Complaints form Slow Case Processing or Failure to Provide Case Processing and Possible Discrimination by Ministry of Environment Appeals Board 4. july 2012
Complainant Submitted by Forename: Surname: Organisation: Address: Postcode: Town: E-mail: Telephone: Fax:
Lara Johnstone SHARP P O Box 5042 6539 George, RSA jmcswan@mweb.co.za +27-71 170 1954 +27-44 870 7239
Complainant Forename: Surname: Address: Postcode: Town:
Complaint Which public agency does your complaint refer to? Environmental Appeals Board / Miljøklagenemnda Enter the public agency's case number or reference if known Ref: 2012/708 - 1 and Ref: 2008/363 I complain about a decision made
Nei
When was the decision made (date of letter)?
I complain about slow case processing or failure to reply I complain about other issues (e.g. bad treatment)
Ja Ja
Complaints form
Attachments 12-07-04__Ombudsman_MinofEnv_AppealsBoard_Miljøklagenemnda.pdf 12-06-11__Env Appeals Board_Miljøklagenemnda.pdf 12-05-22__AFTENPOSTEN_Tilgang-Informasjon_Offentleglova-miljoinformasjonsloven.pdf 12-04-22 - No-v-Breivik_Acquital-or-Firingsquad_IfBleadsItLeadsReport.pdf
Grounds for complaint Describe your complaint Overview: Slow Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board first deleted my appeal without reading it, then I was refused a case number and only provided a ?reference number?; and then told my ?enquiry? would only be addressed in August at the end of summer holidays. Failure to Provide Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board appear to be attempting to refuse to provide me with a Case Number, in their attempts to obstruct my appeal from the public record. Discrimination: Environment Appeals Board state my appeal is only an ?enquiry? and my ?enquiry? will only be addressed in August and refuse to confirm whether their ?summer holiday policy? is applicable to all complainants, or only my complaint; also refuse to put a public notice on their website stating their ?summer holiday policy? and whom it does and does not apply to. Full Chronology of Facts details provided in attached PDF: On 25 May 2012, Requests for Access to Environment and Health Information were submitted to the editors of Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2, VG and Addresseavisen requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media?s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway?s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 Earth Day: ?If It Bleads, It Leads? Media?s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs). The Media Publications were requested to provide the requested information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, they had declined to do so. On 18 June 2012 a complaint was filed with the Environmental Appeals Board: Appeals of environmental information. Since 18 June 2012 I have been trying to get Environmental Appeals Board to issue me with a Case number; they refuse stating they are on summer vacation until August, but refuse to say if this is standard policy for everyone, or only my complaint.
Ref: Norway v. Breivik
Case: 11-188627 MED-05 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: +27 (71) 170 1954 04 July 2012
Parliamentary Ombudsman: Arne Fliflet The Parliamentary Ombudsman for Public Administration P.O. Box 3 Sentrum NO - 0101 Oslo Telephone: +47 22 82 85 00 Tel: 22 82 85 00 | Toll: 800 800 39 | Fax: 22 82 85 11 E-mail: postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no
Slow Case Processing or Failure to Provide Case Processing and Possible Discrimination by Ministry of Environment Appeals Board: Overview: Slow Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board first deleted my appeal without reading it, then I was refused a case number and only provided a „reference number‟; and then told my „enquiry‟ would only be addressed in August at the end of summer holidays. Failure to Provide Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board appear to be attempting to refuse to provide me with a Case Number, in their attempts to obstruct my appeal from the public record. Discrimination: Environment Appeals Board state my appeal is only an „enquiry‟ and my „enquiry‟ will only be addressed in August and refuse to confirm whether their „summer holiday policy‟ is applicable to all complainants, or only my complaint; also refuse to put a public notice on their website stating their „summer holiday policy‟ and whom it does and does not apply to.
Chronology of Facts: On 25 May 2012, Requests for Access to Environment and Health Information were submitted to the editors of Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2, VG and Addresseavisen requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media‟s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway‟s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Earth Day: “If It Bleads, It Leads” Media‟s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs). The Media Publications were requested to provide the requested information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, they had declined to do so. On 18 June 2012 a complaint was filed with the Environmental Appeals Board: Appeals of environmental information. On 22 June 2012, the Environmental Appeals Board responded that they had deleted the complaint without reading it. From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:03 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Ikke lest: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Meldingen Til: Post miljoklagenemnda Emne: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Sendt: 18. juni 2012 23:41:11 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien ble slettet uten å ha vært lest 22. juni 2012 15:02:32 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien.
No reasons have been provided by the Environment Appeals Board for their decision to delete my complaint, allegedly without reading it. Nor is it registered on their Inkomne Sake pages: “Saker til behandling nå” and neither on their Vedtak/Decisions page. On 25 June 2012 a complaint was filed to the Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell requesting the Ministry to please inform me whether “the deletion was an error; or if not: written reasons for the deletion of my complaint.” On 25 June 2012 the Environmental Appeals Board (no name provided) responded. They did not apologize at all for the deletion of my complaint, nor did they provide written reasons for their decision. We hereby confirm the receipt of your inquiry. Reference no: 2012/708 - 1
On 26 June 2012 I responded requesting clarification regarding the so-called Reference Number and why I had not been issued with a Case Number. This is rather unusual, in my experience. In South Africa if you submit a complaint to a court; you are given a Case Number for the case. If there is an error in the application, the court clerks inform you of the specific error that allegedly requires your correction. Yet you have provided a 'reference number for an inquiry', with no additional information or any reasons for not providing a court case number. Is "2012/708 - 1" the case number for my complaint? It does not appear so to me, since the case numbers of cases on your website are numbered differently; such as:
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Sak: 2012/1 Sak: 2011/3
Sak: 2011/5 Sak: 2011/1
Sak: 2011/4
There is already a case: Sak: 2012/1; so logically this would be Sak: 2012/2. Could you please clarify what "2012/708 - 1" means, what the case number is to be; and your Norwegian court process for proceeding.
On 28 June 2012 the Environmental Appeals Board responded that they were on summer vacation and would only answer my questions after the summer vacation. Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, we will not be able to answer your inquiry until after the summer vacation. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
On 28 June 2012 I responded to enquire when exactly the summer vacation was ending? Dear Ms. Nameless (Is that so you can avoid being held accountable?) Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board When exactly is the end of your summer vacation?
On 29 June 2012 I filed a complaint with Minister of Justice: Ms. Grete Faremo: Request Clarification & Response: 1. Is there any Norwegian law that provides for discrimination of due process court or administrative procedures against Non-Norwegian citizens? 2.
Do courts and administrative bodies in Norway totally shut down for Summer vacations?
3. Complaint: The Environmental Appeals Board appears to be refusing me access to its administrative due process complaint resolution procedures, and the Minister of Environment appears to approve such discrimination; 4. If your Administration is not their Supervisory Body, please provide contact details of whom exactly are their Supervisory Body/ies?
On 29 June 2012 the Environmental Appeals Board provided a new reference number, with different reference number parameters than before, appearing to refer to 2008, for some unknown reason: We hereby confirm the receipt of your inquiry. Reference no: 2008/363
On 03 July 2012 Environmental Appeals Board responded: Due to vacation leave for the secretary`s employees, we will consider your request in August and get back to you as soon as possible. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience that may cause.
On 03 July 2012 I responded that it was not an inconvenience to wait until August IF this was standard public policy to everyone filing a complaint to the Environmental Appeals Board; however this does not appear to be the case. I again complained to Minister of Justice: Ms. Faremo:
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Request Clarification & Response: Sounds like Norwegian Min of Justice and Environment don’t appreciate honest simple clear radical honesty language correspondence. So, for the fucking hard of hearing; we need to raise the tone a little.: The only fucked up pathetic answer I have so far received from a Norwegian who has so much respect for accountability and honesty; s/he is too much of a gutless fucking coward to take responsibility for her decision by providing her name is: "Due to vacation leave for the secretary`s employees, we will consider your request in August and get back to you as soon as possible. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience that may cause." It is sweet fuck all inconvenience to me: IF I was convinced this was STANDARD POLICY; which if so: SHOULD BE BROADCAST ON THE WEBSITE FOR EVERYONE'S KNOWLEDGE. But it isn't! Why Not? Why is there no sign on the front of Ministry of Environmental Appeals Board website saying: 'CLOSED FOR SUMMER VACATIONS; BACK ON SUCH & SUCH DAY IN AUGUST'? Is it cause the Environmental Appeals Board is only providing service to some elite people, and not to other more inferior people? Why is the Env. Appeals Board policy not standard and publicly broadcast? I am still waiting for a Case Number; and the answer to the following questions: 1. Is there any Norwegian law that provides for discrimination of due process court or administrative procedures against Non-Norwegian citizens? Has the Environmental Appeals Board shut down FOR EVERYONE, or only for me; until August? If for everyone; why is there no PUBLIC NOTICE: "CLOSED UNTIL AUGUST"???? 2. Do courts and administrative bodies in Norway totally shut down for TWO MONTHS of summer vacations? 3. Complaint: The Environmental Appeals Board appears to be refusing me access to its administrative due process complaint resolution procedures, and the Minister of Environment appears to approve such discrimination: Why is my complaint an 'enquiry' and why am I not provided a case number? 4. If your Administration is not their Supervisory Body, please provide contact details of whom exactly are their Supervisory Body/ies? Is it too much to ask the Norwegian Department of Justice to answer a few simple honest goddamn fucking questions?
I have not received any response. Respectfully Submitted
Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway Corruption | Norge Korrupsjon http://norge-korrupsjon.blogspot.com/
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
-----Original Message----From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:41 PM To: 'Env. Appeals Brd' Cc: 'Arne Blix'; 'Ed: Hilde Haugsjerd'; 'Trine Eilertsen'; 'John Arne Markussen'; 'Hans Tore Bjerkaas'; 'Alf Hildrum'; 'Torry Pedersen' Subject: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Environmental Appeals Board: Appeals of environmental information, c / o Secretariat, Climate and Pollution, PO Box 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no Respondents: Adresseavisen: Editor: Arne Blix Aftenposten: Editor: Hilde Haugsgjerd Bergens Tidende: Editor: Trine Eilertsen Dagbladet: Editor: John Arne Markussen NRK: Editor: Hans Tore Bjerkaas TV2: Editor: Alf Hildrum VG: Editor: Torry Pedersen Dear Sirs, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny On 25 May 2012, correspondence was submitted to each of the respondents requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 Earth Day: “If It Bleads, It Leads” Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs) Respondents were requested to provide such information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, all respondents have declined to respond or to provide the information requested. I am unaware what the legal justifications are for the respondents refusal to provide the information. As detailed in the requests to the respondents, the information is requested as a matter of public interest for research and transparency problem solving purposes. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ Encl: [A] Addresseavisen: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
[B] Aftenposten: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [C] BergensTidende: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [D] Dagbladet: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [E] NRK: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [F] TV2: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [G] VG: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [H] 22 April: Earth Day: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42.pg)
From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:03 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Ikke lest: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Meldingen Til: Post miljoklagenemnda Emne: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Sendt: 18. juni 2012 23:41:11 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien ble slettet uten å ha vært lest 22. juni 2012 15:02:32 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien.
From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 12:06 PM To: 'MinEnv: Bård Vegar Solhjell'; 'Jon Berg'; 'DirGen Haege Andenaes'; 'SecGen: Tom Radahl'; 'DirGen: Jon Rorvik' Cc: 'Env. Appeals Brd' Subject: MinEnv: Bård Vegar Solhjel: Complaint: Environmental Appeals Board / Klagenemnda for miljøinformasjon Bård Vegar Solhjell Minister of Environment The Ministry of the Environment Head of Communications Jon Berg Director General Hæge Andenæs Secretary General Tom Rådahl Director General Jon Rørvik Dear Minister, Complaint: Environmental Appeals Board Deletion of my Complaint for Review of Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) sent to Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2, VG and Addresseavisen: RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny On 25 May 2012, Requests for Access to Environment and Health Information were submitted to the editors of Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2, VG and Addresseavisen requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 Earth Day: “If It Bleads, It Leads” Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs). The Media Publications were requested to provide the requested information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, but declined to do so. 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
On 18 June 2012 a complaint was filed with the Environmental Appeals Board : Appeals of environmental information. On 22 June 2012, the Environmental Appeals Board responded that they had deleted the complaint without reading it. ---------From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:03 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Ikke lest: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Meldingen Til: Post miljoklagenemnda Emne: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Sendt: 18. juni 2012 23:41:11 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien ble slettet uten å ha vært lest 22. juni 2012 15:02:32 (UTC+01.00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Roma, Stockholm, Wien. ---------No reasons have been provided by the Environment Appeals Board for their decision to delete my complaint, allegedly without reading it. Nor is it registered on their Inkomne Sake pages: “Saker til behandling nå” and neither on their Vedtak/Decisions page. Please could I be informed whether the deletion was an error; or if not: written reasons for the deletion of my complaint. Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/
-----Original Message----From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:07 PM To: Lara Subject: RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG We hereby confirm the receipt of your inquiry. Reference no: 2012/708 - 1 Sincerely yours, Documentation Services, Records Management Climate and Pollution Agency E-mail: postmottak@klif.no Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96) For more information about us, please visit http://www.klif.no
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
Information about the state of the environment in Norway: http://www.environment.no/
-----Original Message----From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:51 AM To: 'Post miljoklagenemnda'; 'postmottak@klif.no' Cc: 'SecGen: Tom Radahl'; 'HeadComm: Jon Berg'; 'DirGen: Org: Jon Rorvik'; 'DirGen: Intnl Coop: Hege Andenas'; 'Arne Blix'; 'Ed: Hilde Haugsjerd'; 'Trine Eilertsen'; 'Hans Tore Bjerkaas'; 'Alf Hildrum'; 'Torry Pedersen' Subject: RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Documentation Services, Records Management Climate and Pollution Agency E-mail: postmottak@klif.no Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96) Dear Sirs/Ladies: RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG This is rather unusual, in my experience. In South Africa if you submit a complaint to a court; you are given a Case Number for the case. If there is an error in the application, the court clerks inform you of the specific error that allegedly requires your correction. Yet you have provided a 'reference number for an inquiry', with no additional information or any reasons for not providing a court case number. Is "2012/708 - 1" the case number for my complaint? It does not appear so to me, since the case numbers of cases on your website are numbered differently; such as: Sak: Sak: Sak: Sak: Sak:
2012/1 2011/5 2011/4 2011/3 2011/1
There is already a case: Sak: 2012/1; so logically this would be Sak: 2012/2. Strangely, you have cases whose final decisions are not published: Sak: Sak: Sak: Sak: Sak: Sak:
2011/2 2010/2 2010/1 2008/04 2008/02 2008/01
Could you please clarify what "2012/708 - 1" means, what the case number is to be; and your Norwegian court process for proceeding. Respectfully, Lara Johnstone 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:45 AM To: Lara Subject: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Dear Mrs. Lara Johnstone,
Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, we will not be able to answer your inquiry until after the summer vacation. We apologize for any inconvenience caused. Yours sincerely, Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board, Climate and Pollution Agency E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96)
From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:15 PM To: 'Post miljoklagenemnda' Subject: RE: Env. Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | BTidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG Dear Ms. Nameless (Is that so you can avoid being held accountable?) Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board When exactly is the end of your summer vacation? Lara Johnstone
From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 1:11 PM To: 'GFaremo'; 'Ch.Staff: Morten Ruud'; 'Admin: Hans Ostgaard'; 'Comm: Gunnar Johansen'; 'Int Director: Tonje Meinich'; 'Office' Cc: 'Post miljoklagenemnda'; 'MinEnv' Subject: Min.Justice: G.Faremo: Complaint RE: Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell & Miljoklagenemnda Obstruction of Justice MinJustice: Grete Faremo P.O. Box 8005 Dep, 0030 Oslo Tel: 22 24 90 90 CC: Bård Vegar Solhjell Minister of Environment MinEnv (miljovernministeren@md.dep.no) CC: Environmental Appeals Board : Appeals of environmental information E-mail: EnvAppBrd (post@miljoklagenemnda.no) Request Clarification & Response: 1. Is there any Norwegian law that provides for discrimination of due process court or administrative procedures against Non-Norwegian citizens? 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
2. Do courts and administrative bodies in Norway totally shut down for Summer vacations? 3. Complaint: The Environmental Appeals Board appears to be refusing me access to its administrative due process complaint resolution procedures, and the Minister of Environment appears to approve such discrimination; 4. If your Administration is not their Supervisory Body, please provide contact details of whom exactly are their Supervisory Body/ies? Please find complaint details in attached PDF Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right to Legal Sanity Norway Corruption | Norge Korrupsjon http://norge-korrupsjon.blogspot.com/ From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 1:41 PM To: Lara Subject: RE: Min.Justice: G.Faremo: Complaint RE: Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell & Miljoklagenemnda Obstruction of Justice We hereby confirm the receipt of your inquiry. Reference no: 2008/363 Yours sincerely, Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board, Climate and Pollution Agency E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96) From: Post miljoklagenemnda [mailto:Post@miljoklagenemnda.no] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:21 AM To: Lara (jmcswan@mweb.co.za) Subject: Re Env. Appeals
Dear Mrs. Lara Johnstone, Due to vacation leave for the secretary`s employees, we will consider your request in August and get back to you as soon as possible. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience that may cause. Yours sincerely, Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board, Climate and Pollution Agency E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no
Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96) Website: http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:00 AM 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
To: 'GFaremo'; 'Ch.Staff: Morten Ruud'; 'Admin: Hans Ostgaard'; 'Comm: Gunnar Johansen'; 'Int Director: Tonje Meinich'; 'Office' Cc: 'Post miljoklagenemnda'; 'MinEnv' Subject: [2] RE: Min.Justice: G.Faremo: Complaint RE: Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell & Miljoklagenemnda Obstruction of Justice MinJustice: Grete Faremo P.O. Box 8005 Dep, 0030 Oslo Tel: 22 24 90 90 CC: Bård Vegar Solhjell Minister of Environment MinEnv (miljovernministeren@md.dep.no) CC: Environmental Appeals Board : Appeals of environmental information E-mail: EnvAppBrd (post@miljoklagenemnda.no) Request Clarification & Response: Sounds like Norwegian Min of Justice and Environment don’t appreciate honest simple clear radical honesty language correspondence. So, for the fucking hard of hearing; we need to raise the tone a little.: The only fucked up pathetic answer I have so far received from a Norwegian who has so much respect for accountability and honesty; s/he is too much of a gutless fucking coward to take responsibility for her decision by providing her name is: "Due to vacation leave for the secretary`s employees, we will consider your request in August and get back to you as soon as possible. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience that may cause." It is sweet fuck all inconvenience to me: IF I was convinced this was STANDARD POLICY; which if so: SHOULD BE BROADCAST ON THE WEBSITE FOR EVERYONE'S KNOWLEDGE. But it isn't! Why Not? Why is there no sign on the front of Ministry of Environmental Appeals Board website saying: 'CLOSED FOR SUMMER VACATIONS; BACK ON SUCH & SUCH DAY IN AUGUST'? Is it cause the Environmental Appeals Board is only providing service to some elite people, and not to other more inferior people? Why is the Env. Appeals Board policy not standard and publicly broadcast? I am still waiting for a Case Number; and the answer to the following questions: 1. Is there any Norwegian law that provides for discrimination of due process court or administrative procedures against Non-Norwegian citizens? Has the Environmental Appeals Board shut down FOR EVERYONE, or only for me; until August? If for everyone; why is there no PUBLIC NOTICE: "CLOSED UNTIL AUGUST"???? 2. Do courts and administrative bodies in Norway totally shut down for TWO MONTHS of summer vacations? 3. Complaint: The Environmental Appeals Board appears to be refusing me access to its administrative due process complaint resolution procedures, and the Minister of Environment appears to approve such discrimination: Why is my complaint an 'enquiry' and why am I not provided a case number? 4. If your Administration is not their Supervisory Body, please provide contact details of whom exactly are their Supervisory Body/ies? Is it too much 04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr
to ask the Norwegian Department of Justice to answer a few simple honest goddamn fucking questions? Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right to Legal Sanity Norway Corruption | Norge Korrupsjon http://norge-korrupsjon.blogspot.com/
04/07/12 Ombudsman: Env. Appeals Board www.norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr