Increasing energy efficiency in generic building models - Group C

Page 1

FUNDAMENTALS OF RENEWEABLE ENERGY AR - 484 Supervised By: Dr-Ing. Mohannad Bayoumi

Done By Group C : - Husam Kashkari - Abdullah Bukhari - Abdulbary Dajim - Qussay Dhafar


APPLICATIONS

A software for Photovoltaic production analysis

A software for architectural modeling and analysis

A software for architectural drawing

IDA ICE. A software for consumption loads

A software for processing and presenting data


INDEX

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The project 1.2 Contextual analysis 1.3 Architectural drawings 1.4 Users and equipment 1.5 ASHRAE 55 standards 2.0 CONSUMPTION LOADS SIMULATION 2.1 Frame work 2.2 Cooling demand total (starting condition) 2.3 Cooling demand zones (starting condition) 2.4 Case zone consumption loads analysis (starting condition) 2.5 Faรงade design and optimization 2.6 Comparison between starting design and modified design 3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES REASEARCH

4.0 PRODUCTION FROM SOLAR ENERGY 4.1 Introduction 4.2 PV. production 4.3 SWH. production

3


DEFINITIONS & UNITS

•  Renewable Energy. Resources such as sunlight and wind, that are not depleted by use (McCombs, 2015) •  Thermal comfort. that condition of mind that expresses satis- faction with the thermal environment and is assessed by subjective evaluation. (ASHRAE 55)

•  •  •  •  •  CLO. a unit used to express the thermal insulation provided by garments and •  clothing ensembles, where 1 CLO = 0.155 m2·°C/W (0.88 ft2·h·°F/Btu). (ASHRAE 55) •  •  •  MET. Metabolism, a term used to describe reactions involved in maintaining the living state of the cells and organism. considered in cooling demand calculations. (Medical life science) •  Cooling loads. The amount on heat energy that would need to be removed from a space (BASIX)

W = Watt h = hours lx = lux V = volt kWh = Kilowatt hour kWp = Kilowatt peak a = Annual

•  Consumption. The amounts of electricity used running electrical equipment •  Energy budget. Calculations made that show energy consumption of individual equipment and the total consumption •  PV. Photovoltaic, the cells used to convert sunlight into Electricity •  SWH. Solar water heater, a system that captures energy from the sun and uses it to heat water 4


PRESENTATION PROGRESS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The project 1.2 Contextual analysis 1.3 Architectural drawings 1.4 Users and equipment 1.5 ASHRAE 55 Standards 2.0 CONSUMPTION LOADS SIMULATION 2.1 Frame work 2.2 Cooling demand total (starting condition) 2.3 Cooling demand zones (starting condition) 2.4 Case zone consumption loads analysis (starting condition) 2.5 Faรงade design and optimization 2.6 Comparison between starting design and modified design 3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES REASEARCH

4.0 PRODUCTION FROM SOLAR ENERGY 4.1 Introduction 4.2 PV. production 4.3 SWH. production

5


1.1 THE PROJECT OFFICE BUILDING

Project: Energy efficiency optimization for an Office Building Location: Jeddah, Arrawdha, Alkayyal St. Longitude: 39.09 Latitude: 21.33 Site Area: 2 ≈1,200 m Designer: Dr-Ing. Mohannad Bayoumi

6


1.2 INTRODUCTION CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS

Solid And Void

Building Heights 2 Floors 4 Floors 7


1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS GROUND FLOOR PLAN

c

c

3 B

c

1 A

c

2 c

Zones 1 2 3

2

Floor area (m ) 262 14 250

Openings 50 % 0 % 50 %

Legend: A. Entrance (East) B. Entrance (west) C. Services

8


1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS MEZZANINE PLAN A

B

C

E

D

G

F

H

J

I

40.50

EL.+4.50

C

5.70

EL.+4.50

5.70

5.70

3.00

2.70

6.30

EL.+4.50

SHAFT

2.40

SHAFT

3.30

SHAFT

5.70

1

EL.+1.20

7.20

EL.+1.20

EL.+1.20 RESTAURANT (EAST)

EL.+4.44

UP

2 B

18.00

1.35

3 UP

4

B

SHAFT

SHAFT

SHAFT

1.35

2

A SHAFT UP 13

EL.+4.44

2

Floor area (m ) 177 130

Openings 50 % 50 %

UP

B

EL.+4.44

6.60

EL.+4.44

1 A

SHAFT

RESTAURANT (WEST)

A

Zones 1 2

EL.+1.20

EL.+1.20 EL.+1.20

EL.+1.20

1.50

5

6

C

Legend: A. Restaurant (East) B. Restaurant (west)

9


1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

42 A

39 A B

21 A

23 A

C

35 A C

B 25 A

26 A

2

Zones Floor area (m ) 21 36 23 36 25 36 26 41 35 36 39 32 42 32 Legend: A. Office B. Kitchenette C. W/C

Openings 50 % 50 % 80 % 50 % 50 % 80 % 50 %

10


1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

A

A

A B

A C

A C

A B

A

Zones 1

2

Floor area (m ) 290

Openings 100 %

1 D Legend: A. Office B. Kitchenette C. W/C D. Café 11


1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SECTION

ROOF SECOND F FIRST F MEZZANINE

GF

N

BASEMENT

S 12


1.4 USERS AND EQUIPMENT Zones

Equipment

Offices

1. TV. 2. Monitors 3. Printers 4. PC 5. Telephone

Restaurant & Kitchen

Corridor

1. Fridge 2. Stove 3. Mixer 4. Ice machine 5. Dish washer -

Users CLO = 1.0 MET = 1.0 NO. = 6

CLO = 1.0 MET= 1.0 MET (chef) = 2.0 NO. = 100

CLO = 1.0 MET = 2.0 NO. = -

13


1.5 ASHRAE 55 STANDARDS THERMAL COMFORT

14


1.5 ASHRAE 55 STANDARDS THERMAL COMFORT

15


PRESENTATION PROGRESS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The project 1.2 Contextual analysis 1.3 Architectural drawings 1.4 Users and equipment 1.5 ASHRAE 55 standards 2.0 CONSUMPTION LOADS SIMULATION 2.1 Frame work 2.2 Cooling demand total (starting condition) 2.3 Cooling demand zones (starting condition) 2.4 Case zone consumption loads analysis (starting condition) 2.5 Faรงade design and optimization 2.6 Comparison between starting design and modified design 3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES REASEARCH

4.0 PRODUCTION FROM SOLAR ENERGY 4.1 Introduction 4.2 PV. production 4.3 SWH. production

16


2.1 Frame Work IDA ICE ANALYSIS Variables

Framework Factor

Unit

Case 1

case 2

Orient.

-

South

North

Area

m 2

36

32

Opening control

-

No

No

Ext. shading

-

Yes

Yes

U- value glass

W/m k

2.0

2.0

U- value ext. wall

W/m k

0.22

0.22

2

2

The table to right shows the variables or elements that were ta ke n i nto a c co u nt i n t h e simulation of IDA ICE each month to reach realism level of simulation

January February March April May June July August September October November December mean

Internal Walls Window Mech. Infiltration Envelope & Local Local Occupants, Equipment Lighting, Net Thermal bridges, and & Solar, supply air, &Opening heating cooling W , W W losses, W W W W s, W units, W units, W Masses, W -88.97 -87.05 -29.48

-7.61 -4.175 -1.746

114.4 221.4 271.5 342.3 336.5 246.8

77.69 -38.19

1.407 5.761 8.659 8.472 7.854 4.976 -0.291 2 -1.439 -4.579

132

1.465

201.1

187.9 185.4 185.7 171.3 157 151.5 158.5 179.8 186.8

666 654.4 697 860.6 962.5 970.4 1088.1 1086.3 996.2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

153.1 147.7 141.8 154.4 156.4 142.2 156.9 151.2 149.8

249.5 240.5 228.6 247 249.9 224.5 249.9 238.9 235.9

171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9 171.9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

222.1

1001.9

0

157.4

249.6

171.9

0

0

0

205.6 182.1 181.1

837.3 697.8 878

0 0 0

147.8 147.5 150.5

235.6 238.9 240.8

171.9 171.9 171.9

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

2 1 17


2.2 COOLING DEMAND TOTAL BUILDING RESULTS Purchased energy kWh/m2•a

Source

kWh•a

Lighting, facility

82688

20.7

Electric cooling

293649

73.4

HVAC aux

30601

7.7

Total, Facility electric

406938

101.7

Total

406939

101.7

Equipment, tenant

63421

15.9

Total Energy Demand (kWh) Lighting, facility

Electric cooling

Total Energy Demand (kWh/m²) 15

HVAC aux

13 8%

11 20%

9 7 5

72%

Total, Tenant electric

63421

15.9

Grand total

470360

117.5

25.4 25.2 25 3

4

5

6

7

Months

8

9

10 11 12

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

10

11

12

Mech. supply air, W

25.6

2

3

Operative temperature, °C 25.8

1

2

Month

Total Energy Demand (kWh) 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Month

8

9

10

11

12

1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Month

The results of IDA ICE simulation were taken to Excel sheet where they were analyzed and visually represented in charts, which revealed which equipment consume more energy and which equipment needed optimization 18


2.3 COOLING DEMAND ZONES

Op. temp., °C

Lighting, W

Zone 40 Zone 24 Zone 12 Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 2 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 13 Zone 3 Zone 1 Room-35 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 39 Zone 35 Zone 11 Zone 38 Zone 26 Zone 25 Zone 23 Zone 21

Cooling , W

Zone 40 Zone 24 Zone 12 Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 2 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 13 Zone 3 Zone 1 Room-35 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 39 Zone 35 Zone 11 Zone 38 Zone 26 Zone 25 Zone 23 Zone 21 24

24.5

25

25.5

26

26.5

27

27.5

28

28.5

Zone 40 Zone 24 Zone 12 Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 2 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 13 Zone 3 Zone 1 Room-35 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 39 Zone 35 Zone 11 Zone 38 Zone 26 Zone 25 Zone 23 Zone 21 0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

These charts display Operative temperature, lighting loads and cooling loads for each zone in the building individually, the charts help quickly point which zones consumes more energy than others and in need for optimization. 19


2.4 Case zone consumption ZONE 25

Daylight at desktop (at first occupant), lx

Total Energy Demand, W

1300

1800

1200

1700

1100

1600

1000

1500

900

1400

800

1300

700

1

600 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

10

11

12

Month

12

Mech. supply air, W

Operative temperature, °C 25.8

1300 1200

25.6

1100 1000

25.4

900

25.2

800 700 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Month

8

9

10

11

12

25 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Month

20


2.4 Case zone consumption ZONE 39

Total Energy Demand, W

Daylight at desktop (at first occupant), lx 700

950

600

900

500

850

400

800

300

750

200

700 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

10

11

12

Month

Month

Mech. supply air, W

Operative temperature, C°

700

25.3

650

25.2

600

25.1

550

25

500

24.9

450

24.8 24.7

400 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Month

8

9

10

11

12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Month

These charts display various stats for a case zone that is typical in the sense of plan area and opening percentage

21


2.5 WINDOWS DESIGN SITE Jeddah sun path

22


2.5 WINDOWS DESIGN NORTH FAÇADE North Facade

Window in plan

23 23


2.5 WINDOWS DESIGN WEST FAÇADE West Facade

Window in plan

24


2.5 WINDOWS DESIGN SOUTH FAÇADE South Facade

Window in plan

25


2.5 WINDOWS DESIGN EAST FAÇADE East Facade

Window in plan

26


2.6 MODIFIED & STARTING DESIGN COMPARSION Changes For Modified Design Ground Floor

Mezzanine

First Floor

Second Floor

Third Floor

!

!

Already present

Louvers

Mech. supply air, W

Operative temperature, °C Zone 40 Zone 24 Zone 12 Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 2 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 13 Zone 3 Old Design Starting Design Zone 1 Modified Design Room-35 New Design Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 39 Zone 35 Zone 11 Zone 38 Zone 26 Zone 25 Zone 23 Zone 21

Zone 40 Zone 24 Zone 12 Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 2 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 13 Zone 3 Zone 1 Room-35 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 39 Zone 35 Zone 11 Zone 38 Zone 26 Zone 25 Zone 23 Zone 21 0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

23.5

New Design Modified Design Starting Design Old Design

24

24.5

25

25.5

26

26.5

27

27.5

27


PRESENTATION PROGRESS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The project 1.2 Contextual analysis 1.3 Architectural drawings 1.4 Users and equipment 1.5 ASHRAE 55 standards 2.0 CONSUMPTION LOADS SIMULATION 2.1 Frame work 2.2 Cooling demand total (starting condition) 2.3 Cooling demand zones (starting condition) 2.4 Case zone consumption loads analysis (starting condition) 2.5 Faรงade design and optimization 2.6 Comparison between starting design and modified design 3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES REASEARCH

4.0 PRODUCTION FROM SOLAR ENERGY 4.1 Introduction 4.2 PV. production 4.3 SWH. production

28


3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY RESEARCH Solar System Batteries What are the best batteries for solar? Batteries used in home energy storage typically are made with one of three chemical compositions: lead acid, lithium ion, and saltwater. In most cases, lithium ion batteries are the best option for a solar panel system, though other battery types can be more affordable. 1.  Lead acid

2. Lithium ion

3. Saltwater

Source: Whole sale solar

29


3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY RESEARCH Solar System Batteries Depth of discharge (DoD) Most solar batteries need to retain some charge at all times due to their chemical composition. If you use 100 percent of a battery’s charge, its useful life will be significantly shortened. The depth of discharge (DoD) of a battery refers to the amount of a battery’s capacity that has been used. Most manufacturers will specify a maximum DoD for optimal performance. For example, if a 10 kWh battery has a DoD of 90 percent, you shouldn’t use more than 9 kWh of the battery before recharging it. Generally speaking, a higher DoD means you will be able to utilize more of your battery’s capacity.

Solar panels prices have steadily decreased over the last couple of years. Average domestic solar panels cost around 30000 SAR. Solar arrays in this price range can provide you with a system output of 4 kWh, producing around 3,400 kWh per year, provided the solar panels have an inclination of 30-50 degrees. Below, is an approximation of how much you can expect to spend on solar panels for home use.

Roof Space m2

System Power Peak

Estimated Cost (SAR)

+/- 8

1 kWp

from SAR 10,250

+/- 14

2 kWp

from SAR 12,300

+/- 21

3 kWp

from SAR 20,500

+/- 28

4 kWp

from SAR 24,600 30


PRESENTATION PROGRESS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The project 1.2 Contextual analysis 1.3 Architectural drawings 1.4 Users and equipment 1.5 ASHRAE 55 standards 2.0 CONSUMPTION LOADS SIMULATION 2.1 Frame work 2.2 Cooling demand total (starting condition) 2.3 Cooling demand zones (starting condition) 2.4 Case zone consumption loads analysis (starting condition) 2.5 Faรงade design and optimization 2.6 Comparison between starting design and modified design 3.0 RENEWABLE SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES REASEARCH

4.0 PRODUCTION FROM SOLAR ENERGY 4.1 Introduction 4.2 PV. production 4.3 SWH. production

31


4.1 INTRODUCTION THE PV SYSTEM Photovoltaic Module - Type: Monocrystalline - Roof & S Façade integrated - Roof panels NO. = 196 - Façade panels NO. = 89 - Tilt Angle: 30° - Nominal power = 300W - Efficiency = 17% - Area = 1.71 m Inverter Type - Type: String inverter - NO. : 1 - Name: REFUsol 46K-MV - MPPT range= 575 ... 850 - Max recommended PV power= 55.2 - By: sunshine-energy Battery Type - Type: Lithium polymer - NO. : 3 - Total nominal capacity - 79.2 kWh - Usage: PCs during power shutdown By: neeomega

System Characteristic Stand Alone System Two grid

Roof PV Panels

Series connection for each grid Emergency batteries System Components Photovoltaic

Roof PV Panels South façade PV Panels

Inverter Batteries Cables

32


4.1 INTRODUCTION THE SWH SYSTEM Collector - Type: Evacuated tube - Roof - NO. = 5 - Tilt Angle: 30° - Area = 1.3 m

System Components Solar water heater

Solar energy Collector Outdoor Storage tank Indoor storage tank Pipes

Hot water tank - Type: Combi boiler - Roof - NO. = 2 - Height = 1.7 - by: Sonnenkraft

System Characteristic Evacuated tubes Combi boiler

SYSTEM | Source: Solar Oregon

33


4.2 PV. PRODUCTION PV. SYSTEM DIAGRAM PV

SWH PV

PV SWH

SWH

SWH

PV PV

34


4.2 PV. PRODUCTION PV. SYSTEM RESULTS Comparison

PV. Production (kWh) 39000

70000

38000

60000

37000

50000

36000

40000

35000

30000

34000

20000

33000

10000 0

32000 JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Production

JUL

AUG SEP

OCT NOV DEC

Consumption

Electronics Consumption (kWh) 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

The upper right chart is a direct comparison between PV production and building consumption. According to polysun software PV production can cover up to 40% of the building`s electricity needs 35


4.3 SWH. PRODUCTION SWH. SYSTEM DIAGRAM

PV

SWH PV

PV SWH SWH

SWH SWH

SWH SWH

PV PV

Collector

Outdoor Tank

Indoor Tank

36


4.3 SWH. PRODUCTION SWH. SYSTEM RESULTS

Captured solar energy, (kWh)

Solar fraction, %

600

95 94.5

500

94 400

93.5 93

300

92.5

200

92 100

91.5 91

0 JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

Mean solar fraction = 93.5 % The chart to the left displays the amount of solar energy captured be the collectors and the cart to the right displays the percentage of the energy successfully transferred to the water.

37


REFRENCES •  LEED v4 (McCombs, 2015) •  ASHARE 55 | Thermal Comfort •  http://arco-hvac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ASHRAE-55-2010.pdf •  Medical life science | What is metabolism? •  https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/What-is-Metabolism.aspx •  BASIX | Heating and cooling loads •  https://www.basix.nsw.gov.au/iframe/basix-help-notes/thermal/heating-and-cooling-loads.html •  Andrewmarch | sun path diagram •  http://andrewmarsh.com/apps/staging/sunpath3d.html •  Sun-shine | inverters •  https://www.sunshine-energy.gr/sites/default/files/refusol_40-46k_data_sheet_v1_en.pdf •  Neeomega | solar batteries •  Solar Oregon | Solar water heater •  Sonnenkraft | How water tanks •  https://sonnenkraft.c-dn.cloud/assets/images/d/set_compact-77818eed.png •  https://www.energysage.com/solar/solar-energy-storage •  https://www.sma.de/en/products/solarinverters/sunny-tripower-core1.html •  https://news.energysage.com •

https://www.wholesalesolar.com/solar-information/commercial-solar

https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/solar-energy/solar-panels

38


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.