N. Baker Environmental Portfolio

Page 1

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO

Sheikh Mountains, Somaliland/ Photo Credit: Lakmi00
SYSTEMS
SUSTAINABLE
NAIMO BAKAR

SECTION 01 - INTRODUCTION

SECTION

SECTION 02 - CARBON FOOTPRINT > Carbon and Ecologocal Footprint

SECTION

-CASE

SECTION

-CLIMATE CONSULTANT

SECTION

-REGIONAL

SECTION

-LIFE CYCLE

-DAYLIGHTING

2
3
12
CONTENTS 7 8
4 9
13 10 11
> Bio
03
STUDY > Cover Page > Swell Cultural Museum Intro > Site Analysis > Site Strategies > Solar Studies > Site Plan Proposal > Intergrated Design > Solar Access & Sun Shading
>
>
>
04
> Precedent Architecture, Art, & Crafts > Boston Architecture
Construction Materials
Economic History
Demographic
05
> Radiation Chart > Sun Shading > Psychometric Chart > Design Strategies
SECTION 06
ASSESSMENT > RS Means - Cost Estimator > Circulation > Heat Map > Design for Economy > Life Cycle Assessment -Tally > Embodied Carbon Calculator - EC3
16 17
19
18
06
> Window Wall Ratio > Pattern 1: Plan > Pattern 2: Glazing
14 15
20
>
07 -COTE SUPER SPREADSHEETS > Introduction > Intergration > Community > Ecology > Water > Economy > Energy > Wellness > Resources
Change > Discovery > Summary > Results
44
SECTION 08 > Bibiliography 22 23 21 25 27 24 29 31 28 36 42 32 46 47 45 49 48
43 53 54 52 57 55 59 62 58 65 > Walk Score > Boston Climate

BACKGROUND

3
BIO

Naimo Bakar

LOCATION

Nairobi, Kenya

EDUCATION

B. Arch ( 2015) - Georgia Tech

M.Arch (2022) - Boston Architectural College

EXPERIENCE

Architectural Designer , Interior Designer , Project Management

INTEREST

Traveling, Reading, Community Service, Fashion

I graduated from Georgia Tech in 2015: and I presently work as a Lead Designer/ Project Manager between Kenya and Somalia. In 2016, I decided to move back to Kenya to pursue job opportunity. In 2017, I was lucky as I got the a chance of working on massive projects in Somalia. Most of these projects are part of the country’s rebuilding effort after the civil war. The project are mostly funded by nonprofit organizations from around the world. Within Kenya I had the opportunity of working as a Lead Designer, interior designer, and Project Manager .

Climate Change Effect, Madagascar/ Photo: White & Case
4 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 01 | BIO
IMAGE: ME Dubai International Airport
BIO

FOOTPRINT

CARBON & ECOLOGICAL

5

CARBON & ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

ANALYSIS OF MY LIFESTYLE IMPACT

According to my carbon footprint calculator, the result of my consumption category indicate that my mobility is the highest. Due to my lifestyle my total Ecological Footprint is at 72%, and my Carbon Footprint is 10.8. This is very since the global high since the standard global average is 4 tons, and this is what we must strive for in order Io reduce my carbon footprint in this world. In additio, if we want to avoid global warming, we all need to strive to get it under 2 tons by 2050.

According to the consumption category chart my mobility consumption is the highest followed by goods and services on the consumption category. By

understanding that I have to reduce/ improve my mobility preference, and opt for other option. Presently, in Kenya the public transportation is mostly privatized; as a result, its not reliable or well organized .

PLANNED ACTION OF REDUCING MY CARBON FOOTPRINT EQUALS TO:

1. Saving of 2,491 gallons of gas 2. Planting of 567 Trees

3. Recycling of 15,751 tons of waste

Ecological Footprints -Photo/ Footprint Calculator
6 ENVRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 02 | CARBON FOOTPRINT
Carbon Footprints -Photo/ EPA

SWELL MUSEUM

ARCH 4 - STUDIO PROJECT

7

EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES

Boston was originally a hub of immigrants, and the proposed museum celebrates the enduring stories of immigrants that define and strengthen what it means to be American. Physically the museum retains the waterfront connection with the city through a passageway that represents immigrant’s experience. The museum is an intergrated building made of streel structure elements that uses

sustainable approaches and the design considers daylighting, eco friendly and recyclable materials. The Museum utilizes 20% as buildable area, while the rest of site is used as a green space that integrate different activities, such as open gathering spaces, sculpture gardens, restaurant, swimming, and expands the harborwalk connection to the waterfront.

Concept
8 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY
Diagram
NARRATIVE SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM- ARCH 4 STUDIO

IMAGE: Caption Caption

SITE ANALYSIS

Proposed site is located in North End neighborhood, and its popularly known for its Italian American population and Italian restaurants. The district is an important Boston Landmark, and has been a magnet for immigrants since its founding in the 1600s. Due to its proximity to the waterfront the area also served as an entry point into the country; as a result, in the 1800’s the are flourished into vibrant neighborhood that boomed because of the transatlantic commerce.

The proposed museum complies with all current zoning that govern the height, setbacks, use, and F.A.R ; as a result the building sits on 20% of the parcel.

The majority of the landscape, including the Harborwalk, which is to remain accessible to the public.

CIRCULATION

The museum is accessedat differentpoints through its major and minor connectors. Due to its proximity to the waterfront, the site layout utilizes the existing harborwalk trail that wraps around the site for circulation the existing greenery. The main entry point is on Commercial Street across Clark Street and goes all the way to the waterfront. The museum main access is in the middle volume, while the retail entrance is located on the first volume.

Future flooding FEMA- Sea Level Rise – Base Level Elevation (19’-5”)

Boston Harbour and bounded by water, a public access walkway, and Commercial Street. SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

The proposed site popularly known as a Serghent’s Wharf is currently a surface parking lot. Its located at 269 Commercial Street in North End, and its situated on 9
NORTH END NEIGHBORHOOD

PROGRAM ANALYSIS

SITE STRATEGY PROPOSAL

The proposed site falls under the Greenway Underlay District and is prone to future flooding; as a result, the main idea was to to create a resilient riverfront design that reflects and identify the history of the site and its neighborhood. To protect the museum from future storm surges; the existing landscape is raised and then terraced throughout the site to maintain the waterfront connection. In addition, the landscape proposal introduces natural buffer zones (native plants) around the waterfront edge, which serves as both green spaces and storm surge. The layout the museum responds

to the flooding issue; whereby storages, exhibitions, MEP and other essential programs are placed on the top levels. Main goal of the Museum is to educated others on local cultures, highlight the daily life of immigrants, display alternative perspectives on history, and connect people from different background. The Museum collections is organized by three main themes: images including photography, as well as posters, drawings press, cartoons, comic books, audiovisual materials; objects of daily life; and works of art concerning immigration, territory, borders, and roots protection.

Commercial Street St. SITE

ITERATION

Harborwalk

Retail , Mian Lobby, Great Halls

Offices / Support Services

Program + Event Space, Reception, Galleries Green Spaces

Program + Event Space, Reception, Galleries,

Existing Site Conditions- Photo/ Google Maps Site Proposal Diagram 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY
Program Diagram
SITE EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing vegetation

SOLAR STUDIES

SITE ANALYSIS

The proposed site is located on North End neighborhood with access to the waterfront. The location of the sun was critical in determining the amount of daylight the Museum will be receiving throughout the year. Through, Solar studies it was helpful to visualize the impact of natural light and shadows on the exteriors and interiors of the Museum.

The sun path was used as a visual representation that highlights sun’s range of movement across the sky of the proposed site to determine the angle and type of sun shading required.

Excellent Location: maximum sunlight throughout the day

Poor Location: some shade almost all day

Good Location: some shade in the afternoon

SOUTH NORTH EAST WEST

Good Location: Some shade in the morning

Solar Studies - Diagram

SOUTH

SOUTH

WEST winter sunset winter sunset

summer sunset summer sunrise

NORTH

Excellent Location: maximum sunlight throughout the day.

NORTH

Poor Location: Some shade almost all day

EAST Good Location: some shade in the afternoon

WEST

Good Location: Some shade either in the morning

EAST

Museum Revit Screenshots - Solar Studies
11 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY

SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM, NORTH END NEIGHBORHOOD

Proposed

Site

Harris St. Clark St. Fleet St. Eastern Avenue

C Clarrk St.

LEGEND

Proposed Site269 Commercial Street

Major + Minor Connectors

Commercial Street North Street
Plan 12 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY
Waterfront main access Ferry / boat routes Streets Harborwalk Pedestrian Access Point Trail Museum Entry Points
PROPOSED SITE

INTERGRATED DESIGN

PROPOSED MUSEUM

By understanding the building sun path, I wanted to take advantage of the passive solar; whereby I maximized the amount of solar gain in the building. As a result, the design employs insulating glass on the truss south facing façade, which has sun shading that blocks the direct sunlight in summer months and permits it to enter in winter. Photovoltaic panels are placed

on the roof to as a clean energy sourcce thats renewable. To control solar gain on the southern facade a double wall between the exhibition wall and the exterior façade was introduced. The building also employs Ground-source VRF heat pump system to provide due to its efficient HVAC system. Due to its capacity of reducing the building

overall energy consumption and being able to have the units in heating mode or cooling mode at the same time.I have also introduce rainwater collection system on the roof that harvests rain and store it in an underground cistern; this can be used for toilets and gardening .The permeable pavers and the bioswales are used to control storm water runoff around the site.

SKYLIGHTS

(natural lighting)

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS

(renewable energy)

BIOSWALES

RAIN WATER CISTERN

(Storage to be re-used for toilet flush and irrigation system)

MECH ROOM

PERMEABLE PAVERS

(rain water channels)

NATIVE PLANTS

(rain water channels) (natural buffers)

SUN SHADING ( SOUTH + EAST)

CHANNEL ((natural lighting)) PLANTING/ SHADING

13 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO |
SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY
Immigrant Museum - Axon Diagram
NAIMO BAKAR

SOLAR ACCESS & SUN SHADING BUILDING ANALYSIS

throughout the day. As a resutl, the exhibition spaces are well lit to allow user’s to enjoy the art. SECTION 03 | CASE STUDY

SOUTHERN EXPOSURE

Insulating glass as part of the facade system (sound insulation)

building rotation and sun shading protects the southern facade from direct sunlight COOL

Offset space at truss levels provides social + visual connection with the waterfront and the city

Double Skin wall

High level air intake from sorrounding area and southern hemisphere

AUDITORIUM EXHIBITION
Radiant floor heating system
Low level air intake from waterfront that cuts throughout the building
AIR
EXHIBITION EXHIBITION EXHIBITION PERFORMANCE SPACE Thermal Insulation Rainscreen Panels Thermal Breaks
WARM AIR VRF System Indoor heat and cooling
Systems - Section Diagram
Intergrated
The summer glare and overheating are controlled by use of sun shading for both east and southern facade, and use of insulating glass. The large windows allows the museum to be illuminated 14 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

The Irish 1800 s - 1880’s

The Irish1800’s - 1880 s

BOSTON’S TOP 6 FOREIGN LANGUAGES

REGIONAL DESIGN PRECEDENT

Russians , Italians , Chinese1880’s - 1920’s

Russians , Italians , Chinese1880’s - 1920’s

The Portuguese + Jews - 1900’s

The Portuguese + Jews - 1900’s

Global Immigrants1965 - Present

Global Immigrants1965 - Present

SECTION 04 | REGIONAL Global Immigrants1965 - Present Global Immigrants1965 - Present
Atlas Of Boston HIistory- Photo Credit/Massachussets Historical Society
Wave Global Wave Global Immigrants1965 - Present
BASE ON 2010 SURVEY Second
Wave
Global
Restriction Era
ARCHITECTURE, ART, & CRAFT

REGIONAL ARCHITECTURE

BOSTON AREA

The architecture of Boston consists of a robust combination of old and new architecture. Being among the oldest cities in North America, Boston, Massachusetts (along with its surrounding area); as a result, it has accumulated buildings and structures starting from the 17th-century to the present day. Throughout the years the city of Boston has evolved from a small port town to a large cosmopolitan center known for education, industry, finance, and technology.

In addition, the city is known for its granite buildings stemming from its early days.It is also known for being one of the origins of Federal Architecture. Presently, most of the city’s buildings and structures have evolved from a small port town to a large cosmopolitan center for education, industry, finance, and technology.

Boston’s architecture is undoubtedly unique since it is a combination of both old and modern styles. Throughout the city you will see structures built in the Georgian, Greek Revival, Victorian, Art Deco, Gothic Revival, Brutalist and other architectural styles.

Paul Rever House (1680) - Photo Credit /RFT Old State House (1914)- Photo Credit /Viator Trinity Church (1872)- Photo Credit / RTF City Hall (1936-68)- Photo Credit/ Arch Daily ICA Building (2006)- Photo Credit Pygmallion KAratza/ Divisare
16 SECTION 04 | REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Milllenium Building (2006)- Photo Credit Boston Magazine

REGIONAL MATERIALS

NORTH END, BOSTON

Due to the site being located on North End, Boston ;the three main materials that was used on the proposed museum were steel, insulating glass, and concrete.Within the site area most of newer structure pefer using steel due its shelf-life and energy efficientry.

BRICK

The Boston Bricks are an example of all the amazing public art in Boston. From large installations, like the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway, to hidden stained glass windows, the city has something for everyone

STEEL

For over a century, steel has reigned in the construction industry, and it’s used today for every building application. During the Industrial Revolution, the material experienced mass production, and it can be combined with other materials like glass, and cold-rolled and galvanized flat products that have high-elastic limits, toughness, and weldability.

Within the North End area most of the

INSULATING GLASS

Since the 1940’s, homes in the US has been enjoying the benefits of double glazing of windows. Due to their improved thermal efficiency and sealed airtight units; double glazing started to take off for both windows and doors.

Boston being in a cold region, double glazing is very useful because the house is not only insulated from the weather and temperature outside, but also noise

CONCRETE

Exposed concrete became the skin and bones of Boston’s civic architecture in the early 1960s. Like other great American cities, it suffered from a severe postwar urban crisis, prompting leaders to embark on a series of multimillion-dollar urban regeneration projects.

Steel /Photo credit: Montanstahl Insulating Glass /Photo credit: Glass Repair Biz Brick/Photo credit: Emily Wisner
17 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 04 | REGIONAL
Concrete/Photo credits: okcm/shutterstock

ECONOMIC HISTORY

INITIATIVE, POPULATION & INCOME

The city of Boston was first incorporated as a town in 1630 and then as a city in 1822, making it one of the oldest cities in the United States. Over the years the City has evolved into a center for innovation and entrepreneurship as well as for social and political change. Presently, Boston has become the economic engine and cultural hub of New England.

As the seat of Suffolk County, the capital city of Massachusetts, and the region’s

hub, Boston is home to approximately 685,000 residents, many world-renowned institutions of higher education, some of the world’s finest inpatient hospitals, numerous successful corporations, and many professional sports teams and cultural organizations. As a result, it ranks as the 21st largest city by population in the United States, and among the highest in concentrations of employment in the U.S. Additionally, numerous initiatives are being implemented such as the

Economic equity to resolve wage gap .

The city presently is working with different stakeholders to encourage affordability of housing within the urban areas, as a effort of reducing displacement, and improve quality of life.In addition, the city promotes, healthy environment, climate change, an invest in open space, arts and culture.

Boston Waterfront - Photo Credit/Evo Jets
18 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 04 | REGIONAL

RACIAL HISTORY

INITIATIVE, POPULATION & INCOME

Presenlty, Boston has a density of 13,841 people per square mile (5,344/square kilometer), and Greater Boston is the 4th most densely populated region in the United States

BOSTON DIVERSITY

Acoording to 2013 Census, Boston is experiencing colossal growth lately thanks to an immigration boom, and the Boston area gained close to 55,000 residents in the two years following the 2010 Census. The city’s population in the 1950s had 94.7% white people, and they were majority of the city’s population.

However, this racial distribution changed in the last 50 years, and the state is experiencing rapid growth. By 2000, nonHispanic whites accounted for just 49.5% of the population, which made Boston a majority-minority city for the first time in its history. Over the last decade, the city has experienced a great deal of gentrification, and the percentage of non-Hispanic whites was starting to grow. By 2010, this trend reversed once more, partially due to the housing crash, and the minority population rebounded in Boston.

19 SECTION 04 | REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

WALK SCORE

PEOPLE FRIENDLY CITY

North End is a neighborhood has the distinction of being the city’s oldest residential community, where Europeans have continuously inhabited since it was colonized in the 1630s .As a result, 269 Commercial Street is among the 3rd most walkable neighborhood in Boston with a neighborhood Walk Score of 99.The proposed site also has access to the Harborwalk, a continuous 43-mile

linear park along Boston’s shoreline that connects Boston’s waterfront neighbourhoods to the Harbor.

Serghent’s Wharf(Proposed Site) -Photo Credit/Google Maps Harborwalk- Photo: Boston Waterfront Partners Proposed Connection for Historic Bike route / Photo:BIKE LOOP North End Walk Score -Photo Credit/ travelview / shutterstock
20 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 04 | REGIONAL

CLIMATIC CONDITION

BOSTON, MA

The climate of Massachusetts is mainly a humid continental climate, with hot, humid summers and cold, snowy winters and abundant precipitation. The state has its share of extreme weather, prone to nor’easters and to severe winter storms.As a result, Summers can bring thunderstorms, averaging around 30 days of thunderstorm activity per year.

Massachusetts averages one tornado per year, like the entire United States eastern seaboard, the area is vulnerable to hurricanes due to its location, which is farther east in the Atlantic Ocean than states farther south. In recent years.

21 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 04 | REGIONAL
Rising tide and Snow in Boston Waterfront/ Photo credit: Robin Lubbock-WBUR Proposed Boston resilience districts Regional hydrology diagram:/ photo Research gate Koppen Climate Types of Massachusetts: Photo credit/ Icy98

CLIMATE CONSULTANT RADIATION CHART

The location of the sun was critical in determining the amount of daylight the Museum will be receiving throughout the year. Through solar studies I was able to understand the impact of natural light and shadows on both the exteriors and interiors of the Museum. As a result, the building uses solar panels that takes advantage of the direct summer radiation

The Radiation Chart shows Solar Gain on a PV Panel surface, which is highlighted in orange. The top one is the default indicatorswhile the bottom one shows the piostion and angle of the PV Panels placed on the site.

The Radiation Chart shows Solar Gain on a PV Panel surface, which is highlighted in orange. The top one is the default indicatorswhile the bottom one shows the piostion and angle of the PV Panels placed on the site.

22 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT

SUN SHADING

BOSTON, MA

By rotating the Museum I was able to remove the need for horizontal shading due to the design purpose . As a result, the building uses vertical sun-shading on its South, East and West facades. To block and reduces summer sun, and allowing the lower angled sun from the winter. West

Facade East Facade North Facade
23 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT
SUN SHADING CHARTS- CLIMATE CONSULTANT

SUN SHADING PSYCHOMETRIC CHART BOSTON, MA

The Swell Cultural Museum already utilizes several design sustainable strategies that are highlighted on the Psychometric Chart.he building takes advantage of the the Waterfront during the winter. The site has a waterfront view,

and its located in North End neighborhood. Due to this and Boston being a city that experiences flooding; the most important strategies incorporated on the site were flood mitigation and sunshading for the facade.

The design employs insulating glass on the truss south facing façade, which has sunshading that blocks the direct sunlight insummer months and permits it to enter in the winter time

The building also employs Ground-source VRF heat pump system to provide due to its efficient HVAC system.

24 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT

DESIGN STRATEGIES

CLIMATE CONSULTANT

FLOOR FUNCTION/ LAYOUTS SMALL SIZE FOOTPRINT

By understading the sun’s location throughout the year; the layout and organization of the floorplans was prioritized. So that the winter sun would be able to penetrates the building during the daytime and most of the spaces could be used for specific functions that coincide with solar orientation throughout the year.

To reduce excessive heating and cooling energy, the proposed Museum only uses 20% of the site. The rest of the site is use for different activities and green spaces for the sorrounding communites.

25 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT
DESIGN STARTEGIES 31- CLIMATE CONSULTANT DESIGN STARTEGIES 18- CLIMATE CONSULTANT

PASSIVE SOLAR HEATING

To maximize on winter sun and protect the Museum from the hot summer summer the building uses vertical sunshading on both its South, East, and West facades. The proposal has a strong South-North orientation; due to this the south has the strongest exposure while the north gets less sun exposure

HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING

In order to maximize on passive solar gain; the building uses clear glass on the south, while using double pane glazing (Low -E) on its north, eat and west facades.

DESIGN STARTEGIES 19- CLIMATE CONSULTANT
26 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT
DESIGN STARTEGIES 20- CLIMATE CONSULTANT

DESIGN FOR ECONOMY

SQUARE FOOT ESTIMATOR

From this assignment, I came to understand that material usage in construction plays a major role in building design. Good design adds value to the owners, occupants, community, and the planet. As a result, it is important to consider using materials that serve multiple functions; whereby we can eliminate superfluous materials to decrease total cost per square foot. In addition, it is important to choose quality materials that can affect the lifespan of the building. In order to design for economy, we must introduce smart

building strategies such as, understanding upfront and operational costs, knowing the client’s needs, rightsizing, and reusing existing structures.

COST ESTIMATOR

The RS Means is a tools that is used to estimate the cost of a building material. The database contains thousands of line items and cost engineers spend more than 30,000 hours researching and validating the costs every year.

INSULATING GLASS

Double glazing 1/4” Quantity: 57036 s.f Cost: $ 1, 848,553

27 SECTION 05 | CLIMATE CONSULTANT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO |
BAKAR
Cost Estimator- Photo/ RS Means
NAIMO

CIRCULATION

PERCENTAGE

TOTAL CIRCULATION AREA

53535.7 Sq. Ft

TOTAL NET AREA

124791.2 Sq. Ft

The total circulation percentage for the Cultural Museum is 30.0 % ; this is a close to a third of the building Net Area.

After analyzing the building layout and its circulation; I realized it will not be possible to move the circulation area to the exterior or absorbed this space to any adjacent spaces. Due to the building typology and form most of the Museum’s circulation is centralized, and all the programs are on both sides. The circulation area within the Museum also serves as exhibition spaces.

LEGEND

Cores

Egress Stairs with Refuge Area

VisitorArea

Service Elevator

Egress Exits

Ramps

Building Circulation

Harborwalk Museum Visitors

Museum Employees

Vertical Circulation/ Fire Exits

Horizontal Circulation

28 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

HEAT MAP

DAYTIME

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

The highlighted areas on the gorund floor show different users interaction during the daytime. The shared spaces within the building are the stairs, elavators, restrooms, and reception/ lounge area.

LEGEND

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SHARED SPACE/ LOUNGE

EXHIBITION SPACE

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS ELEVATORS

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

Exterior Building Entrance Service Area Entry

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SHARED SPACE/ LOUNGE

EXHIBITION SPACE

Interior Building Entrance Shared Space/ Lounge Exhibition Space

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS ELEVATORS

SHARED SPACE

EGRESS EXITS

RAMPS

SERVICE ELEVATOR BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

EXHIBITION SPACE

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS ELEVATORS

SHARED SPACE/ LOUNGE Service Elevators

Shared Space: Egress Stairs Shared Space: Vistors Elevators

SHARED SPACE

EGRESS EXITS

Shared Space: Restrooms Egress Exits

RAMPS

SERVICE ELEVATOR BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

SHARED SPACE

EGRESS EXITS

RAMPS

Ramps

SERVICE ELEVATOR BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

Building Circulation

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

Harborwalk Museum Visitors Museum Employees Museum Outdoor Exhibition Area

RR 29 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
UP

HEAT MAP

NIGHT TIME

The ground floor map indicate the service areas that are will be used by the Museum employees during the night time. The proposed site layout has outdoor spaces that can be accessed by the public during the night. such as the harborwalk.

LEGEND

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SHARED SPACE/ LOUNGE

EXHIBITION SPACE

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS ELEVATORS

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SHARED SPACE/ LOUNGE

EMPLOYEES BREAKROOM/CHANGING AREA

EXHIBITION SPACE

EXTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

SERVICE AREA ENTRY

Exterior Building Entrance Service Area Entry

INTERIOR BUILDING ENTRANCES

Interior Building Entrance

Employees Changing Room

EMPLOYEES BREAKROOM/CHANGING AREA

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS/ EMPLOYEES ELEVATORS

SERVICE ELEVATOR

EGRESS EXITS

RAMPS

BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

Shared Space: Egress Stairs

EGRESS STAIRS WITH REFUGE AREA

VISITORS ELEVATORS

Shared Space: Vistors Elevators

VISITORS/ EMPLOYEES ELEVATORS

Service Elevators

SERVICE ELEVATOR

SHARED SPACE

SHARED SPACE

EGRESS EXITS

RAMPS

SERVICE ELEVATOR BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

EGRESS EXITS

EGRESS EXITS

Shared Space: Restrooms Egress Exits

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

Ramps Building Circulation Harborwalk Museum Visitors Museum Employees Museum Outdoor Exhibition Area

RAMPS

RAMPS

SERVICE ELEVATOR BUILDING CIRCULATION

BUILDING CIRCULATION HARBORWALK

HARBORWALK MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM VISITORS

MUSEUM EMPLOYEES

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

MUSEUM OUTDOOR EXHIBITION + GARDENS

RR 30 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
UP

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

CONCRETE ANALYSIS

Tally is an add-in application on REVIT that allows architects and engineers to quantify the environmental impact of building materials during the design process. For this assignment, the program was used to define relationships between BIM elements and two construction materials from the Tally database. This information was then used to quantify environmetal impacts across several

Results per Life Cycle Stage

categories, such as embodied energy and global warming potential.

CONCRETE ANALYSIS

The Global Warning potential for the cocrete analysis, and its manufacturing state is at 39%, its maintenance is at 48% , its reuse potential falls at 12%.The results on the chart highlight the impact of materials chosen for a project.

The life cycle stages is used to describe the scope and system boudaries used to define each stage of the life cycle of a building or building product, from raw material acquisition to final disposal.

0% 50% 100% 58,023 kg Mass 95%
Global
Potential 39% 48% 12%
Potential 36% 54%
Eutrophication
25% 70%
46% 41% 11%
31% 62% 57.95 Potential 36% 54% 9.237 kg Neq
25% 70% 911.3
46% 41% 11% 281,312 MJ
31% 62% 39% 48% 12% Global Warming Potential 0% Mass
39%
36%
25%
46%
31%
48% 12% Global Warming
32 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
20,528
Warming
57.95
9.237 kg Neq
Potential
911.3 Smog Formation Potential
281,312 MJ Non-renewable Energy
Eutrophication Potential
Smog Formation Potential
Non-renewable Energy
Global Warming Potential
Potential
Eutrophication Potential
Smog Formation Potential
Non-renewable Energy
Legend Net value (impacts + credits) Life Cycle Stages Product [A1-A3] Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D] 39%
Potential
Results per Life Cycle Stage, itemized by Division 0% 50% 100% 58,023 kg Mass 94% 20,576 Global Warming Potential 31% 48% 11% 58.31 Potential 26% 53% 9.257 kg Neq Eutrophication Potential 12% 13% 70% 926.2 Smog Formation Potential 38% 40% 11% 281,904 MJ Non-renewable Energy 19% 12% 62% Legend Net value (impacts + credits) Product [A1-A3] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Transportation [A4] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes 0% 50% Mass 94% Global Warming Potential 31% Potential 26% Eutrophication Potential 12% 13% Smog Formation Potential 38% Non-renewable Energy 19% 12% Legend Net value (impacts + credits) Product [A1-A3] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Transportation [A4] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes End of Life
03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Module D
03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes 33 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
LIFE CYCLE STAGES-ITEMIZED BY DIVISION
[C2-C4]
[D]
TALLY

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

WOOD ANALYSIS

Legend

Life Cycle Stages

Product [A1-A3] Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D]

For the wood material, the we applied the same procedure on the REVIT plug-in Tally. This information was then used to quantify environmetal impacts across several categories, such as embodied energy and global potential.

WOOD ANALYSIS

Wood is a natural, renewable, and sustainable material for building, with a lighter carbon footprint than steel or concrete.

Results per Life Cycle Stage

6% Global Warming Potential

The Global Warning potential for the wood material, and its manufacturing state is at -84%, its maintenance is at 18% , its reuse potential falls at 75%.The results on the chart highlight the impact of and recyclability of using wood materials.

2% 18% 75%

The life cycle stages is used to describe the scope and system boudaries used to define each stage of the life cycle of a building or building product, from raw material acquisition to final disposal.

34 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
0% 50% 100% -50%
Mass 91%
18% 75% -84%
43% 11%
13%
59%
-18%
43% 11% 45%
13% 79%
60% 18% 17%
59% 35% -18% 2% 18% 75% 6%
0% -50%
18% -84%
43%
15,011 kg
20,204 Global Warming Potential
129.7 Potential
45% 19.34 kg Neq Eutrophication Potential
79% 1,200 Smog Formation Potential 60% 18% 17% 197,439 MJ Non-renewable Energy
35%
129.7 Potential
19.34 kg Neq Eutrophication Potential
1,200 Smog Formation Potential
197,439 MJ Non-renewable Energy
Global Warming Potential
Mass Global Warming Potential
Potential
Eutrophication Potential 13% Smog Formation Potential 60% Non-renewable Energy 59% -18%
credits)
Net value (impacts +
35 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT Results per Life Cycle Stage, itemized by Division 0% 50% 100% 58,023 kg Mass VQB 20,576 Global Warming Potential PN B QU B NN B 58.31 Potential OS B RP B 9.257 kg Neq Eutrophication Potential NO B NP B TM B 926.2 Smog Formation Potential PUB QMB NNB 281,904 MJ Non-renewable Energy NV B NO B SO B Legend Net value (impacts + credits) Product [A1-A3] 03 -
09 - Finishes Transportation
03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Maintenance and Replacement
03 - Concret 0% 50% Mass VQB Global Warming Potential PN B QU B Potential OS B RP B Eutrophication Potential NO B NP B TM B Smog Formation Potential PUB QMB Non-renewable Energy NV B NO B SO B
value (impacts + credits)
LIFE CYCLE STAGES-ITEMIZED BY DIVISION
Concrete
[A4]
[B2-B5]
Legend Net
Product [A1-A3] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Transportation [A4] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes End of Life [C2-C4] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes Module D [D] 03 - Concrete 09 - Finishes TALLY

EMBODIED CARBON IN CONSTRUCTION CALCULATOR (EC3)

Globally , the building and construction sectors play a vital role in minimizing our future carbon footprint. Each year, the built environment contributes almost 40% of global greenhouse (GHG) emissions. Even though the industry’s focus on operational carbon reductions (the energy used to heat, cool, and power our buildings ) has led to many successes. However, the

attention to embodied carbon, the emissions associated with material production and construction processes, has been lagging.

In this assignment we explored the qauntities of concrete and wood material assemblies. As a result, the EC3 tool was to calculate and explore them in terms of

their EPDs, which is their environmental performance and its impact over its lifetime. The Boxplot Chart displays the distribution of data for the cast-in-place concrete flooring.

It highlights for baseline for the embodied carbon that fall at 358 kgCO3e and the achievable target falls at 237.9 kgCO2e.

The three charts compare the concrete EPDs by analyzing data from different plant, manufacturers, and products with the region.

COMPARE BY PLANT

BOX PLOT
36 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
CONCRETE

COMPARE BY MANUFACTURER

COMPARE BYPRODUCT

37 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO |
BAKAR
NAIMO

EMBODIED CARBON IN CONSTRUCTION CALCULATOR (EC3)

WOOD By understanding the importance of Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) and the environmental impacts of a product through the product life cycle, the chart below show thr EPD for the wooden flooring.

The wood flooring data on the boxplot is similar to the concrete. The baseline for

the embodied carbon that fall at 456.4 kgCO3e and the achievable target falls at 236 kgCO2e. The three charts compare wood flooring EPDs by analyzing and comparing data from different plants, manufacturers, and products with the region.

COMPARE BY PLANT

38 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

COMPARE BY MANUFACTURER COMPARE BYPRODUCT

39 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
| NAIMO BAKAR

MATERIALS ASSEMBLIES

Floor

WOOD & CONCRETE

GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart

For this assignment, we used the EC3 tool to calculate information on the embodied carbon built into building materials. For this analysis. I used two materials from my studio 4 project (Immigrant Museum), which is North End neighborhood, Boston. To analyze the embodied carbon that analyzes its manufacturing, transportation, and installation. The GWP Sankey Summary Chart Swankey chart is based on the amount of concrete needed for foundation.

40 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
EC3

MATERIALS ASSEMBLIES

STEEL/CONCRETE

GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart

The GWP Sankey diagram compare the embodied carbon for the demo model.

By comparing the steel and concrete in the project, and from the chart of the Sankey it appears that concrete has the highest area of embodied carbon.

EC3
Floor
41 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

WINDOW WALL RATIO

SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM

The assignment asks for the measurements for the window wall ratio for the museum’s facade. This is calculated by finding the total glazing window area and dividing it with the total wall area. This calculations will determine the window to wall ratio and the wall to window ratio.

NORTH

WWR% = (25700 sq.ft / 39549 sq.ft /)

= 65%

SOUTH

WWR% = (16210 sq.ft / 40524 sq.ft /)

= 40%

EAST

WWR% = ( 4718 sq.ft / 6591 sq.ft /)

= 71%

WEST

WWR% = ( 2576 sq.ft / 5152 sq.ft /)

= 50%

ROOF SKYLIGHT

WWR% = ( 3777 sq.ft / 55277 sq.ft /)

= 7%

NORTH SOUTH

EAST WEST

42 SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING ENVIRONMENTAL
Immigrant Museum - REVIT Model
PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

DAYLIGHTING PATTERN GUIDE

PATTERN 1-PLAN

SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM

1-2 GENERAL MOTORS OFFICE BUILDING

Location: Detroit, MI (1917)

Architect: Albert Kahn and Associates

Floor Plate Area: 59,000 sf

Perimeter Length: 2540 ft

Max. Dist. to Perimeter: 32 ft

Percentage of Area Within 20’ of a Window: 90%

The General Motors Office Building designed by Albert Kahn in 1917 exhibits a building organization that is fundamentally designed around the use of daylight as the primary source of illumination. Kahn designed a building that was almost entirely perimeter to maximize access to daylight. To do this he created thin “finger plan” bars that were spaced far enough apart from one another to avoid reducing access to daylight at the opposing office bar. The first floor, originally designed as an auto showroom

block, far too deep to be daylit from the perimeter alone. However, rooftop skylights located between the office bars allow diffuse “toplight” to illuminate the center of the floor plate and to balance the brightness from the perimeter. Corridor spaces are deliberately illuminated at a very low level to allow users’ eyes to adjust to indoor light levels while moving toward their destination within the building.

Similar to the General Motors Office Building, the proposed museum layout is organized and designed around the use of daylight. Most of the building perimeter for the three blocks maximizes access to daylight, whereby the building opens up to the waterfront and the city views wih expansive windows.

FINGER PLAN

The summer glare and overheating are controlled by use of sun shading for both east and southern facade, and use of insulating glass. The floor plates for the museum is 60 feet and 75 feet, which allows the museum to be illuminated throughout the day. The exhibition spaces have very low level of illumination to allow uses’ eyes to adjust and enjoy the art. PROPOSED GROUND

FLOOR

43 SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO |
BAKAR
Perspective and Plans - Photo Credit/ Advanced Building
NAIMO
ENTR
ENTRY
RR

DAYLIGHTING PATTERN GUIDE

PATTERN 2: 75% GLAZING

WINDOW AREA (HORIZONTAL WINDOW)

A horizontal band of windows at 75% percent of the wall area (nearly 100% of the interior wall area) provides daylight illumination that meets or exceeds commonly accepted minimum daylight illumination criteria at more than 90 percent of the adjacent 26’-0” section. Minimal contrast remains between the interior surfaces and the glazing, and the brightness of the “back” wall (at left) provides a balance of brightness across the section.

WINDOW AREA (HORIZONTAL WINDOW) - SWELL MUSEUM

The window ratio that most closely matches my façade condition is number 7, which has 75% glazing. Similarly, the facade of the building is comprised of insulating glass and channel glass that controls the amount of daylight. The Museum uses daylight to reduce internal heat loads from electric lighting during peak cooling times to enable passive cooling. To achieve this goal, no portion of the building is further

than 10 ft from a window. Solar heat gains and glare are controlled through active and fixed shading devices that are place on the East and South facade.

Light Level Ratio- Photo Credit/ Advanced Building North Facade - Render
44 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING
North Elevation- Revit Model

COTE

architects informaon ydisplaythe suresof formanceor TopTen and hmarking orolder. improvethe SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

SPREADSHEET

Thisrstpageassignsbenchmarksbasedonbuilding-specic,naonaldat afortheprojecttobecomparedagainst

Ifauser-denedbenchmarkispresent,thenaonalbenchmarkswillbeoverridden.

Thirdpa

Th

Th

Step 2: Review y our benchm arks to ev aluate y our projec ts performance. BasicProjectInformaon Transporta on ProjectNameSWELL:CulturaMuseumTotalAnnual 3,458,471 kg-CO2e/yr ProjectAddress268CommercialStreet,NorthEndTotalAnnualperOccupant 1,729 kg-CO2e/occupant/yr apt.,suite,etc CityBoston Water StateM ATotalAnnualWaterUse 1,693,958 gal/yr ZipCode2110WUI-WaterUseIntensity (Program-based) 13.0 gal/sf/yr User-De ned Benchmark Source ASHRAEClimateZone5A(Link)WUI-WaterUseIntensity (User-De ned) gal/sf/yr OtherClimateZone(?:WaterUseperOccupant 847 gal/occupant/yr TotalBuildingArea(?)130,500Grosssf SiteArea(?)130,500sf Energy Regularlyoccupiedspace(?)50,000sfTotalAnnualEnergyUse 8,384,625 kBtu/yr Avgdailyoccupancy(?)2,000PeopleEUI-EnergyUseIntensity (Program-based) 64.3 kBtu/sf/yr Peakoccupancy(?)3,400PeopleEUI-EnergyUseIntensity (User-de ned) kBtu/sf/yrUseZeroTooldesignatedEUI FTEs(?)200PeopleEnergyUseperOccupant 4,192 kBtu/occupant/yr Projectcompleonyear onAnnualdaysofoperaon (?)312Days Opera onal Carbon Emissions Avg.dailyhoursofoperaon (?)8hoursTotalAnnualCarbonEmissions 780,188 kg-CO2e/yr TotalCons truconCost(?)16,150,000USDCarbonUseIntensity (Program-based) 6.0 kg-CO2e/sf/yr User-De ned Benchmark Source FAR1.00CarbonUseIntensity (User-De ned) kg-CO2e/sf/yr Cost/sf123. $75CarbonEmissionsperOccupant 390 kg-CO2e/occupant/yr sf/occupant-Avg.65 COTETop10sf/occupant-Peak38 Electric Ligh ng ValueAnnualhoursofoperaon2,496LighngPowerDensity 0.86 W/sf User-De ned Benchmark Source LighngPowerDensity (User-De ned) W/sf BuildingProgram ProgramBreakdown(? %ofBuildingArea BuildingProgram#1Museum35% BuildingProgram#2Food-Service5% BuildingProgram#3Educaon-Other5% BuildingProgram#4SelfStorage5% BuildingProgram#5Oce5% BuildingProgram#6Reta
Total must equal 100% 100% AddionalBuildingInformaon ProjectTypeNewConstrucon SiteEnvironment(?)Urban
eviouslyDevelopedSiteParally IsthermanAI
gnatoryNo
port
ADDxNo
il-General5% BuildingProgram#7ServicesGeneral40% BuildingProgram#8
Pr
A2030Si
Re
edintheAI
rtyrangsystem1None
yrangsystem2
irdpart
ystem3 Ifother,specify Step 1: Fill out the below basic informa on of your projec t
irdpartyrangs
SUPER
ForCOTETopTenenergyreducons,thebenchmarkshouldbeuser-denedusingArchitecture2030'sZeroTool.Oponaluser-dened benchmarkscanbeenteredaboveasawayoftrackinganyspecicbenchmarkingresearchthattheteamconducted. INTRODUCTION 45 ENVRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION

The proposed museum is a community center that lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery, and serves as a dynamic component of learning.The Proposal

takes visitors on an experiential journey and aim to structure a much-needed dialogue; whereby the museum shares stories of the immigrants and migrant

experience throughout the building. Comprised of three volumes that features a truss that cantilever 100’ above the harbor,the museum employs a hybrid

facade, and intergrates sustainable systems throughout the site. The outdoor and indoor exhibition spaces serves as the heart of the project for the community.

COMMUNITY

Placebased. EC OLOGY

Aquifer/ watershed, sharedresource.

Clim ateappropriate landscape.Rainwater WATER

Financialresilience.biophilicdesign.Low maintenancedesign

Districtsystems design

Carbonemissionsfrom quality.

Locallysourcedmaterials.

Watersavings,wat er independence

Energysavingsfrom treatmentofwater.

Waterquality.

EC ONOMY

Lifecyclecost,Lifecycle analysis buildingoccupants.

ENERGY

WELLNESS

Environmentally consciousmaterial anddisposal.

Socialequityisamajor componentofresilience. oceanrise.

surfacewaterqualityand enjoyment,watershed

Waterresilience. changes,drought.

Mindfulpresenceof water.

Durabilityand maintenanceofmaterials growthandchange. strategies

Embodiedcarbonof materials.materialtransparency.

RESOURCES

Carbon'sroleinclimate change. Passivesurvivability

Measurementand Trackinghealthim pacts.Futureadaptability.

Embodiedcarbonsavings CHANGE heatmaps. Biodiversity.

Post-occupancy DISC OVERY

HOLISTICSUSTAINABILITY1-Whatisthebigidea?
46 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

DESIGN FOR EQUITTABLE COMMUNITIES

Walkscore.comgeneratessev eral scoresforwalkabilityand comm unityresourcesforany addres sintheUS.Thehigherthe score,them orepedestrian-friendly

The Museum proposal is designed with the intent of advancing social equity with the North End and its surrounding neighborhoods in Boston. The site is adjacent to the waterfront, and it was once a part of Boston Harbor before dock extensions and fill eventually solidified its status as part of Boston’s North End. It has served as a shipyard, a station and hotel, a mill, a sugar refinery, and a cold storage warehouse before being turned into a parking lot.

BasedonSherryAArnstein's,"A wasthelev elofcomm unity engagementduringthedesignand

In addition, the proposed site is among the waterfront site that the Harborwalk wraps continuously along the Boston shoreline. This public access established an edge between the City and its harbor; as a result, it provides a place for recreation, and creates a zone in which to defend against high tides.

The proposed designed introduced outdoor community performance space, sculptor gardens, and public pool that can be used throughout the day by the community. The building also steps with the site, merging the pedestrian experience by a space-defining ramp that serves all.

alculatorcanproduce goodres ultsforallbuildingsthat peopletrav eltoandfrom

Calc ulators: Enter y ou r valu es into th e yellow c ells 1-Walk/Trans it/BikeScore WalkScore99% TransitScore100% BikeScore82% 2-Comm unityEngagement Comm unityEngagementLevel Community Engage me nt Score 43 % Propos edBaselineUnit AverageDailyOccupancy2 00 0 (?)20 0 10 %7 6%WeeklyAvg. Averageroundtripcomm ute2 52 5.4M iles 55Days 5050weeks AverageCarFuelEconomy(?)2524 .9mpg Averagecarbonemiss ionpergallonofgasoline8.898.89kg-CO2 e/gal 22 2 1,72 9kg-CO2 e/occupant/yr 444 ,3 50 #######kg-CO2 e/yr 87.2% Thiss im plecalculatorcom paresyour s urv ey(oraneducatedguess )to distanceandav eragempgofthe building'soccupants . projects,thec
47 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

Water Located in North End, Sargent’s Wharf is an active parking lot in the neighborhood that experiences a lot of flooding during high tides and storms. By understanding that the site falls under the Greenway Underlay District, the proposed design aims to create a resilient river front design.

As a result, the proposal explored the idea of converting the site into a climate resilient waterfront by introducing green buffer spaces with native plants along the edges. This was achieved by elevating the landscape that creates a temporary flood barrier, improving the Harborwalk, introducing living shorelines, and increased planting and shade area.

Me asure 3 - De sign f or Eco logy Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells Reasonab Greenroofarea-sf-sf Buildingfootprintarea54,071sf-sf Surfaceparkingarea-sf95sf 67,553sf-sf Areaofthetotalsitethatisvegetated8,876sf130,405sf SiteArea130,500sf130,500sf Pe rcent ve ge tate d6.8% 99.9% Increase in Pe rcent of vegetated are a-93.1% 11,133sf Areaofthetotalsitecoveredbyturfgrass-Pos tDevelopment5,058sf 125.4% Turf grass - Perce nt of Site 57.0% 8.5% BiodiversityYes DarkSkiesNo BirdSafetyNo Yes No Yes Yes Other:No Ecological Design Score50.0% im plem entedbytheprojectto helpus ersbecomem oreawareor connectedwiththesiteandtheir regionalecosystem s. Theseareal concern,so Determ inetheareaofthesite fromthesitearea.Greenroofsare includedinthepercentvegetated Inm ostcase increaseas adaptedforthelocalclim ateand ecosystems.Use"turfgrass"for anylandscapeareaswith thelocalclim ate. andasm al isusual
3-LevelofEcologicalDesign 1-VegetatedArea PostDe ve lopment PreDe ve lopment 48 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
lypre
Connection to the Waterfront/ Render Sculpture Garden/ Render/ ender

DESIGN FOR WATER

Water systems of the Museum Building are designed to integrate the project into the local ecosystem and ensure the project lives within its water means. By understanding that every drop that leaves the site is a potential polluter further down the stream, the museum utilizes permeable pavers, bioswales, and subsurface storage.

Rainfalls is harvested and channeled to the roof whereby its filtered and stored in a cistern, and this is the primary source for portable water. In addition, if there is a overflow from the cistern the water is directed to the bioswales system and is infiltrated into the ground.

Reasonable

Step 1: Benchmark Water Use I

WaterUseIntensity13.0gal/sf/yr

DailyAvgOccupancy2000Enclosed 312

Step 2: Indoor Water use

Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal)

Toilet1.11.2uses2,640823,6 80 Urinal*0.50.6uses600187,2 00 Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Public

Lavatory0.20.9minutes360112,3 20Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2m inutes384119,8 08 Warehous

Total daily wate r use12,984 gal/day-

Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr

Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells Yes-baseline

NoNo-highper

Proposed Design

Base line #1: All Turf Base line #2:

IrrigatedArea(potableornon-potable)16,191sf16,19116,191 Climate WarmH um id3.33.33.3

PlantQualityFactor(Qf)Waterstress0.40.40.4 Turf110.2W 0.90.750.9 14,794 17,753 2,959

ProposedDesignComparison

49 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
| NAIMO BAKAR
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

Proposed Design

Base line #1: All Turf Base line #2:

IrrigatedArea(potableornon-potable)16,191sf16,19116,191 Climate WarmH um id3.33.33.3 PlantQualityFactor(Qf)Waterstress0.40.40.4 Turf110.2W 0.90.750.9 14,794 17,753 2,959

Month gal 17%-400%

January31%4,586.2 2) Qf - Plant Qu February38%5,621.8No

March60%8,876.6

April77%11,391.6

May88%13,018.9

June99%14,646.3

July100%14,794.3 August100%14,794.3

Septem ber77%11,391.6Sprinkle October60%8,876.6 November38%5,621.8 December30%4,438.3 118,058 gal/yr

Yes-baseline NoNo-highperfo
edDesignComp
Reasonable Step 1: Benchmark Wate r Use In WaterUseIntensity13.0gal/sf/yr DailyAvgOccupancy2000Enclosed 312 Step 2: Indoor Wate r us e Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal) Toilet1.1 1.2uses2,640823,680 Urinal*0.0 5.6uses600187,200 Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Public Lavatory0.0 2.9minutes360112,320Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2minutes384119,808R Warehous Total daily water use 12,984 gal/day Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells 50 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Propos
arison

Step 2: Indoor Wate r us e

Wate r Use Summary

Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal)

Toilet1.1 1.2uses2,640823,680

3-Stor

Urinal*0.0 5.6uses600187,200Public

Be nchmarkPre dicted ImprovementMeasure dI mproveme nt 1,693,9 583,784,946 -123% 307,296 82% 8471,892154 13.029.02

Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Publicord Lavatory0.0 2.9minutes360112,320Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2minutes384119,808R

Total daily water use 12,984 gal/day

Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr

TypeofStormEvent2yr-24hr StormEvent3.4in StormEvent0.28 Storm waterStorage10000cf

Surface Area (sf)Stormwate r (cf)

Roof0.

ilyAvgupancy 312
Warehous
mwaterM anagedOn-site
51 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
954,07115,32013,788 Im pervious0.967,55319,14017,226 Turf0.25,0581,433287 0.0511,1333,154158 Semi-Pervious0.5-7,315(2,073)(1,036) Sub Total 130,50036,97530,422M 20,422 Pe rcentage of Stormwater Managed O n-site 44.8% 80% 2yr TotalAnnualPotableWaterUse(gal/yr) WaterUseIntensity(gal/sf/yr) TotalAnnualWaterUseperOccupant(gal/occupant/yr)

Enterthepublishedcosttoconstruct similarbuildingsintheregionand listthesource.

With the use of RS Means data we were able to find the cost per square foot for the of the project. The constrcution cost benchmark is based on simlilar project within the region, and its used to compare the actual cost.

On the Estimated operation cost tab, the amount is based on the Energy Spreadsheet data to highlight the reduction energy cost.

Building space efficiency starts to analyze the ratio of building typology, circulation, operation and maintenance. The amount is based on benchmark source from US General Service Adminiatration (GSA).

,thesourceofthe achieved

$140
$123
12
$7,
Calc
Enter
our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-numerical data into the green cells.
Measure 5 - De sign f or Eco no my Reas
.00/sfBenchmarkSourceRSMeansData
.75/sf
%
806.00/yearM ajorStrategyRenewables Fromcleaning/yearM ajorStrategy Durabilityinvestments/yearMajorStrategy Other/yearM ajorStrategy Other/yearM ajorStrategy Total$7,806.00 /year 70%BenchmarkSourceGSA 80%M ajorStrategy 14%
ulators:
y
Therearemanydesignstrategiesfor Includedesignstrategies,alongwith andismostvaluableasathought exerciseThecostsavingsfrom resourcestoconstruct,operate,and maintainEnterthetypicalbuilding asabenchmark
52 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE
SUPER SPREADSHEET DESIGN FOR ECONOMY

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

The museum uses a dynamic approach to be able to achieve thermal comfort by understanding Boston’s climate. As a result, the proposed design considers regional weather, temperature, humidity, clothing, and activity level on all the spaces to manage energy required by the mechanical systems.

The Museum covered with a highperformance building envelope that comprises of insulating glass. Continuous exterior insulation, and carefully sealed air barriers to reduce heating and cooling energy. The Photovoltaic panels are placed on the roof to as a clean energy source that’s renewable to meet the building demand.

ep2Filloutthepre

ctedenergy typeUseenergymodeloutputsor measuredenergyOn-siterenewables requiregrosmeteringnotnetmeteringvalues. Ifanenergymodelwasnotcompleted measuredenergyuseIfauetype wanotusedleavethemonthl inputsasZero

Step3Enterthelocalenergycostor eachfuetypeavailable.Thecosof

Step4ForprojectsusingChilled Wateforcooling,usethedropdown toassigntheappropriatecarbon conversionactobysystemtypeThe chiller

h4,283.02,142.012,000.04,900.0GJ947

e00643 April4,283.02,142.013,000.06,500.0kWh341214Fu

il0.0742 May4,283.02,142.017,500.07,100.0MWh3412.14D

ter00664 June4,283.02,142.020,000.06,000.0Lbs1.194DistrictChilledWater-lectriDriven0.0527

July4,283.02,142.022,000.05,800.0kLbs11940.0739

August4,283.02,142.018,000.04,800.0MLbs1194000DistricChilledWater-NaturaGasEngineDrivenChiller0.0493

September4,283.02,142.016,500.05,800.0Therms100

October4,283.02,142.014,000.06,300.0kg2.632

November4,283.02,142.012,500.04,650.0TonHours12

December4,283.02,142.011,000.03,700.0cf1.026

Total51,39600025,704180,80000065,050ccf102.6

Step1Calculatethetotainstalled building Step2Thebenchmarkvalueisauto-

Measure 6 - Design for Energy Reasonable RangesSources Step 1 Benchmark BenchmarkSiteEUI64.3kBtusyrBenchmarkSiteAnnualEnergykBtu/yr 6.0kgCO2esf/ykgCO2e/yr WaASHRAEStandard90.1usedtodeterminepEUI?Whattoolwasusedtomodeenergy? WhatversionoASHRAEStandard90.1wasused?Other: Other:Whatthetoolversion? Step 3 Record Monthly Data Grid Electricity Natura Ga District Chilled Wate District Steam Onsite (? Grid Electricity Natura Ga District Chilled Water District team Onsite (? Month kWhMBtuMBtukLbskWhkWhMBtuMBtuLbskWh EnergyUniFactortoconver tokBtu January4,283.02,142.011,000.05,000.0kBtu1Electricity0.1182 February4,283.02,142.013,300.04,500.0MBtu1000NaturalGas0.0531 Ma
rc
.817Propan
elO
istricSteamHoWa
Tota
CostoEnergypesele
9-0.02$0.12$0.94$0.18$9.39-0.02 DistrictChilledWaterType(iapplicable CarbonConversionFactorkg-COe/kBtu)0.1180.0530.0530.066-0.1180.1180.0530.0530.0660.118 e yr)20,731000 -10,36872,926 000 26,238 Step 4 Review Outputs Energy Predicted Measured Predicted Measured 175,370616,915Annual(kg-CO2e/yr)10,36399,163 87,706221,960Annualntensitykg-COesf/yr)01 NeAnnualkBtuyr)87,665394,95599%87% PercenofTotalEnergyfromRenewableEnergy50.0%36.0% GrossEnergyUsentensity(kBtu/fyr)1.34.7 Cost Predicted Measured NepeArea(kBtu/fyr)0.73.0NetAnnualCost($)$5,653$20,395 99.0%95.3% LPDTablesbySpace Installed(LPD)0.30W/s Benchmark(LPD)0.86W/s 65% North0.40East0.20South0.35West0.20 BuildingAggregate0.40 Usethesecellstodocumenthetools andreferencecodesusedtocalculate
dictedandMeasured MonthlyEnergyUse measurementoreachfueltyp
kW
St
kBTUConversionFactor3.411000.001000.001194.003.413.411000.001000.001.193.41kc1026
Energy kBtu/yr) 175,370 00 087,706 616,915 000 221,960 CubicMeters36.303
ctedunit)$0.12$0.94$0.18$9.3
ForbothPre
e,.e.
horkBTUofgridelectricity.
di
Re
ll30%to40%ideal.AhigherWWR DistrictChilledWaterElectricDriven UseIECC2021asthebenchmark EPA-EnergyConversions EIA-ElectrictyCosts EIA-NaturaGasCosts Seethebenchmarkingpagefo reasonableranges. tab. Calculators: Enter you values nto the yellow cells Enter non-numerica data into the green cells Predicted Measured Predicted Measured YeNotApplicable 2016 8,384,625 780,188 COTE
cordyourbuilding'swindowwa
SUPER SPREADSHEET
53 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR

Step1:Determinetheareaofthebuildingthatisregularlyoccupied.

Step2:Inputtheareaofoccupiedspacesthathaveaccesstoviews, operablewindows,daylight,andcomplaincewiththeannualsolar exposureareacriteria.

DESIGN FOR WELLNESS

metric.Ifdaylightperformancewas n'tsimulated,inputthetotalarea within15'fromaperimeterwall

Inputthetotalnumberofaccessiblethermostatsandthepercentof occupantswhocontroltheirownlightlevels.

To promote occupants and visitors’ wellness in SWELL- Cultural Museum, I introduced few measures such as introducing curtain wall façade with some sun shading to combat summer sun. The large opening on the south, north and east. The sun shading on the southern façade and the circulation protects the interior spaces that are used for exhibition.

The rotation of the building and different outdoor spaces is created to maintain the connection between the city and the waterfront. To retain good indoor air quality and VOCs level, the museum will use low emitting materials. In addition, the accessible ramps throughout the site and prominent within the building, is a beautiful celebration of inclusion. On either side of the ramp is the irresistible (performance space) with occupiable stair, which encourages movement and interaction.

Inputthetotalnumberofmaterialsthathaveathird-partyhealth

*Declare *CradletoCradle

*Level -ORInputthetotalnumberofchemicalsofconcernthatyouavoided.Then nameeachofthosechemicalsandthestandardthatyouus edasaguide. Examplesofthestandardsinclude:

*LivingBuildingChallengeRedList

*WELLBuildingStandard

erofchemicalsofconcernthatwhereavoidedChemicals

ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard

ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard

ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard

ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard

ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard

Measure 7 - De sign f or Wellness Reasonable Ran Totalareaofregularlyoccupiedspace50,000sfGood Percentofbuildingthatisregularlyoccupied38% Areawithqualityviews45,300sf91%VeryHighPerfor Areawithoperablewindows30,000sf60% Daylitarea(sDA300/50%)sf0% AnnualSolarExposureCompliantArea(ASE1000,250)sf0% Daylightsensorsinstalled?Yes Areoperablewindowsused?Yes TotalaccessiblethermostatsThermostatBaselinen Occupantsperthermostat0.0Good Dooccupantshavetasklights?Yes Percentofoccupantswhocontroltheirownlightlevels100%VeryHighPerfor 3-CO2&VOCs Contaminant GoalM aximumCO2levels1000ppm IsCO2meas
Form
ured?Yes MaximumMeasuredCO2levels900ppmOzoneO IsVOCmeasured?NoCarbonmonox MaximumMeasuredVOClevelsppb
aldehyde Materials NotableMaterial1 NotableMaterial2 NotableMaterial3 NotableMaterial4 NotableMaterial5 Numb
54 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-numerical data into the g reen c ells
| NAIMO BAKAR
COTE
SUPER SPREADSHEET

COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

RESOURCES

The design intent was to design a didactic building that used utilized sustainable material assemblies throughout the building. To reduce embodied carbon associated with materials and construction processes. These evaluations were achieved with the use of Tally and EC3 to analyze material selections and its impact. The main purpose of the EC3 allows benchmarking, assessment, and reductions in embodied carbon, focused on the upfront supply chain emissions of construction materials. While Tally tool a plug-in for Revit was used to Understand the impact of building materials, and traditionally involves Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), an in-depth form of analysis performed on whole buildings, manufactured building products and materials, and material assemblies. This assignment helped me in understanding the different methods one can source construction materials and carbon footprint and cost was very important.

PredictedM easured

Annual(kg-CO2 e/yr)10,362.899,163.4

AnnualIntensity(kg-CO2 e/sf/yr)0.10.8 99%87%

Wasem bodiedcarbonmodeled?No

TotalPredictedEm bodiedCarbonkgCO2 e Embodied Carbon Inte nsity kg CO 2 e / sf

Whattoolwasused? Other:

Whatisthetoolversion? Isbiogeniccarbonconsidered?(?)

IndicatetheLCAsystemboundary:Product(A1-A3)EndofLife(C1-C4) Beyond(D) Use(B1-B5)

IndicatetheLCAscope:SubstructureMEPSystem s

SuperstructureSite/Landscape Enclosure Interiors

MajorStructuralSystem ?(?)

Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?

Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?

4-Pe

NumberofmaterialswithEPDsM aterials

NotableMaterial1

NotableMaterial2

NotableMaterial3

NotableMaterial4

NotableMaterial5

NotableMaterial6

NotableMaterial7

NotableMaterial8

NotableMaterial9

Me asure 8 - Re so urce s Reasonable
Tally Late
ulators: Enter
our values into the yellow
ells. Enter non-numerical data int
0 (Reference
)
bodiedCar
Thn erear
yTallyor Athena
tr
ar
envi
8 55 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL
rcentofReusedFloorArea
Other: Calc
y
c
84.6
from 6-Energy
2-Em
bo
eavarietyoftoolsfor BuildCarbonNeutral,whichonly takesafewminutesandinputs.For amoredetailedanalysis,tr
"AnEnvironmentalProduct
ansp
entandcomparable
ronmentalim pactofproducts." collectedformaterialsusedand tallyupthetot alnumber.
PORTFOLIO
| NAIMO BAKAR

"AnEnvironmentalProduct transparentandcomparable environmentalim pactofproducts."

MajorStructuralSystem ?

Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?

Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?

collectedformaterialsusedand tallyupthetot alnumber.

NumberofmaterialswithEPDsM aterials

NotableMaterial1

NotableMaterial2

NotableMaterial3

NotableMaterial4

NotableMaterial5

NotableMaterial6

NotableMaterial7

NotableMaterial8

NotableMaterial9

Weighingandrecordingdumpster aswell.

ofm aterialsthatwererecycled, program s.

LocalMaterials: Don'tworryaboutstayingina yourbestjudgm enttodetermine whichmaterialswereharvestedor manufactured"locally"

Recycled/ReusedMaterials: Includeallmaterialsthatcontain somecom ponentoringredientthat isreusedorrecycled.

4-PercentofReusedFloorArea sf Pe rcent re used Pe
50%-Go
Howtheabovewastheabovenumberdeterm ined?90%-Be
tegy
tegy
tegy Total Mate rials Cost Pe rcent Totalcostofrecycledm aterials Totalcostofregionalm aterials NotableReusedorRecycledM aterial NotableReusedorRecycledM
0% $16,150
rcentWast
od
st! NotableStra
NotableStra
NotableStra
aterial NotableReusedorRecycledM aterial NotableRegionalMaterial NotableRegionalMaterial NotableRegionalMaterial
,000 0
56 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

CHANGE

The design of the structural modules means that the floor plans are ready for future changes if needed. By understanding the museum would be a dynamic building, the whole building is designed to handle change whereby the building structural system is based on the Warren Truss system. As a result, the 100’ cantilever creates a performance space that is flexible and can be used by the community.

The rainwater system is designed to handle the rainfall and will be able provide portable water for the irrigation of the landscape and its native plants.

Me asur e 9 - Change Reason 1-LocalHazardRes earchLocalHa HailNoEpidem icNo EarthquakesNoSocialUnrestNo DroughtNoPowerOutageNo4 Extrem eTemperaturesYesGridIns tabilityNo FloodingYesNo Re se arch Score 50 % 2-Resiliency Nothabi Passive 100 % Fullbac TypeofBackupPower Other (?) 3-BuildingLifespan Buildingdes ignlifespan20 0Years Wasthebuildingdes ignedfordisassem bly?Yes NotablelongevityStrategy NotablelongevityStrategy NotablelongevityStrategy backuppowerfromthedropdown. Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-num eric al data into the g reen c ell Fullbackupenergy Choosethelocalhazardsres earched Building Was re se arch conducted on the most like ly local hazards? Other: 36 % Museum Outdoor Performance Space/
57 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Render/ e
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET

The proposed SWELL Cultural Museum was conceived as a place of discovery for the current community and future generation. Its mission would be to recognize the dynamic component of learning and should be able to lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery. Therefore, focal point will be its interactive permanent collection that defines the building and unify all aspects of the design.

These collections would reveal information otherwise forgotten and educate on topics related to the site and should be able to take visitors on an experiential journey that would structure the much-needed dialogue between the past and present.

Measure 10 - Discovery Reasonable 1-LeveofCommissioning BasicCommissioningYesEnhancedCommissioning(ThirdParty) YesMonitoring-BasedCommissioning EnclosureCommissioningYes Commissioning Score60% 2-LevelofPostOccupancyEngagement Contacttheowner/OccupanttoseehowthingsaregoingNo NoDataloggingofindoorenvironmentalmeasurements YesPostoccupancyenergyanalysis FormalonsitedaylightmeasurementsYesDevelopandsharestrategiestoim provethebuilding'sPerformance SharecollecteddatawithbuildingoccupantsYesTeachoccupantsandoperatorshowtoim provebuildingperformance 30% 3-LeveofTransparency YesNo PresentthedesignoftheprojecttotheprofessionYesPresentoutcomesandlessonsearnedtotheprofessionNo PresentthedesignoftheprojecttothepublicYesPresentoutcomesandlessonslearnedtothepublicNo PublishpostoccupancydatafromthebuildingNoYes other:other: Transparency Score 40% 4-LeveofOccupantFeedbackNobody BuildingOpe Architect2 Chooseone Mostoccup Feedback Score 40% Alloccupant Who has access to performance feedback? Selectthelevelofoccupancy feedback Architect Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Which of the following did you do to share the lessons of the project? Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells Enter non-numerical data into the gree Selectallthepostoccupancy strategiesthatwereemployed. Selectallthetransparency strategiesthatwereemployed.
Which of the following did
you
do to stay engaged with the building?
58 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET DISCOVERY

rOccupant6.1gal/occupant/day

PotableWaterUs eIntensity2 9.0gal/sf/day

PercentRainwaterUs e9%%oftot alwat erusefromcollectedrainwater PercentGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%oftot alwat erusefromgreyorblackwater -1 23 %

To

highlight
outputs
59 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE Top Ten Toolkit Super Spreadsheet COTE_Super_Spreadsheet_Version_2 .3 _Bakar.xlsx Measure2-DesignforCommunity WalkScore0.99 TransitScore1 BikeScore0.82 Comm unityEngagementLevel43 % 444,3 50kgCO2 e/year Measure3-DesignforEcology PercentofSit eVegetated-Post-Development7% PercentofSit eVegetated-Pre-Development100% IncreaseinPercentofSit eVegetated-93 % 9% 125% EcologicalDesignScore5 0% TotalAnnualPot ableWaterUseperOccupant1,89 2gal/occupant/year TotalDailyPotableWaterUs epe
The summery
all the
for every measure take for the Museum Project.
SUMARY
Perc
ta
Percen
ta
82 % No Rainwate
% 80 % Measure5-DesignforEconomy $124Dollar(USD)/sf $140Dollar(USD)/sf 12 % 80 %NettoGros s 14 % Me as ur ed Measure4-DesignforWater Pr ed ic te d
talAnnualPot ableWaterUseperOccupant15 4gal/occupant/year TotalDailyPotableWaterUs eperOccupant0.5gal/occupant/day PotableWaterUs eIntensity2 .4gal/sf/day
entRainwaterUs e0%%to
lwaterusefromcollectedrainwater
tGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%to
lwaterusefromgreyorblackwater
rManagedOn-Site45
60 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR Body Copy CAP HEADER (CHARACTER STYLE) Body Copy y2gal//ay PercentRainwaterUs e0%%totalwaterusefromcollectedrainwater PercentGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%totalwaterusefromgreyorblackwater 82 % No RainwaterManagedOn-Site45 % 80 % Measure5-DesignforEconomy $124Dollar(USD)/sf $140Dollar(USD)/sf 12 % 80 %NettoGros s 14 % Measure6-DesignforEnergy NetsiteEUI0 .7kBtu/sf/yr GrosssiteEUI1 .3kBtu/sf/yr 99 % 0kg-CO2 e/sf/yr PercentfromRenewableEnergy50 % 99 % NetsiteEUI3 .0kBtu/sf/yr GrosssiteEUI4 .7kBtu/sf/yr 95 % 1kg-CO2 e/sf/yr PercentfromRenewableEnergy36 % 87 % 0.30W/ sf 65 % 40 % Me asure 7 - Design for Wellness Qualityviews9 1%%occupiedarea Operablewindows60 %%occupiedarea Daylitarea(sDA300/50%)0 %%occupiedarea ASECompliantArea(ASE1000,250 )0 %%occupiedarea Individualtherm alcontrol0.0Occupantspertherm ostat 100% Peakm easuredCO290 0ppm Peakm easuredVOC0ppb 0M aterials Chem icalsofConcernAvoided0Chemicals Me asure 8 - Design for R esources Em bodiedcarbonintensity0 .0kg-C0 2 e/sf Totalem bodiedcarbon8 5kg-C0 2 e Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNoY/N Biogeniccarbonconsidered?0Y/ N NumberofEPDsCollected0 0% Me as ur Pr ed ic te d Me as ur ed
61 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR Body Copy CAP HEADER (CHARACTER STYLE) Body Copy ASECompliantArea(ASE1000,250 )0 %%occupiedarea Individualtherm alcontrol0.0Occupantspertherm ostat 100% Peakm easuredCO290 0ppm Peakm easuredVOC0ppb 0M aterials Chem icalsofConcernAvoided0Chemicals Me asure 8 - Design for R esources Em bodiedcarbonintensity0 .0kg-C0 2 e/sf Totalem bodiedcarbon8 5kg-C0 2 e Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNoY/N Biogeniccarbonconsidered?0Y/ N NumberofEPDsCollected0 0% 0% Percentofrecycledcontentofbuildingmaterials Percentofregionalmaterials Measure9-DesignforChange LocalHazardResearchScore5 0% 100% BuildingDesignLifespan20 0Years Measure10-DesignforDiscovery LevelofCom missioningScore60 % 30 % 40 % LevelofFeedback(Ongoingdiscovery)4 0%

RESULTS

COTE SPREADSHEETS

The overall project reached its main target, which was to recognize the dynamic component of learning that should lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery. The main objective of the museum was to create a museum that celebrates the history of North End and integrates sustainable system throughout the building to increase its performance in community engagements, ecology use of water, energy, and wellness. Through the Harborwalk (public access walkway) and Cultural Connector (Harbor Cruise), public pool, and green public spaces, the Museum maintains its connection with the city and its community.

The museum project main goal is to celebrates its community rich past by creating a didactic building that will engage, inspire, and celebrate the site’s history. Through integrated design the museum will introduces sustainable strategies that will understand and support the existing site conditions. By analyzing the results from all the measures; the SWELL Cultural Center can utilize the different measures highlighted on the COTE Spreadsheet to understand how the building will perform in the future.

Thispagecomparesm etricsagainsttheirbenchmark alongascalefrom"Baseline"to"VeryHigh Performance"

Me asure 2: Design For Community

WalkScore0%100% TransitScore0

00 % BikeScore0%100% CommunityEngagem entLevel0

Me asure 3: Design For Ecology

PercentofSit eVegetated-Post-Development0%100% PercentofSit eVegetated-Pre-Developm ent0

00 % Vegetatedareaincreas e0

00 % PercentofSit ewithNavePlanngs0

00 % PercentofV egetatedAreawithNavePlanngs0

00 % EcologicalDes ignScore0

Potablewaterreducon0%-1

bleWaterUs edforIrrigaonYe

Ve ry High Pe rformance
Base line
%1
%1 00 %
%1
%1
%1
%1
%1
PredictedM easured
23 %8 2%100%
)No(1 ) RainwaterManagedOn-Site0%100% EsmatedRunoQuality0 %1 00 % \ Cons truconcos tReduconfromtheBenchm ark0 %>50 % Eciencyraopercentim provem ent0%>5 0% PredictedM easured NetenergyreduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %9 5%105% Percentfromrenewableenergy0%50 %3 6%100% PercentOperaonalCarbonReduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %8 7%100% LighngPowerDensity%Reducon0%75 % Qualityviews0 %1 00 % Operablewindows0%100% Re sponse 14 % 12 % 80 % 43 % 82 % 100% 7% 100% 9% 125% 99 % Me asure 4: Design For Wate r 1 45 % Me asure 5: Design For Economy -9 3% 50 % Me asure 6: Design For Energy Me asure 7: Design For We llness 65 % 91 % 60 % 62 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
00 %
Pota
s(0
| NAIMO BAKAR

RainwaterManagedOn-Site0%100%

EsmatedRunoQuality0 %1 00 %

Cons truconcos tReduconfromtheBenchm ark0 %>50 %

Eciencyraopercentim provem ent0%>5 0%

PredictedM easured

NetenergyreduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %9 5%105%

Percentfromrenewableenergy0%50 %3 6%100%

PercentOperaonalCarbonReduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %8 7%100%

LighngPowerDensity%Reducon0%75 %

Qualityviews0 %1 00 %

Operablewindows0%100%

Daylitarea(s DA3 00/50%)0 %1 00 %

ASECompliantArea(ASE1 000 ,2 50)0%100%

IsCO2Meas ured?No(0)Yes(1 )

IsV OCm easured?No(0)Yes(1 )

Materialswithhealthcercaons010 +

Chem icalsofConcernAvoided01 0+

Em bodiedcarbonintens ity(kg-C0 2e/s f)

Totalem bodiedcarbon(kg-C0 2e)

Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNo(0 )Yes(1)

Biogeniccarboncons idered?No(0 )Yes(1)

Percentofreusedoorarea0 %1 00 %

Percentofconstruconwastediverted0 %1 00 %

Percentofrecycledcontentofbuildingmaterials0 %1 00 %

Percentofregionalmaterials0 %1 00 %

PercentofinstalledwoodthatisFSCCered0%100%

Me asure 9: Design For Change

LocalHazardRes earchScore0

FunconalityWithou

\
%1 00 %
tPower(Res iliency)Score0%100% BuildingDesignLifes pan3020 0
asure 10: Design For Discove ry LevelofCom missioningScore0 %1 00 % LevelofPos tOccupancyEvaluaonScore0%100% LevelofKnowledgeDis tribuon/Trans parencyScore0 %1 00 % LevelofFeedbac
covery)0 %1 00 % 40 % 40 % 0% 0% 60 % 30 % 0 20 0 100% 50 % 14 % 12 % 80 % 45 % Me asure 5: Design For Economy Me asure 6: Design For Energy
asure 7: Design For We llness 0 0 Me asure 8: Design For Re source s 0.00 85 0 FALSE 1 65 % 91 % 60 % 0% 63 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Me
k(Ongoingdis
Me

THE BIG IDEA:

CARBON OVER TIME:

CARBON OVER TIME:

To talkgo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m:

Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total

1Year444,35099,16385543,598 20Year8,887,0001,983,2678510,870,352 100Year44,435,0009,916,3378554,351,421 200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758

Design200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758

To talPercentageo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m:

Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total

1Year81. 7%18.2%0.0%100.0% 20Year81.8%18. 2%0. 0%100.0% 100Year81. 8%18.2%0.0%100.0% 200Year81. 8%18.2%0.0%100.0% Design0Year81.8%18. 2%0. 0%100.0%

THE BIG IDEA:
Energy/year 18
Buil di ng Mate ri al s
Commut
ar
% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0%
Commute/ye ar 82%
%
0%
e/ye
82
Desi
To ta
tageo fCarbonDio xideEquivalen
ro m: Life
an Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total
.2%0.0%100.0%
0%100.0%
%0.0%100.0% 20
.2%0.0%100.0% Desi
0%100.0% Commute/ye ar 82% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0% Commute/ye ar 82% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0% 64 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
To talkgo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m: Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total 1Year444,35099,16385543,598 20Year8,887,0001,983,2678510,870,352 100Year44,435,0009,916,3378554,351,421 200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
gn200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
lPercen
tsf
sp
1Year81. 7%18
20Year81.8%18. 2%0.
100Year81. 8%18.2
0Year81. 8%18
gn0Year81.8%18. 2%0.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. “Shzeikh District.” 2021. Wikipedia. November 22, 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_District#/media/File:Sheikh_mountain.

2. Burianski, Dr. Markus, Mark Clarke, Dr. Federico Kunle, and Gwen Wackwitz. 2021. “Climate Change Litigation in Africa: Current Status and Future Developments | White & Case LLP.” www.whitecase.com. November 9, 2021. https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/africa-focus-autumn-2021/climate-change-litigation-africa.

3. Global Footprint Network. n.d. “How Many Planets Does It Take to Sustain Your Lifestyle?” Www.footprintcalculator.org. Accessed February 11, 2022. https://www.footprintcalculator. org/home/en.

4. US EPA, Office of Air and Radiation. n.d. “Carbon Footprint Calculator | Climate Change | US EPA.” Www3.Epa.gov. Accessed February 10, 2022. https://www3.epa.gov/carbonfootprint-calculator.

5. Wikipedia Contributors. 2022. “File:Köppen Climate Types Massachusetts.png.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:K%C3%B6ppen_Climate_ Types_Massachusetts.png.

6.Berger, Alan & Wilson, Michael & Susskind, Jonah & Zeckhauser, Richard. (2020). Theorizing the resilience district: Design-based decision making for coastal climate change adaptation. Journal of Landscape Architecture. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Regional-hydrology-diagram-and-outline-of-proposed-Boston-resilience-districts_ fig6_343034839

7. “Sea Level Rise and Tidal Flooding in Boston, Massachusetts | Union of Concerned Scientists.” 2016. Www.ucsusa.org. Union of Concerned Scientist. March 31, 2016. https://www. ucsusa.org/resources/sea-level-rise-and-tidal-flooding-boston-massachusetts.

8. “What Style Is That Again? A Two-Part History of Boston Architecture | Boston by Foot.” n.d. www.bostonbyfoot.org. Boston By Foot. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://www. bostonbyfoot.org/what-style-again-two-part-history-boston-architecture.

9. Cook, Greg. 2016. “The 50 Best Works of Public Art in Greater Boston, Ranked | WBUR News.” Wbur.org. WBUR. August 29, 2016. https://www.wbur.org/news/2016/08/29/bostonbest-public-art.

10. Sorathia, Vibhuti. 2020. “15 Places Architects Must Visit in Boston - Rethinking the Future.” RTF | Rethinking the Future. January 28, 2020. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/ architects-lounge/a546-15-places-architects-must-visit-in-boston/.

11. “Ein Kulinarisches Wochenende in Boston, Massachusetts.” 2022. Visit the USA. March 14, 2022. https://www.visittheusa.de/experience/ein-kulinarisches-wochenende-bostonmassachusetts.

12. “Will Climate Change End Waterfront Living? Not If You Can Afford It.” 2020. Worth. April 22, 2020. https://www.worth.com/will-climate-change-end-waterfront-living-not-if-youcan-afford-it/.

65 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 09 | BIBLIOGRAPHY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

15. “News + Events.” n.d. Boston Waterfront Partners. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://bostonwaterfrontpartners.org/news-events/.

16. “City Holds Hearing on Connect Historic Boston Bike Trail Project.” 2014. Boston Magazine. February 26, 2014. https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/02/26/connecthistoric-boston-bike-trail-

17. https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/patterns/pattern-2-window-area.html

18. “Daylighting Pattern Guide.” 2021. Advancedbuildings.net. 2021. https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/pattern-slideshow/Pattern%201_%20Floor%20Plate%20Geometry.html

19. aglassrepairbiz. 2015. “Why It Is Beneficial to Double Glaze Glass.” A Glass Repair Biz. September 14, 2015. https://aglassrepairbiz.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/why-it-isbeneficial-to-double-glaze-glass/.

20. AZoBuild. 2006. “Different Types of Cement - a Guide.” AZoBuild.com. November 24, 2006. https://www.azobuild.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=7959.

21. “DILLER SCOFIDIO + RENFRO, Pygmalion Karatzas · Institute of Contemporary Art.” n.d. Divisare. https://divisare.com/projects/330354-diller-scofidio-renfro-pygmalion-karatzasinstitute-of-contemporary-art.

22. “Stainless Bright Bars and Stainless Steel Structurals.” n.d. Montanstahl. Accessed May 17, 2022. https://www.montanstahl.com/products/stainless-steel-structurals-bright-bars/.

66 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 09 | BIBLIOGRAPHY
68 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.