12-12-06: Alien v. Afriforum: Concourt Justice: Appeal Registrar Refusal to Process Case

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 06 December 2012 Concourt Justices c/o Registrar of the Constitutional Court: 1 Hospital Street, Braamfontein, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 359-7400 || Fax: (011) 339-5098 Email: registrar@concourt.org.za

CC: Deputy Minister: Andries Nel, MP Private Bag X395, Pretoria, 0001 Tel: 012 - 406 4854 Fax: 012 - 406 4878 E-mail: deputyminister@justice.gov.za Priv. Sec: Ms. Joshna Govind (jgovind@justice.gov.za) RE: Appeal of Concourt Registrar‟s Refusal to Process My Concourt Application: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum et al.

At the 21st International Congress of the International Union of Judicial Officers (Sheriffs/Bailiffs)1, on 02 May 2012, the Deputy Minister of Justice stated that the justice system should aim to: (a) be just in the results it delivers; (b) be fair in the way it treats litigants; (c) offer appropriate procedures at a reasonable cost; (d) deal with cases with reasonable speed; (e) be understandable to those who use it; (f) be responsive to the needs of those who use it; (g) provide as much certainty as the nature of particular cases allows; and (h) be effective: adequately resourced and organised… and that the primary objective of the Civil Justice Reform Project (CJRP) is the simplification and harmonization of laws and rules to make justice easily and equally accessible to all, including and not limited to the following: (a) The effectiveness of the courts, their jurisdiction and capacity to deal with civil disputes; (b) Affordability and cost effectiveness; (d) Simplification of court procedures and processes; (e) Modernisation; the implementation of information technology initiatives for the civil justice system. Such initiatives to include the electronic filing of court documents, and electronic service of court processes (by fax, email, etc).

Bearing those ‗justice system‘ principles in mind:

Address by Deputy Minister Andries Nel, MP on the occasion of the 21st International Congress of the International Union of Judicial Officers (Sheriffs/Bailiffs): 2 May 2012, Cape Town: ICC http://www.justice.gov.za/m_speeches/2012/20120502_dmin_uihj.html 1

On 27 November I filed a Pro Se (Radical Honesty invocation of cultural law) Application for Review to the Constitutional Court Registrar per electronic filing (per email), as well as one printed hardcopy per registered mail.

On 28 November I telephoned the Registrar Ms. Stander with a request to provide me with a Case number for my application.

She responded: Like any other court, this Court may only respond to an application properly lodged in terms of the Rules of this Court.

The Rules require of you to lodge 25 hard copies at the Court. Lodging happens after the documents are properly served on all the Respondents.

Email notification is not proper service. Respondent may confirmed receipt of documents.

No Judgment from the other Courts are attached.

I responded by providing her with a copy of the SCA Judgement, and requested that she provide me with written reasons for her refusal to process my complaint on court letterhead. She provided such, subsequent to a request that was submitted to Concourt Director: Mr. Misser. (Annex A)

ORDERS REQUESTED: 1. Legal Aid: SA Lawyers decline to represent Radical Honesty culture 2. Registered Documents: 25 Copies: Request Environmental Justification for such Abuse of Resources 3. Radical Honesty Ecocentric ‗Normal‘ Electronic Service Filing to Respondents 4. Electronic Service Filing to Respondents Acknowledged as Received: Respondents 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, 10.

5. Request Orders for Respondents 08: CRL Rights Commission and 11: David Petraeus 6. Registrar‘s Refusal of Case Number indicates a Registrar‘s Office that discriminates at Pro Se and/or Radical Honesty culture Applicants.

[1] Legal Aid: SA Lawyers decline to represent Radical Honesty culture.

2

In accordance with the Registrar‘s suggestion on the issue of Legal Aid, I filed a request for Info2: Do you have any Advocates willing to serve as Legal Aid/Pro Bono Assistance of Counsel to a member of the Radical Honesty culture?, to the following Law Societies and Bar Associations: (a) Legal Aid: South Africa Ms. Vidhu Vedalankar (PDF3), (b) Jhb Bar Association: Pro Bono Committee: Chair: P F Louw SC (PDF4), (c) Pretoria Society of Advocates: Executive Secretary (PDF5) | KwaZulu-Natal: Pietermaritzburg Bar Council: Exec. Secretary (PDF6) | Society of Advocates KwaZulu-Natal (Durban) (PDF7) | Free State Soc. of Advocates: Executive Secretary (PDF8) | Cape Law Society: Director: Rampela William Mokoena (PDF9) | Free State Law Society: President: Mr. J Fouche (PDF 10) | Kwa Zulu Natal Law Society: Director: Gavin John (PDF11) | Law Society of South Africa: Co-Chairs: K. Govender & J Stemmett (PDF12) I also submitted the following request for info to Ms. Stander: ―Ms. Stander: Could you find out for me the answer: What if there are no lawyers in South Africa (as there have not been for the past 10 years), who are willing to represent someone from the Radical Honesty culture?‖ Pretoria Soc of Advocates: Adv. Francois Botes from the Pretoria Society of Advocates telephoned me on Sunday to state that he was not aware of any such Advocates, and agreed that an Attorney or Advocate was required to represent a client in accordance to their culture, but that he considered the matter to be more relevant to Johannesburg Society of Advocates.

Soc of Advocates of Kwazulu Natal (PMB): M G Roberts SC, Chairman of the Society of Advocates of KwaZulu-Natal: Pietermaritzburg Bar, responded that he had placed the request up on the notice board. (Annex B).

Soc of Advocates of Kwazulu Natal (Dbn): Adv LB Broster SC, responded on behalf of the Pro Bono Committee, stating it if the matter was approved for hearing by the Chief Justice, in terms of Rule 11, ―we can reconsider your application in the light of the directive. At this stage it would be premature to make any decision as to whether we can appoint an advocate to act on your behalf pro bono.‖ (Annex C)

http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2012/11/121130_barlaw1.html http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-29_legal_aid-vidhu_vedalankar.pdf 4 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-29_jhb_bar_assoc_-_pro_bono_comm.pdf 5 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_pretoria_society_of_advocates.pdf 6 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_soc_of_adv_kwazulu_natal_-_pmb.pdf 7 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_soc_of_adv_kwazulu_natal_-_dbn.pdf 8 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_free_state_soc_of_advocates.pdf 9 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_cape_law_society.pdf 10 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_free_state_law_society.pdf 11 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_kwazulu_natal_law_society.pdf 12 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-30_law_society_of_south_africa.pdf 2 3

3

[2] Registered Documents: 25 Copies: Request Environmental Justification for such abuse of Resources?

ORDER REQUESTED: The specific number of hardcopies required to be submitted to the Registrar, from a Pro Se applicant, and if more than one, the environmental justification therefore.

United States, including US Supreme Court Rules of Court provide different – less burdensome – rules for individuals who file their applications Pro Se. My application is filed Pro Se, but Ms. Stander appears to consider that there are no less burdensome rules in South African courts for individuals who file Pro Se. For example: The United States Supreme Court requires 40 hardcopies of applications, printed within specific ‗booklet‘ specifications for normal applications, whereas individuals filing In Forma Pauperis/Pro Se are only required to submit 10 hardcopies, which can be done in normal A4 printed style; and prisoners are only expected to submit one hard copy, which can even be written in pencil.

Secondly, as my application clearly states, I requested ―permission to invoke13 cultural law14 in S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18; to enable the Applicant to honour the duty and responsibility to uphold the -- Pay-Price-4-Peace Peacenik (PP4PP) consumption and procreation15 cultural values -- principles upon which her Radical Honoursty culture is based.‖ As detailed in the application, I am a PP4PP (Pay the Price for Peace Peacenik) member of the Radical Honesty culture, who strives to live my consumption and procreation lifestyle in accordance to a carrying capacity consumption footprint that is below the nation‘s carrying capacity.

There is a significant aggravating and cultural footprint burdensome cost to (i) the Environment and resource scarcity, (ii) resource war violence from resource scarcity, and (iii) consumption behaviour for a PP4P Consumption Peacenik; where Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) at 397: Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry.

14 SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: ‗1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group's right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.‘ 15 Application for Review Founding Affidavit Pay-the-Price-4-Peace One Child Per Family Procreation Credibility (para 80-81) and Pay-the-Price-4-Peace Consumption and Carbon Footprint Credibility (para 82-83) 13

4

any Organisation insists – without any Ecocentric Reasonable Justification therefore -- on a Printed as opposed to Electronic Complaints Policy.

Does the Department of Justice have any Ecocentric Reasonable Justifications for your Printed as opposed to Electronic Filing of Court Service Documents Policy; that justifies your policies significant aggravating and cultural footprint burdensome costs to (i) the Environment and resource scarcity, (ii) resource war violence from resource scarcity, and (iii) denial to a PP4P Consumption Peacenik to live in accordance to her PP4PP consumption behaviour.

Are 25 copies really necessary? Can they be environmentally justified? If the registrar, or court, is capable of informing me of the justifications for these abuse of environmental resources requirements, I shall print 25 copies, or a lesser number of copies, however in the absence of such justifications, I consider one hardcopy to be sufficient.

Environmental Perspectives on Printing vs. Electronic Policies: Lexis Nexis reports in Saving Trees One Page at a Time16, that ―between January 2008 and May 2012, by choosing to use File & Serve as opposed to traditional paper service, our customers have saved over 220,596 trees! That is equal to over 315 acres of trees or 612,769 feet of paper!‖ It also reported that ―a 2008 survey conducted by Arnold & Porter reported that a single attorney uses an average of between 20,000-100,000 pages of paper per year.

This is equal to approximately ½ of a tree and 2 ½ trees per attorney per year in 2008.‖ In 2009 there were approximately 18 000 attorneys practicing in South Africa. On an average of 1 tree per attorney, that amounts to using 18,000 trees, per year; because of court policies that demand Printed as opposed to Electronic Filing and Service Policies.

18,000 trees at an average of 10 trees per acre17, that would be 1,800 acres, / 740 ha / 5.5 miles Long and 1.5 to 2.5 miles Wide ~ 8.25 sq. miles of trees.

In ten years, that amounts to 180,000 trees, at an average of 10 trees per acre 18, 18,000 acres / 7,400 ha / 28,125 sq miles of trees.

ThinkBeforePrinting19 advocate: “We're not against printing. We're against wasting resources. We don't want to stop people printing. We simply think that sometimes, people, and not everyone, need reminding that wasting paper, ink and toner doesn't make economic or environmental sense. http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/fileandserve/blogs/industrynews/archive/2012/07/30/saving-trees-onepage-at-a-time.aspx 17 http://warnell.forestry.uga.edu/service/library/for96-054/index.html 18 http://warnell.forestry.uga.edu/service/library/for96-054/index.html 19 http://thinkbeforeprinting.org/ 16

5

Reduce.org provides the following factual statistics20 on Paper Usage: Over 40% of wood pulp goes toward the production of paper. The costs of using paper in the office can run 13 to 31 times the cost of purchasing the paper in the first place! Saving Paper Saves Money: For each sheet of paper used, a company incurs not only purchasing costs, but also storage, copying, printing, postage, disposal, and recycling. A recent Minnesota study estimates that associated paper costs could be as much as 31 times the purchasing costs (not including labor). So, that ream of paper you paid $5 for really could cost up to $155!

Citigroup, a large financial services company, determined that if each employee used double-sided copying to conserve just one sheet of paper each week, the firm would save $700,000 each year. Bank of America cut its paper consumption by 25% in two years by increasing the use of on-line forms and reports, e-mail, double-sided copying, and lighter-weight paper.

Paper is an office necessity for some essential tasks, but it has an environmental cost. Creating paper from trees requires a lot of natural resources: trees, water, and energy.

It takes more than 1½ cups of water to make one sheet of paper. (Picture a typical soda can.) Reducing paper use reduces greenhouse gases: 40 reams of paper is like 1.5 acres of pine forest absorbing carbon for a year.

Conservatree‟s calculations21 on Printing‘s cost to Environment: 1 ton of uncoated virgin (non-recycled) printing and office paper uses 24 trees.

1 ton of 100% virgin (non-recycled) newsprint uses 12 trees.

A pallet of copier paper (20-lb., or 20#) has 40 cartons and weighs 1 ton.

1 carton (10 reams) of 100% virgin copier paper uses .6 trees.

1 tree makes 16.67 reams of copy paper or 8,333.3 sheets 1 ream (500 sheets) uses 6% of a tree (and those add up quickly!).

1 ton of coated, higher-end virgin magazine paper uses a little more than 15 trees (15.36). 1 ton of coated, lower-end virgin magazine paper uses nearly 8 trees (7.68).

In American Bar Association and American Law Institute‘s The Practical Lawyer: James Martin writes in: ―Don‘t Print That Email‖22 (April 2009); ―Going Paperless…Or Not‖ (October 2007), and ―A Model Electronic File Policy for the Law Office‖ (April 2007).

http://156.98.19.245/paper/index.html http://conservatree.org/learn/EnviroIssues/TreeStats.shtml 22 http://jamesmartinpa.com/blog/?p=344 20 21

6

I don‘t know about your law office, but in mine email carries 90% of what comes in and 90% of what goes out. Paper in and paper out is just 10%. That means we no longer need to print out email onto paper and then file it in a paper file folder. Email has made us paperless. Nowadays, it actually takes more time to ―go paper‖.

5. Make It a Policy: You want your emails to be your business records, your office file, your client file, your evidence. To avoid any dispute about this, you need to make it your standard practice by putting in writing, as an office policy, that your email folder is your official file. ..

Conclusion: A wonderful side benefit to this email filing approach is that it is good for the planet, it saves trees, it‘s green, and it comports with the adage ―If it ain‘t broke, don‘t fix it‖. If it ain‘t paper, don‘t print it. That‘s good old, simple, money-saving advice. Just what we need in the world today. Just don‘t forget to make those backup copies.

[3] Radical Honesty Ecocentric „Normal‟ Electronic Service Filing to Respondents ORDER REQUESTED: Declare that ‗traditional/normal‘ service of process -- as described by Farlam et al in Erasmus Superior Court Practice23 as ―Substituted service is ordered when the defendant is believed to be in the Republic but one of the normal forms of service set out in the rules cannot be effected‖ -- for a PayPrice-4-Peace Peacenik, refers to service by means of email, i.e. responsible conservationist use of resources is to be considered ―traditional/normal‖ use of resources; whereas any unnecessary printing of documents, and its abuse of trees and energy transportation resources is not ‗normal‘ for a PP4PP, and that what is ‗normal/traditional‘ abuse of resources for ‗War is Peace Whores‘ (individuals who live above the nations carrying capacity in terms of procreation and/or consumption) is not normal use of resources for a PP4PP (Annex D).

Applicant appreciates the Registrar‘s concession to allow Applicant to file her Application per electronic filing. Applicant however would like to make the following point, as a matter of principle, on the issue.

Service issue 37, (2011). Also see Herbstein and Van Winsen ‗Civil Practice of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa‘ Vol 1, 5 th edition (2009) at 360 where the authors state that substituted service has been generally effected by allowing for notices to be sent by registered mail or by sending a registered letter 23

7

Electronic Service is ‗normal‘ for a Pay the Price for Peace Peacenik; whereas ‗printed‘ service is ‗abnormal‘ or ‗substituted service‘ for a PP4PP. Applicant hence requests suspension of Rule 4(1)(a) of the Uniform Rules of Court to permit Applicant to initiate proceedings and serve Respondents in accordance with her PP4PP Cultural Footprint consumption practices; to allow for service of all notices – including the initiation of proceedings -- as provided for in 4A(1) of Chapter Ill, Part 2 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002), whereby service of all documents and notices in these proceedings on any party to the litigation, may be effected to the personal or professional email address of the person, or their counsel, by electronic mail to the respective address/es, and if or where such a respondent is a foreign national, employed with such foreign national goverment, that such service of initiation of proceedings be copied to the respondents local Embassy email address.

Ecocentric „Normal‟ Electronic Service is founded on Global NNR Scarcity & Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict Principles/Worldview: Applicants aforementioned Environmental Perspectives on Printing vs.

Electronic Policies, are a subset of her working hypothesis Radical Honoursty cultural belief in Global NNR Scarcity: Global Collapse by 2050 and Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict: Peak Oil is the end of cheap oil, it is the point where every barrel of oil is harder to find, more expensive to extract, and more valuable to whoever owns or controls it.

As early as 2000, geological experts warned Peak Oil would occur sometime between 2000 and 200724. Cheap oil is the oxygen of the ―economic growth‖25 global economic system and industrial food production26.

Domestic (US) & Global NNR Scarcity Analysis is based upon Mr. Clugston‗s 27 analysis of the criticality and scarcity associated with each of the 89 analyzed NNRs, using data from USGS, EIA, BEA, BLS, Fed, CBO, FBI, IEA, UN, World Bank, etc; and concludes in general that ―absent some combination of immediate and drastic reductions in our global NNR utilization levels, ... we will experience escalating international and intranational conflicts during the coming decades over increasingly scarce NNR‗s, which will devolve into global societal collapse, almost certainly by the year 2050.‖

On February 11, 2006, geologist Kenneth Deffeyes claimed world oil production peaked on December 16, 2005 Deffeyes (2006): "The economists all think that if you show up at the cashier's cage with enough currency, God will put more oil in ground."

26 ―We eat oil. It is a little known fact that for every 1 calorie of food energy produced, 10 calories of hydrocarbons are consumed.‖ - Ruppert, MC (2004): Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, New Society, p.24.

27 Clugston, Chris: Scarcity (Booklocker.com Inc 2012) 24 25

8

Scarcity Global NNR Scarcity Analysis (pg.51-59) (pg 41-4928) summarizes global criticality and scarcity associated with each of the 89 analyzed NNRs: (a) An overwhelming majority, 63 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, were considered ―scarce‖ globally in 2008, immediately prior to the Great Recession; (b) A significant number, 28 of the 89 analyzed NNRs have peaked: are ―almost certain‖ to remain scarce permanently going forward; and a sizeable number, 16 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, will ―likely‖ remain scarce permanently; and (c) Global extraction/production levels associated with 39 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, are considered ―at risk‖29.

Scarcity as a cause of Violent Conflict and a matter of National Security, is based upon the research and conclusions of: ICJ: Opinion of Weeramantry30, Senator Sam Nunn (D-GA), Senate, June 28, 199031; Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, (Environmental Security32)33; White House National Security Strategy, 199134; White House National Security Strategy, 199335; White House National Security Strategy, 199536; White House National Security Strategy, 199637; White House National Security Strategy, 201038; NSSM 200: National Security Study http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/clugston_scarcity_pg31-55 At risk are: (a) Antimony: 8 yrs to Global Reserves exhaustion (used for starter lights ignition batteries in cars and trucks; (b) Bauxite: 40 years (only economically viable feedstock for aluminium); (c) Bismuth: 17 years (non-toxic substitute for lead in solder and plumbing fixtures); (d) Cadmium: 25 years; (e) Chromium: 26 years (stainless steel, jet engines and gas turbines); (f) Coal: 40 years (electricity generation); (g) Cobalt: 26 years (gas turbine blades, jet aircraft engines, batteries); (h) Copper: 27 years; (i) Fluorspar: 23 years (feedstock for fluorine bearing chemicals, aluminium and uranium processing); (j) Graphite (Natural): 23 years; (k) Iron Ore: 15 years (only feedstock for iron and steel); (l) Lead: 17 years; (m) Lithium: 8 years (aircraft parts, mobile phones, batteries for electrical vehicles); (n) Manganese: 17 years (stainless steel, gasoline additive, dry cell batteries) ; (o) Molybdenum: 20 years (aircraft parts, electrical contacts, industrial motors, tool steels); (p) Natural Gas: 34 years; (q) Nickel: 30 years; (r) Niobium: 15 years (jet and rocket engines, turbines, superconducting magnets); (s) Oil: 39 years; (t) Rhenium: 22 years (petroleum refining, jet engines, gas turbine blades); (u) Silver: 11 years; (v) Thalium: 38 years; (w) Tin: 18 years; (x) Tungsten: 32 years; (y) Uranium: 34 years (primary energy source, weapons); (z) Zinc: 13 years; (aa) Zirconium: 19 years (nuclear power plants, jet engines, gas turbine blades).

30 Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/92/7383.pdf & http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/95/7521.pdf http://www.unep.org/padelia/publications/Jud.dec.%20pre(Int%20.pdf 31 ―There is also a new and different threat to our national security emerging—the destruction of our environment. The defense establishment has a clear stake in this growing threat... one of our key national security objectives must be to reverse the accelerating pace of environmental destruction.‖ 32 ―By participating on a preventive basis in the resolutions of environmental issues that could lead to such conflict, DOD can forestall future Somalia-like involvements before they occur--an action that is extremely cost effective.

Recognizing this phenomenon, the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Environmental Security has defined DOD's role in environmental security to include, "mitigating the impacts of adverse environmental actions leading to international instability.‖ - Butts, Kent Hughes (25 April 1994): Environmental Security: A DoD Partnership for Peace 33 Sherri Wasserman Goodman, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, (Environmental Security), Statement Before the Subcommittee on Installation and Facilities, May 13, 1993 34 National Security Strategy of the United States, Washington, DC, US Gov Printing Office, 1991.

35 National Security Strategy of the United States, Washington, DC, US Gov Printing Office, 1993 36 National Security Strategy of the United States. February 1995, Washington, D. C: Government Printing Office, 1995, p. 18 http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nss/nss-95.pdf 37 A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, February 1996.

38 May 2010: National Security Strategy http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf 28 29

9

Memorandum: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (The Kissinger Report)39; National Security Council: National Security Decision Memorandum 314: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests40; Rockefeller Commission Report: Population and the American Future: The Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future41; United Nations: 1974 World Population Plan of Action42; Department of Defense: Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for the 21st Century Defense43; United States Army & TRADOC (2012): US Army Unified Quest 2012 Fact Sheet44; United States Joint Forces Command: The Joint Operating Environment - 2010 (The JOE – 2010)45; Department of the Army, Field Manual 100-23, Peace Operations46; Butts, Kent: Environmental Security: A DOD Partnership for Peace47; US Army War College; Murphy, Richard: US Army Strategy of the Environment, Office of the Dep. Asst. Sec. of the Army, Environment, Safety & Occup. Health: Assistant for Sustainability48; Council on Environmental Quality49; James M. Waddell, Chief, Office of Strategic Initiatives, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Working Paper: Environment as an Element of National Security50; Michael Renner, World Watch Inst: National Security: The Economic and Environmental Dimensions51; World Bank,

http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf National Security Council (1975/11/26): National Security Decision Memorandum 314: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests4, Washington, DC. 4 pp.; made public policy by Pres. Gerald Ford www.population-security.org/12-CH4.html 41 Rockefeller Commission Report (1972/03/27): Population and the American Future: The Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future; a Signet Special Edition, W5219, The New American Library, Inc., 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, March, 1972 issuu.com/jsror/docs/720327_rock-pop www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm 42 UN (1974/08): World Population Plan of Action; Adopted by consensus of the 137 countries represented at the UN World Population Conference at Bucharest, August 1974 www.population-security.org/27-APP1.html and issuu.com/js-ror/docs/74_un-pop-actionplan 43 http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf 44 United States Army & TRADOC (2012): US Army Unified Quest 2012 Fact Sheet9, Unified Quest 2012 is the Army Chief of Staff's annual Title 10 Future Study Plan (FSP) www.army.mil/article/68379/Unified_Quest_2012___Fact_Sheet/ 45 United States Joint Forces Command (2010/02/18): The Joint Operating Environment - 201010 (The JOE – 2010) www.jfcom.mil/newslink/storyarchive/2010/JOE_2010_o.pdf 46 Department of the Army, Field Manual 100-23, Peace Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, December 1994, p. 28. http://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-us-archive/fm100-23(94).pdf 47 Butts, Kent Hughes (25 April 1994): Environmental Security: A DoD Partnership for Peace http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB339.pdf 48 Murphy, R (2006/10/24): US Army Strategy of the Environment, Office of the Dep. Asst. Sec. of the Army, Environment, Safety & Occup. Health: Assistant for Sustainability http://www.cecer.army.mil/techreports/ERDC-CERL_TR-07-9/Session%20I/RichardMurphy.pdf 49 Environmental Quality. 1978 Annual Report on the Environment Washington: Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1978.

50 James M. Waddell, Chief, Office of Strategic Initiatives, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Working Paper: Environment as an Element of National Security, February 1992, p. 4.

51 Michael Renner, National Security: The Economic and Environmental Dimensions, Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, May 1989.

39 40

10

World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment52; U.S. Department of State, Problems of Environmental Contamination in the Former Soviet Union53; US Army Inst. of Water Resources: Water in the Sand: A Survey of Middle East Water Issues54; Peter Gleick: "Water and Conflict: Freshwater Resources and International Security"55; Peter Gleick, "Water and Conflict," Occasional Paper Series on Environmental Change and Acute Conflict56; U.S. European Command, Environmental Security In U.S. EUCOM In the Year 200357; William J. Carson, Environmental Security in the USEUCOM Area of Responsibility, (Background Paper)58; Wendy Grieder, U.S. National CCMS Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Memorandum: Status of the NATO/ CCMS Program"59; and "NATO Works with Cooperation Partners on Environmental Problems"60; Peters, Ralph: The Culture of Future Conflict, US Army War College61; MAJ William E David, US Military Intelligence: Environmental Scarcity as a Cause of Violent Conflict62; LTC Kurt F. Ubbelohde: US Army War College: Freshwater Scarcity in the Nile River Basin63; Colonel Brian Bush, US Army War College: Promoting Environmental Security during Contingency Operations64; and many others.

There is a significant difference between the irresponsible and abuse of natural resources of a Printed Complaints/Service Policy and the responsible and conservationist respect for natural resources of an Electronic Complaints/Service policy; and that abuse of resources contributes to resource scarcity, which World Bank, World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 30.

53 U.S. Department of State, Problems of Environmental Contamination in the Former Soviet Union, July 14, 1993, pp. 2-3.

54 Water in the Sand: A Survey of Middle East Water Issues, Washington: U.S. Army Institute for Water Resources, 1991, p. 4.

55 Peter Gleick, "Water and Conflict: Freshwater Resources and International Security," International Security, Summer 1993, p. 81.

56 Peter Gleick, "Water and Conflict," Occasional Paper Series on Environmental Change and Acute Conflict, Cambridge, Massachusetts: International Security Studies Program, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, September 1992, p. 8.

57 U.S. European Command, Environmental Security In U.S. EUCOM In the Year 2003, Draft Vision Statement, 1993.

58 William J. Carson, Environmental Security in the USEUCOM Area of Responsibility, (Background Paper), March 9, 1994.

59 Wendy Grieder, U.S. National CCMS Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Memorandum: Status of the NATO/ CCMS Program," May 10, 1993 60 Wendy Grieder, U.S. National CCMS Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "NATO Works with Cooperation Partners on Environmental Problems," NATO Review, April 1993, p. 34.

61 Peters, R (1996): The Culture of Future Conflict, US Army War College: Parameters: Winter 1995-96, pp. 1827 http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/Articles/1995/peters.htm 62 MAJ William E David, USA Military Intelligence: Environmental Scarcity as a Cause of Violent Conflict, School of Advanced Military Studies; United States Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA314878 63 LTC Kurt F. Ubbelohde (10 April 2000): Freshwater Scarcity in the Nile River Basin, US Army War College http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA378148 64 Colonel Brian X. Bush (13 March 1997): Promoting Environmental Security during Contingency Operations; US Army War College http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA326869 52

11

contributes to resource wars; and should be avoided at all costs, where possible, by anyone who considers themselves a sincere Peacenik and whose procreation and consumption lifestyle proves her Practice What She Preaches, PP4PP status.

Consequently, ‗traditional/normal‘ service of process -- as described by Farlam et al in Erasmus Superior Court Practice65 as ―Substituted service is ordered when the defendant is believed to be in the Republic but one of the normal forms of service set out in the rules cannot be effected‖ -- for a Pay-Price-4-Peace Peacenik, refers to service by means of email, i.e. responsible conservationist use of resources is to be considered ―traditional/normal‖ use of resources; whereas any unnecessary printing of documents, and its abuse of trees and energy transportation resources is not ‗normal‘ for a PP4PP, and that what is ‗normal/traditional‘ abuse of resources for ‗War is Peace Whores‘ (individuals who live above the nations carrying capacity in terms of procreation and/or consumption) is not normal use of resources for a PP4PP.

[4] Electronic Service Filing to Respondents Acknowledged as Received: Respondents 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, 10.

Respondent 1: Afriforum: Afriforum acknowledged receipt of service subsequent to the 27 November Electronic Service Notice. A confirmation notice was sent to Afriforum on 29 November: From: Ernst Roets [mailto:ernst@afriforum.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:17 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Respondent: 1. Afriforum; 2. TAU-SA; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service

Respondent 2: Transvaal Agricultural Union: TAU-SA acknowledged receipt of service subsequent to the 27 November Electronic Service Notice. A confirmation notice was sent to TLU on 29 November: From: Hoofbestuurder [mailto:hb@tlu.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:59 PM To: 'Habeus Mentem'

Service issue 37, (2011). Also see Herbstein and Van Winsen ‗Civil Practice of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa‘ Vol 1, 5 th edition (2009) at 360 where the authors state that substituted service has been generally effected by allowing for notices to be sent by registered mail or by sending a registered letter 65

12

Subject: Read: Respondent: 1. Afriforum; 2. TAU-SA; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service

Respondent 3 & 4: Julius Malema and African National Congress Mr. Malema and the ANC‘s counsel in the Supreme Court of Appeal in this matter, acknowledged receipt of service, subsequent to a ‗Final Notice‘ (PDF66): From: Jim Matemane [mailto:matemane@mhalaw.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 3:23 PM To: 'Habeus Mentem' Subject: Read: Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Mr. Leslie Mkhabela: RE: Julius Malema & ANC (Review of SCA 815-11: Afriforum v.

Malema) From: Jackie Huntley [mailto:huntleyj@mhalaw.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:36 PM To: 'Habeus Mentem' Subject: Read: Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Mr. Leslie Mkhabela: RE: Julius Malema & ANC (Review of SCA 815-11: Afriforum v.

Malema) From: Byron Anthony Morris [mailto:morris@mhalaw.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:26 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Mr. Leslie Mkhabela: RE: Julius Malema & ANC (Review of SCA 815-11: Afriforum v.

Malema)

Respondent 5: Desmond Tutu: Desmond Tutu acknowledge receipt of service subsequent to the 27 November Electronic Service Notice. A confirmation notice was sent on 29 November: From: Toni Doman [mailto:Toni@tutu.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:07 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Respondent: 5:D.Tutu, 6: Intention - Per Electronic Service

N.Mandela;

From: Vivian Ford [mailto:Vivian@tutu.org.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:00 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Respondent: 5:D.Tutu, 6: N.Mandela; Intention - Per Electronic Service

Notice

of

Notice

of

Respondent 6: Nelson Mandela: The Nelson Mandela Foundation acknowledged receipt of service subsequent the 27, 29 November and 03 December Electronic Service Notices: 66

http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-12-04_leslie_mkhabela_anc_malema.pdf

13

From: Ethel Arends [mailto:Ethel@nelsonmandela.org] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:03 PM To: Andrea Subject: Read: Concourt Respondent: 6: N.Mandela; Intention - Per Electronic Service

Notice

of

Respondent 7: FW de Klerk: The FW de Klerk Foundation have acknowledged receipt subsequent to the 27 November Electronic Service Notice. A confirmation notice was sent on 29 November: From: Shan Wolsky [mailto:shan@fwdeklerk.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:12 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: RE: Respondent: 7: FW de Klerk; 8: CRL Rights Comm; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service

Respondent 9: Norwegian Nobel Committee: Chairman: The Norwegian Nobel Committee acknowledged receipt of service subsequent to original notices on 27 and 29 November, and a ‗Final Notice‘ (PDF67) sent on 04 December 2012: From: Lars Heikensten [mailto:Lars.Heikensten@nobel.se] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 8:48 AM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Läst: Nobel Comm: Chair: Thorbjorn Jagland; CC: Nobel Inst, Nobel Fnd & Council of Europe From: Barbro Jonsson [mailto:Barbro.Jonsson@nobel.se] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 12:49 AM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Läst: Nobel Comm: Chair: Thorbjorn Jagland; CC: Nobel Inst, Nobel Fnd & Council of Europe From: HOLTGEN Daniel [mailto:Daniel.HOLTGEN@coe.int] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 1:01 AM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Nobel Comm: Chair: Thorbjorn Jagland; CC: Nobel Inst, Nobel Fnd & Council of Europe

Respondent 10: Central Intelligence Agency: Director General The Office of the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, National Security Division, Department of Justice, acknowledged receipt on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency: Director General; subsequent to the 27 November Electronic Service Notice. A confirmation notice was sent on 29 November: From: NSD Public (NSD) [mailto:NSD.Public@usdoj.gov] 67

http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-12-04_nobel-comm_chair_thorbjorn-jagland_encl.pdf

14

Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:27 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: Respondent: 10: CIA: Dir.Gen; 11: David Petraeus; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service From: NSD Public (NSD) [mailto:NSD.Public@usdoj.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:19 PM To: Habeus Mentem Subject: Read: RE: Respondent: 10: CIA: Dir.Gen; Petraeus; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service

11:

David

[5] Request Orders for Respondents 08: CRL Rights Commission and 11: David Petraeus Respondent 8: CRL Rights Commission: The CRL Rights Commission have not acknowledged receipt to initial 27 November and 29 November notices.

On 04 December 2012, CRL Rights Commission were given a ‗Final Notice‘ (Annex E), which informed them that: From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:35 PM To: CRL Rights: Chair (Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za); CRL Rights: CEO Adv Moreroa (ceo@crlcommission.org.za); CRL Rights: Office (info@crlcommission.org.za) Cc: 'Edward Mafadza'; 'Nobandile Nkosi'; 'Reitumetse Lemeke'; 'PS Moreroa' Subject: CRL Rights Commission: Rev Mabuza & Adv Moreroa; RE: Concourt Review of SCA 815-11 (Afriforum v Malema) Chair: Rev. Dr Wesley Madonda Mabuza Dep. Chair: Mrs Julia Mabale CEO: Adv. Pheagane Moreroa CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION Private Bag X 90 000 Houghton, 2041 Tel: (011) 537 7600 | Fax: (011) 880 3495 Rev Mabuza & Adv Moreroa, Please find attached PDF: RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al (Review of SCA 815/11: Afriforum v. Malema) Notice of Intention served upon CRL Rights Commission on 27 Nov and 29 Nov. CRL Rights Commission have not yet acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Intention electronically served upon your offices on 27 and 29 November 2012.

In the absence of acknowledgement of receipt, from any CRL Rights Commission Official; by 17:00hrs on Wednesday 05 December 2012.

An application shall be filed with the registrar / court for an order:

15

Authorizing Applicant’s service per email to Respondents 08 (CRL Rights Commission, per electronic service to the CRL website Official Contact email addresses for the CRL Rights Commission: (i) Chairperson: Dr. Wesley Mabuza (Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za), (ii) CEO: Adv. Pheagane Solomon Moreroa (ceo@crlcommission.org.za); (iii) Office: (info@crlcommission.org.za), to initiate proceedings and the service of process in this matter; in accordance to Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002).

ORDER REQUESTED: CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION: Authorizing Applicant‘s service per email to Respondents 08 (CRL Rights Commission, per electronic service to the CRL website Official Contact68 email addresses for the CRL Rights Commission: (i) Chairperson: Dr. Wesley Mabuza (Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za), (ii) CEO: Adv. Pheagane Solomon Moreroa (ceo@crlcommission.org.za); (iii) Office: (info@crlcommission.org.za), on 27 November, 29 November and 04 December 2012; to have initiated proceedings and the service of process in this matter; in accordance to Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002).

Respondent 11: David Petraeus: Robert Barnett, the counsel of Mr. David Petraeus, did not acknowledged receipt to 27, 29 November and 03 December notices.

On 04 December 2012, Mr. Barnett and the firm of Williams & Connolly LLP were given a ‗Final Notice‘ (Annex F), which informed them that: From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 4:01 PM To: CIA-PB: David Petraeus: c/o Robert Barnett (rbarnett@wc.com); 'Williams Connolly: Office'; 'Executive Director: Jennifer Scott'; 'Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick' Cc: CIA-PB: DNI: James Clapper (james.clapper@dni.gov); CIA-PB: WH: NSA: Thomas Donilon (thomas.donilon@whitehouse.gov); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o NATO Pub Info Office (moc.web@hq.nato.int); CIA-PB: FBI-DC: James McJunkin (washington.field@ic.fbi.gov); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o ISAF Pub Aff Off (ijc.media.operations@afghan.swa.army.mil) Subject: Williams & Connolly LLP: Robert Barnett: Re: David Petraeus SA Concourt Notice DAVID PETRAEUS C/O Robert Barnett Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

68

http://www.crlcommission.org.za/contact.php

16

Tel: 202-434-5034 | Fax: 202-434-5029 rbarnett@wc.com CC: Williams Connolly: Office (info@wc.com) CC: Executive Director: Jennifer Scott (jscott@wc.com) CC: Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick (nminnick@wc.com) Mr. Petraeus & Mr. Barnett, Please find attached PDF: RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al (Review of SCA 815/11: Afriforum v. Malema) Notice of Intention served upon Mr. David Petraeus on 27 Nov and 29 Nov. [Reference to Mr. Petraeus being in regard to Declaratory Order that “Credible Proactive Peace Plan require confronting Peak NNR & Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict”.]

Mr. Petraeus has not yet acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Intention electronically served upon him, via the offices of Mr. William Barnett, Williams & Connolly LLP, on 27 and 29 November 2012.

In the absence of acknowledgement of receipt, from Mr. William Barnett, Williams & Connolly LLP; by 17:00hrs (GMT + 2) on Wednesday 05 December 2012; an application shall be filed with the registrar / court for an order: Authorizing Applicant’s service per email to United States citizen, Respondent 11 (David Howell Petraeus ), per electronic service to Mr. Petraeus, via Mr. Petraeus appointed counsel: Robert Barnett, of Williams Connolly’s official email addresses of: Robert Barnett (rbarnett@wc.com); carbon copied to Williams Connolly’s Official Email addresses for: Office (info@wc.com), Executive Director: Jennifer Scott (jscott@wc.com) and Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick (nminnick@wc.com); in accordance to (I) Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002) and (II) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4(f) which allows for service “by other means not prohibited by international agreement as directed by the court,” as implemented in Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern.

Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002) which established that e-mail was an effective means of communication between parties, and that messages sent to the respondents would serve the purposes of notifying them of the pending litigation. Moreover, there is no indication that service in this manner would contravene any international agreement.

Finally courts “have upheld service via e-mail, [in] cases involving email addresses undisputedly connected to the defendants and that the defendants used for business purposes.” (Ehrenfeld v. Bin Mufouz, 2005 WL 696769 (S.D.N.Y., March 23, 2005))

ORDER REQUESTED: DAVID PETRAEUS: Authorizing Applicant‘s service per email to United States citizen, Respondent 11 (David Howell Petraeus69), per electronic service to Mr. Petraeus, via Mr. Petraeus David Howell Petraeus, born November 7, 1952, a retired American military officer and public official, who served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012. Prior to his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus was a highly decorated four-star general, serving over 37 years in the United States Army. His last assignments in the Army were as commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) from July 4, 2010, to July 18, 2011. His other four-star assignments include serving as the 10th Commander, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) from October 13, 2008, to June 30, 2010, and as 69

17

appointed70 counsel: Robert Barnett, of Williams Connolly‘s official email addresses of: Robert Barnett71 (rbarnett@wc.com) [on 27 November 2012,, 29 November, 03 December 2012]; carbon copied to Williams Connolly‘s Official Email addresses for: Office72 (info@wc.com), Executive Director: Jennifer Scott73 (jscott@wc.com) and Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick74 (nminnick@wc.com) [on 04 December 2012]; in accordance to (I) Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002) and (II) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 75 4(f) which allows76 for service ―by other means not prohibited by international agreement as directed by the court,‖ as implemented in Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002) which established that e-mail was an effective means of communication between parties, and that messages sent to the respondents would serve the purposes of notifying them of the pending litigation. Moreover, there is no indication that service in this manner would contravene any international agreement.77 Finally courts ―have upheld service via e-mail, [in] cases involving email addresses undisputedly connected to the defendants and that the defendants used for business purposes.‖ (Ehrenfeld v. Bin Mufouz, 2005 WL 696769 (S.D.N.Y., March 23, 2005))

[6] Registrar‟s Refusal of Case Number indicates a Registrar‟s Office that discriminates at Pro Se and/or Radical Honesty culture Applicants.

ORDER REQUESTED: Declare that Clerk: Martie Stander‘s refusal to issue the Applicant with (A) a case number for her Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, et al application is insufficiently justified, (B) in the absence of sufficient justification provided

by Director of the Constitutional Court: Vic Misser for his refusal to issue a case number and process application, such refusal should be interpreted to be a result of court officials discrimination against Pro Se and/or Radical Honesty culture applicant/s, (C) that discrimination is unlawful, including discrimination by Court Officials against a Pro Se or Radical Honesty Commanding General, Multi-National Force – Iraq (MNF-I) from February 10, 2007, to September 16, 2008. As commander of MNF-I, Petraeus oversaw all coalition forces in Iraq.

70 Jessica Dye (2012, Nov 18): Petraeus retains Robert Barnett, lawyer to political elite; Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/18/us-usa-generals-lawyer-idUSBRE8AH0EW20121118 71 http://www.wc.com/attorney-RobertBarnett.html 72 http://www.wc.com/contact.html 73 http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-jscott.html 74 http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-nminnick.html 75 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4 76 http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/05/14/service-of-process-by-e-mail-allowed-for-foreign-defendants/ 77 See also: Clint Pharmaceuticals v. Northfield Urgent Care, LLC, 2012 WL 3792546 (Minn. App., September 4, 2012), and Williams-Sonoma Inc. v. Friendfinder Inc., No. 06-6572, 2007 WL 1140639 (N.D.Cal. April 17, 2007)

18

applicant; (D) that Clerks/Registrars, like U.S. courts are required to treat the applications of Pro Se applicants liberally (Foreign Law: Haines v Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991); and (E) consequently that the Registrar is ordered to issue the Applicant a case number, including – if relevant – clear and specific requirements the Registrar Respondent requires from the Applicant, for the processing of her Pro Se application.

Liberal Treatment of Pro Se or Controversial Applicants: Impartial hearings for arguments about enlarged penises and vagina‟s blocking oil wells, to discharged mice, and women who are not „persons‟; but none for a Radical Honesty PP4PP Pro Se exposing South Africa‟s TRC Fraud: Case Study of United States of America Courts Clerks/Registrars Liberal Response to Pro Se Applicant: Jonathan Lee Richards: Clerks/Registrars, like U.S. courts are required to treat the applications of Pro Se applicants liberally (Foreign Law: Haines v Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) Jonathan Lee Riches is a former prisoner (inmate #40948-018) known for the many lawsuits he has filed in various United States district courts78.

Since January 8, 2006, he has filed over twenty-six hundred79 lawsuits in federal district courts across America,80 some of which have received considerable press attention.81 Among the more famous defendants of his lawsuits are Dallas area lawyer Treyson Brooks, New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick, former President of the United States George W. Bush,82 Martha Stewart,83 NASCAR driver Jeff Gordon,84 former Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick,85 entrepreneur Steve Jobs,86 celebrity blogger Perez Hilton,87 Somali pirates, and pop

78

South Carolina inmate hits Michael Vick with '$63,000,000,000 Billion Dollar' lawsuit alleging Al Qaeda ties Fox News. (August 15, 2007) Accessed October 2, 2007.

79 Wikipedia Ref: http://www.pacer.gov 80 Wikipedia Ref: US Pacer US Party/Case Index Website maintained by the federal courts; search for Jonathan Riches prisoner cases on March 3, 2008 returned 1017 cases.

81 "Man of Many Suits", Emil Steiner, The Washington Post 82 Howard, Brian. (April 13–19, 2006). Trial of the century. Philadelphia City Paper. Accessed October 3, 2007.

83 Prisoner known for suing celebrities takes on Martha Stewart Boston.com, in connection with The Boston Globe.

(September 19, 2007). Accessed October 3, 2007.

84 Saxon, Eric. (2007). Inmate files federal complaint against NASCAR star Jeff Gordon wsoctv.com. Accessed October 3, 2007.

85 Rankin, Bill. (August 17, 2007). Inmate's bizarre lawsuit against Vick thrown out of court The Atlanta JournalConstitution; and Transcript: 'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for August 15 MSNBC. Accessed October 3, 2007.

86 Jade, Kasper. (September 25, 2007).Inmate's suit claims O.J. Simpson is "hitman" for Steve Jobs. Apple Insider.

Accessed October 3, 2007.

87 "An Embarrassment Of Riches". thesmokinggun.com. Retrieved October 19, 2007.

19

star Britney Spears.88 He also sued the late Benazir Bhutto, Pervez Musharraf, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service on November 7, 2007, to prevent him from being deported to Pakistan upon his release from prison in March 2012 so that he will not be tortured. In May 2009, Riches filed for an injunction against the Guinness Book of World Records, seeking to stop them from naming him as the most litigious individual in the history of mankind.89 Some of Riches' defendants are not even people or potentially sueable. These include "Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Party" and the "13 tribes of Israel." 90 One lawsuit, which includes George Bush, also includes another 783 defendants that cover 57 pages. They include Plato, Nostradamus, Che Guevara, James Hoffa, "Various Buddhist Monks," all survivors of the Holocaust, the Lincoln Memorial, the Eiffel Tower, the USS Cole, the book Mein Kampf, the Garden of Eden, the Roman Empire, the Dark Ages, the Appalachian Trail, Plymouth Rock, the Holy Grail, Nordic gods, the dwarf planet Pluto, and the entire Three Mile Island.91 In August 2010 he filed suit against Julian Assange of Wikileaks (CASE #: 1:10-cv-02096-BNB),92 which Assange publicly acknowledged as received, as reported in the Wall Street Journal93: ―"Today I also had a case filed against me in the United States on a wholly unrelated manner," he added, without elaborating.‖ Every case filed by Mr. Riches, received a case number, and can be retrieved at Pacer.gov. Just between August 20 and 23 of 2010, Mr. Riches initiated 25 cases, one of them against Assange.

Mr. Riches Pro Se application94 accuses Mr. Assange of among others: ―I had a sexual affair with Barack Obama. I used George W. Bush's stolen credit card to get Obama a penis enlargement which is posted on wikileaks and wikileaks posted the bribe Blagojevish extorted one $50,000 from stolen identities for me to fill Baracks Senate seat. Julian Assange plans to hack into my experian credit report and steal my citibank card to use at Wal-mart to get Just For Men black hair dye to dye for his hair. .. Wikileaks posted secret documents regarding contracts BP oil has with Dr. Amanda Hughes, aka Dr. Amanda Leigh Hughes, Dts, at the Rdap in FMC Lexington. Dr. Hughes was paid 5 million dollars to use her vagina and squat and sit on the BP Lea King oil well to stop the leak in the gulf of Mexico. Dr.

88

"Contactmusic.com". Prison Inmate Seeks Spears Restraining Order. Retrieved October 12, 2007.

Clouse, Thomas (May 23, 2009). "Man sues book over most-litigious crown". The Spokesman-Review. Retrieved 25 May 2009.

90 Emil Steiner, Man of Many Suits, Jonathan Lee Riches Sues Everyone and Everything, Washington Post, August 23, 2007 91 Case #: 2:06-cv-01055-LP 92 http://cryptome.org/0002/riches/riches-v-assange.htm 93 Wall Street Journal (03 Sep 2010): Assange Calls Rape Probe 'Legal Circus' http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704206804575467540444512012.html 94 http://cryptome.org/0002/riches/riches-002.pdf 89

20

Hughes vagina received a Congressional Medal of Honour. I demand all Jonathan Lee Riches copyright material be deleted from the Defendants site....‖ On 30 August 2010, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland issued the following in Jonathan Lee Riches v. Julian Assange, Wikileaks et al: ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency and to Show Cause. Plaintiff is directed to submit a 1915 Motion, Prisoner Complaint, and show cause why filing restrictions should not be imposed against him within 30 days. order95

Case Study of another USA Clerks/Registrars Liberal Response to Pro Se Applicant: United Kingdom: Morabito v. Cyrta: “To a Mouse”: As documented by Christopher Stone in his seminal work: Should Trees have Standing? -- Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, A group of prison inmates in Suffolk country tamed a mouse that they discovered, giving him the name of Morris. Discovering Morris, a jailer flushed him down the toilet. The prisoners brought a proceeding against the Warden complaining, inter alia, that Morris was subjected to discriminatory discharge and was otherwise unequally treated. The action was unsuccessful, on grounds that the inmates themselves were "guilty of imprisoning Morris without a charge, without a trial, and without bail," and that other mice athte prison were not treated more favourably. "As to the truth victim the Court can only offer again the sympathy first proffered to his ancestors by Robert Burns...." The Judge proceeded to quote from Burns. "To a Mouse" - Morabito v. Cyrta, 9 CRIM. L. REP. 2472 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Suffolk Co. Aug. 26, 1971)

In re Goddell: Even Patriarchal Bigots Granted Women the Right to a Hearing: The first woman in Wisconsin who thought she might have a right to practice law was not denied the right to file her application, or denied the right to be heard, she was given the opportunity to be heard, and honourably – to her face – given a verdict to her application, in the following terms: "The law of nature destines and qualifies the female sex for the bearing and nurture of children of our race and for the custody of the homes of the world .... [A]ll life-long callings of women, inconsistent with these radical and sacred duties of their sex, as is the profession of the law, are departures from the order of nature; and when voluntary, treason against it.... The And when counsel was arguing for this lady that the word person, in sec. 32, ch.

119 [respecting those qualified to practice law], necessarily includes females, her presence made it impossible to suggest to him as reductio ad absurdum of his position, that the same construction of the same word... would subject woman to prosecution for the paternity of a bastard, and... prosecution for rape.‖ -- In re Goddell, 39 Wisc. 232, 245 (1875), at 246 95

http://cryptome.org/0002/riches/riches-v-assange.htm

21

Radical Honesty Culture‟s Perspective of SA‟s TRC Fraud, Registrar Denies Applicant a Case Number, let alone the Right to be Heard: Meanwhile in Mandelatopia South Africa, with the ‗greatest constitution in the world‘ (sic), a member of the Radical Honesty culture (the applicant) has for ten years been unable to find an attorney to represent her, in accordance to her cultural practices, and been denied a fair and impartial hearing of the Radical Honesty culture‘s evidence and perspective of South Africa‘s Truth and Reconciliation Fraud.

Are Pro Se Applications only worthy of ‗liberal treatment to Pro Se‘ Applicants, given Case Numbers and a fair impartial hearing before impartial justices, when the applications are filed by men, from War is Peace Whore cultures, dealing with enlarged penises, vagina‘s blocking leaking oil wells, and discharged mice?

RELIEF REQUESTED: Consequently, I request the Justices to issue the orders as aforementioned, succinctly as: -

Number of Hard copies required by Pro Se Applicants

-

Traditiona/Normal service of process for PP4PP is per electronic service.

-

Orders of Electronic Initiated Service for Respondents 8 and 11

-

Issuance of Case Number, Liberal Treatment of Pro Se Applicants and Registrars discrimination not allowed.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Encl: A: 29 Nov: Concourt Registrar Letter to Applicant B: 05 Dec: Soc of Advocates of Kwazulu Natal (PMB) C: 06 Dec: Soc of Advocates of Kwazulu Natal (Dbn) D: Applicants Pay-Price-4-Peace-Peacenik Credibility E: 04 Dec: Final Notice to CRL Rights Commission F: 04 Dec: Final Notice to David Petraeus

22

Annexure “A”

Annexure “B”

SOCIETY OF ADVOCATES OF KWAZULU-NATAL Pietermaritzburg Bar

Advocates’ Chambers, 17 Prince Edward Street, PIETERMARITZBURG, 3201

Tel: (033) 845 3547

Fax: (033) 845 3548

E-mail: pmbbar@pmblaw.co.za

3 December 2012 SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East 6539 Email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za

Dear Lara Your letter addressed to the Pietermaritzburg Bar Administrator has been handed to me for a reply.

I have placed your letter on the notice board with the request that any advocate that is interested should contact you directly.

Yours faithfully M G ROBERTS CHAIRMAN Afriforum & malema.let (lara johnstone (3.12)

Pietermaritzburg Bar Committee Members 2011/2012: Chairman – M G Roberts SC; Deputy Chairman – AE Potgieter SC; C J Snyman; H.S. Gani; S. Jasat; R Ramdass; Secretary – J A van Heerden

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 30 November 2012 KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg Bar Council 17 Prince Edward Street, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Tel: 033 845 3547 Fax: 033 845 3548 Email: pmbbar@pmblaw.co.za CC: Concourt: Registrar (Ref: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, et al) Dear Executive Secretary, Request for Info: Do you have any Advocates who are willing to act as assistance of counsel to a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I filed a Pro Se application for Review of the Supreme Court of Appeal Negotiated Agreement between Afriforum and Julius Malema (SCA 815/11) to the Constitutional Court. The Concourt Registrar has suggested that I contact Legal Aid South Africa, which I have done.

I have previously qualified for Legal Aid (Capetown office and George office), and In Forma Pauperis Aid (Cape Town High Court), so I imagine, I would again.

Prior to again applying for Legal Aid or In Forma Pauperis Aid, I would like to determine whether there is any lawyer and Advocate in South Africa who is willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I am the only member of the Radical Honesty culture in South Africa. Both the Concourt1 in Citizen v. McBride and Judge Lamont2 in Afriforum v. Malema acknowledged my membership of the Radical Honesty culture.

Previous Legal Aid/In Forma Pauperis lawyers appointed to represent me refused to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; so I was faced with either firing them, or being denied the right to practice my culture; or they recused themselves without honestly informing the court that they refused to represent someone from the Radical Honesty culture.

Concourt Order by Chief Justice on 03 May 2012, in Citizen v. McBride (CCT 23-10): "Ms. Lara Johnstone, Member of Radical Honesty culture and religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae."

2 In Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010) [2011] ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC); [2011] 4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011); Judge Lamont confirmed that: ―[48] Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.‖ http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAEQC/2011/2.html 1

Radical Honesty culture and religion was founded by Dr. Brad Blanton, who is: (1) President and CEO of The Center for Radical Honesty, dedicated to promoting honesty in the world; (2) former candidate for Congress in 2004 and 2006, on the platform of ‗Honesty in Politics‘3; (3) Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church; i.e. ―Dr. Truth‖4; and (4) author of (a) Radical Honesty: How To Transform your Life by Telling the Truth; (b) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help from Your Friends, (c) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that Can Change the World, with Neale Donald Walsh (Conversations with God series); (d) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; (e) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and (f) Beyond Good and Evil: The Eternal Split-SecondSound-Light-Being; (g) Some New Kind of Trailer Trash.

The Radical Honesty culture and religion are founded upon the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness5; as excerpted from: Practicing Radical Honesty. Radical Honesty is a powerful process by which people can make corrections in the minds distorted and only partly conscious map of the world. Our maps of the world are distorted by our repressed anger and resentment; the greater the amount of repressed anger and resentment, the greater the distortion. The key to individuality, integrity, individual freedom, and free societies, lies in providing people with the skills and capabilities to get over their anger, and experience sincere forgiveness. It is the way the statistics from Stanley Milgram‘s experiments on blind obedience to authority6 get changed.

In the Radical Honesty worldview, if you find the truth (accurate information based on evidence), in any dispute, which is contrary to what you believed, and hence means you lose the particular dispute, in fact, your loss of a false belief, based upon inaccurate evidence, and your gaining of more accurate information that enables your worldview to be closer to a big picture truth and reality is a win.

Enlightenment and Personal (or Social) Transformation can only occur in a being or beings with a ‗don’t know‘ or put differently: philosophically open to new perspectives, information & evidence mind/s.

In Radical Honesty winning a court case, based on deception and manipulation is despicable, disgusting and dishonourable. A true win-win occurs when the trial or dispute resolution process does not censor information – pretending controversial or politically incorrect evidence is ‗irrelevant‘ or such shit -- that embarrasses or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx-OVdTkwvA See Center for Radical Honesty at: www.radicalhonesty.com 5 Chapter 9: Radical Honesty About Anger http://radical-honoursty.blogspot.com/2012/01/practicing-radical-honesty-being.html 6 Great World Trials; The Adolph Eichmann Trial, 1961. pages 332-337; 1997.: Eichmann, speaking in his own defense, said he did not dispute the Holocaust facts. During the whole trial, Eichmann insisted that he was only "following orders"—the same Nuremberg Defense used by some of the Nazi war criminals during the 1945–1946 Nuremberg Trials. He explicitly declared that he had abdicated his conscience in order to follow the Führerprinzip. Eichmann claimed that he was merely a "transmitter" with very little power. He testified that: "I never did anything, great or small, without obtaining in advance express instructions from Adolf Hitler or any of my superiors."

3 4

2

exposes flaws in either party‘s arguments. Finding the Truth is what matters, wherever that search leads.

Consequently I refuse to lie, about anything. I also do not practice Bullshit-thePublic Relations sycophancy to anyone. In Radical Honesty ‗diplomacy‘ or ‗ettiquette‘ or ‗manners‘ or ‗public relations‘ is lying and manipulative deception.

Are you aware of any Attorney or Advocate, who would be (A) willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture, without denying her the right to practice her culture; and if so (B) to do it either Pro Bono, or to do so at legal aid/In Forma Pauperis payment level?

If so, could you inform me, of such information, A.S.A.P; and if so, I shall be happy to file an application for Legal Aid/In Forma Pauperis aid, for such attorney and advocate to assist (not represent) me, in my case.

Sincerely,

Lara Johnstone SHARP PP4PP SHARP: Problem Solving Radical Honoursty Accountability PP4PP: Pay the Price for Peace Peacenik Encl: Application for Review filed to Concourt * NOTICE OF MOTION * FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT - Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint - Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA Download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html * APPLICANTS CONSENT TO ALL AMICUS CURIAE ARGUMENTS * PROOF OF SERVICE including REGISTERED MAIL REC TO CONCOURT Download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html * SCA Judgement in Afriforum v. Malema Download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html

3

Annexure “C”

From: Caroline Berry - Society of Advocates of KZN [mailto:kznbar@law.co.za] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 10:33 AM To: 'Lara' Subject: RE: Society of Advocates KwaZulu-Natal (Durban) Dear Ms Johnstone I have read your email and I have read the application which you have lodged with the Constitutional Court. Rule 11 of the Constitutional Court Rules requires the Chief Justice to make a decision of the future conduct of the case once the affidavits have been filed.

Perhaps it would be better for you to let me know in due course whether the Chief Justice has directed that the application should be heard, and if so, we can reconsider your application in the light of the directive.

At this stage it would be premature to make any decision as to whether we can appoint an advocate to act on your behalf pro bono.

Yours faithfully LB BROSTER SC On behalf of the Pro Bono Committee Society of Advocates KZN 3rd Floor 6 Durban Club Place DURBAN 4001 Tel : 031 3013099 Fax : 031 3044415

From: Lara [mailto:jmcswan@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:36 AM To: 'Caroline Berry - Society of Advocates of KZN' Subject: RE: Society of Advocates KwaZulu-Natal (Durban) Adv. Berry Thank you for your response.

I understand "it would be premature to make any decision as to whether we can appoint an advocate to act on your behalf pro bono."

If the Chief Justice directs that the application should be heard, I shall inform you of the information, for your further possible Pro Bono consideration.

My concern -- based on my past experience over the last 10 years -- was my inability to get any lawyer, to represent me, in terms of my culture.

Finding a Legal Aid or Pro Bono attorney, or even when my brother paid for my attorney, was not a problem. Getting such attorney to represent me, as a member of my Radical Honesty culture, was not possible.

Hopefully not so, in the future! ;-) Thanks again, Lara Johnstone

Annexure “D”

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044: 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954

Maria Bochkareva Guerrylla Hussar Death Battalion Alien on Pale Blue Dot (I) PP4PP Consumption and Carbon Footprint Credibility (II) PP4PP One Child per Family Procreation Credibility: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath

[I] Pay-the-Price-4-Peace Consumption and Carbon Footprint Credibility:

[Fig.01] (myfootprint.org): ecological consumption footprint is 10.83. [Fig.01] [Fig.02] (earthlab.com): Carbon Outpout is 0.8 tons (RSASA: 13.1; World: 17.2) , Earth Conservation Plan score is 171 (RSA 324; World 384). [Fig.02]

2

IN

THE

UNITED

STATES

COURT

OF

APPEALS

FOR

THE

ARMED

FORCES

CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ET AL.,

PETITION

Petitioners-Appellants,

FOR RECONSIDERATION:

Crim. App. Misc.

Dkt. No. 20120514

v.

USCA Misc.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COL. DENISE LIND, MILITARY JUDGE

Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR

Respondents-Appellees.

TO THE JUDGES ARMED

OF THE UNITED

FORCES

AND THE DIRECTOR

INTELLIGENCE MARIA WHO

BOCHKAREVA IS WILLING

STATES

AGENCY:

LEAVER

COURT GENERAL

GENERAL

PEACENIK

PETRAEUS:

OATH:

PER FAMILY

of Lara

FOR THE

OF THE CENTRAL

DAVID

ONE CHILD

TO PAY THE ONE CHILD

Declaration

OF APPEALS

'I AM A LEAVER, PRICE

FOR PEACE'

Johnstone

I, Lara Johnstone, declare as follows: [1]

I

am

an

Sustainable BRIEF

IN

SUPPORT

adult

Security

PROPRIA OF

AN

Radical

Honoursty

practicing

PERSONA

BY

ECOCENTRIC

Ecofeminist

paralegal,

AMICI WILD

CURIAE LAW

the LARA

Wild

author

of

JOHNSTONE

SUSTAINABLE

Law the IN

SECURITY

PERSPECTIVE, in this matter; member of Friends of Wikileaks, and the Radical Honesty culture. I reside in George, Southern Cape, South

Africa;

r- :> T? ~

.. c:::-

~ ~

where

<f- 'Z9=>

I

run

a

small

"'1-?

SUID-AFRII<AANSE

POLISIEDIENS

.~.

s'TATION COMMISSIONER

2012 -1 0- 1 4

EcoFeminist

pedal-powered

wormery business.

I enclose

for verification [2]

this [3]

provide

declaration,

territories,

which

civilization

is

I

have

for

rapidly

reduce

CIA

very

simple

resulted

in

populations

Pentagon

are

now all to

colonized;

a crisis

of

which

Jack

Dr.

art,

?:.?T ? -==e4-~

will

to less

than

per family

Conflict

spiral;

Decline

S:ATION COMMISSIONER

-----

1m2 -10- '14 STAS:E KOMMISSARIS

~~,.--'A~"~~Q..ry~.--_._~_ ~

-:-:::>

1:1.-

~I

""re.J

t,~_\;"",:",,~:

death

(3) Human behavior

How Much Population

"'-1P-?

_

•••

~_

.••••

..."

it

must

100 million,

to adopt a one child

the death

shows

sustainable,

and technology,

(1) The Scarcity

(4 )

our

Rapid

Dr. Alpert

Collapse3,

population

choosing

which

video:

Alpert's

science,

spiral;

to

new

means

conflict,

to advance

policy:

failure

200 years.

or Civilization

global

how our

colonize

to

to become peaceful,

->

to

explanation

our

1 sqswans.weebly.com/overpopulation-means-murder.html 2 sqswans.weebly.com/human-predicament.html 3 sqswans. weebly. com/rapid-population..sarJR;i'ifR~61tJrti.!l POL/SIEDIENS

---- ->

&

CommonSense Required2

have

watched

(2) The system trips death

Nightline:

human experiment

means of humanity procreation

accordance

Resources Scarcity Death Spiral, which

heading

Decline

and continue

in

the

it:

Better

surplus

also

the

act,

Alpert's

the wars of the past

Population

the

Jack

the Conflict pressured

that

Dr.

limitations

previously

[5 ]

Agency with

and Resources Wars1 videos.

process

dwarf all

to

the Ted Koppel's

HumanPredicament:

understand

Intelligence

and authority

I have watched

thought

Central

should I violate

on Overpopulation

video:

the

declaration

I have watched

[4]

Passport

purposes.

I hereby following

a copy of my South African

<.' !'••••__, _-..;r

'::'~_~"":"'"-=.~~~,~.~:~

by only

spiral; trips Saves

Civilization?;

(5) Are you sure

below 100 million?

(a) What if

bigger? / (b) What if What if

people

What if

the richest

advances Decline [6]

faster

then

that

towards

I hereby declare child,

[8]

or less,

violate the

this

Central

Leaver

the

this CIA to

2072

onto

a

to pay the one

that

if

I

authorize

remove me and my children

genepool,

I hereby

Prosecutorial

if

One Child Oath,

further

inform

CIA

confirms

the

with my violation

or Police

to be wasted on the matter,

-10- 1 4

causes

remove my dishonourable

in accordance

S:;.TfOi'J COMMISSIONER

the root

I thereby

Leaver Peacenik

occurred

POLISIEDIENS

who is

by assassination.

assassination

are required

Population

peacenik,

I understand

One Child Oath,

that

SUID-AFRIKAANS5:

Rapid

humans on Planet

that

Office,

no further

(d)

of peace.

Prosecutor's

oath,

It's

who is willing

Agency to

Should I have violated

from the

/ (c)

improvement? /

by addressing

declare

Leaver Peacenik

require

is

peace.

hereby

Intelligence

and thereby

self

( 6)

to move the

I am leaver,

from the Leaver genepool, [9]

spread

are shorter?

I am a sincere

per family price

I furthermore

rich-poor

richer? / (e) What if technology

of peace,

and helping trend

population

collapse.

to pay the price

procreation

reduce

times for

we expect?;

declare

of conflict,

to

initial

desires

keep getting

or Civilization

willing

the

re-generation

have undying

I hereby

[7]

soil

we have

Investigation

genes

the that

local my

of this resources

of my assassination.

[10]

I further hereby

willing

request,

that if Pfc Bradley Manning

is

to take this Leaver Peacenik One Child Oath, that the

Director

General

of the

official

request

to

against

Central

the

Pfc. Manning

Intelligence

relevant

authority,

in this matter

Agency, for

all

to be withdrawn

make

an

charges and

the

matter to be considered amicably resolved, forthwith.

[11]

Secondly,

that

establish

Center4

Manning,

to

a

the fund

establish

Peacenik Honor Medal',

a

Central for

Intelligence

contributions

bi-annual

'Maria

in

Agency's honour

Bochkareva

Kent

of

Pfc

Leaver

to be awarded on the 23rd of April,

of

every year, for the individual who has done the most to educate their

community,

or nation

on the role

of overpopulation

and

overconsumption as factors pushing society to conflict and war.

[12]

Pursuant

to 28

u. S.C §

1746, I declare under penalty

of

perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Executed this 14th day of October, 2012 George, South Africa

SUIO-AFRIKi>,ANSE POLISIEDIENS STATJON COMMISSIONER

Lara Johnstone 2012 -10- 1

i,

STASIE KOfv1MISSARIS GI::UKI.;it:

i,]b4~"iWM;'~~ ~i:.§1~~kent ~""9.'

"" ••••~J;

,\,~""':

•..•·,,",:L

_

~

_

,.-~:::

~:;"_=

",,,,\.-.:::,_

-center-occasional-papers/

index. html

CERTIFICATE OF FILING & AUTHORISATION TO CIA: DIR.GEN. PETRAEUS

I certify

that

on 15 October

my MARIA BOCHKAREVA verification Central

to

General

D.C.

granting

General

I certify

that

at 18:34

HRS

(GMT+2),

I faxed

LEAVER PEACENIK ONE CHILD OATH and passport

Intelligence

Washington,

2012

David

Petraeus,

20505, Petraeus

by

of

Office

Agency,

facsimile

the relevant

I electronically

Director

General,

Public

Affairs,

authorization,

submitted

on

482-1739,

(703)

to:

as stated.

16 October

2012;

copy to: 1. USCAAF

Clerk

of the Court:

William

DeCicco:

bill.decicco@armfor.uscourts.gov 2. USA Counsel:

Captain

Chad

Fisher:

Chad.m.fisher.mil@mail.mil 3. Pfc Manning

Counsel:

David

Coombs

Esq:

coombs@armycourtmartialdefense.com 4. US House

Intelligence

Committee:

Intelligence.HPSCI@mail.house.gov

Executed George,

this

16th day

of October,

2012

South Africa

,

Lara

Johnstone

a

Annexure “E”

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 04 December 2012 Chair: Rev. Dr Wesley Madonda Mabuza Dep. Chair: Mrs Julia Mabale CEO: Adv. Pheagane Moreroa CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION Private Bag X 90 000 Houghton, 2041 Tel: (011) 537 7600 | Fax: (011) 880 3495 Rev Mabuza & Adv Moreroa, RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al (Review of SCA 815/11: Afriforum v. Malema) Notice of Intention served upon CRL Rights Commission on 27 Nov and 29 Nov. CRL Rights Commission have not yet acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Intention electronically served upon your offices on 27 and 29 November 2012.

In the absence of acknowledgement of receipt, from any CRL Rights Commission Official; by 17:00hrs on Wednesday 05 December 2012.

An application shall be filed with the registrar / court for an order: Authorizing Applicantâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s service per email to Respondents 08 (CRL Rights Commission, per electronic service to the CRL website Official Contact1 email addresses for the CRL Rights Commission: (i) Chairperson: Dr. Wesley Mabuza (Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za), (ii) CEO: Adv. Pheagane Solomon Moreroa (ceo@crlcommission.org.za); (iii) Office: (info@crlcommission.org.za), to initiate proceedings and the service of process in this matter; in accordance to Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002).

RESPONDENTS WHO HAVE ACKNOWLEGED RECEIPT: 01. Afriforum (Ernst Roets) 02. TAU-SA (Hoofbestuurder & Roelof du Plessis) 1

http://www.crlcommission.org.za/contact.php

05. Archbishop Tutu (Toni Doman, Archbishop Tutu's Personal Assistant; Vivian Ford, Tutu Peace Center) 06. Nelson Mandela (Ethel Arends) 07. FW de Klerk (Shan Wolsky) 10. Central Intelligence Agency: Director General (Office of Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Department of Justice) Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 South Africa T: +27-44 870 7239 | C: +27-71 170 1954 Email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za Encl: * 10-05-06: CCT 23-10: Concourt Order: Radical Honesty culture (PDF2) * Concourt Review of SCA 815/11: * NOTICE OF MOTION (PDF3) * FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT (PDF4) - Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint - Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA * APPLICANTS CONSENT TO ALL AMICUS CURIAE ARGUMENTS (PDF5) * PROOF OF SERVICE incl. REGISTERED MAIL REC TO CONCOURT (PDF6) * SCA Judgement in Afriforum v. Malema (PDF7) * 12-11-29: Concourt Registrar Letter to Lara Johnstone (PDF8) All documents available for download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html

http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/10-05-06__cct2310_concourt_radicalhonestyamicusorder.pdf 3 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_nom.pdf 4 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_affid_encl-a-b.pdf 5 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23_alien-v-afriforum__malema_consent-2amicuscuriae.pdf 6 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_pos-regmail.pdf 7 http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/121131_sca_851-11-order/1 8 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-29_concourtregistrar_letter_to_lara_johnstone.pdf 2

2

ELECTRONIC SVC NOTICE TO CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION: From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 PM To: 'Dave Steward - FWF'; 'Adv. Nikki de Havilland'; 'Piet Le Roux - FWF' Cc: 'Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za'; 'ceo@crlcommission.org.za'; 'info@crlcommission.org.za' Subject: Respondent: 7: FW de Klerk; 8: CRL Rights Comm; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service TO: FW DE KLERK c/o D. Steward & N de Havilland FW de Klerk Foundation P O Box 15785, Panorama, 7506 T: +27(21) 930 3622 | F: +27(21) 930 3898 CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION CEO: Adv. Pheagane Moreroa Private Bag X 90 000 Houghton, 2041 Tel: (011) 537 7600 | Fax: (011) 880 3495 Notice of Intention: Per Electronic Service Respondents: 1. AFRIFORUM 2. TRANSVAAL AGRICULTURAL UNION (TAU) 3. JULIUS MALEMA 4. AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 5. DESMOND TUTU 6. NELSON MANDELA 7. FW DE KLERK 8. CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION 9. NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE: CHAIR 10. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: DIRECTOR 11. DAVID PETRAEUS Please find attached: * NOTICE OF MOTION * FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT - Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint - Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA * APPLICANTS CONSENT TO ALL AMICUS CURIAE ARGUMENTS BRIEF OVERVIEW: Take notice that LARA JOHNSTONE, herein referred to as Alien on Pale Blue Dot, Member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, (hereinafter called The Applicant) intends to make application to this Court for the following orders in terms of Rule 11, of the Rules of Court;(1) Radical Honesty culture; (2) Review SCA Afriforum v. Malema Mediation Agreement; (3) EcoFeminist Evidence Censored: TRC’s-War is Peace-Fraud (A) TRC’s Legal Tyranny ‘Reconciliation’ Definition; (B) TRC’s Erroneous ‘ANC’ Just War

3

Definition; (C) TRC’s Anthropocentric Flat Earth Worldview; (D) TRC’s Tragedy of Constitutional Commons Suicide Pact; (4) Credible Proactive Peace Plan requires confronting Peak NNR & Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict; (5) Alternatively; IF South Africa's TRC Fraud Fragile Ego's are more important than confronting the ‘SCARCITY AS CAUSE OF VIOLENT CONFLICT’ factor; all South Africans should prepare themselves for the impending Race and Class War consequences of the Peak NNR Crisis of Conflict.

Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone, Pro Se P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 South Africa T: +27-44 870 7239 | C: +27-71 170 1954 Email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za

From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:04 PM To: 'Dave Steward - FWF'; 'Adv. Nikki de Havilland'; 'Piet Le Roux - FWF' Cc: 'Chairperson@crlcommission.org.za'; 'ceo@crlcommission.org.za'; 'info@crlcommission.org.za' Subject: RE: Respondent: 7: FW de Klerk; 8: CRL Rights Comm; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service FW de Klerk & CRL Commission: RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al CASE NUMBER: Concourt Registrar: Ms. Martie Stander shall issue a case number as soon as proof of service to all parties is confirmed: PROOF OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: She has approved initiation of proceedings, if done by email, if the respondents acknowledge receipt thereof, and such acknowledgement of receipt shall be considered as proof of service.

So far, the following parties have acknowledged receipt: - Afriforum (Ernst Roets) - TAU-SA (Hoofbestuurder & Roelof du Plessis) - Archbishop Tutu (Toni Doman, Archbishop Tutu's Personal Assistant; Vivian Ford, Tutu Peace Center) - Central Intelligence Agency: Director General (Office of Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Department of Justice; General Allen, ISAF: IJC Media Operations.Org, Afghanistan, US Army) Nobody from FW de Klerk Foundation, or CRL Commission has, so far acknowledged receipt. Could you kindly acknowledge receipt, please.

LEGAL AID: ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL:

4

She has also suggested I apply for Legal Aid. I have consented to do so, although, in the past ten years, I have not found one lawyer in South Africa willing to assist a member of the Radical Honesty culture; so I am not sure such a lawyer exists in South Africa.

Lawyers around the world are happy to represent mass murderers, paedophiles, etc.., but when it comes to members of the Radical Honesty culture, they refuse to touch us with a barge pole.

I have filed a request for info to Legal Aid SA and Jhb Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm: Chairman: PF Coetzee, to ask if they know of any lawyer willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I have asked Ms. Stander for the following info: "Ms. Stander: Could you find out for me the answer: What if there are no lawyers in South Africa (as there have not been for the past 10 years), who are willing to represent someone from the Radical Honesty culture?"

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone [INCLUDING COPY OF Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 PM EMAIL] From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:13 PM To: 'Edward Mafadza'; 'Nobandile Nkosi'; 'Reitumetse Lemeke'; 'PS Moreroa' Subject: [1]: Respondent: .. 8: CRL Rights Comm; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service TO CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION: Edward Mafadza (EDDIE@crlcommission.org.za) Nobandile Nkosi (NOBANDILE@crlcommission.org.za) Reitumetse Lemeke (RLEMEKE@crlcommission.org.za) PS Moreroa (PSMoreroa@crlcommission.org.za) [INCLUDING COPY OF Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 PM EMAIL] [INCLUDING COPY OF Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:04 PM EMAIL]

5

Home

A bout Us

Programs

Media Room

Gallery

Lodging Complaints

Vacancies & Tenders

Links

Latest News

Contact Us

Postal address:

Private Bag X 90 000, Houghton, 2041 Africa

Physical Address:

158 Jan Smuts Avenue 1st Floor, West Wing ROSEBANK Johannesburg South

Telephone Number:

+27 11 537 7600

Fax Number:

+27 11 880 3495

E-mail Address:

chairperson@crlcommission.org.za ceo@crlcommission.org.za info@crlcommission.org.za complaints@crlcommission.org.za

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Annexure “F”

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 04 December 2012 DAVID PETRAEUS C/O Robert Barnett Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: 202-434-5034 | Fax: 202-434-5029 rbarnett@wc.com CC: Williams Connolly: Office (info@wc.com) CC: Executive Director: Jennifer Scott (jscott@wc.com) CC: Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick (nminnick@wc.com) Mr. Petraeus & Mr. Barnett, RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al (Review of SCA 815/11: Afriforum v. Malema) Notice of Intention served upon Mr. David Petraeus on 27 Nov and 29 Nov. [Reference to Mr. Petraeus being in regard to Declaratory Order that “Credible Proactive Peace Plan require confronting Peak NNR & Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict”1] Mr. Petraeus has not yet acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Intention electronically served upon him, via the offices of Mr. William Barnett, Williams & Connolly LLP, on 27 and 29 November 2012.

In the absence of acknowledgement of receipt, from Mr. William Barnett, Williams & Connolly LLP; by 17:00hrs (GMT + 2) on Wednesday 05 December 2012; an application shall be filed with the registrar / court for an order: Authorizing Applicant’s service per email to United States citizen, Respondent 11 (David Howell Petraeus2), per electronic service to Mr. 1

“Declaring that in our Post Peak NNR world, Sustainable Security requires seriously confronting Scarcity as a Cause of Violent Conflict, and to recommend that if the South African Government and its „Peace Leaders‟ are sincerely committed to implementing peaceful coexistent relations between races, cultures and religions; the SAG should support the United States Government‟s Leadership to implement an Internationally recognized „Pay the Price for Peace‟ Sincere Peacenik Politico-Legal Status, granted to any individual who is willing to sign the Maria Bochkareva One Child Per Family Oath, submitted to the Intelligence Agency of their choice (copy provided to either the CIA or the Kremlin), wherein they confirm that they…………”

2 David Howell Petraeus, born November 7, 1952, a retired American military officer and public official, who served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012. Prior to his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus was a highly decorated four-star general, serving over 37 years in the United States Army. His last assignments in the Army were as commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) from July 4, 2010, to July 18, 2011. His other four-star assignments include serving as the 10th Commander, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) from October 13, 2008, to June 30, 2010, and as

Petraeus, via Mr. Petraeus appointed3 counsel: Robert Barnett, of Williams Connolly’s official email addresses of: Robert Barnett4 (rbarnett@wc.com); carbon copied to Williams Connolly’s Official Email addresses for: Office5 (info@wc.com), Executive Director: Jennifer Scott6 (jscott@wc.com) and Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick7 (nminnick@wc.com); in accordance to (I) Applicants PP4PP consumption and cultural footprint values interpretation of S. 15(3), 30, 31, and 18 of the Bill of Rights, read in conjunction with the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act. 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002) and (II) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule8 4(f) which allows9 for service “by other means not prohibited by international agreement as directed by the court,” as implemented in Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002) which established that e-mail was an effective means of communication between parties, and that messages sent to the respondents would serve the purposes of notifying them of the pending litigation. Moreover, there is no indication that service in this manner would contravene any international agreement.10 Finally courts “have upheld service via e-mail, [in] cases involving e-mail addresses undisputedly connected to the defendants and that the defendants used for business purposes.” (Ehrenfeld v. Bin Mufouz, 2005 WL 696769 (S.D.N.Y., March 23, 2005)) RESPONDENTS WHO HAVE ACKNOWLEGED RECEIPT: 01. Afriforum (Ernst Roets) 02. TAU-SA (Hoofbestuurder & Roelof du Plessis) 03. Mr. Julius Malema (Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Mr. Byron Anthony Morris and Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Ms. Jackie Huntley) 04. African National Congress (Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Mr. Byron Anthony Morris and Mkhabela Huntley Adekeye Inc: Ms. Jackie Huntley) 05. Archbishop Desmond Tutu (Toni Doman, Archbishop Tutu's Personal Assistant; Vivian Ford, Tutu Peace Center) 06. Nelson Mandela (Ethel Arends) 07. FW de Klerk (Shan Wolsky) 10. Central Intelligence Agency: Director General (Office of Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Department of Justice) Commanding General, Multi-National Force – Iraq (MNF-I) from February 10, 2007, to September 16, 2008. As commander of MNF-I, Petraeus oversaw all coalition forces in Iraq.

3 Jessica Dye (2012, Nov 18): Petraeus retains Robert Barnett, lawyer to political elite; Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/18/us-usa-generals-lawyer-idUSBRE8AH0EW20121118 4 http://www.wc.com/attorney-RobertBarnett.html 5 http://www.wc.com/contact.html 6 http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-jscott.html 7 http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-nminnick.html 8 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4 9 http://blog.internetcases.com/2007/05/14/service-of-process-by-e-mail-allowed-for-foreign-defendants/ 10 See also: Clint Pharmaceuticals v. Northfield Urgent Care, LLC, 2012 WL 3792546 (Minn. App., September 4, 2012), and Williams-Sonoma Inc. v. Friendfinder Inc., No. 06-6572, 2007 WL 1140639 (N.D.Cal. April 17, 2007)

2

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se P O Box 5042 George East, 6539, South Africa T: +27-44 870 7239 | C: +27-71 170 1954 Email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za Online Encl: * 10-05-06: CCT 23-10: Concourt Order: Radical Honesty culture (PDF11) * Concourt Review of SCA 815/11: * NOTICE OF MOTION (PDF12) * FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT (PDF13) - Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint - Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA * APPLICANTS CONSENT TO ALL AMICUS CURIAE ARGUMENTS (PDF14) * PROOF OF SERVICE incl. REGISTERED MAIL REC TO CONCOURT (PDF15) * SCA Judgement in Afriforum v. Malema (PDF16) * 12-11-29: Concourt Registrar Letter to Lara Johnstone (PDF17) All documents available for download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html Encl:  Transcript: ELECTRONIC SVC NOTICE TO DAVID PETRAEUS:

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22



Excerpt: 18 November 2012: Reuters: Petraeus retains Robert Barnett, lawyer to political elite18



PDF conversions of Williams Connolly webpages: Robert Barnett19 (rbarnett@wc.com); Office20 (info@wc.com), Executive Director: Jennifer Scott21 (jscott@wc.com) and Chief Information Officer: Nicole G. Minnick22.

http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/10-05-06__cct23-10_concourt_radicalhonestyamicusorder.pdf http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_nom.pdf http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_affid_encl-a-b.pdf http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23_alien-v-afriforum__malema_consent-2-amicuscuriae.pdf http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-23__alien-v-afriforum--malema_pos-regmail.pdf http://issuu.com/js-ror/docs/121131_sca_851-11-order/1 http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/12-11-29_concourt-registrar_letter_to_lara_johnstone.pdf http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/18/us-usa-generals-lawyer-idUSBRE8AH0EW20121118 http://www.wc.com/attorney-RobertBarnett.html http://www.wc.com/contact.html http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-jscott.html http://www.wc.com/contact-leadership-nminnick.html

3

ELECTRONIC SVC NOTICE TO DAVID PETRAEUS: From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:47 PM To: 'AG for Nat Sec: Lisa Monaco'; 'Amb Donald Gips'; 'David Petraeus: c/o Robert Barnett' Cc: CIA-PB: DNI: James Clapper (james.clapper@dni.gov); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o NATO Pub Info Office (moc.web@hq.nato.int); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o ISAF Pub Aff Off (ijc.media.operations@afghan.swa.army.mil); 'WH: NSA: Thomas Donilon'; 'DSCA'; 'FBI-DC: James McJunkin' Subject: Respondent: 10: CIA: Dir.Gen; 11: David Petraeus; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service TO: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: DIRECTOR & DAVID PETRAEUS CIA DIR GENERAL: C/O Lisa Monaco Asst Att. General for National Security National Security Division Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 514-2007 | Fax: (202) 514-5331 C/O Ambassador Donald Gips U.S. Embassy in Pretoria PO Box 9536, Pretoria 0001 877 Pretorius St, Arcadia, Pretoria Tel: (27-12) 431-4000 Fax: (27-12) 342-2299 DAVID PETRAEUS C/O: Robert Barnett Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: 202-434-5034 | Fax: 202-434-5029 Transparency Copies: DNI: James Clapper; General Allen (ISAF & NATO); WH: Nat. Sec. Adv: Thomas Donilon; FBI-DC: Dir. James McJunkin ; Defense Security Coop. Agency Notice of Intention: Per Electronic Service Respondents: 1. AFRIFORUM 2. TRANSVAAL AGRICULTURAL UNION (TAU) 3. JULIUS MALEMA 4. AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 5. DESMOND TUTU 6. NELSON MANDELA 7. FW DE KLERK 8. CRL RIGHTS COMMISSION 9. NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE: CHAIR 10. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: DIRECTOR 11. DAVID PETRAEUS

4

Please find attached: * NOTICE OF MOTION * FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT - Annex A: 08/11/2012: Judicial Service Commission Ack. Rec. of Complaint - Annex B: 15/10/2012: Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik Oath to CIA * APPLICANTS CONSENT TO ALL AMICUS CURIAE ARGUMENTS [Download: http://sqswans.weebly.com/sa-constitutional-court.html] BRIEF OVERVIEW: Take notice that LARA JOHNSTONE, herein referred to as Alien on Pale Blue Dot, Member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, (hereinafter called The Applicant) intends to make application to this Court for the following orders in terms of Rule 11, of the Rules of Court;(1) Radical Honesty culture; (2) Review SCA Afriforum v. Malema Mediation Agreement; (3) EcoFeminist Evidence Censored: TRC’s-War is Peace-Fraud (A) TRC’s Legal Tyranny ‘Reconciliation’ Definition; (B) TRC’s Erroneous ‘ANC’ Just War Definition; (C) TRC’s Anthropocentric Flat Earth Worldview; (D) TRC’s Tragedy of Constitutional Commons Suicide Pact; (4) Credible Proactive Peace Plan requires confronting Peak NNR & Sustainable Security: Scarcity as Cause of Violent Conflict; (5) Alternatively; IF South Africa's TRC Fraud Fragile Ego's are more important than confronting the ‘SCARCITY AS CAUSE OF VIOLENT CONFLICT’ factor; all South Africans should prepare themselves for the impending Race and Class War consequences of the Peak NNR Crisis of Conflict.

Respectfully Submitted Lara Johnstone, Pro Se P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 South Africa T: +27-44 870 7239 | C: +27-71 170 1954 Email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za

From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:15 PM To: 'AG for Nat Sec: Lisa Monaco'; 'Amb Donald Gips'; 'David Petraeus: c/o Robert Barnett' Cc: CIA-PB: DNI: James Clapper (james.clapper@dni.gov); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o NATO Pub Info Office (moc.web@hq.nato.int); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o ISAF Pub Aff Off (ijc.media.operations@afghan.swa.army.mil); 'WH: NSA: Thomas Donilon'; 'DSCA'; 'FBI-DC: James McJunkin' Subject: RE: Respondent: 10: CIA: Dir.Gen; 11: David Petraeus; Notice of Intention - Per Electronic Service CIA DIRECTOR GENERAL & DAVID PETRAEUS: RE: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, et al CASE NUMBER:

5

Concourt Registrar: Ms. Martie Stander shall issue a case number as soon as proof of service to all parties is confirmed (attached letter) PROOF OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: She has approved initiation of proceedings, done by email, if the respondents acknowledge receipt thereof, and such acknowledgement of receipt shall be considered as proof of service.

So far, the following parties have acknowledged receipt: - Afriforum (Ernst Roets) - TAU-SA (Hoofbestuurder & Roelof du Plessis) - Archbishop Tutu (Toni Doman, Archbishop Tutu's Personal Assistant; Vivian Ford, Tutu Peace Center) - Central Intelligence Agency: Director General (Office of Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Department of Justice) Thank you.

Nobody has yet acknowledged receipt for Mr. Petraeus; it would be appreciated if someone could be so kind as to do so, if possible.

LEGAL AID: ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL: The Registrar has also suggested I apply for Legal Aid. I have consented to do so, although, in the past ten years, I have not found one lawyer in South Africa willing to assist a member of the Radical Honesty culture; so I am not sure such a lawyer exists in South Africa.

Lawyers around the world are happy to represent mass murderers, paedophiles, etc.., but when it comes to members of the Radical Honesty culture, they refuse to touch us with a barge pole.

I have filed a request for info to Legal Aid SA and Jhb Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm: Chairman: PF Coetzee, to ask if they know of any lawyer willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I have asked Ms. Stander for the following info: "Ms. Stander: Could you find out for me the answer: What if there are no lawyers in South Africa (as there have not been for the past 10 years), who are willing to represent someone from the Radical Honesty culture?"

AFRIFORUM V. MALEMA SCA JUDGEMENT I forgot to include a copy of the SCA judgement in the original application; please find it attached.

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone [INCL. COPY OF Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:47 PM EMAIL] From: Habeus Mentem [mailto:habeusmentem@mweb.co.za] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:44 PM To: CIA-PB: David Petraeus: c/o Robert Barnett (rbarnett@wc.com) Cc: CIA-PB: Jill Kelley: c/o Abbe Lowell (adlowell@chadbourne.com); CIA-PB: DNI: James Clapper (james.clapper@dni.gov); CIA-PB: WH: NSA: Thomas Donilon

6

(thomas.donilon@whitehouse.gov); CIA-PB: Holly Petraeus (info@consumerfinance.gov); CIA-PB: Frederick Humphries: c/o Lawrence Berger (legisvp@fleoachapter9.org); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o NATO Pub Info Office (moc.web@hq.nato.int); CIA-PB: Paula Broadwell: c/o Robert Muse (rmuse@steinmitchell.com); CIA-PB: FBI-DC: James McJunkin (washington.field@ic.fbi.gov); CIA-PB: Gen Allen: c/o ISAF Pub Aff Off (ijc.media.operations@afghan.swa.army.mil) Subject: SA Concourt Notice to David Petraeus; c/o Mr. Robert Barnett, Williams & Connolly LLP DAVID PETRAEUS C/O: Robert Barnett Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: 202-434-5034 | Fax: 202-434-5029 PR KISS YOUR ASS LANGUAGE REQUEST TO FRAGILE EGO' LAWYER MR. BARNETT: CONFIRM RECEIPT OF DOC'S TO DAVID PETRAEUS: Mr. Barnett could you kindly acknowledge receipt on behalf of Mr. David Petraeus, for the South African Constitutional Court documentation -- Alien on Pale Blue Dot vs. Afriforum, et al -- submitted to Mr. Petraeus (c/o your office) in the emails below.

All docs available for download at: http://sqswans.weebly.com/cct-alien-v-afriforum.html RADICAL HONESTY NOTE TO MR. DAVID PETRAEUS: No offence, but in my culture: 1. An individual who lacks the honour to acknowledge receipt of all communications for their attention, cannot with a straight face call themselves honourable.

2. An individual who calls themselves a warrior, and lacks the courage to acknowledge receipt of a document, is a gutless coward.

All you got to tell your coward PR lawyer if you are not seriously interested in matters of Sustainable Security is 'Tell the Radical Honesty bitch, I am not interested.'

If you cannot be an honourable enemy; then honour means fuck all to you.

Alternatively if you are interested in Sustainable Security matters, but consider yourself superior to persons of the Radical Honesty culture, who do not practice Bullshit the Public Relations horseshit; thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s also okay.

If America's corporate and political elite are so Bernaysian mindfucked brainwashed, by their own propaganda, they prefer to drive SY Civilization Titanic fast forward to its Peak NNR iceberg, believing they won't sink with it; thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s their choice.

Perhaps it is time for them to consider that, it is not only Planet Earth's Intelligence Agencies who practice Total Surveillance, that there are ExtraTerrestrial Entities whose surveillance, and data storage of correspondence and consciousness; is way more advanced than that of the NSA. When do you think your attorney shall find a pair of balls to tell me that his client - Mr. Petraeus - wants me to 'fuck off, leave Petraeus alone'; or

7

'acknowledges receipt of documents' or 'whatever' in whatever 'Bullshit the Public Relations' language he prefers, that is clear and succinct, and I shall honour the request, and not be offended in the least.

Respectfully, Lara Johnstone [INCL. COPY OF Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:47 PM EMAIL] [INCL. COPY OF Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:15 PM EMAIL]

8

Print PDF

RETURN TOATTORNEY SEARCH

PRACTICE AREAS Administrative Law

Robert B. Barnett Partner TEL: 202-434-5034 FAX: 202-434-5029 rbarnett@w c.com Dow nload Vcard

Legislative Assistant, Senator Walter F. Mondale, United States Senate, 1973-1975

W illiams & Connolly LLP 725 Tw elfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

Law C lerk, Justice Byron R. White, United States Supreme C ourt, 19721973

Appellate Arbitration Business, Transactions, and Tax C ontracts C riminal Defense Employment and Labor Entertainment Law Executive C ompensation First Amendment and Media General C ivil Litigation Intellectual Property Product Liability, Torts, and Medicine Representation of Authors

Robert B. Barnett has a diverse practice representing national and international corporations and individuals on a w ide variety of matters.

During his thirty years of practice, he has represented clients before almost every executive department and administrative agency in Washington. His clients have included McDonald's Corporation, General Electric,

Representation of Former Government Officials Representation of Television C orrespondents, Anchors, and Producers

Mr. Barnett is one of the premier authors' representatives in the w orld. His clients have included Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Laura

EDUCATION & HONORS The University of C hicago Law School, J.D., cum laude, 1971 University of Wisconsin, B.A., graduation honors, 1968 "AV-Rated" by Martindale-Hubbell速

BAR & COURT ADMISSIONS District of C olumbia Supreme C ourt of the United States United States C ourts of Appeals for the District of C olumbia and Fifth C ircuits United States District C ourts for the District of C olumbia and the Eastern District of Louisiana

Law C lerk, Judge John Minor Wisdom, United States C ourt of Appeals for the Fifth C ircuit, 19711972

Mr. Barnett represents major corporations in litigation matters, corporate w ork, contracts, crisis management, transactions, government relations, and media relations.

Comcast, New sw eek/Daily Beast, JM Family Enterprises, Sunbeam, Toyota, Deutsche Bank, MacAndrew s & Forbes, Revlon, First Alert, Southeast Toyota, ChoicePoint, and Toll Brothers, among others.

Sports

GOVERNMENT EXPERIENCE

Bush, Bob Woodw ard, Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, Shania Tw ain, Jill Biden, Lynne Cheney, Alan Greenspan, James Patterson, Katharine Graham, Daniel Silva, Tim Russert, Stephen W hite, Barbra Streisand, George W ill, Art Buchw ald, James Carville, Mary Matalin, W illiam Bennett, Mary Higgins Clark, Cokie Roberts, several former U.S. Secretaries of State, numerous U.S. Senators, Tony Blair of the United Kingdom, Queen Noor of Jordan, The Prince of Wales, Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, and many others, including journalists, novelists, business leaders, sports stars, politicians, and others.

He is also one of the leading representatives of television new s correspondents and producers. His clients include Brian W illiams, Lesley Stahl, Ann Curry, Sam Donaldson, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Steve Doocy, Christiane Amanpour, Brit Hume, Andrea Mitchell, Rita Braver, Susan Spencer, Brian Kilmeade, Gw en Ifill, David Gergen, Bill Plante, Judy Woodruff, Neil Cavuto, anchors in many major television markets, and producers on virtually every major broadcast on netw ork and cable television.

Mr. Barnett also represents former government officials in conjunction w ith their transitions to the private sector. His clients have included Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Madeleine Albright, Alan Greenspan, Andrew Card, Karl Rove, Norman Mineta, Dan Quayle, Bill Richardson, James Baker, Larry Summers, Donna Shalala, and many former Senators and Congressmen.

He also represents many corporate and trade association converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

executives and corporations in conjunction w ith executive compensation agreements. He has represented senior officers of AT&T, The Carlyle Group, Fannie Mae, McDonald's Corporation, the Recording Industry Association of America, the Air Transport Association, the Motion Picture Association of America, and Deutsche Bank. He also represents several university presidents, deans, and professors.

Mr. Barnett w as ranked Number One on Washingtonian magazine's list of "Washington's Best Law yers" and as one of "The 100 Most Influential Law yers in America" by The National Law Journal. He w as also named one of the one hundred most pow erful people in the entertainment industry by Entertainment Weekly Magazine.

Mr. Barnett has w orked on eight national presidential campaigns, focusing on debate preparation. In addition to playing a major role on the debate preparation teams in 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 2000, 2004 and 2008, he played the role of George Bush in practice debates w ith Geraldine Ferraro in 1984, w ith Michael Dukakis in 1988, and practice debated Bill Clinton more than tw enty times during the 1992 campaign. In 2000, he played the role of Dick Cheney in practices w ith Joe Lieberman. In 2004, he played the role of Dick Cheney in practices w ith John Edw ards. In 2000 and 2006, he assisted Hillary Rodham Clinton w ith her Senate debate preparations and helped prepare her for 23 presidential primary debates in 2008.

Mr. Barnett is a member of the firm's Executive Committee.

He joined W illiams & Connolly LLP in 1975 and has been a partner since 1978. He w as a presidentially-appointed member of the Board of Trustees of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts from 1994 to 2004 and currently serves as Senior Counsel.

Home

Contact Us

Disclaimer

Sitemap

Š 2012 Williams & Connolly LLP

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Print this page

CONTACT US

Contact Us Williams & Connolly LLP

DIRECTIONS

725 Twelfth Street, N.W.

ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP

Washington, D.C . 20005 Email: info@wc.com Phone: 202-434-5000 Fax:

202-434-5029

Enlarge map

Notice of Financial Scams Telephone and internet criminals are unlaw fully using the names of American law firms, including W illiams & Connolly LLP, to bilk individuals of money. One such scam uses letterhead of Mercantile Bank International, Sofia, Bulgaria. If you receive communications from this bank referencing W illiams & Connolly LLP, please call the FBI Washington Field Office at 202-278-2000.

Home

Contact Us

Disclaimer

Sitemap

Š 2012 Williams & Connolly LLP

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Print PDF

Nicole G. Minnick

CONTACT US

Chief Inform ation Officer

DIRECTIONS TEL: 202-434-5770 FAX: 202-434-5029 nminnick@w c.com Dow nload Vcard

ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP

W illiams & Connolly LLP 725 Tw elfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

EDUCATION & HONORS University of Maryland, B.A., 1993

Home

Contact Us

Disclaimer

Sitemap

Š 2012 Williams & Connolly LLP

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Print PDF

Jennifer H. Scott

CONTACT US

Executiv e Director

DIRECTIONS TEL: 202-434-5950 FAX: 202-434-5029 jscott@w c.com Dow nload Vcard

ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP

W illiams & Connolly LLP 725 Tw elfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

EDUCATION & HONORS Georgetown University Law C enter, J.D., 2002 James Madison University, B.S., 1995

Home

Contact Us

Disclaimer

Sitemap

Š 2012 Williams & Connolly LLP

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Annexure “G”

P F LOUW SC ______________________________________________________________________________________

6 December 2012 Ms Lara Johnstone Per email: habeusmentem@mweb.co.za

Dear Madam RE: PRO BONO I apologise for only reverting to you now. As I understand your request, it is for an advocate to assist you whilst you present your case. The advocate will not represent you. I regret to inform you that this is not an instruction that an advocate may accept.

Furthermore, advocates are appointed by attorneys or a limited number of briefing institutions. I can accordingly not accede to your request and identify an advocate to serve your purposes.

Yours faithfully

P F LOUW SC CHAIRMAN: PRO BONO COMMITTEE

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Maisels Group th SALA House, 6 Floor, 12 Fredman Drive, Sandown, Sandton P O Box 652668, Benmore 2010 Docex 143, Randburg Tel: (011) 535-0802 / Fax: (011) 883-2701 E-mail: pflouw@law.co.za / gjkotze@mweb.co.za (Mrs KotzĂŠ)

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 06 December 2012 P F Louw SC (Chairman) Jhb Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Committee Group: Maisels Group, Maisels Chambers Tel: 011 535 0800 | Fax: 011 883 2701 Cell: 083 303 3934 Email: gjkotze@mweb.co.za CC: Concourt: Registrar (Ref: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, et al) Re: Request for Info: Do you have any Advocates willing to serve as Pro Bono Assistance of Counsel to a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

Thank you for your response. My apologies, maybe I was not clear enough.

I was attempting to find out if there are any Advocate members of the Johannesburg Bar Association who would be willing to represent/assist a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I am aware that Advocates are appointed by Attorneys. My problem is that in the past ten years, I have not been able to find any Attorney or Advocate who is willing to represent/assist me, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture. They all insist that the representation should be in accordance to their culture. I am not a member of their culture. I am a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

If I do find an Attorney who is willing to represent me, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; then we need to find an Advocate who similarly is willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

It is pointless for me, to find a Pro Bono Attorney and Advocate who refuse to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

Sincerely,

Lara Johnstone

Annexure “H”

From: Riona Gunpath [mailto:riona@lawsoc.co.za] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:35 AM To: 'Lara' Subject: RE: Kwa Zulu Natal Law Society: Director: Gavin John Dear Sir/Madam In order to qualify for pro-bono assistance you need to earn a joint income below R 7000.00 and not have assets exceeding R 350 000.00. if you meet these requirements please complete the enclosed forms and return to me. Your matter will be assessed in terms of merit.

If you donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t meet the above requirements please visit the Law Society's website under "find a lawyer" to find an attorney in your area.

Kind regards Riona Gunpath Manager Corporate Service KZN Law Society (033)345 -1304 (0866) 393 978 www.lawsoc.co.za

SHARP PP4PP PO Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (044) 870 7239 Cel: (071) 170 1954 07 December 2012 Mrs. R Gunpath Kwa Zulu Natal Law Society P O Box 1454, Pietermaritzburg 3200 Phone : (+27)-33-345 1304 Fax :(+27)-33-394 9544 E-mail: info@lawsoc.co.za, (probono@lawsoc.co.za) CC: Concourt: Registrar (Ref: Alien on Pale Blue Dot v. Afriforum, et al) Mrs. Gunpath, Req for Info: Names of KZN Law Society Attorneys willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture.

I do qualify for Pro Bono assistance and shall be happy to fill out your form, once you have informed me whether you have any attorneys who are willing to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture. Why must I fill out a form, if you have no attorneys willing to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture? Do you have any members who are willing to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture? As stated in original letter: I am the only member of the Radical Honesty culture in South Africa. Both the Concourt1 in Citizen v. McBride and Judge Lamont2 in Afriforum v.

Malema acknowledged my membership of the Radical Honesty culture.

Previous Legal Aid/In Forma Pauperis lawyers appointed to represent me refused to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; so I was faced with either firing them, or being denied the right to practice my culture; or they recused themselves without honestly informing the court that they refused to represent someone from the Radical Honesty culture.

Concourt Order by Chief Justice on 03 May 2012, in Citizen v. McBride (CCT 23-10): "Ms. Lara Johnstone, Member of Radical Honesty culture and religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae."

2 In Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010) [2011] ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC); [2011] 4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011); Judge Lamont confirmed that: â&#x20AC;&#x2022;[48] Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.â&#x20AC;&#x2013; http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAEQC/2011/2.html 1

Radical Honesty culture and religion was founded by Dr. Brad Blanton, who is: (1) President and CEO of The Center for Radical Honesty, dedicated to promoting honesty in the world; (2) former candidate for Congress in 2004 and 2006, on the platform of ‗Honesty in Politics‘3; (3) Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church; i.e. ―Dr. Truth‖4; and (4) author of (a) Radical Honesty: How To Transform your Life by Telling the Truth; (b) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help from Your Friends, (c) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that Can Change the World, with Neale Donald Walsh (Conversations with God series); (d) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; (e) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and (f) Beyond Good and Evil: The Eternal Split-Second-SoundLight-Being; (g) Some New Kind of Trailer Trash.

The Radical Honesty culture and religion are founded upon the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness5; as excerpted from: Practicing Radical Honesty. Radical Honesty is a powerful process by which people can make corrections in the minds distorted and only partly conscious map of the world. Our maps of the world are distorted by our repressed anger and resentment; the greater the amount of repressed anger and resentment, the greater the distortion. The key to individuality, integrity, individual freedom, and free societies, lies in providing people with the skills and capabilities to get over their anger, and experience sincere forgiveness. It is the way the statistics from Stanley Milgram‘s experiments on blind obedience to authority6 get changed.

In the Radical Honesty worldview, if you find the truth (accurate information based on evidence), in any dispute, which is contrary to what you believed, and hence means you lose the particular dispute, in fact, your loss of a false belief, based upon inaccurate evidence, and your gaining of more accurate information that enables your worldview to be closer to a big picture truth and reality is a win.

Enlightenment and Personal (or Social) Transformation can only occur in a being or beings with a ‗don’t know‘ or put differently: philosophically open to new perspectives, information & evidence mind/s.

In Radical Honesty winning a court case, based on deception and manipulation is despicable, disgusting and dishonourable. A true win-win http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx-OVdTkwvA See Center for Radical Honesty at: www.radicalhonesty.com 5 Chapter 9: Radical Honesty About Anger http://radical-honoursty.blogspot.com/2012/01/practicing-radical-honesty-being.html 6 Great World Trials; The Adolph Eichmann Trial, 1961. pages 332-337; 1997.: Eichmann, speaking in his own defense, said he did not dispute the Holocaust facts. During the whole trial, Eichmann insisted that he was only "following orders"—the same Nuremberg Defense used by some of the Nazi war criminals during the 1945– 1946 Nuremberg Trials. He explicitly declared that he had abdicated his conscience in order to follow the Führerprinzip. Eichmann claimed that he was merely a "transmitter" with very little power. He testified that: "I never did anything, great or small, without obtaining in advance express instructions from Adolf Hitler or any of my superiors."

3 4

2

occurs when the trial or dispute resolution process does not censor information – pretending controversial or politically incorrect evidence is ‗irrelevant‘ or such shit -- that embarrasses or exposes flaws in either party‘s arguments. Finding the Truth is what matters, wherever that search leads.

Consequently I refuse to lie, about anything. I also do not practice Bullshitthe-Public Relations sycophancy to anyone. In Radical Honesty ‗diplomacy‘ or ‗ettiquette‘ or ‗manners‘ or ‗public relations‘ is lying and manipulative deception.

I shall be happy to fill out your form as soon as you confirm that the KwaZulu Natal Law Society (A) has members who are willing to represent an individual as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; and (B) the number of such members, and their names.

If none of your members are willing to represent me as a member of the Radical Honesty culture; WHY ARE YOU ASKING ME TO FILL OUT YOUR PRO BONO FORM, SINCE YOU HAVE NOBODY WILLING TO REPRESENT ME, IN ACCORDANCE TO MY CULTURE? Why not be honest, that none of your attorneys are willing to represent a member of the Radical Honesty culture? You got a problem with honesty???

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Encl: Nov 2012 In Forma Pauperis Application to US Supreme Court

3

No. ____________________________________

In the Supreme Court of the United States Alien on Pale Blue Dot1

Petitioner v.

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP), et al

Respondents ________________ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS The Petitioner asks leave to file the attached petition for a writ of certiorari without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.

Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the following South African court(s): (i)

Cape Town High Court: 22/09/2009 Clerk: Ms. VP Fassie Divorce proceedings from husband in prison in America: The appointed Attorney withdrew from representing Petitioner, when Petitioner refused to sign documentation that was inaccurate and deceptive, and Attorney refused to allow Petitioner to submit her own radical honesty affidavit.

Petitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in any United States Court.

Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration in support of this motion is attached hereto.

See: (1) ICJ: Opinion of Weeramantry J; (2) 1 ST Amendment, Sherbert v. Verner, Wisconsin v. Yoder, Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, RFRA (3) Annex E: Radical Honesty Religion; (4) Johnstone, L (2012/09/24), Pg.1 “alien on Pale Blue Dot perspective”; (5) Johnstone, L (12/10/15): Petition for Reconsideration, para 65-68: Radical Honesty religion concept of ‘I’.

1

AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS I, Lara Johnstone, am the petitioner in the above-entitled case, cited as Alien on Pale Blue Dot. In support of my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of my voluntary poverty I am unable to pay the costs of this case or to give security therefore, and I believe I am entitled to redress.

1. My husband, Demian Emile Johnson, has been in prison in California, since October 1982, for felony murder. We married in Folsom Prison on 11 October 1997, whereupon I processed the paperwork to become a legal resident (INS # A77 177 281; CA Drivers Licence #: CA: B9644585). I was arrested by San Francisco INS on 31 January 2002, and deported to South Africa on 03 March 2002, denied the right to return for 10 years. Attempts to resolve the matter with Pretoria Embassy and Johannesburg Homeland Security Department have been unsuccessful, as they state that the INS have lost my file.

Considering the reality that I probably shall never see my husband again, I considered filing for divorce. However I refused to lie on various affidavits, and the appointed Attorney refused to represent me, if I insisted on telling the truth. Consequently, I am still married, considered amicably separated, but have received no financial support from my husband at any time during our marriage.

As a result of my Ecocentric worldview (simplified by Dmitry Orlov as “being poor on purpose is much easier than being poor as a result of suddenly having less than you are accustomed to having. Voluntary poverty is a hell of a lot easier than involuntary poverty”), I live a subsistence lifestyle wherein I grow food for me and my parents, barter (vermicompost and guano fertilizer which I receive from cleaning a pigeon racer’s Aviary) for rent, internet access and food, and have as little contact with the financial Fiat currency Debt Based Economic Growth (exponential use of finite resources for short term profits) Consumptionist grid as possible. I run a small Vermicompost worm farm, all deliveries and transport is done by pedal power: bicycle and bicycle trailer.

Consequently, my income source’s, do not include any income from my husband, and my own are as follows: Self Employment: Average of approximately R500 ($50.00), or less per month.

Income from Real Property: $0.

Interests and Dividends: $0.

Gifts: $0 Alimony: $0.

Child Support: $0.

Retirement: $0.

Disability: $0.

Unemployment: $0.

Public Assistance: $0.

Other: $0.

Total Monthly Income: Approximately R500.00 ($50.00) 2. Employment history for past two years. As above. Self Employed: Gross Monthly Income: Average: R500.00 3. Spouse Employment History: California Prison, since 1982. Gross Monthly Pay: $0.

4. Money in Bank Account: Standard Bank: Savings Account: R6,000 ($600).

Spouse: $0 (as far as I am aware).

5. Assets: Home: Zero/None.

Motor Vehicle: Zero/None Other Assets: Zero/None.

Other Real Estate: Zero/None Bicycle & Trailer: 1

6. Every person or business owing me money. None .

7. Persons who rely on me for support: None.

8. Average Monthly Expenses: I live with my parents, whereby I pay rent by barter. In exchange for looking after the house, when they go away, growing food, and providing compost and fertilizer, I receive free rent, electricity, toiletries and internet. Consequently: Rent or Mortgage Payment: $0.

Cellphone: Approx $10/year.

Home Maintenance: $0.

Food: $0.

Clothing: Secondhand: $20/year.

Laundry: $0.

Medical/Dental: $0 (Eat and live healthy & embrace death: be fully alive) Transportation: $0 (Pedal power) Recreation: $0 (Internet) Insurance: $0 Taxes: $0.

Installment Payments: $0.

Alimony: $0 / Other: $0.

Regular Expenses: Bicycle service, broken bucket, etc): Approx: $20/year.

Total: Approx: $50 per year; about $4. per month.

9. I expect no major changes in my monthly income or expenses, or in my assets or liabilities for the next 12 months.

10. I will not be paying an attorney any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form.

11. I will not be paying anyone other than an attorney any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form.

12. As stated above: See Ecocentric Worldview.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on: 31 October , 2012

________________________________ Lara Johnstone

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REGISTRAR OF THE HIGH COURT CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL 35 KEEROM STREET· CAPE TOWN 8000 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA TELEPHONE: (021) 480-2411 FAX: (021) 423-0412 EMAIL: sofourie@justice.gov.co.za

DEPARTEMENT VAN JUSTlSIE GRIFFIER VAN DIE HOOGGEREGSHOF PROVINSIALE AFD KAAP DIE GOEIE HOOP 35 KEEROM STRAA T KAAPST AD 8000 REPUBLIEK VAN SUlD-AFRIKA TELEFOON: (021) 480-2411 REPUBLIEK YAN SUlD AFRIKA FAX: (021) 423-0412 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA EMAIL: sofourie@justice.gov.co.za

DATUM: DATE:

I

0''-' ...-.0°I ~

VERWYSING: REFERENCE:

MOHAl£ ~~

.MALAN

\0

0 a-,

<1•..•.•• d-~ 1

RILE:S'

9~e.EE\

MOS$GL ----~ .

<k\-~ 691- dS'S3/y-{b Sir / Madam

INFORMA PAUPERIS PROCEEDINGS

('.!s~lea)

terms o.ft~e "provisions of Sub-Rule t'>1ti>, L-.... ;:YO t-f IInrefer

'

of Rule 40 of the Rule toofyou. this Court,

Yours faithful1y

FOR REGlSTRRAR The Secretary Cape Bar Council Huguenot Chambers 67 Keerom Street CAPE TOWN

8001 Sir / Madam Copy forwarded

for your information.

Yours faithful1y

J>4r1 Mrs

L, :::::ro If N .s-rG-Nb I L,.,

IAA i 60S

HE"Tfi ~

-PA-V<-.-

@eoiLGE .

-

T6L~ 0"9-'(

-

\"=t--O

Kindly communicate with above mentioned Attorney as soon as possible.

PLEASE NOTE that al1 advertisements and sheriffs fees are for yOULQyy!L._.

Account and does not form part of the IN FORMA P AUPIRIS appoihtmenC;:

n

• __

._~

__ ••

•

_

>/ : -; , :'," (, :::T

~'----_.._-~.-----..... ,...-. "',".,...-'.._-..~--..,.._i~~.::" : .....-.-...--."...----

Yours Faithful1y

:,/,;,C

:-'.' :;

..'-.;,.; ;.:':r " ~-: :1:

""

i i

DIY