Regional Report Q1 GCDP ASIA PACIFIC 1st January – 31st March 2014
% of global contribution of the region (RE) Progra m
En*ty
AI
GCDP
Rela*ve Growth
Q1 2014 Global Contribu*on Q1 2013 AbGrowth iGCDP oGCDP iGCDP oGCDP iGCDP oGCDP iGCDP oGCDP iGCDP oGCDP (%) (%) 5962 5964 100% 100% 5116 5116
846
848
17%
17%
1748 2340 Asia Pacific Central and Eastern 1656 712 Europe
29%
39%
1628 1995
120
345
7%
17%
28%
12%
1447
639
209
73
14%
11%
1327 1612
22%
27%
850
1178
477
434
56%
37%
602
182
10%
3%
590
264
12
-‐82
2%
-‐31%
338
751
6%
13%
345
709
-‐7
42
-‐2%
6%
291
367
5%
6%
256
331
35
36
14%
11%
Iberoamerica Africa Western Europe and North America Middle East and North Africa
% of global contribution of the region (RE) Middle East Western and North Europe and Africa North America 5%
Middle East and North Africa 6%
iGCDP % Contribution
oGCDP % Contribution
6%
Africa 10%
Asia Pacific 29%
Iberoamerica 22% Central and Eastern Europe 28%
Africa 3%
Western Europe and North America 13% Asia Pacific 39%
Iberoameric a 27%
Central and Eastern Europe 12%
oGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP GCDP EP raised Q1 2014 EP Raises Q1 2013
77 15 10 270 409 845 135 10 10 0 136 0 0 8 3 48 364 8 70 134 91 18
15 9 12 293 205 654 119 1 12 0 89 1 0 0 5 235 205 12 176 37 113 16
•
• Boon quarter for AP with 20% growth in raises Top 5 growing and dropping entities mentioned below
Raises
oGCDP HONG KONG INDIA Top 5 Growing SINGAPORE THAILAND AFGHANISTAN PAKISTAN TAIWAN Top 5 Dropping CHINA, MAINLAND THE PHILIPPINES SRI LANKA
204 191 159 97 62 -‐187 -‐106 -‐23 -‐22 -‐4
oGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP EP (Ma) Q1 2014
50 23 4 154 23 140 138 16 13 0 64 3 0 5 7 21 99 10 80 34 40 23
GCDP EP (Ma) Q1 2013
7 19 3 256 7 99 77 5 11 0 25 0 0 0 4 14 33 10 81 43 72 9
•
Matches have increased by 22 %, indicating delivery in GCDP on entity partnerships
oGCDP 66 SINGAPORE 61 INDONESIA 43 Top 5 Growing AFGHANISTAN 41 INDIA 39 MALAYSIA CHINA, MAINLAND -‐102 -‐32 THE PHILIPPINES Top 5 Dropping THAILAND -‐9 -‐1 TAIWAN 0 LAOS
Matches
oGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP EP (Re) Q1 2014
34 147 4 1040 22 88 416 87 34 0 89 6 0 4 22 38 12 19 230 6 3 39
GCDP EP (Re) Q1 2013
8 105 6 1078 14 53 262 9 22 0 31 0 0 0 26 13 12 13 278 19 14 32
•
Realizations increased by 17% • Highest across all regions
Realiza*ons
oGCDP INDONESIA JAPAN Top 5 Growing MALAYSIA AUSTRALIA INDIA TAIWAN CHINA, MAINLAND Top 5 Dropping THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES NEW ZEALAND
154 78 58 42 35 -‐48 -‐38 -‐13 -‐11 -‐4
oGCDP Absolute Growth 500 400
No. Of exchanges
300 200 100 0 -100 -200 -300
CHIN HON THE AFG AUST CAM A, INDO MAL MON MYA NEW SING SRI G INDI JAPA KORE NEPA PAKIS TAIW THAIL PHILI VIETN TOTA HANI RALI BODI MAIN NESI LAOS AYSI GOLI NMA ZEAL APO LANK KON A N A L TAN AN AND PPIN AM L STAN A A LAN A A A R AND RE A G ES D
Ra
62
6
-2
-23
204
191
16
9
-2
0
47
-1
0
8
-2
-187
159
-4
-106
97
-22
2
452
Ma
43
4
1
-102
16
41
61
11
2
0
39
3
0
5
3
7
66
0
-1
-9
-32
14
172
Re
26
42
-2
-38
8
35
154
78
12
0
58
6
0
4
-4
25
0
6
-48
-13
-11
7
345
iGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP GCDP TN raised Q1 2014 TN Raises Q1 2013
0 3 49 193 11 1365 99 0 2 1 189 0 0 13 0 43 1 52 225 103 41 98
0 1 118 396 0 1539 153 0 6 0 139 0 0 0 1 42 1 18 168 43 68 65
•
Raises have dropped drastically, with key players like AIESEC India and MoC consciously focussing on quality
Raises
iGCDP THAILAND TAIWAN Top 5 Growing MALAYSIA SRI LANKA VIETNAM CHINA, MAINLAND INDIA Top 5 Dropping CAMBODIA INDONESIA THE PHILIPPINES
60 57 50 34 33 -‐203 -‐174 -‐69 -‐54 -‐27
iGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP TN (Ma) Q1 2014
0 4 11 94 0 232 125 0 28 0 103 0 0 12 0 7 2 72 123 19 28 50
GCDP TN (Ma) Q1 2013
0 1 30 124 0 189 138 0 17 0 85 0 0 0 0 6 1 48 99 34 33 26
•
Matches have gone up, indicating thee efficiency has increased and entity partnerships are being prioritized
Matches
iGCDP INDIA SRI LANKA Top 5 Growing TAIWAN VIETNAM MALAYSIA CHINA, MAINLAND CAMBODIA Top 5 Dropping THAILAND INDONESIA THE PHILIPPINES
43 24 24 24 18 -‐30 -‐19 -‐15 -‐13 -‐5
iGCDP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
GCDP TN (Re) Q1 2014
0 3 91 175 0 412 256 0 31 0 124 1 0 15 0 20 4 276 127 84 71 58
GCDP TN (Re) Q1 2013
0 3 96 182 0 463 248 0 20 0 138 0 0 0 1 21 1 187 116 40 91 21
•
Realizations have gone up by 7 % again indicating that the efficiency has risen and even though raises reduced drastically due to increased efficiency realizations have gone up.
iGCDP 89 SRI LANKA 44 THAILAND 37 Top 5 Growing VIETNAM 15 NEPAL 11 KOREA -‐51 INDIA -‐20 THE PHILIPPINES -‐14 Top 5 Dropping MALAYSIA CHINA, MAINLAND -‐7 -‐5 CAMBODIA
Realiza*ons
i GCDP Absolute Growth 150 100 50 Axis Title
0 -50 -100 -150 -200 -250 -300
CHIN HON THE AFG AUST CAM A, INDO MAL MON MYA NEW SING SRI G INDI JAPA KORE NEPA PAKIS TAIW THAIL PHILI VIETN HANI RALI BODI MAIN NESI LAOS AYSI GOLI NMA ZEAL APO LANK Total KON A N A L TAN AN AND PPIN AM STAN A A LAN A A A R AND RE A G ES D
Ra
0
2
-69
-203
11
-174
-54
0
-4
1
50
0
0
13
-1
1
0
34
57
60
-27
33
-270
Ma
0
3
-19
-30
0
43
-13
0
11
0
18
0
0
12
0
1
1
24
24
-15
-5
24
79
Re
0
0
-5
-7
0
-51
8
0
11
0
-14
1
0
15
-1
-1
3
89
11
44
-20
37
120
Over all Inferences GCDP Incoming ¤ Raises dropped drastically compared to 2013, however matches(10%) and realizations (7%) went up, which indicates higher efficiency within the region. even though entities like MoC, India, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines had dropped in raising entities like Thailand Taiwan Malaysia Sri Lanka Vietnam caught up and a more balanced contribution is seen in Q 1 for iGCDP. Outgoing ¤ Boon Quarter for AP with great growth seen in raises(20%) matches(22%) and realizations(17%). Refer to Top 5 list in excel for entity contributions in ra/ma/re
Completed iGCDP Net Promoters Score (AP)
NPS
46 % of Promoters
% of Passive
% of Detractor
57%
31%
12%
Response/ realisation
Total Responses
65%
1136
Completed oGCDP Net Promoters Score (AP)
NPS
45 % of Promoters
% of Passive
% of Detractor
57%
31%
12%
Response/ realisation
Total Responses
71%
1660
Overall GCDP Self-Select Issues (Level 1): AP Top Promoters Issues Self-select Issue 1
Total Count 41
Logistical Support"
2 Job-description clarity and alignment"
39
3 Support "
34
Top Detractors Issues Self-select Issue 1 2 3 4
Total Count
VISA
48
Job-description clarity and alignment
42
Communication
25
Logistical support
25
*For the duration of 01/01/2014 to 31/03/2014
Regional Report Q1GIP ASIA PACIFIC 1st January – 31st March 2014
% of global contribution in 4 programmes of the region Progra m
En*ty
iGIP (%)
oGIP (%)
iGIP
Rela*ve Growth
oGIP
iGIP
oGIP
1369 1367 100% 100% 1221 1221
148
146
12%
12%
431
172
32%
13%
461
159
-‐30
13
-‐7%
8%
267
380
20%
28%
255
343
12
37
5%
11%
297
367
22%
27%
188
300
109
67
58%
22%
32 Africa Western Europe and 296 North America Middle East and 46 North Africa
59
2%
4%
22
33
10
26
45%
79%
289
22%
21%
257
306
39
-‐17
15%
-‐6%
100
3%
7%
38
80
8
20
21%
25%
Iberoamerica
oGIP
AbGrowth iGIP
Asia Pacific Central and Eastern Europe
iGIP
Q1 2013 oGIP
AI
GIP
Q1 2014 Global Contribu*on
% of global contribution in 4 programmes of the region Middle East and North Africa 3%
Western Europe and North America 22%
iGIP % Contribution
Middle East and North Africa 7%
Asia Pacific 13%
Asia Pacific 31%
Western Europe and North America 21% Central and Eastern Europe 28%
Africa 2% Africa 4% Iberoamerica 22%
oGIP % Contribution
Central and Eastern Europe 20%
Iberoamerica 27%
oGIP oGIP ENTITY AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
EP raised Q1 2014 EP Raises Q1 2013 1 5 3 8 4 3 139 260 49 63 202 165 31 34 12 0 11 8 0 0 10 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 22 40 42 15 5 1 49 33 19 1 36 28 25 13
2014 Q1
2014 Q1
Eps (Ra) Eps (Ra) Marke*ng Teaching 0 0 0 1 0 2 82 39 33 9 86 36 19 2 10 2 8 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 2 25 2 2 2 38 8 7 8 21 7 15 9
7% drop in raising within the region • Big drops from MoC, India, Pakistan compared to 2013 • 54 % raises in marketing segment • 20 % raises in teaching segment • 26% raises in all other segments
•
oGIP oGIP
2014 Q1
2014 Q1
ENTITY
AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
Eps (Ma) EP (Ma) Q1 2014 EP (Ma) Q1 2013 Marke*ng 1 4 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 48 40 29 5 5 4 32 21 8 21 12 13 11 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 5 2 3 2 2 1 1 0 16 16 9 7 0 6 11 10 4 6 12 3
Eps (Ma) Teaching 1 2 0 16 0 13 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 4 5 1
Matching performance has gone up by 20 % indicating increased efficiency • 52% of those matched being marketing EP • 31 % being teaching EP • 17% other segments • This indicates that by specifying the product clearly within the subproducts can increase efficiency •
oGIP oGIP ENTITY
AFGHANISTAN
EP (Re) Q1 2014 EP (Re) Q1 2013 EP (Re) Q1 Goal 1 2 0
Overall realizations increased by 7% in the regions • However when compared to the market place only 64 % of the goals for Q1 were met • 48 % EP realized in Marketing • 90% of marketing goals as per M.P. were met this quarter • 28% EP realized in Teaching • 73 % goal achievement for teaching this quarter •
Eps (Re)Q1 2014 Eps (Re)Q1 2014 Eps (Re)Q1 2014 Eps (Re)Q1 2014 Marke*ng Marke*ng Goal Teaching Teaching Goal 0 0 1 0
AUSTRALIA
13
6
4
1
0
6
4
CAMBODIA
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
CHINA, MAINLAND
42
62
52
26
9
12
11
HONG KONG
3
3
9
2
5
0
0
INDIA
40
19
79
11
24
11
30
INDONESIA
9
14
23
5
16
4
7
JAPAN
15
5
43
10
9
1
5
KOREA
9
5
6
6
6
2
0
LAOS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MALAYSIA
2
3
6
2
0
0
0
MONGOLIA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MYANMAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEPAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEW ZEALAND
3
4
1
0
0
2
1
PAKISTAN
5
3
3
3
0
1
0
SINGAPORE
3
1
3
2
3
0
0
SRI LANKA
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
TAIWAN
12
14
10
10
7
3
3
THAILAND
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
THE PHILIPPINES
8
6
13
3
5
5
6
VIETNAM
6
11
11
2
8
1
0
iGIP iGIP
2014 Q1
2014 Q1
ENTITY
AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
TN raised Q1 2014 TN Raises Q1 2013 TNs (Ra) Marke*ng TNs (Ra) Teaching 0 5 0 0 4 3 1 0 5 9 2 2 177 249 30 118 33 51 13 12 873 994 457 194 10 37 4 5 58 52 25 5 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 13 21 12 2 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 19 4 0 38 21 25 1 28 30 22 4 18 16 8 4 7 12 4 2 10 25 8 0 15 1 8 7
Dropped in raising by 19% compared to 2013 Q1 • 48% Marketing TNs raised • 28% Teaching TNs raised • 7 entities increased in raising and the rest were wither stagnant or have declined • More raising is highly required for the growth of iGIP within the region •
iGIP iGIP
2014 Q1
2014 Q1
ENTITY
AFGHANISTAN AUSTRALIA CAMBODIA CHINA, MAINLAND HONG KONG INDIA INDONESIA JAPAN KOREA LAOS MALAYSIA MONGOLIA MYANMAR NEPAL NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN SINGAPORE SRI LANKA TAIWAN THAILAND THE PHILIPPINES VIETNAM
TNs (Ma) TN (Ma) Q1 2014 TN (Ma) Q1 2013 Marke*ng 0 0 0 4 1 1 4 3 0 63 80 17 7 14 2 184 196 92 18 36 6 38 27 22 2 3 0 0 0 0 13 16 10 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 8 8 4 18 16 13 16 7 7 8 4 7 7 8 5 11 6 4
TNs (Ma) Teaching 0 0 4 36 3 40 14 5 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6
Matching again has declined by 5 % • This is a result of the decline in raises in Q1 2014 • 48 % marketing and 28 % teaching TNs matched •
iGIP iGIP ENTITY
AFGHANISTAN
TNs (Re)Q1 2014 TNs (Re)Q1 2014 TNs (Re)Q1 2014 Eps (Re)Q1 2014 Marke*ng Goal Teaching Teaching Goal TN (Re) Q1 2014 TN (Re) Q1 2013 TN (Re) Q1 Goal Marke*ng 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
AUSTRALIA
6
7
9
2
2
0
0
CAMBODIA
6
4
14
1
0
5
10
CHINA, MAINLAND
71
70
75
15
18
37
42
HONG KONG
11
9
12
4
1
3
1
INDIA
190
217
614
82
189
35
127
INDONESIA
36
42
64
9
23
29
41
JAPAN
21
42
53
13
12
6
6
KOREA
2
2
1
0
1
2
0
LAOS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MALAYSIA
8
11
9
4
5
1
0
MONGOLIA
5
3
20
2
0
4
20
MYANMAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NEPAL
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
NEW ZEALAND
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
PAKISTAN
3
3
15
2
0
0
12
SINGAPORE
11
9
29
5
12
0
0
SRI LANKA
16
18
21
12
15
1
0
TAIWAN
13
0
14
6
10
2
0
THAILAND
8
7
17
7
14
0
3
THE PHILIPPINES
9
6
12
6
5
0
0
VIETNAM
13
8
15
5
4
7
7
7% decline in overall realizations • 5 entities have declined, however the T3/2 have not grown as expected • M.P. Goal achievement for the quarter is only 43% • 56 % in marketing and 48% in teaching M.P. Goal achievement until now •
Over all Inferences iGIP ¤ Declined quarter for AP in iGIP. Drop in raise(19%) match (5%) realizations (7%). Except Taiwan and Vietnam all entities in the negative. Nepal and Myanmar not starting any operations in GIP till now. Raising needs to be done more strongly and still needs to be prioritized in Q2 oGIP ¤ Raising (7%) in oGIP has decreased, however matching (20%) has gone up indicating a certain level of efficiency leading to a growth in realizations (7%) as well. Marketing remains the prominent segment from where most of AP’s Eps come from . Finding supply for AP EP still a struggle with most AP entities.
Completed iGIP Net Promoters Score (AP)
NPS
35 % of Promoters
% of Passive
% of Detractor
55%
25%
20%
Response/ realisation
Total Responses
47%
204
Completed oGIP Net Promoters Score (AP)
NPS
38 % of Promoters
% of Passive
% of Detractor
62%
14%
24%
Response/ realisation
Total Responses
34%
58
Overall GIP Self-Select Issues (Level 1): AP Top Promoters Issues Self-select Issue
Total Count
1 JD alignment and Clarity
39
2 VISA
31
3 Communication
24
Top Detractors Issues Self-select Issue
Total Count
1
VISA"
36
2
JD alignment and clarity"
26
3
Communication"
17 *For the duration of 01/01/2014 to 31/03/2014