![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230523202852-8408128cbbf445e032bc0489de9335cd/v1/07cb1d2091e4ab0023d4dc0950be1eec.jpeg?width=720&quality=85%2C50)
1 minute read
Natural Science An d Math
SELAH: How didthe ACLtl affect the actions oftheadvisory committee?
Weaver: TheACLCI raised an issue about "separation of church and state." They suggested that fortheboard to certify a private liberalartscollege holding to a religious/doctrinal statement would be establishing religion bythe state Misconception about the issue created such a smokescreen that the board was unwilling toact Progress was paralyzed for almost two years.
SELAH: On Dec 8, 1982, thecollege received final approval, but the certification was awarded for a one-year rather than a five-year term What are theramifications of theshortened term?
Weaver: There were no valid reasons to deny us.Theone-year certification was a reasonable compromise to accommodate pressure groups on all sides.I expect that we will eventually obtain the five-year approval, mainly because thereis no basis for refusal.
SELAH: How do you feel this issue has affected thepublic opinion of LBC?
Weaver: Having ourapproval should reinforce the notion that weare teachinglegitimate science, which we are. We fought, not because there were a great number of students directly involved, butbecauseit concerns one of our basic rights ascitizens We are committed to training our students intheorthodox doctrinesand dogma ofmodern science
![](https://assets.isu.pub/document-structure/230523202852-8408128cbbf445e032bc0489de9335cd/v1/b10f3e45b17e152abcd6d667a127d944.jpeg?width=720&quality=85%2C50)