10-12-07: Volkstaat / Jus Sanguinis Petition to France; c/o Ambassador Jacques Lapouge

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return for African White Refugees Petition to French Republic / Republique Francaise 08 March 2010 President Nicolas Sarkozy Elysee Palace, Paris, France c/o: Hon. Ambassador: Jacques Lapouge Republique Francaise Embassy 250 Melk Street, Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria 0181, South Africa Tel: 012 425 1600 | Fax: 012 425 1609

Ref: Peak Oil: Resource Scarcity & National Security1; Peak Oil Domino2 Revolutions3; Crash of World Economy Ponzi scheme4.

Dear President Sarkozy,

Hardcopy of Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition & Briefing Paper: Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees.

Please find attached the updated hardcopy of the Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to Officials from Republique Francaise, on 07 December 2010, for your investigation and consideration. The Briefing Paper includes every Petitioner’s original signature individually (Pg JS.17-19) and collectively at their FR Stamvader/Progenitor’s History (Pg: JS.22-24).

Please Note: SA Political, Religious, Media and Academic TRC elite have been honourably notified of the contents of this Jus Sanguinis petition, and its allegations of TRC Fraud, as detailed at: Audi Alteram Partem Notice to Republic of South Africa5.

The Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to Europe for African White Refugees Petition and Briefing Paper was submitted by email to the Stamvader/Progenitor nations of Netherlands6, France7, Germany8, United Kingdom9, and Switzerland10; and finally to the NATO Military Committee Chiefs of Defence11, between 05 to 16 December 2010.

One hundred and sixty EU politicians, academics, legal experts and military officials were petitioned; the majority of whom acknowledged receipt of the petitions for their attention.

The Boer Volkstaat for African White Refugees Petition appeals for: [A] Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Boer-Volkstaat in S. Africa; or in the absence thereof;

1

Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, Der Spiegel http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,715138,00.html http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Leaked-German-Military-Study-Warns-of-Peak-Oil-Crisis.html; Oilquake in the Middle East, by Michael Klare http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-03-03/oilquake-middle-east 2 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/humans-endangered-species-i-power-of.html 3 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/tunisia-egypt-libyatick-tock-peak-oil.html 4 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/03/exponential-economic-population-growth.html 5 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/za_southafrica.htm 6 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_netherlands.htm 7 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_france.htm 8 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_germany.htm 9 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_uk.htm 10 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_switzerland.htm 11 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/eu_nato.htm

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return, for African White Refugees ·§· www.jussanguinis.com PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

[B] The legislative enactment of Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by the relevant Progenitor/Stamvader EU Nations, for EU citizenship for African White Refugee descendants.

The Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Petition Evidentiary Arguments and Justifications; are contained in the Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Briefing Paper, which is also available for PDF download from www.african-white-refugees.co.nr. Briefly the Justification arguments are: 

International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Just War Theory; S. 235 of the SA Constitution, 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination signed by the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party;



ANC’s TRC Fraud: African National Congress (ANC) / Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) / Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud: (a) Just War Theory Arguments; (b) Clash of Cultures Friction Theory Arguments; (c) Population Policy Common Sense Arguments.



Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession & Economic Relocalisation: The geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving population pressures colliding with declining resources multi-cultural conflicts, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic resource war consequences of Peak Oil.

On 05 January 2011, the General Secretariat Parliamentary Services Office of Hansheiri Inderkum, Swiss President of the Council of States; requested that the Petition be submitted in hardcopy form and bear each Petitioners original signature; that such original hardcopy be submitted to the Swiss Embassy in Pretoria. Accordingly hardcopy Petitions and Briefing Papers are also being submitted to the other Petitioned Progenitor Nations, NATO, and other EU and UN nations.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone (Co-Founding Petitioner to France, United Kingdom and Netherlands)

Hendrik du Plessis (Co-Founding Petitioner to France and Germany)

Jus Sanguinis Petitioners to Republique Francaise (See Pg JS.17-19 & 22-24):

DU PLESSIS: Hendrik

DU PLESSIS: Louis Pierre

VORSTER, Lize Russelle (Du Plessis)

JOHNSTONE: Lara

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return, for African White Refugees ·§· www.jussanguinis.com PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

DUNCAN: Bennie

DU PLESSIS STODDART: RIA

DU PREEZ: Jaco

DE BEER: Jesica

LE GRANGE: Johannes Ferdinand

LE GRANGE: Johannes Ferdinand Jnr

LE GRANGE: Phillip Mario

LE ROUX: Andries Theron

LE ROUX: Inge

LE ROUX: Rudolph Martin

Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return, for African White Refugees ·§· www.jussanguinis.com PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

07 December 2010 Hon. Ambassador: Jacques Lapouge Republique Francaise Embassy 250 Melk Street, Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria 0181, South Africa Tel: 012 425 1600 | Fax: 012 425 1609 E-mail: france@ambafrance-rsa.org

Ref: * Peak Oil: Implications Of Resource Scarcity On (National) Security; Center for German Army Transformation, Group for “Future Studies”, July 20101; * The 2010 ASPO Conference: National Security Aspects2

CC:

Attorney Mr. Rocco Galati 637 College Street, Suite 203 Toronto, Ontario M6G 1B5 Telephone: (416) 536-7811 FAX: (416) 536-6801 c/o: Russel Kaplan, Barrister & Solicitor 838 Somerset West Street West, Suite 30 Ottawa, Ontario, K1R 6R7 Tel: (613) 233 7900 | Fax: (613) 233 0800

Ref: 24 November 2010 ruling in Docket: IMM-4423-09: Minister of Immigration and Brandon Huntley

CC:

Judge James Russell Judge of the Federal Court Federal Court, Ottowa, Ontario, K1A 0H9, Canada

Ref: 24 November 2010 ruling in Docket: IMM-4423-09: Minister of Immigration and Brandon Huntley

c/o:

CC:

Adèle Dion, High Commissioner High Commission of Canada in Pretoria Private Bag X13 Hatfield, 0028, Pretoria Telephone: +27-12 422 3000 Fax: +27-12 422 3052 Email: pret@international.gc.ca

Dr. Gregory Stanton

1 Military Study Warns of Potentially Drastic Oil Crisis, Der Spiegel http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,715138,00.html Leaked German Military Study Warns of Peak Oil, Robert Rapier, Oil Price, 03 September 2010: This week a study on peak oil by a German military think tank was leaked on the Internet. The document shows that the German government is closely studying the issue of peak oil, and is aware of the potential for serious consequences as oil production declines. The study is reminiscent of the Hirsch Report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy, that warned of the risks posed by peak oil. The document warns of the potential for regional shortages, market failures, and a shift in political power toward those capable of exporting oil. http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Leaked-German-Military-Study-Warnsof-Peak-Oil-Crisis.html 2 The 2010 ASPO conference: national security aspects, by Rick Munroe, Energy Bulletin, 17 October 2010 http://energybulletin.net/stories/2010-10-17/2010-aspo-conference-national-security-aspects

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

Genocide Watch P.O. Box 809, Washington, D.C. 20044 USA. Tel: 703-448-0222 E-mail:communications@genocidewatch.org

Dear Ambassador Lapouge,

Request for Transparent Official Forwarding of African White Refugees Petition to Officials and citizens of the French Republic / Republique Francaise: Volkstaat Secession in South Africa; or Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) French Citizenship for African White Refugees.

The Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees campaign herewith submits the following Petitions to the French Republic Embassy in South Africa, for official forwarding to the following Republique Francaise Officials and Civil Society Citizens: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

President Nicolas Sarkozy, Elysee Palace, Paris3 Jacques Chirac & Jean-Francois Cope, Union pour un Mouvement Populaire / Union for a People's Movement (UMP)4 Jean-Marie Le Pen, Front National (FN) / National Front5 Cecile Duflot, The Greens / Les Verts (VEC / LV)6 Philippe de Villiers, Movement for France / Mouvement pour la France (MPF)7 Martine Aubry, Socialist Party / Parti Socialiste (PS)8 Herve Morin, New Centre / Nouveau Centre (NC) / European Social Liberal Party / Parti Social Liberal Europeen (PSLE)9 Frederic Nihous, Hunting, Fishing, Nature, Tradition / Chasse, Peche, Nature, Traditions (CPNT)10 Gilles Piquois, European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Coordinator for France11 Francois Julien – Laferriere, ELENA Refugee Law Expert, Professor in Public Law at the Universite de Paris-Sud12 Denis Alland, ELENA Refugee Law Expert, Professor in Public Law at the Universite Pantheon-Assas Paris II13 Jacqueline Benassayag, France Terre d'Asile, ELENA Refugee Assistance Org.14 Catherine Teitgen-Colly, ELENA Refugee Law Expert, Professor in Public Law at the Université de Paris-Sud15 Alexis Spire, EU Democracy Observatory (EUDO) on Citizenship Expert, Center National de La Recherche Scientifique, Universite Lille 2 Droit et Sante16

3

http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/President-Nicolas-Sarkozy.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/UMP_J-Chiraq--JF-Cope.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/FN_Jean-Marie-Le-Pen.htm 6 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/LV_Cecile-Duflot.htm 7 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/MPF_Philippe-de-Villiers.htm 8 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/PS_Martine-Aubry.htm 9 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/NC_Herve-Morin.htm 10 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/CPNT_Frederic-Nihous.htm 11 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/ELENA_Gilles-Piquois.htm 12 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/ELENA_FJ-Laferriere-Prof.htm 13 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/ELENA_Dennis-Alland-Prof.htm 14 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/FTDA_Jacqueline-Benassayag.htm 15 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/ELENA_Catherine-Teitgen-Colly.htm 16 http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/CNRS_Alexis-Spire.htm 4 5

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

15.

16.

17.

18.

Patrick Weil, EUDO Citizenship Expert, Directeur de Recherche au CNRS, Université Paris I - Panthéon-Sorbonne17 Christophe Bertossi, EUDO Citizenship Expert, Director of the "Migrations, Identities, Citizenship" Program, French Institute of Intl Relations - Ifri (Paris).18 Board of Directors, Forum réfugiés19 Jean H. Laherrère & Xavier Chavanne, Membre d'ASPO France, Membre d'ASPO: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas20

Justifications for Transparent Official Forwarding Request: [A] Judge James Russell’s African White Refugee Assertions of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, US State Department and British Home Office as ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective evidence.’

[1]

On 24 November 2010, Canadian Federal Court Judge James Russell’s ruling21 in Docket: IMM-4423-09: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Brandon Huntley asserts (in among others para 59 and 67), that Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, U.S. State Department and British Home Office are ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective evidence’ in refugee matters.

[2]

It is herewith alleged these NGO’s and Government entities may be ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective evidence’ in many refugee matters, where they have no particular ideological bias in support of, or against, either of the relevant parties they are reporting upon. This is however not the case when it comes to South Africa, where these organisations are -- as members of, or ideological supporters of the ANC / Anti-Apartheid Movement -- hugely biased against ethnoculturally conservative white South Africans/African White Refugees.

[3]

In fact, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International AntiApartheid Movement communities endorsement, silence and censorship of the ANC’s horrific torture, execution and detention without trial, of its own ANC members at Camp Quatro in Angola for years and years, documents when it comes to endorsing the persecution of those deemed by ANC leaders to be enemies of the ANC; organisations and government officials who considered themselves members of the Anti-Apartheid Movement have no objections whatsoever to endorsing and supporting not only persecution, by horrific torture and executions, by the ANC of their own dissenting members. To believe that such NGO’s or government officials who endorse the ANC’s torture, execution and persecution of their own, would object to the ANC’s Ethno-cultural White European enemies being tortured, executed and persecuted, is unbelievably naïve. The only Anti-Apartheid organisation that objected to the ANC’s Camp Quatro treatment of ANC dissenters, or SWAPO’s torture, execution and persecution treatment of its dissenters, was Baruch Hirson’s democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa who

17 18 19 20 21

http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/CNRS_Patrick-Weil.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/IFRI_Christophe-Bertossi.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/Forum-refugies.htm http://www.jussanguinis.com/JS-RoR/fr/ASPO-France.htm http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/11/imm-4423-09-judge-james-russell-24.html

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

described the ANC led Anti-Apartheid Movement as “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”22 “The ANC’s Camp Quatro regime of terror, was a necessary element in the total practice of repression and deception which made the Anti-Apartheid Movement the most successful Popular Front lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”

“In its 30 years’ existence, the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) put international collaborative organisations of the period of the Spanish Civil War and of the StalinRoosevelt-Churchill alliance to shame. Extending to the press, the churches, the bourgeois political parties, the trade unions and the radical, even the ‘trotskyist’ left, the AAM has been an outstanding success for Stalinism.. [..] Vital to its success has been a practice of open and covert censorship now blown wide open. [..] The ANC’s

Camp Quatro prisoners were its necessary sacrificial victims.”

[4]

It is herewith also further alleged that such NGO and government official AntiApartheid Movement bias requires them to ignore, censor and/or suppress evidence of the ANC South African government’s practices, rulings, cases and treatment of ethno-cultural conservative White South Africans that document the systemic elements required to constitute persecution, whenever it suits their Poverty Pimping or Human Rights Ecolaw Fraud ideological agenda’s.

[5]

It is alleged that these organisations have hugely different standards in their demands from European conservative governments treatment of black Africans (as they had of Apartheid, but not of any other Black African state, who treated black Africans far worse than Apartheid did); which are required to be of an exceptionally high standard; than they do of African governments treatment of Africans or conservative Europeans, for which the standard is lowered to include almost any kind of systemic persecution, torture or execution, as long as the NGO or government entity can get away with pretending they don’t know about it, or describing it is ‘random’ or non-systemic.

[6]

For example: None of these Anti-Apartheid Movement ideologically biased organisations or government agencies consider the expert opinion of the world's top expert on the subject of Genocide, Dr Gregory Stanton -- a former US state department legal expert who set up "Genocide Watch", who has no Anti-Apartheid Movement ideological bias support for the persecution of African White Refugees, as relevant for inclusion in their reports. Dr. Stanton, of Genocide Watch asserts that the crime experienced by whites in South Africa is no ordinary crime wave, but a form of genocide, in accordance with the Genocide Watch international law definition of the term genocide.

[7]

None of these Anti-Apartheid Movement ideologically biased organisations or government are remotely interested in any impartial enquiry as to the lack of ANC leaders commitment to any social contract with white South Africans, considering: (a) Former Minister of Safety and Security, Charles Nqakula was by far not the only person who is blatantly indifferent and contemptuous towards whites concern about crime, as he stated in Parliament; that ‘whites who keep complaining about crime, should either just go blue in the face, or leave the country’23.

22 Mutinies in the Liberation Armies: Inside Quadro, by Paul Trewhela (Searchlight South Africa, Vol 2, No 1: July 1990 p. 30-35). Searchlight South Africa’s expose of ANC Mbokodo Camp Quatro atrocities available at: (www.mbokodo-quatro-uncensored.co.nr) 23 SA Institute of Race Relations: Governments Disdainful Indifference towards Concern About Crime

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

(b) In 1998, then President Nelson Mandela said the same thing. He claimed that fear of crime was mainly a white preoccupation fomented by a mainly whiteowned press. Of people who left the country because of crime, the then President said, “Good Riddance” 24. (c) Some years later the then Minister of Justice, Penuell Maduna, and the then Minister of Safety and Security, Steve Tshwete, scoffed at rape statistics when they said on American television, ‘We’ve been standing here for 26 seconds and nobody has been raped’25. Since then the rape statistics in South Africa have gone from one woman raped every 26 seconds, to every 17 seconds.

[8]

The argument that asserts that simply because black South Africans are equally the victims of crime in South Africa, means whites should ‘shut up, go blue in the face, f**k off, or endure rape, torture and murder with a smile on their faces, or be deemed ‘racists’; totally ignores the reality that IF black South Africans are remotely sincerely upset or concerned about crime; they are the demographic majority and capable of electing alternative political parties or leaders who are serious and sincere about the importance of a competent ethical police force, justice system and government to seriously, competently and impartially deal with everyone and anyone alleged to be guilty of any crime. White South Africans are not politically capable of removing the corrupt and incompetent ANC; only black South Africans are; and black South Africans couldn’t care less about doing so.

[B] Censorship & Suppression of African White Refugees Documentation by International and South African Officials, Organisations and Corporations: [I]

International Refugee Agency Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa:

[1]

Between 21 October 2009, to 16 February 2010, dozens and dozens of European Refugee Agencies affiliated with European Council for Refugee (ECRE) and/or European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA), were directly contacted with a ‘Legal Memo’ providing them with information about the SA’s governments political and legal persecution of a member of the Radical Honesty community: Lara Johnstone.

[2]

In particular, Lara Johnstone had been (a) illegally arrested, without a valid arrest warrant (18 July 2007); (b) denied right to appear in court within 24 hours of arrest (19 July 2007); (c) illegally detained for 33 days in Pollsmoor prison (18 July – 22 Aug 2007); (c) denied right to information (alleged Arrest Warrant) to defend her rights (18 July 2007 to present); (d) denied impartial investigating Officer, Prosecutor and Magistrate (18 July to present); (e) framed in court by Investigating Officer and Prosecutor who intentionally withheld critical evidence of innocence (cellphone conversations with plaintiff) from the court; (f) framed by Magistrate who ignores Plaintiff committing perjury on affidavit and witness stand; (g) denied valid legal internationally recognized Political Necessity defence; (h) denied international cultural and psychological integrity expert witness evidentiary testimony by Dr. Brad Blanton and Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz; (i) denied right to not be found guilty of an act that is ‘lawful’ (i.e. as per common law ‘reasonableness’ test); (j) denied right

24 25

SA Institute of Race Relations: Governments Disdainful Indifference towards Concern About Crime SA Institute of Race Relations: Governments Disdainful Indifference towards Concern About Crime

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

to withdraw formal admissions if Prosecution breach the ‘Formal Admission/Plea’ Agreement; (k) denied right not to be sentenced to a suspended prison sentence for an act that the law says is ‘lawful’, etc.

[3]

Not one International Refugee Agency made any enquiries for any further information or evidence For example:

[4]

The response from Refugee and Migrant Justice, UK: From: Jill Rutter [mailto:jrutter@rmj.org.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:17 PM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Not read: Refugee & Migrant Justice, UK: Legal Memo: FYI: Refugee Issues Your message To: Jill Rutter Subject: Refugee & Migrant Justice, UK: Legal Memo: FYI: Refugee Issues Sent: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:06:02 -0000 was deleted without being read on Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:17:03 -0000 -Refugee and Migrant Justice – lawyers defending human rights.

Delivering quality legal help and campaigning for change: fairer decisions, more humane treatment, wider protection.

Refugee and Migrant Justice Registered charity number 1012804 Registered in England and Wales number 2710867 Registered address 153-157 Commercial Road, London, E1 2DA

[5]

The response from European Council on Refugees & Exiles (ECRE): From: Laurent Aldenhoff [mailto:laldenhoff@ecre.org] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:38 AM To: Lara Johnstone Subject: Not read: ECRE: European Council on Refugees & Exiles: Legal Memo: FYI: Refugee Issues Your message To: General emails Subject: ECRE: European Council on Refugees & Exiles: Legal Memo: FYI: Refugee Issues Sent: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:37:14 +0200 was deleted without being read on Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:37:51 +0200 ECRE is an AISBL under Belgian law, Registration Number 0809.651.278

[II] SA Political, Academic and Media Elite Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa: [1]

Dr. Brad Blanton – Radical Honesty author, ‘Dr. Truth’ psychologist and ‘Honesty in Politics’ Candidate for US Congress in 2004 and 2006, filed a written affidavit,

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

wherein he stated under oath as an Expert Witness26, filed in the High Court Western Cape #19963-0927; that:  If South Africa does not value non-violent civil disobedience free speech dissent, as one of its hallmarks; then it is not a democratic country.  Hon. Mrs. De Lille, and the NPA Senior Prosecutor conducted a political and legal prosecution and persecution campaign against the defendant.  The law of crimen injuria is a law so ridiculous, it appears to date back to a belief in curses from witchdoctors. [Put differently, any society that values the principle of 'crimen injuria'; is one that values protecting the right of people with fragile ego's to not be offended as more important, than protecting the right of Galileo's and Voltaire's to offend.]  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally punishing defendant for practicing her culture and religion of Radical Honesty: non-violently telling another the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; with a commitment to remaining in the conversation until sincere forgiveness has occurred.  The South African government are deliberately and intentionally denying defendant her right to a defence; and ignoring the justification and accuracy of her non-violent civil disobedience political necessity defence.  That there is a significant difference between posed forgiveness and real forgiveness and that this difference is almost always avoided by politicians, including South Africa’s alleged Truth and Reconciliation politicians. Put differently: S. Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation was not real & sincere; but fake & posed; a political fraud committed against SA citizens.

[2]

One hundred and 40 of SA’s Academic, Media, Political and Civil Society ‘TRC’ ‘Leaders’ were personally contacted to inform them of the information and evidence provided to Dr. Blanton, and to determine whether they would join Dr. Blanton, to object to the legal and political persecution and prosecution of a South African citizen, by providing a public comment of objection to such persecution by the SA goverment.

[3]

Not one would provide a comment to object to the SA Government persecution of the Radical Honesty White Refugee. Not one disputed the Radical Honesty White Refugee’s persecution: the illegal arrest, detention, obstruction of justice, denial of defence and due process, conviction & sentence for a lawful act; i.e. political & legal persecution.

[4]

One hundred and twenty-three (87%) were so deliberately indifferent they had no objection to their comment being stated as: “Deliberate Indifference: I, Name (Job Description) am deliberately indifferent to certain people of certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions being politically and legally persecuted and prosecuted; and you and Brandon Huntley, fit one or more of those particular ethnic, ideological, cultural or religious categories, towards whom I am deliberately indifferent; or on occasion, whose persecution I publicly, or privately endorse.”

[5]

26 27 28

On Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:18 AM; the ‘140 SA Elite are Deliberately Indifferent to the Legal and Political Persecution of a SA Citizen/White Refugee’ report28 was

See Evid. Doc’s listed at: http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-truth-sas-trc-was-fake-dog-and-pony.html http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/2333061 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100321_140-sa-elite-dindif-rhwr-persecution?mode=a_p

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

provided to Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Mr. Jason Kenney. It consisted of the correspondence to the political, academic and media SA elite, who admitted that they are deliberately indifferent to the legal and political persecution and prosecution of individuals from certain ethnicities and/or ideologies and/or cultures and/or religions, and that Brandon Huntley and members of Radical Honesty fit one or more of those particular ethnic, ideological, cultural or religions categories towards whom they are deliberately indifferent or on occasion whose persecution they publicly or privately endorse.

[III] SA Media and Constitutional Court Response to Political & Legal Persecution of Radical Honesty culture Member in South Africa: [1]

On 03 May 2010, the Constitutional Court of South Africa approved Johnstone’s application, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, to file an Amicus Curiae, in support of the Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act.

[2]

The Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae29 was filed on 18 July 2010, and requests the court to clarify numerous issues related to multi-cultural definitions and interpretations of various important ‘TRC’ social contract concepts, such as forgiveness, reconciliation, including whether Radical Honesty is a culture and religion, or a refugee status; considering SA courts criminalisation of Radical Honesty practices, and refusal to make impartial cultural enquiries or to consider cultural expert witness testimony on behalf of Johnstone. The Radical Honesty Amicus is supported by expert witness Affidavits from Dr. Brad Blanton30 and Dr. T. Michael Maher31.

[3]

All media publications have censored the contents of the Radical Honesty White Refugee Amicus Curiae before the Constitutional Court, from the South African public and international community’s right to know.

[4]

A complaint to the South African Press Ombudsman about the SA Media’s censorship of the Radical Honesty White Refugee Amicus Curiae and its contents before the Concourt was dismissed without hearing.

[5]

The complaint32 alleged that the Media’s censorship of the Radical Honesty argument was an intentional, malicious campaign of censorship of the Radical Honesty Amicus arguments: (a) ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; (b) Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; (c) Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid PopulationEnvironment Connection Study; (d) TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ was a Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Afrikaner Demographic Survival; (e) That 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution of the Radical Honesty White Refugee.

29

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100718_rhwr-concourt-amicus?mode=a_p Written Statement by Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness. http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100518_cc2310_affid-bblanton?mode=a_p 31 How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D.; CCT 23-10: Written Statement by Consent of T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection?mode=a_p http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100522_concourt-expwitness-tmmaher?mode=a_p 32 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/100930_rhwr_ecolaw-press-ombudsman?mode=a_p 30

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

[6]

The Dismissal without hearing was appealed to the Press Appeals Panel33, where it was also dismissed without hearing34. An application for review of these administrative decisions by the Press Council is currently being drawn up, for direct access to the Constitutional Court.

[IV] UNHCR Response to African White Refugee Petition to Federal Court Canada, Justice’s via: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada: [1]

At 03:31 hrs on 13 September 2009, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres, acknowledged receipt of the African White Refugees Petition (www.why-we-are-white-refugees.co.nr), which makes the following requests: [A]

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres, [is] to co-ordinate this White Refugee signatories petition, by submitting it on behalf of the Petitioners, to Minister of Citizenship & Immigration: Mr. Jason Kenney; and/or his Counsel: Deputy Attorney General of Canada: John H. Sims, HQ.

[B]

If Leave to Judicial Review, is granted, by the Federal Court of Canada; Petitioners herewith request that Minister of Citizenship & Immigration for Canada, and/or his Counsel: Deputy Attorney General of Canada, to submit this Why We Are White Refugees Petition, as an enclosure to their Application for Review, to the Federal Court of Canada, for their due process consideration;

[C]

the Federal Court of Canada, to Please Take Notice that: [The petition provides extensive detailed evidence supporting Mr. Brandon Huntley and Ms. Lara Kaplan’s arguments, which included among others: (i) the undisputable evidence from the world's top expert on the subject of Genocide, Dr Gregory Stanton -- a former US state department legal expert who set up "Genocide Watch", who has no Anti-Apartheid Movement ideological bias support for the persecution of African White Refugees; and (ii) The South African Goverments Response to South Africans who complain about Crime in South Africa: In parliament, Safety and Security Minister, Charles Nqakula, informed "you whites", that complain about crime to 'get out of the country if you don't like the crime.']

[2]

Considering Judge James Russell’s 24 November 2010 ruling35 in The Minister of Immigration and Brandon Huntley, wherein Judge Russel makes no mention whatsoever of the Why We Are White Refugees petition, submitted to the Federal Court via UNHCR and above authorities, it is plausible that either the UNHCR or the Deputy Attorney General of Canada did not submit the petition to the Federal Court, as requested, and lacked the honour and integrity to inform the African White Refugee petitioners of their intentional refusal to do so.

[3]

It is clear that organisations and governmental bodies deemed by Judges to allegedly be ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective documentary evidence’ on the issue of Refugees, cannot even be considered credible and trustworthy ‘forwarding postal agents’ of evidentiary information regarding African White Refugees, which their ANC and/or Poverty Pimping and/or Anti-Ecolaw ideological bias, requires them to censor, ignore, or suppress. Considering such organisations as ‘credible trustworthy sources’ on the issue of African White Refugees or racially motivated

33 34 35

http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101011_sapap-appeal_35-ecolaw-justice?mode=a_p http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/101117_sapap_jzulman-35-ecolaw?mode=a_p http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/11/imm-4423-09-judge-james-russell-24.html

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

resource war criminal political violence, will not result in any court acquiring ‘objective documentary evidence’ about the reality of African White Refugees.

Conclusions and Justification for Request for Transparent Official Forwarding: International NGO’s and Government Departments, who endorse (i) the ANC / AntiApartheid Movement (AAM)’s narrative of South African Apartheid history, and/or (ii) Poverty Pimping (abnormal government-sponsored population explosions of poverty and violence) breeding wars as a tactic for power/status36; (iii) Human Rights and social justice, while ignoring, censoring or suppressing the population policy requirements for an ecological social contract (Ecolaw: the ecological carrying capacity laws of sustainability37); cannot be considered ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ of ‘objective documentary evidence’; when it comes to respectively (i) their nemesis: “Boers” (i.e. ethno-cultural conservative European Africans); and (ii) & (iii) the demographic/overpopulation ecological overshoot root causes of resource war political violence.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone

Hendrik du Plessis

(§ » DE VILLIERS, Jacques (Jacob))

(§ » DU PLESSIS, Jean Prieur)

On behalf of Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Founding Petitioners to France: BURGER, Christa, CILLIERS, Adriaan, DE BEER, Jesica, DUNCAN, Bennie, DU PLESSIS, Hendrik, DU PLESSIS, Louis Pierre, DU PREEZ, Jaco, DU TOIT, Francois Jacobus, HOGAN, Sabrina, JOHNSTONE, Lara, LE GRANGE, Johannes Ferdinand, LE GRANGE, Johannes Ferdinand Jnr, LE GRANGE, Philip Mario, LE ROUX, Andries Theron, LE ROUX, Inge, LE ROUX, Rudolph Martin, ROSSOUW, Braam, VORSTER, Lize Russelle (born Du Plessis).

36 Their preference for ‘collateral damage’ slave and cannon fodder breeding as a policy to secure their own aggrandizement -- as opposed to population policy common sense human rights, peace and social justice ecological carrying capacity advocacy -- “committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups… with the intention of maintaining that regime.”? (International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid; 18 July 1976, Article XV: Art. II 37 18 Laws of Sustainability are articulated by Dr. Albert Bartlett, in Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth and the Environment, republished in The Essential Exponential! For the Future of our Planet

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe, for African White Refugees PO Box 5042 George East, RSA, 6539 ·§· Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 ·§· www.jussanguinis.com

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

„“All the great nations of the earth have what the Jews call a Diaspora”, and nations have “special and residual obligation(s) toward them”, which “include recognizing their right to citizenship”.‟ – -- Conservative MP Quintin Hogg, Baron Hailsham of St. Marylebone, announcing his support for right of return legislation in Britain1.

“The Dutch government „has a very special responsibility towards all South Africans of Dutch descent.‟” --–Kees van der Staaij, Staatkundig-Gereformeerde Party, in response to a Jus Sanguinis Right of Return letter from Boers, to Geert Wilders2 “Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx‟s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of 1

Joppke, Christian, Immigration and the Nation-State; The United States, Germany and Great Britain, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p.110 Bange Zuid-Afrikanen smeken om Wilders' hulp, Casper Naber & Axel Veldhuuzen, Algemene Dagblad, 23/04/2010 http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/04/help-asseblief-graaf-wilders-royal.html 2

JS.01

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

production.” -- Eve‟s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History , by Robert McElvaine “We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war.” –-- Jason G. Brent, Attorney and author of Humans: An Endangered Species “Population control will be difficult enough to achieve peacefully if society has merely to deal with families that differ in their desire to have children. If groups larger than the family assert their intention to exceed community norms, the difficulty in achieving population control will be greatly compounded. This problem is often stated as a racial problem. Some exponents of “Black Power” identify all proposals to control population as “genocide” and call upon blacks to engage in a breeding war” -- Garrett Hardin, Stalking the Wild Taboo: Population, Biology and the Law, p.231 “With complete freedom in reproduction, conscientious people will be eliminated.”

-- Garrett Hardin, The Feast of Malthus: Living within Limits and The Tragedy

of the Commons

“What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except -- breed. And how easy it is to do nothing.” -- Isaac Asimov „As far as relations with the other peoples of SA the National Party believed that its interests could be best served by following a policy of "separateness" - or apartheid. Only in this manner, would the whites in general - and Afrikaners in particular - avoid being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of the black peoples of our country. Only in this manner would they be able to maintain their JS.02

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

own identity and their right to rule themselves [..], because any other course would inevitably lead to inter-racial conflict.‟ -- Submission to Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) by National Party Leader, President F.W. de Klerk3 “The agricultural department of a bank in South Africa has calculated the per capita murder rate of ethno-European farmers to be four (4) times greater than the average murder rate for the population of South Africa.” -- GenocideWatch Report, 2002 “The Committee also interviewed 15 prosecutors -- all of them state advocates -in Bloemfontein, Capetown, Kimberley, Pietermaritzburg and Pretoria. They were unanimously of the view that .... the degree of violence and cruelty during farm attacks was exceedingly high. Most state advocates attributed this extreme violence to racial hatred.” -- Report: Comm. of Enquiry into Farm Attacks, July 20034 “We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.” -- Moammar Gadhafi, April 10, 2006 “In fact, let us deal with this “racist” label right now. It is not racist to defend your country against an obvious and growing threat. It is not racist to defend your culture, your heritage, and your traditions. It is not racist to work to ensure a democratic future for your children and grandchildren. If you choose not to defend your country, your culture and the democratic future of your children, [.. ] there is no getting away from the label I have for you. You are a traitor and a betrayer of your country, a betrayer of your culture, and a betrayer of our yet unborn children.” -- Paul Weston: “We Will Hold You to Account” for Islamicization of Europe5, Amsterdam Freedom of Speech Rally

3

Submission to Truth & Reconciliation Commission by National Party Leader http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2010/09/sa-farm-attacks-wwwsa-farm-attacksconr.html 5 http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/10/we-will-hold-you-to-account.html 4

JS.03

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Numerical Significance of 10/31/16 10: 10 October 1825 Birth of a Boer President: Paul Kruger: Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger (10 October 1825 – 14 July 1904), better known as Paul Kruger, or Uncle Paul (Afrikaans: "Oom Paul") was State President of the South African Republic (Transvaal), four times. He gained international renown as the face of Boer resistance against the British during the South African or Second Boer War (1899–1902). Kruger was also instrumental in the formation of the Kruger National Park, after advocating the policy of setting aside specific areas for animals to proliferate without human interference. Kruger was a descendant of German immigrants to South Africa. His ancestor, Jacobus Krüger, emigrated from Berlin to South Africa in 1713 to work as a mercenary for the Dutch East India Company (VOC). There are streets and squares named after Kruger in Dutch towns and cities. In Amsterdam's Transvaalbuurt where most of the names of the streets and squares are taken from the Boer wars there is a Krugerstraat and a Krugerplein. There are other "Transvaalbuurts" in other Dutch towns and cities. These names were given some years after the Second Boer War.

31: 31 October 1517 Martin Luther Posts 95 Theses on door of Castle Church, sparking the Protestant Reformation The 95 Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, is widely regarded as the primary catalyst for the Protestant Reformation. Luther considered the doctrine of Indulgences to be religious corruption.

The sale by the church of indulgences (forgiveness) made the church huge profits. The archbishop of Mainz, Albert of Brandenburg, sponsored such a sale in 1517 to pay the pope for his appointment to Mainz and for the construction of Saint Peter's in Rome. He selected Johann Tetzel, a Dominican friar, to preach the indulgences and collect the revenues. When Tetzel arrived in Saxony, Luther posted his famous 95 theses on the door of the church of All Saints ("Castle Church"), at Univ. of Wittenberg.

Copies of the 95 theses quickly spread throughout Europe and unleashed a storm of controversy. The Saxon Dominican provincial charged Luther with heresy, and he was summoned to appear in Augsburg before the papal legate, Cardinal Cajetan. Refusing to recant, he fled to Wittenberg, seeking the protection of the elector Frederick III, (Frederick the Wise) of Saxony. When the Wittenberg faculty sent a letter to Frederick declaring its solidarity with Luther, the elector refused to send Luther to Rome, where he would certainly meet imprisonment or death.

16: 16 December 1838 Battle of Blood River: The Day of the Vow: Afrikaner’s Covenant with God The Battle of Blood River, so called due to the colour of water in the Ncome River turning red from blood, (Afrikaans: Slag van Bloedrivier; Zulu: iMpi yaseNcome) was fought between 470 Voortrekkers led by Andries Pretorius, and an estimated 10,000–15,000 Zulu attackers on the bank of the Ncome River on 16 December 1838, in what is today KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Casualties amounted to three thousand of King Dingane's soldiers dead, including two Zulu princes competing with prince Mpande for the Zulu throne. Three Trekker commando members were lightly wounded, including Pretorius himself. The besieged Voortrekkers took a public vow (or covenant) together before the battle, led by either Andries Pretorius or Sarel Cilliers. In return for God's help in obtaining victory, they promised to build a church. Participants also vowed that they and their descendants would keep the day as a holy Sabbath. In 1994, the ANC Government unilaterally changed the name to the „Day of Reconciliation‟, while escalating their „breeding war‟ tactic of war: the population explosion of poverty & misery blamed on apartheid!

JS.04

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

TABLE OF CONTENTS:  Numerical Significance of 10/31/16  Volkstaat Secession: Jus Sanguinis Right -of-Return Founding Petitioners & their Progenitors/Stamvaders

JS.4 JS.8-19

 Endorsements

JS.20-23

 Executive Summary

JS.24-30

[A] Just War: Tragedy of the Breeding War Commons 1.

Just War Tradition: Mutually Agreed Rules of Combat between Culturally Similar Enemies: Jus Ad Bellum Convention, Principles of Jus In Bello & Just Post Bellum

A.1-4

2.

Population Policy Common Sense: Eco-Numeracy, Exponential Functions & Carrying Capacity, Youth Bulge Population Pressure Conflicts & Competitive Exclusion Principle.

A.5-11

[B] Politically Incorrect Truths About Apartheid Conflict 1.

Forsaking Gandhian Non-violence, honour & character.. ANC-Fanonstein spawned Gov. of comrade-tsotsis, gangsters & kleptomaniacs

B.1-3

2.

Pandora‟s Multi-Culti Apartheid Box: SA‟s Multi-Cultural, Multi-Lingual, MultiRacial Integration Nightmare

B.3-5

3.

SACP‟s M-Plan: Violent Liberation & Mandela‟s Cult of Personality

B.6-9

4.

No Proper Authority: Did Black South Africans want Black Rule?

5.

No Right Intention: Did „Evil Apartheid‟ raise poor Black living standards to highest in Africa?

B.12-14

6.

Black Consciousness & Fanon‟s Handbook for Black Liberation: „Violence as a cleansing Liberating Force‟

B.14-21

7.

ANC‟s People‟s War: Terrorize the People to Support the „Liberation Struggle‟

B.21-27

8.

The Nature & Causes of Apartheid: A Just War for Boer-Afrikaner Demographic Survival

B.27-32

9.

Apartheids Strategic Ethno-Demographic Political Mistakes

B.32-34

B.9-11

[C] Rainbow Illusions: Truth and Reconciliation Fraud 1.

TRC Social Contract provides NO Definitions for Multi-Cultural MultiInterpretation of Key Concepts of „Forgiveness‟, „Reconciliation‟, „Closure‟ and „Ubuntu‟.

C.1-2

2.

Western Descartian Individualist “I Think, therefore I am” vs. African Ubuntu Conformist “I participate, therefore I am.”

C.2-4

3.

Black Liberation Theology: Salvation/Liberation by Marxist/Fanon Class

C.4-8

JS.05

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Struggle, not Reconciliation/Forgiveness of Sins 4.

Stalinist Popular Front: ANC‟s Mbokodo Quatro Torture Camps

5.

Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done; by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission?

C.11-15

6.

Masculine Insecurity Poverty Pimping: ANC‟s Population Production of Poverty & Violence Breeding War

C.16-25

7.

Land Grabs & Farm Murders: A Rainbow-TRC-Peace, or Racial-Hatred-War Reality?

C.26-29

8.

Zimbabwefication of South Africa: State‟s Systemic Collapse

C.29-41

9.

Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, Amicus Curiae to Constitutional Court: CENSORED

C.42-43

C.8-11

[D] Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return 1.

Wake Up Whitey!: African White Refugee Canaries in the International EthnoCultural Geopolitical Coalmine

D.1-2

2.

Europe commits Ethno-Cultural Suicide: Dr. Frank Ellis reviews Dr. Thilo Sarrazin‟s Germany Consigns Itself to Oblivion

D.2-8

3.

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: Cultural & Ethno Homogeneity

4.

Multiculturalism Impossible with Dysfunctional Cultures

D.17-21

5.

Peak Oil, Economic Collapse & Friction Theory Cultural Conflict

D.21-27

6.

ABC‟s of Ecology: Food Production & Population Growth; Peak Oil and Population DieOff

D.27-30

7.

Parallel Goals: Economic Relocalisation & Political Secession

D.30-32

8.

Secession in SA: Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK): Electoral Commission for the Election of a Boer-Afrikaner People‟s Assembly

D.33-37

D.8-17

[E] Evidentiary Annexures Attached & Online [a]

Letter from Nelson Mandela to Freedom Front: General Constand Viljoen: Mandela endorses the Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party, on April 23, 1994.

E.1-1

[b]

Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party

E.2-8

[c]

ONLINE6: List of Signatories to the Why We Are White Refugees Petition

[d]

ONLINE: Updated List of Names of Farmers/Small Holders Murdered since 1994, as compiled by Adriana Stuijt7, verified by Lara Johnstone

Research, Compilation and Admin Info: Research, compilation and editing done by Lara Johnstone and Hendrik du Plessis.

The Jus Sanguinis website (www.jussanguinis.com) is sponsored by emigrated South African International corporate attorney in New Zealand and United States of America, Dr. Jay-D Olivier. Read/Download Briefing Paper at: www.jussanguinis.com; Direct link: www.african-white-refugees.co.nr

6 7

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/minister-of-citizenship-immigration-canada http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/

JS.06

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Founding Petitioners Hereby Petition their Relevant EU Progenitor/Stamvader Nations for: [A] International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a „European Union/Boere-Afrikanerâ€&#x; Volkstaat in South Africa; Or in the absence thereof [B] Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by all relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugees descendants.

Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Justifications: (i)

(ii)

(iii) (iv)

International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Right-ofReturn, International Covenant on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc; S. 235 of the SA Constitution & Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party ANC / Anti-Apartheid Movement / TRC Fraud Peak Oil Political Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Relocalisation.

JS.07

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Volkstaat Secession: Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Founding Petitioners & their Stamvaders/Progenitors Overview: EU FOUNDING PETITIONERS 8:

EU STAMVADER/PROGENITORS:

COX, William Ernest (Billy) CRACKNELL, Magda DE BEER, Jesica DUNCAN, Bennie DU PLESSIS, Hendrik DU PLESSIS, Louis Pierre DU PLESSIS-HOBERG, Annelie DU PLESSIS STODDART, Ria DU PREEZ, Jaco HOGAN, Sabrina JOHNSTONE, Lar a LE GRANGE, Johannes Ferdinand LE GRANGE, Johannes Ferdinand Jnr LE GRANGE, Philip Mario LE ROUX, Andries Theron LE ROUX, Inge LE ROUX, Rudolph Martin MEYER, Deon Gerhard MEYER, Gerhard MEYER, Jeandre MEYER, Jean Simonet NIEWOUDT, Anita OLIVIER, Derrick OLIVIER, Laetitia Dr (nee Ras) OLIVIER, Johannes Diederik (Jay -D) Dr RAUTENBACH, Kobus VAN DUIJN, Mignon (nee Olivier) VAN TIL, Michael Marsden VAN ZYL, Erasmus Johannes Hendrik VENTER, Jaco VERWEY, Andre VERWEY, Anita N ieuwoudt VORSTER, Lize R uselle ( nee Du Plessis)

FRANCE: CILLIER, JosuĂŠ DU PLESSIS, Jean Prieur DU PRE/DES PRES, Hercule DE VILLIERS, Jacques (Jacob) DU TOIT, Francois HUGO, Daniel LE GRANGE, Pierre LE ROUX, Gabriel LOMBARD, Pierre MARE, Ignace ROUSSEAU, Pierre ROUX, Paul GERMANY: KRIEL, Hermanus RAUTENBACH, Georg Frederich VENTER, Heinrich Conrad NETHERLANDS: BOSMAN, Hermanus KOLVER, Andreas Lutgerus MEIRING, Arnoldus Mauritius NOOME, Meindert Jansz OLIVIER, Hendrik Cornelisz STEENKAMP, Jan Harmensz VAN TIL, Bartus VAN ZYL, Willem VERWEY, Gysbert SWITZERLAND: VOSTER, Jan UNITED KINGDOM: COX, William Stoyel JOHNSTONE, Augustus James STEAR, Sir John Richard WIGGILL, Isaac

8

On 27 August 2009, the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) granted white South African, Brandon Huntley, Official 'White Refugee' Status: The IRB ruling found Huntley "was a victim (of persecution) because of his race rather than a victim of criminality; who presented clear and convincing proof of the South African state and security forces' inability or unwillingness to protect him."

Transcript of IRB RULING: MA8-04910 at: http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2009/09/transcript-of-irb-william-davis-ruling.html

JS.08

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Executive Summary “An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” -– Mahatma Gandhi “We believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve these interests, which are as dear to us as to them, by advocating the purity of all races, and not one alone.” – Mahatma Gandhi, Indian Opinion, 24 September 1903

The purpose of this Briefing Paper is to argue that: [A] International and EU Political Recognition for VVK negotiations for a „European Union/Boere-Afrikaner‟ Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof [B] Jus Sanguinis Right of Return legislation by relevant EU nations, for African White Refugees, is fully justified as a result of, among others: (I) International Law, (II) S 235 of the SA Constitution, Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination, between Freedom Front, African National Congress & SA Government; (III) African National Congress (ANC) / Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) / Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud; and (IV) the geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving population pressures colliding with declining resources multi-cultural conflicts, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic friction theory resource war consequences of Peak Oil. Limitations of space and concern for the readers patience do not provide the opportunity to discuss every evidentiary argument in support of the „TRC fraud‟ thesis. Instead we focus on a few glaringly obvious „Politically Incorrect TRC fraud‟ evidentiary examples, seemingly deliberately ignored or censored by the Proudly South African Rainbow Hypocrisy worshipping academia and media, formerly known as the „Anti-Apartheid Movement‟, or if you prefer the democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa description of the Anti-Apartheid Movement: “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.” 9

TRC Fraud: Just War Tradition Arguments: 1.

Just War Tradition: Mutually Agreed Rules of Combat between Culturally Similar Enemies: Jus Ad Bellum Convention, Principles of Jus In Bello and Just Post Bellum, provides a brief overview of Just War Theory principles, and argues that the TRC‟s „Just War‟ and consequent „crimes against humanity‟ declarations against apartheid negligently or deliberately ignored fundamental Just War principles: Specifically the ANC had no Just Cause and its People‟s War „liberation struggle‟ was not a War of Last Resort. The ANC had no Proper Authority, No Right Intention, No Reasonable Prospects of Just War Success and its Desired End was not proportional to the Means Used. The ANC attacked illegitimate civilian targets – its own people - and did not use proportional force. Finally, the ANC‟s Promises of Amnesty were reneged upon, destroying all trust in future multi-cultural political agreements for minority cultures.

9

Mutinies in the Liberation Armies: Inside Quadro, by Paul Trewhela (Searchlight South Africa, Vol 2, No 1: July 1990 p. 30-35). Searchlight South Africa‟s expose of ANC Mbokodo Camp Quatro atrocities available at: (www.mbokodo-quatro-uncensored.co.nr)

JS.09

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

2.

Forsaking Commitment to Gandhian Non-violence, honour and character, the ANC-Fanonstein spawned a Government of comrade-tsotsis, gangsters & kleptomaniacs argues that the ANC violent liberation struggle was anything but a Just Cause of Last Resort, and that the ANC was without Proper Authority or Right Intention in its liberation struggle actions.

3.

SA Communist Party (SACP)‟s M-Plan: Violent Liberation and Mandela‟s Cult of Personality provides additional argument to the ANC‟s lack of Just Cause, justifications for violence as Last Resort, and lack of Right Intention.

4.

No Proper Authority: Did Black South Africans want Black Rule addresses in greater detail how and why we allege that the ANC lacked among others Proper Authority, to justify its violent liberation struggle declaration of war.

5.

No Right Intention: Did „Evil Apartheid raise poor black living standards to the highest in Africa, argues that the ANC‟s alleged outrage to justify waging war on behalf of living standards of poor black South Africans was not sincere, but fraudulent and hypocritical, considering its endorsement of the far worse living standards of poor black Africans in African states under the direct political control of the ANC‟s „liberation struggle‟ Marxists political elite friends.

6.

Black Consciousness and Fanon‟s Handbook for Black Liberation: „Violence as a cleansing liberating force‟ provides further evidence for the ANC‟s lack of Just Cause of Last Resort and Right Intention. The ANC did not consider violence a last resort, but an essential „cleansing liberating force‟. In their „Fanon Black Liberation‟ perception, liberation could only be achieved by violence, from the „rotting corpse of the settler‟; for violence was the cleansing force which freed the native from his inferiority complex, made him fearless and restored his selfrespect. It was a total repudiation of Gandhi‟s honour and integrity of non-violence principles.

7.

The ANC‟s People‟s War: Terrorize the People to Support the Liberation Struggle argues that the ANC‟s decision to „People‟s War‟ terrorize their own people, to coerce them to join the „liberation struggle‟ meant it had no Just Cause, nor was it a Last Resort. It means the ANC had no Proper Authority, no Right Intention and did not use proportional force.

8.

Zimbabwefication of South Africa: The State‟s Systemic Collapse, argues that the evidence of the ANC‟s actions to facilitate the Zimbabwefication of South Africa‟s Systemic Collapse is the final „hand in the cookie jar‟ evidence for the ANC‟s lack of Right Intention and Proper Authority; for these Systemic Collapse realities were exactly what common black citizens feared would occur under Black Rule, and why the ANC decided to terrorize them to participate in the alleged „liberation struggle‟.

9.

In Stalinist Popular Front: ANC‟s Mbokodo Quatro Torture Camps, the democratic socialist publication, Searchlight South Africa, argues that the ANC‟s Anti-Apartheid Movement was one of the largest and most successful Popular Front Lobby‟s for Stalinist fascism anywhere in the world. An examination of the treatment of ANC members by ANC Military Intelligence Mbokodo Officers at Camp Quatro in Angola, reveal the inner-workings and nature of the ANC and its secret decision-making body: the SA Communist Party. It reveals among others how the ANC and SACP condoned torture, imprisonment without trial or charge, executions,

JS.010

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

murder and assassination of its own ANC dissenting members, that was far worse than that inflicted by allegedly „evil Apartheid‟ on its enemies.

TRC Just War Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory: 1.

In Pandora‟s Multi-Culti Apartheid Box: SA‟s Multi-Cultural, Multi-Lingual, Multi-Racial Integration Nightmare, Mike Smith provides an overview of SA‟s huge diversity of languages, cultures, and ethnicities. It argues that where two cultures have almost opposite cultural values on any given issue, both cultures existential cultural reality would be that practicing multi-culturalism with the relevant other culture is impossible due to its perceived „dysfunctional‟ values.

Whereas multi-cultural fundamentalists would insist that one of the culture‟s values was functional, and the other‟s values dysfunctional, and consequently the latter would be coerced to discard their values; the principle of Apartheid or „separateness‟, or alternatively secession and different Ethno-Nationalist Volkstaat‟s allows for each and all culture‟s to maintain and practice their cultural values, within their own ethno-cultural State.

2.

Western Descartian Individualist „I Think, Therefore I Am” vs. African Ubuntu Conformist “I Participate, therefore I Am‟ provides further argument for the huge difference of cultural points of worldview, confirming that Africans and Apartheid Afrikaners were/are not Culturally Similar Enemies. The Westernized worldview encourages an individualist free thinking concept of cultural and personal identity, whereas the latter worldview encourages a culture of identity which requires blind obedience to conformity. The clash of these worldviews are further exacerbated in South Africa by a legal and political elite which pretend the differences don‟t exist, in favour of manipulating the ignorant poverty stricken vote farm‟s confusion, with apartheid blame game tactics for their own political gain.

3.

Black Liberation Theology: Salvation/Liberation by Marxist Class Struggle, not Reconciliation/Forgiveness of Sins, clarifies how Black Liberation Theologies conceptual understanding of Forgiveness and Reconciliation are very different to , for example, those of Calvinist Christianity; and that in the absence of sufficiently precise legislation clarifying the meanings and definitions of key concepts, citizens are unable to regulate their affairs with individuals from other cultures in accordance with the rule of law. Subsequent evidentiary information for the bias, omissions and conflicts of interest of the TRC Commission, conclude that a wide range of black and white, left and right citizens concluded that Truth and Reconciliation was not seen to be done, by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission.

4.

TRC Social Contract provides NO definitions for Multi-Cultural, MultiInterpretation Key Concepts of „Forgiveness‟, „Reconciliation‟, „Closure‟ and „Ubuntu‟, argues that the TRC social contract provides NO definitions for multicultural multi-interpretation for the Key Concepts of „Forgiveness‟, „Reconciliation,‟ „Closure‟ and „Ubuntu‟, which are socially, culturally, religiously, psychologically, and racially important terms; which have multiple different meanings for different cultures, religions, etc. This results in citizens from conflicting cultures not being provided with sufficiently precise legislation to enable them to regulate their affairs with other cultures in accordance to the law.

JS.011

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

5.

Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done, by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission, argues that, among others Anthea Jefferey‟s The Truth About the Truth Commission, Generals Malan, Viljoen, Geldenhuys and Liebenberg‟s Assessment of the probable results of the activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as perceived by former Chiefs of the SADF IRO the SADF, and their additional Complaint filed with the Public Protector (which was just ignored), raise so many issues of conflicts of interest, bias, omissions, censorship, etc. by the TRC, that it is no surprise how John Kane Berman, the Head of the SA Institute of Race Relations concluded in the foreword to The Truth about the Truth Commission that: “The commission also said that there could be no healing without truth, that half-truths and denial were no basis for building the new South Africa, that reconciliation based on falsehood would not last, and that selective recollection of past violence would easily provide the mobilisation for further conflict in the future. If these are its criteria for the role of truth in promoting reconciliation, it has failed to meet them.”

TRC Just War Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense: Mandela and Tutu‟s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) negligently or deliberately ignored the role of Population Pressures and Black Power/African Ideal of Manhood Breeding War Policies, as (a) Youth Bulge Population Pressure‟s aggravating factors for Racial Conflict Resource War Political Violence, and (b) the „swart gevaar‟ motives to establish Apartheid to avoid European national suicide; i.e. for Boer-Afrikaners to maintain their identity and right to rule themselves, to avoid being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of black S. Africans.

1.

Population Policy Common Sense: Eco-Numeracy, Exponential Functions & Carrying Capacity, Youth Bulges Population Pressure Conflicts and Competitive Exclusion Principle, provides not only an overview of these Population Policy issues as factors contributing to Resource War Conflicts, National Security issues, but argues that if the ANC was seriously concerned about reducing socio-economic and psycho-political misery, they would welcome any opportunity to educate the poor on the Malthusian misery and starvation consequences of irresponsible procreation policies. When such opportunities were submitted to the SA elite, who profess to be concerned about alleviating the misery of socio-economic poverty, by means of an Amicus Curiae to the Constitutional Court, the entire TRC elite endorsed it being censored from the SA public, indicating that their alleged concerns for the SA poor, are of the Poverty Pimp variety; i.e. are NOT SINCERE.

2.

The Nature and Causes of Apartheid: A Just War for Boer-Afrikaner Demographic Survival argues that while the ANC‟s „liberation struggle‟ declaration of war against the Apartheid Government was not in accordance with Just War principles; there is enough evidence to suggest a further in-depth argument into the probability that the Apartheid Governments response to the ANC‟s declaration of war, can be considered that of a Just Cause, a Last Resort, declared by Proper Authority and of Right Intention.

3.

Apartheid‟s Strategic Demographic and Political Mistakes, supports the aforementioned argument that Apartheid was a Just War for Boer-Afrikaner Demographic Survival, and describes the strategic political and demographic mistakes made by Apartheid Political leaders. These mistakes being the decisions to use cheap alien labour, which dispossessed them of their fatherland, as a result of JS.012

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

massive non-white exponential population growth; and how the consequent spiralling population pressure‟s exacerbated racial friction theory safety and security problems. Kemp argues that only by understanding the relationship between demographics and political power, by abandoning their dependence on non-white labour, and “accepting that their salvation lies in a smaller territory, congregating in such territory to form an outright demographic majority,” can Afrikaners be saved in Africa.

4.

In Land Grabs and Farm Murders: A Rainbow-TRC-Peace, or Racial-Hatred-War Reality, we argue as stated that Land Grabs and Farm Murders are not the result of a Rainbow-TRC-Peace, but of a Racial-Hatred-War Reality, which both the ANC and the Anti-Apartheid TRC elite deliberately ignore, like alcoholics addicted to their Rainbow-TRC-Peace Illusion. They are a direct result of a refusal to address Population Policy issues of exponential population growth.

5.

In Masculine Insecurity Poverty Pimping: ANC‟s population Production of Poverty and Violence Breeding War we argue that the ANC and its concomitant Anti-Apartheid Movement remains one of the most successful professional Poverty Pimp Political Organisations and Movements in the world. It continues to pretend to act as an intermediary on behalf of the black SA poor, disadvantaged and alleged „victimized‟ groups, but has no serious intentions whatsoever of addressing the root causes of these groups socio-economic poverty or psycho-political „freedom/liberation‟ babble ignorance. In fact the ANC derives its political power from pimping ever more black Africans into poverty; i.e. from sustaining and in fact increasing its alleged disadvantaged and victimized political power base, while deflecting the blame for its poverty pimping consequences upon the proverbial scapegoat of „apartheid‟. Put succinctly the ANC pimps its own people into poverty by its conscious and deliberate “abnormal government-sponsored population explosion of Malthusian poverty aggravation, moral degeneration and social disintegration.”10 The poor are a commodity not only to ANC politicians, but AntiApartheid religious and political activists, from those with impressive Archbishop titles to the Poverty Pimping Professors who suck up the research grants to “support themselves and their cronies while they are studying, romanticizing or otherwise exploiting the [African] poor.”

6.

Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, Amicus Curiae to Constitutional Court: CENSORED, argues for many of the issue raised in this Briefing Paper. The Amicus has been hugely censored by the SA media, even though it is supported by expert witness statements from (i) Dr. Brad Blanton11, founder of Radical Honesty, best selling author of Radical Honesty series of books, and former candidate for United States Congress from Virginia, in 2004 and 2006; as well as (ii) Dr. T. Michael Maher12, Professor and Head of the Dept. of Communication at the University of Louisiana, since November 1974, author of the study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection.

Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return: 10

Mbeki‟s Legacy Not His Alone, Meshack Mabogoane, 08 October 2008, Mail & Guardian Statement of Consent by Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty, Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; Paradigms and Contexts 12 Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue 11

JS.013

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

1.

Wake Up Whitey!: African White Refugee Canaries in the International Ethno-Cultural Geopolitical Coalmine, details the past and future ethnocultural comparison demographic statistics of South Africa, Europe, United States and the world.

2.

Europe commits Ethno-Cultural Suicide: Dr. Frank Ellis reviews Dr. Thilo Sarrazin‟s Germany Consigns itself to Oblivion: Dr. Frank Ellis, Former Professor of Russian and Slavonic Studies at Leeds Univ. UK reviews Dr. Sarrazin‟s epic, including his analysis, commentary and selected translations.

3.

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return Cultural & Ethno Homogeneity, asks whether the Failure of Multi-Culturalism in Europe, including Europe‟s demographic decline, should motivate European Union States to invite their Blood Relatives home from the Diaspora; and also .provides a brief Historical and Current Reality overview of Jus and Lex Sanguini, and Right of Return laws and their contribution to Principles of Cultural and Ethno Homogeneity.

4.

Jus Sanguinis Right of Return Cultural & Ethno Homogeneity, provides a brief Historical and Current Reality overview of Jus and Lex Sanguini, and Right of Return laws and their contribution to Principles of Cultural and Ethno Homogeneity.

5.

Multiculturalism Impossible with Dysfunctional Cultures, argues How and Why Multiculturalism is Impossible with Cultures whose values are Diametrically Opposing, or considered by each other as Dysfunctional Cultures; including suggestions for an EU Moratorium on Muslim Immigration and Voluntary Repatriation.

6.

Peak Oil, Economic Collapse & Friction Theory Cultural Conflict, argues that it is impossible to overestimate the International, Geopolitical, National, Ethnic, Cultural importance of amicably resolving Multi-Cultural Conflicts and potential for Population Pressure Cultural Conflicts, prior to their aggravation by the sociopolitical and economic Friction Theory Resource War consequences of Peak Oil. This reality is clearly clarified in three Military Peak Oil Reports (2 American and 1 German) released in 2010, warning that the „socio-political and economic consequences of Peak Oil will be severe‟, of the “total collapse of the markets” and of serious political and economic crises, which could threaten the continued survival of democratic governments. Put differently Peak Oil‟s consequences on among others transportation costs, the financial markets, and food production, shall significantly aggravate what Military genius and geo-political thinker Homer Lea qualified as the angles of convergence, of States converging lines of self interest, in the Conflict over Scarce Resources. Simply put, multi-cultural conflict will experience Friction Theory on Steroids.

7.

ABC‟s of Ecology: Food Production & Population Growth; Peak Oil and Population DieOff, argues that increased food production is a direct causal factor of population growth; the world‟s exponential population explosion is a direct result of the cheap oil stimulated green revolution food production surpluses; and the reality of Peak Oil, means that declining oil production, will have catastrophic consequences to food production, and result in a population dieoff.

8.

Parallel Goals: Economic Relocalisation & Political Secession, argues Multicultural conflict Friction Theory on Steroids resulting from Overpopulation colliding with Scarce and Depleting – particularly Energy - Resources (Ecological JS.014

Excerpts from Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return: African White Refugees Briefing Paper 10/31/16#

Overshoot) can be hugely mitigated by strategically implementing the Parallel Goals of Economic Relocalisation and Ethno-Nationalist Political Secession.

Relocalized states and communities can better plan for a world of Energy Depletion, by rebuilding more balanced local economies that emphasise local food, energy and water systems, for local political stability.

9.

Secession in SA: Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK): Electoral Commission for the Election of a Boer-Afrikaner People‟s Assembly, provides a Constitutional Overview of Section 235 in the SA Constitution, the right to Self Determination for “any community sharing a common cultural and language heritage, within a territorial entity in the Republic..”, as a prelude to an overview of The Role and Task of the Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) / Electoral Commission for the Election of a Boer-Afrikaner People‟s Assembly. Because “the right to self-determination can only be claimed and it's practical implementation only be negotiated on behalf of a people by a body they elected and mandated for this purpose in a free, fair and democratic election; to be held within such a people”, the VVK has been established to facilitate such an election of a Volksraad, to attain a mandate from the people, to initiate the negotiations for a Boer-Afrikaner Volkstaat.

Election of a Boer-Afrikaner People‟s Assembly Talking Points: The Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Founding Petitioners consequently Petition their Relevant EU Progenitor/Stamvader Nations for: [A]

International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a „European Union/Boere-Afrikaner‟ Volkstaat in South Africa; Or in the absence thereof;

[B]

Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by all relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugees descendants.

Their Volkstaat Secession; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return Petition Justifications: [i]

International Law, Jus Sanguinis, Right-of-Return, International Covenants on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc.;

[ii]

S. 235 of the SA Constitution & Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party;

[iii] African National Congress (ANC) / Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) / Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud; [iv] The geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving population pressures colliding with declining resources multi-cultural conflicts, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic friction theory resource war consequences of Peak Oil. The VVK and supporting organisations are of the firm belief that any national or international assistance or recognition rendered to it by any roleplayer, including the South African Government, shall constitute a contribution to the establishment of a durable, and more importantly ecologically sustainable peace in Southern Africa.

Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return Founding Petitioner Boers endorse any and every other cultural, ethnic or linguistic group‟s right to their ethno-cultural self-determination.

JS.015