THE CONTACT WEEKLY NEWSPAPER ISSUE - 636, 13 OCT. - 19 OCT. 2015 PH: (905) 671 - 4761
‘HISTORY MURDERED’ Shiv Sena’s attack on Sudheendra Kulkarni, a black day for Mumbai
15 Indian Writers Return Sahitya Akademi Awards, More Expected To Follow Suit
MUMBAI Nine more writers returned their Sahitya Akademi awards on Sunday, citing stifling of freedom of speech under the present government. Now the tally of those who have lodged their protest at the Akademi is 15, not including Kannada author Aravind Malagatti, who resigned from the Akademi’s general council yesterday. This number is expected to cross 20, with more authors gearing to return their awards. “We clearly see a threat to our democracy, secularism and freedom. There have been attempts to curb free speech earlier also, but such trends have become more pronounced under the present government. These are visible all over,” said Hindi poets Mangalesh Dabral and Rajesh Joshi to The Indian Express. It all began when Hindi writer Uday Prakash returned his award last month over the the murder of author M. M. Kalburgi. “Kalburgi’s
murder has shaken the writer inside me,” he wrote in a Facebook post where he announced he was returning the award. “Now is not the time to
remain silent and hide in safety. Otherwise these threats will become bigger for us.” The writers are protesting against recent incidents that have
threatened free expression in the country, including the brutal murder of a 52-year-old Muslim man in Dadri for allegedly slaughtering a
cow and eating beef. Besides Prakash, Dabral and Joshi, writers who have returned their awards include renowned Vadodara-based literary
Why equate Sahitya Akademi with govt, asks Mridula Garg? Noted Hindi writer Mridula Garg, who won the Sahitya Akademi award for her novel Miljul Mann in 2013, explains in an exclusive statement what’s troubling her about the protests. A dilemma has been troubling me which I want to share with my fellow writers. As a writer, I strongly protest the violent intolerance prevailing in all the states of the country and the Centre, with government indifference, if not connivance. I have written about it. I sympathize with writers who express their anguish by returning their Sahitya Akademi awards or quitting their posts there. Dissent with intolerance and protest against imposition of a mono cultural value system by
self-appointed moral custodians is inherent in the act of writing. But if we express our protest by returning the Sahitya Akademi (SA) awards or quitting our posts there, are we not in effect saying that the Sahitya Akademi is not an autonomous body but a branch of the government? Remember what Pandit
Nehru said when he was both president of the Akademi and Prime Minister. He will not let the Prime Minister interfere with the decisions of the president of Sahitya Akademi, as it is an autonomous body of writers with an elected board. Are we not weakening the Sahitya Akademi by equating it with the government? I am haunted by the fear that the government might take its cue from the writers and appoint its representative on SA under the pretext of an endangered Akademi. The culture minister in his statement has endorsed
the autonomy of the Sahitya Akademi but also issued a thinly veiled threat that the government was keeping a close watch on the dissentions, etc., surrounding the Akademi. We all know what keeping a watch means. Do we want to give Big Brother an excuse to take over the autonomous Sahitya Akademi? I concede that the Sahitya Akademi should have not only held a condolence meeting for M M Kalburgi but also condemned his murder. There is a difference between a writer dying a natural death and being killed for his beliefs. I have also written a letter to the president of Sahitya Akademi about it. A widely attended condolence Continued on Page 2
critic Ganesh Devy; Konkani writer N. Shivdas; Kannada writer Kum Veerabhadrappa; and renowned authors Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhullar and Waryam Singh Sandhu, and playwrights Ajmer Singh Aulakh and Atamjit Singh were the first ones to return their awards from the Punjab. “It is with utmost regrets that I would like to convey to you that I wish to return the 1993 Sahitya Akademi Award ... I do this as an expression of my solidarity with several eminent writers who have recently returned their awards to highlight their concern and anxiety over the shrinking space for free expression and growing intolerance towards difference of opinion,” Devy said in his letter to the Akademi. Writers have accused the Akademi of maintaining silence over recent incidents that have threatened freedom of expression in India. “A week after his killing, I participated in a Continued on Page 2