University of Alaska Building 7 Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the findings and conclusions of a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. Figure E.1 shows the layout of WTC 7 in relation to the World Trade Center complex prior to September 11, 2001. Figure E.2 shows the structural layout of Floor 13. Figure E.3 shows the finite element model of WTC 7. This study was conducted by a three-person team of researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering with funding provided by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose purpose is to conduct research and educate the public about the World Trade Center building collapses on 9/11. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce that investigated the three building failures on 9/11 — the collapse of WTC 7 was the first known instance of the total collapse of a tall building primarily due to fires. However, many independent researchers have studied the collapse of WTC 7 and assembled a body of evidence that raises questions about the validity of NIST’s conclusions. The objective of this study, therefore, was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by NIST. We also reviewed the collapse initiation hypotheses advanced by private engineering firms whose studies were commissioned as part of litigation related to the collapse of WTC 7. Third, we simulated several scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. Before conducting a thorough and detailed evaluation of building response due to fire 1

University of Alaska Building 7 Report

Articles inside

REFERENCES

Figure 4.20 Velocity comparison between Chandler measurement (green plotted line) and UAF simulation (red plotted line). Bold green trend line illustrates free fall

Figure 4.17 (a) Comparison of simulated collapse to perspective 1; (b) comparison of simulated collapse to perspective 2

2.7 Summary and Conclusion

3.2.2 Girder A2001 Web Stiffeners Prevent Flange Failure and Girder Walk-off

Table 2.3 Comparison of UAF and NIST Modeling

4.6 Results of Core Column/Exterior Column Failure Analysis

2.6.2 ABAQUS Analysis

3.2.3 Lateral Support Beams Prevent Beam Buckling

2.6.1 SAP2000 Thermal Deformation Analysis

Figure 2.36 Modeling process for a beam to girder shear connector, “STC.”

Table 2.1 Column loading for the Floor 12 and 13 assembly

Figure 2.21 SAP2000 model of entire WTC 7 without roof

Figure 2.24 Column number layout of Floor 13 (NIST, 2008, NCSTAR 1A

Figure 2.26 Small section of typical floor slab of WTC 7 with finer meshing

Figure 2.29 Plan View: Model of floor slabs in strong direction (parallel to flutes

Figure 2.46 Seated moment connection of exterior girders to exterior columns ABAQUS model

2.2 Solid Works Modeling

2.1.3 Background Studies

1.5.3 Approach 3: Simulating the Collapse of WTC 7

Figure 2.5 Area of floor where connection failure was modeled by NIST

1.5.2 Approach 2: Evaluation of NIST’s Collapse Initiation Hypothesis

Figure 2.6 Progressive collapse separated into two parts

Figure 2.3 Approach used to model buckled beams in LS-DYNA model (NIST, 2008, NCSTAR 1-9, Vol. 2

1.4.3 Arup and Nordenson, April 2010

Figure E.3 Finite Element Model of WTC7 in SAP2000, as viewed from the south

Figure 1.6 WTC 7 was in free fall for approximately 2.25 seconds over a distance of approximately 8 stories or 32.0 meters (NIST, 2008, NCSTAR 1A

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.2 Hypothetical Failure Mechanisms for West Penthouse and North Face Roofline

Figure 1.4 WTC 7 tenants on September 11, 2001 (FEMA, 2002

Figure 1.9 WTC 7 steel frame building geometry prior to its collapse (FEMA, 2002

Figure 1.5 The collapse of WTC 7 at 5:20 PM (source unknown

1.4.2 National Institute of Standards and Technology, November 2008