ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN ANALYSIS
FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER IN MANHATTAN, KS JILL SORNSON KURTZ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE FINAL REPORT MAY 2, 2014
PROJECT PROGRAM Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being (World Heath Organization), not merely the absence of disease. When mental and social injuries are not addressed, physical healing is hindered. Healthcare facilities today, whose key purpose is to promote health, frequently fail to address the fundamentals of health beyond physical healing. They appear sterile, cold and barren, discouraging recuperation. They prevent patients from developing confidence in their will to get better and impair mental health as individual responsibilities and social stimulation fall away. In order to address the issue of healing in a Rehabilitation Center, one must look far beyond the typical means required for health.
The relationship between health and community is one of reciprocity; each one dependent on the other. Medical staff members together with patients, their families, friends and visitors constitute a small community of their own. Additionally, during the rehabilitation process, members of this small community can become part of the larger downtown community. As this is facilitated, mental, social, and physical health are promoted. Through the strengthening of patients’ total health, a critical step is reached in their healing process and they actively engage in the community around them. Additionally, as private healthcare facilities extend their realm of services to a larger population base, more members in the community benefit from them and health is encouraged.
CONGENITAL
NT IDE C AC
S ICE RV SE
RES OU RC ES
Y
DIS EAS E
IND US TR
CES RVI FITNESS OPPORTUN E ITIE HS S LT A P R E O FES H ION AL
REHABILITATION + AGING CENTER
ELDERLY FROM COMMUNITY
N TS
MENTAL THERAP
Y
OR NT
ME
AT M RE
I
TME
I
IN
US
TH
W
S
RA
DJ
HI P
LT
LA
D
DS
NA
ME
T
EN
O ATI
O NG CIA
L ICA
F RI
EN
T
VOC
IN G
INDIVIDUAL FROM THE COMMUNITY
PA TIE
NT
S
ED
UCA TIO N A
VOLU L PROGRAMS
N
R TEE
IN G
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PROJECT LOCATION Through the thesis design studio Arch 707 at Kansas State University College of Architecture, Planning, & Design, a Neuro-Rehabilitation Center has been proposed in downtown Manhattan, Kansas. It is intended to address the needs of spinal chord and brain injury patients through the built environment while Simultaneously, this project addresses a patient’s need for community and a community’s need for health. The project is located on Manhattan’s main street, Poyntz Avenue. As a college town, Manhattan is susceptible to seasonal fluxuation but downtown Manhattan has remained a key pillar in the local side to the community and maintains a strong presence throughout the year and seasonal variances experienced in other areas nearby.
MANHATTAN, KS
POYNTZ AVENUE DOWNTOWN MANHATTAN
PROJECT SITE
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PROGRAM PARTI Connecting the rehabilitation patients specifically with the aging population became the catalyst for uniting health and the community of Manhattan in this project. Through collaboration with the city’s Center for the Aging, a strong link was found between the tangible services offered by both groups and the opportunities for social and mental stimulation that would occur in their exchange. To a facility focused on complete physical, mental and social well-being, this connection is critical and became the driving force of the project.
The entrance to the aging and rehabilitation centers are located off of the main avenue in downtown Manhattan and would maintain the street front with other commercial establishments in the area. The rehabilitation center would continue into the block’s interior and connect to inpatient living. On the south side of the block would be townhouses available for seniors or out patient living. The building’s form creates 3 outdoor spaces which are used for parking, outdoor rehabilitation spaces, and a private courtyard for the living areas.
AGING CENTER
N CENTER
REHABILITATIO
PARKING
OUTDOOR REHABILITATION SPACE NITY
INDOOR COMMU
G
INPATIENT LIVIN
PRIVATE COURTYARD OUTPATIENT HOUSING OPTIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
SITE PLAN The building’s design was premised around the idea of blending the outside with the inside and therefore, was situated in such a way as to create outdoor rooms that complimented the building’s program.
Several pools are located around the site to provide therapeutic opportunities and natural vegetation as well as trees are situated both for shade and to provide connections to nature.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
3
1 2
18
14
1 4
2 12 13
10 9
8
15 15
15 15
15 15
2
16 17
1 Entry/Control 2 Elevator/Fire Stair 3 Outpatient Therapy 4 Nurse Station 5 Exam Room 6 Medication Room 7 Clean Linens 8 Community Room 9 Community Kitchen 10 Kitchen 11 Locker Room 12 Aquatic Therapy 13 Mechanical Room 14 Indoor Garden 15 Patient Room 16 Transitional Apartment 17 Family Educational 18 Health Track 19 Staff Restroom 20 Staff Lounge 21 Administration 22 Work Room 23 Conference Room 24 Doctor’s Office 25 Psychiatrist’s Office 26 Case Manager’s Office 27 Unit Manager’s Office 28 Nutritionist 29 Massage Therapy 30 Speech Therapy 31 Individual Therapy 32 Storage 33 Therapist’s Stations 34 Occupational Therapy 35 Strength/Aerobic Therapy 36 Mat Therapy 37 Family Consultation 38 Resource Library 39 Soiled/Laundry 40 Janitor’s Storage 41 Chapel
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
19 23
2
1
20 21 22
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
37 38
2
40 41
13
4 7 5
15 15
15 15
15 15
2
16 17
1 Entry/Control 2 Elevator/Fire Stair 3 Outpatient Therapy 4 Nurse Station 5 Exam Room 6 Medication Room 7 Clean Linens 8 Community Room 9 Community Kitchen 10 Kitchen 11 Locker Room 12 Aquatic Therapy 13 Mechanical Room 14 Indoor Garden 15 Patient Room 16 Transitional Apartment 17 Family Educational 18 Health Track 19 Staff Restroom 20 Staff Lounge 21 Administration 22 Work Room 23 Conference Room 24 Doctor’s Office 25 Psychiatrist’s Office 26 Case Manager’s Office 27 Unit Manager’s Office 28 Nutritionist 29 Massage Therapy 30 Speech Therapy 31 Individual Therapy 32 Storage 33 Therapist’s Stations 34 Occupational Therapy 35 Strength/Aerobic Therapy 36 Mat Therapy 37 Family Consultation 38 Resource Library 39 Soiled/Laundry 40 Janitor’s Storage 41 Chapel
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
BUILDING MODEL
LIV
TY AR
DA
NS
TY NI MU
GA
RE
E AC SP
RE
A
A
ED
AR
SH
ER
UN
MM
CO
REHA
UR
IN
CENT
CO
IO PT
OM
NT
GO SIN OU
RC
OO TION BILITA
TH IEN AT TP OU
IVA TE
PA TIE
D IN OOR OUTD ATION BILIT REHA REA A
ER
CENT
ITY SE
G
IN PARK
S ICE
RV
AGING
PR
IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Although this project was designed in 2005 with thought to environmental strategies such as daylight, natural ventilation, and connection to nature, those strategies were not clearly defined or measured. In 2014 as part of University of Pennsylvania’s graduate seminar, Ecological Architecture, the project was given the opportunity for a second look in order to identify areas for environmental improvement. Applying what has been learned in the past nine years since graduating to this thesis project was a perfect opportunity to combine my interests in sustainability and design.
The project was evaluated for stormwater management, passive and active energy opportunities, and ultimately, the project was evaluated under the LEED New Construction scorecard to determine how it would rank within this rating system. This process provided invaluable insight and refinement to the original design but also confirmed many of the original concepts did accommodate a more technical application of green building strategies. As designed both in 2005 and refined in 2014, this project should qualify as a LEED Platinum project.
PASSIVE DESIGN
1. Daylight Harvesting 2. Natural Ventilation
5
6
ACTIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS 3. Solar Hot Water 4. Geo-Exchange
WATER MANAGEMENT
1
5. Pervious Pavement 6. Xeriscaping 7. Rain Water Collection
7 3
2
4
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING Vertical shades were informed by biophilic design and created to mimic the trunks of trees in a forest. The intention of this was to connect the patients to nature in hopes of facilitating healing. The shade trunks were to be made of cor-ten steel and angled 5-10O from a perpendicular position to the ground. They were designed along a single line offset but parallel to the glazing. In addition to being a aesthetic and healing feature, these shading devices were intended to provide shade coverage to the glazing on the west and north sides of the building. The intention of these was partially to protect against intense west sun but also to use them as an aesthetic element on most public sides of the facade. At the time of the original design, no modeling was done to determine if theses shading divides worked as they were intended to work. Therefore, this analysis sought to confirm if the shading device adequately shade the rehabilitation space and what the ideal sizing and spacing of the shade trunks should be for optimal views.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING An illuminance analysis was conducted on four iterations of the vertical shading design. The first was the baseline case which included glazing with a visible transmittance of 0.5, 50 shading devices in the analysis area with a radius of 2” and with the devices 3’ away from the windows. The other three cases adjusted these variables as indicated below to determine how illuminance levels would be affected by the changes. Also, after the first baseline case was completed, it was clear that the skylight in the middle of the space severely over lit the area and that shading devices would also be needed on the east side. The skylight was removed from the design and is not included in any of the illuminance analyses. Shading devices were mirrored from the west side to the east side as well and iterations were made to the shading devices on both the east and the west facades.
Tvis = 0.5 Shading Number = 50 Radius = 0’-2” Extension = 3’-0
Tvis = 0.5 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-2” Extension = 3’-0
Tvis = 0.4 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-4” Extension = 3’-0
Tvis = 0.4 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-4” Extension = 6’-0
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING MARCH
9a
12p
3p
6p
Tvis = 0.5 Shading Number = 50 Radius = 0’-2” Extension = 3’-0
JUNE
9a
12p
3p
6p
1500
1200
900 DECEMBER
9a
12p
3p
6p
600
300
0 lux ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING MARCH
9a
12p
3p
6p
Tvis = 0.5 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-2” Extension = 3’-0 JUNE
9a
12p
3p
6p
1500
1200
900 DECEMBER
9a
12p
3p
6p
600
300
0 lux ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING MARCH
9a
12p
3p
6p
Tvis = 0.4 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-4” Extension = 3’-0 JUNE
9a
12p
3p
6p
1500
1200
900 DECEMBER
9a
12p
3p
6p
600
300
0 lux ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | DAYLIGHT HARVESTING MARCH
9a
12p
3p
6p
Tvis = 0.4 Shading Number = 100 Radius = 0’-4” Extension = 6’-0 JUNE
9a
12p
3p
6p
1500
1200
900 DECEMBER
9a
12p
3p
6p
600
300
0 lux ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
PASSIVE DESIGN | NATURAL VENTILATION Although a CFD analysis was not conducted at this time, more thought was given to natural ventilation strategies and how the project could better facilitate natural cooling winds. Individual control can be given to each patient in their rooms for temperature and fan control. Additionally, a sensor could be installed in each room to alert the patient when the conditions are optimal to open the windows in their space. With a small window above their door mechanically controlled, cross ventilation could easily occur. In the communal areas, sensors are also installed and connected to clerestory windows at the southern facing side of the building and the operable windows in the north facade. In optimal conditions, these windows will open incremental amounts to increase fresh air supply and air movement.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
ACTIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS | SOLAR HOT WATER There are two types of solar thermal collectors. One is a flat plate collector and the other is an evacuated tube collector, both of which could be an appropriate fit in this project’s application. A properly sized system can provide approximately 50 - 70% of the energy required for domestic hot water with a relatively short payback period. The system can be designed to protect from freezing temperatures and ensure that the system can operate in hot and cold seasons (though it is more effective in the spring, summer, fall). While a solar hot water system does not make sense to use in most commercial applications, it does make sense if domestic uses for water is present (such as laundry, showers, heated pools, etc.). Since this project houses patients as part of the building program, heating water for their units using a solar hot water system could be a very efficient strategy for this context. A solar hot water system could also be very effective in heating water for the indoor therapy/aging community pool.
80 GAL TANK
11 STACKED UNITS
AP-20
+
x
EVACUATED TUBE AND HEAT PIPE SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
ACTIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS | GEO-EXCHANGE A geo-exchange system is a central heating and cooling system that uses the consistent temperature of the earth to provide heating and cooling to buildings. It provides winter heating by extracting heat from a source and transferring it into a building; in the summer, the process can be reversed. Water is circulated through polyethelene pipes in closed loops that are installed at a minimum of 5 feet below the earth’s surface connected to multiple holes that are bore deep in to the ground (anywhere from 50-400’ depending on the climate/ conditions) 15-20’ apart. The holes are connected to the building through a closed loop system which also include a heat exchanger between the refrigerant loop (in appliance cabinet) and the water loop (in the bore holes and runs through the heat exchanger), and pumps in both loops. Geo-exchange systems work well in most climate but make sense in climates with significant temperature swings between seasons. The EPA lists geo-exchange systems as the most environmentally friendly and efficient systems available today. Installing this system on the project will have a profound affect on energy savings in the building by reducing the demand for electrical or natural gas heating or cooling systems.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
WATER MANAGEMENT | PERVIOUS PAVEMENT While managing stormwater may not be a major concern of the City of Manhattan, the traditional piped system approach which aims to move stormwater off of sites to a distant location may not be feasible in the future if development continues to install impervious surfaces. Responsibly managing stormwater not only naturally recharges the local aquifer but also reduces the demand on municipal surfaces which is important for future infrastructure development. Of the hard surfaces on the site, almost all of them can be pervious surfaces, allowing most of the typical rainstorm water to infiltrate on site. Special attention should be given to the selection of these materials to make sure they are suitable for wheelchair applications.
PERVIOUS PAVERS FOR VEHICLES
RECYCLED RUBBER FOR WALKING TRACK
PAVERS FOR COMMUNITY SPACES
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
WATER MANAGEMENT | XERISCAPING To decrease the potable water used for irrigation on a project, the first step is to reduce the demand for irrigation. This can be done by using more efficient irrigation systems and by using plants that are native or adaptive to the area. Natural vegetation can survive primarily on the rainfall common to the region with little or no additional water use and is commonly known as xeriscaping. In the Kansas prairie region, wildflowers such as Asters and Milkweed are very common and would be recommended. Full lists of plant types and resources can be found at multiple departments at Kansas State University’s and the design of the landscape could be created by students as part of their learning curriculum.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
WATER MANAGEMENT | RAINWATER COLLECTION Rainwater harvesting systems collect and stores rainwater for reuse before it reaches the aquifer. It can be reused for irrigation, and non-potable uses such as flushing toilets. In addition to being able to reuse this water at little cost, it also reduces the need to purchase as much water from the municipal system as well as reduces the demand on stormwater systems by retaining rain water on site.
Catchment area: Collection efficiency: Initial tank volume: Tank size: Irrigated area: Monthly indoor demand:
Based on local weather data, it is estimated that rainwater could be used for most all irrigation and toilet flushing uses for about 50% of the year (though less water would be needed for landscaping the months the chart indicates supplemental water would be need). Five 5,000 gallon tanks would be enough volume to collect water from the Rehabilitation Center’s roof area and can be located in 3 areas around the building so as to reduce the piping needed and connect the rain barrels to their reuse sources.
27,000 95% 0 25,000 40,000 50,000
WATER USE Tank Water Supplemental Water Needed 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
OCTOBER
SEPTEMBER
AUGUST
JULY
JUNE
MAY
APRIL
MARCH
FEBRUARY
JANUARY
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
OCTOBER
SEPTEMBER
AUGUST
JULY
JUNE
MAY
APRIL
MARCH
FEBRUARY
JANUARY
0
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
Ne
LEED SCORECARD EVALUATION
Y
?Y
73
5
Y
25
Neuro-Rehabilitation Neuro-Rehabilitation Center to estimate where the A preliminary LEED evaluation Center was conducted April 3, 2014 April 3, 2014 project would rank for LEED certification. With the current strategies Prepared byPrepared Jill Sornson by Jill Kurtz, Sornson reBuild Kurtz, Consulting reBuild Consulting indicated, the project could attain 73 points with 11 points needing further investigation. The project’s energy savings is the biggest ?NY N?Y ?N in Nachieving LEED Platinum but with the solar hot water variable 673 255
6 25Project Total Total Score Project Score
?Y
?NY
?N
0
025 1 0
Y
Y
1 5
N?Y
1 0
5
0 1
0 1 Sustainable Sustainable Sites Sites Prereq 1 Construction Construction Activity Pollution ActivityPrevention Pollution Prevention
Credit 1 Credit 2
Prep
Certified = 40-49 CertifiedSilver = 40-49 = 50-59 SilverGold = 50-59 = 60-79 GoldPlatinum = 60-79 = Platinum 80 + = 80 +
N
Prereq 1
April
and geo-exchange system, at least 20% energy savings should be more than possible. A difficulty in achieving platinum may be that local contractors have little experience with the rating system and additional training may be necessary to ensure application related credits be achieved. Y
?Y
?NY
N?Y
26 Points 26 Points 7
0
07
70
Required
Required
Credit 1 Site Selection Site Selection
1
1
Credit 2 Development Development Density & Community Density & Community Connectivity Connectivity
5
5
Credit 31
Credit 3 Brownfield Brownfield Redevelopment Redevelopment
1
1
Y
Y
2
?N
Y
N
0 7 Materials Materials & Resources & Resources
73
Prereq 1 Storage
3
Credit 1.1 3
Credit 1.1 Building
1
Credit 1.2 1
Credit 1.2 Building
Credit 2
Credit 2 Construction Construction Waste Management Waste Management
2
Credit 32
Credit 3 Materials
Reuse Materials Reuse
2 2
N
& Collection Storage & Collection of Recyclables of Recyclables
5
6
25
?Y
?N
N
0
0
1
Required
Required
Reuse, Building Maintain Reuse, of Maintain Existing Walls, of Existing Floors Walls, & Roof Floors & Roof
3
3
Reuse, Building Maintain Reuse, of Maintain Interior Non-Structural of Interior Non-Structural Elements Elements
1
1
Y
2
6
6
Credit 4.1
Credit 4.1 Alternative Alternative Transportation, Transportation, Public Transportation Public Transportation Access Access
6
6
1
1
Credit 4.2
Credit 4.2 Alternative 1 Alternative Transportation, Transportation, Bicycle Storage Bicycle & Changing Storage &Rooms Changing Rooms
1
2
2
Credit 4
Credit 4 Recycled
Content, Recycled(post-consumer Content, (post-consumer + ½ pre-consumer) + ½ pre-consumer)
3
3
Credit 4.3
Credit 4.3 Alternative 3 Alternative Transportation, Transportation, Low-Emitting Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Vehicles
3
2
2
Credit 5
Credit 5 Regional
25
2
2 Materials, Regional Extracted, Materials, Processed Extracted, & Processed Manufactured & Manufactured Regionally Regionally
2
2
2
Credit 4.4
Credit 4.4 Alternative Alternative Transportation, Transportation, Parking Capacity Parking
Capacity
2
2
Credit 61
Credit 6 Rapidly
1
1
Credit 5.1
Credit 5.1 Site Development, Site Development, Protect of Restore Protect Habitat of Restore Habitat
1
1
Credit 7
Credit 7 Certified
Y
1
1
1
Credit 5.2
Credit 5.2 Site Development, Site Development, Maximize Open Maximize Space Open Space
1
1
1
1
Credit 6.1
Credit 6.1 Stormwater Stormwater Design, Quantity Design, Control Quantity Control
1
1
Y
?Y
?NY
1
1
Credit 6.2
Credit 6.2 Stormwater Stormwater Design, Quality Design, Control Quality Control
1
1
14
1
014 0 1
1
1
Credit 7.1
CreditIsland 7.1 Heat Heat Effect, Island Non-Roof Effect, Non-Roof
1
1
Y
Y
Prereq 1
Prereq 1 Minimum
1
1
Credit 7.2
CreditIsland 7.2 Heat Heat Effect, Island RoofEffect, Roof
1
1
Y
Y
Prereq 2
Prereq 2 Environmental Environmental Tobacco Smoke Tobacco (ETS) Smoke Control (ETS)
1
1
Credit 8
Credit Pollution 8 Light LightReduction Pollution Reduction
1
1
1
1
Credit 1
Credit 1 Outdoor
Y
?Y
?NY
N?Y
?N
7
2
17
02
1 0 Efficiency Water Water Efficiency
2
?N
14 Points 14 Points
Prereq 1
2
?Y
1 1
1 N?Y
?N
Renewable Rapidly Renewable Materials Materials
1
Wood Certified Wood
1
Control
1
Credit 2
Credit 2 Increased
1
Credit 3.1
Credit 3.1 Construction Construction IAQ Management IAQ Management Plan, During Plan, Construction During Construction
Ventilation Increased Ventilation
1
1
Y
Prereq 1
Prereq Use 1 Water Water Reduction Use Reduction
1
1
Credit 3.2
Credit 3.2 Construction Construction IAQ Management IAQ Management Plan, Before Plan, Occupancy Before Occupancy
1
4
4
Credit 1
Credit 1Efficient Water Water Landscaping Efficient Landscaping
4
4
1
1
Credit 4.1
Credit 4.1 Low-Emitting Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives Materials, & Adhesives Sealants &
1
Credit 2
Credit 2 Innovative Innovative Wastewater Wastewater Technologies Technologies
2
2
1
1
Credit 4.2
Credit 4.2 Low-Emitting Low-Emitting Materials, Paints Materials, & Coatings Paints &
Credit 1 3
Credit 3Use Water Water Reduction Use Reduction
4
4
1
1
Credit 4.3
Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet Materials, Systems Carpet
Credit 4.4
Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Materials, Composite Wood & Agrifiber Wood Products & Agrifiber
Credit 5
Credit 5 Indoor
2
2 13
Y
?Y
?NY
13
2
313 172
N?Y
?N
1
N
3 17 &Energy Energy Atmosphere & Atmosphere
35 Points 35 Points
1 1
1
Sealants
Coatings
Systems
Chemical Indoor&Chemical Pollutant&Source Pollutant Control Source Control
1 1 Products 1 1
Y
Y
Prereq 1
Prereq 1 Required Fundamental Fundamental Commissioning Commissioning of the Building of theEnergy Building Systems Energy Systems
Required
1
1
Credit 6.1
Credit 6.1 Controllability Controllability of Systems, ofLighting Systems,
Y
Y
Prereq 2
Prereq 2 Energy Minimum Minimum Performance Energy Performance
Required
Required
1
1
Credit 6.2
Credit 6.2 Controllability Controllability of Systems, ofThermal Systems, Comfort Thermal
Y
Prereq 3
Prereq 3 Fundamental Fundamental RefrigerantRefrigerant Management Management
Required
Required
1
1
Credit 7.1
Credit 7.1 Thermal
Comfort, ThermalDesign Comfort, Design
1
Credit 1 1 12
Credit 1 Energy Optimize Optimize Performance Energy Performance
19
19
1
1
Credit 7.2
Credit 7.2 Thermal
Comfort, ThermalVerification Comfort, Verification
1
Credit 25
Credit 2 Renewable On-Site On-Site Renewable Energy Energy
7
7
1
1
Credit 8.1
Credit 8.1 Daylight
& Daylight Views, Daylight & Views, 75% Daylight 75%
1
Credit 2 3
Credit 3 Enhanced Enhanced Commissioning Commissioning
2
2
1
1
Credit 8.2
Credit 8.2 Daylight
& Daylight Views, Views & Views, for 90% Views for 90%
1
Y 5
1
1
1
1 5 121 1
51
2 2
2
Credit 4
Credit 4 Enhanced Enhanced RefrigerantRefrigerant Management Management
2
2
Y
?Y
?NY
N?Y
?N
3
3
Credit 5
Credit 5 Measurement Measurement & Verification & Verification
3
3
6
0
06
00
0 0 Innovation Innovation & Design& Design
Credit 6
Credit 6Power Green Green Power
2
2
1
1
Credit 1.1
Credit 1.1Education Green Green Education
1
1
Credit 1.2
Credit 1.2Power Green Green 70%Power offset70%
4 Points 1
2
2
Y
?Y
?NY
N?Y
1
0
21
00
1
1
1 1 1
1 0
01 1
0
?N
N
2 0 Regional Regional Priority Priority
4 Points
Lighting
1 Comfort
1
N
1 3 2 1 1 1 1
Cleaning
1
1
1
Credit 1.3
Credit 1.3Cleaning Green Green
Credit 1.1
Credit 1.1Renewable On-Site On-Site Renewable Energy Energy
1
1
1
1
Credit 1.4
Credit 1.4 Learning
Controls Learningfor Controls Thermalfor Comfort Thermal Comfort
1
Credit 1.2
Credit 1.2 Construction Construction Waste Management Waste Management
1
1
1
1
Credit 1.5
Credit 1.5 Walkable
Project Walkable SiteProject Site
1
Credit 0 1.3
Credit 1.3 Alternative 1 Alternative Transportation, Transportation, Low-Emitting Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Vehicles
1
1
1
Credit 2
Credit 2 ® Accredited LEED LEED® Accredited Professional Professional
1
Credit 1.4
Credit 1.4 Site Development, Site Development, Protect of Restore Protect of Habitat Restore Habitat
1
1
6
6 Points offset
1
Required Required
Air Outdoor Delivery Air Monitoring Delivery Monitoring
Y
3
Credi
Required Required
1
Required
0
15 Points 15 Points
IAQ Minimum Performance IAQ Performance
1 Required
Credi
5
0 0 Environmental Indoor Indoor Environmental Quality Quality
1
1 1
Sus
Prere
1
1
N
10 Points 10 Points 1
N
2
Tota
1
Credi
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Credi
6 Points
Credi
1
Credi
1 1
Credi
1 1
Y
?Y
?N
N
7
2
1
0
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR NEURO-REHABILITATION CENTER | ARCH 734: ECOLOGICAL ARCHTIECTURE | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | JILL SORNSON KURTZ | MAY 2, 2014
Y
Wat
Prere