Norway v. Breivik :: Case: 11-188627 MED-05
23 April 2012 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 South Africa
Mr. Anders Behring Breivik Postboks 150 1332 Osteras Norway Dear Mr. Breivik,
URGENT: (1) Legal Applications sent to you c/o Lippestad Attorneys; (2) Norway v. Breivik blog I am a Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Radical Transparency Problem Solving Activist from South Africa. I have political motivated criminal convictions for (A) Terrorism (bomb threat to local national airport on political necessity of exposing SA‟s Truth and Reconciliation Fraud); (B) Malicious Damage to Property (broke windows in prison and set the prison on fire, when authorities refused to recognize my hungerstrike for a single cell); (C) Contempt in Facie Curiae (Contempt in the Face of the Court) for calling a white Magistrate & Black Prosecutor corrupt white and black kaffirs in court proceedings [The Radical Honoursty definition of „kaffir‟ is not racial, but the original etymological definition: l: „non-believer‟ in truth telling, liar, deceiver], and when I was ordered by the judge to apologize, I responded with a middle finger and „F**k You‟. I served a year in George Women‟s prison on 3 counts of contempt (3 months, 3 months and 6 months running consecutively) and in the cell next to me was a 17 year girl who had murdered a prison guard with a broken beer bottle because he refused to give her a cigarette. She was sentenced to 10 months for murder (being a juvenile).
Please confirm that you are aware of & have received the following Guerrilla Law legal applications filed in your legal matter, from your attorney: Mr. Lippestad (very brief description of each application below): [1A] 11-07-25: Application to Norway Supreme Court: Application in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, as laid down on 17 May 1814 by the Constituent Assembly at Eidsvoll and subsequently amended, most recently on 20 February 2007: Any person who obeys an order the purpose of which is to disturb the liberty and security of the Storting is thereby guilty of treason. Statement of Facts: 2083 – Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution: 14. I am the Defendants Knights Templar (Miragestorum Navajo Dwarfwhisper32) Religious and Cultural Mentor. My Codename is „Francis Marion Braidfute‟. 15. He obeyed my – SSBN 619: OMGASM - order to disturb the liberty and security of the Storting, and both of us should consequently be charged with treason against Norway. 23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
16. We request to be charged with treason and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial -- of the same standard as provided to Nelson Mandela by the Apartheid South African Government – by a jury of our peers; to be executed, together, by firing squad. 17. We hereby notify the court of our intention to plead to the Political Necessity Defence. 18. If convicted: We do not wish to waste the taxpayers money by keeping us incarcerated, but to be executed by firing squad. [..] [Argument & Evidence:] [IIA] Statement of Facts: 2083 – Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution. [IIB] Statement of Facts: African White Refugees Jus Sanguinis Petition to Norway. [IIC] Statement of Facts: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute. [1B] RESPONSE: 21 September 2011 Response from Chief Justice: From: Ruud, Kjersti [mailto:Kjersti.Ruud@hoyesterett.no] On Behalf Of HRET (postmottak) Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:13 AM To: jmcswan@mweb.co.za Dear Ms Johnstone, Reference is made to your e-mail of 26 July 2011 regarding the abovementioned matter. Please be advised that the Supreme Court of Norway only handles appeals against judgments given by the lower courts. The Supreme Court can consequently not deal with the issues mentioned in your e-mail. Yours sincerely, Gunnar Bergby Secretary-General
[1C] 02-08-11: [Not a legal application, but sent with legal headers with reference to aforementioned application to Norway Supreme Court] Notice to Category A & B Traitors in NO, DE, UK, FR, NL & CH. CATEGORY A & B TRAITOR: In terms of Article 85 & 2083 Declaration of European Independence: Declaration of Pre-Emptive War; You are Herewith Notified of the Charges Against Category A & B Traitors. In the absence of your capitulation to our military forces, by - “08-1968 777GASM”1 - a date to be finalized by Co-Chief of Defence of Norway (Forsvarssjefen) General Anders Breivik; you shall be subpoenaed to Testify in the Trial of Norway vs. Anders Beihring Brevick & Others; to respond to these charges. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF:
1
[A]
Overview of Evidentiary Documentation
[B]
Notes on Provisional Accused and Charges
[C]
The European Resistance Movement/Indigenous Rights Movement – PCCTS, Knights Templar offer a full pardon to the Western European multiculturalist regimes, the MA 100 alliance (political parties) and all category A and B individual traitors if they capitulate to our military forces by (081968 777 GASM /January 1st, 2020).
GASM: Golden Apple Seed Mission (Dischordian)
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
[D]
Demands/Requests/Pleas to our National Military Commands
[E]
Assimilation policy/demands/offer for Muslim individuals living in Europe (this offer will expire on (08-1968 777 GASM /January 1st, 2020)).
[F]
Why the actions of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe have rendered armed resistance against as the only rational approach
[G]
Explanation of the European Civil War - Phase 1, 2 and 3:
[H]
Differentiating between and dealing with category A, B and C traitors: hardcore Marxists, cultural Marxists, suicidal humanists/career cynicists and capitalist globalists
[I]
Declaration and Signature [A] Overview of Evidentiary Documentation:
[1]
2083 – A DECLARATION OF EUROPEAN INDEPENDENCE, by Andrew Berwick (PDF)
[2]
NORWEGIAN SUPREME COURT: CHIEF JUSTICE: Application in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, as laid down on 17 May 1814 by the Constituent Assembly at Eidsvoll and subsequently amended, most recently on 20 February 2007: Any person who obeys an order the purpose of which is to disturb the liberty and security of the Storting is thereby guilty of treason (PDF2).
[3]
EU (NL, FR, UK, DE, & NO) AFRICAN WHITE REFUGEE SETTLER APPLICATION FILED IN HIGH COURT, SOUTH GAUTENG (07-2010 EQ JHB): Heads of Argument of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture; „Boer/Settler‟ descendant of Dutch, French Huguenot and British „Settlers‟: Hermanus Bosman, Andreus Lutgerus Kolver; Jacques de Villiers and James Augustus Johnstone; In Support of „Political Necessity French Riddle of the Kaffir Lily Pond‟ Application of the Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of ANC‟s „TRC Social Contract Fraud‟; Recommendation to Constitutional Court to Resolve „Kill Boer/Settler Hate Speech‟ Descartian v. Ubuntu Conformist Cultural Friction by Implementing: (A) 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner SelfDetermination to provide Boers with a „Kaffir‟ Free Speech Volkstaat; and/or (B) Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of „Settlers‟ to European Progenitor Nations (PDF 3).
[4]
EU (NL, FR, UK, DE, & NO) AFRICAN WHITE REFUGEE SETTLER COMPLAINT TO INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE HAGUE: COMPLAINT ITO ART.15 OF ROME STATUTE: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute. Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movemnts (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness („liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers‟) (ii) Black Liberation Theology („violent elimination of „whiteness‟); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) 4 inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC‟s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime (PDF)5.
[5]
EU (NL, FR, UK, DE, & NO) AFRICAN WHITE REFUGEE SETTLER COMPLAINT TO EU PROGENITOR NATIONS: [AT] [BE] [CH] [CZ] [DE] [DK] [FI] [FR] [GR] [IE] [IT] [NL] [NO] [PT] [SE] [UK] AND INTERNATIONAL WITNESSES [AR] [BG] [CA] [EE] [ES] [HU] [IL] [JP] [LT] [MC] [NATO] [NZ] [RU] [RS] [US] [VA]: Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition & Briefing Paper (PDF): Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees. The Petition argues for Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees Founding Petitioners Hereby Petition their Relevant EU Progenitor Nations for: [A] International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; Or in the absence thereof [B] Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by all relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugees descendants. Justifications: (i) International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Right-of-Return, International Covenant on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc; (ii) S. 235 of the SA Constitution & Accord
2
http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/110725_no-sc_art-85?mode=a_p http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/110419__eq-07-10?mode=a_p “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” -- Houari Boumediene, President of Algeria, at the United Nations, 1974 (Boumediene was an ardent supporter of the ANC and SWAPO) 5 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/110509_icc_trcfraud_complaint?mode=a_p 3 4
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party; (iii) Just War TRC Fraud: ANC & Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth & Reconciliation Fraud (iv) Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation.
[2A] 31-11-2011: Application to Oslo District Court: Application in terms of Article‟s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article‟s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicant herewith applies to this court for an order from Judge Nina Opsahl that (A) Anders Breivik be provided a copy of this application for his consideration, and to be ordered to provide the court with his personal written response to the application, to be documented into the court record. (B) If approved by Anders Breivik, additional orders as follows: [I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011. Writ of Habeus Mentem Orders as follows: [1] I, Lara Johnstone be appointed as Mr. Breivik‟s „Political Necessity‟ Pro Bono (expenses only required) legal and psychological representative, to: (A) act as Mr. Breivik‟s paralegal assistant in aiding him to represent himself in accordance to the Political Necessity defence; by means of research, contacting relevant Norwegian and International expert witnesses to testify to relevant issues documented in his manifesto, research, etc; (B) act as Mr. Breivik‟s paralegal forensic psychology advisor in aiding Mr. Breivik to expose the fraudulent allegations against him -– questioning his Mens Real political necessity criminal culpability on 22 July 2011 -- by those practicing political psychiatry6, intent on denying Breivik, his Political Necessity Treason trial. (C) in accordance to Radical Honoursty socio-political-legal cultural practices of honour; to support Mr. Breivik to be charged with treason and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial -of the same standard as provided to Nelson Mandela by the Apartheid South African Government -- to be executed along with my client, by firing squad. [2] Attorney Lippestad shall be retained as representative on Norwegian court administrative rules and procedures; [3] the court is to take notice of Breivik‟s intention to plead to the Political Necessity Defence 7 to the relevant charges, in accordance to his motivations to disturb the liberty and security of the Storting (in defence of the multi-culti political elite‟s disturbances of the Storting by means of massive illegal foreign immigration), and consequently requests to be charged in accordance to Article 85: Treason. [4] Attorney Lippestad shall make relevant arrangements for me to travel to Norway to assist Mr. Breivik in his legal defence in accordance to [1-3]. Writ of Certiorari Review as follows: [II] The writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report as to the Mens Rea criminal liability of Anders Breivik‟s political terrorism criminal acts, on 22 July 2011; shall order. [1] Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby to provide me with: 6
The ad hominem attack of mental illness accusations used to quell or impeach a political dissident. In extreme cases it leads to the medically unnecessary committal of the dissident to a mental institution and/or the forcing of the dissident to take pacifying or punitive medication. It is a particularly effective method for totalitarian regimes as they can shield the public from viewing evidence supporting the claims of the dissident. 7 Civil Disobedience and Political Necessity, Pierce Law Review http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/070820_civil-disobedience-necessity-defense
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
(A) A copy of their cultural Marxist „political correct‟ Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation Report, for my investigation and discussion with Mr. Breivik‟ and examination into his Mens Rea state of mind on 22 July 2011, in accordance to Radical Honoursty, Radical Honesty, Thomas Szassz, Frantz Fanon, Erich Fromm and other related relevant psychological schools of thought. Upon completion of such examination I shall provide Dr. Tarjei Rygnestad, Norwegian Commission of Forensic Medicine with my „non‟ cultural Marxist politically incorrect report for his consideration in this mater; (B) in the event their cultural Marxist politically correct report does not clarify this matter: the particular psychological schools of thought they used to base their socio-political and psychocultural foundations upon in examining Mr. Breivik‟s socio-political and psycho-cultural Mens Rea and Actus Reus motivations for his political necessity criminal terrorism acts conducted on 22 July 2011. (C) In the event that their cultural Marxist politically correct report does not clarify the matter: their particular subjective and objective tests for Mens Rea (criminal culpability): Subjective and objective tests for Mens Rea: The test for the existence of mens rea may be: (a) subjective, where the court must be satisfied that the accused actually had the requisite mental element present in his or her mind at the relevant time (for purposely, knowingly, recklessly etc) (see concurrence); (b) objective, where the requisite mens rea element is imputed to the accused, on the basis that a reasonable person would have had the mental element in the same circumstances (for negligence); or (c) hybrid, where the test is both subjective and objective. The court will have little difficulty in establishing mens rea if there is actual evidence – for instance, if the accused made an admissible admission. This would satisfy a subjective test. But a significant proportion of those accused of crimes make no such admissions. Hence, some degree of objectivity must be brought to bear as the basis upon which to impute the necessary component(s). It is always reasonable to assume that people of ordinary intelligence are aware of their physical surroundings and of the ordinary laws of cause and effect (see causation). Thus, when a person plans what to do and what not to do, he will understand the range of likely outcomes from given behaviour on a sliding scale from "inevitable" to "probable" to "possible" to "improbable". The more an outcome shades towards the "inevitable" end of the scale, the more likely it is that the accused both foresaw and desired it, and, therefore, the safer it is to impute intention. If there is clear subjective evidence that the accused did not have foresight, but a reasonable person would have, the hybrid test may find criminal negligence. For these purposes, therefore, where the relevant statutes are silent and it is for the common law to form the basis of potential liability, the reasonable person must be endowed with the same intellectual and physical qualities as the accused, and the test must be whether an accused with these specific attributes would have had the requisite foresight and desire. (D) In the event that their cultural Marxist politically correct report does not clarify the matter: their particular subjective and objective tests for „REASONABLENESS‟. Put differently, if we consider the dozens of political terrorism acts conducted around the world every year, none of whom are charged with being insane, how are those terrorists actions considered to have been „reasonable terrorist acts‟ and hence worthy of a free and fair trial to disclose their political grievances; but Anders Breivik‟s actions are not only not those of a „reasonable terrorist‟, but additionally „insane‟? Applicants Perspective to Reasonableness Test: Common Law Definition of Reasonable Test is in accordance to Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582; [1957] 2 All ER 118: Generally, the standard of care/foresight a person is expected to attain is an objective standard derived from what a reasonable person would do under the same circumstances. 'Where you get a situation which involves the use of some special skill or competence, then the test…is not the test of the man on the top of a Clapham omnibus, because he has not got this special skill. The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill.' „The man on the Clapham omnibus‟, is in legal speak, 'the reasonable person'. This is a phrase that was first used by Sir Charles Bowen, QC (later Lord Bowen). (Brewer's Dictionary of 23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Phrase & Fable, 16th Edition, 1995) The man on the Clapham omnibus/the man in the street means the average ordinary English person (Oxford Guide to British & American Culture, 1999) Bolam -v- Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582; [1957] 2 All ER 118: Professional Negligence: “Where some special skill is exercised, the test for negligence is not the test of the man on the Clapham omnibus, because he has not got this special skill. The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising or professing to have that special skill.” [..] Argument: Quick Summary If I understand Mr. Breivik correctly, without having had the opportunity to interview him in depth, only from reading his Manifesto: his argument is that multiculturalists are attempting to conquer his country and exterminate his conservative Norwegian heritage and culture; and he considered it his political necessity patriotic warrior duty to object thereto. When his non-violent attempts proved futile due to the Norwegian media who discriminate against conservative Norwegians and their culture; he considered his only option to be to publicize his grievances by means of political necessity violence: terrorism. While he does not share the political-cultural beliefs of Che Guevarra, Jaan Laaman, Tom Manning, Marilyn Buck, Carlos the Jackal, Nelson Mandela, Robert McBride, etc (left wing terrorists: none of whom were considered by conservative prosecutors to require psychological evaluation, but who were allowed their day in court to take personal and political responsibility for their politically violent criminal acts); I imagine they may find themselves in agreement as to how Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Gatekeeper editors censorship contributed to their decisionmaking to resort to political necessity violence. Unfortunately, the root source of this „terrorism‟ in my personal opinion, lies in the corruption of the legal system, more specifically in what I refer to as KAFFIR CULTURE, LAWYERS AND LEGISLATION: the KAFFIR LEGAL MATRIX. We live in a legal matrix that has not incorporated the scientific reality into its „right to breed‟ legislation, constitutions, bill of rights and responsibilities or treaties, that the earth is flat, resources are finite, and breeding wars should be acknowledged as ACTS OF WAR. Unlike the corrupt Catholic Church who at least had the honour to acknowledge the criticisms of Galileo and Luther, the current corrupt legal religious matrix sale of innocence indulgences establishment, have no such honourable intentions. In the absence of dead and mangled bodies, blood and gore, any modern day Luther or Galileo‟s 95 Theses would never see the light of day; and frequently even if the Luther or Galileo accomplish the dead and mangled bodies prerequisite, the Kaffir Legal Matrix‟s political psychology denies them their day in court. Argument: Brief Overview 1. Breivik‟s Manifesto details his clear cognitive, theoretical and kinaesthetic understanding of Individual Criminal Responsibility (i.e. legal sanity) a. Breivik clearly details his reasoning for how and why he believes that the time for talk and non-violent attempts to reform politically correct cultural Marxist multi-culti democracy were over in Why the actions of the cultural Marxist/Multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe have rendered armed resistance as the only rational approach i. Cultural Marxist institutionalised ideological coercion and brainwashing ii. Corruption and feminisation indirect/direct coercion:
of
political
parties
and
individuals
by
iii. Systematically import of multiculturalist/socialist voters iv. Cultural Marxist/multiculturalist/suicidal humanist/globalist media: v. News corporations, controlled by cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, full scale war against cultural conservatism/nationalism: vi. Political, cultural and media elites are colluding against the interests of free indigenous Europeans.
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
2. Breivik clearly and very „reasonably‟ explains his Political Necessity Motivations for his Political Terrorist acts. a. Breivik‟s Manifesto (Book 3): A Declaration of pre-emptive War, clearly details his beliefs that the Conservative Revolution – [is] the only Solution for free Europeans, wherein he clearly and succinctly (in my opinion) explains his beliefs, and how he came to hold his beliefs, including his perspective to the concept of criminal culpability. b. If the Norwegian politically correct, cultural Marxist multiculti political, religious, academic, media and military elite, consider Breivik‟s aforementioned allegations of a political program of political fraud and genocide conducted upon indigenous Norwegians and Europeans to be false and untrue, then the honourable ethical democratic way to prove such allegations false, is to allow him to submit his evidence for his argument, and for the State to submit their evidence to the contrary. c. Denying Breivik a trial, by means of political psychology fake and fraudulent allegations as to his alleged insanity: PROVES BREIVIKS ARGUMENTS TO BE TRUE. 3. Breivik clearly details his beliefs that hardcore Marxists, cultural Marxists Multiculturalists are deceiving indigenous Europeans, by implementing a demographic conquering Breeding War Act of War, upon them; in his Manifesto in Differentiating between and dealing with category A, B and C traitors: hardcore Marxists, cultural Marxists, suicidal humanists/career cynicists and capitalist globalists. 4. A case study: How the European politically correct cultural Marxist multicultural AntiApartheid movement overthrew Verwoerd‟s Apartheid by means of political terrorism and an African breeding war; and installed the ANC regime that provides SA‟s with between 3,000 to 25,000 percent worse socio-political government services; and turned white South Africans into African White Refugees. 5. If Norwegians ignore the warnings of Anders Breivik; the current experiences of white South Africans, being murdered and exterminated; shall be the experiences of future Norwegians, who shall end up living as persecuted minorities, under Islamic rule.
03-05 December 2011: 1,283 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist „Radical Honesty Enemy‟ (Better an Honest Enemy, than a Fake Friend) Free & Fair Trial Support for Breivik. Response from Media: CENSORED. [2B] 15-12-2011: Request for Confirmation and Response from Court: From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:56 PM To: NO: Crt: Breivik: Oslo District Court (oslo.tinghus.sentralbord@domstol.no); NO Oslo District Court: Admin (oslo.tingrett.postmottak@domstol.no) Cc: NO: Emb: Pta: Amb Tor Hildan (emb.pretoria@mfa.no); NO: Crt: Breivik: ForMedicine: (drk@sivilrett.no); NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad (geir@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (tord@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (odd@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (postmottak.ila-fengsel@kriminalomsorg.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (post@ilafengsel.no); NO: Crt: Breivik: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei (postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no); NO Police Security Svc (post.pst@politiet.no); NO Police: Oslo (oslo@namsfogden.no); NO Police Directorate (politidirektoratet@politiet.no); NO: Police: Justice Dept: (postmottak@jd.dep.no); NO: MinJustice: Grete Faremo (grete.faremo@jd.dep.no); NO: MinJustice: Pol Advisor: Astrid Bergmal (astrid.bergmal@jd.dep.no); NO: PM: JStoltenberg: Chief of Staff: Karl Schjott-Pedersen (kesp@smk.dep.no); NO: PM: JStoltenberg: State Sec: Tor Brostigen (tbr@smk.dep.no) Subject: [2] Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Application: Respondent: Judge Nina Opsahl Oslo District Court: Registrar, In the matter between: KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK 23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Application between: LARA JOHNSTONE JUDGE NINA OPSAHL ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK GEIR LIPPESTAD SYNNE SERHEIM TORGEIR HUSBY TARJEI RYGNESTAD SVEIN HOLDEN
Applicant First Respondent Second Respondent Third Respondent Fourth Respondent Fifth Respondent Sixth Respondent Seventh Respondent
Please could you confirm: (1)
The date my application is to be submitted to Judge Opsahl, or the relevant Judge, for their consideration. (2) The date the said Judge intends to provide me with their ruling on the matter. Respectfully, Lara Johnstone Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr NO RESPONSE YET RECEIVED.
[3] 14-04-2012: NOTICE OF APPLICATION: AMICUS CURIAE: Application in terms of Article‟s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article‟s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the Rules of the Court PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicant, a Problem Solving Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion; herewith applies to this Court for the Following orders: (a)
For an Order to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae in the above proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Article‟s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b of Norwegian Constitution; and Article‟s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the ECHR Rules of the Court8.
(b)
For an Order Amending the Charges Against the Defendant and Applicant to include Treason in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial; to be executed by firing squad.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the Applicant requests that the Prosecution and/or Accused/Defendant inform the Applicant and Court of their objection or consent to this Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee Amicus Curiae application, by 17hrs (GMT+2) on April 23, 2012. [..] Argument: Quick Summary
8
European Court of Human Rights: D.D. v Lithuania (ongoing): As Chair of the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs), in February 2008, the IHRC organised the first third party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights by a regional grouping of national institutions in the case D.D. v Lithuania. http://www.ihrc.ie/enquiriesandlegal/amicuscuriae.html http://www.ihrc.ie/download/doc/european_group_nhris_third_party_intervention_d.d._v_lithuania.doc
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
The Applicant is of the view that the main application raises novel questions which are crucial for the future credibility of Western Civilisation‟s Masculine Insecurity Human Farming 9 Kaffir10 Legal Matrix conceptualisation of the rule of law and the principle of legality. The Applicants Amicus written submissions shall (a) address alternative legal arguments to those of both the Prosecution and Defense, i.e. from a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists perspective as opposed to the Prosecution & Defense‟s Parasite Leeching Masculine Insecurity Patriarchal perspectives; (b) „argue points deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular Parasite Leeching Masculine Insecurity case‟ 11; (c) „apprise the court of Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists legal, social, economic, ecological and cultural enquiry implications for its consideration‟ 12 to allow the court to base its decision on a larger, more comprehensive, and more accurate reality based natural law legal framework; (d) provide the court with hard evidence of (I) non-violent Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee applications filed to European Heads of State for France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom and NATO Military Committee; providing evidentiary arguments for support for a Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees; (II) how former and current UNHCR, ECRE and ELENA Officials deliberately wish to censor the issue of African White Refugees from public scrutiny and knowledge13; so that the court‟s final judgment shall include a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists legal analysis14. I am the only leader in South Africa focussed on Problem Solving 15. All other political, media, corporate and religious leaders (sic) in South Africa practice Parasite Leeching16 Leadership (sic).17 I have no followers, because I am not interested in Parasite Leeching Pretend Problem Solving. Individual South Africans who are serious about Problem Solving must sign the Honour Contract Oath: I Understand SHARP’s Principles & Wish to Join SHARP 18, which identifies SHARP: Problem Solving Radical Honoursty Accountability: Principles and Problems. Problem of Masculine (Reason & Logic) Insecurity: Masculine Insecurity is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, due to (A) obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving, (B) being the cognitive foundation of the antiMeritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) Paradigm; (C) hence propagandizes an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- „walking penis procreation‟ overpopulation and „consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis‟19 overconsumption -- worldview.
9
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * „Kaffir Behaviour‟: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * „Kaffir Etymology‟: Original Etymological Definition for „Kaffir‟: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. 11 Luther T. Munford, When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 279, 280 (1999). 12 Paul M. Sandler & Andew D. Levy, Appellate Practice for the Maryland Lawyer: State and Federal: Amicus Briefs 331 (1994). 13 (A) Monaco-RSA: Prince Albert II's Hon. Consul demands Jus Sanguinis delete African White Refugees Petition to Principality of Monaco webpage (B) African White Refugee Petition to NL:ECRE & ELENA Officials posted to ECRE & ELENA Facebook Wall deleted; (C) Prof. Denis Alland, Univ. Paris II; UNHCR Rep. (1989-97), ECRE & ELENA Refugee Law Expert Declares Legal War on African White Refugees; (D) French UNHCR Rep. & EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Law Prof.'s legal allergy to Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat 4 African White Refugees Petition; (E) http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/search/label/*%20ECRE-ELENA%3A%20Anti-White%20Refugee%20Bias 14 Paul M. Smith, The Sometimes Troubled Relationship Between Courts and Their “Friends”, note 2, at 26 (1998). 15 Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing. 16 Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership „problem solving‟ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained 16). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn‟t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of „followers‟, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called „leadership‟ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP. 17 All SA Political Parties & Media Editors practice Parasite Leeching Leadership - Survey http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2012/03/all-sa-political-parties-media-editors.html 18 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120419_sharp?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage 19 Edward Bernay‟s „Father of Public Relations‟ theories on using Masculine Insecurity to manipulate men and women for corporate purposes: basically to chance independent free thinking (I am my character and values) citizens into consumer zombies (I am my material possessions); as described in: The Century of the Self: (1) Happiness Machines, by Adam Curtis (BBC) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941 10
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Problem of Overpopulation20: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our national and international problems: exponential resource use and decline, local national and international resource wars: crime, poverty, political correctness, etc. Solving the overpopulation problem to reach a state of ecological sustainable carrying capacity requires massive population reduction … Problem of Overconsumption21: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our nations ecological problems, of which the political and economic problems are simply symptoms of the deeper ecological problems. Peak Nonrenewable Natural Resources shall result in the impending collapse of industrial civilization, which cannot exist without these resources (Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter : A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston22) SHARP Professional Ethics and Pragmatism: focus is on “(A) professional ethics is to follow the truth wherever the truth leads us, which can only be done in a radical transparency environment; and (B) pragmatism, is to measure problem solving by what works, rather than emotional or ideological standards or intentions”. My Guerrilla Lawfare Worldview: The Paradox of the Masculine Insecurity Human Farming 23 Kaffir24 Matrix Court: Radical Transparency Problem Solving is to the Masculine Insecurity Kaffir Matrix Court; what Martin Luther or Galileo Galilei were to the Catholic Church. The Kaffir Matrix Court system is founded on „Kaffir Legislation‟: Inalienable Right to Breed and Vote: Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable „Right to Breed‟ and „Right to Vote‟, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc.
The $64,000 question: Why does the Masculine Insecurity Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix not require citizens to get voting25 or breeding licences???
Kaffir Legislation covers up that an „Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war 26. Kaffir Legislation covers up that the Inalienable Right to Vote, or Universal Suffrage for the Ignorant is the road to centralisation of power and tyranny. 27 Argument: Overview 1. Defendant Defense: Political and/or Military Necessity
20
The population of an environment by a particular species in excess of the environment's carrying capacity. The effects of overpopulation can include the depletion of resources, environmental deterioration, and the prevalence of famine and disease. The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the maximum population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely. 21 Over-consumption is a situation where resource-use has outpaced the sustainable capacity of the ecosystem. A prolonged pattern of overconsumption leads to inevitable environmental degradation and the eventual loss of resource bases. Generally the discussion of overconsumption parallels that of overpopulation; that is the more people, the more consumption of raw materials to sustain their lives. 22 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2011/12/peak-nnr-scarcity-humanitys-last.html 23 Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc 24 Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * „Kaffir Behaviour‟: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * „Kaffir Etymology‟: Original Etymological Definition for „Kaffir‟: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. 25 “In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.” -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60 26 From Shortage to Longage: Forty Years in the Population Vineyards, by Garrett Hardin, Population and Environment, Vol. 12, No. 3. Spring 1991 http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_from_shortage_to_longage.html 27 “In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.” -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
2. Habeus Mentem :: The Right to Legal Sanity A. Marketing of Madness: The Myth of Mental Illness Experts B. Norway‟s History of Political Psychiatry 3. Masculine (Reason & Logic) Insecurity Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) A. Masculine Insecurity is not necessarily a masculine phenomena B. Masculine Insecurity Obstructs Radical Transparency Communication Problem Solving. C. Masculine Insecurity is the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) paradigm . It is the Root Cause of Overpopulation and Overconsumption: It Propagandizes on behalf of an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- „walking penis procreation‟ overpopulation and „consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis‟ overconsumption28 -- worldview. 4. Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee: A Product of (A) European Masculine Insecurity Phallic Enhanced Colonialism and (B) African and Liberal Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement‟s „Operation Production‟ Breeding War A. The Competitive Exclusion Principle (Apartheid) was an Act of Political Just War Self Defense to Tragedy of the Breeding War – Act of War – African Commons Exponential Population Growth: B. Apartheid Inconvenient Truths Masculine Insecurity Liberals and AntiApartheid Movement Lack the Honour to Confront: C. Masculine Insecurity Liberal Europe‟s Endorsement of African Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement‟s „Operation Production‟ Breeding War: D. Masculine Insecurity Liberal Europe‟s Endorsement of African Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement‟s Parasite Leeching TRC Fraud Social Contract: 5. Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement International Organisations, such as UNHCR, ECRE, ELENA, etc are Not Credible, or Reliable Source on the matter of African White Refugees; they believe Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, and Europe for Everybody and definitely not for Jus Sanguinis European White Refugees.
1,384 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist „Radical Honesty Enemy‟ Free & Fair Trial Support for Breivik29. Response from Media: CENSORED. [2B] Confirmations of Receipt; but no Official Response yet received: From: Odd Ivar Grøn [mailto:odd@advokatlippestad.no] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:19 PM To: Lara Subject: Lest: OSLO CRT REGISTRAR: 11-188627 MED-05: Notice of Application: Amicus Curiae from Norwegian Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee Importance: High Meldingen ble lest 15. april 2012 16:18:52 UTC.
28
Edward Bernay‟s „Father of Public Relations‟ theories on using Masculine Insecurity to manipulate men and women for corporate purposes: basically to chance independent free thinking (I am my character and values) citizens into consumer zombies (I am my material possessions); as described in: The Century of the Self: (1) Happiness Machines, by Adam Curtis (BBC) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941 29 1,384 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist Radical „Honesty Enemy‟ Free & Fair Trial Support. Response from Media: CENSORED. http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2012/04/1384-norwegian-media-informed-of.html
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
From: Oslo tinghus_sentralbord [mailto:Oslotinghus_sentralbord@domstol.no] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:28 AM To: Lara Subject: Lest: OSLO CRT REGISTRAR: 11-188627 MED-05: Notice of Application: Amicus Curiae from Norwegian Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee Importance: High Your message To: Oslo tingrett_postmottak; Oslo tinghus_sentralbord Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad; NO: Lippestad; NO: Lippestad; Pros Holden ; Pros Holden; Pros Holden; Pros Holden; Pros Holden; Pros Holden; Pros Holden; Pros Holden Subject: OSLO CRT REGISTRAR: 11-188627 MED-05: Notice of Application: Amicus Curiae from Norwegian Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee Sent: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:41:50 +0200 was read on Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:27:57 +0200
[2C] If It Bleads, It Leads :: Media‟s Population Terrorism Connection: From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:17 AM To: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad (geir@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (tord@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (odd@advokatlippestad.no); HM: MP: IvarJohansen (post@ivarjohansen.no) Cc: Pros Holden (tonje.meinich@jd.dep.no) ; Pros Holden (grete.faremo@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden (postmottak@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden (morten.ruud@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden (post.okokrim@politiet.no); Pros Holden (oslo@namsfogden.no); Pros Holden (politidirektoratet@politiet.no); Pros Holden (post.pst@politiet.no); NO: Emb: Pta: Amb Tor Hildan (emb.pretoria@mfa.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (postmottak.ilafengsel@kriminalomsorg.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (post@ilafengsel.no) Subject: NO v Breivik :: 11-188627 MED-05 | ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection TO: NORWAY: Prosecutor Svein Holden (C/O Police & Dept. of Justice) TO: DEFENDANT: Anders Breivik IN THE OSLO DISTRICT COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY Case: 11-188627 MED-05 22 April 2012 :: Earth Day Acquittal or Firing Squad?? ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Pasthtun Pakistani & Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend Scientific Journalism Media Censorship Case Studies Media's Anders Breivik Narrative: * Breivik is legally insane * His ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ justification for 22/07 Terrorism is Unjustified Media Censor: * Whores of the Court: The Myth of Mental Illness: Insanity is to PharmaPsychiatry what Heresy was to the Inquisition * Media’s If It Bleads, It Leads Population-Terrorism Connection 23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
************* Please find attached in PDF: * ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Enclosure: * Margaret Hagen, Ph.D (Harvard): Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony (From: http://whoresofthecourt.com/) Respectfully, Lara Johnstone Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com [..]
[The report lists the names of every single Norwegian Journalist who was sent a copy of the aforementioned legal applications (1,283) of the Habeus Mentem application; and 1,384 of the Amicus Curiae Application] [Excerpts from Report:] Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Editors censorship30 of non-violent political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a pressure cooker socio-political reality for their „If it Bleads, It Leads‟ corporate propaganda profits, in their knowledge application of:
Overpopulation31 colliding with resource scarcity is one of the main causes of terrorism: „As long as there is some possibility of getting results by political means, the chances that any political group or individual will turn violent are truly radically small, or maybe vanishingly small‟32;
„The exposure in the media is what gets people‟s attention. People follow what is happening in the news, not what is happening in the courts‟ 33;
„[Editors] abuse of media power, by means of strategies whereby they abuse public discourse/free speech resources; by providing certain parties with preferential and special access to such public discourse, and severely restricting or denying others any access to such public discourse34;
Mainstream media avoid addressing or enquiring into root causes of problems as reported in How and Why Journalists Avoid Population - Environment connection35; and censor non-violent root-cause problem solving activism36.
30
“The moderate blacks were not selling the papers. We were presenting a non-violent strategy, that did not say „Burn, baby Burn‟. A strategy that said people must come together and sit down around a negotiating table. And this is not sensational stuff; it does not sell the papers.” – Rev. John Gogotya, ANC: VIP’s of Violence, documentary; “For revolutionary groups, the more murderous the deed, the more certain the media coverage.” -Nicholas Partridge, Presenter, ANC: VIP‟s of Violence. See: Transcript of ANC: VIP‟s of Violence at: UA: [C.6] „If it Bleads, It Leads,’ Editorial Maxim [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/32739403] 31 Public Report of the Vice President‟s Task Force on Combatting Terrorism, February 1986 http://www.population-security.org/bush_report_on_terrorism/bush_report_on_terrorism.htm United Quest 2012: http://www.army.mil/article/68379/Unified_Quest_2012___Fact_Sheet/ Resource Scarcity Contributes to Global Instability: There is no Security without Sustainability http://www.cecer.army.mil/techreports/ERDC-CERL_TR-07-9/Session%20I/RichardMurphy.pdf 2000 Nightline with Ted Koppell: CIA & Pentagon on Overpopulation & Resource Wars 32 Clark McCauley, Ph.D, Prof. of Psychology at Bryn Mawr College, in When Does Political Anger Turn to Violence?, by Benedict Carey, New York Times, March 26, 2010 [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34271993] 33 Jean Pierre Mean, Group General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, SGS Group, In Confronting Corruption: The Business Case for an Effective Anti-Corruption Programme, by PricewaterhouseCoopers Intnl [PDF: www.pwc.com/anti-corruption] 34 (I) Power and the news media, Teun A. van Dijk, Univ. of Amsterdam, D. Paletz (Ed.), Political Communication & Action. (pp. 9-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995 [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34271955] ; (II) Ubuntu Amicus (UA) : [C] Right to „Free Speech‟ Propaganda Profits Deception [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/32739403] 35 CCT 23-10: Statement of Consent by Dr. T. Michael Maher [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/31373074]; How and Why Journalists Avoid PopulationEnvironment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/33694415]
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
[..] Whores of the Court :: The Myth of Mental Illness „There is no such thing as mental illness. Psychiatric diagnosis of „mental disorders‟ is just a way of stigmatising behaviour that society does not want to live with. Psychiatry thrives on coercion and is replacing religion as a form of social control.‟ - Dr. Thomas Szasz "There is no such thing as a mental disorder. A mental disorder is whatever someone says it is, and if the person saying "This is a mental disorder", has enough power and influence, then people believe 'Oh, that is a mental disorder'. - Dr. Paula Caplan, Harvard “Biological psychology/psychiatry is a total perversion of medicine and science, and a fraud.” Neurologist Fred Baughman “The entire enterprise of defining mental disorder is pointless, at least in so far as the goal is to allow us to recognize „genuine‟ or „true‟ disorders” - Dr. Mary Boyle, Schizophrenia: A Scientific Delusion? “DSM is a book of tentatively assembled agreements. Agreements don‟t always make sense, nor do they always reflect reality. You can have agreements among experts without validity. Even if you could find four people who agreed that the earth is flat, that the moon is made of green cheese, that smoking cigarettes poses no health risks, or that politicians are never corrupt, such agreements do not establish truth.” - Herb Kutchins & Stuart A Kirk , Making us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, “To admit the central role of value judgments and cultural norms [in the creation of the DSM] is to give the whole game away. The DSM has to be seen as reliable and valid, or the whole enterprise of medical psychiatry collapses.” -- Lucy Johnstone, The Users and Abusers of Psychiatry "[Alleged Mental Disorders] are based on a grab-bag of checklists for disorders that are published in a book called the DSM; which is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There are no statistics in this book, by the way. That just makes it sound more scientific." -- Dr Margaret Hagen, Professor of Psychology, Boston University [The report includes the full copy of Prof. Caplan‟s book: Whores of the Court. I provided Professor Caplan with a copy of the email sent to your attorneys which provided them with a copy of her book.]
FINALLY: Norway v. Breivik Blog: http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ Also: www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr The abovementioned blog was setup to document information about your trial that remains largely censored by the mainstream media, including legal applications filed in your matter, which the media are also censoring (see below). Should you wish to publish any article, or open letter to any individual on the blog you are most welcome and it shall be published in full. Your prison address is also stated on the blog, for any individuals who wish to contact you. I include a screenshot of the blog heading for you. The little flags are linked to legal documents and petitions filed to those relevant countries on behalf of African White Refugees in South Africa and Zimababwe, based upon the justification of among others: Truth and Reconciliation Fraud.
Please can you confirm that you have been informed of aforementioned legal applications. Sincerely, Lara Johnstone Encl: Print of Norway-v-Breivik.blogspot.com top of page. [Total Pages: 14+1=15) 36
HC-WC 19963-09: 140 SA Elite Deliberate Indifference to Rule of Law [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34274197]
23/04/12 Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr