M M MARIANA MORALES Architecture Portfolio 2022
July 27, 2019 Re: Letter of Reference for Mariana Morales July 27, 2019 To Whom it May Concern, Re: Letter of Reference for Mariana Morales It is with pleasure and great enthusiasm that I am writing this letter of reference for Mariana. I have had the To Whom it May Concern, opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia. Mariana provided a diverse range of skills and team collaboration efforts on It is with pleasure and great enthusiasm that I am writing this letter of reference for Mariana. I have had the these projects. Her energy and work ethic was a model for the team. opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia. Mariana provided a diverse range of skills and team collaboration efforts on Sasaki provides support and a major commitment to the development of its internship program. these projects. Her energy and work ethic was a model for the team. Consequently, we are exposed to between 15 and 20 intern employees each year. I would start this commentary with the honest evaluation that Mariana has positioned herself at the top of our intern alumni Sasaki provides support and a major commitment to the development of its internship program. group. Her performance was as strong as I have seen in my 14 years with the firm. Consequently, we are exposed to between 15 and 20 intern employees each year. I would start this commentary with the honest evaluation that Mariana has positioned herself at the top of our intern alumni With respect to the work that we were involved with at Washington and Lee, the firm was contracted to group. Her performance was as strong as I have seen in my 14 years with the firm. provide a series of planning and design studies on 9 potential building projects as part of a strategic initiative by the university over the next 10 years, including projects for a Student Center, a Library, a Science Center With respect to the work that we were involved with at Washington and Lee, the firm was contracted to expansion, Housing projects and several significant landscape projects. This work was both at a campus provide a series of planning and design studies on 9 potential building projects as part of a strategic initiative master planning level, but also at a conceptual design level for the individual projects. by the university over the next 10 years, including projects for a Student Center, a Library, a Science Center expansion, Housing projects and several significant landscape projects. This work was both at a campus Her work constantly ‘bridged’ the gap between campus planning strategies and building design concepts. master planning level, but also at a conceptual design level for the individual projects. Mariana was completely comfortable in supporting this range of tasks. Her skills became quickly evident to the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketch up, CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly Her work constantly ‘bridged’ the gap between campus planning strategies and building design concepts. became the ‘go to’ team member in support of our team’s digital graphics and illustration. What impressed Mariana was completely comfortable in supporting this range of tasks. Her skills became quickly evident to me most was her speed and efficient approach to the work. It was a unique balance that provided a strong the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketch up, CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly skill set with a focused work ethic. At the same time, her perspective as a designer was always present. became the ‘go to’ team member in support of our team’s digital graphics and illustration. What impressed me most was her speed and efficient approach to the work. It was a unique balance that provided a strong Mariana appeared to be very comfortable with this role and level of responsibility. I was continually skill set with a focused work ethic. At the same time, her perspective as a designer was always present. impressed by her willingness to take on tasks. If she was not sure of an approach, she reached out to other team members for advice. She had an opportunity to participate in video conferences with the client and Mariana appeared to be very comfortable with this role and level of responsibility. I was continually became a recognized team member. She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same impressed by her willingness to take on tasks. If she was not sure of an approach, she reached out to other time, she was always circumspect and a great listener. team members for advice. She had an opportunity to participate in video conferences with the client and became a recognized team member. She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that time, she was always circumspect and a great listener. she will be missed very much…….in fact, very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that she will be missed very much…….in fact, very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young I would be happy to discuss any questions you might have. professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. Sincerely, I would be happy to discuss any questions you might have. Sincerely,
S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA Principal S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA Principal 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02472
USA
p 617 926 3300
f 617 924 2748
www.sasaki.com
64 Pleasant Street
USA
p 617 926 3300
f 617 924 2748
www.sasaki.com
Watertown, MA 02472
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION FOR MARIANA MORALES
JulyAugust 27, 2019 15, 2019 It May Concern, for Mariana Morales Re: To Whom Letter of Reference July 27, 2019 Curious. Team Player. Friendly. Gracious. Thorough. Confident. Articulate. To Whom it Poised. May Concern, Re: All areLetter of Reference for Mariana Morales qualities which immediately come to mind when describing Mariana Morales.
Sasaki
It is with pleasure and great enthusiasm that I am writing this letter of reference for Mariana. I have had the Marianait arrived at Sasaki, a firm which receives resumes and applications from the To Whom May Concern, opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee brightest of students from the strongest schools and firms across the country, with talent, University inattitude Lexington, Mariana provided a diverse range of skills and team collaboration efforts on open andgreat aVirginia. willingness to take the profession call architecture. It is an with pleasure and enthusiasm thatonI am writing thisweletter of reference for Mariana. I have had the these projects. Her energy and work ethic was a model for the team. opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee She delivered. University in Lexington, Virginia. Mariana provided a diverse range of skills and team collaboration efforts on Sasaki provides support and a major commitment to the development of its internship program. these projects. Her energy and work ethic was a model for the team. The first thing you to about Mariana her20 humanity. Mariana is one the most Consequently, wethat arestrikes exposed between 15 isand intern employees eachofyear. I would start this thoughtful, generous and decent human beings one is likely to encounter. The second is of our intern alumni commentary with the honest evaluation that Mariana has positioned herself at the top Sasaki provides support and aand major commitment toShe theisdevelopment ofincapable its internship program. her competence, diligence, overall work ethic. fundamentally of group. Her performance was as strong as I have seen in my 14 years with the firm. Consequently, we are exposed to between 15 and 20 intern employees each year. I would start this giving less than her all. commentary with the honest evaluation that Mariana has positioned herself at the top of our intern alumni With respect to the work that we were involved with at Washington and Lee, the firm was contracted to group. Her performance was as strong have seenon in amy 14 years with the firm. As Mariana and I worked together during as herI internship variety of projects at Sasaki. provide a series of planning and design studies on 9 potential building projects as part of a strategic initiative we grew to know each other, I quickly could see how, even as a young designer, her by the university over the next 10 permeated years, including projects forthe a Student Center, a Library, a Science Center and to herthe sparks wisdom andwith subtly design. to was contracted Withideas respect workofthat we were involved atcrafted Washington and Not Lee,afraid the firm to expansion, Housing projects and several significant landscape projects. This work was both at a campus speaka up, sheof offered insights her team with aon respect and responsibility beyondasher provide series planning andtodesign studies 9 potential building projects part of a strategic initiative master planning level, but also at a conceptual design leveland for the individual projects. years. Soon, I was her more and more responsibility and staffing on by the university overgiving the next 10 years, including projects for atrust, Student Center,her a Library, a Science Center all of my projects. expansion, Housing projects and several significant landscape projects. This work was both at a campus Her work constantly ‘bridged’ the gap between campus planning strategies and building design concepts. master planning level, but also at a conceptual design level for the individual projects. She was and curious and thorough. She was incredibly the Mariana waseager completely comfortable in supporting this rangeorganized of tasks. yet Herstretched skills became quickly evident to boundaries of creativity. She developed ways of speeding development of design the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketchup up,the CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly Her options. work constantly ‘bridged’ the gapand between campus planning strategies renderings and building design concepts. programs suggested of enhancing became theShe ‘go learned to’ teamnew member in support of our clever team’sways digital graphics and illustration. What impressed Mariana was completely comfortable in supporting this range of tasks. Her skills became quickly evident to and visualizations she was developing. She dug in and leaned in, and made things me most was her speed and efficient approach to the work. It was a unique balance that provided a strong the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketch up, CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly happen. skill set with a focused work ethic. At the same time, her perspective as a designer was always present. became the ‘go to’ team member in support of our team’s digital graphics and illustration. What impressed Whenwas project wanted to see approach three options, shework. gave them five, but that’s not the that provided a strong me most herleaders speed and efficient to the It was a unique balance Mariana time appeared Mariana to be very comfortable with thisShe roledid and level day of responsibility. I was continually went above andsame beyond. it every in more subtle was skillonly set with awhen focused work ethic. At the time, her perspective as a designer always present. impressed by her to take on tasks.theIfmateriality she was not an approach, ways, when shewillingness was interested in exploring of asure newofbuilding or whenshe shereached out to other teamdecided members for advice. She had an opportunity to participate in video conferences with the client and to look at shadow of massing Mariana appeared to be very studies comfortable withschemes. this role and level of responsibility. I was continually became a recognized team member. She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same impressed by herthings willingness to take on tasks. If will, she and was her notown sureintellectual of an approach, she reached out to other She didwas these on her own accord, own curiosity time, she always circumspect and a her great listener. team members for advice. She had an opportunity to participate in video conferences with the client and about the built environment and its impact on the community became evident. became a recognized team member. She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that time, shethe was circumspect andreturned a great listener. Over lastalways few weeks, after Mariana to school for her final semester, the gap she will be missed very much…….in fact, very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young left on her teams has become evident. The ease in which Mariana new ideas and 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02472 USA p 617 926 3300 f 617 924 2748 grasps www.sasaki.com 1 of 2 professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. tackles new tasks is unparalleled, and filling the role she carved out on her teams has In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that she is largelyfact, missed. she proved will bechallenging, missed veryand much…….in very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young I would be happy to discuss any questions you might have. professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. There is a professional and personal excellence about Mariana that one doesn’t see every
day. Even in the early stages of her career, it is visible and obvious to those around her – Sincerely, I would happyfor to greatness discuss any you she isbe destined andquestions has the drive to might make ithave. happen. It is with great pleasure and great confidence that I offer my recommendation for Mariana. Please feel free to
Sincerely, contact me if you have any questions, and I will be delighted to speak with you.
S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA Sincerely, Principal Stacey Chapman, S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., AIA, FAIALEED AP BD+C Senior Associate Principal 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02472 USA p 617 926 3300
f 617 924 2748
www.sasaki.com
64 Pleasant Street
f 617 924 2748
www.sasaki.com
Watertown, MA 02472
USA
p 617 926 3300
16 April 2020 July 27, 2019 Re: Letter of Morales Reference for Mariana Morales Ref: Mariana July 27, 2019 Intern at Sasaki (summer 2018 to summer 2019) To Whom it May Concern, Re: Letter of Reference for Mariana Morales It is with pleasure and great enthusiasm that I am writing this letter of reference for Mariana. I have had the To To whom Whom itit may May concern, Concern, opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee University into Lexington, Virginia. Mariana provided a diverse range of skills andas team collaboration efforts on IIt am writing offer my strongest support Morales a former intern I I have had is with pleasure and great enthusiasm thatofI Mariana am writing this letter of reference for Sasaki. Mariana. the had pleasure of energy working with Mariana in several institutional Master Plan projects of thesethe projects. Her and work ethic was a model for the team. opportunity to work with Mariana over the past year on a series of diverse projects at the Washington and Lee mine including UC Berkeley, Washington and Lee University, and Wabash University, University in Lexington, Virginia. Mariana provided a diverse skills and team collaboration efforts on and I cannot emphasize enough how crucial her to role inrange all of of those Sasaki provides support and a major commitment thewas development of itsprojects. internship program. these projects. Her energy and work ethic was a model for the team. Consequently, we are exposed to between 15 and 20 intern employees each year. I would start this Mariana was part architecture internship program at Sasaki and therefore sheof our intern alumni commentary with of thethe honest evaluation that Mariana has positioned herself at the top Sasaki provides support and a major to the development internship program. initially joined the Master Plan teamscommitment to support building 3D models of foritsthe campuses group. Her performance was as strong as I have seen in my 14 years with the firm. Consequently, we Sketchup. are exposed to between and 20 intern employees each year. both in Revit and However, her15 attention to detail when executing herI would job as start this well as her ability to represent the models drawings that are easy to understand commentary with the honest evaluation thatinto Mariana has positioned herself at the top ofand our intern alumni With respect to the work that westarted were involved with at Washington andbecame Lee, thean firm was contracted to aesthetically compelling really to stand out. Mariana quickly group. Her performance was as strong as I have seen in my 14 years with the firm. intern provide a series planning there and design studies onneed 9 potential building projects as part of a strategic initiative that I could trustofwhenever were tasks and to be done. by the university over the next 10 years, including projects for a Student Center, a Library, a Science Center With respect to the work that we were involved with at Washington and Lee, the firm was contracted to expansion, Housing and several significant landscape projects. This work was both at a campus Mariana also showedprojects great talent and passion for areas beyond architecture – she was provide a series of planning and design studies on 9 potential building projects as part of a strategic initiative more willinglevel, to jump intoat and learn aboutdesign otherlevel aspects of the Master Plan projects masterthan planning but also a conceptual for the individual projects. by the university over the next 10 years, including projects for a Student Center, a Library, a Science Center such as landscape architecture and the realm of urban design. Mariana ended of expansion, Housing and entry-level several significant landscape This work was at a campus performing the rolesprojects of a typical urban designer orprojects. landscape at both Her work constantly ‘bridged’ the gap between campus planning strategies architect and building design concepts. master planning level, but also at a conceptual design level for the individual projects. Sasaki, many of the urban design framework illustrative plans, and quickly evident to Marianaleading was completely comfortable in supporting thisdiagrams, range of tasks. Her skills became closely working with me to propose a schematic landscape plan for one institution. the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketch up, CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly Her work constantly ‘bridged’ the gap between campus planning strategies and building design concepts. became the ‘go to’ team member in support of our team’s digital graphics and illustration. What impressed Mariana was completely in supporting range ofattitude. tasks. Her skills became Above all, I would like tocomfortable praise and highly supportthis Mariana’s She listens veryquickly evident to me most was heralways speed come and efficient approach to the work. It was a unique balance that provided a strong well and would back with appropriate and up, thoroughly explored questions the team in multiple computer software platforms (sketch CADD, illustrator and more). She quickly skill was set with a focused worktoethic. At the same time,She herwas perspective as a designer was present. that always a pleasure discuss more about. always hard-working andalways became the ‘go to’ team member in support of our team’s digital graphics and illustration. What impressed approached and madetothe of the team assuredbalance that it could me most washer hertasks speedwith andpositivity efficient approach therest work. It was a unique that provided a strong Mariana appeared to bea very comfortable with and this role and level of responsibility. I was continually be done. Mariana was true joy to work with we here at Sasaki miss her a lot! skill set with a focused work ethic. At the same time, her perspective as a designer was always present. impressed by her willingness to take on tasks. If she was not sure of an approach, she reached out to other Please accept this with highest support oftoMariana andindo not conferences hesitate to with the client and team members for letter advice. Shemy had an opportunity participate video Mariana appeared to be very comfortable with this role and level of responsibility. I was continually contact if you haveteam anymember. questions.She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same becameme a recognized impressed by her willingness to take on tasks. If she was not sure of an approach, she reached out to other time, she was always circumspect and a great listener. team members for advice. She had an opportunity to participate in video conferences with the client and became a recognized team member. She was socially sophisticated in her willingness to engage. At the same In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that time, she was always circumspect and a great listener. Sincerely, she will be missed very much…….in fact, very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. In conclusion, I thoroughly enjoyed having Mariana on my team. The best commendation I can offer is that she will be missed very much…….in fact, very difficult to replace. This is an unusual attribute for a young I would be happy to discuss any questions you might have. professional and suggests enormous potential for her future growth. Chanwoo Kim, LEED AP ND Sincerely, I wouldAssociate be happy&toUrban discuss any questions Senior Designer, Sasakiyou might have. ckim@sasaki.com Sincerely,
S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA Principal 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02472 USA p 617 926 3300 f 617 924 2748 www.sasaki.com S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA Principal 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02472 USA p 617 926 3300 f 617 924 2748 www.sasaki.com 64 Pleasant Street
Watertown, MA 02472
USA
p 617 926 3300
f 617 924 2748
www.sasaki.com
MARIANA MORALES Houston, Texas mariana.mme03@gmail.com +1 346 448 4841 15/03/1996
S UMMA R Y Entry-level Architectural Designer looking for a job opportunity. One year of experience as an Architectural Intern in Sasaki Associates, a firm based in Boston, MA. Two year professional experience as an Independent Architectural Designer in Monterrey, Mexico.
EDUCAT I ON 2014 - 2019 Summer 2018
•
Tecnológico De Monterrey / Monterrey, Mexico Bachelor of Architecture Degree GPA: 4.0 • Steel & Construction Management / Valencia, Spain Summer international experience
PR O F ESS I O NAL EX PER I EN CE 2019- Present
Independent Architectural Designer / Monterrey, Mexico As an independent Architectural Designer, I've strenghten my client and time management skills. I became familiarized with architectural design and construction documentation for small-scale residential, mixed-use, and community projects. As a part of my experience, I collaborated with Cuartopiso Arquitectura's firm for several months developing conceptual design drawings and graphic representation. I'm proficient in Revit Architecture Environment to generate architectural drawings and Enscape to create 3D renderings. In addition, the implementation of Adobe Suite (Illustrator, Photoshop, and Indesign) to create graphic representation documents.
2021 Feb - May
IAARQ/ Architectural Designer/ Monterrey, Mexico Working as an Architectural Designer I developed knowledge of architectural and conceptual design, as well as producing construction documents with Autodesk Revit environment. I had the opportunity to be the project leader of a small-scale architecture project and management with clients and consultants.
2018 - 2019 Sep - Aug
Sasaki Associates/ Architectural Intern/ Boston, MA As a one-year intern at Sasaki, I worked on multidisciplinary projects and developed design proposals in architecture, landscape, and urban projects. I worked in a fast-paced professional environment which strengthened my time management skills. I developed project representation documents and presentations for client meetings. Participated in client meetings and managed the architectural design of proposals. I also worked in different stages of architecture projects which included conceptual design, programmatic development, and design documents for construction. This role gave me the best practices of the industry, such as 3D modeling in Revit and Sketchup, work shared environment in Revit, rendering in Enscape and Vray, postproduction in Adobe Suite (Photoshop and Illustrator) and 2D drawings (Revit and Autocad).
2015 / 2017
AM Arquitectura and Distrito Tec / Summer Design Intern / Monterrey, Mexico As an Architecture Student, I had the opportunity to start my professional experience in two architecture firms. This early exposure to the industry helped me develop early management and project development skills. I managed design proposals, client presentations, and master plan analysis documents. I developed project representation such as; diagrams, renders, and architectural drawings for residential and commercial projects. I also learned about conceptual and diagrammatic development.
S K I LLS Language
Software
Manual
Spanish / Native
Model Making
English / Fluent
Photography
French / Basic
Graphic Design / Sketching
AutoCAD / Advanced Revit / Advanced
Personal
Creative Problem Solving
Enscape / Advanced
Time Management
Sketchup & Vray / Advanced
Team Work & Leadership
Photoshop / Advanced Illustrator / Advanced
Interests
Architectural & Conceptual Design
Ms Office / Advanced
Landscape Design
Rhinoceros / Intermediate
Sustainable Design
InDesign / Basic
LEED & NCARB Accreditation
3D Max / Basic
AIA Membership
C O NT ES T S 2019
Orange Investments Annual Competition / Local, Monterrey
2018
Barrio Colonia Obrera Conservation Plan / Regional, Monterrey
2018
ENEA National Student Competition / National, Mx
2018
Bienal N.L. School Of Architects / Regional, Monterrey
2017
Pape Observatory Tower / International
2017
Rome Contemporary Chapel / International
2017
Citizen Park / Regional, Monterrey
2017
Hyde Park Library / International
2019
Highest GPA in Architecture School / Tecnológico de Monterrey
2018
National Finalist / ENEA National Student Competition, Mx
2018
National First Place / ENEA National Student Competition
AWA R DS
DUAL Master Plan, Mx 2016 - 2018 2017 2015 - 2017
Proyecta Exhibition / Tecnológico de Monterrey Regional Finalist / Citizen Park Competition, Monterrey, Mx GPA Honorific Mentions / Tecnológico de Monterrey Publications
WO R K SH O PS 2019
Real State Workshop / Tecnológico de Monterrey
2019
Photography Workshop / Tecnológico de Monterrey
2018
Architectural Illumination Workshop / Tecnológico de Monterrey
2017
Food Factory Design Workshop / Tecnológico de Monterrey
2017
Digital Illustration Workshop / Cannaletto’s Firm
2016
Adaptation Workshop / Analysis and Improvement of a Local School
2015
Accessibility Workshop / Adaptation of Spaces for Disabled People
CONTENT Architecture Portfolio 2022
This portfolio presents a cohesive sample of different habilities and techniques throughout a series of architectural projects. These projects are developed through a comprehensive approach to different circumstances and surroundings. Knowledge such as conceptual design, architectural drawings, diagrams, renderings, and construction details is displayed thoughout this portfolio. The first part of this document shows academic theoretical projects, analyzing and experimenting with concepts such as form, space, and function. The second part shows a more practical approach to architecture through professional projects developed from 2017 to 2022.
01
FUG COMPLEX
02
ETHEREAL CHAPEL
03
ITESM DESIGN HUB
04
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Mixed Use/ T heoric Design / Mty, Mexico p. 10-21
Spiritual / Architectural Competition / Rome, Italy p. 22-31
Academic / Architectural Design / Mty, Mexico p. 32-43
Boston, United States / Monter rey, Mexico p. 44-89
FUG COMPLEX Mixed Use T heoric Design Typology: Mixed Use Location: Monterrey, México Size: 65,000 m2 Year: 2018 Project Type: Academic The project responds strongly to the surrounding context by incorporating two main site factors to its form definition. At first, the pedestrian and vehicle’s flows generate a dinamic context. Then, the project also responds by merging into the existent buildings and metro line by appling a transect, which generates a gradual growth of height. Both factors are then involved in an experimental design methodology, which consists in manipulating such factors and results in a curved surface. The F.U.G. Complex intends to generate a new kind of urbanism, a urbanism in which exterior and interior spaces are merged and complemented with one another. It’s program involves a mixed use program including housing, offices, commerce and a cultural center.
Theory
Integration
DESIGN CONCEPT
10
Reactivation
11
PROCESS
1.CONTEXT
2.BLENDING
The project responds to the surrounding context by incorporating existing pedestrian flows, vehicle flows and context heights. The flows are considered to enter the site and bounce by reflecting in same angles.
A centroid is taken from every reflected line and then projected to the surfaces, generating different heights. Then, an average surface is created.
FUNCTION
12
1 . P U B L I C S PA C E
2.ATRIA
The project provides public space to reactivate the surrounding community. Cultural and artistic activities are inserted into these spaces to generate a new interest point in the area.
In response to the floor plans, atria are generated by creating an offset to the exterior contour to let more light and ventilation enter the project.
3.ADAPTATION
4.FINAL FORM
The surface is transformed to create public space and entrances. Also, it´s streched up to add the height needed to meet the program needs.
Slabs are added to the resultant surface. The final form of the project meets context, programatic, social and ergonomic needs.
3.CIRCULATION
4.STRUCTURE
The main circulation cores are located in strategic points of the project to provide mobility and connect different levels on the most dense and interesting points.
The project contains a conventional structural system, which allows modulation.
13
INTEGRATION The site is located in the center of Monterrey, a highly occupied area within the city, but including mainly low height constructions. The project is inserted and integrated in the main connection node, in which four main streets, a school and the metro line converge.
14
15
PROGRAM
1
2
Public space and access allows commerce and cultural activities to flourish. This is one of the most powerful program element to reactivate the community.
The cultural program includes expositions on the public space and a Cultural Center with a total of 5,000 m2. This program element intends to add interest to the area.
3
Commerce is located o with a total of 20,500 m2 reactivate the economic commerce in the area.
PUBLIC - PRIVATE The mixed use program responds to the required m2 and created a public to private transition within the ascending levels.
Hou
Offices Commerce
16
NORTH ELEVATION
3
on the first two levels, 2. The project intends to c activities by providing
4
5
Offices are located on the third level (a semi-public area), with a total of 8,800 m2. This program element responds to the project location and high occupation.
Housing is located on level four to fourtheen with the most private spaces and best views to surrounding mountains.
using
Cultural
SOUTH SECTION
17
FLOOR PLANS
Site Plan
18
Commerce Level
CULTURAL CENTER Multipurpose area for art expositions and recreational activities.
Offices Level
Housing Level
PUBLIC SPACE Shops, green areas and multipurpose platform.
19
COMMUNITY REACTIVATION The project reactivates the zone by providing a mixed use program which includes commerce, offices, housing, public space, cultural and artistic activities. There´s a link between the theorical methodology by which the project is adapted to its surrounding and how it reactivates the community in which it´s inserted.
20
21
AJAR CHAPEL Architectural Design Competition Typology: Spiritual Location: Rome, Italy Size: 730 m2 Year: 2020 Project Type: Competition Ajar stands for an slightly open or unclosed space, which allows free access to whom is willing to enter. As the world becomes more advanced and inclusive, the concept of church becomes extensively redesigned in order to create a different approach to the new standards of religious reconciliation. The Ajar Chapel is a statement of inclusiveness through religious phenomena, a journey that leads to a disconection from the world to enhance instrospection and spiritual connection. The chapel is perceived at first as an open space which then leads to an underground level that provides niches for individual experience. These different niches are placed around the same circle aming for unity.
Spiritual
Journey
DESIGN CONCEPT
22
Unity
23
THEORY
1. CIRCLE
2. CIRCLE
3. CIRCLE
4. CIRCLE
Circle as a whole, spiritual divin ty.
The circle generates a journey to a spiritual connection.
The center peacefully unites individual´s beliefs.
The circle and its center generate an interconnected ethos.
EXPERIENCE EXTERIOR PROCESSION
Disconnection from the world
Contemplation through procession
Reflection at the exterior plaza
INTERIOR PROCESSION
24
Introspection by entering the underground level
Revelation through an oculus, evoking ethernal light
Confession / Meditation for all religions in different niches
PROGRAM EXPLODED DIAGRAM
25
FLOOR PLANS
26
Ground Level
Underg round Level
27
28
Site Plan
ENTRANCE HALL Disconnection from exterior world through procession sur rounded by nature.
LONGITUDINAL SECTION Relationship between exterior and interior that leads to instrospection and a spiritual connection.
29
U N I T Y. D I V E R S I T Y. The project responds to the human necessity of diversity, unity, intospection and a spiritual connection. Ajar Chapel generates an exterior and interior journey that leads to a peaceful coexistence of all religions.
30
31
ITESM DESIGN HUB Architectural Design Typology: Academic Location: Monterrey, México Size: 19,100 m2 Year: 2017 Project Type: Academic The project is located within the Campus Tec Monterrey, in Monterrey Nuevo León. Its main objective is to provide a variety of spaces that satisfy academic, social and urban needs, within the campus. Itesm Design Hub takes in consideration the most important variants of the district regeneration plan tec which are; use of facade that minimizes the increase of temperatures and the energetic consumption, green roofs, orientation elements, access to public spaces, promote pedestrian flows thus reducing road distances and the creation of outdoor public spaces. Likewise, for the formal design three fundamental factors where taken in consideration; adequate pedestrian flows, spatial experience that produces pleasant views and conservation of trees. These three factors give a unique identity to the project, generating benefits, not only to students, but also to the environment.
Livability
Sustainability
DESIGN CONCEPT
32
Multipurpose
33
PROCESS The form of the project is created by cutting a general volume to generate views, pedestrian flows and to conserve existing trees. VIEWS TREE CONSERVATION PEDESTRIAN FLOWS
34
FUNCTION
Circulation
Str uctur e
Ter races
Public - Private Pr og ram
Plaza
Gr een Strategies
35
PROGRAM The program is distributed in a way that public activities are in the lower levels while activities that require more concentration are located on the highest levels.
36
EXPLODED DIAGRAM
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
37
FLOOR PLANS
Level 2
38
Level 1
Level 3
Level 4
39
GREEN PLAZA T he project g enerates bridg es and ter races that enhace g reen public space and natural light.
LONGITUDINAL SECTION 40
SIMULTANEITY Ter races, cor ridors, exposition areas and classrooms g enerate a integ ral space.
CROSS SECTION 41
STUDENT LIFE The project responds to the necessity of creating a node composed by academic, artistic and social activities, everything in the same place to provide students and teachers with a multidisciplinary, interesting and livable space.
42
43
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Boston / Monterrey
This part of the portfolio shows my professional experience which includes my work as an Architectural Intern at Sasaki Associates, a firm based in Boston Massachusetts, and also my work as an Independent Architect in Monterrey Mexico. During my internship in Sasaki, I had the opportunity of working in multidisciplinary and integral projects which combined architecture, landscape, and urbanism. I also got to work in different stages of architecture projects that included conceptual design, programmatic development, and design documents for construction. As an Independent Architect, I got the opportunity to develop projects with a close relationship with clients. This experience includes conceptual design and graphic representation of residential projects and design documents for the construction of small-scale community projects.
44
01
ARCHITECTURE
02
LANDSCAPE
03
URBANISM
Architecture / Conce ptual Design / Prog ram Design p. 46-71
Landscape Design / Proposal Analysis p. 72-79
Master plan Re presentation / Proposal Analysis p. 80-89
45
ARCHITECTURE
VILLA RM HOUSE
PUBLIC AREA
Architectural Design
SEMI PUBLIC AREA
Typology: Residential Location: México Size: 1,750 m2 Year: 2021 The residential villa is inspired in traditional mexican architecture. It responds to the client's necessities while creating spaces full of natural illumination and outdoor views.
PRIVATE AREA SERVICES
Music Studio Visit Rooms Entrance
Main Villa Te r r a c e Central Patio
Main Entrance
46
Ground Level
Garage
CENTRAL PATIO Green open space for recreation and big g atherings.
ENTRANCE Main entrance includes a plaza with a fountain, sur rounded by trees.
POOL AREA Open ter race area with a pool and barbecue.
47
ARCHITECTURE
The volumetric aproach to the project focuses in the central patio and a series of volumetric extractions which provide natural illumination and outdoor views.
West Section
South Section
West Elevation
48
South Elevation
FAMILY LIVING ROOM Views to central patio, provides a more private g athering space for the family.
49
ARCHITECTURE
OLEAH Architectural Design Typology: Residential Location: Akumal, México Size: 1,500 m2 Year: 2022 The apartment building located in front of the beach, provides great views to the ocean and amenities. TYPOLOGY 1 (79M2) TYPOLOGY 2 (128M2) PENTHOUSE (226M2)
Ground Level
50
Front Isometr y
MAIN ENTRANCE T he building blends with its envior nment and local materials.
OPENNESS Balconies and big windows create a connection with the sur roundings.
51
ARCHITECTURE TYPOLOGY 1 (79M2) TYPOLOGY 2 (128M2) PENTHOUSE (226M2)
T hird Level
Second Level
52
Back Isometr y
ACCESS T he project provides direct access to enjoy the beach and ocean views.
OCEAN CLOSENESS T he project provides a place to enjoy views, pool and ocean.
53
ARCHITECTURE
MESA HOUSE
Architectural Design Typology: Residential Location: Monterrey, México Size: 1,500 m2 Year: 2021 Designed in collaboration with Cuartopiso Arquitectura firm. The project has a modern approach to functional architecture, while maximizing square footage by adapting to the steep terrain. Local materials and mountain views create a relation with its surroundings.
Second Level
Ground Level
54
Basement Level
Garag e Level
LEVELS T he project maximizes sf by adapting to the stee p ter rain.
LOCAL MATERIALS T he project blends into its sur roundings by using local materials.
MAXIMIZING PATIO T he second level suspends over the patio to maximize its area.
55
ARCHITECTURE
The project's volumetric modern approach emphasizes in its funcionality and maximizing floor area. The project's lower levels focus on service areas, while upper levels focus on social and private areas.
Cross Section 1
56
Cross Section 2
Longitudinal Section
OPEN FLOOR PLAN T he f loor plan maximizes natural illumination and openness.
SPACE FUNCTIONALITY T he project's adaptation to the slope g enerates functional spaces.
OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES Almost half of the g round f loor provides open space for outdoor activities.
57
ARCHITECTURE
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros
Entrada Principal Entrada / Salida Servicio 96 Asientos
EBENEZER TEMPLE
Cuarto Niños Baño Mujeres Oficina Pastoral
Architectural Design
Baño Hombres Cuarto Limpieza
Typology: Communitary Location: Sabinas Hidalgo, México Size: 245 m2 Year: 2021-2022 The project has a practical and functional approach and responds to the necessities of the community. The construction strategy and materials focuses on local availability. The warehouse-like structure consists mainly in reinforced concrete.
Bodega
2
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta
ESP.
Isometría Programa Sin Escala
NTN NB
Prog ram Isometr y
SI
Sin Escala
1
25%
TARIMA 0.92
K1
VER NOTA
1.60
TL- 1
4.00
1
10%
Isometría Fachada
4.00
4.00
C1 P1 Z1
1.00
25%
NB 0.40
1.00
1
Str uctural Found
1.60
Ground Level Architectural Floor Plan
2%
2
ENTRADA / SALIDA DE SERVICIO
C1 P1 Z1
2 4.00
4.00
ALTAR
96 ASIENTOS
C1 P1 Z1
M
6
1
B
4 28/01/21
Ing.
Author
Arq.
Checker
ARQ 01 PLANTA ARQ
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta Nivel de Firme Nivel Desplante Firme Nivel Desplante Trabe Nivel Desplante Zapata Columna Zapata Pedestal Trabe de Liga
ESP. GENERALES
Fecha
1.50
0
Templo Ebenezer Plano #
A NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
K1
3.44 C1 P1 Z1
TL- 1
F
Firme de concreto F'c=10 kg/cm2 12 cm. malla electrosolda 6x6 - 10/10 K1
C1 P1 Z1
25%
1.60 1:125
+0 +0 0 +0 -1
1.50 8.00 11.00
SIMBOLOGÍA
1
Planta Arquitectónica
TL- 1
2%
1.00
1.50
58
H
Banqueta de concreto f'c=100 kg/cm2, de 10 cm de espesor.
4.00
4.00
BODEGA
6
5
PASTOR
NF NP NTN NDTL NDZ
NB +0.40
1.00
CUARTO DE NIÑOS
LIMPIEZA
5
E
F
SONIDO 4.00
4.00
RECEPCIÓN
2%
4
NF 0.42
10%
TL- 1
4.00
22.00
ENTRADA
C1 P1 Z1
1
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
5
Plano Cimentación
A
1:125
m.
Templo Ebenezer Plano # Fecha
4 28/01/21
Ing.
Oscar González
Arq.
Mariana Morales
EST 01 CIMENTACIÓN
SIMBOLOGÍA
4
TL- 1
3
4.00
22.00
3
E
NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
Nivel d Nivel d Nivel d Nivel D Nivel D Nivel D Colum Zapata Pedes Trabe
N2
5
1.00
4
4.00
4.00
3
22.00 4.00
2
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo 3.00 1.00 fy=4,200 kg*cm2
6
1
4.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
N1
4.00
3.00
ESP. GENERALES NF
NF 0.42
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta Nivel de Firme Nivel Desplante Firme Nivel Desplante Trabe Nivel Desplante Zapata Columna Zapata Pedestal Trabe de Liga
0.42
1:100
Architectural Elevations
Elevación Sur 1:100
Templo Ebenezer
Checker
C1 P1 Z1
2.05
2%
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 1 K1
K1
NOTA: COLOCAR EJE DE TL1 PARA QUE COINCIDA CON EL EJE DEL MURO. LA CARA EXTERIOR DEL MURO COINCIDE CON LA CARA EXTERIOR DE LA COLUMNA.
VER NOTA 8.00
1.50
11.00
de Terreno Natural de Banqueta de Firme Desplante Firme Desplante Trabe Desplante Zapata mna a stal de Liga
6
B 0
1
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
1.05 0.85 K2
K1
2%
Cimentación Corrida
C1 P1 Z1
K2
1.50
1 5
K1
1.13
K2
K1
K2
K2
K2
1.17 K2
K1
1.19
15
0.13 TL- 1
K2
Cimentación Corrida
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 1 K1
K1
8.00
A
1:125
m.
NOTA: DEJAR VARILLAS PREPARADAS PARA CASTILLOS EN MURO DE FACHADAS Y EN MURO POSTERIOR DE ACUERDO A PROYECTO ARQUITECTÓNICO.
1.50
B 0
Templo Ebenezer Plano # Fecha
4 28/01/21
Ing.
Author
Arq.
Checker
EST 02 CASTILLOS
NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta Nivel de Firme Nivel Desplante Firme Nivel Desplante Trabe Nivel Desplante Zapata Columna Zapata Pedestal Trabe de Liga
Sin Escala
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 2
K2
Castillo 2
TL- 1
0.13 K2
4VR #3 EST1/4 @15cm
0.13
11.00
Plano Castillos
Sin Escala
K1
ESP. GENERALES
K2
0.13
K1
0.93
K2
K2
1.05 0.95 0.60
TL- 1
1.19
K2
0.05
K2
TL- 1
K1
1.19
K2
K2
1.30
1.05
K2
C1 P1 Z1
5
TL- 2
K2
TL- 1
1.15
K2
0.35
K2
C1 P1 Z1
K1
0.60 1.05
K1
TL- 1
3.44
0.45
K2
0.13
2.08
K2
2.11
K1
3
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 2
2.60
1.30
1.40 2%
K2
ESP. GENERALES
K1
1.05
00
K2
Castillo K1
15
TL- 1
4
K1
2
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 2
C1 P1 Z1
4.00
1.55 0.45
K2
TL- 2 K2
4VR #3 EST1/4 @15cm
15
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 1
4.00
0.85 1.05
1.15
K2
C1 P1 Z1
NTL +0.30
K2
ada K2
22.00
2%
TL- 2
C1 P1 Z1
3
TL- 1
K1
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
TL- 1
1.00
0.42 0.30 0.00 0.30 1.20
TL- 1
SIMBOLOGÍA
D
2.05
TL- 1
4.00
TL- 2
1.95
C1 P1 Z1
4.00
C1 P1 Z1
K1
0.13
2
TL- 1
D
1.95
0.05
C1 P1 Z1
K1
0.05
2%
C1 P1 Z1
TL- 1
K1
TL- 1
4.00
TL- 1
ELEVACIONES ARQ
0.05
1
A
TL- 2
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta Nivel de Firme Nivel Desplante Firme Nivel Desplante Trabe Nivel Desplante Zapata Columna Zapata Pedestal Trabe de Liga
20
Arq.
0.05
Author
1.00
C1 P1 Z1
ARQ 03
28/01/21
Ing.
SIMBOLOGÍA
4
Plano # Fecha
K1
NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
Str uctural Floor Plan
0.05
dation Floor Plan
K1
Checker
4.00
3.00
NF
0.42
1
1:125
1.00
ARQ 04
N1
3.42
1.50
11.00
Arq.
Elevación Oeste
TL- 1
B 8.00
ELEVACIONES ARQ
Templo Ebenezer
4.00 3.00
NF 0.42
K1
A 1.50
N2 SIMBOLOGÍA 4.42
1.00
4
4.00
Author
4.00
28/01/21
4.00
6
Ing.
4.00
5
1.00
4.00
4
22.00
Fecha
1.00
3
Plano #
N2
2
NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
1 4.42 N1
Elevación Norte
2
1:125
ESP. GENERALES
Elevación Este
2%
4.00
3.42
3.42
1
1.50
4.42
N1
3.42
A 8.00 11.00
N2
4.42
2
B 1.50
1
5
m.
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
59
ARCHITECTURE
JE 3/8" CELOTEX
SECCIÓN A
1/6
JE 3/8" CELOTEX
FIRME
B
Codo de PVC a 90° de 1/2"
Detalle Inodoro
2
C1
Detalle Lavabo
3
Sin Escala
Tubería PVC de 1/2"
Sin Escala
0.12
0.20
Codo de PVC a 90° de 1/2"
Conector Re. de PVC de 1/2"
FIRME
(JE)= JUNTA DE EXPANSIÓN
A
0.70
Conector de PVC de 1/2"
Coflex para sanitario
A/B
Lavabo
0.12
Inodoro Tubería PVC de 1/2"
Llave de lavabo
Coflex para lavabo
DETALLE PLANTA SECCIÓN B
4
1
0.42
Juntas de Expansión Sin Escala
1.00
4.00
NF
0.20
5 4.00
1/2"
4 Varillas ancladas mínimo / castillo *CONFIRMAR UBICACIÓN EN PLANO DE CASTILLOS Y CERRAMIENTOS*
0.20 0.56
1/2"
TL1
Dejar varillas preparadas para castillos en muro de fachadas y en muro posterior de acuerdo a proyecto arquitectónico.
1/2" 1/2"
0.20 1.02 0.20
TL2 1.64
1/2"
B 1/2" 0.20 0.20
TL1
0.60
G
M 1.50
8.00
NOTA: UBICAR VÁLVULA CHECK, LLAVE DE PASO Y MEDIDORES EN LUGAR ÓPTIMO SEGÚN EL PREDIO Y SUS CONEXIONES A MUNICIPIO.
1.50
11.00
A
B
Planta Hidrosanitarios
1
0
4
Plano # Fecha
INS 01
28/01/21
Ing.
Author
Arq.
Checker
HIDROSANITARIOS
M G
Agua Fría Agua Caliente Gas Conexión Agua Fría Conexión Agua Caliente Conexión de Gas Válvula Check Llave de Paso Medidor de Agua Medidor de Gas
1
5
Isometría Estructural 1 Sin Escala
m.
INSTALACIÓN HIDRÁULICA El calibre de los tubos será el indicado en el plano, variando entre tubos de 3/4" y 1/2". La tubería de agua caliente y la de agua fría deberán preferentemente tener una distancia mínima de 15 cm entre ellas.
ESP. DISCIPLINA
Templo Ebenezer
SIMBOLOGÍA
1:100
2
INSTALACIÓN DE GAS La tubería será de cobre tipo L y M de 1/2".
Templo Ebenezer 4
Plano # Fecha
28/01/21
Ing.
Oscar González
Arq.
Mariana Morales
EST 05 ISOMETRÍA Y JUNTAS
Hydro-Sanitar y Floor Plan
CARA INTERIOR
3VR #6
0.50 25
CARA INTERIOR
A/B
Pedestal P1
11
NB +0.40
50
SECC B-B / Sin Escala
CARA EXTERIOR 3VR #6
NDZ -1.20
A/B
SECC A-A / Sin Escala
A/B
4
Columna C1
EST#3 @20cm 6
28
1
6
40
Z1
Sin Escala
SECC C-C / Sin Escala
1
25
26
40
75
4
Niveles Estructurales
7
25
6
5
1/6
A/B
60
1 50
P1
NDZ -1.20
6 13 6
25
Elevación Zapata Z1
7 Muro Capa Vegetal
CARA INTERIOR
75 150
1
NTN 0.00
110 20 5
75
28
3VR #4
3
B
6VR #4
1
13
11
NTN 0.00
2VR #4
Cimentación Corrida
P1
Plantilla de concreto simple de 5 cm f'c=100 k/cm2
CARA EXTERIOR
1/6 4
TL-1
B
EST#3 @20cm
10
MURO
C
20
TL-2
11
C1
40
C
35
11
15
Nivel d Nivel d Nivel d Nivel D Nivel D Nivel D Colum Zapata Pedes Trabe
Constr ucti
A/B CARA EXTERIOR
3VR #4
CARA EXTERIOR
NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1 P1 TL1
Str uctural Isome
2VR #4
A/B
SIMBOLOGÍA
1/2"
0.20 0.20
3/4"
3/4"
0.20
0.20
1.00
6
0.53
TL2
4VR #4 EST #3
2
Terreno natural al cual se le retiró la capa vegetal y material orgánico (20 cm mínimo), nivelar, compactarl al 95% PVSM, con humedad óptima. El área preparada debe extenderse mínimo 7.0 metros afuera de los ejes perimetrales A,B, 1 y 6. Terraplen de 30 cm de espesor compacto, formado
JE
JE
Ventila PVC de 2"
2
Inodoro Ventila de PVC 4"
JE
3
JE JE
Tee de PVC de 4"
Detalle Inodoro
2
Codo de PVC a 45° de 2"
Detalle Lavabo
3
Sin Escala
Chupón de neupreno de 2"
Sin Escala
JE
4
5
NF
JE
0.42
4.00
4"
5
B NOTA: Confirmar dimensiones de Trabes de Liga en PLANO DE ELEMENTOS ESTRUCTURALES
4.00
VV2"
Templo Ebenezer 4
Plano #
6VR #4
Fecha Plantilla de Ing. de 5 cm concreto simple f'c=100 Arq. k/cm2
INS 02
28/01/21 Author
DRENAJE
Checker
75
75 150
etr y and Details 1
11 13
Pedestal P1 0
3 VV
Reducción(4"-2")
Bajante de 4"
Codo 45° 2"
Bajante de 2"
NDZ -1.20
Yee 4" a 2"
R
Yee 4"
R Registro Ciego
Registro
Drainag e Floor Plan
Elevación Zapata Z1 A/B
28
11
5
50
m.
Para la instalación utilizar tubos de PVC de 4'' para aguas con sólidos y de 2'' para aguas jabonosas A/B sanitarias como se indica en elCARA plano.INTERIOR CARA EXTERIOR Para la instalación de las tuberías se considerará una pendiente del 2% y se colocarán los tubos 45° en dirección de la descarga. Tomas de sanitario y regadera por piso a 30 cm del muro.
EST#3 @20cm 6
Columna C1
4
SECC A-A / Sin Escala
NOTA: UBICAR REGISTRO SEGÚN EL PREDIO Y SUS 1/6 CONEXIONES A MUNICIPIO. EST#3 @20cm
SECC B-B / Sin Escala INSTALACIÓN HIDROSANITARIA
Ventila Vertical de 4" o 2"
Codo 45° 4"
1
3VR #6
B
P1
11
NTN 0.00
40
Cimentación Corrida
B 11
C
1.50
6 13 6
A
1:100
B
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
11.00
TL-2
MURO
TL-1 Planta Drenaje
1 ESP. GENERALES
C1
C
TL1
8.00 35
Z1
1.50
3VR #4
R
25
ESP. DISCIPLINA
15
CARA INTERIOR
R
0.50
P1
ion Details
A/B CARA EXTERIOR 2VR #4
C1
2"
CARA INTERIOR
3VR #4
CARA EXTERIOR
3VR #6
A/B
2VR #4
TL1 TL2
0.68
6
TL2
4"
VV4" 4"
0.40
Cimentación Corrida
TL2
2"
R
1.00
TL1
VV2"
0.90
SIMBOLOGÍA 20 5 110
A
0.20 1.08
VV4"
25
JE
6
de Terreno Natural de Banqueta de Firme Desplante Firme Desplante Trabe Desplante Zapata mna a stal de Liga
Tubería PVC de 2"
Codo de PVC a 90° de 4"
4
PLANTA LLAVE
Tee de PVC de 2" 0.60
1
28
1/6
6
40
SECC C-C / Sin Escala
A/B 25
25
5 75
Límite de excavación
5
Banqueta de concrecto f'c=100 kg/cm2, de 10 cm de espesor y 1.50 metros de ancho. Sellar con sikaflex o elastoflex la junta de banqueta con el muro en todo el perímetro. Usar volteador en juntas a cada 1.50 m. y
Templo Ebenezer Plano # Fecha
4 28/01/21
EST 03
26 26
20
IMBOLOGÍA
6 Trabe de liga/cimentación para el apoyo del muro.
4VR #3 EST #3 @15cm
20
Sin Escala
La zapata debe de desplantar sobre suelo en estado natural con capacidad de carga mínima de qa= 1.0 kg/cm2. (No sobre rellenos con escombro)
4
4VR #3 EST 1/4 @15cm
40
7
2
Planta Zapata Z1
7
Plantilla de concreto simple de 5 cm de espesor. f'c=100 kg/cm2
25
SECC E-E / Sin Escala
1/6
150
Rellenar excavación con material seleccionado producto de la excavación, en capas de 15 cm compactadas al 95% de su PVSM, con la humedad óptima.
Trabe Liga TL1
A/B
75
Trabe Liga TL2 (tensor) SECC D-D / Sin Escala NTN NB NF NDF NDTL NDZ C1 Z1
Nivel de Terreno Natural Nivel de Banqueta Nivel de Firme Nivel Desplante Firme Nivel Desplante Trabe Nivel Desplante Zapata Columna Zapata
7 . GENERALES
12
7 11 7
2
1
4VR #4 EST #3 @15cm
1/6
P1
NF +0.42 NDF +0.30
75
3
Firme
35
150
C1
A
18 18
A
7
75
CARA INTERIOR
40
7
B
Cimentación Corrida
7 11 7 25
SECC F-F / Sin Escala
- Acotaciones generales y niveles en metros - Dimensiones de elementos en centimetros - Las cotas son a paños - F’c=250 kg*cm2 - Acero de refuerzo fy=4,200 kg*cm2
61
ARCHITECTURE
Facade Pr opo Univer s 62
sal Rendering sity, NY 63
ARCHITECTURE
Prog ram Org anization Diag ram
Conce ptual University, P 64
Prog ram Org anization Diag ram
l Rendering Pennsylvania 65
ARCHITECTURE
3D Modeling/Diag ramming University, Lexington
66
Librar y Prog ram Elevation
Music School Prog ram Elevation
Academic Hub Prog ram Elevation 67
ARCHITECTURE
Librar y Renovation Pr oposal Univer sity, Lexington
68
69
ARCHITECTURE
Librar y Prog ram Proposal Floor Plan
70
Librar y Prog ram Proposal Floor Plan
Librar y Demolition Proposal Floor Plan
Librar y RCP Proposal Floor Plan
71
LANDSCAPE
72
Before / Landscape Proposal University, Lexington
After / Landscape Proposal University, Lexington
73
LANDSCAPE
Landscape Pr oposal Univer sity, Lexington
74
75
LANDSCAPE
Landscape Proposal Axonometric University, Lexington
76
77
LANDSCAPE
Circulation Analysis
78
Main Area / Exterior Classrooms Relation Analysis
Plaza / Facade Relation Analysis
Relationship between Buildings Analysis
79
UBRANISM
80
Accesibility Master plan Analysis
Road Master p University,
plan Analysis Lexington
Pedestrian Master plan Analysis
81
UBRANISM
82
Master plan University,
n Proposal Lexington
83
UBRANISM
84
Master plan University
n Proposal y, Indiana
85
U Bplan RANISM Master University, Califor nia
86
Master plan University,
n Existing Califor nia
87
UBRANISM
88
Master plan Exist University,
ting Axonometric Califor nia
89
M M