10-02-22: Beeld Editor: Tim du Plessis: Deliberate Indifference to RH White Refugees

Request Beeld’s Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Radical Honesty White Refugee Free Speech dissenter.

The Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[9]), states among others, that: 

Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.



If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.



The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.



Confirms my culture and religion as that of Radical Honesty; namely to non-violently tell another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.



My defence of non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence was justified and accurate.



My opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, such as South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians is entirely accurate.

Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis: 25 February 2010 “Kindly be informed that I am not going to comment on the questions/issues raised in you letter.

There will be no further correspondence or liaison in this matter.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/27357977/10-02-22-Beeld-Editor-Tim-du-Plessis

Questions for SANEF Beeld Editor: Mr. Tim du Plessis Statement of Fact: Beeld Editor, Mr. Tim du Plessis is aware of the contents of the First Amicus Curiae before the Constitutional Court in Citizen vs. McBride, which alleges TRC fraud and media corruption, and which is supported by the expert witness statements of (a) the worlds foremost expert on honesty, transparency and sincere forgiveness, Dr. Brad Blanton, bestselling author of Radical Honesty series of books, and former ‘Honesty in Politics’ candidate for Congress in Virginia in 2004 and 2006; (b) Dr. T. Michael Maher, the author of the study How and Why Journalists Avoid the Environment-Population Connection. (First Amicus included as attachment to this email); Beeld has decided to censor this information from SA public.

[9]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned

22 February 2010 Mr Tim Du Plessis Editor: Beeld PO Box 333, Auckland Park, 2006 Tel: (011) 713 9000 Fax: (011) 713 9956 / 7 E-mail: timdup@beeld.com, nuus@beeld.com, briewe@beeld.com CC: Canadian High Commissioner: Ref: IRB RULING: MA8-04910: Brandon C. Huntley[1] CC: UNHCR: White Refugee Memo to UNHCR[2] CC: Mr. Brandon Huntley; c/o & via: Attorney Russell Kaplan Mr. du Plessis,

Request Beeld’s Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: Non-violent civil disobedience Radical Honesty expression of Dissent to Politically Correct Tyrannical Insanity.

American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech dissenter.

It is assumed that your organisation’s support for democratic values, would agree that: If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.

It is further assumed, that if you were informed of the South African government’s legal prosecution and persecution of any non-violent truth-telling civil-disobedient Free Speech South African citizen; you would wish to express your democratic objections thereto.

As you are no doubt aware, on 27 August 2009, the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board (IRB) granted white South African, Brandon Huntley, Official Canadian Refugee Status[3]: The IRB ruling found Huntley “was a victim [of persecution] because of his race rather than a victim of criminality, who presented clear & convincing proof of state & security forces’ inability or unwillingness to protect him.”

The ANC SA political elite demanded the Canadian government overturn the IRB’ ruling; and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, was politically pressured with the dreaded ‘r’ word to launch an Application of Review of the IRB’s decision[4]. The liberal South African academic[5] and media elite far and wide condemned Huntley alleging that persecution of whites in South Africa, does not exist; and complaints filed with the SAPS are always professionally investigated.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/p/white-refugee-petition.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/p/memo-to-unhcr.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/transcript-of-irb-william-davis-ruling.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/federal-court-review-application-min-of.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/criminal-victimization-of-whites-heres.html

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

On 22 September 2009 an Application for Review in the High Court, Western Cape # 19963-09 (PDF[6]) [Proof of Service (PDF[7])]; was filed protesting against political and legal prosecution and persecution by SA politicians and State officials. On 12 October 2009, complaint WC-2009-O455BS (PDF[8]) was also filed with the SA Human Rights Commission, with the same allegations.

Dr. Brad Blanton, psychologist, best selling author, activist, President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises, founder of the Center for Radical Honesty, Candidate for U.S. Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006; filed an expert witness affidavit, on behalf of the ‘White Refugee’, in both aforementioned applications.

The Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[9]), states among others, that:  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.  Confirms my culture and religion as that of Radical Honesty; namely to non-violently tell another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  My defence of non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence was justified and accurate.  My opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, such as South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians is entirely accurate.

Brief excerpts from Dr. Blanton’s affidavit: [2] I have a Ph.D degree in Psychology; I have been a clinical psychologist in Washington DC for 25 years.

[3] I am the author of 1) Radical Honesty: How to Transform Your Life by Telling The Truth; 2) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help From Your Friends, 3) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World with Neil Donald Walsh, author of the Conversations with Good books; 4) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; 5) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and 6) my biography, A New Kind of Trailer Trash.

[4] I am the founder and currently the President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises SparrowHawk Book Publishing, the founder and board member of the Center for Radical Honesty, a non-profit corporation.

[6] I was a Candidate for Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006. I am the Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church.

[7] Lara read one of my books, contacted me in 1999, attended some of my programs, worked for me briefly and has corresponded with me via email since then.

[8] Lara and I were arrested together while protesting campaign finance corruption in the Rotunda of the Capital Building in Washington DC in January of 2000. It was a non-violent protest and we were jailed for less than six hours. If you are interested, the story and [6] [7] [8] [9]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20923652/SAHRC-Complaint-Indictment-Crimes-Against-Humanity-Crime-of-Apartheid http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

purpose of that action, is in my report for the second time I was arrested for the same cause a month later. It is in my book co-authored with Neil Donald Walsch, Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World.

[9] Lara is pissed off about abusive lying and withholding authorities who get by, by withholding, secrecy and hiding what they do in the name of national security and so am I. I don't know if Lara would ever be violent or not, but she hasn't been so far as I've known her, about ten years.

[10] She has worked hard to demand fairness and to oppose inequality among people.

[11] Lara has told me that she is the Defendant in criminal court proceedings, regarding Political Necessity/Civil Disobedience ‘crimen injuria[14]’ text messages[15], she sent to some politicians[16], at 15:23; 15:32 and 18:32 hrs, on 10 July; and at 10:23 and 11:32 hrs on 16 July 2007; which are alleged to be ‘insults to the dignity’ of the Politicians.

[16] The ‘social contract’ is a socio-political and legal agreement between citizens and government. For the purpose of this matter, a healthy social-contract exists, when men and women in government respect the rights of its people, by guaranteeing and, in fact, encouraging their right to speak out, to criticize irresponsible leadership, and to hold their government accountable for its failures and actions.

[17] The State’s argument is that the Defendants civil disobedience acts, should be judged in terms of whether the man on the Clapham omnibus considers the defendants actions of civil disobedience ‘reasonable’ or not; and if unreasonable, accordingly ‘unlawful’.

[18] The Defendant argues that Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience, demonstrate that actions of civil disobedience, to perceived illegitimate authority, require certain emotional, psychological, legal and political skills and competencies that the man on the Clapham omnibus lack; and accordingly the reasonableness test to be applied is not that of the man on the Clapham omnibus, but the test of the ordinary skilled person exercising and professing to have that particular special skill.

[22] The Milgram experiment was designed to simulate the conditions in which Eichmann operated, and to determine how many individuals would – like Eichmann – follow orders and be obedient to the system in which they operated; and how many would practice civil disobedience and refuse to be obedient to perceived illegal authority. Milgram’s experiment revealed that a significant majority of the population – 65%, like Eichmanns millions of accomplices – merely follow orders, irrespective whether the orders violate their deepest moral beliefs; only 35 % possessed the skills and competencies for civil disobedience.

[30] Lara submits that any reasonable person, with 37% or 8% (Milgram speak) skills and competencies, would have asked themselves some of the following questions, in evaluating her Political Necessity and Radical Hon(our)sty ‘criminal acts’. I agree.

[31] To determine the reasonableness of Lara’s alleged criminal ‘civil disobedient’ act, individuals with the legal, political, etc. skills and competencies, would need to determine the reasonableness, or not, of Lara’s political necessity ‘Offer of Proof’ allegations, which motivated her ‘civil disobedient’ criminal act.

[33] As a ‘reasonable’ Radical Honesty Politician, Psychologist, Activist and Pope, I think that: [14]

Crimen Injuria & Reasonableness: a fundamental prong of determining the unlawfulness of Crimen Injuria, is what is called ‘the criterion of reasonableness’. This is an objective test; and it requires the conduct complained of to be tested against the prevailing norms of society, in order to determine whether such conduct can be classified as wrongful.

[15] SMS @ 15:23 hrs, on 10 July 2007: [Be My Guest Kaffir! Quote SAP George Case 572-02, U Kaffir Moron Imbecile] SMS @ 15:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [U r 1 stupid dumb kaffir bitch. Don’t u fucking dare say I didn’t warn u, u goddamn kaffir hypocrite! Lara Johnstone] SMS @ 18:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [As usual u gutless 2faced hypocrite coloured kaffir imbecile, U r all talk & no action. SAP # 572/02 U rotting excuse 4 a brain!] SMS @ 10:23 hrs on 16 July 2007: [So Your Message to JAG is: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* SMS @ 11:32 hrs on 16 July KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN’, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”?]

2007: [Press Release: PDLille 2 LJohnstone: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”] [16] Lara Johnstone: “The factual truth:. I sent the SMS’s to six tough South African politicians, c/o the Primary Plaintiff, who: (i) I had been dealing with on this issue, since 2002; spoken to, written dozens of documents, including documents wherein I defined what I mean, when I use the word “Kaffir”, (ii) I had spoken to 15 minutes before I sent her the ‘crimen injuria’ SMS’s, for her forwarding, where we had a heated discussion, which was finally terminated by her with the words “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!”

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

I)

The law Lara is being prosecuted for is ridiculous and dates back to a belief in curses from witch doctors.

II)

Even though Lara is, like me, crazy and always asking for trouble, she is being ridiculously prosecuted, and her defence is justified and accurate and her opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness is entirely accurate and, so far, almost always avoided by politicians.

Dr. Blanton’s affidavit was filed as an expert witness affidavit in support of the High Court, Western Cape Application for Review: Case Number 19963-09 (PDF[10]) [Proof of Service (PDF[11])]; which states among others: [10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication.

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy (PDF[12]).

[10d] Citizens committed to a healthy social contract with their Government have a duty and a right, when any government becomes tyrannical and corrupt, and acts in destructive breach of the social contract; to alter or abolish such government, and to institute new government.

[10e] In contrast to Respondents Three to Eight’s strategies endorsing and inciting violence, mob justice and ungovernability, in their alleged ‘Anti-Apartheid’ (sic) struggle for a non-racial (sic) South Africa; the Applicant is a citizen committed to non-violent civildisobedience, and the rule of law. Accordingly the only means the Applicant has of altering and abolishing a corrupt and tyrannical government, and instituting a new healthy social contract government, is to deny such a corrupt and tyrannical government, any respect as a legitimate authority, until it demonstrates that it is committed to upholding its social contract duties and responsibilities, as an impartial, legitimate and procedurally fair authority.

[10f] As of 07 June 2007, the Applicant does not recognize the legitimacy of any South African Official or Office, which is not willing to demonstrate its sincere and serious commitment to upholding its duties and responsibilities to the constitutional Social Contract.

[10g] While South African Legislative, Judicial and Executive authorities have, and continue to, refuse to confront, enquire into, or acknowledge the reality of the tyrannical Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the Failed State, and its effective nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract, which has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended; a foreign court/tribunal has finally had the courage to impartially enquire into, and courageously confront, the reality of this evidence.

In the State of Ontario, Canada, on 27 August 2009, Board Member William Davis of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (“RPD”), in file [10]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped See An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent Rehabilitation Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies as a Major Intentional Source of New South Africa’s ‘Kaffirs’ AKA ‘Criminals’: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16788940/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520264/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/16789736/ [11] [12]

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

number MA8-04910, found white South African, Brandon Carl Huntley to be a Convention Refugee.

Background Information: On 10 July 2007, I telephoned Mrs. Patricia De Lille on her cellphone, to request her help on a legal matter. I had phoned to confirm that she had received legal document, Official Notice to RSA Goverment (PDF[13]) I had sent to her office; to make sure she understood it was time-sensitive and required a response by 18 July 2007, and to make sure she understood the request that she foreword the legal document on my behalf to various SA politicians and the South African government. She got angry, and ended the telephone discussion with: “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!” I subsequently sent her five civil disobedience SMS responses, three on 10 July and two on 16 July, with among others, my cryptic K-word. As described in a legal document sent to the South African government; c/o & via Judge J.J. Fagan, dated 11 June 2004, An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent ‘Rehabilitation’ Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies as a Major Intentional Source of New South Africa’s ‘Kaffirs’ AKA ‘Criminals’ (PDF[14]); when I use the word ‘Kaffir’, I generally use it in its original etymological meaning; someone who ‘knows the truth, and deliberately conceals it’ (PDF[15]).

On 18 July 2007, I was arrested (without an arrest warrant) by Insp. Christian, and detained for 33 days in Pollsmoor, before I finally saw a Magistrate on 22 August 2007, for a bail hearing. I filed a request to the Senior Prosecutor for a copy of the alleged original arrest warrant, but to this day the request has been denied, by being deliberately ignored (PDF[16]). The case dragged on for over two years, with never-ending postponements, which cost my parents over R20,000. When we could no longer afford an attorney, I was approved for Legal Aid financially, being indigent; but denied for politically, for reasons of ‘conflict of interest’. The Police refused to provide forensic evidence proving my cellphone conversation with Ms. De Lille, prior to me sending her the SMS’. Mrs. de Lille lied on the witness stand and perjured herself: she denied knowing me, or having had a telephone conversation with me, or having received any legal letters or documents from me, prior to her receiving my five SMS’.

Even though ‘crimen injuria’ can only be considered ‘unlawful’ in accordance with the legal principles of the ‘reasonableness’ test; the Magistrate ignored the fact that I had sent the SMS’ to Mrs. De Lille, as well as the five other SA politicians, and only Mrs. De Lille filed any charges; whereas all other five did not consider the matter a ‘serious insult to their dignity’. The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit of American politician, psychologist and best selling author, Dr. Brad Blanton, who ran for Congress in 2004 and 2006, who filed an expert witness affidavit (PDF[17]) on my behalf, accusing Mrs. De Lille and the NPA, on behalf of the South African government of conducting a political and legal prosecution and persecution witch-hunt of myself.

The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit (PDF[18]) of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of the bestselling Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?[19].

I was found guilty and sentenced to six months prison, suspended for 3 years. I have filed an application for In Forma Pauperis Council with the High Court, Western Cape, which was approved, and I was referred to Braam Swart and Partners (PDF[20]), who declined to accept the referral, for reasons of lack of legal experience in freedom of speech cases, and complexity of legal issues (PDF[21]). I filed a request to the Registrar to appoint me new In Forma Pauperis council & for Condonation (PDF[22]), and filed a request with the Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee, and various well known legal experts in Capetown requesting their help to assist the Registrar to recommend an appropriate legal firm for my representation (PDF[23]). The Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee have so [13]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520382/ and http://www.scribd.com/doc/4870062/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520264/AA-01-c-04-06-11-Proudly-SA-Parasite-Hypocrisy-Fraudulent-Rehabilitation-Boomerang http://www.scribd.com/doc/21768956/09-08-11-State-v-Johnstone-Legal-Argument-Political-Necessity-dated-11-August-2009-1-2-3-5-5 [16] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520262/AA-01-b-08-12-28-State-v-Johnstone-Incomplete-Further-Particulars-Letter-to-Senior-ProsecutorJacobs [17] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned [18] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20889550/GG-09-09-11-Affidavit-of-Len-Horowitz-evidencing-Iatrogenic-AIDS-Origins-OrigSigned [19] http://astore.amazon.com/whitrefu-20/detail/0923550127 [20] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801180/Registrar-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Referral-of-S-v-J-Review-to-Braam-Swart-Partners [21] http://www.scribd.com/doc/26795413/10-02-10-Braam-Swart-Partners-to-High-Court-In-FormaPauperis-Proceedings-L-Johnstone [22] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801317/09-10-28-Request-to-HC-WC-Registar-RE-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Condonation [23] http://www.scribd.com/doc/23722325/09-10-28-Pro-Bono-Committees-HC-WC-In-Forma-Pauperis-Crimen-Injuria-Review [14] [15]

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

far declined to provide such assistance, and I am still waiting for the Registrar to refer me to new In Forma Pauperis Legal Representation.

I also submitted the following Affidavits to the SAP in George last year, to file charges against Hon. Patricia de Lille and Senior Pros. Jacobs, but the SAPS refused to accept the Affidavits, to open a file for an investigation into the allegations:  Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against Hon. Patricia de Lille for Perjury, Fraud and Persecution (PDF[24])  Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against NPA: Senior Pros. Jacobs for Obstruction of Justice, Persecution and Corruption (PDF[25]) For the ‘White Refugee’ Court Record: American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton, accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech dissenter.

Please clarify your Organisation’s official response to the Dr. Blantons allegations that:  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing me for practicing my culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying me my right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of my non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.  That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Cell: (071) 170 1954.

[24] [25]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890746/EE-SAPS-Complaint-DeLille-Perjury-Fraud-Persecution-Affidavit-Signed http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890741/FF-SAPS-Complaint-Pros-Jacobs-Obstruction-of-Justice-Persecution-Corruption-Signed

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

-- George Washington

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

From: Pieter Du Toit [mailto:PDuToit@beeld.com] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:55 PM Subject: Read: Tim du Plessis, Editor: Beeld: Req Beeld Position on media corruption and media censorship

Your message To: Tim Du Plessis Cc: Nuus Beeld; Beeld BRW; Marietie Louw; Antoinette Pienaar; gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com; Pieter Du Toit; Jo Prins; Beeld Pretoria; cmnaude@beeld.com Subject: Att: Tim du Plessis, Editor: Beeld: Req Beeld Position on media corruption and media censorship Sent: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:53:09 +0200 was read on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:55:02 +0200

From: Beeld Pretoria [mailto:Pretoria@beeld.com] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:04 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Att: Tim du Plessis, Editor: Beeld: Req Beeld Position on media corruption and media censorship Your message was read on 26 July 2010 12:04:16 PM UTC.

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:53 PM To: 'timdup@beeld.com' Cc: 'nuus@beeld.com'; 'briewe@beeld.com'; ' (mlouw1@beeld.com)'; ' (aapienaar@beeld.com)'; ' (gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com)'; ' (pdutoit@beeld.com)'; (jprins@beeld.com); (pretoria@beeld.com); (cmnaude@beeld.com) Subject: Att: Tim du Plessis, Editor: Beeld: Req Beeld Position on media corruption and media censorship Attach: 10-07-18__1st_Amicus_HoA_FilSheet-PracticeNote-HoA.pdf (323 KB) [1] Mr Tim Du Plessis Editor: Beeld PO Box 333, Auckland Park, 2006 Tel: (011) 713 9000 Fax: (011) 713 9956 / 7 E-mail: timdup@beeld.com CC: Beeld Sub Editors and Journalists: Mr. Andries Cornelissen, et al: nuus@beeld.com, briewe@beeld.com, Marietjie Louw: mlouw1@beeld.com, AA Pienaar: aapienaar@beeld.com, Daniela du Plooy: gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com, J. Prins: jprins@beeld.com, Pieter du Toit: pdutoit@beeld.com, Beeld, Pta: Ms. Nicoleze Mulder: pretoria@beeld.com, Beeld Sake: Mr. Charles Naude: cmnaude@beeld.com 1

PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34551212/10-07-18-Citizen-v-McBride-1st-Amicus-Heads-of-Argument

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

Questions for SANEF Member: Beeld Editor: Mr. Tim du Plessis 1. Are you a member of South African National Editors Forum (SANEF)?

Statement of Fact: Beeld Editor, Mr. Tim du Plessis is aware of the contents of the First Amicus Curiae before the Constitutional Court in Citizen vs. McBride, which alleges TRC fraud and media corruption, and which is supported by the expert witness statements of (a) the worlds foremost expert on honesty, transparency and sincere forgiveness, Dr. Brad Blanton, bestselling author of Radical Honesty series of books, and former ‘Honesty in Politics’ candidate for Congress in Virginia in 2004 and 2006; (b) Dr. T. Michael Maher, the author of the study How and Why Journalists Avoid the Environment-Population Connection. (First Amicus included as attachment to this email); Beeld has decided to censor this information from SA public.

2. If aforementioned statement of fact is incorrect, could you please inform me where Beeld have informed the SA public of the contents of the First Amicus Curiae, which alleges TRC fraud and media corruption, and which is supported by the expert witness statements of consent of Dr. Blanton (as a world expert on Honesty, Transparency and sincere forgiveness) and Dr. Michael Maher (a world expert on media censorship of the environment-population connection)?

3. Is it fair to interpret Beeld’s editorial and journalists decision-making in this matter as endorsing corruption; i.e. the censorship of the First Amicus allegations of TRC fraud and journalism corruption, in Constitutional Court matter: Citizen v. McBride?

4. How has Beeld aforementioned censorship of First Amicus TRC fraud allegations and media corruption been ethically driven?

5. How does Beeld censorship of First Amicus TRC fraud allegations and media corruption, provide for an environment for ethics discourse in SA media?

6. How has Beeld censorship of First Amicus TRC fraud allegations and media corruption, been in support of First Amicus freedom of expression?

7. How has Beeld censorship of First Amicus TRC fraud allegations and media corruption, been in support of enabling a culture of real debate of the highest standard?

8. How has Beeld censorship of First Amicus TRC fraud allegations and media corruption, been in accordance to SANEF’s and the SA Press Codes, alleged values of integrity, accountability and the public interest?

Respectfully Submitted, Lara Johnstone First Amicus Curiae in Citizen vs. McBride Why We Are White Refugees: www.white-refugee.co.nr Apartheid: Crime; or Race Realism? www.crime-of-apartheid.co.nr

From: Nuus Beeld [mailto:Nuus@beeld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:32 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Tim du Plessis, Ed, Beeld; RE: Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say 'No Thanks' to the Rule-of-Law

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

Your message To: Tim Du Plessis; Nuus Beeld Cc: Marietie Louw; Antoinette Pienaar; goggavlooi@gmail.com; Jo Prins; Beeld BRW Subject: Tim du Plessis, Ed, Beeld; RE: Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say 'No Thanks' to the Rule-of-Law Sent: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:57:32 +0200 was read on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:32:10 +0200

From: Tim Du Plessis [mailto:timdup@beeld.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:02 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Tim du Plessis, Ed, Beeld; RE: Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say 'No Thanks' to the Rule-of-Law Your message To: Tim Du Plessis; Nuus Beeld Cc: Marietie Louw; Antoinette Pienaar; goggavlooi@gmail.com; Jo Prins; Beeld BRW Subject: Tim du Plessis, Ed, Beeld; RE: Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say 'No Thanks' to the Rule-of-Law Sent: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:57:32 +0200 was read on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:02:06 +0200

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:58 PM To: 'Tim Du Plessis'; 'nuus@beeld.com' Cc: (mlouw1@beeld.com); ' (aapienaar@beeld.com)'; (goggavlooi@gmail.com); (jprins@beeld.com); briewe@beeld.com Subject: Tim du Plessis, Ed, Beeld; RE: Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say ‘No Thanks’ to the Rule-ofLaw Mr. Tim du Plessis, Beeld Editor c/o & via: Letter to Editor c/o & via: Beeld Journalists M. Louw, D. du Plooy, AA Pienaar, J Prins.

Tel: (011) 713 90000 Tel: (012) 424 6000 Mr. Tim du Plessis, RE: Thank you. Final Report: 140 of SA Elite; say ‘No Thanks’ to the Rule-of-Law Thank you for your comment. For Your Records, please herewith find the Final Report of all Comments.

Why We Are African White Refugees: 140 of SA Elite; say ‘No Thanks’ to the Rule-of-Law Table of Contents:

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

African White Refugee Memo to: Min. of Citizenship & Immigration, Canada, For the Record Memo: ‘Beyond Milgram Belief’: 140 SA Editors, Politicians, Academics et al confirm they are Deliberately Indifferent to the Rule-of-Law; have No Objections to SA Governments persecution of ‘Radical Honesty White Refugee’ (“RHWR”) For the White Refugee Record: 140 SA Elite on # 19963-09: » Radical Honesty Dr. Brad Blanton’s Allegations » [31] Editors, TV News Producers & Radio Station Manager, etc. » [09] Political Parties & Government Bodies » [12] Non-Profit Human Rights Related Org’s, including Mandela & De Klerk Foundations » [09] University Rectors & Vice Chancellors » [79] TRC Academics who Petitioned Canadian Charge D’Affaires objecting to IRB granting Brandon Huntley ‘White Refugee’ status.

Admin: Notices Sent and Acknowledgements of Receipt » Min of Citizenship & Immigration, Canada & IRB » Canadian High Commissioner, Pta & RSA Ambassador, Toronto » UNHCR, Amnesty Intn’l & EU Council for Refugees Google News article at Rant & Rave: 140 of RSA Elite Say ‘No Thanks’ to the Rule-of-Law » http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/140-of-RSA-Elite-Say-No-Thanks-to-the-Rule-of-Law.aspx White Refugees: 140 SA Elite Confirm their Deliberate Indifference to Rule-of-Law; No Objections to SA Gov. Persecution of ‘RH White Refugee’ » http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/03/140-sa-elite-confirm-theirdeliberate.html PDF Memo: 140 SA Elite Say No Thanks to the Rule-of-Law » http://www.scribd.com/doc/28430454/10-03-13-140-SA-Elite-say-No-Thanks-to-the-Rule-of-Law PDF Report: Why We Are African White Refugees: The Rule of Law; or No Rules at All? » http://www.scribd.com/doc/28486699/10-03-17-Why-We-Are-African-White-Refugees-The-Ruleof-Law-or-No-Rules-at-All

From: Michael Schmidt [mailto:mschmidt@frayintermedia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:57 AM Subject: Read: ProJourn Admin. Sec., Mr. Michael Schmidt; RE: For Your Records & Information.

Your message To: Michael Schmidt Cc: Subject: ProJourn Admin. Sec., Mr. Michael Schmidt; RE: For Your Records & Information.

Sent: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:00:56 +0200 was read on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:49:04 +0200

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:49 AM To: 'mschmidt@frayintermedia.com' Subject: ProJourn Admin. Sec., Mr. Michael Schmidt; RE: For Your Records & Information.

Attach: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28430454/10-03-13-140-SA-Elite-say-No-Thanks-to-the-Ruleof-Law

ProJourn: mschmidt@frayintermedia.com Please find below and attached PDF, sent to Min. of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada; whereupon you are CC’d, for your records and information.

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:46 AM To: 'johanr@ombudsman.org.za' Subject: Att: Press Ombudsman, SA Press Council; RE: For Your Records & Information.

SA Press Ombud: johanr@ombudsman.org.za Mr. Ombudsman, Please find below and attached PDF, sent to Min. of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada; whereupon you are CC’d, for your records and information.

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:18 AM To: 'kennej@parl.gc.ca'; 'Minister@cic.gc.ca' Subject: Ref: Fed. Crt. Rev: IMM 4423-09: Brandon Huntley The Honourable Jason Kenney, P.C., M.P. Min. of Citizenship and Immigration Canada Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 1L1 Email: Minister@cic.gc.ca || kennej@parl.gc.ca

Ref:

Fed. Crt. Rev: IMM 4423-09: Brandon Huntley[1]

For the Record Memo: ‘Beyond Milgram Belief’: 140 SA Editors, Politicians, Academics et al confirm they are Deliberately Indifferent to the Rule-of-Law; have No Objections to SA Governments persecution of ‘Radical Honesty White Refugee’ (“RHWR”)      [1]

30 Media Corporations Editors; [1/5/25] 7 Political Party Leaders; [0/0/7] 2 Gov. Protection Bodies, including the Public Protector; [0/0/2] 12 Human Rights Org’s, incl. the F.W. de Klerk and Nelson Mandela Foundations; [1/4/7] 9 University Vice Chancellor’s; [0/0/9]

http://www.scribd.com/group/84434-brandon-huntley-court-file

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

 76 Academics who signed a Petition to the Canadian Charge D’Affaires in Pretoria, objecting to the granting of ‘White Refugee’ status to Brandon Huntley. [3/3/73] 140 of SA’s Academic, Media, Political and Civil Society ‘TRC’ ‘Leaders’ were personally contacted to determine their commitment to the Rule of Law. They were informed that it was assumed that they (a) are Proudly TRC SA leaders who agree that if SA does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, it is not a democratic country and (b) if informed of evidence the SA government is legally and politically persecuting a SA citizen; they would wish to express their democratic objections thereto, with at the very least a public comment, that they object.

Not one would provide a comment to object to the SA Government persecution of the RHWR. Not one disputed the RHWR’s persecution: the illegal arrest, detention, obstruction of justice, denial of defence and due process, conviction & sentence for a lawful act; i.e. political & legal persecution.

123 (87%) were so deliberately indifferent they had no objection to their comment being stated as: “Deliberate Indifference: I, Name (Job Description) am deliberately indifferent to certain people of certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions being politically and legally persecuted and prosecuted; and you and Brandon Huntley, fit one or more of those particular ethnic, ideological, cultural or religious categories, towards whom I am deliberately indifferent; or on occasion, whose persecution I publicly, or privately endorse.”

See attached PDF, for full Memo, including all comments and all correspondence regarding comments.

Respectfully submitted, Lara Johnstone

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:46 AM To: 'johanr@ombudsman.org.za' Subject: Att: Press Ombudsman, SA Press Council; RE: For Your Records & Information.

Attach: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28430454/10-03-13-140-SA-Elite-say-No-Thanks-to-the-Ruleof-Law SA Press Ombud: johanr@ombudsman.org.za Mr. Ombudsman, Please find below and attached PDF, sent to Min. of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada; whereupon you are CC’d, for your records and information.

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:18 AM To: 'kennej@parl.gc.ca'; 'Minister@cic.gc.ca' Subject: Ref: Fed. Crt. Rev: IMM 4423-09: Brandon Huntley

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

The Honourable Jason Kenney, P.C., M.P. Min. of Citizenship and Immigration Canada Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 1L1 Email: Minister@cic.gc.ca || kennej@parl.gc.ca

Ref:

Fed. Crt. Rev: IMM 4423-09: Brandon Huntley[1]

For the Record Memo: ‘Beyond Milgram Belief’: 140 SA Editors, Politicians, Academics et al confirm they are Deliberately Indifferent to the Rule-of-Law; have No Objections to SA Governments persecution of ‘Radical Honesty White Refugee’ (“RHWR”)      

30 Media Corporations Editors; [1/5/25] 7 Political Party Leaders; [0/0/7] 2 Gov. Protection Bodies, including the Public Protector; [0/0/2] 12 Human Rights Org’s, incl. the F.W. de Klerk and Nelson Mandela Foundations; [1/4/7] 9 University Vice Chancellor’s; [0/0/9] 76 Academics who signed a Petition to the Canadian Charge D’Affaires in Pretoria, objecting to the granting of ‘White Refugee’ status to Brandon Huntley. [3/3/73]

140 of SA’s Academic, Media, Political and Civil Society ‘TRC’ ‘Leaders’ were personally contacted to determine their commitment to the Rule of Law. They were informed that it was assumed that they (a) are Proudly TRC SA leaders who agree that if SA does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, it is not a democratic country and (b) if informed of evidence the SA government is legally and politically persecuting a SA citizen; they would wish to express their democratic objections thereto, with at the very least a public comment, that they object.

Not one would provide a comment to object to the SA Government persecution of the RHWR. Not one disputed the RHWR’s persecution: the illegal arrest, detention, obstruction of justice, denial of defence and due process, conviction & sentence for a lawful act; i.e. political & legal persecution.

123 (87%) were so deliberately indifferent they had no objection to their comment being stated as: “Deliberate Indifference: I, Name (Job Description) am deliberately indifferent to certain people of certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions being politically and legally persecuted and prosecuted; and you and Brandon Huntley, fit one or more of those particular ethnic, ideological, cultural or religious categories, towards whom I am deliberately indifferent; or on occasion, whose persecution I publicly, or privately endorse.”

See attached PDF, for full Memo, including all comments and all correspondence regarding comments.

Respectfully submitted, Lara Johnstone

From: Beeld BRW [mailto:briewe@beeld.com] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:24 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Not read: Request Beeld's Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: Nonviolent civil disobedience expression of Dissent to Tyranny Your message [1]

http://www.scribd.com/group/84434-brandon-huntley-court-file

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

To: Marietie Louw; Antoinette Pienaar; gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com; Jo Prins; Beeld BRW Subject: Request Beeld's Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: Nonviolent civil disobedience expression of Dissent to Tyranny Sent: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:53:27 +0200 was deleted without being read on Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:24:01 +0200

From: Beeld Pretoria [mailto:Pretoria@beeld.com] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 8:26 AM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Confirmation of Beeld's Official comment in Radical Honesty Culture & Religion Free Speech Legal Issue Your message To: Tim Du Plessis; melanies@beeld.com Cc: Beeld Pretoria; cmnaude@beeld.com; Nuus Beeld; Jo Prins; Marietie Louw; goggavlooi@gmail.com; Nuus Beeld; Beeld BRW Subject: Confirmation of Beeld's Official comment in Radical Honesty Culture & Religion Free Speech Legal Issue Sent: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:27:09 +0200 was read on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:25:47 +0200

From: Tim Du Plessis [mailto:timdup@beeld.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:29 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Confirmation of Beeld's Official comment in Radical Honesty Culture & Religion Free Speech Legal Issue Your message To: Tim Du Plessis; melanies@beeld.com Cc: Beeld Pretoria; cmnaude@beeld.com; Nuus Beeld; Jo Prins; Marietie Louw; goggavlooi@gmail.com; Nuus Beeld; Beeld BRW Subject: Confirmation of Beeld's Official comment in Radical Honesty Culture & Religion Free Speech Legal Issue Sent: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:27:09 +0200 was read on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:29:17 +0200

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:27 PM To: 'Tim Du Plessis'; 'melanies@beeld.com' Cc: (pretoria@beeld.com); (cmnaude@beeld.com); (nuus@beeld.com); (jprins@beeld.com); (mlouw1@beeld.com); (goggavlooi@gmail.com); 'nuus@beeld.com'; briewe@beeld.com Subject: Confirmation of Beeld's Official comment in Radical Honesty Culture & Religion Free Speech Legal Issue Mr Tim Du Plessis Editor: Beeld PO Box 333, Auckland Park, 2006

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

Tel: (011) 713 9000 Fax: (011) 713 9956 / 7 Mr. Du Plessis, Confirmation of Beeld’s Official Comment in Radical Honesty Free Speech Legal Issue: In Response to request for Beeld Editors Official Comment to the following Free Speech legal Issues: http://www.scribd.com/doc/27357977/10-02-22-Beeld-Editor-Tim-du-Plessis-Request-OfficialComment-on-Free-Speech-Legal-Issue American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton, accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech dissenter.

Please clarify Beeld’s official response to Dr. Blantons allegations as made in a legal affidavit (PDF[1]) filed in the High Court, Western Cape (#19963-09), which cites among others, Former President’s Mbeki and Mandela, the Norwegian Nobel Committee and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Mr. Jason Kenney, as respondents; that:  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks; then it is not a democratic country.  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against Lara Johnstone.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors. [Put differently, any society that values the principle of 'crimen injuria'; is one that values protecting the right of people with fragile ego's to not be offended; as more important, than protecting the right of Galileo's and Voltaire's to offend.]  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing Lara Johnstone for practicing my culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying Lara Johnstone her right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of her non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.  That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians.

Beeld’s Official Comment of Response is: “Dear Ms Johnstone. Kindly be informed that I am not going to comment on the questions/issues raised in you letter. There will be no further correspondence or liaison in this matter.” – Tim du Plessis, Editor Beeld; February 25, 2010 @ 15:44 hrs.

Should I have misinterpreted Beeld’s Official comment in this matter; please let me know, so that I can make the relevant and appropriate corrections. In the absence of you notifying me of any corrections; I shall conclude aforementioned to be Beeld’s official comment, in this matter.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone [1]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilegeBradNotarySigned

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

From: Tim Du Plessis [mailto:timdup@beeld.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:44 PM To: jmcswan@mweb.co.za Subject: FW: Request Beeld's Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue Dear Ms Johnstone Kindly be informed that I am not going to comment on the questions/issues raised in you letter.

There will be no further correspondence or liaison in this matter.

Tim du Plessis Editor: Beeld

From: Nuus Beeld [mailto:Nuus@beeld.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:28 AM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Read: Request Beeld's Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue Your message To: Tim Du Plessis; Nuus Beeld; Beeld BRW Subject: Request Beeld's Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue Sent: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:03:13 +0200 was read on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:27:32 +0200

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:03 AM To: 'timdup@beeld.com'; 'nuus@beeld.com'; 'briewe@beeld.com' Subject: Request Beeld’s Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue

22 February 2010 Mr Tim Du Plessis Editor: Beeld PO Box 333, Auckland Park, 2006 Tel: (011) 713 9000

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

Fax: (011) 713 9956 / 7 E-mail: timdup@beeld.com, nuus@beeld.com, briewe@beeld.com CC: Canadian High Commissioner: Ref: IRB RULING: MA8-04910: Brandon C. Huntley[1] CC: UNHCR: White Refugee Memo to UNHCR[2] CC: Mr. Brandon Huntley; c/o & via: Attorney Russell Kaplan Mr. du Plessis, Request Beeld’s Official Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: Non-violent civil disobedience Radical Honesty expression of Dissent to Politically Correct Tyrannical Insanity.

American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech dissenter.

It is assumed that your organisation’s support for democratic values, would agree that: If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.

It is further assumed, that if you were informed of the South African government’s legal prosecution and persecution of any non-violent truth-telling civil-disobedient Free Speech South African citizen; you would wish to express your democratic objections thereto.

As you are no doubt aware, on 27 August 2009, the Canadian Immigration & Refugee Board (IRB) granted white South African, Brandon Huntley, Official Canadian Refugee Status[3]: The IRB ruling found Huntley “was a victim [of persecution] because of his race rather than a victim of criminality, who presented clear & convincing proof of state & security forces’ inability or unwillingness to protect him.”

The ANC SA political elite demanded the Canadian government overturn the IRB’ ruling; and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, was politically pressured with the dreaded ‘r’ word to launch an Application of Review of the IRB’s decision[4]. The liberal South African academic[5] and media elite far and wide condemned Huntley alleging that persecution of whites in South Africa, does not exist; and complaints filed with the SAPS are always professionally investigated.

On 22 September 2009 an Application for Review in the High Court, Western Cape # 19963-09 (PDF[6]) [Proof of Service (PDF[7])]; was filed protesting against political and legal prosecution and persecution

by SA politicians and State officials. On 12 October 2009, complaint WC-2009-O455BS (PDF[8]) was also filed with the SA Human Rights Commission, with the same allegations.

Dr. Brad Blanton, psychologist, best selling author, activist, President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises, founder of the Center for Radical Honesty, Candidate for U.S. Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006; filed an expert witness affidavit, on behalf of the ‘White Refugee’, in both aforementioned applications.

The Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[9]), states among others, that:  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/p/white-refugee-petition.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/p/memo-to-unhcr.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/transcript-of-irb-william-davis-ruling.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/federal-court-review-application-min-of.html http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/criminal-victimization-of-whites-heres.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20923652/SAHRC-Complaint-Indictment-Crimes-Against-Humanity-Crime-of-Apartheid http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.  Confirms my culture and religion as that of Radical Honesty; namely to non-violently tell another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  My defence of non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence was justified and accurate.  My opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, such as South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians is entirely accurate.

Brief excerpts from Dr. Blanton’s affidavit: [2] I have a Ph.D degree in Psychology; I have been a clinical psychologist in Washington DC for 25 years.

[3] I am the author of 1) Radical Honesty: How to Transform Your Life by Telling The Truth; 2) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help From Your Friends, 3) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World with Neil Donald Walsh, author of the Conversations with Good books; 4) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; 5) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and 6) my biography, A New Kind of Trailer Trash.

[4] I am the founder and currently the President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises SparrowHawk Book Publishing, the founder and board member of the Center for Radical Honesty, a non-profit corporation.

[6] I was a Candidate for Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006. I am the Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church.

[7] Lara read one of my books, contacted me in 1999, attended some of my programs, worked for me briefly and has corresponded with me via email since then.

[8] Lara and I were arrested together while protesting campaign finance corruption in the Rotunda of the Capital Building in Washington DC in January of 2000. It was a non-violent protest and we were jailed for less than six hours. If you are interested, the story and purpose of that action, is in my report for the second time I was arrested for the same cause a month later. It is in my book co-authored with Neil Donald Walsch, Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World.

[9] Lara is pissed off about abusive lying and withholding authorities who get by, by withholding, secrecy and hiding what they do in the name of national security and so am I. I don't know if Lara would ever be violent or not, but she hasn't been so far as I've known her, about ten years.

[10] She has worked hard to demand fairness and to oppose inequality among people.

[11] Lara has told me that she is the Defendant in criminal court proceedings, regarding Political Necessity/Civil Disobedience ‘crimen injuria[14]’ text messages[15], she sent to some [14]

Crimen Injuria & Reasonableness: a fundamental prong of determining the unlawfulness of Crimen Injuria, is what is called ‘the criterion of reasonableness’. This is an objective test; and it requires the conduct complained of to be tested against the prevailing norms of society, in order to determine whether such conduct can be classified as wrongful.

[15] SMS @ 15:23 hrs, on 10 July 2007: [Be My Guest Kaffir! Quote SAP George Case 572-02, U Kaffir Moron Imbecile] SMS @ 15:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [U r 1 stupid dumb kaffir bitch. Don’t u fucking dare say I didn’t warn u, u goddamn kaffir hypocrite! Lara Johnstone] SMS @ 18:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [As usual u gutless 2faced hypocrite coloured kaffir imbecile, U r all talk & no action. SAP # 572/02 U rotting excuse 4 a brain!] SMS @ 10:23 hrs on 16 July 2007: [So Your Message to JAG is: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* SMS @ 11:32 hrs on 16 July KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN’, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”?]

2007: [Press Release: PDLille 2 LJohnstone: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”]

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

politicians[16], at 15:23; 15:32 and 18:32 hrs, on 10 July; and at 10:23 and 11:32 hrs on 16 July 2007; which are alleged to be ‘insults to the dignity’ of the Politicians.

[16] The ‘social contract’ is a socio-political and legal agreement between citizens and government. For the purpose of this matter, a healthy social-contract exists, when men and women in government respect the rights of its people, by guaranteeing and, in fact, encouraging their right to speak out, to criticize irresponsible leadership, and to hold their government accountable for its failures and actions.

[17] The State’s argument is that the Defendants civil disobedience acts, should be judged in terms of whether the man on the Clapham omnibus considers the defendants actions of civil disobedience ‘reasonable’ or not; and if unreasonable, accordingly ‘unlawful’.

[18] The Defendant argues that Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience, demonstrate that actions of civil disobedience, to perceived illegitimate authority, require certain emotional, psychological, legal and political skills and competencies that the man on the Clapham omnibus lack; and accordingly the reasonableness test to be applied is not that of the man on the Clapham omnibus, but the test of the ordinary skilled person exercising and professing to have that particular special skill.

[22] The Milgram experiment was designed to simulate the conditions in which Eichmann operated, and to determine how many individuals would – like Eichmann – follow orders and be obedient to the system in which they operated; and how many would practice civil disobedience and refuse to be obedient to perceived illegal authority. Milgram’s experiment revealed that a significant majority of the population – 65%, like Eichmanns millions of accomplices – merely follow orders, irrespective whether the orders violate their deepest moral beliefs; only 35 % possessed the skills and competencies for civil disobedience.

[30] Lara submits that any reasonable person, with 37% or 8% (Milgram speak) skills and competencies, would have asked themselves some of the following questions, in evaluating her Political Necessity and Radical Hon(our)sty ‘criminal acts’. I agree.

[31] To determine the reasonableness of Lara’s alleged criminal ‘civil disobedient’ act, individuals with the legal, political, etc. skills and competencies, would need to determine the reasonableness, or not, of Lara’s political necessity ‘Offer of Proof’ allegations, which motivated her ‘civil disobedient’ criminal act.

[33] As a ‘reasonable’ Radical Honesty Politician, Psychologist, Activist and Pope, I think that: III)

The law Lara is being prosecuted for is ridiculous and dates back to a belief in curses from witch doctors.

IV)

Even though Lara is, like me, crazy and always asking for trouble, she is being ridiculously prosecuted, and her defence is justified and accurate and her opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness is entirely accurate and, so far, almost always avoided by politicians.

Dr. Blanton’s affidavit was filed as an expert witness affidavit in support of the High Court, Western Cape Application for Review: Case Number 19963-09 (PDF[10]) [Proof of Service (PDF[11])]; which states among others: [10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication.

[16]

Lara Johnstone: “The factual truth:. I sent the SMS’s to six tough South African politicians, c/o the Primary Plaintiff, who: (i) I had been dealing with on this issue, since 2002; spoken to, written dozens of documents, including documents wherein I defined what I mean, when I use the word “Kaffir”, (ii) I had spoken to 15 minutes before I sent her the ‘crimen injuria’ SMS’s, for her forwarding, where we had a heated discussion, which was finally terminated by her with the words “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!” [10] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped [11] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy (PDF[12]).

[10d] Citizens committed to a healthy social contract with their Government have a duty and a right, when any government becomes tyrannical and corrupt, and acts in destructive breach of the social contract; to alter or abolish such government, and to institute new government.

[10e] In contrast to Respondents Three to Eight’s strategies endorsing and inciting violence, mob justice and ungovernability, in their alleged ‘Anti-Apartheid’ (sic) struggle for a non-racial (sic) South Africa; the Applicant is a citizen committed to non-violent civil-disobedience, and the rule of law. Accordingly the only means the Applicant has of altering and abolishing a corrupt and tyrannical government, and instituting a new healthy social contract government, is to deny such a corrupt and tyrannical government, any respect as a legitimate authority, until it demonstrates that it is committed to upholding its social contract duties and responsibilities, as an impartial, legitimate and procedurally fair authority.

[10f] As of 07 June 2007, the Applicant does not recognize the legitimacy of any South African Official or Office, which is not willing to demonstrate its sincere and serious commitment to upholding its duties and responsibilities to the constitutional Social Contract.

[10g] While South African Legislative, Judicial and Executive authorities have, and continue to, refuse to confront, enquire into, or acknowledge the reality of the tyrannical Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the Failed State, and its effective nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract, which has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended; a foreign court/tribunal has finally had the courage to impartially enquire into, and courageously confront, the reality of this evidence.

In the State of Ontario, Canada, on 27 August 2009, Board Member William Davis of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (“RPD”), in file number MA8-04910, found white South African, Brandon Carl Huntley to be a Convention Refugee.

Background Information: On 10 July 2007, I telephoned Mrs. Patricia De Lille on her cellphone, to request her help on a legal matter. I had phoned to confirm that she had received legal document, Official Notice to RSA Goverment (PDF[13]) I had sent to her office; to make sure she understood it was time-sensitive and required a response by 18 July 2007, and to make sure she understood the request that she foreword the legal document on my behalf to various SA politicians and the South African government. She got angry, and ended the telephone discussion with: “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!” I subsequently sent her five civil disobedience SMS responses, three on 10 July and two on 16 July, with among others, my cryptic K-word. As described in a legal document sent to the South African government; c/o & via Judge J.J. Fagan, dated 11 June 2004, An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent ‘Rehabilitation’ Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies as a Major Intentional Source of New South Africa’s ‘Kaffirs’ AKA ‘Criminals’ (PDF[14]); when I use

[12] See An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent Rehabilitation Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies as a Major Intentional Source of New South Africa’s ‘Kaffirs’ AKA ‘Criminals’: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16788940/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520264/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/16789736/ [13] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520382/ and http://www.scribd.com/doc/4870062/ [14] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520264/AA-01-c-04-06-11-Proudly-SA-Parasite-Hypocrisy-Fraudulent-Rehabilitation-Boomerang

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

the word ‘Kaffir’, I generally use it in its original etymological meaning; someone who ‘knows the truth, and deliberately conceals it’ (PDF[15]).

On 18 July 2007, I was arrested (without an arrest warrant) by Insp. Christian, and detained for 33 days in Pollsmoor, before I finally saw a Magistrate on 22 August 2007, for a bail hearing. I filed a request to the Senior Prosecutor for a copy of the alleged original arrest warrant, but to this day the request has been denied, by being deliberately ignored (PDF[16]). The case dragged on for over two years, with never-ending postponements, which cost my parents over R20,000. When we could no longer afford an attorney, I was approved for Legal Aid financially, being indigent; but denied for politically, for reasons of ‘conflict of interest’. The Police refused to provide forensic evidence proving my cellphone conversation with Ms. De Lille, prior to me sending her the SMS’. Mrs. de Lille lied on the witness stand and perjured herself: she denied knowing me, or having had a telephone conversation with me, or having received any legal letters or documents from me, prior to her receiving my five SMS’.

Even though ‘crimen injuria’ can only be considered ‘unlawful’ in accordance with the legal principles of the ‘reasonableness’ test; the Magistrate ignored the fact that I had sent the SMS’ to Mrs. De Lille, as well as the five other SA politicians, and only Mrs. De Lille filed any charges; whereas all other five did not consider the matter a ‘serious insult to their dignity’. The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit of American politician, psychologist and best selling author, Dr. Brad Blanton, who ran for Congress in 2004 and 2006, who filed an expert witness affidavit (PDF[17]) on my behalf, accusing Mrs. De Lille and the NPA, on behalf of the South African government of conducting a political and legal prosecution and persecution witch-hunt of myself. The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit (PDF[18]) of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of the bestselling Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?[19].

I was found guilty and sentenced to six months prison, suspended for 3 years. I have filed an application for In Forma Pauperis Council with the High Court, Western Cape, which was approved, and I was referred to Braam Swart and Partners (PDF[20]), who declined to accept the referral, for reasons of lack of legal experience in freedom of speech cases, and complexity of legal issues (PDF[21]). I filed a request to the Registrar to appoint me new In Forma Pauperis council & for Condonation (PDF[22]), and filed a request with the Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee, and various well known legal experts in Capetown requesting their help to assist the Registrar to recommend an appropriate legal firm for my representation (PDF[23]). The Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee have so far declined to provide such assistance, and I am still waiting for the Registrar to refer me to new In Forma Pauperis Legal Representation.

I also submitted the following Affidavits to the SAP in George last year, to file charges against Hon. Patricia de Lille and Senior Pros. Jacobs, but the SAPS refused to accept the Affidavits, to open a file for an investigation into the allegations:  Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against Hon. Patricia de Lille for Perjury, Fraud and Persecution (PDF[24])  Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against NPA: Senior Pros. Jacobs for Obstruction of Justice, Persecution and Corruption (PDF[25]) For the ‘White Refugee’ Court Record: American politician and author Dr. Brad Blanton, accuses SA Government of conducting a legal prosecution and persecution campaign against non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech dissenter.

Please clarify your Organisation’s official response to the Dr. Blantons allegations that:

[15]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21768956/09-08-11-State-v-Johnstone-Legal-Argument-Political-Necessity-dated-11-August-2009-1-2-3-5-5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520262/AA-01-b-08-12-28-State-v-Johnstone-Incomplete-Further-Particulars-Letter-to-Senior-ProsecutorJacobs [17] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned [18] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20889550/GG-09-09-11-Affidavit-of-Len-Horowitz-evidencing-Iatrogenic-AIDS-Origins-OrigSigned [19] http://astore.amazon.com/whitrefu-20/detail/0923550127 [20] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801180/Registrar-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Referral-of-S-v-J-Review-to-Braam-Swart-Partners [21] http://www.scribd.com/doc/26795413/10-02-10-Braam-Swart-Partners-to-High-Court-In-FormaPauperis-Proceedings-L-Johnstone [22] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801317/09-10-28-Request-to-HC-WC-Registar-RE-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Condonation [23] http://www.scribd.com/doc/23722325/09-10-28-Pro-Bono-Committees-HC-WC-In-Forma-Pauperis-Crimen-Injuria-Review [24] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890746/EE-SAPS-Complaint-DeLille-Perjury-Fraud-Persecution-Affidavit-Signed [25] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890741/FF-SAPS-Complaint-Pros-Jacobs-Obstruction-of-Justice-Persecution-Corruption-Signed [16]

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

 If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing me for practicing my culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying me my right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of my non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.  That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Cell: (071) 170 1954.

From: Lara Johnstone [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:53 AM To: ' (mlouw1@beeld.com)'; ' (aapienaar@beeld.com)'; ' (gogga_vlooi@hotmail.com)'; ' (jprins@beeld.com)'; 'briewe@beeld.com' Subject: Request Beeld's Comment on Free Speech Legal Issue: Nonviolent civil disobedience expression of Dissent to Tyranny Mr. Tim du Plessis, Beeld Editor c/o & via: Letter to Editor c/o & via: Beeld Journalists M. Louw, D. du Plooy, AA Pienaar, J Prins.

Tel: (011) 713 90000 Tel: (012) 424 6000 Mr. du Plessis, Request Beeld’s Comment on American Politician & author, Dr. Brad Blanton’s allegations of State’s Political and Legal Prosecution and Persecution of non-violent civil disobedience Free Speech Dissenter in South Africa Please could you clarify what the Beeld’s Editorial position is on the following Capetown legal matter regarding Freedom of Speech and cultural issues of non-violent honest expression of dissent.

I would particularly like to know where the Beeld (and I am contacting various other SA media

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

organisations and Political Parties, and Foreign Embassies, as well) stands on the affidavit filed by Dr. Brad Blanton, psychologist, best selling author, activist and President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises and the founder of the Center for Radical Honesty and Candidate for U.S. Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006; filed in, among others: High Court, Western Cape Case Number 19963-09 (PDF[1]) [Proof of Service (PDF[2])].

The Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[3]), states among others, that:  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant, myself.  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks, where ‘civil disobedience’ is defined as: “a public, non-violent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”; then it is not a democratic country.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors.  My defence of non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence was justified and accurate.  My opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, such as South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians is entirely accurate.

Brief excerpts from Dr. Blanton’s affidavit: [2] I have a Ph.D degree in Psychology; I have been a clinical psychologist in Washington DC for 25 years.

[3] I am the author of 1) Radical Honesty: How to Transform Your Life by Telling The Truth; 2) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help From Your Friends, 3) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World with Neil Donald Walsh, author of the Conversations with Good books; 4) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; 5) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and 6) my biography, A New Kind of Trailer Trash.

[4] I am the founder and currently the President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises SparrowHawk Book Publishing, the founder and board member of the Center for Radical Honesty, a non-profit corporation.

[6] I was a Candidate for Congress of the United States from Virginia in 2004 and 2006. I am the Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church.

[7] Lara read one of my books, contacted me in 1999, attended some of my programs, worked for me briefly and has corresponded with me via email since then.

[8] Lara and I were arrested together while protesting campaign finance corruption in the Rotunda of the Capital Building in Washington DC in January of 2000. It was a non-violent protest and we were jailed for less than six hours. If you are interested, the story and purpose of that action, is in my report for the second time I was arrested for the same [1] [2] [3]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

cause a month later. It is in my book co-authored with Neil Donald Walsch, Honest to God: A Change of Heart that can Change the World.

[9] Lara is pissed off about abusive lying and withholding authorities who get by, by withholding, secrecy and hiding what they do in the name of national security and so am I. I don't know if Lara would ever be violent or not, but she hasn't been so far as I've known her, about ten years.

[10] She has worked hard to demand fairness and to oppose inequality among people.

[11] Lara has told me that she is the Defendant in criminal court proceedings, regarding Political Necessity/Civil Disobedience ‘crimen injuria[14]’ text messages[15], she sent to some politicians[16], at 15:23; 15:32 and 18:32 hrs, on 10 July; and at 10:23 and 11:32 hrs on 16 July 2007; which are alleged to be ‘insults to the dignity’ of the Politicians.

[16] The ‘social contract’ is a socio-political and legal agreement between citizens and government. For the purpose of this matter, a healthy social-contract exists, when men and women in government respect the rights of its people, by guaranteeing and, in fact, encouraging their right to speak out, to criticize irresponsible leadership, and to hold their government accountable for its failures and actions.

[17] The State’s argument is that the Defendants civil disobedience acts, should be judged in terms of whether the man on the Clapham omnibus considers the defendants actions of civil disobedience ‘reasonable’ or not; and if unreasonable, accordingly ‘unlawful’.

[18] The Defendant argues that Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience, demonstrate that actions of civil disobedience, to perceived illegitimate authority, require certain emotional, psychological, legal and political skills and competencies that the man on the Clapham omnibus lack; and accordingly the reasonableness test to be applied is not that of the man on the Clapham omnibus, but the test of the ordinary skilled person exercising and professing to have that particular special skill.

[22] The Milgram experiment was designed to simulate the conditions in which Eichmann operated, and to determine how many individuals would – like Eichmann – follow orders and be obedient to the system in which they operated; and how many would practice civil disobedience and refuse to be obedient to perceived illegal authority. Milgram’s experiment revealed that a significant majority of the population – 65%, like Eichmanns millions of accomplices – merely follow orders, irrespective whether the orders violate their deepest moral beliefs; only 35 % possessed the skills and competencies for civil disobedience.

[30] Lara submits that any reasonable person, with 37% or 8% (Milgram speak) skills and competencies, would have asked themselves some of the following questions, in evaluating her Political Necessity and Radical Hon(our)sty ‘criminal acts’. I agree.

[31] To determine the reasonableness of Lara’s alleged criminal ‘civil disobedient’ act, individuals with the legal, political, etc. skills and competencies, would need to determine the reasonableness, or not, of Lara’s political necessity ‘Offer of Proof’ allegations, which [14]

Crimen Injuria & Reasonableness: a fundamental prong of determining the unlawfulness of Crimen Injuria, is what is called ‘the criterion of reasonableness’. This is an objective test; and it requires the conduct complained of to be tested against the prevailing norms of society, in order to determine whether such conduct can be classified as wrongful.

[15] SMS @ 15:23 hrs, on 10 July 2007: [Be My Guest Kaffir! Quote SAP George Case 572-02, U Kaffir Moron Imbecile] SMS @ 15:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [U r 1 stupid dumb kaffir bitch. Don’t u fucking dare say I didn’t warn u, u goddamn kaffir hypocrite! Lara Johnstone] SMS @ 18:32 hrs on 10 July 2007: [As usual u gutless 2faced hypocrite coloured kaffir imbecile, U r all talk & no action. SAP # 572/02 U rotting excuse 4 a brain!] SMS @ 10:23 hrs on 16 July 2007: [So Your Message to JAG is: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN’, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”?]

SMS @ 11:32 hrs on 16 July 2007: [Press Release: PDLille 2 LJohnstone: “FUCK U, FUCK STARH, & AIDS IS A 5* KAFFIR DIE B/W DEPOP’N PROGRAM. BEST INVENTION SINCE ‘MANHATTEN, USURY, RAPE & TORTURE”] [16] Lara Johnstone: “The factual truth:. I sent the SMS’s to six tough South African politicians, c/o the Primary Plaintiff, who: (i) I had been dealing with on this issue, since 2002; spoken to, written dozens of documents, including documents wherein I defined what I mean, when I use the word “Kaffir”, (ii) I had spoken to 15 minutes before I sent her the ‘crimen injuria’ SMS’s, for her forwarding, where we had a heated discussion, which was finally terminated by her with the words “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!”

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

motivated her ‘civil disobedient’ criminal act.

[33] As a ‘reasonable’ Radical Honesty Politician, Psychologist, Activist and Pope, I think that: V)

The law Lara is being prosecuted for is ridiculous and dates back to a belief in curses from witch doctors.

VI)

Even though Lara is, like me, crazy and always asking for trouble, she is being ridiculously prosecuted, and her defence is justified and accurate and her opinion that there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness is entirely accurate and, so far, almost always avoided by politicians.

Dr. Blanton’s affidavit was filed as an expert witness affidavit in support of the High Court, Western Cape Application for Review: Case Number 19963-09 (PDF[4]) [Proof of Service (PDF[5])]; which states among others: [10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication.

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy (PDF[6]).

[10d] Citizens committed to a healthy social contract with their Government have a duty and a right, when any government becomes tyrannical and corrupt, and acts in destructive breach of the social contract; to alter or abolish such government, and to institute new government.

[10e] In contrast to Respondents Three to Eight’s strategies endorsing and inciting violence, mob justice and ungovernability, in their alleged ‘Anti-Apartheid’ (sic) struggle for a non-racial (sic) South Africa; the Applicant is a citizen committed to non-violent civildisobedience, and the rule of law. Accordingly the only means the Applicant has of altering and abolishing a corrupt and tyrannical government, and instituting a new healthy social contract government, is to deny such a corrupt and tyrannical government, any respect as a legitimate authority, until it demonstrates that it is committed to upholding its social contract duties and responsibilities, as an impartial, legitimate and procedurally fair authority.

[10f] As of 07 June 2007, the Applicant does not recognize the legitimacy of any South African Official or Office, which is not willing to demonstrate its sincere and serious commitment to upholding its duties and responsibilities to the constitutional Social Contract.

[10g] While South African Legislative, Judicial and Executive authorities have, and continue

[4]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878486/HC-WC-19963-09-Notice-of-Intention-Application-for-Leave-Judicial-Review-p12-Court-Stamped http://www.scribd.com/doc/20878135/KK-09-09-23-Affidavit-of-Lara-Johnstone-Proof-of-Service-of-Notice-of-Intention-P5-HCStamped See An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent Rehabilitation Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies as a Major Intentional Source of New South Africa’s ‘Kaffirs’ AKA ‘Criminals’: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16788940/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520264/ & http://www.scribd.com/doc/16789736/ [5] [6]

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

to, refuse to confront, enquire into, or acknowledge the reality of the tyrannical Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the Failed State, and its effective nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract, which has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended; a foreign court/tribunal has finally had the courage to impartially enquire into, and courageously confront, the reality of this evidence.

In the State of Ontario, Canada, on 27 August 2009, Board Member William Davis of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (“RPD”), in file number MA8-04910, found white South African, Brandon Carl Huntley to be a Convention Refugee.

Background Information: On 10 July 2007, I telephoned Mrs. Patricia De Lille on her cellphone, to request her help on a legal matter. I had phoned to confirm that she had received legal document (PDF[7]) I had sent to her office; to make sure she understood it was time-sensitive and required a response by 18 July 2007, and to make sure she understood the request that she foreword the legal document on my behalf to various SA politicians and the South African government. She got angry, and ended the telephone discussion with: “Fuck Your [Legal Military] Document. Fuck Your Racist Conspiracy Theories about the [Manmade Biological Warfare] Origins of AIDS; and Fuck You!” I subsequently sent her five civil disobedience SMS’s responses, three on 10 July and two on 16 July, with among others, my cryptic K-word. For the record, when I use the word ‘Kaffir’, I generally use it in its original etymological meaning; namely that a Kaafar, is someone who ‘knows the truth, and deliberately conceals it’ (PDF[8]). I was arrested (without an arrest warrant) by Insp.

Christian on 18 July 2007, and detained for 33 days in Pollsmoor, before I finally saw a Magistrate on 22 August 2007, for a bail hearing. I filed a request to the Senior Prosecutor for a copy of the alleged original arrest warrant, but to this day the request has been denied, by being deliberately ignored (PDF[9]). The case dragged on for over two years, with never-ending postponements, which cost my parents over R20,000. When we could no longer afford an attorney, I was approved for Legal Aid financially, being indigent; but denied for Legal Aid politically, who said they had a ‘conflict of interest’, and consequently had to represent myself. The Police refused to provide forensic evidence proving my cellphone conversation with Ms. De Lille, prior to me sending her the SMS’. Mrs. de Lille lied on the witness stand and perjured herself: she denied knowing me, or having had a telephone conversation with me, or having received any legal letters or documents from me, prior to her receiving my five SMS’s.

Even though ‘crimen injuria’ can only be considered ‘unlawful’ in accordance with the legal principles of the ‘reasonableness’ test; the Magistrate ignored the fact that I had sent the SMS’s to Mrs. De Lille, as well as the five other SA politicians, and only Mrs. De Lille filed any charges; whereas all other five did not consider the matter a ‘serious insult to their dignity’. The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit of an American politician, psychologist and best selling author, Dr. Brad Blanton, who ran for Congress in 2004 and 2006, who filed an expert witness affidavit (PDF[10]) on my behalf, accusing Mrs. De Lille and the NPA, on behalf of the South African government of conducting a political and legal prosecution and persecution witch-hunt of myself.

The Magistrate also ignored the expert witness affidavit (PDF[11]) of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of the bestselling Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?[12], on my behalf.

[7]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520382/ and http://www.scribd.com/doc/4870062/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/21768956/09-08-11-State-v-Johnstone-Legal-Argument-Political-Necessity-dated-11-August-2009-1-2-3-5-5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/20520262/AA-01-b-08-12-28-State-v-Johnstone-Incomplete-Further-Particulars-Letter-to-Senior-ProsecutorJacobs [10] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20888675/HH-09-09-18-Affidavit-of-Brad-Blanton-Nuremberg-Principles-citizens-privilege-BradNotarySigned [11] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20889550/GG-09-09-11-Affidavit-of-Len-Horowitz-evidencing-Iatrogenic-AIDS-Origins-OrigSigned [12] http://astore.amazon.com/whitrefu-20/detail/0923550127 [8] [9]

[Last Update: 02 August 2010]

Correspondence: Beeld: Editor: Tim du Plessis

I was found guilty and sentenced to six months prison, suspended for 3 years. I have filed an application for In Forma Pauperis Council with the High Court, Western Cape, which was approved, and I was referred to Braam Swart and Partners (PDF[13]), who declined to accept the referral, for reasons of lack of legal experience in freedom of speech cases, and complexity of legal issues (PDF[14]). I filed a request to the Registrar to appoint me new In Forma Pauperis council & for Condonation (PDF[15]), and filed a request with the Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee, and various well known legal experts in Capetown requesting their help to assist the Registrar to recommend an appropriate legal firm for my representation (PDF[16]). The Cape Bar Pro Bono Committee have so far declined to provide such assistance, and I am still waiting for the Registrar to refer me to new In Forma Pauperis Legal Representation.

I also submitted the following Affidavits to the SAP in George last year, to file charges against Hon. Patricia de Lille and Senior Pros. Jacobs, but the SAPS refused to accept the Affidavits, to open a file for an investigation into the allegations: ď ś Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against Hon. Patricia de Lille for Perjury, Fraud and Persecution (PDF[17]) ď ś Affidavit of Complaint to SAPS against NPA: Senior Pros. Jacobs for Obstruction of Justice, Persecution and Corruption (PDF[18]) Respectfully Submitted, Lara Johnstone Cell: (071) 170 1954.

[13] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801180/09-10-13-HC-WC-Registrar-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Referral-of-State-v-Johnstone-Reviewto-Braam-Swart-Partners [14] http://www.scribd.com/doc/26795413/10-02-10-Braam-Swart-Partners-to-High-Court-In-FormaPauperis-Proceedings-L-Johnstone [15] http://www.scribd.com/doc/21801317/09-10-28-Request-to-HC-WC-Registar-RE-In-Forma-Pauperis-Proceedings-Condonation [16] http://www.scribd.com/doc/23722325/09-10-28-Pro-Bono-Committees-HC-WC-In-Forma-Pauperis-Crimen-Injuria-Review-Application-REFreedom-of-Speech-Political-and-Cultural-Rights-or-Se [17] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890746/EE-SAPS-Complaint-DeLille-Perjury-Fraud-Persecution-Affidavit-Signed [18] http://www.scribd.com/doc/20890741/FF-SAPS-Complaint-Pros-Jacobs-Obstruction-of-Justice-Persecution-Corruption-Signed