References

‘We shape our buildings and afterward our buildings shape us’ (Winston Churchill). This thesis asked how could our environments change if we designed for our evolutionary needs; does a reinterpretation of Browning’s biophilic principles provide an improved architectural solution that caters for our emotional wellbeing? This thesis redefined 6 of Williams Browning’s biophilic principles. The resulting architecture of the University of Melbourne Fishermans Bend Campus Hub implemented the revised principles proposed by the thesis. The aim of the resulting architecture is to create an architectural solution that provides an environment that is focused on user wellbeing. As discussed throughout this thesis the benefits of using human centric nature based architectural design solutions are profound. The campus hub will be integral in shaping the experience of students throughout their study journey. We shape our buildings and afterward our buildings shape us. Architecture can shape our wellbeing and help to improve the statistic of 1 in 6 Australian university students experience a form of mental distress during their time at university. The identity of us is about creating buildings that respond to our needs as humans and work towards improving our experiences.

Abdelaal, M. S., & Soebarto, V. (2019). Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture. Architectural Science Review, 62(3), 195–205.

Abdelaal M & Soebarto V. (2018). History Matters: The Origins of Biophilic Design of Innovative Learning Spaces in Traditional. International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3) 108-127. https://search.proquest.com/ docview/2164083850?accountid=12372

Benfield, J. A., Rainbolt, G. N., Bell, P. A., & Donovan, G. H. (2015). Classrooms With Nature Views: Evidence of Differing Student Perceptions and Behaviors. Environ-ment and Behavior, 47(2), 140-157. doi:10.1177/0013916513499583

Bond M (2017). The Hidden ways that architecture affects how you feel, accessed 17th August 2020, <https://www.bbc.com/ future/article/20170605-the-psychology-behind-your-citys-design>

Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. In W. D. Browning (Ed.), (pp. 64). Retrieved from terrapinbrightgreen.com

Gullone, E. (2000). The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology?

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 293–322. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1010043827986

Han, K.-T. (2010). An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 2, 243.

Heerwagen, J. H. and Hase, B. (2001). Building biophilia: connecting people to nature in building design. Environmental Design + Construction, Mar/Apr, 30-36.

Joye Y. (2006). Cognitive and Evolutionary Speculations for Biomorphic Architecture. Leonardo, 39(2), 145.

Mehaffy M (2020). The Chernobyl Paradox: The Intense Connection Between Health and Living Structure, accessed 24th August 2020, source < https://commonedge.org/the-chernobylparadox-the-intense-connection-between-health-and-livingstructure/>.

Miller J. (2013). Authenticity, Sin-cerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West. Method & Theory in the Study of Reli-gion, 25(3), 283. https://doi. org/10.1163/15700682-12341259

Nejati, A. (2012). Spirituality, Health, and Architecture: With Respect

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21. to Stress. International Journal of Health, Wellness & Society, 2(4), 1–11.

Scarfone S. (1996). Design of Outdoor Environments for Wellness and the Role of Landscape Architecture. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 8, 68.

Sevinc Kayihan, K., Özcelik Guney, S., & Ünal, F. C. (2018). Biophilia as the Main Design Question in Architectural Design Studio Teaching. Megaron, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5505/ MEGARON.2017.59265

Söderlund J, & Peter Newman. (2015). Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2(4), 950–969. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2015.4.950

Usher, W. (2020). Living in Quiet Desperation: The Mental Health Epidemic in Australia’s Higher Education. Health Education Journal, 79(2), 138–151.

Watson J “Introduction” and “Conclusion”, in Lo-Te: Design by Radical Indigenism (Cologne: Taschen, 2020): 16-27 and 396-399

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

Xue, F., Lau, S. S., Gou, Z., Song, Y., & Jiang, B. (2019). Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 76, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004

Yimaz, M. (2006). Architectural identity and local community. EKISTICS -ATHENS-, 436/441, 140.