Protest Square’, located at the center of the headquarters, facing the Prime Minister’s office and reception hall. 2. The place belongs to the public: As the entire complex is built out of the taxpayers money, it should be able to provide the most to the public. The majority of the site in our design is an open park, accessible to all. 3. Creating a modest building: As oppose to Carmi’s proposal, that was monumental and introverted, we wanted the building to reflect modesty and accessibility. The visitor should never feel frightened by the power that it represents while, on the other hand, the building should also portray stability and reassure the visitor’s trust in the government. We gave much thought to the delicate balance between the two. 4. Sustainability: The building should give a prime example of how buildings should be built. By creating double Façades with external shading, we were able to allow transparency and avoid the sun’s radiation. A large portion of the building’s envelope is underground, thus less effected by the surrounding heat. The flat roofs are used for photo-voltaic cells and the buildings are ventilated by pressure differences via the towers.
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Process
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1/500 Model
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Design
Accessible to the public
Pedestrian axis
Motorized transportation
Building uses
Civilian vehicles Authorized vehicles
Public service facilities Prime Minister’s headquarters Non-public serving facilities Prime-minister’s residence
Vertical Movement
Horizontal Movement
Cover
Open Park Photo-voltaic cells
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Entrances
View from the reception hall to the Headquarters offices
Academic research rooms
Double layered shaded facade Trapezoid curtain wall facade Longitudinal windowed gray stone facade Shaded curtain wall Double layered shaded facade Longitudinal windowed gray stone facade
Library’s rooftop as a public open park
Double elevator shaft, both for interior and exterior use Stairs and ramps for the handicapped Gathering and protest space Escalators Reference library Entrance to the Reference library Entrance to the National Library’s archive Cultural axis Ceremonial axis
Prime minister’s private residence Authorized vehicle parking lot Official reception hall Gathering and protest space Spokesmanship and press rooms Bridge connecting the office buildings to the cambers, above the archive National library’s archive Reference library Government offices Auditorium Archive space Underground parking lot, connected to existing lot
Exploded axonometric
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Photo voltaic solar panels Academic research rooms
B
A
04 03 05
01 02
11 06
B
12 -4.00 -8.00
07
10
11 -4.00
09
13
-4.00 Floor plan
12
08
13
A
01 Official reception hall 02 Gathering and protest space 03 Authorized vehicle driveway 04 Authorized vehicle parking lot 05 Headquarters offices 06 Press, Media and spokesmanship 07 Underground bridge 08 Public recipient offices 09 Auditorium 10 Open reference library 11 National Library’s archive 12 Ground 13 Street level
B
A
12 22
14
22
05
15
21
-4.00
02
21 13
22
20
B
-4.00
22
-4.00
17
11
22
10 22
-4.00
-4.00
18
19 22
A
14 Lobby and reception hall 15 Water channel 16 The Prime-Minister’s private residence and garden 17 Headquarter’s offices 18 Cafeteria 19 Lobby 20 Library’s patio 21 Researcher’s towers 22 Double-height space
+ - 0.00
Floor plan
22
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
16
11
View from the reference library’s lower floor
Section B-B
Night View
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Sketches
Schematic section through library Library roof and ledge
Entrance to the library
Stairway from the street
Section A-A
Entrance to library
Looking from the patio to the library’s entrance
Curtain wall detail and openings
Section through library’s patio
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Double layered facade and ventilation sketch
Process Sketches
Previous designs proposals for the library
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Bubble scheme - connection between functions
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 View from the ceremonial axis to the entrance to the library
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Appendix
Delft, Netherlands. +31639504241 Web: itai.co
Resumé
e.mail: i@itai.co Education M.Sc. Building Technology Engineering –Green Building Innovation.
2010-2012
Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
(expected)
Specialization: Green building innovation/computational performance. B. Arch. Ed (Magna Cum Laude) - Bachelor of Architecture and Education.
2005-2010
Neri Bloomfield WIZO School of Design, Haifa, Israel. Cumulative GPA – 91.8, First in class. 1997-2001
H igh School Diploma (with excellence). 0B
WIZO High School for the Arts, Haifa, Israel. Major in still photography. Professional Experience 2010-2012
Title: Climate team leader
ReVolt House – TU Delft’s Solar Decathlon 2012 Entry, Delft, Netherlands. Core team member and climate team leader since the conceptual design until prefabrication phase (project terminated unexpectedly due to lack of funding). Work included: Bioclimatic design, simulation, calculation and analysis, mechanical system design, design coordination, integration, sponsoring and funding. Voluntary Voluntary Work Work Title: Architecture Apprentice Bout Bout student student association association board board member, member, Delft, TheThe Netherlands Netherlands . . Yoram Popper Architects, Haifa, Israel.Delft,
2007-2010 2010-2012 2010-2012
Acted Acted as after board as board member member ofofthe of2nd the building building technology technology student student association. association.work on several Hired completion year of architecture school. Simultaneous Pre-Military Pre-Military volunteer volunteer Shnat Shnat Sheirut Sheirut program, program, Haifa, Haifa, Israel. Israel.public buildings and competitions. projects, including industrial buildings, residential, Postponed Postponed my&my military military service service in ain year a year to take to take partpart in ainvolunteer a volunteer program program in which in which I lived I lived Post-production artist Title: Photographer in an in an autonomous autonomous commune commune with with 5 other 5 other volunteers volunteers andand took took partpart in several in several volunteer volunteer Keren Or Photography Studio , Haifa, Israel.
2000-2001 2000-2001 2005-2007 2000-2002
projects projects simultaneously, simultaneously, such as: as: In-house In-house photographer photographer at the at as the Shabtay LeviLevi orphanage orphanage After graduation fromsuch photography high school, was hired a Shabtay photographer's of children of children from from birth birth to five to five years years old, old, youth youth guide guide and and tutor tutor for for middle middle school school pupils, assistant and post-production artist. Work included: composition, lighting and pupils, computer computer Teacher Teacher for for elderly elderly people. people. photography, photo editing, fixing and proofing for print. Military Service Military Service Computer skills Life•Life Support Support Technical Technical Instructor, Israeli Israeli AirAir Force. Force. Professional level Instructor, – Autodesk Autocad, McNeel Rhinoceros, Grasshopper, Google Sketchup, • •Have Have taught taught and and supervised supervised technical technical personnel personnel training in the in the field field of pilot of pilot andand airBuilder crew air crew lifelife Adobe Photoshop, Adobe InDesign, Adobe Flash,training Adobe Dreamweaver, Desgin •
support, support, rescue rescue and survival. survival. (Energy+ UI), and Autodesk Ecotect Weather Tool, Adobe Lightroom, Nextlimit Maxwell Render, •Was Was inoffice, charge in charge of transforming of transforming conventional conventional teaching teaching methods methods to E-Learning to E-Learning computerized computerized MS WinOS. systems, andand constructed constructed training training for for new new courses courses from from scratch. scratch. •systems, Intermediate level – Autodesk Revit, Autodesk 3DSmax, Adobe Illustrator,
•
•Honorably Honorably discharged discharged the at the rank rank of Sergeant of Sergeant First First Class. Class. Ecotect, Oasys GSA, at MacOS.
Special skills *Recommendations available upon request *Recommendations available upon request
Dialux, Autodesk
2002-2005 2002-2005
Title: Photographer & Post-production artist
2005-2007
Keren Or Photography Studio, Haifa, Israel.
2000-2002
After graduation from photography high school, was hired as a photographer's assistant and post-production artist. Work included: composition, lighting and
Computer skills Professional level – Autodesk Autocad, McNeel Rhinoceros, Grasshopper, Google Sketchup,
•
Adobe Photoshop, Adobe InDesign, Adobe Flash, Adobe Dreamweaver, Desgin Builder (Energy+ UI), Autodesk Ecotect Weather Tool, Adobe Lightroom, Nextlimit Maxwell Render, MS office, WinOS. Intermediate level – Autodesk Revit, Autodesk 3DSmax, Adobe Illustrator, Dialux, Autodesk
•
Ecotect, Oasys GSA, MacOS. Special skills Sustainable Design - Climatic analysis, passive design, solar design, comfort design, dynamic
•
thermal calculation, weather data manipulation. Parametric and Computational Design – Generative design, parametric methodology,
•
genetic optimization, intermediate VB.net scripting abilities, advance analysis skills. •
Teaching and Presentation – Highly experienced in delivering presentations, classes and
•
Personal Skills – Innovative, creative, hard working, devoted, a team player, sociable, curious.
lectures in both English and Hebrew.
1 Competitions: •
Delft Innovation Awards for most innovative research project at the Delft University of
•
Azrieli Awards for nation’s best B.arch graduation project – Finalist.
2011
•
The New Kuip stadium design – shortlisted
2011
2011
Technology – Finalist (As part of the ReVolt House core team).
(With P. Papanastazis, M. van Meijeren and L. Birznieks). •
Solar Decathlon TU Delft internal competition for design of a sustainable solar house – 1st
2010
prize winner (with E. Duijn, E. Kapedani and B. Linares). •
Haifa’s City Square, Haifa Municipality, shortlisted.
2010
•
Mobile sustainable market stall, Jerusalem Seminar of Architecture student competition -
2009
2nd prize winner (With O.Fish). •
Community V2.0, AI magazine's Project of the Year awards - Un-built category, shortlisted.
•
Design of a temporary installation , Beth HaTfutzot Museum of Jewish Diaspora, 1st prize winner.
2009 2008
Exhibitions: •
‘Seeds of Israeli architecture’, Azrieli award finalist exhibition, Beit Hadrichal Gallery, Tel
2011
Aviv-Yaffo / Technion, Haifa, Israel. •
XXL Digital Design Workshop stadium design exhibition, FC Feyenoord Kuip stadium,
Rotterdam, Netherlands.
2011
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
photography, photo editing, fixing and proofing for print.
Competitions: •
Delft Innovation Awards for most innovative research project at the Delft University of
•
Azrieli Awards for nation’s best B.arch graduation project – Finalist.
2011
•
The New Kuip stadium design – shortlisted
2011
2011
Technology – Finalist (As part of the ReVolt House core team).
(With P. Papanastazis, M. van Meijeren and L. Birznieks). •
Solar Decathlon TU Delft internal competition for design of a sustainable solar house – 1st
2010
prize winner (with E. Duijn, E. Kapedani and B. Linares). •
Haifa’s City Square, Haifa Municipality, shortlisted.
2010
•
Mobile sustainable market stall, Jerusalem Seminar of Architecture student competition -
2009
2nd prize winner (With O.Fish). •
Community V2.0, AI magazine's Project of the Year awards - Un-built category, shortlisted.
•
Design of a temporary installation , Beth HaTfutzot Museum of Jewish Diaspora, 1st prize winner.
2009 2008
Exhibitions: •
‘Seeds of Israeli architecture’, Azrieli award finalist exhibition, Beit Hadrichal Gallery, Tel
2011
Aviv-Yaffo / Technion, Haifa, Israel. •
XXL Digital Design Workshop stadium design exhibition, FC Feyenoord Kuip stadium,
•
'The Future of Hadar HaCarmel', exhibition of selected student projects at the Municipal
•
'Ze Israel 2 ’, exhibition of winners and shortlisted entries of AI magazine's Project of the
2011
Rotterdam, Netherlands. 2009
Council Building, Haifa, Israel. 2009
Year award competition, ZeZeZe Gallery of Architecture, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel.
Teaching Experience Title: Guest Lecturer
2012
Delft University of Technology - TBM Faculty, Delft, The Netherlands . Guest lecture to master’s students in a serious game design course by Dr. Ivo Wenzler, in regard to ongoing Master’s thesis. (scheduled, June ’12). Title: Guest Lecturer
Neri Bloomfield WIZO School of Design, Haifa, Israel. Guest lecturer in ‘Windows to Architecture’ lecture series. Lecture regarding the design and fabrication of the ReVolt house project, from concept to reality. Title: Guest Lecturer and workshop instructor
2011
•
'The Future of Hadar HaCarmel', exhibition of selected student projects at the Municipal
2009
Council Building, Haifa, Israel. •
'Ze Israel 2 ’, exhibition of winners and shortlisted entries of AI magazine's Project of the
2009
Teaching Experience Title: Guest Lecturer
2012
Delft University of Technology - TBM Faculty, Delft, The Netherlands . Guest lecture to master’s students in a serious game design course by Dr. Ivo Wenzler, in regard to ongoing Master’s thesis. (scheduled, June ’12). Title: Guest Lecturer
2011
Neri Bloomfield WIZO School of Design, Haifa, Israel. Guest lecturer in ‘Windows to Architecture’ lecture series. Lecture regarding the design and fabrication of the ReVolt house project, from concept to reality. Title: Guest Lecturer and workshop instructor
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (External studies unit),
2011
Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel. Attended as lecturer and contributor for 3 days at the initiation workshop of the Israeli Solar Decathlon 2013 group with Dr. Joseph Cory and Chen Shalita. Title: Architecture Tutor assistant
Neri Bloomfield WIZO School of Design, Haifa, Israel. Served as an architectural design studio assistant in both second and fourth year of
2008-2009 2006-2007
architecture school. Course coordinator: Dr. Raquel Rapaport. Title: Sketchup and Photoshop Instructor
2007-2008
'Cavim' Institute for Architecture and Design, Haifa, Israel. Prepared a syllabus and taught Sketchup and Photoshop course for architecture practical engineers. Voluntary Work Bout student association board member, Delft, The Netherlands.
2010-2012
Acted as board member of the building technology student association. Pre-Military volunteer Shnat Sheirut program, Haifa, Israel.
2000-2001
Postponed my military service in a year to take part in a volunteer program in which I lived
2
in an autonomous commune with 5 other volunteers and took part in several volunteer projects simultaneously, such as: In-house photographer at the Shabtay Levi orphanage of children from birth to five years old, youth guide and tutor for middle school pupils, computer Teacher for elderly people. Military Service Life Support Technical Instructor, Israeli Air Force. •
Have taught and supervised technical personnel training in the field of pilot and air crew life support, rescue and survival.
2002-2005
A 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Year award competition, ZeZeZe Gallery of Architecture, Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel.