A. Sarquiz Environmental Portfolio

ENVIRONMENTAL

PORTFOLIO

ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO I SPRING 2022

IMAGE: Caption Caption FROM: Mexico City MX

ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

CURRENTLY AT: San Antonio - TX

EDUCATION:

UT AUSTIN (2019-2020)

> Urban Studies/Architecture

BAC (2020-PRESENT)

> Architecture

INTERESTS: Fine Art Mountani Biking Trail Building Furniture Design Animation Piano

Growing up I was alway obsessive about my surroundings. Having severe anxiety since birth and growing up in one of the world’s busiests cities, I quickly found a safe haven in the built environment. My Dad being an architect, would always take me to his projects, and it was then when I felt the most at home; Visualizing the finished work and traversing my own surreal architecture in my head.

Mexico City has a population of around 20 million people, which made it hard to cope with its density as a kid; However, it being a metropolis, it offered vast exposure to design, fine arts and culture (And took advantage of every last bit).

On a weekly

basis my family and would go to art museums, galleries, events, festivals, furniture stores, design markets, anything we could get our hands on; And so I developed a passion and taste for all kinds of design, from clay pots made by farmers to vintage art deco posters.

My parents did their best not to push architecture on to me, and let me find my own path, but as it turned out architecture was my path.

“Don’t forget to dance.” -My Dad

ECOLOGICAL & CARBON FOOTPRINT

CARBON FOOTPRINT

I was surprised to find that my household’s carbon footprint is lower than the average; However, I then notices that the difference is almost neglible. I was also sadened to see that even after my lanned actions it would still be fairly high

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

Sadly, my ecological footprint is also enormously higher than expected. The sheer proportion of my ecological footprint when scaled to how many earths would be needed to sustain it is ridiculous. cannot believe I have been living like this.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Puritan settlers brought architecture with them, which evolved into colonial-style buildings. These buildings were dark and did not promote health. By rejecting this architectural precedent we can hope to develop healthier occupancy which accomodates the public better.

SITE MATERIAL HISTORY

Boston has historicaly had a heavy use of a diversity of bricks and wood paneling. By creating a mix of pulverized brick and concrete, we can recycle bricks from deteriorating surrounding buildings and bring vernacular

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

WALK SCORE ANALYSIS

66 Long Wharf has a Walk Score of 93 out of 100. This location is a Walker’s Paradise so daily errands do not require a car. 66 Long Wharf is a six minute walk from the Blue Line at the Aquarium Inbound stop. This location is in the North End neighborhood in Boston. Nearby parks include Christopher Columbus Park, Rose Kennedy Rose Garden and Christopher Columbus Park.

PRELIMINARY TOOLS

Tourists are in search for the soul of the city, and they are actively on the move. Residents want pride and ownership, and they offer a taste of the city. Flexible and playful spaces, in works with easy circulation, allows for both groups to thrive from each other’s presence. Bending, tangible volumes, and adaptable elements encourage the exploration of activities. With simple, yet exciting circulation, and a diversity of multiple use spaces, tourists and residents are encouraged to participate as a single chaotic entity.

SUN SHADING CHARTS

BOSTON LONG WHARF

By using tools such as Climate Consultante, it becomes clear to see the multiple challenges each facade face due to their relationship with the sun. At tdifferent times of the year each facade faces different circumstances, but thanks to these charts we are able to idetify the main issues and design targeted ccounter meassurements.

SUN SHADING CHARTS BOSTON LONG WHARF

This chart offers insight into some of the best design strategies for the project.

PSYCHROMETRIC CHART DESIGN STRATEGIES

THERMAL STORAGE WALLS

A Thermal Storage Wall is a mass wall, usually masonry, located directly behind solar glazing.

Cold Climates*30% at 28º – 40º latitude 40% at 44º – 56º latitude

CROSS VENTILATION

Window openings located perpendicular to prevailing winds, and coupled with openings on the opposite side of a space or building, will provide natural ventilation for fresh air and/or space cooling. Adequate cross ventilation will remove heat from a space or building and maintain indoor air temperatures approximately 1.5 C° (2.7 F°) above the outdoor air temperatures.

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

THE PROJECT

ECOLOGY

WAVE AT BOSTON LONG w

CARBON FOOTPRINT

At first glance, the site wouldn’t be an obvious host for ecological opportunities. Given the site’s developed urban nature, as well as the fact that it was previously a parking lot, it meant that it didn’t house any vegetation in-land. This being noted, any ecological betterment would have to be designed and brought in (at least for in-land purposes). Parting from the negative aspects of the site, it did provide the exciting opportunity of being located next to water. By embracing and working with the local aquatic fauna, the project could benefit as well as facilitate the interaction between people and their surrounding ecosystems.

Sketch Perspective

Tourists are in search for the soul of the city, and they are actively on the move. Residents want pride and ownership, and they offer a taste of the city. Flexible and playful spaces, in works with easy circulation, allows for both groups to thrive from each other’s presence. Bending, tangible volumes, and adaptable elements encourage the exploration of activities. With simple, yet exciting circulation, and a diversity of multiple use spaces, tourists and residents are encouraged to participate as a single chaotic entity.

LOCATION: Boston, MA

AREA: 52,488 ft2

OCCUPANCY: 600 2,000

COMPLETION YR: 2021 COST: 5,000,000 USD

THE SITE

The site is located in the North End of Boston, Massachusets.

Previously being used as a parking lot, it is now a center of diversity and

THE FUTURE

Sadly, despite its great location and exciting program, the site is projected to be underwater by the year 2050. This is due to climiate change and the rise in water levels.

WATER DEPTH: 30’

RAINFALL: 3.06” - 3.98”

TEMPERATURE: 22.1 F - 82.2 0 F

WIND: 14 KM/HR @ 41 0 SW

Building Section

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

ECOLOGY

INTEGRATION

Hello

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY

Being located at the water’s edge, the project is highly conscious of the conservation of this precious resource. Though not much greenery is being used WW, it emphasizes the capture and recycle of rain water. The project also has the advantage of not being surrounded by taller masses, which could reduce it’s water capture. The Principal Riverwalk Pump Station served as a great example of how to accomplish this. By capturing and reusing water it is able to be efficient, despite its heavy traffic.

Month Irrigation Co. gal

January31% 0.0 February 38% 0.0 March 60% 0.0 April 77% 0.0 May 88% 0.0 June99% 0.0 July 100% 0.0 August 100% 0.0 September 77% 0.0 October 60% 0.0 November 38% 0.0 December30% 0.0 Annual Irrigation Water Use0 gal / yr

ECONOMY ENERGY

Due to the size, as well as intensive use of the building, it has a relatively high energy consumption. This however, is less impactfull when taking into account it is operatoinal and open to the public 24/7. this means that for such high intensity use, its energy consumption in moderate. This is also relieved by the fact that solar panes are used.

By creating a strong community, the

thrives with aid from said community. By implementing renewable energy, it lowers energu costs. Volunteers aid in the cleaning and mainainance of the building, and and wear on the building is celebrated along with the memories it created.

January 1,606.0 806.7 857.3 475.8

February 1,606.0 806.7 783.9 436.9

March 1,606.0 806.7 964.0 513.5 April 1,606.0 806.7 1,286.4 635.9

May 1,606.0 806.7 954.7 452.6 June 1,606.0 806.7 1,158.6 634.1 July 1,606.0 806.7 1,360.3 748.6 August 1,606.0 806.7 1,238.5 575.8 September 1,606.0 806.7 782.3 352.8 October 1,606.0 806.7 1,078.9 539.9 November 1,606.0 806.7 825.8 423.5 December 1,606.0 806.7 968.6 463.1 Total 19,272 0 0 0 9,680 12,259 0 0 0 6,253

WELLNESS

Total area of regularly occupied space34,992sf

Percent of building that is regularly occupied67%

Area with quality views25,212sf 72%

Area with operable windows3,969sf 11% Daylit area (sDA 300/50%)27,593sf 79%

Annual Solar Exposure Compliant Area (ASE 1000,250)24,413sf 70% Daylight sensors installed?No Are operable windows used?No

Total accessible thermostats 1Thermostat Occupants per thermostat300.0 Do occupants have task lights?No

Percent of occupants who control their own light levels0%

Due to its water fron location, the project offers many oportunities for enjoyment and relaxation. Due to community oriented nature of the project, the building engourages social and cultural interactions, and provides a variety of settings to do so; From a playful roof that over looks its surroundings, to a submergable water plataform, the oportunities for discovery are endless.

DISCOVERY

By developing our understanding of the project after its completion, important data

future projects.

Boston has a wonderful diversity of people, cutures and ideas. By forstering an environmet for communities to come together, the project facilitates the interaction and expression of all.

RESULTS SECTION 05 | SPREAD-SHEET.RESULTS

This page compares metrics against their benchmark along a scale from "Baseline" to "Very High Performance"

Measure 2: Design For Community

Walk Score 0% 100%

9300%

Transit Score 0% 100%

Bike Score 0% 100%

Community Engagement Level 0% 100%

Measure 3: Design For Ecology

Percent of Site Vegetated - Post-Development 0% 100%

Percent of Site Vegetated - Pre-Development 0% 100%

Measure 7: Design For Wellness 0

Quality views 0% 100%

Operable windows 0% 100% Daylit area (sDA 300/50%) 0% 100%

ASE Compliant Area (ASE 1000,250) 0% 100%

29% 83% 100% 0% 0% 1%

Vegetated area increase 0% 100%

Percent of Site with Native Plantings 0% 100%

Percent of Vegetated Area with Native Plantings 0% 100% Ecological Design Score 0% 100% Predicted Measured

Measure 4: Design For Water 0 49%

Potable water reduction 0% 304% 59% 100%

Potable Water Used for Irrigation Yes (0) No (1)

Rainwater Managed On-Site 0% 100%

Measure 5: Design For Economy

0% 13% 17% 75%

100%

Estimated Runoff Quality 0% 100%

Construction cost Reduction from the Benchmark 0% >50%

Efficiency ratio percent improvement 0% >50% Predicted Measured

Measure 6: Design For Energy -11%

Net energy reduction from Benchmark 0% 99% 99% 105%

Percent from renewable energy 0% 50% 51% 100%

Percent Operational Carbon Reduction from Benchmark0% 100% 100% 100%

Lighting Power Density % Reduction 0% 75%

Is CO Measured? No (0) Yes (1)

Embodied carbon intensity (kg-C02e sf)

Total embodied carbon (kg-C02e)

0

Is VOC measured? No (0) Yes (1)

Materials with health certifications 0 10+ Chemicals of Concern Avoided 0 10+

Embodied carbon modeled No (0) Yes (1)

Biogenic carbon considered? No (0) Yes (1)

Percent of reused floor area 0% 100%

Percent of construction waste diverted 0% 100%

Percent of recycled content of building materials 0% 100%

Percent of regional materials 0% 100%

Measure 9: Design For Change

0 0%

67% 52 53 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

Percent of installed wood that is FSC Certified 0% 100%

Local Hazard Research Score 0% 100%

Measure 10: Design For Discovery

2 350 33% 100% SECTION 05 | SPREAD-SHEET.RESULTS ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

Functionality Without Power (Resiliency) Score 0% 100% Building Design Lifespan 30 200

Level of Commissioning Score 0% 100%

Level of Post Occupancy Evaluation Score 0% 100%

70% 48% 88% 0% 100% 100%

Level of Knowledge Distribution / Transparency Score 0% 100%

Level of Feedback (Ongoing discovery) 0% 100%

72% 11% 79% 80% 100%

Total kg of Carbon Dioxide Equivalents from: Lifespan Commute/yearEnergy/yearBuilding Materials Total

1Year111,976 7,467 1,386,000 1,505,443 20Year2,239,524149,334 1,386,000 3,774,858 100Year11,197,620746,669 1,386,000 13,330,289 200Year22,395,2401,493,3391,386,000 25,274,579 Design 350Year39,191,6702,613,3431,386,000 43,191,013 Total Percentage of Carbon Dioxide Equivalents from: Lifespan Commute/yearEnergy/yearBuilding Materials Total

While having an outstanding low mainainance impact on the ecosystem, concrete carries most of its failures at the end of its life, transportation, and specially as a product. Due to its stable and effortless presence, concrete is able to out due many materials in its user and eco-friendly mainainance, being able to hold its self even when neglected; regretfully, this comes at a cost. Concrete is excidingly exploitative of resources as a material during construction, and due to its strong nature once built, it is also bears a heavy use of resources when it is time to get rid of it.

PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

Wood is a rather conservative, if not eco-friendly material to use in construction, specially when compared to other alternatives such as concrete;

Or at least it would seem so at first sight. The truth is that while, yes, wood is relatively eco-friendly as a material, it takes a considerable amount of resourses in order to be maintained, replaced, and at the end of its life. As a material wood has a positive impact on the evironmet due to its organic nature, however, it it this same nature which cripples its stability and reliability; thus requiring more efforts ir order to remain functional.

PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO

The material selection of a project has immense power over its ecology. By better alocating resources, the project was made 6% more efficient. More conservative concrete mixes, smaller and more thorough steel structures, and localy sourced materials are a key element in the reduction of a building’s emmisions.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Cross ventilation. 2030 Palette. (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2022, from http://2030palette.org/cross-ventilation/

2. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015, June 1). Carbon Footprint Calculator | Climate Change US EPA. EPA. Retrieved March 16, 2022, from https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/

3. “How Many Planets Does It Take to Sustain Your Lifestyle?” Ecological Footprint Calculator. Accessed March 16, 2022. https:// www.footprintcalculator.org/. 4. Thermal storage wall. 2030 Palette. (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2022, from http://2030palette.org/thermal-storage-wall/ s

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS

ALEJANDRO ZAMBRANO I SPRING 2022 INSTRUCTOR - MARY POLITES