CYCLE

CYCLE Project Location: Elmhurst Street and Oakman Boulevard, Detroit, MI

Project Team Members: Mitch Deans Niels Hoyle-Dodson Kaylee Tucker

Systems Studio Section: Kathy Velikov Jonathan Rule

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan Arch 672 Systems Studio Fall 2020

CONTENTS

Project Narrative and Statistics Design Proposal Assignments Exercises Precedent Studies

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

PROJECT NARRATIVE

Detroit is a city of fabrication entwined with the factory

Site Strategy

line automobile and the captivating myth of opportunity.

Our site is entwined with the Joe Louis Greenway—a 27

However, those who came to Detroit with hopes of prosperity

mile long loop of interconnected bike paths and walkways

have had to contend with the reality of exploitation from

designed to encircle the heart of Detroit’s metropolitan

the neoliberal state. Fictions of the American dream,

center and reimagine a more equitable, economical, and

the nuclear family, and the grand promise of the livable

sustainable future for the city. Previously home to a Sears

manufacturing job have all failed to deliver on their

shopping complex, this area severely lacks the amenities

promises, resulting in generations plundered by corporate

necessary for a healthy neighborhood: including libraries,

greed, racist policies and profit-driven development. Due to

workshops, and grocery stores. CYCLE creates space for

the despotic choices of white, wealthy economic interests,

these missing amenities, benefiting both the residents of

Detroit was systematically disinvested. Though a city of

the bringing new forms of resilience to the cooperative itself

hope, the visions offered by those in power have acted to

as well as surrounding communities.

keep Detroit dependent on a system of predation.

The Joe Louis Greenway and Oakman Blvd act as northWe wanted to think critically about the future of work and

south axes for the project. Both these axes have connections

life in Detroit and favor building unbreakable foundations of

to outside communities—Oakman Blvd to the neighborhood

collectivity and community over defaulting to modes of living

to the west and the Joe Louis Greenway to the center of

that acquiesce to investment capital. For some time, Detroit

Detroit. The project wraps around Oakman Blvd and the

has been growing communities that can rely on each other

Greenway. Elmhurst Ave bisects the site but is transformed

through adverse times, but as long as the central paradigm

into a pedestrian and transit-only zone, striking against

of Detroit’s “dream” remains intact, the alienating nature of

Detroit’s car-centric past. Weaved between these three

the urban fabric will continue to undermine that effort.

axes, community-oriented public space begins to take

We imagine a new direction for this dream, built upon the

shape.

best of Detroit’s culture and elevated on a foundation of collectivity and interdependence that transcends alienation

Due to the need for better access to fresh food options, the

and separation.

cooperative has a large community garden serving as one of the main sites of production, as well as a corner store

By reflecting on the dreams that once built this city, we

for produce and a restaurant. Moving through the site

can imagine a critical realignment of production and

from south to north, one can see the process of growing,

place. Building collectivity directly into the urban fabric

harvesting, and consuming—from the garden, to the corner

empowers the people who labor here to take control of the

store, to the restaurant. To address the needs of children and

dream altogether. By building a foundation of resilience and

parents, the site has a childcare facility, as well as a library

collective interdependence, Detroit can position itself to

that serves everybody in the community. Most importantly,

avoid and become independent of the pitfalls of speculative

the project surrounds a plaza which accommodates a large

capital investment.

range of activities, as well as a bike bar to engage both residents and visitors along the Joe Louis Greenway.

Project Statistics Total gross floor area

137,654 sf

Site area (acres and square feet)

124,319 sf 2.85 acres

FAR Number of floors

1.1 4

Site Strategy Structural Concept We began by laying out a grid system. This system runs parallel to the series of interconnected bar buildings, readjusting angles where the building turns. At the far North end of project, the grid switches to a radial system to

Building height in number of floors and in feet/inches

44’-0”

Dwelling unit count and bedroom count

78 units (48 enclosed) 120 beds

accommodate the larger arc that follows Oakman Ave. The grid is laid out in 25’ bays but some units take advantage of 12.5’ wide half-bays.

In the spirit of the fabrication and craft happening on site, the cooperative uses a CLT post-and-beam structure, with light wood framing dividing walls. The stair cores are structural masonry while the parking garage is comprised of precast concrete elements. The project sits on a concrete foundation, with a partial basement to make for easy maintenance access for all mechanical equipment.

Our post-and-beam system is cantilevered to accommodate larger spans. With a 6’ cantilever on each side, this system also determined our circulation system and our unit dimensions. To allow for horizontal circulation throughout the project, hallways are carved out of one side of the cantilever. Additionally, balconies are carved out of the other side of the cantilever on the top floors.

Dwelling units/acre

27.38

Total SF of non-residential space (retail, office, institutional)

34,945 sf

Total net leasable area

64,280 sf

Efficiency rate in %

54%

Unit Access typology (Point Walk up and/ or singleaccess, walk up, single loaded/ double loaded corridor, loaded corridor etc) Unit Typology (flexible layout, Modular loft, live work, maisonette, units, studios micro unit, etc.)

Number of on-site parking spaces/ parking concept

113 Pedestal and surface

Environmental Strategy

Unit Typology and Social Agenda

Facade Concept and Materiality

As a project which concerns itself with the sustainability of a

Acting as a collection of homes, riffing on the existing

The surrounding Barton-MacFarland neighborhood has an

community and the creation of resilience against neoliberal

housing fabric of Detroit, this cooperative creates varying

abundance of brick buildings and houses with wood siding

threats to a neighborhood’s safety, this project also concerns

levels of communality that can flexibly cater to a diverse

or shingles atop brick. Our façade riffs off of this existing

itself with its own sustainability from an environmental

range of lifestyles. This collection of houses is anchored

housing stock. This illustrates that this space is housing—

standpoint. CYCLE minimizes the usage of steel or concrete

by large communal spaces that are used by the entire

encouraging residents of the cooperative to feel that they

and maximizes wood where structural framing is needed.

community. We have imagined three actors among the

belong in the neighborhood. This also softens the façade

A CLT slab construction with glulam columns and beams

diverse sets of people who would be living on the site:

and makes the space more approachable. Because Cycle

helps to both trap and reduce carbon through the wide use

artists, the elderly, and those who seek transitional

is focused on labor and the importance of maintenance,

of timber throughout the project.

housing. Though the community as a whole benefits from

fabrication, and care, the natural wood shingles can be

the amenities in the cooperative, these groups will benefit

replaced by residents over a long period of time.

Where needed, in areas such as the semi-underground

from them in particular.

parking garage, precast concrete structural members

Balcony spaces are created through the use of knee walls

are used instead of cast-in-place concrete. This type of

There are four main unit types that interlock to form

that act as extensions of the walls below them—sometimes

cosntruction has less embodied energy while ensuring

programmatic bars. The Ally is an individual studio unit

resulting in shingle balconies and other times in brick ones.

long-term durability.

designed to provide accommodations for residents with more privacy needs. The units span one half bay in the module

Conscious of the need to bring as much daylighting as

The cooperative also uses active mechanical systems which

and can be accommodated in many places throughout the

possible into the spaces while avoiding overheating, each

help to reduce energy usage within the building. The project

bar. The Compatriot is envisioned as a paired unit, suited

window has a metal and wood shading device. Though

primarily uses a heat pump for its energy production:

best for caregivers and those in need of assistance. With

based on the same materials and design, there are different

powering the water heaters; powering the cooling and

variations to accommodate ADA accessibility and ground

versions for the various façcades for good solar orientation.

heating systems. An air handling system with heat return

level entry, it makes for ideal housing for single parents, or

Many windows include operable components. Many also

saves energy, while a radiant floor heating system both

elderly and their caretakers. The Comrade, a 3-4 bedroom

feature a built-in planter box to add vegetation to the façade

creates more overall comfort for residents, and does so

unit, is designed to bring together many diverse residents

and to create more opportunities for editability of the

at a lower tempurature to reduce heating costs. Because

into a communal living arrangement. A more contained

building by the residents.

there are minimal ducts needed to distribute air, the need

version of communal living, it has a private kitchen and the

for soffits and enclosed spaces to house mechanical

largest living room space. With variations for accessibility,

A precast concrete system for the partially underground

distribution systems is reduced.

the unit spans two floors and a full bay. The Accomplice

parking garage on the north side serves double duty—while

is designed as a home for young upstarts, the elderly,

structurally necessary for the parking garage, it also forms

and anyone seeking transitional housing—including those

the floor of the sloping plaza above. Vegetated above, this

in unstable situations—among many others who are

area is a pervious surface, softening the large plaza.

interested in taking on a more communal form of living. The unit can be repeated to span an entire three-bay section and features a long bar of communal space with micro kitchens to be shared among multiple units.

A core element of this unit module is the ability for units to absorb one another through a partitionable panel that bridges through bedrooms. This allows for a large degree of flexibility and autonomy to all of the residents and emphasizes shared living situations.

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Site Strategies Diagrams

Site Strategy & Massing Alternative 1 Site and Building Data: 333,293 sq ft or 7.65 acres Site Area 292, 651 sq ft GFA 0.88 FAR 32,517 sq ft Roof area 32,517 sq ft Footprint 32,517 sq ft Site Coverage 83.43% Percentage of pervious site area Approx. 175 Number of Parking spaces

ARCH 527 | Integrative Systems | Exercise 1.2.5 Part 2 - Compactness

Natural Ventilation: (deffective > ___) Floor to Floor Single Angled Cross Stack Height (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

10

25

40

50

150

Design Narrative:

Site Plan

Massing and site coverage

Section Daylight Diagrams

2. Due to the site’s enormity, we were able to try much more eccentric shapes such as this one. The existing buildings also gave us an opportunity to create a building which not only becamed framed by these buildings but also created a semi-enclosed open space along Grand River Avenue.

Solar Studies July 15th, 9 am

July 15th, 4.15 pm

Impervious Area: 55,231 sq ft

September 19th, 10.45 am

Estimated Caluclations Site Gross FAR Estimated Building Area (ft²)

(BGA/SGA)

Gross Area (ft²)

333,294 333,294

0.8 1.1

266,635 366,623

Estimated Estimated Floor No. of Floors Gross Area (ft²)

29,626 40,736

9 9

Final Calculations No. of Floors

9

Floor Gross Building Gross FAR Area (ft²) Area (ft²)

32,768

Roof Area: 32,517 sq ft

September 19th, 4.15 pm

294,912

(BGA/SGA)

Envelope Area (ft²)

E/A

0.88

171,683

0.58

(EA/BGA)

1. Located at the lower end of this site, this iteration was a test in maximizing compactness of our building, as well as experimenting with curves.

3. The advantages of this iteration was its relatively small footprint on the site, maximizing efficiency and permeability through a high degree of pervious surfaces and extremely high compactness.

4. Due to the fact that this was a more objectlike folley in the urban fabric, the massing sticks out awkwardly against its own backdrop. It also produces very dark zones within the small lightwells, due to its tall height.

We first determined the site gross area of site 3, the old Sears site. We focused on the northern parcel of the site. This, along with the FAR range given, allowed us to determine a range for the estimated building gross area. We evetually settled on using 9 floors, giving us a range of estimated floor gross area. These estimated values let us design iteratively while ensuring that our design would be acceptable. Our final FAR was 0.88 and our final E/A compactness value was 0.58.

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Site Circulation

Roof Area and Percentage of Pervious vs. impervious site area

Parking solution

A-2

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Site Strategies Diagrams

Site Strategy & Massing Alternative 2 Site and Building Data: 333,293 sq ft or 7.65 acres Site Area 284,800 sq ft GFA 0.85 FAR 120,800 sq ft Roof area 75,200 sq ft Footprint 83,200 sq ft Site Coverage 60% Percentage of pervious site area Approx. 118 Number of Parking spaces

ARCH 527 | Integrative Systems | Exercise 1.2.5 Part 1 - Solar Orientation & Daylight

Natural Ventilation: (deffective > ___) Floor to Floor Single Angled Cross Stack Height (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

10

25

40

50

150

Design Narrative:

Site Plan

Massing and site coverage

Section Daylight Diagrams

2. Due to the site’s super long North-South shape, we were able to create many rows of south-facing bar buildings without blocking sunlight. The series of bars also created an interesting layering of frames as it stepped toward Grand River Avenue, creating an interesting series of thresholds as we opened a hole in the bar buildings in a circulation path towards the busy street.

Solar Studies July 15th, 9 am

July15th, 4.15 pm

Impervious Area: 133, 034 sq ft

September 19th, 10.45 am

September 19th, 4.15 pm

Estimated Caluclations Site Gross Area (ft²)

333,294 333,294

FAR Estimated Building (BGA/SGA)

Gross Area (ft²)

0.8 1.1

266,635 366,623

Final Calculations Building Gross FAR Area (ft²)

284,400

(BGA/SGA)

Envelope Area (ft²)

E/A

0.85

430,800

1.51

(EA/BGA)

Roof Area: 120,800 sq ft

3. The advantages of this design were its maximized Southern exposure, its interesting interaction with Grand River Avenue and its ability to create shared, centralized spaces which disrupt the series of strips. The massing would also have great crossventilation.

We first determined the site gross area of site 3, the old Sears site. We focused on the northern parcel of the site. This, along with the FAR range given, allowed us to determine a range for the estimated building gross area. For the solar design process, we used these numbers to check ourselves as we designed. We then calculated the Envelope Area and E/A value. For this part, the FAR was 0.85 and the E/A value was 1.51.

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Site Circulation

Roof Area and Percentage of Pervious vs. impervious site area

1. A precursor to our final iteration, this project creates a series of bar buildings which orient South for best daylighting, with specific openings creating zones for public space on the site.

Parking solution

4. This design is very fragmented and apart, making it less compact and thus more wasteful. Past the first massing along Grand River, this open space becomes walled off for the most part, which may produce a more private-feeling “dead zone” of open space.

A-2

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Site Strategies Diagrams

Site Strategy & Massing Alternative 3 Site and Building Data: 124,319sq ft or 2.85 acres Site Area 137,654 sq ft GFA 1.11 FAR 64,922.33 sq ft Roof area 64,922.33 sq ft Footprint 46,565.5 sq ft Site Coverage 33% Percentage of pervious site area 103 Number of Parking spaces

Design Narrative:

Site Plan

Massing and site coverage

1. Departing from the last two, this massing takes on the Northern section of the site, composed of a series of ribbons of massing which frame out shared public spaces in the middle.

2. Short text description of opportunities your team took from site conditions

Impervious Area: 83,294 sq ft

3. Short text description for advantages of the site strategy of this alternative 4. Short text description of challenges this alternative presents

Roof Area: 64,922 sq ft

Site Circulation

Roof Area and Percentage of Pervious vs. impervious site area

Parking solution (see last page of A2 for more)

A-2

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Building and Site Diagrams Solar Orientation and Daylight N

Site Strategy & Massing SOLAR ORIENTATION AND DAYLIGHT Key design strategies: 1. Orient Units to all have adequate Southern exposure as much as possible.

2. Increase height on Northern bar buildings and minimize height on more Southerly ones to maximize sunlight in shared public spaces.

3. Keep space open along the Joe Louis Greenway to maximize sunlight along this strip of important walking trail.

9:00 AM 10/05

Design Narrative:

1:00 PM 10/05

The massing designed as a series of ribbons which frame important public areas of the site, this project orients as many of the ribbons of building as possible in a Southern direction to maximize Southern exposure. The massing is then built up on the most Northern ribbons and reduced near the more Southern sections to maximize lighting into the shared public spaces. Most importantly, maximizing sunlight within the community garden spaces on the Southern half of the site to encourage plant growth.

3:00 PM 10/05

6:00 PM 10/05

A-2

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Site Strategy & Massing PARKING SOLUTION Parking Strategy Partially Underground Parking (sloped, 48 spaces), street parking on Oakman Blvd. (23 spaces), Small lot along South access road (42 spaces) 120 Parking Requirement Number of Parking Required per Ordinance 1.00 Total parking Area Number of Parking Spaces Area per Space

23,713 sq ft 103 (8.5’x20’) 170 sq ft 6 6

Accessible Parking Spaces Van-Accessible Parking. Spaces

Reduction of Parking Requirement Strategy Varience due to available transit, proximity to Joe Louis Greenway and thus ample bike parking (both indoor and outdoor)

Design Narrative: Knowing that this project wanted to turn away from the ubiquity of the large surface parking lot, this project spread out its parking and placed some in a parking garage serving to elevate the sloping plaza, some along the street, as well as a little at the Southern end along the already-needed access street for the fabrication shop.

Though certainly under the required amount at 103 of 119 parking spaces, it was our desire to encourage as much transit and bike transportation as possible. Located along the 15 bus line and also accomodating 98 bike parking spaces (98 spaces each indoor and outdoor) this project offers such amenities to encourage residents to not use cars.

A-2

CYCLE OCCUPANCY GROUPS: R-2 A-2 A-3 E B F-1 M 1 HR FIRE SEPARATIONS: WALL: 70 min provided by: • 2x4 wood studs @16” O.C. (20 min) • 2x6 wood studs @ 16” O.C. (20 min) • 5/8” gypsum board (30 min) FLOOR & CEILING: at least 60 min provided by: • 9” CLT

M

M

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Egress and Accessibility Gross Building Area 137,654 SF Percentage of circulation area 7.77% Required Egress Stair Width 36” Sprinklered Yes Sprinkler Type NFPA 13R Sprinkler System Building Occupant Load 1066

Building Circulation

Cores distributed throughout buildings with single-loaded hallways connecting them.

Additionally, units with ground access have their own exits and internal circluation (if 2 stories)

A-2 A-2

M r

1h

r

r

1h

1h

M r

1h

1hr

A-3

M

F-1

A-2 A-2

r

1h

F-1

r

M

1hr

r

1h

r 1h

E

1h

M

E F-1

M

M

E

A-3 F-1

E F-1 A-3

E F-1

unit circulation, vertical

E

M

E E building circulation, vertical A-3

1hr

B

building circulation, horizontal

unit circulation, vertical

exit discharge

building circulation, vertical

F-1

All occupancy groups not labeled are

R-2

1hr

B

0’

12.5’ 25’

50’

building circulation, horizontal

100’

exit discharge

EGRESS AXON

F-1

All occupancy groups not labeled are

R-2

0’

12.5’ 25’

50’

100’

A-3

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Occupant Load: 39

58’-10”

38’-7”

58’-10”

UP

Maximum Allowable Common Path of Travel: 125’

Max. Common Path of Travel: 68’-3”

38’-7”

Maximum Allowable Travel Distance: 250’

Max. Travel Distance: 246’-4”

UP

Number of Exits: 3

DN

Egress and Accessibility

DN

” ’-7 48

” ’-7 48 12

Required Stair Width: 36”

”

-3

9’

” ’-3

UP

2 12

2

12

UP

UP

Required Door Width: 32” clear

48’-

2”

48’-

Gross Floor Area Percentage of circulation area Required Egress Stair Width Required Egress Door Width

148

’-6”

’-6”

90’-

2”

90’-

2”

2”

DN

148

DN

12

”

-3

9’

”

’-3

UP

44’-

9”

44’-

9”

42126 SF 6.4% 44” 32” clear

DN DN

UP

69’-

3”

UP

69’-

3”

195

195

’-11

’-11

”

”

Floor Circulation

There are two buildings­— the north building has three circulation cores and the south one has four. The north building also takes advantage of the grade change of the plaza and has some “ground level” egress access.

Occupant Load: 111 65’-

65’-

2”

261

’-9” 261

’-9”

Number of Exits: 4

2”

UP UP

262’-4”

Required Stair Width: 44”

94’-10”

Unit Circulation 262’-4”

For double height units that span between the first and second level, unitspecifc egress is provided on the first floor. For all other double height units, there is access to a main horizontal circulation path on at least one floor. Single height units have access to horizontal circulation as well.

94’-10”

179

179

’-2”

’-2”

163

163

’-3”

’-3”

Required Door Width: 32” clear

DN DN

93’-1”

93’-1”

DN DN

254

254

’-4”

’-4”

87’-

5”

5”

107

9”

107

’-1”

30’-

’-1”

30’-

9”

87’-

EXIT BELOW TO STREET

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

DN

DN

0’ 12.5’ 25’

50’

100’

0’ 12.5’ 25’

50’

100’

A-3

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Structural schemes - Plan details

CNC

Schematic Structural Concepts 25’

Building Data:

6’ 40’

24’

23’ 24’

25’

6’ 23’

Ground Snow Load Structural Frame Type Structural Materials Structure Fire Rating Period

Structural Scheme Option 1 Post-and-Beam Linear System / Heavy Timber / First Floor Plan 1

Structural Scheme Option 2 Grid System / Precast Concrete / First Floor Plan Concrete Plan 3/32" = 1'-0"

Primary grid spacing

Based on an agreeable unit module for the project, it was decided that the columns would be spaced at 25’ bays, and cantilevered at 6’ to reduce the beam sizing and allow for a more free facade.

Secondary Spanning system sizing

At 25’ spans, the CLT slab system would be shipped in 10’ widths. Because of its length, we sized the CLT slab at 7 layers (10.5”)

Primary Spanning system sizing

Due to the slight cantilever of 6’ on both ends, the beam only spans 23’ between the two columns. According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the beam should be sized at 18”.

Vertical bearing system sizing

According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the sizing of the columns could be as small as 8”x8” (but to make flush with the beam we increased the width to 10” and increased depth to account for lateral loads).

Structural Scheme Option 3 Post-and-Beam Radial System / Heavy Timber / First Floor Plan

Structural Schematics Primary grid spacing

Based on maximum spans of 40’, this is a one-way system of precast concrete columns, inverted tee beams and slab panels. Due to the differing demands of the parking structure, this system was chosen.

Secondary Spanning system sizing

The secondary spanning system would be precast concrete slabs.

According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the slabs should be sized at 9” deep slabs would only span in the North-South direction, where column-to-column spacing is a maximum of 24’)

Primary Spanning system sizing

The primary spanning system would be an inverted tee beam. According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the beam should be sized at 24”.

Vertical bearing system sizing

According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the sizing of the columns would be 12”x12”.

Primary grid spacing

A variation on the first structural scheme, this structural scheme uses 25’ bays (from the inside circular grid) and arrays radially.

Secondary Spanning system sizing

At 25’ spans, the CLT slab system would be shipped in 10’ widths. Because of its length, we sized the CLT slab at 7 layers (10.5”)

Type IV Zone A 105 mph Roof: 20 psf, Floor:40 psf 25 psf Post-and-Beam Precast Concrete,CLT slab,Glulam Framing 1 Hour

Type of Construction Site Location Seismic Rating Site Specific Wind Speed 3s gust Floor and Roof Live Load

Design Narrative: Our massing composed of thin bars in various forms and shapes, we sought out the simplicity of a single bay system in one direction, for versatility.

Considering sustainability and the high degree of woodworking happening on-site, we pursued wood construction. We were also eager to learn more about heavy timber and CLT construction, which we also used in most areas of the project.

However, because of differing needs for the parking garage, we explored a precast concrete system that could be more durable, fire-resistant and less moldprone.

Primary Spanning system sizing

Due to the slight cantilever of 6’ on both ends, the beam only spans 23’ between the two columns. According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the beam should be sized at 18”.

Vertical bearing system sizing

According to the Architect’s Studio Companion, the sizing of the columns could be as small as 8”x8” (but to make flush with the beam we increased the width to 10” and increased depth to account for lateral loads).

A-4

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Building Layout and Grid - Plan views

CNC

Schematic Structural Concepts

restaurant

back of house

Building Data:

parking below cooperative/ commercial

Type of Construction Site Location Seismic Rating Site Specific Wind Speed 3s gust Floor and Roof Live Load Ground Snow Load Structural Frame Type Structural Materials Structure Fire Rating Period

cooperative/ commercial

cooperative/ commercial

corner store

bike bar

Building Layout (Partial, First Floor)

Structural Spanning System

Structural Grid

Design Narrative: Our massing composed of thin bars in various forms and shapes, we sought out the simplicity of a single bay system in one direction, for versatility.

community library

gallery daycare daycare

daycare

Structural Schematics Summary - Isometric Views joe louis greenway

Considering sustainability and the high degree of woodworking happening on-site, we pursued wood construction. We were also eager to learn more about heavy timber and CLT construction, which we also used in most areas of the project.

joe louis greenway

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

3 8'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

joe louis greenway

greenhuose

Type Zone mph psf psf Type Materials Minutes

However, because of differing needs for the parking garage, we explored a precast concrete system that could be more durable, fire-resistant and less moldprone.

3 21'-8 4 "

parking

public plaza

3 21'-8 4 "

parking

public plaza

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

parking

3 21'-8 4 "

public plaza

artists’ studio

1 8'-0 4"

2

Level 2 Copy 3 3/32" = 1'-0"

1 31'-4 2 " oakland ave.

concrete retaining walls

masonry

heavy timber (clt)

concrete retaining walls

oakland ave.

masonry

heavy timber (clt)

concrete retaining walls

12'-0" oakland ave.

13'-0"

12'-0"

masonry

13'-0"

Level 2 Copy 3 3/32" = 1'-0"

12'-0"

2

Structural Scheme Option 2 Axonometric

13'-0"

heavy timber (clt)

1 31'-4 2 "

1 31'-4 2 "

4'-0

Structural Scheme Option 1 Axonometric

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

3 21'-8 4 "

fabrication shop

Structural Scheme Option 3 Axonometric

A-4

CYCLE

ENERGY DISTRIBUTION

AIR HANDLING UNIT

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

WARM WATER ENERGY HEATING CONVERSION

CNC

Active Environmental Systems Design (HVAC) Integrated Systems Design Summary The system starts at the Heat pump which utalizes a compressort to generator energy from ground water.

The energy is directed to a water heating unit for warmwater heating, and channeled through a heat recover AHU to distribute warm or cool air. Additionally energy is directed a series of radiant floor loops to heat rooms through thermal mass in the floors.

WATER HEATER

Active Energy Concept Illustrate the mechanical system in a sketch. It should include - Mechanical Vent Heat Recovery Unit - Mechanical Heat Pump - Radiant Floor/ Mechanical Vent - Water Heater

RADIANT SLAB HEAT RECOVERY UNIT

HEAT PUMP

AIR VENTILATION GROUNDWATER

A-5

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Heat Recovery Unit Air Handling Unit

CNC

Active Environmental Systems Design (HVAC) Energy Conversion Heating system: Mechanical Heat Pump

Cooling System: Natural Ventilation/ Heat Pump

Energy Conversion Mechanical Heat Pump The Mechanical Heat Pump allowed us to combine radiant floor heating with mechanical ventilation as well as to power a water heating system.

Radiant Floor Loop

Thermal Heat Pump Supply Air Return Air

A-5

CYCLE

ENERGY CONCEPT SECTION DIAGRAM - Q2 SOLAR WARM WATER HEATING PLATE

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

STUDIO: CNC GROUP NAMES: MITCH DEANS KAYLEE TUCKER NIELS HOYLEDODSON

CNC

Active Environmental Systems Design (HVAC)

MECHANICAL VENT. AHU (HEAT RECOVERY)

Mechanical Ventilation Design Summary RADIANT FLOOR HEATING (FROM HEAT PUMP)

Mechanical ventilation is designed to conicide with unit design. Paired dwelling units share an air handling unit and which provides air to a shared commons space. windows on both sides of the units allow for natural ventilation.

NATURAL VENTILATION

Components are located to minimize chase width and a demising wall is utalized as a chase for a below ground mechanical heat pump.

COOLING COIL (BASED ON HEAT PUMP)

WARM WATER SYSTEM BACKUP: HEAT PUMP WARM WATER HEATING TANKS

Return Air

Supply Air

Return Air Duct

Air Handling Unit

Radiant Floor Loop

Heat Pump

HEAT PUMP BASED ON AHU (HEAT RECOVERY)

Supply Air Duct

ALL SYSTEMS IN BASEMENT FOR EASY MAINTENANCE ACCESS

Air Handling Unit

Heat Pump

Supply Air Duct Return Air Duct

Radiant Floor Loop

Supply Air Return Air

A-5

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Level 4/Roof (32’) Black Painted Shingle

Level 3 (22’)

Facade Systems Selection and Layout Building Data: Gross Building SF

Level 2 (12’) Total Elevation SF (including courtyard sections) Total Glass SF Total Percentage of Glass Elevation

Blonde Brick JOE LOUIS GREENWAY ELEVATION 0’

6.25’

12.5’

25’

50’

Roof (42’)

137,654 sq ft 58,843 sq ft 17,223 sq ft 29.27% East

Facade Design Narrative:

Level 4 (32’) Level 3 (22’) Level 2 (12’)

The design of this project’s facade riffs on the existing housing stock in the Barton-MacFarland and other Detroit neighborhoods, playing with the common trope of a brick base with upper floors clad in a wood shingle. By using a blonde brick which contrasts with a dark gray fishscale shingle, the project brings a more contemporary look to the commonly traditional facade material combination.

This 2-tone style helps to differentiate the residential spaces from the more public ones, with almost all commercial spaces existing on the bottom floor (which makes the change to storefront windows more natural on sections of brick). This also creates the sense of a “base” on which upper levels sit upon.

Roof (42’) Level 4 (32’) Level 3 (22’) Level 2 (12’)

Ramp Level

Overall Building Elevation: Primary Site or Street Facade(s)

Many second and third floor walkways are left open to increase connection and views upon the adjacent open spaces, which can be enclosed by a corrugated plastic, steel-framed shutter which folds up along the walkways’ knee walls for protection against snow and rain.

To create more opportunities for resident editability, many residential windows are fitted with built-in planter boxes. There are also wood-slatted, metal framed shading devices outside all non-North-facing windows, some operable and others not, in different orientations depending on the window’s orientation with the sun in order to allow for more daylighting while blocking some of the more intense direct sunlight.

A-6

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Roof (42’)

Facade Systems Selection and Layout

Level 4 (32’)

Building Data:

Level 3 (22’)

Gross Building SF Level 2 (12’) Total Elevation SF Total Glass SF Total Percentage of Glass in Elevation

OAKMAN BLVD ELEVATION 0’

12.5’

25’

50’

137,654 sq ft 46,429 sq ft 10,591 sq ft 22.81% West

100’

Roof (42’)

Facade Design Narrative: The design of this project’s facade riffs on the existing housing stock in the Barton-MacFarland and other Detroit neighborhoods, playing with the common trope of a brick base with upper floors clad in a wood shingle. By using a blonde brick which contrasts with a dark gray fishscale shingle, the project brings a more contemporary look to the commonly traditional facade material combination.

Level 4 (32’) Level 3 (22’) Level 2 (12’)

This 2-tone style helps to differentiate the residential spaces from the more public ones, with almost all commercial spaces existing on the bottom floor (which makes the change to storefront windows more natural on sections of brick). This also creates the sense of a “base” on which upper levels sit upon.

Level 4 (32’) Level 3 (22’) Level 2 (12’)

Overall Building Elevation: Side / Secondary Facade(s)

Many second and third floor walkways are left open to increase connection and views upon the adjacent open spaces, which can be enclosed by a corrugated plastic, steel-framed shutter which folds up along the walkways’ knee walls for protection against snow and rain.

To create more opportunities for resident editability, many residential windows are fitted with built-in planter boxes. There are also wood-slatted, metal framed shading devices outside all non-North-facing windows, some operable and others not, in different orientations depending on the window’s orientation with the sun in order to allow for more daylighting while blocking some of the more intense direct sunlight.

A-6

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

OAKMAN BOULEVARD ELEVATION

0’

3.12’’

6.25’

25’

12.5’

Facade Systems Selection and Layout Building Data: Gross Building SF Total Elevation SF (excluding wall under parking garage) Total Glass SF Total Percentage of Glass in Elevation

137,654 sq ft 640 sq ft

146.5 sq ft 22.89% East

Facade Design Narrative: The design of this project’s facade riffs on the existing housing stock in the Barton-MacFarland and other Detroit neighborhoods, playing with the common trope of a brick base with upper floors clad in a wood shingle. By using a blonde brick which contrasts with a dark gray fishscale shingle, the project brings a more contemporary look to the commonly traditional facade material combination.

This 2-tone style helps to differentiate the residential spaces from the more public ones, with almost all commercial spaces existing on the bottom floor (which makes the change to storefront windows more natural on sections of brick). This also creates the sense of a “base” on which upper levels sit upon. restaurant

Many second and third floor walkways are left open to increase connection and views upon the adjacent open spaces, which can be enclosed by a corrugated plastic, steel-framed shutter which folds up along the walkways’ knee walls for protection against snow and rain.

back of house

parking below cooperative/ commercial

cooperative/ commercial

cooperative/ commercial

corner store

bike bar

Key Plan

Enlarged Elevation Study

To create more opportunities for resident editability, many residential windows are fitted with built-in planter boxes. There are also wood-slatted, metal framed shading devices outside all non-North-facing windows, some operable and others not, in different orientations depending on the window’s orientation with the sun in order to allow for more daylighting while blocking some of the more intense direct sunlight.

A-6 community library

gallery daycare daycare

daycare

CYCLE Metal-Capped Wood Mullions Aluminum Exterior, Wood Interior

3’-0”

3’-0”

Exterior Door: D1

Storefront Window: S1

Exterior Door/Window Combination: DW1 (with planter box variation of shingled or anodized aluminum)

1’-3” 3’-0”

Window: W3 (open and closed)

5’-4”

8’-0”

1’-3”

12’-6”

Folding Walkway Enclosure: W4 Tube Steel Frame with Polycarbonate Cladding

5’-0”

Window: W5 (with shading variation)

Scale: 3/16”=1’-0”

Window Type Diagram / Schedule

Instances: S1: D1: DW1: W1: W2: W3: W4: W5: W6:

21 112 56 123 38 49 38 38 102

Because our entire window concept was designed with the window manufacturer VELFAC, we planned to use a more thermally resistive triple-glazed system filled with argon gas in the cavities between the plates of glass. These windows, because of their material, would help to conserve energy. The fact that most of the window is made from wood also helps to reduce the amount of embodied energy present within the windows, to make for a more sustainable window/ door choice. All residential non-North-facing windows and doors are also fitted with shading devices, in different orientations as needed and some operable, to help reduce overheating due to direct sunlight while increasing daylighting in the space with transom lites above most windows and doors.

2’-0”

Window: W2 (with planter box variation)

Unit Data:

Considering the high amount of exposed heavy timber on the inside, and in celebration of the wood/ metal fabrication work happening in the fabrication shop, our group decided to go with a window/door framing material which would have a wood structure and an anodized aluminum exterior cover. This would provide warm, attractive windows on the inside with a more durable, long-lasting material on the outside.

5’-0”

Window and Side Lite Combination: W1 (with planter box variation)

Facade Systems Selection and Layout

Window Design Narrative:

4’-0”

4’-0”

4’-0”

1’-3”

1’-3”

Sealed wood Shading Device Wood 1x1 slats fastened to a fabricated tube steel frame

3’-0”

4’-0”

5’-0”

Sealed wood Shading Device: Sliding Wood 1x1 slats fastened to a fabricated tube steel frame

2’-0”

1/8” Thick Anodized Aluminum Trim

4’-0”

7’-0”

10’-0” Typ.

1’-3”

1’-3”

Metal-Capped Wood Frames Aluminum Exterior, Wood Interior

Triple Glazing, Low-E Coating with Argon Filling (Typical)

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Sealed wood Shading Device Wood 1x1 slats fastened to a fabricated tube steel frame

7’-0”

4’-7” Typ.

4’-0”

Window: W6

Continuing the language of wood and metal, the jamb, head and sill trim material on the exterior is composed of a thin anodized aluminum material to match the window, and also give a clean edge to the wall as it wraps to the window. On the interior, the wall wraps with a 3/4” wood trim, to match the exposed interior wood frame structure of the windows/doors.

A-6

CYCLE

Floor Details

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Façade, Environmental Systems & Wall Sections Building Data: Site Restrictions Structural framing system Structural frame Facade system Flooring type Fire Protection Construction method Procurement approach

Typical module force exploded diagrams

Typical flooring system and finishes

Typical anatomy of structure and construction

Site Rigid Frame CLT Cedar Shingle/ Brick Hardwood Methods Crane, Pre-cast, CIP

Design Narrative: The CLT Beam and Slab Rigid Framing system is ideal for this project because it allows for the most efficient use of a module that ensures balcony spaces to every residential unit in the building.

Structural Assembly and Lateral Support System

Detail Design

25'-0"

1. On the selected structural scheme, provide an exploded view of a typical bay showing the vertical load bearing elements and the transfer of loads from secondary to primary load bearing members - show how the force components are broken down in the exploded views.

11'-11"

0"

25'-

"

'-0

2. Provide technical cut away views of the selected structural system and fully describe the materials, profiles and sizes shown in an isometric view.

- 6" 12' - 6"

0"

- 6"

12'

- 6"

12'

25'-

12'

25'0"

- 6" 12' - 6" 12'

0"

- 6" 12'

4 1 4"

21'

30'-

4 1 4"

0’

25’

50’

4. Provide detailed plans, sections, elevations, axonometric views of final structural system, as representative for the entire building – show cut away sections fully annotated with sizes.

5. Provide typical floor plan showing bearing structure grid at typical big scale- with clear demarcations of the lateral support system.

25'-

25'-

Isometric view of structural assembly fully annotated with lateral support system shown

3. Provide a detailed cut away view of the structural system showing how the floor system integrates with the vertical load bearing structure and strategic layering association with other services and finishes as relevant.

12'

- 6"

25'-

0"

12'

- 6"

12'

- 6"

25'0"

25

'-0 "

25

'-0

"

25

29'

- 11

3/4"

- 7 1/3

2"

100’

Typical Floor plan with all structural sizes and grids dimensioned

6. Include functional zoning diagrams, integrated with the structual system to illustrate your strategy for integrated systems.

7. Explain how materials considerations provide opportunities and create challenges in relation to thermal mass, fire resistance, durability and weight.

A-7

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC CLT Beam and Slab placement via Crane

Façade, Environmental Systems & Wall Sections Building Data:

Masonry Stair Core layed manually EPDM built-up roof

GYP on Light Wood Framing CLT Beam CLT Slab

Cedar Slats w/ Steel Frame Cast in place Pre-Cast Concrete concrete Panels

Cedar Shingles

Cast in place concrete

Aluminum Frame

Masonry Veneer Applied over gyp Runing Brick

Steel Plate Alluminum Storefront

Site Restrictions Structural framing system Structural frame Facade system Flooring type Fire Protection Construction method Procurement approach

Grand River Ave. and Elm

Rigid Frame CLT Cedar Shingle Hardwood Fiberglass Insulation Crane, Pre-Cast, INSITU

Compettative Bidding

Cedar Shingles Applied manually as weatherproofing

Design Narrative:

Construction rendered exploded views

Construction schematic diagram described with annotations

Integrated Systems Details

CLT Slab and Beam construction combine with Masonry shear elements to create an aesthetic melding of wood and masonry into an overall unified aesthetic.

Integrated Design 1. Show zoning strategy details – for vertical and horizontal distributions on 3D view representations.

2. Show X Section details of key structural elements integrated with detail design sizes and key interfacting components on interior elements - finishes, services, clearances, access, circulation openings.

3. Show X section details of structural/walls/facades elements and how these are integrated with detail design sizes including lateral support systems.

4. Show constructional system with exploded views with strategy and staged construction illustrated 5. Show staged constructional layout diagrams, showing how opportunities are created on the site and constraings are overcome - to include aspects on speed of erection, access to site, location, height, size.

Typical internal wall structure floor junction

Typical Isometric cut away structure integrated detail

Studio style cut away structural detail with finishes fully annotated

A-7

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Faรงade, Environmental Systems & Wall Sections

Key Plan with Wall Section Location Wall Section Design Narrative: The wall section is designd with consideration for an operable wall section. The operable partition allows for a more flexibilty interior/exterior corridore which can be insulated in the winter, and open in the summer months. Brick and Shingle weather barriers are continued into these corridors to ensure proper protection year round. Brick Material t the ground level indicates more mixed programatic areas, while purely shingle finishes indicate residential units.

Concrete (Cast in Place and SITU) typically indicates more public areas and functionally allows for an exccavated below grade parking garage.

A-7

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Faรงade, Environmental Systems & Wall Sections

Key Plan with Wall Section Location

Wall Section / Window Design Narrative: Window Mullions were selected in order to be well integrated with a movable screens sytem, as well as to allow for the transition of material (Metal to Wood) from Exterior to Interior in accordance with the project aesthetic. Sun shading devices were specified in order to provide optimal shading at each position in the building. Sun shades vary dependant on exposure for north, south, east, and west facing windows.

Head, jamb and sill details are all constucted of wood trim, creating a wood lip at every opening in the project. The wood trim reflects the materiality of the exposed CLT structural system.

Enlarged Facade and Wall Section at Window Opening A-7

CYCLE Passive and Active Environmental Systems and Facades

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

ARCH 527 | E08a | Mitch Deans, Niels Holye-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Q2 - Glazing

Façade, Environmental Systems & Wall Sections

Glazing type - VELFAC 200 ENERGY - Triple glazing

Insulation U-value Roof (R-Value) U-Value Wall (R-Value) (ft2/F/kBTU/h) U-Value Floor (R-Value) (ft2/F/kBTU/h)

SHGC

Weather Wrap PERM

45.87 (ft2/F/kBTU/h) X,xx W/m2K (ft2/F/kBTU/h) XX

Btu/(h•ft2•ºF)

0.088 0.092 0.092 Prioritze a low SHGC over a low U value because we have a lot of glazing on the E and W sides of our building.

Clear 4mm EXT.

48 mm 1.889”

Energy 4mm INT.

Sun SKN176 6mm Argon gap 18mm

Argon gap 16mm

Location Material Thickness Calculation R value Exterior shingle siding (not included in calculation- hung off wall) N/A Air Space (Vertical, Horizontal Heat Flow, non-reflective) 0.68 Rainscreen 0.75 N/A neglibible XPS insulation 1.50 5.00*t 7.5 Plywood Sheathing 0.50 N/A 0.62 Fiberglass Batt Insulation 5.50 4.00*t 22 Fiberglass Batt Insulation 3.50 4.00*t 14 Air Space (Vertical, Horizontal Heat Flow, non-reflective) 0.68 Interior Gypsum 0.625 0.39 Total R Value

4 5 .8 7

XPS Insulation

R values from Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings , Grondzik - Tables E.1, E.3

Insulation Layer

Weather Wrap Vapor Barrier

A-7

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

Specifications Outline and Sections 06 18 16, 08 53 13, and xx xx xx SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINE Division 00 ­Procurement and Contracting Requirements 00 00 00 Procurement and Contracting Requirements 00 10 00 ­Solicitation 00 20 00 ­Instructions for Procurement 00 30 00 ­Available Information 00 40 00 ­Procurement Forms and Supplements 00 50 00 ­Contracting Forms and Supplements 00 60 00 ­Project Forms 00 70 00 ­Conditions of the Contract 00 80 00 ­Unassigned 00 90 00 ­Revisions, Clarifications, and Modifications Division 01 ­General Requirements

01 00 00 ­General Requirements 01 10 00 ­Summary 01 20 00 ­Price and Payment Procedures 01 30 00 ­Administrative Requirements 01 40 00 ­Quality Requirements 01 60 00 ­Product Requirements 01 70 00 ­Execution and Closeout Requirements 01 80 00 ­Performance Requirements 01 90 00 ­Life Cycle Activities Division 02 ­Existing Conditions

02 00 00 ­Existing Conditions 02 20 00 ­Assessment 02 30 00 ­Subsurface Investigation 02 50 00 ­Site Remediation 02 60 00 ­Contaminated Site Material Removal 02 70 00 ­Water Remediation Division 03 ­Concrete

03 00 00 ­Concrete 03 10 00 ­Concrete Forming and Accessories 03 20 00 ­Concrete Reinforcing 03 30 00 ­Cast-­in-­Place Concrete 03 40 00 ­Precast Concrete

03 41 16 Precast Concrete Slabs 03 41 23 Precast Concrete Stairs 03 41 33 Precast Structural Pretensioned Concrete 03 60 00 ­Grouting 03 80 00 ­Concrete Cutting and Boring Division 04 ­Masonry

04 00 00 ­Masonry

04 01 00 Maintenance of Masonry

04 01 20 Maintenance of Unit Masonry

04 05 13 Masonry Mortaring

04 20 00 ­Unit Masonry

04 21 00 Clay Unit Masonry 04 21 13 Brick Masonry 04 21 13.13 Brick Veneer Masonry

04 27 00 Multiple-Wythe Unit Masonry Division 05 ­Metals

05 01 00 Maintenance of Metals

05 01 50 Maintenance of Metal Fabrica

tions 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications Division 06 ­Wood, Plastics, Composites

06 00 00 ­Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 10 00 ­Rough Carpentry 06 20 00 ­Finish Carpentry 06 40 00 ­Architectural Woodwork 06 17 19 Cross-Laminated Timber 06 18 13 Glued-Laminated Beams 06 18 16 Glued-Laminated Columns 06 46 00 Wood Trim Division 07 ­Thermal and Moisture Protection

07 00 00 ­Thermal and Moisture Protection 07 10 00 ­Dampproofing and Waterproofing 07 20 00 ­Thermal Protection 07 21 00 Thermal Insulation 07 21 13 Board Insulation 07 21 26 Blown Insulation 07 25 00 ­Weather Barriers 07 50 00 ­Membrane Roofing 07 60 00 ­Flashing and Sheet Metal

07 62 00 Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim 07 72 73 Vegetated Roof Systems 07 76 00 Roof Pavers Division 08 ­Openings

08 00 00 ­Openings 08 10 00 ­Doors and Frames 08 14 23 Clad Wood Doors 08 14 23.13 Metal-Faced Wood Doors 08 40 00 ­Entrances, Storefronts, and Curtain Walls

08 43 11 Timber-Framed Storefronts 08 50 00 ­Windows

08 52 13 Metal-Clad Wood Windows 08 70 00 Hardware Division 09 ­Finishes 09 00 00 ­Finishes

09 01 00 Maintenance of Finishes

09 20 00 ­Plaster and Gypsum Board 09 50 00 ­Ceilings 09 60 00 ­Floorings

09 68 00 Carpeting

09 64 33 Laminated Wood Flooring 09 90 00 ­Painting and Coating

09 91 13 Exterior Painting 09 91 23 Interior Painting 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing

Specifications

Division 10 ­Specialties

10 01 30 Operation and Maintenance of Fireplaces and Stoves 10 30 00 ­Fireplaces and Stoves 10 71 13 Exterior Sun Control Devices Division 11 ­Equipment 11 10 00 ­Vehicle and Pedestrian Equipment 11 30 00 Residential Equipment 11 40 00 Foodservice Equipment Division 12 ­Furnishings 12 20 00 ­Window Treatments 12 30 00 ­Casework Division 13 ­Special Construction

Division 14 ­Conveying Equipment 14 00 00 ­Conveying Equipment 14 20 00 ­Elevators 14 30 00 ­ Division 21 ­Fire Suppression Division 22 ­Plumbing Division 23 ­Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Division 25 ­Integrated Automation Division 26 ­Electrical Division 27 ­Communications Division 28 ­Electronic Safety and Security Division 31 ­Earthwork Division 32 ­Exterior Improvements

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC Division 33 ­Utilities Division 40 ­Process Integration

Specifications

Division 41 ­Material Processing and Handling Equipment SPECIFICATION SECTIONS 04 21 13.13 Brick Veneer Masonry Part 1: General 1.1 Summary This section includes all Brick Veneer Masonry.

Related Sections: 03 30 00 - Cast-In-Place Concrete: Structural wall backing.

04 01 00 - Maintenance of Masonry 04 05 00 - Common Work Results for Masonry 04 06 00 - Schedules for Masonry 04 08 00 - Commissioning of Masonry 04 21 00 - Unit Masonry 07 26 00 - Vapor Retarders

1.2 References ASTM International C1088 - 20: Standard Specification for Thin Veneer Brick Units Made from Clay or Shale.

ASTM International C62 - 17: Standard Specification for Building Brick (Solid Masonry Units Made From Clay or Shale) Structural Engineer Please refer to structural drawings for details and information on Masonry Wall Construction.

1.4 Quality Assurance All Masonry Veneer will be composed of shale, and must be free of chips or discoloration before leaving the manufacturing facility.

All Masonry Veneer Units must be composed of the same material as Structural Masonry Units.

1.5 Qualifications Contractor Qualifications: Building Contractor must have previous experience in the construction of brick masonry veneer walls.

1.6 Mockup A mockup will be made of a wall section with Masonry Veneer properly attached, and connected to a wall.

The wall section will be erected on-site. Location to be determined by architect/engineer.

The mockup will then be deconstructed, and if approved, the wall will be used on-site for construction.

Part 2: Products 2.1 Masonry Veneers Manufacturers: Masonry Veneers are to be sourced from a company within 500 miles of the construction site, and must show proof of product conformance with ASTM standard C1670-

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC 13. Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: Glen-Gery Masonry Supply If the contractor wishes to source the Veneers from a different manufacturer, the contractor must receive approval from the architect before ordering.

Specifications

2.3 Accessories Air/Vapor Barriers: All Walls must be fitted properly with an Air/ Vapor Barrier system that controls the flow of moisture in and out of the building. Please refer to 07 26 00 Vapor Retarders for specifications regarding above & below-grade vapor retarders Part 3: Execution 3.1 Examination Ensure each wall which will receive a brick veneer has the proper framing fastened at the top and bottom.

Ensure that each wall which wall receive a brick veneer has a vapor barrier, installed according to 07 26 00.

Ensure the site is ready to receive the veneers and properly store the items before erection.

Veneers must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

3.2 Preparation Check to make sure that veneer has no blemishes, scrapes, gashes or marks before installation.

Ensure the veneers are adhered level, and that the placement is tight and straight.

3.3 Installation Take care to make sure the veneers are not damaged during placement and adhesion to the overall structure. Any damage must be discarded and replaced. Notify the architect of any replaced veneers.

If the veneer must be cut, use a diamond blade saw which will leave a clean, straight cut in the veneer. Ensure cutting does not leave any marks, chips, or damage.

06 18 16 Glued-Laminated Columns Part 1: General 1.1 Summary This section includes all structural timber glued-reinforced glued-laminated timber columns.

Related Sections: 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications 06 00 00 足Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 10 00 足Rough Carpentry 06 20 00 足Finish Carpentry 06 40 00 足Architectural Woodwork 06 17 19 Cross-Laminated Timber 06 18 13 Glued-Laminated Beams 06 46 00 Wood Trim 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing 1.2 References APA Glulam Report: ESR-1040ESR-1040: Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC ASTM International: ASTM D 3737-12: Standard Practice for Establishing Allowable Properties For Structural Glued-Laminated Timber (Glulam)

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC American National Standards Institute: ANSI Standard A190.1, Standard for Wood Products Structural Engineer Please refer to structural drawings for details and information on column construction.

1.4 Quality Assurance All glulam columns will be composed of wood from the same species, and must be free of dents, holes, or chips before leaving the manufacturing facility.

All glulam columns will be composed of the same wood species as those used in the fabrication of all cross-laminated timber slabs as well as glulam beams.

1.5 Qualifications Contractor Qualifications: Building Contractor must have previous experience in the construction of heavy timber construction.

All workers erecting columns on the construction site must honor proper safety protocols and wear proper safety equipment while erecting columns, as specified by the contractor’s insurance.

1.6 Mockup A mockup will be made of the column with metal connectors properly attached, and connected to a floor.

The column will be erected on-site. Location to be determined by architect/engineer.

The mockup will then be deconstructed, and if approved, the column will be used on-site for construction.

Specifications

Part 2: Products 2.1 Glulam Columns Manufacturers: Glulam columns are to be sourced from a company within 500 miles of the construction site, and must show proof of product conformance with ANSI standard A190.1.

Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC If the contractor wishes to source the columns from a different manufacturer, the contractor must receive approval from the architect before ordering.

2.3 Accessories Steel-to-steel connector pieces: All columns must be fitted properly with steel connections which will tie the column to the beam and cross-laminated timber slabs below and above.

Please refer to 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings for specifications regarding metal glulam column steel connectors.

Transparent Sealer: All exposed sections of the glulam columns will be finished with a low-VOC sealer. Please refer to 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing for more information on the specifications of the transparent sealer finish.

Part 3: Execution 3.1 Examination Ensure each space which will receive a column has the proper steel connections below and placed in the proper location as dictated by the architect and engineer.

Ensure the site is ready to receive the columns and properly store the items before erection.

A storage space must be provided which must maintain a dry atmosphere to assure the glulam columns remain dry, prevent mold and remain undamaged during storage.

Columns must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

Given any precipitation/weather (high humidity, rain, snow, etc.) during storage on-site before installation, the contractor must check for any mold damage on the columns.

3.2 Preparation Check to make sure that column has no blemishes, scrapes, gashes or marks before installation. Sand out minor damage if possible, and approve quality of repair with the architect before installation.

When attaching to a moving crane, ensure that the connection will not damage the column during installation. If a connection which will blemish the face is necessary, make sure the affected area will not be visible after construction.

Ensure the steel connectors are properly fastened, and that the connection is tight and straight. Check for any rust marks on the steel connector, and replace if rust is present. Check to see if rust has stained the column if so, and only use if no rust stains are present.

3.3 Installation Take care to make sure the column is not damaged during placement and fastening to the overall structure. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair by sanding. Notify the architect of any repaired columns.

Ensure the column is protected from moisture as soon as possible after installation. The contractor must check for any mold damage after installation, as well as after closing up the building envelope.

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC If the column must be cut, use a saw which will leave a clean, straight cut in the column. Ensure cutting does not leave any marks, chips, or damage. Notify the architect of any cuts which must be made to the column which are over an inch in depth.

All exposed portions of the column will be protected from damage after installation. Make sure exposed surfaces are ready to receive the transparent sealer. Please refer to 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing for more information.

Specifications

08 52 13 Metal-Clad Wood Windows Part 1: General 1.1 Summary This section includes all metal-clad wood windows.

1.2 Related Sections: 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications 06 00 00 ­Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 46 00 Wood Trim 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing 1.4 Performance Requirements All window production facilities will operate an ISO 9001 quality control system.

Manufacturing facilities will operate an ISO 14001 environmental policy, as will key suppliers.

All timber shall be FSC certified.

85% of aluminum will be procured from hydro-electric sources with a recycled content of at least 50%.

Resistance to wind load shall conform with EN 12211:2000 & EN 12210:2000 Watertightness shall conform with EN 1027:2000 & EN 12208:2000 Load-bearing capacity of safety devices shall conform with EN 14531-1:2006+A2:2016 Thermal Transmittance shall conform with EN ISO 10077-2:2012 Air Permeability shall conform with EN 1026:2000 & EN 12207:2000 Part 2: Products 2.1 Components Interior Framing Interior framing shall be VACUMAT preservative treated and factory finished with two coats of solvent free, micro-porous clear lacquer or acrylic paint containing anti-mould fungicide, in accordance with EN 152-1:1998.

Dipped, brushed or site applied finishes will not be acceptable.

Minimum dry film thickness: 100–225microns.

Color: RAL 1015 to gloss level 20% External Sash Extruded aluminium profiles in accordance with BS EN 755-2 (mechanical properties), BS EN 12020-2 & BS EN 755-9 (dimensional accuracy).

Alloys shall be EN AW-6060 T5, EN AW-6063 T5, EN AW-6082, or EN AW-600. All windows shall be composed of the same alloy.

Dimensions: 54 mm face dimension Color: RAL 6014 Vision Glazing Inner pane

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC 4MM CLEAR Cavity 16MM ARGON FILLED Middle Pane 4MM CLEAR Cavity 18MM ARGON FILLED Outer Pane 6MM SUN SKN176

Specifications

2.2 Manufacturers Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: Velfac Ltd, The Old Livery, Hildersham, Cambridge, CB21 6DR 2.3 Accessories Locking System Concealed espagnolette multipoint locking system operated by a single handle per sash (or two handles per sliding window/door). Locking points to incorporate anti-tamper locking pins on espagnolette bolts and double stage keeps providing secure night ventilation.

Handles to be a matt chrome finish and are and include integrated key locking facility where applicable.

Concealed opening restrictors incorporating a socket key release mechanism providing an approximate clear opening of 100mm.

Concealed 90ยบ hinges Sidehung windows shall have concealed hinges in combination with friction break.

Hinges shall have matte-chrome surface finish.

2.4 Fabrication Glaze windows in the factory.

Complete assembly, finishing, and hardware application to the greatest extent possible in the factory.

Part 3: Execution 1 Examination Ensure each space which will receive a column has the proper steel connections below and placed in the proper location as dictated by the architect and engineer.

Ensure the site is ready to receive and properly store the windows before installation.

A storage space must be provided which must maintain a dry atmosphere to ensure the window frames remain dry, prevent mold, and remain undamaged during storage.

Window frames and glazing must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

Given any precipitation/weather (high humidity, rain, snow, etc.) during storage on-site before installation, the contractor must check for any mold damage on the windows.

3.2 Preparation Clean surfaces thoroughly prior to installation.

Ensure structure and substrate are adequate to support window systems.

Verify rough opening conditions and dimensions: Verify opening is properly flashed and waterproofed.

Verify opening is level, plumb, and square with no unevenness on the floor.

Prepare surfaces using the methods recommended by the manufacturer for achieving the best result for the substrate under the project conditions.

Take care to make sure both the frame and the glass are not damaged before installation. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair. Notify the architect of any repaired elements.

3.3 Installation

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC Take care to make sure both the frame and the glass are not damaged during placement and fastening to the overall structure. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair. Notify the architect of any repaired elements.

Install in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions approved submittals and in proper relationship with adjacent construction.

Adjust components and systems for correct function and operation in accordance with manufacturer’s written instructions.

Accurately fit, align, and securely fasten Install level, straight, plumb, and square.

Specifications

3.3 Erection Tolerances All aluminum members shall be installed with tolerances according to BS EN 12020-2:2016 & BS EN 755-9

A-8

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC

COST ESTIMATION PROJECT DATA SHEET

4 Bedroom: 7 Units

01. Total Site Area Square Footage (TSASF) 124,319 sqft

10. Average Unit Area. Divide Building Gross Square Footage by Total Number of Units Assuming Residential Area, 47,549 sqft/74 Units = 642 sqft/unit

02. Total Building Gross Square Footage (TBGSF) Include roof terraces and balconies if you have them.

137,654 sqft 03. FAR Floor Area Ratio. FAR = TBGSF / TSASF 1.11

11. Total Building Facade Square Footage Wall Only: 82,463 sqft Storefront: 6,607 sqft Windows: 14,820 sqft Total: 103,890 sqft

04. Site Coverage Ratio. Building Footprint Square Footage / Total Site Area Square Footage 64,562 sqft

12. Percentage of Facade Windows / Glass: Total Glass-Window Area / Total Facade Square Footage 21,427 sqft / 82,643 sqft = 26%

05. Impervious Cover Ratio. Building Footprint + All Paved Surfaces / Total Site Area Square Footage 64,562 sqft - 15,957 sqft + 34,967 sqft = 83,572 sqft

13. Structural System(s) used in your project CLT Slab with Glulam post-and-beam construction on concrete slab-on-grade and foundation.

06. Net Building Square Footage.

Total Building Gross Square Footage minus the square footage of _Hallways and dedicated horizontal circulation _Stairs, elevators and all vertical circulation not contained in units _Any voids, openings, mechanical shafts etc. _Plan area of walls and structure. Do not include this in your calculations unless directed by your studio instructors.

85,248 sqft

14. Active Mechanical Systems used in your building Heat Pump, powering water heater and cooling coil, air handling unit with return, radiant heat flooring

07. Net Leasable / Saleable Square Footage Net Building Square Footage minus any mechancial rooms, building storage or other non leas able or saleable spaces in your project.

71,483 sqft

Cost Estimation

15. Total number of elevators in your building, their load capacity and type (hydraulic or hoist) 7 Elevators Total 3 Geared Traction Elevators 4 Hydraulic Elevators 16. Additional number of bathrooms in your building beyond the baseline number of one-per-unit.

12 additional bathrooms

08. Total number of residential units in your project 74 09. Summary of unit types and their sizes You likely have prepared this information for studio use. Please include this information here.

For example: 14 Units Type A. Two Bedroom. 756 sf. e tc. etc.

Communal: 36 Units 1 Bedr oom: 8 Units 2 Bedr oom: 18 Units 3 Bedroom: 5 Units

A-9

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC Building Cost Estimate Worksheet

Total Number of Second Floor Units X (AUA X (Base Cost + Required Increase)) = 32 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.10/sqft*1.05)= $5,422,670.42

Area Modification Factor (AMF) from the 2017 National Building Cost Manual (NBCM) (Michigan / Detroit): 7%

Total Number of Third Floor and Above Units X (AUA X (Base Cost + Required Increase)) = 34 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.55/sqft*1.07)= $5,871,331.82

Construction Cost Factor for Teams working in China (from Arcadis reading) (China 2015): 2-3%

Base Overall Building Cost (add three calculation values above) = $14,286,154.30

Building Cost Historical Index (HCI) from the 2017 NBCM For Your Birth Year (1996): $1.86/$1.00 For Your Parent’s Birth Year(1968): $7.58/$1.00 Quality Classification: Multi-Family Residences–Apartments from NBCM Based on the various descriptions per the NBCM’s guide, our group settled on a Classification of 3.

Cost Estimation

Verify that your total building square footage should equal your Average Unit Area multiplied by your total number of units. Your gross overall building cost should thus reflect the total square footage of your building.

Yes___YES___ If no, review your work and track your error.

Additional Costs to add to your Base Overall Building Cost: Plumbing Total number of “extra” bathrooms your project provides beyond 1 per unit. 12

We decided this because the project Features: 1. A deep foundation on a flat site (3) 2. An engineered wood floor structure (2) 3. A simple flat built-up roof (4) 4. Metal capped wood windows at residential grade (3) 5. Simple textured gypsum board interior with wood trim around windows (3) 6. Average carpet and hardwood in most rooms (4) 7. Separate dining area and adequate closets in each room as well as extra closets for linens/storage (3) 8. Tile shower with simple vanity and medecine cabinet (3) 9. Kitchen with quartz countertops and 4 appliances (fridge, dishwasher, garbage disposal, oven/stove) (3) 10. Fairly standard electrical and plumbing fixtures (3) 11. Colored clay brick used on masonry walls in complex patterns (3) Average Unit Area Assuming gross square footage (commercial, circulation, etc. added): 137,654 sqft/74 units=1,860 sqft/unit 1,860 sqft/unit With Area Modification factor 7%: 1,990 sqft/unit Assuming 30% masonry facade: add 3% factor to calculation Base Per Square Foot Cost for Your Average Unit Area Based on NBCM Tables for Multi-Family Residences.

(From the page 22 10 or more Units table): $81.10/sqft (interpolated)* Average Unit Area X Base Per Square Footage Cost + Cost Modification Factors

Select the number of plumbing fixtures in your additional bathrooms. 3 fixtures/ bathroom 3 fixtures/bathroom (vanity, toilet, combined bath/shower) Indicate which Quality Class(es) these bathrooms are categorize under. Class 3 bathrooms Total additional building costs related to additional bathrooms $89,124.00 Cost per 3 fixture, Class 3 bathroom according to NBCM: $7,427/unit $7,427*12=$89,124.00 Additional Costs to add to your Base Overall Building Cost: Elevators Number of elevators your have in your project by type: 3 Geared Traction, 4 Hydraulic Elevator size(s) weight capacities, and speeds (FPM).

Hydraulic: Stainless steel doors, standard size, 100 f.p.m., 2,000 lbs. capacity.

3-storey hydraulic elevators: 3 3*($45,700+10,200+3,600)= $178,500.00 2-storey hydraulic elevators: 1 1*($45,700+10,200)= $55,900.00 Electric elevators, 5 storeys: 3 3*($114,600)= $343,800.00 Elevator(s) Base Cost(s) $578,200.00 “Deluxe” Cars Yes____NO_____ If so include upgrade cost here________________

Total Number of First Floor Units X AUA Base Cost = 18 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.10/sqft*1.03)= $2,992,152.06

Determine the number of floors / stops your elevators will travel 3: 5 stories, 3: 3 stories, 1: 1 storey

A-9

CYCLE Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker CNC For a hydraulic piston elevator, for each floor / stop above 2 add $3600 to your base cost.

For an electric / hoist elevator, for each floor / stop above 6, add $9700 to your base cost.

Cost Estimation

Total Elevator Cost per car / shaft = $82,600.00 $578,200.00/7=$82,600.00 Multiply your Total Elevator Cost(s) by the number / types of elevators in your project.

(See above calculations) Total additional building costs related to elevators $578,200.00 Estimated Building Cost Add your Base Building Cost to the additional building costs related to additional bathrooms and elevators.

Base Building Cost (residential): $14,286,154.30 Extra Plumbing Fixtures Cost: $89,124.00 Elevator Costs: $578,200.00 Total estimated building cost = $14,953,478.30 Finally...a little bit of contextualization of these figures....

Historical Cost Index HCI Your Birth Year 1996 Estimated Building Cost: $8,039,504.46 $14,953,478.30/$1.86/$1.00= $8,039,504.46 HCI Your Parent’s Birth Year 1968 Estimated Building Cost: $1,972,754.39 $14,953,478.30/$7.58/$1.00= $1,972,754.39 Inflation Adjusted Building Cost for Your Birth Year 1996 Estimated Building Cost: $13,344,830.00 Inflation Rate: $1.66/$1.00. $1.66*$8,039,054.46= $13,344,830.00 Inflation Adjusted Building Cost for Your Parent’s Birth Year 1968 Estimated Building Cost $14,756,202.84 Inflation Rate: $7.48/$1.00. $7.48*$1,972,754.39= $14,756,202.84

A-9

ARCH 527 | Integrative Systems | Exercise 1.2.5 Part 1 - Solar Orientation & Daylight

Natural Ventilation: (deffective > ___) Floor to Floor Single Angled Cross Stack Height (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

10

25

40

50

150

Section Daylight Diagrams

Solar Studies July 15th, 9 am

July15th, 4.15 pm

September 19th, 10.45 am

September 19th, 4.15 pm

Estimated Caluclations Site Gross Area (ft²)

333,294 333,294

FAR Estimated Building (BGA/SGA)

Gross Area (ft²)

0.8 1.1

266,635 366,623

Final Calculations Building Gross FAR Area (ft²)

284,400

(BGA/SGA)

Envelope Area (ft²)

E/A

0.85

430,800

1.51

(EA/BGA)

We first determined the site gross area of site 3, the old Sears site. We focused on the northern parcel of the site. This, along with the FAR range given, allowed us to determine a range for the estimated building gross area. For the solar design process, we used these numbers to check ourselves as we designed. We then calculated the Envelope Area and E/A value. For this part, the FAR was 0.85 and the E/A value was 1.51.

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

ARCH 527 | Integrative Systems | Exercise 1.2.5 Part 2 - Compactness

Natural Ventilation: (deffective > ___) Floor to Floor Single Angled Cross Stack Height (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

10

25

40

50

150

Section Daylight Diagrams

Solar Studies July 15th, 9 am

July 15th, 4.15 pm

September 19th, 10.45 am

September 19th, 4.15 pm

Estimated Caluclations Site Gross Area (ft²)

333,294 333,294

FAR Estimated Building (BGA/SGA)

Gross Area (ft²)

0.8 1.1

266,635 366,623

Estimated Estimated Floor No. of Floors Gross Area (ft²)

29,626 40,736

9 9

Final Calculations No. of Floors

9

Floor Gross Building Gross FAR Area (ft²) Area (ft²)

32,768

294,912

(BGA/SGA)

Envelope Area (ft²)

E/A

0.88

171,683

0.58

(EA/BGA)

We first determined the site gross area of site 3, the old Sears site. We focused on the northern parcel of the site. This, along with the FAR range given, allowed us to determine a range for the estimated building gross area. We evetually settled on using 9 floors, giving us a range of estimated floor gross area. These estimated values let us design iteratively while ensuring that our design would be acceptable. Our final FAR was 0.88 and our final E/A compactness value was 0.58.

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

ARCH 527 | Integrative Systems | Exercise 1.2.5 Part 3 - Comparison When beginning this exercise, we decided we would first explore how feasibly compact we could make a building, followed by a focus on how much sun shading we could provide. For the compactness exercise, we brainstormed ways in which to give the building as little building envelope as possible while still maintaining decent levels of natural ventilation. We knew that we needed to reduce the perimeter to area ratio in order to minimize the E/A value. It was for this reason that we stumbled upon a multi-circular design (circular shapes have the smallest perimeter to area ratio). We then devised small atriums within the project to allow for stack ventilation. Because of the need for high compactness, we designed a very tall, singular structure. This, in turn, made for probably less-than-optimal daylighting conditions at the bottom units facing the atriums.

In comparison to the compact project, the more beneficially solar-oriented and cross-ventilated one was much more spread-out, and fragmented. Though this certainly meant it was far less compact and thus would release more energy to the outside, the building had far better solar heat gain because all the massings were oriented south to slightly southwest.

We did this to maximize the southern exposure of the project. In addition, the units of the buildings were stacked so as to create a stepped pattern, stepping down from south to north in height. This meant that more light could penetrate each building directly north of its southern counterpart.

We found in this exercise that compactness and optimal solar gain act as opposites. When we designed to the extreme of each, it was at the expense of the other. When designing our studio project, we can use this exercise to ensure that we remember to design in moderation for both a compact building and one that has good solar orientation.

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Exercise 4a Foundation Strategies

CNC Your Studio Section: ______________________

Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker Team Members Names: _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____ Submittal Date: Saturday, 10.10.20 Work with your studio teammates to discuss and develop your answers. Each team should submit one set of answers.

The goal of this exercise to help you consider the possibilities and ramifications of a foundation system for your overall project. This is where you can think these ideas through, the same way you might sketch diagrammatic massing or program relationships.

We are not asking you to design your foundation system‌..

Exercise 4a-1: Developing a design strategy for integrating foundation design with your housing project.

To begin we would like each team to use this exercise to further consider your building(s) relationship to the ground. This relationship is of utmost importance to the architect and provides many opportunities for spatial connections, structural expression and experiential movement.

Use the following page to sketch your answers to the following questions: 1. What spaces and program might be located below ground?

2. What spaces and program might be located partially below grade?

3. What spaces and program might be elevated above the ground to allow activities to take place beneath? If you haven’t yet considered these, do so now.

At this phase of your design work, how can your project take advantage of all of these opportunities? Now is the time to take some chances and make some discoveries.

On the following page sketch out options with clear legible annotations that answers these questions as part of your overall housing design strategy. Be clear and specific.

north side of site residential

areas located below grade- parking public plaza

commercial/civic bike shop

parking

• out of the way, keeps access to the greenway open • sloped public plaza allows easy access to underground levels • excavation gives us the opportunity to design the ground plane for the public plaza

south side of site living communal

residential

living

residential/ commercial above grade • easy access • views • light areas elevated above the ground • the public plaza is raised to 11’ on the right side so it can be extended over the bike shop on the south end of the north site so visitors can look over the bike path • carving out pieces of the building and the plaza will allow for activities to take place below

areas located below grade- living • private • opportunity for light • prioritization of communal spaces on grade

N

S

Exercise 4a-2: In the space below, provide an overall axon diagram of your building which illustrates the spatial and physical relationships to the ground outlined above.

Provide multiple views if necessary to describe fully.

Annotate appropriately with your strategy for foundation solutions.

above grade

above grade shallow foundations

below grade

deep foundations below grade

Exercise 4a-3: With your ambitions now clarified, consider what foundation structural systems might best serve your spatial needs and architectural expression.

On the following page provide an axon diagram of the foundation elements (retaining walls, piers, pads, rafts, piles etc as appropriate ) that might begin to serve to define and support these spaces.

This will necessitate considerations of load paths from the building above, based on initial schematic locations of vertical load bearing columns and walls that will transfer their loads to the necessary foundations.

Identify these load bearing elements with light shading or poche and indicate foundation types and configurations.

Annotate your sections appropriately.

Lightly ghost in the profile of your building(s) above.

Be sure to indicate the ground plane.

Remember: You are using this exercise to help you consider the possibilities and ramifications of a foundation system for your overall project. This is where you can think these ideas through, the same way you might sketch diagrammatic massing or program relationships. We are not asking you to design your foundation system‌..

NORTH deep foundations

GROUND 6” Slab-On-Grade

GROU ND

Column Footing

12” Foundation Wall

Friction Foundation Piles

Wall Footing

SOUTH shallow foundations

GROUND 12” Foundation Wall

GROUND

Wall Footing

12” Slab-On-Grade

Exercise 4-4a: In the spaces below provide two diagram sketch sections through your design showing the relationship of spaces below grade, the ground plane and spaces above grade that are defined by the structural foundation elements diagrammed above.

Clearly sketch out the foundation solution on the cross sections and annotate the type of foundations and reasons for their choice.

In lighter lines indicate the scope of the building above.

Clearly indicate the ground plane and any key dimensions to help clarify your intentions.

Provide a small axon diagram to show where your sections are cut.

Section 1.

SOUTH shallow foundations chosen because of a lower building height. wall footings chosen because interior strucutral organization includes walls

key plan

GROUND 12� Foundation Wall

GROUND

Wall Footing

12� Slab-On-Grade

Exercise 4-4b: Section 2.

NORTH

key plan

deep foundations chosen because of combination of poor soil conditions (silty soil) and a larger loads (4 story building on part of the site and 2 stories of parking on the other part of the site) friction piles chosen because they don’t need to go all the way down to bedrock timber friction piles chosen to tie with the material of the structural system above grade

GROUND 6” Slab-On-Grade Column Footing

12” Foundation Wall

Friction Foundation Piles

Wall Footing

GROU ND

Exercise 4b Structural Systems: Schematic Design Options

Velikov | Rule

Your Studio Section: ________________

Niels Hoyle-Dodson Kaylee Tucker Mitch Deans _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____

Team Members Names: _____________

Date: Thursday, 10.10.20 Work with your studio teammates to discuss and develop your answers. Each team should submit one set of answers.

Exercise 4b-1: Developing a design strategy for integrating a structural design concept with your housing project.

To begin we would like each team to use this exercise to further consider your building(s) structure relationship to the program and site. This relationship is of utmost importance to the architect and provides many opportunities for spatial connections, structural expression and experiential movement.

Consider three alternative structural systems in relationship to the spatial development of your project.

Which structural systems might best serve your spatial needs and architectural expression?

1. For each of these options please provide a text description of the structural systems and why it is of interest to the team.

2. Consider the pros and cons of each system and include these in your explanatory texts.

3. How might your project take advantage of repetitive structural bays and components to achieve maximum economy?

4. What spaces and program in your project might require an alternative configuration of structure or an alternate systems altogether?

- Parking Structure

5. What construction types would each of your alternatives fall under? Review the required fire resistance ratings for structural elements and include this information in your documentation.

- Parking Structure

At this phase of your design work, how can your project take advantage of all of these opportunities? Now is the time to take some chances and make some discoveries. In the space below sketch out options with clear legible annotations that answers these questions as part of your overall housing design strategy.

Be clear and specific.

Structural System Alternative 1 Text Description

Rigid Frame 1: The superstructure of this system is constructed as a series of Cross Laminated Timber

Beams resting on top of a grid of Glu Laminated columns to form a rigid frame. This frame in turn sits on top of a sturcutral masonry wall which transitions to a below grade concrete slab/rataining wall. This slab connects to the ground through a series of concrete spread footings.

Pros:

- Large Cantelevers allow more light below grade via trenches.

- Glu Laminated Columns can be tapered to decrease weight - Less expensive foundation

Cons:

- Less Lateral Stablity - Limited Floor Plan

Economy:

- Repeating glulam/clt bays w/ basic frame wood construction between - Simpler Foundation - Fixed Modular Units

Construction Type: 2A

Structural System Alternative 2 Text Description

Rigid Frame 2: The superstructure of this system is constructed as a series of Horizontal Cross Laminated

Timber Panles resting on top of a grid of Vertical CLT Panels/Columns. This frame in turn sits on top of a sturcutral masonry wall which transitions to a below grade concrete slab/Slurry Wall. This slab connects to a grid of Steel Columns which meet the ground at a Raft Foundation.

Pros:

- Larger continuous Floor Plans - More Lateral Stability - Higher Building Capacity

Cons:

- Heavier Loads - Expensive Foundation - Less light below grade

Economy:

- Structure/ Partition/ Insulation combined - Higher Building Height/ more units.

Structural System Alternative 3 Text Description

Rigid Frame 3: This system is constructed as a series of Horizontal Cross Laminated Timber Panles resting on top of a perimeter of CLT Panels/Columns and a masonry core. This core/frame in turn sits on top of a below grade sturcutral masonry wall which connects to a grid of spread footings.

Pros:

- Thermal Mass - Below Grade Light - Light foundation

Cons:

- Limited Floor Plans

Economy:

- Structure/ Partition/ Insulation combined Simple Foundation

Exercise 4b-2:

For each of these options provide two axon diagrams: one of the whole building structural system and one at a larger scale showing a cluster of 3-4 residential units. Annotate thoroughly.

Each diagram should include the following information (graphically adjusted for clarity and communication.)

In the space below provide an axon diagram of the primary structural elements (eg. main grid lines, columns, load bearing walls, primary beam spanning system, secondary flooring system) shown in the context of the building volume that will begin to define and support the program and building massing.

Diagram out load paths from the internal spaces and building enclosure, and identify locations of permanent vertical load bearing columns and walls that constitute the dead weight of the building (as opposed to removable internal partitioning which is part of the live load).

Indicate your preliminary design ideas for a floor spanning system or systems.

Also identify zones and spaces to locate structural elements for laterally bracing your sytstem.

Clearly identify these elements with in your diagram with light shading or color coding that and indicate vertical load bearing types (walls and columns) lateral bracing and the floor spanning system (beams, slabs, rafters, joists etc).

Annotate your axon diagrams appropriately identifying material systems and key dimensions. Lightly ghost in the profile of your building enclosure(s) against the key structural components. Be sure to indicate the ground plane and the building enclosure planes.

Structural System Alternative 1 Diagrams

Structural System Alternative 2 Diagrams

Structural System Alternative 3 Diagrams

-

40/40 CNC Your Studio Section: ________________ Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson and Kaylee Tucker Team Member’s Names: _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________

Exercise 5. Structural Systems: Organization and Member Sizing

Date: Thursday, 10.10.20 Work with your studio teammates to discuss and develop your answers.

Each team should submit one set of answers.

Exercise 5: Estimating dimensions and member sizing. Determining spans and floor height.

Using the 3 schemes proposed in Exercise 4b, use either the span charts from The Architect’s Studio Companion or the rules of thumb outlined in the lecture to estimate the sectional dimensions of the member used in your design. Provide an axonometric drawing similar to what you used in Exercise 4b for each of your three proposals, and include labeling to indicate the member sections of the different slabs, joists, beams, and columns in each scheme. Based on the member depth, estimate your floor to floor height.

Scheme 1:

Exterior 3-layer (4.5”) CLT Panel 5-layer (9”) loadbearing/ shear CLT panel (Also serves as fire wall).

2’

10’ 7-layer (9”)CLT Floor

10’ 12” Glulam Beam

Structural Clay Tile Column, 16”x16” (Based on Lecture, sizing based on CMU tables)

10’

25’ TYP. 25’ TYP.

10’ Structural Clay Tile Wall, 12” 6” Slab-On-Grade

5’-6”

2’ 20’

5’-6” 11’-6” (10’-6” Clearance)

Column Footing W24 Steel Beams W18 Steel Columns

12’ (10’-6” Clearance)

Metal Decking with Concrete Topping: 8” Slab, 4” Deep Steel Decking.

1’ thickRaft Foundation.

W18 Steel Beams 40’

1’ Deep Concrete Slab with Green Roof and Membrane

Page | 2

Scheme 2: DISCLAIMER: Exterior Walls and Interior Partitions will be made of Wood Light Framing.

Structural Clay Tile Reinforced Stair Core, 40’ Height, 16” Wall Width.

12” Glulam Beams 5.5” Wide Glulam Columns: 1’ deep at bottom, 2’ deep at top.

7-layer (9”) CLT Floor 10’

10’

10’

25’ TYP.

Steel Vine Trellis

25’ TYP.

10’ Nonbearing Structural Clay Tile Wall, 8” 6” Slab-On-Grade

5’-6”

2’ 20’

5’-6” 12’-6” (10’-6” Clearance)

12” Glulam Beams Concrete Topping 12’-6” (10’-6” Clearance)

7-layer (9”) CLT Floor

12” Foundation Wall 24” Glulam Beams 1’ thickRaft Foundation.

40’

24” Glulam Beams

1’ Deep Concrete Slab with Green Roof and Membrane

Page | 3

Scheme 3: DISCLAIMER: This scheme explores a different structural scheme for a different section of the project.

Structural Clay Tile Reinforced Stair Core, 40’ Height, 16” Wall Width.

7-layer (9”) CLT Floor Attached to side of Masonry Wall.

Steel Vine Trellis

4’

25’ TYP.

10’

10’

10’

66’ Structural Clay Tile Reinforced Demising and Bracing Wall, 20’ Height, 8” Wall Width.

1’ thick Raft Foundation.

8” Concrete Simple Slab.

8” wide Retaining Wall Foundation.

13’

A527 Exercise 6_Active Environmental Systems Selection and Organization Kaylee Tucker Names:_____________________________ Mitch Deans _____________________________ Niels Hoyle-Dodson _____________________________ _____________________________

Due Oct. 25 by 11:59pm ET.

CNC Studio:_____________________________

Q1: Chose all components of the active system for energy distribution, heating, cooling, air handling, warm water heating and renewable energy. Follow the instructions given in the video lesson and the handout.

Q2: Develop the Energy Concept of your building. The energy concept shows the components of the active systems. Make a diagram of the active heating and cooling system. Please include following components: - Air Handling Unit (heat recovery? ) - Energy Distribution (mechanical ventilation, radiant floor heating, radiator, ‌.)

- Heating/Cooling Unit (heat pump, furnace, boiler,‌..)

- Warm Water heating - Renewable energy source (optional) You need to have calculation results for the operation cost and the green-house gas emission for building operation. You have following options to get this data: - Use the CasaSol calculation tool - Use the handout of 3.1.1 (overview). The data is for a residential building in Detroit.

- Use the PDF in the section 3.2.3 Q3: Do the drawing of the Energy Distribution system (the system that delivers the heat/cold into the room). Do the drawing in the floor plan and the section of one of the residential units of your project. Use the floor plan of your project. Only use the attached floor plan if you do not have your own. Indicate all components of the energy distribution system including all connections, location of heating/cooling unit, areas of dropped ceiling (mechanical ventilation).

Dash in and dropped ceiling in the floor plan and section.

Please use the video lesson and handout for this exercise.

ENERGY CONCEPT SECTION DIAGRAM - Q2 SOLAR WARM WATER HEATING PLATE

STUDIO: CNC GROUP NAMES: MITCH DEANS KAYLEE TUCKER NIELS HOYLEDODSON

MECHANICAL VENT. AHU (HEAT RECOVERY) RADIANT FLOOR HEATING (FROM HEAT PUMP)

NATURAL VENTILATION

COOLING COIL (BASED ON HEAT PUMP)

ALL SYSTEMS IN BASEMENT FOR EASY MAINTENANCE ACCESS HEAT PUMP BASED ON AHU (HEAT RECOVERY)

WARM WATER SYSTEM BACKUP: HEAT PUMP WARM WATER HEATING TANKS

ENERGY CONCEPT CALCULATIONS - Q2

STUDIO: CNC GROUP NAMES: MITCH DEANS KAYLEE TUCKER NIELS HOYLEDODSON

ENERGY CONCEPT CALCULATIONS - Q2

STUDIO: CNC GROUP NAMES: MITCH DEANS KAYLEE TUCKER NIELS HOYLEDODSON

ENERGY CONCEPT CALCULATIONS - Q2 AIM: balance minimum operating cost with minimum CO2 emissions SOLUTION:

ENERGY CONVERSION

25 10 20 5 2.5 | 15.4

heating/cooling cooling

0

15 10 5

CO2 eq. emission [kg/m^2 year]

Operating Cost [ Cost/m^2 year]

15

Heat Pump (return air) Low operational cost, average CO2 emission

AIR HANDLING 60 50

7 6

40 5.1 | 35

5 4.5 | 29.9

30

4 20

2 1

heating cooling

3

Mechnical Ventilation with Heat Recovery Average to low operational cost and CO2 emission

10

CO2 eq. emission [kg/m^2 year]

Operating Cost [ Cost/m^2 year]

8

STUDIO: CNC GROUP NAMES: MITCH DEANS KAYLEE TUCKER NIELS HOYLEDODSON

Heat Pump

Radiant Floor Loop

Air Handling Unit

Supply Air Duct Return Air Duct Supply Air Return Air

Exercise 7 Facade Systems: Materials + Methods

E ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

DŝƚĐŚ ĞĂŶƐ͕ <ĂLJůĞĞ dƵĐŬĞƌ͕ EŝĞůƐ ,ŽLJůĞͲ ŽĚƐŽŶ dĞĂŵ DĞŵďĞƌƐ EĂŵĞƐ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƵďŵŝƩĂů ĂƚĞ͗ ^ƵŶĚĂLJ͕ ϭϭ͘Ϭϭ͘ϮϬ ĂĐŚ ƚĞĂŵ ƐŚŽƵůĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ ƚŚŝƐ ĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ ĐŽůůĞĐƟǀĞůLJ͘ Exercise Goals dŚĞ ŐŽĂů ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ ŝƐ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ Ă ƐĞƚ ŽĨ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĂŶĚ ĂƐƐĞŵďůLJ ĐŚŽŝĐĞƐ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĞŶǀĞůŽƉĞ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĞǀĞŶƚƵĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ĂŶĚ ǁĂůů ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ ĨŽƌ ƐƚƵĚŝŽ͘ džĞƌĐŝƐĞ ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͗ zŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ϭ͘ Ϯ ϯ͘ ϯ

ŽŵƉůĞƟŽŶ ŽĨ ĞĂĐŚ ƋƵĞƐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ ůĂƌŝƚLJ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟǀĞ ƚĞdžƚƐ dŚŽƌŽƵŐŚŶĞƐƐ ĂŶĚ ĐůĂƌŝƚLJ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ƐĐŚĞŵĂƟĐ ĚŝĂŐƌĂŵŵŝŶŐ͘ dŚŽƌŽƵŐŚŶĞƐƐ ĂŶĚ ĐůĂƌŝƚLJ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĂŶŶŽƚĂƟŽŶƐ

WůĞĂƐĞ ƌĞĂĚ ƚŚĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ĞĂĐŚ ƉĂƌƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ ĐĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ďĞĨŽƌĞ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ͘ WĂƌƚ ϭ͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ Ă ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƉĂůĂƚĞ͘ ƌŝĞŇLJ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞ LJŽƵƌ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŵďŝƟŽŶƐ ͬ ŝŶƚĞŶƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ ϭ͘ dŚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů Žƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ƉĂůĂƩĞ ǁŝƚŚ ǁŚŝĐŚ LJŽƵ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĐŽŵƉŽƐŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐ͘ Ϯ͘ ,Žǁ ĚŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ĐŚŽŝĐĞƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƐĐĂůĞ ŽĨ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ Žƌ ƉĂŶĞůƐ Žƌ ƐƵď ĂƐƐĞŵďůŝĞƐ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚĞ ƚŽ LJŽƵƌ ŽǀĞƌĂůů ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŵďŝƟŽŶƐ͍ tŚLJ ĐŚŽŽƐĞ ƐŽŵĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ŽǀĞƌ ŽƚŚĞƌƐ͍ 3͘ zŽƵƌ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ ƚŽ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ĂŶĚ ĨĞŶĞƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞƐ ͬ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĞŶǀĞůŽƉĞ ŝŶ ƚĞƌŵƐ ŽĨ ďŽƚŚ ĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐƐ ĂŶĚ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ͘ Ğ ƐƵƌĞ ƚŚĂƚ LJŽƵƌ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂůůLJ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐ Ăůů ƚŚĞ ĂďŽǀĞ ƋƵĞƐƟŽŶƐ͗ Ğ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ĂŶĚ ĐůĞĂƌ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ͘ ϭ͘ dŚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ƉĂůĞƚƚĞ ǁĞ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ǁŝůů ďĞ ďƌŝĐŬ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵ ĨůŽŽƌ ĂŶĚ ƐƚĂŝƌ ĐŽƌĞƐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ǁŽŽĚ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞ ƐŝĚŝŶŐ͕ ŐůĂƐƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ĂŶĚ ŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞƐ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ŵĞƚĂů ĨƌĂŵŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ďŽƚŚ͘ Ϯ͘ dŚĞ ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĂƌƚŽŶͲDĂĐ&ĂƌůĂŶĚ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ŝƐ ƚĞĂŵŝŶŐ ǁŝƚŚ ůŽǀĞůLJ ďƌŝĐŬ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ ĂůŽŶŐƐŝĚĞ ŚŽƵƐĞƐ ǁŝƚŚ ďƌŝĐŬ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵ ĨůŽŽƌ ǁŝƚŚ ǁŽŽĚ ƐŝĚŝŶŐ Žƌ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƚŽƉ͘ KƵƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƉĂůůĞƚƚĞ ŝƐ ŵĞĂŶƚ ƚŽ ƌŝĨĨ ŽĨĨ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƐƚŽĐŬ ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ ƚŽ ƐŝŐŶŝĨLJ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƉĂĐĞ ĂƐ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ ƐŽ ĂƐ ƚŽ ĂǀŽŝĚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ŝƐƐƵĞ ŽĨ ĨĞĞůŝŶŐ ĂůŝĞŶĂƚĞĚ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ ŽŶĞΖƐ ŚŽŵĞ ĚŽĞƐ ŶŽƚ ůŽŽŬ ůŝŬĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝƐ ĂůƐŽ ĚŽŶĞ ƚŽ ƐŽĨƚĞŶ ƚŚĞ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŬĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƉĂĐĞ ŵŽƌĞ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĂďůĞ͘ KƵƌ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ĂůƐŽ ĨŽĐƵƐĞĚ ŽŶ ůĂďŽƌ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶĐĞ ŽĨ ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĂŶĚ ĐĂƌĞ ŝŶ Ă ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͗ ƚŚƵƐ ŝƐ ǁŚLJ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƵƐĞƐ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ǁŽŽĚ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ůŽŶŐ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ ŽĨ ƚŝŵĞ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂƌĞ ĞĂƐLJ ƚŽ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞ ŝŶ ƐŵĂůů ƉŝĞĐĞƐ ;ĂƐ ŽƉƉŽƐĞĚ ƚŽ ŵŽƌĞ ĚŝĨĨŝĐƵůƚ ůĂƌŐĞ ƉĂŶĞů ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐͿ͘ ϯ͘ ĞĐĂƵƐĞ ƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ĐŽŶĐĞƌŶĞĚ ĂďŽƵƚ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ĚƵƌĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ƵƐĞƐ Ă >d ĂŶĚ ŐůƵůĂŵ ǁŽŽĚ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ǁĞ ŚĂǀĞ ĚĞĐŝĚĞĚ ƚŽ ƵƐĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁŽƵůĚ ŚĂǀĞ ǁŽŽĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĂŶĚ Ă ŵĞƚĂů ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ͘

džĞƌĐŝƐĞ ϭϬ &ĂĐĂĚĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ͗ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ н DĞƚŚŽĚƐ

^ƚƵĚŝŽ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

zŽƵƌ EĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞĂŵ DĞŵďĞƌƐ EĂŵĞƐ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WĂƌƚ ϭ ŽŶƟŶƵĞĚ Ϯ͘ ŽŶƟŶƵĞ ƚŽ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ƚŚĞ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ Žƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘ ͺ Ğ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ͗ ĞŐ͘ >ŝŵĞƐƚŽŶĞ ƉĂŶĞůƐ ĞdžŚŝďŝƟŶŐ Ă ŐƌĞĞŶŝƐŚͲŐƌĂLJ ŚƵĞ Žƌ ǁĂƌŵ͕ ƌĞĚĚŝƐŚ ƚŽŶĞ ďƌŝĐŬ ǁŽƌŬ͕ Žƌ ƌŽƵŐŚ͕ ƐƚƌŝĂƚĞĚ ƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĚ ƉƌĞĐĂƐƚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ƉĂŶĞůƐ͕ ŐůĂƐƐ ƉĂŶĞůƐ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ůŝŐŚƚ ŐƌĞĞŶ ŚƵĞ͘ ͺ Ğ ƚŚŽƵŐŚƞƵů ĂŶĚ ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟǀĞ ĂƐ ƚŽ ǁŚĞƌĞ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ĂƌĞ ĚĞƉůŽLJĞĚ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ͗ ĞŐ͘ >ĂƌŐĞ ŐůĂƐƐ ƐƚŽƌĞ ĨƌŽŶƚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ Ăƚ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ůĞǀĞů͕ ǁĂƌŵ LJĞůůŽǁ ďƌŝĐŬ ĨŽƌ ŵŝĚͲůĞǀĞů ĐŽƵƌƐĞƐ͕ ŐƌĂLJ ƐƚƵĐĐŽ Ăƚ ƵƉƉĞƌ ůĞǀĞůƐ ĂŶĚ ƉĂƌĂƉĞƚ͘ KƵƌ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ǁŽƵůĚ ƵƐĞ Ă ĚĂƌŬ ƉƵƌƉůĞ ďƌŝĐŬ͕ ƐŵŽŽƚŚ ǁŝƚŚ ƐůŝŐŚƚ ĐŽůŽƌ ǀĂƌŝĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵ ĨůŽŽƌ ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁŽƵůĚ ƚƵƌŶ ƵƉ ŝŶ ƵƐĞ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƐƚĂŝƌ ĐŽƌĞƐ͘ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ǁŽƵůĚ ƵƐĞ ůĂƌŐĞ ŐůĂƐƐ ƐƚŽƌĞĨƌŽŶƚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ƐŚĂƌƉ ĐŽůŽƌ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ŵƵůůŝŽŶƐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ǁŽŽĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĂŶĚ ƚƌŝŵ ĂŶĚ Ă ŵĞƚĂů ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ͘ dŚĞ ƵƉƉĞƌ ĨůŽŽƌƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ƚŚĞŶ ƵƐĞ Ă ŵƵĐŚ ůŝŐŚƚĞƌ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ƚŽŶĞ ĐĞĚĂƌ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞ͕ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ĚŝĂŵŽŶĚ ƉĂƚƚĞƌŶ ĂŶĚ Ă ĨĂŝƌůLJ ƐŵĂůů ƐŚĂƉĞ͘ ĂĐŚ ƵŶŝƚ ĞŶƚƌLJ ĚŽŽƌ ǁŽƵůĚ ŚĂǀĞ Ă ƐŵĂůů ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶĞĚ ŽĨĨ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ǁŽŽĚ ƚƌŝŵ ĨŽƌ ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂů ĐƵƐƚŽŵŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉĂŝŶƚŝŶŐ͕ ĞƚĐ͘ ϯ͘ ƌŝĞŇLJ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞ ƚŚĞ ƐŝnjĞƐ ͬ ĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ ͬ ŵŽĚƵůĞƐ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ WƵƌƉůĞ ďƌŝĐŬ͗ ŵŽĚƵůĂƌ͕ ϳ ϱͬϴΗ ;ϴΗͿ dž ϯ ϱͬϴΗ ;ϰΗͿ dž Ϯ ϭͬϰΗ ĞĚĂƌ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ͗ ƐŵĂůů͕ ĚŝĂŵŽŶĚ ƉĂƚƚĞƌŶ͕ ůŝŐŚƚ ƚŽŶĞ͕ ƌŽƵŐŚůLJ ϰΗdžϰΗ ^ƚŽƌĞĨƌŽŶƚ tŝŶĚŽǁƐ͗ tŽŽĚ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĂŶĚ ĂůƵŵŝŶƵŵ ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞ ƉůĂƚĞͬĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ĐŽǀĞƌŝŶŐ͘ ƌŝŐŚƚ ǁŚŝƚĞ ĐŽůŽƌŝŶŐ ŽŶ ŵĞƚĂů ƉĂƌƚƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ǁŽŽĚ ůĞĨƚ ŶĂƚƵƌĂů ǁŝƚŚ Ă ǀĂƌŶŝƐŚ͘ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů tŝŶĚŽǁƐ͗ ^ĂŵĞ ƐĐŚĞŵĞ ĂƐ ƐƚŽƌĞĨƌŽŶƚ͕ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ƚŚŝŶ ƐƚĞĞů ƚƌŝŵ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂĐƚƐ ĂƐ Ă Ɛŝůů ĂŶĚ ŚĞĂĚĞƌ ƚŽ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ ƚŚĞ ĞĚŐĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ͘ tŝŶĚŽǁƐ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƉůĂĐĞĚ ĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĐĞŶƚĞƌůŝŶĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ǁĂůů͕ ƚŽ ĂůůŽǁ ĨŽƌ ƌĞĐĞƐƐĞƐ ŽŶ ďŽƚŚ ƐŝĚĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ǁĂůů͘

ϰ͘ ƌŝĞŇLJ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞ ŚŽǁ ĞĂĐŚ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ŝƐ ƚŽ ďĞ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ͕ ĂƐƐĞŵďůĞĚ͕ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚ ĞƚĐ͘ ƚŽ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͗ ĞŐ͘ ďƌŝĐŬ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ ďLJ ƐŚĞůĨ ĂŶŐůĞ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂƌĞ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚ ďĂĐŬ ƚŽ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ƐůĂď ĞĚŐĞ͘​͘Žƌ͘​͘​͘ ^ƚŽŶĞ ƉĂŶĞůƐ ŚƵŶŐ Žī ŽĨ ƐƵďĨƌĂŵĞ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ ďLJ ƉƌŝŵĂƌLJ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĨƌĂŵĞ͘​͘​͘​͘Žƌ͘​͘​͘​͘ŐůĂƐƐ ƉĂŶĞůƐ ƐĞƚ ŝŶ Ă ǁŝŶĚŽǁ ǁĂůů ĨƌĂŵĞ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ĞƚĐ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƐŬĞƚĐŚĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞƐĞ ĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ ĂƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ ƚŽ ŚĞůƉ LJŽƵ ƚŚŝŶŬ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ͘ ;ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ŶĞdžƚ ƉĂŐĞ ŝĨ ŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ ƌŝĐŬ ǀĞŶĞĞƌ ǁĂůůƐ͕ ƐŝŶĐĞ ƚŚĞLJ ŽŶůLJ ĞdžŝƐƚ Ăƚ ƐƚĂŝƌ ĐŽƌĞƐͬďŽƚƚŽŵ ĨůŽŽƌƐ͕ ǁŝůů ƌĞƐƚ ĂƚŽƉ ƚŚĞ ƉĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌ ĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ǁĂůůƐ͘ KƉĞŶŝŶŐƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ďƌŝĐŬ ǀĞŶĞĞƌ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ƐŚĞůĨ ĂŶŐůĞ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ǁĂůů ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ƉĂŝŶƚĞĚ ǁŚŝƚĞ ƵŶĚĞƌŶĞĂƚŚ ƚŽ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ ƚŚĞ ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ ŵƵůůŝŽŶƐ͘ tŽŽĚ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞ ǁĂůůƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ŐĂƉ ďĞŚŝŶĚ ƚŚĞŵ ƚŽ ĂůůŽǁ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ǁŝĐŬŝŶŐ ŽĨ ŵŽŝƐƚƵƌĞ ůŝŬĞ Ă ƌĂŝŶ ƐĐƌĞĞŶ͕ ƵƐŝŶŐ ĨƵƌƌŝŶŐ ƐƚƌŝƉƐ͘ dŚĞ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ƚŚĞŶ ďĞ ŶĂŝůĞĚ ĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƐƚƌŝƉƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ŶĂŝůƐ ďĞŝŶŐ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚ ďLJ ƚŚĞ ƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚ ůĂLJĞƌ ŽĨ ƐŚŝŶŐůĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĨĂƐŚŝŽŶ͘ ZĞŐƵůĂƌ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ǁŽŽĚ ůŝŐŚƚ ĨƌĂŵŝŶŐ ǁĂůůƐ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĨůŽŽƌͲƚŽͲĐĞŝůŝŶŐ ƐƚŽƌĞĨƌŽŶƚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ďƵŝůƚ ƵƉ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞ ĞĚŐĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĨůŽŽƌ ;ǁŚŝĐŚ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ƌĂŝƐĞĚ ĚƵĞ ƚŽ ƵƐĂŐĞ ŽĨ ƌĂĚŝĂŶƚ ĨůŽŽƌ ŚĞĂƚŝŶŐͿ ĂŶĚ ĂƚƚĂĐŚ ĂƚŽƉ ƚŚĞ >d ƐůĂď Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ďŽƚƚŽŵ ĂŶĚ ďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞ >d ƐůĂď ĂďŽǀĞ͘

džĞƌĐŝƐĞ ϭϬ &ĂĐĂĚĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ͗ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ н DĞƚŚŽĚƐ zŽƵƌ EĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞĂŵ DĞŵďĞƌƐ EĂŵĞƐ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

WůĞĂƐĞ ƌĞĂĚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐ ĐĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ďĞĨŽƌĞ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ͘

WĂƌƚ Ϯ &ĂĐĂĚĞ ŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ ϭ͘ ^ĞůĞĐƚ ĂŶ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ĨĂĐĂĚĞͬĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ƐƚƵĚLJ͘ Ϯ͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ƐƉĂĐĞ ďĞůŽǁ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ϭ Žƌ Ϯ Žƌ Ă ƐĞƌŝĞƐ ŽĨ ĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĂů ƐŬĞƚĐŚ ƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ƵƐŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ĂŶĚ ĨĞŶĞƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ LJŽƵ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚ ĂďŽǀĞ͘ ϯ͘ hƐĞ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ ƚŽ ƚĞƐƚ ƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶƐ͕ ĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ƐŝnjĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĐĂůĞƐ ŽĨ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŝŶ Ă ůŽŽƐĞ͕ LJĞƚ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟǀĞ ŵĂŶŶĞƌ͘ ϰ͘ /Ŷ Ă ůŝŐŚƚ ŽǀĞƌůĂLJ͘​͘​͘ƐŚŽǁ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĂů ůŽŐŝĐ ƵŶĚĞƌůLJŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ͘​͘​͘ďĞ ƚŚĞLJ ƌĞŐƵůĂƟŶŐ ůŝŶĞƐ Žƌ ŽƚŚĞƌ ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ ŽĨ ĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĂů ŵĞƚŚŽĚ͘

Thin steel header, serving as shade and rain protection for window.

Continuation is based on communal unit size.

Dark metal spandrel cover Lintel, precast dark concrete

džĞƌĐŝƐĞ ϭϬ &ĂĐĂĚĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ͗ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ н DĞƚŚŽĚƐ zŽƵƌ EĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞĂŵ DĞŵďĞƌƐ EĂŵĞƐ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

WůĞĂƐĞ ƌĞĂĚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐ ĐĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ďĞĨŽƌĞ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ͘ WĂƌƚ ϯ hŶĨŽůĚĞĚ ŽƌŶĞƌ ůĞǀĂƟŽŶ

ϭ͘ >ŽĐĂƚĞ ĂŶ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ĐŽƌŶĞƌ ĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶ ŝŶ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘ Ϯ͘ KŶ ƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƉĂŐĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ Ă ďĂƐŝĐ ƉĂƌƟĂů Ϯ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƚǁŽ ĨĂĐĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ŵĂŬĞ ƵƉ ƚŚŝƐ ĐŽƌŶĞƌ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ LJŽƵ ĐĂŶ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ŝŶ ĮŶĞƌ ĚĞƚĂŝů ŝŶ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ LJŽƵƌ ǁĂůů ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ƚŽ ĐŽŵĞ͘ ϯ͘ ĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ ŚŽǁ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ͕ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞ ƐŬLJ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽƌŶĞƌ͘ ϰ͘ LJ ƉĂƌƟĂů Ϯ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ͕ ǁĞ ŵĞĂŶ Ă ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞ ƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ ĞĂĐŚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƚǁŽ ĨĂĐĂĚĞƐ͕ ƉĞƌŚĂƉƐ ϭͲϭͬϮ ƚŽ Ϯ ďĂLJƐ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ŝĨ LJŽƵ ĂƌĞ ƵƐŝŶŐ Ă ŐƌŝĚĚĞĚ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ Žƌ ϮϬͲϯϬ͛ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ŝĨ ŶŽƚ͘ hƐĞ LJŽƵƌ ďĞƐƚ ũƵĚŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘​͘​͘ďƵƚ ƌĞŵĞŵďĞƌ ƚŚŝƐ ŝƐ Ă ƉĂŝƌ ŽĨ ƉĂƌƟĂů ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐ͘​͘​͘ĚŽ ŶŽƚ ĚƌĂǁ LJŽƵƌ ǁŚŽůĞ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐ ĂŐĂŝŶ͘

ϱ͘ /Ŷ ƚŚĞ ůŽǁĞƌ ƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉĂŐĞ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ Ă ƉĂƌƟĂů ƉůĂŶ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĂďŽǀĞ ĐŽƌŶĞƌ ƉŽƌƟŽŶƐ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ͘ hŶĨŽůĚ ƚŚŝƐ ƉůĂŶ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ ĂƐ ǁĞůů͘ zŽƵ ŵĂLJ ƐĞůĞĐƚ Ăƚ ǁŚĂƚĞǀĞƌ ůĞǀĞů LJŽƵ ĂƌĞ ĐƵƫŶŐ ƚŚŝƐ ƉůĂŶ ĨƌŽŵ͘ Ğ ƐƵƌĞ ƚŽ ŶŽƚĞ ƚŚĞ ůŽĐĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ƉůĂŶ ĐƵƚ ŽŶ LJŽƵƌ ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ͘

džĞƌĐŝƐĞ ϭϬ &ĂĐĂĚĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ͗ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ н DĞƚŚŽĚƐ zŽƵƌ EĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ^ĞĐƟŽŶ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞĂŵ DĞŵďĞƌƐ EĂŵĞƐ͗ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

WůĞĂƐĞ ƌĞĂĚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐ ĐĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ďĞĨŽƌĞ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ͘ WĂƌƚ ϰ WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ tĂůů ^ĞĐƟŽŶ KƵƚůŝŶĞ ^ƚƵĚLJ

KŶ ƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƉĂŐĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ Ă ƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ͕ ďĂƐŝĐ Ϯ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ĐƵƚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ ƉĂƌƟĂů ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƐŬĞƚĐŚĞĚ ĂďŽǀĞ ŝŶ WĂƌƚ ϯ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ŝŶ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĂƚ ĨĂĐĂĚĞ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ƉĂƌƟĂů ƉůĂŶ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝƐ ŶŽƚ Ă ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘​͘​͘ďƵƚ ƚŚĞ ƐŬĞůĞƚĂů ďŽŶĞƐ ŽĨ Ă ǁĂůů ƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ Ă wall͕ ŶŽƚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ LJŽƵƌ ǁŚŽůĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ /ŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ LJŽƵƌ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ůĞǀĞů͕ ŇŽŽƌ ůĞǀĞůƐ͕ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂů ŐƌŝĚůŝŶĞƐ ĂŶĚ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ďĂƐŝĐ ŽƵƚůŝŶĞƐ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ůĂLJĞƌƐ ŽĨ ĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ ĂŶĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ ƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ůŽĐĂƚĞ ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ Žƌ ǁŝŶĚŽǁ ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͘ Ž ŶŽƚ ƚŚŝŶŬ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ĂƐ Ă ĨƵůůLJ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ ǁĂůů ƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘ zŽƵ ĂƌĞ ŶŽƚ ďĞŝŶŐ ĂƐŬĞĚ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ Ă ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ǁĂůů ƐĞĐƟŽŶ

WůĞĂƐĞ ƌĞĂĚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶƐ ĐĂƌĞĨƵůůLJ ďĞĨŽƌĞ ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ LJŽƵƌ ǁŽƌŬ͘

^ĐĂůĞ ƚŚŝƐ ƐĞĐƟŽŶ ͞ďŽŶĞƐ͟ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ ƚŽ ŵĂƚĐŚ ƚŚĂƚ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ƉĂƌƟĂů ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ƉĂƌƟĂů ƉůĂŶ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ ƉĂŐĞ͘ &ŽƌŵĂƚ ƚŚĞŵ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƉĂŐĞ ƐŽ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞLJ ŵĂLJ ďĞ ǀŝĞǁ ŝŶ ƚĂŶĚĞŵ͘ /ƚ ŝƐ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ LJŽƵ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ƌĞŐŝƐƚƌĂƟŽŶ ŵĂƌŬƐ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƚǁŽ ƉĂŐĞƐ ĨŽƌ ĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͘

t/fourth floor 42’-0”

clt floor 4" x 4" x 1" cedar shingles rain edge

2x top plate

window frame wood interior, steel exterior

insulating glass (1/4" glass, 1/2" air space, 1/4" glass) planter

5/8" gypsum board 2x6 studs @ 24" o.c.

t/ third floor 32’-0”

exterior sheathing weather resistive barrier clt floor

2” insulation 2x sole plate

Exercise 8a Wall Section Diagramming

Coordinating Facade Design and Structural Design and Environmental Systems Kaylee Tucker, Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson Team Member Names: ____________________________________________________ CNC Studio Title: ______________________________________ Due date: November 8, 2020 Q1_Shading System ď&#x201A;§ Define the type of shading system for your project, including if your project has fixed or movable shading systems. ď&#x201A;§ Make a sketch of your shading system in a section.

Q2_Glazing ď&#x201A;§ Define the glazing type of your windows. Find a product by a glazing manufacturer or use the table in the handout. ď&#x201A;§ Define the following physical values: - U-value (IP or SI unit) - SHGC (solar heat gain coefficient)

ARCH 527 | E08a | Mitch Deans, Niels Holye-Dodson, Kaylee Tucker

Q2 - Glazing Glazing type - VELFAC 200 ENERGY - Triple glazing

SHGC

Btu/(h•ft2•ºF)

0.088 0.092 0.092 Prioritze a low SHGC over a low U value because we have a lot of glazing on the E and W sides of our building.

Clear 4mm EXT.

48 mm 1.889”

Energy 4mm INT.

Sun SKN176 6mm Argon gap 18mm

Argon gap 16mm

Q3_Wall Materials and R-Value  List the chosen material and thickness for each layer of your wall construction.  Calculate the R-value using one of the calculation methods listed in the class handout.

Q4_Wall Section  Using the basic draft wall section you developed for Exercise 7, add the following design information to the most important details (wall to window, wall to foundation, wall to roof): - Include the Glazing U-value and SHGC in the detail wall section drawing (from Q2).

- Use the same construction you have used for the R-value calculation (from Q3).

- Draw the insulation layer, weather wrap, and vapor (moisture) barrier in your building detail section. Identify these layers with different colors. List the material used for the weather wrap and vapor barrier/vapor retarder.

CYCLE​ Championing a new form of economy through interdependence and respect for labor ARCH 527

Students: Mitch Deans, Kaylee Tucker and Niels Hoyle-Dodson

Studio Section: Velikov and Rule (CNC) SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINE Division 00 ​ Procurement and Contracting Requirements 00 00 00 Procurement and Contracting Requirements 00 10 00 ​ Solicitation 00 20 00 ​Instructions for Procurement 00 30 00 ​ Available Information 00 40 00 ​ Procurement Forms and Supplements 00 50 00 ​ Contracting Forms and Supplements 00 60 00 ​ Project Forms 00 70 00 ​ Conditions of the Contract 00 80 00 ​ Unassigned 00 90 00 ​ Revisions, Clarifications, and Modifications Division 01​ ​ General Requirements 01 00 00 ​ General Requirements 01 10 00 ​ Summary 01 20 00 ​ Price and Payment Procedures 01 30 00 ​ Administrative Requirements 01 40 00 ​ Quality Requirements 01 60 00 ​ Product Requirements 01 70 00 ​ Execution and Closeout Requirements 01 80 00 ​ Performance Requirements 01 90 00 ​ Life Cycle Activities Division 02 ​ Existing Conditions 02 00 00 ​ Existing Conditions 02 20 00 ​ Assessment 02 30 00 ​ Subsurface Investigation 02 50 00 ​ Site Remediation 02 60 00 ​ Contaminated Site Material Removal 02 70 00 ​ Water Remediation Division 03​ ​ Concrete 03 00 00 ​ Concrete 03 10 00 ​ Concrete Forming and Accessories 03 20 00 ​ Concrete Reinforcing 03 30 00 ​ Cast-​in-​Place Concrete 03 40 00 ​ Precast Concrete 03 41 16 Precast Concrete Slabs 03 41 23 Precast Concrete Stairs

03 41 33 Precast Structural Pretensioned Concrete 03 60 00 ​ Grouting 03 80 00 ​ Concrete Cutting and Boring Division 04​ ​ Masonry 04 00 00 ​ Masonry 04 01 00 Maintenance of Masonry 04 01 20 Maintenance of Unit Masonry 04 05 13 Masonry Mortaring 04 20 00 ​ Unit Masonry 04 21 00 Clay Unit Masonry 04 21 13 Brick Masonry 04 21 13.13 Brick Veneer Masonry 04 27 00 Multiple-Wythe Unit Masonry Division 05​ ​ Metals 05 01 00 Maintenance of Metals 05 01 50 Maintenance of Metal Fabrications 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications Division 06​ ​ Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 00 00 ​ Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 10 00 ​ Rough Carpentry 06 20 00 ​ Finish Carpentry 06 40 00 ​ Architectural Woodwork 06 17 19 Cross-Laminated Timber 06 18 13 Glued-Laminated Beams 06 18 16 Glued-Laminated Columns 06 46 00 Wood Trim Division 07​ ​ Thermal and Moisture Protection 07 00 00 ​ Thermal and Moisture Protection 07 10 00 ​ Dampproofing and Waterproofing 07 20 00 ​ Thermal Protection 07 21 00 Thermal Insulation 07 21 13 Board Insulation 07 21 26 Blown Insulation 07 25 00 ​ Weather Barriers 07 50 00 ​ Membrane Roofing 07 60 00 ​ Flashing and Sheet Metal 07 62 00 Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim 07 72 73 Vegetated Roof Systems 07 76 00 Roof Pavers Division 08​ ​ Openings 08 00 00 ​ Openings

08 10 00 ​ Doors and Frames 08 14 23 Clad Wood Doors 08 14 23.13 Metal-Faced Wood Doors 08 40 00 ​ Entrances, Storefronts, and Curtain Walls 08 43 11 Timber-Framed Storefronts 08 50 00 ​ Windows 08 52 13 Metal-Clad Wood Windows 08 70 00 Hardware Division 09​ ​ Finishes 09 00 00 ​ Finishes 09 01 00 Maintenance of Finishes 09 20 00 ​ Plaster and Gypsum Board 09 50 00 ​ Ceilings 09 60 00 ​ Floorings 09 68 00 Carpeting 09 64 33 Laminated Wood Flooring 09 90 00 ​ Painting and Coating 09 91 13 Exterior Painting 09 91 23 Interior Painting 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing Division 10​ ​ Specialties 10 01 30 Operation and Maintenance of Fireplaces and Stoves 10 30 00 ​ Fireplaces and Stoves 10 71 13 Exterior Sun Control Devices Division 11​ ​ Equipment 11 10 00 ​ Vehicle and Pedestrian Equipment 11 30 00 Residential Equipment 11 40 00 Foodservice Equipment Division 12​ ​ Furnishings 12 20 00 ​ Window Treatments 12 30 00 ​ Casework Division 13​ ​ Special Construction Division 14​ ​ Conveying Equipment 14 00 00 ​ Conveying Equipment 14 20 00 ​ Elevators 14 30 00 ​ Division 21​ ​ Fire Suppression Division 22​ ​ Plumbing

Division 23​ ​ Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Division 25​ ​ Integrated Automation Division 26​ ​ Electrical Division 27​ ​ Communications Division 28​ ​ Electronic Safety and Security Division 31​ ​ Earthwork Division 32​ ​ Exterior Improvements Division 33​ ​ Utilities Division 40​ ​ Process Integration Division 41​ ​ Material Processing and Handling Equipment

Part 1: General

04 21 13.13 Brick Veneer Masonry

1.1 Summary A. This section includes all Brick Veneer Masonry.

B. Related Sections: 03 30 00 - Cast-In-Place Concrete: Structural wall backing.

04 01 00 - Maintenance of Masonry 04 05 00 - Common Work Results for Masonry 04 06 00 - Schedules for Masonry 04 08 00 - Commissioning of Masonry 04 21 00 - Unit Masonry 07 26 00 - Vapor Retarders

1.2 References A. ASTM International a. C1088 - 20: Standard Specification for Thin Veneer Brick Units Made from Clay or Shale.

B. ASTM International a. C62 - 17: Standard Specification for Building Brick (Solid Masonry Units Made From Clay or Shale) C. Structural Engineer

a. Please refer to structural drawings for details and information on Masonry Wall Construction.

1.4 Quality Assurance A. All Masonry Veneer will be composed of shale, and must be free of chips or discoloration before leaving the manufacturing facility.

B. All Masonry Veneer Units must be composed of the same material as Structural Masonry Units.

1.5 Qualifications A. Contractor Qualifications: a. Building Contractor must have previous experience in the construction of brick masonry veneer walls.

1.6 Mockup A. A mockup will be made of a wall section with Masonry Veneer properly attached, and connected to a wall.

B. The wall section will be erected on-site. Location to be determined by architect/engineer.

C. The mockup will then be deconstructed, and if approved, the wall will be used on-site for construction.

Part 2: Products 2.1 Masonry Veneers A. Manufacturers: Masonry Veneers are to be sourced from a company within 500 miles of the construction site, and must show proof of product conformance with ASTM standard C1670-13. Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: a. Glen-Gery Masonry Supply B. If the contractor wishes to source the Veneers from a different manufacturer, the contractor must receive approval from the architect before ordering.

2.3 Accessories A. Air/Vapor Barriers: All Walls must be fitted properly with an Air/ Vapor Barrier system that controls the flow of moisture in and out of the building. Please refer to 07 26 00 Vapor Retarders for specifications regarding above & below-grade vapor retarders Part 3: Execution 3.1 Examination A. Ensure each wall which will receive a brick veneer has the proper framing fastened at the top and bottom.

B. Ensure that each wall which wall receive a brick veneer has a vapor barrier, installed according to 07 26 00.

C. Ensure the site is ready to receive the veneers and properly store the items before erection.

D. Veneers must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

3.2 Preparation

A. Check to make sure that veneer has no blemishes, scrapes, gashes or marks before installation.

B. Ensure the veneers are adhered level, and that the placement is tight and straight.

3.3 Installation A. Take care to make sure the veneers are not damaged during placement and adhesion to the overall structure. Any damage must be discarded and replaced. Notify the architect of any replaced veneers.

B. If the veneer must be cut, use a diamond blade saw which will leave a clean, straight cut in the veneer. Ensure cutting does not leave any marks, chips, or damage.

Part 1: General

06 18 16 Glued-Laminated Columns

1.1 Summary A. This section includes all structural timber glued-reinforced glued-laminated timber columns.

B. Related Sections: 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications 06 00 00 ​ Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 10 00 ​ Rough Carpentry 06 20 00 ​ Finish Carpentry 06 40 00 ​ Architectural Woodwork 06 17 19 Cross-Laminated Timber 06 18 13 Glued-Laminated Beams 06 46 00 Wood Trim 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing 1.2 References A. APA Glulam Report: a. ESR-1040ESR-1040: Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC B. ASTM International: a. ASTM D 3737-12: Standard Practice for Establishing Allowable Properties For Structural Glued-Laminated Timber (Glulam) C. American National Standards Institute: a. ANSI Standard A190.1, Standard for Wood Products D. Structural Engineer a. Please refer to structural drawings for details and information on column construction.

1.4 Quality Assurance A. All glulam columns will be composed of wood from the same species, and must be free of dents, holes, or chips before leaving the manufacturing facility.

B. All glulam columns will be composed of the same wood species as those used in the fabrication of all cross-laminated timber slabs as well as glulam beams.

1.5 Qualifications A. Contractor Qualifications: a. Building Contractor must have previous experience in the construction of heavy timber construction. b. All workers erecting columns on the construction site must honor proper safety protocols and wear proper safety equipment while erecting columns, as specified by the contractorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s insurance.

1.6 Mockup A. A mockup will be made of the column with metal connectors properly attached, and connected to a floor.

B. The column will be erected on-site. Location to be determined by architect/engineer.

C. The mockup will then be deconstructed, and if approved, the column will be used on-site for construction.

Part 2: Products 2.1 Glulam Columns A. Manufacturers: Glulam columns are to be sourced from a company within 500 miles of the construction site, and must show proof of product conformance with ANSI standard A190.1. Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: a. Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC B. If the contractor wishes to source the columns from a different manufacturer, the contractor must receive approval from the architect before ordering.

2.3 Accessories A. Steel-to-steel connector pieces: All columns must be fitted properly with steel connections which will tie the column to the beam and cross-laminated timber slabs below and above. Please refer to 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings for specifications regarding metal glulam column steel connectors.

B. Transparent Sealer: All exposed sections of the glulam columns will be finished with a low-VOC sealer. Please refer to 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing for more information on the specifications of the transparent sealer finish.

Part 3: Execution 3.1 Examination A. Ensure each space which will receive a column has the proper steel connections below and placed in the proper location as dictated by the architect and engineer.

B. Ensure the site is ready to receive the columns and properly store the items before erection.

C. A storage space must be provided which must maintain a dry atmosphere to assure the glulam columns remain dry, prevent mold and remain undamaged during storage.

D. Columns must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

E. Given any precipitation/weather (high humidity, rain, snow, etc.) during storage on-site before installation, the contractor must check for any mold damage on the columns.

3.2 Preparation C. Check to make sure that column has no blemishes, scrapes, gashes or marks before installation. Sand out minor damage if possible, and approve quality of repair with the architect before installation.

D. When attaching to a moving crane, ensure that the connection will not damage the column during installation. If a connection which will blemish the face is necessary, make sure the affected area will not be visible after construction.

E. Ensure the steel connectors are properly fastened, and that the connection is tight and straight. Check for any rust marks on the steel connector, and replace if rust is present.

Check to see if rust has stained the column if so, and only use if no rust stains are present.

3.3 Installation C. Take care to make sure the column is not damaged during placement and fastening to the overall structure. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair by sanding. Notify the architect of any repaired columns.

D. Ensure the column is protected from moisture as soon as possible after installation. The contractor must check for any mold damage after installation, as well as after closing up the building envelope.

E. If the column must be cut, use a saw which will leave a clean, straight cut in the column.

Ensure cutting does not leave any marks, chips, or damage. Notify the architect of any cuts which must be made to the column which are over an inch in depth.

F. All exposed portions of the column will be protected from damage after installation. Make sure exposed surfaces are ready to receive the transparent sealer. Please refer to 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing for more information.

Part 1: General

08 52 13 Metal-Clad Wood Windows

1.1 Summary A. This section includes all metal-clad wood windows.

1.2 Related Sections: 05 05 23 Metal Fastenings 05 60 00 Metal Fabrications 06 00 00 â&#x20AC;&#x2039; Wood, Plastics, Composites 06 46 00 Wood Trim 09 93 13 Exterior Staining and Finishing

1.4 Performance Requirements A. All window production facilities will operate an ISO 9001 quality control system.

B. Manufacturing facilities will operate an ISO 14001 environmental policy, as will key suppliers.

C. All timber shall be FSC certified.

D. 85% of aluminum will be procured from hydro-electric sources with a recycled content of at least 50%.

E. Resistance to wind load shall conform with EN 12211:2000 & EN 12210:2000 F. Watertightness shall conform with EN 1027:2000 & EN 12208:2000 G. Load-bearing capacity of safety devices shall conform with EN 14531-1:2006+A2:2016 H. Thermal Transmittance shall conform with EN ISO 10077-2:2012 I. Air Permeability shall conform with EN 1026:2000 & EN 12207:2000 Part 2: Products 2.1 Components A. Interior Framing a. Interior framing shall be VACUMAT preservative treated and factory finished with two coats of solvent free, micro-porous clear lacquer or acrylic paint containing anti-mould fungicide, in accordance with EN 152-1:1998. b. Dipped, brushed or site applied finishes will not be acceptable. c. Minimum dry film thickness: 100â&#x20AC;&#x201C;225microns. d. Color: RAL 1015 to gloss level 20% B. External Sash a. Extruded aluminium profiles in accordance with BS EN 755-2 (mechanical properties), BS EN 12020-2 & BS EN 755-9 (dimensional accuracy). b. Alloys shall be EN AW-6060 T5, EN AW-6063 T5, EN AW-6082, or EN AW-600.

All windows shall be composed of the same alloy. c. Dimensions: 54 mm face dimension d. Color: RAL 6014 C. Vision Glazing a. Inner pane i.

4MM CLEAR b. Cavity i.

16MM ARGON FILLED c. Middle Pane i.

4MM CLEAR d. Cavity i.

18MM ARGON FILLED e. Outer Pane i.

6MM SUN SKN176 2.2 Manufacturers

A. Unless otherwise agreed upon by contractor and architect, the following manufacturer is suggested: a. Velfac Ltd, The Old Livery, Hildersham, Cambridge, CB21 6DR 2.3 Accessories A. Locking System a. Concealed espagnolette multipoint locking system operated by a single handle per sash (or two handles per sliding window/door). Locking points to incorporate anti-tamper locking pins on espagnolette bolts and double stage keeps providing secure night ventilation. b. Handles to be a matt chrome finish and are and include integrated key locking facility where applicable. c. Concealed opening restrictors incorporating a socket key release mechanism providing an approximate clear opening of 100mm.

B. Concealed 90ยบ hinges a. Sidehung windows shall have concealed hinges in combination with friction break. b. Hinges shall have matte-chrome surface finish.

C. 2.4 Fabrication A. Glaze windows in the factory.

B. Complete assembly, finishing, and hardware application to the greatest extent possible in the factory.

Part 3: Execution 1 Examination A. Ensure each space which will receive a column has the proper steel connections below and placed in the proper location as dictated by the architect and engineer.

B. Ensure the site is ready to receive and properly store the windows before installation.

C. A storage space must be provided which must maintain a dry atmosphere to ensure the window frames remain dry, prevent mold, and remain undamaged during storage.

D. Window frames and glazing must be stored with proper space to ensure each retains an undamaged surface: free of scrapes, gashes, or marks.

E. Given any precipitation/weather (high humidity, rain, snow, etc.) during storage on-site before installation, the contractor must check for any mold damage on the windows.

3.2 Preparation A. Clean surfaces thoroughly prior to installation.

B. Ensure structure and substrate are adequate to support window systems.

C. Verify rough opening conditions and dimensions: a. Verify opening is properly flashed and waterproofed. b. Verify opening is level, plumb, and square with no unevenness on the floor.

D. Prepare surfaces using the methods recommended by the manufacturer for achieving the best result for the substrate under the project conditions.

E. Take care to make sure both the frame and the glass are not damaged before installation. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair. Notify the architect of any repaired elements.

3.3 Installation A. Take care to make sure both the frame and the glass are not damaged during placement and fastening to the overall structure. Any damage must be assessed for reparability and discarded if not capable of repair. Notify the architect of any repaired elements.

B. Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions approved submittals and in proper relationship with adjacent construction. a. Adjust components and systems for correct function and operation in accordance with manufacturer's written instructions. b. Accurately fit, align, and securely fasten C. Install level, straight, plumb, and square.

3.3 Erection Tolerances A. All aluminum members shall be installed with tolerances according to BS EN 12020-2:2016 & BS EN 755-9 G.

Summary: The following specifications outline and selected sections describe the construction, craft, labor, and maintenance of two, 3-4-storey buildings which have been constructed at the Old Sears site along Grand River Ave, in Detroit, MI. The project is a mixed-use cooperative which consists mostly of residential housing units, but also contains a wide variety of communal kitchens, dining and living areas, community facilities (a library and childcare facility), a fabrication shop, a parking garage (hence the precast concrete), a restaurant and leasable commercial spaces.

This is a project meant to accommodate a lot of flexibility in usage, and as such the project must make sure to use durable finishes and materials which can be easily, and continually maintained. The project is heavy timber construction, with painted wood shingles and brick exterior finishes. The interior has a lot of wood trim on doors and windows, with Glulam columns and beams also exposed. This means the specifications must address a need for finishing of wood elements, sealing materials, and maintenance to ensure successful upkeep.

F2020 Arch 527 Integrated Systems

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan

Arch527 Exercise_Building Costs Worksheet Template

Project Team Members: Mitch Deans, Niels Hoyle-Dodson and Kaylee Tucker Studio Instructors: Velikov and Rule (CNC)

Project Data Sheet 01. Total Site Area Square Footage (TSASF)

124,319 sqft

02. Total Building Gross Square Footage (TBGSF) Include roof terraces and balconies if you have them.

137,654 sqft

03. FAR Floor Area Ratio. FAR = TBGSF / TSASF

1.11

04. Site Coverage Ratio. Building Footprint Square Footage / Total Site Area Square Footage

64,562 sqft

05. Impervious Cover Ratio. Building Footprint + All Paved Surfaces / Total Site Area Square Footage

64,562 sqft - 15,957 sqft + 34,967 sqft = 83,572 sqft

06. Net Building Square Footage.

Total Building Gross Square Footage minus the square footage of _Hallways and dedicated horizontal circulation

_Stairs, elevators and all vertical circulation not contained in units

_Any voids, openings, mechanical shafts etc.

_Plan area of walls and structure. Do not include this in your calculations unless directed by your studio instructors.

85,248 sqft

07. Net Leasable / Saleable Square Footage

Net Building Square Footage minus any mechancial rooms, building storage or other non leas

able or saleable spaces in your project.

71,483 sqft

08. Total number of residential units in your project

74

F200 Arch 527 Integrated Systems

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan

09. Summary of unit types and their sizes

You likely have prepared this information for studio use. Please include this information here.

For example: 14 Units Type A. Two Bedroom. 756 sf.

etc. etc.

Communal: 36 Units

1 Bedroom: 8 Units

2 Bedroom: 18 Units

3 Bedroom: 5 Units

4 Bedroom: 7 Units

10. Average Unit Area. Divide Building Gross Square Footage by Total Number of Units

Assuming Residential Area, 47,549 sqft/74 Units = 642 sqft/unit

11. Total Building Facade Square Footage

Wall Only: 82,463 sqft

Storefront: 6,607 sqft

Windows: 14,820 sqft

Total: 103,890 sqft

12. Percentage of Facade Windows / Glass: Total Glass-Window Area / Total Facade Square Footage

21,427 sqft / 82,643 sqft = 26%

13. Structural System(s) used in your project

CLT Slab with Glulam post-and-beam construction on concrete slab-on-grade and foundation.

14. Active Mechanical Systems used in your building

Heat Pump, powering water heater and cooling coil, air handling unit with return, radiant heat flooring

15. Total number of elevators in your building, their load capacity and type (hydraulic or hoist)

7 Elevators Total 3 Geared Traction Elevators 4 Hydraulic Elevators

16. Additional number of bathrooms in your building beyond the baseline number of one-per-unit.

12 additional bathrooms

F2020 Arch 527 Integrated Systems

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan

Building Cost Estimate Worksheet Area Modification Factor (AMF) from the 2017 National Building Cost Manual (NBCM)

(Michigan / Detroit): 7%

Construction Cost Factor for Teams working in China (from Arcadis reading)

(China 2015): 2-3%

Building Cost Historical Index (HCI) from the 2017 NBCM

For Your Birth Year (1996): $1.86/$1.00 For Your Parent’s Birth Year(1968): $7.58/$1.00

Quality Classification: Multi-Family Residences–Apartments from NBCM

Based on the various descriptions per the NBCM’s guide, our group settled on a Classification of 3.

We decided this because the project Features: 1. A deep foundation on a flat site (3) 2. An engineered wood floor structure (2) 3. A simple flat built-up roof (4) 4. Metal capped wood windows at residential grade (3) 5. Simple textured gypsum board interior with wood trim around windows (3) 6. Average carpet and hardwood in most rooms (4) 7. Separate dining area and adequate closets in each room as well as extra closets for linens/storage (3) 8. Tile shower with simple vanity and medecine cabinet (3) 9. Kitchen with quartz countertops and 4 appliances (fridge, dishwasher, garbage disposal, oven/stove) (3) 10. Fairly standard electrical and plumbing fixtures (3) 11. Colored clay brick used on masonry walls in complex patterns (3)

Average Unit Area

Assuming gross square footage (commercial, circulation, etc. added): 137,654 sqft/74 units=1,860 sqft/unit

1,860 sqft/unit With Area Modification factor 7%: 1,990 sqft/unit Assuming 30% masonry facade: add 3% factor to calculation

Base Per Square Foot Cost for Your Average Unit Area Based on NBCM Tables for Multi-Family Residences.

(From the page 22 10 or more Units table): $81.10/sqft (interpolated)*

Average Unit Area X Base Per Square Footage Cost + Cost Modification Factors Total Number of First Floor Units X AUA Base Cost = 18 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.10/sqft*1.03)= $2,992,152.06

Total Number of Second Floor Units X (AUA X (Base Cost + Required Increase)) = 32 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.10/sqft*1.05)= $5,422,670.42 Total Number of Third Floor and Above Units X (AUA X (Base Cost + Required Increase)) = 34 Units*1,990 sqft/unit*($81.55/sqft*1.07)= $5,871,331.82 Base Overall Building Cost (add three calculation values above) = $14,286,154.30 Verify that your total building square footage should equal your Average Unit Area multiplied by your total number of units. Your gross overall building cost should thus reflect the total square footage of your building.

Yes___YES___

If no, review your work and track your error.

Additional Costs to add to your Base Overall Building Cost: Plumbing Total number of “extra” bathrooms your project provides beyond 1 per unit. 12 Select the number of plumbing fixtures in your additional bathrooms. 3 fixtures/bathroom 3 fixtures/bathroom (vanity, toilet, combined bath/shower) Indicate which Quality Class(es) these bathrooms are categorize under. Class 3 bathrooms Total additional building costs related to additional bathrooms $89,124.00 Cost per 3 fixture, Class 3 bathroom according to NBCM: $7,427/unit $7,427*12=$89,124.00 Additional Costs to add to your Base Overall Building Cost: Elevators Number of elevators your have in your project by type 3 Geared Traction, 4 Hydraulic Elevator size(s) weight capacities, and speeds (FPM).

Hydraulic: Stainless steel doors, standard size, 100 f.p.m., 2,000 lbs. capacity.

3-storey hydraulic elevators: 3

3*($45,700+10,200+3,600)= $178,500.00

2-storey hydraulic elevators: 1

1*($45,700+10,200)= $55,900.00

Electric elevators, 5 storeys: 3

3*($114,600)= $343,800.00 Elevator(s) Base Cost(s) $578,200.00 “Deluxe” Cars Yes____NO_____ If so include upgrade cost here________________ Determine the number of floors / stops your elevators will travel 3: 5 stories, 3: 3 stories, 1: 1 storey For a hydraulic piston elevator, for each floor / stop above 2 add $3600 to your base cost.

For an electric / hoist elevator, for each floor / stop above 6, add $9700 to your base cost.

Total Elevator Cost per car / shaft = $82,600.00 $578,200.00/7=$82,600.00 Multiply your Total Elevator Cost(s) by the number / types of elevators in your project.

(See above calculations)

Total additional building costs related to elevators $578,200.00 Estimated Building Cost Add your Base Building Cost to the additional building costs related to additional bathrooms and elevators.

Base Building Cost (residential): $14,286,154.30 Extra Plumbing Fixtures Cost: $89,124.00 Elevator Costs: $578,200.00 Total estimated building cost = $14,953,478.30

Finally...a little bit of contextualization of these figures....

Historical Cost Index HCI Your Birth Year 1996 Estimated Building Cost: $8,039,504.46 $14,953,478.30/$1.86/$1.00= $8,039,504.46 HCI Your Parentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Birth Year 1968 Estimated Building Cost: $1,972,754.39 $14,953,478.30/$7.58/$1.00= $1,972,754.39 Inflation Adjusted Building Cost for Your Birth Year 1996 Estimated Building Cost: $13,344,830.00 Inflation Rate: $1.66/$1.00. $1.66*$8,039,054.46= $13,344,830.00 Inflation Adjusted Building Cost for Your Parentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Birth Year 1968 Estimated Building Cost $14,756,202.84

Inflation Rate: $7.48/$1.00. $7.48*$1,972,754.39= $14,756,202.84

MADRID HOUSING Morphosis Calle Patrimonio de

la Humanidad Apa

rtments Calle Patrimonio de

Madrid, Spain, 2006 la Humanidad Apa

rtments

SITE: ORGANIZATION

Calle Patrimonio de

Total Site Area FAR Lot Coverage Percentage

Space

Colegio Artica

Calle de los Mora

r Aliende

Building Depth Building Height

Greenspace Percentage Total Greenspace Area Parking Type Number of Parking Spaces

128,614 sq ft 1.8 61.68% 275”-7” 80’-0”

21.82% 28,069SF Underground 92

Calle de Salvado

Apartment Complex

les

Surrounding Green

Building Type Public Housing with 141 two-, three- and fourbedroom units

la Humanidad

it

e/Ex

tranc

g En

in Build

xit

ing E

Park

les

ent Apartm

Complex

Calle

de ce

ntran

ing E

Park

ora M s o l

Drawings prepared by:

SITE PLAN SCALE:

1/64” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

Nicholas Di Donato

P-1

MADRID HOUSING Morphosis Winter Solstice Shade

Madrid, Spain, 2006

Equinox Shade Summer Solstince Shade

SITE: MASSING Building Typology Variable stacked units, surrounded on two sides by stack-towers Gross Floor Area (GFA) 236,800 sq ft

Winter Solstice Azimuth

Number of Floors Number of Units Commercial Area Total leasable Area (Net Area) Program 1st floor (Partially Underground)

Equinox Azimuth

2nd to 8th floor

Summer Solstince Shade Azimuth

Underground

8 141 0 sq ft 236,800 sq ft

Parking Storage

Residential Units

Parking Storage

Photo of building here

3 Bedroom, 2 Stories - Type 1 3 Bedroom, 2 Stories - Type 2 4 Bedroom, 2 Stories 3 Bedroom, 2 Stories - Type 3 2 Bedroom, 1 Story - Tower 2 Bedroom, 1 Story - Small Tower 2 Bedroom, 2 Stories Tower

Drawings prepared by:

MASSING AXON SCALE:

1/64” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

Nicholas Di Donato

P-1

1/16" = 1'-0"

A101

Scale

Checked By

Drawn By

Date

Project Number

Morphosis Madrid, Spain, 2006 Scale

Checked By

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker Drawn By

Date

Project Number

Project Name

1st Floor Egress

No.

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Description

Owner

Date

9/17/2020 5:10:04 AM www.autodesk.com/revit

2nd Fl

Proj No.

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

www.

MADRID HOUSING

SITE: CIRCULATION / EGRESS

Egress / Circulation

Towers: Max. Path of Egress travel “Pad”: Max. Path of Egress travel (on typical residential floor)

DN

AXONOMETRIC: UNIT EGRESS ENCLOSURE

Access and Egress Typology Towers: Single hallway with stair egress.

“Pad”: Gridded hallway egress.

Key Dimensions 114 mm (45”) Egress Stair width 1 m (39.25”) Egress Door width

DN

Construction Type

41 m (132’) 27 m (88’)

Non-combustible Type II B

Sprinklered

Yes

Max. Egress Distance: “Pad” 1 main thoroughfare in middle of site. Single hallway with stairs for towers. Grid of hallways for lower “pad”.

UP

Building Circulation

Entry DN DN

UP

Vehicle Entry

Tower

“Pad”

Tower

SCALE:

1/128” = 1’-0”

UP

UP

CIRCULATION: 2ND FLOOR

Egress Stairs/ Vertical Circulation Drawings prepared by:

Mitch Deans

Max. Egress Distance: Tower

CIRCULATION: 1ST FLOOR SCALE:

1/128” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

THE STACK GLUCK + New York City, USA, 2014

SITE: MASSING Building Typology i.e. Bar Building, double loaded corridor Gross Floor Area (GFA)

45,000 sq ft

Number of Floors Number of Units Commercial Area Total leasable Area (Net Area)

6 35 5,700 sq ft 37,200 sq ft

Program 1st floor

2nd to 5th floor Roof

Underground

Residential Lobby Small Shop Bicycle Storage Laundry Room Residential Community room Roof Terrace Sauna Mechanical Parking Storage

DRAWING TITLE SCALE:

1/32” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

THE STACK GLUCK + New York City, USA, 2014 FLR 8

SITE: CIRCULATION / EGRESS Access and Egress Typology i.e. double loaded corridor, 2 means of egress Key Dimensions Egress Stair width Egress Door width

FLR 7

42” 36”

Max. Path of Egress travel (on typical residential floor) Construction Type

VERTICAL

Building Circulation

FLR 6

2 - BR 1 - BR

125’-0”

Non-Combustible Type III-B

Sprinklered APARTMENTS

12

No 1 stairwell adjacent to central elevator core

Photo of interior of a unit here

STUDIO

TERRACE COURTYARD/ PATIO CORRIDORS

FLR 3-5

Egress: 125’ - 0” FLR 2

Drawings prepared by:

HORIZONTAL

CIRCULATION

Niels Hoyle-Dodson

FLR 1

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture

STUDIO INN VAN NUYS

Los Angeles, United States, 2016 SITE: ORGANIZATION 13600 SHERMAN WAY APARTMENTS

Building Type Stepped towers on stilts with open air parking below, mid-rise Total Site Area FAR Lot Coverage Percentage

SHERM AN WAY

SPEEDY LANE AUTOMOTIVE

Building Depth Building Height

280’-3” 61’-0”

Greenspace Percentage Total Greenspace Area

6 5

26,477 sq ft 1.83 44%

42.8% 11,352 SF

1

Parking Type Number of Parking Spaces Number of Bike Spaces

3

1 4

1. Bike Storage

NELIE’S BAKERY

APARTMENTS

13672 SHERMAN WAY APARTMENTS

SHERMAN WAY MARKET PLACE

ORA ELECTRIC & SUPPLY

YUMMY PIZZA

2

Protected Surface 21 70

2. Visitor Parking

3. Outdoor Patio

4. Mobile Clinic Parking

5. Covered Parking

SITE PLAN SCALE:

1/48” = 1’-0”

6. Community Garden

Drawings prepared by:

HANA SAIFULLAH + KAYLEE TUCKER

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture Los Angeles, United States, 2016

SITE: MASSING Building Typology Arched tiers with terraced towers, open courtyards Gross Floor Area (GFA)

48,538 sq ft

Number of Floors Number of Units Commercial Area Total leasable Area (Net Area)

5 64 0 sq ft 22,577 sq ft

Program 1st floor

2nd floor

Living Space Storage

3rd - 5th floor

Living Space Storage Terrace

Drawings prepared by:

Summer Solstice at 10:00am

Summer Solstice at 4:00pm

Winter Solstice at 10:00am

Winter Solstice at 4:00pm

MASSING AXON SCALE:

1/64” = 1’-0”

Lobby Office Community Kitchen Community Lounge Conference Room Social Services Client Room Break Room Laundry Mechanical Room

HANA SAIFULLAH + KAYLEE TUCKER

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture Los Angeles, United States, 2016

Egress Distance: 168’-8”

12

Egress Distance: 142’-3”

SITE: CIRCULATION / EGRESS Access and Egress Typology Double loaded corridor, 2 means of egress

11 11

Key Dimensions Egress Stair width

Egress Door width

12

12

North Stair - 50” South Stair - 45” 36”

Max. Path of Egress travel (on typical residential floor) Construction Type

Type III Concrete and Wood

Sprinklered

11

Building Circulation 12

13

12

168’ 8”

Yes 2 Stair wells at each end of corridor, 1 partially exterior stairwell adjacent to central the elevator core

10

11 9 8

7 5 4 3

1 13

2

6

2 1 Lobby

6 Laundry Room

11 Apartment

2 Office

7 Social Services

12 Terrace

3 Community Kitchen

8 Client Room

13 Circulation

4 Community Lounge

9 Break Room

Entry

5 Conference Room

10 Mechanical Room

Drawings prepared by:

EXPLODED PLANS SCALE:

1/72” = 1’-0”

HANA SAIFULLAH + KAYLEE TUCKER

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-1

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture Los Angeles, United States, 2016

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS UP

UP

Construction Typology Podium +4 stories above Primary Structural System

GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:

Podium Basement

1/64” = 1’-0”

Cold-formed Steel In-situ concrete Pre-framed wood

Substructure structural Strategy 1. Spread wall footings, 2. Column footings UP

DN

Substructure structural Strategy 1. One-Story Podium, In-situ Concrete columns 2. Slab, separating construction types, in-situ concrete 2. Four Story Residential on Slab, a. Pre-framed “smart” shear walls b. Pre-framed lightweight wood walls

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:

1/64” = 1’-0”

AXONOMETRIC SCALE:

1/64” = 1’-0”

demising walls pre-assembled wood framing

12” walls pre-assembled wood framing roof • 61' - 0"

level 5 • 48' - 0"

level 4 • 36' - 0"

level 3 • 24' - 0"

level 2 • 12' - 0"

ground • 0' - 0" floor pre-cast concrete panels

36” Ø columns in-situ concrete w/ reinforcement

spread footings CMU w/ reinforcement

loadbearing walls CMU walls w/ reinforcement

Drawings prepared by:

Kaylee Tucker

LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE:

1/32” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-2

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture Los Angeles, United States, 2016

shear wall connection through slab all threaded rod (ATR) ties shear walls together

STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS Structural System Typology Hybrid Construction - Concrete base with wood above

2x6 dimensional lumber makes up the walls

Primary Structural System

14” 2-way concrete slab separates type IA from VA

metal gusset plate provides shear support

Floors, Ground Walls, Ground Floors, 2nd Floor Walls, 2nd Floor Floors, typ.

Walls, typ.

precast concrete panels CMU w/ rebar 14” concrete slab pre-framed wood wood framing wood framing

metal C channel connects shear wall to slab

rebar from CMU walls below helps against uplift 2” concrete curb on slab frames out the shear walls

CMU wall w/ reinforcement type IA shear wall Drawings prepared by:

STRUCTURAL AXON SCALE:

1/2” = 1’-0”

Kaylee Tucker

CORNER DETAIL SCALE:

1/4” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-2

CREST APARTMENTS Michael Maltzan Architecture

circulation

Los Angeles, United States, 2016 circulation

circulation

BUILDING PLANS UP

Building Typology Arched tiers with terraced towers, open courtyards

circulation residences DN

Number of Units

UP

Unit Mix Studio 1 (47 units) Studio 2 (16 units) 1 BR (1 units)

residences DN

Gross Floor Area (GFA) Leasable Floor Area Efficiency

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:

1/32” = 1’-0”

Program Residential Business Parking

social services office

community lounge conference room

community kitchen community lounge

circulation

circulation office

break room

lobby

community kitchen

social services office break room

conference room

client room

lobby

UP

laundry room

client room office

circulation

Common Amenities Lobby Community Kitchen Community Lounge Laundry Room

laundry room

circulation

64

387 sq ft 397 sq ft 1,031 sq ft 48,538 sq ft 25,572 sq ft 53 %

42,909 sq ft 1,256 sq ft 7,770 sq ft / 21 spaces

798 sq ft 504 sq ft 329 sq ft 187 sq ft

UP mechanical room

mechanical room

GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:

1/32” = 1’-0”

Drawings prepared by:

PRECEDENT STUDY

Kaylee Tucker

P-3

CREST APARTMENTS 24'-11"

6'-4"

5'-10"

16'-0"

Michael Maltzan Architecture 1 3'-11 2 "

Los Angeles, United States, 2016

Number of Units

11'-7

1 2"

1 4"

17'-3"

15'-6

1 6'-8 2" 2'-8"

11'-1"

9'-8"

0’

64

Unit Mix Studio 1 (47 units) Studio 2 (16 units) 2 BR (1 unit)

387 sq ft 397 sq ft 1,031 sq ft

Drawings prepared by:

Student name(s)

29'-10"

STUDIO 1 SCALE:

UNIT TYPES

MANAGER’S UNIT, 2ND FLOOR

1/8” = 1’-0” 5’

SCALE: 10’

20’

0’

1/8” = 1’-0” 5’

6'-4"

20’

5'-10"

16'-0"

7'-7"

17'-3"

13'-3"

8'-0"

29'-1"

10’

8'-10"

5'-6"

4'-9"

8'-4"

STUDIO 2 SCALE: 0’

29'-10"

1/8” = 1’-0” 5’

10’

20’

MANAGER’S UNIT, 1ST FLOOR

studio 2

SCALE: 0’

1/8” = 1’-0” 5’

10’

20’

studio 1

Key Plan SCALE:

manager’s unit

1/64” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-3

Barrett’s Ground GROUPWORK London, UK, 2014-16 C ELEVATIONS D

Main Building Orientation

E

Percentage of Glazing (average)

North Facade

West Facade

East Facade

South Facade

North-South 9.42% 35.38% 2.91% 13.05% 16.88%

B F

Facade Materials

Red brick

Accent Materials

Aluminum, glass

Door /Windows

A north

B east

C south

E south

F west

area - 1025.41 glass - 362.74 35.38% glass

area - 2320.47 glass - 30.28 13.05% glass

area - 546.16 glass - 60.97 11.16% glass

area - 529.56 glass - 120.62 22.78% glass

area - 1838.79 glass - 0 0.00% glass

Wood interior, Aluminum exterior

A

FLOOR PLAN SCALE:

MATERIAL PALATE

1/16” = 1’-0”

D west area - 586.38 glass - 70.61 12.01% glass

UNROLLED ELEVATION SCALE:

1/16” = 1’-0”

PERSPECTIVE N.T.S. Drawings prepared by:

PRECEDENT STUDY

Kaylee Tucker

P-4

Barrett’s Ground GROUPWORK London, UK, 2014-16

FENESTRATION

clt structure

Window Types roller shade wood window frame

flashing + waterproofing brick

fixed window

Window Frame Aluminum exterior, wood interior Max Glass dimensions h = 4’-6”, w = 4’-0” Max Glass area 18 sq ft

aluminum frame

Type of glazing

double paned glazing

aluminum window frame clt structure

Fixed Sliding Terrace Doors Side-hung

VELFAC 200 Energy double glazing U < 0.2466 Btu/ (h*ft2*°F)

WINDOW CLOSE UP SCALE:

1” = 1’-0”

insulation

WALL DETAIL SCALE:

1” = 1’-0”

aluminum window frame

double-paned window

wood window frame

red brick

shade above

clt structure Drawings prepared by:

Student name(s)

WINDOW PLAN SCALE:

1” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-4

THE YARDHOUSE ASSEMBLE London, United Kingdom, 2012-2014

ALUMINUM FRAMED SKYLIGHT METAL INSULATED PANEL

METAL CORNER CAP

FENESTRATION Window Types

Window Frame Max Glass dimensions Max Glass area Type of glazing

PLAN: WALL/CORNER DETAIL SCALE:

1/4” = 1’-0”

Fixed Skylights

Aluminum, with polycarbonate cover h= 8’-0”, w = 3’-7” 41.3 sq ft Double-pane

SECTION: ROOF/WALL DETAIL SCALE:

1/4” = 1’-0”

METAL INSULATED PANEL

AXONOMETRIC: INSULATED METAL PANEL/WINDOW SCALE:

1/4” = 1’-0”

FURRING STRIPS

GFRC TILE

FURRING STRIPS (INSET INTO INSULATED PANEL)

OUTSIDE

AXONOMETRIC: SHINGLE TILE CLADDING SCALE:

1/4” = 1’-0”

INSIDE

Drawings prepared by:

Mitchell James Deans

ELEVATION: WINDOW DETAIL SCALE:

3/16” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-4

46’ 46.8 4’ 4’ 3.82 3.86

8’ 7.76

4’ 4.03

8’ 7.98

4’ 3.97

8’ 7.78

THE YARDHOUSE

4’ 4’ 3.83 3.82

ASSEMBLE 6’ 4’ 6’ 5.89 4.20 4.61

ELEVATIONS 35’ 35.3

Main Building Orientation

4’ 4.71

8’ 8.22

28’ 27.6

35’ 35.3

London, United Kingdom, 2012-2014

7’ 4” 7.33

ELEVATION: FRONT SCALE:

Percentage of Glazing (average)

North Facade

West Facade

East Facade

South Facade

ELEVATION: RIGHT

1/12” = 1’-0”

SCALE:

Alluminum Panels

Accent Materials

Clay Tiles

Storefronts

SCALE:

Aluminum clad Aluminum, anodized

1/12” = 1’-0”

Drawings prepared by:

ISOMETRIC: EXPLODED FACADE

54% 10% 0% 5% 95%

Facade Materials

Door /Windows

45’ 46.5

North-South

Niels Hoyle-Dodson

PERSPECTIVE

1/16” = 1’-0”

PRECEDENT STUDY

P-4