S. Ahmed Environmental Portfolio

Page 1

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO

SAMANTHA AHMED

BIO CARBON & ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

PROJECT INFORMATION

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

COMMUNITIES

SUN SHADING, PSYCHROMETRIC CHARTS

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

DESIGN FOR WATER DESIGN FOR ECONOMY DESIGN FOR ENERGY

MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES

WINDOWS AND DAYLIGHTING

DESIGN FOR WELLNESS

BIBILIOGRAPHY

5 7-9 11-14 17-26 29-30 33-37 39-40 41-49 00-00 51-55 57-60 63-66 68-72 74

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAMANTHA AHMED

Biography

Currently an associate architect at John Schimenti, PC, Samantha previously worked in visual displays for retail brands. She graduated with a BFA from Pratt Institute, where she was in the Interior Design program at the School of Fine Arts. Samantha is currently in her thesis year of the MArch program at the Boston Architectural College (Distance).

On her free time, Samantha enjoys spending time with her four year old boy, finds cooking to be very therapeutic, and likes to visit farms and national parks. On a perfect day, she would be outdoors with her sketchbook.

Samantha’s hometown is Brooklyn, New York, where she spent most of her life. She resides in Lindenhurst, New York on the South Shore of Long Island.

EDUCATION

Boston Architectural College Masters of Architecture (Thesis Research) Currently Enrolled

Pratt Institute - BFA Interior Design

Graduate

EMPLOYMENT

JOHN SCHIMENTI ARCHITECTURE

Associate Architect

> Residential Design

> Health Facilities

A WEEKEND STROLL Planting Fields Arboretum Oyster Bay, New York 2021
5 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED INTRODUCTION

CARBON AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

7 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

CARBON AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS

summation - pending

CARBON

AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS

summation - pending

8 9 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC
AHMED
SAMANTHA
MY FOOTPRINT
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

PROJECT INFORMATION

11 REIMAGINING THE
AHMED SECTION XX NAME OF SECTION
WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA

PROJECT INFORMATION

summation

Whether it's used to better understand a design's performance or to streamline the process of submitting for the COTE Top Ten award, this tool will allow easy, consistent calculation and evaluation of project performance metrics and benchmarking.

Note: This version is not compatible with Excel 2016 or older.

For questions email cote@aia.org, we are looking to improve the tool, and appreciate your feedback!

This

Development team

Helena Zambrano, AIA (Project Lead)

Mahlum Architects, Portland, OR

Corey Squire, AIA

Bora Architects, Portland, OR

Tate Walker, AIA

OPN, Madison, WI

Z Smith, FAIA EDR, New Orleans, LA

Billie Faircloth, FAIA

KieranTimberlake, Philadelphia, PA

Janki A Vyas, AIA

KARMA co/lab, Philadelphia, PA

Ryan Welch

KieranTimberlake, Philadelphia, PA

Note:

Explanation Step 2: Review your benchmarks to evaluate your projects performance. Basic Project Information Transportation Project Name Fertility Clinic Total Annual 172,924 kg‐CO2e / yr Project Address 4855 Hylan Blvd Total Annual per Occupant 1,729 kg‐CO2e / occupant yr apt., suite, etc. City Staten Island Water State NY Total Annual Water Use 244,940 gal / yr Zip Code 10312 WUI ‐ Water Use Intensity (Program‐based) 6.2 gal / sf / yr User‐Defined Benchmark Source ASHRAE Climate Zone 4A (Link) WUI ‐ Water Use Intensity (User‐Defined) 20 gal / sf / yr Other Climate Zone(?) Water Use per Occupant 2,449 gal / occupant yr Total Building Area(?) 12,247Gross sf Site Area(?) 20,319sf Energy Regularly occupied space(?) 3,708sf Total Annual Energy Use 1,224,700 kBtu yr Avg daily occupancy(?) 100People EUI ‐ Energy Use Intensity (Program‐based) 66.6 kBtu sf yr Peak occupancy(?) 150People EUI ‐ Energy Use Intensity (User‐defined) 100.0 kBtu sf yr Use ZeroTool designated EUI FTEs(?) 50People Energy Use per Occupant 12,247 kBtu occupant / yr Cell Type Legend Project completion year 2025 Input data Explanation Annual days of operation(?) 340Days Operational Carbon Emissions Avg. daily hours of operation(?) 8hours Total Annual Carbon Emissions 122,470 kg‐CO2e / yr Total Construction Cost(?) 1,000,000USD Carbon Use Intensity (Program‐based) 6.3 kg‐CO2e / sf / yr User‐Defined Benchmark Source FAR 0.60 Carbon Use Intensity (User‐Defined) 10 kg‐CO2e / sf / yr COTE Top 10 Award Program Color Scheme Cost/sf 81.65 $ Carbon Emissions per Occupant 1,225 kg‐CO2e / occupant yr sf/occupant ‐ Avg. 122 Optional for COTE Top 10Mandatory for COTE Top 10 sf/occupant ‐ Peak 82 Electric Lighting Calculated Value Calculated Value Annual hours of operation 2,720 Lighting Power Density 1.06 W / sf User‐Defined Benchmark Source Lighting Power Density (User‐Defined) 1.5 W / sf Building Program Program Breakdown(?) % of Building Area Building Program #1Retail ‐ General 20% Building Program #2Self Storage 20% Building Program #3Services ‐ General 20% Building Program #4Warehouse 20% Building Program #5Warehouse ‐ Refrigerated 20% Building Program #6 Building Program #7 Building Program #8 Total must equal 100% 100% Additional Building Information Project TypeRenovation and New Construction Site Environment(?) Suburban Previously Developed SiteNo Is the firm an AIA 2030 SignatoryHmm…I'm totally interested in learning more Reported in the AIA DDxYes Third party rating system 1LEED Third party rating system 2 Third party rating system 3 If other, specify Welcome to the COTE Top Ten Super Spreadsheet!
Step 1: Fill out the below basic information of your project
Reasonable values and sources
This first page assigns benchmarks based on building‐specific, national data for the project to be compared against. If a user‐defined benchmark is present, the national benchmarks will be overridden. For COTE Top Ten energy reductions, the benchmark should be user‐defined using Architecture 2030's Zero Tool. Optional user‐defined benchmarks can be entered above as a way of tracking any specific benchmarking research that the team conducted.
by COTE members to help architects calculate project performance metrics. After entering information on
This tool has been created
each measure tab, the "Results" tab will graphically display the holistic project's performance across all 10 COTE measures of sustainable design.
Basic Project Information Transportation
Total Annual 172,924 kg
CO e yr Project Address 4855 Hylan Blvd Total Annual per Occupant 1,729 kg‐CO e occupant / yr apt., suite, etc. City Staten Island Water State NY Total Annual Water Use 244,940 gal yr Zip Code 10312 WUI ‐ Water Use Intensity (Program‐based) 6.2 gal sf yr User‐Defined Benchmark Source ASHRAE Climate Zone 4A (Link) WUI ‐ Water Use Intensity (User‐Defined) 20 gal sf yr Other Climate Zone(?) Water Use per Occupant 2,449 gal occupant / yr Total Building Area(?) 12,247Gross sf Site Area(?) 20,319sf Energy Regularly occupied space(?) 3,708sf Total Annual Energy Use 1,224,700 kBtu yr Avg daily occupancy(?) 100People EUI ‐ Energy Use Intensity (Program‐based) 66.6 kBtu sf / yr Peak occupancy(?) 150People EUI ‐ Energy Use Intensity (User‐defined) 100.0 kBtu sf / yr Use ZeroTool designated EUI FTEs(?) 50People Energy Use per Occupant 12,247 kBtu occupant yr Cell Type Legend Project completion year 2025 Input data Explanation Annual days of operation(?) 340Days Operational Carbon Emissions Avg. daily hours of operation(?) 8hours Total Annual Carbon Emissions 122,470 kg‐CO e yr Total Construction Cost(?) 1,000,000USD Carbon Use Intensity (Program‐based) 6.3 kg‐CO e sf yr User‐Defined Benchmark Source FAR 0.60 Carbon Use Intensity (User‐Defined) 10 kg‐CO e sf yr COTE Top 10 Award Program Color Scheme Cost/sf 81.65 $ Carbon Emissions per Occupant 1,225 kg‐CO e occupant / yr sf/occupant ‐ Avg. 122 Optional for COTE Top 10Mandatory for COTE Top 10 sf/occupant ‐ Peak 82 Electric Lighting Calculated Value Calculated Value Annual hours of operation 2,720 Lighting Power Density 1.06 W sf User‐Defined Benchmark Source Lighting Power Density (User‐Defined) 1.5 W sf Building Program Program Breakdown(?) % of Building Area Building Program #1Retail ‐ General 20% Building Program #2Self Storage 20% Building Program #3Services ‐ General 20% Building Program #4Warehouse 20% Building Program #5Warehouse ‐ Refrigerated 20% Building Program #6 Building Program #7 Building Program #8 Total must equal 100% 100% Additional Building Information Project TypeRenovation and New Construction Site Environment(?) Suburban Previously Developed SiteNo Is the firm an AIA 2030 SignatoryHmm…I'm totally interested in learning more Reported in the AIA DDxYes Third party rating system 1LEED Third party rating system 2 Third party rating system 3 If other, specify Welcome to the COTE Top Ten Super Spreadsheet!
Welch KieranTimberlake, Philadelphia, PA Smith, FAIA EDR, New Orleans, LA Billie Faircloth, FAIA
PA Janki A Vyas, AIA KARMA co/lab, Philadelphia, PA Step 1: Fill out the below basic information of your project Tate Walker, AIA OPN, Madison, WI Reasonable values and sources Development team Helena Zambrano, AIA (Project Lead) Mahlum Architects, Portland, OR Corey Squire, AIA Bora Architects, Portland, OR This first page assigns benchmarks based on building‐specific, national data for the project to be compared against.
a user‐defined benchmark is present, the national benchmarks will be overridden.
COTE Top Ten energy reductions, the benchmark should be user‐defined using Architecture 2030's Zero Tool. Optional user‐defined benchmarks can be entered above as a way of tracking any specific benchmarking research that the team conducted.
Explanation Step 2: Review your benchmarks to evaluate your projects performance.
Project Name Fertility Clinic
Ryan
KieranTimberlake, Philadelphia,
If
For
tool has been created by COTE members to help architects calculate project performance metrics. After entering information on each measure tab, the "Results" tab will graphically display the holistic project's performance across all 10 COTE measures of sustainable design.
used to better understand a design's performance or to streamline the process of submitting for the COTE Top Ten award, this tool will allow easy, consistent calculation and evaluation of project performance metrics and benchmarking.
Whether it's
This version is not compatible with Excel 2016 or older.
questions email cote@aia.org, we are looking to improve the tool, and appreciate your feedback!
For
- pending PROJECT INFORMATION
12 13 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED COTE INTRODUCTION COTE INTRODUCTION
summation - pending

summation - pending

PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION 02 | TSM2001 14 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

17
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

DESIGNING

FOR

INTEGRATION summation - pending

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION summation - pending

IMAGE: Topography and Hydrography TNM Download V2, accessed February 4855

IMAGE: Sun Path - Winter Solstice https://www.suncalc.org/#/40.5269,-

IMAGE: Sun Path - Summer Solstice https://www.suncalc.org/#/40.5269,-

IMAGE: Rainfall - January 2022

NCEI GIS Team, “Monthly Summaries,”

IMAGE: Temperature Average NCEI GIS Team, “Monthly Summaries,”

IMAGE: Wind Data https://globalwindatlas.info/National Centers

IMAGE: Vegetation John Schimenti PC

IMAGE: Section Sketch Grade Conditions

T-005.00 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
ES295606495 Under Directive Date: Muslima Khandakar
520302084
HYLAN BOULEVARD
18 19 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
Solar Access, Sun Path, Air Flow PV Summer Sun Winter Sun Rainwater Collec�on Natural Ven�la�on 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Ocean Breeze South Facing Courtyard Tabby Concrete Historical/ Residential architectural elements
IMAGE: Axonometric Sketch
Inventory VIEW 1 VIEW 2 View 1 View 2 Views towards Ocean Bike/Walk Accessibility
DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION summation - pending IMAGE: Plan Sketch Sensory
20 21 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS
DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION summation - pending

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

summation - pending

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY

From the Spanish Colony, to upscale residential.

10132 RICHMOND HILL

HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

> The community of Annadale was named circa 1860 after Anna Seguine, a descendant of French Huguenots who were among the South Shore’s earliest settlers. In 1929, immigrants from Spain purchased land along the Annadale shoreline, which became known as the Spanish Colony. In early years of the settlement, bungalows were built at the site. Buildings, as well as the abundant woodland, were demolished at the end of the 20th century to make room for large, upscale homes. A city park in the heart of the neighborhood was converted into a wildlife preserve; known as Blue Heron Park Preserve. This park spans 222 acres, and has ponds, swamps and small streams which empty into Raritan Bay.

> Hurrican Sandy significantly damaged the Ocean View Estates, however many were repaired and rebuilt.

> The creation of the South Shore Business Improvement District will mean additional resources for sanitation, security, holiday tree lighting and events ina small green space called Annadale Green.

citation-pending

citation-pending

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

summation - pending

ECONOMIC HISTORY AND DEMOGRAPHICS

10132 Richmond Hill POPULATION AND INCOME

2020 CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS

> Annadale is a middle class neighborhood on the South Shore of Staten Island, NY.

> This area of Richmond Hill has a higher median household income and average household income than New York State. Furthermore, within the 10312 zip code, the median income is higher than the outlying areas.

> With a population of 61,392, the majority is White, followed by Hispanic and Asian populations.

22 23 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
THE
SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS
REIMAGINING
WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

summation - pending

REGIONAL MATERIALS

Timber, stone, brick, concrete and sand.

NEW YORK

MATERIAL CULTURE AND HISTORY

> Frame constructions dominate for dwelling unit materials. The concentration of stone structures is in urban centers, due to availability and urban affluence.

> Tabby concrete is a more local material used at the coast, where the use of a waste marine sea shell product is incorporated into a concrete mix as an aggregate replacement. Utilising shells reduces the storage of shell waste, also reducing the need for quarried aggregate.

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

summation - pending

TRANSPORTATION: WALK SCORE 31 TRANSIT SCORE 50

The Staten Island Railway serves the Annadale location of this site. Local and express buses are also stationed throughout. Although ample public transportation is available, people are prone to drive for transportation. The neighborhood is bike friendly.

citation-pending Sketch of an Albany Brick Cottage New York: Stone Dwellings 1855, By County New York: Frame Dwellings 1855, By County New York: Brick Dwellings 1855, By County
24 25
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
SITE ANALYSIS
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

DESIGNING FOR INTEGRATION

summation - pending

NARRATIVE

The community of Annadale was named circa 1860 after Anna Seguine, a descendant of French Huguenots who were among the South Shore’s earliest settlers. In 1929, immigrants from Spain purchased land along the Annadale shoreline, which became known as the Spanish Colony. In early years of the settlement, bungalows were built at the site. Buildings, as well as the abundant woodland, were demolished at the end of the 20th century to make room for large, upscale homes. A city park in the heart of the neighborhood was converted into a wildlife preserve; known as Blue Heron Park Preserve. This park spans 222 acres, and has ponds, swamps and small streams which empty into Raritan Bay.

The median household income for Richmond Hill is $82,783, which is higher than the New York state average ($63,998). The average income for the Annadale community is higher than that, at approximately $97,000. The site has an income population that falls within the majority clientele of fertility clinics. The accessibility by train, bus and bike allows for people in neighboring Brooklyn and Manhattan to get treatment in a more serene natural environment. While a higher income population is desirable for profit in a fertility clinic, this site can be reached by lower income neighborhoods

easily, removing urban stressors that can harm results in the fertility process. Beyond client satisfaction, staff satisfaction is also critical. Research shows that indoor environmental quality correlates with job satisfaction and worker productivity. The environmental comfort variables, such as temperature, air quality, and access to natural light and views, are all intended to increase patient and staff satisfaction.

Climate-disrupting greenhouse gases and other harmful emissions are directly and indirectly generated by raw extraction, production, transport, and disposal of materials across the globe. Impacts felt at the local level includes deforestation, water contamination, and soil degradation. Using locally extracted and manufactured products and materials; incorporating materials generated by local salvage operations and recyclers; and creative reusing materials existing on-site can also greatly reduce energy use and harmful emissions associated with transporting construction materials while saving money. Responsible material and waste management also lessens burden on landfills. The use of a waste marine sea shell product is incorporated into a concrete mix as an aggregate replacement. Utilizing shells reduces the storage of shell waste, also reducing the need for quarried aggregate. This is known as Tabby concrete, which is used

in combination with timber to is used as a structural material in place of traditional concrete. Other locally available materials in the region are timber, stone, brick, concrete and sand. The design of the building follows historical guidelines, and is inspired by the residential surrounding frame construction houses.

26 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED SITE ANALYSIS

COMMUNITIES

29
COMMUNITIES
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

summation - pending

Measure 2

Design for Equitable Communities

Walkscore.com generates several scores for walkability and community resources for any address in the US.

The higher the score, the more pedestrian‐friendly the site.

Based on Sherry A Arnstein's, "A Ladder of Citizen Participation", what was the level of community engagement during the design and construction process?

This simple calculator compares your project's commuting patterns to published national averages. Use a survey (or an educated guess) to determine the average commuting distance and average mpg of the building's occupants.

If no information is available, use the baseline (US national average). Though it's designed for office projects, the calculator can produce good results for all buildings that people travel to and from.

Explanations Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells Reasonable Ranges Sources 1 ‐ Walk Transit / Bike Score RangeWalk Score Transit ScoreRangeBike Score Walk Score Methodology 0% ‐ 24% Minimal Transit0% ‐ 49%Somewhat Bikeable Walk Score 40% 25% ‐ 49% Some Transit50% ‐ 69%Bikeable Transit Score 50% 50% ‐69% Good Transit70% ‐ 89%Very Bikeable Bike Score 40% 70% ‐ 89% Excellent Transit90% ‐ 100%Biker's Paradise 90% ‐ 100% Rider's Paradise 2 ‐ Community Engagement Type Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation Manipulation00% Poor Community Engagement Level Consultation Therapy114% Informing229% Community Engagement Score43% Consultation343% Baseline Placation457% Partnership571% Better Delegation686% Citizen Control7100% Best! 3 ‐ Simple Transportation Carbon Calculator kgs of CO2e/Occupant Reference Values Unit Source Average car fuel economy 24.9mpg 2020 EPA Automative Trends Report ProposedBaseline Unit > 1800Baseline Average CO2 emitted per gallon 8.89 kg CO e/gallon EPA ‐ Vehicle Emissions Average Daily Occupancy 100 1350 ‐ 1800Getting there Average one way commute 12.7Miles2017 National Household Travel Survey No. of occupants commuting by single‐occupancy gas vehicle(?) 35 900 ‐ 1350Better Table 27, Survey Year 2017 Adj., Private Vehicle Percent of occupants commuting by single‐occupancy vehicle 35%76%Weekly Avg. 450 ‐ 900High Performing Share of single occupancy commutes76% 2019 Census Average round trip commute 2525.4Miles 0 ‐ 450Very High Performing Average commuting days 250days/year 5 days * 50 weeks Days Commuting per week 55Days Weeks commuting per year 5050weeks *Please use reference values, not regional values Average Car Fuel Economy(?) 24.924.9mpg Average carbon emission per gallon of gasoline 8.898.89 kg‐CO e gal Annual transportation carbon per occupant 781 1,729 kg‐CO e occupant / yr Annual transportation carbon78,074 172,924 kg‐CO e yr Percent reduction over the baseline54.9%
COMMUNITIES
Car Dependent Mostly Car Dependent Somewhat Walkable Very Walkable Walker's Paradise Score
30 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED COTE DESIGN CHARTS

SUN SHADING AND PHSYCHROMETRIC CHARTS

33 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED CHARTS

SUN SHADING CHART

DATA SOURCE TMY3

J F Kennedy Intl Airport, NY, USA

40.65 DEG NORTH, 73.8DEG WEST

The TMY3 data for JFK is used for this site as it is the most similar available conditions to Staten Island Site. While EWR Airport data is available, JFK is likely to have a more similar climate due to it’s proximity to the ocean.

J F Kennedy Intl Airport, NY, USA

40.65 DEG NORTH, 73.8DEG WEST

December 21 to June 21

NORTH Shade Needed

FINS FOR SHADING

AT 60 DEG. 18 HRS EXPOSED

> Horizontal Fins: Minimal horizontal fins is needed, as the North facing side does not get much sun. NOTE: Chart shown has a shade angle of approximately 60 degrees.

> Vertical Fins: Approx. 15-17 degrees

SOUTH Shade Needed

FINS FOR SHADING

TO ACHIEVE 0 HRS EXPOSED

> Horizontal Fins: 50-55 degrees

> Vertical Fins: Horizontal fins bring the exposed hours to zero, therefore vertical fins are not needed in this scenario.

> This facade receives the most sun and will need the most intervention.

REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

DATA SOURCE TMY3
34 35 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC
AHMED
SAMANTHA
SITE SUN CHARTS SITE WEATHER ANALYSIS

SUN SHADING CHART

EAST

Shade Needed

FINS FOR SHADING

TO ACHIEVE 0 HRS EXPOSED

> Horizontal Fins: 20 degrees

> Vertical Fins: Horizontal fins bring the exposed hours to zero, therefore vertical fins are not needed in this scenario.

PSYCHROMETRIC CHART DESIGN STRATEGIES

100% COMFORTABLE HOURS

TARGET OF DESIGN STRATEGIES

> #16 - Heating and Humidification (3937 hrs) - Priority 1

> #9 Internal Heat Gain (1856 hrs)Priority 2

STRATEGY #19 Addressing heat gain

PASSIVE SOLAR HEATING

GLASS AREA TO SOUTH

> This strategy will allow for full shade in the summer, which treats the issue of the South facade of the building being the most exposed to the sun.

WEST

Shade Not Needed

FINS FOR SHADING

TO ACHIEVE 0 HRS EXPOSED

> Horizontal Fins: 0 degrees = No fins

> Vertical Fins: 0 degrees = No fins

STRATEGY #20 Addressing heat gain

DOUBLE PANE HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING

GLAZING AT WEST, NORTH AND EAST

> This strategy further refines strategt #19, and provides a typical solar heat gain coefficient of .42 (at 58%, or 10% higher than at the clear face at the South).

DATA SOURCE TMY3
36 37 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED SITE SUN CHARTS SITE SUN CHARTS
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

39 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED SECTION XX NAME OF SECTION

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

LEVEL OF ECOLOGICAL DESIGN

Intentional Design Strategies Landscape and Zoning

INTEGRATED DESIGN PLANNING

The Fertility Clinic that I am introducing is an addition to an existing medical center. Therefore, some of the existing building will remain. The site has topographic and tree regulations, so it is mandatory to preserve trees that are on site. One tree for each 25’ of street frontage is required, and while 10 trees exist, 2 new trees will be planted to comply. Special landscaping and buffering of 4’ is required, which will also be in compliance. The zoning requires 1 car per 400sf for parking. There is existing parking for 9 cars, and 12 total car parking spots are being provided at grade to meet the new occupancy. Given these zoning requirements, the level of ecological design is impacted by habitat conservation and the abatement of specific regional environmental concerns. plan to design for soil conservation, which works well with the conservation of the vegetation.

Measure 3 ‐ Design for Ecology

Determine the area of the site reserved for vegetation, both before and after development by subtracting all impervious areas from the site area. Green roofs are included in the percent vegetated calculations.

1 ‐ Vegetated Area

Green roof area 5,000 sf sf

In most cases, it's desirable to increase a site's vegetated area.

Native plants include those that are indigenous to a specific geographic location and are adapted for the local climate and ecosystems. Use "turf grass" for any landscape areas with decorative plants not adapted to the local climate.

Identify the strategies implemented by the project to help users become more aware or connected with the site and their regional ecosystems.

2 ‐ Native Plantings

Building footprint area12,247 sf 3,708 sf Surface parking area 4,830 sf 3,708 sf Area of additional on site hardscapes 400 sf sf Area of the total site that is vegetated 7,842 sf 12,903 sf Site Area20,319 sf 20,319 sf Percent vegetated38.6% 63.5% Increase in Percent of vegetated area ‐24.9% Area of the total site covered by native plants‐ Post Development 8,000 sf Area of the total site covered by turf grass ‐ Post Development ‐ sf Native plantings ‐ Percent of vegetated area102.0% Turf grass ‐ Percent of Site0.0% Native plantings ‐ Percent of site39.4% Intentional design strategies were used to promote: BiodiversityNo

DESIGN FOR WATER

A greater percentage of native plants and a smaller percentage of turf grass is usually preferable. 3 ‐ Level of Ecological Design

are all areas of ecological concern, so a higher score is good.

SkiesNo

SafetyNo

ConservationYes

SequestrationNo

Conservation, Flora/FaunaYes

of Specific Regional Environmental ConcernsYes

Ecological Design Score37.5%

Explanations Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells Reasonable Ranges Sources
Dark
Bird
Soil
Carbon
Habitat
Abatement
Other:No
These
Post‐Development Pre‐Development
40 41 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED DESIGN FOR WATER COTE CHARTS

January31% 178.1 February38% 218.3 March60% 344.7 April77% 442.4 May88% 505.6 June99% 568.8 July100% 574.5 August100% 574.5 September77% 442.4 October60% 344.7 November38% 218.3 December30% 172.4

Step 1: Benchmark Water Use Intensity 20.0 gal / sf / yr Daily Avg Occupancy 100 Annual days of operations 340 Step 2: Indoor Water use Flow Rate (GPF|GPM) Usage/ day / occupant Daily Water Use (gal) Annual Water Use (gal) Toilet 1.1 2.0uses 220 74,800 Urinal* 0.5 1.0uses 50 17,000 Shower 1.5 0.5minutes 75 25,500 Lavatory 0.2 1.5minutes 30 10,200 Kitchen faucet 1.28 0.3minutes 32 10,880 * if no urinal, use toilet value for fixture flow rate Total daily water use 407 gal / day ‐Total annual water use138,380 gal / yr Is potable water used for irrigation? No Proposed Design Baseline #1: All Turf Baseline #2: All Native Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells Step 3: Irrigation Water Use Quick Irrigation Estimation Calculator 1 ‐ Predicted and Measured Water Consumption
non‐potable)
500 500
Irrigated Area (potable or
500 sf
Summer EvapotranspirationHot Humid8.3 8.3 8.3 Plant Quality Factor (Qf)No water stress1 1 1 Type of plantings (Plant Factor)Native plants0.2 1 0.2 Irrigation efficiencyDrip Irrigation0.9 0.75 0.9 575 3,447 575 MonthIrrigation Co. gal 83% 0%
Annual Irrigation Water Use4,585 gal / yr Step 4: Cooling tower 0% 0gal / sf / yr 0gal / yr Yes 1 Yes 0.75 0 gal / yr Cooling tower water use intensity Where strategies taken to conserve cooling tower water? Does the cooling tower use potable water? Assume: 0 water for non‐potable use, 25% less water for conservation strategies.* Total cooling tower water use Proposed Design Comparison Percent of the buidling cooled by a water‐cooled chiller 2 ‐ Account for Rainwater and Reclaimed Water (Grey/Black) 42 43 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED COTE CHARTS COTE CHARTS

Month

January11,710 10,021 1,689

February11,750 10,061 1,689

March11,876 10,187 1,689

April11,974 10,285 1,689

May12,037 10,348 1,689

June12,100 10,411 1,689

July12,106 10,417 1,689

August12,106 10,417 1,689

September11,974 10,285 1,689

October11,876 10,187 1,689

November11,750 10,061 1,689

December11,704 10,015 1,689

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

17,000 1,900

204,00022,800

Demand1 Potable Rainwater3 Reclaimed grey/black3 Potable2 Rainwater3 Reclaimed grey/black3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 17,000
0
0
0
0 Total AnnualPotableRainwaterGrey/BlackTotal Predicted142,96585.8% 14.2% 0.0% 100.0% Measured226,80089.9% 10.1% 0.0% 100.0% Water Use Summary BenchmarkPredictedImprovementMeasuredImprovement 244,940122,697 50% 204,000 17% 2,449 1,227 2,040 20.0 10.0 17 3 ‐ Stormwater Managed On‐site Type of Storm Event2yr‐24hr Storm Event 3.4in Total Annual Potable Water Use (gal / yr) Water Use Intensity (gal / sf / yr) Total Annual Water Use per Occupant (gal / occupant / yr) Predicted gal/mo Measured gal/mo Storm Event0.28ft Stormwater Storage 1337cf SurfaceRunoff Co.Area (sf)Stormwater (cf)Total Runoff (cf) Roof0.9 12,247
3,123 Impervious0.9 5,230
Turf0.2 0 ‐ ‐Native Plantings0.05
113 Semi‐Pervious0.5 ‐5,158 (1,461)
Sub Total 20,319 5,757
After Storage
Percentage of Stormwater Managed On‐site56.5% 4 ‐ Water Runoff Quality 100% Mechanically filtered and released Estimated Water Runoff Quality Estimated Water Runoff Quality Score
44 45 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED COTE CHARTS COTE CHARTS
0
0
0
0
0
Total (gal)142,965 122,697 20,268
3,470
1,482 1,334
8,000 2,267
(731)
3,839
2,502
The estimated building’s water consumption takes into consideration indoor water use, irrigation and cooling. The Fertility Clinic is a commercial use building located in Staten Island, where there is an average annual rainfall of 47 inches. This location is hot and humid in the Summer. Due to the limitations of landscape area on the site, estimated water run off will be mechanically filtered and released to achieve the highes quality score. My predicted 50% improvement between benchmark and predicted shows that actually fell under what was predicted. The measured improvement is 17%.

IMAGE: CIRCULATION PERCENTAGE 28%

CALCULATION METHOD:

THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA IS 12,246.6 SQ. FT. INCLUDED THE ELEVATORS, STAIRS AND CORRIDORS IN THE CIRCULATION AREA. THE CELLAR IS NOT INCLUDED AS FLOOR AREA FOR THIS SITE, WHERE THERE IS A PARKING GARAGE.

LOOKING AT EFFICIENCY, DO NOT THINK MOVING THE CIRCULATION TO THE EXTERIORS WILL IMPROVDE THE CONDITIONS. THE CIRCULATION ALLOWS FOR TREATMENT AREAS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CORRIDORS, CLOSEST TO WINDOWS, WHICH IS PREFERRED FOR HEALTH FACILITIES.

THE INSULTECH SYSTEM IS MANUFACTURED LOCALLY. THIS IS THE HIGHEST PERFORMING INSULATED SYSTEM AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET. THE SYSTEM IS INSTALLED AS A COMPLETE ASSEMBLY, WHICH ELIMINATES THE INEFFICIENCIES IN CONSTRUCTING CAVITY WALLS. THE R-VALUE IS 16.2 AT 75 DEGREES FARENHEIGHT. THIS PRODUCT IS OFFERED IN A RANGE OF FINISHES. MASONRY IS HIGHLY ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY DUE TO ITS REDUCED EMBODIED ENERGY COMPARED TO OTHER STRUCTURAL MATERIALS.

ACACIA TREES CAPTURE CARBON FROM THE ATMOSPHERE, AND PRODUCTS BUILT WITH THIS WOOD WORK AS LONG LASTING CARBON STORAGE. THE TREES ARE FAST GROWING, WHICH MAKE IT A SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY OF TIMBER. MANUFACTURING WITH THIS WOOD HAS A LOW CARBON FOOTPRINT WHEN WOOD WASTE IS USED TO MAKE BY-PRODUCTS.

BUILDERS CAN WORK FASTER WITH CLT, WHICH SAVES MONEY AND CONSTRUCTION TIME. CLT HAS EXCELLENT STRENGTH AND DURABILITY, AS WELL AS HIGH THERMAL AND INSULATING PROPERTIES. SINCE THE PANELS ARRIVE ON THE SITE PREFABRICATED, THERE IS LESS WASTE ON BUILDING SITES. THE PRODUCT ALSO RESISTS MOISTURE WELL.

SF COST ESTIMATOR REPORT
Main Materials Economical and Locally Supplied
MFG: ECHELON MFG: ROBERT’S PLYWOOD MFG: STRONGTIE
46 47 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
AHMED CIRCULATION MATERIALS ANALYSIS
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA

DAYTIME

IMAGE: HEAT MAP DAYTIME USE NIGHTTIME USE

THE HEAT MAP WAS CREATED BY ASSUMING THAT THE STAIRS AND ELEVATOR THAT PROVIDES MORE PATIENT ACCESS WILL HAVE MORE CIRCULATION. THE TREATMENT AREAS HAVE HIGHER CIRCULATION ACTIVITY.

THE OPERATION AREAS ARE LIKELY TO BE USED LESS FREQUENTLY, AS APPOINTMENTS ARE SPACED FURTHER APART. STAFF AREAS WOULD HAVE LESS ACTIVITY THAN PATIENT/STAFF INTERACTION.

AT NIGHT, THERE WOULD BE LITTLE TO NO PATIENTS IN THE SPACE. THE BOH OPERATIONS WOULD BE MORE OCCUPIED.

Step

or generation per fuel type. Use energy model outputs for predicted energy and a utility bill for measured energy. On‐site renewables calculations in this spreadsheet require gross metering, not net‐metering values. If an energy model was not completed for the project, just fill out the measured energy use. fuel type was not used, leave the monthly inputs as Zero.

Step  ‐ Enter the local energy cost for each fuel type available. The cost of renewables calculated as negative.

projects using Chilled Water for cooling, use the dropdown to assign the appropriate carbon conversion factor by system type. The default natural gas absorption chiller.

January15,000.0 2,500.0 12,000.0

February15,000.0 2,500.0 11,000.0

March15,000.0 2,500.0 13,500.0

April15,000.0 2,500.0 14,900.0

May15,000.0 2,500.0 17,800.0 June15,000.0 2,500.0 21,300.0 July15,000.0 2,500.0 24,100.0

August15,000.0 2,500.0 21,800.0

September15,000.0 2,500.0 19,400.0 October15,000.0 2,500.0 16,700.0 November15,000.0 2,500.0 13,300.0 December15,000.0 2,500.0 12,200.0 Total 180,000 0 0 030,000198,000 0000

IMAGE: DESIGN FOR ENERGY

Predicted Energy Consumption Measured Monthly Energy Use

The monthly grid electricity values are estimated. The lighting power density is below the benchmark.

NIGHTTIME

Measure 6 ‐ Design for Energy Explanations Step 1: Benchmark Benchmark Site EUI100.0kBtu / sf yr Benchmark Site Annual Energy kBtu yr Benchmark Operational Carbon Intensity10.0 kg CO e sf yr Benchmark Operational Carbon kg CO e yr Step 2: Record Tool Information Was ASHRAE Standard 90.1 used to determine pEUI? What tool was used to model energy? What version of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 was used? Other: Other: What is the tool version? Step 3: Record Monthly Data Grid ElectricityNatural Gas District Chilled Water District Steam Onsite Generation (?) Grid ElectricityNatural Gas District Chilled Water District Steam Onsite Generation (?) Month kWh MBtu MBtu kLbs kWh kWh MBtu MBtu Lbs kWh
kBTU Conversion Factor
Total Energy (kBtu/yr) 614,185
Cost of Energy (per selected unit) $0.12 $0.94 $0.18 $9.39 ‐0.02 $0.12 $0.94 $0.18 $9.39 ‐0.02 District Chilled Water Type (if applicable) Carbon Conversion Factor (kg‐CO kBtu) 0.118 0.053 0.053 0.066 ‐0.118 0.118 0.053 0.053 0.066 0.118 Total Operational Carbon (kg‐CO yr) 72,603 0 0 0 ‐12,10079,863 0000 Step 4: Review Outputs Energy PredictedMeasured Operational Carbon PredictedMeasured Gross Annual Consumption (kBtu yr)614,185675,604 Annual (kg‐CO2e yr)60,50279,863 Gross Annual Generation (kBtu yr)102,3640 Annual Intensity (kg‐CO sf yr) 57 Net Annual (kBtu yr)511,821675,604 Percent Reduction from Benchmark51% 35% Percent of Total Energy from Renewable Energy16.7% 0.0% Gross Energy Use Intensity (kBtu sf yr)50.1 55.2 Cost PredictedMeasured Net per Area (kBtu sf yr)41.8 55.2 Net Annual Cost ($)$21,000$23,760 Percent Reduction (Inclusive of Renewables)58.2% 44.8% ‐ Lighting Power Density (LPD) Installed (LPD)0.70W/sf Benchmark (LPD)1.50W/sf LPD Reduction53% 3 ‐ Window Wall Ratio (WWR) North0.30 East0.30 South0.30 West0.30 Building Aggregate0.30 Use these cells to document the tools and reference codes used to calculate predicted energy consumption.
both Predicted and Measured Monthly Energy Use:
‐ Select and confirm the unit of measurement for each fuel type, i.e. kWh or kBTU of grid electricity.
‐ Fill out the predicted energy consumption
3.411000.001000.001194.00 3.41 3.411000.001000.00 1.19 3.41
0 0 0102,364675,604 0000
For
Step
Step
Step 1: Calculate the total installed lighting power density for your building. Step 2: The benchmark value is auto‐filled from the Referenced Tables tab. Record your building's window wall ratio. Energy Consumption or Generation District Chilled Water ‐ Electric Driven Benchmarks will auto‐fill from the Introduction or the Reference Tables tab. Calculators: Enter your values into the yellow cells. Enter non‐numerical data into the green cells Predicted Measured Predicted Measured Yes 2016 1,224,700 122,470 Operational Carbon Emission Calculations per EPA Scope and II 1 ‐ Predicted and Measured Energy Consumption
‐ For
SECTION 02 | TSM2001 48 49 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED CIRCULATION

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

51
THE
REIMAGINING
WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

IMAGE: RESULTS/LIFE CYCLE STAGE Concrete and Carpet Itemized by Divisions

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

AND RESOURCES

Impacts and Credits

CONCRETE AND CARPET

The aspects of LCA include manufacturing, construction, use, end of life, and module D. You can trace a material’s emissions to soil, to air, and to water. The product composition includes the material itself and how it is composed. On the left side is concrete and carpet, and on the right is the wood (LVL) and vinyl. Looking at the results per Life Cycle Stage, we can see some differences in the Global Warming Potential. For the concrete material has a larger amount of maintenance and replacement.

49%
SECTION 02 | TSM2001 52 53 REIMAGINING THE
WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
MATERIALS
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

IMAGE: RESULTS/LIFE CYCLE STAGE Wood and Vinyl Itemized by Divisions

DESIGN FOR ENERGY

AND RESOURCES

Impacts and Credits

WOOD AND VINYL

The product itself for the wood has a Module D value (reuse, recovering, recycling), meaning that there are credits towards the end of the life cycle. Wood can absorb carbon, and there is a negative indicator which is seen in the red quantity of the chart. The end of life has a large value because of some of the processing of the wood material. Wood can be recycled, and therefore has a better value in the chart than concrete.

15,011 kg Mass 91% 20,204 kg CO₂eq Global Warming Potential 18% 75% -84% 129.7 kg SO₂eq Acidification Potential 43% 11% 45% 19.34 kg Neq Eutrophication Potential 13% 79% 1,200 kg O₃eq Smog Formation Potential 60% 18% 17% 197,439 MJ Non-renewable Energy 59% 35% -18% Transportation [A4] Maintenance and Replacement [B2-B5] End of Life [C2-C4] Module D [D]
SECTION 02 | TSM2001 54 55 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
REIMAGINING

MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES

57 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

MATERIALS

IMAGE: SANKEY AND BAR DIAGRAMS

Concrete and Carpet

EC3

MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES

Floors

CONCRETE

Pending Boxplot chart is not working

Compare Plant to Plant:

Compare by Product: GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart

Narrative:

IMAGE: SANKEY AND BAR DIAGRAMS Wood and Vinyl

EC3

MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES

Floors

WOOD

Pending Boxplot chart is not working

Compare Plant to Plant: Compare by Product: GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart Narrative:

58 59
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

IMAGE: SANKEY AND BAR DIAGRAMS

BT Resideential Mid-Rise

EC3

MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES

Floors

BT RESIDENTIAL MID-RISE

Pending Boxplot chart is not working

Compare Plant to Plant: Compare by Product: GWP Sankey and LEED Bar Chart

Narrative:

60 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED MATERIALS

IMAGE: Caption Caption

WINDOWS AND DAYLIGHTING

63 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

IMAGE: CALCULATIONS

Window Wall Ratio

WINDOW WALL RATIO

IMAGE: ALLIANCE KAI

DAYLIGHTING PATTERN GUIDE

Facades

GLAZING CALCULATIONS

Sustainable buildings should have a WWR in the range of 25% to 40%. Glazing provides views and natural light into the building, however it does not have good insulating properties. By calculating each facade, the glazing can be reduced or increased to find a balance between the design and the insulation. In this example, the glazing on the South side is highest in square footage. For my own project, would reduce glazing on the southern facing facade where there would be stronger sun. The East, West, and North sides fall within a good range.

Program and Natural Lighting COMPARATIVE STUDY

Pattern 1 in plan relates to my project site, which is also near the water. This is a large office building, and is much larger in scale than the clinic I am proposing. However, the intervals between the masses allows for ample lighting and views. plan to introduce a courtyard to my project to work similarly in creating glazing towards the center of the mass. Similarly, the majority of the floor area will fall into a daylit zone. Glare and overheating can be controlled with blinds or other architectural shading systems.

USED
EXTRA CREDIT EXAMPLE
DAYLIGHTING
64 65 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED EXTRA CREDIT ASSIGNMENT
PATTERN GUIDE ‐https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/home.html

IMAGE: HORIZONTAL BAND Glazing Solution

DAYLIGHTING

Program and Natural Lighting

COMPARATIVE STUDY

Pattern 2 in section provides 75% of the wall area as a horizontal band of windows.

This meets and exceeds the minimum daylighting recommendation at 95% illumination across 26’. The back wall is receiving some lighting, where as less glazing would leave the back wall dark, even while meeting the minimum criteria. This is for windows above 300 LUX.

[This page intentionally left blank for the purpose of double-sided printing.]

PATTERN GUIDE
GUIDE ‐https://patternguide.advancedbuildings.net/home.html 66 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED EXTRA CREDIT ASSIGNMENT
DAYLIGHTING PATTERN

IMAGE: COTE WELLNESS Calculations

DESIGN FOR WELLNESS

VIEWS AND MATERIALS

Health Benefits Through Views and Materials

WELLNESS STUDY

The site is located in a residential area with views towards the Ocean. My building is also at the corner of a street. This allows for many opportunities for views. There is a large amount of windows, and many are operable. The windows are important for reducing stressors in a clinic environment, and provide positive distractions.

IMAGE: COTE RESOURCES Calculations

68 69 REIMAGINING THE
WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
COTE COTE
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
70 71 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
THE
CLINIC
AHMED COTE COTE
IMAGE: COTE RESOURCES Calculations IMAGE: COTE RESOURCES Calculations
REIMAGINING
WOMEN’S FERTILITY
SAMANTHA

IMAGE: COTE CHANGE

Calculations

SECTION 02 | TSM2001 72 73 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
COTE
REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED
SECTION 02 | TSM2001 74 REIMAGINING THE WOMEN’S FERTILITY CLINIC SAMANTHA AHMED

ENVIRONMENTAL PORTFOLIO

SAMANTHA AHMED

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.