THE CONTACT WEEKLY NEWSPAPER ISSUE - 650, 19 JAN. - 25 JAN. 2016 PH: (905) 671 - 4761
JeM chief Masood Azhar not arrested, not under house arrest, says report Lahore Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Maulana Masood Azhar has reportedly neither been arrested not placed under house arrest by Pakistan. Even worse for India is this nugget: the three lower ranking JeM members who have been arrested in Pakistan have not been detained in connection with the Pathankot attack, reports The Indian Express. The newspaper reports that “no FIR had yet been lodged against Azhar. There have been media reports from Pakistan claiming a crackdown is under way against
Jaish-e-Mohammed and its members. However, as yet, there is no authentic and credible proof to suggest that such action has
actually been taken by Pakistan. Till now, no FIR has been registered against Azhar for Pathankot attack,” a government official told The Indian Express. The chatter that is surfacing now is that though Pakistan claims it has detained a bunch of JeM people, it has not said under what law or sections they were detained. All India is hanging on to is a Pakistan PMO statement from 13 January which says “considerable progress has been made in the investigations being carried out against terrorist elements reportedly
belonging to Jaish-eMohammed have been apprehended. The offices of the organisation are also being traced and sealed. Further investigations are under way.” JeM taunts India, Pakistan Reports of Masood Azhar ‘not arrested, not under house arrest’ blend with the JeM’s online propaganda last week when the notionally banned Pakistan-based jihadist group countered claims that its leader Maulana Masood Azhar has been arrested for his alleged role in the terror strike on the India’s Pathankot airbase in the early hours of 1 January 2016. Azhar, chief of JeM, was reportedly in constant touch with the six terrorists who stormed an Indian Air Force base in Pathankot on 1 January and killed seven Indian soldiers. MEA spokesperson, Vikas Swarup India and Pakistan have agreed to linked to the Pathankot incident. reschedule talks between their Based on initial investigations in foreign secretaries, the Indian Pakistan and the information foreign ministry said on provided, several individuals Thursday, while an investigation
into the Pathankot Attack is carried out. Pakistani media has reported that JeM chief Maulana Masood Azhar, his brother and “several individuals” belonging to his dreaded outfit have been arrested in connection with the Pathankot terror attack. Pakistan media said JeM offices were
sealed after India demanded action on the group linking it to the fate of Foreign Secretary-level talks. Some semblance of officialese on the arrest surfaced early on Thursday, with Lt Gen (retd) Abdul Qadir Baloch, minister Continued on Page 2
Are Sikhs minority in Punjab? Supreme Court to adjudicate
UK’s crackdown on the burka Muslim women will have to remove face veil for officials London Muslim women should have to remove the burka when officials need to see their faces for security reasons, David Cameron said today as he announced new initiatives to help tackle extremism in the UK. The Prime Minister said it was reasonable for women to be asked to remove the veil in circumstances where facial identification was important - for example in court and during immigration checks. However
he distanced himself from a French-style all-out ban on such
coverings, which are worn by some Muslim women to protect their modesty. Mr Cameron told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “In our country
people should be free to wear what they like. “When you are coming into contact either with different institutions or, for instance, you are in court or you need to see someone’s face at the border, then I would always back the authorities or the institutions that have put in place proper and sensible rules. Going for the French approach of banning an item of clothing, I do not think that’s the way we do things Continued on Page 2
NEW DELHI It may sound ridiculous at first blush, but the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether Sikhs were a “minority group in homeland Punjab” saying it had far reaching importance and consequences. A constitution bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and justices FMI Kalifulla, AK Sikri, S A
Bobde and R Banumathi initially countered the plea by senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi for treating Sikhs as a minority in Punjab by asking, “Can Muslims be treated as minority in Jammu and Kashmir? - whether the group was numerically minority and whether they were dominated Continued on Page 2