MATERIALS ASSEMBLIES
STEEL/CONCRETE
GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart
The GWP Sankey diagram compare the embodied carbon for the demo model.
By comparing the steel and concrete in the project, and from the chart of the Sankey it appears that concrete has the highest area of embodied carbon.
EC3
Floor
41 SECTION 06 | LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
WINDOW WALL RATIO
SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM
The assignment asks for the measurements for the window wall ratio for the museum’s facade. This is calculated by finding the total glazing window area and dividing it with the total wall area. This calculations will determine the window to wall ratio and the wall to window ratio.
NORTH
WWR% = (25700 sq.ft / 39549 sq.ft /)
= 65%
SOUTH
WWR% = (16210 sq.ft / 40524 sq.ft /)
= 40%
EAST
WWR% = ( 4718 sq.ft / 6591 sq.ft /)
= 71%
WEST
WWR% = ( 2576 sq.ft / 5152 sq.ft /)
= 50%
ROOF SKYLIGHT
WWR% = ( 3777 sq.ft / 55277 sq.ft /)
= 7%
NORTH SOUTH
EAST WEST
42 SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING ENVIRONMENTAL
Immigrant Museum - REVIT Model
PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
DAYLIGHTING PATTERN GUIDE
PATTERN 1-PLAN
SWELL CULTURAL MUSEUM
1-2 GENERAL MOTORS OFFICE BUILDING
Location: Detroit, MI (1917)
Architect: Albert Kahn and Associates
Floor Plate Area: 59,000 sf
Perimeter Length: 2540 ft
Max. Dist. to Perimeter: 32 ft
Percentage of Area Within 20’ of a Window: 90%
The General Motors Office Building designed by Albert Kahn in 1917 exhibits a building organization that is fundamentally designed around the use of daylight as the primary source of illumination. Kahn designed a building that was almost entirely perimeter to maximize access to daylight. To do this he created thin “finger plan” bars that were spaced far enough apart from one another to avoid reducing access to daylight at the opposing office bar. The first floor, originally designed as an auto showroom
block, far too deep to be daylit from the perimeter alone. However, rooftop skylights located between the office bars allow diffuse “toplight” to illuminate the center of the floor plate and to balance the brightness from the perimeter. Corridor spaces are deliberately illuminated at a very low level to allow users’ eyes to adjust to indoor light levels while moving toward their destination within the building.
Similar to the General Motors Office Building, the proposed museum layout is organized and designed around the use of daylight. Most of the building perimeter for the three blocks maximizes access to daylight, whereby the building opens up to the waterfront and the city views wih expansive windows.
FINGER PLAN
The summer glare and overheating are controlled by use of sun shading for both east and southern facade, and use of insulating glass. The floor plates for the museum is 60 feet and 75 feet, which allows the museum to be illuminated throughout the day. The exhibition spaces have very low level of illumination to allow uses’ eyes to adjust and enjoy the art. PROPOSED GROUND
FLOOR
43 SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO |
BAKAR
Perspective and Plans - Photo Credit/ Advanced Building
NAIMO
ENTR
ENTRY
RR
DAYLIGHTING PATTERN GUIDE
PATTERN 2: 75% GLAZING
WINDOW AREA (HORIZONTAL WINDOW)
A horizontal band of windows at 75% percent of the wall area (nearly 100% of the interior wall area) provides daylight illumination that meets or exceeds commonly accepted minimum daylight illumination criteria at more than 90 percent of the adjacent 26’-0” section. Minimal contrast remains between the interior surfaces and the glazing, and the brightness of the “back” wall (at left) provides a balance of brightness across the section.
WINDOW AREA (HORIZONTAL WINDOW) - SWELL MUSEUM
The window ratio that most closely matches my façade condition is number 7, which has 75% glazing. Similarly, the facade of the building is comprised of insulating glass and channel glass that controls the amount of daylight. The Museum uses daylight to reduce internal heat loads from electric lighting during peak cooling times to enable passive cooling. To achieve this goal, no portion of the building is further
than 10 ft from a window. Solar heat gains and glare are controlled through active and fixed shading devices that are place on the East and South facade.
Light Level Ratio- Photo Credit/ Advanced Building
North Facade - Render
44 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 07 | DAYLIGHTING
North Elevation- Revit Model
COTE
architects informaon ydisplaythe suresof formanceor TopTen and hmarking orolder. improvethe SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
SPREADSHEET
Thisrstpageassignsbenchmarksbasedonbuilding-specic,naonaldat afortheprojecttobecomparedagainst
Ifauser-denedbenchmarkispresent,thenaonalbenchmarkswillbeoverridden.
Thirdpa
Th
Th
Step 2: Review y our benchm arks to ev aluate y our projec ts performance. BasicProjectInformaon Transporta on ProjectNameSWELL:CulturaMuseumTotalAnnual 3,458,471 kg-CO2e/yr ProjectAddress268CommercialStreet,NorthEndTotalAnnualperOccupant 1,729 kg-CO2e/occupant/yr apt.,suite,etc CityBoston Water StateM ATotalAnnualWaterUse 1,693,958 gal/yr ZipCode2110WUI-WaterUseIntensity (Program-based) 13.0 gal/sf/yr User-De ned Benchmark Source ASHRAEClimateZone5A(Link)WUI-WaterUseIntensity (User-De ned) gal/sf/yr OtherClimateZone(?:WaterUseperOccupant 847 gal/occupant/yr TotalBuildingArea(?)130,500Grosssf SiteArea(?)130,500sf Energy Regularlyoccupiedspace(?)50,000sfTotalAnnualEnergyUse 8,384,625 kBtu/yr Avgdailyoccupancy(?)2,000PeopleEUI-EnergyUseIntensity (Program-based) 64.3 kBtu/sf/yr Peakoccupancy(?)3,400PeopleEUI-EnergyUseIntensity (User-de ned) kBtu/sf/yrUseZeroTooldesignatedEUI FTEs(?)200PeopleEnergyUseperOccupant 4,192 kBtu/occupant/yr Projectcompleonyear onAnnualdaysofoperaon (?)312Days Opera onal Carbon Emissions Avg.dailyhoursofoperaon (?)8hoursTotalAnnualCarbonEmissions 780,188 kg-CO2e/yr TotalCons truconCost(?)16,150,000USDCarbonUseIntensity (Program-based) 6.0 kg-CO2e/sf/yr User-De ned Benchmark Source FAR1.00CarbonUseIntensity (User-De ned) kg-CO2e/sf/yr Cost/sf123. $75CarbonEmissionsperOccupant 390 kg-CO2e/occupant/yr sf/occupant-Avg.65 COTETop10sf/occupant-Peak38 Electric Ligh ng ValueAnnualhoursofoperaon2,496LighngPowerDensity 0.86 W/sf User-De ned Benchmark Source LighngPowerDensity (User-De ned) W/sf BuildingProgram ProgramBreakdown(? %ofBuildingArea BuildingProgram#1Museum35% BuildingProgram#2Food-Service5% BuildingProgram#3Educaon-Other5% BuildingProgram#4SelfStorage5% BuildingProgram#5Oce5% BuildingProgram#6Reta
Total must equal 100% 100% AddionalBuildingInformaon ProjectTypeNewConstrucon SiteEnvironment(?)Urban
eviouslyDevelopedSiteParally IsthermanAI
gnatoryNo
port
ADDxNo
il-General5% BuildingProgram#7ServicesGeneral40% BuildingProgram#8
Pr
A2030Si
Re
edintheAI
rtyrangsystem1None
yrangsystem2
irdpart
ystem3 Ifother,specify Step 1: Fill out the below basic informa on of your projec t
irdpartyrangs
SUPER
ForCOTETopTenenergyreducons,thebenchmarkshouldbeuser-denedusingArchitecture2030'sZeroTool.Oponaluser-dened benchmarkscanbeenteredaboveasawayoftrackinganyspecicbenchmarkingresearchthattheteamconducted. INTRODUCTION 45 ENVRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION
The proposed museum is a community center that lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery, and serves as a dynamic component of learning.The Proposal
takes visitors on an experiential journey and aim to structure a much-needed dialogue; whereby the museum shares stories of the immigrants and migrant
experience throughout the building. Comprised of three volumes that features a truss that cantilever 100’ above the harbor,the museum employs a hybrid
facade, and intergrates sustainable systems throughout the site. The outdoor and indoor exhibition spaces serves as the heart of the project for the community.
COMMUNITY
Placebased. EC OLOGY
Aquifer/ watershed, sharedresource.
Clim ateappropriate landscape.Rainwater WATER
Financialresilience.biophilicdesign.Low maintenancedesign
Districtsystems design
Carbonemissionsfrom quality.
Locallysourcedmaterials.
Watersavings,wat er independence
Energysavingsfrom treatmentofwater.
Waterquality.
EC ONOMY
Lifecyclecost,Lifecycle analysis buildingoccupants.
ENERGY
WELLNESS
Environmentally consciousmaterial anddisposal.
Socialequityisamajor componentofresilience. oceanrise.
surfacewaterqualityand enjoyment,watershed
Waterresilience. changes,drought.
Mindfulpresenceof water.
Durabilityand maintenanceofmaterials growthandchange. strategies
Embodiedcarbonof materials.materialtransparency.
RESOURCES
Carbon'sroleinclimate change. Passivesurvivability
Measurementand Trackinghealthim pacts.Futureadaptability.
Embodiedcarbonsavings CHANGE heatmaps. Biodiversity.
Post-occupancy DISC OVERY
HOLISTICSUSTAINABILITY1-Whatisthebigidea?
46 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
DESIGN FOR EQUITTABLE COMMUNITIES
Walkscore.comgeneratessev eral scoresforwalkabilityand comm unityresourcesforany addres sintheUS.Thehigherthe score,them orepedestrian-friendly
The Museum proposal is designed with the intent of advancing social equity with the North End and its surrounding neighborhoods in Boston. The site is adjacent to the waterfront, and it was once a part of Boston Harbor before dock extensions and fill eventually solidified its status as part of Boston’s North End. It has served as a shipyard, a station and hotel, a mill, a sugar refinery, and a cold storage warehouse before being turned into a parking lot.
BasedonSherryAArnstein's,"A wasthelev elofcomm unity engagementduringthedesignand
In addition, the proposed site is among the waterfront site that the Harborwalk wraps continuously along the Boston shoreline. This public access established an edge between the City and its harbor; as a result, it provides a place for recreation, and creates a zone in which to defend against high tides.
The proposed designed introduced outdoor community performance space, sculptor gardens, and public pool that can be used throughout the day by the community. The building also steps with the site, merging the pedestrian experience by a space-defining ramp that serves all.
alculatorcanproduce goodres ultsforallbuildingsthat peopletrav eltoandfrom
Calc ulators: Enter y ou r valu es into th e yellow c ells 1-Walk/Trans it/BikeScore WalkScore99% TransitScore100% BikeScore82% 2-Comm unityEngagement Comm unityEngagementLevel Community Engage me nt Score 43 % Propos edBaselineUnit AverageDailyOccupancy2 00 0 (?)20 0 10 %7 6%WeeklyAvg. Averageroundtripcomm ute2 52 5.4M iles 55Days 5050weeks AverageCarFuelEconomy(?)2524 .9mpg Averagecarbonemiss ionpergallonofgasoline8.898.89kg-CO2 e/gal 22 2 1,72 9kg-CO2 e/occupant/yr 444 ,3 50 #######kg-CO2 e/yr 87.2% Thiss im plecalculatorcom paresyour s urv ey(oraneducatedguess )to distanceandav eragempgofthe building'soccupants . projects,thec
47 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY
Water Located in North End, Sargent’s Wharf is an active parking lot in the neighborhood that experiences a lot of flooding during high tides and storms. By understanding that the site falls under the Greenway Underlay District, the proposed design aims to create a resilient river front design.
As a result, the proposal explored the idea of converting the site into a climate resilient waterfront by introducing green buffer spaces with native plants along the edges. This was achieved by elevating the landscape that creates a temporary flood barrier, improving the Harborwalk, introducing living shorelines, and increased planting and shade area.
Me asure 3 - De sign f or Eco logy Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells Reasonab Greenroofarea-sf-sf Buildingfootprintarea54,071sf-sf Surfaceparkingarea-sf95sf 67,553sf-sf Areaofthetotalsitethatisvegetated8,876sf130,405sf SiteArea130,500sf130,500sf Pe rcent ve ge tate d6.8% 99.9% Increase in Pe rcent of vegetated are a-93.1% 11,133sf Areaofthetotalsitecoveredbyturfgrass-Pos tDevelopment5,058sf 125.4% Turf grass - Perce nt of Site 57.0% 8.5% BiodiversityYes DarkSkiesNo BirdSafetyNo Yes No Yes Yes Other:No Ecological Design Score50.0% im plem entedbytheprojectto helpus ersbecomem oreawareor connectedwiththesiteandtheir regionalecosystem s. Theseareal concern,so Determ inetheareaofthesite fromthesitearea.Greenroofsare includedinthepercentvegetated Inm ostcase increaseas adaptedforthelocalclim ateand ecosystems.Use"turfgrass"for anylandscapeareaswith thelocalclim ate. andasm al isusual
3-LevelofEcologicalDesign 1-VegetatedArea PostDe ve lopment PreDe ve lopment 48 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
lypre
Connection to the Waterfront/ Render
Sculpture Garden/ Render/ ender
DESIGN FOR WATER
Water systems of the Museum Building are designed to integrate the project into the local ecosystem and ensure the project lives within its water means. By understanding that every drop that leaves the site is a potential polluter further down the stream, the museum utilizes permeable pavers, bioswales, and subsurface storage.
Rainfalls is harvested and channeled to the roof whereby its filtered and stored in a cistern, and this is the primary source for portable water. In addition, if there is a overflow from the cistern the water is directed to the bioswales system and is infiltrated into the ground.
Reasonable
Step 1: Benchmark Water Use I
WaterUseIntensity13.0gal/sf/yr
DailyAvgOccupancy2000Enclosed 312
Step 2: Indoor Water use
Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal)
Toilet1.11.2uses2,640823,6 80 Urinal*0.50.6uses600187,2 00 Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Public
Lavatory0.20.9minutes360112,3 20Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2m inutes384119,8 08 Warehous
Total daily wate r use12,984 gal/day-
Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr
Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells Yes-baseline
NoNo-highper
Proposed Design
Base line #1: All Turf Base line #2:
IrrigatedArea(potableornon-potable)16,191sf16,19116,191 Climate WarmH um id3.33.33.3
PlantQualityFactor(Qf)Waterstress0.40.40.4 Turf110.2W 0.90.750.9 14,794 17,753 2,959
ProposedDesignComparison
49 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
| NAIMO BAKAR
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
Proposed Design
Base line #1: All Turf Base line #2:
IrrigatedArea(potableornon-potable)16,191sf16,19116,191 Climate WarmH um id3.33.33.3 PlantQualityFactor(Qf)Waterstress0.40.40.4 Turf110.2W 0.90.750.9 14,794 17,753 2,959
Month gal 17%-400%
January31%4,586.2 2) Qf - Plant Qu February38%5,621.8No
March60%8,876.6
April77%11,391.6
May88%13,018.9
June99%14,646.3
July100%14,794.3 August100%14,794.3
Septem ber77%11,391.6Sprinkle October60%8,876.6 November38%5,621.8 December30%4,438.3 118,058 gal/yr
Yes-baseline NoNo-highperfo
edDesignComp
Reasonable Step 1: Benchmark Wate r Use In WaterUseIntensity13.0gal/sf/yr DailyAvgOccupancy2000Enclosed 312 Step 2: Indoor Wate r us e Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal) Toilet1.1 1.2uses2,640823,680 Urinal*0.0 5.6uses600187,200 Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Public Lavatory0.0 2.9minutes360112,320Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2minutes384119,808R Warehous Total daily water use 12,984 gal/day Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells 50 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Propos
arison
Step 2: Indoor Wate r us e
Wate r Use Summary
Flow R ate (GPF|GPM)Usage / day / occupant Daily Wate r Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal)
Toilet1.1 1.2uses2,640823,680
3-Stor
Urinal*0.0 5.6uses600187,200Public
Be nchmarkPre dicted ImprovementMeasure dI mproveme nt 1,693,9 583,784,946 -123% 307,296 82% 8471,892154 13.029.02
Shower150.3m inutes9,0002,808,000Publicord Lavatory0.0 2.9minutes360112,320Re Kitchenfaucet1.280.2minutes384119,808R
Total daily water use 12,984 gal/day
Total annual water use 4,051,008 gal/yr
TypeofStormEvent2yr-24hr StormEvent3.4in StormEvent0.28 Storm waterStorage10000cf
Surface Area (sf)Stormwate r (cf)
Roof0.
ilyAvgupancy 312
Warehous
mwaterM anagedOn-site
51 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
954,07115,32013,788 Im pervious0.967,55319,14017,226 Turf0.25,0581,433287 0.0511,1333,154158 Semi-Pervious0.5-7,315(2,073)(1,036) Sub Total 130,50036,97530,422M 20,422 Pe rcentage of Stormwater Managed O n-site 44.8% 80% 2yr TotalAnnualPotableWaterUse(gal/yr) WaterUseIntensity(gal/sf/yr) TotalAnnualWaterUseperOccupant(gal/occupant/yr)
Enterthepublishedcosttoconstruct similarbuildingsintheregionand listthesource.
With the use of RS Means data we were able to find the cost per square foot for the of the project. The constrcution cost benchmark is based on simlilar project within the region, and its used to compare the actual cost.
On the Estimated operation cost tab, the amount is based on the Energy Spreadsheet data to highlight the reduction energy cost.
Building space efficiency starts to analyze the ratio of building typology, circulation, operation and maintenance. The amount is based on benchmark source from US General Service Adminiatration (GSA).
,thesourceofthe achieved
$140
$123
12
$7,
Calc
Enter
our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-numerical data into the green cells.
Measure 5 - De sign f or Eco no my Reas
.00/sfBenchmarkSourceRSMeansData
.75/sf
%
806.00/yearM ajorStrategyRenewables Fromcleaning/yearM ajorStrategy Durabilityinvestments/yearMajorStrategy Other/yearM ajorStrategy Other/yearM ajorStrategy Total$7,806.00 /year 70%BenchmarkSourceGSA 80%M ajorStrategy 14%
ulators:
y
Therearemanydesignstrategiesfor Includedesignstrategies,alongwith andismostvaluableasathought exerciseThecostsavingsfrom resourcestoconstruct,operate,and maintainEnterthetypicalbuilding asabenchmark
52 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE
SUPER SPREADSHEET DESIGN FOR ECONOMY
DESIGN FOR ENERGY
The museum uses a dynamic approach to be able to achieve thermal comfort by understanding Boston’s climate. As a result, the proposed design considers regional weather, temperature, humidity, clothing, and activity level on all the spaces to manage energy required by the mechanical systems.
The Museum covered with a highperformance building envelope that comprises of insulating glass. Continuous exterior insulation, and carefully sealed air barriers to reduce heating and cooling energy. The Photovoltaic panels are placed on the roof to as a clean energy source that’s renewable to meet the building demand.
ep2Filloutthepre
ctedenergy typeUseenergymodeloutputsor measuredenergyOn-siterenewables requiregrosmeteringnotnetmeteringvalues. Ifanenergymodelwasnotcompleted measuredenergyuseIfauetype wanotusedleavethemonthl inputsasZero
Step3Enterthelocalenergycostor eachfuetypeavailable.Thecosof
Step4ForprojectsusingChilled Wateforcooling,usethedropdown toassigntheappropriatecarbon conversionactobysystemtypeThe chiller
h4,283.02,142.012,000.04,900.0GJ947
e00643 April4,283.02,142.013,000.06,500.0kWh341214Fu
il0.0742 May4,283.02,142.017,500.07,100.0MWh3412.14D
ter00664 June4,283.02,142.020,000.06,000.0Lbs1.194DistrictChilledWater-lectriDriven0.0527
July4,283.02,142.022,000.05,800.0kLbs11940.0739
August4,283.02,142.018,000.04,800.0MLbs1194000DistricChilledWater-NaturaGasEngineDrivenChiller0.0493
September4,283.02,142.016,500.05,800.0Therms100
October4,283.02,142.014,000.06,300.0kg2.632
November4,283.02,142.012,500.04,650.0TonHours12
December4,283.02,142.011,000.03,700.0cf1.026
Total51,39600025,704180,80000065,050ccf102.6
Step1Calculatethetotainstalled building Step2Thebenchmarkvalueisauto-
Measure 6 - Design for Energy Reasonable RangesSources Step 1 Benchmark BenchmarkSiteEUI64.3kBtusyrBenchmarkSiteAnnualEnergykBtu/yr 6.0kgCO2esf/ykgCO2e/yr WaASHRAEStandard90.1usedtodeterminepEUI?Whattoolwasusedtomodeenergy? WhatversionoASHRAEStandard90.1wasused?Other: Other:Whatthetoolversion? Step 3 Record Monthly Data Grid Electricity Natura Ga District Chilled Wate District Steam Onsite (? Grid Electricity Natura Ga District Chilled Water District team Onsite (? Month kWhMBtuMBtukLbskWhkWhMBtuMBtuLbskWh EnergyUniFactortoconver tokBtu January4,283.02,142.011,000.05,000.0kBtu1Electricity0.1182 February4,283.02,142.013,300.04,500.0MBtu1000NaturalGas0.0531 Ma
rc
.817Propan
elO
istricSteamHoWa
Tota
CostoEnergypesele
9-0.02$0.12$0.94$0.18$9.39-0.02 DistrictChilledWaterType(iapplicable CarbonConversionFactorkg-COe/kBtu)0.1180.0530.0530.066-0.1180.1180.0530.0530.0660.118 e yr)20,731000 -10,36872,926 000 26,238 Step 4 Review Outputs Energy Predicted Measured Predicted Measured 175,370616,915Annual(kg-CO2e/yr)10,36399,163 87,706221,960Annualntensitykg-COesf/yr)01 NeAnnualkBtuyr)87,665394,95599%87% PercenofTotalEnergyfromRenewableEnergy50.0%36.0% GrossEnergyUsentensity(kBtu/fyr)1.34.7 Cost Predicted Measured NepeArea(kBtu/fyr)0.73.0NetAnnualCost($)$5,653$20,395 99.0%95.3% LPDTablesbySpace Installed(LPD)0.30W/s Benchmark(LPD)0.86W/s 65% North0.40East0.20South0.35West0.20 BuildingAggregate0.40 Usethesecellstodocumenthetools andreferencecodesusedtocalculate
dictedandMeasured MonthlyEnergyUse measurementoreachfueltyp
kW
St
kBTUConversionFactor3.411000.001000.001194.003.413.411000.001000.001.193.41kc1026
Energy kBtu/yr) 175,370 00 087,706 616,915 000 221,960 CubicMeters36.303
ctedunit)$0.12$0.94$0.18$9.3
ForbothPre
e,.e.
horkBTUofgridelectricity.
di
Re
ll30%to40%ideal.AhigherWWR DistrictChilledWaterElectricDriven UseIECC2021asthebenchmark EPA-EnergyConversions EIA-ElectrictyCosts EIA-NaturaGasCosts Seethebenchmarkingpagefo reasonableranges. tab. Calculators: Enter you values nto the yellow cells Enter non-numerica data into the green cells Predicted Measured Predicted Measured YeNotApplicable 2016 8,384,625 780,188 COTE
cordyourbuilding'swindowwa
SUPER SPREADSHEET
53 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Step1:Determinetheareaofthebuildingthatisregularlyoccupied.
Step2:Inputtheareaofoccupiedspacesthathaveaccesstoviews, operablewindows,daylight,andcomplaincewiththeannualsolar exposureareacriteria.
DESIGN FOR WELLNESS
metric.Ifdaylightperformancewas n'tsimulated,inputthetotalarea within15'fromaperimeterwall
Inputthetotalnumberofaccessiblethermostatsandthepercentof occupantswhocontroltheirownlightlevels.
To promote occupants and visitors’ wellness in SWELL- Cultural Museum, I introduced few measures such as introducing curtain wall façade with some sun shading to combat summer sun. The large opening on the south, north and east. The sun shading on the southern façade and the circulation protects the interior spaces that are used for exhibition.
The rotation of the building and different outdoor spaces is created to maintain the connection between the city and the waterfront. To retain good indoor air quality and VOCs level, the museum will use low emitting materials. In addition, the accessible ramps throughout the site and prominent within the building, is a beautiful celebration of inclusion. On either side of the ramp is the irresistible (performance space) with occupiable stair, which encourages movement and interaction.
Inputthetotalnumberofmaterialsthathaveathird-partyhealth
*Declare *CradletoCradle
*Level -ORInputthetotalnumberofchemicalsofconcernthatyouavoided.Then nameeachofthosechemicalsandthestandardthatyouus edasaguide. Examplesofthestandardsinclude:
*LivingBuildingChallengeRedList
*WELLBuildingStandard
erofchemicalsofconcernthatwhereavoidedChemicals
ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard
ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard
ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard
ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard
ChemicalofconcernAVOIDEDStandard
Measure 7 - De sign f or Wellness Reasonable Ran Totalareaofregularlyoccupiedspace50,000sfGood Percentofbuildingthatisregularlyoccupied38% Areawithqualityviews45,300sf91%VeryHighPerfor Areawithoperablewindows30,000sf60% Daylitarea(sDA300/50%)sf0% AnnualSolarExposureCompliantArea(ASE1000,250)sf0% Daylightsensorsinstalled?Yes Areoperablewindowsused?Yes TotalaccessiblethermostatsThermostatBaselinen Occupantsperthermostat0.0Good Dooccupantshavetasklights?Yes Percentofoccupantswhocontroltheirownlightlevels100%VeryHighPerfor 3-CO2&VOCs Contaminant GoalM aximumCO2levels1000ppm IsCO2meas
Form
ured?Yes MaximumMeasuredCO2levels900ppmOzoneO IsVOCmeasured?NoCarbonmonox MaximumMeasuredVOClevelsppb
aldehyde Materials NotableMaterial1 NotableMaterial2 NotableMaterial3 NotableMaterial4 NotableMaterial5 Numb
54 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-numerical data into the g reen c ells
| NAIMO BAKAR
COTE
SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
RESOURCES
The design intent was to design a didactic building that used utilized sustainable material assemblies throughout the building. To reduce embodied carbon associated with materials and construction processes. These evaluations were achieved with the use of Tally and EC3 to analyze material selections and its impact. The main purpose of the EC3 allows benchmarking, assessment, and reductions in embodied carbon, focused on the upfront supply chain emissions of construction materials. While Tally tool a plug-in for Revit was used to Understand the impact of building materials, and traditionally involves Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), an in-depth form of analysis performed on whole buildings, manufactured building products and materials, and material assemblies. This assignment helped me in understanding the different methods one can source construction materials and carbon footprint and cost was very important.
PredictedM easured
Annual(kg-CO2 e/yr)10,362.899,163.4
AnnualIntensity(kg-CO2 e/sf/yr)0.10.8 99%87%
Wasem bodiedcarbonmodeled?No
TotalPredictedEm bodiedCarbonkgCO2 e Embodied Carbon Inte nsity kg CO 2 e / sf
Whattoolwasused? Other:
Whatisthetoolversion? Isbiogeniccarbonconsidered?(?)
IndicatetheLCAsystemboundary:Product(A1-A3)EndofLife(C1-C4) Beyond(D) Use(B1-B5)
IndicatetheLCAscope:SubstructureMEPSystem s
SuperstructureSite/Landscape Enclosure Interiors
MajorStructuralSystem ?(?)
Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?
Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?
4-Pe
NumberofmaterialswithEPDsM aterials
NotableMaterial1
NotableMaterial2
NotableMaterial3
NotableMaterial4
NotableMaterial5
NotableMaterial6
NotableMaterial7
NotableMaterial8
NotableMaterial9
Me asure 8 - Re so urce s Reasonable
Tally Late
ulators: Enter
our values into the yellow
ells. Enter non-numerical data int
0 (Reference
)
bodiedCar
Thn erear
yTallyor Athena
tr
ar
envi
8 55 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL
rcentofReusedFloorArea
Other: Calc
y
c
84.6
from 6-Energy
2-Em
bo
eavarietyoftoolsfor BuildCarbonNeutral,whichonly takesafewminutesandinputs.For amoredetailedanalysis,tr
"AnEnvironmentalProduct
ansp
entandcomparable
ronmentalim pactofproducts." collectedformaterialsusedand tallyupthetot alnumber.
PORTFOLIO
| NAIMO BAKAR
"AnEnvironmentalProduct transparentandcomparable environmentalim pactofproducts."
MajorStructuralSystem ?
Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?
Majorstrategyforreducingem bodiedcarbon?
collectedformaterialsusedand tallyupthetot alnumber.
NumberofmaterialswithEPDsM aterials
NotableMaterial1
NotableMaterial2
NotableMaterial3
NotableMaterial4
NotableMaterial5
NotableMaterial6
NotableMaterial7
NotableMaterial8
NotableMaterial9
Weighingandrecordingdumpster aswell.
ofm aterialsthatwererecycled, program s.
LocalMaterials: Don'tworryaboutstayingina yourbestjudgm enttodetermine whichmaterialswereharvestedor manufactured"locally"
Recycled/ReusedMaterials: Includeallmaterialsthatcontain somecom ponentoringredientthat isreusedorrecycled.
4-PercentofReusedFloorArea sf Pe rcent re used Pe
50%-Go
Howtheabovewastheabovenumberdeterm ined?90%-Be
tegy
tegy
tegy Total Mate rials Cost Pe rcent Totalcostofrecycledm aterials Totalcostofregionalm aterials NotableReusedorRecycledM aterial NotableReusedorRecycledM
0% $16,150
rcentWast
od
st! NotableStra
NotableStra
NotableStra
aterial NotableReusedorRecycledM aterial NotableRegionalMaterial NotableRegionalMaterial NotableRegionalMaterial
,000 0
56 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
CHANGE
The design of the structural modules means that the floor plans are ready for future changes if needed. By understanding the museum would be a dynamic building, the whole building is designed to handle change whereby the building structural system is based on the Warren Truss system. As a result, the 100’ cantilever creates a performance space that is flexible and can be used by the community.
The rainwater system is designed to handle the rainfall and will be able provide portable water for the irrigation of the landscape and its native plants.
Me asur e 9 - Change Reason 1-LocalHazardRes earchLocalHa HailNoEpidem icNo EarthquakesNoSocialUnrestNo DroughtNoPowerOutageNo4 Extrem eTemperaturesYesGridIns tabilityNo FloodingYesNo Re se arch Score 50 % 2-Resiliency Nothabi Passive 100 % Fullbac TypeofBackupPower Other (?) 3-BuildingLifespan Buildingdes ignlifespan20 0Years Wasthebuildingdes ignedfordisassem bly?Yes NotablelongevityStrategy NotablelongevityStrategy NotablelongevityStrategy backuppowerfromthedropdown. Calc ulators: Enter y our values into the yellow c ells. Enter non-num eric al data into the g reen c ell Fullbackupenergy Choosethelocalhazardsres earched Building Was re se arch conducted on the most like ly local hazards? Other: 36 % Museum Outdoor Performance Space/
57 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Render/ e
COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
The proposed SWELL Cultural Museum was conceived as a place of discovery for the current community and future generation. Its mission would be to recognize the dynamic component of learning and should be able to lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery. Therefore, focal point will be its interactive permanent collection that defines the building and unify all aspects of the design.
These collections would reveal information otherwise forgotten and educate on topics related to the site and should be able to take visitors on an experiential journey that would structure the much-needed dialogue between the past and present.
Measure 10 - Discovery Reasonable 1-LeveofCommissioning BasicCommissioningYesEnhancedCommissioning(ThirdParty) YesMonitoring-BasedCommissioning EnclosureCommissioningYes Commissioning Score60% 2-LevelofPostOccupancyEngagement Contacttheowner/OccupanttoseehowthingsaregoingNo NoDataloggingofindoorenvironmentalmeasurements YesPostoccupancyenergyanalysis FormalonsitedaylightmeasurementsYesDevelopandsharestrategiestoim provethebuilding'sPerformance SharecollecteddatawithbuildingoccupantsYesTeachoccupantsandoperatorshowtoim provebuildingperformance 30% 3-LeveofTransparency YesNo PresentthedesignoftheprojecttotheprofessionYesPresentoutcomesandlessonsearnedtotheprofessionNo PresentthedesignoftheprojecttothepublicYesPresentoutcomesandlessonslearnedtothepublicNo PublishpostoccupancydatafromthebuildingNoYes other:other: Transparency Score 40% 4-LeveofOccupantFeedbackNobody BuildingOpe Architect2 Chooseone Mostoccup Feedback Score 40% Alloccupant Who has access to performance feedback? Selectthelevelofoccupancy feedback Architect Which of the following did you do to stay engaged with the building? Which of the following did you do to share the lessons of the project? Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells Enter non-numerical data into the gree Selectallthepostoccupancy strategiesthatwereemployed. Selectallthetransparency strategiesthatwereemployed.
Which of the following did
you
do to stay engaged with the building?
58 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET DISCOVERY
rOccupant6.1gal/occupant/day
PotableWaterUs eIntensity2 9.0gal/sf/day
PercentRainwaterUs e9%%oftot alwat erusefromcollectedrainwater PercentGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%oftot alwat erusefromgreyorblackwater -1 23 %
To
highlight
outputs
59 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET
COTE Top Ten Toolkit Super Spreadsheet COTE_Super_Spreadsheet_Version_2 .3 _Bakar.xlsx Measure2-DesignforCommunity WalkScore0.99 TransitScore1 BikeScore0.82 Comm unityEngagementLevel43 % 444,3 50kgCO2 e/year Measure3-DesignforEcology PercentofSit eVegetated-Post-Development7% PercentofSit eVegetated-Pre-Development100% IncreaseinPercentofSit eVegetated-93 % 9% 125% EcologicalDesignScore5 0% TotalAnnualPot ableWaterUseperOccupant1,89 2gal/occupant/year TotalDailyPotableWaterUs epe
The summery
all the
for every measure take for the Museum Project.
SUMARY
Perc
ta
Percen
ta
82 % No Rainwate
% 80 % Measure5-DesignforEconomy $124Dollar(USD)/sf $140Dollar(USD)/sf 12 % 80 %NettoGros s 14 % Me as ur ed Measure4-DesignforWater Pr ed ic te d
talAnnualPot ableWaterUseperOccupant15 4gal/occupant/year TotalDailyPotableWaterUs eperOccupant0.5gal/occupant/day PotableWaterUs eIntensity2 .4gal/sf/day
entRainwaterUs e0%%to
lwaterusefromcollectedrainwater
tGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%to
lwaterusefromgreyorblackwater
rManagedOn-Site45
60 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR Body Copy CAP HEADER (CHARACTER STYLE) Body Copy y2gal//ay PercentRainwaterUs e0%%totalwaterusefromcollectedrainwater PercentGrey/BlackWaterUse0%%totalwaterusefromgreyorblackwater 82 % No RainwaterManagedOn-Site45 % 80 % Measure5-DesignforEconomy $124Dollar(USD)/sf $140Dollar(USD)/sf 12 % 80 %NettoGros s 14 % Measure6-DesignforEnergy NetsiteEUI0 .7kBtu/sf/yr GrosssiteEUI1 .3kBtu/sf/yr 99 % 0kg-CO2 e/sf/yr PercentfromRenewableEnergy50 % 99 % NetsiteEUI3 .0kBtu/sf/yr GrosssiteEUI4 .7kBtu/sf/yr 95 % 1kg-CO2 e/sf/yr PercentfromRenewableEnergy36 % 87 % 0.30W/ sf 65 % 40 % Me asure 7 - Design for Wellness Qualityviews9 1%%occupiedarea Operablewindows60 %%occupiedarea Daylitarea(sDA300/50%)0 %%occupiedarea ASECompliantArea(ASE1000,250 )0 %%occupiedarea Individualtherm alcontrol0.0Occupantspertherm ostat 100% Peakm easuredCO290 0ppm Peakm easuredVOC0ppb 0M aterials Chem icalsofConcernAvoided0Chemicals Me asure 8 - Design for R esources Em bodiedcarbonintensity0 .0kg-C0 2 e/sf Totalem bodiedcarbon8 5kg-C0 2 e Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNoY/N Biogeniccarbonconsidered?0Y/ N NumberofEPDsCollected0 0% Me as ur Pr ed ic te d Me as ur ed
61 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR Body Copy CAP HEADER (CHARACTER STYLE) Body Copy ASECompliantArea(ASE1000,250 )0 %%occupiedarea Individualtherm alcontrol0.0Occupantspertherm ostat 100% Peakm easuredCO290 0ppm Peakm easuredVOC0ppb 0M aterials Chem icalsofConcernAvoided0Chemicals Me asure 8 - Design for R esources Em bodiedcarbonintensity0 .0kg-C0 2 e/sf Totalem bodiedcarbon8 5kg-C0 2 e Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNoY/N Biogeniccarbonconsidered?0Y/ N NumberofEPDsCollected0 0% 0% Percentofrecycledcontentofbuildingmaterials Percentofregionalmaterials Measure9-DesignforChange LocalHazardResearchScore5 0% 100% BuildingDesignLifespan20 0Years Measure10-DesignforDiscovery LevelofCom missioningScore60 % 30 % 40 % LevelofFeedback(Ongoingdiscovery)4 0%
RESULTS
COTE SPREADSHEETS
The overall project reached its main target, which was to recognize the dynamic component of learning that should lead its visitors on a voyage of discovery. The main objective of the museum was to create a museum that celebrates the history of North End and integrates sustainable system throughout the building to increase its performance in community engagements, ecology use of water, energy, and wellness. Through the Harborwalk (public access walkway) and Cultural Connector (Harbor Cruise), public pool, and green public spaces, the Museum maintains its connection with the city and its community.
The museum project main goal is to celebrates its community rich past by creating a didactic building that will engage, inspire, and celebrate the site’s history. Through integrated design the museum will introduces sustainable strategies that will understand and support the existing site conditions. By analyzing the results from all the measures; the SWELL Cultural Center can utilize the different measures highlighted on the COTE Spreadsheet to understand how the building will perform in the future.
Thispagecomparesm etricsagainsttheirbenchmark alongascalefrom"Baseline"to"VeryHigh Performance"
Me asure 2: Design For Community
WalkScore0%100% TransitScore0
00 % BikeScore0%100% CommunityEngagem entLevel0
Me asure 3: Design For Ecology
PercentofSit eVegetated-Post-Development0%100% PercentofSit eVegetated-Pre-Developm ent0
00 % Vegetatedareaincreas e0
00 % PercentofSit ewithNavePlanngs0
00 % PercentofV egetatedAreawithNavePlanngs0
00 % EcologicalDes ignScore0
Potablewaterreducon0%-1
bleWaterUs edforIrrigaonYe
Ve ry High Pe rformance
Base line
%1
%1 00 %
%1
%1
%1
%1
%1
PredictedM easured
23 %8 2%100%
)No(1 ) RainwaterManagedOn-Site0%100% EsmatedRunoQuality0 %1 00 % \ Cons truconcos tReduconfromtheBenchm ark0 %>50 % Eciencyraopercentim provem ent0%>5 0% PredictedM easured NetenergyreduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %9 5%105% Percentfromrenewableenergy0%50 %3 6%100% PercentOperaonalCarbonReduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %8 7%100% LighngPowerDensity%Reducon0%75 % Qualityviews0 %1 00 % Operablewindows0%100% Re sponse 14 % 12 % 80 % 43 % 82 % 100% 7% 100% 9% 125% 99 % Me asure 4: Design For Wate r 1 45 % Me asure 5: Design For Economy -9 3% 50 % Me asure 6: Design For Energy Me asure 7: Design For We llness 65 % 91 % 60 % 62 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO
00 %
Pota
s(0
| NAIMO BAKAR
RainwaterManagedOn-Site0%100%
EsmatedRunoQuality0 %1 00 %
Cons truconcos tReduconfromtheBenchm ark0 %>50 %
Eciencyraopercentim provem ent0%>5 0%
PredictedM easured
NetenergyreduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %9 5%105%
Percentfromrenewableenergy0%50 %3 6%100%
PercentOperaonalCarbonReduconfromBenchm ark0 %99 %8 7%100%
LighngPowerDensity%Reducon0%75 %
Qualityviews0 %1 00 %
Operablewindows0%100%
Daylitarea(s DA3 00/50%)0 %1 00 %
ASECompliantArea(ASE1 000 ,2 50)0%100%
IsCO2Meas ured?No(0)Yes(1 )
IsV OCm easured?No(0)Yes(1 )
Materialswithhealthcercaons010 +
Chem icalsofConcernAvoided01 0+
Em bodiedcarbonintens ity(kg-C0 2e/s f)
Totalem bodiedcarbon(kg-C0 2e)
Em bodiedcarbonmodeledNo(0 )Yes(1)
Biogeniccarboncons idered?No(0 )Yes(1)
Percentofreusedoorarea0 %1 00 %
Percentofconstruconwastediverted0 %1 00 %
Percentofrecycledcontentofbuildingmaterials0 %1 00 %
Percentofregionalmaterials0 %1 00 %
PercentofinstalledwoodthatisFSCCered0%100%
Me asure 9: Design For Change
LocalHazardRes earchScore0
FunconalityWithou
\
%1 00 %
tPower(Res iliency)Score0%100% BuildingDesignLifes pan3020 0
asure 10: Design For Discove ry LevelofCom missioningScore0 %1 00 % LevelofPos tOccupancyEvaluaonScore0%100% LevelofKnowledgeDis tribuon/Trans parencyScore0 %1 00 % LevelofFeedbac
covery)0 %1 00 % 40 % 40 % 0% 0% 60 % 30 % 0 20 0 100% 50 % 14 % 12 % 80 % 45 % Me asure 5: Design For Economy Me asure 6: Design For Energy
asure 7: Design For We llness 0 0 Me asure 8: Design For Re source s 0.00 85 0 FALSE 1 65 % 91 % 60 % 0% 63 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
Me
k(Ongoingdis
Me
THE BIG IDEA:
CARBON OVER TIME:
CARBON OVER TIME:
To talkgo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m:
Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total
1Year444,35099,16385543,598 20Year8,887,0001,983,2678510,870,352 100Year44,435,0009,916,3378554,351,421 200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
Design200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
To talPercentageo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m:
Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total
1Year81. 7%18.2%0.0%100.0% 20Year81.8%18. 2%0. 0%100.0% 100Year81. 8%18.2%0.0%100.0% 200Year81. 8%18.2%0.0%100.0% Design0Year81.8%18. 2%0. 0%100.0%
THE BIG IDEA:
Energy/year 18
Buil di ng Mate ri al s
Commut
ar
% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0%
Commute/ye ar 82%
%
0%
e/ye
82
Desi
To ta
tageo fCarbonDio xideEquivalen
ro m: Life
an Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total
.2%0.0%100.0%
0%100.0%
%0.0%100.0% 20
.2%0.0%100.0% Desi
0%100.0% Commute/ye ar 82% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0% Commute/ye ar 82% Energy/year 18% Buil di ng Mate ri al s 0% 64 SECTION 08 | COTE SUPER SPREADSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR
To talkgo fCarbonDio xideEquivalentsf ro m: Lifespan Commute/year Energy /y earBuilding Materials Total 1Year444,35099,16385543,598 20Year8,887,0001,983,2678510,870,352 100Year44,435,0009,916,3378554,351,421 200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
gn200Year88,870,00019,832,67485108,702,758
lPercen
tsf
sp
1Year81. 7%18
20Year81.8%18. 2%0.
100Year81. 8%18.2
0Year81. 8%18
gn0Year81.8%18. 2%0.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. “Shzeikh District.” 2021. Wikipedia. November 22, 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_District#/media/File:Sheikh_mountain.
2. Burianski, Dr. Markus, Mark Clarke, Dr. Federico Kunle, and Gwen Wackwitz. 2021. “Climate Change Litigation in Africa: Current Status and Future Developments | White & Case LLP.” www.whitecase.com. November 9, 2021. https://www.whitecase.com/publications/insight/africa-focus-autumn-2021/climate-change-litigation-africa.
3. Global Footprint Network. n.d. “How Many Planets Does It Take to Sustain Your Lifestyle?” Www.footprintcalculator.org. Accessed February 11, 2022. https://www.footprintcalculator. org/home/en.
4. US EPA, Office of Air and Radiation. n.d. “Carbon Footprint Calculator | Climate Change | US EPA.” Www3.Epa.gov. Accessed February 10, 2022. https://www3.epa.gov/carbonfootprint-calculator.
5. Wikipedia Contributors. 2022. “File:Köppen Climate Types Massachusetts.png.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:K%C3%B6ppen_Climate_ Types_Massachusetts.png.
6.Berger, Alan & Wilson, Michael & Susskind, Jonah & Zeckhauser, Richard. (2020). Theorizing the resilience district: Design-based decision making for coastal climate change adaptation. Journal of Landscape Architecture. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Regional-hydrology-diagram-and-outline-of-proposed-Boston-resilience-districts_ fig6_343034839
7. “Sea Level Rise and Tidal Flooding in Boston, Massachusetts | Union of Concerned Scientists.” 2016. Www.ucsusa.org. Union of Concerned Scientist. March 31, 2016. https://www. ucsusa.org/resources/sea-level-rise-and-tidal-flooding-boston-massachusetts.
8. “What Style Is That Again? A Two-Part History of Boston Architecture | Boston by Foot.” n.d. www.bostonbyfoot.org. Boston By Foot. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://www. bostonbyfoot.org/what-style-again-two-part-history-boston-architecture.
9. Cook, Greg. 2016. “The 50 Best Works of Public Art in Greater Boston, Ranked | WBUR News.” Wbur.org. WBUR. August 29, 2016. https://www.wbur.org/news/2016/08/29/bostonbest-public-art.
10. Sorathia, Vibhuti. 2020. “15 Places Architects Must Visit in Boston - Rethinking the Future.” RTF | Rethinking the Future. January 28, 2020. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/ architects-lounge/a546-15-places-architects-must-visit-in-boston/.
11. “Ein Kulinarisches Wochenende in Boston, Massachusetts.” 2022. Visit the USA. March 14, 2022. https://www.visittheusa.de/experience/ein-kulinarisches-wochenende-bostonmassachusetts.
12. “Will Climate Change End Waterfront Living? Not If You Can Afford It.” 2020. Worth. April 22, 2020. https://www.worth.com/will-climate-change-end-waterfront-living-not-if-youcan-afford-it/.
65 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 09 | BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
15. “News + Events.” n.d. Boston Waterfront Partners. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://bostonwaterfrontpartners.org/news-events/.
16. “City Holds Hearing on Connect Historic Boston Bike Trail Project.” 2014. Boston Magazine. February 26, 2014. https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/02/26/connecthistoric-boston-bike-trail-
17. https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/patterns/pattern-2-window-area.html
18. “Daylighting Pattern Guide.” 2021. Advancedbuildings.net. 2021. https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/pattern-slideshow/Pattern%201_%20Floor%20Plate%20Geometry.html
19. aglassrepairbiz. 2015. “Why It Is Beneficial to Double Glaze Glass.” A Glass Repair Biz. September 14, 2015. https://aglassrepairbiz.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/why-it-isbeneficial-to-double-glaze-glass/.
20. AZoBuild. 2006. “Different Types of Cement - a Guide.” AZoBuild.com. November 24, 2006. https://www.azobuild.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=7959.
21. “DILLER SCOFIDIO + RENFRO, Pygmalion Karatzas · Institute of Contemporary Art.” n.d. Divisare. https://divisare.com/projects/330354-diller-scofidio-renfro-pygmalion-karatzasinstitute-of-contemporary-art.
22. “Stainless Bright Bars and Stainless Steel Structurals.” n.d. Montanstahl. Accessed May 17, 2022. https://www.montanstahl.com/products/stainless-steel-structurals-bright-bars/.
66 ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO | NAIMO BAKAR SECTION 09 | BIBLIOGRAPHY
68 PROJECT NAME | STUDENT NAME