Department of Applied Sciences of Education Faculty of Behavioural Sciences
Health Education programs in Greek primary schools Enhancing development and implementation of School Health Education Margarita Gerouki margarita.gerouki@helsinki.fi
5th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JUNE 5-7, 2006, ATHENS, GREECE
Health Education as extra curriculum school activity
Working on a HE program Thematic Units: (1) nutrition; (2) cardiovascular diseases/physical exercise; (3) consumers’ education ; (4) road and vehicle /prevention of road accidents; (5) dental hygiene; (6) addictions/mental health; (7) sexuality and relationships education
THE RESEARCH: AIMS AND METHODS February-March 2005 Primary school HE Coordinators in Greece Aim: to collect information that illuminates the status of primary school Health Education four years after its original introduction
to explore factors that facilitate the development and application of Health Education programs in Greece
Research questions:
Which is the most popular subject for Health Education interventions? (Is there a significant imbalance in teachers' choices?)
What factors positively affect teachers’ subject selection?
What do teachers need in the form of resources, material, information and the like, in order to be more effective in developing and implementing Health Education programs?
What do Health Education Coordinators need in the form of resources, information, material and the like, in order to become more effective in their duties?
RESULTS Popular thematic units for Health Education activities
Mean value
1. Nutrition
1.52
2. Road and vehicle Education – prevention of road accidents
2.52
3. Dental hygiene
3.24
4. Addictions – mental Health
3.59
5. Consumers’ Education
5.14
6. Cardiovascular diseases - physical exercise
5.31
7. Sexuality and relationships Education (SRE)
6.69
No 1 = most popular to No 7 = least popular
nutrition
SRE
Reasons for choosing a Health Education topic The importance of the subject in the everyday life of pupils
No
“changes� in health habits in the population in general
7
change of health habits in school
3
pupils' health problems
2
existing facilities in the community
1
Educational related features for teaching the subject
No
plenty of educational material, also pre-developed
6
plenty of topics for discussion
6
teachers don't need special training or have received training
5
plenty of references in the textbooks
4
teachers' imminent gratification
1
cooperation with experts
1
Educational factors that facilitate the choice of a thematic unit for HE program development and implementation Enhancing factors for Health Education programs
mean value
25 20
1. Teachers' training
1.48
15
2. Educational material
2.61
10
3. Consultation with experts
3.03
5
4. Time for preparation 5. Familiarization with ICT
3.65 4.23
22
4
3
1
1
0 time for preparation
educational materials
training
ICT
Additional enhancing factors for Health Education programs
consultation w ith experts
No
Funding
10
To be introduced as a curriculum subject and receive more teaching hours
7
Positive attitude from other Educational administrators
4
Motivation for teachers
1
Cooperation with other schools
1
Factors that enhance HE Coordinators’ job Factors that enhance HE Coordinators' job
mean value
Seminars/training
1,48
Funding for programs
1,90
Educational materials
2,60
25 21 20
15
10 7 5
Contacts with EU colleagues ICT
3
3,66 4,42
0
0
0 seminars
ICT
contacts
funding
material
Additionasl factors for making the HE Coordinator's job more effective
No
Secretarial assistance, less bureaucracy, technical equipment
8
Upgrade in the hierarchy of their position as HE Coordinators
5
Cooperation with other schools/colleagues
3
Funding that arrives on time
2
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL POLICY MAKERS
“Equal opportunities – Equal chances” (mandating the subject) Enhance teachers’ choices: - promote all topics (their importance for pupils’ health and well-being) - personal confidence in teaching the subject Teachers’ training issues (also pre-service teachers’ training) The role and status of Health Education Coordinators
Reference 1 Alexander, P., Murphy, K., Woods, B., (1996). Of Squalls and Fathoms: Navigating the seas of educational innovation. Educational Researcher. Vol 25 (3). Bitan-Friedlander, N., Dreyfus, A., Milgrom, Z. (2004). Types of “teachers in training”: the reactions of primary school science teachers when confronted with the task of implementing an innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004), pp. 607-619. Brules, I., & Tillman, M. (1985). Relationships of Inservice Training Components and Changes in Teacher Conserns Regarding Innovations. Journal of Educational research. Vol. 78. No 6. pp. 364-371. Cros, F. (1999). Innovation in Education: Managing the future. Innovating Schools. OCED Education & Skills , March 2000, vol. 1999, no. 12 , pp. 59-75. Englert, C.S., Tarrant, K.L., (1993). Educational Innovations: Achieving curricular
change through
collaboration. Education & Treatment of Children, Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 441-474 Gouvra, M., Kyridis, A., & Mavrikaki, E., (1999) Health Education in the Greek school. Our
Stand, Issue 8,
Nov. 1999, pp. 30 – 31 (in Greek) Health education, aims and targets. Greek Ministry of Education, Retrieved from the World 04/10/2005, http://www.ypepth.gr/el_ec_page73.htm
Wide Web on
Reference 2 Health education programs, Inderdisciplinary Unified Curriculum Framework, Pedagogical Institute, retrieved from the World Wide Web on 22/09/2005, http://www.pi -schools.gr/download/programs/depps/29deppsaps_AgogiYgias.pdf Higgins, M. (2000). The role of creativity in planning: The “Creative Practitioner”. Planning Practice & Research. Feb-May 2000, Vol. 15, Issue 1 / 2, p.117. Horwath, J. (2001). Child care Practice Innovations: Using a Model of Change to Develop Training Strategies. Child abuse review. Vol. 10, Jan/Feb 2001, pp. 18-34. Inbar, D. (1996). Planning for innovation in education. Paris 1996. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning. Kyridis. A, (2001). Health Education in Schools. Makednon. Vol. 8. pp. 21-40 (in Greek) Naiddo. J, & Wills, J. (2000). Health Promotion – Foundations for Practice. Bailliere Tindall Stevens. R, (2004). Why do educational innovations come and go? What do we know? What can we do? Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004), pp. 389-396 What schools for the future? OECD Education & Skills, October 2001, vol. 2001, No 17 What works in Innovation in Education. New school management approaches. OECD Education & Skills , May