sounds from a safe harbour// lucas druet_M1 20.01-20.04
2
3
Contents
first term summary
2
preliminary studies
16
site & context studies
26
program development
36
schematic design
42
model studies
62
design development
76
final design
90
Ă?S - Sound Installation
146
1
First Term Summary
Sept - Dec 2019
2
The prompt of a School of Music in the expanse of Iceland’s West Fjords set off a series of studies focused around landscape and the meditative and collaborative process of song writing.
3
Landscape & Creativity The project began with submersion into geographical, contextual, and programmatic studies. Experienced through readings, film, photography, and physical experimentation. The ultimate goal of these studies was to uncover and explore sources of inspiration conducive to the creation and writing of music.
4
5
ab
le
vu
ln
er
perman ent
in t ro ve r te d s o lid s / ext ro ve r te d flo w s
Inspired by the natural interactions between permanent and vulnerable or fluid elements, I began to strategize the program arrangement in terms of introverted solid spaces and extroverted fluid space.
sol
fluid
id
int
ro
ve
extrovert
d
ed
te
r
cast ing stu d ie s
6
An experiment using charred wood as form-work for a curved geometry was an additional study into the idea of elemental interactions and creating imprints of a memory.
Introverted Studies Having established a concept of introverted and extroverted spaces I began a series of form and material studies through digital and physical modeling, inspired by formations in the Icelandic landscape.
7
Ex t ro ve r t e d S t u d ie s
8
This model was created purely for the purpose of studying spatial relationships between introverted and extroverted forms as well as beginning to understand strategies of flowing a program down a sloped site.
Further to its intended purpose of understanding spatial relationships, this model became used as a device to study the use of light, reflections, and distorted imagery. These new ideas where translated to experiential and material strategies for the building.
9
B ui l di n g D eve l o p m e n t Gathering strategies learned from studies and experiments, I had begun to formalize and express these ideas in building representational graphics as well as form studies that related to program adjacency strategies and scale.
10
This graphic depicts the notion of various introverted solid austere forms scattered in the landscape with a light transparent structure flowing and bridging between them. The highly reflective glass projects the surrounding landscape in an effort to add a level of stealth of the building in the landscape.
11
12
This graphic explores the interior experience of the extroverted volume. Continuation of solid forms and glimpses of other spaces encourage exploration. Volumes open to the exterior strengthen environmental connections.
13
14
15
Preliminary Studies
preliminary studies
16
A highly urban project demands a great deal of research in understanding the needs of a community and the impact of an intervention.
17
A Space to Make Noise In researching the music scene in ReykjavĂk, I came across the story of two brothers who moved to the city in the early 80s to form the popular rock band UtangarĂ°smenn. In interviews, guitarist Danny Pollock speaks of the struggles that musicians faced in trying to find places to perform and rehearse in ReykjavĂk. Frustrated by this, Danny took the initiative to convert an old fish factory into a music development centre where local musicians, professional and amateur alike, could come together and perform, rehearse and contribute to the burgeoning Icelandic music scene.
18
Since Danny has first hand experience in identifying the needs of the local music community and operating a highly public and social building, I reached out to him to discuss these community needs and the success of his music centre. Our discussion became a catalyst for the development of the building program.
Images Source: http:// icelandicmusicmuseum.blogspot. com/2014/12/158-daniel-pollock. html
19
Character of a Safe Harbour During the studio trip to Iceland, I spent a full two days getting to immerse myself in context of my site. Spending hours monitoring the activities from different points around the Old Harbour, speaking with local industry workers, and observing the effects of the climate and October lighting. While the primary character of the harbour is one of safety and shelter, the aesthetic is one of grunge, durability, and weathering.
20
21
preliminary studies
intimacy of rafting
22
Given the limited space of the harbour, long rafted lines of boats are ubiquitous. This simple act of efficiency produces a quiet charm of intimacy and bracing.
preliminary studies
durability and weathering The harbour hosts a diverse collection of ships. Each with their own construction and unique history imprinted through natural weathering.
23
preliminary studies
scale and influence of the tide
24
The roughly 4m rise and fall of the tide adds another dynamic element to the harbours aesthetic. The grand fishing vessels grow and diminish against the fixed pier edge.
preliminary studies
visual noise Another delightful element to the harbour aesthetic is the constant visual noise produced by the collage of different structures, objects, materials, and colours.
25
Site & Context Studies
Site & Context Studies
26
A site located in ReykjavĂk’s Old Harbour provides a unique blend of urban public and industrial activities.
27
Primarily flat at harbour sea floor 7.5-10m MLLW
Harbour Growth 10.0m
7.5m 5.0m 2.5m
0m 5m
10m
15m
Primarily flat at harbour edge 0-5m
28
The ReykjavĂk Old Harbour is a perpetually evolving man-made land mass. As the harbour industry grew, reclaimed land continued to push outwards along the outer perimeter. This means that the vast majority of the Old Harbour is flat, sitting at 3m above mean sea level, with the average harbour depth of 7.5-10m below the mean lowest low water mark. Future development plans show further integration of public and private amenities to the Old Harbour.
1960
1990
1970
2000
2020
1980
29
REYKJAVIK OLD HARBOUR
marine industry
marine industry
general moorage
tool library
the marshall house art museum Olafur Eliasson studio cafe / bar
music rehearsal centre instrument repair shop
marine industry general moorage
private moorage
marine industry
iceland ocean cluster marine industry entrepreneur incubator restaurants marine industry rentable units
seafood wholesaler
general moo
tourism & commercial car rentals shops markets
private moo
tourism & commercial
site & context study
Flourishing Hybridized Urban Harbour
30
As tourism began to become a major contributor to Iceland’s economy, ReykjavĂk’s Old Harbour did not become de-industrialized, but rather a more hybridized urban space. The harbour is a vibrant mix of tourist industry, marine industries, public amenities, restaurants, local craft, design, and music. With hybridization it is slowing become more public, more touristy, while the established industries are flourishing.
harpa concert hall
sailing club
hotel & commercial hotel & commercial
maritime safety training
flea market
naval ship restaurants & shops art museum
whale watching centre
tourist industry whale watching yatch charters Sea tours
retaurants & shops
private moorage
ship yards hotel & commercial
orage
residential reykjavik maritime muesum restaurants offices
orage residential & shops
restaurants & shops
31
site & context study
climatic forces on-site
32
The proposed site, located on a narrow 25m wide by 110m long fixed pier that extends south east, exposing the west face to the majority of afternoon sun. The daylighting conditions in Iceland can be a beautiful and artistic tool to work with, It skims the horizon, giving only 3-4 hours of daylight in the winter and 22-23 hours of daylight in the summer. The annual temperature has a very moderate swing from an average of 0ยบC in the winter and 11ยบC in the summer.
N
W
E
S ANNUAL WIND AVERAGE
20ยบ
10ยบ
0ยบ
-10ยบ ANNUAL TEMP AVERAGE
100mm 80mm 60mm 40mm 20mm 0mm
ANNUAL RAINFALL AVERAGE
33
HIGH TIDE
(example)
October 26th 5:05 PM GMT 4.04m MLLW
HIGH TIDE
(example)
October 26th 5:05 PM GMT 4.04m MLLW
3m above MSL - Average Ground Level High Tide: 4.04m Above MLLW
3.000
King Tide: 4.66m Above MLLW February 21st 2019 7:41 AM GMT
2.240
0m - Mean Sea Level (MSL) (Datum for Land Topography)
0m - Mean Lowest Low Water (MLLW) (Datum Reference for Marine & Tide Charts)
3.000
13.240
3m above MSL - Average Ground Level
2.240
8.000
0m - Mean Sea Level (MSL) (Datum for Land Topography)
13.240
0m - Mean Lowest Low Water (MLLW) (Datum Reference for Marine & Tide Charts)
8m below MLLW - Average Sea Floor
34 GSEducationalVersion
)elpmaxe(
EDIT WOL
TMG MA 24:11 ht72 rebotcO WLLM m10.0
LOW TIDE
(example)
October 27th 11:42 AM GMT
leveL dnuorG egarevA - LSM evoba m3
0.01m MLLW
000.3
)LSM( leveL aeS naeM - m0 )yhpargopoT dnaL rof mutaD(
042.2
)WLLM( retaW woL tsewoL naeM - m0 )strahC ediT & eniraM rof ecnerefeR mutaD(
3m above MSL - Average Ground Level
3.000
042.31
0m - Mean Sea Level (MSL) (Datum for Land Topography)
2.240
000.8
13.240
0m - Mean Lowest Low Water (MLLW) (Datum Reference for Marine & Tide Charts)
roolF aeS egarevA - WLLM woleb m8
35 noisreVlanoitacudESG
Program Development
program development
36
Preliminary urban and contextual studies led to a redevelopment of the building program to better service the needs of the city and industry.
37
urban study
plan
38
---
Public Ownership & Harmony with Industry Through preliminary research into Reykjavík’s music scene I found that there is a demand for: • Music rehearsal spaces to allow musicians to develop their craft • Small music venues to promote local talent • Access to instruments & local and international music for influence This in combination with the understanding of my site as being in a highly public yet industrial setting led me to shift my building program from an institutional School of Music to a highly public Music Conservatory with supporting program including formal performance venues as well as informal venues, Cafes and Bars. The main challenge was to realize this program while ensuring I did not impede in the existing harbour activities, but rather contributed to them. A major part in the public ownership of the building is the incorporation of a music and instrument library. Putting the tools and knowledge in the hands of the public to create and inspire others. It should be a building where musicians can practice as loud as they want, a place to develop your own skills and branch out to other instruments, a place to be inspired and to create.
39
40
A detached streetscape massing meets, matched to the neighbouring building height acts as a comfortable invitation to the activities of the building.
02 Concourse Massing
The existing site, used for miscellaneous harbour activities, including ship renovations, tourist boat unloading, and safe moorage during storms.
01 Streetscape Massing
00 Blank Site
Massing Response to Site
A long concourse will host a majority of the public functions of the building. Set to the limits of the pier to allude to the intimacy of rafted ships.
Begin to manipulate the massing of the concourse to allocate and accommodated the different public functions.
05 Grounding Mass Block
04 Program Manipulation
03 Lifting Public Concourse
Lifting the public concourse to not impede in the daily activities and life of the pier below.
A mass block to ground the structure and host the remaining programmatic functions of the building.
41
Schematic Design
schematic design
42
The project continued to develop through rigorous digital and physical modelling to test the structural and experiential value of the building.
43
Architectural Expression as a Response
44
An architectural language characterized by structural expression and honesty of materials began to develop as a response to the industrial visual noise of the harbour.
45
schematic design
development of expression
46
Early digital massing models helped to formulate the language of form in the context of the harbour with the neighbouring buildings, the rise and fall of ships with the tide, and the mixing of activities between industry and program.
47
schematic design
engagement with the urban context
48
Early studies of the interaction the building had with the streetscape was important to help ground the project as one that encouraged public exploration and ownership.
49
east elevation
structural strategy ___
floating diaphram
mass-wood block
lift tower
conservatory ballast
22.0 18.0 14.0 10.5
10.0
07.0 05.0
03.5 00.0
00.0 west elevation
50
05.0
03.5 00.0
00.0
structural strategy ___
west elevation
mass-wood block
lift tower
Structural Focus Due to the constraints of the site and the resolution of the program massing, a large focus on structural systems began early on in the design process.
10.5 07.0 03.5 00.0
The raised main floor volume created an immediate challenge of achieving great north elevation cantilevered spaces.
west elevation
south elevation
Establishing a tight 5m grid,
k j a v í k m u s i c l a b the @ t hfirst e o l d strategy h a r b o u r was to use a
___ h ö f n t ó n l i s t a r m i ð s t ö ð
rsion
steel full story high spacetruss that projected from a concrete grounding ‘ballast’.
north elevation
reykjavík music lab @ the old harbour
GSEducationalVersion
51
schematic design
Structural Studies
52
By creating a structural digital massing I was able to simulate simple structural stresses to highlight areas that required greater reinforcement.
53
structural simulation ___
structural simulation ___
schematic design
exterior view 01
54
- Experiments in form - Striving for visual noise - Structural expression
55
schematic design
exterior view 02
56
- Experiments in form - Striving for visual noise - Structural expression
57
schematic design
interior view theatre
58
- Experiments in material expression - Focused views - play with light
59
schematic design
exterior view activities
60
-
Experiments in material expression intimacy of activities industry cross-pollination structural expression
61
Model Studies
preliminary studies
62
Physical models became a vital tool in the study of structural systems and experiential qualities
63
1:200
What started out as a simple structural grid model became a device which accompanied me through many stages of the design. Evolving from a structural study into an experiential tool as it was built onto and manipulated.
64
65
With this model I began to develop the ideas of the exploration I wanted to achieve in the main public concourse. I started to visualize the experience of progressing through this volume as being akin to the experience of progressing through the different levels and rooms of a ship. Complex paths that flow through differing levels and levels of compression and openness. This brings a certain level of complexity to the circulation that helps to entice further exploration and discovery in a space.
66
67
68
69
1:100
A larger scale model allowed me to further this study of experience and material relationship through careful crafting and realization of form and opportunities.
70
71
72
This model became a device to find opportunities for moments within a simple form. A strong structural expression gave way to some of these moments and the use of solid wood to simulate monolithic concrete forms helped to visualize other moments.
73
74
75
Design Development
design development
76
After completing structural and physical model studies I spent time reflecting on the early design principles I had established. This aided in the further evolution of the building form and structural strategy.
77
Building Evolution
In revisiting early design principles and strategies that I began the project with, I realized there were items I wasn’t achieving. 1. An unobstructed pier that was both functional for the marine industries and inviting for the public gaze. 2. A public concourse focused on diverse exploration through programmatic volumes. 3. A more simplified building structure and material response to the visual noise of the harbour. 4. Better diversity in spatial arrangement of the music conservatory.
78
design development
visual noise Simple 3D printed forms aided in the iterative process to satisfy the design principles I was aiming to achieve.
79
Building Evolution The revised form removes the large grounding mass and the cantilevered structure is replaced with a series of supporting diagonal columns. This visually and spatially frees the pier level. The strong concrete structure give more flexibility to the manipulation of spaces within.
80
81
82
Final Structural & Systems Approach The primary structural approach for this building form was to use a concrete diagonal grounding structure spaced 10m apart that pierced through the second floor concourse and landed on a concrete pile cap. From the pile cap five steel pipe piles descended until reaching the Icelandic bedrock where they were secured using Rock Socket connections. The floors that sit atop the concrete concourse are built using a lighter steel/mass timber hybrid system. Mechanical systems run through a raised floor pedestal system, with hydronic radiant heated floor tiles. The vertical circulation block acts as a lateral stabilizer for the concourse and carries services to be distributed on each floor.
83
SOUND WAVES SCATTER & DISPERSE
LOW LIGHT REFLECTS AND DIFFUSES
Special attention has been given to the handling of natural light and acoustics within the building spaces. An inverted pitch vault form pierces downwards into performance spaces, rehearsal rooms, as well as the entry building volume. This form works to scatter sound waves onto other surfaces, including reflective and absorbent panels. Additional, the roof form works with the low Icelandic sun to diffuse daylighting back into the space at regular hours of the day. At night, the activities within illuminate the ceiling and create a beacon into the Old Harbour.
84
April 21st 10am
April 21st 7pm
85
design development
axonometric massing
86
87
Final Program Arrangement Starting at the street level you immediately enter into an Cafe space with a built in venue space, acting as a lure for passerby’s. This building also hosts the primary administrative functions of the building. After ascending the stairs of the entry building you pass through a skybridge connecting to the main concourse volume. From here you immediately enter the music library with instrument library accessed through a grand stair. Continuing in the concourse you come across the primary performance space. Past this is the Cafe/Barrin venue space. The primary building mass above the concourse hosts all the practice rooms as well as the recording studio. At the front of the building sits a detached recital hall.
88
89
[Music Development Centre]
Tónlistarþróunarmiðstöð
Final Design
90
A experiential walkthrough as a user of the Music Development Centre.
91
92
93
SITE ENTRY EXISTING BUILDING
A
B
C
D
E
F
20.000 5.000
H
1 A-302
I
J
K
L
5.000 5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
EG
2
3.
00
5.000
G
2 A-302
EG
3.
SETBACK
SITE ENTRY
.15m CURB
01 3. FG
FG
3.
01
2
3 A-302
5
4 A-302
2.1 1 6.650
A-301
13.300
CAFE VENUE
FLOOR AREA: 266 m2
1 01 3. FG 1 01
1 01
3.
LOADING
EXISTING BUILDING
FG
3.
FG
SERV.
FG
3 01
STAGE
3.
2 3. EG
2.3
GROUND FLOOR
94
KITCHEN
UP 26R
6.650
2.2
4
3
A-302
A-302
UP 21R
2
1
A-302
A-302
SITE ENTRY
M
E
5.000
5.000
O
G
P
90.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000
H
Q
5.000 5.000
I
1
R
5.000 5.000
2
3
A-302 A-301
J
S
5.000 5.000
K
T
5.000 5.000
L
U
M
5.000 5.000
A-301
V
N
5.000 5.000
W
5.000 5.000
O
X
90.000 5.000 5.000
P
Q 5.000
R 5.000
S 5.000
5.000
EG
3.
00
5.000
F
2 A-302
3.250
EG
3.
00
1.1 1.2
.15m CURB
3
UP 24R
UP 24R
FG
3.
01
2
6.750
A-302
1.3 1 6.750 27.525
A-301
1
3.250
1.4
EG
3.
3.
00
00
1.5
UP 21R
7.525
FG
3.
01
1
EG
1 01
LOADING
3.
SERV.
FG
EG
3.
00
FG
3.
01
1
B
N
3 A-301
1.6
3 A-302
3
2
A-301
A-302
1
2
3
A-302 A-301
A-301
GENERAL NOTES: 1.
REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF ALL LOAD-BEARING PARTITIONS AND SHEAR WALLS.
2.
EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING OR FURTHEST EXPOSED STRUCTURAL SURFACE
3.
SEE INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR ALL INTERIOR FINISHES AND DETAILS.
4.
PROVIDE UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED UNOBSTRUCTED VENTILATION @ FLAT ROOF - MIN 1/150 OF INSULATED CEILING AREA (NOT APPLICABLE WHERE INSULATION IS LOCATED ABOVE ROOF STRUCTURE)
5.
PROVIDE FIRE SEPARATIONS CONTINUOUS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING AT ALL COMPARTMENT AND EXIT STAIR & SHAFT LOCATIONS. NO FRAMING MEMBERS ARE TO PENETRATE FIRE SEPARATION.
6.
REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR FINAL EXTERIOR GRADING AND LAYOUT OF ANY RETAINING WALLS, SIDEWALKS, GRADE PLANTERS AND FENCING.
7.
REFER TO CIVIL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROADS, CURBS, GUTTER, DRIVEWAYS, SLOPES, AND THE DESIGN OF MUNICIPAL STREETS WITHIN THE PROPERTY OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
8.
REFER TO CODE CONSULTANT REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS TO THE REYKJAVIK BUILDING CODE.
9.
REFER TO ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDOW & WALL DESIGN
10.
PROVIDE MIN. 2% SLOPE AT BALCONIES AND ROOFS
95
MUSIC LIBRARY & LOUNGE
SKY BRIDGE CONNECTION
A
B
C
D
E
20.000 5.000
G
H
1 A-302
I
J
K
L
5.000 5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
4
3
A-302
A-302
2.1
MUSIC LIBRARY & LOUNGE
1 6.650 13.300
2.2
MUSIC LIBRARY & LOUNGE
DN 16R
A-301
UP 27R
DN 16R
5.000
F
2 A-302
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 1,710.19 m2
ADMIN SPACE
DN 16R
6.650
FLOOR AREA: 56.5 m2
UP 27R DN
2.3
SECOND FLOOR
96
4
3
A-302
A-302
2
1
A-302
A-302
PERFORMANCE THEATRE
M
N
CAFE BARRIN VENUE
3
2
A-301
A-301
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
90.000 5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
COOLER
3.250
1.1 STOR.
1.2
KITCHEN
6.750
STORAGE
REHEARSAL THEATRE
RESTAURANT
20.000
DN
DN
BAR
PATIO
1.3 1
6.750
WC
WC
STAGE
1.4 3.250
DN 16R
UP 27R
DN
DN
A-301
WC
1.5 7.525
7.525
21R
1.6
3
2
A-301
A-301
GENERAL NOTES: 1.
REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF ALL LOAD-BEARING PARTITIONS AND SHEAR WALLS.
2.
EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING OR FURTHEST EXPOSED STRUCTURAL SURFACE
3.
SEE INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR ALL INTERIOR FINISHES AND DETAILS.
4.
PROVIDE UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED UNOBSTRUCTED VENTILATION @ FLAT ROOF - MIN 1/150 OF INSULATED CEILING AREA (NOT APPLICABLE WHERE INSULATION IS LOCATED ABOVE ROOF STRUCTURE)
5.
PROVIDE FIRE SEPARATIONS CONTINUOUS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING AT ALL COMPARTMENT AND EXIT STAIR & SHAFT LOCATIONS. NO FRAMING MEMBERS ARE TO PENETRATE FIRE SEPARATION.
6.
REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR FINAL EXTERIOR GRADING AND LAYOUT OF ANY RETAINING WALLS, SIDEWALKS, GRADE PLANTERS AND FENCING.
7.
REFER TO CIVIL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROADS, CURBS, GUTTER, DRIVEWAYS, SLOPES, AND THE DESIGN OF MUNICIPAL STREETS WITHIN THE PROPERTY OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
8.
REFER TO CODE CONSULTANT REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS TO THE REYKJAVIK BUILDING CODE.
9.
REFER TO ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDOW & WALL DESIGN
10.
PROVIDE MIN. 2% SLOPE AT BALCONIES AND ROOFS
97
INSTRUMENT LIBRARY
A
B
C
D
E
20.000 5.000
G
H
1 A-302
I
J
K
L
5.000 5.000
5.000
4
3
A-302
A-302
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
DN 27R
5.000
F
2 A-302
PRACTICE ROOM
2.1 1
13.300
INSTRUMENT LIBRARY
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 930.33 m2
6.650
2.2
DN 27R
6.650
A-301
DN UP 22R
2.3
4
3
A-302
A-302
2
1
A-302
A-302
VERTICAL CORE
THIRD FLOOR
98
REHEARSAL ROOMS
M
N
RECITAL HALL
3
2
A-301
A-301
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
90.000 5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
3.250
1.1 1.2 PRACTICE ROOM PRACTICE ROOM
6.750
PRACTICE ROOM PRACTICE ROOM
1.3
RECITAL ROOM
1 A-301 6.750 27.525
PRACTICE ROOM
PRACTICE ROOM
1.4 3.250
STRG
UP 22R
PRACTICE ROOM
DN 27R
PRACTICE ROOM
1.5 7.525
27R
1.6
3
2
A-301
A-301
GENERAL NOTES: 1.
REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF ALL LOAD-BEARING PARTITIONS AND SHEAR WALLS.
2.
EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING OR FURTHEST EXPOSED STRUCTURAL SURFACE
3.
SEE INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR ALL INTERIOR FINISHES AND DETAILS.
4.
PROVIDE UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED UNOBSTRUCTED VENTILATION @ FLAT ROOF - MIN 1/150 OF INSULATED CEILING AREA (NOT APPLICABLE WHERE INSULATION IS LOCATED ABOVE ROOF STRUCTURE)
5.
PROVIDE FIRE SEPARATIONS CONTINUOUS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING AT ALL COMPARTMENT AND EXIT STAIR & SHAFT LOCATIONS. NO FRAMING MEMBERS ARE TO PENETRATE FIRE SEPARATION.
6.
REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR FINAL EXTERIOR GRADING AND LAYOUT OF ANY RETAINING WALLS, SIDEWALKS, GRADE PLANTERS AND FENCING.
7.
REFER TO CIVIL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROADS, CURBS, GUTTER, DRIVEWAYS, SLOPES, AND THE DESIGN OF MUNICIPAL STREETS WITHIN THE PROPERTY OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
8.
REFER TO CODE CONSULTANT REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS TO THE REYKJAVIK BUILDING CODE.
9.
REFER TO ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDOW & WALL DESIGN
10.
PROVIDE MIN. 2% SLOPE AT BALCONIES AND ROOFS
99
RECO
A
B
C
D
E
20.000 5.000
5.000
F
G
H
2
1
A-302
A-302
I
J
K
L
5.000 5.000
5.000
4
3
A-302
A-302
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
PRACTICE ROOM
2.1 1
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 589.35 m2
6.650
2.2
13.300
6.650
A-301
UP 23R DN
2.3
4
3
A-302
A-302
2
1
A-302
A-302
VERTICAL CORE
THIRD FLOOR
100
ORDING STUDIO
M
N
REHEARSAL ROOMS
3
2
A-301
A-301
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
90.000 5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
3.250
1.1 1.2 PRACTICE ROOM PRACTICE ROOM
6.750
PRACTICE ROOM PRACTICE ROOM
1.3 1 A-301 DN 22R
PRACTICE ROOM
6.750 27.525
PRACTICE ROOM PRACTICE ROOM
3.250
1.4 1.5 7.525
22R
1.6
3
2
A-301
A-301
GENERAL NOTES: 1.
REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF ALL LOAD-BEARING PARTITIONS AND SHEAR WALLS.
2.
EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING OR FURTHEST EXPOSED STRUCTURAL SURFACE
3.
SEE INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR ALL INTERIOR FINISHES AND DETAILS.
4.
PROVIDE UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED UNOBSTRUCTED VENTILATION @ FLAT ROOF - MIN 1/150 OF INSULATED CEILING AREA (NOT APPLICABLE WHERE INSULATION IS LOCATED ABOVE ROOF STRUCTURE)
5.
PROVIDE FIRE SEPARATIONS CONTINUOUS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING AT ALL COMPARTMENT AND EXIT STAIR & SHAFT LOCATIONS. NO FRAMING MEMBERS ARE TO PENETRATE FIRE SEPARATION.
6.
REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR FINAL EXTERIOR GRADING AND LAYOUT OF ANY RETAINING WALLS, SIDEWALKS, GRADE PLANTERS AND FENCING.
7.
REFER TO CIVIL CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROADS, CURBS, GUTTER, DRIVEWAYS, SLOPES, AND THE DESIGN OF MUNICIPAL STREETS WITHIN THE PROPERTY OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
8.
REFER TO CODE CONSULTANT REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS TO THE REYKJAVIK BUILDING CODE.
9.
REFER TO ACOUSTICAL REPORT FOR THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDOW & WALL DESIGN
10.
PROVIDE MIN. 2% SLOPE AT BALCONIES AND ROOFS
101
A
B
C
5.000
5.000
D 5.000
E 5.000
F 5.000
G 5.000
H 5.000
I 5.000
J 5.000
K 5.000
5.00
2 A-302
#Lay
4
3
A-302
A-302
SECOND FLOOR 7.15
4.450
SUSPENDED PATH 4.45
2.700
4.248
TOP OF ROOF 11.40
FIRST FLOOR 0.00
1
Building Section 0
SCALE: 1:200
5m
1.6
10m
1.5 7.525
1.4 3.250
1.3 6.750
1.2 6.750
1.1 3.250
1
BUILDING SECTION
05 #LayID
7.148
TOP OF ROOF 19.05
THIRD FLOOR 11.90
102
4.750
Monday, April 27, 2020
A-301
SECOND FLOOR
M 5.000
N 5.000
O 5.000
P 5.000
Q 5.000
R 5.000
S 5.000
T 5.000
U 5.000
V 5.000
W 5.000
X 5.000
4.000
TOP OF ROOF 34.42
3
2
A-301
A-301
SIXTH FLOOR 26.42 4.000
1 A-302
4.000
SIXTH FLOOR MEZZ. 30.42
FIFTH FLOOR 22.42 4.000
00
L
yID
3.500
FOURTH FLOOR 18.42
SECOND FLOOR 10.17 SUSPENDED PATH 7.72
4.700
2.450
4.750
THIRD FLOOR 14.92
FIRST FLOOR 3.02
1.6
1.5 7.525
TOP OF ROOF 31.40
1.4 3.250
1.3 6.750
1.2 6.750
1.1 3.250
4.000
1 A-301
4.000
SIXTH FLOOR MEZZ. 27.40
4.000
SIXTH FLOOR 23.40
01 A-303
4.000
FIFTH FLOOR 19.40
3.500
FOURTH FLOOR 15.40
4.750
THIRD FLOOR 11.90
SECOND FLOOR
103
4.700
1.6
1.5 7.525
1.4 3.250
1.3 6.750
TOP OF ROOF 31.40
1.2 6.750
1.1 3.250
4.000
1 A-301
4.000
SIXTH FLOOR MEZZ. 27.40
SIXTH FLOOR 23.40 4.000
01 A-303
4.000
FIFTH FLOOR 19.40
3.500
FOURTH FLOOR 15.40
SECOND FLOOR 7.15
4.700
SUSPENDED PATH 4.70
2.450
4.750
THIRD FLOOR 11.90
FIRST FLOOR 0.00
3
Building Section SCALE: 1:200
BUILDING SECTION
104
0
5m
10m
1.2
1.1
07 A-501 3.250
TOP OF UPPER ROOF
1.648
20.55
TOP OF ROOF
3.500
18.90
08 A-501
FOURTH FLOOR
3.500
15.40
09 A-501
THIRD FLOOR
20.548
11.90
4.750
83°
SECOND FLOOR
2.450
SUSPENDED PATH
THIRD FLOOR
4.70
11.90
10 A-501 29° 4.700
Document.pln 7:28 PM Monday, April 27, 2020
7.15
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
0.00
7.15
105
SUSPENDED PATH
106
final design
evening illumination The vertical rhythm of the facade allows for views inward to selectively percolate, while light pools outwards.
107
108
A concrete bench extends from a foundation perimeter wall of the building. A public long-table to be used for the function of the cafe or anyone passing by. The physical connection to the building is meant to symbolize the public ownership of the building.
109
110
The entry cafe acts as an introduction to the material language of the building. A durable concrete exterior is softened on the inside with accents of wood and an industrial tinge of steel. The use of wood shows another parallel to ship construction where a durable exterior is unexpectedly softened by a comfortable wood interior. The platform stage offers opportunity to showcase local talent.
final design
entry cafe interior
111
final design
entry cafe
112
113
final design
entry cafe interior
114
115
final design
music library & forum
116
117
final design
music library & forum
118
119
final design
instrument library
120
121
final design
instrument library
122
123
final design
performance theatre
124
125
final design
performance theatre
126
127
final design
performance theatre
128
129
final design
concourse passage
130
131
final design
cafe barrin venue
132
133
final design
cafe barrin venue
134
135
final design
pier level
136
137
final design
rehearsal room hallways 3rd & 4th floor
138
139
final design
4th floor rehearsal / room
140
141
April 21st 10am
final design
recital hall
142
April 21st 7pm
143
final design
viewing tower
144
145
146
preliminary studies
Ă?S An interactive sound installation inspired by the volatility of Icelandic landscapes.
147
ZONE III
ZONE II
ZONE I
- WATER
- SLUSH
- ICE
3.1 3.2 3.3
60' ROLL?
CLIMAX: BREAK THROUGH
Zone 3 _ Water
107
107
CLIMAX: FLOOD
Layout
Title
Project ENTRY 150' ROLL?
Sound Installation
287 158
70
253 107
107
Zone 2 _ Slush
EXIT
148
Dwg. No.
2.1 2.2
1.2
Zone 1 _ Ice
GSEducationalVersion
2020-01-19
Date Scale:
2.3
1.1 1.3
1:25, 1:100
505
330
175
287
158
457
253
280
In collaboration with: University of Manitoba Faculty of Architecture Herbert Enns Studio 6 Laurie Aftanas Jony Bailes Tali Budman Lucas Druet Mackenzie Hammond Emily Jones Andria Langi Mackenzie Skoczylas Desautels Faculty of Music Composition Master’s Students Örjan Sandred Ross Bugden Nolan Hildebrand Jesse Aaron Krause
All Images and graphics by Lucas Druet
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158