GROUP MEMBER:
Concepts and Framework……………………………………… 02
IBS Score Calculation…………………………………… 63
Conclusion……………………………………………………… 65
IBS Components ………………………………………………..…… 15
Sequence Of Construction…………………………………….. 38
Drawings………………………………………………………………….. 45
References……………………………………………………… 67
Introduction of Industrialised Building System (IBS)
Advantages
Cost saving
Short Construction Time
Less labour required
Minimal Wastage
Disadvantages
Lack of aesthetics value
IBS components are expensive
Lack of skilled labours
Improper planning leads to failure
Types of Industrialised Building System (IBS)
Hamakareem.M, n.d)
Precast Concrete System
Blockwork System
Steel Frame System
Steel Formwork System
Prefabricated Timber System
Introduction to Blockwork System
Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU)
Figure 1.7: Blockwork often used to build internal walls and retaining walls (universalsoloads, 2018)
Solid Concrete Block
Hollow-core Block
Advantages ● ● ● ●
Disadvantages ●
●
Figure 1.8: Blockwork wall (anuntul, 2012)
Figure 1.9: Solid Block Wall (CivilBlock, 2014)
Figure 1.10: Hollow-core concrete block (Lawsons, n.d)
Figure 1.11: Concrete stretcher block (
)
Figure 1.12: Concrete corner block (
Figure 1.13: Concrete pillar block (
)
)
Figure 1.14: Frogged brick block (
)
Figure 1.15: Bullnose block (
Figure 1.16: Lintel block (
)
)
Figure 1.17: Partition concrete block (
Figure 1.18: Jamb concrete block (
)
)
Figure 1.19: The weigh batcher is used to measure the proper amounts of each material (Concrete Block, n.d)
Selection and proportion of Ingredients
Figure 1.20: The concrete comes off a conveyor and is forced into molds. The rotating brushes remove loose material. (Concrete Block, n.d)
Mixing of ingredients
Figure 1.21: In the block machine, the concrete is forced downward into molds (Concrete Block, n.d)
Molding
Figure 1.22: The curing rack is rolled onto a set of rails and moved into a curing kiln.(Concrete Block, n.d)
Curing
Figure 1.23: Layout ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
1. Layout
Figure 1.24: Positioning the first block ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
2. Mixing
Figure 1.25: Applying mortar ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
3. Apply Mortar
Figure 1.26: Aligning using string ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
4. Filling
Figure 1.29: Laying mesh("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
7. Laying metal lath
Figure 1.27: Building paper as control joint ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
5. Control Joints
Figure 1.30: Laying top course block ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
8. Setting top course block
Figure 1.28: Applying mortar ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
6. Strike the Mortar
Figure 1.31: Capping ("Concrete Block Walls", 2018)
9. Capping
Case Study
Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bandar Enstek Education school with facilities for secondary science, art streams and handicapped students Bandar Baru Enstek, Negeri Sembilan 24 months Ministry of education NIL Management Consultancy yed Ahmad Ibrahim Associate Architects Sdn Bhd ATE Consult Sdn. Bhd. Dasacon Sdn. Bhd. Integrated Brickwork System Load Bearing Blockwork System
Figure 1.33: SMK Bandar Enstek (Foursquare, 2016)
Structural: Slab: Precast concrete slab Roof : Prefab metal roof truss
0.8 1.0
Full IBS Factor Full IBS Factor
Wall : Blockwork System
0.5
Partial IBS Factor
Foundation
Prefabricated concrete staircase Prefabricated concrete slab Prefabricated blockwork Prefabricated metal roof truss
Figure 1.32: Construction of SMK Bandar Enstek (Foursquare, 2016)
Block work wall arrangement
, the most used bond and is composed of . Since there are no headers in this bond, metal ties are usually used. Running bond is used largely in cavity wall construction and veneered walls of brick, and often in facing tile walls where the bonding may be accomplished by extra width stretcher tile.
â—? â—?
Easy to execute Provide more strength across vertical planes than stack bond
Figure 2.8: Details of blockwork arrangement (Lee, 2018)
Figure 2.7: Running bond blockwork arrangement (Lee, 2018)
Grouting and reinforcing
Joint reinforcement is used in addition to when bond beams are spaced at more than 1200mm. It is a ladder of 9 gauge (3.7mm) galvanized wire , which positions a wire in the centre of each block faceshell. It is spaced at either a maximum of 600mm, 400mm for stack pattern, or at 400mm in seismic zones. Joint reinforcement resists wall cracking and can contribute to the horizontal steel area in the wall.
A control joint is a , but with a on one side so that tensile stress cannot develop across the joint. If control joints are not provided, a concrete masonry wall may crack as it shrinks over time.
Grout & Reinforcing where required Terminate horizontal joint reinforcement at control joint
Building paper Grout fill
Horizontal steel bars
Caulking joint
Figure 2.9: Joint reinforcement (Yuen, 2018)
Figure 2.10: Details of control joint (Yuen, 2018)
Grouting and reinforcing
Grouting techniques have been developed to ensure that walls are completely grouted Low- and high-lift grouting are both traditional grouting methods, with the difference being the height of lift. Lifts five feet or less are considered low lift, while lifts greater than five feet are considered to be high lift.
Stop grout 1� form top of pour to create shear key
U- block units w/ solid bottom at bond beam course
Grout in bond beams & reinforced vertical cells placed in top of wall after wall has been laid up.
Cells containing reinforcement are filled solidly with grout; vertical cells should provide a continuous cavity free of mortar dropping
Vertical reinforcement for closed- end concrete masonry units can be set after wall has been laid.
Cleanout openings @ base of vertically reinforcement cells, 32� O.C max spacing for solid grouted walls. Remove mortar droppings through cleanouts and verify placement & location of vertical reinforcement; form over openings before placing grout
Rebar positioner, wall tie or other device to position vertical reinforcement, as required. Horizontal reinforcement placed in bond beams as wall is laid up Note: Grout lifts not to exceed 5ft.
Standard cmu w/ cross webs knocked out/ at bond beam course Metal lath, mesh, or wide screen placed in mortar joints under knockout bond beam courses to prevent filing of ungrouted cells Figure 2.11: Grouting procedure (Yuen, 2018)
Wall to Wall Connection
Advantages Block system ●Good heat & sound insulation; energy saving ●2 hours fire rating approved by Sirim ●Cheaper and simple footing along the wall is required for single storey
Grout and reinforcing
Block produced by machine ●Quality control ●Better strength ●No cracks ●Consistent size and compaction
50% interlocking to bond walls Control joint
Speed of erecting Block Wall ●3 to 4 times faster than conventional method ●Environmentally friendly; less formworks ●Consistent size; less wastage Load Bearing Wall ●Need no formwork as columns and beams are cast within blocks ●Save ~ 2/3 of reinforcement compared to conventional method
Web wall
Control joint
Flange wall
Figure 2.12: Details of intersection wall (Yuen, 2018)
Column and Beam
Reinforcing bar Concrete masonry bond beam units
610 x 610 corner bar at intersection ef
Bond beam reinforcing Control joint
Hollow core stretcher block
Vertical reinforcement Figure 2.14: Bond beam plan detail (Yuen, 2018)
Figure 2.13: Details of column and beam (Yuen, 2018)
Length as required to develop reinforcement
Grout and reinforcing as required
Flange wall
Rake out mortar for control joint
Knock out face shell of bond beam unit for continuous grout & reinforcement
Rake out mortar for control joint Web wall Figure 2.15: Bond beams at intersecting walls (Yuen, 2018)
Precast Hollow core slab
Advantages ● ●
● ● ●
● ●
Disadvantages ● ●
Figure 2.16: Hollow core slab (Hardprecast, 2018)
1
1. Loading to site
2
3 Figure 2.21: Sectional view of hollow core slab (Lee, 2018)
Figure 2.17: Loading (Orak factory,2015)
2. Hoisting
1 Figure 2.18: Hoisting (Orak factory,2015)
3. Grouting 2
Figure 2.19: Grouting (Wikizie,2018)
Figure 2.22: Details of Hollow core slab (Lee, 2018)
4. Finishing
Figure 2.20: Screeding (Wikizie,2018)
Figure 2.23: Slab to internal beam connection (Tan, 2018)
Figure 2.24: Connection of different levels of slab (Yuen,2018)
1 This detail shows a precast concrete plank bearing at an exterior CMU wall. The wall has horizontal joint reinforcement at 16″ o.c. vertically. The plank has reinforcement and grout at the keyways, and the floor bears on a concrete masonry unit (CMU) bond beam. The wall is grouted and reinforced vertically as required, and the bars are lapped to achieve sufficient development strength per structural design. The brick veneer is not shown for clarity.
3
2
4
5 6 11 7 9
8
10
13
11 12
Figure 2.25: Slab to external wall connection (Yuen 2018)
1
This detail shows a precast concrete plank bearing at an interior CMU wall. The wall has horizontal joint reinforcement at 16″ o.c. vertically. The plank has continuous reinforcement and grout at the keyways, and the floor bears on an interior CMU bond beam. The wall is grouted and reinforced vertically as required, and the bars are lapped to achieve sufficient development strength per structural design.
2
4
5 6
3
8 7
9
10
Figure 2.26: Slab to internal wall connection (Yuen, 2018)
Door and Window
Figure 2.28: Elevation view of door connection (Tan, 2018)
Figure 2.27: Door and window connection (Lee, 2018)
Staircase
Advantages ● ●
● ●
Disadvantages ●
Figure 2.29: Precast staircase (Staircase design,2018)
Figure 2.30: Craft template (stair kosour, 2018)
1. Craft template
Figure 2.31: During installation (stair kosour, 2018)
2. During installation
Figure 2.32: Finishing (stair kosour, 2018)
3. Finishing
1
1 1
3
2
3
3 4
5
Figure 2.33: Stair to floor connection (Lee, 2018)
Stair to Floor Connection
2 4
Figure 2.34: Landing to wall connection (Lee, 2018)
Landing to Wall Connection
1 2
4
2 3
Figure 2.35: Landing to down riser connection (Lee, 2018)
Figure 2.36: Landing to up riser connection (Lee, 2018)
Landing to Down Riser Connection
Landing to Up Riser Connection
Advantages ● Apex Joint
Web Joint
● ● ● ● ●
Web Joint
Disadvantages ●
●
Heel Joint
● Figure 2.42: Roof truss joint connection (Tan, 2018)
3 Cladding to batten load transfer through self-drilling screw
1 2 6 5
4
Figure 2.43: Roof truss joint connection (Tan, 2018)
Batten to rafter load transfer through self-drilling screw
Figure 2.44: Batten to roofing and truss connection (Yuen, 2018)
Ceiling
Galvanized Steel Wire
Wall Angle
Main Runner
Cross Tee
Figure 2.45: Ceiling connection (Lee, 2018)
Toilet Pod
Integrated, pretested plumbing and electric, code compliant & ready for final hookup
● ●
Completely finished interior clean & ready to use
● ● ●
Moisture-resistant abuse resistant wallboard, glued & screwed to framing
Waterproof, thin profile subfloor supports floor finish while providing a seamless transition to the adjoining floor.
Figure 2.46: Toilet pod detail (Tan, 2018)
Advantages Faster construction programmes for accelerated occupation Cost savings over traditional on-site installation Elimination of many on-site health and safety issues Highest standards of quality control Minimal on-site skilled labour required
Installation of Toilet Pod
Figure 2.47: On site delivery (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.51: MEP connections (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.48: Hoisting (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.52: Toilet pod detail (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.49: Toilet pod in building (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.53: Exterior finish (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.50: Toilet pod in final location (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Figure 2.54: Toilet pod (oldcastlesurepods, 2017)
Construction Process on Site
Figure 3..1 : Excavation (Youtube,2017)
Figure 3.2: Formwork for foundation (Shutterstock,2018)
Figure 3.3: Strip foundation (Shutterstock,2018)
Setting out and excavation
Construction of Formwork
Footing
Construction Process on Site
Figure 3.4 : Foundation wall (Binaan,2017)
Foundation wall A wall built from the concrete strip foundation to the height of the placement of hollow core slab. Besides,
Figure 3.5: Backfilling (Construction Mentor,2017)
Backfilling
Figure 3.6: Installation of Slab (Binaan,2017)
Installation of Slab Hollow core slabs are then installed and attached by reinforcement bars then filling with sand-cement grout.
Construction Process on Site
Figure 3.7: Installation of Walls & Toilet pod (Binaan,2017)
Installation of Walls & Toilet pod
Figure 3.8: Installation of Lintel & Beam (Youtube,2018)
Installation of Lintel & Beam
Figure 3.9 : Construction of 3 storeys (Wallnet,2017)
Repeat the same procedure
Construction Process on Site
Figure 3.10: Installation of trusses and battens(Youtube,2018)
Figure 3.11: Corrugated steel roofing (rockthelhc,2018)
Installation of roof trusses and battens
Installation of Roofing
Figure 3.12 : Completed blockwork house (Youtube, 2018)
Finishes
Construction Process of Model
Figure 3.13: Strip foundation (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.14: Partial wall (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.15: Cast in situ slab (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.16: External & Internal Wall (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.17: Lintel (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.18: Hollow core slabs (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.19: Solid CMU encloses perimeter (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.20: External & Internal Wall (Tan 2018)
Construction Process of Model
Figure 3.21: Screeding (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.22: Lintel (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.23: Construction of second floor (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.25: Final Model (Tan 2018)
Figure 3.24: Construction of roof (Tan 2018)
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
200
2400
600
1200
600
200
200
2200
2400
9600
200
2200
200
600
1200
A
WD 1
3600
A1
WD 1
WD 1
BEDROOM 3
MASTER BEDROOM
WD 1
MASTER BEDROOM
BEDROOM 3
11.52 SQM
6.96 SQM
6.96 SQM
FFL 0.00
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.20
600
200
400 200
B1
UP 50
DR 1
DR 1
YARD
5.72 SQM
5.72 SQM
FFL +0.15
FFL +0.15
7
WD 1
DN 50
F G
600 400 200 400
WD 2
3.36 SQM
C'
8.88 SQM
DR 1
BATH 2 DN 50
DR 1
DR 1
1
FFL +0.20
3.36 SQM
MASTER BATHROOM
FFL +0.20
3
BEDROOM 2
FFL +0.15
8.32 SQM
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.15
WD 2
DN 50 CORRIDOR
DN 50
3.36 SQM
600
E1
MASTER BATHROOM
WD 1
DN 50
200 400
10000
E
8.32 SQM
DR 1
DR 1
5
CORRIDOR
WD 2
FFL +0.20
DR 1
YARD
DR 1
11.52 SQM
FFL +0.20
DR 1
B
D
1200
2400
B
DR 1
C
200
200
A
600
FFL +0.15
BEDROOM 2
C
8.88 SQM
FFL +0.20
UP KITCHEN
KITCHEN
6.6 SQM
6.6 SQM
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.20
DR 1
DN 50
BATH 2 3.36 SQM
FFL +0.15
WD 2
CORRIDOR 18.72 SQM
H
FFL +0.15
H1 2600
DN 50
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +0.15
DN 50
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
DINING AREA
10.4 SQM
7.72 SQM
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.20
DR 2
FOYER
FOYER
1.28 SQM
1.28 SQM
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.20
UP 50
UP 50
DINING AREA
DR 2
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
7.72 SQM
10.4 SQM
FFL +0.20
FFL +0.20
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +0.15
I
200
WD 3
I1 A'
B' 1 unit area
= 76.98 SQM
Corridor area
= 18.72 SQM
N
Total floor area = 76.98 + 18.72 + 76.98 = 172.68 SQM
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.1.1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
01 001
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
46
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
200
2400
600
1200
600
200
200
2200
2400
9600
200
2200
200
600
1200
A
WD 1
3600
A1
WD 1
WD 1
WD 1
MASTER BEDROOM
MASTER BEDROOM
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 3
11.52 SQM
6.96 SQM
6.96 SQM
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
600
200
DR 1
400 200
DR 1
DR 1
YARD
5.72 SQM
5.72 SQM
FFL +3.40
FFL +3.40
7
WD 1
DN 50
G
600
MASTER BATHROOM
400 200 400
MASTER BATHROOM
FFL +3.45
WD 2
3.36 SQM
C'
8.88 SQM
DR 1
BATH 2 DN 50
DR 1
DR 1
1
FFL +3.45
3.36 SQM
8.32 SQM
3
BEDROOM 2
FFL +3.40
DN 50 CORRIDOR
DN 50
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.40
WD 2
WD 1
DN 50
3.36 SQM
600
F
8.32 SQM
200 400
10000
E1
WD 2
DR 1
DR 1
5
CORRIDOR
E
FFL +3.45
DR 1
YARD
B1
11.52 SQM
DR 1
B
D
1200
2400
B
DR 1
C
200
200
A
600
FFL +3.40
BEDROOM 2
C
8.88 SQM
FFL +3.45
UP KITCHEN
KITCHEN
6.6 SQM
6.6 SQM
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
DR 1
DN 50
BATH 2 3.36 SQM
FFL +3.40
WD 2
CORRIDOR 18.72 SQM
H
FFL +3.40
H1 2600
DN 50
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +3.40
DN 50
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
DINING AREA
10.4 SQM
7.72 SQM
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
DR 2
FOYER
FOYER
1.28 SQM
1.28 SQM
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
UP 50
UP 50
DINING AREA
DR 2
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
7.72 SQM
10.4 SQM
FFL +3.45
FFL +3.45
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +3.40
I
200
WD 3
I1 A'
B' 1 unit area
= 76.98 SQM
Corridor area
= 18.72 SQM
N
Total floor area = 76.98 + 18.72 + 76.98 = 172.68 SQM
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.1.2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
02 002
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
47
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
200
2400
600
1200
600
200
200
2200
9600
200
2400
2200
200
600
1200
A
WD 1
3600
A1
WD 1
WD 1
WD 1
MASTER BEDROOM
MASTER BEDROOM
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 3
11.52 SQM
6.96 SQM
6.96 SQM
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
600
200
DR 1
400 200
DR 1
DR 1
YARD
5.72 SQM
5.72 SQM
FFL +6.60
FFL +6.60
13
WD 1
DN 50
F G
600
MASTER BATHROOM
400 200 400
MASTER BATHROOM
FFL +6.65
WD 2
3.36 SQM
C'
8.88 SQM
DR 1
BATH 2 DN 50
DR 1
DR 1
19
FFL +6.60
BEDROOM 2
C
8.88 SQM
DN
FFL +6.65
3.36 SQM
8.32 SQM
17
BEDROOM 2
FFL +6.60
DN 50 CORRIDOR
DN 50
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.60
WD 2
WD 1
DN 50
DR 1
DR 1
15
8.32 SQM
3.36 SQM
600
E1
WD 2
200 400
10000
CORRIDOR
E
FFL +6.65
DR 1
YARD
B1
11.52 SQM
DR 1
B
D
1200
2400
B
DR 1
C
200
200
A
600
FFL +6.65
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
6.6 SQM
6.6 SQM
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
DR 1
DN 50
BATH 2 3.36 SQM
FFL +6.60
WD 2
CORRIDOR 18.72 SQM
H
FFL +6.60
H1 2600
DN 50
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +6.60
DN 50
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
DINING AREA
10.4 SQM
7.72 SQM
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
DR 2
FOYER
FOYER
1.28 SQM
1.28 SQM
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
UP 50
UP 50
DINING AREA
DR 2
DR 3
LIVING ROOM
7.72 SQM
10.4 SQM
FFL +6.65
FFL +6.65
BALCONY 2.86 SQM
FFL +6.60
I
200
WD 3
I1 A'
B' 1 unit area
= 76.98 SQM
Corridor area
= 18.72 SQM
N
Total floor area = 76.98 + 18.72 + 76.98 = 172.68 SQM
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.1.3 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
03 003
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
48
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
2400
200
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
1200
2400
600
200
200
A
600
9600
3600
A1
FALL 30º
E1 F G
400 200 400
E
600
D
200 400
C
10000
B1
600
400 200
B
H
FALL 30º
I
200
2600
H1
I1
N
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.2 ROOF PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
04 004
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
49
16A 16
13A 13
14
15
12
11
10A 10
9A
9
8
8A
7A
7
5
6
4A
4
2
3
1A
1
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
9600
200
2400
200
2200
600
1200
600
200
2400
1200
600
200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
(FFL +0.20) GROUND FLOOR LVL GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00) BL 5
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.3.1 NORTH ELEVATION
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
05 005
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
50
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
9600
200
2400
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
2400
1200
600
200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
(FFL +0.20) GROUND FLOOR LVL GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.3.2 SOUTH ELEVATION
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
06 006
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
51
I1
200
I
H1
A
2600
7200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
GROUND FLOOR LVL (FFL(FFL +0.20) +0.20) GROUND FLOOR LVL GROUNDGROUND LVL (FFLLEVEL 0.00) (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.3.3 EAST ELEVATION
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
07 007
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
52
I
H1
A
I1
10000
7200
2600
200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
BL 3
GROUND FLOOR LVL (FFL +0.20) GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.3.4 WEST ELEVATION
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
08 008
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
53
I1
A
10000
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60) BL 1 BL 4
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65) BL 6
BL 2
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
GROUND FLOOR LVL (FFL +0.20) GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.4.1 SECTION A-A'
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
09 009
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
54
I
H1
A
I1
10000
7200
2600
200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
GROUND FLOOR LVL (FFL +0.20) GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.4.2 SECTION B-B'
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
10 010
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
55
16A 16
13A 13
14
15
12
11
10A 10
9A
9
8
8A
7A
7
5
6
4A
4
2
3
1A
1
21600
2400
9600
200
600
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
9600
200
2400
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
1200
2400
600
200
ROOF LVL (FFL +9.60)
SECOND FLOOR LVL (FFL +6.65)
FIRST FLOOR LVL (FFL +3.45)
(FFL +0.20) GROUND FLOOR LVL GROUND LVL (FFL 0.00)
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.5 SECTIONAL PERSPECTIVE C-C'
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
11 011
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
56
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.6 AXONOMETRIC
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:250
Drawn by
12 012
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
57
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
2400
200
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
1200
2400
600
200
200
A
600
9600
3600
A1
E1 F G
400 200 400
E
600
D
200 400
C
10000
B1
600
400 200
B
H
I
200
2600
H1
I1
N
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.7 FOUNDATION PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
13 013
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
58
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
2400
200
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
1200
2400
600
200
200
A
600
9600
A1 SL1
SL1
SL1
3600
SL1
SL11
SL11
B
F G
600
400 200
E1
SL3
SL7
SL3
SL7
400 200 400
E
SL12
SL11
SL13
600
D
SL2
SL2
SL7
SL3
SL7
SL3
SL8
SL4
SL13
SL15 200 400
C
10000
B1
SL4
SL8
SL13
SL13
H SL15
H1 SL9
2600
SL5
SL13
SL13
SL9
SL5
SL9
SL5
SL10
SL6
I
200
SL15 SL5
SL9
SL6
SL10
SL14
SL14
SL16
I1
N
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.8 STRUCTURAL FIRST & SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
14 014
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
59
1
1A
2
3
4
4A
5
6
7
7A
8
9
8A
10 10A
9A
11
12
13 13A
14
16 16A
15
21600
2400
9600
200
1200
2400
200
600
1200
600
200
2200
200
2400
200
2200
200
600
1200
600
200
1200
2400
600
200
200
A
600
9600
3600
A1
E1 F G
400 200 400
E
600
D
200 400
C
10000
B1
600
400 200
B
H
I
200
2600
H1
I1
N
PROJECT TITLE
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWING NO. Starting Date
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY Wisdom • Integrity • Excellence
BLD 61403 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY 1 PROJECT 1 INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM
4.9 STRUCTURAL ROOF PLAN
Date
5 October 2018
Scale
1:75
Drawn by
15 015
17
Checked by Page number
SHEET NO.
28 September 2018
60
IBS Score Calculation
690.72 SQM
84.2 x 3 = 252.6 66.4 x 3 = 199.2 451.8m
0.5 0.5
172.68 / 690.72 = 0.25
50 x 0.7 x 0.25 = 8.75
345.36 / 690.72 = 0.5
50 x 0.8 x 0.5 = 20
172.68 / 690.72 = 0.25
50 x 1.0 x 0.25 = 12.5
1.0
41.25
252.6 / 451.8 = 0.56 199.2 / 451.8 = 0.44
20 x 0.5 x 0.56 = 5.6 20 x 0.5 x 0.44 = 4.4
1.0
10
42 / 48 x 100% = 88% 39 / 39 x 100% = 100% 100% 62 / 92 x 100% = 67.4%
4 4 4 2
3/3 x 100% = 100% 3/3 x 100% = 100% 3/3 x 100% = 100%
2 2 2 20 71.25
Conclusion
IBS score of 71.25/100, t
References