Portfolio 2022 - Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño

Page 1

Master in Conservation of Cultural Built Heritage.

National University of Colombia. University of La Salle.

Certificate BIM - Revit. Naska Digital, 2016.

7th Workshop: Heritage Risk Management in Urban Centers. D’Annunzio University.

01.
Hola!

CURRICULUM VITAE

WORK EXPERIENCE

Since May

2021

Escuela Tecnológica Instituto Técnico Central - ETITC (Central Technological Institute Technical School).

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Cultural Interest Building Management Architect.

Sept - Dec

2018 May - Aug

2018 Feb - May

2018

Instituto Distrital de Patrimonio Cultural - IDPC (District Institute of Cultural Heritage).

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Valuation Sheets Architect

NVP Arquitectos (NVP Architects).

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Architect

Consorcio Restauración Bogotá (Bogota Restoration Consortium).

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Architect

April 2017

February 2018

Grupo de Protección del Patrimonio Cultural Inmueble (Cultural Heritage Protection Group)

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Research Assistant

August 2014

July 2015

Instituto Distrital de Patrimonio Cultural - IDPC (District Institute of Cultural Heritage).

Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Position: Intern

(IELTS 7.5 Overall)

SOFTWARES AutoCAD Revit Illustrator InDesign Photoshop SketchUp
Native English
French Basic
LANGUAGES Spanish
C1

The study of heritage in Colombia is a field that has not been deeply explored and covered by the different research groups in the country, however, the construction and technological part has a lesser degree of study.

The project of "Technical characterization and classification of Colombian heritage buildings " was proposed in order to focus an investigation approaching the constructive part of Colombian architecture. With the study of the different cases, the history of Colombian construction was contributed, since the characterization allowed a higher level of approximation and understanding of the construction system of these buildings. It started with the research in the district and national level that allowed the collection, interpretation, documentation and analysis of the selected buildings.

As a result of this research, there are characterization sheets, in which the different graphic resources such as photographs and plans constructed by the research assistants were recorded, also, as the construction of a historical review, which allows the understanding of the constructive evolution and interventions existing throughout the history of the buildings studied.

Name: Technical characterization and classification of Colombian heritage buildings.

Project: Cultural Heritage Protection Group of the National University of Colombia.

Location: La Candelaria, Bogotá - Colombia.

Members: David Ricardo Cortés Sánchez.

Daniela Ospina Betancur.

Juan José Bacca Guevara.

Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Project Director: Angélica Chica Segovia.

Project Level: Academic research group.

Date: 2017 - 2018.

DESCRIPTION

The Venados house is built on a middle lot made up today of three different volumes, the first (front volume) is the only part that remains of the original 19th century republican house. The original typology of the two-story building was a central patio with the development of spaces around it. Today its facade is composed by a plinth in stone ashlars, a central wooden door and 5 wooden windows on the first level and 4 wooden window-doors with wrought iron railings and 2 closed wooden balconies built into the walls of the second level.

Its structure is made up of a cyclopean footing in stone masonry a concrete subfloor plate and compacted fill material (recent intervention). Its walls are load-bearing and built in adobe masonry blocks with patches of rammed earth and some brick interventions. The mezzanine is made up of beams and wooden joists. The roof structure is gabled and made of rafters, collar ties, purlins and ridge beam that serve as support for the ceiling, on which the clay tile rests.

The floors on the first level are clay foor tile made, on the second level wooden joint slats. The walls of the entire house are plastered with lime and sand with lime paint, on the second level in the main room there is a border with mural paintings of deer figures. The carpentry of the house is made up of the main staircase, balconies, windows and doors. As non-structural elements, the wrought iron railings of the balconies, the metal railings and balusters, the plaster moldings and cornices stand out. The back of the building is a recent construction by the students of the Escuela Taller de Bogotá.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RESTITUTION

chronology

Built: First stage: 1866 - 1878

Second stage: 1878 - 1882

02.
Photography: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Taken by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture. FIRST FLOOR PLAN Republican house Recent construction Facade in year 2018

TRADITIONAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

SECTION A-A’ SECTION b-b’

a’ a b’ b
Documentation
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Center of the Ministry of Culture. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture.

FACADE SECTION main facade (north)

Legend:

Ridge clay tile

Sawn wood ridge beam Clay tile

Sawn wood purlin

Wooden ceiling

6 7 Wooden collar tie

Wooden common rafter

Wooden principal

Wooden rafter

Wooden common

Wooden principal

Upper tie beam 13 14

Metallic gutter

02. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1 2 3 4 5
8 9 10 11 12
Wooden eave
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture.

TRADITIONAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

principal rafter rafter tie common wall plate principal wall plate beam in concrete gutter eave 15 16 17 18 19 Plaster molding Metallic downspout Wooden tie beam Deer border in mural painting Adobe blocks 20 21 Lime and sand mortar Closed wooden balcony 22 23 24 25 26 Wooden joint slats Wooden joists Wooden beam Plaster molding Door wooden lintel 27 28 Plaster cornice Solid wood front door 29 30 31 32 33 Plinth
36
Clay floor tile Cement mortar Concrete sidewalk Subfloor plate in concrete 34 35 Fill material Lime and sand mortar
in stone ashlars
Cyclopean footing in stone masonry

DESCRIPTION

The Church of Las Aguas was built between 1657 and 1690. Its typology is defined by the orders of Dominican monastic temples. It is made up of a main volume with a rectangular plan where the presbytery and the main nave are located, it has an annex volume on the north side that corresponds to the chapel of San Antonio.

Its facade is made up of two parts, the first part is a smooth one with 4 pilasters attached to the wall that frame the main entrance to the church, on the lateral parts of the facade there is a door and a window whose top in both cases are a cornice and on top of this, the second part corresponding to a triangular composition. This part is made up of two lateral bell gables that each house a couple of campaigns, topped by semicircular pediments and pyramidal or pinnacle finials.

Its structure is made up of a stone foundation locked with some earth matrix, load-bearing walls with a mixed technique in stone, brick and adobe, the side walls have arches walled in brick masonry. The San Antonio Chapel has brick walls. The mezzanine structure of the choir is made of wood. The roof system of the main nave is a truss in wood with a wooden framework of chusque mat tied with cuan as support for the clay tile. The vault of San Antonio Chapel is made up of camones suspended from the rafters and its drapery is made of plaster.

The carpentry of the temple is made up mainly of the lacework on the roof of the main nave, by wooden doors, windows, balusters and the choir railing.

chronology

02.
PHOTOGRAPhIC RESTITUTION
1690 1901 Photography: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Taken by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture. Facade in year 2022 1968 Wall structure San Antonio Chapel Ossuaries

TRADITIONAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

NORTH ELEVATION
a
SECTION a-a’
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture.
a’
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture.

FACADE SECTION MAIN FACADE (WEST)

02. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Legend: 1 2 3 4 5 Upper end in concrete Plank brick pediment Plank brick bell gable Ridge clay tile Mud ceiling 6 7 Wooden mat ceiling Round wood rafter tie 8 9 10 11 12 Sawn Sawn Wooden Sawn Sawn 13 14 Plank Plank
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Based on: Documentation Center of the Ministry of Culture.

TRADITIONAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

Sawn
Wooden
Sawn
Sawn
Plank
Plank
15 16 17 18 19
Plank
Lime
Turned
Wooden
slats 20 21 Sawn
Sawn
eave 22 23 24 25 26
Clay
Cement
Stone
27 28 Concrete
Concrete
Sawn wood ridge beam
wood purlin
rafter
wood rafter tie
wood eave
brick cornice
brick frieze
Plank brick niche
brick wall
and sand mortar
wood baluster
joint
wood beam
wood
Solid wood front door
Sawn wood internal door
floor tile
and sand mortar
step
paste mortar
paver
29 30 Lime and sand mortar Cyclopean footing in stone masonry

This research thesis starts with the expositions of the problems caused by the disorderly growth of the city at the beginning of the 20th century and the attempts of counteracting them through the Bogotá Futuro plan, promoted by Ricardo Olano, the forerunner of City Planning in the country. In parallel to this, the process of dismantling the estates located mainly in the north of the city was carried out, allowing the Santa Teresita neighborhood to be projected on the grounds of the farm in 1927. This was one of the first neighborhoods planned under hygienist guidelines, in addition to being a pioneer in the adoption of innovative urban elements.

Because it has architectural, urban and environmental values, today Santa Teresita is part of the Sector of Cultural Interest of Teusaquillo, declared as a Sector with Individual Development, making part of the urban heritage of the Capital District. With the analysis made, it was possible to show that there is currently a fragmentation of the neighborhood network, especially due to the validity of two contrary urban treatments such as Urban Renewal and Conservation.

As a result, urban conservation strategies are proposed that seek the reintegration of the neighborhood as a unit and set that it was in its origin, helping to counteract the various factors that threaten its conservation as part of the cultural heritage of the city of Bogotá.

Name: Paradigm of modernization in the urban planning of Bogota during the first half of the 20th century. Urban conservation strategies. Case study: Santa Teresita neighborhood.

Subject: Master's final thesis.

Location: Teusaquillo, Bogotá - Colombia.

Members: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Project Director: Luis Carlos Colón Llamas.

Project Level: Academic research thesis.

Date: 2021.

*Merit mention thesis Illustration: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

conceptual development and research approach

Venice “testimony of a particular civilization”

Research question

Bogotá Futuro plan

Karl Brünner

charters Legal regulations Colombian laws Law 163 of 1959

Old sectors, urban characterized fragments

Washington “urban core values” Veracruz “criteria for protection and memory of social identity”

Urban planning guidelines, as the origin of the monument

from la merced farmstead to santa teresita neighborhood

What urban conservation strategies should be established in Santa Teresita neighborhood for it to be preserved as a whole ?

General objective

To propose urban conservation strategies for the Santa Teresita neighborhood.

Specific objectives

To make a historical research through the study of the social, political and economic context and the planning process of the " modern city " in Bogotá.

To establish a comprehensive diagnosis of Santa Teresita neighborhood to understand the current dynamics

”La

1990 Agreement 6 Historical, urban and architectural conservation - Urban conservationTransition conservation

1976 Santa Teresita neighborhood

Holguín & Liévano society

To identify which urban conservation strategies in the Santa Teresita neighborhood avoid the fragmentation of the neighborhood network

the religious order for the church’s construction 1927

1923 Bogotá Futuro construction Neighborhood’s projection according to Bogotá futuro Church’s construction 1928

1948

April 9th

Death of Jorge Eliécer Gaitán

Casa

after Jorge

1941 Santa Teresita Church

Canalization Arzobispo River 1943

1936 Santa Teresita neighborhood

Casa Gaitán’s construction

1933

Karl Brünner urban planning director

1932 Santa Teresita neighborhood

1930 Santa Teresita neighborhood Avenida Caracas design 1934

03.
Interconnected elements
City
Planning
Urban
Living
Concept Urbanization Historical
Modern neighborhoods Urban elites Colonial
Urban
Cultural
International
Heritage
network Urban conservation
site
farmsteads
migrations
context Territory occupation
1791 21.397 inhabitants
1845 Owner: Antonio Malo Lack of urban growth 1848 1861 Disentailment of mortmain properties Decree 1902 Agreement 10 1914 January
Arturo
dies Northern expansion to Chapinero 1908 1912 Agreement 19 Sucession among daughters 1918 1926 Establishment
22nd
Malo O’Leary
of Dávila,
Land given to
Church’s construction completion 1939 Santa Teresita neighborhood 1956
Gaitán
Eliécer’s death Agreement 7 Conservation treatmentUrban conservation 1979 Decree 190 Sector of Cultural InterestTeusaquillo 2004
Decree 619 Conservation treatment 2000
Merced” farmstead 1800 Owner Arturo Malo O’Leary 1887

site analysis (based on the district decree 190 of 2004)

Transportation and Accessibility

conservation status

Preserved elements: This analysis was made in order to identify which Santa Teresita’s elements are preserved, since either the origin of the neighborhood or its consolidation until nowadays.

1 2 1
Photography: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Taken by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Primary road Secondary road Neighborhood road Transmilenio station SITP (Bus) stop Bike paths

03. urban elements analysis

Urban layout: It can be established that the urban layout is the position of the roads in a city or neighborhood, being the basis of the morphological structure of this. The analysis was made comparing what was planned (1925), what was built, and what exists nowadays.

Streets: as morphological and perspective frames. Besides, since the origin of the neighborhood this was one of the main features, due to the visual studies made for the location of buildings.

Road sections: According to the Decree 190 of 2004 it is important to study the road sections, because with this graphic representation it is possible to understand how the streets and elements of public space are composed. The analysis was made comparing what was planned (1925), what was established on the public records, and what exists nowadays.

R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9
1925 1932 1933 1938 1944 Nowadays
Designed streets Built streets Arzobispo
Current neighborhood’s perimeter
River
Road section in Bogota Futuro Plan. Road section “R3” nowadays (45th street). Road section in public record 2707 of 1934. Made by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Original perspective 44th street Made by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

urban conservation strategies

urban elements analysis

Urban block: The urban blocks are the complement of the urban layout, basically when seeing this, you read an urban plan because it stands out . The analysis was made comparing what was planned (1925), what was built, and what exists nowadays.

1925 1932 1933 1938 1944 Nowadays

Morphology

Current neighborhood’s perimeter Designed blocks Built blocks Arzobispo River

Land parcelling: The lots are grouped in blocks, the analysis of these helps to understand the property’s structure and its relationship with land uses. A parcel is understood as the division of land (in this case the blocks), in lots for its later urbanization. The analysis was made identifying the occupation of the lot and how it was changing during the neighborhood’s consolidation to nowadays.

Merging lots Apportioning

Triangular Rectangular Square Trapezoidal

Front spaces: Are the ones created to divide the public and private area of a building or lots. The analysis was made by a characterization of front spaces during the neighborhood’s consolidation to nowadays.

Lot occupation: The buildings are the last scale to study, they adapt to the shape and dimensions of the lot and that it is the element that is most susceptible to changes.

Location Block Chronology Lots’ proportion and width Cadastral Code 007102010 Before 1936 1936 1943 1956 1976 1980 Demolished New building 1:1 1:2 1:3 <10m 10-15m 15-20m 20-25m 25-30m >30m
Initial lot Merged lot Initial building New building Initial lot Apportioned lot Initial building Apportioned building Green front garden Projected line Lot limit Vacant lot New building
lots
Types Solid Void

urban elements analysis

Occupation typologies: The typologies respond to the social group to which the urbanization was planned to. The analysis was made comparing what was planned (1925), what was built, and what exists nowadays.

Building heights: The most noticeable transformation linked to the analyzed elements is the building’s height, specially the way that the vertical space is occupied nowadays.

1 Floor

2 Floors

3 Floors

4 Floors

5 Floors

6 Floors

8 Floors

10 Floors

12 Floors Vacant lot

Continuous Reflected

Semi-isolated Isolated Rounded corner Vacant lot New building

conservation strategies

These strategies are divided into categories and focus mainly, in exalting the urban and architectural values with the structuration of guidelines, proposals and actions aimed at urban conservation.

Average height

Public space

Strategies oriented to circulation areas of neighborhood scale.

Environmental

Actions focused on the integration of the Arzobispo river.

Real-estate

Seeking to make the real estate profitable with low-impact dynamics.

Aesthetic

Approaching to the buildings through their aesthetic in the origin.

Regulations

03.
Continuous Reflected Rounded corner Isolated Semi-isolated
Based on the land uses that the built heritage of the neighborhood has nowadays. f i n a n t i a l - f i s c a l c o m m u n i t y - m a n a g e m e n t

urban conservation strategies divulgation

L
A set of postcards with drawings of the neighborhood’s different architecture influences. Made by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

The development of this proposal starts with the reinterpretation of the first church built in 1912 and destroyed by a fire caused by a short circuit in 2009. This was the material and determining axis of the urban layout of the town, in addition of being an icon of the rooting of the population and the correspondent construction technique.

It began with a symbolic assessment of the significance of the previous church, along with the qualities of the most important temples, traditions, customs and cultural manifestations of the Catholic religion. However, the existing risks were: the creation of a “historical false ”, loss of traditional construction techniques and the lack of appropriation by the community towards the new church.

As a result, the articulation of the built heritage through avenues that lead to them was proposed. Also the prioritization of pedestrians allowing greater interaction with artisan workers, and finally, the integration of drug addicts for their pertinent care.

Name: Our Lady of Mercy Temple.

Subject: Built heritage intervention.

Location: Circasia, Quindío - Colombia.

Members: Lina María Gaitán Díaz.

Diego Ferney Joya Monroy.

Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Project Director: Guillermo Trimiño Arango.

Project Level: Seventh Semester - Bachelor’s degree .

Date: 2014.

Sketch: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

location and context

Inscribed on the UNESCO world heritage list in 2011. Urban area of Circasia. The temple was one of the few remaining made of wood in Colombia, precisely with the trembling bahareque technique from the Republican period.

valuation process (according to decree 763 of 2009)

Historic value

HV Aesthetic value

Reconstruction of history through direct association with times, processes, events, and political, economic, social, and cultural practices.

Traditional economy

Inner product boost

Systems renewal Growth opportunity

Patrimonial value

Conservation of traditions

AV Symbolic value

Appreciation of the formal and physical characteristics of the property with its materiality.

Linking the property with processes, practices, events or significant activities for the constant development of the community.

Manifestation Heritage Element Concept Value

Tangible

Symbolisms

“Alto de la Cruz”

Catholic temple

Previous Temple of Circasia

Roads

Vegetation

Construction materials

Central square

Antioquian colonial architecture

Tourist potential

Pilgrimage routes

Construction techniques

Inhabitants’ appropriation

Easter tradition

Custom

Historical memory

Coffee tradition

Identity - Physical context

Shape

Memory

Physical context

Environmental context

Identity

Physical context

Identity

Identity

Physical context - Antiquity

Identity

Identity

Antiquity

Antiquity

Antiquity

Identity - Antiquity

04.
Digital reconstruction of the previous temple
“Strengthen the community”
Intangible
Community
Temple Tradition SV - AV SV - AV HV - SV SV - AV SV - AV SV SV - AV SV SV HV - SV - AV SV SV HV HV HV HV - SV
SV

syte analysis

our lady of mercy temple

swot analysis

• Conservation of the CIBs and architectural typology.

• Cultural expression of big importance.

• Unique landscape.

Opportunities

• Strengthening of cultural expressions.

• Rescuing the historical memory.

• Potentialization of the municipality as a tourist destination through cultural recovery.

design process

Design 1

A design was proposed where the virtualism of the cross, the transparency of the materials and the majesty seek and represent the divine.

Design 3

The functions of each space were determined, which helped in the evolution of the volumetry. The symbolism is embodied in the architectural object.

Design 2

A volumetry is generated with elements of Catholic religious architecture, the symbology being the design basis. A more compact element was generated.

Design 4

A more detailed design was proposed by opening the volume, specifying the interaction of the symbolic and the physical. Cultural values were also related to the proposal.

Weaknesses

• The harvest coffee tradition may disappear, due to the bad payment of this trade.

• Lack of municipal development.

• Appearance of false histories such as eco-farms.

Threats

• Loss of identity.

• Lack of tourists for not having attractions.

• Deterioration of the coffee tradition.

Interaction

construction system

Transportation Environmental Land Use Morphology Strenghts Primary road Secondary road Congestion points Vegetation zones Mixed-use Residential Institutional Biggest size Average size Small size Smallest size Urban layout New church’s structure 6th street - 14th avenue
Temple - Community Education Public health Tourism Municipal development Environment
architectonic program Semi public areas Existing building Public areas Private areas Priest houseOffices Sacristy Choir Cleanlines s Dining room Belf r y Reception Lobby Classrooms Apse Presbytery A mbon Craft markets Chapel T r ansept Ossuary Nave Nave Nave Narthex Atrium
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.
Wooden
Concrete
Asphalt roof shingles Columns in guadua
walls
subfloor plate with wood joint slats
Photography: Diego Ferney Joya Monroy.

04. project plan

main facade (west)

Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

our lady of mercy temple

SECTION A-A’ section b-b’

Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

The seventh International Workshop: “Heritage Risk Management in Urban Centers” with the Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" was held in the Italian town of Scurcola Marsicana, specifically in the rural area very close to Alba Fucens along with the organization “Libera”. This organization was born in 1995 with the goal of a society free of mafia, corruption and all forms of illegality.

In this case, two properties had been seized from Banda della Magliana and were the site determined for the design proposals. It started from the observation and recognition of the territory that surrounded the properties. Scurcola’s community is a pioneer in the region regarding the issue of recycling inside homes, it was proposed a project seeking to continue encouraging environmental processes, create some sources of employment and generate energy from a sustainable process such as the construction of a biogas company.

We want the issue of recycling to be understood not only from the concept of the transformation of organic material but also from a change in the mentality of the society of Scurcola and its surrounding communes, making each citizen understand that their contribution directly affects a change and benefits for the region. Finally, was also proposed to create awareness campaigns, starting these from educational institutions, state entities and community action groups (existing in Italy).

Name: Biogas plant.

Subject: Summer course.

Location: Scurcola Marsicana, L’Aquila, Abruzzo - Italy.

Members: Clara Fragoso.

Jonathan Fontanilla.

Andrés Abreo

Jason Vivas

Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Project Director: Mario Tancredi - Piero Rovigatti.

Project Level: International Workshop.

Date: 2013.

Sketch: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

location and concept

The buildings were seized in 2011. Urban area of Scurcola Marsicana, Capelle dei Marsi and Alba Fucens.

Recycling

The first indicator of strengthening, is the construction process adopted in this project and based on the previous knowledge that Scurcola Marsicana presents in a field of recycling either material and in a social way.

Fracture

The second indicator is established in such a way that an impact is generated to the existing structure with the rupture section in it, generating a new structure that breaks with the misappropriation of the old implantation.

Transformation

The third indicator is to give a new look as the main component is Scurcola Marsicana, which is the new generation of projecting other communities to appropriate their culture and landscape.

advantages

Biogas is a gas basically composed of methane, carbon dioxide and small proportions of other gases. When it is processed in equipment, it is transformed into electrical and thermal energy of renewable origin, some of its advantages being the following:

• Better provision of energy service and better cost

• Environmental and ecological purification

• High quality fertilizers are created

The useful life of a biogas company is 20 years and a cubic meter of biogas is enough to:

• Run a 14 cubic foot refrigerator for 10 hours

• Cook three meals for a family of four

• Run a 3000 calorie infrared display for 3 hours

• Run a lamp for 12 hours

It is worth noticing that the biogas production and transformation process generates energy that does not contribute to global warming.

05.
Photography by: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.
Economic impact Social impact Environmental impact Community Cost-Benefit Nature Energy Biogas Co Generation Infrared stove burners Lamp Engines Electricity Heat Illumination Mechanical power

design process

First Stage

In the first stage of the project, the demolition of one of the buildings will be carried out, leaving the trace that it existed, it will be left only the columns on the first level. In this space, excavations will be made for the respective biodigesters that will put the plant into operation.

Second Stage

In the second stage, the rubble from the demolition of the building will be reused to fill in the land next to the building that is going to be preserved in order to create access to the future building.

Third Stage

The third stage of the project consists of the construction of a building and balcony on the structures of the existing building, which will have the function of managing the recycling center. This new structure will be raised above the old structure, supported by some piles that, in addition to functioning structurally will be a symbol of fracture.

construction system

Existing structure in concrete Remain structure in concrete Metal columns
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.
Semi public areas Old structure Public areas Private areas Biodig sretseO ffisec Manag e tnem Wasteseparation C fa e Offices Auditory Greenareas Balcony
aluminum frame
railings
rubble
biodigesters
Digital drawing: Andrés Abreo and Jason Vivas.
Window
Metal
Acces in
Metal
05. project plan
Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. section A-A’ section B-B’

biogas plant

north elevation

west elevation east elevation

south elevation

Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño. Digital drawing: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

The Historic Center of the city of Bogotá is declared a National Monument by the Decree 264 of 1963 for "representing the founding origin of the city and containing some of the oldest and most representative structures of periods of national history such as the Colony, the Republic and the modern age”. Also, since it has been the concentration node of central power for several centuries, various dynamics that include practices, knowledge and traditions are developed in it. Its proximity to the eastern hills makes it a unique landscape. However, since its declaration there has not been a continuity of public policies, coordination, implementation and management that allow its conservation.

According to the IDPC, this project reviewed the previous plans that have been formulated for the Center of Bogotá. Both the diagnosis and the delimitation of the area and formulation of programs and projects are based on the plans carried out in the last 20 years, which were reviewed as experiences and efforts advanced by the Administration. Specifically, it focused on reverse the low execution of the actions proposed by said plans, evidencing the need to include a management system that develops appropriate financing and monitoring mechanisms, responds to the changing reality of the Historic Center effectively through the inclusion of new prioritized actions and projects during their implementation.

Name: Special Management and Protection Plan for the historic center of Bogotá.

Project: Valuation sheets for urban norm.

Location: Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.

Members: Lina Marcela Moreno Roa.

Hernán David Aldana Carrasco.

Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Project Director: Mauricio Uribe.

Project Level: Professional.

Date: 2018.

Sketch: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Military, residential, religious, institutional, commercial, industrial, transportation, architectural ensembles, engineering and infrastructure works.

Photography: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.

Keep its values

Applies to buildings inside a declared urban sector and are compatible with it, even when they do not meet representative architectural characteristics of volume, implantation or profile and materials.

The building must be preserved in its entirety due to its high heritage value

Must be preserved: heights, occupancy rates, blocks, front spaces, parks, profiles, squares, layouts and roads

Representative characteristics in: lot implantation, built volume, spatial organization, ornamental elements

Physical definition of the urban and architectural elements that support the values of the assets that will be declared heritage

Level 1

Integral conservation

Mitigate its risks Take advantage of potentialities

Preventive and corrective actions for its conservation

Conditions of the relationship between the CIAs and its environment to:

What a Special Management and Protection Plan is

Analysis of potentialities, threats and risks

Level 2

Architectural conservation

Level 3

Contextual conservation

fftcede oz

Delimitation of the context close to the CIA to guarantee its recovery and sustainability

Conditions for maintenance

Mechanisms for recovery and sustainability

Infl

It’s a planning and management instrument for the conservation of a Cultural Interest Asset.

Strategies for appropriation by the community

06. definition
Photography: Maria Alejandra Agudelo Briceño.
cul a r i t y What a Cultural Interest Asset is It’s an asset that requires a special treatment because of its outstanding values. These valuesare: Aesthetics, His t o r i c s dna S scilobmy Movable Asset Built Asset Urbangroup Architectonic group Individual buildings with heritage values Urban sectors Public space
characteristics in: Physiognomy Characteristics Features
UnityandParti
Similar
Fractions of territory of a community Historic centers with values of: urbanism, architecture and history
uencezone A
How? n e
Conservationlevels
location urban norm special management and protection plan Taken from : www.IDPC.gov.co Taken from : www.IDPC.gov.co Affected zone Influence zone Integral conservation Contextual conservation Public space Transmilenio’s roads First metro line Redensification Redevelopment Integral improvement Development built heritage Conservation level N1 N2 N3 N3 N3 N3 N3 N3 N3 N2 N2 N3 N2 Integral conservation Architectural conservation Contextual conservation Taken from www.IDPC.gov.co Typology Language T2 T2 T2 T2 T2 T1 T1 T1 T1 T1 T1 Courtyard house T2 Compact house T3 Residential passage T4 Commercial passage T5 Conventional building T6 Platform tower T7 Specials Taken from www.IDPC.gov.co Taken from www.IDPC.gov.co Taken from : www.IDPC.gov.co Taken from : www.IDPC.gov.co Group 1 Group 2 Group 6 Group 7 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5
06.
Taken from www.IDPC.gov.co
sample sheet

special management and protection plan

sample sheet Taken from www.IDPC.gov.co
• 2 0 2 2 •
PORTFOLIO

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.