12-11-12: Parl.Ombud: Environment Appeals Board: Erroneous Ruling

Complaints form Erroneous Decision by Environment Appeals Board in Environmental Information Appeals 12. november 2012

Complainant Submitted by Forename: Surname: Organisation: Address: Postcode: Town: E-mail: Telephone: Fax:

Lara Johnstone SHARP PO Box 5042 6539 George East, 6539 jmcswan@mweb.co.za

Complainant Forename: Surname: Address: Postcode: Town:

Complaint Which public agency does your complaint refer to?

Environment Appeals Board / Klagenemnda for Miljoinformasjon Enter the public agency's case number or reference if known CASE 2012/2 AND CASE 2012/5 I complain about a decision made

Ja

When was the decision made (date of letter)?

10 September 2012 I complain about slow case processing or failure to reply I complain about other issues (e.g. bad treatment)

Nei Nei

Complaints form

Attachments 12-11-11_PO_EAB_MediaCensorship_AdvFor.pdf 12-11-12_PO_[A]_EAB_Media-Aftenposten_Pop-Env-Conn.pdf 12-11-12_PO_[B]_EAB_BarAssoc_DiscComm-DiscBrd.pdf 12-11-12_PO_[C]_EAB-Ruling_Encl_ReqforInfoITOPublicAdminAct.pdf

Grounds for complaint Describe your complaint Erroneous Decision by Environment Appeals Board in Environmental Information Appeals re: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship of Media?s ?Population-Environment-Terrorism? Connection; [II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy: The Environmental Appeals Board ?appeals that clearly have to be denied? refusal to process Complainants Appeals against Media Respondents and Bar Association Respondents are a violation of Complainant?s right to due process, and a failure of Impartial Arbitration procedures.

The Environmental Appeals Board?s ruling that Editor Respondents decision-making to censor information about the Media?s Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik?s Highly Public Terrorism trial, alleging that it was not ?Environmental Information? is beyond absurd, and totally lacking in factual and legal justifications.

Corporate decision-making (ยง 2(1)(b)) to censor factual information (ยง2 (1)(a)) information about the media?s Population-Environment-Terrorism connection directly affects not only the environment (ยง2 (1)(b)), but the health, safety and living conditions of all beings who live in that particular environment (ยง 2(1)(c)).

The Environmental Appeals Board?s failed to factually or legally justify that there is no appreciable difference between a Printed and an Electronic Complaints policy. To the contrary the Bar Association?s current Anti-Environmental Disciplinary Complaints Policy wastes directly and indirectly between 7.2 and 2,750 trees by failing to implement an Email Complaints policy.

The Editor Respondents, Bar Association Respondents and Environmental Appeals Board?s Refusal of Access to the Environmental Information requested is Contrary to the Provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, Right to Environmental Information Act, and the Aarhus Convention.

Lara Johnstone PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044: 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 11 November 2012 Parliamentary Ombudsman: Arne Fliflet The Parliamentary Ombudsman for Public Administration P.O. Box 3 Sentrum NO - 0101 Oslo Telephone: +47 22 82 85 00 Tel: 22 82 85 00 | Toll: 800 800 39 | Fax: 22 82 85 11 E-mail: postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no Dear Parliamentary Ombudsman, Erroneous Decision by Environment Appeals Board in Environmental Information Appeals re: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship of Media’s ‘Population-Environment-Terrorism’ Connection; [II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy: The Environmental Appeals Board ―appeals that clearly have to be denied‖ refusal to process Complainants Appeals against Media Respondents and Bar Association Respondents are a violation of Complainant‘s right to due process, and a failure of Impartial Arbitration procedures.

The Environmental Appeals Board‘s ruling that Editor Respondents decision-making to censor information about the Media‘s Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik‘s Highly Public Terrorism trial, alleging that it was not ‗Environmental Information‘ is beyond absurd, and totally lacking in factual and legal justifications.

Corporate decision-making (§ 2(1)(b)) to censor factual information (§2 (1)(a)) information about the media‘s Population-Environment-Terrorism connection directly affects not only the environment (§2 (1)(b)), but the health, safety and living conditions of all beings who live in that particular environment (§ 2(1)(c)).

The Environmental Appeals Board‘s failed to factually or legally justify that there is no appreciable difference between a Printed and an Electronic Complaints policy. To the contrary the Bar Association‘s current Anti-Environmental Disciplinary Complaints Policy wastes directly and indirectly between 7.2 and 2,750 trees by failing to implement an Email Complaints policy.

The Editor Respondents, Bar Association Respondents and Environmental Appeals Board‘s Refusal of Access to the Environmental Information requested is Contrary to the Provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, Right to Environmental Information Act, and the Aarhus Convention.

BACKGROUND OF COMPLAINTS: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship Environment-Terrorism’ Connection

of

Media’s

‘Population-

Anders Breivik Alleged that his Terrorism was motivated by the Media’s Censorship of Non-Violent Problem Solving, which facilitated a sociopolitical pressure cooker reality for their If it Leads, It Bleeds Profit from violence.

Oslo Organized Crime Police Investigation Report: "Explanation of 22 July 2011, doc 08,01, states: ―[Breivik] emphasizes that if he had not been censored by the media all his life, he would not have had to do what he did. He believes the media have the main responsibility for what has happened because they did not publish his opinions.... The low-intensity civil war that he had already described, had lasted until now with ideological struggle and censorship of cultural conservatives...... He explains that this is the worst day of his life and that he has dreaded this for 2 years. He has been censored for years. He mentions Dagbladet and Aftenposten as those who among other things have censored him..... He says that he also wrote ―essays‖ that he tried to publish via the usual channels, but that they were all censored..... The subject summarizes: As long as more than twelve were executed, the operation will still be a success. The experts ask how the number twelve comes into consideration. Twelve dead are needed to penetrate the censorship wall, he explains..... About his thoughts on the Utøya killings now, the subject says: The goal was to execute as many as possible. At least 30. It was horrible, but the number had to be assessed based on the global censorship limit. Utøya was a martyrdom, and I am very proud of it..... The subject says in the conversation that he knows the truth that is hidden from others. He believes that there is a civil war in the country. He believes he had to kill at least twelve, because there is a censorship-wall preventing an open debate about what is happening in the country..... So I knew I had to cross a certain threshold to exceed the censorship-wall of the international media."

13 May 2012: Social Science Testing of Anders Breivik’s Media Censorship Allegations: Complainant sent over 1,300 Norwegian Editors and Journalists an email1: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?, which included information that: [1] In December 2011, complainant informed2 1,283 Norwegian Editors and Journalists of her EcoFeminist support for Breivik’s right to a free and fair trial, in a Habeus Mentem application to the Oslo District Court.

The application argued that the roots of terrorism – irrespective of whether it was Mr. Breivik‘s ‗right wing‘ terrorism, or Mandela and Guevarra‘s left wing terrorism -- were a result of the Mainstream Media‘s censorship of non-violent problem solving to facilitate a socio-political pressure cooker reality for their ―If it Bleads, It Leads‖ corporate propaganda profits from terrorism violence. The mainstream media are the chief

1 2

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/04/120416_amicus_1384media.html http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2011/12/111207_habeusmedia.html

2

cheerleaders for overpopulation and overconsumption, which cause resource scarcity, local and national resource wars, which frequently include terrorism.

Mainstream media deliberately and intentionally aggravate overpopulation, overconsumption and resource scarcity social conflict, by providing preferential access to parties who advocate on behalf of population growth and Consumptionism and silencing those opposing overpopulation and overconsumption.

The media‘s conscious deliberate choices to advocate on behalf of population growth and Consumptionism, to the detriment of the environment, and ecological social and economic problems were well documented in the study by Dr. Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population - Environment Connection3.

The consequence of the Media‘s advocacy results in an Anthropocentric Masculine Insecurity legal system, which refuses to acknowledge the laws of nature: i.e. sustainable security demands that societies live in accordance to their carrying capacity, and acts and advocacy in support of breeding and consumption wars should be acknowledged as ACTS OF WAR.. However Anthropocentric legal doctrine ignores the laws of nature, believing that the earth is flat, resources are infinite, and everyone has the inalienable right to be a breeding war or consumption war combatant, pretending breeding and consumption war combatants are ‗innocent‘.

[2] In April 2012, complainant informed 1,384 Norwegian Editors and Journalists of her EcoFeminist support for Breivik’s right to a free and fair, in an Application to the Oslo District Court to proceed as an Ecocentric Amicus Curiae.

The proposed Amicus would provide the court with – among others - a Laws of Nature perspective how Masculine Insecurity was a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, due to obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving, and being the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Bullshit the Public Relations communication paradigm.

Anthropocentric Flat Earth Society law views the world from a fundamentalist inaccurate masculine insecurity human-centred perspective, assuming there will always be ―enough‖ Non Renewable Natural Resources (NNR‗s) to enable a brighter future, concerning itself with production and distribution of NNR‗s for ever improving material living standards for ever-increasing numbers of our ever-expanding global population. From an Ecocentric Finite Resource Scarcity perspective, Peak NNR: Overpopulation and Overconsumption of NNR‘s shall result in the impending collapse of industrial civilization, which cannot exist without these resources (Scarcity: Humanity‘s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity‘s Consequences, by Chris Clugston) [3] Masculine Insecurity of Norwegian Elite’s Political Psychiatry Silencing of Breivik’s Heresy: “The inquisition is to heresy, as psychiatry is to mental illness.”

Both applications also provided extensive evidence of how Politics is a dispute about the power or authority to define other people's reality, and that Political Correctness is a symptom of the Political elite‘s use of Psychiatry to enforce Political Correct conformity.

Psychiatry is an agent of, or a state mechanism of, social control to enforce Political and State power; which often allows for social control and coercion of Political Correct Conformity outside of the criminal justice system. Information included International Experts who argued that ―there is no such thing as mental illness, or a mental disorder‖, its all just about social control, PC ―value judgements and cultural norms‖; based upon ―horoscope chart science‖ and Pharma-Psychiatry‗s Humpty Dumpty definition of ―insanity‖ and ―disorder‖.

CCT 23-10: Statement of Consent by Dr. T. Michael Maher www.scribd.com/doc/31373074; How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection, www.scribd.com/doc/33694415 3

3

25 May 2012: Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) Complainant contacted the editors of Addresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Adresseavisen4, Aftenposten5, Bergens Tidende6, Dagbladet7, NRK8, TV29 and VG10 requesting: [1] Your Editors decision-making justification for censorship of the Norway v. Breivik Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection documentation provided to your publication in 13 May 2012 email: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

[2] (a) The total number of articles published by your publication either in print or online which refer to Breivik‘s alleged ―insanity‖; and (b) the number of these articles which - for fairness, impartiality and scientific objectivity - include a ―Critical Psychiatry‖ perspective, such as: ―The Myth of Mental Illness‖, the Marketing of Madness11, the use of Psychiatry as social control, and Psychiatrists Legal Testimony being equivalent to that of ―Whores of the Court‖: ―psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent‖.12 [3] The total amount of advertising revenue received by your publication from Pharmaceutical Corporations per year, over the past five years.

18 June 2012: Complaint to Environment Appeals Board: Complaint submitted13 to Environmental Appeals Board: Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny.

[II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy: In June 2012, complainant filed 170 complaints with the Bar Association Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board, against Attorneys for Anders Breivik and Attorneys for the Families of 22 July victims. The Complaints alleged violation of the CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_addvisen.html http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_aftenposten.html 6 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_btidende.html 7 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_dagbladet.html 8 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_nrk-htb.html 9 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120525_tv2.html 10 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/05/120528_vg-tp.html 11 http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/marketing-of-madness-are-independent.html 12 Psychology‘s takeover of our legal system represents not an advance into new but clearly charted areas of science but a terrifying retreat into mysticism and romanticism, a massive suspension of disbelief propelled by powerful propaganda. Thanks to the willingness of judges and juries to believe psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts, babble puffed about by psychological professionals with impressive credentials, what we‘ve got now are thousands of self-styled soul doctors run amok in our courts, drunk with power, bedazzled by spectacular fees for the no-heavy-lifting job of shooting off their mouths about any psychological topic that sneaks a toe into a courtroom. The demand is great, the supply is huge, and the science behind it all is nonexistent. But the reality does not matter.‖ – Margaret Hagen, Ph.D: Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony (www.whoresofthecourt.com) 13 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120618_eab-complaint.html 4 5

4

Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media‘s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway‘s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud, etc.

On 19 June the Bar Association refused to accept the complaints by email, citing their policy of insisting that all complaints be submitted on printed paper mailed by land mail: Should you nevertheless uphold your complaints, please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Norwegian Bar Association does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail. [..] The Norwegian Bar Association cannot process the complaint without a completed and signed attorney complaint form. Documents received without the complaint form attached will be returned to the complainant.

Please send two copies of the signed written complaint enclosed with any documentation you find relevant, in duplicate, and a filled-out and signed consent form in original ..

On 20 June 2012, complainant filed a Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed against Attorneys for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics.

[3] The Bar Association Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decisionmaking justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and nonrenewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decisionmaking justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

On 10 July 2012, the Bar Association‘s responded14 by contradicting themselves, stating that they had no Environmental decision-making justifications for their Complaints policy, but that their policy had to be followed, irrespective of lacking any environmental justifications for it.

As to your question on the "Complaints Environmental Principles", the Disciplinary Board does not have any such principles. We thus kindly ask you to follow the complaint procedure described to you in our previous e-mails. Your complaints will thus not be dealt with by the Disciplinary Board as long as they are sent by e-mail.

14

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/07/120710_discbrd.html

5

On 16 August, complainant filed15 an Appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board: Application to Environment Appeals Board: for an Order that the Disciplinary Board and Committee: Provide their Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transportation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to them; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

ENVIRONMENT APPEALS BOARD PROCESSING & RULINGS: 25 June – September 2012: Obstruction of Complaint Initially the media censorship complaint was deleted without reason. Upon complaint to Ministry of Environment16, it was given a Reference number17, with no apology for the deletion, implying the deletion was intentional and appropriate. The Environment Appeals Board refused to provide clear and simply answers to questions, delaying the complaint until ‗after summer‘18, and refusing19 to say when the end of summer would be20. Then promising it would be dealt with in August21, only to do nothing22 in August232425.

10 September 2012: Secretariat of Environmental Appeals Board Ruling: The Ruling stated26: We refer to your appeal of June 18 2012 against Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG regarding the undertakings decline to provide a justification for the decision not to publish two articles related to the incident on July 22 2011 and terrorism. We also refer to your appeal of August 16 2012 against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board regarding their refusal to provide an environmental justification for the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail.

According to the Environmental Information Act section 16 (1) "Any person is entitled to receive environmental information from undertakings such as are mentioned in section 5, sub-section 2, concerning factors related to the undertaking, including factor inputs and products, which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/08/120816_eab_advfor.html http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120625_minenv.html 17 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120625_eab_12-708.html 18 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120628_eab-1045.html 19 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120629_eab-mjustice.html 20 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/06/120628_eab-1315.html 21 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/07/120703_eab-1021.html 22 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/07/120703_mjus-eab-1100.html 23 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/07/120704_po_eab.html 24 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/08/120831_eab-mcensor.html 25 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/09/120902_po-eab.html 26 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/09/120910_eab-ba-media1.html 15 16

6

When used in the Environmental Information Act, the term "environment" means the external environment, including archaeological and architectural monuments and sites and cultural environments, cf. section 2 (2) of the act. Information regarding the social environment is thus not considered "environmental information" as the term is defined in the act. Information concerning human health, safety and living conditions, is only considered "environmental information" to the extent that these factors are or may be affected by the state of the external environment or factors that affect or may affect the environment, cf. section 2 (1).

The right to receive environmental information from undertakings is limited to information concerning factors "which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

Concerning your first appeal, the Appeals Board for Environmental Information would like to point out that the editorial choices made by the staff working for newspapers, TV channels etc. are not factors related to the undertaking which may have an effect on the environment. The information that you have requested from Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG is thus not "environmental information". [..]

On these grounds, the Appeals Board has made the following decision: The appeals are denied as not justified.

The decision of the board is final and is not subject for further appeals. Disputes about the duties of undertakings according to The Environmental Information Act may be subject for legal proceedings.

Regarding your first appeal, the secretariat for the Appeals Board adds that editors` freedom to make decisions in editorial issues is granted in the Act regarding Editorial Freedom in the Media section 4.

11 September: Request for Information: Request for Information stated27, in pertinent part: It is my understanding that general due process procedure includes the following: [A] Complainant files complaint; [B] Adjudicating Authority immediately issues a Case Number; [C] Complaint provided to Respondents, who are given a specific time period for their response; [D] Respondents provide their arguments, detailing issues such as – FOR EXAMPLE in this case - alleged inaccurate ‗environmental information‘ definitions; or ‗rights to discriminate against certain cultures/races/religions and censor all information about such culture/religions/races opinions or actions in any court proceeding‘; [E] The Complainant is given the opportunity to respond to the issues raised by the Respondent/s; [F] If there are additional issues still unclear, the adjudicating authority can ask for another round of submissions, repeating [D] and [E]; [G] The Adjudicating authority makes a final decision based upon the evidence and arguments submitted to it; which were transparently provided to both parties, and which both parties had the ‗right of reply‘ to.

27

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/09/120911_eab.html

7

Media Censorship Complaint: Skip [B-F] and go straight to [G] Now, in my complaint to the Environmental Appeals Board against the media publications of (a) Addresseavisen, (b) Aftenposten, (c) Bergens Tidende, (d) Dagbladet, (e) NRK, (f) TV2 and (g) VG, the Environmental Appeals Board has skipped the due process procedures of [B] to [F] and gone straight to [G].

Could you provide the statutory authority that provides the Environmental Appeals Board with this authority to violate due process procedures?

If the Environmental Appeals Board did receive submissions from any of the Media Publications Respondents; please clarify what authority authorizes you to withhold such submissions from the complainant and to deny the complaint a response to such submissions; and provide the complainant with copies of these submissions that were made to the Environmental Appeals Board?

Bar Association Disciplinary Committee’s Obstruction of Justice Complaint: Skip [B-F] and go straight to [G] Now, in my complaint to the Environmental Appeals Board against the Bar Association Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board for Advocates, the Environmental Appeals Board has also skipped the due process procedures of [B] to [F] and gone straight to [G].

Could you provide the statutory authority that provides the Environmental Appeals Board with this authority to violate due process procedures?

If the Environmental Appeals Board did receive submissions from either the Disciplinary Board of Disciplinary Committee Respondents; please clarify what authority authorizes you to withhold such submissions from the complainant and to deny the complaint a response to such submissions; and provide the complainant with copies of these submissions that were made to the Environmental Appeals Board?

18 September: Env. Appeals Board Response Appeals ‘clearly had to be denied’: Environmental Appeals Board Response28: We refer to your appeal of June 18 2012 against Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG regarding the undertakings decline to provide a justification for the decision not to publish two articles related to the incident on July 22 2011 and terrorism. We also refer to your appeal of August 16 2012 against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board regarding their refusal to provide an environmental justification for the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail.

According to the Environmental Information Act section 16 (1) "Any person is entitled to receive environmental information from undertakings such as are mentioned in section 5, sub-section 2, concerning factors related to the undertaking, including factor inputs and products, which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

When used in the Environmental Information Act, the term "environment" means the external environment, including archaeological and architectural monuments and sites 28

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/09/120918_eab.html

8

and cultural environments, cf. section 2 (2) of the act. Information regarding the social environment is thus not considered "environmental information" as the term is defined in the act. Information concerning human health, safety and living conditions, is only considered "environmental information" to the extent that these factors are or may be affected by the state of the external environment or factors that affect or may affect the environment, cf. section 2 (1).

The right to receive environmental information from undertakings is limited to information concerning factors "which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

Concerning your first appeal, the Appeals Board for Environmental Information would like to point out that the editorial choices made by the staff working for newspapers, TV channels etc. are not factors related to the undertaking which may have an effect on the environment. The information that you have requested from Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG is thus not "environmental information".

Regarding your second appeal, against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board, the Appeals Board finds that the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail is not a factor which may have an appreciable effect on the environment.

On these grounds, the Appeals Board has made the following decision: The appeals are denied as not justified.

The decision of the board is final and is not subject for further appeals. Disputes about the duties of undertakings according to The Environmental Information Act may be subject for legal proceedings.

Regarding your first appeal, the secretariat for the Appeals Board adds that editors` freedom to make decisions in editorial issues is granted in the Act regarding Editorial Freedom in the Media section 4.

08 October 2012: Request Clarification of ‘Environment’ Definitions: Request for Clarification to Env. Appeals Board29: Please could you clarify for me your reasoning viz a viz: ―When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied‖ It is not remotely clear to me why my complaints ‗clearly had to be denied‘; unless your office is massively corrupt, like many other Norwegian government offices, on the matter of Mr. Breivik‘s case and surrounding issues.

The Dept of Environment clearly encourages people to be active in holding Government Departments and corporations accountable on environmental issues: --------A prerequisite for environmental law to work as intended is that the public uses it actively.

29

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/10/121008_eab1.html

9

The law will put citizens able to: * contribute to the protection of the environment * protect against health and environmental * influence public and private decision makers in environmental issues --------According to: LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law). http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html -------§ 2 What is understood by environmental (1) An environmental means factual information and reviews about a) environment, b) factors that affect or may affect the environment, including - planned and implemented measures and activities in the environment, - product features or content, - Ratio of operating the business, and - administrative decisions and actions, including individual decisions, agreements, regulations, plans, strategies and programs, and associated analyzes, calculations and assumptions, c) human health, safety and living conditions to the extent they are or may be affected by the state of the environment or the factors mentioned in b (2) The environment means the environment including cultural heritage.

-------The Aarhus Convention defines 'environmental information' as: ----------3. ―Environmental information‖ means any information in written, visual, aural, electronic or any other material form on: (a) The state of elements of the environment, such as air and atmosphere, water, soil, land, landscape and natural sites, biological diversity and its components, including genetically modified organisms, and the interaction among these elements; (b) Factors, such as substances, energy, noise and radiation, and activities or measures, including administrative measures, environmental agreements, policies, legislation, plans and programmes, affecting or likely to affect the elements of the environment within the scope of subparagraph (a) above, and cost-benefit and other economic analyses and assumptions used in environmental decision-making; (c) The state of human health and safety, conditions of human life, cultural sites and built structures, inasmuch as they are or may be affected by the state of the elements of the environment or, through these elements, by the factors, activities or measures referred to in subparagraph (b) above; ----------The information requested of the Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG clearly - if you read it - falls under both LAW 2003-0509 # 31: Environmental Law and the Aarhus Convention definitions.

10

The information requested of Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board clearly falls under both LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Environmental Law and the Aarhus Convention definitions.

It is therefore not remotely obvious why you wrote: "When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied, it is not necessary to ask the respondents to provide their arguments. In these cases the secretariat prepares a draft decision and consults the members of the board. If the draft decision is approved by the members of the board, no further discussion is needed. This makes the Appeals Board able to settle obvious cases without arranging unnecessary meetings. Your appeals have been settled this way. Because no meeting has taken place, you will not receive a signed decision."

Is the secretariat for the Appeals Board for Environmental Information | www.miljoklagenemnda.no | Environmental Appeals Board just a Fake PR front for Corporate whores raping the planet? Setup just to pretend Nowegian Government gives a fuck about the environment? You just sit there and rubber stamp environmental requests with " clearly have to be denied" and laugh how massively stupid the citizens are for believing the bullshit in your Duhmockery press releases that you legislate laws to encourage citizens to: * contribute to the protection of the environment * protect against health and environmental * influence public and private decision makers in environmental issues

03 November: Request to Environment Appeals Board in terms of Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 25, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 2230.

I have received no response to my request for information submitted to you on 08 October: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee; in response to your ruling of 18 September 2012.

Relief Requested: In terms of the Public Administration Act, Section, 24, 25, and 26, and Freedom of Information Act, Section 2: Please could you kindly provide a ruling in consideration of clarifying what factual and legal grounds you considered in terms of coming to your conclusion that my complaint ‗clearly had to be denied‘; including clarifying exactly how my complaints do not fit the definition of Environment as clarified by the Aarhus convention and LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decisionmaking processes relating to the environment (environmental law), as requested in correspondent of 08 October.

06 November: Information Denied31

30 31

http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121103_eab.html http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121106_eab1.html

11

Reference is made to your e-mails of October 8 and November 3 2012, where you request a justification for statements in the e-mail of September 18 2012 from the secretariat for the Appeals Board for Environmental Information.

The secretariat would like to point out that our e-mail of September 18 2012, were we explained how your appeals had been prepared prior to the Appeals Board decision, is not an administrative decision. We can not provide you with a ruling clarifying the factual and legal grounds for our statements in this e-mail. However, as the decision of the Appeals Board for Environmental Information shows, the board agreed that your appeals were not justified and therefore had to be denied. The board´s grounds for this were, in accordance with the Public Administration Act § 24, stated in the e-mail of September 10 2012 notifying you of the decision. The secretariat does not wish to add anything to these grounds, and will not reply to further e-mail from you regarding this same matter.

We can however inform you that we have chosen to provide you the Appeals Board's decision on an official letterhead. You will find this document enclosed.

ARGUMENT: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship Environment-Terrorism’ Connection

of

Media’s

‘Population-

[1] Irregular Violation of Due Process: Irregular failure of Impartial Arbitration due process procedures There is no evidence whatsoever to justify the Environmental Appeals Board‘s decision that complainants complaint fits the decision of an Appeal that clearly had to be denied. ("When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied, it is not necessary to ask the respondents to provide their arguments.‖) The Environmental Appeal Boards conduct was that of appointing itself as legal counsel for the Respondents, instead of being impartial arbiter of the issues, subsequent to hearing the evidence of both arguments.

An impartial arbiter provides both parties with the opportunity to submit their arguments and evidence and then bases their final ruling upon the evidence submitted to it. Appointing itself as the counsel for one party, is not an indication of impartial arbitration based upon the evidence submitted to the arbiter to adjudicate the matter in accordance to the rule of law.

[2] Environmental Appeals Board fails to justify how the requested Population Growth and Consumptionism information requested from the Media is not ‘Environmental Information’: Population Growth and Corporate Advocacy of Consumptionism are primary factors in Resource Scarcity, Species Extinction and Environmental Degradation.

The Environmental Appeal Boards decision that the Media‘s deliberate decision-making to refuse to inform the public of ‗How and Why Journalists Censor the PopulationEnvironment Connection‘ information supporting Breivik‘s argument about media censorship being a contributory motivating factor for resource scarcity, social conflict and

12

political and socio-economic problems; is not ‗Environmental information‘, is beyond absurd.

Population Growth: Population growth is one of the primary, if not the primary factors contributing to species extinction, resource depletion and environmental degradation.

Censorship of population growth aggravates species extinction, resource depletion, social conflict and resource wars. Population growth is a primary aggravating factor for the social conditions that pressure Muslims and Africans to emigrate to Europe to escape the overcrowded consequences of overpopulation colliding with declining resources in their own countries.

To censor information about population growth‘s consequences on the environment massively aggravates population growth‘s consequences on the environment.

In the same way that an oil company‘s CEO‘ is required to make due diligence corporate decisions to protect the environment, by securing his oil tankers from spillage; a media corporation has the same due diligence to educate their readers about information that harms the environment, whether that information is population growth, overconsumption or oil companies bad decision making.

The rule of law requires – or should require – that all corporations, including media corporations are held to the same standards of due diligence in terms of their decision making choices to harm, or protect, the environment.

Political Correct Conformist Consumptionism: Consumptionism is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for the planets ecological problems, of which the political and economic problems are simply symptoms of the deeper ecological problems. Peak Nonrenewable Natural Resources shall result in the impending collapse of industrial civilization, which cannot exist without these resources32. Consumptionism is a direct result of pharma-psychiatry‘s zombification of individuals identities from being critical thinking citizens who based their purchases based upon need being converted to pacified zombie conformist consumers, whose identity was based upon their consumptionism. Pacified zombie conformist consumers are incapable of critical thinking faculties to act on behalf of defending their nations environments and natural resources from being raped and pillaged by international consumptionist corporations.

Population growth and Consumptionism is factual information (§2 (1)(a)33) that directly affects not only the environment (§2 (1)(b)), but the health, safety and living conditions of all beings who live in that particular environment (§ 2(1)(c)). Corporate decision making (§ 2(1)(b)) to censor factual information (§2 (1)(a)) information about of population growth or Consumptionism, similarly directly affects not only the environment (§2 (1)(b)), but the health, safety and living conditions of all beings who live in that particular environment (§ 2(1)(c)).

According to the General Court in Luxembourg34, the Aarhus Convention prevails over the EU‘s own regulations about access to information, public participation, and access to justice within EU institutions. Consequently in a conflict over interpretation or Scarcity: Humanity‘s Last Chapter : A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity‘s Consequences, by Chris Clugston 33 LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law). http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html 34 Stichting Natuur en Milieu & Pesticide Action Network Europe v. European Commission (Case T-338/08 at 52) and Vereniging Milieudefensie & Stichting Stop Luchtverontreininging Utrecht v. European Commission (Case T-396-09 at 43) 32

13

definitions, the Aarhus Convention would also prevail over the Right to Environmental Information (LAW 2003-05-09 # 31).

[3] Editor’s and Environmental Appeals Board’s Refusal of Access to Information from Media Respondents is Contrary to Provisions of Freedom of Information Act, Right to Environmental Information Act35 and Aarhus Convention: The public‘s access to information includes access to information about whether any decision by a public, corporate or media official purposing to be acting ‗on behalf of informing the public‘ was impartial, rational, fair, and subjectively and objectively reasonable. The Freedom of the Press does not include the freedom to refuse the public access to information about Editorial decision-making processes.

In the case of reporting on a politically sensitive trial, freedom of the press does not include the freedom to abuse the press‘ publicity power on behalf of the State, by censoring information to the detriment of a free and fair trial.

The public‘s access to information, includes access to information from the Respondent Editors, regarding the editorial decision making processes involved in choosing to censor from their readers the information submitted to them in the emails: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

The public‘s access to Environmental Information, includes access to information about how and why the editors choose to censor population information and the consequences of such censorship upon political and social problems experienced by the public.

At the very least the media owe the public an explanation for their editorial decisionmaking justifications for censoring this information from the public, at this particular time, during this particular trial.

[II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy: [1] Irregular Violation of Due Process: Irregular failure of Impartial Arbitration due process procedures There is no evidence whatsoever to justify the Environmental Appeals Board‘s decision that complainants complaint fits the decision of an Appeal that clearly had to be denied. ("When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied, it is not necessary to ask the respondents to provide their arguments. .. Regarding your .. appeal, against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board, the Appeals Board finds that the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail is not a factor which may have an appreciable effect on the environment.‖) The Environmental Appeal Boards conduct was that of appointing itself as legal counsel for the Respondents, instead of being impartial arbiter of the issues, subsequent to hearing the evidence of both arguments.

An impartial arbiter provides both parties with the opportunity to submit their arguments and evidence and then bases their final ruling upon the evidence submitted to LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law). http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html 35

14

it. Appointing itself as the counsel for one party, is not an indication of impartial arbitration based upon the evidence submitted to the arbiter to adjudicate the matter in accordance to the rule of law.

The Environmental Appeals Board refused to provide information about what factual and legal environmental factors they considered to come to their conclusion that the Bar Association Disciplinary Committee‘s ―policy to refuse complaints by e-mail is not a factor which may have an appreciable effect on the environment.‖

[2] Environmental Appeals Board fails to justify that there is no appreciable Environmental difference between a Printed and Electronic Complaints policy: There is a massive physical and psychological Environmental difference in following a policy of printing instead of emailing.

ThinkBeforePrinting36 advocate: “We're not against printing. We're against wasting resources. We don't want to stop people printing. We simply think that sometimes, people, and not everyone, need reminding that wasting paper, ink and toner doesn't make economic or environmental sense.

Reduce.org provides the following factual statistics37 on Paper Usage: Over 40% of wood pulp goes toward the production of paper. The costs of using paper in the office can run 13 to 31 times the cost of purchasing the paper in the first place! Saving Paper Saves Money: For each sheet of paper used, a company incurs not only purchasing costs, but also storage, copying, printing, postage, disposal, and recycling—and it adds up. A recent Minnesota study estimates that associated paper costs could be as much as 31 times the purchasing costs (not including labor). So, that ream of paper that you paid $5 for really could cost up to $155!

Citigroup, a large financial services company, determined that if each employee used double-sided copying to conserve just one sheet of paper each week, the firm would save $700,000 each year. Bank of America cut its paper consumption by 25% in two years by increasing the use of on-line forms and reports, e-mail, doublesided copying, and lighter-weight paper.

Paper is an office necessity for some essential tasks, but it has an environmental cost. Creating paper from trees requires a lot of natural resources: trees, water, and energy.

It takes more than 1½ cups of water to make one sheet of paper. (Picture a typical soda can.) Reducing paper use reduces greenhouse gases: 40 reams of paper is like 1.5 acres of pine forest absorbing carbon for a year.

Conservatree’s calculations38 on Printing‘s cost to Environment: ―1 ton of uncoated virgin (non-recycled) printing and office paper uses 24 trees. 1 ton of 100% virgin (nonrecycled) newsprint uses 12 trees. A "pallet" of copier paper (20-lb. sheet weight, or 20#) contains 40 cartons and weighs 1 ton. Therefore, 1 carton (10 reams) of 100% virgin copier http://thinkbeforeprinting.org/ http://156.98.19.245/paper/index.html 38 http://conservatree.org/learn/EnviroIssues/TreeStats.shtml 36 37

15

paper uses .6 trees. 1 tree makes 16.67 reams of copy paper or 8,333.3 sheets; 1 ream (500 sheets) uses 6% of a tree (and those add up quickly!). 1 ton of coated, higher-end virgin magazine paper (used for magazines like National Geographic and many others) uses a little more than 15 trees (15.36). 1 ton of coated, lower-end virgin magazine paper (used for newsmagazines and most catalogs) uses nearly 8 trees (7.68).‖ American Bar Association and American Law Institute’s The Practical Lawyer: James Martin: ―Don‘t Print That Email‖39 (April 2009); ―Going Paperless…Or Not‖ (October 2007), and ―A Model Electronic File Policy for the Law Office‖ (April 2007).

I don‘t know about your law office, but in mine email carries 90% of what comes in and 90% of what goes out. Paper in and paper out is just 10%. That means we no longer need to print out email onto paper and then file it in a paper file folder. Email has made us paperless. Nowadays, it actually takes more time to ―go paper‖.

5. Make It a Policy: You want your emails to be your business records, your office file, your client file, your evidence. To avoid any dispute about this, you need to make it your standard practice by putting in writing, as an office policy, that your email folder is your official file. ..

Conclusion: A wonderful side benefit to this email filing approach is that it is good for the planet, it saves trees, it‘s green, and it comports with the adage ―If it ain‘t broke, don‘t fix it‖. If it ain‘t paper, don‘t print it. That‘s good old, simple, money-saving advice. Just what we need in the world today. Just don‘t forget to make those backup copies.

Bar Association Current Disciplinary Complaint Policy wastes between 7.2 – 2,750 Trees by failing to implement Email Complaints Policy.

According to the Bar Association‘s Disciplinary Statistics40, the total number of complaints from 2009 to 2011 were 2009 (2011: 468 + 233; 2010: 491 + 191; 2009: 441 + 185). Assuming that each complaint was an average of 30 pages, that would amount to 60,270 pages, which is 120 reams, which is 7.2 trees.

It is fair to say that if the Bar Association chose to set an example of ThinkBeforePrinting Environmental Consciousness and amended its Complaints Policy to Florida Lawyer Jim Martin‘s Email In, Email Out policy, this would set an environmental precedent for the Bar Association‘s lawyers to adopt Jim Martin‘s Email In, Email Out policy.

Lexis Nexis reports in Saving Trees One Page at a Time41, that ―between January 2008 and May 2012, by choosing to use File & Serve as opposed to traditional paper service, our customers have saved over 220,596 trees! That is equal to over 315 acres of trees or 612,769 feet of paper!‖ It also reported that ―a 2008 survey conducted by Arnold & Porter reported that a single attorney uses an average of between 20,000-100,000 pages of paper per year.

This is equal to approximately ½ of a tree and 2 ½ trees per attorney per year in 2008.‖ http://jamesmartinpa.com/blog/?p=344 http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Etiske-regler/Disiplinarbeslutninger/Statistikk-Disiplinarsystemet/ 41 http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/fileandserve/blogs/industrynews/archive/2012/07/30/saving-trees-onepage-at-a-time.aspx 39 40

16

In 2008, the Bar Association had about 5,500 Advocate members42. Imagine that the Bar Association‘s Environmental ‗Email In, Email Out‘ Complaints policy encouraged 25% of its members to adopt an Environmentally Friendly ‗Email In, Email Out‘ policy, and converted 80% of their paper lawyering to electronic lawyering.

1375 lawyers x 2 trees, per year is 2,750 trees, at an average of 10 trees per acre43, that would be 275 acres of trees.

RELIEF REQUESTED: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship of Media’s ‘PopulationEnvironment-Terrorism’ Connection [1] Environmental Appeals Board‘s decision was an irregular denial of due process and should be ruled invalid.

[2] Environmental Appeals Board‘s definition of ‗Environmental Information‘ is contrary to Right to Environmental Information Act and Aarhus Convention definition.

[3] Editor‘s and Environmental Appeals Board‘s Refusal of Access to Information is Contrary to Provisions of Freedom of Information Act, Right to Environmental Information Act and Aarhus Convention.

[II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy: [1] Environmental Appeals Board‘s decision was an irregular denial of due process and should be ruled invalid.

[2] Environmental Appeals Board definition of ‗Appreciable Environmental Difference‘ is contrary to Right to Environmental Information Act and Aarhus Convention definition.

[3] Bar Association and Environmental Appeals Board‘s Refusal of Access to Information is Contrary to Provisions of Freedom of Information Act, Right to Environmental Information Act and Aarhus Convention.

PERTINENT LEGISLATION Freedom of Information Act (1970) § 2. The main provisions of the Act The case documents of the public administration are public insofar as no exception is made by or pursuant to statute.

Any person may demand of the pertinent administrative agency to be apprised of the publicly disclosable contents of the documents in a specific case. The same applies to case registers and similar registers and the agenda of meetings of publicly elected

42 43

http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Aktuelt/Nyheter/Stadig-flere-medlemmer-i-Advokatforeningen/ http://warnell.forestry.uga.edu/service/library/for96-054/index.html

17

municipal and county municipal bodies. The administrative agency shall keep a register pursuant to the provisions of the Archives Act and its regulations.

Notwithstanding that a document may be exempted from public disclosure pursuant to the provisions of this Act, the administrative agency shall consider whether the document should nevertheless wholly or partly be made public.

LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law)44. § 2 What is understood by environmental (1) An environmental means factual information and reviews about a) environment, b) factors that affect or may affect the environment, including -

planned and implemented measures and activities in the environment,

-

product features or content,

-

Ratio of operating the business, and

- administrative decisions and actions, including individual decisions, agreements, regulations, plans, strategies and programs, and associated analyzes, calculations and assumptions, c) human health, safety and living conditions to the extent they are or may be affected by the state of the environment or the factors mentioned in b (2) The environment means the environment including cultural heritage.

Aarhus Convention: Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters45 3. ―Environmental information‖ means any information in written, visual, aural, electronic or any other material form on: (a) The state of elements of the environment, such as air and atmosphere, water, soil, land, landscape and natural sites, biological diversity and its components, including genetically modified organisms, and the interaction among these elements; (b) Factors, such as substances, energy, noise and radiation, and activities or measures, including administrative measures, environmental agreements, policies, legislation, plans and programmes, affecting or likely to affect the elements of the environment within the scope of subparagraph (a) above, and cost-benefit and other economic analyses and assumptions used in environmental decision-making; (c) The state of human health and safety, conditions of human life, cultural sites and built structures, inasmuch as they are or may be affected by the state of the elements of the environment or, through these elements, by the factors, activities or measures referred to in subparagraph (b) above;

44 45

http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf

18

Article 9: Access to Justice: 1. Each Party shall, within the framework of its national legislation, ensure that any person who considers that his or her request for information under article 4 has been ignored, wrongfully refused, whether in part or in full, inadequately answered, or otherwise not dealt with in accordance with the provisions of that article, has access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law.

In the circumstances where a Party provides for such a review by a court of law, it shall ensure that such a person also has access to an expeditious procedure established by law that is free of charge or inexpensive for reconsideration by a public authority or review by an independent and impartial body other than a court of law.

Final decisions under this paragraph 1 shall be binding on the public authority holding the information. Reasons shall be stated in writing, at least where access to information is refused under this paragraph.

2. Each Party shall, within the framework of its national legislation, ensure that members of the public concerned (a) Having a sufficient interest or, alternatively, (b) Maintaining impairment of a right, where the administrative procedural law of a Party requires this as a precondition, have access to a review procedure before a court of law and/or another independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive and procedural legality of any decision, act or omission subject to the provisions of article 6 and, where so provided for under national law and without prejudice to paragraph 3 below, of other relevant provisions of this Convention.

What constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right shall be determined in accordance with the requirements of national law and consistently with the objective of giving the public concerned wide access to justice within the scope of this Convention. To this end, the interest of any non-governmental organization meeting the requirements referred to in article 2, paragraph 5, shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of subparagraph (a) above. Such organizations shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purpose of subparagraph (b) above.

The provisions of this paragraph 2 shall not exclude the possibility of a preliminary review procedure before an administrative authority and shall not affect the requirement of exhaustion of administrative review procedures prior to recourse to judicial review procedures, where such a requirement exists under national law.

3. In addition and without prejudice to the review procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, each Party shall ensure that, where they meet the criteria, if any, laid down in its national law, members of the public have access to administrative or judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment.

4. In addition and without prejudice to paragraph 1 above, the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above shall provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief as appropriate, and be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive. Decisions under this article shall be given or recorded in

19

writing. Decisions of courts, and whenever possible of other bodies, shall be publicly accessible.

5. In order to further the effectiveness of the provisions of this article, each Party shall ensure that information is provided to the public on access to administrative and judicial review procedures and shall consider the establishment of appropriate assistance mechanisms to remove or reduce financial and other barriers to access to justice.

Aarhus Convention definitions prevail over the EU‘s own regulation about access to information, public participation, and access to justice within EU institutions.

CURIA: General Court: Stichting Natuur en Milieu & Pesticide Action Network Europe v. European Commission46 (Case T-338/08) 52. The Aarhus Convention was signed by the European Community and subsequently approved by Council Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 (OJ 2005 L 124, p. 1).

The institutions are accordingly bound by that convention, which prevails over secondary Community legislation. It follows that the validity of Regulation No 1367/2006 may be affected by the fact that it is incompatible with the Aarhus Convention.

CURIA: General Court: Vereniging Milieudefensie & Stichting Stop Luchtverontreininging Utrecht v. European Commission47 (T-396-09) 43. [..] Given that the Aarhus Convention prevails over Regulation No 1367/2006 ..

REGULATION (EC) No 1367/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decisionmaking and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies48

Public Administration Act (1967) The administrative decision § 23. (the formal requirements for individual decisions) An individual decision shall be in writing except where, for practical reasons, this would be particularly burdensome for the administrative agency. § 24. (when grounds shall be given for individual decisions) Grounds shall be given for individual decisions. The administrative agency shall state the grounds at the same time as the decision is made. § 25. (the contents of the grounds) The grounds shall refer to the rules on which the administrative decision is based, unless the party is familiar with the rules. Insofar as it is necessary in order to enable http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf? text=&docid=123824&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=doc&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3936156 47 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf? text=&docid=123823&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=doc&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3936156 48 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:264:0013:0013:EN:PDF 46

20

the party to understand the administrative decision, the grounds shall also cite the contents of the rules or the assessment of the problem on which the administrative decision is based.

The grounds shall also mention the factual circumstances upon which the administrative decision is based. If the factual circumstances have been described by the party himself or in a document whose contents have been disclosed to the party, a reference to the previous account shall suffice. In this case a copy of the said account shall be appended to the notification to the party.

Mention should be made of the chief considerations which have been decisive for the exercise of the administrative agency's discretionary powers. If guidelines have been given for the exercise of such powers, reference to these guidelines will as a rule be sufficient.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone Encl: [A] 18 June: Env. Appeals Board: Req for Access to Env Info ITO S.28 & S.10: Encl: 25 May: Aftenposten: Req for Access to Env Info ITO S.28 & S.10: Encl: 22 April: Media‘s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42.pg) [B] 15 Aug: EAB: Req for Access to Info: AdvFor: Disciplinary Comm.

15 Aug: EAB: Req for Access to Info: AdvFor: Disciplinary Board [C] 10 Sep: Env. Appeals Board Ruling: Encl: 03 Nov: Req. for Info ITO Public Admin Act S.23,24, 25.

21

DECISION IN CASE 2012/2 AND CASE 2012/5 Complainant:

Defendants in case 2012/2:

in case 2012/5:

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem

Adresseavisen Aftenposten Bergens Tidende Dagbladet NRK TV2 VG the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee the Disciplinary Board

We refer to your appeal of June 18 2012 against Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG regarding the undertakings decline to provide a justification for the decision not to publish two articles related to the incident on July 22 2011 and terrorism. We also refer to your appeal of August 16 2012 against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board regarding their refusal to provide an environmental justification for the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail.

According to the Environmental Information Act section 16 (1) "Any person is entitled to receive environmental information from undertakings such as are mentioned in section 5, subsection 2, concerning factors related to the undertaking, including factor inputs and products, which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

When used in the Environmental Information Act, the term "environment" means the external environment, including archaeological and architectural monuments and sites and cultural environments, cf. section 2 (2) of the act. Information regarding the social environment is thus not considered "environmental information" as the term is defined in the act. Information concerning human health, safety and living conditions, is only considered "environmental information" to the extent that these factors are or may be affected by the state of the external environment or factors that affect or may affect the environment, cf. section 2 (1).

The right to receive environmental information from undertakings is limited to information concerning factors "which may have an appreciable effect on the environment".

Concerning your first appeal, the Appeals Board for Environmental Information would like to point out that the editorial choices made by the staff working for newspapers, TV channels etc. are not factors related to the undertaking which may have an effect on the environment.

1

The information that you have requested from Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG is thus not "environmental information".

Regarding your second appeal, against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board, the Appeals Board finds that the policy to refuse complaints by e-mail is not a factor which may have an appreciable effect on the environment.

On these grounds, the Appeals Board has made the following decision: The appeals are denied as not justified.

The decision of the board is final and is not subject for further appeals. Disputes about the duties of undertakings according to The Environmental Information Act may be subject for legal proceedings.

Oslo, 10. september 2012

Hans Chr. Bugge

Morten Hugo Berger

Andreas Pihlstrøm

Karl Kristensen

Cecilie Skarning

Ina Lindahl Nyrud

2

Lara Johnstone PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044: 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 03 November 2012 Benedikte Strøm Secretary for the Environmental Information Appeals Board Climate and Pollution Agency Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 Oslo (Strømsveien 96) E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no Phone: + 47 22 57 34 00 - Fax: +47 22 67 67 06 Website: www.miljoklagenemnda.no Ms. Strøm, Request to Environment Appeals Board in terms of Public Administration Act (PAA), section 23, 24, 251, and (iii) Freedom of Information Act: Section 222.

I have received no response to my request for information submitted to you on 08 October3: Appeals Board for Environmental Information Decisions: Media Censorship & AdvokatForengin Disc. Brd & Committee, in response to your ruling of 18 September 2012.

Relief Requested: In terms of the Public Administration Act, Section, 24, 25, and 26, and Freedom of Information Act, Section 2: Please could you kindly provide a ruling in consideration of clarifying what factual and legal grounds you considered in terms of coming to your conclusion that my complaint ‘clearly had to be denied’; including clarifying exactly how my complaints do not fit the definition of Environment as clarified by the Aarhus convention and LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law), as requested in correspondent of 08 October.

18 September 2012: Secretariat of Env. App Board Ruling: 1

http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-19670210-000-eng.pdf http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-19700619-069-eng.pdf 3 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/1/post/2012/10/121008_eab.html 2

The secretariat for the Appeals Board for Environmental Information refers to your e-mails of September 10 and 11 2012.

The Appeals Board`s reference number for you appeal of June 18 2012 against Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG is 2012/2. For archival purposes the reference number 2012/708 is used in addition. The Appeals Board's reference number for your appeal of August 16 2012 against the Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board is 2012/5. For archival purposes the number 2012/1023 is used in addition.

The information on www.miljoklagenemnda.no about how cases prepared has only status as guidance. The rules that are binding for the Appeals Board are found in the regulation December 14 2003 regarding the Appeals Board for Environmental Information. This regulation is available in Norwegian at http://www.lovdata.no/for/sf/md/xd-20031214-1572.html.

When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied, it is not necessary to ask the respondents to provide their arguments. In these cases the secretariat prepares a draft decision and consults the members of the board. If the draft decision is approved by the members of the board, no further discussion is needed. This makes the Appeals Board able to settle obvious cases without arranging unnecessary meetings. Your appeals have been settled this way. Because no meeting has taken place, you will not receive a signed decision.

08 October: Request for Clarification Re: ‘Definition of Environment’ and Written Reasons for ‘clearly have to be denied’: Please could you clarify for me your reasoning viz a viz: “When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied” It is not remotely clear to me why my complaints ‘clearly had to be denied’; unless your office is massively corrupt, like many other Norwegian government offices, on the matter of Mr. Breivik’s case and surrounding issues.

The Dept of Environment clearly encourages people to be active in holding Government Departments and corporations accountable on environmental issues: --------A prerequisite for environmental law to work as intended is that the public uses it actively.

The law will put citizens able to: * contribute to the protection of the environment * protect against health and environmental 2

* influence public and private decision makers in environmental issues --------According to: LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Act concerning the right to information and participation in public decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law). http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html -------§ 2 What is understood by environmental (1) An environmental means factual information and reviews about a) environment, b) factors that affect or may affect the environment, including - planned and implemented measures and activities in the environment, - product features or content, - Ratio of operating the business, and - administrative decisions and actions, including individual decisions, agreements, regulations, plans, strategies and programs, and associated analyzes, calculations and assumptions, c) human health, safety and living conditions to the extent they are or may be affected by the state of the environment or the factors mentioned in b (2) The environment means the environment including cultural heritage.

-------The Aarhus Convention defines 'environmental information' as: ----------3. “Environmental information� means any information in written, visual, aural, electronic or any other material form on: (a) The state of elements of the environment, such as air and atmosphere, water, soil, land, landscape and natural sites, biological diversity and its components, including genetically modified organisms, and the interaction among these elements; (b) Factors, such as substances, energy, noise and radiation, and activities or measures, including administrative measures, environmental agreements, policies, legislation, plans and programmes, affecting or likely to affect the elements of the environment within the scope of subparagraph (a) above, and cost-benefit and other economic analyses and assumptions used in environmental decision-making; (c) The state of human health and safety, conditions of human life, cultural sites and built structures, inasmuch as they are or may be affected by the state of the elements of the environment or, through these elements, by the factors, activities or measures referred to in subparagraph (b) above; -----------

3

The information requested of the Adresseavisen, Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2 and VG clearly - if you read it - falls under both LAW 2003-05-09 # 31: Environmental Law and the Aarhus Convention definitions.

The information requested of Norwegian Bar Association´s Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board clearly falls under both LAW 200305-09 # 31: Environmental Law and the Aarhus Convention definitions.

It is therefore not remotely obvious why you wrote: "When receiving appeals that clearly have to be denied, it is not necessary to ask the respondents to provide their arguments. In these cases the secretariat prepares a draft decision and consults the members of the board. If the draft decision is approved by the members of the board, no further discussion is needed. This makes the Appeals Board able to settle obvious cases without arranging unnecessary meetings. Your appeals have been settled this way. Because no meeting has taken place, you will not receive a signed decision."

Is the secretariat for the Appeals Board for Environmental Information | www.miljoklagenemnda.no | Environmental Appeals Board just a Fake PR front for Corporate whores raping the planet? Setup just to pretend Nowegian Government gives a fuck about the environment? You just sit there and rubber stamp environmental requests with " clearly have to be denied" and laugh how massively stupid the citizens are for believing the bullshit in your Duhmockery press releases that you legislate laws to encourage citizens to: * contribute to the protection of the environment * protect against health and environmental * influence public and private decision makers in environmental issues Public Administration Act (1967) The administrative decision § 23. (the formal requirements for individual decisions) An individual decision shall be in writing except where, for practical reasons, this would be particularly burdensome for the administrative agency. § 24. (when grounds shall be given for individual decisions) Grounds shall be given for individual decisions. The administrative agency shall state the grounds at the same time as the decision is made. § 25. (the contents of the grounds)

4

The grounds shall refer to the rules on which the administrative decision is based, unless the party is familiar with the rules. Insofar as it is necessary in order to enable the party to understand the administrative decision, the grounds shall also cite the contents of the rules or the assessment of the problem on which the administrative decision is based.

The grounds shall also mention the factual circumstances upon which the administrative decision is based. If the factual circumstances have been described by the party himself or in a document whose contents have been disclosed to the party, a reference to the previous account shall suffice. In this case a copy of the said account shall be appended to the notification to the party.

Mention should be made of the chief considerations which have been decisive for the exercise of the administrative agency's discretionary powers. If guidelines have been given for the exercise of such powers, reference to these guidelines will as a rule be sufficient.

Freedom of Information Act (1970) ยง 2. The main provisions of the Act The case documents of the public administration are public insofar as no exception is made by or pursuant to statute.

Any person may demand of the pertinent administrative agency to be apprised of the publicly disclosable contents of the documents in a specific case. The same applies to case registers and similar registers and the agenda of meetings of publicly elected municipal and county municipal bodies. The administrative agency shall keep a register pursuant to the provisions of the Archives Act and its regulations.

Notwithstanding that a document may be exempted from public disclosure pursuant to the provisions of this Act, the administrative agency shall consider whether the document should nevertheless wholly or partly be made public.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone

5

Ref: Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 18 June 2012

Environmental Appeals Board1: Appeals of environmental information c / o Secretariat, Climate and Pollution PO Box 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no

Respondents: Chief Editor: Arne Blix Adresseavisen PO Box 3200 sloop, 7003 Trondheim Phone: 47 07 200 | Fax: + 47 72 50 Email: Arne Blix (arne.blix@adresseavisen.no)

Sjefredaktør Hilde Haugsgjerd Aftenposten Biskop Gunnerus' gate 14A, 0185 OSLO Tel: 22 86 30 00 Epost (hilde.haugsgjerd@aftenposten.no)

Ansvarlig redaktør: Trine Eilertsen Bergens Tidende: Krinkelkroken 1, Postboks 7240, 5020 Bergen E-Post: Trine Eilertsen (trine.eilertsen@bt.no)

John Arne Markussen (@JAMarkussen) Dagbladet/Dagbladet.no Boks 1184 Sentrum, 0107 Oslo Tel: 24 00 10 00 Epost: 2400@db.no

Editor: Hans Tore Bjerkaas PB 8500, Majorstuen, 0340 Oslo Tel: 23 04 70 00 E-post: (hans-tore.bjerkaas@nrk.no)

Alf Hildrum Ansvarlig redaktør: TV 2 Postboks 7222, 5020 Bergen Tel: 02255 Epost: Alf Hildrum (alf.hildrum@tv2.no)

Ansvarlig redaktør: Torry Pedersen Verdens Gang AS Postboks 1185 Sentrum, 0107 Oslo Telefon: 22 00 00 00 | Fax: 22 42 67 80 NO: VG: Torry Pedersen (torry.pedersen@vg.no)

Dear Sirs, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny 1

http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no/

18/06/12 Env. Appeals Board: Media Appeal norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

On 25 May 2012, correspondence was submitted to each of the respondents requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 Earth Day: “If It Bleads, It Leads” Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs) Respondents were requested to provide such information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, all respondents have declined to respond or to provide the information requested.

I am unaware what the legal justifications are for the respondents refusal to provide the information.

As detailed in the requests to the respondents, the information is requested as a matter of public interest for research and transparency problem solving purposes.

Respectfully Submitted

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ Encl: [A] Addresseavisen: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [B] Aftenposten: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [C] BergensTidende: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [D] Dagbladet: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [E] NRK: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [F] TV2: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [G] VG: Req for Access to Environment and Health Information ITO S.28 & S.10 [H] 22 April: Earth Day: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42.pg)

18/06/12 Env. Appeals Board: Media Appeal norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05

“The moderate blacks were not selling the papers. We were presenting a non-violent strategy, that did not say „Burn, baby Burn‟. A strategy that said people must come together and sit down around a negotiating table. And this is not sensational stuff; it does not sell the papers.” - Rev. John Gogotya, ANC: VIP‟s of Violence “For revolutionary groups, the more murderous the deed, the more certain the media coverage.” - Nicholas Partridge, Presenter, ANC: VIP‟s of Violence.

P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 Sjefredaktør Hilde Haugsgjerd Aftenposten Biskop Gunnerus' gate 14A, 0185 OSLO Tel: 22 86 30 00 Epost (hilde.haugsgjerd@aftenposten.no) CC: Prosecutor Holden, Breivik/Geir Lippestad, Victims Families Dear Ms. Haugsgjerd, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) | Forespørsel om tilgang til Miljø og helse informasjon i form av S.28 (offentleglova) og S.10 (miljøinformasjonsloven); RE: Censorship in Norway‟s Media: (I) Media‟s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway‟s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny | Sensur i Norge Media: (I) Media Miljø-populasjonsbasert terrorisme tilkobling, (II) Norge politiske Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny Request for Information | Be om informasjon [1] Your Editors decision-making justification for censorship of the Norway v. Breivik Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection documentation provided to your publication in 13 May 2012 email: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings? | Dine Redaksjon beslutningsprosesser begrunnelse for sensur av Norge v.

Breivik Miljø-populasjonsbasert terrorisme tilkobling dokumentasjon gitt til publikasjonen i 22/05/12 Aftenposten Req. forAccess of Information

norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

den 13 mai 2012 e-post: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:51 AM To & BCC: NO:; NO: Aftenposten: Helle Skjervold (helle.skjervold@aftenposten.no); NO: Aftenposten: Kjersti Løken Stavrum (kjersti.loken.stavrum@aftenposten.no) Subject: [AFTENPOSTEN] Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

Attach: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection (PDF1); News Release NO-Breivik SupremeCrt EcoIndigenousRights (PDF 2)

[2] (a) The total number of articles published by your publication either in print or online which refer to Breivik‟s alleged „insanity‟; and (b) the number of these articles which - for fairness, impartiality and scientific objectivity - include a „Critical Psychiatry‟ perspective, such as: „The Myth of Mental Illness‟, the Marketing of Madness3, the use of Psychiatry as social control, and Psychiatrists Legal Testimony being equivalent to that of „Whores of the Court‟: “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”.4 | [2] (a) Det totale antall artikler publisert av publikasjonen, enten på trykk eller på nettet som viser til Breiviks påståtte 'galskap', og (b) antall av disse artiklene som - for rettferdighet og vitenskapelige objektivitet - inkluderer en "kritisk psykiatri 'perspektiv, for eksempel: “Myten om psykisk sykdom”, Markedsføring av psykisk sykdom, Bruk av Psychiatry som sosial kontroll, og Psykiatere Juridisk vitnesbyrd være tilsvarende som for Whores av Domstolen': "Psychobabble med vitenskapelige grunnlaget lik Horoskop diagrammer ... vitenskapen bak det hele er ikke-eksisterende"5.

[3] The total amount of advertising revenue received by your publication from Pharmaceutical Corporations per year, over the past five years. | [3] Den totale mengden av reklame inntekter mottatt av publikasjonen fra farmasøytiske selskaper per år, de siste fem årene.

Please provide the requested information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012; in the absence of which an appeal shall be filed with Environmental Appeals Board6: Appeals of environmental information, c / o Secretariat, Climate and Pollution, PO Box 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no | Vennligst oppgi nødvendig informasjon ved 17.00 11. juni 2012, i fravær av noe som en klage skal sendes Miljøklagenemnda har endret kontaktinformasjon7: Klagenemnda for miljøinformasjon, v/ sekretariatet, Klima- og forurensningsdirektoratet, Postboks 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-post: post@miljoklagenemnda.no

1

Read: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120422_bleads-leads?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage Download: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120422_bleads-leads 2 Read: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120510_breivik-dgr-ecofem?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage Download: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120510_breivik-dgr-ecofem 3 http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/marketing-of-madness-are-independent.html 4 Psychology’s takeover of our legal system represents not an advance into new but clearly charted areas of science but a terrifying retreat into mysticism and romanticism, a massive suspension of disbelief propelled by powerful propaganda. Thanks to the willingness of judges and juries to believe psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts, babble puffed about by psychological professionals with impressive credentials, what we’ve got now are thousands of self-styled soul doctors run amok in our courts, drunk with power, bedazzled by spectacular fees for the no-heavy-lifting job of shooting off their mouths about any psychological topic that sneaks a toe into a courtroom. The demand is great, the supply is huge, and the science behind it all is nonexistent. But the reality does not matter.” – Margaret Hagen, Ph.D: Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony (www.whoresofthecourt.com) 5 See previous Footnote 6 http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no/ 7 http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no/

22/05/12 Aftenposten Req. forAccess of Information

norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

BACKGROUND INFO | BAKGRUNNSINFO: Environment-Population | Miljø-Innbyggertall: Dr. Michael Maher Ph.D thesis documents how the media censors the Environment Population Connection: How & Why Journalists Avoid the Environment-Population Connection (PDF8) | Dr. Michael Maher Ph.D avhandlingen dokumenterer hvordan media sensuren miljø Befolkning Tilkobling: Hvordan og hvorfor journalister Unngå miljø-Befolkning tilkobling (PDF9) Ecological Source of Political & Economic Problems | Økologisk kilde til politisk og økonomiske problemer: “The economic and political problems with which we concern ourselves are merely manifestations of our ecological predicament -- they are symptoms, not the disease.” – Chris Clugston: Scarcity: Humanity's Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Non-Renewable Natural Resources and its implications and consequences for humanity10 | "De økonomiske og politiske problemer som vi bry oss bare er manifestasjoner av vår økologiske knipe - er de symptomer, ikke sykdommen." - Chris Clugston: Knapphet: menneskehetens siste kapittel: En omfattende analyse av ikke-fornybare naturressurser og sitt implikasjoner og konsekvenser for menneskeheten US Naval Services Long-Term Study: Global Tipping Points on Food, Water, Energy, Pollution, Population, & Natural Resources & Population Explosion: The Most Powerful Force on Earth11 | US Naval Tjenester Studer: Global Vippepunkter på mat, vann, energi, forurensning, Befolkning, & Natural Resources og befolkningseksplosjon: The mektigste tving på jorda 1996: US Army War College: Parameters: The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict, and War12 | 1996: US Army War College: Parametere: Kultur til framtidig konflikt: Overbefolkning og ressursknapphet vil være den direkte årsaken til konfrontasjon, konflikt og krig Act on the Right of Access to Documents in Public Administration (the Act). § 28 Disclosure requirement13 Access can be demanded in writing or orally.

Access to information must relate to a specific cause or a reasonable extent, matters of a particular species. This does not apply when it is demanded access to a journal or similar registry.

Lov om rett til innsyn i dokument i offentleg verksemd (offentleglova). § 28. Innsynskravet14 8

Read: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage Download: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection 9 Read: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage Download: http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/mahertm_journo-env-pop-connection 10 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2011/12/peak-nnr-scarcity-humanitys-last.html 11 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2012/05/us-naval-services-long-term-study.html 12 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2012/05/1996-us-army-war-college-parameters.html 13 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20060519-016.html#28

22/05/12 Aftenposten Req. forAccess of Information

norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Innsyn kan krevjast skriftleg eller munnleg.

Innsynskravet må gjelde ei bestemt sak eller i rimeleg utstrekning saker av ein bestemt art. Dette gjeld ikkje når det blir kravd innsyn i ein journal eller liknande register.

Environmental Public15 When products and activities that may affect the environment and health, we have the right to more information than usual, both from private and public. Check how you can go to the manufacturer, importer, dealer, municipal or a private company to get the information you are looking for.

Miljøoffentlighet16 Når produkter og virksomheter som kan påvirke miljø og helse, har vi krav på mer informasjon enn vanlig, både fra private og offentlige. Sjekk hvordan du kan gå til produsent, importør, forhandler, kommune eller en private bedrift for å få de opplysningene du er på jakt etter.

LOV 2003-05-09 nr 31: Act concerning the right to environmental information and public participation in decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law).17 § 10 The right to environmental information held by a public body18 (1) Everyone has the right to obtain environmental information from a public body, so framt information provided to the competent body or body of knowledge covered by the obligation under § § 8 or 9, and it is not exempt from the information right under this Act. (2) Environmental information is the competent authority when the information a) is in the public authority itself, or b) held by a natural or legal person on behalf of the public authority.

(3) A request for environmental information may be rejected if it is too generally formulated or does not provide sufficient basis to identify the claim. Before a claim is rejected, the applicant shall be given reasonable assistance to formulate the request in such a way that it can be treated.

(4) If the requirements for access aimed at the wrong agency, it shall as soon as possible to forward the claim to the right authority or guidance as to which public bodies are believed to have information.

LOV 2003-05-09 nr 31: Lov om rett til miljøinformasjon og deltakelse i offentlige beslutningsprosesser av betydning for miljøet (miljøinformasjonsloven). 19 § 10. Rett til miljøinformasjon hos offentlig organ 14

http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20060519-016.html#28 http://ezcust0003.web1.dedicated99.no.webdeal.no/offentlighet_user/Miljoeoffentlighet http://ezcust0003.web1.dedicated99.no.webdeal.no/offentlighet_user/Miljoeoffentlighet 17 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10 18 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10 19 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10 15 16

22/05/12 Aftenposten Req. forAccess of Information

norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

(1) Enhver har rett til å få miljøinformasjon fra et offentlig organ, så framt informasjonen foreligger hos vedkommende organ eller omfattes av organets kunnskapsplikt etter §§ 8 eller 9, og det ikke er gjort unntak fra informasjonsretten etter loven her.

(2) Miljøinformasjonen foreligger hos vedkommende organ når informasjonen a) er i det offentlige organets besittelse, eller b) oppbevares av en fysisk eller juridisk person på vegne av det offentlige organet.

(3) Et krav om miljøinformasjon kan avvises dersom det er for generelt formulert eller ikke gir tilstrekkelig grunnlag for å identifisere hva kravet gjelder. Før et krav avvises, skal informasjonssøkeren i rimelig grad gis veiledning til å utforme kravet på en måte som gjør at det kan behandles.

(4) Dersom krav om innsyn rettes mot feil organ, skal organet hurtigst mulig videresende kravet til rette instans eller veilede om hvilke offentlige organer som antas å ha informasjonen.

Respectfully Submitted | Respektfullt Sendt

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

22/05/12 Aftenposten Req. forAccess of Information

norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05

22 April 2012 :: Earth Day

Acquittal or Firing Squad „If It Bleads, It Leads‟ Media‟s Population-Terrorism Connection Pasthtun Pakistani & Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend Scientific Journalism Media Censorship Case Studies Media Anders Breivik Narrative:  Breivik is legally insane  His „If It Bleads, It Leads‟ justification for Terrorism is Unjustified Media Censor:  Whores of the Court Myth of Mental Illness: Insanity is to PharmaPsychiatry what Heresy was to the Inquisition  Media‟s If It Bleads, It Leads Population-Terrorism Connection

If It Bleads, It Leads :: Media Population-Terrorism Connection Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Editors censorship1 of non-violent political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a pressure cooker socio-political reality for their „If it Bleads, It Leads‟ corporate propaganda profits, in their knowledge application of: 

Overpopulation2 colliding with resource scarcity is one of the main causes of terrorism: „As long as there is some possibility of getting results by political means, the chances that any political group or individual will turn violent are truly radically small, or maybe vanishingly small‟3;



„The exposure in the media is what gets people‟s attention. People follow what is happening in the news, not what is happening in the courts‟4;



„[Editors] abuse of media power, by means of strategies whereby they abuse public discourse/free speech resources; by providing certain parties with preferential and special access to such public discourse, and severely restricting or denying others any access to such public discourse5;



Mainstream media avoid addressing or enquiring into root causes of problems as reported in How and Why Journalists Avoid Population - Environment connection6; and censor non-violent root-cause problem solving activism7.

Put Simply: Terrorists and their Victims are to the Corporate Media and Political Elite, what Bad Newz Kennels8 pitbulls Mel9 and Georgia10 were to Michael Vick, Purnell Peace, Quanis Phillips and Tony Taylor.

When editors deliberately deny problem solving political activists access to public discourse to raise consciousness about the ecological, political, psychological etc socio-political problems in communities that require solving; they create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, where the problems get worse and worse, and the activists are forced to confront the reality that their only access to public discourse problem solving on their issues of concern is: violent terrorism, the more spectacular and brutally violent, the greater the „If It Bleads, It Leads‟ coverage; and un/fortunately the greater the Corporate Media Profits, and Politicians ability to use such violence for their own agenda‟s of greater state tyranny control.

1

―The moderate blacks were not selling the papers. We were presenting a non-violent strategy, that did not say ‗Burn, baby Burn‘. A strategy that said people must come together and sit down around a negotiating table. And this is not sensational stuff; it does not sell the papers.‖ – Rev. John Gogotya, ANC: VIP’s of Violence, documentary; ―For revolutionary groups, the more murderous the deed, the more certain the media coverage.‖ -- Nicholas Partridge, Presenter, ANC: VIP‘s of Violence. See: Transcript of ANC: VIP‘s of Violence at: UA: [C.6] ‗If it Bleads, It Leads,’ Editorial Maxim [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/32739403] 2 Public Report of the Vice President‘s Task Force on Combatting Terrorism, February 1986 http://www.population-security.org/bush_report_on_terrorism/bush_report_on_terrorism.htm United Quest 2012: http://www.army.mil/article/68379/Unified_Quest_2012___Fact_Sheet/ Resource Scarcity Contributes to Global Instability: There is no Security without Sustainability http://www.cecer.army.mil/techreports/ERDC-CERL_TR-07-9/Session%20I/RichardMurphy.pdf 2000 Nightline with Ted Koppell: CIA & Pentagon on Overpopulation & Resource Wars 3 Clark McCauley, Ph.D, Prof. of Psychology at Bryn Mawr College, in When Does Political Anger Turn to Violence?, by Benedict Carey, New York Times, March 26, 2010 [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34271993] 4 Jean Pierre Mean, Group General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, SGS Group, In Confronting Corruption: The Business Case for an Effective Anti-Corruption Programme, by PricewaterhouseCoopers Intnl [PDF: www.pwc.com/anti-corruption] 5 (I) Power and the news media, Teun A. van Dijk, Univ. of Amsterdam, D. Paletz (Ed.), Political Communication & Action. (pp. 9-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995 [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34271955] ; (II) Ubuntu Amicus (UA) : [C] Right to ‗Free Speech‘ Propaganda Profits Deception [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/32739403] 6 CCT 23-10: Statement of Consent by Dr. T. Michael Maher [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/31373074]; How and Why Journalists Avoid PopulationEnvironment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/33694415] 7 HC-WC 19963-09: 140 SA Elite Deliberate Indifference to Rule of Law [PDF: www.scribd.com/doc/34274197] 8 Animal Fighting Case Study: Michael Vick http://aldf.org/article.php?id=928 9 Dog owner can't forgive Michael Vick http://articles.latimes.com/2010/nov/16/sports/la-sp-plaschke-20101117 10 Animal Fighting Case Study: Michael Vick http://aldf.org/article.php?id=928

CENSORED: The War You Don‟t See: Scientific Journalism Campaign The Australian: Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths11 "We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?

TechPresident: Julian Assange's Vision of a „Scientific Journalism‟ 12 Assange told me, ―I want to set up a new standard: ‗scientific journalism.‘ If you publish a paper on DNA, you are required, by all the good biological journals, to submit the data that has informed your research—the idea being that people will replicate it, check it, verify it. So this is something that needs to be done for journalism as well. There is an immediate power imbalance, in that readers are unable to verify what they are being told, and that leads to abuse.‖ Because Assange publishes his source material, he believes that WikiLeaks is free to offer its analysis, no matter how speculative. In the case of Project B, Assange wanted to edit the raw footage into a short film as a vehicle for commentary. For a while, he thought about calling the film ―Permission to Engage,‖ but ultimately decided on something more forceful: ―Collateral Murder.‖

Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist „Scientific Journalism‟ Submission to SA ConCourt13: [Request and Order] to issue an advisory ruling, with expert witness input from Wikileaks and/or Open Leaks ‗scientific journalism‘ experts, in support of a clear classification system of ‗media corporations‘; similar to Hotel Star Ratings and Smoking Label warnings.

For example: (a) Three Star Media Corporations practice unbiased and politically incorrect scientific journalism: the truth, wherever it leads; (b) Two Star media corporations practice left or right ideological propaganda when it contradicts scientific journalism truths, and withhold from their readers access to the original documents they are reporting their bias upon; (c) One Star gutter yellow smear propaganda journalism, which has no interest whatsoever in scientific truthful reporting, only profiting from spreading gossip and malice.

All media corporations are required to publish their ‗scientific journalism‘ hierarchical star status, in a designated space on their front page, clarifying their Star Status, and what that start status means regarding the scientific journalism or not quality of factual information being sold to the reader: (A) Truthseekers; (B) Left or Right Propaganda seekers; (C) Morons..

11

The Australian: Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-uncomfortable-truths/story-fn775xjq-1225967241332 12 TechPresident: Julian Assange's Vision of a ‗Scientific Journalism‘ http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/julian-assanges-vision-%E2%80%98scientific-journalism%E2%80%99 13 CCT 06-11: Radical Honesty vs. SANEF & 88 SA Media Publicatons & Editors http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/search/label/**%20Concourt%2006-11

Consequences of Lack of Scientific Journalism: Censored from Causes of War Enquiries14: John Pilger Letter: I was curious whether your documentary negligently or consciously avoided including two fundamental root cause issues in the promotion of war (in which the media play a primary role); but which your documentary did not address at all. In the absence of root causes problem solving; any problem cannot be solved; and hence any documentary or policy which fails to address the root causes of any problem; is nothing less than bullshit the public PR image management.

1: Population Growth Cannon Fodder Breeding Wars The media play a direct role in encouraging population growth and covering up the local, national and international resource war consequences of population growth colliding with finite or declining resources; as documented in among others Dr. T. Michael Maher‘s study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection.

2: Media‟s Obsession with Political Correctness and Vilification of Radical Transparency Cultures, enables it to profit from War as Social Release of Suppressed Tensions from the boredom of Political Correctness: Role of War in Political Correct Cultures: ―War as a general social release. This is a psychosocial function, serving the same purpose for a society as do the holiday, the celebration, and the orgy for the individual---the release and redistribution of undifferentiated tensions. War provides for the periodic necessary readjustment of standards of social behaviour (the "moral climate") and for the dissipation of general boredom, one of the most consistently undervalued and unrecognized of social phenomena. ―War fills certain functions essential to the stability of our society; until other ways of filling them are developed, the war system must be maintained -- and improved in effectiveness.‖ -Excerpt from Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Probability of Peace Radical Transparency Culture’s15 Substitute the Orderly Boredom of Political Correctness culminating in Treason and Rage; with the Adventure of Continuous Psychological Growth by means of Constructive Criticism: In order to live in reality we need to know what is true, especially those things that we would rather not be true, so that we can decide how best to deal with them. Radical Transparency cultures want logic and reason to be the basis for making decisions, striving for transparency by being radically truthful and transparent is the foundation for building meaningful work and meaningful relationships‖.

14

Censored: The War You Don‘t See: Root Cause Problem Solving: Scientific Journalism Campaign http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/06/censored-war-you-dont-see-root-cause.html 15 (1) Delancey Street Foundation (www.delanceystreetfoundation.org): the worlds most successful rehabilitation program, where over 14,000 former drug addicts, murderers, felons, criminals and delinquents have rehabilitated themselves; (2) Bridgewater Associates (www.bwater.com) is managed according to CEO Ray Dalio‘s Radical Transparency Principles (http://www.bwater.com/home/culture--principles.aspx); (3) Radical Honesty (www.radicalhonesty.com), founded by best selling author, activist and psychologist, Dr. Brad Blanton.

Whores of the Court :: The Myth of Mental Illness „There is no such thing as mental illness. Psychiatric diagnosis of „mental disorders‟ is just a way of stigmatising behaviour that society does not want to live with.

Psychiatry thrives on coercion and is replacing religion as a form of social control.‟ - Dr. Thomas Szasz "There is no such thing as a mental disorder. A mental disorder is whatever someone says it is, and if the person saying "This is a mental disorder", has enough power and influence, then people believe 'Oh, that is a mental disorder'. - Dr. Paula Caplan, Harvard “Biological psychology/psychiatry is a total perversion of medicine and science, and a fraud.” - Neurologist Fred Baughman “The entire enterprise of defining mental disorder is pointless, at least in so far as the goal is to allow us to recognize „genuine‟ or „true‟ disorders” - Dr. Mary Boyle, Schizophrenia: A Scientific Delusion?

“DSM is a book of tentatively assembled agreements. Agreements don‟t always make sense, nor do they always reflect reality. You can have agreements among experts without validity. Even if you could find four people who agreed that the earth is flat, that the moon is made of green cheese, that smoking cigarettes poses no health risks, or that politicians are never corrupt, such agreements do not establish truth.” - Herb Kutchins & Stuart A Kirk , Making us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, “To admit the central role of value judgments and cultural norms [in the creation of the DSM] is to give the whole game away. The DSM has to be seen as reliable and valid, or the whole enterprise of medical psychiatry collapses.” -- Lucy Johnstone, The Users and Abusers of Psychiatry "[Alleged Mental Disorders] are based on a grab-bag of checklists for disorders that are published in a book called the DSM; which is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There are no statistics in this book, by the way. That just makes it sound more scientific." -- Dr Margaret Hagen, Professor of Psychology, Boston University

„If It Bleads, It Leads‟ Media‟s Population-Terrorism Connection Pasthtun Pakistani & Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend Scientific Journalism Media Censorship Case Studies [I]

[II]

[III]

July 2011: Pasthtun Pakistani [A]

Pashtun Pakistani Leader: then Pakistan executive member of the Renaissance Vanguard International Political Party (RVI): Support for Breivik to Preserve Traditional European Culture.

[B]

CENSORED BY Intnl. Mainstream Media (CNN, AJ, ABC, WSJ, etc)

December 2011: Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist: [A]

Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist: Habeus Mentem: Support for (1) Breivik‘s Habeus Mentem :: Right to Legal Sanity Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‗free and fair trial‘ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

[B]

CENSORED BY 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials

April 2012: Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist: [A]

Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist: Amicus Curiae: Support for (1) Breivik‘s Habeus Mentem :: Right to Legal Sanity Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‗free and fair trial‘ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

[B]

CENSORED BY over 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials

07/11: Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend: Pashtun Pakistani Leader: Arif Hasan Akhundzada Pakistan executive member of the Renaissance Vanguard International Political Party (RVI) Support for Breivik to Preserve Traditional European Culture.

Arif Akhudzada16: Arif Hasan Akhundzada is 43, and the Pakistan executive member of the Renaissance Vanguard International Political Party (RVI). He is unmarried and lives off the income of his inherited tribal lands. His mother was English. He has college level education and is also a trained pilot.

His main activities center around all kinds of reading and writing, and since his (late father's) family has a high standing in our local Pashtun tribal society in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, he also takes part in local social and political activity. His ancestor was originally a Turkoman 16

Media 2 ArmAGideon-Knight Breivik Fair Trial Supporter: ‗If you are anti-Multi-Culti, you are a fascist-racist-Nazi & yr opinion does not count‘? http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/07/media-2-armagideon-knight-breivik-fair.html

from Central Asia in what is now the Turkmenistan and Southern Russian region, but their clan has been living in ethnic Afghan lands, within present day Pakistan, for the better part of 300 years.

Arif Hasan Akhundzada17 posted18 to Til støtte for Geir Lippestad19: The purity of traditional European culture (not the "postmodern" variety) - which has given so much to the world and its future.... should be preserved, and defended from the liberal folly that has now afflicted Europeans..... I say this as a halfEnglish resident of a very nasty Third World country......

Media Informed20 of Pashtun Akhundzada’s ‘Honest Enemy’ Free & Fair Trial Support: 1. @Kronprinsparet: Their Royal Highnesses The Crown Prince of Norway21 2. @jensstoltenberg Prime Minister: Jens Stoltenberg22 3. @WSJ: Wall Street Journal23 4. @NBC: NBC24 5. @AP: The Associated Press25 6. @Time: Time Magazine26 7. @evanchill: Evan Hill: Al Jazeera English Online Producer27 8. @shephardm: Michelle Shephard: Toronto Star National Security Reporter28 9. @nytjim: Jim Roberts: Assistant Managing Editor: New York Times29 10. @camanpour: Christiane Amanpour, ABC News30 11. @mikeallen: Mike Allen: Chief White House Correspondent, Politico31 12. @gretawire: Greta van Susteren: On the Record, Fox News32 13. @FoxNews: Fox News33 14. @AJELive: Al Jazeera Live34 MEDIA RESPONSE:

17



Inquiry for More info:

NONE



Publication of Info:

NONE

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1176887714 https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=108750809222430&id=1176887714 https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=108308355933342 20 Media 2 ArmAGideon-Knight Breivik Fair Trial Supporter: ‗If you are anti-Multi-Culti, you are a fascist-racist-Nazi & yr opinion does not count‘? http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/07/media-2-armagideon-knight-breivik-fair.html 21 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/status/95535811587620864 22 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/status/95535811587620864 23 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 24 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 25 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 26 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 27 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 28 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 29 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95537940708597760 30 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95593998810492928 31 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95593998810492928 32 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95593998810492928 33 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95593998810492928 34 http://twitter.com/#!/WhiteRefugee/statuses/95593998810492928 18 19

Dec 2011 & April 2012: Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend: Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist: Habeus Mentem Support for (1) Breivik‟s Habeus Mentem :: Right to Legal Sanity Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real „free and fair trial‟ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

Radical Honoursty EcoFemnist35: Lara Johnstone is a South African Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Radical Transparency Political Activist, amicably separated from African-American Demian Emile Johnson (prisoner in California, where he has been serving a sentence of 15 to life since 1982) 36, member of the Radical Honesty culture. A former employee of (1) Brad Blanton, Ph.D; founder of the Radical Honesty culture; (2) Ms. Peggy Noonan, former Speechwriter for President Reagan and G.W. Bush, Snr; at her home in New York City, NY; (3) HRH Princess Gloria Von Thurn & Taxis Family on their Private Yacht: S.Y. Aiglon; (4) Lord and Lady Glenapp, now Earl and Countess Inchcape, at their home in Swindon, Wiltshire. (PDF References37). As a Radical Transparency rule-of-law political activist, she endorses and has advocated on behalf of the rule-of-law for rich, poor, white, black, left and right, religious or atheist. She has been involved in civil disobedience and guerrilla law actions on behalf of her former husband38, Greenpeace39, Amnesty Int‘l, Pacific Inst. for Criminal Justice40, Jericho 9841, Crack the CIA42, The Disclosure Project43, New Abolitionist44, Justice for Timothy McVeigh45, Alliance for Democracy46, Boycott 2010 World Cup47, Right of Return for African White Refugees48, et al49.

She is 45 years old. With the help of an IUD, inserted at age 19, Common Sense and a love for children, she has never been pregnant, nor had an abortion; nor brought any unwanted children onto the planet; nor contributed to local, national or international overpopulation or resource wars; nor advocated on behalf of population or economic growth; or materialist consumerism.

35

Media 2 ArmAGideon-Knight Breivik Fair Trial Supporter: ‗If you are anti-Multi-Culti, you are a fascist-racist-Nazi & yr opinion does not count‘? http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/07/media-2-armagideon-knight-breivik-fair.html 36 98-05-31: Sun Times: US convict wins love and support in SA town,; 98-09-24: YOU & Huisgenoot: Volkrust FarmGirl Doomed Love for Black Convict,

by Frans Kemp 37 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/jl-references?mode=a_p 38 RSA OVERSEAS: South African on hunger strike in California, by Ilda Jacobs 39 In Easter 1993, she was arrested with a few dozen Greenpeace activists in a Save Our Seas anti-nuclear demonstration at Sellafield, Nuclear Power station, in Scotland, for trespassing. She was neither charged nor prosecuted. See: Greenpeace’s Campaign Against Ocean Dumping of Radio-Active Waste, 1978 – 1998 (www.greenpeace.org).

40 98-07-04 Miami Herald: Police action harms image as protectors 41 Jericho 98 is the movement to Free America‘s Political Prisoners. She participated in Jericho 98, wrote to President Mandela to request his support for the many Anti-Apartheid Activists whom the ANC conveniently forgot, rotting away in America‘s prisons: Marilyn Buck, Jaan Laaman, Tom Manning, etc. She visited Marilyn Buck in prison a few times, helped where she could.

42 99-03-16: San Francisco Chronicle: CIA Class Action Suit For Not Reporting Drug Trade 43 Presidential UFO: George W. Bush‘s UFO Mail: Are You Ready for the Revolution?

44 New Abolitionist: Race Traitor: Zero Tolerance 45 April 2001: New Abolitionist: Tim McVeigh and Me 46 In 2000, she was arrested & detained for 3 hours, with Brad Blanton, Ronny Dugger (founding editor of Texas Observer and Alliance for Democracy), & others in the Wash, DC, Capital of the Rotunda. Issue: Campaign Finance Reform. District Attorney declined to Prosecute.

47 09-12-17: IOL Tech.: Anti-SA Smear Campaign on Facebook 48 10-04-23: Algemene Dagblad: Zuid Afrikanen Smeken Om Wilders Hulp ; 10-04-25: Sunday Argus: SA family seeks repatriation to Netherlands; 10-0430: Mail & Guardian: Persecuted Afrikaners Talk of Returning Home; 10-05-17: Christian Science Monitor: White South Africans use Facebook in Campaign to Return to Holland 49 On 17 Dec 1998, she was arrested at Oakland Federal Building, with anti-war protestors, who shut down the Federal Building for two hours. She was detained by Oakland Police for an hour, before being released. Alameda Co. District Attorney declined to prosecute. 1998-12-19 Beeld: SA `plaasmeisie' vas in VSA oor Golf-protes

[1] December 2011: Application to Oslo Court for a Writ of Habeus Mentem Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Habeus Mentem Application Arguments: Argument: Quick Summary If I understand Mr. Breivik correctly, without having had the opportunity to interview him in depth, only from reading his Manifesto: his argument is that multiculturalists are attempting to conquer his country and exterminate his conservative Norwegian heritage and culture; and he considered it his political necessity patriotic warrior duty to object thereto. When his non-violent attempts proved futile due to the Norwegian media who discriminate against conservative Norwegians and their culture; he considered his only option to be to publicize his grievances by means of political necessity violence: terrorism.

While he does not share the political-cultural beliefs of Che Guevarra, Jaan Laaman, Tom Manning, Marilyn Buck, Carlos the Jackal, Nelson Mandela, Robert McBride, etc (left wing terrorists: none of whom were considered by conservative prosecutors to require psychological evaluation, but who were allowed their day in court to take personal and political responsibility for their politically violent criminal acts); I imagine they may find themselves in agreement as to how Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Gatekeeper editors censorship contributed to their decision-making to resort to political necessity violence.

Unfortunately, the root source of this ‗terrorism‘ in my personal opinion, lies in the corruption of the legal system, more specifically in what I refer to as KAFFIR CULTURE, LAWYERS AND LEGISLATION: the KAFFIR LEGAL MATRIX. We live in a legal matrix that has not incorporated the scientific reality into its ‗right to breed‘ legislation, constitutions, bill of rights and responsibilities or treaties, that the earth is flat, resources are finite, and breeding wars should be acknowledged as ACTS OF WAR. Unlike the corrupt Catholic Church who at least had the honour to acknowledge the criticisms of Galileo and Luther, the current corrupt legal religious matrix sale of innocence indulgences establishment, have no such honourable intentions. In the absence of dead and mangled bodies, blood and gore, any modern day Luther or Galileo‘s 95 Theses would never see the light of day; and frequently even if the Luther or Galileo accomplish the dead and mangled bodies prerequisite, the Kaffir Legal Matrix‘s political psychology denies them their day in court.

Argument: Brief Overview 1. Breivik’s Manifesto details his clear cognitive, theoretical and kinaesthetic understanding of Individual Criminal Responsibility (i.e. legal sanity) a. Breivik clearly details his reasoning for how and why he believes that the time for talk

and non-violent attempts to reform politically correct cultural Marxist multi-culti democracy were over in Why the actions of the cultural Marxist/Multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe have rendered armed resistance as the only rational approach i. Cultural Marxist institutionalised ideological coercion and brainwashing ii. Corruption and feminisation of political parties and individuals by indirect/direct coercion: iii. Systematically import of multiculturalist/socialist voters

iv. Cultural Marxist/multiculturalist/suicidal humanist/globalist media: v. News corporations, controlled by cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, full scale war against cultural conservatism/nationalism:

vi. Political, cultural and media elites are colluding against the interests of free indigenous Europeans.

2. Breivik clearly and very ‘reasonably’ explains his Political Necessity Motivations for his Political Terrorist acts. a. Breivik‘s Manifesto (Book 3): A Declaration of pre-emptive War, clearly details his beliefs that the Conservative Revolution – [is] the only Solution for free Europeans, wherein he clearly and succinctly (in my opinion) explains his beliefs, and how he came to hold his beliefs, including his perspective to the concept of criminal culpability. b. If the Norwegian politically correct, cultural Marxist multiculti political, religious, academic, media and military elite, consider Breivik‘s aforementioned allegations of a political program of political fraud and genocide conducted upon indigenous Norwegians and Europeans to be false and untrue, then the honourable ethical democratic way to prove such allegations false, is to allow him to submit his evidence for his argument, and for the State to submit their evidence to the contrary. c. Denying Breivik a trial, by means of political psychology fake and fraudulent allegations as to his alleged insanity: PROVES BREIVIKS ARGUMENTS TO BE TRUE.

3. Breivik clearly details his beliefs that hardcore Marxists, cultural Marxists Multiculturalists are deceiving indigenous Europeans, by implementing a demographic conquering Breeding War Act of War, upon them; in his Manifesto in Differentiating between and dealing with category A, B and C traitors: hardcore Marxists, cultural Marxists, suicidal humanists/career cynicists and capitalist globalists.

4. A case study: How the European politically correct cultural Marxist multicultural AntiApartheid movement overthrew Verwoerd‘s Apartheid by means of political terrorism and an African breeding war; and installed the ANC regime that provides SA‘s with between 3,000 to 25,000 percent worse socio-political government services; and turned white South Africans into African White Refugees.

5. If Norwegians ignore the warnings of Anders Breivik; the current experiences of white South Africans, being murdered and exterminated; shall be the experiences of future Norwegians, who shall end up living as persecuted minorities, under Islamic rule.

1,283 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist Radical „Honesty Enemy‟ Free & Fair Trial Support. Response from Media: CENSORED. ADRESSEAVISEN (04): Sat 12/3/2011 10:10 PM [SS] 50 NO: Adresseavisen: Arne Blix; NO: Adresseavisen: Tips; NO: Adresseavisen: Kirsti Husby; NO: Adresseavisen: Atle Bersvendsen AFTENBLADET (06): Sun 12/4/2011 11:09 PM [SS] 51

50

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 51 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

NO: Aftenbladet: Tips; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Tom Hetland; NO: Aftenbladet: Folk; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Janne Hagen; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Stein Jupskas; NO: Aftenbladet: Sven Egil Omdal AGDERPOSTEN (06): Sat 12/3/2011 10:12 PM [SS] 52 NO: Agderposten: Leserinnlegg; NO: Agderposten: Annonser; NO: Agderposten: Nettutgaven; NO: Agderposten: Redaktor: Morten Rod; NO: Agderposten: Adm Director: Nuls Kr. Gauslaa; NO: Agderposten: Redaksjonen AMTA (03): Sat 12/3/2011 10:14 PM [SS] 53 NO: AMTA: Nettredaksjonen; NO: AMTA: Editor: Morten Oby; NO: AMTA: Mail AVISA NORDLAND (07): Sat 12/3/2011 10:14 PM [SS] 54 NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Borje Klaeboe Eidissen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Tips; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Reidun Kjelling Nybo; NO: Avisa Nordland: Annonser; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Vibeke Madsen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Bjarne Holgersen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Chief Ed: Jan-Eirik Hanssen BERGENSAVISEN (03): Sat 12/3/2011 10:17 PM [SS] 55 NO: Bergensavisen; NO: BA: Ed: Anders Nyland; NO: BA: Ed: Eva Johansen BERGENS TIDENDE (15): Sat 12/3/2011 10:17 PM [SS] 56 NO: Bergens Tidende; NO: Bergens Tidende: Marianne Nilsen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Ronald Hole; NO: Bergens Tidende: Christian Nicolaisen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Rune Christophersen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Ed: Gard Steiro; NO: Bergens Tidende: Lasse Lambrechts; NO: Bergens Tidende: Jo Hjelle; NO: Bergens Tidende: Eirik Brekke; NO: Bergens Tidende: Oyvind Lefdal Eidsvik; NO: Bergens Tidende: Chief Journo: Jan Stian Vold; NO: Bergens Tidende: Alice Bratshaug; NO: Bergens Tidende: Liv Skotheim; NO: Bergens Tidende: Odd Mehus; NO: Bergens Tidende: Tron Strand BUDDSTIKKA (03): Sat 12/3/2011 10:17 PM [SS] 57 NO: Buddstikka: Ed; NO: Buddstikka: Ed: Andreas Gjolme; NO: Buddstikka: Ed: Dagotter Johansen DAGBLADET (03): Sat 12/3/2011 10:17 PM [SS] 58 NO: Dagbladet; NO: Dagbladet: Editor: Kristofer Egeberg; NO: Dagbladet: Marius Huseby DAGEN (06): Sat 12/3/2011 10:17 PM [SS] 59 NO: Dagen: Ed; NO: Dagen: Ove Eikje; NO: Dagen: Hanne Kristine Pedersen; NO: Dagen: Tor Weibye; NO: Dagen: Bjorn Olav Hammerstad; NO: Dagen: Inger Anna Drangsholt DAG OG TID (09): Sat 12/3/2011 10:35 PM [SS] 60 NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Svein Gjerdaker; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Johan Brox; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Agnes Ravatn; NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Svein Gjerdaker; Journo: Roald Helgheim; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Per Anders Todal; NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Ottar Fyllingsnes; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Jon Hustad; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Klaus Myrvoll 52

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 53 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 54 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 55 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 56 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 57 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 58 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 59 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 60 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

DAGSAVISEN (07): Sat 12/3/2011 10:37 PM [SS] 61 NO: Dagsavisen; NO: Dagsavisen: Editor; NO: Dagsavisen: Debate; NO: Dagsavisen: Editor: Arne Strand; NO: Dagsavisen: Ivar Iversen; NO: Dagsavisen: Kaia Storvik; NO: Dagsavisen: Mode Steinkjer DEMOKRATEN (05): Sat 12/3/2011 10:37 PM [SS] 62 NO: Demokraten; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Tomm Pedersen; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Helge Solheim; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Tom Raae; NO: Demokraten: Journ: Arne Borresen DRAMMENS TIDENDE (20):Sat 12/3/2011 10:40 PM [SS] 63 NO: DrammensTidende: Editor; NO: DrammensTidende: Ragnhild Connell; NO: DrammensTidende: Anne Dirdal; NO: DrammensTidende: Gro Ellingsgard; NO: DrammensTidende: Marianne Heimdal; NO: DrammensTidende: Tore Shetelig; NO: DrammensTidende: Henning Aarset; NO: DrammensTidende: Hege Bakken; NO: DrammensTidende: Ingvill Draegni; NO: DrammensTidende: Arild Hansen; NO: DrammensTidende: Lars Johnsen; NO: DrammensTidende: Alf Petter Overli; NO: DrammensTidende: Lars Arntzen; NO: DrammensTidende: Inger Boldvik; NO: DrammensTidende: Hege Ekholdt; NO: DrammensTidende: Marita Haugo; NO: DrammensTidende: Olav Lindteigen; NO: DrammensTidende: Tips; NO: DrammensTidende: Ed: Geir Bore; NO: DrammensTidende: Ed: Monica Lid FINNMARKEN (13): Sat 12/3/2011 10:40 PM [SS] 64 NO: Finnmarken: Desk; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Ola Finseth; NO: Finnmarken: Henriette Baumann; NO: Finnmarken: Stian Hansen; NO: Finnmarken: Kjetil Sorenes; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Alf Jensen; NO: Finnmarken: Kine Sandness; NO: Finnmarken: Anniken Sandvik; NO: Finnmarken: Tonje Solem; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Kari Karstensen; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Torbjorn Ittelin; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Rita Hagala FJORDENES TIDENDE (06): Sat 12/3/2011 10:51 PM [SS] 65 NO: FjordenesTidende: Ed: Erling Wage; NO: FjordenesTidende: Kari Rasberg; NO: FjordenesTidende: Ed: Erling Waage; NO: FjordenesTidende: Jo Carlson; NO: FjordenesTidende: Odd Drablos; NO: FjordenesTidende: Svanhild Breidalen FJUKEN (08): Sat 12/3/2011 10:51 PM [SS] 66 NO: Fjuken: Asta Brimi; NO: Fjuken: Arve Danielsen; NO: Fjuken: Terje Randen; NO: Fjuken: Hans Kjosbakken; NO: Fjuken: Tom Solstad; NO: Fjuken: Ragnhild Brimi; NO: Fjuken: Vigdis Kroken; NO: Fjuken: Helene Skjakodegard FREDERIKSSTAD BLAD (25): Sat 12/3/2011 10:40 PM [SS] 67 NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Tips; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Espen Normann; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Heidi Jonassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Kristine Cheer; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Geir Eggen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Kristine Andreassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Svein Kristiansen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Anne-Lene Froland; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Erlin Omvik; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Marianne Holoien; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Svein Jonassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Frank Torkildsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Erling Rewinding; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Thomas Arntsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ole-Morten Vestby; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Marie Jacobsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Roy Andersen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Thor Johannessen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Duty Off: Lill Mostad; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Jan Willadsen; NO:

61

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 62 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 63 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 64 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 65 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 66 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 67 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

FrederiksstadBlad: MD: Peter Saugstad; FrederiksstadBlad: JDir: Lars Weberg

NO:

FrederiksstadBlad:

Anne-Lise

Johnson;

NO:

FREMOVER (18): Sat 12/3/2011 10:51 PM [SS] 68 NO: Fremover: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Fremover: Ed: Line Holand; NO: Fremover: Per-Helge Berg; NO: Fremover: Espen Eidum; NO: Fremover: Anders Horne; NO: Fremover: Terje Naesje; NO: Fremover: Ed: Vaksjef; NO: Fremover: Ed: Terje Naesje; NO: Fremover: Frode Danielsen; NO: Fremover: Frits Hansen; NO: Fremover: Else Marie Nordman; NO: Fremover: Jan Teigen; NO: Fremover: Ed: Nett; NO: Fremover: Ed: Ann-Kristin Hanssen; NO: Fremover: Roger Danielsen; NO: Fremover: Ann-Kristin Hanssen; NO: Fremover: Carl Naesje; NO: Fremover: Ragnar Boifot FRIHETEN (05): Sat 12/3/2011 10:51 PM [SS] 69 NO: Friheten: Kantor; NO: Friheten: Knut Eide; NO: Friheten: Harald Reppesgaard; NO: Friheten: Svend Jacobsen; NO: Friheten: Peter Sandvik GLOMDALEN (05): Sun 12/4/2011 1:09 AM [SS] 70 NO: Glomdalen: Tips; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Geir Christiansen; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Eivind Lid; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Per-Erik Stomner HALDEN ARBEIDERBLAD (13): Sun 12/4/2011 1:12 AM [SS] 71 NO: Ha-Halden: Redaksie; NO: Ha-Halden: Oivind Kvitnes; NO: Ha-Halden: Anne Tonnesen; NO: HaHalden: Jan Erik Sorlie; NO: Ha-Halden: Redaksie; NO: Ha-Halden: Ed: Bjorn Ystrom; NO: Ha-Halden: Hanne Eriksen; NO: Ha-Halden: Steinar Ostli; NO: Ha-Halden: Thorkil Lindskog; NO: Ha-Halden: Ed: Hans-Petter Kjoge; NO: Ha-Halden: Morten Paulsen; NO: Ha-Halden: Jan Erik Sorle; NO: Ha-Halden: Thomas Lilleby HALLINGDOLEN (06): Sun 12/4/2011 1:12 AM [SS] 72 NO: Hallingdolen: Redaksie; NO: Hallingdolen: Olav Bothun; NO: Hallingdolen: Ed: Bjarne Tormodsgard; NO: Hallingdolen: Grete Sveinhaug; NO: Hallingdolen: Ed: Embrik Luksengard; NO: Hallingdolen: Kari Mette HAMAR ARBEIDERBLAD (07): Sun 12/4/2011 1:10 AM [SS] 73 NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Redaksie; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Anette Loberg; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Andre Arntzen; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Tips; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Henning Christensen; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Ole Lynsgstad; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Carsten Bleness HAMMER DAGBLAD (06): Mon 12/5/2011 5:05 PM [SS] 74 NO: HamarDagblad: Ed: Redaksie; NO: HamarDagblad: Jo Espen Brenden; NO: HamarDagblad: Ed: Tore Svensrud; NO: HamarDagblad: Hilde Berit Evensen; NO: HamarDagblad: Geir Aasen; NO: HamarDagblad: Anne Huuse HAUGESUNDS AVIS (33): Sun 12/4/2011 1:16 AM [SS] 75

68

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 69 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 70 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 71 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 72 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 73 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 74 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 75 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

NO: H-Avis: Tips; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Trond Aase; NO: H-Avis: Magnus Berning; NO: H-Avis: Oystein Eide; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Joran Gronstad; NO: H-Avis: Else Marie Hansen; NO: H-Avis: Roar Jacobsen; NO: HAvis: Geir Kristiansen; NO: H-Avis: Knut Meland; NO: H-Avis: Marit Nilsen; NO: H-Avis: Eli Osland; NO: H-Avis: Knut Sandersen; NO: H-Avis: Kari Stautland; NO: H-Avis: Trine Varlo; NO: H-Avis: Kjell Oren; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Redaksjonen; NO: H-Avis: Ed: John Arne; NO: H-Avis: Gaute Hakon Bleivik; NO: HAvis: Oddveig Finshus; NO: H-Avis: Odd Grottland; NO: H-Avis: Rolf Hansen; NO: H-Avis: Carsten Kickstat; NO: H-Avis: Tone Lutcherath; NO: H-Avis: Kai-Inge Melkeraaen; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Torstein Nymoen; NO: H-Avis: Hans Ringodd; NO: H-Avis: Gunnar Sortland; NO: H-Avis: Eva Sternhoff; NO: HAvis: Einar Vestvik; NO: H-Avis: Alfred Aase; NO: H-Avis: Pal Berg; NO: H-Avis: Ronny Carlsson; NO: H-Avis: Dir: Jan Tore Hamnoy; NO: H-Avis: Ellen Marie Hagevik; NO: H-Avis: Truls Horvei; NO: H-Avis: Kare Kompelien; NO: H-Avis: Espen Lovvik; NO: H-Avis: Elisivi Nilsen; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Arnstein Olaisen; NO: H-Avis: Gro Lohne Sande; NO: H-Avis: Lillian Haug Sortland; NO: H-Avis: Einar Tho; NO: H-Avis: Frank Waal INDRE AKERSHUS BLAD (08): Sun 12/4/2011 1:16 AM [SS] 76 NO: IABlad: Redaksjon; NO: IABlad: Svein Samuelsen; NO: IABlad: Oivind Eriksen; NO: IABlad: Anre Vestreng; NO: IABlad: Roger Odegard; NO: IABlad: Anders Sandbu; NO: IABlad: Bjorn Bergerud; NO: IABlad: Anita Jacobsen INSTITUTT FOR JOURNALISTIKK (19): Sun 12/4/2011 1:24 AM [SS] 77 NO: IJ: Ivar Andenaes; NO: IJ: Jeanette Bertelsen; NO: IJ: Leif-Arne Danielsen; NO: IJ: Elisabeth Johansen; NO: IJ: Gro Nervik; NO: IJ: Knut-Tore Thorsteinsen; NO: IJ: Karl-Martin Bakke; NO: IJ: Gunnar Bodahl-Johansen; NO: IJ: Grete Field; NO: IJ: Stale Kofoed; NO: IJ: Asgeir Olden; NO: IJ: Trygve Aas Olsen; NO: IJ: Marianne Barth; NO: IJ: Inger Brekke; NO: IJ: Erika Jahr; NO: IJ: Vigdis Larsen; NO: IJ: Brit Tangen; NO: IJ: Editor: Firmapost; NO: IJ: Editor: Frode Rekve JAERBLADET (02): Sun 12/4/2011 1:24 AM [SS] 78 NO: Jærbladet: Ed: Kjell Stangeland; NO: Jærbladet: Ed: Anne Hatlem JARLSBERG AVIS (06): Sun 12/4/2011 1:24 AM [SS] 79 NO: JarlsbergAvis: Knut Evensen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Hege Dahle; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Ed; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Redaksjonen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Harl Rehn-Erichsen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Lisa Lund Haga JOURNALISTEN (11): Sun 12/4/2011 1:24 AM [SS] 80 NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Leif Gjerstad; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Glenn Slydal Johansen; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Martin Huseby Jensen; NO: Journalisten: Photographer: Birgit Dannenberg; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Bjorn Age Mossin; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Paola Thoner; NO: Journalisten: Admin: Inger Vardal; NO: Journalisten: Admin: Kari-Mette Rugland; NO: Journalisten: Office; NO: Journalisten: Editor: Helge Ogrim; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Kathrine Geard JOURNALISTLAG (21): Sun 12/4/2011 1:24 AM [SS] 81 NO: Journalistlag: Jahn-Arne Olsen; NO: Journalistlag: Stein Larsen; NO: Journalistlag: Bente Sabel; NO: Journalistlag: Stein Svendsen; NO: Journalistlag: Aslaug Watten; NO: Journalistlag: May Kjsenslie Anderssen; NO: Journalistlag: Trine Frydenlund; NO: Journalistlag: Ketil Heyerdahl; NO: Journalistlag: Ina Lindahl Nyrud; NO: Journalistlag: Tore Sjolie; NO: Journalistlag: Hilde Tretterud; NO: Journalistlag: Anne Hilde Thue; NO: Journalistlag: Nina Borjesson; NO: Journalistlag: Sissel Haugan; NO: Journalistlag: Trond Idaas; NO: Journalistlag: August Ringvold; NO: Journalistlag: Knut

76

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 77 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 78 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 79 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 80 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 81 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

Skaslien; NO: Journalistlag: Gunhild Mohn; NO: Journalistlag: Kristin Akselsen; NO: Journalistlag: Helle Kristin Fredheim; NO: Journalistlag: Leonard Nesdal KLASSEKAMPEN (27): Sun 12/4/2011 12:07 PM [SS] 82 NO: Klassekampen: Ed: Bjorgulv Braanen; NO: Klassekampen: Mari Skurdal; NO: Klassekampen: Alf Skjeseth; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Brox; NO: Klassekampen: Emilie Ekeberg; NO: Klassekampen: Olav Ostrem; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Shanmugaratnam; NO: Klassekampen: Peter Johansen; NO: Klassekampen: Velaug Hobbelstad; NO: Klassekampen: Katrine Holmoy; NO: Klassekampen: Mimir Kristjansson; NO: Klassekampen: Pal Hellesnes; NO: Klassekampen: Line Simenstad; NO: Klassekampen: Kristin Haug; NO: Klassekampen: Sandra Lillebo; NO: Klassekampen: Astrid Meyer; NO: Klassekampen: Sissel Henriksen; NO: Klassekampen: Eirik Grasaas-Stavanes; NO: Klassekampen: Kjell-Erik Kallset; NO: Klassekampen: Lars Vegstein; NO: Klassekampen: Ase Brandvold; NO: Klassekampen: Magnhild Folkvord; NO: Klassekampen: Marte Eielsen; NO: Klassekampen: Guri Kulas; NO: Klassekampen: Dag Larsen; NO: Klassekampen: Amal Wahab; NO: Klassekampen: Tollef Mjaugedal KVINNHERINGEN (10): Sun 12/4/2011 12:09 PM [SS] 83 NO: Kvinnheringen: Redaksi; NO: Kvinnheringen: Ivar Vaage; NO: Kvinnheringen: Jonn Saetre; NO: Kvinnheringen: Mona Gronnigen; NO: Kvinnheringen: Ed: Tomas Bruvik; NO: Kvinnheringen: Kjartan Olsen; NO: Kvinnheringen: Arne Lindeflaten; NO: Kvinnheringen: Aasmund Sande; NO: Kvinnheringen: Sjur Tjemeland; NO: Kvinnheringen: Trude Aarsand LAAGENDALSPOSTEN (17): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 84 NO: Laagendalsposten: Sentralbord; NO: Laagendalsposten: Terje Jensen; NO:Laagendalsposten: Irene Mjoseng; NO: Laagendalsposten: Tonhild Solberg; NO: Laagendalsposten: Brita Sorum; NO: Laagendalsposten: Lars Bryne; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stine Knudsen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Cato Martinsen; NO:Laagendalsposten: May Olsen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Jorn Steinmoen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Even Traen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Knut Hermansen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Marte Leland; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stig Mebust; NO:Laagendalsposten: Per Skoien; NO: Laagendalsposten: Jan Storfossen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stale Weseth LEVANGERAVISA (01): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 85 NO: Levangeravisa: Ed: Roger Rein LOKAL RADIO (04): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 86 NO: LokalRadio: Post; NO: LokalRadio: Sigmund Holtskog; NO: LokalRadio: Erik FagernÌs; NO: LokalRadio: Susanne Hjelmeset MEDIETILSYNET (03): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 87 NO: Medietilsynet: Aase-Gunn Engø; NO: Medietilsynet: Gudbrand Guthus; NO: Medietilsynet: Dir: Post; NO: Medietilsynet: Dir: Tom Thoresen MORGENBLADET (07): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 88 NO: Morgenbladet: Debatt; NO: Morgenbladet: Ideer; NO: Morgenbladet: Kronikk; NO: Morgenbladet: Kultuur; NO: Morgenbladet: Samfunn; NO: Morgenbladet: Bok; NO: Morgenbladet: Ed: Redaksjon 82

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 83 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 84 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 85 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 86 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 87 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 88 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

MOSS AVIS (04): Sun 12/4/2011 12:15 PM [SS] 89 NO: Moss Avis: Ed: Pal Enghaug; NO: Moss Avis: Helge Kjoniksen; NO: Moss Avis: Ed: Sigrid Holmsen; NO: Moss Avis: Ed: Desken NETTAVISEN (02): Sun 12/4/2011 3:05 PM [SS] 90 NO: Nettavisen: Ed: Gunnar Stavrum; NO: Nettavisen: Ed: Gunnar Stavrum NORDLYS (29): Sun 12/4/2011 3:07 PM [SS] 91 NO: Nordlys: Tips; NO: Nordlys: Danny Pellicer; NO: Nordlys: Are Medby; NO: Nordlys: Vigdis Bendiktsen; NO: Nordlys: Ragnhild Enoksen; NO: Nordlys: Egon HOlstad; NO: Nordlys: Asbjorn Jaklin; NO: Nordlys: Ola Solvang; NO: Nordlys: Sissel Wessel Hansen; NO: Nordlys: Stein Wilhelmsen; NO: Nordlys: Oddvar Nygard; NO: Nordlys: Ed: Anders Opdahl; NO: Nordlys: Helge Nitteberg; NO: Nordlys: Geir Tarnesvik; NO: Nordlys: Torgeir Braathen; NO: Nordlys: Anders Mo Hanssen; NO: Nordlys: Eva Hirsti; NO: Nordlys: Jostein Larsen; NO: Nordlys: Oyvnd Sundheim; NO: Nordlys: Tove Myhre; NO: Nordlys: Susanne Noreng; NO: Nordlys: Bjorn-Harald Larssen; NO: Nordlys: Marit Rein; NO: Nordlys: Guttorm Pedersen; NO: Nordlys: Oystein Barth-Heyerdahl; NO: Nordlys: Torkil Emberland; NO: Nordlys: Ragnhild Gustad; NO: Nordlys: Marte Hotvedt; NO: Nordlys: Tone Jensen; NO: Nordlys: Tord Olander Pedersen; NO: Nordlys: Bengt Nielsen; NO: Nordlys: Lina Livsdatter NRK (126): Sun 12/4/2011 3:13 PM [SS] 92 NO: NRK: CEO: Hans-Tore Bjerkaas; NO: NRK: Solveig Jolstad; NO: NRK: Grethe Gynnild-Johnsen; NO: NRK: Hege Grova; NO: NRK: Arne Helsingen; NO: NRK: Kristian Tolonen; NO: NRK: Oyvind Vasaasen; NO: NRK: Unni Arnoy; NO: NRK: Heidi Pleym; NO: NKR: Solveig Jolstad; NO: NRK: Ulf Finsberg; NO: NRK: Kari Sorensen; NO: NRK: Geir Sjotner; NO: NRK: Reid Downie; NO: NRK: Bjorn Stuevold; NO: NRK: Eiliv Flakne; NO: NRK: Unni Arnoy; NO: NRK: Rune Moklebust; NO: NKR: Oddbjorn Rosnes; NO: NRK: Nina Einem; NO: NRK: Oyvind Lund; NO: NRK: Arne Helsingen; NO: NRK: Elisabeth Mjos; NO: NRK: Jon Branaes; NO: NRK: Sindre Ostgard; NO: NRK: Andreas Munkelien; NO: NRK: Christan Sommerfelt; NO: NRK: Turid Schnell; NO: NRK: Reidun Martol; NO: NRK: Espen Graff; NO: NRK: Kristin Jynge; NO: NRK: Solveig Tvedt; NO: NRK: Alf Hartgen; NO: NRK: Lars Kristiansen; NO: NRK: Egil Sundvor; NO: NRK: Gisle Knudsen; NO: NRK: Thomas Goodwin; NO: NRK: Siss Kvamme; NO: NRK: Ingrid Hafstad; NO: NRK: Grethe Haaland; NO: NRK: Svein Prestvik; NO: NRK: Ingrid Belt; NO: NRK: CEO: Hans-Tore Bjerkaas; NO: NRK: Olav Nyhus; NO: NRK: Per Arne Kalbakk; NO: NRK: Marius Lillelien; NO: NRK: Anne Britt Osland; NO: NRK: Turid Schnell; NO: NRK: Bjorn Stuevold; NO: NRK: Ulf Morten Davidsen; NO: NRK: Tone Kunst; NO: NRK: Anders Sarheim; NO: NRK: Gro Stenvik; NO: NRK: Sissel Bjornstad; NO: NRK: Anne Oye; NO: NRK: Henning Olstad; NO: NRK: Merete Verstad; NO: NRK: Vigdis Holmaas; NO: NRK: Svein Haaland; NO: NKR: Odd Fosse; NO: NRK: Torill Olsen; NO: NRK: Runar Ostmo; NO: NRK: Lise Storm Hansen; NO: NRK: Ole Jan Larsen; NO: NRK: Nicolai Flesjo; NO: NRK: Frank Gander; NO: NRK: Rolf Brandrud; NO: NRK: Mette Goplen; NO: NRK: Siri Antonsen; NO: NRK: Gro Skjensvold; NO: NRK: Chris Carlsen; NO: NRK: Ingebjorg Berdal; NO: NRK: Marit Moi; NO: NRK: Hanna Thorsen; NO: NRK: Bente Hakerud; NO: NRK: Turid Gronlund; NO: NRK: Line Ostby; NO: NRK: Bente Bjurholt; NO: NRK: Charlo Halvorsen; NO: NRK: Frank Hanssen; NO: NRK: Hans Rossine; NO: NRK: Kristin Johannessen; NO: NRK: Kari Jacobsen; NO: NRK: Jon Espen Lohne; NO: NRK: Annika Biornstad; NO: NRK: Geir Hauge; NO: NRK: Sindre Ostgard; NO: NRK: Lene Einang Flach; NO: NRK: Lars Alstadsaeter; NO: NRK: Pal Hansen; NO: NRK: Rolf Sanne-Gundersen; NO: NRK: Ragnar Christensen; NO: NRK: Otto Haug; NO: NKR: Inger Djupskas; NO: NRK: Kirsti Lium; NO: NRK: Pal Snoen; NO: NRK: Elin Mo; NO: NRK: Sigrid Gjellan; NO: NRK: Ida Kvissel; NO: NRK: Vegard Woll; NO: NRK: Christel Higraff; NO: NRK: Terje Dale; NO: NKR: Pal Hansen; NO: NRK: Reuben Sletten; NO: NRK: Kristina Thomsen; NO: NRK: Cecilie Lyng; NO: NRK: Peter Wallace; NO: NRK: Mona Kvam; NO: NRK: Erik Bolstad; NO: NRK: Geir Bordalen; NO: NRK: Kristian Tolonen; NO: NRK: Oivind Lahnstein; NO: NRK: Ellen Rian; NO: NRK: Mette Bay; NO: NRK: Aslaug Undheim; NO: NRK: Rune Alstadsaeter; NO: NRK: Morten Stensland; NO: NRK: Vibeke Haug; NO: NRK: Are Andreassen; NO: NRK: Grethe 89

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 90 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 91 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 92 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

Higraff; NO: NRK: Hildri Gulliksen; NO: NRK: Hege Duckert; NO: NRK: Kristin Huseby; NO: NRK: Katrine Raade; NO: NRK: Tormod Kjensjord; NO: NRK: Frode Nielsen NYE TROMS (04): Sun 12/4/2011 3:21 PM [SS] 93 NO: Nye Troms: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Nye Troms: Bardu; NO: Nye Troms: Admin; NO: Nye Troms: Balsfjord NY TID (09): Sun 12/4/2011 3:21 PM [SS] 94 NO: Ny Tid: Tips; NO: Ny Tid: Post; NO: Ny Tid: Torbjorn Nilsen; NO: Ny Tid: Tonje Reiersen; NO: Ny Tid: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Ny Tid: Kim Bredesen; NO: Ny Tid: Rafia Zaheer; NO: Ny Tid: Ed: Ingunn Kacar; NO: Ny Tid: Ed: Dag Herbjornsrud; NO: Ny Tid: Camilla Heinesen OSTLANDEST BLAD (35): Mon 12/5/2011 5:56 PM [SS] 95 NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Siri Zachariassen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Bengt Rosth; NO: OstlandestBlad: Jorgen Aas; NO: OstlandestBlad: Torbjorn Endal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Helge Gjessing; NO: OstlandestBlad: Tor Idland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Tore Kubberod; NO: OstlandestBlad: Una Oltedal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Odd Inge Rand; NO: OstlandestBlad: Lisa Rypeng; NO: OstlandestBlad: Knut Stenseth; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ole Kristian Trana; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Tom Ullsgard; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Kay Pettersen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Christian Clausen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ole Endresen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Anita Gjos; NO: OstlandestBlad: Carine Johansen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Mette Kvitle; NO: OstlandestBlad: Bernt Olsen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Vivi Rian; NO: OstlandestBlad: Gro Birgitte Roiland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Silje Stromland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Solveig Wessel; NO: OstlandestBlad: General; NO: OstlandestBlad: Inger Eidem; NO: OstlandestBlad: Rolf-Otto Eriksen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Karin Hastensen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Kari Klovstad; NO: OstlandestBlad: Lars Norsted; NO: OstlandestBlad: Stigg Persson; NO: OstlandestBlad: Terje Ruud; NO: OstlandestBlad: Bjorn Sandness; NO: OstlandestBlad: Vidar Svinndal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Cathrine Wilhelmsen OSTLANDS-POSTEN (23): Mon 12/5/2011 5:56 PM [SS] 96 NO: OstlandsPosten: AdmDir: Havard Heimdal; NO: OstlandsPosten: Ed: Per Marvin Tennum; NO: OstlandsPosten: Rune Ostby; NO: OstlandsPosten: Bjorn Jakobsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Erik Werner Andersen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Sigfrid Kvasjord; NO: OstlandsPosten: Lasse Nordheim; NO: OstlandsPosten: Nils-Erik Kvamme; NO: OstlandsPosten: Terje Svendsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Gry Nordvik; NO: OstlandsPosten: Readers; NO: OstlandsPosten: Bjorn-Tore Sandbrekkene; NO: OstlandsPosten: Kjersti Bache; NO: OstlandsPosten: Elisabeth Losnaes; NO: OstlandsPosten: Sigrid Ringnes; NO: OstlandsPosten: Roger Sordahl; NO: OstlandsPosten: Ed; NO: OstlandsPosten: Erik Berge; NO: OstlandsPosten: Tips; NO: OstlandsPosten: Per Albrigtsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Svend Einar Hansen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Siw Normandbo; NO: OstlandsPosten: Inger Lene Steen OSTLENDINGEN (50): Mon 12/5/2011 5:56 PM [SS] 97 NO: Ostlendingen: Ed: Nils Kristian Myhre; NO: Ostlendingen: Ingeborg Roste; NO: Ostlendingen: Kjetil B Dahl; NO: Ostlendingen: Randi Helen Nodeland; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Harald Salberg; NO: Ostlendingen: Marianne Ostmoen; NO: Ostlendingen: Torgrim Bakke; NO: Ostlendingen: Knut Fjeld; NO: Ostlendingen: Anita Gotehus; NO: Ostlendingen: Trine Loken; NO: Ostlendingen: Cathrine Moystad; NO: Ostlendingen: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Nils Henning Vespestad; NO: Ostlendingen: Freddie Overgaard; NO: Ostlendingen: Ingrid Nylund; NO: Ostlendingen: Marit Arnesen; NO: Ostlendingen: Karin Sletten; NO: Ostlendingen: Ed: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Knut Vigdal-Olsen; NO: Ostlendingen: Marte Dalsegg; NO: Ostlendingen: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Bjorn Vidar Tasigtil; NO: Ostlendingen: Sigbjorn Kristiansen; NO: Ostlendingen: Guro 93

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 94 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 95 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 96 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 97 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

Breck; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Morten Frengstad; NO: Ostlendingen: Rune Hagen; NO: Ostlendingen: Erik Moe; NO: Ostlendingen: Merette Netteland; NO: Ostlendingen: Kristin Sogard; NO: Ostlendingen: Wivi Westgard; NO: Ostlendingen: Gry Dornberg Olsen; NO: Ostlendingen: Liv Simensen; NO: Ostlendingen: Tore Rasmussen; NO: Ostlendingen: Erland Vingelsgard; NO: Ostlendingen: Ed; NO: Ostlendingen: Sol Osthagen; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Morten Frengstad; NO: Ostlendingen: Arnstein Moen; NO: Ostlendingen: Sverre Viggen; NO: Ostlendingen: Tore Sandberg; NO: Ostlendingen: Anders Bronken; NO: Ostlendingen: Kjell Arne Fridtun; NO: Ostlendingen: Havard Lillebo; NO: Ostlendingen: Brynhild Mollersen; NO: Ostlendingen: Wenche Norberg-Schulz; NO: Ostlendingen: Ola Thorset; NO: Ostlendingen: Gard Oien; NO: Ostlendingen: Torill Kolbu; NO: Ostlendingen: Tunset; NO: Ostlendingen: Mali Hagen Roe RADIO 102 | DAGER | NYHETENE (07): Sun 12/4/2011 8:13 PM [SS] 98 NO: Radio 102: Direkte; NO: Radio 102: Asbjorn Kallevik; NO: Radio 102: Terje Gronnigen; NO: Radio 102: Per Ivar Reine; NO: Radio 102: Egil Houeland; NO: Radio Nyhetene: Post; NO: RadioDager: Morten Scott Janssen; NO: RadioDager: Anne Nordheim; NO: RadioDager: Rolf Brandrud; NO: RadioDager: Ellen Rake Bergseng; NO: RadioDager: Wilhelm Haagensli RANA BLAD (18): Sun 12/4/2011 8:15 PM [SS] 99 NO: Rana Blad: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Rana Blad: Ed: Kirsti Nielsen; NO: Rana Blad: Toril Alfsvag; NO: Rana Blad: Harald Mathiassen; NO: Rana Blad: Klaus Solbakken; NO: Rana Blad: Beate Nygard; NO: Rana Blad: Kultur; NO: Rana Blad: Roger Marthinsen; NO: Rana Blad: Marit Ulriksen; NO: Rana Blad: Arne Forbord; NO: Rana Blad: Ingeborg Andreassen; NO: Rana Blad: Hedda Elvestad; NO: Rana Blad: Religion; NO: Rana Blad: Viktor Hogseth; NO: Rana Blad: Hugo Charles Hansen; NO: Rana Blad: Geir Vea; NO: Rana Blad: Anita Ravn; NO: Rana Blad: Siri Nybakk REDAKTORFORENING (11) Sun 12/4/2011 8:19 PM [SS] 100 NO: Redaktorforening: Nordland: Jan-Eirik Hanssen; NO: Redaktorforening: Oslo: Kjersti Løken Stavrum; NO: Redaktorforening: Vestafjelske: Jan Inge Fardal; NO: Redaktorforening: Nils Oy: General Secretary; NO: Redaktorforening: Romsdal: Hallstein Vemøy; NO: Redaktorforening: Rogaland: Tom Hetland; NO: Redaktorforening: VeTeBu: Jan Roaldset; NO: Redaktorforening: Arne Jensen: Ass. Gen. Sec; NO: Redaktorforening: Oplandenes: Torbjørn Moen; NO: Redaktorforening: Trondelag: Tor Røed; NO: Redaktorforening: Ostfold: Øivind Lågbu RINGBLAD (01): Sun 12/4/2011 8:19 PM [SS] 101 NO: Ringblad: Net: Audun Jahren RINGSAKER BLAD (13): Mon 12/5/2011 5:07 PM [SS] 102 NO: RingsakerBlad: Redaksie; NO: RingsakerBlad: Kari Finsrud; NO: RingsakerBlad: Birgit Herud; NO: RingsakerBlad: Erik Lauretsen; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ole Johan Storsve; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ed: Ivar Bae; NO: RingsakerBlad: Gaute Freng; NO: RingsakerBlad: Jeanne Haland; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ole Rosenborg; NO: RingsakerBlad: Jan Rune Bakkeland; NO: RingsakerBlad: Torunn Henriksen; NO: RingsakerBlad: Eli Korsveien; NO: RingsakerBlad: Svein Sjolie ROGALAND AVIS (26): Sun 12/4/2011 8:19 PM [SS] 103 NO: RogalandAvis: Anne-Marie Nygaard; NO: RogalandAvis: Erik Holsvik; NO: RogalandAvis: Henriette Gill; NO: RogalandAvis: Lars Einarsson; NO: RogalandAvis: Marius Vervik; NO: RogalandAvis: Ragnhild Naess; NO: RogalandAvis: Torborn Svendsen; NO: RogalandAvis: Oyvind Jacobsen; NO: RogalandAvis: Bengt Enersgard; NO: RogalandAvis: Frode Gjerald; NO: RogalandAvis: Hilde Urdall; NO: 98

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 99 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 100 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 101 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 102 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 103 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

RogalandAvis: Karoline Reilstad; NO: RogalandAvis: Mona Byrkjedal; NO: RogalandAvis: Ole Nerheim; NO: RogalandAvis: Stein Roger Fossmo; NO: RogalandAvis: Tore Bruland; NO: RogalandAvis: Ed: Bjorn Saebo; NO: RogalandAvis: Bjorn Saebo; NO: RogalandAvis: Geir Sondeland; NO: RogalandAvis: Ina Steen Andersen; NO: RogalandAvis: Kjersti Riiber; NO: RogalandAvis: Pa Traden; NO: RogalandAvis: Rasmus Sommerseth; NO: RogalandAvis: Thor Erik Waage; NO: RogalandAvis: Oyvind Ellingsen ROMERIKUS BLAD (41): Sun 12/4/2011 8:19 PM [SS] 104 NO: RomerikesBlad: Ed: Redaksie; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lars Hansen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Bernhus; NO: RomerikesBlad: Torstein Davidsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Alexander Gjermundshaug; NO: RomerikesBlad: Trond Henriksen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Roar Lokken; NO: RomerikesBlad: Jan Schei; NO: RomerikesBlad: Brede Wardrum; NO: RomerikesBlad: Marit Anderssen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Hege Paulsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Caroline Bjerkland; NO: RomerikesBlad: Nina Skyrud; NO: RomerikesBlad: Pal Eskas; NO: RomerikesBlad: Thor Woje; NO: RomerikesBlad: Arne Kongsnes; NO: RomerikesBlad: Espen Bolstad; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Fjellvang; NO: RomerikesBlad: Arnfinn Hanssen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Bjorn Johnsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Knut Nadheim; NO: RomerikesBlad: Hallgeir Skjelstad; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Westengen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Ola Einbu; NO: RomerikesBlad: Marianne Tonsberg; NO: RomerikesBlad: Oyvind Larsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Per Stokkebrun; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lesers; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lars Lier; NO: RomerikesBlad: Stig Bakke; NO: RomerikesBlad: Karoline Carlsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Thor Fremmerlid; NO: RomerikesBlad: Helle Karterud; NO: RomerikesBlad: Hans Nyborg; NO: RomerikesBlad: Elin Svendsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Tom Gustavsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Tina Oppen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Jessheim; NO: RomerikesBlad: Elisabeth Lunder; NO: RomerikesBlad: Kjell Aasum ROMSDALS BUDSTIKKE (30): Sun 12/4/2011 8:30 PM [SS] 105 NO: RomsdalsB: Renate Gilde; NO: RomsdalsB: Ingrid Cruz; NO: RomsdalsB: Therese Rostberg; NO: RomsdalsB: Oddbjorn Harnes; NO: RomsdalsB: Olav Skjegstad; NO: RomsdalsB: Torill Skuseth; NO: RomsdalsB: Egil Torvik; NO: RomsdalsB: Per Kristian Bratteng; NO: RomsdalsB: Agnar Gendem; NO: RomsdalsB: Carl Indbjor; NO: RomsdalsB: Oyvind Brunvoll; NO: RomsdalsB: Bjorg Hovde; NO: RomsdalsB: Bente Tovan; NO: RomsdalsB: Eirik Heen; NO: RomsdalsB: Svein Bjornerem; NO: RomsdalsB: Vera Saether; NO: RomsdalsB: Richard Nergaard; NO: RomsdalsB: Bjorn Brunvoll; NO: RomsdalsB: Heine Marit; NO: RomsdalsB: Stian Viken; NO: RomsdalsB: Jan Inge Tomren; NO: RomsdalsB: Gjermund Kjopstad; NO: RomsdalsB: Kjell Langmyren; NO: RomsdalsB: Anita Vingen; NO: RomsdalsB: Jan Roe; NO: RomsdalsB: Per Tveeikrem; NO: RomsdalsB: Iver Gjelstenli; NO: RomsdalsB: Alf Vidar Ebbestad; NO: RomsdalsB: Ole Welde; NO: RomsdalsB: Marianne Hjelset SANDEFJORDS BLAD (32): Mon 12/5/2011 5:09 PM [SS] 106 NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ed: Jan Roaldset; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Olaf Akselsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kristin Bjorntvedt; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Bjorn Ivar Erlandsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Tom-Erling Hem; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kurt Hoyessen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Atle Moller; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Roaldset; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Laars Schei; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Eli Torud; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ole Sigurd; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ed: Vibeke Bjerkaas; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Geir Baarnes; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Oddvar Borve; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kare Gasholt; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Flemming Hofmann Tveitan; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Vibeke Jorgensen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Eric Moller; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Asle Rowe; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jarle Sor-Reime; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Tone Ude; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Abrahamsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Vibeke Bjerkaas; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Maja Christense; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Anders Hasle; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Merete Holtan; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Per Langevei; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Paal Nygaard; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ann Saastad; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Dag Sorensen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Steinar Ulrichsen SARPSBORG ARBEIDERBLAD (03): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS]

107

NO: SarpsborgA: Eirik Moe; NO: SarpsborgA: Bernt Lyngstad; NO: SarpsborgA: Editor: Nett Redaksie 104

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 105 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 106 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 107 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

SOGN AVIS (16): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS] 108 NO: SognAvis: Ekspedision; NO: SognAvis: Ed: Eli Grotle; NO: SognAvis: Sigrid Svartefoss; NO: SognAvis: Jan Fimreite; NO: SognAvis: Renate Sael; NO: SognAvis: Hanne Stedje; NO: SognAvis: Redaksjon; NO: SognAvis: Eirik Thue; NO: SognAvis: Kai Brekke; NO: SognAvis: Marian Skau; NO: SognAvis: Kjell Eldegard; NO: SognAvis: Ed: Jan Fardal; NO: SognAvis: Terje Eggum; NO: SognAvis: Morten Sortland; NO: SognAvis: Gunnar Kleven; NO: SognAvis: Keth Oren STRANDBUEN (02): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS] 109 NO: Strandbuen: Redaksjon; NO: Strandbuen: Gaute Henriksen SUNNMORSPOSTEN (26): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS] 110 NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Leser; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Sindre Halkjelsvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Sissel Bigset; NO: Sunnmorsposten: HIlde Hovik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Johan Behrentz; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Inger Otterlei; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Mona Skjong; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Svein Aam; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Culture; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed: Hanna Berg; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jan Erik Rosvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Olav Rise; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jan Albertsen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Helge Gloppen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Olav Sindre Rise; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Lars Skrede; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Stig Vagnes; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Reporting; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed: Tormod Utne; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Kristin Knudsen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jorn Egset; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Arne Andersen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Frode Kleiveland; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Peter Sandvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Karl Vatne TIDENS KRAV (05): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS] 111 NO: TidensKrav: Ed; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Bent Botten; NO: TidensKrav: Dir: Per Brochmann; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Ole Alnaes; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Tore Dyrnes TONSBERG BLAD (57): Mon 12/5/2011 5:14 PM [SS] 112 NO: TonsbergBlad: Dir: Oystein Hjornevik; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Kristin Monstad Lund; NO: TonsbergBlad: Lena Malnes; NO: TonsbergBlad: Arnt-Einar Revetal; NO: TonsbergBlad: Harald Stromnaes; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anne Torressen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Sidsel Winding-Stavseth; NO: TonsbergBlad: Terje Baro; NO: TonsbergBlad: Hakon Borud; NO: TonsbergBlad: Per Gilding; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anette Haldorsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kirvil Haberg Allum; NO: TonsbergBlad: Paul Jensen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Lars Doyle Larssen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Editor; NO: TonsbergBlad: Suzanne Kristoffersen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Solfrid Bjerkeskaug; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kirsten Sand; NO: TonsbergBlad: Hans Christian Moen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Marie Olaussen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Morten Wang; NO: TonsbergBlad: Linn Mathisen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anne Charlotte Schjoll; NO: TonsbergBlad: Harald Syvertsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Vegar Vatn; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind WindingStavseth; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ellen Bering; NO: TonsbergBlad: Caissa Gjolberg; NO: TonsbergBlad: Thor Johan Hallin; NO: TonsbergBlad: Gunnar Iversen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Jon Cato Landsverk; NO: TonsbergBlad: Aleksander Lee Olsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kristin Svensen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Janne Bjergli; NO: TonsbergBlad: Knut-Erik Lahn; NO: TonsbergBlad: Tom Gjermundsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Debate; NO: TonsbergBlad: Erik Munsterhjelm; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Erik Wold Aunemo; NO: TonsbergBlad: Arne Lysne; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oivind Munkas; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind Skavhellen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind Saetre; NO: TonsbergBlad: Terje Wilhelmsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anja Jasinski Wright; NO: TonsbergBlad: Marit Borgen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Morten Borsum; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ralf Haga; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ove Hustadbraten; NO: TonsbergBlad: Robert Jamieson; NO: TonsbergBlad: An-Magritt Larsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Asbjorn Olav Lien; NO: TonsbergBlad: SvenErik Syrstad; NO: TonsbergBlad: Emira Holmoy; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ann Iren Ljone; NO: TonsbergBlad: Trond Lunde; NO: TonsbergBlad: Tone Finsrud 108

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 109 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 110 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 111 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 112 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

TROMS FOLKEBLAD (22): Mon 12/5/2011 5:28 PM [SS] 113 NO: TromsFolkeblad: Steinulf Henriksen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Raymond Larsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Ronny Traelvik; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Morten Dokka; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Eirik Dahl; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Andre Lund; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stine Jacobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Silje Haugen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Kjell Sorlie; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Rune Rene Kristiansen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Reidar Ingebrigtsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Jan-Erik Bergstad; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Trond Sondnes; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Blindheim; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Heidi Moen Jacobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Vidar Bjorkli; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Maria Simonsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Jakobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Joran Kristensen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Knut Aune; NO: TromsFolkeblad: May-Britt Kjosnes; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Trude Morkved TROMSO (22): Mon 12/5/2011 5:28 PM [SS] 114 NO: Tromso: Tips; NO: Tromso: Editor: Mortenr Albertsen; NO: Tromso: Ed: Jorn Skoglund; NO: Tromso: Carina Hansen; NO: Tromso: Torbjorn Karlsen; NO: Tromso: Jorn Pedersen; NO: Tromso: John Strandmo; NO: Tromso: Kjetil Vik; NO: Tromso: Debatt; NO: Tromso: Ed: Jonny Hansen; NO: Tromso: Journ: Thor Angelsen; NO: Tromso: Kine Hanssen; NO: Tromso: Helge Matland; NO: Tromso: Bente Simonsen; NO: Tromso: Petter Strom; NO: Tromso: Byrunden; NO: Tromso: Ed: Trond Haaksensen; NO: Tromso: Journ: Gurdun Gulldahl; NO: Tromso: Asgeir Johansen; NO: Tromso: Christer Pedersen; NO: Tromso: Camilla Solheim; NO: Tromso: Inger Thuen TRONDER AVISA (51): Mon 12/5/2011 5:28 PM [SS] 115 NO: TronderAvisa: Dir: Arve Loberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Heidi Stiklestad; NO: TronderAvisa: Harald Hustad; NO: TronderAvisa: Sigrun Bakken; NO: TronderAvisa: Trond Bliko; NO: TronderAvisa: Vigdis Devik; NO: TronderAvisa: Jon Age Fiskum; NO: TronderAvisa: Gunn Magni Galaaen; NO: TronderAvisa: Guri Hjulstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Nina Kjeoy; NO: TronderAvisa: Steinar Kvarme; NO: TronderAvisa: Tormod Lingeberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Stian Manka; NO: TronderAvisa: Anders Nordmeland; NO: TronderAvisa: Johan Prestvik; NO: TronderAvisa: Anders Setten; NO: TronderAvisa: Ellen Marie Stollen; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Arnulf Gotvasli; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: John Arne Moen; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Redaksie; NO: TronderAvisa: Havard Bartnes; NO: TronderAvisa: Maj-Britt Bruheim; NO: TronderAvisa: Goril Engesvik; NO: TronderAvisa: Lene-Mari Flaamo; NO: TronderAvisa: Gaute Ulvik Haugan; NO: TronderAvisa: Geir Jenshus; NO: TronderAvisa: Erling Koldaas; NO: TronderAvisa: Bjorn Sigurd Larsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Olav Lorentsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Per-Magne Midjo; NO: TronderAvisa: Hakon Okkenhaug; NO: TronderAvisa: Ingvild Radwan; NO: TronderAvisa: Kjetil Skaufel; NO: TronderAvisa: Harald Saeteroy; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Bjornar Tromsdal; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Arnulf Gotvasli; NO: TronderAvisa: Hakon Arntsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Tone Berg; NO: TronderAvisa: Joar Borstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Svein Falstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Roar A Fordal; NO: TronderAvisa: Hanne Heggdal; NO: TronderAvisa: Paul Ola Kjerkreit; NO: TronderAvisa: Stig A Kristiansen; NO: TronderAvisa: Espen Leirset; NO: TronderAvisa: Arve Loberg; NO: TronderAvisa: John Arnt Nesgard; NO: TronderAvisa: Stein Aa Olsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Normann Ryan; NO: TronderAvisa: Terje Solberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Tore Vikan TV2 (07): Wed 12/7/2011 11:02 PM [SS] 116 NO: TV2: Kristian Ervik; NO: TV2: Espen Eide; NO: TV2: Kjell Persen; NO: TV2: Elin Sorsdahl; NO: TV2: Lars Barth Heyerdahl; NO: TV2: Asbjorn Oyhovden; NO: TV2: Kadafi Zaman VARDEN (56): Mon 12/5/2011 5:28 PM [SS] 117 NO: Varden: Editorial; NO: Varden: EdDir: Lasse Johannessen; NO: Varden: Public Ed: Geir Roang; NO: Varden: Birte Ulveseth; NO: Varden: Jan Taranrod; NO: Varden: Morten Skifjeld; NO: Varden: Arve Moen; NO: Varden: Nils-Tore Olsen; NO: Varden: Gary Payton; NO: Varden: Jan Tangvald; NO: 113

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 114 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 115 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 116 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 117 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

Varden: Gagnhild Johansen; NO: Varden: Andreas Soltvedt; NO: Varden: Halvor Wolves; NO: Varden: Bjorn Borge; NO: Varden: Olav Boe; NO: Varden: Tor Arvid Gundersen; NO: Varden: Jon-Inge Hansen; NO: Varden: Gro Hogli; NO: Varden: Rolf Jensen; NO: Varden: MD: Jan Arild Tveten; NO: Varden: Ed: Lars Kise; NO: Varden: Ed: Culture: Anne Spanem; NO: Varden: Tom Weber; NO: Varden: Tore Svarverud; NO: Varden: Arnt Lundholt; NO: Varden: Frederik Nordahl; NO: Varden: Helge Ottesen; NO: Varden: Andre Stromodden; NO: Varden: Kjell Aulie; NO: Varden: Morten Small-Hagen; NO: Varden: Aslak Thorsen; NO: Varden: Jane Berge; NO: Varden: Tom Arne; NO: Varden: Silvie Rui Fedog; NO: Varden: Karina Hagen; NO: Varden: Aashiled Hvidsten Langaas; NO: Varden: Jeanette Tall; NO: Varden: FinMng: Petter Grotnes; NO: Varden: Ed: Bjornar Larsen; NO: Varden: Ed: News: Tom Erik Thorsen; NO: Varden: Martin Oyvang; NO: Varden: Marit Schulstok; NO: Varden: Paul Lundholt; NO: Varden: Magne Olsen; NO: Varden: Silje Paulsen; NO: Varden: Anita Bjorbekk; NO: Varden: Knut Heggenes; NO: Varden: Bjorn Harry Schonhaug; NO: Varden: Pal Egil Tornholm; NO: Varden: Kristin Berge; NO: Varden: Lars Martin Borlaug; NO: Varden: Kari Gisholt; NO: Varden: Marianne Halling Forest; NO: Varden: Elisabeth Hvitsten; NO: Varden: Lena Beathe Jakobsen VARINGEN (12): Mon 12/5/2011 5:56 PM [SS] 118 NO: Varingen: Ed: Redaksie; NO: Varingen: Ann Berntzen; NO: Varingen: Tor Hjelset; NO: Varingen: Kari Tveoy; NO: Varingen: Ed: Jan Fossen; NO: Varingen: Sigbjorn Hoidalen; NO: Varingen: Liv Seiff; NO: Varingen: Kristin Haagensen; NO: Varingen: Liv Stubberud; NO: Varingen: Truls Jarle Hansen; NO: Varingen: Knut Hjertaas; NO: Varingen: Marit Grumstad VARTLAND (53): Mon 12/5/2011 5:56 PM [SS] 119 NO: Vartland: HQ; NO: Vartland: Debate; NO: Vartland: Ed: Reidar Kristiansen; NO: Vartland: Geir Bjartvik; NO: Vartland: Sverre Egner Bruun; NO: Vartland: Geir Ove Fonn; NO: Vartland: Signe Fæø; NO: Vartland: Arne Guttormsen; NO: Vartland: Per Anders Hoel; NO: Vartland: Trygve WJordheim; NO: Vartland: Brita Kraglund; NO: Vartland: Heidi Marie Lindekleiv; NO: Vartland: Johannes Morken; NO: Vartland: Liv Riiser; NO: Vartland: Jarle Sanden; NO: Vartland: Halvor Stensrud; NO: Vartland: Mads Vegstein; NO: Vartland: Anne Lise Økland; NO: Vartland: Tips; NO: Vartland: AdmDir: Helge Simonnes; NO: Vartland: Anders Brisa; NO: Vartland: Christian Nicolai Bjorke; NO: Vartland: Martin Eikeland; NO: Vartland: Øystein Franck-Nielsen; NO: Vartland: Lars Gilberg; NO: Vartland: Eiring Hegdal; NO: Vartland: Jan Arild Holbek; NO: Vartland: Rebekka Joswig; NO: Vartland: Reidar Kristiansen; NO: Vartland: Jon MLund; NO: Vartland: Astrid Norheim; NO: Vartland: Erling Rimehaug; NO: Vartland: Helge Simonnes; NO: Vartland: Marianne Tønnessen; NO: Vartland: Alf Kjetil Walgermo; NO: Vartland: Bjarte Botnen; NO: Vartland: PR; NO: Vartland: AdmDir: Ole-Jacob Mosvold; NO: Vartland: Ed: Olav Egil Aune; NO: Vartland: Bjørgulv K. Bjåen; NO: Vartland: Lars OFlydal; NO: Vartland: Erlend Friestad; NO: Vartland: Randi Hegle; NO: Vartland: Kristin Rosnes Holte; NO: Vartland: Jarle Kallestad; NO: Vartland: Kjell Kvamme; NO: Vartland: Marianne Lystrup; NO: Vartland: Vibeke Normann; NO: Vartland: Britt Rogstad; NO: Vartland: Olav Solvang; NO: Vartland: Espen Utaker; NO: Vartland: Øyvind Woie; NO: Vartland: Une Bratberg VG (15): Wed 12/7/2011 11:05 PM [SS] 120 VG: 2200; NO: VG: Ed: Espen Hansen; NO: VG: Jo Christian Oterhals; NO: VG: Sissel Kruse Larsen; NO: VG: Sigrid Svensen; NO: VG: Jarle Brenna; NO: VG: Helje Solberg; NO: VG: PR; NO: VG: Ole Olsen; NO: VG: Dennis Ravndal; NO: VG: Geir Arne Kippernes; NO: VG: Hanne Skartveit; NO: VG: Marianne Vikas; NO: VG: Vidar Enerstvedtog; NO: VG: Morten Hopperstad

118

Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 119 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html 120 Notice to 1,283 NO Media Officials (Editors & Journalists): NO v. Breivik: Oppose Norway's Political Psychiatric Stalinesque Tyranny http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2011/12/notice-to-1283-no-media-officials.html

[2] April 2012: Application to Oslo Court to Proceed as an Amicus Curiae Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist Amicus Arguments: Argument: Quick Summary The Applicant is of the view that the main application raises novel questions which are crucial for the future credibility of Western Civilisation‘s Masculine Insecurity Human Farming121 Kaffir122 Legal Matrix conceptualisation of the rule of law and the principle of legality.

The Applicants Amicus written submissions shall (a) address alternative legal arguments to those of both the Prosecution and Defense, i.e. from a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists perspective as opposed to the Prosecution & Defense‘s Parasite Leeching Masculine Insecurity Patriarchal perspectives; (b) ‗argue points deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular Parasite Leeching Masculine Insecurity case‘123; (c) ‗apprise the court of Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists legal, social, economic, ecological and cultural enquiry implications for its consideration‘124 to allow the court to base its decision on a larger, more comprehensive, and more accurate reality based natural law legal framework; (d) provide the court with hard evidence of (I) non-violent Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee applications filed to European Heads of State for France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom and NATO Military Committee; providing evidentiary arguments for support for a Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Europe for African White Refugees; (II) how former and current UNHCR, ECRE and ELENA Officials deliberately wish to censor the issue of African White Refugees from public scrutiny and knowledge125; so that the court‘s final judgment shall include a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists legal analysis126.

I am the only leader in South Africa focussed on Problem Solving127. All other political, media, corporate and religious leaders (sic) in South Africa practice Parasite Leeching128 Leadership (sic).129 I 121

Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‗Kaffir‘: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R ―to cover‖. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and ―cover up‖ the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as ―Kuffar.‖ Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning ―a person who hides or covers‖; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.

123 Luther T. Munford, When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 279, 280 (1999).

124 Paul M. Sandler & Andew D. Levy, Appellate Practice for the Maryland Lawyer: State and Federal: Amicus Briefs 331 (1994).

125 (A) Monaco-RSA: Prince Albert II's Hon. Consul demands Jus Sanguinis delete African White Refugees Petition to Principality of Monaco webpage (B) African White Refugee Petition to NL:ECRE & ELENA Officials posted to ECRE & ELENA Facebook Wall deleted; (C) Prof. Denis Alland, Univ. Paris II; UNHCR Rep. (1989-97), ECRE & ELENA Refugee Law Expert Declares Legal War on African White Refugees; (D) French UNHCR Rep. & EU Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) Law Prof.'s legal allergy to Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat 4 African White Refugees Petition; (E) http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/search/label/*%20ECRE-ELENA%3A%20Anti-White%20Refugee%20Bias 126 Paul M. Smith, The Sometimes Troubled Relationship Between Courts and Their “Friends”, note 2, at 26 (1998).

127 Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.

128 Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‗problem solving‘ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained128). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn‘t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to 122

have no followers, because I am not interested in Parasite Leeching Pretend Problem Solving.

Individual South Africans who are serious about Problem Solving must sign the Honour Contract Oath: I Understand SHARP’s Principles & Wish to Join SHARP130, which identifies SHARP: Problem Solving Radical Honoursty Accountability: Principles and Problems.

Problem of Masculine (Reason & Logic) Insecurity: Masculine Insecurity is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, due to (A) obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving, (B) being the cognitive foundation of the antiMeritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) Paradigm; (C) hence propagandizes an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- ‗walking penis procreation‘ overpopulation and ‗consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis‘131 overconsumption -- worldview.

Problem of Overpopulation132: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our national and international problems: exponential resource use and decline, local national and international resource wars: crime, poverty, political correctness, etc. Solving the overpopulation problem to reach a state of ecological sustainable carrying capacity requires massive population reduction …

Problem of Overconsumption133: is a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of our nations ecological problems, of which the political and economic problems are simply symptoms of the deeper ecological problems. Peak Nonrenewable Natural Resources shall result in the impending collapse of industrial civilization, which cannot exist without these resources (Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter : A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston134) SHARP Professional Ethics and Pragmatism: focus is on ―(A) professional ethics is to follow the truth wherever the truth leads us, which can only be done in a radical transparency environment; and (B) pragmatism, is to measure problem solving by what works, rather than emotional or ideological standards or intentions‖.

My Guerrilla Lawfare Worldview: The Paradox of the Masculine Insecurity Human Farming135 Kaffir136 Matrix Court: Radical Transparency Problem Solving is to the Masculine Insecurity Kaffir Matrix Court; what Martin Luther or Galileo Galilei were to the Catholic Church. The Kaffir Matrix Court system is founded on ‗Kaffir Legislation‘: Inalienable Right to Breed and Vote: Kaffir Law/Legislation provides citizens with the Inalienable ‗Right to Breed‘ and ‗Right to Vote‘, but perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‗followers‘, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‗leadership‘ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP. 129 All SA Political Parties & Media Editors practice Parasite Leeching Leadership - Survey http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2012/03/all-sa-political-parties-media-editors.html 130 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/120419_sharp?mode=window&viewMode=doublePage 131 Edward Bernay‘s ‗Father of Public Relations‘ theories on using Masculine Insecurity to manipulate men and women for corporate purposes: basically to chance independent free thinking (I am my character and values) citizens into consumer zombies (I am my material possessions); as described in: The Century of the Self: (1) Happiness Machines, by Adam Curtis (BBC) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941 132 The population of an environment by a particular species in excess of the environment's carrying capacity. The effects of overpopulation can include the depletion of resources, environmental deterioration, and the prevalence of famine and disease. The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the maximum population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely.

133 Over-consumption is a situation where resource-use has outpaced the sustainable capacity of the ecosystem. A prolonged pattern of overconsumption leads to inevitable environmental degradation and the eventual loss of resource bases. Generally the discussion of overconsumption parallels that of overpopulation; that is the more people, the more consumption of raw materials to sustain their lives.

134 http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2011/12/peak-nnr-scarcity-humanitys-last.html 135 Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc 136 Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for ‗Kaffir‘: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R ―to cover‖. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and ―cover up‖ the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as ―Kuffar.‖ Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning ―a person who hides or covers‖; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.

demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc, etc. 

The $64,000 question: Why does the Masculine Insecurity Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix not require citizens to get voting137 or breeding licences???



Kaffir Legislation covers up that an ‗Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control policy + No Social Welfare policies or practices provides for an equilibrium carrying capacity; whereas Inalienable Right to Breed/laissez-faire birth control within a welfare state, results in Runaway Growth, and ultimately greater misery, poverty and war138.



Kaffir Legislation covers up that the Inalienable Right to Vote, or Universal Suffrage for the Ignorant is the road to centralisation of power and tyranny.139

Argument: Overview 1.

Defendant Defense: Political and/or Military Necessity

2.

Habeus Mentem :: The Right to Legal Sanity A. Marketing of Madness: The Myth of Mental Illness Experts B. Norway’s History of Political Psychiatry

3.

Masculine (Reason & Logic) Insecurity Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) A. Masculine Insecurity is not necessarily a masculine phenomena B. Masculine Insecurity Obstructs Radical Transparency Communication Problem Solving.

C. Masculine Insecurity is the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) paradigm . It is the Root Cause of Overpopulation and Overconsumption: It Propagandizes on behalf of an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching -- ‘walking penis procreation’ overpopulation and ‘consume to demonstrate the size of my consumption penis’ overconsumption140 -- worldview.

4.

Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee: A Product of (A) European Masculine Insecurity Phallic Enhanced Colonialism and (B) African and Liberal Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement’s ‘Operation Production’ Breeding War A. The Competitive Exclusion Principle (Apartheid) was an Act of Political Just War Self Defense to Tragedy of the Breeding War – Act of War – African Commons Exponential Population Growth:

137

―In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.‖ -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60 138 From Shortage to Longage: Forty Years in the Population Vineyards, by Garrett Hardin, Population and Environment, Vol. 12, No. 3. Spring 1991 http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_from_shortage_to_longage.html 139 ―In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.‖ -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60 140 Edward Bernay‘s ‗Father of Public Relations‘ theories on using Masculine Insecurity to manipulate men and women for corporate purposes: basically to chance independent free thinking (I am my character and values) citizens into consumer zombies (I am my material possessions); as described in: The Century of the Self: (1) Happiness Machines, by Adam Curtis (BBC) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9167657690296627941

B. Apartheid Inconvenient Truths Masculine Insecurity Liberals and AntiApartheid Movement Lack the Honour to Confront: C. Masculine Insecurity Liberal Europe’s Endorsement of African Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement’s ‘Operation Production’ Breeding War: D. Masculine Insecurity Liberal Europe’s Endorsement of African Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement’s Parasite Leeching TRC Fraud Social Contract: 5.

Masculine Insecurity Anti-Apartheid Movement International Organisations, such as UNHCR, ECRE, ELENA, etc are Not Credible, or Reliable Source on the matter of African White Refugees; they believe Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, and Europe for Everybody and definitely not for Jus Sanguinis European White Refugees.

1,384 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist Radical „Honesty Enemy‟ Free & Fair Trial Support. Response from Media: CENSORED. [4] ADRESSEASVISEN: Mon 4/16/2012 9:21 AM [SS]141 NO: Adresseavisen: Arne Blix; NO: Adresseavisen: Tips; NO: Adresseavisen: Kirsti Husby; NO: Adresseavisen: Atle Bersvendsen [6] AFTENBLADET: Mon 4/16/2012 9:24 AM

142

NO: Aftenbladet: Tips; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Tom Hetland; NO: Aftenbladet: Folk; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Janne Hagen; NO: Aftenbladet: Ed: Stein Jupskas; NO: Aftenbladet: Sven Egil Omdal [2] AFTENPOSTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 9:26 AM

143

NO: Aftenposten: Thomas Spence; NO: Aftenposten: Helle Skjervold [3] AMTA: Mon 4/16/2012 9:26 AM144 NO: AMTA: Nettredaksjonen; NO: AMTA: Editor: Morten Oby; NO: AMTA: Mail [6] AGDERPOSTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 9:26 AM145 NO: Agderposten: Redaktor: Morten Rod; NO: Agderposten: Adm Director: Nuls Kr. Gauslaa; NO: Agderposten: Redaksjonen; NO: Agderposten: Leserinnlegg; NO: Agderposten: Annonser; NO: Agderposten: Nettutgaven [7] AVISA NORDLAND: Mon 4/16/2012 9:26 AM146 NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Bjarne Holgersen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Chief Ed: Jan-Eirik Hanssen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Borje Klaeboe Eidissen; NO: Avisa Nordland: Tips; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Reidun Kjelling Nybo; NO: Avisa Nordland: Annonser; NO: Avisa Nordland: Ed: Vibeke Madsen [15] NS TIDENDE: Mon 4/16/2012 11:31 AM147

141

[Andreaseavisen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Aftenbladet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Aftenposten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 144 [AMTA] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 145 [Agderposten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 146 [Avisa Nordland] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 147 [BergensTidende] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 142 143

NO: Bergens Tidende; NO: Bergens Tidende: Ed: Gard Steiro; NO: Bergens Tidende: Rune Christophersen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Christian Nicolaisen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Ronald Hole; NO: Bergens Tidende: Marianne Nilsen; NO: Bergens Tidende: Lasse Lambrechts; NO: Bergens Tidende: Jo Hjelle; NO: Bergens Tidende: Eirik Brekke; NO: Bergens Tidende: Oyvind Lefdal Eidsvik; NO: Bergens Tidende: Chief Journo: Jan Stian Vold; NO: Bergens Tidende: Alice Bratshaug; NO: Bergens Tidende: Liv Skotheim; NO: Bergens Tidende: Odd Mehus; NO: Bergens Tidende: Tron Strand [03] BERGENSAVISEN: Mon 4/16/2012 11:42 AM148 NO: Bergensavisen; NO: BA: Ed: Anders Nyland; NO: BA: Ed: Eva Johansen [03] BUDDSTIKKA: Mon 4/16/2012 11:44 AM149 NO: Buddstikka: Ed; NO: Buddstikka: Ed: Andreas Gjolme; NO: Buddstikka: Ed: Dagotter Johansen [06] DAGBLADET: Mon 4/16/2012 12:19 PM150 NO: Dagbladet; NO: Dagbladet: Hans-Martin Thomt; NO: Dagbladet: Editor: Kristofer Egeberg; NO: Dagbladet: Sindre Granly Meldalen; NO: Dagbladet: Marius Huseby; NO: Dagbladet: Espen Sandli [09] DAGOGTID: Mon 4/16/2012 12:26 PM151 NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Svein Gjerdaker; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Johan Brox; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Agnes Ravatn; NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Svein Gjerdaker; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Roald Helgheim; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Per Anders Todal; NO: Dagogtid: Ed: Ottar Fyllingsnes; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Jon Hustad; NO: Dagogtid: Journo: Klaus Myrvoll [06] DAGEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:23 PM152 NO: Dagen: Ed; NO: Dagen: Ove Eikje; NO: Dagen: Hanne Kristine Pedersen; NO: Dagen: Tor Weibye; NO: Dagen: Bjorn Olav Hammerstad; NO: Dagen: Inger Anna Drangsholt [07] DAGSAVISEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:26 PM153 NO: Dagsavisen; NO: Dagsavisen: Ed; NO: Dagsavisen: Debate; NO: Dagsavisen: Editor: Arne Strand; NO: Dagsavisen: Ivar Iversen; NO: Dagsavisen: Kaia Storvik; NO: Dagsavisen: Mode Steinkjer [03] DOCUMENT.NO: Mon 4/16/2012 12:26 PM154 NO: Document. no: Office; NO: Document. no: Ed: Hans Rustad; NO: Document. no: Nina HjerpsetĂ˜stlie [05] DEMOKRATEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:26 PM155 NO: Demokraten; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Tomm Pedersen; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Helge Solheim; NO: Demokraten: Ed: Tom Raae; NO: Demokraten: Journ: Arne Borresen [19] DRAMMENS TIDDENDE: Mon 4/16/2012 12:39 PM [SS]156 NO: DrammensTidende: Ed: Monica Lid; NO: DrammensTidende: Arild Hansen; NO: DrammensTidende: Lars Johnsen; NO: DrammensTidende: Alf Petter Overli; NO: DT: Lars Arntzen; NO: DrammensTidende: Inger Boldvik; NO: DrammensTidende: Hege Ekholdt; NO: DrammensTidende: Marita Haugo; NO: DrammensTidende: Olav Lindteigen; 'NO: DrammensTidende: Ed: Geir Bore'; 'NO: DrammensTidende: Tips'; NO: DrammensTidende: Editor; NO: DrammensTidende: Ragnhild Connell; 148

[Bergensavisen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Buddstikka] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Dagbladet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 151 [Dagogtid] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 152 [Dagen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 153 [Dagsavisen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 154 [Document.NO] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 155 [Demokraten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 156 [Drammens Tidende] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 149 150

NO: DrammensTidende: Anne Dirdal; NO: DrammensTidende: Gro Ellingsgard; NO: DrammensTidende: Marianne Heimdal; NO: DrammensTidende: Tore Shetelig; NO: DrammensTidende: Henning Aarset; NO: DrammensTidende: Hege Bakken; NO: DrammensTidende: Ingvill Draegni [13] FINNMARKEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:39 PM157 NO: Finnmarken; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Ola Finseth; NO: Finnmarken: Ed; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Alf Jensen; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Kari Karstensen; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Torbjorn Ittelin; NO: Finnmarken: Ed: Rita Hagala; NO: Finnmarken: Henriette Baumann; NO: Finnmarken: Stian Hansen; NO: Finnmarken: Kjetil Sorenes; NO: Finnmarken: Kine Sandness; NO: Finnmarken: Anniken Sandvik; NO: Finnmarken: Tonje Solem [04] FJORDABLET: Mon 4/16/2012 12:39 PM158 NO: Fjordablet: Ed: Tormod Flatebo; NO: Fjordablet: Anna Wuttudal; NO: Fjordablet: Yngve Tolaas; NO: Fjordablet: Maria Hjelle [06] FJORDENES TIDENDE: Mon 4/16/2012 12:50 PM159 NO: FjordenesTidende: Ed: Erling Waage; NO: FjordenesTidende: Ed: Erling Wage; NO: FjordenesTidende: Kari Rasberg; NO: FjordenesTidende: Jo Carlson; NO: FjordenesTidende: Odd Drablos; NO: FjordenesTidende: Svanhild Breidalen [08] FJUKEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:50 PM160 NO: Fjuken: Asta Brimi; NO: Fjuken: Arve Danielsen; NO: Fjuken: Terje Randen; NO: Fjuken: Hans Kjosbakken; NO: Fjuken: Tom Solstad; NO: Fjuken: Ragnhild Brimi; NO: Fjuken: Vigdis Kroken; NO: Fjuken: Helene Skjakodegard [07] FJORDINGEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:50 PM161 NO: Fjordingen: Ed: Bengt Flaten; NO: Fjordingen: Ed: HansHolmoyvik; NO: Fjordingen: Ed; NO: Fjordingen: Inge Faenn; NO: Fjordingen: Sigrid Heggestad; NO: Fjordingen: Harald Vartdal; NO: Fjordingen: Ove Sveen [03] FORSIDEN: Mon 4/16/2012 12:59 PM162 NO: Forsiden; NO: Forsiden: Ed: Eivind Ljostad; NO: Forsiden: Ed: Vidar Udjus [23] FREDERIKSTADBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 1:02 PM163 NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Tips; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Espen Normann; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Heidi Jonassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Kristine Cheer; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Geir Eggen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Kristine Andreassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Svein Kristiansen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Anne-Lene Froland; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Roy Andersen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Thor Johannessen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Duty Off: Lill Mostad; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Jan Willadsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: MD: Peter Saugstad; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Anne-Lise Johnson; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: JDir: Lars Weberg; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Erlin Omvik; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Marianne Holoien; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Svein Jonassen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Frank Torkildsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ed: Erling Rewinding; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Thomas Arntsen; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Ole-Morten Vestby; NO: FrederiksstadBlad: Marie Jacobsen 157

[Finnmarken] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Fjordablet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Fjordenes Tidende] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 160 [Fjuken] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 161 [Fjordingen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 162 [Forsiden] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 163 [FrederiksstadBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 158 159

[18] FREMOVER: Mon 4/16/2012 1:04 PM [SS]164 NO: Fremover: Ed; NO: Fremover: Ed: Line Holand; NO: Fremover: Per-Helge Berg; NO: Fremover: Espen Eidum; NO: Fremover: Anders Horne; NO: Fremover: Terje Naesje; NO: Fremover: Ed; NO: Fremover: Ed: Terje Naesje; NO: Fremover: Frode Danielsen; 'NO: Fremover: Frits Hansen'; 'NO: Fremover: Else Marie Nordman'; 'NO: Fremover: Jan Teigen'; 'NO: Fremover: Ed'; 'NO: Fremover: Ed: Ann-Kristin Hanssen'; 'NO: Fremover: Roger Danielsen'; 'NO: Fremover: Ann-Kristin Hanssen'; 'NO: Fremover: Carl Naesje'; 'NO: Fremover: Ragnar Boifot' [05] FRIETEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:12 PM165 NO: Friheten; NO: Friheten: Knut Eide; NO: Friheten: Harald Reppesgaard; NO: Friheten: Svend Jacobsen; NO: Friheten: Peter Sandvik [05] GLOMDALEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:12 PM166 NO: Glomdalen; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Geir Christiansen; NO: Glomdalen: Ed; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Eivind Lid; NO: Glomdalen: Ed: Per-Erik Stomner [13] HA-HALDEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:12 PM [SS]167 NO: Ha-Halden: Hanne Eriksen; NO: Ha-Halden: Steinar Ostli; NO: Ha-Halden: Thorkil Lindskog; NO: Ha-Halden: Ed: Hans-Petter Kjoge; NO: Ha-Halden: Morten Paulsen; NO: Ha-Halden: Jan Erik Sorle; NO: Ha-Halden: Thomas Lilleby; NO: Ha-Halden: Redaksie; NO: Ha-Halden: Oivind Kvitnes; NO: HaHalden: Anne Tonnesen; NO: Ha-Halden: Jan Erik Sorlie; NO: Ha-Halden: Redaksie; NO: Ha-Halden: Ed: Bjorn Ystrom [06] HALLINGDOLEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM168 NO: Hallingdolen; NO: Hallingdolen: Olav Bothun; NO: Hallingdolen: Ed: Bjarne Tormodsgard; NO: Hallingdolen: Grete Sveinhaug; NO: Hallingdolen: Ed: Embrik Luksengard; NO: Hallingdolen: Kari Mette [06] HAMAR DAGBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM169 NO: HamarDagblad: Ed; NO: HamarDagblad: Jo Espen Brenden; NO: HamarDagblad: Ed: Tore Svensrud; NO: HamarDagblad: Hilde Berit Evensen; NO: HamarDagblad: Geir Aasen; NO: HamarDagblad: Anne Huuse [07] HAMAR ARBEIDERBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM170 NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Redaksie; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Anette Loberg; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Andre Arntzen; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Tips; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Henning Christensen; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Ole Lynsgstad; NO: HamarArbeiderblad: Ed: Carsten Bleness [43] H-AVIS: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PMC[SS] 171 NO: H-Avis: Marit Nilsen; NO: H-Avis: Eli Osland; NO: H-Avis: Knut Sandersen; NO: H-Avis: Kari Stautland; NO: H-Avis: Trine Varlo; NO: H-Avis: Kjell Oren; NO: H-Avis: Ed; NO: H-Avis: Ed: John Arne; NO: H-Avis: Gaute Hakon Bleivik; NO: H-Avis; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Trond Aase ; NO: H-Avis: Magnus Berning; NO: H-Avis: Oystein Eide; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Joran Gronstad; NO: H-Avis: Else Marie Hansen; NO: H-Avis: Roar Jacobsen; NO: H-Avis: Geir Kristiansen; NO: H-Avis: Knut Meland; NO: H-Avis: Ellen 164

[Fremover] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Friheten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Glomdalen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 167 [Ha-Halden] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 168 [Hallingdolen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 169 [Hamar Dagblad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 170 [Hamar Arbeiderblad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 171 [H-Avis] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 165 166

Marie Hagevik; NO: H-Avis: Truls Horvei; NO: H-Avis: Kare Kompelien; NO: H-Avis: Espen Lovvik; NO: H-Avis: Elisivi Nilsen; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Arnstein Olaisen; NO: H-Avis: Gro Lohne Sande; NO: H-Avis: Lillian Sortland; NO: H-Avis: Einar Tho; NO: H-Avis: Frank Waal; NO: H-Avis: Hans Ringodd; NO: HAvis: Gunnar Sortland; NO: H-Avis: Eva Sternhoff; NO: H-Avis: Einar Vestvik; NO: H-Avis: Alfred Aase; NO: H-Avis: Pal Berg; NO: H-Avis: Ronny Carlsson; NO: H-Avis: Dir: Jan Tore Hamnoy; NO: H-Avis: Oddveig Finshus; NO: H-Avis: Odd Grottland; NO: H-Avis: Rolf Hansen; NO: H-Avis: Carsten Kickstat; NO: H-Avis: Tone Lutcherath; NO: H-Avis: Kai-Inge Melkeraaen; NO: H-Avis: Ed: Torstein Nymoen [01] HONEST THINKING: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM172 Ole Jorgen Anfindsen [05] IDAG: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM173 NO: Idag: Tips; NO: Idag: Debatt; NO: Idag: Bjarte Ystebo; NO: Idag: Folk; NO: Idag: Redaksjonen [08] IABLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM174 NO: IABlad; NO: IABlad: Svein Samuelsen; NO: IABlad: Oivind Eriksen; NO: IABlad: Anre Vestreng; NO: IABlad: Roger Odegard; NO: IABlad: Anders Sandbu; NO: IABlad: Bjorn Bergerud; NO: IABlad: Anita Jacobsen [17] IJ: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM [SS], Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM [SS]175 NO: IJ: Karl-Martin Bakke; NO: IJ: Gunnar Bodahl-Johansen; NO: IJ: Grete Field; NO: IJ: Stale Kofoed; NO: IJ: Asgeir Olden; NO: IJ: Trygve Aas Olsen; NO: IJ: Marianne Barth; NO: IJ: Inger Brekke; NO: IJ: Erika Jahr; NO: IJ: Vigdis Larsen; NO: IJ: Brit Tangen; NO: IJ: Editor; NO: IJ: Editor: Frode Rekve; NO: IJ: Ivar Andenaes; NO: IJ: Jeanette Bertelsen; NO: IJ: Leif-Arne Danielsen; NO: IJ: Elisabeth Johansen; NO: IJ: Gro Nervik; NO: IJ: Knut-Tore Thorsteinsen [06] JARLSBERG AVIS: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM176 NO: JarlsbergAvis: Knut Evensen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Hege Dahle; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Ed; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Redaksjonen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Harl Rehn-Erichsen; NO: JarlsbergAvis: Lisa Lund Haga [02] JAERBLADET: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM177 NO: Jærbladet: Ed: Kjell Stangeland; NO: Jærbladet: Ed: Anne Hatlem [11] JOURNALISTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:21 PM178 NO: Journalisten; NO: Journalisten: Editor: Helge Ogrim; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Leif Gjerstad; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Glenn Slydal Johansen; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Martin Huseby Jensen; NO: Journalisten: Photographer: Birgit Dannenberg; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Bjorn Age Mossin; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Paola Thoner; NO: Journalisten: Admin: Inger Vardal; NO: Journalisten: Admin: Kari-Mette Rugland; NO: Journalisten: Journalist: Kathrine Geard [21] JOURNALISTLAG: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM[SS]179 NO: Journalistlag: Ketil Heyerdahl; NO: Journalistlag: Ina Lindahl Nyrud; NO: Journalistlag: Tore Sjolie; NO: Journalistlag: Hilde Tretterud; NO: Journalistlag: Anne Hilde Thue; NO: Journalistlag: Nina Borjesson; NO: Journalistlag: Sissel Haugan; NO: Journalistlag: Trond Idas; NO: Journalistlag: August Ringvold; NO: Journalistlag: Jahn-Arne Olsen; NO: Journalistlag: Stein Larsen; NO:

172

[HonestThinking] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [IDag] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [IAblad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 175 [IJ] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 176 [Jarlsberg Avis] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 177 [Jaerbladet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 178 [Journalisten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 179 [Journalistlag] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 173 174

Journalistlag: Bente Sabel; NO: Journalistlag: Stein Svendsen; NO: Journalistlag: Aslaug Watten; NO: Journalistlag: May Kjsenslie Anderssen; NO: Journalistlag: Trine Frydenlund; NO: Journalistlag: Knut Skaslien; NO: Journalistlag: Gunhild Mohn; NO: Journalistlag: Kristin Akselsen; NO: Journalistlag: Helle Kristin Fredheim; NO: Journalistlag: Leonard Nesdal [27] KLASSEKAMPEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM180 NO: Klassekampen: Ed: Bjorgulv Braanen; NO: Klassekampen: Mari Skurdal; NO: Klassekampen: Alf Skjeseth; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Brox; NO: Klassekampen: Emilie Ekeberg; NO: Klassekampen: Olav Ostrem; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Shanmugaratnam; NO: Klassekampen: Peter Johansen; NO: Klassekampen: Velaug Hobbelstad; NO: Klassekampen: Katrine Holmoy; NO: Klassekampen: Mimir Kristjansson; NO: Klassekampen: Pal Hellesnes; NO: Klassekampen: Line Simenstad; NO: Klassekampen: Kristin Haug; NO: Klassekampen: Sandra Lillebo; NO: Klassekampen: Astrid Meyer; NO: Klassekampen: Sissel Henriksen; NO: Klassekampen: Eirik Grasaas-Stavanes; NO: Klassekampen: Kjell-Erik Kallset; NO: Klassekampen: Lars Vegstein; NO: Klassekampen: Ase Brandvold; NO: Klassekampen: Magnhild Folkvord; NO: Klassekampen: Marte Eielsen; NO: Klassekampen: Guri Kulas; NO: Klassekampen: Dag Larsen; NO: Klassekampen: Amal Wahab; NO: Klassekampen: Tollef Mjaugedal [27] KVINNHERINGEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM181 NO: Klassekampen: Ed: Bjorgulv Braanen; NO: Klassekampen: Mari Skurdal; NO: Klassekampen: Alf Skjeseth; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Brox; NO: Klassekampen: Emilie Ekeberg; NO: Klassekampen: Olav Ostrem; NO: Klassekampen: Johan Shanmugaratnam; NO: Klassekampen: Peter Johansen; NO: Klassekampen: Velaug Hobbelstad; NO: Klassekampen: Katrine Holmoy; NO: Klassekampen: Mimir Kristjansson; NO: Klassekampen: Pal Hellesnes; NO: Klassekampen: Line Simenstad; NO: Klassekampen: Kristin Haug; NO: Klassekampen: Sandra Lillebo; NO: Klassekampen: Astrid Meyer; NO: Klassekampen: Sissel Henriksen; NO: Klassekampen: Eirik Grasaas-Stavanes; NO: Klassekampen: Kjell-Erik Kallset; NO: Klassekampen: Lars Vegstein; NO: Klassekampen: Ase Brandvold; NO: Klassekampen: Magnhild Folkvord; NO: Klassekampen: Marte Eielsen; NO: Klassekampen: Guri Kulas; NO: Klassekampen: Dag Larsen; NO: Klassekampen: Amal Wahab; NO: Klassekampen: Tollef Mjaugedal [17] LAAGENDALSPOSTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM182 NO: Laagendalsposten: Sentralbord; NO: Laagendalsposten: Terje Jensen; NO:Laagendalsposten: Irene Mjoseng; NO: Laagendalsposten: Tonhild Solberg; NO: Laagendalsposten: Brita Sorum; NO: Laagendalsposten: Lars Bryne; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stine Knudsen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Cato Martinsen; NO:Laagendalsposten: May Olsen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Jorn Steinmoen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Even Traen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Knut Hermansen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Marte Leland; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stig Mebust; NO:Laagendalsposten: Per Skoien; NO: Laagendalsposten: Jan Storfossen; NO: Laagendalsposten: Stale Weseth [01] LEVANGERISA: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM183 NO: Levangeravisa: Ed: Roger Rein [04] LOCAL RADIO: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM184 NO: LokalRadio: Post; NO: LokalRadio: Sigmund Holtskog; NO: LokalRadio: Erik FagernĂŚs; NO: LokalRadio: Susanne Hjelmeset

180

[KlasseKampen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Kvinnheringen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [LaagendalsPosten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 183 [Levangeravisa] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 184 [Lokal Radio] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 181 182

[04] MEDIETILSYNET: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM185 NO: Medietilsynet: Aase-Gunn Engø; NO: Medietilsynet: Gudbrand Guthus; NO: Medietilsynet: Dir; NO: Medietilsynet: Dir: Tom Thoresen [07] MORGENBLADET: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM186 NO: Morgenbladet; NO: Morgenbladet Ideer; NO: Morgenbladet Kroniik; NO: Morgenbladet Kultur; NO: Morgenbladet: Samfun; NO: Morgenbladet Bok; NO: Morgenbladet: Ed [04] MOSS AVIS: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM187 NO: Moss Avis: Ed: Pal Enghaug; NO: Moss Avis: Helge Kjoniksen; NO: Moss Avis: Ed: Sigrid Holmsen; NO: Moss Avis: Ed [02] NETTAVISEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM188 NO: Nettavisen: Ed: Gunnar Stavrum; NO: Nettavisen: Ed: Gunnar Stavrum [01] NEWS IN ENGLISH: Mon 4/16/2012 3:17 PM189 NO: NewsEnglish: Nina Burgland [31] NORDLYS: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM190 NO: Nordlys: Tips; NO: Nordlys: Danny Pellicer; NO: Nordlys: Are Medby; NO: Nordlys: Vigdis Bendiktsen; NO: Nordlys: Ragnhild Enoksen; NO: Nordlys: Egon HOlstad; NO: Nordlys: Asbjorn Jaklin; NO: Nordlys: Ola Solvang; NO: Nordlys: Sissel Wessel Hansen; NO: Nordlys: Stein Wilhelmsen; NO: Nordlys: Oddvar Nygard; NO: Nordlys: Ed: Anders Opdahl; NO: Nordlys: Helge Nitteberg; NO: Nordlys: Geir Tarnesvik; NO: Nordlys: Torgeir Braathen; NO: Nordlys: Anders Mo Hanssen; NO: Nordlys: Eva Hirsti; NO: Nordlys: Jostein Larsen; NO: Nordlys: Oyvnd Sundheim; NO: Nordlys: Tove Myhre; NO: Nordlys: Susanne Noreng; NO: Nordlys: Bjorn-Harald Larssen; NO: Nordlys: Marit Rein; NO: Nordlys: Guttorm Pedersen; NO: Nordlys: Oystein Barth-Heyerdahl; NO: Nordlys: Torkil Emberland; NO: Nordlys: Ragnhild Gustad; NO: Nordlys: Marte Hotvedt; NO: Nordlys: Tone Jensen; NO: Nordlys: Bengt Nielsen; NO: Nordlys: Lina Livsdatter [134] NRK: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM191 NO: NRK: CEO: Hans-Tore Bjerkaas; NO: NRK: Solveig Jolstad; NO: NRK: Grethe Gynnild-Johnsen; NO: NRK: Hege Grova; NO: NRK: Arne Helsingen; NO: NRK: Kristian Tolonen; NO: NRK: Unni Arnoy; NO: NRK: Otto Haug; NO: NRK: Heidi Pleym; NO: NKR: Solveig Jolstad; NO: NRK: Ulf Finsberg; NO: NRK: Kari Sorensen; NO: NRK: Geir Sjotner; NO: NRK: Reid Downie; NO: NRK: Bjorn Stuevold; NO: NRK: Eiliv Flakne; NO: NRK: Unni Arnoy; NO: NRK: Rune Moklebust; NO: NKR: Oddbjorn Rosnes; NO: NRK: Nina Einem; NO: NRK: Oyvind Lund; NO: NRK: Arne Helsingen; NO: NRK: Elisabeth Mjos; NO: NRK: Jon Branaes; NO: NRK: Sindre Ostgard; NO: NRK: Andreas Munkelien; NO: NRK: Christan Sommerfelt; NO: NRK: Reidun Martol; NO: NRK: Espen Graff; NO: NRK: Kristin Jynge; NO: NRK: Solveig Tvedt; NO: NRK: Kristina Thomsen; NO: NRK: Alf Hartgen; NO: NRK: Lars Kristiansen; NO: NRK: Egil Sundvor; NO: NRK: Gisle Knudsen; NO: NRK: Thomas Goodwin; NO: NRK: Siss Kvamme; NO: NRK: Ingrid Hafstad; NO: NRK: Grethe Haaland; NO: NRK: Svein Prestvik; NO: NRK: Ingrid Belt; NO: NRK: Oyvind Bye Separator; NO: NRK: Kjetil Solhoi; NO: NRK: Marit Holm Quist Fenn; NO: NRK: CEO: Hans-Tore Bjerkaas; NO: NRK: Olav Nyhus; NO: NRK: Anne Martha Moland; NO: NRK: Marius Lillelien; NO: NRK: Anne Britt Osland; NO: NRK: Turid Schnell; NO: NRK: Bjorn Stuevold; NO: NRK: Ulf Morten Davidsen; 185

[Medietilsynet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [MorgenBladet] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Moss Avis] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 188 [Nettavisen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 189 [NewsinEnglish] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 190 [Nordlys] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 191 [NRK] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 186 187

NO: NRK: Tone Kunst; NO: NRK: Lars Alstadsaeter; NO: NRK: Gro Stenvik; NO: NRK: Oyvind Vasaasen; NO: NRK: Sissel Bjornstad; NO: NRK: Anne Oye; NO: NRK: Henning Olstad; NO: NRK: Merete Verstad; NO: NRK: Vigdis Holmaas; NO: NRK: Svein Haaland; NO: NKR: Odd Fosse; NO: NRK: Torill Olsen; NO: NRK: Runar Ostmo; NO: NRK: Siv Sandvik; NO: NRK: Turid Schnell; NO: NRK: Nicolai Flesjo; NO: NRK: Frank Gander; NO: NRK: Rolf Brandrud; NO: NRK: Siri Antonsen; NO: NRK: Gro Skjensvold; NO: NRK: Chris Carlsen; NO: NRK: Ingebjorg Berdal; NO: NRK: Marit Moi; NO: NRK: Hanna Thorsen; NO: NRK: Bente Hakerud; NO: NRK: Turid Gronlund; NO: NRK: Line Ostby; NO: NRK: Bente Bjurholt; NO: NRK: Charlo Halvorsen; NO: NRK: Frank Hanssen; NO: NRK: Hans Rossine; NO: NRK: Kristin Johannessen; NO: NRK: Kari Jacobsen; NO: NRK: Lasse Bjornstad; NO: NRK: Sun Iren Bjornas; NO: NRK: Erik Berg Hansen; NO: NRK: Jonas Saetre; NO: NRK: Annika Biornstad; NO: NRK: Geir Hauge; NO: NRK: Sindre Ostgard; NO: NRK: Kent Eriksen Amara; NO: NRK: Anders Sarheim; NO: NRK: Pal Hansen; NO: NRK: Rolf Sanne-Gundersen; NO: NRK: Ragnar Christensen; NO: NKR: Inger Djupskas; NO: NRK: Kirsti Lium; NO: NRK: Pal Snoen; NO: NRK: Elin Mo; NO: NRK: Sigrid Gjellan; NO: NRK: Ida Kvissel; NO: NRK: Vegard Woll; NO: NRK: Christel Higraff; NO: NRK: Terje Dale; NO: NKR: Pal Hansen; NO: NRK: Reuben Sletten; NO: NRK: Cecilie Lyng; NO: NRK: Oivind Lahnstein; NO: NRK: Peter Wallace; NO: NRK: Mona Kvam; NO: NRK: Erik Bolstad; NO: NRK: Geir Bordalen; NO: NRK: Kristian Tolonen; NO: NRK: Ellen Rian; NO: NRK: Mette Bay; NO: NRK: Aslaug Undheim; NO: NRK: Rune Alstadsaeter; NO: NRK: Morten Stensland; NO: NRK: Mette Goplen; NO: NRK: Vibeke Haug; NO: NRK: Are Andreassen; NO: NRK: Grethe Higraff; NO: NRK: Hildri Gulliksen; NO: NRK: Hege Duckert; NO: NRK: Kristin Huseby; NO: NRK: Katrine Raade; NO: NRK: Tormod Kjensjord; NO: NRK: Runa Henriksen Jorstad; NO: NRK: Eva Stabell; NO: NRK: Frode Nielsen [10] NY TID: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM192 NO: Ny Tid: Tips; NO: Ny Tid: Post; NO: Ny Tid: Torbjorn Nilsen; NO: Ny Tid: Tonje Reiersen; NO: Ny Tid: Ed; NO: Ny Tid: Kim Bredesen; NO: Ny Tid: Rafia Zaheer; NO: Ny Tid: Ed: Ingunn Kacar; NO: Ny Tid: Ed: Dag Herbjornsrud; NO: Ny Tid: Camilla Heinesen [04] NYE TROMS: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM193 NO: Nye Troms: Ed; NO: Nye Troms: Bardu; NO: Nye Troms: Admin; NO: Nye Troms: Balsfjord [08] OA: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM194 NO: OA: Tips; NO: OA: Ed: Oivind Ludvigsen; NO: OA: Frode Klevrud; NO: OA: Ed; NO: OA: Anne Sletten; NO: OA: Ed: Jens Jenssen; NO: OA: Arne Ness; NO: OA: Ed [35] OSTLANDESTBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM195 NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Siri Zachariassen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Bengt Rosth; NO: OstlandestBlad: Jorgen Aas; NO: OstlandestBlad: Torbjorn Endal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Helge Gjessing; NO: OstlandestBlad: Tor Idland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Tore Kubberod; NO: OstlandestBlad: Una Oltedal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Odd Inge Rand; NO: OstlandestBlad: Lisa Rypeng; NO: OstlandestBlad: Knut Stenseth; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ole Kristian Trana; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Tom Ullsgard; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ed: Kay Pettersen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Christian Clausen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Ole Endresen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Anita Gjos; NO: OstlandestBlad: Carine Johansen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Mette Kvitle; NO: OstlandestBlad: Bernt Olsen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Vivi Rian; NO: OstlandestBlad: Gro Birgitte Roiland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Silje Stromland; NO: OstlandestBlad: Solveig Wessel; NO: OstlandestBlad: General; NO: OstlandestBlad: Inger Eidem; NO: OstlandestBlad: Rolf-Otto Eriksen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Karin Hastensen; NO: OstlandestBlad: Kari Klovstad; NO: OstlandestBlad: Lars Norsted; NO: OstlandestBlad: Stigg Persson; NO: OstlandestBlad: Terje Ruud; 192

[Ny Tid] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Nye Troms] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [OA] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 195 [OstlandestBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 193 194

NO: OstlandestBlad: Bjorn Sandness; NO: OstlandestBlad: Vidar Svinndal; NO: OstlandestBlad: Cathrine Wilhelmsen [23] OSTLANDSPOSTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM196 NO: OstlandsPosten: AdmDir: Havard Heimdal; NO: OstlandsPosten: Ed: Per Marvin Tennum; NO: OstlandsPosten: Rune Ostby; NO: OstlandsPosten: Bjorn Jakobsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Erik Werner Andersen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Sigfrid Kvasjord; NO: OstlandsPosten: Lasse Nordheim; NO: OstlandsPosten: Nils-Erik Kvamme; NO: OstlandsPosten: Terje Svendsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Gry Nordvik; NO: OstlandsPosten: Readers; NO: OstlandsPosten: Bjorn-Tore Sandbrekkene; NO: OstlandsPosten: Kjersti Bache; NO: OstlandsPosten: Elisabeth Losnaes; NO: OstlandsPosten: Sigrid Ringnes; NO: OstlandsPosten: Roger Sordahl; NO: OstlandsPosten: Ed; NO: OstlandsPosten: Erik Berge; NO: OstlandsPosten: Tips; NO: OstlandsPosten: Per Albrigtsen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Svend Einar Hansen; NO: OstlandsPosten: Siw Normandbo; NO: OstlandsPosten: Inger Lene Steen [50] OSTLENDINGEN: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM197 NO: Ostlendingen: Ed: Nils Kristian Myhre; NO: Ostlendingen: Ingeborg Roste; NO: Ostlendingen: Kjetil B Dahl; NO: Ostlendingen: Randi Helen Nodeland; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Harald Salberg; NO: Ostlendingen: Marianne Ostmoen; NO: Ostlendingen: Torgrim Bakke; NO: Ostlendingen: Knut Fjeld; NO: Ostlendingen: Anita Gotehus; NO: Ostlendingen: Trine Loken; NO: Ostlendingen: Cathrine Moystad; NO: Ostlendingen: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Nils Henning Vespestad; NO: Ostlendingen: Freddie Overgaard; NO: Ostlendingen: Ingrid Nylund; NO: Ostlendingen: Marit Arnesen; NO: Ostlendingen: Karin Sletten; NO: Ostlendingen: Ed: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Knut Vigdal-Olsen; NO: Ostlendingen: Marte Dalsegg; NO: Ostlendingen: Christoph Schmitz; NO: Ostlendingen: Bjorn Vidar Tasigtil; NO: Ostlendingen: Sigbjorn Kristiansen; NO: Ostlendingen: Guro Breck; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Morten Frengstad; NO: Ostlendingen: Rune Hagen; NO: Ostlendingen: Erik Moe; NO: Ostlendingen: Merette Netteland; NO: Ostlendingen: Kristin Sogard; NO: Ostlendingen: Wivi Westgard; NO: Ostlendingen: Gry Dornberg Olsen; NO: Ostlendingen: Liv Simensen; NO: Ostlendingen: Tore Rasmussen; NO: Ostlendingen: Erland Vingelsgard; NO: Ostlendingen: Ed; NO: Ostlendingen: Sol Osthagen; NO: Ostlendingen: Jan Morten Frengstad; NO: Ostlendingen: Arnstein Moen; NO: Ostlendingen: Sverre Viggen; NO: Ostlendingen: Tore Sandberg; NO: Ostlendingen: Anders Bronken; NO: Ostlendingen: Kjell Arne Fridtun; NO: Ostlendingen: Havard Lillebo; NO: Ostlendingen: Brynhild Mollersen; NO: Ostlendingen: Wenche Norberg-Schulz; NO: Ostlendingen: Ola Thorset; NO: Ostlendingen: Gard Oien; NO: Ostlendingen: Torill Kolbu; NO: Ostlendingen: Tunset; NO: Ostlendingen: Mali Hagen Roe [05] RADIO 102: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM198 NO: Radio 102; NO: Radio 102: Asbjorn Kallevik; NO: Radio 102: Terje Gronnigen; NO: Radio 102: Per Ivar Reine; NO: Radio 102: Egil Houeland [01] RADIO NYHETENE: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM199 NO: Radio Nyhetene [05] RADIODAGER: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM200 NO: RadioDager: Morten Scott Janssen; NO: RadioDager: Anne Nordheim; NO: RadioDager: Rolf Brandrud; NO: RadioDager: Ellen Rake Bergseng; NO: RadioDager: Wilhelm Haagensli [18] RANABLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM201 196

[OstlandsPosten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Ostlendingen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Radio 102] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 199 [Radio Nyhetene] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 200 [RadioDager] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 197 198

NO: Rana Blad: Ed; NO: Rana Blad: Ed: Kirsti Nielsen; NO: Rana Blad: Toril Alfsvag; NO: Rana Blad: Harald Mathiassen; NO: Rana Blad: Klaus Solbakken; NO: Rana Blad: Beate Nygard; NO: Rana Blad: Culture; NO: Rana Blad: Roger Marthinsen; NO: Rana Blad: Marit Ulriksen; NO: Rana Blad: Arne Forbord; NO: Rana Blad: Ingeborg Andreassen; NO: Rana Blad: Hedda Elvestad; NO: Rana Blad: Religion; NO: Rana Blad: Viktor Hogseth; NO: Rana Blad: Hugo Charles Hansen; NO: Rana Blad: Geir Vea; NO: Rana Blad: Anita Ravn; NO: Rana Blad: Siri Nybakk [11] REDAKTORFORENING: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM202 NO: Redaktorforening: Nordland: Jan-Eirik Hanssen; NO: Redaktorforening: Oslo: Kjersti Løken Stavrum; NO: Redaktorforening: Vestafjelske: Jan Inge Fardal; NO: Redaktorforening: Nils Oy: General Secretary; NO: Redaktorforening: Romsdal: Hallstein Vemøy; NO: Redaktorforening: Rogaland: Tom Hetland; NO: Redaktorforening: VeTeBu: Jan Roaldset; NO: Redaktorforening: Arne Jensen: Ass. Gen. Sec; NO: Redaktorforening: Oplandenes: Torbjørn Moen; NO: Redaktorforening: Trondelag: Tor Røed; NO: Redaktorforening: Ostfold: Øivind Lågbu [04] RINGLBAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM203 NO: Ringblad: Tips; NO: Ringblad: Net: Audun Jahren; NO:Ringblad: Ed: Oyvind Lien; NO:Ringblad: Dir: Bjorn Blaker [13] RINGSAKERBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM204 NO: RingsakerBlad: Ed; NO: RingsakerBlad: Kari Finsrud; NO: RingsakerBlad: Birgit Herud; NO: RingsakerBlad: Erik Lauretsen; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ole Johan Storsve; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ed: Ivar Bae; NO: RingsakerBlad: Gaute Freng; NO: RingsakerBlad: Jeanne Haland; NO: RingsakerBlad: Ole Rosenborg; NO: RingsakerBlad: Jan Rune Bakkeland; NO: RingsakerBlad: Torunn Henriksen; NO: RingsakerBlad: Eli Korsveien; NO: RingsakerBlad: Svein Sjolie [25] ROGALAND AVIS: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM205 NO: RogalandAvis: Anne-Marie Nygaard; NO: RogalandAvis: Erik Holsvik; NO: RogalandAvis: Henriette Gill; NO: RogalandAvis: Lars Einarsson; NO: RogalandAvis: Marius Vervik; NO: RogalandAvis: Ragnhild Naess; NO: RogalandAvis: Torborn Svendsen; NO: RogalandAvis: Oyvind Jacobsen; NO: RogalandAvis: Bengt Enersgard; NO: RogalandAvis: Frode Gjerald; NO: RogalandAvis: Hilde Urdall; NO: RogalandAvis: Karoline Reilstad; NO: RogalandAvis: Mona Byrkjedal; NO: RogalandAvis: Ole Nerheim; NO: RogalandAvis: Stein Roger Fossmo; NO: RogalandAvis: Tore Bruland; NO: RogalandAvis: Ed: Bjorn Saebo; NO: RogalandAvis: Bjorn Saebo; NO: RogalandAvis: Geir Sondeland; NO: RogalandAvis: Ina Steen Andersen; NO: RogalandAvis: Kjersti Riiber; NO: RogalandAvis: Pa Traden; NO: RogalandAvis: Rasmus Sommerseth; NO: RogalandAvis: Thor Erik Waage; NO: RogalandAvis: Oyvind Ellingsen [40] ROMERIKESBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM206 NO: RomerikesBlad: Ed; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lars Hansen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Bernhus; NO: RomerikesBlad: Torstein Davidsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Alexander Gjermundshaug; NO: RomerikesBlad: Trond Henriksen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Roar Lokken; NO: RomerikesBlad: Jan Schei; NO: RomerikesBlad: Brede Wardrum; NO: RomerikesBlad: Marit Anderssen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Hege Paulsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Caroline Bjerkland; NO: RomerikesBlad: Nina Skyrud; NO: RomerikesBlad: Pal Eskas; NO: RomerikesBlad: Thor Woje; NO: RomerikesBlad: Arne Kongsnes; NO: RomerikesBlad: Espen Bolstad; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Fjellvang; NO: RomerikesBlad: Arnfinn Hanssen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Bjorn Johnsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Knut Nadheim; NO: RomerikesBlad: 201

[RanaBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Redaktorforening] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [RingBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 204 [RingsakerBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 205 [Rogaland Avis] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 206 [RomerikesBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 202 203

Hallgeir Skjelstad; NO: RomerikesBlad: Rune Westengen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Ola Einbu; NO: RomerikesBlad: Marianne Tonsberg; NO: RomerikesBlad: Oyvind Larsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Per Stokkebrun; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lesers; NO: RomerikesBlad: Lars Lier; NO: RomerikesBlad: Stig Bakke; NO: RomerikesBlad: Karoline Carlsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Thor Fremmerlid; NO: RomerikesBlad: Helle Karterud; NO: RomerikesBlad: Hans Nyborg; NO: RomerikesBlad: Elin Svendsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Tom Gustavsen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Tina Oppen; NO: RomerikesBlad: Jessheim; NO: RomerikesBlad: Elisabeth Lunder; NO: RomerikesBlad: Kjell Aasum [30] ROMSDALSBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM207 NO: RomsdalsB: Renate Gilde; NO: RomsdalsB: Ingrid Cruz; NO: RomsdalsB: Therese Rostberg; NO: RomsdalsB: Oddbjorn Harnes; NO: RomsdalsB: Olav Skjegstad; NO: RomsdalsB: Torill Skuseth; NO: RomsdalsB: Egil Torvik; NO: RomsdalsB: Per Kristian Bratteng; NO: RomsdalsB: Agnar Gendem; NO: RomsdalsB: Carl Indbjor; NO: RomsdalsB: Oyvind Brunvoll; NO: RomsdalsB: Bjorg Hovde; NO: RomsdalsB: Bente Tovan; NO: RomsdalsB: Eirik Heen; NO: RomsdalsB: Svein Bjornerem; NO: RomsdalsB: Vera Saether; NO: RomsdalsB: Richard Nergaard; NO: RomsdalsB: Bjorn Brunvoll; NO: RomsdalsB: Heine Marit; NO: RomsdalsB: Stian Viken; NO: RomsdalsB: Jan Inge Tomren; NO: RomsdalsB: Gjermund Kjopstad; NO: RomsdalsB: Kjell Langmyren; NO: RomsdalsB: Anita Vingen; NO: RomsdalsB: Jan Roe; NO: RomsdalsB: Per Tveeikrem; NO: RomsdalsB: Iver Gjelstenli; NO: RomsdalsB: Alf Vidar Ebbestad; NO: RomsdalsB: Ole Welde; NO: RomsdalsB: Marianne Hjelset [31] SANDEFJORDSBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM208 NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ed: Jan Roaldset; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Olaf Akselsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kristin Bjorntvedt; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Bjorn Ivar Erlandsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Tom-Erling Hem; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kurt Hoyessen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Atle Moller; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Roaldset; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Laars Schei; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Eli Torud; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ole Sigurd; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ed: Vibeke Bjerkaas; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Geir Baarnes; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Oddvar Borve; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Kare Gasholt; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Flemming Hofmann Tveitan; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Vibeke Jorgensen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Eric Moller; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Asle Rowe; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jarle Sor-Reime; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Tone Ude; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Jan Abrahamsen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Vibeke Bjerkaas; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Maja Christense; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Anders Hasle; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Merete Holtan; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Per Langevei; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Paal Nygaard; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Ann Saastad; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Dag Sorensen; NO: SandefjordsBlad: Steinar Ulrichsen [03] SARPSBORGA: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM209 NO: SarpsborgA: Eirik Moe; NO: SarpsborgA: Bernt Lyngstad; NO: SarpsborgA: Editor [16] SOGNAVIS: Mon 4/16/2012 2:40 PM210 NO: SognAvis: Rec; NO: SognAvis: Ed: Eli Grotle; NO: SognAvis: Sigrid Svartefoss; NO: SognAvis: Jan Fimreite; NO: SognAvis: Renate Sael; NO: SognAvis: Hanne Stedje; NO: SognAvis: Ed; NO: SognAvis: Eirik Thue; NO: SognAvis: Kai Brekke; NO: SognAvis: Marian Skau; NO: SognAvis: Kjell Eldegard; NO: SognAvis: Ed: Jan Fardal; NO: SognAvis: Terje Eggum; NO: SognAvis: Morten Sortland; NO: SognAvis: Gunnar Kleven; NO: SognAvis: Keth Oren [02] STRANDBUEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM211 NO: Strandbuen: Ed; NO: Strandbuen: Gaute Henriksen

207

[RomsdalsBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [SandefjordsBlad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [SarpsborgA] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 210 [SognAvis] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 211 [Strandbuen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 208 209

[26] SUNNMORSPOSTEN: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM212 NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Leser; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Sindre Halkjelsvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Sissel Bigset; NO: Sunnmorsposten: HIlde Hovik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Johan Behrentz; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Inger Otterlei; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Mona Skjong; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Svein Aam; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Culture; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed: Hanna Berg; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jan Erik Rosvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Olav Rise; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jan Albertsen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Helge Gloppen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Olav Sindre Rise; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Lars Skrede; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Stig Vagnes; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Reporting; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Ed: Tormod Utne; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Kristin Knudsen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Jorn Egset; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Arne Andersen; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Frode Kleiveland; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Peter Sandvik; NO: Sunnmorsposten: Karl Vatne [05] TIDENSKRAV: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM213 NO: TidensKrav: Ed; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Bent Botten; NO: TidensKrav: Dir: Per Brochmann; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Ole Alnaes; NO: TidensKrav: Ed: Tore Dyrnes [03] THE LOCAL: Mon 4/16/2012 3:32 PM214 NO: TheLocal: Ed: Paul O'Mahony; NO: TheLocal: William Koichevski; NO: TheLocal: Ed: James Savage [57] TONSBERGBLAD: Mon 4/16/2012 2:12 PM215 NO: TonsbergBlad: Dir: Oystein Hjornevik; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Kristin Monstad Lund; NO: TonsbergBlad: Lena Malnes; NO: TonsbergBlad: Arnt-Einar Revetal; NO: TonsbergBlad: Harald Stromnaes; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anne Torressen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Sidsel Winding-Stavseth; NO: TonsbergBlad: Terje Baro; NO: TonsbergBlad: Hakon Borud; NO: TonsbergBlad: Per Gilding; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anette Haldorsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kirvil Haberg Allum; NO: TonsbergBlad: Paul Jensen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Lars Doyle Larssen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Editor; NO: TonsbergBlad: Suzanne Kristoffersen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Solfrid Bjerkeskaug; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kirsten Sand; NO: TonsbergBlad: Hans Christian Moen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Marie Olaussen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Morten Wang; NO: TonsbergBlad: Linn Mathisen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anne Charlotte Schjoll; NO: TonsbergBlad: Harald Syvertsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Vegar Vatn; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind WindingStavseth; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ellen Bering; NO: TonsbergBlad: Caissa Gjolberg; NO: TonsbergBlad: Thor Johan Hallin; NO: TonsbergBlad: Gunnar Iversen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Jon Cato Landsverk; NO: TonsbergBlad: Aleksander Lee Olsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Kristin Svensen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Janne Bjergli; NO: TonsbergBlad: Knut-Erik Lahn; NO: TonsbergBlad: Tom Gjermundsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Debate; NO: TonsbergBlad: Erik Munsterhjelm; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ed: Erik Wold Aunemo; NO: TonsbergBlad: Arne Lysne; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oivind Munkas; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind Skavhellen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Oyvind Saetre; NO: TonsbergBlad: Terje Wilhelmsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Anja Jasinski Wright; NO: TonsbergBlad: Marit Borgen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Morten Borsum; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ralf Haga; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ove Hustadbraten; NO: TonsbergBlad: Robert Jamieson; NO: TonsbergBlad: An-Magritt Larsen; NO: TonsbergBlad: Asbjorn Olav Lien; NO: TonsbergBlad: SvenErik Syrstad; NO: TonsbergBlad: Emira Holmoy; NO: TonsbergBlad: Ann Iren Ljone; NO: TonsbergBlad: Trond Lunde; NO: TonsbergBlad: Tone Finsrud [22] TROMSFOLKEBLADET: Mon 4/16/2012 2:12 PM216

212

[Sunnmorsposten] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Tidens Krav] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [The Local] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 215 [Tonsberg Blad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 216 [Troms Folkeblad] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 213 214

NO: TromsFolkeblad: Vidar Bjorkli; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Heidi Moen Jacobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Blindheim; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Trond Sondnes; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Jan-Erik Bergstad; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Reidar Ingebrigtsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: May-Britt Kjosnes; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Trude Morkved; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Knut Aune; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Joran Kristensen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Jakobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Maria Simonsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Morten Dokka; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Ronny Traelvik; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Raymond Larsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Steinulf Henriksen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Rune Rene Kristiansen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Kjell Sorlie; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Silje Haugen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stine Jacobsen; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Stian Andre Lund; NO: TromsFolkeblad: Eirik Dahl [22] TROMSO: Mon 4/16/2012 2:12 PM217 NO: Tromso: Torbjorn Karlsen; NO: Tromso: Carina Hansen; NO: Tromso: Ed: Jorn Skoglund; NO: Tromso: Editor: Mortenr Albertsen; NO: Tromso: Tips; NO: Tromso: Bente Simonsen; NO: Tromso: Helge Matland; NO: Tromso: Kine Hanssen; NO: Tromso: Journ: Thor Angelsen; NO: Tromso: Ed: Jonny Hansen; NO: Tromso; NO: Tromso: Kjetil Vik; NO: Tromso: John Strandmo; NO: Tromso: Jorn Pedersen; NO: Tromso: Camilla Solheim; NO: Tromso: Inger Thuen; NO: Tromso: Christer Pedersen; NO: Tromso: Asgeir Johansen; NO: Tromso: Journ: Gurdun Gulldahl; NO: Tromso: Ed: Trond Haaksensen; NO: Tromso: Byline; NO: Tromso: Petter Strom [51] TRONDER AVISA: Mon 4/16/2012 2:12 PM[SS]218 NO: TronderAvisa: Terje Solberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Tore Vikan; NO: TronderAvisa: Normann Ryan; NO: TronderAvisa: Stein Aa Olsen; NO: TronderAvisa: John Arnt Nesgard; NO: TronderAvisa: Arve Loberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Espen Leirset; NO: TronderAvisa: Stig A Kristiansen; NO: TronderAvisa: Bjorn Sigurd Larsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Erling Koldaas; NO: TronderAvisa: Geir Jenshus; NO: TronderAvisa: Gaute Ulvik Haugan; NO: TronderAvisa: Lene-Mari Flaamo; NO: TronderAvisa: Goril Engesvik; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Bjornar Tromsdal; NO: TronderAvisa: Harald Saeteroy; NO: TronderAvisa: Kjetil Skaufel; NO: TronderAvisa: Ingvild Radwan; NO: TronderAvisa: Hakon Okkenhaug; NO: TronderAvisa: Per-Magne Midjo; NO: TronderAvisa: Olav Lorentsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Paul Ola Kjerkreit; NO: TronderAvisa: Hanne Heggdal; NO: TronderAvisa: Roar A Fordal; NO: TronderAvisa: Svein Falstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Joar Borstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Tone Berg; NO: TronderAvisa: Hakon Arntsen; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Arnulf Gotvasli; NO: TronderAvisa: Vigdis Devik; NO: TronderAvisa: Trond Bliko; NO: TronderAvisa: Sigrun Bakken; NO: TronderAvisa: Harald Hustad; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Heidi Stiklestad; NO: TronderAvisa: Dir: Arve Loberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Anders Nordmeland; NO: TronderAvisa: Stian Manka; NO: TronderAvisa: Tormod Lingeberg; NO: TronderAvisa: Steinar Kvarme; NO: TronderAvisa: Nina Kjeoy; NO: TronderAvisa: Guri Hjulstad; NO: TronderAvisa: Gunn Magni Galaaen; NO: TronderAvisa: Jon Age Fiskum; NO: TronderAvisa: Maj-Britt Bruheim; NO: TronderAvisa: Havard Bartnes; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: John Arne Moen; NO: TronderAvisa: Ed: Arnulf Gotvasli; NO: TronderAvisa: Ellen Marie Stollen; NO: TronderAvisa: Anders Setten; NO: TronderAvisa: Johan Prestvik

[23] TV2: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM[SS]219 NO: TV2: Svein Lian; NO: TV2: Kjell Persen; NO: TV2: Kjersti Johannessen; NO: TV2: Lars Barth Heyerdahl; NO: TV2: Elin Sorsdahl; NO: TV2: Kjell Persen; NO: TV2: Espen Eide; NO: TV2: Kristian Ervik; NO: TV2: Day Stamnes; NO: TV2: Bent Skjaerstad; NO: TV2: Bjørn Carlsen; NO: TV2: Geir Hakonsund; NO: TV2: Kadafi Zaman; NO: TV2: Find Erik Robstad; NO: TV2: Anja Nygren Lohne; NO: TV2: Anne Huso; NO: TV2: Robin Krüger; NO: TV2: Jens Christian Norve; NO: TV2: Asbjorn Oyhovden; NO: TV2: Bjorn Carlsen; 'Birger Henriksen'; 'Margaret Stakkestad'; 'Birthe Hansen Steen'

[55] VARDEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM [SS]220

217

[Tromso] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Tronder Avisa] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [TV2] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 220 [Varden] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute 218 219

NO: Varden: Frederik Nordahl; NO: Varden: Arnt Lundholt; NO: Varden: Tore Svarverud; NO: Varden: Tom Weber; NO: Varden: Ed: Culture: Anne Spanem; NO: Varden: Ed: Lars Kise; NO: Varden: MD: Jan Arild Tveten; NO: Varden: Rolf Jensen; NO: Varden: Gro Hogli; NO: Varden: Jon-Inge Hansen; NO: Varden: Tor Arvid Gundersen; NO: Varden: Olav Boe; NO: Varden: Bjorn Borge; NO: Varden: Halvor Wolves; NO: Varden: Andreas Soltvedt; NO: Varden: Gagnhild Johansen; NO: Varden: Jan Tangvald; NO: Varden: Gary Payton; NO: Varden: Nils-Tore Olsen; NO: Varden: Arve Moen; NO: Varden: Morten Skifjeld; NO: Varden: Jan Taranrod; NO: Varden: Birte Ulveseth; NO: Varden: Public Ed: Geir Roang; NO: Varden: EdDir: Lasse Johannessen; NO: Varden: Editorial, NO: Varden: Elisabeth Hvitsten; NO: Varden: Lena Beathe Jakobsen; NO: Varden: Marianne Halling Forest; NO: Varden: Kari Gisholt; NO: Varden: Lars Martin Borlaug; NO: Varden: Kristin Berge; NO: Varden: Karina Hagen; NO: Varden: Silvie Rui Fedog; NO: Varden: Tom Arne; NO: Varden: Jane Berge; NO: Varden: Aslak Thorsen; NO: Varden: Morten Small-Hagen; NO: Varden: Kjell Aulie; NO: Varden: Andre Stromodden; NO: Varden: Helge Ottesen; NO: Varden: Martin Oyvang; NO: Varden: Ed: News: Tom Erik Thorsen; NO: Varden: Ed: Bjornar Larsen; NO: Varden: FinMng: Petter Grotnes; NO: Varden: Jeanette Tall; NO: Varden: Aashiled Hvidsten Langaas; NO: Varden: Pal Egil Tornholm; NO: Varden: Bjorn Harry Schonhaug; NO: Varden: Knut Heggenes; NO: Varden: Anita Bjorbekk; NO: Varden: Silje Paulsen; NO: Varden: Magne Olsen; NO: Varden: Paul Lundholt; NO: Varden: Marit Schulstok

[11] VARINGEN: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM221 NO: Varingen: Truls Jarle Hansen; NO: Varingen: Knut Hjertaas; NO: Varingen: Liv Stubberud; NO: Varingen: Kristin Haagensen; NO: Varingen: Liv Seiff; NO: Varingen: Sigbjorn Hoidalen; NO: Varingen: Ed: Jan Fossen; NO: Varingen: Kari Tveoy; NO: Varingen: Tor Hjelset; NO: Varingen: Ann Berntzen; NO: Varingen: Ed

[53] VARTLAND: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM [SS] 222 NO: Vartland: Anders Brisa; NO: Vartland: Christian Nicolai Bjorke; NO: Vartland: Martin Eikeland; NO: Vartland: Øystein Franck-Nielsen; NO: Vartland: Lars Gilberg; NO: Vartland: Eiring Hegdal; NO: Vartland: Jan Arild Holbek; NO: Vartland: Rebekka Joswig; NO: Vartland: Reidar Kristiansen; NO: Vartland: Brita Kraglund; NO: Vartland: Heidi Marie Lindekleiv; NO: Vartland: Johannes Morken; NO: Vartland: Liv Riiser; NO: Vartland: Jarle Sanden; NO: Vartland: Halvor Stensrud; NO: Vartland: Mads Vegstein; NO: Vartland: Anne Lise Økland; NO: Vartland: Tips; NO: Vartland: AdmDir: Helge Simonnes; NO: Vartland: HQ; NO: Vartland: Debate; NO: Vartland: Ed: Reidar Kristiansen; NO: Vartland: Geir Bjartvik; NO: Vartland: Sverre Egner Bruun; NO: Vartland: Geir Ove Fonn; NO: Vartland: Signe Fæø; NO: Vartland: Arne Guttormsen; NO: Vartland: Per Anders Hoel; NO: Vartland: Trygve WJordheim; NO: Vartland: Britt Rogstad; NO: Vartland: Olav Solvang; NO: Vartland: Espen Utaker; NO: Vartland: Øyvind Woie; NO: Vartland: Une Bratberg, NO: Vartland: Ed: Olav Egil Aune; NO: Vartland: Bjørgulv K. Bjåen; NO: Vartland: Lars OFlydal; NO: Vartland: Erlend Friestad; NO: Vartland: Randi Hegle; NO: Vartland: Kristin Rosnes Holte; NO: Vartland: Jarle Kallestad; NO: Vartland: Kjell Kvamme; NO: Vartland: Marianne Lystrup; NO: Vartland: Vibeke Normann; NO: Vartland: Jon MLund; NO: Vartland: Astrid Norheim; NO: Vartland: Erling Rimehaug; NO: Vartland: Helge Simonnes; NO: Vartland: Marianne Tønnessen; NO: Vartland: Alf Kjetil Walgermo; NO: Vartland: Bjarte Botnen; NO: Vartland: PR; NO: Vartland: AdmDir: Ole-Jacob Mosvold

[22] VG: Mon 4/16/2012 1:40 PM[SS]223 NO: VG: Eva-Therese Grottum; NO: VG: Marianne Vikas; NO: VG: Lucas Weldeghebriel; NO: VG: Morten Hopperstad; NO: VG: Vidar Enerstvedtog; NO: VG: Marianne Vikas; NO: VG: Hanne Skartveit; NO: VG: Geir Arne Kippernes; NO: VG: Morten Hopper; NO: VG: Sigrid Svensen; NO: VG: Sissel Kruse Larsen; NO: VG: Jo Christian Oterhals; NO: VG: Ed: Espen Hansen; VG ; NO: VG: Bjornar Tommelstad; NO: VG: Geir Arne Kippernes; NO: VG: Dennis Ravndal; NO: VG: Ole Olsen; NO: VG: PR; NO: VG: Helje Solberg; NO: VG: Jarle Brenna; NO: VG: Torry Pedersen

221 222 223

[Varingen] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [Vartland] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute [VG] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute

Ref: Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 15 August 2012

Environmental Appeals Board1: Appeals of environmental information c / o Secretariat, Climate and Pollution PO Box 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no

Respondents: Chairperson: Berit Reiss-Andersen Sec./Exec. Officer: Inger-Johanna Hammer Disciplinary Committee The Norwegian Bar Association Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (post@advokatforeningen.no), IJ Hammer: (ijh@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe Disciplinary Board for Advocates Kristian Augustsgt. 9 0164 OSLO Tlf. 22 03 50 50 | Fax 22 11 53 25 Disciplinary Committee: (nemnden@jus.no) E-post: Judge Ernst Moe (ernst.moe@domstol.no)

Environmental Appeals Board, Request for Access to Environment Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Norwegian Bar Association’s AntiEnvironmental Printed Complaints Policy Disciplinary Complaints were filed against 170 Advocates in the Norway v. Breivik matter (4 with Disciplinary Board of Advocates (“Disciplinary Board”; 166 with Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee (“Disciplinary Committee”), by email. Complaints: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s EnvironmentPopulation-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud.

1

http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no/

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Both the Disciplinary Board and Committee responded that according to their complaints policy; they refuse to accept complaints submitted by email; all complaints must be submitted in hardcopy (printed and sent by landmail). [..] please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

All complaints must be submitted in writing and signed. [.. ] 4. The documents submitted should always be sorted and copied in duplicate. Send your complaint as an original by regular post and a filled-out and signed form of consent I subsequently filed a Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed with Disciplinary Board against Attorneys for Victims Families in Norway v. Breivik matter.

[3] The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and nonrenewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm]; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm’s] responded by refusing to provide their environmental decisionmaking justifications: “As previously mentioned, your potential complaints must be sent by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.”

I again requested: [3] The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and nonrenewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm]; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

[2] Please provide the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

They responded: As to your question on the "Complaints Environmental Principles", the Disciplinary Board does not have any such principles. We thus kindly ask you to follow the complaint procedure described to you in our previous e-mails. Your complaints will thus not be dealt with by the Disciplinary Board as long as they are sent by e-mail.

The Disciplinary Board will not answer further e-mails from you on this matter.

Relief Requested: An Order that the Disciplinary Board and Committee:

1.

Provide their Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to them; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

Respectfully Submitted

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ Encl:

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

From: Advokatforeningen [SS] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:16 AM To: Lara Subject: RE: Adv.For: Klage: Dear Ms Lara Johnstone, The Norwegian Bar Association’s Disciplinary Committee has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik.

Complaints concerning a lawyer’s possible breach of the Code of conduct for lawyers can be brought before the Disciplinary Committee as long as the lawyer is a member of the Norwegian Bar Association. If the lawyer is not a member, the complaint must be addressed to the Disciplinary Board.

The Disciplinary Committee’s handling of complaints is regulated by The Norwegian Bar Association’s bylaws § 13-1, cf. the Disciplinary Committee’s processing regulations.

We would like to point out that anyone whose complaint is based on a legal interest is entitled to file a complaint. In practice this means that the attorney’s client has a right to complain. Complaints regarding the other party’s attorney may also be filed. It is thus primarily the parties involved in a case that can file a complaint against a lawyer, as the complainant must have a direct connection to the circumstances that the complaint is built on. If the complainant has no such legal interest, the complaint will be rejected. A complaint may also be rejected if it is obviously baseless.

Based on the information received in your complaints, it seems like these are not in compliance with the legal interest- requirement.

Should you nevertheless uphold your complaints, please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Norwegian Bar Association does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

The following items should be included in the complaint: 1. Name and address of the attorney who is the subject of the complaint.

2. Indicate the date you became aware of the matter(s) that is/are the subject of the complaint.

3. Write why you believe the attorney has violated the rules of proper conduct and/or why you believe the demanded fee is too high. Provide a brief presentation of the factual circumstances. It is important, to the extent you can, that you provide dates for all events.

4. Enclose copies of letters and other documents that you believe are relevant to the complaint.

5. Complete an attorney complaint form with declaration of consent to the processing and handling of personal data.

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

The Norwegian Bar Association cannot process the complaint without a completed and signed attorney complaint form. Documents received without the complaint form attached will be returned to the complainant.

Please send two copies of the signed written complaint enclosed with any documentation you find relevant, in duplicate, and a filled-out and signed consent form in original to: Advokatforeningen Kristian Augustsgt. 9 NO-0164 Oslo Label the envelope “Disciplinary Complaint”.

Kind regards The Norwegian Bar Association From: Lara Johnstone Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:34 PM To: 'Inger-Johanna Hammer'; 'Baard Amundsen' Cc: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints' Subject: Den Norske Advokatforening: Berit Reiss-Andersen: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Chairperson: Berit Reiss-Andersen Sec./Exec. Officer: Inger-Johanna Hammer Comm: Baard Amundsen The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 E: ijh@advokatforeningen.no, ba@advokatforeningen.no CC: Disciplinary Complaints The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (post@advokatforeningen.no) Dear Ms. Reiss-Andersen, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed against Attorneys for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) : Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Thank you for the email from the Norwegian Bar Association’s Disciplinary Committee, dated Tue 6/19/2012 10:16 AM; in response to the 170 complaints I filed against Attorney’s for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter. In response, I request the following information: Request for Information: [1] List of Attorney’s I filed complaint against who are not members of the Bar Association, whose complaints cannot be handled by the Disciplinary Committee and require referral to the Disciplinary Board.

[2] The Bar Association ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Bar Association endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Bar Association be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Bar Association’s ‘legal interest requirement’?

[D] Is the Bar Association’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Bar Association’s decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the ‘Bar Association’s ‘legal interest requirement’ had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain ‘War is a Racket Military Industrial Complex’s centralisation of power and tyranny , founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide ‘Right to Breed’ and ‘Right to Vote’, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Bar Association’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway’s endorsement of the Legal Establishment’s use of Whores of the Court Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their ‘Whores of the Court’ Bullshit the public and the court with “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”?

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

[3] The Bar Association Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

ECHR: Rule of law requires adequately Precise and Accessible Legislation: In Lithgow & others v United Kingdom , the European Court of Human Rights held that the rule of law requires provisions of legislation to be adequately accessible and sufficiently precise to enable people to regulate their affairs in accord with the law: “As regards the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law”, it requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise domestic legal provisions (see, amongst other authorities, the alone judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, pp. 31-33, paras. 66-68).” [..]

Conclusion: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Bar Association support the due process principles; that 1. such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted 2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand ‘complaints’ procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Full complaint in attached PDF Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ From: Inger Johanne Hammer Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 10:03 AM To: Lara Subject: RE: Den Norske Advokatforening: Berit Reiss-Andersen: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10

Lara Johnstone, With reference to your e-mail below, and your previous 170 complaints send the Norwegian Bar Association's Disciplinary Committee last week.

Which lawyers that are members of the Norwegian Bar Association, can be found on the members list at the associations' website. We refer you to that list, where you can search up whether a lawyer is a member or not; http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Sok/Sok-imedlemslisten/ On your question regarding legal interest, we refer you to the Disciplinary Committee's Regulations ยง 3 and to our e-mail of June 19th where all relevant information has been provided. Should you have any questions in regards to the complaints system, you can find further information under this link http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/complaint-against-an-attorny/ As we already have informed you about, your potential complaints must be send by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Norwegian Bar Association's Disciplinary Committee does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

Med vennlig hilsen Inger-Johanne Hammer sekretรฆr / Secretary ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T + 47 22 03 50 50 E ijh@advokatforeningen.no www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no From: Lara Johnstone Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:04 PM To: 'Inger Johanne Hammer'; 'Baard Amundsen' Cc: NO: Lippestad: Tord; Crt: Victims: Siv Hallgren; Crt: Victims: Frode Elgesem; Crt: Victims: Mette Yvonne Larsen Subject: RE: Den Norske Advokatforening: Berit Reiss-Andersen: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Sec./Exec. Officer: Inger-Johanna Hammer Comm: Baard Amundsen The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

E: ijh@advokatforeningen.no, ba@advokatforeningen.no Dear Ms. Hammer, CC: Norway v. Breivik Defence (4) & Victims Family Attorneys (166) Many thanks for your email sent Friday, June 22, 2012 10:03 AM. My apologies. Last time I contacted the Norwegian Bar Association, they kindly informed me whether the individual was a Bar Association member or not. I thought this was a service you provide; but clearly I am mistaken. I imagine the majority of complaints filed are member of your Bar Association; and you are simply stalling for time to obstruct the procedure of addressing my complaints. Its very common masculine insecurity (reason and logic) legal behaviour when a lawyer does not want to address the facts in any individuals complaint. Nevertheless I shall do the search and confirm which are members of the Bar Association.

Re: Legal Interest & Bar Association Complaints Policy: You have not answered my request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) in terms of the Bar Association's Legal Interest and Complaints policies: I repeat: [2] The Bar Association 'Legal Interest' Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Bar Association endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Bar Association be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Bar Association's 'legal interest requirement'?

[D] Is the Bar Association's 'Legal Interest' Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Bar Association's decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the 'Bar Association's 'legal interest requirement' had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain 'War is a Racket Military Industrial Complex's centralisation of 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

power and tyranny , founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide 'Right to Breed' and 'Right to Vote', but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Bar Association's 'Legal Interest' Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway's endorsement of the Legal Establishment's use of Whores of the Court Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their 'Whores of the Court' Bullshit the public and the court with "psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts. the science behind it all is nonexistent"?

[3] The Bar Association Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

ECHR: Rule of law requires adequately Precise and Accessible Legislation: In Lithgow & others v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights held that the rule of law requires provisions of legislation to be adequately accessible and sufficiently precise to enable people to regulate their affairs in accord with the law: "As regards the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law", it requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise domestic legal provisions (see, amongst other authorities, the alone judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, pp. 31-33, paras. 66-68)."

Conclusion Repeated: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Bar Association support the due process principles; that 1. such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand 'complaints' procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ From: Advokatforeningen Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 12:43 PM To: Lara Subject: RE: Den Norske Advokatforening: Berit Reiss-Andersen: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Lara Johnstone, We refer to your e-mail below, and your e-mail of June 26.

As written in our reply to you dated June 22, all relevant information regarding the requirement of legal interest in accordance with the Disciplinary Committee's Regulations § 3 has been provided to you.

The Norwegian Bar Association cannot answer your many questions in this regard. It is the Disciplinary Committee that considers complaints against our members, and thus also considers whether or not the complainant has legal interest or not. Our information to you in this regard is based on the practice from the Disciplinary Committee and the Disciplinary Board.

We would nevertheless like to point out that the Disciplinary Committee is not a court; it is a body within the Norwegian Bar Association.

As to your question on the “Complaints Environmental Principles”, we do not have any such principles. We thus kindly ask you to follow the complaint procedure described to you in our previous e-mails. You complaints will not be dealt with by the Disciplinary Committee as long as they are sent by e-mail.

As all relevant information has been send to you in regards to the above mentioned, we will not reply to further e-mails from you on this same matter.

Regards, The Norwegian Bar Association

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Comm norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05

‘Lawyers are either social engineers, or they are parasites. Social Engineer Lawyers aim to eliminate the difference between what the laws say and mean, and how they are applied; whereas legal parasites aim to entrench their parasitism from the difference between what the laws say and mean, and the application of such differences to their parasitic benefit.’ - Prof. Charlie Houston, mentor of Justice Thurgood Marshall, Simple Justice: History of Brown v. Board of Education1 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 Chairperson: Berit Reiss-Andersen Sec./Exec. Officer: Inger-Johanna Hammer Comm: Baard Amundsen The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 E: ijh@advokatforeningen.no, ba@advokatforeningen.no CC: Disciplinary Complaints The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (post@advokatforeningen.no)

Dear Ms. Reiss-Andersen, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed against Attorneys for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)2: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment1

Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, the epochal Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and of black America’s century-long struggle for equality under law, by Richard Kluger; Random House (1975) (pp126-129) 2

http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Etiske-regler/Internasjonale-regler/CCBEs-etiske-regler-norsk/

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud Thank you for the email from the Norwegian Bar Association‟s Disciplinary Committee, dated Tue 6/19/2012 10:16 AM; in response to the 170 complaints I filed against Attorney‟s for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter. In response, I request the following information: Request for Information: [1] List of Attorney‟s I filed complaint against who are not members of the Bar Association, whose complaints cannot be handled by the Disciplinary Committee and require referral to the Disciplinary Board.

[2] The Bar Association ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Bar Association endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v 3 United Kingdom ) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Bar Association be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Bar Association‟s „legal interest requirement‟?

[D] Is the Bar Association‟s „Legal Interest‟ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Bar Association‟s decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the „Bar Association‟s „legal interest requirement‟ had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming4 Kaffir5 Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain6 „War

3

Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom (1986) * EHRR 329 § 110 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,ECHR,,GBR,3ae6b7230,0.html Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc 5 Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for „Kaffir‟: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.

6 Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace http://www.teachpeace.com/Report_from_Iron_Mountain.pdf 4

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

is a Racket7 Military Industrial Complex‟s centralisation of power and tyranny 8, founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide „Right to Breed‟ and „Right to Vote‟, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Bar Association‟s „Legal Interest‟ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway‟s endorsement of the Legal Establishment‟s use of Whores of the Court Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their „Whores of the Court‟ Bullshit the public and the court with “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”?

[3] The Bar Association Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

ECHR: Rule of law requires adequately Precise and Accessible Legislation: In Lithgow & others v United Kingdom9, the European Court of Human Rights held that the rule of law requires provisions of legislation to be adequately accessible and sufficiently precise to enable people to regulate their affairs in accord with the law: “As regards the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law”, it requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise domestic legal provisions (see, amongst other authorities, the alone judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, pp. 31-33, paras. 66-68).”

Act on the Right of Access to Documents in Public Administration (the Act). § 28 Disclosure requirement10: Access can be demanded in writing or orally. Access to information must relate to a specific cause or a reasonable extent, matters of a particular species. This does not apply when it is demanded access to a journal or similar registry.

Environmental Public11

7

War is a Racket, by USMC General Smedley Bulter http://warisaracket.org/dedication.html “In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.” -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60 9 Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom (1986) * EHRR 329 § 110 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,ECHR,,GBR,3ae6b7230,0.html 10 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20060519-016.html#28 11 http://ezcust0003.web1.dedicated99.no.webdeal.no/offentlighet_user/Miljoeoffentlighet 8

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

When products and activities that may affect the environment and health, we have the right to more information than usual, both from private and public. Check how you can go to the manufacturer, importer, dealer, municipal or a private company to get the information you are looking for.

LOV 2003-05-09 nr 31: Act concerning the right to env. Info. and public participation in decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law).12 § 10 The right to environmental information held by a public body13 (1) Everyone has the right to obtain environmental information from a public body, so framt information provided to the competent body or body of knowledge covered by the obligation under § § 8 or 9, and it is not exempt from the information right under this Act. (2) Environmental information is the competent authority when the information: a) is in the public authority itself, or b) held by a natural or legal person on behalf of the public authority.

(3) A request for environmental information may be rejected if it is too generally formulated or does not provide sufficient basis to identify the claim. Before a claim is rejected, the applicant shall be given reasonable assistance to formulate the request in such a way that it can be treated.

(4) If the requirements for access aimed at the wrong agency, it shall as soon as possible to forward the claim to the right authority or guidance as to which public bodies are believed to have information.

Conclusion: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Bar Association support the due process principles; that 1. such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted 2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand „complaints‟ procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Respectfully Submitted

12 13

http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

From: Advokatforeningen [mailto:post@advokatforeningen.no] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:16 AM To: Lara Subject: RE: Adv.For: Klage:

Dear Ms Lara Johnstone, The Norwegian Bar Association’s Disciplinary Committee has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik. Complaints concerning a lawyer’s possible breach of the Code of conduct for lawyers can be brought before the Disciplinary Committee as long as the lawyer is a member of the Norwegian Bar Association. If the lawyer is not a member, the complaint must be addressed to the Disciplinary Board.

The Disciplinary Committee’s handling of complaints is regulated by The Norwegian Bar Association’s bylaws § 13-1, cf. the Disciplinary Committee’s processing regulations.

We would like to point out that anyone whose complaint is based on a legal interest is entitled to file a complaint. In practice this means that the attorney’s client has a right to complain. Complaints regarding the other party’s attorney may also be filed. It is thus primarily the parties involved in a case that can file a complaint against a lawyer, as the complainant must have a direct connection to the circumstances that the complaint is built on. If the complainant has no such legal interest, the complaint will be rejected. A complaint may also be rejected if it is obviously baseless.

Based on the information received in your complaints, it seems like these are not in compliance with the legal interest- requirement.

Should you nevertheless uphold your complaints, please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Norwegian Bar Association does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

The following items should be included in the complaint: 1. Name and address of the attorney who is the subject of the complaint.

2. Indicate the date you became aware of the matter(s) that is/are the subject of the complaint.

3. Write why you believe the attorney has violated the rules of proper conduct and/or why you believe the demanded fee is too high. Provide a brief presentation of the factual circumstances. It is important, to the extent you can, that you provide dates for all events.

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

4. Enclose copies of letters and other documents that you believe are relevant to the complaint.

5. Complete an attorney complaint form with declaration of consent to the processing and handling of personal data.

The Norwegian Bar Association cannot process the complaint without a completed and signed attorney complaint form. Documents received without the complaint form attached will be returned to the complainant.

Please send two copies of the signed written complaint enclosed with any documentation you find relevant, in duplicate, and a filled-out and signed consent form in original to: Advokatforeningen Kristian Augustsgt. 9 NO-0164 Oslo Label the envelope “Disciplinary Complaint�.

Kind regards The Norwegian Bar Association

20/06/12 Nors Bar Assoc: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Ref: Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 15 August 2012

Environmental Appeals Board1: Appeals of environmental information c / o Secretariat, Climate and Pollution PO Box 8100 Dep, 0032 OSLO, E-mail: post@miljoklagenemnda.no

Respondents: Chairperson: Berit Reiss-Andersen Sec./Exec. Officer: Inger-Johanna Hammer Disciplinary Committee The Norwegian Bar Association Juristenes Hus Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo Tel: 22 03 50 50 | Fax: 22 11 53 25 Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (post@advokatforeningen.no), IJ Hammer: (ijh@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe Disciplinary Board for Advocates Kristian Augustsgt. 9 0164 OSLO Tlf. 22 03 50 50 | Fax 22 11 53 25 Disciplinary Committee: (nemnden@jus.no) E-post: Judge Ernst Moe (ernst.moe@domstol.no)

Environmental Appeals Board, Request for Access to Environment Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Norwegian Bar Association’s AntiEnvironmental Printed Complaints Policy Disciplinary Complaints were filed against 170 Advocates in the Norway v. Breivik matter (4 with Disciplinary Board of Advocates (“Disciplinary Board”; 166 with Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee (“Disciplinary Committee”), by email. Complaints: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s EnvironmentPopulation-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud.

1

http://www.miljoklagenemnda.no/

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Both the Disciplinary Board and Committee responded that according to their complaints policy; they refuse to accept complaints submitted by email; all complaints must be submitted in hardcopy (printed and sent by landmail). [..] please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

All complaints must be submitted in writing and signed. [.. ] 4. The documents submitted should always be sorted and copied in duplicate. Send your complaint as an original by regular post and a filled-out and signed form of consent I subsequently filed a Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed with Disciplinary Board against Attorneys for Victims Families in Norway v. Breivik matter.

[3] The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and nonrenewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm]; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm’s] responded by refusing to provide their environmental decisionmaking justifications: “As previously mentioned, your potential complaints must be sent by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.”

I again requested: [3] The [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and nonrenewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm]; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

[2] Please provide the [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and [Disciplinary Brd/Comm] environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

They responded: As to your question on the "Complaints Environmental Principles", the Disciplinary Board does not have any such principles. We thus kindly ask you to follow the complaint procedure described to you in our previous e-mails. Your complaints will thus not be dealt with by the Disciplinary Board as long as they are sent by e-mail.

The Disciplinary Board will not answer further e-mails from you on this matter.

Relief Requested: An Order that the Disciplinary Board and Committee:

1.

Provide their Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to them; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

Respectfully Submitted

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ Encl:

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater [mailto:nemnden@jus.no] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:26 AM To: Lara Subject: RE:

Dear Ms Lara Johnstone, The Disciplinary Board has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik.

The Board’s handling of complaints is regulated by chapter five of the Regulations for Advocates (Regulations) (Advokatforskriften). Complaints may in some cases be decided by the chair of the Board alone, cf. section 5-5 of the Regulations.

We would like to point out that anyone whose complaint is based on a legal interest is entitled to file a complaint. In practice this means that the attorney’s client has a right to complain. Complaints regarding the other party’s attorney may also be filed. It is thus primarily the parties involved in a case that can file a complaint against a lawyer, as the complainant must have a direct connection to the circumstances that the complaint is built on. If the complainant has no such legal interest, the complaint will be rejected. A complaint may also be rejected if it is obviously baseless.

Based on the information received in your complaints, it seems like these are not in compliance with the legal interest- requirement.

Should you nevertheless uphold your complaints, please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

All complaints must be submitted in writing and signed.

1. Indicate the date you became aware of the matter(s) that is/are the subject of the complaint.

2. Explain why you believe the attorney has violated the rules of proper conduct and/or why you believe the demanded fee is too high. Provide a brief presentation of the factual circumstances. It is very important, to the extent you can, that you provide dates for all events that are subject to your complaint.

3. Enclose copies of letters and other documents that you believe are relevant to the complaint.

4. The documents submitted should always be sorted and copied in duplicate. Send your complaint as an original by regular post and a filled-out and signed form of consent to:

Disiplinærnemnden Kristian Augustsgt. 9 NO – 0164 Oslo Label the envelope; “Disciplinary Complaint”.

The Disciplinary Board and the Secretariat are subject to a duty of confidentiality.

Kind regards, The Disciplinary Board From: Lara Johnstone 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:38 PM To: 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'; 'Judge Ernst Moe' Subject: Disciplinary Board Head: Judge Ernst Moe: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Head: Judge Ernst Moe Sec: Beate Sundstrøm Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden Kristian Augustsgt. 9 0164 OSLO Tlf. 22 03 50 50 | Tlf: 22 03 51 08 | Fax 22 11 53 25 Dear Judge Moe, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed with Disciplinary Board against Attorneys for Victims Families in Norway v. Breivik matter: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) : Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud Thank you for your email from the Disciplinary Board, dated Tue 6/19/2012 10:26 AM; in response to the 170 complaints I filed against Attorney’s for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter. I am awaiting response from the Disciplinary Committee to inform me which Attorney’s are not members of the Bar Association, whose complaints I am required to file with the Disciplinary Board. In the meantime, in response to the issues raised in your Tue 6/19/2012 10:26 AM email, I request the following information: Request for Information: [2] The Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Disciplinary Board endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom ) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Disciplinary Board be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Disciplinary Boards ‘legal interest requirement’?

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Disciplinary Board’s decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the Disciplinary Board’s ‘legal interest requirement’ had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain ‘War is a Racket Military Industrial Complex’s centralisation of power and tyranny , founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide ‘Right to Breed’ and ‘Right to Vote’, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway’s endorsement of the Legal Establishment’s use of ‘Whores of the Court’ Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their ‘Whores of the Court’ Bullshit the public and the court with “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”?

[3] The Disciplinary Board’s Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide the Disciplinary Board’s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Disciplinary Board’s; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide Disciplinary Board’s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints? [..]

Conclusion: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Disciplinary Board’s support the due process principles; that 1. such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted; 2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand ‘complaints’ procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Please see PDF for full detailed request including footnotes.

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:49 PM To: 'Lara Johnstone' Subject: RE: Disciplinary Board Head: Judge Ernst Moe: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Lara Johnstone, With reference to your e-mail of 20th of June, and your previous 170 complaints sent the Disciplinary Board last week.

A list of the Norwegian Bar Association’s members is available at;http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Sok/Sok-i-medlemslisten .

Regarding your question concerning legal interest, we refer to the Regulations for Advocates (Advokatforskriften) § 5-3 and to our e-mail of June 19th where all the relevant information has been provided. If you have further questions regarding our complaint system, you can find more information at http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/complaint-against-an-attorny/ .

As previously mentioned, your potential complaints must be sent by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

Regards The Disciplinary Board From: Lara Johnstone Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:05 PM To: 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'; 'Judge Ernst Moe' Subject: RE: Disciplinary Board Head: Judge Ernst Moe: Req for Env. & Health Info ITO S.28 and S.10 Head: Judge Ernst Moe Sec: Beate Sundstrøm Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden Kristian Augustsgt. 9 0164 OSLO Tlf. 22 03 50 50 | Tlf: 22 03 51 08 | Fax 22 11 53 25 Dear Judge Moe, Thanks for your email sent Friday, June 22, 2012 2:49 PM. As I wrote to the Disciplinary Committee: My apologies. Last time I contacted the Norwegian Bar Association, they kindly informed me whether the individual was a Bar Association member or not.

I thought this was a service they provide; but clearly I am mistaken. I imagine the majority of complaints filed are member of the Bar Association; and the Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board are simply stalling for time to obstruct the procedure of addressing my 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

complaints. Its very common masculine insecurity (reason and logic) legal behaviour when a lawyer does not want to address the facts in any individuals complaint. Nevertheless I shall do the search and confirm which are members of the Bar Association.

Re: Legal Interest & Disciplinary Boards Complaints Policy: You have not answered my request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) in terms of the Bar Association's Legal Interest and Complaints policies: I repeat: Request for Information: [2] The Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Disciplinary Board endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Disciplinary Board be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Disciplinary Boards ‘legal interest requirement’?

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Disciplinary Board’s decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the Disciplinary Board’s ‘legal interest requirement’ had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming Kaffir Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain ‘War is a Racket Military Industrial Complex’s centralisation of power and tyranny , founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide ‘Right to Breed’ and ‘Right to Vote’, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway’s endorsement of the Legal Establishment’s use of ‘Whores of the Court’ Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their ‘Whores of the Court’ Bullshit the public and the court with “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”?

[3] The Disciplinary Board’s Environmental Principles Decision-Making 15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

[1] Please provide the Disciplinary Board’s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Disciplinary Board’s; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide Disciplinary Board’s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints? [..]

Conclusion: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Disciplinary Board’s support the due process principles; that 1. Such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted; 2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand ‘complaints’ procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Please see PDF sent to the Disciplinary Board by email on 20. juni 2012 14:38 Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:38 PM To: 'Lara' Subject: RE: Disciplinary Board: Judge Moe: AG Ronning-Aaby | Arne Seland | Borghild Fjeld Gylvik | Ole Klanderud Lara Johnstone, Regarding your e-mail.

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

All relevant information regarding the requirement of legal interest in accordance with the Regulations for Advocates (Advokatforskriften) ยง 5-3 has been provided to you in our reply of June 22nd.

The Disciplinary Board's secretariat cannot answer your further questions in this regard. It is the Disciplinary Board that considers complaints against lawyers, and thus also considers whether the complainant has legal interest or not. Our information to you in this regard is based on the practice from the Disciplinary Board.

We would nevertheless like to point out that the Disciplinary Board is not a court; it is a board.

As to your question on the "Complaints Environmental Principles", the Disciplinary Board does not have any such principles. We thus kindly ask you to follow the complaint procedure described to you in our previous e-mails. Your complaints will thus not be dealt with by the Disciplinary Board as long as they are sent by e-mail.

The Disciplinary Board will not answer further e-mails from you on this matter.

Regards, The Disciplinary Board

15/08/12 Env. Appeals Board: Disc.Brd norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Norway v. Breivik

Case: 11-188627 MED-05

‘Lawyers are either social engineers, or they are parasites. Social Engineer Lawyers aim to eliminate the difference between what the laws say and mean, and how they are applied; whereas legal parasites aim to entrench their parasitism from the difference between what the laws say and mean, and the application of such differences to their parasitic benefit.’ - Prof. Charlie Houston, mentor of Justice Thurgood Marshall, Simple Justice: History of Brown v. Board of Education1 P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Cell: (071) 170 1954 Head: Judge Ernst Moe Sec: Beate Sundstrøm Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden Kristian Augustsgt. 9 0164 OSLO Tlf. 22 03 50 50 | Tlf: 22 03 51 08 | Fax 22 11 53 25 Disciplinary Committee: (nemnden@jus.no) E-post: Judge Ernst Moe (ernst.moe@domstol.no)

Dear Judge Moe, Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law) RE: Complaints filed with Disciplinary Board against Attorneys for Victims Families in Norway v. Breivik matter: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)2: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s EnvironmentPopulation-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

1

Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, the epochal Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and of black America’s century-long struggle for equality under law, by Richard Kluger; Random House (1975) (pp126-129) 2

http://www.advokatforeningen.no/Etiske-regler/Internasjonale-regler/CCBEs-etiske-regler-norsk/

20/06/12 Judge Moe: Disc. Brd: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Thank you for your email from the Disciplinary Board, dated Tue 6/19/2012 10:26 AM; in response to the 170 complaints I filed against Attorney‟s for Defendant (4) and Victims Families (166) in Norway v. Breivik matter. I am awaiting response from the Disciplinary Committee to inform me which Attorney‟s are not members of the Bar Association, whose complaints I am required to file with the Disciplinary Board. In the meantime, in response to the issues raised in your Tue 6/19/2012 10:26 AM email, I request the following information: Request for Information: [2] The Disciplinary Board’s ‘Legal Interest’ Decision Making Justifications: [A] Does the Disciplinary Board endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom3) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

[B] If so, if or when any Judge refuses to provide any applicant in any court proceeding that any Norwegian Lawyer is a participant in, with such prompt written response, it is the duty of honourable and ethical Lawyers to uphold the respect for impartial court due process proceedings to object to, and expose such discrimatory corrupt practices being practiced by a Norwegian Magistrate or Judge?

[C] In consideration for [A] and [B], could the Disciplinary Board be detailed specific about how and why it alleges that my complaints do not meet the Disciplinary Boards „legal interest requirement‟?

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board‟s „Legal Interest‟ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of the Human-Farming-EcoSuicide-Kaffir-Legal-Matrix?: Whether the Disciplinary Board‟s decision-making to allege that my complaint did not meet the Disciplinary Board‟s „legal interest requirement‟ had anything to do with silencing, suppressing or obstructing my legal applications to the court in this matter expoing the Human Farming4 Kaffir5 Legal Matrix: the Iron Mountain6 „War is a Racket7 Military Industrial Complex‟s centralisation of power and tyranny 8, founded on Kaffir Law/Legislation which provides citizens with the Inalienable Eco-Suicide „Right to Breed‟ and „Right to Vote‟, but demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a

3

Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom (1986) * EHRR 329 § 110 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,ECHR,,GBR,3ae6b7230,0.html Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc 5 Radical Honoursty Definitions of Kaffir are not Racial, but Behavioural: For Example: * ‘Kaffir Behaviour’: Cultural Beliefs and Procreation Behaviour Definition: Individuals who either independently or as a result of their cultural value systems, are incapable of, or unwilling to, practice sexual restraint and procreation responsibility; who consequently breed cockroach-prolifically without personal financial or psychological responsibility to, or emotional concern for, their offspring; and/or who abuse women and children as sexual or economic slaves procreated for such purpose; and/or whose cultural ideal of manhood endorses non-consensual sex (rape) as their sexual slavery entitlement, etc. * ‘Kaffir Etymology’: Original Etymological Definition for „Kaffir‟: The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a preIslamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till the earth and “cover up” the seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth.

6 Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace http://www.teachpeace.com/Report_from_Iron_Mountain.pdf 7 War is a Racket, by USMC General Smedley Bulter http://warisaracket.org/dedication.html 8 “In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce [the right to vote] universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.” -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60 4

20/06/12 Judge Moe: Disc. Brd: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, a Marxist/Capitalist Traitor Hunting licence, etc, etc.

[D] Is the Disciplinary Board‟s „Legal Interest‟ Decision Making an Endorsement of Censoring Exposure of Norway‟s endorsement of the Legal Establishment‟s use of „Whores of the Court‟ Psychiatrists for the purposes of White Supremacy cultural supremacy and social control; ignoring the reality their „Whores of the Court‟ Bullshit the public and the court with “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”?

[3] The Disciplinary Board’s Environmental Principles Decision-Making [1] Please provide the Disciplinary Board‟s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Disciplinary Board‟s; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[2] Please provide Disciplinary Board‟s Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for printed complaints; when even third world goverments and Bar Associations environmental policies allow courts and organisations to accept email complaints?

ECHR: Rule of law requires adequately Precise and Accessible Legislation: In Lithgow & others v United Kingdom9, the European Court of Human Rights held that the rule of law requires provisions of legislation to be adequately accessible and sufficiently precise to enable people to regulate their affairs in accord with the law: “As regards the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law”, it requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise domestic legal provisions (see, amongst other authorities, the alone judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, pp. 31-33, paras. 66-68).”

Act on the Right of Access to Documents in Public Administration (the Act). § 28 Disclosure requirement10: Access can be demanded in writing or orally. Access to information must relate to a specific cause or a reasonable extent, matters of a particular species. This does not apply when it is demanded access to a journal or similar registry.

Environmental Public11 When products and activities that may affect the environment and health, we have the right to more information than usual, both from private and public. Check how you can go to the manufacturer, importer, dealer, municipal or a private company to get the information you are looking for.

LOV 2003-05-09 nr 31: Act concerning the right to env. Info. and public participation in decision-making processes relating to the environment (environmental law).12

9

Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom (1986) * EHRR 329 § 110 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,ECHR,,GBR,3ae6b7230,0.html http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20060519-016.html#28 http://ezcust0003.web1.dedicated99.no.webdeal.no/offentlighet_user/Miljoeoffentlighet

10 11

20/06/12 Judge Moe: Disc. Brd: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

§ 10 The right to environmental information held by a public body13 (1) Everyone has the right to obtain environmental information from a public body, so framt information provided to the competent body or body of knowledge covered by the obligation under § § 8 or 9, and it is not exempt from the information right under this Act. (2) Environmental information is the competent authority when the information: a) is in the public authority itself, or b) held by a natural or legal person on behalf of the public authority.

(3) A request for environmental information may be rejected if it is too generally formulated or does not provide sufficient basis to identify the claim. Before a claim is rejected, the applicant shall be given reasonable assistance to formulate the request in such a way that it can be treated.

(4) If the requirements for access aimed at the wrong agency, it shall as soon as possible to forward the claim to the right authority or guidance as to which public bodies are believed to have information.

Conclusion: If an individual files a legal application to a Norwegian Court; does the Disciplinary Board‟s support the due process principles; that 1. such an individual has a right to a prompt and clear written response from the Court informing the applicant their legal application has been accepted or if not, whether further information is required or what is required from the individual for such legal application to be accepted; 2. When any legal applicant is denied such due process written response by the court; it is the honourable duty of all legal parties involved in the matter to uphold the respect for due process and the law, by demanding the Judge provide the applicant with a clear and written response to their application.

We live on a finite resource planet and not even Bar Associations have the right to believe that resources are infinite and to demand „complaints‟ procedures that require complainants to waste scarce resources, when alternative procedures exist that are more environmentally resource friendly.

Respectfully Submitted

Lara Johnstone Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/ 12 13

http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10 http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20030509-031.html#10

20/06/12 Judge Moe: Disc. Brd: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater [mailto:nemnden@jus.no] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:26 AM To: Lara Subject: RE:

Dear Ms Lara Johnstone, The Disciplinary Board has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik.

The Board’s handling of complaints is regulated by chapter five of the Regulations for Advocates (Regulations) (Advokatforskriften). Complaints may in some cases be decided by the chair of the Board alone, cf. section 5-5 of the Regulations.

We would like to point out that anyone whose complaint is based on a legal interest is entitled to file a complaint. In practice this means that the attorney’s client has a right to complain. Complaints regarding the other party’s attorney may also be filed. It is thus primarily the parties involved in a case that can file a complaint against a lawyer, as the complainant must have a direct connection to the circumstances that the complaint is built on. If the complainant has no such legal interest, the complaint will be rejected. A complaint may also be rejected if it is obviously baseless.

Based on the information received in your complaints, it seems like these are not in compliance with the legal interest- requirement.

Should you nevertheless uphold your complaints, please be aware that all complaints must be submitted in writing and signed, and send us as two originals by ordinary mail. We would like to emphasize the importance of sending your complaints by ordinary mail due to the fact that the Disciplinary Board does not accept any complaints sent by e-mail.

All complaints must be submitted in writing and signed.

1. Indicate the date you became aware of the matter(s) that is/are the subject of the complaint.

2. Explain why you believe the attorney has violated the rules of proper conduct and/or why you believe the demanded fee is too high. Provide a brief presentation of the factual circumstances. It is very important, to the extent you can, that you provide dates for all events that are subject to your complaint.

3. Enclose copies of letters and other documents that you believe are relevant to the complaint.

4. The documents submitted should always be sorted and copied in duplicate. Send your complaint as an original by regular post and a filled-out and signed form of consent to:

Disiplinærnemnden Kristian Augustsgt. 9 NO – 0164 Oslo Label the envelope; “Disciplinary Complaint”.

The Disciplinary Board and the Secretariat are subject to a duty of confidentiality.

Kind regards, The Disciplinary Board

20/06/12 Judge Moe: Disc. Brd: Req. for Access of Info norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr