Distorted History: Presidential Candidate Claims Slavery “Helped” Slaves

The risk of a political platform seeking to appeal to extremist groups is that it must abandon logic and sow division. This is what happened to Florida Governor and Republican presidential hopeful, Ron DeSantis, who defended the controversial new rules in his state, requiring educators to teach that enslaved Afro-descendants “benefited” from slavery.

Politicians seeking to change history with fiction

Following an extremist agenda, DeSantis is absurdly trying to rewrite history to downplay one of the darkest episodes in the United States: slavery, which was legal in this country before its founding until the mid-19th century.

There is an abundance of historical evidence that leaves no doubt about the cruel conditions endured by slaves brought from the African continent and their descendants, who were not considered human beings but mere possessions of their masters, who could dispose of them, sell them, separate them from their families, punish, or even kill them.

This historical reality is painful, but far from learning from this period and growing as a nation, there are some misguided individuals who seek to create a parallel reality free of white guilt. Under this premise, an educational reform was made in Florida seeking to rewrite history, claiming that slavery “wasn’t that bad.”

The new educational guidelines in Florida have been widely criticized by historians due to the requirement to teach in schools that some slaves benefited from the technical skills they learned during their captivity. This suggestion is absurd, ahistorical, and fundamentally racist.

Governor DeSantis attempted to defend the measure by claiming that some slaves may have used their skills, such as blacksmithing, to prosper later in life, stating in a thoughtless manner that

Presidente

Alvaro Gurdián

Directora

Hilda H. Gurdián

Vice Presidente

Alvaro Gurdián Jr.

Editor Diego Barahona A. dbarahona@lanoticia.com

Reporteros

Kayla Young

Yuliana Montiel

Jeralí Giménez

Jonathan Hernández

Apolo Valdés

Escritores/Colaboradores

Mae Lynn Reyes-Rodríguez, Ph.D.

Dr. Mike Walden

Dr. Carlos Cruz

Patricia Huerta

Gustavo Cruz

Marcos Andón

Ernesto Maradiaga

Fotos/Video

Rodrigo Gaudenzi

José Félix Sánchez

Traducción

Kendal Walters

Ventas

Rosario Herrera rherrera@lanoticia.com

Directora de Arte

María E. Benton

Director de Informática

Alvaro Gurdián Jr.

Administración

Alejandrina Rosales

Director de Circulación

Alvaro Gurdián

Circulación

Luciano Cruz

Diego Barahona A.

they “developed skills that, in some cases, could benefit them personally.”

Was slavery “beneficial” for slaves?

Historical reality shows that Africans already possessed skills and knowledge before being enslaved, and in many cases, slave owners sought and bought individuals from specific African societies because of their skills in areas like blacksmithing, shipbuilding, or herding.

On the other hand, after the emancipation of slaves and the Civil War, oppressive and violent conditions continued to affect African American workers.

Research by Ndubueze L. Mbah, a professor in the Department of History at the University at Buffalo, highlights the existence of conditions similar to slavery after abolition, contradicting the notion that the lives of Afro-descendants in the post-slavery period were self-determined.

Do we want an extremist in the presidency?

Sadly, historical denialism is not new among some leaders of the Republican Party. Recently, former member of the North Carolina House of Representatives, Larry G. Pittman, compared President Abraham Lincoln to Adolf Hitler on his Facebook account. Donald Trump continues to chant that he won the 2020 elections (although no court in the country believed him) and claims he had nothing to do with the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, despite videos showing that he called for and incited it.

It is clear that figures like DeSantis and Trump cannot unite the country; they seek to divide it further. Electing one of these extremist figures as president would be a new serious historical mistake.

La Noticia 5936 Monroe Rd. Charlotte, NC 28212 Tel: 704-568-6966 www.lanoticia.com

La Noticia no asume responsabilidad sobre el contenido de los artículos o de los avisos.

Las opiniones expresadas por los colaboradores son de exclusiva responsabilidad de sus autores, La Noticia no se solidariza necesariamente con dichas opiniones.

Las contribuciones una vez recibidas son propiedad de La Noticia, no se devuelven y están sujetas a edición por razones de aclaración de idea o falta de espacio.

La Noticia is not responsible for the content of third party articles and ads. Opinions expressed in by-lined articles and letters are those of the writers do not necessarily represent the opinions of La Noticia. No portion of La Noticia, including editorial features, advertising or artwork may be reproduced in whole or part without written permission of the publisher.